Hubbry Logo
Friedrich Heinrich JacobiFriedrich Heinrich JacobiMain
Open search
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
Community hub
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (/dʒəˈkoʊbi/;[1] German: [jaˈkoːbi]; 25 January 1743 – 10 March 1819) was a German philosopher, writer and socialite. He is best known for popularizing the concept of nihilism. He promoted the idea that it is the necessary result of Enlightenment thought and the philosophical systems of Baruch Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte and Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling.[2]

Key Information

Jacobi advocated Glaube (variously translated as faith or "belief") and Offenbarung (revelation) instead of speculative reason. According to one view, Jacobi can be seen to have anticipated present-day writers who criticize secular philosophy as relativistic and dangerous for religious faith. His aloofness from the Sturm and Drang movement was the basis of a brief friendship with Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

He was the younger brother of poet Johann Georg Jacobi and the father of the great psychiatrist Maximilian Jacobi.

Biography

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

He was born at Düsseldorf, the second son of a wealthy sugar merchant, and was educated for a commercial career, which included a brief apprenticeship at a merchant house in Frankfurt-am-Main during 1759. Following, he was sent to Geneva for general education. Jacobi, of a retiring, meditative disposition, associated himself at Geneva mainly with the literary and scientific circle (of which the most prominent member was Georges-Louis Le Sage).[3]

He studied closely the works of Charles Bonnet, as well as the political ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Voltaire. In 1763, he was recalled to Düsseldorf, and in the following year, he married Elisabeth von Clermont and took over the management of his father's business.[3]

After a short time, he gave up his commercial career, and in 1770, he became a member of the council for the duchies of Jülich and Berg. He distinguished himself by his ability in financial affairs and his zeal in social reform. Jacobi kept up his interest in literary and philosophical matters through an extensive correspondence. His mansion at Pempelfort, near Düsseldorf, was the centre of a distinguished literary circle. He helped to found a new literary journal with Christoph Martin Wieland. Some of his earliest writings, mainly on practical or economic subjects, were published[3] in Der Teutsche Merkur.

Here too appeared in part the first of his philosophical works, Edward Allwill's Briefsammlung (1776), a combination of romance and speculation. This was followed in 1779 by Woldemar, a philosophical novel, of very imperfect structure, but full of genial ideas, and giving the most complete picture of Jacobi's method of philosophizing.[3]

In 1779, he visited Munich following his appointment as minister and privy councillor for the Bavarian department of customs and commerce. He opposed the mercantilistic policies of Bavaria and intended to liberalize local customs and taxes; but, after a short stay there, differences with his colleagues and with the authorities of Bavaria, as well as his unwillingness to engage in a power struggle, drove him back to Pempelfort. The experience as well as its aftermath led to the publication of two essays in which Jacobi defended Adam Smith's theories of political economy. These essays were followed in 1785 by the work which first brought Jacobi into prominence as a philosopher.[3]

Pantheism controversy

[edit]
Main article: Pantheism controversy
Jacobi painting by Johann Friedrich Eich, 1780

A conversation with Gotthold Lessing in 1780 in which Lessing avowed that he knew no philosophy in the true sense of that word, save Spinozism, led him to a protracted study of Spinoza's works. After Lessing's death, just a couple of months later, Jacobi continued to engage with Spinozism in an exchange of letters with Lessing's close friend Moses Mendelssohn, which began in 1783. These letters, published with commentary by Jacobi as Briefe über die Lehre Spinozas (1785; 2nd ed., much enlarged and with important Appendices, 1789), expressed sharply and clearly Jacobi's strenuous objection to a dogmatic system in philosophy, and drew upon him the vigorous enmity of the Aufklärer.[3]

Jacobi was ridiculed for trying to reintroduce into philosophy the antiquated notion of unreasoning belief, was denounced as an enemy of reason, as a pietist, and as a Jesuit in disguise, and was especially attacked for his use of the ambiguous term "belief". His next important work, David Hume on Faith, or Idealism and Realism (David Hume über den Glauben oder Idealismus und Realismus, 1787), was an attempt to show not only that the term Glaube had been used by the most eminent writers to denote what he had employed it for in the Letters on Spinoza, but that the nature of the cognition of facts as opposed to the construction of inferences could not be otherwise expressed. In this writing, and especially in the Appendix, Jacobi came into contact with the critical philosophy and subjected the Kantian view of knowledge to searching examination.[3] Jacobi addressed in the said Appendix Kant's concept of "thing-in-itself." Jacobi agreed that the objective thing-in-itself cannot be directly known. However, he stated, it must be taken on faith. A subject must believe that there is a real object in the external world that is related to the representation or mental idea that is directly known. This faith or belief is a result of revelation or immediately known, but logically unproven, truth. The real existence of a thing-in-itself is revealed or disclosed to the observing subject. In this way, the subject directly knows the ideal, subjective representations that appear in the mind, and strongly believes in the real, objective thing-in-itself that exists outside of the mind. By presenting the external world as an object of faith, Jacobi legitimized belief and its theological associations. Schopenhauer would later state: "…[B]y reducing the external world to a matter of faith, he wanted merely to open a little door for faith in general…."[4]

Ironically, the pantheism controversy led later German philosophers and writers to take an interest in pantheism and Spinozism. Jacobi's fideism remained unpopular, and instead his critique of Enlightenment rationalism led more German philosophers to explore atheism and wrestle with the perceived loss of philosophical foundations for theism, myth, and morality. Jacobi and the pantheism controversy he ignited remain important in European intellectual history, because he formulated (albeit critically) one of the first systematic statements of nihilism and represents an early example of the death of God discourse.[5]

Later life

[edit]

The Pempelfort era came to an end in 1794 when the French Revolution spilled over into Germany following the outbreak of war with the French Republic. The occupation of Düsseldorf by French troops forced him to resettle and, for nearly ten years, live in Holstein. There he became intimately acquainted with Karl Leonhard Reinhold (in whose Beyträge zur leichtern Uebersicht des Zustandes der Philosophie beym Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts Jacobi's important work, "Ueber das Unternehmen des Kriticismus, die Vernunft zu Verstande zu bringen", was first published), and with Matthias Claudius, the editor of the Wandsbecker Bote.[3]

Atheism dispute

[edit]
Main article: Atheism dispute

Gottlieb Fichte was dismissed from Jena in 1799 as a result of a charge of atheism. He was accused of this in 1798, after publishing his essay "Ueber den Grund unsers Glaubens an eine göttliche Weltregierung" ("On the Ground of Our Belief in a Divine World-Governance"), which he had written in response to Friedrich Karl Forberg's essay "Development of the Concept of Religion", in his Philosophical Journal. For Fichte, God should be conceived primarily in moral terms: "The living and efficaciously acting moral order is itself God. We require no other God, nor can we grasp any other" ("On the Ground of Our Belief in a Divine World-Governance"). Fichte's intemperate "Appeal to the Public" ("Appellation an das Publikum", 1799) as well as a more thoughtful response entitled “From a Private Letter” (1799), provoked F. H. Jacobi to publish Letter to Fichte (1799), in which he equated philosophy in general and Fichte's transcendental philosophy in particular with nihilism and the relation of his own philosophical principles to theology.[6]

President of Bavarian Academy of Sciences and retirement

[edit]

Soon after his return to Germany, Jacobi received a call to Munich in connection with the new academy of sciences just founded there. The loss of a considerable portion of his fortune induced him to accept this offer; he settled in Munich in 1804 and in 1807 became president of the academy.[3]

In 1811, his last philosophical work appeared, directed against Friedrich Schelling especially (Von den göttlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung), the first part of which, a review of the Wandsbecker Bote, had been written in 1798. A bitter reply from Schelling was left without answer by Jacobi, but gave rise to an animated controversy in which Fries and Baader took prominent part.[3]

In 1812, Jacobi retired from the office of president and began to prepare a collected edition of his works. He died before this was completed. The edition of his writings was continued by his friend F. Koppen, and was completed in 1825. The works fill six volumes, of which the fourth is in three parts. To the second is prefixed an introduction by Jacobi, which is at the same time an introduction to his philosophy. The fourth volume also has an important preface.[3]

Influence on his contemporaries

[edit]

Controversy with Schelling

[edit]

Jacobi and Schelling knew each other before the controversy. After being anointed as the president of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften), Jacobi worked along with Schelling as colleagues.[7] As illustrated above, a great portion of Jacobi's work focused on opposing the Spinozist pantheism as well as fatalism. From Jacobi's perspective, Schelling, his colleague as well as one of the most influential philosophers at that time, matches his criteria of pantheism perfectly. Jacobi holds a viewpoint that the Naturphilosophie of Schelling is essentially a philosophy without the transcendental realm: everything emerges from a unconditional nature (natura naturans), which leads to a conclusion that God is nature that is graspable by human reason, while not the "total other" in Christian traditions; in the meantime, the realm of faith, which is the central conception that Jacobi intended to restore, is faded in Schelling's rationalism.[7] Jacobi consequently published On the Divine Things (Von den göttlichen Dingen) in 1811, initiated the controversy towards Schelling. In this treatise, Jacobi condemns Schelling because he eliminates the freedom of God by integrating God into nature, whilst nature is a "whole" (Ganzes) that is manipulated by logical necessity or causality. According to the Christian tradition, God ought to be totally independent of all necessity. As for himself, Jacobi insists that the freedom of God manifests itself when God is acting as an ultimate cause, which operates free action (handlung), instead of being framed in logical necessity (nature, in this context).[8]

Correspondingly, Schelling responded to Jacobi with his last publication Denkmal in next year. The way Schelling defended himself is to re-emphasise his idea in his 1809 Philosophical Inquiries into the Essence of Human Freedom (Freiheitschrift). According to Schelling, the relationship between God and nature must be taken into account in philosophy, or it will leave "an unnatural God and a godless nature".[9] In other words, Schelling's reaction based on this viewpoint: freedom does not expel necessity but contains it. Schelling holds a quite Kantian position, claiming that freedom implies self-determination, not merely actions. Therefore, freedom does not present itself in actions, but in the obedience to certain rules that are not imposed from outside, but from within. To Schelling, since these rules emerge without the interference from outside, this is an indication of nature's self-determination, namely, freedom; additionally, it is this self-determination that made the freedom of actions emphasized by Jacobi possible. In other words, in Schelling's discourse, freedom and necessity do not essentially expel each other; rather, freedom and necessity are ultimately one.[8]

Jacobi responded to Schelling's self-defense in 1815; however, they did not reach any immediate result, because Jacobi died a few years later. Nonetheless, Schelling moved on to the construction of his late philosophy of revelation and mythology, whereas reflected his early system and reconsidered the value of Jacobi's thought--in his 1833 lectures on modern philosophy, and recognized him as a pioneer of the "positive philosophy".[7] As Schelling notes[10],

As such he [Jacobi] is perhaps the most instructive personality in the whole history of modern philosophy.

— Friedrich Schelling, Jacobi and Theosophy, On the History of Modern Philosophy

Influences on Fichte's 1794 Wissenschaftslehre

[edit]

Although J. G. Fichte never directly mentioned Jacobi's name or cited his work in 1794 version of Wissenschaftslehre, according to Wood, Fichte's work in fact explicitly expresses some proximity to Jacobi's thought.[11] In Jacobi's 1785 work On the teachings of Spinoza in letters to Moses Mendelssohn (Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn), he declared [12]

Denn wir empfinden doch nur unseren Körper, so oder anders beschaffen; und indem wir ihn so oder anders beschaffen fühlen, werden wir nicht allein seine Veränderungen, sondern noch etwas davon ganz verschiedenes, das weder bloß Empfindung noch Gedanke ist, andre würkliche Dinge gewahr, und zwar mit | eben der Gewißheit, mit der wir uns selbst gewahr werden; denn ohne Du, ist das Ich unmöglich.


For we only feel our body, one way or another; and by feeling it is created in one way or another, we will not only perceive its changes, but something quite different from it, which is neither mere sensation nor thought, aware of other things, and with the very certainty with which we become self-aware; for without Thou, the I is impossible.

— Friedrich Jacobi, Über die Lehre des Spinoza

Here the structure we observed from Jacobi's text could be summarized as follows: we as beings who possess "I", only manifest the "I" (namely, selfhood) when encounters Thou, that is, the "other" surrounds us. Only when we encounter something other than ourselves, our sense of "self" is confirmed. Hence, we may perceive a nexus and mutual dependency between I and Thou: I always come first, and then Thou confirms the existence of it.

This pair of reflective determinations echoes Fichte's work. In his 1794 Foundations of Science of Knowledge (Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre), Fichte adopted a methodology that he called "synthetic method". In the context of Foundations, it presents itself in a mode of "thesis–antithesis–synthesis": "I" is absolutely posited at first, and then "Not-I" is posited as the antithesis of the former. Nevertheless, this process would be incomplete if it lacked the final step of synthesis. The synthesis method guarantees the relations between I and Not-I. In Fichtean discourse, this may possibly contain interpersonal relationships.[11] Here we could tell the similarity between Jacobi and Fichte: "Thou", as in Jacobi's work, is basically replaced by "Not-I" in Fichte's work. Even though Fichte never showed his source of ideas, in a letter from him to Jacobi in April 1796, he expressed his appreciation of the alignment between him and Jacobi. This could be seen as evidence that Fichte's theory is inspired by Jacobi to a great extent.

Jacobi's influence on Fichte is more explicit and openly admitted by Fichte himself on the topic of certainty and faith. Still, in Jacobi's Spinoza text, he wrote:[12]

Wie können wir nach Gewißheit streben, wenn uns Gewißheit nicht zum voraus schon bekannt ist; und wie kann sie uns bekannt sein, anders als durch etwas das wir mit Gewißheit schon erkennen? Dieses führt zu dem Begriffe einer unmittelbaren Gewißheit, welche nicht allein keiner Gründe bedarf, sondern schlechterdings alle Gründe ausschließt, und einzig und allein die mit dem vorgestellten Dinge übereinstimmende Vorstellung selbst ist.


How can we strive for certainty if certainty is not already known to us in advance, and how can it be known to us other than through something we already know with certainty? This leads to the concept of an immediate certainty, which not only requires no reasons, but simply excludes all reasons, and is the only idea itself that agrees with the thing presented.

— Friedrich Jacobi, Über die Lehre des Spinoza

To Jacobi, the concept he chose to put in the position of unconditional certainty is God. By means of this presupposition, Jacobi leaves room for faith in his philosophy, whereas this element already dissolved in reason in many preceding philosophers. This move prevents, at least from Jacobi's point of view back in time, the ontological infinite regress. Fichte adopted the same strategy as well.[11] In §1 of the Foundations, Fichte stated[13]:

...[H]uman beings must possess some truth that neither can nor needs to be proven and from which all other truths can be derived. If not, then there is no truth at all, and we are driven into an infinite regress.

— J. G. Fichte, Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy

As we shall tell from the use of certain terms, Fichte addressed the same topic as Jacobi. Furthermore, this proximity in ways of searching for unconditional ontological foundation was directly acknowledged by Fichte[14]:

Auch darüber hätten sie sich bei ]acobi belehren können, welcher diesen Punkt, sowie noch viele andere Punkte, von denen sie gleichfalls nichts wissen, völlig ins reine gebracht. They could also have learned about this at Jacobi, which brought this point, as well as many other points, of which they also know nothing, completely in the clear.

— J. G. Fichte, Zweite Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre, Versuch einer neuen Darstellung der Wissenschaftslehre (1797/98)

Philosophical work

[edit]

Jacobi's philosophy is essentially unsystematic. A fundamental view which underlies all his thinking is brought to bear in succession upon those systematic doctrines which appear to stand most sharply in contradiction to it, and any positive philosophical results are given only occasionally. The leading idea of the whole is that of the complete separation between understanding [comprehension] and apprehension of real fact. For Jacobi, Understanding, or the logical faculty, is purely formal or elaborative, and its results never transcend the given material supplied to it. From the basis of immediate experience or perception, thought proceeds by comparison and abstraction, establishing connections among facts, but remaining in its nature mediate and finite.[3]

The principle of reason and consequent, the necessity of thinking each given fact of perception as conditioned, impels understanding towards an endless series of identical propositions, the records of successive comparisons and abstractions. The province of the understanding is therefore strictly the region of the conditioned; to it the world must present itself as a mechanism. If, then, there is objective truth at all, the existence of real facts must be made known to us otherwise than through the logical faculty of thought; and, as the regress from conclusion to premises must depend upon something not itself capable of logical grounding, mediate thought implies the consciousness of immediate truth.[3]

Thus, for the scientific understanding, there can be no God and no liberty. It is impossible that there should be a God, for if so, he would of necessity be finite. But a finite God, a God that is known, is no God. It is impossible that there should be liberty, for if so, the mechanical order of phenomena, by means of which they are comprehensible, would be disturbed, and we should have an unintelligible world, coupled with the requirement that it shall be understood. Cognition, then, in the strict sense, occupies the middle place between sense perception, which is belief in matters of sense, and reason, which is belief in supersensuous fact.[3]

Reception

[edit]

According to Stefan Schick, Jacobi was always "defamed as an apologist of religious faith and an enemy of reason" in both the 19th and 20th centuries. It was not until the 1990s and 2000s that the work of scholars such as Dieter Henrich, and especially Birgit Sandkaulen in her book Grund und Ursache (2000) revitalized the systematic reading of Jacobi for the first time. Moreover, influential works such as Frederick Beiser's Fate of Reason (1987) still portray Jacobi as an anti-enlightenment, religious thinker.[15]

Works

[edit]
  • Early essays in Der Teutsche Merkur. Available online.
  • Edward Allwill’s Briefsammlung (1781).
  • Etwas das Lessing gesagt hat (1782). Werke, vol. 2, pp. 325-388.
  • Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn (1785). 2nd edition, 1789. NYPL.
  • Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi wider Mendelssohns Beschuldigungen betreffend die Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza (1786). Oxford.
  • David Hume über den Glauben oder Idealismus und Realismus (1787). University of Lausanne.
  • Woldemar (1794). 2 volumes. Oxford. 2nd edition, 1796. NYPL.
  • Jacobi an Fichte (1799/1816). University of Michigan. Italian translation, 3 Appendices with Jacobi's and Fichte's complementary Texts, Commentary by A. Acerbi: La Scuola di Pitagora, Naples 2017, ISBN 978-88-6542-553-4.
  • Ueber das Unternehmen des Kriticismus (1801). Werke, vol. 3, pp. 59-195.
  • Ueber Gelehrte Gesellschaften, ihren Geist und Zweck (1807). Harvard.
  • Von den göttlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung (1811). University of California.
  • Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi's Werke (1812–1825).
  • Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi's auserlesener Briefwechsel (1825–27). 2 volumes.

Historical-critical editions

[edit]
  • Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. Werke. Gesamtausgabe. Edited by Klaus Hammacher and Walter Jaeschke. Hamburg: Meiner, 1998 ff. 7 volumes.
  • Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. Briefwechsel. Gesamtausgabe. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1981 ff. 15 volumes.

Further reading

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (25 January 1743 – 10 March 1819) was a German , writer, and political administrator renowned for his sharp critiques of Enlightenment and systematic , positing instead that genuine arises from immediate (Glaube) and personal conviction rather than discursive reason. Born in to a prosperous merchant family, Jacobi initially trained in and briefly studied physics and in before entering , eventually rising to privy councillor in and serving as president of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences from 1807 to 1812. His philosophical outlook emphasized the primacy of existence and individual freedom, warning that rationalist systems—such as those of Spinoza, Kant, and later Fichte—inevitably devolve into or by subordinating reality to abstract grounds or conditions. Jacobi's most enduring contribution was igniting the Pantheismusstreit (pantheism controversy) in 1785 by publishing letters revealing Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's Spinozist leanings, which provoked a public debate with on the compatibility of Spinozism with theism, freedom, and morality, thereby reintroducing Spinoza as a central figure in German thought and exposing perceived flaws in rationalist metaphysics. In works like Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen (1785) and über den Glauben (1787), he contended that reason alone cannot access reality without a "salto mortale"—a mortal leap—into faith, which he described as the elemental form of human cognition encompassing both theoretical and practical certainty. This fideistic stance, while influencing figures like Hamann, Herder, and early , drew accusations of and from proponents of systematic philosophy, positioning Jacobi as a pivotal, if polemical, bridge between Enlightenment critique and post-Kantian developments. Beyond philosophy, Jacobi authored novels such as Eduard Allwill's sämtliche Werke (1776), which explored themes of sentiment and , and engaged in literary circles, hosting intellectuals at his Pempelfort estate near . His later critiques, including Jacobi an Fichte (1799) amid the atheism controversy and disputes with Schelling, underscored his commitment to a personal, transcendent God against immanentist or idealistic reductions, shaping trajectories in while resisting their totalizing tendencies.

Biography

Early Life and Commercial Career

Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi was born on 25 January 1743 in , in the , into a prosperous merchant family. As the second son, he received an education geared toward continuing the family trade rather than scholarly pursuits, reflecting the practical expectations placed on him by his merchant father. Despite this, Jacobi displayed an early meditative disposition that inclined him toward intellectual interests beyond commerce. To prepare for a business career, Jacobi was apprenticed at a commercial house in , an experience that only deepened his aversion to trade. In 1759, he traveled to , where he underwent further commercial training under the physicist Georges-Louis Le Sage and encountered key Enlightenment thinkers, including influences from , Rousseau, and the French Encyclopedists. This period broadened his exposure to literary and scientific circles, fostering a tension between his obligatory mercantile path and emerging philosophical inclinations. Upon returning to in 1762, he married and assumed management of his father's trading house, operating it successfully for a decade. Jacobi directed the family firm from 1764 until 1772, demonstrating competence in commerce despite his personal disinterest, which had been evident since his Frankfurt apprenticeship. In 1772, he stepped away from business to accept an administrative role in the duchies of and Berg, marking the effective end of his commercial involvement as he shifted toward and intellectual activities. This transition aligned with his growing distaste for purely mercantile life, though he had already begun exploring literary and philosophical writings privately during his business years.

Philosophical Entry and Initial Writings

Jacobi's entry into came in the mid-1770s via literary forms that embedded speculative ideas within narrative structures, diverging from the systematic treatises of his rationalist contemporaries. His first significant philosophical-literary work, Eduard Allwills Briefsammlung (1776), blended epistolary romance with explorations of sentiment, , and the limits of reason, reflecting Jacobi's early critique of Enlightenment . This publication appeared amid Jacobi's involvement in literary circles, including his co-founding of the journal Der Teutsche Mercur with in 1773, where fragments of his early writings were disseminated. In 1779, Jacobi released Woldemar, a philosophical depicting interpersonal relationships and moral dilemmas to illustrate his preference for intuitive over , providing a fuller early articulation of his thought. These initial writings gained Jacobi notice in German intellectual spheres but wider philosophical recognition followed his 1785 epistolary treatise Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn , which exposed purported Spinozism in Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's views and ignited the dispute with . In this work, Jacobi argued that systematic inevitably led to and , advocating immediate certainty through belief as the foundation of knowledge.

Later Public Roles and Retirement

In 1804, financial losses prompted Jacobi to accept an invitation from the Bavarian court to join the newly founded Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften in , where he relocated in 1805. He was elected president of the in 1807, a position in which he sought to promote scientific inquiry while defending traditional religious and metaphysical perspectives against emerging idealistic trends. During his tenure, Jacobi navigated internal conflicts, including resentment toward non-Bavarian members, and contributed to the academy's early organization amid Napoleonic-era political instability. Jacobi's presidency ended acrimoniously in 1812, when he was compelled to resign due to mounting factional opposition and his outspoken critiques of , though he retained the honorary title and pension until his death. In retirement, he focused on compiling his Gesammelte Werke, collaborating with disciples Johann Friedrich Köppen and Carl Joseph Friedrich Roth to edit and publish the multi-volume collection spanning 1812 to 1825. This effort aimed to consolidate his philosophical oeuvre, including dialogues, letters, and treatises, for posterity, reflecting his enduring commitment to countering rationalist excesses through appeals to faith and immediate cognition. Jacobi spent his final years in , maintaining intellectual correspondence and public influence despite declining health, until his death on March 10, 1819, at age 76. His retirement period underscored a shift from active institutional to reflective , preserving his legacy amid the rise of post-Kantian idealism.

Philosophical Thought

Critique of and the Path to

Jacobi maintained that Enlightenment rationalism, by privileging discursive reason and the principle of sufficient reason (PSR) as the sole arbiter of truth, inexorably progresses toward Spinozism, a system he identified as inherently nihilistic due to its elimination of contingency, , and individual substance. In works such as Über die Lehre des Spinoza (1785), he posited Spinoza as the consummate rationalist, whose metaphysics demonstrates the endpoint of consistent reasoning: a single, necessary substance encompassing all reality, rendering indistinguishable from and subordinating finite beings to deterministic necessity. This path begins with the rationalist demand for total explicability—every fact requiring a sufficient ground—avoiding only by applying PSR unconditionally, which dissolves distinctions between creator and creation, eroding and personal existence in favor of mechanistic . The nihilistic implication arises from reason's inability to affirm without external mediation; Jacobi argued that pure reason, detached from immediate , abstracts away objective reality, confronting philosophers with a void where individuality and transcendence vanish. He illustrated this in his David Hume on Faith (1787), critiquing empiricist and epistemologies alike for reducing to mediated representations, which, under PSR's universal sway, culminate in by denying any unconditioned reality beyond the chain of determinations. Without recourse to non-rational faculties, rationalism thus annihilates the self and the world, as all phenomena are demoted to illusory modes of an impersonal whole, stripping life of purpose and agency. Jacobi's diagnosis extended to contemporaries like Lessing, whom he accused of tacit Spinozism, warning that such rational coherence demands a salto mortale—a perilous leap beyond reason's bounds—to recover reality, lest philosophy terminate in self-defeating nothingness. This critique underscored reason's finitude: while adept at conditional explanations, it fails to ground existence itself, propelling thinkers toward unless checked by primordial belief. By 1799, in reflections on his disputes, Jacobi reiterated that rationalism's pursuit of systematic unity sacrifices the concrete for the abstract, yielding a where "nothingness" supplants being.

Epistemology of Immediate Knowledge and Faith

Jacobi's epistemology centers on the primacy of immediate (unmittelbares Wissen), which he contrasted with the discursive reasoning of rationalist systems that, in his view, culminate in or . In works such as on , or and Realism (1787), he argued that all cognition originates from direct, intuitive apprehension rather than inferential chains, asserting that "all derives exclusively from , for things must be given to me from outside." This immediate provides unmediated access to foundational realities, including the of the and external objects, as in his example: "I experience that I am, and that there is something outside me." Jacobi positioned this against philosophies like Kant's, where reason's abstractions obscure direct encounter with being. Faith (Glaube), for Jacobi, functions epistemologically as the primordial certainty enabling realism, akin to Hume's of but extended to affirm personal freedom, divine personality, and beyond rational demonstration. He contended that reason presupposes this faith, as pure dissolves individuality into deterministic systems, leading to the "nihilism thesis" where nothing substantial remains knowable. In David Hume on Faith, Jacobi defended Glaube against charges of , emphasizing its role in grounding practical knowledge: without it, even sensory data lacks warrant, rendering systematic untenable. This faith is not opposed to reason but its precondition, integrating intuitive immediacy with logical reflection to avoid . The salto mortale—"mortal leap"—encapsulates Jacobi's response to reason's impasses, first articulated in his 1785 Spinoza Letters as the volitional affirmation of existence and divine personality against Spinozistic necessity. Rather than a fideistic abandonment of logic, it combines a logical recognition of reason's limits with Glaube's immediacy, enabling escape from nihilistic closure: one must "leap" to posit a personal cause of the world, as Jacobi reported urging Lessing. This act sustains realism by prioritizing lived certainty over constructed systems, influencing later debates on the boundaries of knowledge in . Jacobi's framework thus privileges causal immediacy—direct relational knowing—over abstracted deduction, ensuring philosophy remains tethered to empirical and existential truth.

Engagement with Spinoza and Pantheism

Jacobi's philosophical engagement with Spinoza centered on the latter's , which he regarded as the consummate expression of rationalist metaphysics. In his 1785 Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza (Letters Concerning the Doctrine of Spinoza), Jacobi offered a meticulous reconstruction of Spinoza's system, emphasizing its monistic ontology where a single infinite substance—identified as both and nature—underlies all reality through the exhaustive application of the principle of sufficient reason. This framework, Jacobi contended, logically precludes any transcendent creator distinct from the world, rendering divine personality, providence, and human freedom illusory, as all events follow necessarily from the substance's attributes. While acknowledging Spinoza's intellectual rigor and systematic coherence, Jacobi critiqued Spinozism as the terminal point of pure reason, inevitably devolving into and . He argued that reason, when pushed to its limits, demonstrates the interdependence of all things within the singular substance, but this dissolves finite beings into mere modes without independent , famously encapsulating the outcome as a progression "out of nothing, to nothing, for nothing and in nothing." , in this view, equates with extended nature, stripping away and religious immediacy, and exposing rationalism's inability to affirm reality's causal or ethical foundations without contradiction. To counter this rationalist , Jacobi advocated transcending demonstration through Glaube (faith), an immediate intuitive certainty of God's personal reality, freedom, and the world's contingency—elements inaccessible to discursive proof yet essential for averting nihilistic . This "salto mortale" (mortal leap) beyond reason's chain preserves the conditions for practical life and , positioning Spinozism not as error but as the truthful of reason's boundaries, compelling a turn to non-rational grounds for truth.

Major Controversies

Pantheism Dispute with Lessing and Mendelssohn

In July 1780, Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi visited at , where the two engaged in discussions on philosophy, particularly Baruch Spinoza's system. During these conversations, commencing on July 5, Lessing reportedly confided that he regarded Spinoza as the sole philosopher from whom no viable alternative to Spinozism could be derived, dismissing orthodox Christian tenets like creation ex nihilo as untenable and aligning himself with Spinoza's , which Jacobi interpreted as implying and the denial of divine . Jacobi later documented these exchanges in his 1785 publication Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen (On the Doctrine of Spinoza in Letters), presenting them as evidence that Lessing, a prominent Enlightenment figure, had privately embraced , equating with in a manner that undermined personal providence and immortality. The publication ignited the Pantheismusstreit (Pantheism Controversy), a public debate over whether Spinozism constituted or a viable metaphysics, with Jacobi arguing that rationalist deduction inevitably culminated in Spinoza's system, rendering belief in a transcendent God accessible only through immediate faith rather than reason. , Lessing's close friend and a defender of rational , responded vehemently in his 1785 work Morgenstunden oder über das Dasein Gottes (Morning Hours, or Lectures on the ), portraying Lessing as a proponent of enlightened akin to his own, while conceding that refined might overlap with but rejecting Spinoza's as incompatible with creation and divine personality. Mendelssohn challenged Jacobi's account of the conversations as potentially misinterpreted or exaggerated, insisting that Lessing's views preserved a providential God and critiquing Jacobi's reliance on subjective faith as subordinating philosophy to revelation. The exchange escalated into mutual accusations: Jacobi maintained that Mendelssohn's masked an underlying Spinozism, leading to by eroding distinctions between finite and infinite, while Mendelssohn accused Jacobi of that privileged unverifiable personal testimony over demonstrable proofs. Published amid broader Enlightenment tensions between reason and religion, the dispute—continuing until Mendelssohn's death in January 1786—exposed fractures in German intellectual circles, prompting figures like and to weigh in and foreshadowing later idealist engagements with Spinoza. Jacobi's intervention thus highlighted his core epistemological stance: that systematic reason dissolves into , necessitating a "" grounded in non-discursive to affirm against skeptical abstraction.

Atheism Dispute with Fichte

The Atheism Dispute, known in German as the Atheismusstreit, unfolded between 1798 and 1800 amid growing concerns over the implications of post-Kantian for religion in Germany. It was sparked by two articles published in the Philosophisches Journal in 1798: Johann Gottlieb Fichte's "On the Basis of Our in a Divine World-Governance" and Christian Garve's associate Karl Heinrich Georg Forberg's "On the Concept of Religion," which argued that could neither prove nor require in God's , positing self-sufficiency instead. These texts drew accusations of atheism from conservative critics, including Niethammer and others, prompting Fichte to defend his Wissenschaftslehre as compatible with practical while insisting on its autonomy from theological dogma. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi entered the fray in 1799, not as the originator of the atheism charge against Fichte—which he explicitly disavowed—but as a philosophical adversary leveraging to reiterate his longstanding critique of systematic . Between March 3 and 21, 1799, Jacobi composed an addressed to Fichte, titled Jacobi an Fichte, which Fichte himself consented to publish due to their amicable personal relations. In the letter, Jacobi contended that Fichte's , by positing the absolute ego as the unconditioned starting point from which all is constructed through intellectual intuition, effectively dissolves the independent , nature, and finite beings into subjective positing, culminating in metaphysical . He famously described this trajectory as a saltomortale, a headlong into the void where reason, unchecked by immediate , annihilates transcendence and leaves only self-referential nothingness. Jacobi's argument rested on his epistemology of "immediate knowledge" (unmittelbares Wissen), which prioritizes non-discursive in personal reality and divine over demonstrative proofs, viewing Fichte's system as an extension of the Spinozistic he had earlier opposed. He asserted that any philosophy claiming exhaustive rational explanation of existence must either smuggle in unprovable assumptions or devolve into by reducing to a mere postulate or ethical demand within the ego's activity, devoid of personal relationality. This critique marked the letter's first prominent use of "nihilism" (Nihilismus) to denote the logical endpoint of Enlightenment , influencing later existential thought while underscoring Jacobi's as the sole antidote to such outcomes. The publication intensified the dispute, contributing to Fichte's forced resignation from the in 1799 under pressure from Saxon authorities and public backlash, though Jacobi maintained that his intent was philosophical clarification rather than institutional . Fichte responded indirectly in subsequent works, defending his system's ethical realism against Jacobi's charges, yet the exchange highlighted irreconcilable divides: Jacobi's emphasis on faith's primacy versus Fichte's confidence in reason's moral self-grounding. Jacobi's intervention thus reinforced his role as a sentinel against idealism's perceived excesses, prioritizing causal realism in divine over constructed absolutes.

Debate with Schelling

In response to Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling's 1809 Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit, which included criticisms of Jacobi's prior characterization of Baruch Spinoza's philosophy as inherently atheistic, Jacobi drafted a pointed during his later years. This exchange highlighted deepening rifts between Jacobi's emphasis on and Schelling's evolving , with Jacobi perceiving Schelling's system as reviving Spinozist under a new guise. Jacobi's Von den göttlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung appeared in 1811, marking his final major philosophical publication and directly targeting Schelling's identity philosophy. In it, Jacobi contended that Schelling's positing of an absolute identity between God, nature, and reason collapses the distinction between creator and creation, yielding an impersonal pantheism that denies genuine human freedom and moral agency. He argued this framework treats freedom not as an originary act but as a derivative necessity emerging from an undifferentiated ground, ultimately fatalistic and nihilistic, as reason's demand for total explanation erodes transcendence. Jacobi contrasted this with his own "salto mortale" of faith, positing immediate, non-discursive knowledge of a personal God as the antidote to rationalism's self-undermining path. Schelling countered in 1812 with Denkmal der Schrift von den göttlichen Dingen des Herrn Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, framing Jacobi's critique as a misunderstanding of his positive , where arises dialectically from the absolute's internal potencies rather than alone. Schelling accused Jacobi of that evades reason's constructive role in revealing divine reality. Jacobi briefly replied, reiterating that speculative systems like Schelling's inevitably subordinate to human constructs, perpetuating the he had long warned against. This late controversy encapsulated Jacobi's enduring opposition to German Idealism's rationalist ambitions, influencing subsequent theological critiques of pantheistic tendencies in .

Influence and Interactions

Effects on German Idealism and Contemporaries

Jacobi's critiques of and emphasis on as a salto mortale beyond reason posed fundamental challenges to the systematic ambitions of , forcing its proponents to grapple with the risks of inherent in deriving solely from conceptual constructions. By arguing that pure reason leads to or —exemplified in his 1785 Dispute and subsequent works—Jacobi influenced the Idealists' efforts to integrate immediacy, individuality, and transcendence into their frameworks, though they often reframed his within dialectical or absolute structures. The Atheism Dispute (Atheismusstreit) of 1798–1800, ignited by Jacobi's 1799 to Fichte, directly accused Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre (first presented 1794) of for positing the ego's absolute self-positing as the ground of reality, thereby dissolving objective existence into subjective activity and suppressing personal freedom. This confrontation, which contributed to Fichte's dismissal from the in 1799, compelled Fichte to clarify his ethical and religious dimensions in subsequent writings, such as the Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre (1797/98), while underscoring tensions between Jacobi's realism of and Idealist . Jacobi's 1811 Von den göttlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung critiqued Schelling's of identity for equating divine freedom with natural necessity, arguing it reduced to mechanistic processes and echoed Spinozistic ; this sparked the Theismusstreit and influenced Schelling's shift toward a positive of mythology and in his later works (post-1810s), where he sought to affirm historical immediacy over abstract . Schelling's early engagement with Jacobi's also informed his , bridging nature and intellect through non-rational faculties. Hegel's reception of Jacobi was more integrative; in Faith and Knowledge (1802), Hegel addressed Jacobi's charge of formalism in Kantianism by dialectically synthesizing and reason, while his 1825–1827 review of Jacobi's complete works praised the latter's insights into the limits of reflection, incorporating them to critique abstract and bolster the concrete universality of the Absolute Spirit. Jacobi's ideas were discussed among Hegel, Schelling, and Hölderlin at the Stift in the 1790s, shaping their early confrontations with in post-Kantian thought. Among contemporaries, Jacobi's emphasis on vital immediacy and critique of Enlightenment abstraction resonated with Romantic figures; his exchanges with Goethe in the 1780s, including discussions of Spinoza during the Pantheism Dispute, briefly inspired Goethe's pantheistic leanings in works like but later strained over divergences in versus aesthetic . Interactions with Herder highlighted shared anti-rationalist sentiments, influencing Herder's , though Jacobi's diverged from Herder's . These engagements positioned Jacobi as a catalyst for Romanticism's prioritization of feeling and individuality over systematic deduction.

Long-Term Impact on Philosophy and Theology

Jacobi's critique of rationalism as inevitably culminating in nihilism—a term he employed to describe the dissolution of transcendent reality under the dominance of speculative reason—anticipated key themes in 19th- and 20th-century philosophy, particularly the existential diagnosis of modernity's crisis. By arguing in works such as Über die Lehre des Spinoza (1785) that systematic philosophy denies personal freedom and divine personality, Jacobi compelled later thinkers to confront the boundaries of reason, influencing the Romantic reaction against Enlightenment universalism and paving the way for subjectivist epistemologies. This perspective resonated in Søren Kierkegaard's development of the "leap of faith," where Kierkegaard drew on Jacobi's distinction between mediated knowledge (via concepts) and immediate certainty (via belief), adapting it to critique Hegelian rationalism in texts like Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846). In epistemology, Jacobi's advocacy for Glaube (faith) as an intuitive, non-discursive grasp of reality—opposed to the infinite regress of proofs—provided a foundational challenge to idealism's monistic tendencies, echoing in Arthur Schopenhauer's emphasis on will over intellect and even in Friedrich Nietzsche's inversion of rationalist optimism, though Nietzsche repurposed Jacobi's nihilism diagnosis against faith itself. Jacobi's salto mortale metaphor, denoting the existential jump from doubt to conviction, prefigured existentialist motifs of absurdity and decision, as evidenced by Kierkegaard's explicit references to Jacobi in his journals and pseudonymous writings from the 1840s. This framework underscored philosophy's inability to secure metaphysical foundations without recourse to personal conviction, a theme that persisted in 20th-century phenomenology and , where thinkers like grappled with similar antinomies of reason. Theologically, Jacobi's polemics against pantheistic and deistic dilutions of reinforced a tradition of revealed theology that prioritized divine personality and historical revelation over abstract systems, impacting Protestant orthodoxy's resistance to liberal rationalism in the . His arguments in the Atheism Dispute (1799), targeting F.H. Jacobi's claim that reason's self-sufficiency excludes , bolstered fideist currents that viewed speculative theology as idolatrous, influencing figures like Kierkegaard in affirming faith's beyond reason's grasp. This legacy endured in 20th-century dialectical theology, such as Karl Barth's (1932–1967), which echoed Jacobi's insistence on 's "wholly other" nature against anthropomorphic rationalizations, though Barth critiqued Jacobi's . By framing as the antidote to reason's nihilistic drift, Jacobi contributed to a causal understanding of as rationalism's internal failure, rather than mere historical accident.

Reception and Legacy

Immediate Responses and Criticisms

Mendelssohn's swift rebuttal to Jacobi's 1785 publication of their correspondence on Lessing's alleged Spinozism appeared in An die Freunde Lessings (October 1785), where he accused Jacobi of misrepresenting Lessing's views and promoting an unsubstantiated that undermined rational theology. In his Morgenstunden oder über das Dasein Gottes (1785), Mendelssohn systematically critiqued Spinoza's system as internally inconsistent—lacking true necessity and devolving into —while rejecting Jacobi's alternative of immediate as a dogmatic shortcut evading philosophical scrutiny. Kant addressed Jacobi's broader challenge to in Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren? (1786), interpreting Jacobi's advocacy for a "salto mortale" of beyond reason's limits as an overstatement that neglected reason's self-orienting capacity through practical postulates, thereby defending a harmonious integration of and against Jacobi's stark . Jacobi's 1787 Über den Versuch, den Idealismus zu vernichten extended his of Kant's "" as an unstable presupposition—untenable without yet incompatible with systematic —prompting further Enlightenment-aligned responses decrying it as skeptical masquerading as piety. Herder, in his 1787 Gott, engaged Jacobi's Spinozist interpretations critically, faulting their portrayal of Spinoza as a fatalistic atheist while conceding some anti-rationalist insights, though ultimately prioritizing a dynamic over Jacobi's personalist . Contemporaries like praised Jacobi's emphasis on revelation against abstract reason, but dominant criticisms from rationalist circles, including figures such as Christian Garve, labeled his as irrationalist, arguing it dissolved knowledge into subjective intuition and eroded Enlightenment progress by privileging unverifiable belief over demonstrable truth.

Modern Reassessments and Enduring Relevance

In recent decades, scholars have reassessed Jacobi's as a pivotal critique of Enlightenment , highlighting its anticipation of limits inherent in systematic reasoning. His contention that pure reason inevitably leads to —exemplified by the Spinozist deduction of from concepts alone—has been reevaluated as a prescient warning against the reduction of to logical constructs, influencing discussions on the boundaries of and . For instance, in a 2023 , Jacobi's emphasis on immediate (Anschauung) and as non-discursive accesses to is positioned as a counter to modern scientism's overreach, where empirical data alone cannot ground ethical or existential commitments. Jacobi's "salto mortale" or , posited as essential for affirming personal freedom and divine immediacy against deterministic , finds echoes in 20th-century , particularly Kierkegaard's development of subjective truth over objective certainty. Contemporary theologians, drawing on Jacobi, argue this leap underscores the irreducibility of religious experience to propositional , relevant amid secular challenges to ; a 2024 study notes its utility in resisting reductionist interpretations of belief as mere psychological artifact. His critique thus endures in debates over whether reason's self-application dissolves transcendence, prompting reevaluations in where is defended not as but as rationally necessary for coherence. Theologically, Jacobi's advocacy for over speculative maintains in Protestant and Catholic circles wary of liberal accommodations to . Recent works credit him with shaping responses to idealism's collapse into , informing critiques of immanentist theologies; for example, his 1810s exchanges with Schelling prefigure 21st-century concerns over holistic systems erasing divine otherness. Philosophically, his anti-systematic stance resonates in postmodern toward grand narratives, though without the Jacobi rejected, as evidenced by 2023 scholarship linking his finite reason—bounded by sensibility and —to embodied cognition theories. Overall, Jacobi's legacy lies in restoring agency to non-rational faculties, challenging academia's residual rationalist bias toward verifiable propositions over lived immediacy.

Principal Works

Jacobi's early philosophical writings include the novel Edward Allwills Briefsammlung (1781), which explores themes of sentiment, deception, and the limits of reason through epistolary form. His seminal critique of appeared in Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn (1785; expanded 1789), a series of letters documenting conversations with Lessing and Mendelssohn on Spinozism, , and the inherent in deterministic systems. In David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus: Ein Gespräch (1787), Jacobi defends immediate faith (Glaube) as the foundation of realism against Humean and Kantian , arguing that of requires a non-rational salto mortale. Later works include Jacobi an Fichte (1799), an accusing Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre of leading to by reducing to subjective construction. Über das Unternehmen des Kriticismus, die Vernunft zu Verstande zu bringen (1802) critiques Kant's for subordinating reason to understanding, thereby severing access to the infinite. His final major publication, Von den göttlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung (1811), elaborates a theistic realism emphasizing divine freedom and personal against post-Kantian .

References

  1. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-jacobi/
  2. https://cambridgeblog.org/2023/03/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/
  3. https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/philosophy-and-religion/philosophy-biographies/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/jacobi-as-literary-author/3BC78E6A6100D3C6734670D0D10BF9EF
  5. https://philarchive.org/rec/DIGJAL
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368368656_Jacobi_as_Literary_Author
  7. https://academic.oup.com/book/25575/chapter/192908311
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt807ch
  9. https://philarchive.org/archive/DIGJAL
  10. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/friedrich-jacobi/
  11. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/friedrich-jacobi/
  12. http://www.metajournal.org/download.php?id=173&type=articles
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/critique-of-reason-debates-on-rationalism-empiricism-and-skepticism/258AE7F1901C95C3A25067B855400B68
  14. https://phil971-2022.colinmclear.net/materials/readings/beiser-fate-2-3.pdf
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/jacobi-and-spinoza/108AA9BF13912D079103AC0566B24324
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/lessing-philosophical-and-theological-writings/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-recollections-of-conversations-with-lessing-in-july-and-august-1780-1785/D6281F872A199FFB8AADAFF52DC83EBB
  17. https://phil880.colinmclear.net/materials/readings/jacobi-spinoza.pdf
  18. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mendelssohn/
  19. https://academic.oup.com/book/25356/chapter/192427435
  20. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/j-g-fichte-and-the-atheism-dispute-1798-1800/
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/jacobis-philosophy-of-faith-in-fichtes-1794-wissenschaftslehre/A2A820BE71D8D791F23BD348E7E3F47C
  22. https://www.thecollector.com/what-was-the-atheism-dispute/
  23. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/files/31320817/The_Interest_of_Reason_is_to_Go_Without_God.pdf
  24. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.12135
  25. https://journals.library.mun.ca/index.php/kabiri/article/download/2759/2226/9911
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/jacobis-impact-on-idealism-and-romanticism/CC2ABE1B134B7A2B442D5772B5E7B8AC
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment/jacobi-and-kierkegaard/45C551350F8337B7DB0D12AB4DA16087
  28. https://philarchive.org/archive/FREKUO-2
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368370008_Jacobi_and_Kierkegaard
  30. https://academic.oup.com/book/1382/chapter/140696488
  31. https://users.utu.fi/valvil/wp-content/uploads/sites/1290/2024/08/Pantheism-Controversy-penultimate.pdf
  32. https://phil880.colinmclear.net/notes/kant-spinoza-pantheism/
  33. https://academic.oup.com/book/46519/chapter/407876406
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/618
  35. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/philosophy-of-friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-9781350235717/
  36. https://dokumen.pub/friedrich-heinrich-jacobi-and-the-ends-of-the-enlightenment-religion-philosophy-and-reason-at-the-crux-of-modernity-newnbsped-1009244949-9781009244947.html
  37. https://meiner.de/uber-die-lehre-des-spinoza-in-briefen-an-den-herrn-moses-mendelssohn.html
  38. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/friedrich-jacobi/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.