Hubbry Logo
FideismFideismMain
Open search
Fideism
Community hub
Fideism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Fideism
Fideism
Fideism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Theism
Types of faith
Specific conceptions
In particular religions
Abrahamic
Indo-Iranian
Chinese
Attributes
  • Experiences
  • Practices
Related topics

Fideism (/ˈfiːdeɪ.ɪzəm, ˈfaɪdiː-/ FEE-day-iz-əm, FY-dee-) is a standpoint or an epistemological theory which maintains that faith is independent of reason, or that reason and faith are hostile to each other and faith is superior at arriving at particular truths (see natural theology). The word fideism comes from fides, the Latin word for faith, and literally means "faith-ism".[1] Philosophers have identified a number of different forms of fideism.[2] Strict fideists hold that reason has no place in discovering theological truths, while moderate fideists hold that though some truth can be known by reason, faith stands above reason.[3]

Theologians and philosophers have responded in various ways to the place of faith and reason in determining the truth of metaphysical ideas, morality, and religious beliefs. Historically, fideism is most commonly ascribed to four philosophers: Søren Kierkegaard, Blaise Pascal, William James, and Ludwig Wittgenstein; with fideism being a label applied in a negative sense by their opponents, but which is not always supported by their own ideas and works or followers.[4] A qualified form of fideism is sometimes attributed to Immanuel Kant's famous suggestion that we must "deny knowledge in order to make room for faith".[5]

Overview

[edit]

Alvin Plantinga defines "fideism" as "the exclusive or basic reliance upon faith alone, accompanied by a consequent disparagement of reason and is used especially in the pursuit of philosophical or religious truth". The fideist therefore "urges reliance on faith rather than reason, in matters philosophical and religious", and therefore may go on to disparage the claims of reason.[7] The fideist seeks truth, above all, and affirms that reason cannot achieve certain kinds of truth, which must instead be accepted only by faith.[6]

History

[edit]
Main article: Relationship between religion and science

Theories of truth

[edit]
Main article: Truth § Major theories

The doctrine of fideism is consistent with some, and radically contrary to other theories of truth:

Tertullian

[edit]

Tertullian taught fideistic concepts such as the later philosophers William of Ockham and Søren Kierkegaard.[3] Tertullian's De Carne Christi (On the Flesh of Christ])[8] says "the Son of God died; it is by all means to be believed, because it is absurd."[9]

On the other hand, some deny Tertullian's fideistic character, the statement "Credo quia absurdum" ("I believe because it is absurd") is sometimes cited as an example of views of the Church Fathers. However, this has been argued to have been a misquotation of Tertullian,[10] saying that Tertullian was critiquing intellectual arrogance and the misuse of philosophy, but that he remained committed to reason and its usefulness in defending the faith.[1][11]

William of Ockham

[edit]

Ockham was a fideist, holding that belief in God is only a matter of faith and not from knowledge; this led him to deny all the alleged proofs of God.[12][3]

Luther

[edit]

Martin Luther taught that faith informs the Christian's use of reason. Regarding the mysteries of Christian faith, he wrote, "All the articles of our Christian faith, which God has revealed to us in His Word, are in presence of reason sheerly impossible, absurd, and false." And "Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has." However, Luther conceded that, grounded upon faith in Christ, reason can be used in its proper realm, as he wrote, "Before faith and the knowledge of God reason is darkness in divine matters, but through faith it is turned into a light in the believer and serves piety as an excellent instrument. For just as all natural endowments serve to further impiety in the godless, so they serve to further salvation in the godly. An eloquent tongue promotes faith; reason makes speech clear, and everything helps faith forward. Reason receives life from faith; it is killed by it and brought back to life."[13]

Blaise Pascal and fideism

[edit]
Blaise Pascal

Another form of fideism is assumed by Pascal's Wager, which is a rational argument for a pragmatic view of God's existence.[14] Blaise Pascal invites the atheist considering faith to see faith in God as a cost-free choice that carries a potential reward.[15] He does not attempt to argue that God indeed exists, only that it might be valuable to assume that it is true. Of course, the problem with Pascal's Wager is that it does not restrict itself to a specific god, although Pascal did have in mind the Christian version (referred to both by Jews and Christians as God), as is mentioned in the following quote. In his Pensées, Pascal writes:

Who then will blame Christians for not being able to give reasons for their beliefs, since they profess belief in a religion which they cannot explain? They declare, when they expound it to the world, that it is foolishness, stultitiam; and then you complain because they do not prove it! If they proved it, they would not keep their word; it is through their lack of proofs that they show they are not lacking in sense.

— Pensées, no. 233

Pascal, moreover, contests the various proposed proofs of the existence of God as irrelevant. Even if the proofs were valid, the beings they propose to demonstrate are not congruent with the deity worshiped by historical faiths, and can easily lead to deism instead of revealed religion: "The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—not the god of the philosophers!"[16]

Hamann and fideism

[edit]

Considered to be the father of modern antirationalism, Johann Georg Hamann promoted a view that elevated faith alone as the only guide to human conduct. Using the work of David Hume he argued that everything people do is ultimately based on faith.[17] Without faith (for it can never be proven) in the existence of an external world, human affairs could not continue; therefore, he argued, all reasoning comes from this faith: it is fundamental to the human condition. Thus all attempts to base belief in God using reason are in vain. He attacks systems like Spinozism that try to confine what he feels is the infinite majesty of God into a finite human creation.[18]

Kant's qualified fideism

[edit]

Hamann was a personal friend of Immanuel Kant, one of the most influential philosophers of the modern era. While Kant and Hamann disagreed about both the use of reason and the scientific method, there were also a number of points of agreement between them.[19] For instance, one of the views defended in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is that reason is incapable of attaining knowledge of the existence of God or the immortality of the soul, a point with which Hamann would agree. The most important difference on this point is that Kant did not think that this gave way to antirationalism, whereas Hamann did.[19] As a result, a qualified form of fideism is sometimes attributed to Kant. This modified form of fideism is also evident in his famous suggestion that we must "deny knowledge in order to make room for faith".[5]

Kierkegaard

[edit]

Natural theologians may argue that Kierkegaard was a fideist of this general sort: the argument that God's existence cannot be certainly known, and that the decision to accept faith is neither founded on, nor needs, rational justification, may be found in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard and his followers in Christian existentialism. Many of Kierkegaard's works, including Fear and Trembling, are under pseudonyms; they may represent the work of fictional authors whose views correspond to hypothetical positions, not necessarily those held by Kierkegaard himself.

In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard focused on Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac. The New Testament apostles repeatedly argued that Abraham's act was an admirable display of faith. To the eyes of a non-believer, however, it must necessarily have appeared to be an unjustifiable attempted murder, perhaps the fruit of an insane delusion. Kierkegaard used this example to focus attention on the problem of faith in general.[20] He ultimately affirmed that to believe in the incarnation of Christ, in God made flesh, was to believe in the "absolute paradox", since it implies that an eternal, perfect being would become a simple human. Reason cannot possibly comprehend such a phenomenon; therefore, one can only believe in it by taking a "leap of faith".

James and "will to believe"

[edit]

American pragmatic philosopher and psychologist William James introduced his concept of the "will to believe" in 1896. Following upon his earlier theories of truth, James argued that some religious questions can only be answered by believing in the first place: one cannot know if religious doctrines are true without seeing if they work, but they cannot be said to work unless one believes them in the first place.

William James published many works on the subject of religious experience. His four key characteristics of religious experience are: 'passivity', 'ineffability', 'a noetic quality', and 'transiency'. Due to the fact that religious experience is fundamentally ineffable, it is impossible to hold a coherent discussion of it using public language. This means that religious belief cannot be discussed effectively, and so reason does not affect faith. Instead, faith is found through experience of the spiritual, and so understanding of belief is only gained through the practice of it.

Wittgenstein and fideism

[edit]

The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein did not write systematically about religion, though he did lecture on the topic of religious belief (e.g., student notes published as "Lectures on Religious Belief"), and various remarks about religions appear in sources such as the "Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough", his private diaries, in the collection Culture and Value, and in notes on conversations with former students and friends such as Maurice O'Connor Drury and Oets Kolk Bouwsma.

In his 1967 article, entitled "Wittgensteinian Fideism", Kai Nielsen argues that certain aspects of Wittgenstein's thought have been interpreted by Wittgensteinians in a "fideistic" manner. According to this position, religion is a self-contained—and primarily expressive—enterprise, governed by its own internal logic or "grammar". This view—commonly called Wittgensteinian fideism—states: that religion is logically cut off from other aspects of life; that religious concepts and discourse are essentially self-referential; and that religion cannot be criticized from an external (i.e., non-religious) point of view.[4]

Wittgenstein stated that "Christianity is not based on historical truth; rather, it offers us a historical narrative and says: now believe! But not, believe this narrative with the belief appropriate to a historical narrative, rather: believe, through thick and thin". For Wittgenstein you should "not take the same attitude to it as you take to other historical narratives...there is nothing paradoxical about that!" and that "The historical accounts in the Gospel, might historically speaking, be demonstrably false yet belief would lose nothing by this".[21]

Shestov

[edit]

Lev Shestov is associated with radical fideism, holding that religious truth can only be gained by rejecting reason.[22]

Fideism and presuppositional apologetics

[edit]

Presuppositional apologetics is a Christian system of apologetics associated mainly with Calvinist Protestantism; it attempts to distinguish itself from fideism.[23] It holds that all human thought must begin with the proposition that the revelation contained in the Bible is axiomatic, rather than transcendentally necessary, else one would not be able to make sense of any human experience (see also epistemic foundationalism). To non-believers who reject the notion that the truth about God, the world, and themselves can be found within the Bible, the presuppositional apologist attempts to demonstrate the incoherence of the epistemic foundations of the logical alternative by the use of what has come to be known as the "transcendental argument for God's existence" (TAG). On the other hand, some presuppositional apologists, such as Cornelius Van Til, believe that such a condition of true unbelief is impossible, claiming that all people actually believe in God (even if only on a subconscious level), whether they admit or deny it.

Presuppositional apologetics could be seen as being more closely allied with foundationalism than fideism, though it has sometimes been critical of both.

Criticism

[edit]

Fideism rejected by the Catholic Church

[edit]

Catholic doctrine rejects fideism, with its earliest condemnations dating back to 1348.[24] The Catechism of the Catholic Church, affirms that it is a Catholic doctrine that God's existence can indeed be demonstrated by reason.

The Anti-Modernist oath promulgated by Pope Pius X required Catholics to affirm that:

God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (cf. Rom. 1:20), that is, from the visible works of creation, as a cause from its effects, and that, therefore, his existence can also be demonstrated

Similarly, the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that:

Though human reason is, strictly speaking, truly capable by its own natural power and light of attaining to a true and certain knowledge of the one personal God, who watches over and controls the world by his providence, and of the natural law written in our hearts by the Creator; yet there are many obstacles which prevent reason from the effective and fruitful use of this inborn faculty. For the truths that concern the relations between God and man wholly transcend the visible order of things, and, if they are translated into human action and influence it, they call for self-surrender and abnegation. The human mind, in its turn, is hampered in the attaining of such truths, not only by the impact of the senses and the imagination, but also by disordered appetites which are the consequences of original sin. So it happens that men in such matters easily persuade themselves that what they would not like to be true is false or at least doubtful.

— Catechism of the Catholic Church, ss. 37

Pope John Paul II's encyclical Fides et Ratio also affirms that God's existence is in fact demonstrable by reason, and that attempts to reason otherwise are the results of sin. In the encyclical, John Paul II warned against "a resurgence of fideism, which fails to recognize the importance of rational knowledge and philosophical discourse for the understanding of faith, indeed for the very possibility of belief in God".

Fideist currents in Catholic thought

[edit]

Another course of fideist thinking within the Catholic Church is the concept of "signs of contradiction".[25] According to this belief, the holiness of certain people and institutions is confirmed by the fact that other people contest their claims: this opposition is held to be worthy of comparison to the opposition met by Jesus Christ himself. This opposition and contradiction does not inherently prove something is true in Catholic thought, but acts an additional possible indication of its truth. The idea of the sign of contradiction is related to the conviction that, while human reason is still operative, the distortion of fallen human nature causes some instances of reasoning to go astray.

As sin

[edit]

Fideism has received criticism from theologians who argue that fideism is not a proper way to worship God. According to this position, if one does not attempt to understand what one believes, one is not really believing. "Blind faith" is not true faith. Notable articulations of this position include:

As relativism

[edit]

Some critics argue that fideism can lead to relativism.[26]

A case for reason

[edit]
Main article: Relationship between religion and science

Some critics note the successful use of reason in the daily lives of people to solve problems. That reason has led to an increase of knowledge, including in the sphere of science.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fideism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Fideism is a philosophical and theological position that asserts the independence of from reason, particularly in the domain of religious , maintaining that serves as the primary or sole means to access divine truths without reliance on rational demonstration. This view emphasizes that religious convictions, such as those derived from , transcend or even oppose the limitations of human reason, positioning as epistemically superior for spiritual matters. The term "fideism" (from the Latin fides, meaning "faith") emerged in the late 19th century within French theology as part of the traditionalist movement, reacting against the rationalism of the Enlightenment and the upheavals of the French Revolution. It was first notably used in the work of theologian Eugène Ménégoz and developed by figures such as Louis Bautain, who argued in La philosophie du christianisme (1835) for the insufficiency of reason in grasping Christian doctrines, Augustin Bonnetty, and Philippe Olympe Gerbet. Precursors to this modern formulation include 18th- and early 19th-century traditionalists like Joseph de Maistre and Louis de Bonald, who stressed the primacy of divine authority over human intellect. Historically, fideistic attitudes trace back to early Christian thinkers, such as (c. 160–220 CE), who rhetorically questioned the compatibility of Greek philosophy and Christian faith in his Apology with the phrase "What has to do with ?", and (354–430 CE), who in acknowledged the preparatory role of reason but ultimately subordinated it to faith. In the 19th century, advanced a subjective, existential form of fideism through concepts like the "," portraying religious commitment as a passionate, irrational choice beyond objective proof. Fideism has been distinguished into moderate and extreme variants: moderate fideism allows reason a supportive role in illuminating faith, while extreme fideism rejects reason outright as incompatible with belief. The has consistently rejected fideism, condemning it in documents such as the First Vatican Council's Dei Filius (1870), which affirmed reason's capacity to prove God's existence, and Pope Pius X's Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), which linked extreme fideism to and . In the , the term extended to "Wittgensteinian fideism," associated with philosophers like D.Z. Phillips, who viewed religious language as non-propositional and insulated from rational critique, though many such thinkers disavowed the label. Overall, fideism underscores ongoing debates in about the interplay between faith and reason, influencing discussions on .

Definition and Core Concepts

Etymology and Definition

The term "fideism" derives from the Latin fides, meaning "faith," combined with the suffix -ism to denote a doctrinal position, literally translating to "faith-ism." The French term "fidéisme" first appeared around 1854, with the English "fideism" entering use in 1885, originating in 19th-century French theological discourse among Catholic traditionalists and Protestant modernists to describe an emphasis on faith over rational inquiry. Fideism is an epistemological stance asserting that serves as the primary or exclusive pathway to , especially in theological or religious domains, while deeming reason insufficient, unreliable, or even obstructive to genuine . This position prioritizes divine and personal as superior to evidential arguments or logical deduction, often framing as a suprarational or noncognitive faculty. Fideism often embraces paradoxes and truths that appear to transcend rational comprehension, such as certain religious doctrines. Fideism manifests in several variants, distinguished by the degree of tension between and reason. Strict fideism posits an outright incompatibility, viewing reason as antithetical to and incapable of apprehending spiritual realities. Moderate fideism, by contrast, allows reason a preparatory role—such as clarifying concepts or refuting errors—but subordinates it entirely to as the ultimate . Radical fideism extends this further, contending that wholly transcends rational processes, rendering philosophical scrutiny irrelevant or presumptuous in matters of ultimate truth. These forms underscore fideism's broader place within , where it challenges evidentialist norms by elevating nonrational commitment.

Relationship to Faith and Reason

Fideism posits as a non-rational or supra-rational faculty capable of accessing ultimate truths that lie beyond the reach of empirical observation or logical deduction, while confining reason to the domain of mundane, worldly affairs. In this view, religious convictions derive their validity not from argumentative justification but from an immediate, personal commitment that transcends evidential requirements. This central tenet underscores 's role as an autonomous mode of , independent of rational scrutiny for its epistemological warrant. In contrast to , which elevates reason as the supreme arbiter of all truth including the divine, and , which demands that be buttressed by sufficient rational or probabilistic arguments, fideism asserts the inherent of against such demands. 's insistence on deriving religious beliefs solely from logical is rejected, as is evidentialism's criterion that beliefs must align with available to be justified. Instead, fideism maintains that operates in a sphere where reason's tools are inadequate or even obstructive, allowing to flourish without deference to philosophical proofs or empirical verification. A key element in fideist thought is the embrace of and , particularly in religious doctrines such as the , which appear rationally incomprehensible—defying logical coherence—yet are affirmed as true through alone. These doctrines, often involving apparent contradictions like divine unity and multiplicity, highlight reason's limitations in grasping transcendent realities, positioning as the necessary bridge to their acceptance. By willingly engaging with such paradoxes, fideism elevates faith's capacity to resolve what reason deems irresolvable. Epistemologically, fideism implies that knowledge acquired through faith possesses an immediacy and certainty unattainable by rational methods, which typically yield only probabilistic or contingent understanding. Unlike reason's incremental, evidence-based approximations, faith delivers direct apprehension of ultimate truths, unmediated by doubt or further justification. This positions faith not as a deficit in rationality but as a superior epistemic pathway for domains where reason falters.

Fideism and Theories of Truth

Fideism positions as a primary mode of accessing truth, particularly in religious contexts, challenging traditional epistemological frameworks that prioritize reason and . Unlike correspondence theories, which define truth as an accurate representation of , or deflationary views that reduce truth to mere assertion, fideism contends that certain truths—especially theological ones—are grasped through an act of that transcends rational . This approach treats not merely as a supplement to reason but as a self-sufficient epistemic faculty capable of yielding genuine . Some forms of fideism reject both and as inadequate for religious truth, arguing that such foundations are insufficient for divine truths, which instead derive from -based presuppositions that serve as their own ground. Similarly, , which evaluates truth by the mutual consistency and interconnectedness of a , is dismissed in strict variants because operates outside rational webs of , prioritizing existential commitment over intellectual harmony. In this view, truth emerges from the presuppositional structure of itself, rendering rational architectures secondary or irrelevant. Fideism also aligns closely with pragmatist theories of truth, which emphasize practical over abstract correspondence. Here, religious truths are validated not by their alignment with an external but by their "workability" in guiding lived , fostering transformation, and providing existential fulfillment. This pragmatic orientation allows fideism to affirm faith's epistemic legitimacy in situations where is ambiguous or absent, treating as rational when it yields beneficial outcomes in religious practice. A key aspect of fideism's critique targets , the doctrine that one's degree of belief must match the available evidence, as articulated in classical formulations requiring empirical or rational support for justification. Fideists counter that does not demand such verification; instead, faith-based truths are self-authenticating, arising from an internal conviction or divine encounter that renders external proofs unnecessary or even counterproductive. This rejection underscores fideism's insistence that cannot be reduced to evidential standards, as doing so would undermine faith's unique capacity for certainty. Finally, fideism exerts significant influence on by serving as a bulwark against , which arises when reason exposes the limits of human and leads to pervasive . In response, fideism posits as an alternative epistemic route to truth, where rational scrutiny halts at but bridges the gap to assurance. This framework not only defends religious against skeptical challenges but also reframes to accommodate non-rational sources of , emphasizing through commitment rather than probabilistic reasoning.

Historical Development

Early Christian Origins

The roots of fideist thought in can be traced to key texts that emphasize as a form of assurance and independent of visible evidence. :1 defines as "the assurance of things hoped for, the of ," portraying it as a subjective and objective guarantee from that enables in unseen divine realities, such as future rewards and creation itself. This conceptualization laid proto-fideist groundwork by prioritizing trust in revelation over empirical or rational verification, influencing later patristic developments. In the patristic era (second to fifth centuries), early Christian thinkers responded to Greco-Roman by integrating philosophical tools while asserting the supremacy of scriptural as the ultimate authority. Figures like defended against charges of by framing it as a "divine " that used rational arguments but reserved for the unlearned masses, rejecting sole reliance on pagan . This approach countered Hellenistic emphasis on unaided reason, positioning as essential for true understanding and marking an early tension between and that proto-fideist ideas would amplify. Tertullian (c. 155–220 CE), a North African theologian, exemplified this shift through his paradoxical defense of Christian doctrines against pagan rationalism. In De Carne Christi, he argued that the and , though seemingly absurd to Greco-Roman logic, gain credibility precisely through their improbability: "The is dead; this is believable because it is unfitting; and buried, He rose again; this is certain because it is impossible." He further separated Christian from philosophical by questioning, "What indeed has to do with ?"—a rhetorical dismissal of pagan reason in favor of scriptural authority. Although later Enlightenment misinterpretations amplified his stance as outright fideism (e.g., the fabricated ""), Tertullian's rhetoric highlighted faith's embrace of divine paradoxes beyond rational bounds, influencing subsequent proponents (as detailed in his dedicated section). Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) further developed these ideas, initially drawing on Platonic reason in works like Contra Academicos but ultimately affirming faith's precedence in spiritual matters. Echoing Isaiah 7:9, he stated "crede ut intelligas" ("believe so that you may understand"), arguing that faith provides the foundation for rational insight, especially in salvation where unaided reason falls short. In De Trinitate and Confessions, Augustine described how belief opens the mind to divine truths, shifting from philosophical integration to faith's supremacy for comprehending God's mysteries. This progression underscored proto-fideist priorities in early Christianity, where revelation guided reason toward eternal ends.

Medieval Foundations

In the medieval period, scholasticism represented a concerted effort to harmonize faith and reason, yet it also sowed seeds of tension that nurtured fideist perspectives. Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) exemplified the scholastic ideal with his doctrine of "faith seeking understanding" (fides quaerens intellectum), positing that belief in God precedes and informs rational inquiry, as articulated in his Proslogion. This approach sought to elucidate divine truths through logic without subordinating faith to reason. However, as scholastic debates intensified, particularly in the 12th and 13th centuries, skeptics of reason's capacity emerged, highlighting its limitations in grasping mysteries like the Trinity or divine essence, thereby elevating faith as the primary epistemic route. William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347) advanced this through his , which denied the real existence of universals beyond mental concepts, thereby undermining rational 's reliance on essentialist proofs for God's attributes. By insisting that knowledge of God derives solely from rather than demonstrative reason, Ockham promoted a voluntarist view of divine will as arbitrary and unbound by rational necessity, stating that theological truths like God's existence are inaccessible to human cognition in this life. This fideist turn separated from , confining the latter to empirical and conceptual analysis while reserving sacred doctrines for alone. Mystical traditions further bolstered fideism by prioritizing direct, experiential union with over dialectical reasoning. Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), a leading Cistercian, critiqued scholastic —exemplified by —as presumptuous, arguing that true theology fosters love of through contemplative faith rooted in Scripture and the , not intellectual dissection. In works like his Sermons on the , Bernard emphasized mystical ecstasy as the path to divine knowledge, influencing monastic theology to view reason as secondary to heartfelt devotion. The crises of the , including the (1347–1351) and the (1378–1417), intensified fideist reliance on divine will amid institutional collapse. The plague, claiming up to 50% of Europe's population, prompted widespread penitential movements like the Flagellants, who sought atonement through faith-based rituals, interpreting the catastrophe as God's inscrutable judgment beyond rational comprehension. Similarly, the schism's dual papacies eroded trust in ecclesiastical authority, spurring lay piety movements that favored personal, faith-driven spirituality over hierarchical rationalism. These upheavals collectively shifted medieval toward an emphasis on God's sovereign will, diminishing confidence in human intellect to navigate existential chaos.

Reformation and Early Modern Shifts

The marked a pivotal intensification of fideist tendencies within , as emphasized the primacy of in response to perceived corruptions in medieval . Martin Luther's doctrine of , or justification by faith alone, rejected the notion that human reason or works could contribute to , positioning faith as the sole means of grasping divine truth beyond rational comprehension. This anti-rationalist stance aligned with fideism by portraying reason as corrupted by and incapable of accessing God's hidden will, as seen in Luther's concept of Deus absconditus, where God's true nature is revealed only through faith in Christ and Scripture rather than philosophical speculation. The post-Reformation era, scarred by the Wars of Religion across , further amplified fideist appeals by exposing the limitations of reason in resolving doctrinal conflicts and preventing . These conflicts, spanning the mid-16th to early 17th centuries, demonstrated how rational arguments and theological debates often fueled division rather than unity, leading thinkers to prioritize scripture, grace, and inward as the only reliable paths to religious truth. Fideism emerged as a response to this crisis, directing believers toward personal conviction over public rational justification and undermining claims for based on logical superiority. John Calvin reinforced these fideist shifts through his doctrine of predestination, which underscored God's absolute sovereignty and the inscrutability of divine election, rendering human logic insufficient for understanding salvation. In Calvin's theology, faith alone receives the grace of election, while reason remains subordinate and prone to error, echoing Reformation critiques of medieval voluntarism but extending them to affirm God's will as beyond rational probing. This emphasis on divine mystery over human intellect contributed to a broader fideist orientation in Reformed traditions. In Catholic responses during the , developed as a counter to the rationalist tendencies of Jesuit , advocating a rigorous Augustinian view of grace that minimized human and intellectual merit in favor of divine initiative. Influenced by Cornelius Jansen's Augustinus (1640), this movement portrayed salvation as entirely dependent on God's efficacious grace, critiquing Jesuit probabilism and as overreliant on reason.

Modern and Contemporary Evolution

During the Enlightenment, fideism faced significant challenges from proponents of reason, exemplified by Voltaire's sharp mockery of its reliance on faith over , particularly in his critiques of religious dogmatism that echoed Pascal's earlier fideistic tendencies. Despite this, Pascal's influence endured through his probabilistic approach to faith, such as the wager argument, which framed belief as a rational bet amid uncertainty, persisting as a bridge between fideism and emerging deistic thought. This tension highlighted fideism's adaptation from Reformation-era emphases on to confronting secular rationality. In the , provided fertile ground for fideism's revival, with emerging as a key precursor through his critique of Enlightenment reason as an idolatrous abstraction that obscured divine and human . Hamann argued that true arises from , , and historical rather than abstract , influencing romantic emphases on , , and the limits of reason in grasping the sacred. His work laid groundwork for viewing not as irrational but as a holistic response to the world's mystery, countering the era's mechanistic worldview. The 20th century saw fideism evolve within and , where Søren Kierkegaard's emphasis on as a subjective, passionate commitment beyond objective proofs reinvigorated its role in personal authenticity amid modern alienation. Similarly, Ludwig Wittgenstein's concept of language games positioned religious discourse as a distinct, self-contained practice insulated from scientific or rational verification, fostering interpretations of fideism as contextual rather than irrational. These developments shifted fideism from defensive to a philosophical tool for navigating and pluralism. In , postmodern has revived fideism by questioning grand narratives and objective truth, allowing to flourish in diverse forms such as , where multiple traditions coexist without rational hierarchy. This links to presuppositionalism in , which posits faith-based axioms as the starting point for all reasoning, echoing earlier variants while addressing secular relativism.

Major Proponents and Variants

Tertullian

, born around 160 AD in , , was a prominent early theologian and apologist, the son of a pagan Roman in provincial service. He converted to in his adulthood, likely before 197 AD, and became one of the first major writers in Latin, earning the title "father of Latin Christianity." Later in life, around 207 AD, Tertullian aligned with the Montanist movement, a prophetic sect emphasizing ecstatic revelations and strict moral discipline, which marked a shift toward a more rigorous, faith-centered piety in his theology. Among his key works, the (c. 197 AD) serves as a legal defense of against Roman persecutions, arguing that Christian truths, such as the crucifixion of Christ, appear as "foolishness to the Greeks" in line with 1 Corinthians 1:23, prioritizing divine over pagan . In De Carne Christi (c. 210 AD), refutes Gnostic by affirming the reality of Christ's human flesh, famously stating, "And He was buried, and rose again; the fact is certain, because it is impossible," underscoring faith's of paradoxical doctrines beyond rational comprehension. These texts highlight his rhetorical skill in contrasting Christian with the inconsistencies of Greek philosophy, as seen in his critique that philosophers "pervert the simple and ancient declaration of the divine writings" into conflicting speculations. Tertullian's proto-fideist elements emerge in his rejection of philosophical speculation as insufficient for grasping divine mysteries, exemplified by his theology, where the union of and man demands "ineptitude" to reveal truth, echoing 1 Corinthians 1:27 that chooses "the foolish things of the world to confound the wise." He advocated as the primary means to apprehend such paradoxes, dismissing overly rational inquiries that undermine scriptural , though he employed reason apologetically to expose pagan errors rather than purely irrational belief. This stance positioned not in opposition to all reason but superior to Hellenistic dialectics, as in his view that fulfills natural reason's yearnings while transcending its limits. Tertullian's legacy as an early exponent of fideist tendencies influenced subsequent Christian thinkers by establishing a framework for prioritizing in revealed truths over speculative , despite his own use of rational arguments in defenses. Although not a pure fideist—given his Montanist emphasis on prophetic and occasional rational —his paradoxical affirmations, often misquoted as "" from De Carne Christi 5, prefigured later developments in faith-reason dynamics within Western theology. His works laid groundwork for viewing Christian as defying worldly wisdom, impacting patristic debates on the and .

William of Ockham

(c. 1287–1347) was an English Franciscan friar and philosopher who studied at Oxford University, where he earned the title "Venerable Inceptor" for his innovative lectures on Peter Lombard's . His academic career was interrupted in 1324 when he was summoned to the papal court in to defend his theological views against charges of , including suspected . In 1328, amid escalating conflicts with over Franciscan poverty and papal authority, Ockham fled Avignon into exile with fellow Franciscans, seeking protection under Holy Roman Emperor Louis IV of Bavaria; he spent his remaining years in , writing polemical treatises against until his death in 1347. Ockham's philosophical contributions, rooted in , emphasized simplicity and empirical observation over metaphysical speculation. His famous principle, known as Ockham's Razor—"entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity"—advocated parsimony in explanations, rejecting unnecessary assumptions about universals or causal intermediaries in favor of direct, observable relations. In , this nominalist framework extended to deny the reality of universals as independent entities, viewing them instead as mental concepts or names, which undermined scholastic efforts to rationally ground divine attributes. Central to his theological outlook was the doctrine of 's potentia absoluta (absolute power), positing that God's will is unbound by rational necessity or natural order; God could, in principle, command or effect anything logically possible, including altering moral norms or natural laws, without contradiction. These ideas carried profound fideist implications, prioritizing divine will over rational demonstration in matters of , , and truth. Ockham rejected natural theology's proofs for 's existence or attributes, arguing that such demonstrations rely on premises evident only to , not reason alone; theological truths like the must be accepted on despite apparent rational inconsistencies. In , moral obligations and truths derive solely from 's commands (), rendering goodness contingent on divine fiat rather than intrinsic rational necessity—God could, for instance, make hating Him obligatory if willed. This separation of from scholastic reason positioned as the sole access to theological knowledge, limiting reason to while subordinating it to in the divine realm. Ockham's emphasis on God's sovereign will and the limits of reason influenced later theological shifts, paving the way for the Protestant Reformation by challenging the integration of faith and Aristotelian philosophy in scholasticism. His rejection of natural theology in favor of scripture and revelation echoed in reformers' sola fide and sola scriptura, highlighting divine freedom over human rational constructs.

Martin Luther

Martin Luther (1483–1546) was a German theologian and Augustinian friar whose , posted on the door of the Castle Church in on October 31, 1517, criticized the Catholic Church's practice of selling indulgences and initiated the Protestant Reformation. The theses emphasized repentance through rather than monetary , arguing that true contrition—induced by —frees one from guilt and penalty, independent of papal authority. This act positioned Luther as a key figure in challenging ecclesiastical structures reliant on human merit over . At the core of Luther's theology was the principle of sola fide, asserting that justification and occur through alone, without reliance on works or human effort. In his 1525 treatise The Bondage of the Will, written as a response to of Rotterdam's On , Luther contended that human will is bound by , rendering reason incapable of grasping spiritual truths or contributing to . He vividly described reason as the "devil's whore," enslaved to the flesh, prone to blaspheming God's revelations by presuming to judge divine mysteries through philosophical means. For Luther, alone receives God's promises, interpreting Scripture not via rational analysis but through the Holy Spirit's illumination. Luther's critique of scholasticism, evident in his 1517 Disputation Against Scholastic Theology, rejected the integration of Aristotelian philosophy into Christian doctrine, which he saw as promoting a merit-based system of righteousness. He argued that humans cannot will God as God by nature, and that righteousness arises solely from faith, not from doing good works or philosophical deduction; indeed, he claimed it would have been better if key scholastic figures like Porphyry had never introduced universals into theology. This polemic extended Ockham's voluntarism by emphasizing God's sovereign will over human reason in Reformation practice. Luther viewed scholastic methods as corrupting the gospel by equating faith with intellectual achievement, insisting instead that Scripture must be approached humbly through faith alone. Luther's practical contributions reinforced his fideistic emphasis on personal over institutional mediation. His translation of the into German in 1522, followed by the full in 1534, democratized access to Scripture, enabling laypeople to engage directly with God's word and interpret it through faith rather than clerical or philosophical filters. This vernacular promoted individual piety and , shifting authority from scholastic tradition to personal encounter with the text. Complementing this, Luther composed hymns like "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God" (based on ), which proclaimed God's grace and the believer's reliance on amid spiritual battles, encouraging congregational to internalize doctrinal truths. These hymns, intended as confessions of rather than mere emotional expression, helped embed in everyday worship and devotion.

Blaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) was a French mathematician, physicist, inventor, and philosopher who became deeply involved in , a rigorous Catholic theological movement emphasizing and . After a profound mystical experience known as the "Night of Fire" in 1654, Pascal shifted his focus toward religious , producing notes that were posthumously compiled and published as in 1670. This fragmentary work, intended as a defense of against and , embodies Pascal's moderate fideism, which integrates faith with limited rational inquiry while insisting that true belief transcends purely intellectual demonstration. Central to Pascal's fideist perspective is his distinction between the capacities of reason and the "heart," an intuitive faculty that apprehends divine truths beyond logical analysis. He famously wrote, "The heart has its reasons, which reason does not know," underscoring that involves a non-rational, experiential dimension essential for genuine conversion. Pascal critiqued traditional rational proofs for God's existence, such as those from , as insufficient and even counterproductive, arguing they establish only an abstract "god of the philosophers" rather than the of Abraham, , and revealed through Scripture and grace. For Pascal, these proofs fail to compel the will or address humanity's wretched condition marked by distraction and self-deception, rendering them inadequate for authentic religious commitment. Pascal's famous "Wager" argument, presented in (Fragment 418/Laf. 233), offers a pragmatic rationale for embracing amid evidential uncertainty, calculating that belief in yields infinite gain (eternal happiness) if true, versus finite loss (worldly pleasures foregone) if false, while disbelief risks infinite loss. Yet, this is not a strict rational proof but a strategic appeal to those inclined toward , rooted in the idea that ultimately enables belief, with reason serving only as an auxiliary tool. Pascal emphasized that the Wager presupposes a humbled recognition of reason's limits, positioning fideism as a balanced response where supplements rather than supplants rational . In the context of 17th-century intellectual currents, Pascal's approach responded directly to ' rationalism, which sought to ground all knowledge, including faith, in indubitable clear and distinct ideas. He rejected this method as overly reductive, warning that submitting religion to exhaustive rational scrutiny strips away its supernatural mystery and reduces God to a human construct (, Fragment 190/Laf. 222). This critique helped lay groundwork for later existential forms of fideism by prioritizing subjective encounter and decision over systematic proof.

Søren Kierkegaard

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) was a Danish philosopher and theologian whose works profoundly shaped existential thought and fideist perspectives on faith. Born in on May 5, 1813, as the youngest of seven children in a devout Lutheran family, Kierkegaard studied and at the , graduating in 1840. He is renowned for his use of s to explore complex ideas, allowing him to present multiple viewpoints without directly endorsing them; notable among these is (1843), published under the pseudonym Johannes de Silentio, which examines the nature of faith through the biblical story of Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son . In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard articulates his concept of the "leap of faith" as a passionate, subjective commitment to the absurd, exemplified by Abraham's paradoxical obedience to God's command, which defies ethical norms and rational comprehension. Abraham's act represents a teleological suspension of the ethical, where faith transcends universal moral laws in absolute duty to the divine, embracing objective uncertainty with infinite personal passion. Kierkegaard describes faith as "the highest passion in a man," a venture into the paradox where reason falters, requiring an individual's resolute inward appropriation rather than evidential proof. This leap is not a mere intellectual assent but an existential risk, as Abraham stands alone in his isolation, unable to communicate his conviction to others. Kierkegaard's fideism emerges sharply in his critique of Hegelian rationalism, which he saw as reducing to a diluted, objective system that erodes authentic . In Concluding Unscientific Postscript to (1846), under the pseudonym Johannes Climacus, he argues that "truth is subjectivity," emphasizing that religious truth demands subjective appropriation over speculative mediation, as objective certainty undermines the passionate risk inherent in belief. He lambasts "" for rationalizing into cultural complacency, stripping it of its demanding, paradoxical essence and turning it into mere doctrine rather than lived . This rejection of Hegel's all-encompassing rational prioritizes the individual's infinite resignation and leap into uncertainty as the path to genuine . Kierkegaard's ideas laid foundational groundwork for 20th-century , influencing thinkers like and by highlighting individual , choice, and subjective authenticity in confronting the absurd. His fideist , which privileges faith's subjective intensity over rational justification, also impacted theological developments, including through figures like , and continues to inform debates on the limits of reason in religious belief.

William James

William James (1842–1910) was an American philosopher and psychologist renowned as a leading figure in the development of , a philosophical tradition emphasizing the practical consequences of ideas as the test of their truth. His seminal 1897 essay "The Will to Believe," originally delivered as a lecture in 1896, explores the justification for adopting religious beliefs in the absence of conclusive evidence, marking a significant contribution to pragmatic fideism. In this work, James defends the voluntary adoption of faith as a rational option when intellectual evidence is inconclusive, positioning belief not as blind but as an active engagement with life's uncertainties. At the core of James's argument is the concept of "genuine options," which he defines as choices that are living (personally appealing), forced (no neutral alternative exists), and momentous (with significant stakes). In matters like the existence of God, where evidence is balanced and agnosticism offers no escape, James contends that passivity toward belief can lead to missed opportunities for a richer existence; thus, opting for faith is justified if it enriches life, fosters moral action, and avoids the sterility of doubt. He illustrates this with everyday examples, such as a shipowner's decision to believe in a vessel's seaworthiness despite incomplete data, arguing that such voluntary beliefs enable experiences and consequences that might otherwise remain inaccessible. This approach counters evidentialist strictures, like those of W.K. Clifford, by asserting that the "right to believe" extends to non-evidentiary domains where belief itself can generate verifying outcomes. James's fideism is distinctly pragmatic, viewing faith as a venture verified not by antecedent proofs but by its fruits—such as personal peace, ethical vigor, and communal harmony—rather than metaphysical certainty. He emphasizes that religious hypotheses, like scientific ones, gain legitimacy through their practical efficacy, transforming fideism from mere irrationalism into a dynamic method aligned with human agency. This perspective responds directly to the agnosticism prevalent in the late 19th century, amid Darwinian challenges to traditional theology, by reclaiming emotion and will as valid epistemic forces against pure rationalism. James's ideas profoundly shaped American religious thought, offering a defense of experiential faith that resonated in an era of and influenced liberal theology, , and broader cultural attitudes toward belief as a source of vitality. By framing religious commitment as a pragmatic choice that enhances human flourishing, his work bridged and , encouraging a more inclusive understanding of faith's role in modern life.

Ludwig Wittgenstein

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher whose later philosophy, developed in the posthumously published (1953), has been extensively interpreted as advancing a form of fideism centered on the nature of and religious . In this work, Wittgenstein argued that religious operates in a non-propositional manner, functioning not to assert empirical truths but to express commitments within distinct linguistic frameworks. He emphasized that is deeply embedded in what he termed "forms of life," communal practices and worldviews that transcend rational justification or evidential support from external standards. These forms of life provide the foundational context for religious , rendering immune to philosophical dissection or probabilistic assessment in the manner of scientific claims. The fideist implications of Wittgenstein's views lie in his concept of the "grammar" of belief, which describes the internal rules governing religious statements that resist external critique or falsification. Within a faith's grammatical structure, doubt is not merely unlikely but logically impossible, as it would require stepping outside the form of life that defines the belief itself. This approach underscores that religious conviction operates on its own terms, defying reduction to rational argumentation and highlighting the limits of reason in penetrating alternative worldviews. Posthumous interpretations of Wittgenstein's philosophy have sparked debates over whether his ideas constitute strict fideism, with some scholars arguing they promote an insulated religious epistemology akin to irrationalism, while others view them as a more nuanced "quasi-fideism" that acknowledges the descriptive role of language without fully rejecting rational discourse. These discussions often center on the extent to which Wittgenstein's emphasis on linguistic limits aligns with or diverges from earlier pragmatist approaches, such as William James's voluntarism, by prioritizing embedded practices over individual choice.

Other Variants

Johann Georg Hamann (1730–1788), dubbed the "Magus of the North," advanced a form of fideism by portraying as rooted in linguistic , which he contrasted sharply with the abstract rationality of Kantian philosophy. Hamann contended that human understanding derives from God's creative word, rendering Enlightenment reason insufficient for grasping divine truth without the immediacy of faith-mediated language. Immanuel Kant presented a qualified fideism in his 1793 treatise Religion within the Bounds of Reason Alone, where he subordinated theoretical reason to practical reason and moral faith. For Kant, while pure reason cannot prove religious doctrines, moral imperatives necessitate postulates of , , and , allowing faith to fill the gaps left by rational limits in ethical and religious contexts. The Russian existentialist Lev Shestov (1866–1938) exemplified fideism through his work Athens and Jerusalem (1938), which starkly opposed Greek philosophical necessity to the liberating faith of biblical revelation. Shestov argued that philosophy imposes rational constraints on truth, whereas faith—unfettered by logic—affirms divine absurdity and personal salvation, prioritizing existential commitment over systematic thought. In 20th-century Reformed theology, emerged as a fideistic variant, notably through (1895–1987), who advocated starting from Christian axioms as the indispensable foundation for all rational discourse. This approach embraces circularity by presupposing the truth of Scripture to critique non-Christian worldviews, rejecting neutral reason in favor of faith as the precondition for knowledge and coherence.

Criticisms and Debates

Catholic Church's Rejection

The Catholic Church's has consistently opposed fideism, interpreting it as an erroneous separation of from reason that diminishes the intellectual dimension of belief and risks reducing to irrational sentiment. This stance underscores the Church's commitment to the intrinsic harmony between the two, where reason prepares the ground for and perfects reason's pursuit of truth. A pivotal condemnation occurred at the (1869–1870), where the dogmatic constitution Dei Filius explicitly rejected positions that pit against reason or deny reason's capacity to attain certain of 's existence and attributes. The document affirms a "twofold order of ," distinct in source and object: one accessed through natural reason, which can demonstrate divine truths with certainty, and the other through divine , which accepts revealed mysteries beyond reason's full grasp but not in opposition to it. It declares that "the Church holds that there can be no real discrepancy between and reason, since the same who reveals mysteries and infuses has given the light of reason to the human mind," thereby anathematizing any view that treats as independent of rational inquiry. In the preceding decades, the Church issued targeted responses to 19th-century traditionalist currents that veered into semi-fideism by overly restricting reason's role in favor of innate ideas or divine alone. For instance, in 1840, Louis-Eugène Bautain was compelled by his bishop, under approval, to subscribe to theses affirming that reason can independently demonstrate God's and the soul's without relying solely on or . Similarly, in 1855, the Sacred Congregation of the Index condemned aspects of Augustin Bonnetty's traditionalism through a requiring him to accept that human reason possesses natural certitude in metaphysical truths apart from aid. These interventions addressed the risk of fideism in traditionalism, which the Church viewed as undermining and the natural . The theological foundation for this rejection lies in the Thomistic synthesis, which integrates Aristotelian reason with Christian to portray and reason as complementary lights from the same divine source, incapable of contradiction. St. Thomas Aquinas argued that "the light of reason and the light of ... come from ," enabling reason to elucidate 's content while directs reason toward its . Fideism, by contrast, was later associated with the broader errors of , condemned by in 1907 as a "synthesis of all heresies" that included agnostic tendencies and an overemphasis on subjective at reason's expense, threatening the objective . Within Catholic thought, fideist currents have occasionally surfaced in qualified forms, always required to remain subordinated to reason and magisterial authority. John Henry Newman's An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870) emphasizes the role of personal, cumulative reasoning in achieving "real assent" to faith, integrating probabilistic judgments without rejecting rational demonstration. Maurice Blondel's L'Action (1893) proposes a that reveals the necessity of faith, yet grounds it in rational to avoid pure . Post-Vatican II developments, such as Karl Rahner's transcendental , further nuance this by positing a "supernatural existential" in —a pre-apprehension of grace that unites existential reason with faith, ensuring neither dominates the other. These approaches, while highlighting faith's primacy in religious experience, align with the Church's insistence on their rational underpinnings to prevent fideist excess.

Philosophical Objections

One major philosophical objection to fideism portrays it as promoting or , potentially constituting a by disregarding reason as a divine endowment. emphasized that human reason is a gift from , imprinted in the as part of the divine , enabling the pursuit of truth and discernment. Rejecting this faculty in favor of unbridled , Aquinas implied, amounts to vincible ignorance—where is attainable but deliberately avoided—which can render one culpable for subsequent errors or , as it violates the natural inclination toward rational inquiry established by . Another key criticism is that fideism fosters by eroding universal truth claims, suggesting that if supersedes reason, competing religious beliefs become equally valid without any objective means of evaluation. Philosophers in the analytic tradition, including , have highlighted this risk, arguing that fideism's "dethroning of reason" leaves no rational grounds for adjudicating between doctrines, potentially equating contradictory on epistemic parity. This undermines the pursuit of coherent, intersubjective , as beliefs held solely on evade critical scrutiny and risk arbitrary endorsement. Evidentialist arguments further challenge fideism by insisting that belief formation carries ethical responsibilities tied to evidence. In his 1877 essay "The Ethics of Belief," W. K. Clifford contended that it is always wrong to believe anything on insufficient evidence, likening unsupported faith to a moral failing that harms both the individual and society by propagating error. Clifford's position implies that fideism, by prioritizing faith over evidential warrant, violates this "ethics of belief," encouraging intellectual irresponsibility akin to negligence. In post-1980s , critiques like Richard Swinburne's have reinforced these objections through a "cumulative case" approach, where reason cumulatively builds probabilistic support for rather than relying on pure . Swinburne argues in Faith and Reason (1981) that religious belief must integrate rational assessment to achieve justification, rejecting fideism's isolation of as irrational and incapable of addressing theological probabilities. This evidential framework, drawing on Bayesian principles, demonstrates how pure fideism fails to engage philosophical tools for verifying claims, leaving it vulnerable to .

Defenses and Qualified Forms

One prominent defense of fideism in of religion is Alvin Plantinga's , developed in the 1980s, which posits that belief in can be "properly basic"—rational without requiring evidential support or inferential justification, much like perceptual beliefs or memory experiences. Plantinga argues that such beliefs arise from the proper functioning of cognitive faculties, such as the sensus divinitatis, in an appropriate environment designed by , thereby rebutting evidentialist critiques that demand propositional for all non-basic beliefs. This approach defends fideistic positions by establishing epistemic parity: just as belief in other minds is warranted without conclusive proof, theistic belief is similarly justified, avoiding the self-defeating restrictions of classical . Qualified forms of fideism integrate reason as a preparatory or supportive role while maintaining faith's primacy, exemplified by the Anselmian principle of ("faith seeking understanding"), where rational inquiry elucidates but does not originate religious truths. In this vein, Paul Tillich's method of correlation offers a moderate fideist framework, correlating existential questions raised by human reason and with theological answers drawn from , thus allowing reason to prepare the ground for faith without supplanting it. Tillich's approach counters objections to strict fideism by demonstrating faith's ultimate authority in resolving philosophical dilemmas, such as the quest for ultimate concern, through a dialectical interplay rather than outright rejection of . In contemporary contexts, post-2000 developments in analytic theology have produced evidential-fideist hybrids, such as disjunctivist models that combine moderate fideism's emphasis on warrant without (e.g., via externalism) with selective evidential support, allowing rational defense of religious beliefs in pluralistic settings. These hybrids, building on Plantinga and others, address by permitting reflective to bolster faith internally while engaging broader discourse.

References

  1. https://inters.org/fideism
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/traditions-of-fideism/05CCF75C74D6361F562313A617E6C380
  3. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism/
  4. https://www.etymonline.com/word/fideism
  5. https://gyan.iitg.ac.in/bitstreams/bdf73d8f-e79c-463d-94fd-572d5a565224/download
  6. https://www2.rivier.edu/journal/ROAJ-Spring-2008/J148-Tavani.pdf
  7. https://www.pharosjot.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_23_vol_104_1__2023.pdf
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337205617_The_nature_and_rationality_of_faith
  9. https://iep.utm.edu/relig-ep/
  10. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic/
  11. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-epistemology/
  12. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=studiaantiqua
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377199800_Philosophy_and_Early_Christianity_Reflections_on_the_Meaning_of_Patristic_Philosophical_Theology
  14. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/i-believe-because-it-is-absurd-the-enlightenment-invention-of-tertullians-credo/69340C3AF8366E79BCF3BDD804DED82E
  15. https://iep.utm.edu/faith-re/
  16. https://iep.utm.edu/ockham/
  17. http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2009/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20091104.html
  18. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1541/religious-responses-to-the-black-death/
  19. https://www.medievalists.net/2011/02/a-crisis-of-faith-the-western-schism-and-its-effect-on-the-lay-piety-movement/
  20. https://www.tyndalebulletin.org/article/27726-luther-heidegger-and-the-hiddenness-of-god.pdf
  21. https://templeton.eastern.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Sola-Fide-by-Dr-Phil-Cary.pdf
  22. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08285a.htm
  23. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/
  24. https://iep.utm.edu/hamann/
  25. https://iep.utm.edu/hamann/#SH4b
  26. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism/#2.2.2
  27. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism/#2.2.4
  28. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism/#5
  29. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism/#3
  30. https://dacb.org/stories/tunisia/tertullian/
  31. https://www.tertullian.org/readfirst.htm
  32. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0301.htm
  33. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0315.htm
  34. https://philarchive.org/archive/CARTTO-2
  35. https://www.academia.edu/20049232/TERTULLIAN_ON_FAITH_AND_REASON
  36. https://oxfordphilsoc.org/Documents/TalbotPrize/2021_Hhca.pdf
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294637015_Reason_and_faith_An_analysis_of_Tertullian%27s_paradox
  38. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ockham/
  39. https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2357&context=luc_diss
  40. https://www.freddoso.com/papers/f&rcam.htm
  41. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8973&context=etd
  42. https://www.academia.edu/103390747/WILLIAM_OF_OCKHAM_CONTRIBUTIONS_TO_THEOLOGY_POLITICAL_THEORY_PHILOSOPHY_AND_SCIENCE
  43. http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/luther/web/ninetyfive.html
  44. https://journal.rts.edu/article/luther-in-1520-justification-by-faith-alone/
  45. https://www.truecovenanter.com/editor/notes/luther_martin_bondage_of_the_will_1996_notes.html
  46. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-265
  47. https://www.1517.org/articles/luthers-german-bible
  48. https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=musicalofferings
  49. https://iep.utm.edu/pascal-b/
  50. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal/
  51. https://people.bu.edu/wwildman/bce/mwt_themes_490_kierkegaard.htm
  52. https://www.religion-online.org/book/fear-and-trembling/
  53. https://www.religion-online.org/book-chapter/chapter-1-a-panegyric-upon-abraham/
  54. https://www.religion-online.org/book-chapter/chapter-4-problem-two-is-there-such-a-thing-as-an-absolute-duty-toward-god/
  55. https://sorenkierkegaard.org/concluding-unscientific-postscript.html
  56. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1403&context=lts_fac_pubs
  57. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/
  58. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26659/26659-h/26659-h.htm
  59. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatic-belief-god/
  60. https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2018/winter/feature/the-thinker-who-believed-in-doing-0
  61. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/philosophyashorthistory3/chapter/wittgenstein/
  62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-blackfriars/article/wittgenstein-and-theological-studies/D0ABA22B7BC3A6A69326CAD8530B9F59
  63. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34444/chapter/292271430
  64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3749076
  65. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/5/575
  66. https://philarchive.org/archive/ELLBKA
  67. https://escholarship.org/content/qt64n230tt/qt64n230tt_noSplash_9d5c83d2045a8503edf26df931b1a18d.pdf?t=soc3uz
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327540401_Wittgenstein_faith_and_theology_as_grammar
  69. https://philarchive.org/archive/CARTDO-49
  70. https://academic.oup.com/book/3514/chapter/144730579
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344645990_Johann_Georg_Hamann_on_Faith_and_Reason_Idealism_and_Realism
  72. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781442690356_A33911172/preview-9781442690356_A33911172.pdf
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341291868_Kant_and_Religion
  74. http://michaelsudduth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/A-Companion-to-Philosophy-of-Religion.pdf
  75. https://forumphilosophicum.ignatianum.edu.pl/docannexe/file/6396/12._macintosh.pdf
  76. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/uram.6.2.152
  77. https://cbtseminary.org/presuppositional-apologetics-the-development-of-presuppositional-apologetics-in-cornelius-van-til-sam-waldron/
  78. https://frame-poythress.org/cornelius-van-til-the-apologist/
  79. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html
  80. https://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/Clifford_ethics.pdf
  81. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/faith-and-reason-9780199283934
  82. https://iep.utm.edu/ref-epis/
  83. https://apcz.umk.pl/RF/article/download/33063/28094/75856
  84. https://research.kuleuven.be/portal/en/project/3H200569
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.