Hubbry Logo
High-bit-rate digital subscriber lineHigh-bit-rate digital subscriber lineMain
Open search
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line
Community hub
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) is a telecommunications protocol standardized in 1994.[1] It was the first digital subscriber line (DSL) technology to use a higher frequency spectrum over copper, twisted pair cables. HDSL was developed to transport DS1 services at 1.544 Mbit/s and 2.048 Mbit/s over telephone local loops without a need for repeaters. Successor technology to HDSL includes HDSL2 and HDSL4, proprietary SDSL, and G.SHDSL.

Standardization

[edit]

HDSL was developed for T1 service at 1.544 Mbit/s by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Committee T1E1.4 and published in February 1994 as ANSI Technical Report TR-28.[1] This American variant uses two wire pairs with at a rate of 784 kbit/s each, using the 2B1Q line code, which is also used in the American variant of the ISDN U interface.[1] First products were developed in 1993.[2] A European version of the standard for E1 service at 2.048 Mbit/s was published in February 1995 by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) as ETSI ETR 152.[3] The first edition of ETR 152 specified the line code 2B1Q on either three pairs at 784 kbit/s each or two pairs at 1,168 kbit/s each.[3] A second edition of ETR 152, published in June 1995, specified trellis coded carrierless amplitude/phase modulation (CAP) as an alternative modulation scheme, running on two pairs at 1,168 kbit/s each.[4] A third version of ETR 152, published in December 1996, added the possibility of using a single CAP-modulated pair at 2,320 kbit/s.[5] Later, an international HDSL standard was published by Study Group 15 of the Telecommunication Standardization Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) on 26 August 1998 and adopted as recommendation ITU-T G.991.1 on 13 October 1998.[6]

Comparison to legacy T1

[edit]

Legacy T1 carriers operated using the alternate mark inversion (AMI) line code, more recently also B8ZS, on two wire pairs. Each wire pair was operated in simplex, that is, one wire pair was used for transmission in each direction. The Nyquist frequency of a 1.544 megabaud signal is 772 kHz. Higher frequencies are attenuated more strongly than lower frequencies, motivating the use of technologies that reduce the signal bandwidth. In HDSL, full duplex by means of echo cancellation is used, enabling simultaneous transmission in both directions on each of the two wire pairs, effectively reducing the symbol rate by a factor two. Through the use of 2B1Q encoding, two bits are combined to one symbol, further reducing the symbol rate by a factor of two. For this two-pair 2B1Q variant of HDSL, framing increases the bitrate from 1.544 Mbit/s to 1.568 Mbit/s, resulting in a symbol rate of 392 kilobaud and a Nyquist frequency of 196 kHz.

Legacy T1 required repeaters every 35 dB of attenuation, equivalent to 1 to 1.2 miles (1.6 to 1.9 km),[citation needed] depending on conductor gauge and other circumstances. Originally marketed as "non-repeated T1", HDSL increased the reach to 12,000 feet (3.7 km) on an AWG24 local loop.[citation needed] To enable longer HDSL lines, up to four repeaters can be used for a reach of 60,000 feet (18 km).[citation needed]

Comparison to other DSL variants

[edit]

Unlike ADSL, HDSL operates in the baseband and does not allow POTS and ISDN to coexist on the same wire pairs. Unlike ADSL, the proprietary SDSL, and G.SHDSL, HDSL is not rate adaptive: the line rate is always 1.544 Mbit/s or 2.048 Mbit/s. Lower rates at multiples of 64 kbit/s are offered to customers by using only a portion of the DS0 channels in the DS1 signal, referred to as channelized T1/E1.

HDSL gave way to new symmetric DSL technologies, HDSL2 and HDSL4, the proprietary SDSL, and G.SHDSL. HDSL2 offers the same data rate over a single pair of copper; it also offers longer reach, and can work over copper of lower gauge or quality.[7] SDSL is a multi-rate technology, offering speeds ranging from 192 kbit/s to 2.3 Mbit/s, using a single pair of copper.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
High-bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) is a symmetric technology that enables high-speed, bidirectional data transmission over existing twisted-pair copper telephone lines, delivering 1.544 Mbps for T1 services in or 2.048 Mbps for E1 services in without requiring mid-span . Developed in the late 1980s as a cost-effective alternative to traditional T1/E1 provisioning, HDSL originated from concepts proposed in 1986 by Bell Laboratories and Bellcore, with the first prototypes emerging in 1989 and commercial deployment beginning in 1992. The technology addressed limitations of earlier T1 installations, such as the need for expensive and line preconditioning, by utilizing full-duplex transmission with echo cancellation over two (or three for E1) 24 AWG twisted-pair wires. HDSL employs 2B1Q line coding, where two binary bits are encoded into one symbol per pair, achieving 784 kbps per pair for a total of 1.544 Mbps, and supports distances up to 12,000 feet (approximately 3,657 meters) on standard loops. It automatically compensates for common line impairments like bridge taps and gauge changes, but does not support (POTS) splitters, requiring separate lines for voice. Standardization efforts culminated in the ANSI Technical Report E1T1/92-002R1 in 1992, the ETSI Technical Report ETR 152 in 1995, and the ITU Recommendation G.991.1 in 1998, establishing HDSL as a mature xDSL variant primarily for business applications such as private line services, PBX interconnections, LAN extensions, and remote network nodes like digital loop carriers or cellular sites. A second-generation variant, HDSL2, introduced in 2000, improved efficiency by achieving the same rates using a single wire pair, further reducing deployment costs while maintaining compatibility with existing .

Overview

Definition and Purpose

High-bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) is a family of symmetric digital subscriber line technologies designed to transmit data at T1 (1.544 Mbit/s) or E1 (2.048 Mbit/s) rates bidirectionally over twisted-pair wires without the need for line . This approach enables the delivery of full-rate DS1 or E1 services across typical distances, leveraging existing to avoid the complexities of repeater installations. HDSL was developed primarily to offer telecommunications carriers a cost-effective alternative to traditional leased T1 lines, facilitating the provision of high-speed digital services to business customers or for backhaul applications without relying on expensive fiber optic deployments or repeater-dependent systems. By eliminating repeaters, HDSL reduces installation and maintenance costs while supporting reliable transmission over distances up to approximately 3.7 km on standard 24-gauge wire. This technology addressed key limitations of legacy T1 deployments, including high capital expenditures for repeaters and the challenges of scaling services over copper loops in urban and suburban environments. The original HDSL was first deployed in public networks in the early , marking it as the initial form of DSL technology and predating asymmetric variants like , which prioritize downstream speeds for consumer internet access.

Key Characteristics

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) provides symmetric full-duplex transmission, delivering equal bandwidth for upstream and downstream directions, which contrasts with asymmetric DSL variants that prioritize higher download speeds. This design supports simultaneous bidirectional data flow over twisted-pair wiring without compromising the payload capacity in either direction. HDSL operates at fixed line rates of 1.544 Mbit/s for T1 services or 2.048 Mbit/s for E1 services, without rate-adaptive capabilities that adjust to line conditions; lower speeds, in multiples of 64 kbit/s, are achieved through channelization while preserving the base transmission rate. For T1 deployment, it requires two twisted pairs, with each pair carrying 784 kbit/s, whereas E1 implementation typically uses three pairs to accommodate the higher aggregate rate. The technology employs 2B1Q line coding, which encodes two data bits into each quaternary symbol transmitted over these pairs. Unlike spectrum-splitting DSL variants, HDSL does not support simultaneous plain old telephone service (POTS) on the same wiring, necessitating separate pairs for voice transmission if required. It functions over standard 24 AWG copper loops without the need for inline amplification or , thereby simplifying and lowering deployment expenses compared to traditional repeatered T1 lines. HDSL serves primarily as a cost-effective alternative for telco backhaul in repeatered T1 environments.

History and Development

Origins in the Early

The development of High-bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) began in the late 1980s as a response to the challenges of delivering T1 services over existing loops without the need for costly and labor-intensive . Bell Laboratories and Bellcore, the research arm for the regional Bell operating companies, initiated the HDSL concept in late 1986 to enable repeaterless transmission of the 1.544 Mbps T1 rate over short-haul distances up to approximately 3.7 km (12,000 feet). This innovation addressed the limitations of traditional Alternate Mark Inversion (AMI) encoding in T1 lines, which required every 1.8 km due to signal attenuation on twisted-pair , thereby increasing deployment costs and complexity in the local loop . PairGain Technologies, founded in 1988 by engineers specializing in , played a pivotal role in advancing HDSL from concept to practical implementation. The company shifted its focus in 1990 to develop the HiGain HDSL product line specifically to solve T1 repeater issues, targeting the growing demand for digital services such as ISDN (PRI) and connections to digital private branch exchanges (PBXs) in business environments. These drivers were rooted in the post-AT&T divestiture era, where regional carriers faced pressure to extend high-capacity digital connectivity to the "last mile" without investing in fiber optics, reducing installation times and operational expenses for services that previously relied on repeatered spans. Early prototypes of HDSL systems emerged in , demonstrating feasible symmetric transmission over two wire pairs to achieve the full T1 rate without intermediate amplification. Field trials commenced in 1991, led by PairGain in collaboration with regional Bell operating companies including and , validating performance over typical urban and suburban copper loops. These trials confirmed HDSL's ability to support reliable digital delivery for ISDN PRI and PBX applications, paving the way for commercial deployment starting in 1992 by the regional carriers. This marked a significant step in leveraging existing for broadband-like capabilities predating widespread consumer DSL variants.

Standardization and Evolution

The standardization of High-bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) was spearheaded by the (ANSI) T1E1.4 committee, culminating in the approval of T1.TR.28 in 1994, which defined the core specifications for symmetric transmission at 1.544 Mbit/s over twisted-pair lines as an alternative to repeatered T1 services. In Europe, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) formalized HDSL through Early ETR 152, published in 1995, adapting the technology for E1 services at 2.048 Mbit/s while ensuring compatibility with existing metallic local loops. The evolution of HDSL addressed limitations in pair usage and , leading to HDSL2, standardized by ANSI as T1.418 in 2000. This variant employed (PAM) with 16 discrete levels to achieve 1.544 Mbit/s over a single up to approximately 3.6 km, halving the copper requirements compared to original HDSL and facilitating retrofits in legacy deployments without extensive rewiring. By the mid-2000s, HDSL2 had emerged as the predominant method for T1/E1 delivery in and , offering improved reach and reduced installation complexity. Subsequent advancements produced HDSL4 in 2001 under ANSI T1E1.4 guidelines, enabling symmetric transport of up to four DS1 services at 1.544 Mbit/s each (total 6.176 Mbit/s) across four pairs and serving as a bridge to more flexible multi-rate systems; this directly influenced the G.991.2 recommendation for (G.SHDSL), ratified in February 2001 to harmonize global symmetric DSL capabilities. These developments emphasized and spectral management to coexist with other DSL services on shared infrastructure. In the , HDSL variants were progressively supplanted by fiber-optic and Ethernet technologies, which provided superior bandwidth and scalability for modern demands, though HDSL persists in legacy networks for of existing T1/E1 circuits as of 2025.

Technical Specifications

Transmission Method

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) employs 2B1Q line coding for baseband transmission, where two binary bits are mapped to one , utilizing four distinct voltage levels to encode data and thereby reduce the required bandwidth compared to binary signaling. This approach achieves a line rate of 784 kbit/s per , with the determined at 392 kbaud, as given by the relation: Bit rate=2×symbol rate\text{Bit rate} = 2 \times \text{symbol rate} where the factor of 2 arises from the two bits per symbol in 2B1Q encoding. In the original HDSL specification, carrierless amplitude/phase modulation (CAP) serves as an alternative passband modulation technique, enabling efficient spectral utilization while maintaining compatibility with existing copper infrastructure. Subsequent evolution to HDSL2 introduced (PAM) with 16-PAM symbols, incorporating trellis coding (TC-PAM) to enhance error correction and spectral shaping for improved performance over longer distances. Full-duplex operation in HDSL is facilitated by digital echo cancellers, which generate and subtract replicas of the transmitted signal from the received signal on the same pair, effectively isolating upstream and downstream channels despite their overlap in the . HDSL transmission is engineered to mitigate interference, particularly near-end (NEXT) and far-end (FEXT), within binder groups of multiple DSL lines, through power spectral density (PSD) masks and adaptive equalization that limit interference coupling between adjacent pairs.

Physical Layer Requirements

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) requires non-loaded twisted-pair copper cabling conforming to Carrier Serving Area (CSA) guidelines, typically unshielded twisted-pair (UTP) Category 3 or better with a 24 AWG wire gauge for optimal performance. For T1 service at 1.544 Mbit/s, HDSL utilizes two pairs of such cabling, while E1 service at 2.048 Mbit/s employs three pairs to achieve the required symmetric transmission. The maximum reach without repeaters is up to 3.7 km (12,000 feet) on 24 AWG cabling for standard HDSL, enabling deployment over typical distances. HDSL2, a successor variant, extends similar performance using a single pair, achieving up to 3.6 km (approximately 12,000 feet) on 24 AWG while maintaining compatibility with existing infrastructure. Bridge taps are permitted but limited to a total length of 2,500 feet across the loop, with no individual tap exceeding 2,000 feet, to minimize signal reflections. Loading coils must be removed entirely, as their presence attenuates high-frequency signals essential for HDSL operation. HDSL operates in the frequency band of approximately 40 kHz to 390 kHz, above the voice spectrum (0–4 kHz). Transmit power levels are limited to about 13.5 dBm per pair to ensure spectral compatibility and minimize with adjacent lines. Deployment occurs in (OSP) environments, where HDSL hardware is designed to tolerate variations from -40°C to +65°C, but it remains sensitive to impulse noise from sources such as electrical appliances or utility operations, which can degrade . These requirements are enabled by modulation techniques like 2B1Q line coding, which support reliable transmission over the specified physical constraints.

Performance Parameters

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) delivers symmetric data rates of 1.544 Mbit/s for T1 service, accommodating 24 DS0 channels plus framing overhead, or 2.048 Mbit/s for E1 service with 30 DS0 channels plus signaling overhead. The HDSL2 variant sustains the T1 data rate of 1.544 Mbit/s over a single , reducing cabling requirements while preserving performance. Error performance in HDSL targets a (BER) of 10−710^{-7} or better, achieved through (CRC) mechanisms for robust error detection across the transmission path. HDSL maintains low latency below 1 ms, enabling its suitability for real-time voice services akin to traditional T1 lines. is managed via precise framing alignment to ensure stable packet timing. Reliable operation is constrained by limits, with signal loss approximated as ≈20log⁡10(distance)+\approx 20 \log_{10}(distance) + cable constants and capped at 35 dB for distances up to approximately 12,000 feet on 24-gauge wire. These parameters are influenced by physical reach, where longer loops increase and potential error rates. HDSL transceivers exhibit high reliability, with (MTBF) exceeding 10 years in typical deployments, and support hot standby redundancy for carrier-grade .

Applications and Deployment

Primary Use Cases

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) finds its primary application in backhaul, where it enables the delivery of T1 or E1 services to cell sites, private branch exchanges (PBXs), and remote terminals over existing twisted-pair lines without the need for optic deployment. This leverages HDSL's ability to transmit symmetric 1.544 Mbps (T1) or 2.048 Mbps (E1) rates over distances up to 12,000 feet, supporting voice and early in mobile networks and enterprise connectivity. In business services, HDSL has historically provided symmetric bandwidth for ISDN (PRI) and connections, allowing enterprises to access high-volume voice and data services prior to widespread adoption in the early 2000s. These deployments often utilized HDSL modems to extend dedicated circuits for applications requiring guaranteed bandwidth, such as remote access servers handling up to 30 simultaneous ISDN PRI calls. HDSL continues in legacy support roles in rural and developing regions where modern is limited. Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) deployed HDSL extensively in the for digital loop carrier (DLC) systems to multiplex multiple POTS lines onto fewer pairs in feeder routes. HDSL2 variants enabled single-pair upgrades in urban street cabinets, provisioning T1 speeds over one pair to optimize existing . HDSL is frequently integrated with (ATM) or protocols for efficient data transport, where the provided by HDSL carries encapsulated traffic to support virtual private networks and LAN interconnects. Its transmission method, relying on two or three twisted-pair wires with echo cancellation, underpins these integrations by ensuring reliable symmetric connectivity up to the full central office serving area.

Advantages and Challenges

One key advantage of HDSL is its significant compared to traditional repeatered T1 lines, as it enables deployment of DS-1 rate services without the high and installation expenses associated with and loop conditioning. This allows for quick installation using existing voice-grade lines, typically completing in hours rather than months. Additionally, HDSL provides reliable symmetric transmission at T1 speeds (1.544 Mbps), supporting both voice and data services equally in the upstream and downstream directions, which is particularly beneficial for applications requiring balanced bandwidth. However, HDSL faces limitations in reach, supporting reliable operation only up to approximately 12,000 feet (3,658 meters) on 24 AWG without , making it unsuitable for long-haul deployments beyond short loops. It is not designed for consumer environments, as it lacks built-in support for (POTS) splitting, requiring dedicated lines that preclude simultaneous voice use without additional equipment. Furthermore, HDSL transmissions are vulnerable to electrical interference and , particularly in bundled cables, which can degrade performance if not mitigated through careful line planning. Scalability is constrained by HDSL's fixed or rate-adaptive rates centered around T1/E1 standards (e.g., 1.544 Mbps or 2.048 Mbps), offering limited flexibility for varying bandwidth demands compared to more modern technologies. Adoption has declined since around due to widespread migration toward fiber-optic solutions like , which provide higher capacities and longer reaches, rendering HDSL less viable for new deployments. Maintenance costs remain low because HDSL eliminates the need for active intermediate repeaters, reducing ongoing operational expenses. That said, spectrum incompatibility with newer xDSL variants, such as or , in mixed cable bundles can cause interference, complicating hybrid deployments. HDSL is used in niche legacy roles within hybrid copper-fiber networks, particularly for T1 backhaul in areas awaiting full fiber upgrades, though its overall use continues to diminish amid the rise of and advanced optical alternatives.

Comparisons

To Traditional T1 Services

High-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL) represents a significant advancement over traditional T1 services by simplifying requirements for delivering DS1 signals over copper loops. In conventional T1 deployments, signal necessitates the installation of 2-3 over distances up to 3.7 km to maintain the 1.544 Mbit/s rate, as the line is limited to approximately 1.8 km without amplification. HDSL, in contrast, employs passive transceivers at each end of the loop, eliminating these intermediate and enabling repeaterless transmission up to 3.7 km on standard 24 AWG twisted-pair . This design not only doubles the effective span without amplification but also reduces deployment complexity, as no specialized engineering for placement or is required. The cost advantages of HDSL stem directly from these infrastructure efficiencies, making it a more economical option for telco-grade T1 provisioning. Traditional T1 installations incur substantial expenses from deployment, which can cost several thousand dollars per unit due to labor-intensive trenching, cabling, and ongoing maintenance for power and monitoring. HDSL avoids these outlays, resulting in initial deployment costs that are significantly lower while eliminating recurring operational expenses for upkeep. Furthermore, HDSL leverages existing unconditioned local loops without the need for line conditioning, accelerating installation from weeks or months to hours. Despite these differences, HDSL maintains full performance equivalence to traditional T1 by transporting an identical DS1 signal at 1.544 Mbit/s with support for Superframe (SF) or Extended Superframe (ESF) framing. The key distinction lies in the transmission method: while traditional T1 uses alternate mark inversion (AMI) or binary 8-zero substitution (B8ZS) line coding across the entire span, HDSL converts the DS1 signal to 2-binary 1-quaternary (2B1Q) coding for the subscriber loop portion, reverting to AMI/B8ZS at the customer interface via channel service unit/data service unit (CSU/DSU) equipment. This approach positions HDSL as a seamless "T1 over DSL" solution for last-mile delivery, providing symmetric fixed-rate connectivity without compromising the standardized DS1 payload integrity.

To Other DSL Variants

HDSL differs from asymmetric DSL variants like and primarily in its symmetric transmission designed for carrier-grade voice and data backhaul, rather than consumer . , defined in G.992.1, provides asymmetric rates with downstream speeds up to 8 Mbit/s and upstream up to 1 Mbit/s over a single pair, while supporting (POTS) integration via splitters for residential deployment. In contrast, HDSL delivers fixed symmetric rates of 1.544 Mbit/s (T1) or 2.048 Mbit/s (E1) using two or three pairs, without POTS compatibility, targeting repeaterless extension of leased lines up to 3.7 km. , standardized in G.993.1, extends this asymmetry to higher speeds—up to 52 Mbit/s downstream and 16 Mbit/s upstream—but over shorter reaches of approximately 300-1000 m, making it ideal for short-loop scenarios like fiber-to-the-building extensions rather than HDSL's long-haul symmetric applications. Compared to other symmetric DSL technologies, HDSL's non-rate-adaptive nature sets it apart from SHDSL (G.SHDSL), which offers adaptive rates from 192 kbit/s to 5.69 Mbit/s over a single pair, enabling flexible bandwidth allocation for varied services. HDSL, predating SHDSL as an early inspiration, fixes its rate to T1/E1 standards without adaptation, requiring multiple wire pairs for transmission and lacking the single-pair efficiency of SHDSL. Unlike the proprietary SDSL, which provides symmetric rates up to 1.544 Mbit/s on one pair with some rate adaptability and POTS support, HDSL mandates two pairs for its core operation and omits voice integration to prioritize pure digital backhaul. Post-2000 developments like HDSL2, standardized under ANSI T1.418, narrow this gap by enabling single-pair symmetric T1 transmission at 1.544 Mbit/s, approaching SHDSL's form factor while remaining T1-specific without full rate adaptability. In terms of spectrum usage, HDSL operates in a lower frequency band of approximately 40–390 kHz using pulse amplitude modulation (PAM), which minimizes far-end with higher-band asymmetric services like (starting at ~25 kHz voice band up to 1.1 MHz). This separation reduces interference in mixed deployments, though HDSL and cannot coexist in the same binder without advanced mitigation like vectoring or in later variants. Market-wise, HDSL remains oriented toward carriers for symmetric leased-line replacement, whereas , , and SHDSL cater more to end-user ; as of 2025, all DSL technologies, including HDSL, have seen declining adoption as fiber-to-the-x (FTTx) solutions dominate fixed growth, with DSL connections shrinking globally and fiber exceeding 50% in many regions.

References

  1. https://www.telebyteusa.com/dslprimer/dslfull.htm
  2. https://cdn.thomasnet.com/ccp/20093289/200443.pdf
  3. https://en.lntwww.de/Examples_of_Communication_Systems/General_Description_of_DSL
  4. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/networking/articles/digital-subscriber-line/
  5. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/atis/t1tr281994
  6. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/stg/D-STG-SG02.12-2002-OAS-PDF-E.pdf
  7. https://www.floridapsc.com/pscfiles/website-files/PDF/Publications/Pai/natpaper.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/high-bit-rate-digital-subscriber-line
  9. https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/an-414.pdf
  10. https://www.ti.com/pdfs/vf/bband/vodsl.pdf
  11. https://www.blackbox.com/insights/blackbox-explains/inner/detail/networking/technologies-standards-and-interfaces/types-of-dsl-shdsl-vdsl-vdsl2-adsl-sdsl
  12. https://dc.engconfintl.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=teaching
  13. https://www.britannica.com/technology/modem/DSL-modems
  14. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_etr/100_199/152/01_60/etr_152e01p.pdf
  15. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/atis/t14182000
  16. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/93088
  17. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101500_101599/10152401/01.01.01_60/ts_10152401v010101p.pdf
  18. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101800_101899/10183002/01.02.01_60/tr_10183002v010201p.pdf
  19. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/tut/t-tut-home-2011-pdf-e.pdf
  20. https://www.telephonecollectors.info/index.php/browse/bsps-bell-system/bsp-categories-by-later-division-number-by-doc/300-379-divisions-transmission-sys-testing/314-division-digital-and-analogue-data-trans/7972-314-410-520-i1/file
  21. https://www.oocities.org/~katmci/pdfs/hdsl.pdf
  22. https://arcelect.com/High-bit-rate_Digital_Subscriber_Line-HDSL.htm
  23. https://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~inf2056/inf2056_files/menu/trabalho/HDSL2-overview.pdf
  24. https://www.equicom.hu/wp-content/uploads/EXFO_Reference-Guide-Local-Loop-DSL-v1_en.pdf
  25. https://www2.blackboxab.se/Datablad/81021.pdf
  26. https://www.eetimes.com/broadband-access-g-shdsl-reaching-the-access-network/
  27. https://www.evdodepotusa.com/what-is-t1-internet/
  28. https://www.academia.edu/10910976/HDSL_Line_and_Desktop_Units_PairGain
  29. https://www.vicorpower.com/documents/quality/Rel_MTBF.pdf
  30. https://www.actelis.com/library/WP_Mobile_Backhaul.pdf
  31. https://www.rcrwireless.com/19980525/archived-articles/telco-systems-offers-hdsl-for-backhaul
  32. https://www.patton.com/datasheet/network_access_guide_lo-res.pdf
  33. https://mtnlmumbai.in/index.php/enterprise/data-solutions/isdn-pri-bri-services
  34. http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~fli/dsl/BNA-4.pdf
  35. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cis788-97/ftp/rbb/index.html
  36. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/3600-series-multiservice-platforms/product_data_sheet09186a00800921f0.html
  37. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4001/3/4/35
  38. https://www.dialogic.com/glossary/high-bit-rate-digital-subscriber-line-hdsl
  39. https://www.arcelect.com/HDSL3698.htm
  40. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.991.2/en
  41. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-G.991.1-199810-I!!PDF-E&type=items
  42. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/680442
  43. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/mobility-report/dataforecasts/fwa-mobile-broadband-growth
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.