Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Heterotroph
View on Wikipedia
A heterotroph (/ˈhɛtərəˌtroʊf, -ˌtrɒf/;[1][2] from Ancient Greek ἕτερος (héteros), meaning "other", and τροφή (trophḗ), meaning "nourishment") is an organism that cannot produce its own food, instead taking nutrition from other sources of organic carbon, mainly matter from other organisms. In the food chain, heterotrophs are primary, secondary and tertiary consumers, but not producers.[3][4] Living organisms that are heterotrophic include most animals,[5][6] all fungi, some bacteria and protists,[7] and many parasitic plants. The term heterotroph arose in microbiology in 1946 as part of a classification of microorganisms based on their type of nutrition.[8] The term is now used in many fields, such as ecology, in describing the food chain. Heterotrophs occupy the second and third trophic levels of the food chain while autotrophs occupy the first trophic level.[9]
Heterotrophs may be subdivided according to their energy source. If the heterotroph uses chemical energy, it is a chemoheterotroph (e.g., humans and mushrooms). If it uses light for energy, then it is a photoheterotroph (e.g., haloquadratum walsbyi and green non-sulfur bacteria).
Heterotrophs represent one of the two mechanisms of nutrition (trophic levels), the other being autotrophs (auto = self, troph = nutrition). Autotrophs use energy from sunlight (photoautotrophs) or oxidation of inorganic compounds (lithoautotrophs) to convert inorganic carbon dioxide to organic carbon compounds and energy to sustain their life. Comparing the two in basic terms, heterotrophs (such as animals) eat either autotrophs (such as plants) or other heterotrophs, or both.
Detritivores are heterotrophs which obtain nutrients by consuming detritus (decomposing plant and animal parts as well as feces).[10] Saprotrophs (also called lysotrophs) are chemoheterotrophs that use extracellular digestion in processing decayed organic matter. The process is most often facilitated through the active transport of such materials through endocytosis within the internal mycelium and its constituent hyphae.[11]
Types
[edit]Heterotrophs can be organotrophs or lithotrophs.
- Organoheterotrophs exploit reduced carbon compounds (organics) as electron sources, such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins from plants and animals.
- Lithoheterotrophs, on the other hand, use inorganic compounds such as ammonium, nitrite, or sulfur, to obtain electrons.
Another way of classifying different heterotrophs is by assigning them as chemotrophs or phototrophs. Phototrophs utilize light to obtain energy and carry out metabolic processes, whereas chemotrophs use the energy obtained by the oxidation of chemicals from their environment.[12]
- Photoorganoheterotrophs, such as Rhodospirillaceae and purple non-sulfur bacteria synthesize organic compounds using sunlight coupled with oxidation of organic substances. They use organic compounds to build structures. They do not fix carbon dioxide and apparently do not have the Calvin cycle.[13]
- Chemolithoheterotrophs like Oceanithermus profundus[14] obtain energy from the oxidation of inorganic compounds, including hydrogen sulfide, elemental sulfur, thiosulfate, and molecular hydrogen.
Mixotrophs (or facultative chemolithotroph) can use either carbon dioxide or organic carbon as the carbon source, meaning that mixotrophs have the ability to use both heterotrophic and autotrophic methods.[15][16] Although mixotrophs have the ability to grow under both heterotrophic and autotrophic conditions, C. vulgaris have higher biomass and lipid productivity when growing under heterotrophic compared to autotrophic conditions.[17]
Heterotrophs, by consuming reduced carbon compounds, are able to use all the energy that they obtain from food for growth and reproduction, unlike autotrophs, which must use some of their energy for carbon fixation.[13] Both heterotrophs and autotrophs alike are usually dependent on the metabolic activities of other organisms for nutrients other than carbon, including nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur, and can die from lack of food that supplies these nutrients.[18] This applies not only to animals and fungi but also to bacteria.[13]
Origin and diversification
[edit]The chemical origin of life hypothesis suggests that life originated in a prebiotic soup with heterotrophs.[19] The summary of this theory is as follows: early Earth had a highly reducing atmosphere and energy sources such as electrical energy in the form of lightning, which resulted in reactions that formed simple organic compounds, which further reacted to form more complex compounds and eventually resulted in life.[20][21] Alternative theories of an autotrophic origin of life contradict this theory.[22]
The theory of a chemical origin of life beginning with heterotrophic life was first proposed in 1924 by Alexander Ivanovich Oparin, and eventually published "The Origin of Life."[23] It was independently proposed for the first time in English in 1929 by John Burdon Sanderson Haldane.[24] While these authors agreed on the gasses present and the progression of events to a point, Oparin championed a progressive complexity of organic matter prior to the formation of cells, while Haldane had more considerations about the concept of genes as units of heredity and the possibility of light playing a role in chemical synthesis (autotrophy).[25]
Evidence grew to support this theory in 1953, when Stanley Miller conducted an experiment in which he added gasses that were thought to be present on early Earth – water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2) – to a flask and stimulated them with electricity that resembled lightning present on early Earth.[26] The experiment resulted in the discovery that early Earth conditions were supportive of the production of amino acids, with recent re-analyses of the data recognizing that over 40 different amino acids were produced, including several not currently used by life.[19] This experiment heralded the beginning of the field of synthetic prebiotic chemistry, and is now known as the Miller–Urey experiment.[27]
On early Earth, oceans and shallow waters were rich with organic molecules that could have been used by primitive heterotrophs.[28] This method of obtaining energy was energetically favorable until organic carbon became more scarce than inorganic carbon, providing a potential evolutionary pressure to become autotrophic.[28][29] Following the evolution of autotrophs, heterotrophs were able to utilize them as a food source instead of relying on the limited nutrients found in their environment.[30] Eventually, autotrophic and heterotrophic cells were engulfed by these early heterotrophs and formed a symbiotic relationship.[30] The endosymbiosis of autotrophic cells is suggested to have evolved into the chloroplasts while the endosymbiosis of smaller heterotrophs developed into the mitochondria, allowing the differentiation of tissues and development into multicellularity. This advancement allowed the further diversification of heterotrophs.[30] Today, many heterotrophs and autotrophs also utilize mutualistic relationships that provide needed resources to both organisms.[31] One example of this is the mutualism between corals and algae, where the former provides protection and necessary compounds for photosynthesis while the latter provides oxygen.[32]
However this hypothesis is controversial as CO2 was the main carbon source at the early Earth, suggesting that early cellular life were autotrophs that relied upon inorganic substrates as an energy source and lived at alkaline hydrothermal vents or acidic geothermal ponds.[33] Simple biomolecules transported from space was considered to have been either too reduced to have been fermented or too heterogeneous to support microbial growth.[34] Heterotrophic microbes likely originated at low H2 partial pressures. Bases, amino acids, and ribose are considered to be the first fermentation substrates.[35]
Heterotrophs are currently found in each domain of life: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya.[36] Domain Bacteria includes a variety of metabolic activity including photoheterotrophs, chemoheterotrophs, organotrophs, and heterolithotrophs.[36] Within Domain Eukarya, kingdoms Fungi and Animalia are entirely heterotrophic, though most fungi absorb nutrients through their environment.[37][38] Most organisms within Kingdom Protista are heterotrophic while Kingdom Plantae is almost entirely autotrophic, except for myco-heterotrophic plants.[37] Lastly, Domain Archaea varies immensely in metabolic functions and contains many methods of heterotrophy.[36]
Flowchart
[edit]Ecology
[edit]Many heterotrophs are chemoorganoheterotrophs that use organic carbon (e.g. glucose) as their carbon source, and organic chemicals (e.g. carbohydrates, lipids, proteins) as their electron sources.[39] Heterotrophs function as consumers in food chain: they obtain these nutrients from saprotrophic, parasitic, or holozoic nutrients.[40] They break down complex organic compounds (e.g., carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) produced by autotrophs into simpler compounds (e.g., carbohydrates into glucose, fats into fatty acids and glycerol, and proteins into amino acids). They release the chemical energy of nutrient molecules by oxidizing carbon and hydrogen atoms from carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins to carbon dioxide and water, respectively.
They can catabolize organic compounds by respiration, fermentation, or both. Fermenting heterotrophs are either facultative or obligate anaerobes that carry out fermentation in low oxygen environments, in which the production of ATP is commonly coupled with substrate-level phosphorylation and the production of end products (e.g. alcohol, CO2, sulfide).[41] These products can then serve as the substrates for other bacteria in the anaerobic digestion, and be converted into CO2 and CH4, which is an important step for the carbon cycle for removing organic fermentation products from anaerobic environments.[41] Heterotrophs can undergo respiration, in which ATP production is coupled with oxidative phosphorylation.[41][42] This leads to the release of oxidized carbon wastes such as CO2 and reduced wastes like H2O, H2S, or N2O into the atmosphere. Heterotrophic microbes' respiration and fermentation account for a large portion of the release of CO2 into the atmosphere, making it available for autotrophs as a source of nutrient and plants as a cellulose synthesis substrate.[43][42]
Respiration in heterotrophs is often accompanied by mineralization, the process of converting organic compounds to inorganic forms.[43] When the organic nutrient source taken in by the heterotroph contains essential elements such as N, S, P in addition to C, H, and O, they are often removed first to proceed with the oxidation of organic nutrient and production of ATP via respiration.[43] S and N in organic carbon source are transformed into H2S and NH4+ through desulfurylation and deamination, respectively.[43][42] Heterotrophs also allow for dephosphorylation as part of decomposition.[42] The conversion of N and S from organic form to inorganic form is a critical part of the nitrogen and sulfur cycle. H2S formed from desulfurylation is further oxidized by lithotrophs and phototrophs while NH4+ formed from deamination is further oxidized by lithotrophs to the forms available to plants.[43][42] Heterotrophs' ability to mineralize essential elements is critical to plant survival.[42]
Most opisthokonts and prokaryotes are heterotrophic; in particular, all animals and fungi are heterotrophs.[7] Some animals, such as corals, form symbiotic relationships with autotrophs and obtain organic carbon in this way. Furthermore, some parasitic plants have also turned fully or partially heterotrophic, while carnivorous plants consume animals to augment their nitrogen supply while remaining autotrophic.
Animals are classified as heterotrophs by ingestion, fungi are classified as heterotrophs by absorption.
Heterotroph Impacts on Biogeochemical Cycles
[edit]Heterotrophs, organisms that obtain energy and carbon by consuming organic matter, are vital parts of Earth's biogeochemical cycles particularly in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles. Their metabolic activities impact the processing and cycling of elements through ecosystems and the biosphere.
Heterotrophs are key players in the carbon cycle, acting as both consumers and decomposers. They release carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere through respiration, contributing to a large portion of carbon dioxide emissions.[44] This process makes carbon available for autotrophs, who can fix carbon through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis. This circulation supports the continuous cycling of carbon between organic and inorganic forms.[45]
Heterotrophic organisms contribute to key processes in the nitrogen cycle like ammonification, the conversion of organic nitrogen to ammonia, and denitrification, the reduction of nitrate and the release of nitrogen gas to the atmosphere.[46] These processes can be known as secondary metabolism in heterotrophs.[47] Heterotrophic microorganisms are essential in the mineralization of organic compounds containing nitrogen.[48][49] Through deamination, they convert organic nitrogen to ammonium (NH4+), which can be further oxidized by lithotrophs into forms available to plants. Similarly, desulfurylation by heterotrophs transforms organic sulfur into hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is then oxidized by lithotrophs and phototrophs, contributing to the sulfur cycle.
The ability of heterotrophs to break down complex organic compounds is fundamental to nutrient cycling in ecosystems.[50] By decomposing dead organic matter, they release essential elements like phosphorus through dephosphorylation, making these nutrients available for other organisms.[51] This process is critical for maintaining soil fertility and supporting plant growth. Heterotrops connect the flow of energy and organic matter across ecosystems. Their biological processes link with atmospheric, chemical and geological systems.[52]
Heterotrophs form intricate relationships with autotrophs in ecosystems. While they depend on autotrophs for energy-rich organic compounds, heterotrophs support autotrophic growth by releasing minerals and carbon dioxide (CO2). This interdependence is exemplified in symbiotic relationships, such as those between corals and algae, where nutrient exchange benefits both partners. Their metabolic processes depend on each other and traces of organic compounds.[53]
The biogeochemical activities of heterotrophs are thus integral to ecosystem functioning, influencing the availability of nutrients, the composition of the atmosphere, and the productivity of both terrestrial and aquatic environments.
Impacts on Biogeochemical Cycles
[edit]Heterotrophs, organisms that obtain energy and carbon by consuming organic matter, are vital parts of Earth's biogeochemical cycles particularly in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles. Their metabolic activities impact the processing and cycling of elements through ecosystems and the biosphere.
Heterotrophs are key players in the carbon cycle, acting as both consumers and decomposers. They release carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere through respiration, contributing to a large portion of carbon dioxide emissions. This process makes carbon available for autotrophs, who can fix carbon through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis. This circulation supports the continuous cycling of carbon between organic and inorganic forms.[54]
Heterotrophic organisms contribute to key processes in the nitrogen cycle like ammonification, the conversion of organic nitrogen to ammonia, and denitrification, the reduction of nitrate and the release of nitrogen gas to the atmosphere.[55] Heterotrophic microorganisms are essential in the mineralization of organic compounds containing nitrogen.[56] Through deamination, they convert organic nitrogen to ammonium (NH4+), which can be further oxidized by lithotrophs into forms available to plants. Similarly, desulfurylation by heterotrophs transforms organic sulfur into hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is then oxidized by lithotrophs and phototrophs, contributing to the sulfur cycle.
The ability of heterotrophs to break down complex organic compounds is fundamental to nutrient cycling in ecosystems. By decomposing dead organic matter, they release essential elements like phosphorus through dephosphorylation, making these nutrients available for other organisms. This process is critical for maintaining soil fertility and supporting plant growth. Heterotrops connect the flow of energy and organic matter across ecosystems. Their biological processes link with atmospheric, chemical and geological systems.[57]
Heterotrophs form intricate relationships with autotrophs in ecosystems. While they depend on autotrophs for energy-rich organic compounds, heterotrophs support autotrophic growth by releasing minerals and carbon dioxide (CO2). This interdependence is exemplified in symbiotic relationships, such as those between corals and algae, where nutrient exchange benefits both partners.[58]
The biogeochemical activities of heterotrophs are thus integral to ecosystem functioning, influencing the availability of nutrients, the composition of the atmosphere, and the productivity of both terrestrial and aquatic environments.
References
[edit]- ^ "heterotroph". Dictionary.com Unabridged (Online). n.d.
- ^ "heterotroph". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.
- ^ "Heterotroph Definition". Biology Dictionary. April 28, 2017. Retrieved 2023-12-02.
- ^ Hogg, Stuart (2013). Essential Microbiology (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-119-97890-9.
- ^ Pelletreau, Karen N.; Bhattacharya, Debashish; Price, Dana C.; Worful, Jared M.; Moustafa, Ahmed; Rumpho, Mary E. (April 2011). "Sea slug kleptoplasty and plastid maintenance in a metazoan". Plant Physiology. 155 (4): 1561–1565. doi:10.1104/pp.111.174078. ISSN 1532-2548. PMC 3091133. PMID 21346171.
- ^ "Giant tubeworm • MBARI". MBARI. Retrieved 2025-08-31.
- ^ a b "How Cells Harvest Energy" (PDF). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2010-10-10.
- ^ Lwoff, A.; C.B. van Niel; P.J. Ryan; E.L. Tatum (1946). Nomenclature of nutritional types of microorganisms (PDF). Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Vol. XI (5th ed.). Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: The Biological Laboratory. pp. 302–303. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-11-07.
- ^ "Heterotrophs". education.nationalgeographic.org. Retrieved 2025-02-10.
- ^ Wetzel, R.G. (2001). Limnology: Lake and river ecosystems (3rd ed.). Academic Press. p. 700.
- ^ "The purpose of saprotrophs and their internal nutrition, as well as the main two types of fungi that are most often referred to, as well as describes, visually, the process of saprotrophic nutrition through a diagram of hyphae, referring to the Rhizobium on damp, stale whole-meal bread or rotting fruit." Advanced Biology Principles, p 296.[full citation needed]
- ^ Mills, A.L. (1997). The Environmental Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits: Part A: Processes, Techniques, and Health Issues Part B: Case Studies and Research Topics (PDF). Society of Economic Geologists. pp. 125–132. ISBN 978-1-62949-013-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
- ^ a b c Mauseth, James D. (2008). Botany: An introduction to plant biology (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-7637-5345-0.
heterotroph fix carbon.
- ^ Miroshnichenko, M.L.; L'Haridon, S.; Jeanthon, C.; Antipov, A.N.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Tindall, B.J.; et al. (1 May 2003). "Oceanithermus profundus gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic, microaerophilic, facultatively chemolithoheterotrophic bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 53 (3): 747–752. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02367-0. PMID 12807196.
- ^ Libes, Susan M. (2009). Introduction to Marine Biogeochemistry (2nd ed.). Academic Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-12-088530-5.
- ^ Dworkin, Martin (2006). The prokaryotes: ecophysiology and biochemistry (3rd ed.). Springer. p. 988. ISBN 978-0-387-25492-0.
- ^ Liang, Yanna (July 2009). "Biomass and lipid productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth conditions". Biotechnology Letters. 31 (7): 1043–1049. doi:10.1007/s10529-009-9975-7. PMID 19322523. S2CID 1989922.
- ^ Campbell and Reece (2002). Biology (7th ed.). Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co. ISBN 978-0-8053-7171-0.
- ^ a b Bada, Jeffrey L. (2013). "New insights into prebiotic chemistry from Stanley Miller's spark discharge experiments". Chemical Society Reviews. 42 (5): 2186–2196. Bibcode:2013CSRev..42.2186B. doi:10.1039/c3cs35433d. ISSN 0306-0012. PMID 23340907.
- ^ Bracher, Paul J. (2015). "Primordial soup that cooks itself". Nature Chemistry. 7 (4): 273–274. Bibcode:2015NatCh...7..273B. doi:10.1038/nchem.2219. ISSN 1755-4330. PMID 25803461.
- ^ Lazcano, Antonio (2015), "Primordial Soup", in Gargaud, Muriel; Irvine, William M.; Amils, Ricardo; Cleaves, Henderson James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 2010–2014, Bibcode:2015enas.book.2010L, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_1275, ISBN 978-3-662-44184-8, retrieved 2022-04-23
- ^ Schönheit, Peter; Buckel, Wolfgang; Martin, William F. (2016). "On the Origin of Heterotrophy". Trends in Microbiology. 24 (1): 12–25. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.003. PMID 26578093.
- ^ Sanger, F.; Thompson, E. O. P. (1953-02-01). "The amino-acid sequence in the glycyl chain of insulin. 1. The identification of lower peptides from partial hydrolysates". Biochemical Journal. 53 (3): 353–366. doi:10.1042/bj0530353. ISSN 0306-3283. PMC 1198157. PMID 13032078.
- ^ Haldane, J.B.S. (1929) The Origin of Life. The Rationalist Annual, 3, 3–10.
- ^ Tirard, Stéphane (2017). "J. B. S. Haldane and the origin of life". Journal of Genetics. 96 (5): 735–739. doi:10.1007/s12041-017-0831-6. ISSN 0022-1333. PMID 29237880. S2CID 28775520.
- ^ Miller, Stanley L. (1953-05-15). "A Production of Amino Acids Under Possible Primitive Earth Conditions". Science. 117 (3046): 528–529. Bibcode:1953Sci...117..528M. doi:10.1126/science.117.3046.528. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 13056598.
- ^ Lazcano, Antonio; Bada, Jeffrey L. (2003). "The 1953 Stanley L. Miller experiment: Fifty years of prebiotic organic chemistry". Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere. 33 (3): 235–242. Bibcode:2003OLEB...33..235L. doi:10.1023/A:1024807125069. PMID 14515862. S2CID 19515024.
- ^ a b Preiner, Martina; Asche, Silke; Becker, Sidney; Betts, Holly C.; Boniface, Adrien; Camprubi, Eloi; Chandru, Kuhan; Erastova, Valentina; Garg, Sriram G.; Khawaja, Nozair; Kostyrka, Gladys (2020-02-26). "The Future of Origin of Life Research: Bridging Decades-Old Divisions". Life. 10 (3): 20. Bibcode:2020Life...10...20P. doi:10.3390/life10030020. ISSN 2075-1729. PMC 7151616. PMID 32110893.
- ^ Jordan, Carl F (2022), "A Thermodynamic View of Evolution", Evolution from a Thermodynamic Perspective, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 157–199, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85186-6_12, ISBN 978-3-030-85185-9
- ^ a b c Zachar, István; Boza, Gergely (2020-02-01). "Endosymbiosis before eukaryotes: mitochondrial establishment in protoeukaryotes". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 77 (18): 3503–3523. doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03462-6. ISSN 1420-682X. PMC 7452879. PMID 32008087.
- ^ Okie, Jordan G.; Smith, Val H.; Martin-Cereceda, Mercedes (2016-05-25). "Major evolutionary transitions of life, metabolic scaling and the number and size of mitochondria and chloroplasts". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 (1831) 20160611. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0611. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 4892803. PMID 27194700.
- ^ Knowlton, Nancy; Rohwer, Forest (2003). "Multispecies Microbial Mutualisms on Coral Reefs: The Host as a Habitat". The American Naturalist. 162 (S4): S51 – S62. Bibcode:2003ANat..162S..51K. doi:10.1086/378684. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 14583857. S2CID 24127308.
- ^ Muchowska, K. B.; Varma, S. J.; Chevallot-Beroux, E.; Lethuillier-Karl, L.; Li, G.; Moran, J. (October 2, 2017). "Metals promote sequences of the reverse Krebs cycle". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1 (11): 1716–1721. Bibcode:2017NatEE...1.1716M. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0311-7. ISSN 2397-334X. PMC 5659384. PMID 28970480.
- ^ Weiss, Madeline C.; Preiner, Martina; Xavier, Joana C.; Zimorski, Verena; Martin, William F. (2018-08-16). "The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics". PLOS Genetics. 14 (8) e1007518. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007518. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 6095482. PMID 30114187. S2CID 52019935.
- ^ Schönheit, Peter; Buckel, Wolfgang; Martin, William F. (2016-01-01). "On the Origin of Heterotrophy". Trends in Microbiology. 24 (1): 12–25. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.003. ISSN 0966-842X. PMID 26578093.
- ^ a b c Kim, Byung Hong; Gadd, Geoffrey Michael (2019-05-04). Prokaryotic Metabolism and Physiology. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316761625. ISBN 978-1-316-76162-5. S2CID 165100369.
- ^ a b Taylor, D. L.; Bruns, T. D.; Leake, J. R.; Read, D. J. (2002), Mycorrhizal Specificity and Function in Myco-heterotrophic Plants, Ecological Studies, vol. 157, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 375–413, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-38364-2_15, ISBN 978-3-540-00204-8
- ^ Butterfield, Nicholas J. (2011). "Animals and the invention of the Phanerozoic Earth system". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 26 (2): 81–87. Bibcode:2011TEcoE..26...81B. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.012. ISSN 0169-5347. PMID 21190752.
- ^ Mills, A.L. "The role of bacteria in environmental geochemistry" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
- ^ "Heterotrophic nutrition and control of bacterial density" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-05-24. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
- ^ a b c Gottschalk, Gerhard (2012). Bacterial Metabolism. Springer Series in Microbiology (2 ed.). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1072-6. ISBN 978-0-387-96153-8. S2CID 32635137.
- ^ a b c d e f Wade, Bingle (2016). MICB 201: Introductory Environmental Microbiology. pp. 236–250.
- ^ a b c d e Kirchman, David L. (2014). Processes in Microbial Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 79–98. ISBN 978-0-19-958693-6.
- ^ Duarte, Carlos M.; Prairie, Yves T. (2005-11-01). "Prevalence of Heterotrophy and Atmospheric CO2 Emissions from Aquatic Ecosystems". Ecosystems. 8 (7): 862–870. Bibcode:2005Ecosy...8..862D. doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0177-4. ISSN 1435-0629.
- ^ Falkowski, Paul G.; Fenchel, Tom; Delong, Edward F. (2008-05-23). "The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles". Science. 320 (5879): 1034–1039. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1034F. doi:10.1126/science.1153213.
- ^ Canfield, Donald E.; Glazer, Alexander N.; Falkowski, Paul G. (2010-10-08). "The Evolution and Future of Earth's Nitrogen Cycle". Science. 330 (6001): 192–196. Bibcode:2010Sci...330..192C. doi:10.1126/science.1186120.
- ^ Martikainen, Pertti J. (2022-05-01). "Heterotrophic nitrification – An eternal mystery in the nitrogen cycle". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 168 108611. Bibcode:2022SBiBi.16808611M. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108611. ISSN 0038-0717.
- ^ Werner, Dietrich (1977). The Biology of Diatoms. University of California Press. pp. 170–181.
- ^ Schlesinger, William H.; Bernhardt, Emily S. (2020). Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change (4th ed.). Waltham, MA: Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-814609-5.
- ^ Howarth, Robert W.; Hobbie, John E. (1982-01-01), Kennedy, VICTOR S. (ed.), "The Regulation of Decomposition and Heterotrophic Microbial Activity in Salt Marsh Soils: A Review", Estuarine Comparisons, Academic Press, pp. 183–207, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50017-x, ISBN 978-0-12-404070-0, retrieved 2025-04-22
- ^ Kerr, P. C., Paris, D. F., & Brockway, D. L. (1970). The interrelation of carbon and phosphorus in regulating heterotrophic and autotrophic populations in aquatic ecosystems (Report No. FWQA-16050-FGS-07/70). U.S. Federal Water Quality Administration.
- ^ Jørgensen, Bo Barker; Boetius, Antje (October 2007). "Feast and famine — microbial life in the deep-sea bed". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 5 (10): 770–781. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1745. ISSN 1740-1534. PMID 17828281.
- ^ Tran, Ngoc Han; Urase, Taro; Ngo, Huu Hao; Hu, Jiangyong; Ong, Say Leong (2013-10-01). "Insight into metabolic and cometabolic activities of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms in the biodegradation of emerging trace organic contaminants". Bioresource Technology. 146: 721–731. Bibcode:2013BiTec.146..721T. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.083. ISSN 0960-8524. PMID 23948223.
- ^ Falkowski, Paul G.; Fenchel, Tom; Delong, Edward F. (2008-05-23). "The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles". Science. 320 (5879): 1034–1039. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1034F. doi:10.1126/science.1153213. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 18497287.
- ^ Canfield, Donald E.; Glazer, Alexander N.; Falkowski, Paul G. (2010-10-08). "The Evolution and Future of Earth's Nitrogen Cycle". Science. 330 (6001): 192–196. Bibcode:2010Sci...330..192C. doi:10.1126/science.1186120. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 20929768.
- ^ Schlesinger, William H.; Bernhardt, Emily S. (2020). Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change (4th ed.). London: Academic press, an imprint of Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-814608-8.
- ^ Jørgensen, Bo Barker; Boetius, Antje (October 2007). "Feast and famine — microbial life in the deep-sea bed". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 5 (10): 770–781. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1745. ISSN 1740-1526. PMID 17828281.
- ^ Wardle, David A.; Bardgett, Richard D.; Klironomos, John N.; Setälä, Heikki; van der Putten, Wim H.; Wall, Diana H. (2004-06-11). "Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota". Science. 304 (5677): 1629–1633. Bibcode:2004Sci...304.1629W. doi:10.1126/science.1094875. PMID 15192218.
Heterotroph
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Characteristics
Definition
A heterotroph is an organism that cannot synthesize its own organic carbon-based compounds from inorganic sources and instead obtains energy and nutrients by consuming organic matter produced by other organisms.[10] This dependency distinguishes heterotrophs from autotrophs, which can produce their own food using inorganic materials like carbon dioxide. The term "heterotroph" derives from the Greek words heteros (other or different) and trophē (nourishment or feeder), literally meaning "other feeder."[11] It was coined by the German botanist Wilhelm Pfeffer in 1897 and first translated into English by Alfred J. Ewart in 1900.[12] Heterotrophs rely on external organic carbon sources to fuel both catabolic and anabolic processes essential for life. Catabolism involves the breakdown of ingested organic molecules, such as carbohydrates and proteins, to release energy through processes like cellular respiration.[13] Anabolism then uses this energy, along with the resulting building blocks, to synthesize complex biomolecules needed for growth and maintenance.[13]Key Characteristics
Heterotrophs obtain carbon exclusively from organic compounds derived from other organisms, with most processing them through conserved metabolic pathways to generate ATP, lacking the capacity for carbon fixation; while primarily chemoheterotrophs obtain energy from these compounds, some photoheterotrophs use light energy via anoxygenic photosynthesis. These pathways begin with glycolysis in the cytoplasm, where glucose or other simple sugars are broken down into pyruvate, yielding a small amount of ATP and NADH. Pyruvate then enters the mitochondria (in eukaryotes) for further oxidation via the Krebs cycle (citric acid cycle), producing additional electron carriers like NADH and FADH₂, followed by oxidative phosphorylation in the electron transport chain, where these carriers drive proton gradients to synthesize the majority of ATP.[14][15] In contrast to autotrophs, heterotrophs lack the enzymatic machinery for the Calvin cycle, relying entirely on exogenous organic carbon sources rather than inorganic CO₂. This metabolic strategy limits heterotrophs to catabolic processes that degrade complex organics into simpler molecules, releasing energy but not building biomass from scratch.[14][16] Heterotrophs require pre-formed organic nutrients, such as carbohydrates (e.g., glucose), proteins (broken down to amino acids), and lipids, which must be supplied externally since they cannot synthesize these de novo from inorganic precursors. These nutrients serve dual roles as both energy sources and building blocks for cellular components like nucleic acids and membranes. To meet these requirements, heterotrophs have evolved diverse adaptations for acquisition and assimilation, including specialized digestive systems in animals that facilitate intracellular enzymatic breakdown of ingested food, absorptive surfaces like villi in the intestines for uptake, and symbiotic relationships with microbes that aid in decomposition. For instance, many fungi employ extracellular digestion by secreting hydrolytic enzymes onto organic matter in their environment, absorbing the resulting monomers directly through their hyphal walls.[14][17][18][19] This reliance on external organics imposes constraints on energy efficiency, as heterotrophs depend on trophic transfers from lower levels in food webs, resulting in substantial losses at each step. Typically, only about 10% of energy from one trophic level is transferred to the next, with the remainder dissipated as heat through respiration and incomplete assimilation—a principle illustrated by the trophic pyramid, which underscores the diminishing biomass and energy availability at higher heterotrophic levels compared to autotrophic bases.[20][21]Classification
Physiological Types
Heterotrophs are physiologically classified based on their mechanisms for acquiring energy and carbon, with a strict reliance on organic compounds for carbon sources. This classification emphasizes biochemical processes at the cellular level, distinguishing how these organisms generate ATP and build biomass without autotrophic CO2 fixation. The primary types include chemoheterotrophs, photoheterotrophs, and chemolithoheterotrophs (also termed lithoheterotrophs), each reflecting adaptations to specific environmental niches in microbial and multicellular life.[22] Chemoheterotrophs obtain both energy and carbon from the oxidation of organic compounds, typically through respiration or fermentation pathways that yield ATP via electron transport chains. This group encompasses the majority of heterotrophic organisms, including most animals, fungi, and many bacteria, which break down complex organics like carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. For instance, humans exemplify chemoheterotrophy by oxidizing glucose through aerobic respiration in mitochondria, where the process C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O + ATP releases energy for cellular functions while producing carbon dioxide as a byproduct.[23]/06:_Fueling_and_Building_Cells)[24] Photoheterotrophs, in contrast, harness light energy for ATP production using pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll, while still requiring organic compounds for carbon assimilation and biosynthesis. These organisms perform cyclic photophosphorylation, where light excites electrons in a photosynthetic reaction center, driving proton gradients for ATP synthesis without generating reducing power for CO2 fixation or oxygen evolution. They are relatively rare and predominantly found among anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria, such as purple non-sulfur bacteria like Rhodospirillum rubrum, which thrive in anaerobic environments rich in organics, using light to supplement energy needs alongside fermentation or respiration of substrates like acetate./15:_Phototrophy)[25]/15:_Phototrophy) Chemolithoheterotrophs (or lithoheterotrophs) derive energy from the oxidation of inorganic compounds, such as reduced metals or sulfur species, but depend on organic sources for carbon, blending chemotrophic energy acquisition with heterotrophic nutrition. This mode overlaps with chemolithotrophy but lacks autotrophic capabilities, allowing higher growth yields in environments where inorganic electron donors are abundant but organic carbon is available. Examples occur among certain bacteria and archaea, including some hyperthermophilic archaea in deep-sea vents that oxidize hydrogen or iron while assimilating simple organics like peptides for biomass.[22][26][27] A key distinction of all heterotrophs from mixotrophs lies in their inability to perform autotrophic carbon fixation; heterotrophs exclusively rely on pre-formed organic carbon and cannot switch to inorganic CO2 as a sole carbon source, limiting their metabolic flexibility compared to organisms capable of both strategies./2:_Cell_Biology/2.18:_Autotrophs_and_Heterotrophs)Ecological Types
Heterotrophs are classified ecologically based on their modes of acquiring food resources within ecosystems, which influences consumer dynamics and energy flow. These categories reflect adaptations to specific niches, from direct consumption of living organisms to processing of non-living matter, ensuring the transfer of organic compounds through trophic levels.[28] Herbivores primarily consume primary producers such as plants and algae, serving as primary consumers that convert solar energy stored in vegetation into biomass for higher trophic levels. Examples include deer, which graze on grasses and leaves, and various insects like caterpillars that feed on foliage. A key adaptation in many mammalian herbivores, particularly ruminants such as deer and cattle, involves symbiotic cellulose-digesting microbes in the rumen that break down plant cell walls, enabling efficient extraction of nutrients from fibrous material.[29][30] Carnivores feed exclusively on other heterotrophs, occupying secondary or tertiary consumer roles and regulating populations of prey species through predation. Prominent examples are lions, which hunt large ungulates in savannas, and spiders, which capture insects via webs or ambush tactics. Carnivores are subdivided into predators, which actively hunt and kill live prey, and scavengers, which consume carrion left by others; this distinction affects energy efficiency, as scavenging reduces hunting risks but depends on predator activity.[29][31] Omnivores exhibit dietary flexibility by consuming both primary producers and other consumers, allowing them to exploit varied resources and adapt to fluctuating environmental conditions. Humans and bears exemplify this versatility; humans incorporate plants, meats, and processed foods, while bears shift between berries and fish depending on seasonal availability. This nutritional flexibility enhances resilience in diverse habitats, linking multiple trophic levels and stabilizing food webs.[32][33] Detritivores and decomposers process dead organic matter, facilitating nutrient recycling essential for ecosystem productivity. Detritivores, such as earthworms, ingest and fragment detritus like fallen leaves and animal remains internally, aiding initial breakdown. Decomposers, including bacteria and fungi, operate via saprotrophy, secreting extracellular enzymes to externally decompose complex organics into simpler compounds that plants can absorb. Together, they recycle carbon, nitrogen, and other elements, preventing nutrient lockup in biomass.[28][34] Parasites obtain nutrients from living hosts without immediately killing them, often weakening host fitness and influencing population dynamics. Examples include tapeworms, which absorb digested food in the intestines of vertebrates, and Plasmodium, the protozoan causing malaria in humans and other mammals. Parasites and hosts engage in a co-evolutionary arms race, where host defenses like immune responses drive parasite adaptations for evasion, such as antigenic variation in Plasmodium, perpetuating dynamic selective pressures.[35][36]Evolutionary History
Origins
The concept of heterotrophy preceding autotrophy in the origin of life stems from the Oparin-Haldane hypothesis, which posits that the earliest cellular organisms were chemoheterotrophs dependent on preformed organic molecules in Earth's primordial environment. These organics were likely produced abiotically through geochemical processes, including atmospheric synthesis under reducing conditions and volcanic outgassing at hydrothermal vents, providing a nutrient-rich "soup" for primitive metabolism around 3.8 to 4.0 billion years ago. Experimental simulations, such as those replicating early Earth atmospheric chemistry, have demonstrated the abiotic formation of amino acids and other biomolecules essential for such heterotrophic lifestyles, supporting the feasibility of this initial phase before self-sustaining biosynthesis evolved.[37] Geological and microbiological evidence further indicates that heterotrophic metabolism dominated early microbial ecosystems. Fossilized stromatolites dating to approximately 3.5 billion years ago, such as those in the Strelley Pool Formation, represent layered microbial mats likely formed by anoxygenic phototrophs or chemoheterotrophic bacteria interacting with sediments near hydrothermal systems, predating the emergence of oxygenic photosynthetic cyanobacteria around 2.7 billion years ago. Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA), estimated to have existed between 3.8 and 4.2 billion years ago, with recent analyses dating it to around 4.2 billion years ago, suggest it possessed a heterotrophic core metabolism capable of utilizing exogenous organics for carbon and energy, with genes for glycolysis and gluconeogenesis but limited de novo biosynthesis pathways. This aligns with genomic analyses indicating LUCA's reliance on a prebiotic organic pool rather than full autotrophy.[38][39] The transition from predominant heterotrophy to autotrophy was driven by the progressive depletion of abiotic organic resources as microbial populations expanded, exerting selective pressure for the evolution of carbon-fixing pathways to sustain growth. This shift allowed heterotrophy to persist and thrive in non-autotrophic lineages, where organisms continued to scavenge organics produced by autotrophs or abiotic sources. A pivotal expansion of heterotrophic diversity occurred during the Great Oxidation Event around 2.4 billion years ago, when atmospheric oxygen accumulation—resulting from cyanobacterial photosynthesis—enabled the rise of aerobic chemoheterotrophy, facilitating more efficient energy extraction from organic substrates across diverse microbial taxa.[37][40]Diversification
Following the initial emergence of chemoheterotrophic prokaryotes, diversification accelerated with the rise of atmospheric oxygen during the Great Oxidation Event around 2.4 billion years ago, enabling the transition from strictly anaerobic respiration to aerobic forms among bacteria and archaea. This shift involved the evolution of oxygen-dependent enzymes in ancestrally anaerobic pathways, such as those for cofactor biosynthesis (e.g., NAD⁺ and ubiquinone), which supported higher energy yields through aerobic respiration—up to 38 ATP molecules per glucose molecule compared to 2 ATP in fermentation.[41][42] Aerobic chemoheterotrophs thus proliferated in oxygenated environments, outcompeting anaerobes in many niches while anaerobes persisted in oxygen-poor habitats. Concurrently, photoheterotrophs—organisms using light for energy but organic compounds for carbon—emerged in anoxic niches around 3 billion years ago, exemplified by anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria like purple nonsulfur bacteria that supplemented heterotrophy with phototrophy in stratified water columns.[43] Eukaryotic heterotrophs arose through endosymbiosis approximately 2 billion years ago, when an alphaproteobacterium was engulfed by an archaeal host, giving rise to mitochondria and enabling efficient aerobic respiration that fueled eukaryotic complexity.[44] This event, dated between 1.6 and 2.2 billion years ago based on microfossil and genomic evidence, marked a pivotal diversification, as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation provided up to 30 ATP per glucose, far surpassing prokaryotic limits.[45] Within opisthokonts—the clade uniting animals and fungi—these lineages diverged around 1 billion years ago, with recent phylogenomic analyses refining the common ancestry to approximately 1.5 billion years ago through comprehensive genome sampling across eukaryotic supergroups.[46][47] Key adaptations further drove heterotroph diversification, including the evolution of multicellularity in eukaryotes around 1.6 billion years ago, which allowed division of labor for enhanced nutrient acquisition and defense; sensory systems like chemoreception and photoreception for locating prey; and specialized digestive structures, such as extracellular enzymes in fungi and internal guts in animals.[48][49] The Cambrian explosion, approximately 540 million years ago, exemplified this radiation in metazoans, with the development of jaws and hard mouthparts in early predators like anomalocaridids facilitating active hunting and the consumption of larger prey, spurring co-evolutionary arms races.[50] Today, heterotrophs dominate eukaryotic biodiversity, comprising the vast majority of described species in kingdoms Animalia and Fungi, with over 1.5 million animal species and an estimated 2-5 million fungal species underscoring their ecological prevalence.[51]Ecological Roles
In Food Webs
Heterotrophs occupy various positions within food webs, serving as consumers that transfer energy from producers or other heterotrophs through trophic interactions. At the primary consumer level, herbivores such as grasshoppers feed directly on autotrophs like plants, converting plant biomass into animal tissue.[52] Secondary consumers, including carnivores like scorpions, prey on herbivores, while tertiary consumers, such as kit foxes, target secondary consumers at higher levels.[52] Decomposers, a distinct group of heterotrophs like bacteria and fungi, operate outside linear trophic chains by breaking down detritus and facilitating energy recycling through detrital pathways.[53] Energy flows inefficiently through these trophic levels, adhering to the approximately 10% rule, where only about 10% of energy from one level is transferred to the next due to losses from respiration, waste, and heat.[54] This limits food chains to typically four or five levels, as seen in examples like terrestrial sequences (grass to hawk) or marine chains (phytoplankton to killer whale).[54] Linear food chains simplify these dynamics as sequential links, such as plants to herbivores to carnivores, but real ecosystems form complex food webs with interconnected pathways, allowing multiple feeding routes and greater resilience.[52] Certain heterotrophs act as keystone species, disproportionately influencing web structure through top-down control. Apex predators like gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park regulate herbivore populations, such as elk, preventing overgrazing and triggering trophic cascades that enhance vegetation recovery and biodiversity, though recent studies suggest multiple factors including climate contribute to these changes.[55][56] For instance, wolf reintroduction in 1995 reduced elk numbers, allowing aspen and willow growth to increase fivefold and supporting beaver recolonization for habitat creation.[55] Pollinators, as heterotrophic insects like bees that consume nectar and pollen, indirectly bolster food webs by enabling plant reproduction and sustaining producer bases for higher trophic levels.[57] Heterotroph diversity enhances food web stability by promoting weak interactions and reducing synchrony in population fluctuations, countering destabilizing effects of high connectivity.[58] Loss of heterotrophs, however, can initiate trophic cascades, as observed in overfishing scenarios where depletion of top predators like mackerel in the Black Sea led to explosions in planktivorous fish, zooplankton crashes, and phytoplankton blooms, shifting ecosystems toward less productive states.[59] Such disruptions underscore how heterotroph biodiversity buffers against regime shifts in energy flow dynamics.[58]In Nutrient Cycling
Heterotrophs play a pivotal role in nutrient cycling by facilitating the decomposition of organic matter, thereby converting complex compounds into simpler inorganic forms that can be reused by primary producers and other organisms in ecosystems. Detritivores, such as earthworms and insects, and microbial heterotrophs, including bacteria and fungi, break down dead plant and animal material through processes like comminution and enzymatic digestion, ultimately mineralizing organics into nutrients like carbon dioxide, ammonia, and phosphates.[60][61] In the decomposition process, fungi exemplify heterotrophic efficiency by secreting enzymes such as ligninases to degrade recalcitrant polymers like lignin in plant litter, enabling access to cellulose and other substrates for further microbial breakdown. Bacteria complement this by mineralizing simpler organics into inorganic ions. These rates are strongly influenced by environmental factors; for instance, optimal temperatures (20–30°C) and moisture levels accelerate decomposition, while extremes slow it, affecting overall nutrient turnover in soils and aquatic systems.[62][63][64] Through nutrient release, heterotrophs return essential elements such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) to the soil and water, sustaining ecosystem productivity. In tropical forests, termites act as key detritivores, processing significant portions of leaf litter and facilitating the rapid recycling of these nutrients, with their activity enhancing soil fertility in nutrient-poor environments. Symbiotic interactions further amplify cycling: gut microbes in herbivores, such as ruminants, break down fibrous plant material via fermentation, releasing short-chain fatty acids and recyclable nutrients, while mycorrhizal fungi exchange soil-derived phosphorus and nitrogen with plant hosts for carbon compounds, optimizing resource distribution in plant communities.[65][66][67] Recent studies highlight microbial heterotrophs' emerging role in nutrient cycling amid anthropogenic pollution, particularly in degrading plastics into bioavailable carbon sources. Post-2020 research has identified bacterial and fungal consortia capable of polyethylene breakdown, potentially integrating synthetic organics into natural cycles, though efficiency remains limited by polymer structure and environmental conditions.[68][69]Impacts on Biogeochemical Cycles
Carbon Cycle Interactions
Heterotrophs play a central role in the global carbon cycle by consuming organic carbon produced through primary production and facilitating its transfer, transformation, and release back into the atmosphere or storage in deeper reservoirs. In terrestrial ecosystems, herbivores and carnivores transfer approximately 10 GtC per year through food webs, where carbon fixed by autotrophs is ingested, partially assimilated for growth and reproduction, and the remainder respired or excreted. This transfer sustains higher trophic levels while channeling carbon flows that ultimately contribute to atmospheric CO₂ through respiration, with global heterotrophic respiration releasing about 60 GtC per year as CO₂. These fluxes are derived from estimates in the global carbon budget, balancing terrestrial net primary production (NPP) of around 60 GtC per year against ecosystem respiration to maintain carbon equilibrium in non-disturbed systems.[70][71] Decomposition by heterotrophic microbes and soil fauna is equally critical, mineralizing the majority of terrestrial NPP annually (~60 GtC per year), equivalent to nearly all net primary production, and preventing the long-term accumulation of organic matter in biomass. This process breaks down dead plant material, litter, and detritus, releasing bioavailable carbon and nutrients while converting a substantial portion to CO₂ via microbial respiration. By rapidly cycling this fraction of NPP—primarily through bacteria and fungi—heterotrophs ensure that terrestrial ecosystems do not become long-term carbon sinks without external perturbations, with the remaining carbon entering slower pools like soil organic matter. This mineralization flux aligns closely with the overall heterotrophic respiration rate, underscoring decomposers' dominance in terrestrial carbon turnover.[72][73] In marine environments, heterotrophic zooplankton graze on phytoplankton, driving the biological pump that exports carbon to the deep ocean. Zooplankton consume a significant portion of primary production in the surface ocean, packaging unused carbon into dense fecal pellets that sink rapidly, bypassing remineralization in the upper water column. This mechanism sequesters approximately 10 GtC per year to depths below 100 meters, with fecal pellets contributing up to 70% of particulate organic carbon flux in some regions, effectively isolating carbon from the atmosphere for centuries. The efficiency of this export varies with zooplankton community structure and feeding rates, but it represents a key heterotrophic mediation of oceanic carbon storage.[74][75] Anthropogenic climate change amplifies heterotrophic influences on the carbon cycle through thawing permafrost, where microbial decomposition of newly exposed organic matter generates methane emissions. Recent studies from the 2020s indicate that these heterotroph-driven processes could release substantial CH₄, with abrupt thaw increasing carbon release by 125-190% compared to gradual thaw in affected sites, potentially adding 0.1–0.2 GtC equivalent per year and intensifying global warming feedbacks. This microbial activity in anaerobic conditions converts ancient permafrost carbon to CH₄, a potent greenhouse gas, highlighting heterotrophs' role in positive climate feedbacks under warming scenarios.[76][77]Nitrogen and Other Cycles
Heterotrophs play a pivotal role in the nitrogen cycle through processes such as ammonification and denitrification, which transform organic and inorganic nitrogen forms essential for ecosystem nutrient availability. During ammonification, heterotrophic bacteria and fungi decompose organic nitrogen compounds from dead organisms and waste, converting them into ammonium (NH₄⁺), a bioavailable form that plants and other microbes can assimilate.[78] This process is driven primarily by aerobic and anaerobic decomposers, ensuring the recycling of nitrogen within soils and sediments.[79] In denitrification, heterotrophic bacteria, including species like Pseudomonas, utilize nitrate (NO₃⁻) as an electron acceptor under low-oxygen conditions, reducing it stepwise to dinitrogen gas (N₂), which is released to the atmosphere.[80] This anaerobic respiration by denitrifying heterotrophs accounts for an estimated global nitrogen loss of approximately 100 Tg N per year from terrestrial and aquatic systems, mitigating excess nitrate accumulation but contributing to greenhouse gas emissions via nitrous oxide (N₂O) intermediates.[81] In the phosphorus cycle, heterotrophic detritivores and microbes facilitate the solubilization and recycling of organic phosphorus, countering the element's low mobility in soils. Detritivores, such as earthworms and arthropods, ingest organic matter rich in phosphorus, breaking it down mechanically and enzymatically to release inorganic forms accessible to plants.[82] Microbial heterotrophs, including bacteria, produce phosphatases—extracellular enzymes that hydrolyze organic phosphorus compounds like phytates and nucleic acids into orthophosphate (PO₄³⁻).[83] Although phosphorus input is primarily limited by rock weathering, heterotrophic processes recycle up to 80% of soil phosphorus through mineralization and immobilization, sustaining long-term fertility in terrestrial ecosystems.[84] Heterotrophs are integral to the sulfur cycle, mediating reduction and oxidation in contrasting redox environments. In anoxic sediments, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), such as Desulfovibrio species, act as anaerobic heterotrophs by oxidizing organic substrates and reducing sulfate (SO₄²⁻) to hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), a process that drives sulfur turnover in oxygen-depleted zones like wetlands and marine benthos.[85] This dissimilatory sulfate reduction couples carbon oxidation with sulfur reduction, influencing sediment geochemistry and contributing to sulfide toxicity or mineral formation.[86] Conversely, in aerobic zones, oxidative heterotrophs, including diverse bacteria from the Roseobacter clade, consume H₂S and elemental sulfur, oxidizing them back to sulfate using organic carbon as an energy source, thereby preventing sulfide buildup and facilitating sulfur re-entry into the bioavailable pool.[87] Heterotrophs interconnect the nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur cycles by influencing nutrient stoichiometries and transformation efficiencies across ecosystems. For instance, nitrogen limitation mediated by heterotrophic denitrification can constrain microbial phosphorus mineralization and carbon sequestration, as insufficient ammonium reduces phosphatase activity and organic matter decomposition rates.[88] These linkages underscore how heterotrophic dynamics regulate elemental feedbacks, such as sulfur oxidation enhancing nitrogen availability in coastal sediments. Recent research highlights emerging disruptions, with microplastics altering microbial nitrogen cycling by shifting denitrifier communities and increasing N₂O emissions in soils, potentially amplifying cycle interconnections under pollution stress.[89]References
- https://s2.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/library/marietta/[ecosystem](/page/Ecosystem).html
