Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Life-support system.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Life-support system
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
A life-support system is the combination of equipment that allows survival in an environment or situation that would not support that life in its absence. It is generally applied to systems supporting human life in situations where the outside environment is hostile, such as outer space or underwater, or medical situations where the health of the person is compromised to the extent that the risk of death would be high without the function of the equipment.[1]
In human spaceflight, a life-support system is a group of devices that allow a human being to survive in outer space. US government space agency NASA,[2] and private spaceflight companies use the phrase "environmental control and life-support system" or the acronym ECLSS when describing these systems.[3] The life-support system may supply air, water and food. It must also maintain the correct body temperature, an acceptable pressure on the body and deal with the body's waste products. Shielding against harmful external influences such as radiation and micro-meteorites may also be necessary. Components of the life-support system are life-critical, and are designed and constructed using safety engineering techniques.
In underwater diving, the breathing apparatus is considered to be life support equipment, and a saturation diving system is considered a life-support system – the personnel who are responsible for operating it are called life support technicians. The concept can also be extended to submarines, crewed submersibles and atmospheric diving suits, where the breathing gas requires treatment to remain respirable, and the occupants are isolated from the outside ambient pressure and temperature.
Medical life-support systems include heart-lung machines, medical ventilators and dialysis equipment.
Human physiological and metabolic needs
[edit] | This section needs additional citations for verification. (February 2024) |
A crewmember of typical size requires approximately 5 kilograms (11 lb) of food, water, and oxygen per day to perform standard activities on a space mission, and outputs a similar amount in the form of waste solids, waste liquids, and carbon dioxide.[4] The mass breakdown of these metabolic parameters is as follows: 0.84 kg (1.9 lb) of oxygen, 0.62 kg (1.4 lb) of food, and 3.54 kg (7.8 lb) of water consumed, converted through the body's physiological processes to 0.11 kg (3.9 oz) of solid wastes, 3.89 kg (8.6 lb) of liquid wastes, and 1.00 kg (2.20 lb) of carbon dioxide produced. These levels can vary due to activity level of a specific mission assignment, but must obey the principle of mass balance. Actual water use during space missions is typically double the given value, mainly due to non-biological use (e.g. showering). Additionally, the volume and variety of waste products varies with mission duration to include hair, finger nails, skin flaking, and other biological wastes in missions exceeding one week in length. Other environmental considerations such as radiation, gravity, noise, vibration, and lighting also factor into human physiological response in outer space, though not with the more immediate effect that the metabolic parameters have.
Atmosphere
[edit]Outer space life-support systems maintain atmospheres composed, at a minimum, of oxygen, water vapor and carbon dioxide. The partial pressure of each component gas adds to the overall barometric pressure.
However, the elimination of diluent gases substantially increases fire risks, especially in ground operations when for structural reasons the total cabin pressure must exceed the external atmospheric pressure; see Apollo 1. Furthermore, oxygen toxicity becomes a factor at high oxygen concentrations. For this reason, most modern crewed spacecraft use conventional air (nitrogen/oxygen) atmospheres and use pure oxygen only in pressure suits during extravehicular activity where acceptable suit flexibility mandates the lowest inflation pressure possible.
Water
[edit]Water is consumed by crew members for drinking, cleaning activities, EVA thermal control, and emergency uses. It must be stored, used, and reclaimed (from waste water and exhaled water vapor) efficiently since no on-site sources currently exist for the environments reached in the course of human space exploration. Future lunar missions may utilize water sourced from polar ices; Mars missions may utilize water from the atmosphere or ice deposits.
Food
[edit]All space missions to date have used supplied food. Life-support systems could include a plant cultivation system which allows food to be grown within buildings or vessels. This would also regenerate water and oxygen. However, no such system has flown in outer space as yet. Such a system could be designed so that it reuses most (otherwise lost) nutrients. This is done, for example, by composting toilets which reintegrate waste material (excrement) back into the system, allowing the nutrients to be taken up by the food crops. The food coming from the crops is then consumed again by the system's users and the cycle continues. The logistics and area requirements involved however have been prohibitive in implementing such a system to date.
Gravity
[edit]Depending on the length of the mission, astronauts may need artificial gravity to reduce the effects of space adaptation syndrome, body fluid redistribution, and loss of bone and muscle mass. Two methods of generating artificial weight in outer space exist.
Linear acceleration
[edit]If a spacecraft's engines could produce thrust continuously on the outbound trip with a thrust level equal to the mass of the ship, it would continuously accelerate at the rate of 32.2 feet per second (9.8 m/s) per second, and the crew would experience a pull toward the ship's aft bulkhead at normal Earth gravity (one g). The effect is proportional to the rate of acceleration. When the ship reaches the halfway point, it would turn around and produce thrust in the retrograde direction to slow down.
Rotation
[edit]Alternatively, if the ship's cabin is designed with a large cylindrical wall, or with a long beam extending another cabin section or counterweight, spinning it at an appropriate speed will cause centrifugal force to simulate the effect of gravity. If ω is the angular velocity of the ship's spin, then the acceleration at a radius r is:
Notice the magnitude of this effect varies with the radius of rotation, which crewmembers might find inconvenient depending on the cabin design. Also, the effects of Coriolis force (a force imparted at right angles to motion within the cabin) must be dealt with. And there is concern that rotation could aggravate the effects of vestibular disruption.
Space vehicle systems
[edit]Gemini, Mercury, and Apollo
[edit]American Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spacecraft contained 100% oxygen atmospheres, suitable for short duration missions, to minimize weight and complexity.[5]
Space Shuttle
[edit]The Space Shuttle was the first American spacecraft to have an Earth-like atmospheric mixture, comprising 22% oxygen and 78% nitrogen.[5] For the Space Shuttle, NASA includes in the ECLSS category systems that provide both life support for the crew and environmental control for payloads. The Shuttle Reference Manual contains ECLSS sections on: Crew Compartment Cabin Pressurization, Cabin Air Revitalization, Water Coolant Loop System, Active Thermal Control System, Supply and Waste Water, Waste Collection System, Waste Water Tank, Airlock Support, Extravehicular Mobility Units, Crew Altitude Protection System, and Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Cooling and Gaseous Nitrogen Purge for Payloads.[6]
Soyuz
[edit]The life-support system on the Soyuz spacecraft is called the Kompleks Sredstv Obespecheniya Zhiznideyatelnosti (KSOZh) (Russian: Комплекс Средств Обеспечения Жизнедеятельности (KCOЖ)).[citation needed] Vostok, Voshkod and Soyuz contained air-like mixtures at approximately 101kPa (14.7 psi).[5] The life support system provides a nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere at sea level partial pressures. The atmosphere is then regenerated through KO2 cylinders, which absorb most of the CO2 and water produced by the crew biologically and regenerates the oxygen, the LiOH cylinders then absorb the leftover CO2.[7]
Plug and play
[edit]The Paragon Space Development Corporation is developing a plug and play ECLSS called commercial crew transport-air revitalization system (CCT-ARS)[8] for future spacecraft partially paid for using NASA's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) funding.[9]
The CCT-ARS provides seven primary spacecraft life support functions in a highly integrated and reliable system: Air temperature control, Humidity removal, Carbon dioxide removal, Trace contaminant removal, Post-fire atmospheric recovery, Air filtration, and Cabin air circulation.[10]
Space station systems
[edit]Space station systems include technology that enables humans to live in outer space for a prolonged period of time. Such technology includes filtration systems for human waste disposal and air production.
Skylab
[edit]Skylab used 72% oxygen and 28% nitrogen at a total pressure of 5 psi.[citation needed]
Salyut and Mir
[edit]The Salyut and Mir space stations contained an air-like Oxygen and Nitrogen mixture at approximately sea-level pressures of 93.1 kPa (13.5psi) to 129 kPa (18.8 psi) with an Oxygen content of 21% to 40%.[5]
Bigelow commercial space station
[edit]The life-support system for the Bigelow Commercial Space Station is being designed by Bigelow Aerospace in Las Vegas, Nevada. The space station will be constructed of habitable Sundancer and BA 330 expandable spacecraft modules. As of October 2010,[update] "human-in-the-loop testing of the environmental control and life-support system (ECLSS)" for Sundancer has begun.[11]
Natural systems
[edit]Natural LSS like the Biosphere 2 in Arizona have been tested for future space travel or colonization. These systems are also known as closed ecological systems. They have the advantage of using solar energy as primary energy only and being independent from logistical support with fuel. Natural systems have the highest degree of efficiency due to integration of multiple functions. They also provide the proper ambience for humans which is necessary for a longer stay in outer space.
Underwater and saturation diving habitats
[edit]Underwater habitats and surface saturation accommodation facilities provide life-support for their occupants over periods of days to weeks. The occupants are constrained from immediate return to surface atmospheric pressure by decompression obligations of up to several weeks.
The life support system of a surface saturation accommodation facility provides breathing gas and other services to support life for the personnel under pressure. It includes the following components:[12] Underwater habitats differ in that the ambient external pressure is the same as internal pressure, so some engineering problems are simplified.
- Gas compression, mixing and storage facilities
- Chamber climate control system – control of temperature and humidity, and filtration of gas
- Instrumentation, control, monitoring and communications equipment
- Fire suppression systems
- Sanitation systems
Underwater habitats balance internal pressure with the ambient external pressure, allowing the occupants free access to the ambient environment within a specific depth range, while saturation divers accommodated in surface systems are transferred under pressure to the working depth in a closed diving bell
The life support system for the bell provides and monitors the main supply of breathing gas, and the control station monitors the deployment and communications with the divers. Primary gas supply, power and communications to the bell are through a bell umbilical, made up from a number of hoses and electrical cables twisted together and deployed as a unit.[13] This is extended to the divers through the diver umbilicals.[12]
The accommodation life support system maintains the chamber environment within the acceptable range for health and comfort of the occupants. Temperature, humidity, breathing gas quality sanitation systems and equipment function are monitored and controlled.[13]
Experimental life-support systems
[edit]MELiSSA
[edit]Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) is a European Space Agency led initiative, conceived as a micro-organisms and higher plants based ecosystem intended as a tool to gain understanding of the behaviour of artificial ecosystems, and for the development of the technology for a future regenerative life-support system for long term crewed space missions.
CyBLiSS
[edit]CyBLiSS ("Cyanobacterium-Based Life Support Systems") is a concept developed by researchers from several space agencies (NASA, the German Aerospace Center and the Italian Space Agency) which would use cyanobacteria to process resources available on Mars directly into useful products, and into substrates[clarification needed] for other key organisms of Bioregenerative life support system (BLSS).[14] The goal is to make future human-occupied outposts on Mars as independent of Earth as possible (explorers living "off the land"), to reduce mission costs and increase safety. Even though developed independently, CyBLiSS would be complementary to other BLSS projects (such as MELiSSA) as it can connect them to materials found on Mars, thereby making them sustainable and expandable there. Instead of relying on a closed loop, new elements found on site can be brought into the system.
See also
[edit]
- Bioregenerative life support system (BLSS) – Artificial ecosystem
- Closed ecological system – Ecosystem that does not exchange matter with the exterior
- Effect of spaceflight on the human body – Medical issues associated with spaceflight
- Environmental control system – Aircraft system which maintains internal pressurization, climate, air supply, and more
- International Conference on Environmental Systems – Conference on human spaceflight technology and space human factors
- ISS ECLSS – International Space Station life-support system
- Primary life support system – Life support device for a space suit
- Saturation diving system – Facility for supporting saturation diving projects
- Spacecraft thermal control – Process of keeping all parts of a spacecraft within acceptable temperature ranges
- Submarine#Life support systems – Watercraft capable of independent underwater operation
Footnotes
[edit]- ^ "Definition of LIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEM". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
- ^ NASA, 2008
- ^ Barry 2000.
- ^ Sulzman & Genin 1994.
- ^ a b c d Davis, Johnson & Stepanek 2008.
- ^ NASA-HSF
- ^ "Habitation module of Soyuz spacecraft". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
- ^ Paragon Projects
- ^ NASA 2010
- ^ Paragon Press Release
- ^ Bigelow Volunteers
- ^ a b Crawford, J. (2016). "8.5.1 Helium recovery systems". Offshore Installation Practice (revised ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 150–155. ISBN 9781483163192.
- ^ a b Staff, US Navy (2006). "15". US Navy Diving Manual, 6th revision. United States: US Naval Sea Systems Command. Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2008.
- ^ Verseux, Cyprien; Baqué, Mickael; Lehto, Kirsi; de Vera, Jean-Pierre P.; Rothschild, Lynn J.; Billi, Daniela (3 August 2015). "Sustainable life support on Mars – the potential roles of cyanobacteria". International Journal of Astrobiology. 15 (1): 65–92. Bibcode:2016IJAsB..15...65V. doi:10.1017/S147355041500021X.
References
[edit]- Barry, Patrick L. (13 November 2000). "Breathing Easy on the Space Station". Science@NASA. Archived from the original on 21 September 2008.
- Bell, Trudy E. (11 May 2007). "Preventing "Sick" Spaceships". Science@NASA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2012.
- "Volunteers Test Bigelow Life-Support Gear". Aviation Week. 22 October 2010. Retrieved 23 October 2010.[dead link]
- Davis, Jeffrey R.; Johnson, Robert & Stepanek, Jan (2008). Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine. Vol. XII. Philadelphia PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 261–264.
- "International Space Station Environmental Control and Life Support System" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 November 2010. Retrieved 11 December 2010.
- "Commercial Crew and Cargo Paragon CCDev". NASA. 30 November 2010. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 2 February 2011.
- "HSF – The Shuttle: Environmental Control and Life Support System". NASA. Archived from the original on 9 November 2000.
- "Paragon Projects". Paragon. January 2011. Archived from the original on 24 June 2011.
- "Press Release – Paragon Space Development Corporation Completes All Development Milestones on the NASA Commercial Crew Development Program". Paragon Space Development Corporation. Archived from the original on 31 January 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2012.
- Sulzman, F.M.; Genin, A.M. (1994). Space, Biology, and Medicine, vol. II: Life Support and Habitability. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Further reading
[edit]- Eckart, Peter. Spaceflight Life Support and Biospherics. Torrance, CA: Microcosm Press; 1996. ISBN 1-881883-04-3.
- Larson, Wiley J. and Pranke, Linda K., eds. Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design. New York: McGraw Hill; 1999. ISBN 0-07-236811-X.
- Reed, Ronald D. and Coulter, Gary R. Physiology of Spaceflight – Chapter 5: 103–132.
- Eckart, Peter and Doll, Susan. Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) – Chapter 17: 539–572.
- Griffin, Brand N., Spampinato, Phil, and Wilde, Richard C. Extravehicular Activity Systems – Chapter 22: 707–738.
- Wieland, Paul O., Designing for Human Presence in Space: An Introduction to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA Reference Publication RP-1324, 1994
External links
[edit]- Environmental Control and Life Support System (NASA-KSC) Archived 26 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- Dedication and Perspiration Builds the Next Generation Life Support System (NASA, Fall 2007) Archived 16 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- Aerospace Biomedical and Life Support Engineering (MIT OpenCourseWare page – Spring 2006)
- Space Advanced Life Support (Purdue course page – Spring 2004)
- Advanced Life support for missions to Mars
- Mars Advanced Life Support
- Mars Life Support Systems
- Publications on Mars Life Support Systems
- Personal Hygiene in Space (Canadian Space Agency)
- Plants will Be Critical for Human Life Support Systems in Space
| General | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applications | |||||||
| Human spaceflight |
| ||||||
| Spacecraft | |||||||
| Destinations | |||||||
| Space launch | |||||||
| Ground segment | |||||||
| National | |
|---|---|
| Other | |
Life-support system
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
A life-support system is an engineered collection of technologies designed to sustain human life in controlled or hostile environments where natural resources like breathable air, potable water, and stable temperatures are unavailable or insufficient, such as in spacecraft, submarines, or isolated habitats.[1] These systems typically encompass subsystems for environmental control, including atmospheric pressure regulation, oxygen generation, carbon dioxide removal, and humidity management; water recovery and purification; waste processing to prevent contamination; and thermal regulation to maintain habitable conditions.[2] Originating from early space exploration efforts, life-support systems have evolved from open-loop designs reliant on expendable supplies to closed-loop regenerative systems that recycle resources with high efficiency, achieving up to 98% water recovery in modern implementations on the International Space Station.[3]
In space applications, pioneered by organizations like NASA, these systems are critical for long-duration missions, integrating physicochemical processes—such as electrolysis for oxygen production and filtration for air purification—with emerging bioregenerative elements like plant-based carbon dioxide scrubbing to mimic Earth's ecosystems.[4] Beyond space, analogous systems support underwater habitats and polar expeditions by addressing similar challenges of resource scarcity and environmental isolation.[2] Key challenges in their design include ensuring reliability through redundancy, minimizing mass and energy use for launch constraints, and mitigating risks like microbial contamination or system failures that could endanger crews.[5] Advances continue to focus on sustainability, with research into hybrid biological-physical integrations for future Mars missions and deep-space travel.[6]
This process, reversed in photosynthesis, enables carbon cycling, with energy input driving the production of biomass from CO₂ and water. Such technologies address limitations of open-loop systems by reducing resupply needs for long-duration missions, though they face challenges like slow biological reaction rates and risks of microbial contamination.[128] The European Space Agency's (ESA) Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA), initiated in 1988, exemplifies a comprehensive closed-loop system designed to recycle human wastes into edible biomass, oxygen, and water. It operates as a five-compartment loop: Compartment 1 performs anaerobic digestion of solid wastes like feces using thermophilic bacteria to liquefy organics, achieving up to 70% efficiency with ongoing improvements targeting over 90%; Compartment 2 employs photoheterotrophic bacteria to further process dissolved organics; Compartment 3 uses nitrifying bacteria to convert ammonia to nitrates; Compartment 4 involves phototrophic microorganisms such as Arthrospira (spirulina) for oxygen production and biomass generation; and Compartment 5 integrates higher plants for additional food and resource production. The system's pilot plant, established in 2009 at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, integrates these compartments to test full-loop functionality, supporting small-scale crews like rats in closed environments. In 2025, ESA demonstrated wastewater recycling in a MELiSSA compartment and hosted the 8th MELiSSA Conference (October 7-9, Granada, Spain) to advance closed-loop technologies.[128][129][130][131] MELiSSA's development includes ground-based breadboard testing in the 2000s, such as the pilot-scale waste compartment validated in 2004, and spaceflight demonstrations on the International Space Station (ISS), including experiments from 2002–2008 (e.g., MESSAGE and BASE series) to assess microbial performance under microgravity and radiation, with more recent ISS flights in the 2010s and 2020s evaluating cyanobacterial growth models for photobioreactors. These tests have demonstrated robust operation but highlight limitations, including slow degradation rates limited by fibrous wastes and pure-culture constraints (achieving only a few percent daily conversion), as well as contamination risks from microbial mutations and biosafety issues in enclosed systems.[128][132][133] The Cyanobacterium-Based Life Support System (CyBLiSS), a conceptual framework explored in collaboration with NASA interests for Mars missions, leverages cyanobacteria for oxygen production and CO₂ fixation to support human habitation in extraterrestrial environments. Cyanobacteria, such as Anabaena sp., perform photosynthesis to generate O₂ while fixing CO₂ from the atmosphere, often integrated with algal components for enhanced biomass and resource yield; the system utilizes local Martian resources like regolith simulants for nutrient input, reducing Earth dependency. Efficiency for O₂ production in such cyanobacterial setups reaches approximately 1-2 kg O₂/m²/year under optimized conditions, comparable to algal photobioreactors tested for space applications.[134][135] CyBLiSS prototypes have undergone ground tests in photobioreactors simulating Mars conditions, including low-pressure (100-200 Pa) N₂/CO₂ atmospheres and temperatures from 0-20°C, achieving biomass growth rates of 0.36 g dry weight/L—similar to Earth norms—and O₂ evolution up to 0.5 µmol/h/g dry weight, with successful integration of waste feeds like E. coli cultures over 10-28 day periods. Limitations include reduced photosynthetic efficiency (20-50% of Earth rates) under low pressure, sensitivity to regolith toxins like perchlorates, and challenges in scaling due to variable environmental acclimation. These systems complement broader NASA bioregenerative efforts, emphasizing microbial resilience for sustainable exploration.[134][136]
Human Physiological and Metabolic Needs
Atmosphere
A breathable atmosphere in isolated environments, such as spacecraft or habitats, is engineered to replicate Earth's sea-level composition, consisting of approximately 21% oxygen (O₂), 78% nitrogen (N₂), and 1% trace gases including argon and carbon dioxide (CO₂). This balance supports human respiration and metabolic processes, with oxygen serving as the primary gas for cellular energy production. In space life-support systems, the total pressure is often maintained between 34.5 kPa and 103 kPa (5.0–15.0 psia), while the partial pressure of oxygen (ppO₂) is maintained above a minimum of 122 mmHg (1-hour average) and typically controlled to 145–155 mmHg to ensure normoxia.[7][8] Deviations from these parameters pose significant physiological risks: hypoxia occurs below a ppO₂ of 122 mmHg (16 kPa), leading to fatigue, dizziness, cognitive impairment, and potential unconsciousness within minutes; hypercapnia from CO₂ partial pressures exceeding 3 mmHg (0.4 kPa) induces headaches, increased respiratory rate, acidosis, and cardiovascular strain; and toxicity from elevated trace gases, such as carbon monoxide or volatile organics, can impair neurological function and hemoglobin binding even at low concentrations.[9][8][9] Oxygen supply is critical and generated through established physicochemical methods to sustain crew needs, estimated at 0.84 kg per person per day. Electrolysis of water is the primary technique, applying electrical current to decompose purified water (H₂O) into oxygen (O₂) and hydrogen (H₂) gases, with systems like NASA's Oxygen Generation System (OGS) producing up to 5.74 kg (270 L at standard conditions) of O₂ per cell per day to support up to 11 crew members at efficiencies above 90%. The hydrogen byproduct is vented or repurposed. Complementing this, the Sabatier reaction enables CO₂ reduction by catalyzing the combination of captured CO₂ and H₂ (from electrolysis) to yield methane (CH₄) and water (2H₂O + CO₂ → CH₄ + 2H₂O), which is then electrolyzed to regenerate oxygen; this process recycles approximately 50% of metabolic CO₂, conserving water resources equivalent to 400 liters annually for a three-person crew.[10][10] Carbon dioxide removal is equally vital, as crew exhalation produces about 1 kg per person per day, necessitating continuous scrubbing to prevent hypercapnia. Lithium hydroxide (LiOH) canisters provide a simple, non-regenerable chemical absorption method (2LiOH + CO₂ → Li₂CO₃ + H₂O), historically used in short-duration missions for their reliability and low mass, such as during Apollo flights where canisters lasted 5–12 days before replacement. For longer missions, regenerable adsorbents dominate: zeolite molecular sieves selectively trap CO₂ molecules via pressure-swing adsorption (PSA) or temperature-swing adsorption (TSA), desorbing the gas through vacuum or heating cycles (up to 400°F); the International Space Station's Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA) employs a four-bed zeolite system to maintain ppCO₂ at 2.0–3.9 mmHg. Amine swing beds offer an alternative, using solid amine resins to adsorb CO₂ and water vapor in alternating beds, regenerated by thermal or pressure swings, providing compact, low-power operation suitable for extended habitation with a service life of 3–5 years.[12][12][12] Atmospheric monitoring and control rely on integrated sensor networks and automated systems within environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS). Sensors continuously measure ppO₂ (target 145–155 mmHg), ppCO₂ (≤3 mmHg average over one hour), total pressure, humidity, and trace contaminants using electrochemical cells, infrared analyzers, and mass spectrometers, with data processed against spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations (SMACs). Automated feedback loops employ proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers or supervisory algorithms to adjust oxygen generation, CO₂ scrubbing, and ventilation rates in real-time, ensuring rapid response to anomalies like metabolic surges or leaks while minimizing crew intervention; for instance, the ECLSS air revitalization subsystem trends environmental parameters and alerts for excursions beyond safe limits.[4][13][4] Early spaceflights underscored the challenges of atmospheric regulation in unproven systems. During the first human orbital mission in Vostok 1 (1961), maintaining stable cabin pressure and gas composition proved demanding amid launch vibrations and orbital dynamics, highlighting the need for robust controls in nascent life-support technologies.[14]Water
In life-support systems for closed environments, water management is critical to sustain human hydration, hygiene, and equipment functionality while minimizing mass and resupply demands. Each crew member typically requires 2-3 liters of potable water daily for drinking and food rehydration, with additional allocations for personal hygiene, oral care, and minor medical uses elevating the total consumption to approximately 10-15 liters per person per day.[15][16] These requirements vary by mission duration and activity levels, such as extravehicular activities that demand up to 0.24 liters per hour for cooling garments.[15] Water sourcing in such systems relies on a combination of stored potable supplies and recovered resources to achieve sustainability. Primary sources include pre-mission stored water for initial potable needs, recovery from urine and stowage condensates generated during waste management, and collection of humidity condensates from cabin air.[1] These approaches ensure a closed-loop cycle, where wastewater from daily activities is captured and repurposed rather than discarded.[3] Purification processes are designed to eliminate contaminants like microbes, organics, and inorganics from recovered water streams. Multifiltration beds, employing activated carbon and ion exchange resins, remove particulates, dissolved solids, and organic compounds in sequential stages.[17] Iodine-based disinfection is commonly applied as a biocide to prevent microbial growth, often via iodinated resins that provide residual protection without compromising material compatibility.[18] For urine processing, catalytic oxidation breaks down urea and other volatiles using heated catalysts, converting them into water vapor and carbon dioxide for further recovery.[19] Recycling efficiencies in advanced life-support systems reach up to 98%, enabling long-duration missions by reclaiming nearly all usable water and reducing the need for external resupply.[3] This high recovery is governed by mass balance principles in the water loop, expressed as: where losses are minimized to less than 5% through optimized filtration and distillation.[3] Distribution systems then deliver purified water at controlled temperatures—typically 18-27°C for potable use and warmer for hygiene—to crew interfaces and subsystems. A pivotal event underscoring water contingency needs occurred during the Apollo 13 mission in 1970, when an oxygen tank explosion damaged power and cooling systems, slashing available water and forcing the crew to ration intake to about 0.18 liters per person per day amid dehydration risks and subfreezing cabin conditions. This crisis, resolved through improvised conservation, prompted NASA to enhance redundancy and planning in subsequent life-support designs, including diversified water storage and failover recovery mechanisms.[20]Food
In life-support systems for isolated environments such as space missions, food provision is critical to meet the physiological demands of human metabolism, providing approximately 2,500 kilocalories per day per astronaut to sustain energy levels and bodily functions. This intake must include a balanced composition of macronutrients—typically 50-60% carbohydrates, 15-20% proteins, and 20-30% fats—along with essential micronutrients like vitamins and minerals to prevent deficiencies. In microgravity conditions, additional challenges arise, such as accelerated bone loss, which necessitates calcium-rich diets supplemented with at least 1,000 milligrams of calcium daily to mitigate demineralization rates that can reach 1-2% per month without countermeasures. Storage methods for space food prioritize compactness, stability, and minimal waste in mass-constrained habitats. Common techniques include dehydration to remove water content, reducing weight by up to 80% while preserving nutritional value, and thermostabilization through retorting or irradiation to extend shelf life to 3-5 years without refrigeration. Irradiation, using doses of 0.5-1.0 kilograys of gamma radiation, effectively eliminates microbial contamination and enzymatic degradation, ensuring safety during long-duration missions. Packaging often employs flexible pouches or rigid containers made from lightweight aluminum-laminated films to withstand vacuum and temperature extremes from -20°C to 60°C. Early life-support systems, such as those in NASA's Mercury program, relied on simple pre-packaged meals stored in thermos flasks to deliver nutrition during short orbital flights. In 1961, astronauts like Alan Shepard consumed semi-liquid foods such as applesauce and cubes of dehydrated meat or vegetables, totaling around 1,600 kilocalories per mission day, packaged in bite-sized forms to minimize crumbs in zero gravity. These approaches emphasized reliability over variety, with foods selected for high caloric density—often exceeding 4 kilocalories per gram—to fit within the program's limited payload capacity of about 15 kilograms per mission. Emerging technologies aim to produce food in situ, reducing resupply needs for extended missions to Mars or beyond. Aeroponics systems, which mist nutrient solutions onto plant roots in a controlled environment, enable the cultivation of vegetables like lettuce or potatoes with 90-95% less water than traditional hydroponics, yielding up to 10 kilograms of produce per square meter annually under LED lighting optimized for photosynthesis. Algae-based protein sources, such as spirulina, offer a compact alternative, providing 60-70% protein by dry weight and generating oxygen as a byproduct, with cultivation systems achieving biomass densities of 1-2 grams per liter in photobioreactors. For mass-limited missions, caloric density calculations prioritize foods yielding at least 1.5 kilocalories per gram, balancing nutritional completeness with storage efficiency to support crews of four for 1,000 days on approximately 2,500 kilograms total. Beyond physical sustenance, food in life-support systems plays a key role in maintaining crew health and morale. Historical incidents, such as scurvy outbreaks during 18th-century sea voyages, underscored the need for vitamin C supplementation, leading to modern protocols that ensure 90 milligrams daily intake through fortified or fresh sources to prevent symptoms like fatigue and gum disease. Varied menus, incorporating cultural preferences and sensory diversity—such as textured proteins or flavored rehydratable entrees—help combat psychological stressors like monotony, with studies showing that menu diversity correlates with 20-30% improvements in mood and performance during simulated isolation.Gravity
In microgravity environments, the human body experiences significant physiological changes due to the absence of gravitational loading. One immediate effect is fluid shift, where bodily fluids redistribute from the lower extremities toward the head and torso, leading to facial puffiness, reduced leg volume, and potential cardiovascular adjustments such as decreased plasma volume by up to 10-20% within days.[21] This shift contributes to orthostatic intolerance upon return to Earth gravity. Over longer durations, muscle atrophy occurs, particularly in antigravity muscles like those in the legs and back, with losses of 1-3% per week in fast-twitch fibers without countermeasures. Bone density loss is also pronounced, averaging 1-2% per month in weight-bearing bones such as the hips and spine, akin to accelerated osteoporosis, due to reduced mechanical stress on the skeletal system.[22][23] To mitigate these effects, artificial gravity simulation techniques are employed to replicate Earth's gravitational pull. Centrifugation is the primary method, using rotational motion to generate centrifugal force that mimics gravity; for instance, a centrifuge with a radius of 6-10 meters can produce 1g at the periphery while minimizing Coriolis effects that cause disorientation.[24] Larger radii reduce the perceived gradient in gravity levels across the body and lessen motion sickness risks associated with head movements. An alternative approach is linear acceleration via spacecraft propulsion, where continuous thrust creates a constant acceleration equivalent to gravity, directing "down" toward the rear of the vehicle; however, this requires sustained propulsion, limiting its practicality for long-duration missions without advanced engines.[24] The dynamics of rotational artificial gravity follow the equation for centrifugal acceleration: where is the simulated gravity, is the angular velocity in radians per second, is the radius of rotation, and m/s² is Earth's gravitational acceleration. Solving for angular velocity gives: To avoid motion sickness from Coriolis forces during head movements, is typically limited to less than 2 rad/s (approximately 19 rpm), though adaptation allows higher rates up to 6 rpm (1 rad/s) for radii around 25 meters with training.[25][26] Historical tests of artificial gravity countermeasures include experiments on Skylab in 1973, where crew members and biological samples, such as spiders and fish, were studied in microgravity to assess orientation and physiological responses, with ground-based centrifuges simulating partial gravity for comparison; these informed early understandings of gravity's role in development and adaptation.[27] For long-duration missions, such as those to Mars, partial gravity levels like 0.38g raise questions about adequacy compared to full 1g simulation. While 0.38g may partially mitigate bone loss and muscle atrophy—reducing demineralization rates by 50-70% relative to microgravity—evidence suggests it insufficiently prevents cardiovascular deconditioning or fully restores bone health, necessitating hybrid countermeasures like exercise or intermittent full-gravity exposure via centrifugation.[28][29] Full Earth-like simulation remains ideal for sustained human health, though partial gravity habitats could serve transitional roles with ongoing research.Temperature and Radiation Protection
Maintaining appropriate temperature and humidity levels is essential for human comfort and physiological function in space environments, where the cabin must support thermal neutrality to prevent heat stress or hypothermia. According to NASA standards, the operating limits for cabin temperature are 18°C to 27°C, with a nominal comfort zone of 20°C to 25°C, while relative humidity should be kept between 25% and 75%, ideally 30% to 60% for optimal performance and to avoid issues like dry skin or microbial growth.[30] These ranges ensure that crew members can perform tasks without thermal discomfort, as deviations can impair cognitive function and physical efficiency. Human thermal regulation in such confined spaces relies on the body heat balance equation, , where represents net heat storage (or loss if negative), is metabolic heat production (typically 100 W at rest, up to 500 W during activity), is external work output, and is evaporative heat loss through sweat.[31] This equation underscores the need for environmental controls to match the body's heat dissipation to its production, preventing core temperature rises above 37°C or drops below 35°C that could lead to fatigue or organ strain.[32] Thermal control systems in life-support setups employ both passive and active methods to achieve this balance amid the vacuum of space, which eliminates convective cooling and exposes vehicles to extreme external temperatures from -150°C in shadow to +120°C in sunlight. Passive techniques include multi-layer insulation (MLI) blankets, which reflect up to 99% of solar radiation and minimize conductive heat loss through low-emissivity surfaces, and phase-change materials (PCMs) like paraffin wax embedded in walls or garments that absorb excess heat by melting at set temperatures (around 20-30°C) before releasing it during cooldown cycles.[33] Active systems complement these by using radiators to reject waste heat—often via ammonia loops that transport heat from the cabin to external panels, where it is radiated away—and electric heaters for cold periods, ensuring precise regulation within ±1°C. For instance, PCMs have been tested in NASA prototypes to handle transient loads during high-metabolism activities, providing buffer capacity without power draw.[34] Beyond thermal management, life-support systems must shield against ionizing radiation, primarily galactic cosmic rays (GCR)—high-energy protons and heavy ions from outside the solar system—and solar particle events (SPE), bursts of protons from solar flares that can deliver acute doses up to 1 Sv in hours.[35] GCR pose a chronic risk, contributing 0.3-1 Sv per year in deep space, while SPE can overwhelm unshielded habitats, increasing cancer risk or causing immediate radiation sickness. Effective shielding uses hydrogen-rich materials like polyethylene, which fragments heavy ions more efficiently than aluminum; layers of 5-20 g/cm² polyethylene can reduce effective dose by 45-65% for SPE and moderate GCR exposure by scattering particles without producing excessive secondary radiation.[36] Early missions like Apollo in 1969 demonstrated practical mitigation by rapidly traversing the Van Allen belts—Earth's trapped proton and electron zones—in under an hour, limiting doses to about 0.16-1.14 rad (1.6-11.4 mGy) per mission, far below harmful levels, though SPE storms remain a contingency threat requiring storm shelters.[37] Continuous monitoring employs thermal sensors (thermistors and infrared detectors) for real-time cabin temperature and humidity tracking, integrated into environmental control systems, alongside personal and area dosimeters (e.g., thermoluminescent or CR-39 detectors) that measure radiation dose equivalents in μSv, alerting crews to exceedances and informing shielding adjustments.[35]Life Support in Space Vehicles
Early Programs (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo)
The early U.S. manned spaceflight programs, including Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo, relied on open-loop life support systems that supplied consumables without significant regeneration, prioritizing reliability for short-duration missions of minutes to days. These systems addressed basic human needs for breathable atmosphere, thermal control, and waste management within compact spacecraft, laying the groundwork for subsequent developments despite limitations in efficiency and mass.[38] Project Mercury, NASA's first human spaceflight program from 1961 to 1963, featured a one-person capsule with a pure oxygen atmosphere at 5 psi to simplify pressure vessel design and suit integration while meeting partial pressure requirements for respiration. Carbon dioxide was scrubbed using replaceable lithium hydroxide canisters, which absorbed CO2 through chemical reaction, with canisters changed as needed during missions. The system's design supported suborbital flights of about 15 minutes, such as Alan Shepard's 1961 mission, up to orbital durations of roughly one day, like John Glenn's in 1962, limited by finite supplies of oxygen, water, and lithium hydroxide without recycling capabilities.[39][40] The Gemini program, spanning 1965 to 1966, advanced to two-person spacecraft capable of multi-day missions, introducing fuel cell power systems that generated electricity by combining stored hydrogen and oxygen, producing potable water as a byproduct for crew consumption and cooling. This innovation reduced the need for separate water storage compared to Mercury, with fuel cells providing both energy and up to several liters of water per day depending on power draw. Gemini also integrated life support with extravehicular activity (EVA) suits, using umbilicals for oxygen, cooling, and communication during the first U.S. spacewalks, such as Ed White's in 1965. An early innovation was testing urine collection and partial water recovery processes, where urine was transferred via a specialized assembly for ground-based analysis and initial freeze-drying experiments to assess feasibility for future reclamation, though operational dumping remained primary.[41][42][43] Apollo missions from 1968 to 1972 built on prior programs for three-person crews and lunar objectives, incorporating lessons from the 1967 Apollo 1 fire, which exposed risks of pure oxygen at launch pressures; subsequent flights used a mixed-gas atmosphere of 60% oxygen and 40% nitrogen at sea-level pressure during ground operations and ascent, transitioning to pure oxygen at 5 psi in orbit to conserve mass and enable EVAs. Thermal control employed dual water-glycol cooling loops circulating a 50/50 mixture to absorb heat from electronics, suits, and cabin air via cold plates and evaporators, maintaining temperatures between 65°F and 75°F. A notable contingency arose during the 1970 Apollo 13 mission, where rising CO2 levels in the lunar module—due to mismatched square command module lithium hydroxide canisters—required an improvised adapter using plastic bags, cardboard, and tape to connect the canisters, successfully restoring safe levels after about 90 minutes of exposure.[44][45][46] Across these programs, open-loop designs predominated, with expendables like lithium hydroxide and water vented overboard after use, contributing to high system masses—for instance, the Apollo command module's environmental control system, including oxygen tanks and cooling hardware, weighed approximately 200 kg dry, plus over 300 kg in consumables for a typical mission. This approach ensured simplicity and safety for durations up to two weeks but imposed payload penalties, highlighting the need for regenerative technologies in later eras.[47][38]Shuttle and Post-Shuttle Vehicles (Space Shuttle, Soyuz, Orion)
The Space Shuttle's Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) incorporated multiple redundant subsystems to maintain crew safety across its operational lifespan from 1981 to 2011, supporting missions of up to 16 days with the Extended Duration Orbiter configuration.[48] Key redundancies included dual pressure control systems for oxygen and nitrogen supply, dual water cooling loops, and dual Freon acquisition loops, enabling failover during potential failures without compromising atmospheric control or thermal regulation.[48] Thermal management relied on a flash evaporator system that circulated supply water through heat exchangers to cool Freon loops, evaporating water into steam vented overboard to reject excess heat from avionics and cabin environments.[49] Carbon dioxide removal primarily used lithium hydroxide (LiOH) canisters, which chemically absorbed CO2 from cabin air at a rate of approximately 2.11 pounds per person per day, with metal oxide (MetOx) canisters employed for extravehicular activity scrubbing in spacesuits and airlocks.[50] The Soyuz spacecraft's life support system provides essential atmospheric control for low-Earth orbit missions, featuring electrochemical oxygen generators that electrolyze water to produce breathable O2 and hydrogen, which is vented overboard.[51] Water supply integrates stored potable reserves with recovery from humidity condensers, supplemented in some configurations by byproducts from auxiliary power systems, supporting a crew of three for up to several days undocked.[51] Following the 2011 transition to digital avionics in the Soyuz TMA-M series and subsequent Soyuz MS upgrades, enhancements included improved digital monitoring interfaces for real-time assessment of environmental parameters, facilitating safer International Space Station docking and extended stays into the 2020s.[52] These updates incorporated automated sensors for oxygen levels, pressure, and humidity, reducing crew workload and enhancing reliability during orbital operations.[53] Orion, developed for NASA's Artemis program, advances life support toward deep-space sustainability with a closed-loop ECLSS designed to support four crew members for missions beyond low-Earth orbit.[54] Urine processors recover up to 85% of water from crew waste through vapor compression distillation, integrating with broader wastewater treatment to minimize resupply needs and enable durations of up to 21 days undocked.[55] For radiation protection, the crew module incorporates designated storm shelters—shielded volumes using the vehicle's structure and water walls—to mitigate exposure during solar particle events, validated during the uncrewed Artemis I flight in 2022.[56] Crewed missions, beginning with Artemis II in 2026 as of November 2025, will leverage these features for lunar and eventual Mars trajectories.[57] Across the Space Shuttle, Soyuz, and Orion, life support architectures blend open-loop expendables—like stored gases and absorbents—with closed-loop recycling for water and air revitalization, achieving mass efficiencies through reduced consumable payloads compared to earlier programs.[58] The Shuttle's ECLSS, for instance, optimized payload capacity by integrating hybrid processes that minimized launch mass for short-duration flights.[59] A notable incident highlighting thermal vulnerabilities occurred during the 2003 Space Shuttle Columbia mission, where foam debris damaged the wing's heat shield tiles, allowing superheated plasma to breach the structure during reentry and overwhelm life support systems with extreme temperatures exceeding 1,650°C, resulting in the loss of the vehicle and crew.[60] This event underscored the critical interplay between thermal protection and ECLSS integrity, prompting reinforced design standards for post-Shuttle vehicles like Orion.[60]Commercial and Emerging Vehicles (Crew Dragon, Starliner)
The SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft represents a significant advancement in private-sector life support for crewed orbital missions, featuring an integrated Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) that supports up to four astronauts for durations of up to 210 days when docked to the International Space Station (ISS), with independent operation limited to about five days or 20 person-days. The ECLSS maintains cabin pressure at 101 kPa with 21% oxygen, regulates temperature between 65-80°F, and includes subsystems for air revitalization using Lithium Hydroxide (LiOH) cartridges to scrub carbon dioxide, achieving effective removal during nominal missions with one in-flight cartridge swap. Water management relies on a Nafion membrane dehumidifier to extract humidity from the cabin atmosphere, though excess water vapor is vented to space rather than fully recycled for potable use in short transits; overall water recovery efficiency is estimated at approximately 90%, adapted from ISS-derived technologies for urine and condensate processing. The system's abort capability is enhanced by eight SuperDraco engines integrated into the capsule's structure, enabling instantaneous escape from launch anomalies while preserving ECLSS functionality to sustain the crew post-abort. Autonomous docking, facilitated by LIDAR, cameras, and thermal sensors, allows touchless alignment with the ISS's International Docking Adapter, minimizing crew intervention and supporting seamless life support handoff to station systems upon arrival.[61][62][63][64] Crew Dragon's ECLSS mass is approximately 500 kg, benefiting from simplified avionics that reduce overall vehicle complexity and enable reusability, with the system validated during the Demo-2 mission in May 2020—the first crewed flight from U.S. soil since 2011—which confirmed ECLSS performance in maintaining a stable atmosphere and supporting two astronauts for the round-trip to the ISS. Oxygen supply utilizes solid fuel oxygen generators delivering about 1 kg per crew member per day, supplemented by stored reserves for redundancy. This design has enabled key milestones, including routine six-month crew rotations to the ISS throughout the 2020s, where the capsule's life support interfaces with station resources during docked operations, demonstrating reliability for extended orbital stays under NASA's Commercial Crew Program (CCP). Advancements like AI-assisted monitoring of atmospheric parameters further enhance fault detection, though the system prioritizes physicochemical processes over full bioregeneration for cost-effective, short-to-medium missions.[61][61] Boeing's CST-100 Starliner incorporates an autonomous ECLSS tailored for up to seven passengers (four for NASA missions), focusing on short-duration transits with ground landings via parachutes and airbags, and reusability up to 10 flights. The system provides oxygen via compressed gas tanks at approximately 1.2 kg per crew member per day, with air revitalization handling carbon dioxide removal and humidity control through a dedicated Humidity Control Subassembly (HCS) that models water extraction for cabin comfort. Water recovery efficiency stands at about 85%, processing urine and humidity for reuse, though optimized for missions under a week independent of the ISS. Power for ECLSS operations draws from lithium-ion batteries in the service module, offering higher energy density than traditional systems and supporting autonomous functions during ascent and reentry. The Orbital Flight Test-2 (OFT-2) in May 2022 successfully demonstrated these elements in an uncrewed configuration, validating ECLSS integration with the vehicle's pusher abort engines—four units providing 40,000 lbf thrust each—for crew safety. However, the planned crewed debut in 2024 faced delays due to propulsion anomalies during the Crew Flight Test, resulting in an uncrewed return and astronauts relying on a SpaceX Crew Dragon for repatriation.[61][65][61][63] Starliner's ECLSS mass is estimated at around 600 kg, with avionics simplifications aiding mass efficiency, though certification challenges under the NASA CCP persist as of 2025, stemming from in-flight helium leaks and thruster performance issues that require additional uncrewed testing potentially into 2026. Autonomous docking mirrors Crew Dragon's approach, using vision-based electro-optical sensors for touchless ISS attachment. Post-2025, both vehicles are slated for Mars analog evaluations to assess ECLSS scalability for deep-space transits, focusing on extended resource closure and radiation exposure during simulated journeys, building on low-Earth orbit successes to inform future hybrid systems. These commercial designs emphasize automation and reduced mass over legacy government vehicles, enabling cost-effective access to orbit while addressing certification hurdles for reliable human spaceflight.[61][66][67][68]Life Support in Space Stations and Long-Duration Habitats
Early Stations (Skylab, Salyut, Mir)
The early space stations, including the United States' Skylab and the Soviet Union's Salyut and Mir programs, represented pioneering efforts to sustain human life in orbit for extended durations, transitioning from short-term missions to semi-permanent habitats with crews typically numbering three members.[69] These stations featured semi-closed life support loops that relied on stored consumables supplemented by limited regeneration, such as CO2 scrubbing and partial water recovery, while grappling with challenges like atmospheric imbalances and crew isolation. With masses ranging from approximately 19 metric tons for Salyut cores to over 100 metric tons for the fully assembled Mir complex, they provided pressurized volumes of 100 to 350 cubic meters, enabling stays of weeks to months but highlighting the limitations of non-fully regenerative systems.[70][71] Skylab, launched in May 1973 as NASA's first space station, supported three crews over 24 weeks of occupancy, with the third mission setting a duration record of 84 days from November 1973 to February 1974. Its environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) maintained a 72% oxygen and 28% nitrogen atmosphere at 5 psia using stored gases (2,779 kg oxygen and 741 kg nitrogen at 3,000 psi), with no primary water electrolysis for oxygen generation, though a static-feed electrolysis subsystem served as backup. CO2 and humidity were managed via a regenerative two-canister molecular sieve unit employing Zeolite 5A for CO2 adsorption and Zeolite 13X for water vapor, with desorption venting waste gases directly to space; this system processed cabin air to keep CO2 below 4 mmHg and relative humidity between 50-55%. Water was supplied from 10 stored tanks totaling 2,722 kg, treated with iodine for microbial control, but urine and condensate were vented overboard without recovery, contributing to logistical constraints. Fecal waste was vacuum-dried in bags for storage. Crews encountered humidity fluctuations, including elevated levels from metabolic and equipment sources that occasionally led to condensation issues, though the sieve system mitigated major imbalances.[70][72][70] The Soviet Salyut program, initiated with Salyut 1 in April 1971, introduced modular station designs capable of hosting crews of three for missions up to several weeks, though early operations were marred by the Soyuz 11 tragedy in June 1971, where a faulty valve caused cabin depressurization during reentry, killing the crew due to inadequate pressure suits and sealing mechanisms in the life support interface.[73] Salyut stations maintained sea-level pressure with 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen, using potassium hydroxide (KOH) canisters and lithium hydroxide (LiOH) beds for CO2 absorption (removing up to 20% CO2 by mass) and potassium superoxide (KO2) candles for oxygen generation as primaries, with air flow rates adjustable between 0.1 and 0.8 m/s for circulation. Later variants like Salyut 6 and 7 incorporated the Vozdukh CO2 scrubber, a four-bed molecular sieve system using silica gel desiccants and zeolite adsorbents to regenerate and vent CO2, supporting more efficient long-duration stays. Water management involved partial recovery of atmospheric condensate via ion-exchange resins, filters, and mineral additives, stored in Rodnik tanks exceeding 400 liters and sanitized with 0.2 mg/L ionic silver; urine was separated but not recycled in early models. The Almaz military variants (disguised as Salyut 2, 3, and 5 from 1973-1976) adapted similar ECLSS for reconnaissance crews of three, emphasizing robust waste compaction and ejection for fecal matter in sealed containers to maintain hygiene in a combat-ready configuration.[70][70][71] Mir, operational from 1986 to 2001 as an expandable modular station with a core mass of 20.9 metric tons growing to over 130 metric tons through add-ons, advanced regenerative capabilities for crews of up to six during its 1990s expansions, including the addition of modules like Kvant-1 and Priroda. Its ECLSS featured the Elektron oxygen generator, a 12-cell alkaline electrolysis unit using potassium hydroxide electrolyte to split reclaimed water (from urine distillation yielding 5.4 L/day and condensate recovery of 21 L/day) into oxygen (up to 6 kg/day) and hydrogen vented overboard, supplemented by solid-fuel oxygen generators (SFOG) using sodium chlorate. CO2 control relied on the Vozdukh system, processing air at up to 27 m³/hour through desiccant and adsorbent beds to maintain levels below 5 mmHg, with trace contaminants filtered via charcoal and catalytic beds. Water was treated with ionic silver and partially recycled from hygiene sources, while waste included compacted feces for Progress resupply vehicle disposal. A notable incident occurred on February 24, 1997, when a fire in an SFOG canister burned for 14 minutes, prompting crew to extinguish it with water sprays; this caused a temporary CO2 partial pressure spike to approximately 20 mmHg, straining the Vozdukh units but avoided by rapid response and no injuries.[70][74][75] Across these stations, semi-closed loops predominated, with resupply via Progress or Apollo-Soyuz flights delivering expendables like oxygen canisters and water, while psychological strain from isolation emerged as a key challenge; for instance, Skylab 4's crew reported fatigue and workload overload leading to a brief "strike" in 1974, and Mir expeditions lasting over a year necessitated countermeasures like private communication and recreation to mitigate interpersonal tensions and monotony. Innovations on Mir included plant growth experiments in the Svet greenhouse, where Super Dwarf wheat was cultivated through full life cycles from 1990s missions, yielding biomass insights and serving as a precursor to bioregenerative systems by demonstrating microgravity effects on photosynthesis and potential for oxygen production and food supplementation.[76][77]International Space Station
The International Space Station (ISS), operational since 1998, features a modular Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) that sustains a multinational crew in low Earth orbit, serving as a benchmark for regenerative technologies in long-duration space habitation through 2025. The U.S. segment's ECLSS emphasizes water and air revitalization, achieving 98% water recovery to minimize resupply needs, while the Russian segment provides complementary systems for oxygen generation and carbon dioxide removal. This integrated approach supports up to six crew members, recycling metabolic byproducts into usable resources and demonstrating partial closure in a microgravity environment.[78][79][3] The ISS cabin atmosphere is maintained at a sea-level equivalent pressure of 14.7 psi (101.3 kPa), with a composition of 21% oxygen and 78% nitrogen to mimic Earth-like conditions and prevent hypoxia or hyperoxia. Carbon dioxide levels are controlled below 3 mmHg through dual systems: the Russian Vozdukh unit, which uses regenerable amine-based adsorbent beds to capture CO2 from cabin air, and the U.S. Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), employing zeolite beds in alternating cycles for adsorption and desorption via space vacuum and heat. Trace contaminants, such as volatile organics from equipment and crew activities, are scrubbed using activated charcoal beds within the U.S. Atmosphere Revitalization Subsystem, ensuring air quality meets health standards.[4][50][80] Water management on the ISS relies on the U.S. segment's Water Recovery System, which processes urine, sweat, and humidity condensates into potable water. The Urine Processor Assembly, installed in 2008 aboard the Destiny laboratory, distills pretreated urine through vapor compression and multi-effect distillation, recovering over 93% of its water content with the addition of the Brine Processor Assembly in 2021-2023 before further purification via the Water Processor Assembly's filtration and iodination steps. For a six-person crew, the overall system recycles 98% of total water usage—equivalent to handling 9 kg of urine daily—supplementing humidity condensate collection to produce drinkable water that meets NASA potability requirements.[81][82][3] Operational challenges in the ISS ECLSS include microbial growth in water recovery loops, where biofilms from bacteria like Ralstonia and fungi such as Penicillium accumulate in stagnant areas, increasing pressure drops and necessitating periodic filter replacements every 12-18 months. Mitigation involves biocide flushes with iodine-laced water and monthly tank cycling, though dormancy periods during crew transitions heighten risks of biomass buildup up to 1 gram in open systems. Ammonia leaks from the external cooling loops, such as those investigated in the 2010s, have occasionally prompted safety protocols, but no major life support-impacting incidents were reported in the 2020s. The ECLSS draws power from the station's solar arrays, which generate up to 215 kilowatts through eight primary wings augmented by roll-out panels, converting sunlight to electricity via photovoltaic cells to support pumps, heaters, and processors.[83][84] As of 2025, the ISS integrates commercial resupply missions to bolster ECLSS sustainability, with Northrop Grumman's NG-23 Cygnus spacecraft delivering over 11,000 pounds of cargo—including water, spare parts, and experiment materials—via SpaceX Falcon 9 launch on September 14, docked to the Unity module on September 18. These missions, part of NASA's Commercial Resupply Services, have cumulatively provided more than 159,000 pounds of supplies since 2013, reducing dependency on government launches and enabling extended operations amid the station's transition toward deorbit in 2030.[85][86]Future and Commercial Stations (Lunar Gateway, Axiom, Bigelow)
The Lunar Gateway, a key component of NASA's Artemis program, is designed as a lunar-orbiting outpost to support sustained human presence in deep space and facilitate lunar surface missions. Its Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO) module, scheduled for launch no earlier than 2027 aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy, will serve as the core habitation area with integrated environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS) capable of sustaining a crew of up to four for expeditions lasting at least 30 days, occurring every 1-3 years, while allowing for extended dormancy periods between visits.[87][88] The ECLSS, distributed across HALO and the European Space Agency's International Habitat (I-Hab) module contributed by JAXA, includes air revitalization, temperature and humidity control, water management, and waste processing to maintain habitable conditions during nominal operations and contingencies.[88][89] Additionally, the Gateway incorporates in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) elements for water extraction from lunar resources to supplement life support, and a dedicated radiation vault in HALO provides shielded workspace for crew during solar events, enhancing long-duration habitability.[90][88] Axiom Station, developed by Axiom Space as the world's first commercial space station, is positioned as a successor to the International Space Station (ISS), initially attaching to the ISS before detaching to operate independently in low Earth orbit. Its modular architecture begins with the Payload Power Thermal Module (AxPPTM) launching in 2027 to dock with the ISS, providing initial power and thermal systems that expand ECLSS capabilities for crewed operations, followed by Habitat Module 1 (AxH1) in 2028 to add living quarters for up to eight astronauts.[91][92] The ECLSS draws from proven ISS and Space Shuttle heritage, incorporating regenerative technologies for oxygen generation, water recovery, and atmospheric control to support commercial research, tourism, and manufacturing payloads in a microgravity environment.[93][92] Subsequent modules, such as the Axiom Power Tower (AxPT) in 2027 and Axiom Lab (AxL) in 2026 repurposed from ISS hardware, will further enhance life support redundancy and autonomy, enabling continuous human presence post-ISS deorbit around 2030 through a leasing model for government and private users.[91][92] Bigelow Aerospace's B330 represents an innovative approach to commercial space habitats through inflatable technology, aimed at providing expandable volume for life support in low Earth orbit or beyond, though development has stalled since the company's 2020 workforce reduction. The B330 module, with a launch mass of approximately 20 metric tons, was designed to deploy to over 330 cubic meters of pressurized volume post-inflation, integrating partner-supplied ECLSS from Orbitec for closed-loop air and water recycling to sustain a crew of four indefinitely or five for several months.[94] Ground prototype tests in 2016 under NASA's NextSTEP program validated the inflatable structure's compatibility with ECLSS, propulsion, and solar power systems for autonomous operations, emphasizing mass efficiency over rigid modules.[95][96] Following the successful 2016 deployment and extension of the smaller Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) on the ISS—transferred to NASA in 2022 for ongoing storage use—the B330 concept envisions commercial leasing for research or staging, with AI-driven autonomy to reduce crew oversight in reduced-gravity environments.[97][98] These designs collectively project toward 2030s applications, such as Mars transit staging with crew rotation via vehicles like Starship, prioritizing scalable, efficient life support for commercial deep-space ventures.[99]Applications in Non-Space Environments
Underwater and Diving Habitats
Underwater and diving habitats provide controlled environments for human occupation in high-pressure aquatic settings, primarily through saturation diving techniques where occupants remain at ambient pressure for extended periods to avoid repeated decompression. These systems manage physiological challenges posed by hydrostatic pressure, which increases with depth and can lead to decompression sickness (DCS) if not properly controlled. Life support in these habitats focuses on maintaining breathable atmospheres, supplying essentials like water and food, and addressing structural vulnerabilities unique to submerged conditions.[100] To prevent DCS, saturation divers and habitat occupants use helium-oxygen (heliox) breathing mixtures, which replace nitrogen to reduce narcosis and bubble formation during decompression; this approach was pioneered in deep dives during the 1970s, allowing safe operations at depths exceeding 300 meters. Heliox minimizes the risk of inert gas loading in tissues, enabling gradual decompression over days or weeks after saturation periods, as demonstrated in commercial mixed-gas dives where standardized heliox compositions are employed for both working and decompression phases.[101][102] Atmospheric control in underwater habitats relies on CO2 scrubbers and O2 sensors to ensure safe gas levels, with fresh air often supplied via surface umbilicals. In the Aquarius Reef Base, operational since the 2010s at a depth of approximately 20 meters off Key Largo, Florida, three CO2 scrubbers maintain cabin air quality for crews of up to six during 10- to 18-day missions, while oxygen monitoring integrates with the life support buoy that pumps conditioned air from the surface. These systems support saturation diving by equalizing internal pressure with the external environment, preventing the need for constant repressurization.[103][104] Water and food provisions in these habitats typically involve desalinated supplies and stored rations delivered from the surface, sustaining crews through saturation cycles lasting up to 28 days. For instance, during the U.S. Navy's SEALAB II mission in 1965 at 205 feet off La Jolla, California, where three teams each spent 15 days (with aquanaut Scott Carpenter spending a record 30 days) relying on umbilicals for water and oxygen replenishment alongside pre-stocked food, marking an early test of prolonged underwater living with automated life support for gas and basic sustenance. Desalination units on support vessels process seawater to provide potable water, minimizing logistical demands during immersion.[105][106][107] Key challenges in underwater habitat life support include corrosion from constant saltwater exposure and the need for thermal insulation against cold ocean temperatures, which can compromise structural integrity and occupant comfort. Habitats employ corrosion-resistant materials like titanium alloys and epoxy coatings to mitigate degradation, while insulation layers prevent heat loss in depths where water temperatures drop below 10°C. NASA's NEEMO (NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations) missions in the 2000s, conducted in Aquarius, highlighted these issues by simulating space isolation under pressure, testing life support resilience to corrosion and thermal fluctuations over 10- to 14-day stays.[108][109][110] Hydrolab operations from the 1960s to 1980s served as early space analogues, hosting over 110 missions in depths of 12 to 18 meters across sites like the Bahamas and U.S. Virgin Islands, where life support systems tested saturation diving protocols akin to orbital habitats. These efforts advanced understanding of prolonged isolation under pressure, influencing modern underwater research.[111][112]Extreme Terrestrial Analogues (Antarctic Stations, Biosphere 2)
Extreme terrestrial analogues provide Earth-based simulations of the isolation, confinement, and resource constraints encountered in space missions, allowing researchers to test life support technologies in operational settings. Antarctic research stations, such as McMurdo Station, serve as key analogues due to their remote locations, extreme cold, and seasonal isolation, mimicking the psychological and logistical challenges of long-duration space habitation. These sites enable the evaluation of closed-loop systems for water recycling and air quality management, as well as strategies for crew psychological well-being during extended periods without resupply.[113][114] At McMurdo Station, the largest Antarctic research base operated by the United States, life support systems include reverse osmosis desalination of seawater to produce potable water, with efforts to incorporate partial recycling to reduce dependency on external sources during winter operations. Winter-over crews, typically numbering around 200 personnel, endure nine months of isolation during the Antarctic winter, approximately from February to October, facing temperatures as low as -50°C and continuous darkness, which tests the resilience of environmental controls and human factors engineering. Psychological support protocols, including pre-deployment screenings, ongoing monitoring via adjustment scales, and interventions for issues like sleep disturbances and interpersonal tension, have been refined here to inform space crew selection and training, drawing parallels to the "winter-over syndrome" observed in confined groups.[115][116][117][118] Biosphere 2, a sealed ecological facility in Arizona, represented a pioneering attempt at a closed-loop life support system from 1991 to 1993, enclosing an 8-person crew within a 3.14-acre structure simulating diverse biomes including rainforest, ocean, and agriculture zones. The experiment aimed to achieve self-sufficiency in air, water, and food production but encountered significant challenges, including oxygen depletion from unexpected proliferation of soil microbes in the nutrient-rich farm soils, which reduced atmospheric O₂ levels to the equivalent of 17,000 feet altitude by early 1993. Concurrently, CO₂ levels surged to approximately 4,000 ppm—about 12 times ambient outdoor concentrations—due to microbial respiration and concrete absorption/release cycles, necessitating external interventions like oxygen injection and CO₂ scrubbing to sustain the crew.[119][120][121][122] These analogues have informed broader applications in space life support, such as the HI-SEAS (Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation) missions in the 2010s, where crews simulated Mars habitats on Mauna Loa volcano, integrating greenhouse-based food production to test bio-regenerative systems for crop yields under controlled lighting and hydroponics. Lessons from Biosphere 2's CO₂ buildup and O₂ imbalances have directly shaped designs for space bioregenerative technologies, emphasizing the need for microbial monitoring and balanced carbon-nitrogen ratios in soil to prevent atmospheric instability. In the 2020s, Antarctic stations continue as analogs for NASA's Artemis program, combining extreme isolation training with field geology exercises to prepare crews for lunar surface operations, including hybrid simulations that blend polar environmental stressors with mission planning for resource utilization.[123][124][125][126][127]Experimental and Advanced Systems
Closed-Loop and Bioregenerative Technologies (MELiSSA, CyBLiSS)
Closed-loop and bioregenerative technologies represent advanced approaches to life support systems, aiming for high degrees of self-sufficiency by recycling waste materials into essential resources such as oxygen, water, and food through biological processes. These systems mimic natural ecosystems, utilizing microorganisms, algae, and plants to achieve mass closure rates exceeding 95%, where nearly all inputs are regenerated with minimal external supplementation, primarily in the form of light or electrical energy for illumination and control. The core principle involves sequential biological conversions, exemplified by the respiration equation for biomass utilization:This process, reversed in photosynthesis, enables carbon cycling, with energy input driving the production of biomass from CO₂ and water. Such technologies address limitations of open-loop systems by reducing resupply needs for long-duration missions, though they face challenges like slow biological reaction rates and risks of microbial contamination.[128] The European Space Agency's (ESA) Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA), initiated in 1988, exemplifies a comprehensive closed-loop system designed to recycle human wastes into edible biomass, oxygen, and water. It operates as a five-compartment loop: Compartment 1 performs anaerobic digestion of solid wastes like feces using thermophilic bacteria to liquefy organics, achieving up to 70% efficiency with ongoing improvements targeting over 90%; Compartment 2 employs photoheterotrophic bacteria to further process dissolved organics; Compartment 3 uses nitrifying bacteria to convert ammonia to nitrates; Compartment 4 involves phototrophic microorganisms such as Arthrospira (spirulina) for oxygen production and biomass generation; and Compartment 5 integrates higher plants for additional food and resource production. The system's pilot plant, established in 2009 at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, integrates these compartments to test full-loop functionality, supporting small-scale crews like rats in closed environments. In 2025, ESA demonstrated wastewater recycling in a MELiSSA compartment and hosted the 8th MELiSSA Conference (October 7-9, Granada, Spain) to advance closed-loop technologies.[128][129][130][131] MELiSSA's development includes ground-based breadboard testing in the 2000s, such as the pilot-scale waste compartment validated in 2004, and spaceflight demonstrations on the International Space Station (ISS), including experiments from 2002–2008 (e.g., MESSAGE and BASE series) to assess microbial performance under microgravity and radiation, with more recent ISS flights in the 2010s and 2020s evaluating cyanobacterial growth models for photobioreactors. These tests have demonstrated robust operation but highlight limitations, including slow degradation rates limited by fibrous wastes and pure-culture constraints (achieving only a few percent daily conversion), as well as contamination risks from microbial mutations and biosafety issues in enclosed systems.[128][132][133] The Cyanobacterium-Based Life Support System (CyBLiSS), a conceptual framework explored in collaboration with NASA interests for Mars missions, leverages cyanobacteria for oxygen production and CO₂ fixation to support human habitation in extraterrestrial environments. Cyanobacteria, such as Anabaena sp., perform photosynthesis to generate O₂ while fixing CO₂ from the atmosphere, often integrated with algal components for enhanced biomass and resource yield; the system utilizes local Martian resources like regolith simulants for nutrient input, reducing Earth dependency. Efficiency for O₂ production in such cyanobacterial setups reaches approximately 1-2 kg O₂/m²/year under optimized conditions, comparable to algal photobioreactors tested for space applications.[134][135] CyBLiSS prototypes have undergone ground tests in photobioreactors simulating Mars conditions, including low-pressure (100-200 Pa) N₂/CO₂ atmospheres and temperatures from 0-20°C, achieving biomass growth rates of 0.36 g dry weight/L—similar to Earth norms—and O₂ evolution up to 0.5 µmol/h/g dry weight, with successful integration of waste feeds like E. coli cultures over 10-28 day periods. Limitations include reduced photosynthetic efficiency (20-50% of Earth rates) under low pressure, sensitivity to regolith toxins like perchlorates, and challenges in scaling due to variable environmental acclimation. These systems complement broader NASA bioregenerative efforts, emphasizing microbial resilience for sustainable exploration.[134][136]
In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) and Hybrid Systems
In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) involves the collection, processing, and use of local extraterrestrial materials to produce essential commodities such as oxygen, water, and propellants, thereby reducing reliance on Earth-supplied resources for space missions. On the Moon, a primary focus is the extraction and electrolysis of water ice deposits, particularly in permanently shadowed craters at the lunar south pole, to generate oxygen for breathing and hydrogen for fuel. This process employs proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers to split purified water into its constituent gases, enabling the production of life-support consumables and propulsion elements directly from indigenous resources.[137][138] For Mars missions, ISRU technologies target the planet's abundant carbon dioxide atmosphere and subsurface water ice to synthesize methane and oxygen via the Sabatier reaction, which reverses the combustion process to produce fuel. The reaction is given by: This method combines atmospheric CO2 with hydrogen—derived from water electrolysis—to yield methane for ascent vehicles and water that can be recycled into the system, supporting both propulsion and habitat needs. NASA studies have demonstrated high conversion efficiencies using ruthenium or nickel catalysts in compact reactors, achieving over 90% methane yield under controlled conditions.[139][140] Hybrid ISRU systems integrate these resource extraction processes with closed-loop life support to enhance overall sustainability, such as by feeding produced oxygen and water back into regenerative environmental control units. A key demonstration is NASA's Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) aboard the Perseverance rover, which uses solid oxide electrolysis to convert Martian CO2 into oxygen at rates of approximately 6 grams per hour during its 2021 operational runs. MOXIE completed 16 successful production cycles by September 2023, producing a total of 122 grams of oxygen at peak efficiencies up to 12 g/h (98% purity), validating the technology's performance under real Martian conditions and paving the way for scaled-up hybrids in future habitats.[141][142] In applications like NASA's Artemis program, ISRU forms a cornerstone of the planned Artemis Base Camp at the lunar south pole, scheduled for development in the 2020s, where it will extract water and oxygen to support extended surface stays and propellant depots. Propellant production via ISRU, such as lunar-derived hydrogen-oxygen mixtures or Mars methane-oxygen, can reduce the mass of Earth-launched materials by up to 75-80% for ascent vehicles, minimizing launch costs and enabling larger payloads.[143][144][145] Significant challenges persist in ISRU implementation, including the mechanical processing of abrasive regolith, which can cause equipment wear during excavation and beneficiation, and the high energy demands—often exceeding tens of kilowatts—for heating, electrolysis, and reaction processes. Power sources like solar arrays face limitations from the lunar night's extended darkness, necessitating nuclear options for continuous operation, while Martian dust storms pose additional risks to solar reliability. As of 2025, NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions have advanced ISRU testing, with recent landers like Intuitive Machines' IM-2 (landed March 2025) delivering instruments such as PRIME-1 to prospect for water ice; sensors detected potential water elements in regolith despite the lander tipping over and preventing drill operation, though full-scale demonstrations remain ongoing amid delays in some payload integrations.[146][147][148] Looking to the 2030s, hybrid ISRU systems for Mars habitats aim to incorporate local resources extensively, with plans under NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign targeting at least 50% of water needs from in-situ sources like polar ice caps and hydrated minerals, integrated with closed-loop recycling to sustain crews for durations beyond one year. These systems will combine Sabatier-derived fuels with habitat air revitalization, reducing resupply demands and enabling self-sufficient outposts.[149][150]References
- https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/[Research](/page/Research)/Advanced_Closed_Loop_System