Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Negative free bid
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Negative free bid Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Negative free bid. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Negative free bid

Negative free bid is a contract bridge treatment whereby a free bid by responder over an opponent's overcall shows a long suit in a weak hand and is not forcing. This is in contrast with standard treatment, where a free bid can show unlimited values and is unconditionally forcing. The treatment is a relatively recent invention, and has become quite popular, especially in expert circles.

Negative free bids resolve relatively frequent situations where the responder holds a long suit with which he would like to compete for a partscore, but is deprived from bidding it by opponent's overcall.

Example

[edit]
West North East South
1 1 ?

For example, if South holds:  86  KJ10852  K6  532, partner opens 1 and East overcalls 1, he couldn't bid 2 in standard methods, as it would show 10+ high-card points, and a negative double would be too off-shape. With NFB treatment in effect though, he can bid 2 which the partner may pass (unless she has extra values and support, or an excellent suit of her own without tolerance for hearts).

However, as a corollary, negative free bids affect the scope of negative double; if the hand is suitable for "standard" forcing free bid (10-11+ points), a negative double has to be made first and the suit bid only in the next round. Thus, the negative double can be made with the following types of hand:

  • A weakish hand with unbid suits (unbid major)
  • A stronger hand with unbid suits
  • A strong (opening bid or more) one-suited hand.

This can sometimes allow the opponents to preempt effectively.

West North East South
1 1 Dbl 4
?

For example, West, holding:  KJ103  J8  AKQ104  J2, after this auction is in an awkward situation — he doesn't know whether partner has spades or not; whether South was bidding to make or to sacrifice — is it correct to double, bid 4 or pass?

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs