Hubbry Logo
Trade nameTrade nameMain
Open search
Trade name
Community hub
Trade name
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Trade name
Trade name
Trade name
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Intellectual property
Related topics
Higher categories:
Property and Property law

A trade name, also known as a trading name, business name or operating name, is a pseudonym used by companies and other organizations that do not operate under their registered legal name.[1][2] Registering the trade name with a relevant government body is often required.

In a number of countries, the phrase "trading as" (abbreviated to t/a) is used to designate a trade name. In the United States, the phrase "doing business as" (abbreviated to DBA, dba, d.b.a., or d/b/a) is used,[2][3] among others, such as assumed business name[4] or fictitious business name.[5] In Canada, "operating as" (abbreviated to o/a) and "trading as" are used, although "doing business as" is also sometimes used.[6]

A company typically uses a trade name to conduct business using a simpler name rather than using their formal and often lengthier name. Trade names are also used when a preferred name cannot be registered, often because it may already be registered or is too similar to a name that is already registered.

[edit]

Using one or more fictitious business names does not create additional separate legal entities.[3] The distinction between a registered legal name and a fictitious business name, or trade name, is important because fictitious business names do not always identify the entity that is legally responsible.

Legal agreements (such as contracts) are normally made using the registered legal name of the business. If a corporation fails to consistently adhere to such important legal formalities like using its registered legal name in contracts, it may be subject to piercing of the corporate veil.[7]

In English, trade names are generally treated as proper nouns.[8]

By country

[edit]

Argentina

[edit]

In Argentina, a trade name is known as a nombre de fantasía ('fantasy' or 'fiction' name), and the legal name of business is called a razón social (social name).

Brazil

[edit]

In Brazil, a trade name is known as a nome fantasia ('fantasy' or 'fiction' name), and the legal name of business is called razão social (social name).

Canada

[edit]

In some Canadian jurisdictions, such as Ontario, when a businessperson writes a trade name on a contract, invoice, or cheque, they must also add the legal name of the business.[9]

Numbered companies will very often operate as something other than their legal name, which is unrecognizable to the public.

Chile

[edit]

In Chile, a trade name is known as a nombre de fantasía ('fantasy' or 'fiction' name), and the legal name of business is called a razón social (social name).

Ireland

[edit]

In Ireland, businesses are legally required to register business names where these differ from the surname(s) of the sole trader or partners, or the legal name of a company. The Companies Registration Office publishes a searchable register of such business names.[10]

Japan

[edit]

In Japan, the word yagō (屋号) is used.

Kenya

[edit]

Nigeria

[edit]

In Colonial Nigeria, certain tribes had members that used a variety of trading names to conduct business with the Europeans. Two examples were King Perekule VII of Bonny, who was known as Captain Pepple in trade matters, and King Jubo Jubogha of Opobo, who bore the pseudonym Captain Jaja. Both Pepple and Jaja would bequeath their trade names to their royal descendants as official surnames upon their deaths.

Singapore

[edit]

In Singapore, there is no filing requirement for a "trading as" name, but there are requirements for disclosure of the underlying business or company's registered name and unique entity number.[11]

United Kingdom

[edit]

In the United Kingdom, there is no filing requirement for a business name, defined as "any name under which someone carries on business" that, for a company or limited liability partnership, "is not its registered name", but there are requirements for disclosure of the owner's true name and some restrictions on the use of certain names and sensitive words, and there are also regulations concerning disclosure of the company name (the legal name of the company) for a company, the name of the owner for a sole trader, or the names of the partners for a partnership.[12]

The Office for Students, the higher education regulator for England, uses the term trading name in the register of higher education providers, and requires these to be registered.[13][14] The Charity Commission of England and Wales uses the terms working name and operating name on the register of charities,[15] with the term working name being used in the Charities Act 2011 (as amended by the Charities Act 2022).[16] The term operating name is also used for government agencies.[17]

United States

[edit]

A minority of U.S. states, including Washington, still use the term trade name to refer to "doing business as" (DBA) names.[18] In most U.S. states now, however, DBAs are officially referred to using other terms. Almost half of the states, including New York and Oregon, use the terms assumed business name or assumed name;[19][20] nearly as many, including Pennsylvania, use the term fictitious name.[21]

For consumer protection purposes, many U.S. jurisdictions require businesses operating with fictitious names to file a DBA statement, though names including the first and last name of the owner may be accepted.[22] This also reduces the possibility of two local businesses operating under the same name, although some jurisdictions do not provide exclusivity for a name, or may allow more than one party to register the same name. Note, though, that this is not a substitute for filing a trademark application. A DBA filing carries no legal weight in establishing trademark rights.[23] In the U.S., trademark rights are acquired by use in commerce, but there can be substantial benefits to filing a trademark application.[24] Sole proprietors are the most common users of DBAs. Sole proprietors are individual business owners who run their businesses themselves. Since most people in these circumstances use a business name other than their own name,[citation needed] it is often necessary for them to get DBAs.

Generally, a DBA must be registered with a local or state government, or both, depending on the jurisdiction. For example, California, Texas and Virginia require a DBA to be registered with each county (or independent city in the case of Virginia) where the owner does business. Maryland and Colorado have DBAs registered with a state agency. Virginia also requires corporations and LLCs to file a copy of their registration with the county or city to be registered with the State Corporation Commission.

DBA statements are often used in conjunction with a franchise. The franchisee will have a legal name under which it may sue and be sued, but will conduct business under the franchiser's brand name (which the public would recognize). A typical real-world example can be found in a well-known pricing mistake case, Donovan v. RRL Corp. (2001),[25] where the named defendant, RRL Corporation, was a Lexus car dealership doing business as "Lexus of Westminster", but remaining a separate legal entity from Lexus, a division of Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.

In California, filing a DBA statement also requires that a notice of the fictitious name be published as a public legal notice in local newspapers for some set period to inform the public of the owner's intent to operate under an assumed name. The intention of the law is to protect the public from fraud, by compelling the business owner to first file or register his fictitious business name with the county clerk, and then making a further public record of it by publishing it in a newspaper.[26] Several other states, such as Illinois, require print notices as well.[27]

Uruguay

[edit]

In Uruguay, a trade name is known as a nombre fantasía, and the legal name of business is called a razón social.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trade name

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A trade name, also referred to as a "doing business as" (DBA) name, fictitious name, assumed name, or trading name (in some jurisdictions), is a designation used by an individual, , , or other entity to identify its operations in , which may differ from the entity's official . Unlike a corporate or , which is formally registered with relevant authorities to establish the entity's existence, a trade name serves primarily as a practical identifier for marketing and transactions without inherently providing exclusive protection. Trade names play a crucial role in branding by allowing flexibility in how a presents itself to customers, such as a operating under a memorable alias rather than the owner's . Registration requirements vary by ; in many, it is mandatory when using a name different from the legal name to provide , prevent conflicts, and enable enforcement of rights or opening accounts under the name, while in others it is optional but recommended. Where applicable, registration is handled by relevant government authorities depending on the , and in some places requires periodic renewal to maintain validity. Importantly, a trade name does not confer the same legal safeguards as a , which protects specific goods or services from imitation; trade names focus on identifying the itself rather than products. Businesses must ensure their trade names do not infringe on existing or other rights to avoid legal disputes. Practices regarding trade names, including terminology and requirements, vary significantly by .

Overview

Definition

A trade name, also known as a trading name or operating name, is the name under which a , , , or other conducts its commercial activities, distinct from its official legal entity name. This name is used to identify the to customers, partners, and the public in everyday transactions and marketing. The primary purpose of a trade name is to enable businesses to operate under a more memorable, descriptive, or marketable identifier without altering their formally registered , providing flexibility in branding while maintaining official records. Additionally, registering or disclosing a trade name creates a public record of the true , helping to prevent confusion about the entity behind the and ensuring transparency in dealings. For example, a legally named "ABC Corporation" might use the trade name "QuickMart Stores" for its retail operations to appeal to customers. Common abbreviations for trade names include "Doing Business As" (DBA) in the United States and "Trading As" (t/a) in the and . Trade names function as identifiers of the business's source in commerce, similar to trademarks but without the associated protections.

Historical Development

The concept of trade names, as distinct identifiers for business operations separate from legal entity names, emerged in the amid growing commercial activity and concerns over and . In the United States, the first law regulating fictitious business names was enacted in New York in 1833, requiring partnerships using names other than the owners' true names to file certificates disclosing ownership. This approach spread to other states, with California's Civil Code provisions originating in 1872 and mandating similar filings to reveal true ownership, influenced by the New York . In the early , as corporate expansion accelerated, additional states adopted DBA statutes to promote accountability and . For instance, Michigan's Act 101 of 1907 regulated carrying on business under assumed names. In the , the Registration of Business Names Act 1916 required firms not using the surnames of all partners or owners to register their business names, creating a public record to aid transparency in trade. The 1883 Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property marked an early international milestone by including Article 8, which protects trade names in member countries without requiring filing or registration. Post-World War II globalization heightened the need for harmonized regulations on business identifiers to mitigate cross-border confusion and infringement risks. The (WIPO), established in 1970 to administer treaties like the Paris Convention, facilitated international discussions and model laws in the 1980s to align national practices. In the UK, the Business Names Act 1985 consolidated earlier rules, requiring disclosure of true ownership in business documents and publicity. These developments reflected broader efforts toward unified protections in an increasingly interconnected economy.

Terminology and Distinctions

Trade Name vs. Trademark

A trade name serves to identify the entity itself, functioning as the name under which a operates, often referred to as a "doing business as" (DBA) or fictitious name, and is typically registered at the state or local level to ensure transparency in business operations and prevent public deception by disclosing the entity's true identity. Unlike intellectual property protections, a trade name registration does not confer exclusive rights or prevent others from using similar names for their businesses, as its primary purpose is administrative compliance rather than branding . In contrast, a protects specific words, phrases, symbols, designs, or combinations thereof that identify and distinguish the source of particular goods or services in commerce, requiring the mark to be distinctive and actively used to qualify for registration. Trademarks are registered with the and Office (USPTO) at the federal level, granting nationwide exclusive rights against infringement and enabling legal enforcement through courts to prevent consumer confusion. This protection extends internationally through agreements like the , emphasizing the trademark's role in safeguarding brand identity for products or services rather than the business entity as a whole. The key differences lie in their scope and legal effects: a trade name does not provide rights and cannot stop competitors from using it in product branding, whereas a offers robust exclusivity specifically for goods or services, allowing the owner to sue for in cases of unauthorized use. For instance, "Joe's Cafe" might be registered as a trade name to identify the operation, but a separate or for its products could be trademarked to protect against imitation in the . Overlap is possible if a trade name is also employed as a source identifier for goods or services and meets criteria, in which case it can receive dual protection through separate registrations. Legally, trade name registration ensures compliance for operations by maintaining of identifiers, often linking to the official legal entity name, while registration establishes enforceable rights that promote fair and integrity on a broader scale. This distinction underscores why businesses must pursue protection separately to secure branding advantages beyond mere operational naming. A legal entity name, also known as the official or registered business name, is the formal designation filed with the relevant government authority during the formation of a business entity, such as a corporation, LLC, or partnership. This name typically includes indicators of the business structure, like "Inc." or "LLC," and is used for essential legal and administrative purposes, including contracts, tax filings, banking, and establishing liability. For example, a company might be officially registered as "XYZ Corporation" with the secretary of state. In contrast, a trade name, often referred to as a "doing business as" (DBA) name, serves as an alternative operating name that a can use for its day-to-day activities, particularly in and public-facing interactions, without altering its core legal documents. This allows flexibility for branding purposes; for instance, "XYZ Corporation" might operate under the trade name "Friendly Widgets" to appeal to customers, dropping formal suffixes for simplicity. However, in legal contexts such as contracts or official disclosures, the underlying legal entity name must still be revealed to ensure transparency and prevent . Businesses, including sole proprietorships and corporations, commonly adopt trade names when their operating identity differs from the registered name, which is often required to avoid or in commercial dealings. This distinction matters in scenarios like sole proprietors branding under a catchy name separate from their , or larger testing market names without full reincorporation. Trade names provide operational agility, as adding or changing one typically involves simpler registration with local or state offices compared to amending a legal name, which demands formal filings, fees, and potential approvals. Nonetheless, trade names do not confer ownership rights or exclusivity, merely permitting public use under the legal umbrella.

Trade Name vs. Brand Name

A trade name refers to the official name under which a operates and conducts transactions, often registered at the state or local level for legal and administrative purposes. , it functions primarily as an identifier for the company's commercial activities, such as in contracts and banking, but lacks inherent protections against imitation in contexts unless separately trademarked (protections vary by ; see relevant sections below). For example, "Smith Holdings LLC" might use "Smith Landscaping" as its trade name (DBA) to focus on specific services. In contrast, a brand name constitutes the broader, multifaceted identity of a product, service, or the itself, incorporating elements like , slogans, visual , and the cultivated among consumers. It emphasizes emotional and perceptual associations, serving as the core of strategies to build and differentiate in the marketplace. While a brand name may originate from or coincide with the trade name, it extends far beyond mere operational use to encompass the overall equity and goodwill generated through and consumer experience. The key differences lie in scope and purpose: a trade name is strictly functional and tied to the business's legal operations, whereas a brand name is strategic and perceptual, often protected through mechanisms to safeguard its distinctive elements. In the Walmart case, where Inc. operates under the name "Walmart" (its legal and trade name), this underpins a brand that includes trademarked features like its yellow smiley face and "Save money. Live better," which contribute to trust and . Brands thus build intangible assets like , which a trade name alone does not confer. Practically, significant overlap occurs when trade names are leveraged through to become synonymous with , blurring lines in minds while maintaining separate legal statuses. For instance, many companies use their trade name as the foundation for branding, but the brand's evolution involves ongoing investment in promotion, distinct from the trade name's registration under the legal entity name. This distinction ensures that while trade names facilitate business functionality, brand names drive and long-term value.

Protection and Rights

Trade names are primarily protected against deceptive or misleading use that causes among the public regarding the source of goods or services. This safeguard operates under general principles of unfair , preventing others from adopting similar names that could imply affiliation or endorsement. In many jurisdictions, rights to a trade name emerge from prior and continuous use in commerce, without requiring formal registration. Business owners acquire rights to a trade name through such prior use, establishing priority over subsequent users in the . These rights do not grant an automatic monopoly, as with trademarks, but instead focus on prohibiting uses that engender likelihood of . Registration of a trade name, where available, primarily serves to provide of use rather than creating substantive exclusive rights. Enforcement of trade name rights typically involves seeking judicial remedies such as injunctions to halt infringing activities and monetary damages to compensate for economic harm from fraud or unfair competition. Courts may award actual damages and defendant's profits in appropriate cases. International treaties like the Paris Convention extend limited reciprocity by mandating protection for trade names in all member states without the obligation of filing or registration, though enforcement remains subject to national laws. Protection for trade names is inherently territorial, confined to the geographic area where the name has been used and recognized, and generally weaker than intellectual property protections like , which offer broader exclusive rights against similar uses. Rights may lapse if the trade name is abandoned or not actively used in commerce, requiring ongoing vigilance to maintain priority.

Registration and Compliance

The registration process for a trade name typically begins with conducting a name availability search through the relevant local or state business registry to ensure the proposed name does not conflict with existing registrations. Businesses then file an application with the appropriate authority, such as a county clerk's office or secretary of state, submitting a form that details the trade name, the underlying legal entity or owner's name, business address, and description of intended use. This filing is accompanied by payment of a nominal fee, usually ranging from $10 to $100 depending on the jurisdiction, and in certain cases, requires publication of the notice in a local newspaper to allow for public objections. Once approved, the trade name is recorded in public databases, providing notice to third parties. Key requirements for registration include full disclosure of the true owner or legal entity associated with the trade name, along with evidence of the entity's formation or authorization to operate, such as articles of incorporation for corporations. The process emphasizes transparency, ensuring the trade name links back to the accountable party, and registrations are generally valid for 1 to 5 years before renewal is necessary. These records are maintained as searchable public documents to facilitate verification by creditors, partners, and regulators. Post-registration, the trade name grants limited protections, such as the ability to use it in commerce without immediate challenge based solely on prior unregistered use in the same area. Ongoing compliance involves periodic renewals, often annually or every few years, to keep the registration active, as well as prompt updates for any material changes like alterations to the name, , or location. Businesses must also ensure continued use of the trade name in commerce to avoid abandonment claims. Non-compliance, such as failing to renew or update, can lead to penalties including monetary fines, of the registration, or legal disabilities like the inability to sue for or collect on debts in the trade name. Across jurisdictions worldwide, trade name registration is frequently integrated with broader licensing procedures at the local, provincial, or national level, varying by administrative structure rather than following a standardized global protocol. Unlike trademarks, which can be pursued internationally through mechanisms like the , trade names lack a unified system and must be registered separately in each relevant territory to achieve local recognition and compliance.

By Jurisdiction

United States

In the , trade name registration is primarily a state-level matter, with no centralized federal registry dedicated to trade names. Businesses operating under a name different from their legal entity name—often filed as a "doing business as" (DBA) or fictitious business name—must register with the appropriate state agency, typically the secretary of state or county clerk's office. This process varies across the 50 states, each with unique forms, requirements, and fees; for example, in , fictitious business name statements are filed at the county level, with a base filing fee of $26 in for the first name and registrant. In Massachusetts, business certificates (DBAs) are valid for four years and must be renewed every four years using the same filing process at the local city or town clerk's office, with no statewide online filing option available; filings are typically submitted by mail or in person. The purpose of these filings is to provide of the true behind the trade name, preventing and facilitating legal identification. At the federal level, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) does not register trade names, as they are distinguished from trademarks under the Lanham Act, which governs federal trademark protection and unfair competition claims. Instead, trade names must avoid infringing on registered trademarks to prevent liability under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, which prohibits false designations of origin that cause confusion. Rights to a trade name are generally established through prior use in commerce, granting common law protections without formal registration, though state filings offer evidentiary benefits in disputes. Some states impose additional notice requirements, such as publishing the trade name in a local newspaper; in California, for instance, filers must publish the statement once a week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. Trade name registrations are subject to renewal in most states to maintain active status, often every five years, though periods range from one to ten years depending on —for example, California's fictitious business names expire after five years and require renewal filing. As of 2025, many states have enhanced filing capabilities through dedicated portals, streamlining DBA submissions and reducing paperwork; Delaware, for instance, centralized trade name registrations into a mandatory effective February 2, 2026, via the Division of Revenue's One Stop portal, with a re-registration window for existing filers to follow. Post-COVID-19, there has been greater emphasis on digital compliance in business naming to support remote operations and , with states like California offering fully electronic filing options including identity verification and payment.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, a trade name, also known as a trading name or "doing business as" (DBA) name, refers to any name under which a operates that differs from its registered . Unlike company names, trade names are not formally registered as separate entities but must comply with disclosure and non-misleading requirements under the Companies Act 2006. This framework ensures transparency for customers and suppliers while preventing deception, with no equivalent to a U.S.-style DBA filing; instead, businesses using trade names must prominently disclose their legal identity on all business documents, websites, and premises. For limited companies, the legal entity name is registered with , the official registry, during incorporation, and trade names can be used alongside it without additional registration, provided they do not imply or mislead the public. Under section 82 of the , companies must state their registered name, place of registration, and registration number whenever a trade name appears on business letters, order forms, invoices, receipts, or websites. Sole traders and partnerships, which are not incorporated, register for tax purposes with (HMRC) via and may adopt a trade name without involvement, but they too must disclose their full legal name (e.g., the owner's and initials) on all business materials to avoid non-compliance. The register is publicly searchable via an online availability checker, which helps prevent duplicate company names but does not cover unregistered trade names, relying instead on checks and protections to address conflicts. Trade names must adhere to specific rules to ensure they are not offensive, misleading, or suggestive of false prestige. Prohibited elements include words implying limited liability, such as "Limited," "Ltd," "LLP," or "plc," and sensitive expressions like "Royal," "Accredited," or "British" that require prior approval from the Secretary of State or relevant government department to prevent misuse or implication of official endorsement. Annual confirmation statements filed with Companies House under section 853 of the Companies Act 2006 confirm the accuracy of registered details, including any changes to principal business activities that may involve trade names, though trade names themselves are not separately listed unless they form part of nature-of-business descriptions. Protection for trade names primarily arises under the common law tort of passing off, which safeguards established goodwill against misrepresentation by competitors, requiring proof of goodwill, deception, and potential damage without needing formal registration. Enforcement of trade name rules falls under Part 41 of the , which consolidated and repealed the earlier Business Names Act 1985, imposing requirements for disclosure and prohibiting deceptive practices across all business forms. Violations, such as failing to disclose the legal entity name or using an approved sensitive word without permission, are criminal offences punishable on summary by a fine not exceeding level 5 on the (currently £5,000). Following , the UK's trade name regime operates independently from EU directives, maintaining alignment with pre-existing domestic standards but without supranational oversight, as confirmed in ongoing reforms through 2025 that emphasize transparency without altering core registration processes. can direct changes to misleading names and issue penalties, with the searchable register aiding enforcement by facilitating public and regulatory scrutiny.

Canada

In Canada, trade name registration—often referred to as business name registration—is primarily a provincial and territorial responsibility, distinct from federal trademark protection under the Trade-marks Act. Businesses operating under a name other than their legal entity name must register it with the relevant provincial registry to comply with local legislation, such as Ontario's Business Names Act, which requires registration for any trade, occupation, or venture carried on for profit. This process ensures public notice and prevents misleading names, with registration providing limited protection against identical names within the province but not exclusive rights nationwide. A key step in provincial registration is conducting a NUANS (Newly Upgraded Automated Name Search) report, a federal search tool administered by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada that scans for conflicts with existing corporate names, business names, and trademarks across Canada. The report, obtained from authorized providers, confirms name availability and is typically required before filing; for example, in Ontario, businesses submit the NUANS report along with the registration application through ServiceOntario for a fee of $60, valid for five years before renewal is needed. Similar processes apply in other provinces, such as Alberta or British Columbia, where fees and validity periods align closely, though exact requirements vary by jurisdiction. Federal involvement arises for businesses operating extra-provincially or incorporating federally through Corporations Canada, which uses the NUANS system for name approvals under the Canada Business Corporations Act but does not directly register trade names. The Trade-marks Act explicitly distinguishes trade names from trademarks, allowing trade name registration only if the name functions as a trademark for goods or services, while common law rights in a trade name accrue through prior continuous use in commerce, enabling enforcement against passing off without formal registration. For corporations, trade names must not imply a different legal entity and cannot be misleading; if operating as a corporation, the trade name registration often references the incorporated entity to avoid deception. Publication in a newspaper is not required in most provinces, including Ontario, streamlining the process compared to some incorporation filings. Violations of provincial rules, such as using an unregistered or misleading trade name, incur penalties under acts like Ontario's Business Names Act, with fines up to $2,000 for individuals and $25,000 for corporations, plus potential orders to cease use. As of 2025, digital harmonization efforts are advancing, with mandatory electronic filing for federal registries and CRA business number (BN) integrations in provincial systems to reduce duplication; for instance, the now requires online-only BN registrations effective November 2025, aligning provincial trade name processes with federal tax identifiers for multi-jurisdictional operations. This mirrors aspects of U.S. state-level systems but emphasizes Canada's push toward unified digital platforms.

European Union

In the , trade name protection operates primarily through national laws of the 27 member states, without a centralized EU-wide registration system, though harmonization is achieved via directives on company law and interconnections between national registers. Trade names, which identify businesses in commerce, are protected under Article 8 of the , to which all member states are parties, granting rights in every country of use without formal registration requirements. The core EU framework for transparency in business naming is provided by Directive (EU) 2017/1132, which codifies aspects of company law including requirements for company names to indicate legal form and ensure distinctiveness, while prohibiting misleading names that could confuse the public. This directive mandates disclosure of company details, including names, in national registers, promoting mutual recognition across borders under the freedom of establishment principle in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Complementing this, the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS), established under Directive 2012/17/EU, links national registries to enable free online access to company information—such as registered business and trade names—for users across the EU, facilitating cross-border verification and reducing administrative barriers. Member state implementations vary, with each maintaining its own registry for trade names; for instance, Germany's Handelsregister requires registration of trade names used in commercial activities and provides public search functions for conflict checks. Similarly, in the Netherlands, trade name availability is checked through the Chamber of Commerce (KvK) Handelsregister via the official website kvk.nl, which offers a Name Check tool to verify if a proposed name is already in use. Additionally, trademark conflicts are assessed through the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) at boip.int for regional trademarks and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) at euipo.europa.eu for EU-wide trademarks. Domain name availability, particularly for .nl extensions, is verified via SIDN.nl, the registry for the Dutch internet domain. Protection against unfair use of trade names often spills over from the Trademark Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, where established prior trade names can oppose conflicting EU trademark applications on grounds of likelihood of confusion or unfair advantage. National laws further safeguard against and misleading practices, aligned with broader EU unfair competition rules. Essential rules emphasize ownership disclosure in accessible registers to prevent anonymity in operations, with protection duration linked to the ongoing existence and genuine use of the business, lapsing upon non-use under national provisions. Enforcement occurs via national courts, supported by EU-wide principles from Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) , which prohibits trade names that mislead consumers or exploit reputation across borders. As of 2025, developments in the have strengthened cross-border name checks through full implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/1151, which updates company law to require online registration processes and digital filing, enhancing for real-time verifications and reducing hurdles for pan-EU naming. Post-2020 amendments to these directives have further integrated trade name transparency with online platforms, ensuring compliance in digital trade environments.

Japan

In Japan, trade names, referred to as yōgo for general business use or yagō specifically for sole proprietorships, are registered via the Legal Affairs Bureau under the Commercial Registration Act of 1951, which establishes a public notification system to ensure credibility in commercial activities. For incorporated entities, the trade name is submitted as part of the initial company registration process, integrating it directly with the corporate structure, and there is no standalone "doing business as" (DBA) mechanism; changes require filing amendments to the existing registration. Trade names must employ Japanese characters or approved foreign scripts, including Romanized alphabets designated by the Minister of Justice, to facilitate clear public identification. The resulting commercial registry, managed by the Legal Affairs Bureau, is publicly searchable by name or registration number through official services, enabling verification of business details. Protection against unauthorized imitation arises under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act of , which deems it an unfair act to use identical or similar business indications that cause confusion with another's trade name, allowing affected parties to seek injunctions and damages. Sole proprietors adopt a yagō through a straightforward notification to the local tax office via the "Notification of Business Commencement" form, without mandatory full registration, though it may be noted for banking or official dealings. Registrations remain valid indefinitely while the business is active, with filing fees typically around ¥150,000 for initial company incorporations that include the trade name, or lower amounts such as revenue stamps for amendments. As of 2025, amid heightened scrutiny under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act, Romanized trade names in English continue to be permissible without novel approval processes, supporting entry. Ongoing digital enhancements to the commercial registry, including expanded access via the National Tax Agency's Corporate Number Publication Site, improve searchability for global users.

Other Selected Jurisdictions

In , trade names, often referred to as "denominaciones comerciales" or doing business as (DBA) names, are registered through the Inspección General de Justicia (IGJ), the federal authority overseeing commercial entities and aimed at preventing fraudulent practices by ensuring name uniqueness and transparency. In , trade names are primarily handled by state-level Boards of Trade (Juntas Comerciais), which approve and register business names as part of , while the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) oversees related protections. Names must comply with rules on uniqueness and non-deception, and official documents are prepared in . Ireland requires registration of business names, commonly known as "trading as" (t/a) names, with the Companies Registration Office (CRO) under the Companies Act 2014, which harmonizes with directives on and fair trading. This process ensures names do not deceive the public and can be filed online via the CORE system for quick approval. In , non-corporate entities such as sole proprietorships and partnerships must register names with the Registrar of Companies under the Business Names Act (Cap. 499), administered by the Business Registration Service (BRS) to promote transparency and prevent name conflicts. The process is now fully online through the eCitizen portal, with mandatory registration for any operating under a name other than the owner's true name. Nigeria's (CAC) manages business name registrations for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which are particularly common for sole proprietorships and partnerships, requiring online submission via the CAC portal to verify availability and avoid deception. While no annual returns are needed, registrations must be renewed every 10 years to remain active, with fees starting at ₦20,000 as of October 2025. Singapore's (ACRA) handles business name approvals through its BizFile+ online platform, offering a streamlined process that typically takes 1-2 days for approval and reserves the name for 120 days. Registrations for sole proprietorships and partnerships are valid for 1 or 2 years, renewable online up to 60 days before expiry, with a focus on preventing misleading names. In , trade names are registered with the National Registry of Commerce (RNC), similar to Argentina's system, as part of company incorporation to ensure distinctiveness and compliance with regional standards influenced by trade agreements. The process emphasizes anti-deception measures, with online filing available through government portals. Across these jurisdictions, common themes include a strong emphasis on local anti-deception regulations to protect consumers from misleading identities, alongside varying registration fees (often under $100 equivalent) and increasing digital access via portals as of 2025, contrasting with more decentralized approaches in major economies like the .

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/trade_name
  2. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/TM-Trademark-or-Trade-Name-flyer.pdf
  3. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/trade-name-vs-business-name-whats-the-difference
  4. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/what-is-dba-when-to-file-one-for-your-business
  5. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/limited-liability-partnership-incorporation-and-names/limited-liability-partnerships-incorporation-and-names
  6. https://www.shopify.com/blog/what-is-doing-business-as-dba
  7. https://clrc.ca.gov/pub/Printed-Reports/Pub084.pdf
  8. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/companies-and-businesses/
  9. https://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/history.html
  10. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/7/enacted
  11. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/intproperty/944/wipo_pub_944_2013.pdf
  12. https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/what-trademark
  13. https://www.lawdepot.com/resources/business-articles/legal-names-vs-trade-names-in-business/
  14. https://www.wardandsmith.com/articles/company-names-vs-trade-names
  15. https://www.upcounsel.com/is-trade-name-the-same-as-brand-name
  16. https://www.kvk.nl/en/starting/what-is-the-difference-between-trade-name-and-brand-name/
  17. https://www.boip.int/en/entrepreneurs/news/you-dont-have-a-monopoly-on-your-company-name
  18. https://www.royaltyrange.com/news/main-differences-between-trademarks-brands-and-trade-names/
  19. https://www.justia.com/intellectual-property/trademarks/trade-name/
  20. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3277&context=uclrev
  21. https://www.loio.com/guides/business/intellectual-property-law/trade-name-infringement/
  22. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/summary_paris.html
  23. https://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/common.html
  24. https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/launch-your-business/choose-your-business-name
  25. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/assumed-names-dba-what-you-need-to-know
  26. https://www.harborcompliance.com/doing-business-as
  27. https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/launch-your-business/register-your-business
  28. https://www.lavote.gov/home/county-clerk/fictitious-business-names/fees
  29. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/business-certificates-dba-in-massachusetts
  30. https://www.boston.gov/departments/city-clerk/how-apply-business-certificate
  31. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_act
  32. https://digital.gov/resources/u-s-trademark-law
  33. https://startupsavant.com/how-to-get-a-dba/dba-publishing-requirements
  34. https://www.harborcompliance.com/doing-business-under-a-fictitious-name
  35. https://revenue.delaware.gov/trade-names-faqs/
  36. https://www.findlaw.com/smallbusiness/starting-a-business/how-to-file-a-dba-by-state.html
  37. https://www.gov.uk/limited-company-formation/choose-company-name
  38. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/5/chapter/6
  39. https://www.gov.uk/become-sole-trader/choose-your-business-name
  40. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/incorporation-and-names/annex-a-sensitive-words-and-expressions-or-words-that-could-imply-a-connection-with-government
  41. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/passing-off-goodwill-misrepresentation-damage
  42. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/canadian-intellectual-property-office/en/trademarks/trademarks-guide
  43. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90b17
  44. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/business/start/choosing-a-business-name-3.html
  45. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/nuans-corporate-name-trademark-reports/en/nuansr-corporate-name-and-trademark-reports
  46. https://www.ontario.ca/page/business/start/register-your-business-online
  47. https://willisbusinesslaw.com/blog/creation-of-business-structures/understanding-ontarios-business-name-registration-requirements/
  48. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/nuans-corporate-name-trademark-reports/en/nuansr-provincialterritorial-report
  49. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/corporations-canada/en/register-federal-corporation-province-or-territory
  50. https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/businesses/topics/business-registration/business-number-program-account/how-register/resident.html
  51. https://crystal.tax/en/company-registration-in-canada-in-2025-a-complete-guide.html
  52. https://guidelines.euipo.europa.eu/1803468/1787175/trade-mark-guidelines/3-2-3-1-trade-names
  53. https://www.kvk.nl/english/checking-the-availability-of-a-business-name/
  54. https://www.boip.int/en
  55. https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/trade-marks
  56. https://www.sidn.nl/
  57. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/4186/en
  58. https://www.moj.go.jp/EN/MINJI/houjintouki.html
  59. https://japan-law-tax.com/blog/companies-in-japan/trade-name-company-llc-japan/
  60. https://www.rsm.global/japan/shiodome/en/insights/category/incorporation/using-romanized-characters-trade-names-japan
  61. https://www.japanpi.com/blog/business-blog/japan-company-registry-record/
  62. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/2803/en
  63. https://stripe.com/resources/more/trade-name-in-japan
  64. https://www.getthera.com/blog/sole-proprietorship-registration-japan-guide
  65. https://samurai-law.com/en/col03_06.html
  66. https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/japan
  67. https://www.houjin-bangou.nta.go.jp/en/index.html
  68. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/justicia/igj
  69. https://www.gov.br/inpi/en/services/trademarks/basic-guide
  70. https://tradecouncil.org/country-guides/doing-business-with-brazil/
  71. https://cro.ie/registration/company/incidental-obligations/company-name/
  72. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/ireland-company-names-business-names-private-company-limited-by-shares
  73. https://brs.go.ke/companies-registry/
  74. http://www.kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Acts/RegistrationofBusinessNamesAct_Cap499.pdf
  75. https://www.cac.gov.ng/business-names/
  76. https://qrafteq.com/new-cac-fees-2025/
  77. https://www.acra.gov.sg/how-to-guides/before-you-start/reserving-a-business-name
  78. https://www.acra.gov.sg/how-to-guides/renewing-your-registration-for-sole-proprietorships-partnerships
  79. https://tradecouncil.org/country-guides/doing-business-with-uruguay/
  80. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/uruguay-trade-agreements
  81. https://brs.go.ke/fee-schedule-companies-registry/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.