Hubbry Logo
Out 1Out 1Main
Open search
Out 1
Community hub
Out 1
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Out 1
Out 1
from Wikipedia

Out 1
2015 French re-release poster
Directed by
Screenplay by
  • Jacques Rivette
  • Suzanne Schiffman
Based onHistory of the Thirteen
by Honoré de Balzac
Produced byStéphane Tchalgadjieff
Starring
CinematographyPierre-William Glenn
Edited byNicole Lubtchansky
Music byJean-Pierre Drouet
Distributed bySunshine Productions
Release date
  • 9 October 1971 (1971-10-09)
Running time
773 minutes
CountryFrance
LanguageFrench

Out 1, also referred to as Out 1: Noli Me Tangere, is a 1971 French experimental mystery film written and directed by Jacques Rivette and Suzanne Schiffman. It is indebted to Honoré de Balzac's La Comédie humaine, particularly the History of the Thirteen collection (1833–35). Known for its length of nearly 13 hours, the film is divided into eight parts of approximately 90–100 minutes each.

The vast length of Out 1 allows Rivette and Schiffman, like Balzac, to construct multiple loosely connected characters with independent stories whose subplots weave amongst each other and continually uncover new characters with their own subplots. A truncated 4½-hour version exists, and its Spectre subtitle was chosen for the name's ambiguous and various indistinct meanings, while the Noli me tangere ("touch me not") subtitle for the original cut is clearly a reference to it being the full-length film as intended by Rivette.

The film's experimentation with parallel subplots was influenced by André Cayatte's two-part Anatomy of a Marriage (1964), while the use of expansive screen time was first toyed with by Rivette in L'amour fou (1969). The parallel narrative structure has since been used in many other notable films, including Krzysztof Kieślowski's Dekalog and Lucas Belvaux's Trilogie, which includes Un couple épatant, Cavale and Après la vie, to name a few. Each part begins with a title in the form of "from person to person" (usually indicating the first and last characters seen in each episode), followed by a handful of black and white still photos recapitulating the scenes of the prior episode, then concluded by showing the final minute or so (in black and white) of the last episode before cutting into the new episode itself (which is entirely in color).

Out 1 has won consistent critical acclaim since its release, and further received 13 votes in the 2012 Sight & Sound critics' poll of the greatest films ever made, resulting in a final ranking of 127th, and 17 votes in the 2022 critics' poll, resulting in a final ranking of 169th.[1][2]

Title

[edit]

Out 1 is known by many titles. Out 1: Noli Me Tangere, the frequently-cited longer title of the film, has its origins as a phrase written on the film canister of an early workprint. This longer title was commonly understood as the film's actual title until a finished print was made in 1989 for exhibition at the Rotterdam Film Festival and as a telecine transfer for TV broadcast. At that point Rivette asserted the title on-screen as simply Out 1.

When asked why the film is called Out 1, Rivette responded, "I chose 'Out' as the opposite of the vogue word 'in', which had caught on in France and which I thought was silly. The action of the film is rather like a serial which could continue through several episodes, so I gave it the number 'One'."

Out 1: Spectre is the proper title of the shorter, four-hour version, which is nonetheless a completely separate and distinctive work rather than simply a shortened form of the longer feature and includes scenes omitted from that version.

Plot and themes

[edit]

Rivette in the film focuses on theatrical rehearsals, a motif present in both L'amour fou and his debut feature Paris nous appartient (1960); he extends L'amour fou's relentless reportage-style examination of the development of a play (in that case Jean Racine's Andromaque) and its effects on the director and his wife. In the case of Out 1, its anchors are two theater groups, each rehearsing Aeschylus plays (Seven Against Thebes and Prometheus Bound); no character is made the lead. There are also two outsiders: Colin, who believes there may be a real-life Thirteen group, and Frédérique, a swindler who steals letters which may be the group's communications. Other characters include Emilie, who runs a hangout under the name Pauline and whose husband, Igor, has been missing.

The film initially alternates between documentary-style scenes observing rehearsals, Colin soliciting money from café patrons as a deaf man by playing irritating harmonica tunes, and Frédérique stealing money through deceptions. Colin receives three mysterious messages referencing "the Thirteen" and Lewis Carroll's The Hunting of the Snark. He connects this to Balzac and begins a quixotic quest to uncover their meaning and the Thirteen. Later, Frédérique interrupts Etienne, playing chess against himself at home; when she is left alone, she looks for a stash of money but instead steals letters. Sensing they refer to a secret society, she attempts to sell them to their correspondents for money or information, but fails. Only Emilie buys the letters, because they reference her husband.

The Seven Against Thebes production employs a newcomer, Renaud, to assist, but he quickly seizes creative direction from Lili, who recedes in disgust. Quentin wins a million francs betting, but during the ensemble's celebration, Renaud steals it; the production is cancelled, and the members search Paris for Renaud. Thomas brings in old friend Sarah to help with a creative block on Prometheus Bound, but she causes a rift and the play is abandoned when another player leaves for unrelated reasons. Thomas's block was due to the break-up of his longterm personal and professional relationship with Lili.

Thomas is revealed to be in the Thirteen, although the group was inactive and had agreed to become dormant. An encounter between Colin and Thomas motivates Thomas to suggest to Etienne reviving it, but Etienne is reluctant because of the group's inactivity. A correspondent, Pierre, discussed but not seen, is described as sinister and childlike. After reading the letters, Emilie prepares photocopies of them for newspapers and asserts a scandal involving Pierre setting up Igor. Since they are both Thirteen members, the group reconstitutes to prevent this, and Thomas, Etienne and ruthless lawyer de Graffe meet to discuss it.

Frédérique meets the man that her gay friend Honey Moon is infatuated with, who turns out to be Renaud; they marry in a blood ritual, but she suspects that he may be in another more sinister secret society and, after seeing him associate with a gang, draws a gun on him, but warns him – causing him to turn and shoot her dead.

Colin gives up on the Thirteen, while it is suggested by two other Thirteen members, Lucie de Graffe and cynical professor Warok, that Pierre wrote the messages to Colin and has been behind developments, because he misses the Thirteen and wants to restore it or replace it with young blood like Colin. Several characters retreat to Emilie's Normandy house, "the Obade" (another Balzacian reference, see "Ferragus"), where she breaks down in front of Sarah, confessing her love for both Colin (who had been courting her) and Igor. Her dilemma is solved when Igor phones to ask her to meet him in Paris. She and Lili set off to see him.

Thomas remains on the beach with two actors and has a drunken hysterical episode, when he pretends to collapse. They try to revive him but, when he reveals his jest, walk away in disgust and leave. Thomas is left, crying and laughing, stranded, and part of no group. The film then cuts to Marie, an actress from the Thebes group, still searching for Renaud and the money. A statue of a goddess, perhaps Athena, towers above her.

Characters

[edit]
  • Achille (Sylvain Corthay): Actor in Prometheus Bound troupe. Accompanies Thomas and Rose to the Obade at the end of the film.
  • Arsenal (Marcel Bozonnet): Actor in Seven Against Thebes troupe. Vaguely knew Renaud and introduced him to the rest of the group. Also known as Nicolas, Papa, or Theo.
  • Balzac specialist (Éric Rohmer): Professor who Colin contacts (while still pretending to be a deaf man) to attempt to discover some further clues as to the possibility of the existence of the Thirteen in real life.
  • Beatrice (Edwine Moatti): Actress in Prometheus Bound troupe. Is a confidant and possibly lover of Thomas. Engages in a threesome with Thomas and Sarah. Her relationship with the Ethnologist is broken off when he announces his intention to depart for the Basque region for work. This also causes her to leave the troupe.
  • Bergamotte (Bernadette Onfroy): Actress in Prometheus Bound troupe.
  • Colin (Jean-Pierre Léaud): Young outsider who pretends to be a deaf whilst playing a harmonica for money around Parisian cafes. Receives three messages from Pierre, which set him off to try to uncover a real-life "Thirteen" in the vein of the Balzac novels. Falls in love with Pauline after numerous meetings at her store. Makes many connections through his investigations, but ultimately fails to find any cooperative parties and abandons his belief in the Thirteen.
  • Elaine (Karen Puig): Actress in Seven Against Thebes troupe. Alerts Lucie when Lili goes missing for several days (which turns out to be a trip with Emilie to the Obade).
  • Emilie (Bulle Ogier): Member of the Thirteen. Name that Pauline goes by at home. With Lili she murders the courier and hides his body in the basement of the shop. Wife to Igor and mother of two children with him. His disappearance six months earlier causes her to buy Pierre's letters from Frédérique; these refer to the disappearance. Despite Sarah's admonitions, she plans to send photocopies of the letters to newspapers in order to discover what is going on; however, Iris winds up burning them behind her back. Leaves for Obade, where she confesses her love for Colin and Igor to Sarah. Igor calls her not long after and tells her to meet him in Paris. She leaves with Lili. See Pauline.
  • The Ethnologist (Michel Delahaye): Romantic interest of Beatrice. Breaks up with her when he announces his departure to the Basque region for work. Beatrice leaves Prometheus Bound shortly afterward because of this.
  • Etienne (Jacques Doniol-Valcroze): Member of the Thirteen. Frederique steals his letters during an attempted con and tries to sell them off for money and information about the group. Meets with Thomas to discuss the revival of the group and later with Thomas and Lucie to discuss how to control Emilie's potential contact with newspapers.
  • Faune (Monique Clement): Actress in Prometheus Bound troupe.
  • Frédérique (Juliet Berto): Young petty thief who deceives and exploits men only as long as she needs to get into their wallets. Her only friend and confidant is Honey Moon, a gay barfly played by Juliet Berto's real-life husband Michel Berto. She finds Etienne's letters while looking for his money and takes them instead. Starts calling the correspondents to sell them for money, but begins to try to make sense of the information referring to the Thirteen and also asks for information, particularly from Lucie. Meets Honey Moon's crush, who turns out to be Renaud, and has a blood wedding with him. After suspecting his involvement in a secret society, she follows him and causes him to shoot her dead before he realizes who she is.
  • Georges (unseen): Member of the Thirteen. Lili's current boyfriend.
  • Gian-Reto (Barbet Schroeder): Hanger-on at Pauline's store.
  • Honey Moon (Michel Berto): Gay confidant of Frédérique who borrows money from her, incites her to disrupt black market pornographers. He is infatuated with Renaud, and this eventually leads to Frédérique seeking out Renaud.
  • Igor (unseen): Emilie's husband and father of her two young children. Member of the Thirteen. Been missing since leaving for work six months ago. Discussed in Etienne's letters, some of which Emilie buys from Frédérique. At the film's end Emilie receives a phone call from Igor asking her to meet him in Paris at Warok's.
  • Iris (Ode Bitton): Pregnant nanny of Emilie and Igor's children. Solves their problem by giving to Thomas Emilie's letters to the newspapers which would have revealed the Thirteen and scandalized Pierre.
  • Lili (Michèle Moretti): Director of the Seven Against Thebes troupe, formerly involved with Thomas. May be involved with Quentin. Gradually recedes from the production as Renaud's influence expands. Accidentally takes a picture of Renaud which the troupe uses to try to get someone from the public to identify him. Member of the Thirteen.
  • Lucie (Françoise Fabian): Lawyer with whom Lili renews contact after a long silence. Member of the Thirteen. Correspondent in some of Etienne's letters. Is contacted by Frédérique and meets her, but instead takes some of the letters from her.
  • Marie (Hermine Karagheuz): Actress in the Seven Against Thebes troupe. Delivers one of Pierre's messages to Colin, which clearly seems to make her a member of the Thirteen. Last character seen in the film, standing next to a Paris monument.
  • Marlon (Jean-François Stevenin): Thug with a criminal history who is an acquaintance of Frédérique. She encounters him in a bar, and he bizarrely beats her, but she pickpockets him during the beating.
  • Max (Louis Julien): Quentin's son. Suggests the Seven Against Thebes troupe use Lili's photograph of Renaud to ask members of the public if they've seen him around.
  • Nicolas (Marcel Bozonnet): Actor in Seven Against Thebes troupe. Vaguely knew Renaud and introduced him to the rest of the group. Also known as Arsenal, Papa, or Theo.
  • Papa (Marcel Bozonnet): Actor in Seven Against Thebes troupe. Vaguely knew Renaud and introduced him to the rest of the group. Also known as Arsenal, Nicolas, or Theo.
  • Pauline (Bulle Ogier): Name that Emilie goes by at her store where local youths hang out. Colin meets her there and soon falls in love with her. She abandons the shop to retreat to the Obade. See Emilie.
  • Pierre (unseen): Member of the Thirteen. Author of letters to Colin. Correspondent in some of Etienne's letters who may be implicated in Igor's disappearance. Emilie threatens to send evidence of this to newspapers after she pays Frédérique for the letters.
  • Quentin (Pierre Baillot): Actor in the Seven Against Thebes troupe. Father to Max. Wins a million francs in the lottery, which is promptly stolen during celebrations by Renaud. Attempts to find Renaud but fails, and joins Prometheus Bound troupe briefly afterwards.
  • Renaud (Alain Libolt): Brought in by Arsenal/Nicolas/Papa/Theo to help the Seven Against Thebes troupe, but gradually starts to exert more and more influence on the production, to Lili's chagrin. Steals Quentin's million francs of lottery winnings during the troupe's celebration. Turns out to be Honey Moon's crush, which allows Frédérique to find him. She soon suspects that he may be a member of a secret society (though ultimately it seems more likely to be a local gang, and not the Thirteen). He shoots and kills her when she catches him off-guard.
  • Rose (Christiane Corthay): Actress in Prometheus Bound troupe. Accompanies Thomas and Achille to the Obade and comforts him during some of his hysterical episodes at the end.
  • Sarah (Bernadette Lafont): Writer living in Igor's Obade home. Thomas asks her to help him with the direction of Prometheus Bound, and later has a threesome with her and Beatrice. She clashes with the group, which is a factor in the abandonment of the play, along with Beatrice's departure, which is caused by personal factors. Member of the Thirteen, she doesn't trust Thomas and strenuously attempts (unsuccessfully) to intervene to prevent Emilie from sending Pierre's letters to the newspapers. Emilie later confides her love for Colin and Igor to her.
  • Theo (Marcel Bozonnet): Actor in Seven Against Thebes troupe. Vaguely knew Renaud and introduced him to the rest of the group. Also known as Arsenal, Nicolas, or Papa.
  • Thomas (Michael Lonsdale): Director of the Prometheus Bound troupe, formerly involved with Lili, and in ambiguously romantic relationships with both Beatrice and Sarah during the course of the film. Asks Sarah to help him direct the play. After a threesome with Sarah and Beatrice, abandons it because of Sarah's friction with the group and Beatrice's unrelated departure. Member of the Thirteen. Destroys Emilie's letters incriminating Pierre. Proposes to reunite with Lili, but is rejected by her, which leads to his final hysteria on the beach.
  • Warok (Jean Bouise): Member of the Thirteen. Referred to in Etienne's letters. Both Frédérique and Colin ask him about the group, but he denies all knowledge.
  • Miss Blandish (Brigitte Roüan)

Style

[edit]

After working with both 35mm film and 16mm film in L'amour fou, Rivette was comfortable enough with the 16mm format to work with it on Out 1, the massive length of which precluded any serious attempt to shoot the whole film on expensive 35mm. Despite the immense length of the final product, the film was shot under a tight shooting schedule of only six weeks. Rivette's preference for the long take was the main reason why such a schedule could be maintained. Because he wanted the performances to have a level of realism, some takes include lines "fluffed" by actors, or other common "mistakes" such as camera and boom microphone shadows, as well as unwitting extras looking at the camera in exterior shots (including a well-known scene where two young boys doggedly follow Jean-Pierre Léaud along the street during an extended monologue). Rivette has said that the intimacy of the performances in the face of such mistakes was precisely why he kept those takes in the film. Many of the rehearsal scenes, particularly those of the Prometheus Bound group, are composed almost entirely of long shots, although the film also contains more conventional editing elsewhere. The slow pacing of the film as a whole is also loosely based on Balzac,[original research?] and its first few hours are constructed more like a prologue, where the editing is slower and the characters are no more than introduced. It is not until three or four hours into the film that characters' motives and the story lines begin to reveal themselves.

The work also includes stylistically adventurous techniques, including the shooting of long shots through mirrors (again developing from work in L'amour fou), shortcuts to black to punctuate otherwise continuous scenes, short cutaways to unrelated or seemingly meaningless shots, non-diegetic sound blocking out crucial parts of the dialogue, and even a conversation in which selected lines are re-edited so that they appear to be spoken backward. However, these experiments form a fairly small part of the work as a whole, which is generally conventional in style (aside from the length of takes and of the work as a whole).

Exhibition

[edit]

First shown as a work in progress at the Maison de la Culture in Le Havre, the film was re-edited down to a four-hour "short" version called Out 1: Spectre, which is more accessible and available (although not widely). Richard Roud, writing in The Guardian, called this version "a mind-blowing experience, but one which, instead of taking one 'out of this world' as the expression has it, took one right smack into the world. Or into a world which one only dimly realised was there – always right there beneath the everyday world ... the cinema will never be the same again, and nor will I." Few people have seen the full-length version, though it is championed by Chicago Reader critic Jonathan Rosenbaum, who compares it to Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow,[3] and has included both Out 1: Noli Me Tangere and Out 1: Spectre in the 100 films singled out from his 1000 favourite films, published in his anthology Essential Cinema.

Out 1: Noli Me Tangere was restored in Germany in 1990 and was shown again at the Rotterdam and Berlin Film Festivals shortly thereafter. It disappeared again into obscurity until 2004, when both Noli Me Tangere and its shorter version Out 1: Spectre featured in the programme on 1–21 June, in the complete retrospective Jacques Rivette Viaggio in Italia di un metteur en scène organized by Deep A.C. and curated by Goffredo De Pascale in Rome at the Sala Trevi Centro Sperimentale and in Naples at Le Grenoble. Then, only in the April/May 2006 Rivette retrospective at London's National Film Theatre, with the shorter film also screening twice across two subsequent nights at Anthology Film Archives in New York City on the same April weekend as the NFT projection of the long work. The North American premiere of Noli Me Tangere took place on 23 and 24 September 2006 in Vancouver's Vancouver International Film Centre organized by Vancouver International Film Festival programmer and Cinema Scope editor Mark Peranson, attended by around twenty people (22 at Peranson's initial count, before episode 1, though others came and went). A subsequent screening took place as a part of the 2006 festival over 30 September and 1 October, introduced by Jonathan Rosenbaum.

The subtitled Out 1: Noli Me Tangere provides a particular challenge for exhibitors, as the subtitles are not burned onto the print of the film itself, as is usual with most foreign films shown in North America. Rather, the subtitles for Out 1, provided by the British Film Institute, are projected from a computer in a separate stream (in the Vancouver screening, just below the film itself); this then has to be synchronized with the film itself, almost certainly by someone unfamiliar with the entire Out 1. Few theatres can meet this technical challenge, especially over a thirteen-hour span. In addition, the film was shot on 16mm at a nonstandard 25 frames per second, a speed few current projectors are equipped to handle. In the Vancouver screening, the film was projected at 24fps, adding about half an hour to the film as a whole.

Screenings of both the long and short works took place in late November and December 2006, during an extensive retrospective of Rivette's work which ran at the Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria, Queens, New York City. The screening of the longer version was sold out for the 9 and 10 December 2006 screening, so the Museum held an encore performance of the film on 3 and 4 March in 2007 (which came close to selling out). It was shown on both occasions over 2 days. In interviews, Rivette has explicitly stated that the work is meant to be seen theatrically "on the big screen", and apparently dislikes it being watched on television. Ironically, the preparation of the film in eight episodes was in large part due to the "naive hope", according to Rivette, of it originally being distributed like that on French television, although his disdain for that mode of exhibition only arose after the film's completion.

Out 1 was restored by Carlotta Films in 2015 and made its U.S. theatrical premiere at the Brooklyn Academy of Music on 4 November 2015. This version has now been released on DVD and Blu-ray in the U.S., while Arrow Films have released it on both formats in the UK.

The restored Out 1 was screened in London, England over two days at the Prince Charles Cinema, Leicester Place on 28 and 29 November 2015. The screening was presented by the Badlands Collective and A Nos Amours.

Reception

[edit]

Out 1 has garnered acclaim from critics. The film holds an aggregate score of 87/100 on Metacritic, based on 7 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".[4] Rotten Tomatoes reports 100% approval based on 22 reviews, with a weighted average of 8.6/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "Time is an essential character in Jacques Rivette's Out 1, Noli Me Tangere, a brilliant 13-hour study of human relationships and an exploration of how a generation's dreams and ideals slowly fade as life goes ruthlessly by."[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Out 1, also known as [Out 1: Noli Me Tangere](/page/Out_1: Noli Me Tangere), is a 1971 French directed by . This monumental 13-hour work, structured as eight episodes, interweaves multiple narratives set in post-May 1968 Paris, centering on two theater troupes rehearsing adaptations of Aeschylus's plays, a seductive con artist, and a street performer investigating cryptic messages that suggest a vast conspiracy. The film's sprawling plot follows the theater ensemble led by Thomas (Michael Lonsdale), who directs , and another group under Renaud (Alain Libolt) preparing The Seven Against Thebes, capturing the improvisational chaos of their rehearsals. Parallel stories track Frédérique (), a drifter who robs men through seduction, and Colin (), a harmonica-playing performer who deciphers Balzac quotes hinting at a secret called the Thirteen. These threads converge through chance encounters, exploring interpersonal dynamics and the elusive nature of truth amid societal disillusionment. Rivette, co-writing with Suzanne Schiffman, shot Out 1 in 1970 on affordable 16mm film, emphasizing long takes, self-reflexive improvisation, and a labyrinthine structure that blurs theater, reality, and fiction. Themes of fragmented utopian ideals from the , , and the performative aspects of life underscore its experimental , making it a profound reflection on modern existence. Due to its length, Out 1 premiered only once in and remained obscure until restorations; a condensed four-hour version, Out 1: Spectre, followed in 1974. It has since been hailed as a landmark of cinema, earning a 96% approval rating from critics on for its innovative study of human relationships and fading generational dreams.

Production

Development

The development of Out 1 emerged in the aftermath of the protests in , capturing a sense of post-revolutionary malaise and communal experimentation in Parisian artistic circles. conceived the project as a response to the era's disillusionment, initially envisioning it as an eight-episode television series to explore fragmented social connections and hidden influences in contemporary society. The narrative core drew inspiration from Honoré de Balzac's History of the Thirteen, a collection of novellas depicting a secretive Parisian society manipulating events from the shadows, which Rivette adapted to reflect modern interpersonal and political intrigue. Rivette collaborated closely with and Suzanne Schiffman on the project's structure, producing only a loose 30- to 40-page chronology rather than a fixed script, allowing for organic evolution during production. This approach emphasized as a core method, fostering a communal creative process where actors contributed to character development and scene progression. To achieve this, Rivette cast performers primarily from experimental theater collectives in , including non-professional actors alongside established ones, who rehearsed plays as a foundation for the film's interwoven stories of performance bleeding into real life. Building on techniques from his earlier film L'Amour fou (1969), Rivette integrated extended rehearsal sequences to blur boundaries between theater and cinema, using to document the actors' collaborative dynamics in real time. The initial runtime was targeted at 12 to 13 hours to accommodate this expansive, serial-like format, shot on economical 16mm film stock to enable low-budget flexibility and a raw, documentary-like realism without conventional constraints. This pre-production planning prioritized process over predetermined outcomes, reflecting Rivette's interest in cinema as a living, unpredictable endeavor.

Filming

The filming of Out 1 took place over a six-week period in the spring of , specifically from April to May, allowing Rivette to capture the vibrant, post-1968 atmosphere of . Principal locations included the city's streets for dynamic chase and pursuit sequences, private apartments to evoke intimate character interactions, and theater rehearsal spaces that grounded the film's exploration of communal performance. This choice of settings emphasized immersive realism, blending staged action with the unplanned energy of urban life, where passersby often became unwitting participants in street scenes. Rivette employed long takes as a core technique, with some sequences extending up to ten minutes—the maximum length of a 16mm reel—to preserve the spontaneity of performances without interruption. The production relied on portable 16mm equipment, including large magazines that enabled extended without frequent reloads, facilitating a documentary-like fluidity in capturing movement through . Natural lighting predominated, particularly in exterior and interior scenes, to maintain an unpolished, immediate aesthetic that mirrored the film's improvisational ethos. The improvisational approach defined the shoot, with over three dozen actors developing their characters and scenes collaboratively on-site, guided loosely by Rivette and co-writer Suzanne Schiffman rather than a fixed script. This process yielded approximately 30 hours of raw 16mm footage, which was later edited down to the final 773-minute runtime, requiring careful selection to weave disparate threads into a cohesive yet open-ended . Actors like and contributed to scene evolution in real time, often drawing from theater exercises inspired by , which added layers of unpredictability to the material. Technical challenges arose from the , which limited coverage options and demanded precise timing for complex ensemble interactions without the safety net of multiple angles. Managing a large cast without formal rehearsals proved demanding, as Rivette's method encouraged organic group dynamics but risked inconsistencies in pacing and focus during extended takes. For street sequences, the crew sometimes concealed the camera to avoid alerting non-professional participants, heightening the logistical strain of maintaining continuity in public spaces. On-set dynamics reflected Rivette's collaborative directing style, fostering a workshop-like environment where actors shared in creative decisions, blurring lines between direction and performance. This approach, rooted in theater , allowed for spontaneous adjustments but occasionally led to intense, unresolved tensions among the ensemble, mirroring the film's themes of fractured collectivity. Real-time events, such as unexpected interactions with the environment or shifts in actor energy, were embraced rather than corrected, contributing to the raw vitality of the footage.

Plot

Overview

Out 1, directed by , is a 1971 French structured as an eight-episode serial with a total runtime of 12 hours and 45 minutes. Set in post-1968 , it follows two parallel theater troupes engaged in rehearsals of Aeschylus's plays: one group, led by Thomas, works on , while the other, led by Lili, rehearses . These improvisational sessions capture the troupes' internal dynamics and communal experiments in performance, reflecting the era's artistic ferment. The narrative interweaves these rehearsals with the investigations of two outsider figures: Colin, a street who poses as a while playing the harmonica, and Frédérique, a specializing in blackmail. Colin begins deciphering cryptic messages that point to a secret society known as "The Thirteen," inspired by Balzac's History of the Thirteen, while Frédérique stumbles upon stolen letters that draw her into the same web of intrigue. Their pursuits lead to encounters with intellectuals, writers, and performers, sparking subplots of personal betrayals, hidden retreats to a country house, and growing within overlapping social circles. Across the episodes, slow-building interconnections emerge between the troupes and the outsiders' quests, creating a mosaic of fragmented lives and elusive connections. The film culminates in dispersed resolutions, with characters parting ways amid lingering mysteries, emphasizing the serial's open-ended progression without tidy closure. Each episode builds episodically, often recapping prior events through still images to guide the sprawling ensemble narrative.

Themes

Out 1 explores themes of and set against the backdrop of post-1968 , where the film's central draws from Honoré de Balzac's Histoire des Treize to evoke a secret society of thirteen members influencing events, yet subverts this literary model by revealing the conspiracy as illusory and emblematic of failed communal ideals from the uprisings. This paranoia manifests through characters' investigations into cryptic signs and connections, mirroring the era's disillusionment with revolutionary politics and the fragmentation of utopian aspirations. Rather than affirming a cohesive hidden order, the narrative critiques how such delusions highlight the collapse of collective dreams into individual suspicion and societal distrust. A core theme is the interplay between and , as the film's theater rehearsals—centered on Aeschylus's plays—seamlessly bleed into characters' personal lives, questioning the authenticity of , relationships, and self-expression. Rivette's use of allows actors to inhabit roles that extend beyond the stage, blurring boundaries and suggesting that life itself becomes a perpetual, unresolved devoid of clear distinction between enactment and existence. This motif underscores a philosophical inquiry into how performative acts shape identity, often leading to emotional and relational instability rather than genuine connection. The film delves into isolation and , exemplified by the beggar Colin's cryptic gestures and the overall fragmented dialogues that hinder meaningful exchange among characters. These elements portray a rife with disconnection, where attempts at interaction dissolve into misunderstanding or silence, amplifying the existential solitude of post-1968 urban life. Colin's , in particular, symbolizes the barriers to articulation, extending to broader societal failures in fostering dialogue after the era's political upheavals. Out 1 offers a critique of intellectual elites and the waning of utopian dreams, depicting loosely connected groups of artists and thinkers as remnants of idealism now mired in petty intrigues and escapism. Motifs of islands recur as symbols of retreat, representing both desired isolation from a corrupt mainland society and the ultimate failure of communal harmony, as characters seek refuge in remote, self-contained worlds that prove untenable. This portrayal satirizes the Parisian avant-garde's detachment, highlighting how post-1968 euphoria has curdled into cynical withdrawal and unfulfilled promises of transformation. At its heart lies existential , with the culminating in dissolution rather than , aligning with Rivette's affinity for incomplete, open-ended structures that resist closure. The film's prolonged, meandering form suspends meaning, inviting viewers to confront the void of unresolved mysteries and the futility of seeking definitive truths in art or life. This approach reflects a philosophical stance on contingency and process, where endings evoke not answers but the ongoing flux of human endeavor.

Cast and Characters

Principal Cast

The principal cast of Out 1 features a core group of French New Wave-affiliated actors who bring authenticity to the film's sprawling ensemble dynamics. Leading the performers are Jean-Pierre Léaud as Colin, a street musician and amateur detective posing as a deaf-mute to solicit tarot readings from passersby; Juliet Berto as Frédérique, a cunning pickpocket navigating Paris's underbelly in search of clues to a shadowy conspiracy; Michèle Moretti as Lili, the intense director of the theater troupe rehearsing Aeschylus's Seven Against Thebes[]; Michael Lonsdale as Thomas, the introspective leader of the theater group working on a modern adaptation of Aeschylus's Prometheus Bound[]; and Bulle Ogier as Émilie (also known as Pauline), a enigmatic figure tied to the film's secretive society, The Thirteen. Léaud, an iconic figure of the since his breakout role as the troubled adolescent in François Truffaut's (1959), infuses Colin with restless energy drawn from his extensive collaborations with New Wave directors like Truffaut and . Berto, a frequent collaborator with across films like L'Amour fou (1969), Céline and Julie Go Boating (1974), and Duelle (1976), embodies Frédérique's outsider ferocity through her background in experimental cinema and theater. Moretti, known for her theater work and prior roles in Rivette's L'Amour fou, channels Lili's commanding presence as a troupe leader, highlighting her roots in performance. Lonsdale, a British-French with a distinguished career beginning in 1955 and extensive work in French theater and film, lends Thomas a philosophical depth informed by his dramatic training. Ogier, another Rivette mainstay appearing in seven of his films from L'Amour fou to 36 Views from the Pic Saint-Loup (2009), contributes to the ensemble's intricate interplay as Émilie, drawing on her reputation for subtle, multifaceted portrayals in New Wave and post-New Wave cinema. Beyond these leads, the film boasts a credited ensemble of over 20 actors, predominantly theater practitioners from Paris's experimental scene, supplemented by non-professionals in minor roles to enhance the improvisational, documentary-like texture of the production. This mix underscores Rivette's emphasis on collective performance, with one sentence noting the cast's reliance on improvisational techniques during the extended shoot to develop scenes organically.
ActorRoleKey Contribution
ColinNew Wave icon bringing youthful intensity to the conspiracy probe.
Juliet BertoFrédériqueRivette regular embodying the pickpocket's resourceful edge.
Michèle MorettiLiliTheater veteran directing the Aeschylus rehearsals with fervor.
ThomasStage-trained performer guiding the Prometheus troupe's explorations.
Émilie/PaulineEnsemble anchor in society intrigue scenes.

Character Descriptions

Colin is an eccentric and who poses as a while performing on the streets of , using cards to solicit donations and probe passersby for information. Driven by intense curiosity, he becomes obsessed with deciphering cryptic messages he receives, leading him to investigate a supposed inspired by Balzac's History of the Thirteen. His introspective and obsessive nature isolates him, though his quest draws him into fleeting encounters with others potentially linked to the conspiracy. Frédérique is a solitary and skilled thief who sustains herself through elaborate scams and petty crimes, including and attempted using stolen documents. Her aggressive and inventive personality propels her from mere survival tactics to deeper entanglements with enigmatic figures, as she exploits fears and secrets for financial gain. She shares a parallel path with Colin in uncovering hints of the hidden , marked by her disruptive presence and underlying boredom in isolation. Thomas serves as the charismatic yet authoritarian leader of a theater troupe rehearsing Aeschylus's , embodying a blend of paternal guidance and personal anguish in his efforts to merge performance with . His nervous, infantile demeanor masks deeper commitments to communal ideals, which falter amid group tensions, while his potential involvement in the adds layers of concealed authority. He navigates the troupe's dynamics with a mix of sincerity and control, highlighting failed utopian aspirations. Emilie, operating under the alias Pauline as the proprietor of a boutique that doubles as a meeting spot, is a reticent figure with a dual identity that underscores her enigmatic role in preserving the society's secrets. Tied to the Thirteen through her connections and her missing husband Igor, she embodies elusive power dynamics, balancing public normalcy with covert intrigue. Her interactions reveal a guarded protectiveness, estranging her from outsiders like Colin while linking her to core members. Igor and Pauline (Emilie) represent a strained marital bond marked by absence and tension, with Igor as a and unseen member of the Thirteen whose disappearance heightens the mystery surrounding their relationship. As young associates potentially within the society's orbit, their dynamic highlights generational conflicts and unresolved romance, with Pauline's longing and fear amplifying the intrigue. Igor's offscreen presence influences alliances, underscoring the society's fractured interpersonal ties. The characters' interrelations form a web of temporary alliances and suspicions, as outsiders like Colin and Frédérique probe the edges of the Thirteen, intersecting with insiders such as and Emilie through stolen clues and chance meetings. Unseen members like Igor contribute to the pervasive mystery, fostering paranoia and fragile connections that reveal the society's elusive power structures without full resolution.

Artistic Style

Techniques

Out 1 employs long, unbroken takes as a core technique to immerse viewers in the film's improvisational flow and capture the spontaneity of performances. These sequences often last 10 minutes or more, allowing actors to develop scenes organically without interruption, which fosters a sense of real-time unfolding and challenges conventional pacing. For instance, rehearsal scenes with theater troupes extend across extended durations, emphasizing the actors' physical and emotional explorations over scripted precision. The film's , handled by Pierre-William Glenn, utilizes 16mm color stock to achieve a raw, textured quality that enhances its handheld mobility and intimate scale. This format, shot primarily on location in , lends a documentary-like realism to the visuals, evoking the immediacy of post-1968 street life while enabling fluid camera movements that follow characters through urban spaces. Glenn's approach prioritizes and unobtrusive tracking, contributing to the film's verité aesthetic without sacrificing compositional depth. Sound design in Out 1 is notably sparse in non-diegetic elements, relying instead on ambient and diegetic noises to underscore authenticity and atmospheric tension. Direct sound recording captures everyday urban sounds—such as street traffic, footsteps, and incidental conversations—dominating the mix, with minimal added music such as percussion emerging organically from the scenes. This restraint heightens the film's realism, allowing environmental audio to propel the and evoke the disorientation of its characters. Editing, led by Nicole Lubtchansky, begins with minimal intervention in the early portions, preserving the integrity of long takes to build immersion, before transitioning to more dynamic montage sequences in later segments that introduce rhythmic tension and fragmented perspectives. This progression mirrors the film's escalating intrigue, using abrupt cuts and juxtapositions to connect disparate threads without resolving them, thereby amplifying . Lubtchansky's work, often in with assistants, transforms hours of improvised footage into a cohesive yet open-ended . Experimental devices such as mirror reflections and off-screen space further disrupt viewer expectations, creating layers of perceptual ambiguity. Mirrors appear recurrently, as in boutique encounters where they multiply identities and suggest hidden conspiracies, while off-screen elements—like unseen voices or implied actions—extend the diegesis beyond the frame, inviting speculation about unobserved events. These techniques subvert spatial and narrative continuity, reinforcing the film's exploration of perception and reality.

Influences

Out 1 draws its central intrigue from Honoré de Balzac's , particularly the History of the Thirteen (1833–1835), which depicts a secretive cabal of thirteen men bound by a shared, transcendent idea during the . This literary framework informs the film's elusive conspiracy motif, where protagonist Colin deciphers cryptic messages alluding to a modern equivalent of Balzac's society, as explained by a Balzac scholar played by . In the narrative overview, Balzac's influence manifests through these encoded references that propel the plot's investigative threads. Rivette's roots in the profoundly shape Out 1's meta-theatrical structure, echoing the improvisational and self-reflexive techniques of contemporaries like and . As a co-founder of the movement, Rivette extends its emphasis on blending with , seen in the film's extended rehearsals that blur performance and everyday life, much like Godard's anarchic narrative disruptions or Rohmer's contemplative dialogues. This approach transforms the film into a labyrinthine exploration of creation and illusion, prioritizing process over resolution. The theatrical rehearsals in Out 1 are steeped in , specifically adaptations of Aeschylus's works, which infuse the film with mythic and communal undertones. One troupe experiments with , while the other tackles , using these ancient texts to probe themes of fate, rebellion, and collective ritual amid the actors' improvisations. These elements draw from Aeschylus's choral dynamics and epic scale to underscore the film's interest in group dynamics and existential conflict. Set in the wake of the uprisings, Out 1 reflects the post-1968 cultural disillusionment in , incorporating ideas of , détournement, and revolt against commodified society. The film's portrayal of fragmented communes and underground networks critiques the erosion of revolutionary ideals, with characters navigating a haunted by the protests' unfulfilled promises and the pervasive "spectacle" of daily life. This context evokes Guy Debord's theories, as the merging of art and activism in the rehearsals mirrors Situationist calls to dissolve boundaries between performance and reality. Literary allusions to appear in the film's tarot sequences, where nonsense poetry parodies (1876), such as lines like "Two paths open up before you / Thirteen to better hunt the Snark," fueling Colin's paranoid quest. This Carrollian whimsy introduces absurdity and mirror-like reversals, enhancing the film's playful yet disorienting tone.

Release and Exhibition

Versions

The original version of Out 1, subtitled , premiered in 1971 as a 773-minute divided into eight episodes, conceived as a serial but never commercially released until 2015 due to its experimental length and lack of distributor interest. In 1972, Rivette edited a condensed four-hour version titled Out 1: Spectre (253 minutes), streamlining the narrative to emphasize the conspiracy plot while omitting much of the improvisational theater sequences for greater accessibility. In the early 1990s, Rivette prepared a re-edit of the full-length version for broadcast and screenings, which included cuts such as the deletion of a lengthy sequence while preserving much of the original . The 2015 digital restoration, undertaken by Carlotta Films from the original 16mm negative, produced a 2K scan that enhanced image clarity and stability for contemporary projections and releases. Concurrent audio remastering from the 16mm magnetic mix maintained the film's original mono track but improved dialogue intelligibility and overall sound fidelity.

Screenings and Distribution

The world premiere of Out 1 took place as a work-in-progress on September 9–10, 1971, at the Maison de la Culture in , , where the 12-hour, 40-minute film was screened continuously over a single night from an unprocessed 16mm to a small audience. This limited exhibition, commissioned but rejected by French television due to its unconventional length and structure, marked the film's only public showing for nearly two decades, as theatrical distribution proved impossible given its experimental format divided into eight episodes. The condensed four-hour version, Out 1: Spectre, had its world television premiere on German broadcaster WDR in December 1972 before receiving a U.S. debut at the in 1974. The full Out 1 resurfaced for its first complete public screening in February 1989 at the , followed by a presentation at the Berlin International Film Festival's Forum section in 1991 and a television broadcast on WDR in 1991. The restored version of Out 1, completed in 2015 with financing from the French National Center for Cinema, made its U.S. theatrical debut at the Brooklyn Academy of Music's BAMcinématek from November 4 to 19, 2015, presented in episodes over multiple days. This restoration enabled wider festival circulation, including appearances at the International Film Festival in January 2016, a at the BFI National Film Theatre in 2005, and a screening at the ICA as part of a Rivette in March 2025. Home media distribution began with a six-disc Blu-ray and DVD released by Carlotta Films in and the U.S. on January 12, , including both versions, supplementary materials, and English subtitles. By the late , the film became available for streaming on platforms such as MUBI, expanding access beyond rare theatrical and festival showings.

Reception and Legacy

Critical Response

Upon its limited initial release in , Out 1 received mixed reviews, with its extraordinary length of over twelve hours drawing both admiration for its bold experimentation and criticism for perceived indulgence. The film premiered with a single screening at on September 9–10, 1971, before being rejected by French television and largely vanishing from public view for over a ; a condensed four-hour version, Out 1: Spectre, fared only marginally better upon its 1974 theatrical release, hampered by the same concerns over accessibility. The 2015 digital restoration and international re-release marked a dramatic shift in reception, transforming Out 1 into a celebrated among cinephiles and critics. It earned a 96% approval rating on based on 24 reviews, with an average score of 8.6/10, and a Metascore of 87 out of 100 on from seven critics, reflecting widespread acclaim for its enduring vitality. Film critic described it as Rivette's "grandest experiment and most exciting movie," highlighting its masterful interplay of collective improvisation, conspiracy motifs, and post-'68 Parisian bohemia as a profound meditation on solitude and community. Contemporary reviews often lauded the film's improvisational energy and satirical take on underground theater and shadowy intrigue, positioning it as a landmark of structural cinema that rewards patient engagement. However, detractors noted challenges with its deliberate pacing and demanding runtime, which could render it inaccessible to casual viewers, echoing earlier complaints of self-indulgence while affirming its status as a cinephile touchstone. In the 2022 Sight & Sound critics' poll, Out 1 tied for 181st place among the greatest films of all time, selected by 1,639 participants worldwide.

Cultural Impact

Out 1 has exerted a notable influence on experimental cinema through its pioneering use of extended runtime and improvisational structure, prefiguring the rise of long-form narrative television and culture. Critics have described the film as an early for serial formats that allow for sprawling ensemble dynamics, akin to those in modern prestige TV series, by emphasizing unhurried character development and interconnected subplots over conventional pacing. In academic discourse, is frequently examined within , particularly for its engagement with post-structuralist ideas such as narrative fragmentation and the interplay between and . Scholars have analyzed its loose of Honoré de Balzac's Histoire des Treize as a meta-commentary on and social structures, with detailed explorations in works like Zahra Tavassoli Zea's Balzac Reframed: The Classical and Modern Faces of and , which highlights Rivette's innovative reframing of literary sources in cinematic form. Additionally, connections to Gilles Deleuze's concepts of time-image and crystal-image appear in studies linking the film's improvisational theater scenes to broader philosophical inquiries into and event. The film's depiction of experimental theater rehearsals has impacted discussions on , blurring boundaries between stage and screen to inspire analyses of immersive and participatory formats. Rivette's approach to capturing actor interactions has been cited in explorations of how cinema can document live creation processes, influencing scholarly views on hybrid media practices. Underexplored aspects include feminist interpretations emphasizing the agency of female characters, such as those navigating personal and collective mysteries, which align with Rivette's recurring focus on women's in post-1968 French society. In the digital age, the film's motif has drawn parallels to contemporary phenomena like , as examined in academic theses on subjectivity and across media, underscoring its prescience regarding viral and networked intrigue. Out 1 continues to feature in legacy screenings at major institutions, including a major retrospective at the (BFI) in March 2025 and past screenings at the (MoMA). It is also referenced in 2020s conversations on , praised for its deliberate tempo and rejection of narrative acceleration in an era of streaming fragmentation.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.