Hubbry Logo
Passivity (engineering)Passivity (engineering)Main
Open search
Passivity (engineering)
Community hub
Passivity (engineering)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Passivity (engineering)
Passivity (engineering)
from Wikipedia

Passivity is a property of engineering systems, most commonly encountered in analog electronics and control systems. Typically, analog designers use passivity to refer to incrementally passive components and systems, which are incapable of power gain. In contrast, control systems engineers will use passivity to refer to thermodynamically passive ones, which consume, but do not produce, energy. As such, without context or a qualifier, the term passive is ambiguous.

An electronic circuit consisting entirely of passive components is called a passive circuit, and has the same properties as a passive component.

If a device is not passive, then it is an active device.

Thermodynamic passivity

[edit]

In control systems and circuit network theory, a passive component or circuit is one that consumes energy, but does not produce energy. Under this methodology, voltage and current sources are considered active, while resistors, capacitors, inductors, transistors, tunnel diodes, metamaterials and other dissipative and energy-neutral components are considered passive. Circuit designers will sometimes refer to this class of components as dissipative, or thermodynamically passive.

While many books give definitions for passivity, many of these contain subtle errors in how initial conditions are treated and, occasionally, the definitions do not generalize to all types of nonlinear time-varying systems with memory. Below is a correct, formal definition, taken from Wyatt et al.,[1] which also explains the problems with many other definitions. Given an n-port R with a state representation S, and initial state x, define available energy EA as:

where the notation supxT≥0 indicates that the supremum is taken over all T ≥ 0 and all admissible pairs {v(·), i(·)} with the fixed initial state x (e.g., all voltage–current trajectories for a given initial condition of the system). A system is considered passive if EA is finite for all initial states x. Otherwise, the system is considered active. Roughly speaking, the inner product is the instantaneous power (e.g., the product of voltage and current), and EA is the upper bound on the integral of the instantaneous power (i.e., energy). This upper bound (taken over all T ≥ 0) is the available energy in the system for the particular initial condition x. If, for all possible initial states of the system, the energy available is finite, then the system is called passive. If the available energy is finite, it is known to be non-negative, since any trajectory with voltage gives an integral equal to zero, and the available energy is the supremum over all possible trajectories. Moreover, by definition, for any trajectory {v(·), i(·)}, the following inequality holds:

.

The existence of a non-negative function EA that satisfies this inequality, known as a "storage function", is equivalent to passivity.[2] For a given system with a known model, it is often easier to construct a storage function satisfying the differential inequality than directly computing the available energy, as taking the supremum on a collection of trajectories might require the use of calculus of variations.

Incremental passivity

[edit]

In circuit design, informally, passive components refer to ones that are not capable of power gain; this means they cannot amplify signals. Under this definition, passive components include capacitors, inductors, resistors, diodes, transformers, voltage sources, and current sources.[3] They exclude devices like transistors, vacuum tubes, relays, tunnel diodes, and glow tubes.

To give other terminology, systems for which the small-signal model is not passive are sometimes called locally active (e.g. transistors and tunnel diodes). Systems that can generate power about a time-variant unperturbed state are often called parametrically active (e.g. certain types of nonlinear capacitors).[4]

Formally, for a memoryless two-terminal element, this means that the current–voltage characteristic is monotonically increasing. For this reason, control systems and circuit network theorists refer to these devices as locally passive, incrementally passive, increasing, monotone increasing, or monotonic. It is not clear how this definition would be formalized to multiport devices with memory – as a practical matter, circuit designers use this term informally, so it may not be necessary to formalize it.[nb 1][5]

Other definitions of passivity

[edit]

This term is used colloquially in a number of other contexts:

  • A passive USB to PS/2 adapter consists of wires, and potentially resistors and similar passive (in both the incremental and thermodynamic sense) components. An active USB to PS/2 adapter consists of logic to translate signals (active in the incremental sense)
  • A passive mixer consists of just resistors (incrementally passive), whereas an active mixer includes components capable of gain (active).
  • In audio work one can also find both (incrementally) passive and active converters between balanced and unbalanced lines. A passive balun converter is generally just a transformer along with, of course, the requisite connectors, while an active one typically consists of a differential drive or an instrumentation amplifier.
  • In some books, devices that exhibit gain or a rectifying function (e.g. diodes) are considered active. Only resistors, capacitors, inductors, transformers, and gyrators are considered passive.[6][7][8] United States Patent and Trademark Office is amongst the organisations classing diodes as active devices.[9] This definition is somewhat informal, as diodes can be considered non-linear resistors, and virtually all real-world devices exhibit some non-linearity.
  • Sales/product catalogs will often use different informal definitions of this term, as fitting to a particular hierarchies of products being sold. It is not uncommon, for example, to list all silicon devices under "active devices," even if some of those devices are technically passive.

Stability

[edit]

Passivity, in most cases, can be used to demonstrate that passive circuits will be stable under specific criteria. This only works if only one of the above definitions of passivity is used – if components from the two are mixed, the systems may be unstable under any criteria. In addition, passive circuits will not necessarily be stable under all stability criteria. For instance, a resonant series LC circuit will have unbounded voltage output for a bounded voltage input, but will be stable in the sense of Lyapunov, and given bounded energy input will have bounded energy output.

Passivity is frequently used in control systems to design stable control systems or to show stability in control systems. This is especially important in the design of large, complex control systems (e.g. stability of airplanes). Passivity is also used in some areas of circuit design, especially filter design.

Passive filter

[edit]

A passive filter is a kind of electronic filter that is made only from passive components – in contrast to an active filter, it does not require an external power source (beyond the signal). Since most filters are linear, in most cases, passive filters are composed of just the four basic linear elements – resistors, capacitors, inductors, and transformers. More complex passive filters may involve nonlinear elements, or more complex linear elements, such as transmission lines.

Television signal splitter consisting of a passive high-pass filter (left) and a passive low-pass filter (right). The antenna is connected to the screw terminals to the left of center.

A passive filter has several advantages over an active filter:

  • Guaranteed stability
  • Scale better to large signals (tens of amperes, hundreds of volts), where active devices are often expensive or impractical
  • No power supply needed
  • Often less expensive in discrete designs (unless large coils are required). Active filters tend to be less expensive in integrated designs.
  • For linear filters, potentially greater linearity depending on components required (in many cases, active filters allow the use of more linear components; e.g. active components can permit the use of a polypropylene or NP0 ceramic capacitor, while a passive one might require an electrolytic).

They are commonly used in speaker crossover design (due to the moderately large voltages and currents, and the lack of easy access to a power supply), filters in power distribution networks (due to the large voltages and currents), power supply bypassing (due to low cost, and in some cases, power requirements), as well as a variety of discrete and home brew circuits (for low-cost and simplicity). Passive filters are uncommon in monolithic integrated circuit design, where active devices are inexpensive compared to resistors and capacitors, and inductors are prohibitively expensive. Passive filters are still found, however, in hybrid integrated circuits. Indeed, it may be the desire to incorporate a passive filter that leads the designer to use the hybrid format.

Energic and non-energic passive circuit elements

[edit]

Passive circuit elements may be divided into energic and non-energic kinds. When current passes through it, an energic passive circuit element converts some of the energy supplied to it into heat. It is dissipative. When current passes through it, a non-energic passive circuit element converts none of the energy supplied to it into heat. It is non-dissipative. Resistors are energic. Ideal capacitors, inductors, transformers, and gyrators are non-energic.[10]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In engineering, passivity is a fundamental input-output property of dynamical systems, particularly in control theory, electronics, and mechanics, where a system is deemed passive if it cannot generate energy internally but can only store or dissipate the energy supplied through its inputs. This concept ensures that the net energy extracted from the system over any time interval is bounded by the initial stored energy, preventing unbounded amplification or instability without external power sources. Mathematically, for a system with input u(t)u(t) and output y(t)y(t), passivity is defined by the existence of a constant βR\beta \in \mathbb{R} such that 0Tu(t)y(t)dtβ\int_0^T u(t) y(t) \, dt \geq \beta for all T0T \geq 0, representing an energy balance where the integral captures the supplied power. The origins of passivity trace back to the study of linear electrical circuits in the mid-20th century, where passive components like resistors, capacitors, and inductors were distinguished by their inability to produce power gain. In 1972, Jan C. Willems formalized the theory within the broader framework of dissipative dynamical systems, establishing passivity as a special case of dissipativity with respect to the supply rate uyu^\top y, which laid the groundwork for its application to nonlinear and interconnected systems. Variants such as output-strict passivity (0Tu(t)y(t)dtδ0Ty(t)2dt+β\int_0^T u(t) y(t) \, dt \geq \delta \int_0^T \|y(t)\|^2 \, dt + \beta for some δ>0\delta > 0) and input-strict passivity introduce additional dissipation terms, enhancing robustness in feedback interconnections. A key theorem states that the negative feedback connection of two passive systems remains passive, providing a modular approach to stability analysis. Passivity has profound implications for stability and control design, as passive systems exhibit bounded input-bounded output (BIBO) stability under certain conditions, contrasting with Lyapunov state-space stability by focusing on energy flows rather than trajectories. In the frequency domain, for linear systems, passivity equates to the positive real condition, where the transfer function satisfies Re[G(jω)]0\operatorname{Re}[G(j\omega)] \geq 0 for all ω\omega. This property underpins passivity-based control (PBC), a methodology introduced in the 1990s for stabilizing nonlinear systems by reshaping their energy functions and injecting damping, often applied to Euler-Lagrange systems like robot manipulators, power converters, and electromechanical devices. For instance, interconnection and damping assignment PBC modifies the system's port-Hamiltonian structure to enforce a desired passive equilibrium. Beyond classical applications, passivity theory extends to adaptive control via the passification method, developed by A.L. Fradkov in 1974, which renders non-passive systems passive through high-gain feedback for robust stabilization. It also addresses modern challenges in synchronization of chaotic systems, robust control against uncertainties, and distributed parameter systems, with ongoing research integrating passivity into hybrid and time-delay dynamics. These advancements highlight passivity's versatility as a tool for ensuring global asymptotic stability in complex engineering systems without relying on precise model knowledge.

Core Definitions

Thermodynamic Passivity

Thermodynamic passivity describes physical systems in engineering that adhere strictly to the principles of energy conservation and entropy non-decrease, preventing the generation of net work or energy without external input. According to the first law of thermodynamics, the internal energy change equals the supplied energy, ensuring no creation of energy from nothing. The second law further requires that such systems do not decrease total entropy, meaning any internal processes must involve dissipation or reversible exchanges that align with increasing or constant entropy in isolated conditions. A fundamental characterization of thermodynamic passivity is the inequality 0Tu(t)y(t)dtβ\int_0^T u(t) y(t) \, dt \geq \beta for all T0T \geq 0 and some constant βR\beta \in \mathbb{R}, where u(t)u(t) represents the input (e.g., force or voltage) and y(t)y(t) the output (e.g., velocity or current). This integral quantifies the cumulative power supplied to the system over time, which must exceed or equal a lower bound related to the system's initial stored energy, implying that the system absorbs at least as much energy as it stores or dissipates without producing excess. In thermodynamic terms, this reflects the balance where supplied energy covers changes in stored energy plus irreversible dissipation, consistent with non-negative entropy production. This mathematical formulation draws from thermodynamic principles of energy conservation and dissipation. Representative examples of passive elements include batteries, which store chemical potential energy and release it upon discharge but require recharging to restore capacity, adhering to energy conservation without net generation. Mechanical systems like springs store elastic potential energy reversibly, while dampers dissipate kinetic energy as heat, ensuring entropy increase without work output beyond input. Heat engines, in their idealized reversible form, operate passively by converting heat to work only up to Carnot efficiency limits, preventing violation of thermodynamic laws. Passivity in thermodynamic contexts derives from potentials such as the Helmholtz free energy F=UTSF = U - TS for constant-temperature processes, where the system's state minimizes FF, and changes satisfy ΔFW\Delta F \leq W, with WW being the work done on the system, ensuring no free energy extraction without input. Similarly, the Gibbs free energy G=HTSG = H - TS (with H=U+PVH = U + PV) applies to constant-pressure scenarios, linking passivity to maximum reversible work constraints. These derivations underscore that passive systems maintain equilibrium potentials without spontaneous decreases. Incremental passivity extends this as a local variant, analyzing behaviors around specific operating points.

Incremental Passivity

Incremental passivity represents a stricter variant of passivity tailored for nonlinear dynamical systems, focusing on the behavior under small perturbations or variations around any operating point rather than solely at equilibrium. It ensures that the incremental energy associated with differences in inputs and outputs remains non-negative, promoting stability in systems subject to disturbances or trajectory variations. This property is particularly valuable for analyzing and controlling systems where global passivity may not hold, but local differential behaviors mimic passive elements. Mathematically, a nonlinear system x˙=f(x,u)\dot{x} = f(x, u), y=h(x,u)y = h(x, u) is incrementally passive if there exists a nonnegative storage function V(x1,x2)V(x_1, x_2) such that for any two trajectories (x1(t),u1(t),y1(t))(x_1(t), u_1(t), y_1(t)) and (x2(t),u2(t),y2(t))(x_2(t), u_2(t), y_2(t)) starting from initial states x1(0)x_1(0), x2(0)x_2(0), V˙(x1,x2)(u1u2)(y1y2),\dot{V}(x_1, x_2) \leq (u_1 - u_2)^\top (y_1 - y_2), with V(x,x)=0V(x, x) = 0 and V(x1,x2)0V(x_1, x_2) \geq 0. This formulation captures differential dissipativity, where the storage function measures the "distance" between states, and the inequality implies that the system does not generate energy in the incremental domain. For linear systems, incremental passivity coincides with standard passivity, but for nonlinear cases, it provides a tool for ensuring contraction-like behaviors essential for synchronization and regulation tasks. The concept originated in the 1970s through Jan C. Willems' foundational work on dissipativity theory for dynamical systems, which laid the groundwork for energy-based inequalities in control. It was extended in the 1990s by Arjan J. van der Schaft to nonlinear port-Hamiltonian systems, emphasizing incremental properties for interconnected physical systems. In applications to nonlinear dynamics, incremental passivity facilitates stability analysis in robotics, where it enables robust trajectory tracking for manipulators under varying loads by treating the system as passively responding to incremental inputs. Similarly, in power systems, it supports disturbance rejection in networks with nonlinear loads. A specific example is the analysis of DC-DC boost converters, where incremental passivity-based control ensures voltage regulation despite time-varying parameters and switching nonlinearities, maintaining passivity in the incremental model for global stability. Unlike thermodynamic passivity, which enforces global energy constraints, incremental passivity addresses local variations critical for dynamic operations away from equilibrium.

Extended Definitions and Variants

Other Definitions of Passivity

In scattering theory, particularly within microwave and RF engineering, a network is defined as passive if its scattering matrix S(jω)S(j\omega) satisfies S(jω)21\|S(j\omega)\|_2 \leq 1 for all frequencies ω\omega, where 2\| \cdot \|_2 denotes the spectral norm; this condition ensures that the network does not amplify incident power. Strict passivity strengthens the standard passivity condition by requiring active dissipation, such that for inputs uu and outputs yy, there exist ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and constant β\beta satisfying 0tu(τ)Ty(τ)dτε0tu(τ)2dτ+β\int_0^t u(\tau)^T y(\tau) \, d\tau \geq \varepsilon \int_0^t \|u(\tau)\|^2 \, d\tau + \beta for all t0t \geq 0, guaranteeing that the system consumes more energy than it stores over time. Passivity indices extend the concept to systems that become passive after linear modifications to the input-output pair; for input feedforward passivity (with index ν\nu), the system satisfies passivity when the output is adjusted as y=y+νuy' = y + \nu u, while output feedback passivity (with index ρ\rho) achieves passivity via modified input u=u+ρyu' = u + \rho y. In signal processing, passivity for linear time-invariant systems corresponds to the transfer function (impedance) being positive real, meaning Z(s)Z(s) has no poles in the right-half complex plane and Re[Z(jω)]0\operatorname{Re}[Z(j\omega)] \geq 0 for all ω\omega where defined; this property can be verified using Nyquist criteria, where the Nyquist plot of Z(jω)Z(j\omega) lies entirely in the right-half plane. For hydraulic systems, passivity is defined such that the cumulative input fluid power (pressure times volumetric flow rate into the system) exceeds the output fluid power plus any stored compressibility energy and dissipative losses, ensuring no net energy generation; for example, in actuators, the supply rate pqp \cdot q (pressure pp and flow qq) forms the inner product for the passivity inequality. Passivity represents a specific instance of the broader dissipativity framework, where systems dissipate energy with respect to a supply rate uTyu^T y.

Dissipativity Relation

In control theory and systems engineering, dissipativity provides a unifying framework for analyzing energy-like properties of dynamical systems. A system is dissipative with respect to a supply rate s(u,y)s(u, y) if there exists a nonnegative storage function V(x)0V(x) \geq 0, with V(0)=0V(0) = 0, such that its time derivative along system trajectories satisfies V˙(x)s(u,y)\dot{V}(x) \leq s(u, y), where uu is the input and yy is the output. This inequality implies that the system's stored energy increases at a rate no greater than the supplied energy, capturing dissipation in a general form applicable to nonlinear and interconnected systems. Passivity emerges as a specific instance of dissipativity when the supply rate is chosen as s(u,y)=uTys(u, y) = u^T y, representing the instantaneous power delivered to the system. Under this choice, the condition becomes V˙(x)uTy\dot{V}(x) \leq u^T y, ensuring that the system's internal energy does not exceed the cumulative input-output power over any time interval. This formulation aligns passivity directly with physical energy conservation principles, where passive systems neither generate nor store more energy than supplied. More broadly, passivity is recognized as a form of quadratic dissipativity with the quadratic supply rate uTyu^T y, which can be generalized to conic dissipativity (with supply rates involving norms like y2ϵuy/ϵ2\|y\|^2 - \epsilon \|u - y/\epsilon\|^2) or sector-bounded dissipativity (for nonlinearities confined to sectors). These extensions allow analysis of systems with mild non-passive behaviors, such as small-gain or relative-degree properties, while retaining the core energy-dissipation insight. The theoretical foundation of dissipativity, including passivity, originated in the early 1970s from efforts to generalize energy concepts in mechanical and electrical systems to abstract dynamical models. This development was unified by Willems in 1972, who introduced the storage function and supply rate formalism to encompass stability and control properties across diverse system classes. A cornerstone result is the passivity theorem by Moylan and Hill (1976), which asserts that the negative feedback interconnection of two passive systems remains passive, provided the interconnection is well-posed. Formally, if systems Σ1\Sigma_1 and Σ2\Sigma_2 each satisfy V˙iuiTyi\dot{V}_i \leq u_i^T y_i for i=1,2i=1,2, then the combined system admits a composite storage function V=V1+V2V = V_1 + V_2 ensuring overall passivity. This closure property under feedback is pivotal for modular stability analysis in large-scale systems. As an illustrative application, consider Lur'e systems, comprising a linear dynamic block in feedback with a static nonlinearity ϕ(y)\phi(y). Dissipativity analysis reveals that such systems are passive if the nonlinearity satisfies a sector condition with gain bounds (e.g., 0ϕ(y)yky20 \leq \phi(y) y \leq k y^2 for k>0k > 0) that align with the supply rate uTyu^T y, ensuring the overall interconnection meets the passivity inequality.

Theoretical Properties

Stability Implications

In control theory, the passivity theorem states that the interconnection of passive systems remains passive, providing a modular framework for ensuring stability in complex systems. This property implies Lyapunov stability for the interconnected system when at least one subsystem is strictly passive, as the strict dissipativity ensures energy decrease over time. Passivity also underpins absolute stability criteria, particularly the circle criterion, which guarantees stability for Lur'e systems consisting of a linear dynamic block in feedback with a nonlinear element satisfying sector conditions related to passivity. In such configurations, passivity of the linear part bounds the nonlinearity within a sector, preventing instability from oscillations or divergences. For passive systems equipped with positive definite storage functions, global asymptotic stability of the equilibrium of the unforced system (u=0) is achieved under zero-state detectability, where for zero input, if the output y(t)=0 for all t ≥ T for some T ≥ 0, then the state x(t) → 0 as t → ∞. This result extends the Lyapunov framework by leveraging the storage function as a Lyapunov candidate, ensuring convergence regardless of initial conditions when inputs are zero. A representative application appears in robotic manipulators for teleoperation, where passivity-based architectures maintain stability despite communication delays, enabling force feedback and synchronized motion between master and slave devices without energy accumulation leading to instability. Extensions to hybrid systems preserve passivity-based stability in event-triggered control schemes, where discrete jumps are designed to maintain bounds on the storage function, ensuring asymptotic stability while reducing communication overhead. Incremental passivity further supports local stability analyses in such interconnections.

Energy Storage and Dissipation

In passive systems, the energy storage function V(x)V(x) is a non-negative, differentiable function of the state xx that quantifies the internal energy stored within the system, satisfying the differential form of the dissipation inequality V˙(x)uTy\dot{V}(x) \leq u^T y along system trajectories, where uu is the input and yy is the output. This inequality ensures that the rate of change of stored energy does not exceed the instantaneous power supplied to the system, preventing energy creation from internal dynamics alone. The integral form of the dissipation inequality provides a global perspective: V(x(t))V(x(0))0tu(τ)Ty(τ)dτV(x(t)) - V(x(0)) \leq \int_0^t u(\tau)^T y(\tau) \, d\tau for all t0t \geq 0 and initial states x(0)x(0), confirming that the net increase in stored energy over any time interval cannot surpass the total energy supplied during that period. This formulation underpins the passivity property by enforcing energy balance in dissipative engineering systems, such as those governed by port-Hamiltonian structures. The available storage Va(x)V_a(x) represents the maximum energy that can be extracted from the current state xx, while the required supply Vr(x)V_r(x) is the minimum energy that must be provided to reach state xx from a state of minimal storage. Any storage function satisfies Va(x)V(x)Vr(x)V_a(x) \leq V(x) \leq V_r(x), bounding the energy potential in passive systems and providing practical tools for analyzing energy flows in passive designs. In electrical networks, the storage function V(x)V(x) typically takes the form of the total electromagnetic energy, such as V=12Liii2+12Cjvj2V = \frac{1}{2} \sum L_i i_i^2 + \frac{1}{2} \sum C_j v_j^2, where iii_i are inductor currents, vjv_j are capacitor voltages, LiL_i are inductances, and CjC_j are capacitances, directly linking passivity to physical energy conservation in RLC circuits. A key condition for convergence to equilibrium in passive systems is detectability, which requires that for zero input u=0u = 0, if the output y(t)=0y(t) = 0 for all t0t \geq 0, then the state x(t)0x(t) \to 0 as tt \to \infty; this ensures that the dissipation inequality V˙0\dot{V} \leq 0 drives the system to the origin without unobserved persistent dynamics.

Practical Applications

Passive Filters

Passive filters are electronic circuits constructed exclusively from passive components—resistors (R), inductors (L), and capacitors (C)—that do not require external power sources and cannot amplify signals, as they inherently dissipate energy, primarily through resistive elements, without generating it. This aligns with the general definition of passivity in engineering, where systems absorb or store energy but do not produce more than supplied. In practice, these filters shape frequency responses by attenuating unwanted signal components while passing others, making them essential for signal processing in analog electronics. Common configurations include low-pass filters, which allow frequencies below a cutoff to pass while attenuating higher ones; high-pass filters, which do the opposite; and band-pass filters, which permit a specific frequency band to pass. These can be realized using simple RC networks for first-order responses or RLC circuits for higher-order behaviors, where the network's driving-point impedance Z(s)Z(s) must satisfy the positive real (PR) condition to ensure the network's passivity—meaning Z(s)+Z(s)0Z(s) + Z(-s)^* \geq 0 for Re(s)0\operatorname{Re}(s) \geq 0, with Z(s)Z(s) analytic in the open right-half plane, ensuring the network's passivity and physical realizability with passive elements. The PR property guarantees that the filter's impedance remains non-negative real for real frequencies, preventing energy generation and enforcing physical realizability with passive elements. A key characteristic of passive filters stems from their compliance with Bode's gain-phase relationship, which links the logarithm of the magnitude response to the phase shift, imposing inherent limits on phase variation—for instance, a 20 dB/decade roll-off corresponds to a 90-degree phase shift, constraining designs to avoid excessive distortion or instability in cascaded systems. This relation arises from the minimum-phase nature of passive networks, ensuring that phase is uniquely determined by the gain profile without all-pass contributions. As an illustrative example, the Butterworth filter provides a maximally flat passband response and is often implemented as a passive ladder network of series inductors and shunt capacitors for low-pass applications. For a second-order realization, the cutoff angular frequency is determined by the relation ωc=1LC,\omega_c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}},
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.