Progressive realism

Progressive realism is a foreign policy paradigm largely made popular by Robert Wright in 2006^[1] which focuses on producing measurable results in pursuit of widely supported goals.^[2] It supports stronger international institutions, free trade, and national interests.^[2] The UK Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, suggested that Progressive Realism will underpin his foreign policy in a speech to the Fabian Society. ^[3]

Progressive realists' beliefs stand in stark contrast to those of neoconservatives. Unlike neoconservatives, progressive realists assert that international security and economic interdependence enable international governance to advance national interests.^[4][5] They highlight the importance of strong participation in the United Nations and acquiescence to international law.^[4] The policy emphasizes the need to convert "hard" power and "soft" power into "smart" power.^[6]

1. ^ Hynd, Steve (June 23, 2009). "Progressive Realism And Iran". Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2010.
2. ^ ^{a b} Greg Anrig (July 20, 2006). "Why democrats should pursue "progressive realism" at home". Archived from the original on July 5, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2010.
3. ^ Lammy, David (1 February 2024). "Progressive Realism". Fabian Society.
4. ^ ^{a b} Wright, Robert (December 31, 1969). "'Progressive realism': In search of a foreign policy - Editorials & Commentary - International Herald Tribune". The New York Times. Retrieved January 10, 2011.
5. ^ Nye, Joseph (August 21, 2006). "Progressive Realism". Retrieved January 10, 2011.
6. ^ Nye, Joseph (August 31, 2006). "Progressive realism in foreign policy". Retrieved January 13, 2011.

This article related to the politics of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e