Proof calculus

This article relies excessively on references to tertiary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or primary sources. Find sources: "Proof calculus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In mathematical logic, a proof calculus or a proof system is built to prove statements.

A proof system includes the components:^[1][2]

• Formal language: The set L of formulas admitted by the system, for example, propositional logic or first-order logic.
• Rules of inference: List of rules that can be employed to prove theorems from axioms and theorems.
• Axioms: Formulas in L assumed to be valid. All theorems are derived from axioms.

A formal proof of a well-formed formula in a proof system is a set of axioms and rules of inference of the proof system that infers that the well-formed formula is a theorem of the proof system.^[2]

Usually a given proof calculus encompasses more than a single particular formal system, since many proof calculi are under-determined and can be used for radically different logics. For example, a paradigmatic case is the sequent calculus, which can be used to express the consequence relations of both intuitionistic logic and relevance logic. Thus, loosely speaking, a proof calculus is a template or design pattern, characterized by a certain style of formal inference, that may be specialized to produce specific formal systems, namely by specifying the actual inference rules for such a system. There is no consensus among logicians on how best to define the term.

The most widely known proof calculi are those classical calculi that are still in widespread use:

• The class of Hilbert systems,^[2] of which the most famous example is the 1928 Hilbert–Ackermann system of first-order logic;
• Gerhard Gentzen's calculus of natural deduction, which is the first formalism of structural proof theory, and which is the cornerstone of the formulae-as-types correspondence relating logic to functional programming;
• Gentzen's sequent calculus, which is the most studied formalism of structural proof theory.

Many other proof calculi were, or might have been, seminal, but are not widely used today.

• Aristotle's syllogistic calculus, presented in the Organon, readily admits formalisation. There is still some modern interest in syllogisms, carried out under the aegis of term logic.
• Gottlob Frege's two-dimensional notation of the Begriffsschrift (1879) is usually regarded as introducing the modern concept of quantifier to logic.
• C.S. Peirce's existential graph easily might have been seminal, had history worked out differently.

Modern research in logic teems with rival proof calculi:

• Several systems have been proposed that replace the usual textual syntax with some graphical syntax. proof nets and cirquent calculus are among such systems.
• Recently, many logicians interested in structural proof theory have proposed calculi with deep inference, for instance display logic, hypersequents, the calculus of structures, and bunched implication.

• Method of analytic tableaux
• Proof procedure
• Propositional proof system
• Resolution (logic)