Hubbry Logo
Rose Bowl GameRose Bowl GameMain
Open search
Rose Bowl Game
Community hub
Rose Bowl Game
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rose Bowl Game
Rose Bowl Game
from Wikipedia

Rose Bowl Game
Rose Bowl Game presented by Prudential
The Granddaddy of Them All
StadiumRose Bowl
LocationPasadena, California
Previous stadiumsTournament Park
(1902, 1916–1922)
Temporary venueDuke Stadium, Durham, North Carolina (1942)[a]
AT&T Stadium, Arlington, Texas (2021)[b]
Operated1902, 1916–present
Championship affiliation
Conference tie-insBig Ten (1947–present)
Previous conference tie-insPac-12 (1917–2023)
PayoutUS$35 million/conference (As of 2016)[2]
Websiterosebowlgame.com
Sponsors
Former names
  • Tournament East–West football game (1902, 1916–1922)
  • Rose Bowl (1923–1998)
  • Rose Bowl presented by AT&T (1999–2002)
  • Rose Bowl presented by PlayStation 2 (2003)
  • Rose Bowl presented by Citi (2004–2010)
  • Rose Bowl presented by Vizio (2011–2014)
  • Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual (2015–2020)
  • Rose Bowl Game presented by Capital One (2021)
  • Rose Bowl Game presented by Capital One Venture X (2022)
2023 season matchup
Michigan vs. Alabama (Michigan 27–20OT)
2024 season matchup
Oregon vs. Ohio State (Ohio State 41–21)

The Rose Bowl Game is an annual American college football bowl game, traditionally played on January 1 (New Year's Day) at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. When New Year's Day falls on a Sunday, the game is played on Monday, January 2.

Nicknamed "The Granddaddy of Them All" by broadcaster Keith Jackson, it was the first postseason football game ever established.[3] The Rose Bowl Game was first played in 1902 as the Tournament East–West football game, and has been played annually since 1916. Since 1945, it has been the highest attended college football bowl game.[4] The game is a part of the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association's "America's New Year Celebration", which also includes the historic Rose Parade. Winners of the game receive the Leishman Trophy, named for former Tournament of Roses presidents, William L. Leishman and Lathrop K. Leishman who played an important part in the history of this game.

Starting in 1917, the Rose Bowl Game selected a team from the predecessor of the Pac-12 Conference each year along with a team from the eastern half of the country. In 1947, the Rose Bowl Game began its traditional matchup of the conference champions from the Big Ten Conference and Pac-12 Conference, which continued to 2023, with some exceptions.

In 1998, the Rose Bowl Game joined with several other bowls to create the Bowl Championship Series to produce an undisputed national champion in college football. This marked the first time the Rose Bowl agreed to release the Big Ten or Pac-12 champion to play in a national championship game if they were ranked #1 or #2. The Rose Bowl Game served as the national championship game in 2002 and 2006. The Rose Bowl stadium and the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association hosted the BCS National Championship Game in 2010 and 2014, in addition to the regular Rose Bowl Game.

In 2014, the Rose Bowl, along with the other "New Year's Six" bowls, became a part of the College Football Playoff. As part of the four team playoff from 2014 to 2023, the Rose Bowl served as a semifinal game in 2015, 2018, and 2021. When not serving as a semifinal, the Rose Bowl featured the best available teams from the Big Ten and Pac-12 conferences.

With the expansion of the College Football Playoff to twelve teams in the 2024–25 season, the Rose Bowl will serve as either a quarterfinal or semifinal each year. It served as a quarterfinal in 2025 and will do so again in 2026. When serving as a quarterfinal, the Rose Bowl will host the Big Ten champion, if seeded in the top four. When serving as a semifinal, the game will be played one week after New Year's Day, and, if the Big Ten champion is one of the top two seeds, the team will be assigned to the Rose Bowl.[5]

History

[edit]

Originally titled the "Tournament East–West football game",[6] the first Rose Bowl was played on January 1, 1902, starting the tradition of New Year's Day bowl games. The football game was added in 1902 to help fund the cost of the Rose Parade.[7] The inaugural game featured Fielding H. Yost's dominating 1901 Michigan team, representing the East, which crushed a previously 3–1–2 team from Stanford University, representing the West, by a score of 49–0 after Stanford quit in the third quarter. Michigan finished the season 11–0 and was crowned the national champion. Yost had been Stanford's coach the previous year. The game was so lopsided that for the next thirteen years, the Tournament of Roses officials ran chariot races, ostrich races, and other various events instead of football.[8] But, on New Year's Day 1916, football returned to stay as the State College of Washington (now Washington State University) defeated Brown University in the first of what was thereafter an annual tradition.[9]

Tournament Park and Rose Bowl stadium

[edit]
The very first Rose Bowl Game at Tournament park in 1902: Michigan v Stanford

Before the Rose Bowl was built, games were played in Pasadena's Tournament Park, approximately three miles (5 km) southeast of the current Rose Bowl stadium, near the campus of Caltech. Tournament Park was found to be unsuitable for the increasingly large crowds gathering to watch the game and a new, permanent home for the game was commissioned.

The Rose Bowl stadium, designed after the Yale Bowl in New Haven, hosted its first "Rose Bowl" game on January 1, 1923. The name of the stadium was alternatively "Tournament of Roses Stadium" or "Tournament of Roses Bowl", until the name "Rose Bowl" was settled on before the 1923 game.[10]

The stadium seating has been reconfigured several times since its original construction in 1922. For many years, the Rose Bowl stadium had the largest football stadium capacity in the United States, eventually being surpassed by Michigan Stadium in 1998.[11][12] The maximum stated seating capacity was 104,594 from 1972 to 1997. Capacity was lowered after the 1998 game; the 2006 game, which was also the BCS championship game, attracted a crowd of 93,986; and there were 94,118 spectators at the 2011 game between TCU and Wisconsin.[13] As of 2012, the Rose Bowl is number seven on the list of American football stadiums by capacity with a current official seating capacity of 92,542 and is still the largest stadium that hosts post-season bowl games.[14] The Rose Bowl is also the only CFP bowl game that is held in a non-NFL stadium.

Team selection 1916–1946

[edit]
Tickets from the 1920 and 1939 Rose Bowl games, displayed at Rose Bowl's original locker room, which is now converted into a museum

In the game's early years, except during World War I, the Rose Bowl always pitted a team—not necessarily the conference champion—from the Pacific Coast Conference (PCC), the predecessor of the current Pac-12 Conference, against an opponent from the Eastern U.S. During the last two years of World War I, teams from military bases met in the Rose Bowl. During its history, a number of notable matchups have been made with the top football teams and top coaches of the time. These include the 1925 game, with Knute Rockne's Notre Dame and their Four Horsemen against "Pop" Warner's Stanford; the 1926 edition was the Alabama Crimson Tide's win over Washington, and 1940 featured Howard Jones' USC Trojans against Bob Neyland's Tennessee Volunteers. During this period, there were ten games in which undefeated teams were matched.

World War II – 1942 venue change to Durham, North Carolina

[edit]
A packed Duke Stadium during the 1942 Rose Bowl

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and a series of attacks on West Coast shipping beginning on December 18,[15] there were concerns about a possible Japanese attack on the West Coast. The Rose Parade, with a million watchers, and the Rose Bowl, with 90,000 spectators, were presumed to be ideal targets for the Japanese. Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt recommended that the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl festivities be cancelled.[16][17][18] The Rose Bowl committee originally planned to cancel the game. On December 16, Duke University invited the game and Oregon State to Duke's home stadium in Durham, North Carolina.[19][20] After the 1942 Allied victory in the Battle of Midway and the end of the Japanese offensives in the Pacific Theater during 1942, it was deemed that a large portion of the West Coast was no longer vulnerable to attack, and the Rose Bowl Game continued on in the Rose Bowl stadium. The Tournament of Roses parade itself still was not held in 1943 because of the war.[21]

Big Nine–PCC agreement

[edit]

During World War II, many college football schools had dropped some conference opponents and instead played football against local military base teams. Many colleges could not even field teams because of the draft and manpower requirements.[22] After the war was over, demobilization and the G.I. Bill enabled returning servicemen to attend college. The 1946 season was the first true post-war college football season with travel restrictions lifted and civilian college opponents returning to schedules.

The Big Nine and PCC were of the same accord when it came to treating players as amateurs, as compared to the semi-professional status that the Southern Universities proposed. Also, the Big Nine and PCC both had the same attitudes towards desegregation and allowing African-Americans to play football.[23] Many other universities were still segregated. None of the Southeastern Conference schools had an African American athlete until 1966. The Cotton Bowl, Orange Bowl, and Sugar Bowl would not be integrated until 1948, 1955, and 1956 respectively.[24]

The Big Nine agreed in 1946, after eight years of negotiating over payments, rules, and ticket allocations, to a five-year exclusive deal with the Rose Bowl to send the conference champion to meet the PCC champion.[25] UCLA, USC, Minnesota and Illinois all voted against it.[26] The 1947 Rose Bowl, with UCLA meeting Illinois, was the first game under this agreement.

Big Ten–AAWU/Pac-8/10/12 agreement

[edit]

When the PCC dissolved prior to the 1959 season following a pay-for-play scandal in 1958, there was no official agreement in force. The Tournament of Roses selected from the former members of PCC and invited Washington, the first champion of the newly formed Athletic Association of Western Universities (AAWU), to play Big Ten champion Wisconsin in the 1960 Rose Bowl. The Big Ten authorized its members to accept any Rose Bowl invitation at their discretion.

The AAWU signed an agreement with the Rose Bowl that remained in force from the 1961 Rose Bowl until the advent of the BCS era in 1998. In 1962, after Minnesota changed its vote against pursuing a new agreement (resolving a 5–5 voting deadlock which had prevented any new negotiations for years), a Big Ten agreement was finalized, which went into effect with the 1963 Rose Bowl and lasted until the BCS era.

While the Big Ten supplied the "East" representative and the PCC, AAWU, or Pac-8/10 supplied the "West" representative from the 1947 Rose Bowl to the BCS era, an "exclusive" Rose Bowl agreement did not exist throughout this period. In particular, the Big Ten was not part of any agreement for at least the 1961 and 1962 games. In particular, the 1961 Big Ten champion Ohio State, declined the invitation to play in the 1962 game without penalty.[27][28][29]

The AAWU used "Big Five", "Big Six", and "Pacific-8" as unofficial nicknames (each reflecting the number of conference members). It officially adopted the "Pacific-8" name for the 1968 season. The name changed to "Pacific-10" with the arrival of Arizona and Arizona State in 1978, its last official name change prior to the formation of the BCS in 1998. The Big Ten Conference retained the same name throughout this period, even though it had eleven members by the start of the BCS era because of the addition of Penn State in 1990.

Both conferences had a "no repeat" rule in force for a number of years. Under this rule, any team that had appeared in the Rose Bowl game the previous season could not go, even if they were the conference champion. The notable exception was Minnesota playing in the 1961 and 1962 games during the period when the conference agreements were in a state of flux. Second-ranked Ohio State did not participate because its faculty council voted it down,[27][28][29] allowing Minnesota to return.[30] The PCC's rule went into effect following California's third straight defeat in 1951 and ended with conference's disbandment in the summer of 1959; it affected the 1955 and 1958 games. The Big Ten abolished their rule in 1972; it had recently affected the 1966 game. Southern California played in four consecutive Rose Bowl games from 1967 to 1970; Ohio State played in four straight from 1973 to 1976.

Both conferences also had "exclusive agreements" with the Rose Bowl game, in the sense that member schools were not allowed to play in any other bowl game. Both conferences abolished this rule before the 1975 NCAA Division I football season. As a result, Michigan and USC were allowed to play in the 1976 Orange Bowl and the 1975 Liberty Bowl, respectively.

Bowl Championship Series

[edit]
The Rose Bowl with the banners for the Rose Bowl Game (the right scoreboard had been removed during the 2011 renovation)
Stanford defeated Wisconsin 20–14 in the 2013 Rose Bowl on January 1, 2013

As of the 1998 season, with the creation of the Bowl Championship Series (BCS), team selection for the Rose Bowl was tied to the other three BCS bowls, although in any given year the Rose Bowl still attempted, if possible, to maintain the traditional Pac-10 (Pac-12 after the addition of Utah and Colorado in 2011) versus Big Ten format (though if the champion from either or both conference was ranked BCS #1 or #2, they were allowed into the national championship game and were replaced by another team, typically from the same conference as the team being replaced). Twice in this era, the Rose Bowl had served as the BCS championship game.

The 2002 game served as the BCS championship game between the BCS No. 1–ranked Miami, then a member of the Big East Conference, and the BCS No. 2–ranked Nebraska, then a member of the Big 12 Conference. The Nebraska selection as the BCS No. 2 team was controversial because Oregon was ranked No. 2 in both the AP and Coaches Polls, while Nebraska was ranked No. 4 in both polls and did not play in its conference championship game (No. 3 Colorado, who would play Oregon in that year's Fiesta Bowl, did and won the Big 12's automatic bid to the BCS). This prevented a West Coast team playing in the Rose Bowl for the first time, and it also marked the first matchup since 1946 not to feature the traditional pairing of Pac-10 vs. Big Ten teams.

The 2006 Rose Bowl game featured offensive powerhouses Texas, riding a 19-game winning streak, and USC, which entered the game with a 34-game winning streak and two Heisman Trophy winners. Texas won 41–38. The game had a television viewership of 35.6 million,[31] the highest for college football contest since the 1987 Fiesta Bowl between Penn State and Miami.

On two other occasions during the BCS era, Rose Bowl participation had expanded beyond the Big Ten and Pac-10. The 2003 Rose Bowl couldn't select Big Ten co-champion and automatic qualifier Ohio State, who finished No. 2 in the BCS and thus received a bid to the Fiesta Bowl to play for the national championship. The Rose Bowl was poised to select Big Ten co-champion Iowa as an at-large in order to preserve the traditional Big Ten/Pac-10 match up. However, the Orange Bowl, which selected ahead of the Rose Bowl that year, chose the Hawkeyes. As a result, the Rose Bowl featured the first appearance by Oklahoma, who faced Pac-10 Champion Washington State. The 2005 game featured Texas of the Big 12 Conference, selected, amid some controversy, over California of the Pac-10, marking the second time a West Coast team did not make the Rose Bowl. The controversy was the result of the BCS computer rankings which elevated Texas over California. Texas went on to defeat Michigan in the 2005 game, featuring a four-touchdown performance by Vince Young, foreshadowing his 467-yard performance a year later in the 2006 defeat of USC that won the National Title for Texas.

The 2004 game is also noteworthy. In this game, USC defeated Michigan, 28–14, thus earning the top ranking in the AP Poll and a share of the national championship with BCS champion LSU. USC, despite being No. 1 in the AP poll, did not qualify for the BCS championship game because of their standing in the BCS system.

The second BCS-era Rose Bowl arrangement ran from 2004 through 2014. The Big Ten and Pac-12 (the new name of the Pac-10) retained their bids, but a provision was inserted mandating that the first time that either conference could not fill their bid (because a school from the Big Ten or Pac-12 qualifies for the BCS National Championship Game), and if a non-BCS conference school qualified, the Rose Bowl was required to take that school.[32] As a result, Texas Christian University (TCU) became the first team from a non-automatic qualifying conference to play in the Rose Bowl in the BCS era. The 2010 TCU Horned Frogs finished their second consecutive regular season at 12–0, were back-to-back champions of the Mountain West Conference, and ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Poll. TCU defeated No. 5 Wisconsin 21–19 in the 2011 Rose Bowl. TCU's appearance satisfied the 'first time' clause of the agreement.

The 100th Rose Bowl Game featured a traditional pairing of Big Ten champion versus Pac-12 champion, with Michigan State playing against Stanford on January 1, 2014. Michigan State won the game, 24–20.

The Bowl Championship Series format ended with the 2014 BCS National Championship Game, played at the Rose Bowl Stadium on January 6.

College Football Playoff

[edit]

The BCS was replaced by the College Football Playoff (CFP) in 2014, seeding four teams into two national semifinal games, leading to a championship game. As part of the arrangement, the Rose Bowl game was selected as a semifinal playoff game every three years. In years when the Rose Bowl is not part of the playoff, it takes the Pac-12 and Big Ten champions, unless one or both teams qualify for the playoff, in which case they are replaced by an alternate team from the same conference.

The first game under the new arrangement was played on January 1, 2015, and was known as the College Football Playoff semifinal at the Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual. It featured the Oregon Ducks of the Pac-12 Conference and the Florida State Seminoles, the first Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) team to participate in the Rose Bowl. Oregon defeated Florida State, 59–20, ending the Seminoles' 29-game winning streak, which dated back to the end of the 2012 season. As a result, Oregon advanced to the 2015 CFP National Championship played on January 12. The 59 points were a new Rose Bowl Game scoring record for a team.

The 2016 Rose Bowl featured Pac-12 champions Stanford against Big Ten West Division champions Iowa. Stanford defeated Iowa, 45–16, scoring 35 points in the first half, the most points ever scored in the first half of a Rose Bowl. The 2017 Rose Bowl featured Penn State of the Big Ten and USC of the Pac-12. Penn State set a record for the most points score by a losing team in a Rose Bowl, as USC won, 52–49.

In the 2018 Rose Bowl, the Georgia Bulldogs (12–1) defeated the Oklahoma Sooners (12–1), 54–48, in double overtime in a semifinal playoff game to advance to the 2018 CFP National Championship game. It was the first Rose Bowl game to go into overtime. The 2024 Rose Bowl, also a semifinal playoff game, became the second Rose Bowl game requiring overtime, as Michigan (13–0) defeated Alabama (12–1), 27–20.

COVID-19 — 2021 venue change to Arlington, Texas

[edit]

In early December 2020, it was announced that the 2021 Rose Bowl, a CFP semifinal game, would be contested behind closed doors without fans, due to California Governor Gavin Newsom's orders in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in California.[33] This was met with criticism,[34] including from Notre Dame head coach Brian Kelly, who wanted players' families to be allowed to attend.[35] On December 19, it was reported that a request by the Tournament of Roses to the State of California, requesting a special exemption to allow some fans to attend, was denied.[36] Later that day, the CFP announced that the semifinal game would be moved from Pasadena to AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas.[37] It was not immediately clear if the game would still be called the Rose Bowl.[38] A press release from the Pasadena Tournament of Roses stated:[39]

"It is not yet determined if the CFP semifinal in Dallas will be called the CFP Semifinal at the Rose Bowl Game presented by Capital One. The name is a part of the Master License Agreement and is co-owned by the Pasadena Tournament of Roses and the City of Pasadena."

On December 30, the City of Pasadena and the Tournament of Roses announced that the game in Arlington could use the Rose Bowl name.[40] The only prior instance of the game being played outside of Pasadena was the 1942 edition.[36]

Conference tie-ins

[edit]

From 1947 to 2024, the Rose Bowl Game traditionally hosted conference champions from the Big Ten and Pac-12, or the champions of their predecessors. Starting in 2002, the Rose Bowl Game occasionally deviated from its traditional matchups for use in "national championship" systems. In 2002 and 2006 (the games following the 2001 and 2005 seasons), under the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) system, the Rose Bowl was designated as its championship game, and hosted the top two teams determined by the BCS system. As of the 2014 season, the Rose Bowl became part of the College Football Playoff (CFP) as one of the New Year's Six bowls—the top six major bowl games in the national championship system—hosting one of the semifinal games every three years. During non-CFP years, the Rose Bowl reverted to its traditional Pac-12/Big Ten matchup, unless the champions from those conferences were selected to play in the CFP.

Beginning in the 2024 season, when the CFP expanded to 12 teams, the Rose Bowl Game is designated to host a quarterfinal or semifinal, along with the other New Year's Six bowls on a rotating basis. When the Rose Bowl hosts a quarterfinal, the CFP selection committee will assign the Big Ten champion to the bowl if it is one of the top four conference champions in the final poll. Once every three years, the Rose Bowl will be played as a semifinal game one week after New Year's Day. If the Big Ten champion is one of the top two seeds, they will be assigned to the Rose Bowl.[41] During the 2024 and 2025 seasons, the Pac-12 champion cannot qualify for the playoff as one of the top four seeds due to the conference only having two teams; as such, the Rose Bowl cannot be guaranteed a Pac-12 team.

Sponsorship and broadcasting rights

[edit]

Sponsorship

[edit]
Large card stunt[42] in 2004

For many years the Rose Bowl eschewed sponsorship, but in 1999, it became "The Rose Bowl Game presented by AT&T." Unlike the other bowl games, the sponsor was not added to the title of the game, but instead as a presenter.[43] In 2002 it was branded The Rose Bowl Game presented by PlayStation 2. From 2003 to 2010, after the agreement with Sony expired, the game was presented by Citi.

In June 2010, Citi decided to end sponsorship of the Rose Bowl games, including the National Championship game.[44] In October 2010, HDTV maker Vizio signed a 4-year contract to be the official sponsor of the Rose Bowl games through 2014.[45][46] After Vizio declined to renew sponsorship in 2014, financial services giant Northwestern Mutual became the new presenting sponsor.[47] From 2015 to 2020, the game was sponsored by Northwestern Mutual and officially known as the Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual.[48][49]

The 2021 edition, sponsored by Capital One, was officially known as the Rose Bowl Game presented by Capital One.[50] As the sponsor of the 2021 Orange Bowl, Capital One became the first company to sponsor two New Year's Six bowls. Capital One continued their sponsorship of the game, with the 2022 edition officially being named the Rose Bowl Game presented by Capital One Venture X after the company's travel rewards credit card.[51]

Prudential Financial became the new sponsor of the Rose Bowl in 2023 and will continue until the 2026 game.[52]

Broadcasters

[edit]

The Rose Bowl was first televised in 1947 on W6XYZ,[53] an experimental station in Los Angeles that would eventually become KTLA.[54] The 1952 game was the first nationally televised bowl game and the first nationally televised college game of any sport.[55] From 1952 to 1988,[56] the Rose Bowl was televised by NBC at 2 p.m. PST, and in most years was the only New Year's Day bowl airing at that time. The 1956 Rose Bowl has the highest TV rating of all college bowl games, watched by 41.1% of all people in the US with TV sets.[57] The 1962 game was the first college football game broadcast in color. Television ratings for the Rose Bowl declined as the number of bowl games increased.[57] The other bowl games also provided more compelling match-ups, with higher-ranked teams.[57] In 1988, NBC gave up the broadcast rights, as the television share dropped in 1987 below 20.[57]

From 1989 to 2010, the game was broadcast on ABC, usually at 2 p.m. PST.[57] The first 9-year contract in 1988 started at about $11 million, which is what NBC had been paying.[57] The 2002 Rose Bowl was the first broadcast not set at the traditional 2:00pm West Coast time.[58] The visual of the afternoon sun setting on the San Gabriel Mountains on New Year's Day is recognized as an important part of the tradition of the game.[59][60]

The 2005 edition was the first one broadcast in HDTV. Beginning in 2007, Fox had the broadcast rights to the other Bowl Championship Series games, but the Rose Bowl, which negotiated its own television contract independent of the BCS, had agreed to keep the game on ABC. Beginning with the 2010 season, ESPN (majority-owned by ABC's parent company, The Walt Disney Company) now broadcasts all the BCS/CFP games, including the Rose Bowl game.[61][62] The game is also broadcast nationally by ESPN Radio and by ESPN International for Latin America. In 2013, ESPN Deportes provided the first Spanish language telecast in the U.S. of the Rose Bowl Game.[63]

The Rose Bowl game contract with ESPN was extended on June 28, 2012, to 2026, for a reported $80 million per year.[64][65]

Game results

[edit]

Winners appear in boldface while italics denote a tie game.

All rankings are taken from the AP poll (inaugurated in 1936, prior to the 1937 Rose Bowl) before each game was played.

Date played West / Pac-12 East / Big Ten Attendance Notes
January 1, 1902 Stanford 0 Michigan 49 8,000 notes
January 1, 1916 Washington State 14 Brown 0 7,000 notes
January 1, 1917 Oregon 14 Penn 0 26,000 notes
January 1, 1918[c] Mare Island – USMC 19 Camp Lewis – US Army 7 25,000 notes
January 1, 1919[c] Mare Island – USMC 0 Great Lakes – US Navy 17 25,000 notes
January 1, 1920 Oregon 6 Harvard 7 30,000 notes
January 1, 1921 California 28 Ohio State 0 42,000 notes
January 2, 1922 California 0 Washington & Jefferson 0 40,000 notes
January 1, 1923 USC 14 Penn State 3 43,000 notes
January 1, 1924 Washington 14 Navy 14 40,000 notes
January 1, 1925 Stanford 10 Notre Dame 27 53,000 notes
January 1, 1926 Washington 19 Alabama 20 50,000 notes
January 1, 1927 Stanford 7 Alabama 7 57,417 notes
January 2, 1928 Stanford 7 Pittsburgh 6 65,000 notes
January 1, 1929 California 7 Georgia Tech 8 66,604 notes
January 1, 1930 USC 47 Pittsburgh 14 72,000 notes
January 1, 1931 Washington State 0 Alabama 24 60,000 notes
January 1, 1932 USC 21 Tulane 12 75,562 notes
January 2, 1933 USC 35 Pittsburgh 0 78,874 notes
January 1, 1934 Stanford 0 Columbia 7 35,000 notes
January 1, 1935 Stanford 13 Alabama 29 84,474 notes
January 1, 1936 Stanford 7 SMU 0 84,474 notes
January 1, 1937 #5 Washington 0 #3 Pittsburgh 21 87,196 notes
January 1, 1938 #2 California 13 #4 Alabama 0 90,000 notes
January 2, 1939 #7 USC 7 #3 Duke 3 89,452 notes
January 1, 1940 #3 USC 14 #2 Tennessee 0 92,200 notes
January 1, 1941 #2 Stanford 21 #7 Nebraska 13 91,500 notes
January 1, 1942 #12 Oregon State 20 #2 Duke 16 56,000[a] notes
January 1, 1943 #13 UCLA 0 #2 Georgia 9 93,000 notes
January 1, 1944 USC 29 #12 Washington 0 68,000 notes
January 1, 1945 #7 USC 25 #12 Tennessee 0 91,000 notes
January 1, 1946 #11 USC 14 #3 Alabama 34 93,000 notes
January 1, 1947 #4 UCLA 14 #5 Illinois 45 90,000 notes
January 1, 1948 #8 USC 0 #2 Michigan 49 93,000 notes
January 1, 1949 #4 California 14 #7 Northwestern 20 93,000 notes
January 2, 1950 #3 California 14 #6 Ohio State 17 100,963 notes
January 1, 1951 #5 California 6 #9 Michigan 14 98,939 notes
January 1, 1952 #7 Stanford 7 #4 Illinois 40 96,825 notes
January 1, 1953 #5 USC 7 #11 Wisconsin 0 101,500 notes
January 1, 1954 #5 UCLA 20 #3 Michigan State 28 101,000 notes
January 1, 1955 #17 USC 7 #1 Ohio State 20 89,191 notes
January 2, 1956 #4 UCLA 14 #2 Michigan State 17 100,809 notes
January 1, 1957 #10 Oregon State 19 #3 Iowa 35 97,126 notes
January 1, 1958 Oregon 7 #2 Ohio State 10 98,202 notes
January 1, 1959 #16 California 12 #2 Iowa 38 98,297 notes
January 1, 1960 #8 Washington 44 #6 Wisconsin 8 100,809 notes
January 2, 1961 #6 Washington 17 #1 Minnesota 7 97,314 notes
January 1, 1962 #16 UCLA 3 #6 Minnesota 21 98,214 notes
January 1, 1963 #1 USC 42 #2 Wisconsin 37 98,698 notes
January 1, 1964 Washington 7 #3 Illinois 17 96,957 notes
January 1, 1965 #8 Oregon State 7 #4 Michigan 34 100,423 notes
January 1, 1966 #5 UCLA 14 #1 Michigan State 12 100,087 notes
January 2, 1967 USC 13 #7 Purdue 14 100,807 notes
January 1, 1968 #1 USC 14 #4 Indiana 3 102,946 notes
January 1, 1969 #2 USC 16 #1 Ohio State 27 102,063 notes
January 1, 1970 #5 USC 10 #7 Michigan 3 103,878 notes
January 1, 1971 #12 Stanford 27 #2 Ohio State 17 103,839 notes
January 1, 1972 #16 Stanford 13 #4 Michigan 12 103,154 notes
January 1, 1973 #1 USC 42 #3 Ohio State 17 106,869 notes
January 1, 1974 #7 USC 21 #4 Ohio State 42 105,267 notes
January 1, 1975 #5 USC 18 #3 Ohio State 17 106,721 notes
January 1, 1976 #11 UCLA 23 #1 Ohio State 10 105,464 notes
January 1, 1977 #3 USC 14 #2 Michigan 6 106,182 notes
January 2, 1978 #13 Washington 27 #4 Michigan 20 105,312 notes
January 1, 1979 #3 USC 17 #5 Michigan 10 105,629 notes
January 1, 1980 #3 USC 17 #1 Ohio State 16 105,526 notes
January 1, 1981 #16 Washington 6 #5 Michigan 23 104,863 notes
January 1, 1982 #12 Washington 28 #13 Iowa 0 105,611 notes
January 1, 1983 #5 UCLA 24 #19 Michigan 14 104,991 notes
January 2, 1984 UCLA 45 #4 Illinois 9 103,217 notes
January 1, 1985 #18 USC 20 #6 Ohio State 17 102,594 notes
January 1, 1986 #13 UCLA 45 #4 Iowa 28 103,292 notes
January 1, 1987 #7 Arizona State 22 #4 Michigan 15 103,168 notes
January 1, 1988 #16 USC 17 #8 Michigan State 20 103,847 notes
January 2, 1989 #5 USC 14 #11 Michigan 22 101,688 notes
January 1, 1990 #12 USC 17 #3 Michigan 10 103,450 notes
January 1, 1991 #8 Washington 46 #17 Iowa 34 101,273 notes
January 1, 1992 #2 Washington 34 #4 Michigan 14 103,566 notes
January 1, 1993 #9 Washington 31 #7 Michigan 38 94,236 notes
January 1, 1994 #14 UCLA 16 #9 Wisconsin 21 101,237 notes
January 2, 1995 #12 Oregon 20 #2 Penn State 38 102,247 notes
January 1, 1996 #17 USC 41 #3 Northwestern 32 100,102 notes
January 1, 1997 #2 Arizona State 17 #4 Ohio State 20 100,635 notes
January 1, 1998 #8 Washington State 16 #1 Michigan 21 101,219 notes
January 1, 1999 #6 UCLA 31 #9 Wisconsin 38 93,872 notes
January 1, 2000 #22 Stanford 9 #4 Wisconsin 17 93,731 notes
January 1, 2001 #4 Washington 34 #14 Purdue 24 94,392 notes
January 3, 2002BCS #4 Nebraska 14 #1 Miami (FL) 37 93,781 notes
January 1, 2003 #7 Washington State 14 #8 Oklahoma 34 86,848 notes
January 1, 2004 #1 USC 28 #4 Michigan 14 93,849 notes
January 1, 2005 #6 Texas 38 #13 Michigan 37 93,468 notes
January 4, 2006BCS #1 USC 38 #2 Texas 41 93,986 notes
January 1, 2007 #8 USC 32 #3 Michigan 18 93,852 notes
January 1, 2008 #6 USC 49 #13 Illinois 17 93,923 notes
January 1, 2009 #5 USC 38 #6 Penn State 24 93,293 notes
January 1, 2010 #7 Oregon 17 #8 Ohio State 26 93,963 notes
January 1, 2011 #3 TCU 21 #4 Wisconsin 19 94,118 notes
January 2, 2012 #6 Oregon 45 #9 Wisconsin 38 91,245 notes
January 1, 2013 #8 Stanford 20 #23 Wisconsin 14 93,359 notes
January 1, 2014 #5 Stanford 20 #4 Michigan State 24 95,173 notes
January 1, 2015SF #3 Oregon 59 #2 Florida State 20 91,322 notes
January 1, 2016 #5 Stanford 45 #6 Iowa 16 94,268 notes
January 2, 2017 #9 USC 52 #5 Penn State 49 95,128 notes
January 1, 2018SF #2 Oklahoma 48 (2OT) #3 Georgia 54 92,844 notes
January 1, 2019 #9 Washington 23 #5 Ohio State 28 91,853 notes
January 1, 2020 #7 Oregon 28 #11 Wisconsin 27 90,462 notes
January 1, 2021SF #1 Alabama 31 #4 Notre Dame 14 18,373[b] notes
January 1, 2022 #10 Utah 45 #7 Ohio State 48 87,842 notes
January 2, 2023 #7 Utah 21 #9 Penn State 35 94,873 notes
January 1, 2024SF #5 Alabama 20 (OT) #1 Michigan 27 96,371 notes
January 1, 2025QF #1 Oregon 21 #6 Ohio State 41 90,732 notes

Source:[66]

^BCS Denotes BCS National Championship Game
^QF Denotes College Football Playoff quarterfinal game
^SF Denotes College Football Playoff semifinal game
  1. ^ a b The 1942 game was played in Duke Stadium in Durham, North Carolina, because of a restriction on crowds allowed on the West Coast after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
  2. ^ a b The 2021 game was moved to Arlington, Texas, shortly after event organizers were unable to receive an exception from the state of California to allow fan attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic.[1]
  3. ^ a b During World War I, military teams played

Future games

[edit]

Appearances and win–loss records

[edit]

The below tables list results by teams competing as members of the Big Ten Conference, Pac-12 Conference, and all other participants. Included in Pac-12 results are teams who competed as a member of the Pacific Coast Conference, Pacific-8 Conference, or Pacific-10 Conference—predecessors of the Pac-12. One team, Oregon, has appearances both as a member of the Pac-12 (or its predecessors) and as a member of the Big Ten.

Updated through the January 2025 edition (111 games, 222 total appearances).

† Some teams who are members of the Pac-12 and Big Ten made appearances while not members; thus, the following results are included in the "Other teams" table:

  • Penn State's January 1923 loss predates their joining of the Big Ten
  • Nebraska's January 1941 and January 2002 losses predates their joining of the Big Ten
  • Stanford's January 1902 loss predates formation of the Pacific Coast Conference, predecessor of the Pac-12
  • Washington State's January 1916 win predates formation of the Pacific Coast Conference, predecessor of the Pac-12

‡ The Southeastern Conference has three current members and two former members who made additional appearances in the Rose Bowl while those schools were not members of the SEC. Alabama made additional appearances in 1926, 1927, and 1931 before becoming a charter member of the SEC in 1932. Oklahoma made appearances in 2003 and 2018 before joining the SEC in 2024. Texas made appearances in 2005 and 2006 before joining the SEC in 2024. Another SEC charter member, Georgia Tech, made an appearance in 1929 and left the SEC in 1964. Tulane, also a charter member, made an appearance in 1932, prior to the SEC's establishment in December of that year. Tulane left the SEC in 1966.

Current Big Ten teams Maryland and Rutgers have never appeared in the Rose Bowl. Nebraska has appeared twice but never as a member of the Big Ten. In 2024, as part of a dissolution of the Pac-12, the Big Ten gained four teams that have represented the Pac-12 and its predecessors in the Rose Bowl numerous times: Oregon, UCLA, USC, and Washington.

Frequent participants

[edit]

If there are any Big Ten teams that shoot for a national championship, they're damn fools ... You play to win the Big Ten championship, and if you win it and go to the Rose Bowl and win it, then you've had a great season.

— Bo Schembechler of Michigan, July 1989[67]

Among Pac-8/10/12 and Big Ten schools, the record for longest drought since a team's last Rose Bowl appearance is held by California (1959), followed by Minnesota (1962), Oregon State (1965), and Indiana (1968).

Among Pac-8/10/12 and Big Ten schools who have played in at least one Rose Bowl, the record for the longest period since a win is held jointly by Indiana and Nebraska, who have never won, followed by Washington State (1916), Cal (1939), Oregon State (1942), Northwestern (1949), and Iowa (1959). As of 2016, head coaches Howard Jones (5–0) and John Robinson (4–0) lead the list of undefeated Rose Bowl records.[68]

Archie Griffin of Ohio State and Brian Cushing of USC are the only players to ever start in four Rose Bowl games. Head coach Woody Hayes led Ohio State to the Rose Bowl from 1973 to 1976, while USC head coach Pete Carroll led the Trojans to the Rose Bowl from 2006 to 2009.

Rose Bowl records at the Hall of Champions

The current members of the Pac-12 or the Big Ten to have not appeared in the Rose Bowl are Maryland and Rutgers,[69] who both joined the Big Ten in 2014. Former Pac-12 members Arizona (who joined the then-Pac-10 in 1978) and Colorado (who joined the Pac-12 in 2011) have never appeared in the Rose Bowl,[69] both having left the Pac-12 in 2024. Former Pac-12 member California appeared in the Rose Bowl only as a member of a predecessor league to the Pac-12. Similar to Cal, Nebraska played in the 1941 and 2002 games, but was not a member of the Big Ten Conference at these times. Idaho and Montana, who were members of the Pacific Coast Conference from 1922 until 1958 and 1950 respectively, never finished near the top in the PCC football standings. Former Big Ten member Chicago withdrew from the league prior to the bowl arrangement being set.

USC has played the most Big Ten schools in the Rose Bowl. As of 2024, the only Big Ten opponents remaining for the Trojans are Iowa, Minnesota, and the schools that have never represented the conference in the Rose Bowl: Maryland, Nebraska, Rutgers, Oregon, UCLA, and Washington. Ohio State and Michigan are tied for playing the most current or former Pac-12 schools in the Rose Bowl. The Buckeyes have not played Oregon State or Washington State in the game, while Michigan has never played Oregon or Utah. Neither team has faced Arizona or Colorado, as these teams have never appeared in the game.

Common matchups

[edit]

The most frequent Rose Bowl matchup is USC–Michigan, occurring for the eighth time in 2007, with USC holding a 6–2 advantage (including rare meetings outside the Rose Bowl, USC leads this series 6–5). The next most frequent matchup is USC–Ohio State, occurring for the seventh time in 1985, with USC holding a 4–3 advantage.

Matchups that have occurred more than once:

# of Times West / Pac-12 East / Big Ten Record Years played
8 USC Michigan USC, 6–2 1948, 1970, 1977, 1979, 1989, 1990, 2004, 2007
7 USC Ohio State USC, 4–3 1955, 1969, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1980, 1985
4 Washington Michigan Tied, 2–2 1978, 1981, 1992, 1993
3 Oregon Ohio State Ohio State, 3–0 1958, 2010, 2025†
3 USC Penn State USC, 3–0 1923, 2009, 2017
3 UCLA Michigan State Michigan State, 2–1 1954, 1956, 1966
2 Stanford Michigan Tied, 1–1 1902, 1972
2 California Ohio State Tied, 1–1 1921, 1950
2 Stanford Alabama Alabama, 1–0–1 1927, 1935
2 USC Pittsburgh USC, 2–0 1930, 1933
2 USC Tennessee USC, 2–0 1940, 1945
2 UCLA Illinois Tied, 1–1 1947, 1984
2 USC Wisconsin USC, 2–0 1953, 1963
2 Washington Iowa Washington, 2–0 1982, 1991
2 UCLA Wisconsin Wisconsin, 2–0 1994, 1999
2 Stanford Wisconsin Tied, 1–1 2000, 2013
2 Oregon Wisconsin Oregon, 2–0 2012, 2020

† Scheduled for January 1, 2025

Top-ranked teams

[edit]

No. 1 ranked teams at the end of the regular season that have played in the Rose Bowl game are listed below:

Twice in a season

[edit]

Of the 26 bowl rematches of regular season games, six have taken place in the Rose Bowl. In three of those instances, the same team won both the regular season game and the Rose Bowl Game. UCLA won three of those five Rose Bowl games, including both instances in which a different team lost the regular season game but won the Rose Bowl Game.

Game arrangements

[edit]
2006 Rose Bowl: Texas defeated Southern California 41–38 on January 4, 2006

Beginning with the 1947 Rose Bowl, the Pacific Coast representative was the home team, and the Big Nine representative was the visitor. This arrangement would alternate each year. The stadium seating started with the Big Nine representatives in the end zone, but eventually was set with the Big Ten fans and team on the West (press box) side, and Pacific-10 fans and team on the East side. The home team wears their darkest home jerseys, and the visiting team wears the white visiting jerseys. There have been exceptions to the uniform arrangement: UCLA wore their home jerseys, light blue, in the 1962, 1966, and 1976 Rose Bowl games, with the Big Ten opponent also wearing their home uniforms.

From 1947 through 2001, the Big Ten team was the home team in even-numbered years (concluding seasons that took place in odd-numbered years), and the Pac-10 team was the home team in odd-numbered years (concluding seasons that took place in even-numbered years). In 2003, Washington State was the home team but faced a non-Big Ten or Pac-10 school (Oklahoma of the Big 12) due to BCS selections that season. In 2005, Michigan served as the home team as a result of playing a Big 12 school, Texas, rather than a Pac-10 opponent.

Beginning with the 2002 Rose Bowl, Nebraska was home, with team and fans on the East sideline. From 2006 through 2013, the home team had been the team with the highest BCS season ending ranking. For the 2005 Rose Bowl, the Michigan team was on the East sideline; Texas was the visiting team and was on the West sideline. For the 2006 Rose Bowl, USC was the home team and Texas was the visiting team on the West sideline. Traditionally, the Big Ten (or its BCS replacement) is on the West side (press box) and the Pac-12 team is on the East side.

During the BCS era, the institution with the higher BCS ranking performed the national anthem, and performed first at halftime. With the exception of BCS championship years, the National Anthem was performed by the band. In BCS Championship years, a performer was invited to sing the Anthem, the last being LeAnn Rimes in 2006. The Rose Bowl does not have other performers (including notable recording artists) during the halftime show besides the school marching bands. As part of the television contract, a portion of each band's halftime performance is shown on television. Each school and each conference are allocated television spots to advertise. For the 100th game on January 1, 2014, Merry Clayton, Lisa Fischer, Judith Hill and Darlene Love sang the national anthem in honor of the song's 200th anniversary. This was the first time in Rose Bowl history that the anthem was performed by singers rather than by a marching band.[70] Today, the institution with the higher ranking by the CFP selection committee performs the national anthem and performs first at halftime.

The coin toss was traditionally presented by the grand marshal of the Rose Parade or the president of the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association (if the grand marshal was unable to attend the game).

Player of the Game award

[edit]
1960 Rose Bowl Player of the Game trophy, presented by the Helms Athletic Foundation

The Rose Bowl's most valuable player is presented the Player of the Game award.[71] The Helms Athletic Foundation created the honor, which was first awarded in the 1940s.[72] Helms executive director Bill Schroeder polled a Helms Hall Board composed of sportswriters to make the selection.[72][71] The modern award selection continues to be made in collaboration with the national media covering the game.[71]

Player of the Game honors were also awarded retroactively back to the 1902 Rose Bowl.[72][71]

Occasionally, the award has been shared by two players. Four players have been named the Player of the Game of more than one Rose Bowl: Bob Schloredt, Washington (1960, 1961), Charles White, USC (1979, 1980), Ron Dayne, Wisconsin (1999, 2000), and Vince Young, Texas (2005, 2006).

Player of the Game awards, 1902, 1916–2004

[edit]
Game Player of the Game[73][74] Team Position
1902 Neil Snow Michigan FB
1916 Carl Dietz Washington State FB
1917 John Beckett Oregon T
1918 Hollis Huntington Mare Island FB
1919 George Halas Great Lakes E
1920 Edward Casey Harvard HB
1921 Harold Muller California E
1922 Russell Stein Washington & Jefferson T
1923 Leo Calland USC G
1924 Ira McKee Navy QB
1925 Elmer Layden Notre Dame FB
Ernie Nevers Stanford FB
1926 Johnny Mack Brown Alabama HB
George "Wildcat" Wilson Washington HB
1927 Fred Pickhard Alabama T
1928 Clifford "Biff" Hoffman Stanford FB
1929 Benjamin Lom California HB
1930 Russell Saunders USC QB
1931 John "Monk" Campbell Alabama QB
1932 Erny Pinckert USC HB
1933 Homer Griffith USC QB
1934 Cliff Montgomery Columbia QB
1935 Millard "Dixie" Howell Alabama HB
1936 James "Monk" Moscrip Stanford E
Keith Topping E
1937 Bill Daddio Pittsburgh E
1938 Victor Bottari California HB
1939 Doyle Nave USC QB
Al Krueger E
1940 Ambrose Schindler QB
1941 Peter Kmetovic Stanford HB
1942 Donald Durdan Oregon State HB
1943 Charles Trippi Georgia HB
1944 Norman Verry USC G
1945 Jim Hardy QB
1946 Harry Gilmer Alabama HB
1947 Claude "Buddy" Young Illinois HB
Julius Rykovich HB
1948 Bob Chappuis Michigan HB
1949 Frank Aschenbrenner Northwestern HB
1950 Fred "Curly" Morrison Ohio State FB
1951 Don Dufek Michigan FB
1952 William Tate Illinois HB
1953 Rudy Bukich USC QB
1954 Billy Wells Michigan State HB
1955 Dave Leggett Ohio State QB
1956 Walter Kowalczyk Michigan State HB
1957 Kenneth Ploen Iowa QB
1958 Jack Crabtree Oregon QB
1959 Bob Jeter Iowa HB
1960 Bob Schloredt Washington QB
George Fleming HB
1961 Bob Schloredt QB
1962 Sandy Stephens Minnesota QB
1963 Pete Beathard USC QB
Ron Vander Kelen Wisconsin QB
1964 Jim Grabowski Illinois FB
1965 Mel Anthony Michigan FB
1966 Bob Stiles UCLA DB
1967 John Charles Purdue DB
1968 O. J. Simpson USC TB
1969 Rex Kern Ohio State QB
1970 Bob Chandler USC FL
1971 Jim Plunkett Stanford QB
1972 Don Bunce QB
1973 Sam Cunningham USC FB
1974 Cornelius Greene Ohio State QB
1975 Pat Haden USC QB
John McKay Jr. SE
1976 John Sciarra UCLA QB
1977 Vince Evans USC QB
1978 Warren Moon Washington QB
1979 Charles White USC TB
Rick Leach Michigan QB
1980 Charles White USC TB
1981 Butch Woolfolk Michigan RB
1982 Jacque Robinson Washington RB
1983 Don Rogers UCLA FS
Tom Ramsey QB
1984 Rick Neuheisel QB
1985 Tim Green USC QB
Jack Del Rio LB
1986 Eric Ball UCLA TB
1987 Jeff Van Raaphorst Arizona State QB
1988 Percy Snow Michigan State LB
1989 Leroy Hoard Michigan FB
1990 Ricky Ervins USC TB
1991 Mark Brunell Washington QB
1992 Steve Emtman DT
Billy Joe Hobert QB
1993 Tyrone Wheatley Michigan RB
1994 Brent Moss Wisconsin RB
1995 Danny O'Neil Oregon QB
Ki-Jana Carter Penn State RB
1996 Keyshawn Johnson USC WR
1997 Joe Germaine Ohio State QB
1998 Brian Griese Michigan QB
1999 Ron Dayne Wisconsin RB
2000
2001 Marques Tuiasosopo Washington QB
2002 Ken Dorsey Miami QB
Andre Johnson WR
2003 Nate Hybl Oklahoma QB
2004 Matt Leinart USC QB

Player of the Game awards, 2005–present

[edit]

Beginning with the 2005 Rose Bowl, Player of the Game awards have been given to both an offensive and defensive player.

Game PotG — Offense[73] Team Position PotG — Defense[73] Team Position
2005 Vince Young Texas QB LaMarr Woodley Michigan LB
2006 Michael Huff Texas S
2007 Dwayne Jarrett USC WR Brian Cushing USC OLB
2008 John David Booty QB Rey Maualuga LB
2009 Mark Sanchez QB Kaluka Maiava LB
2010 Terrelle Pryor Ohio State QB Kenny Rowe Oregon DE
2011 Andy Dalton TCU QB Tank Carder TCU LB
2012 Lavasier Tuinei Oregon WR Kiko Alonso Oregon LB
2013 Stepfan Taylor Stanford RB Usua Amanam Stanford DB
2014 Connor Cook Michigan State QB Kyler Elsworth Michigan State LB
2015 Marcus Mariota Oregon QB Tony Washington Oregon LB
2016 Christian McCaffrey Stanford RB Aziz Shittu Stanford DE
2017 Sam Darnold USC QB Stevie Tu'ikolovatu USC DT
2018 Sony Michel Georgia RB Roquan Smith Georgia LB
2019 Dwayne Haskins Ohio State QB Brendon White Ohio State S
2020 Justin Herbert Oregon QB Brady Breeze Oregon S
2021 DeVonta Smith Alabama WR Patrick Surtain II Alabama CB
2022 Jaxon Smith-Njigba Ohio State WR Tommy Eichenberg Ohio State LB
2023 Sean Clifford Penn State QB Ji'Ayir Brown Penn State S
2024 J. J. McCarthy Michigan QB Mason Graham Michigan DT
2025 Jeremiah Smith Ohio State WR Cody Simon Ohio State LB

Source:[75][76]

Game records

[edit]
Team Performance vs. opponent Year
Most points scored 59, Oregon vs. Florida State (20) 2015
Most points scored (losing team) 49, Penn State vs. USC (52) 2017
Most points scored (both teams) 102, Georgia (54) vs. Oklahoma (48) 2018
Most points scored in a half 41 (second half), Oregon vs. Florida State 2015
Most points scored in a half (both teams) 56, shared by:

(first half), Oregon vs. Wisconsin
(first half), Utah vs. Ohio State

2012
2022
Fewest points allowed 0, Washington vs. Iowa (tied with 17 others) 1982
Largest margin of victory 49, shared by:
Michigan (49) vs. Stanford (0)
Michigan (49) vs. USC (0)

1902
1948
First downs 33, USC vs Penn State 2017
Rushing yards 503, Michigan vs. Stanford 1902
Passing yards 573, Ohio State vs. Utah 2022
Total yards 683, Ohio State vs. Utah 2022
Individual Performance, team vs. opponent Year
Total offense 583, C. J. Stroud, Ohio State vs Utah 2022
Touchdowns 6, C. J. Stroud, Ohio State vs Utah 2022
Rushing yards 247, Charles White, USC vs. Ohio State (39 attempts, 1 TD) 1980
Rushing TDs 5, Neil Snow, Michigan vs. Stanford 1902
Passing yards 573, C. J. Stroud, Ohio State vs Utah (37-46-1, 6 TD) 2022
Passing TDs 6, C. J. Stroud, Ohio State vs Utah 2022
Receptions 15, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Ohio State vs Utah 2022
Receiving yards 347, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Ohio State vs Utah 2022
Receiving TDs 3, Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State vs Utah (tied with 3 others) 2022
All-purpose Yards 368, Christian McCaffrey, Stanford vs. Iowa 2016
Tackles 17, John Boyett, Oregon vs. Wisconsin (tied with 1 other) 2012
Sacks 3, Kenny Rowe, Oregon vs. Ohio State (tied with 3 others) 2010
Interceptions 3, Bill Paulman, Stanford vs. SMU (tied with 1 other) 1936
Long plays Performance, team vs. opponent Year
Touchdown run 91, De'Anthony Thomas, Oregon vs. Wisconsin 2012
Touchdown pass 88, Sean Clifford to KeAndre Lambert-Smith, Penn State vs. Utah 2023
Kickoff return 103, Al Hoisch, UCLA vs. Illinois (TD) 1947
Punt return 86, Aramis Dandoy, USC vs. Ohio State (TD) 1955
Interception return 78, Elmer Layden, Notre Dame vs. Stanford (TD) 1925
Fumble return 58, Tony Washington, Oregon vs. Florida State (TD) 2015
Punt 73, Don Bracken, Michigan vs. Washington 1981
Field goal 55, Rodrigo Blankenship, Georgia vs. Oklahoma 2018

Note: When there is a tie, the most recent one will be listed.

Rose Bowl Hall of Fame

[edit]

Inductees (by year)[77]

All-Century Class

[edit]

The Rose Bowl Game All-Century Class was announced on December 28, 2013.[83]

They are:

In addition to being named as All-Century representatives for their respective decades, John McKay and Archie Griffin were named the 100th Rose Bowl Game All-Century Coach and Player respectively.

The finalists:

Notes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

The Rose Bowl Game is the oldest annually played bowl game in American college football, first contested on January 1, 1902, between the University of Michigan and Stanford University at Tournament Park in Pasadena, California, with Michigan securing a 49–0 victory. Known as the "Granddaddy of Them All," it originated as part of the Tournament of Roses festivities and has been held every year since 1916, traditionally on New Year's Day at the Rose Bowl Stadium since its dedication in 1923.
From 1947 onward, the game established its signature matchup between the champions of the and the (formerly the ), fostering a longstanding East-West that elevated its prestige and viewership. This tradition persisted until the game's integration into the and later the format, where it has occasionally hosted national semifinals, as in 2006 and 2024. Notable achievements include record-setting performances, such as Oregon's 59–20 win over Florida State in , the highest score in Rose Bowl history, and USC's 25 victories, the most by any program. The 1942 edition marked a unique deviation when, amid World War II security fears post-Pearl Harbor, it was relocated to Duke Stadium in , rather than canceled, underscoring the event's resilience. Beyond athletics, the Rose Bowl has influenced milestones, including the first national radio broadcast of a game in 1927, and continues to generate substantial economic impact for Pasadena, estimated at $245 million for the 2024 events.

Origins and Early History

Tournament East-West Game and Initial Iterations (1902–1915)

The Tournament of Roses Association, established in 1890 to promote Pasadena's Mediterranean climate through floral parades and exhibitions, initially featured non-athletic spectacles such as ostrich races and chariot contests that failed to consistently attract large crowds. In 1902, organizers introduced the Tournament East-West Football Game as a novel attraction to boost attendance following the parade, selecting undefeated University of Michigan to represent the East against Stanford University for the West, reflecting emerging interest in interregional college football rivalries. Held on January 1, 1902, at Tournament Park in Pasadena, California, the inaugural matchup drew approximately 8,500 spectators. Michigan, coached by Fielding H. Yost and known as the "Point-a-Minute" team for its high-scoring offense, dominated Stanford 49–0, with fullback Neil Snow scoring five touchdowns. This lopsided result highlighted disparities in regional talent and training, as Eastern programs benefited from more established competitive traditions amid post-1890s rule standardizations by figures like Walter Camp. The game's brutality, including multiple injuries to Stanford players, underscored broader safety concerns in , which saw 18 fatalities in the 1900 season alone and prompted national scrutiny. Organizers discontinued the football event after 1902, reverting to safer alternatives like matches and animal races through 1915, as the observed and logistical challenges of cross-country travel deterred repetition. Despite the hiatus, the 1902 contest demonstrated viable public demand for postseason East-versus-West clashes, contributing causally to football's national expansion by showcasing elite play to West Coast audiences previously limited to local teams. This single iteration preceded widespread reforms, including legalization in 1906, which reduced injury risks and paved the way for resumption. No additional East-West games occurred in Pasadena until , marking the period's sparsity amid evolving .

Permanent Annual Tradition and Stadium Construction (1916–1920s)

Following a hiatus after the 1902 game due to safety concerns from injuries in early football exhibitions, the Tournament of Roses Association reinstated the postseason football contest on January 1, 1916, at Tournament Park in Pasadena, California, committing to annual play to capitalize on public interest and boost local tourism revenue. Washington State College secured a 14–0 victory over Brown University in rainy conditions before an estimated crowd of 7,000, with the win driven by strong defensive play and field position advantages. This resumption marked the game's evolution into a reliable tradition, supported by Pasadena's mild winter climate and the association's organizational infrastructure, which ensured logistical feasibility for East Coast teams despite travel challenges. Rising attendance strained Tournament Park's capacity of around 15,000, prompting the association to pursue a dedicated stadium for economic sustainability amid growing gate receipts and national media coverage. Construction of the Rose Bowl Stadium commenced on February 27, 1922, on 12 acres of Arroyo Seco land purchased in 1919, and concluded by October 1922 at a cost of approximately $272,000, funded through bonds and local subscriptions. Architect Myron Hunt designed the initial horseshoe-shaped structure, inspired by the Yale Bowl's contours for optimal sightlines and natural drainage, accommodating 57,000 spectators with concrete stands and minimal steel to expedite building amid post-World War I material constraints. The stadium hosted its inaugural Rose Bowl Game on January 1, 1923, between and Penn State, drawing over 42,000 fans and demonstrating the venue's role in accommodating demand. The 1925 contest further validated the investment, as Notre Dame defeated Stanford 27–10 before 53,000 attendees, fueled by the visibility of Notre Dame's backfield unit—later dubbed the "Four Horsemen"—and Stanford's Ernie Nevers, which amplified publicity and ticket revenues exceeding prior years' totals at . This era's infrastructure upgrades, including improved rail access for visiting teams, addressed logistical bottlenecks and cemented the game's viability as a revenue-generating event tied to Pasadena's floral .

Stadium and Venue Evolution

Rose Bowl Stadium Development and Features

The Rose Bowl Stadium was constructed on a site in the Arroyo Seco, a natural ravine west of Pasadena, California, with groundbreaking occurring in early 1922 and completion by October of that year. Designed by architect Myron Hunt and modeled after the Yale Bowl, the original horseshoe-shaped structure utilized reinforced concrete and featured minimal ornamentation, emphasizing structural integrity over decoration. Built at a cost of $272,000, it initially accommodated 57,000 spectators and opened with a football game between the University of California and Pomona College on October 28, 1922. Subsequent expansions rapidly increased the stadium's capacity to meet growing demand for the Rose Bowl Game and other events. By , additions to the ends of the horseshoe boosted seating to around 72,000, and further modifications in and 1940s, including closing the ends to form a full bowl, pushed capacity above 100,000 by 1949. Renovations in the late 20th century, particularly in preparation for the and events, incorporated seismic retrofitting to enhance structural amid California's risks, alongside updates to seating and facilities. The stadium reached a record attendance of 106,869 during the Game between USC and Ohio State. Key features include its integration with the surrounding hills and natural terrain of the Arroyo Seco, providing an amphitheater-like acoustic and visual enclosure that distinguishes it from urban stadiums. The field consists of natural perennial ryegrass, a hybrid mix sourced and meticulously maintained year-round to withstand heavy usage, including non-football events like concerts that help offset operational costs. Owned by the City of Pasadena and operated by the nonprofit Rose Bowl Operating Company, the venue incurs significant maintenance expenses—such as $1.4 million annually reserved for preventative work—due to its age and exposure to seismic activity, with ongoing capital campaigns addressing deferred needs.

Temporary Venue Changes and Adaptations

The Rose Bowl Game was relocated from , for the first time on January 1, 1942, to Duke Stadium in , following the Japanese on December 7, 1941, amid fears of potential enemy assaults on West Coast population centers and the implementation of blackout protocols that prohibited large public gatherings in coastal areas. , representing the , faced host , with the Beavers securing a 20–16 victory before an attendance of 56,000 spectators, significantly lower than typical Pasadena crowds due to the hasty cross-country arrangements. The 1942 move imposed substantial logistical burdens, including the transcontinental travel of the Oregon State team by train—spanning over 3,000 miles—which exacerbated player fatigue and disrupted preparations in an without modern air transport, while depriving the event of its customary Pasadena and stadium ambiance integral to the game's identity. No comparable relocations occurred during the remainder of , as subsequent games returned to Pasadena under heightened but manageable security measures. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 Rose Bowl semifinal—pitting Ohio State against Alabama—was shifted on December 20, 2020, from the Rose Bowl Stadium to AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, citing surging case numbers in Southern California, restrictions on guest hosting, and challenges in enforcing health protocols at the traditional site. Alabama defeated Ohio State 52–24 in the relocated contest, but fan attendance was capped at limited allotments, such as 3,380 tickets for Alabama supporters, contrasting sharply with pre-pandemic Rose Bowls averaging over 90,000 attendees and generating tens of millions in local economic activity. Critics in Pasadena highlighted the relocation's erosion of the game's historic ties to the city, arguing it risked long-term contractual leverage with the and diminished the unique outdoor, parade-linked atmosphere, while neutral-site logistics amplified team travel demands without offsetting benefits in safety or revenue, as Texas-hosted games yielded lower gate figures amid constraints. These adaptations underscored causal trade-offs between immediate risk mitigation and preservation of tradition, with no further venue shifts recorded as of 2025.

Selection Process and Conference Agreements

Pre-Conference Era and Independent Selection (1916–1946)

The Tournament of Roses committee handled team selections for the Rose Bowl Game independently from 1916 to 1946, inviting one representative from the Western United States—typically a strong performer from the Pacific Coast Conference (PCC) or its affiliates—and one from the Eastern or Midwestern regions to symbolize an East-West clash. This ad-hoc approach prioritized creating compelling matchups capable of drawing national attention, with invitations extended based on end-of-season evaluations of team strength, records, and logistical feasibility amid the era's cross-country rail travel constraints. Western selections often favored undefeated or high-win PCC squads, such as Washington State in 1916 with its 6-0 record including victories over regional rivals. Selection criteria evolved from an initial focus on prestigious Eastern institutions to greater emphasis on competitive parity as Western programs strengthened. Early invitations targeted elite East Coast teams like (1916, 5-3-1 record), Harvard, Penn, , and Notre Dame through 1925, aiming to leverage their reputations for gate appeal and to highlight regional disparities. By the mid-1920s, the process shifted toward teams demonstrating on-field dominance regardless of conference affiliation, incorporating broader geographic representation to balance matchups; for instance, starting around , Western teams occasionally influenced Eastern picks to ensure viability. This adjustment reflected growing Western competitiveness, as evidenced by improved PCC performances that necessitated stronger Eastern counterparts to sustain public interest. A pivotal example occurred in 1926 when the committee invited the as the Eastern representative after Tulane declined, marking the first selection of a Southern team and challenging prevailing views of regional inferiority. 's 9-0-1 record and victories over tough opponents justified the choice, demonstrating the committee's willingness to prioritize merit over traditional . This decision elevated Southern programs by exposing them to national scrutiny, fostering broader recognition of talent beyond established power centers. The independent selection model cultivated enduring national rivalries by bridging geographic divides through selective invitations, compensating for limited travel technology that relied on multi-day train journeys. By pitting high-caliber independents against regional champions, it generated cross-country media coverage and fan engagement, laying groundwork for football's expansion despite logistical hurdles like weather and scheduling conflicts during and II interruptions. Eastern teams maintained a slight overall edge in this era, underscoring the invitational system's success in curating balanced contests that boosted the game's prestige.

Big Ten–Pacific Coast Agreements and Tie-Ins (1947–Present)

In 1946, the Big Nine Conference (predecessor to the Big Ten) and the (PCC) formalized a five-year exclusive agreement with the Tournament of Roses to pair their respective champions annually in the Rose Bowl Game starting in 1947, marking the first structured conference tie-in for the event. This pact followed years of negotiations over revenue sharing, selection criteria, and logistical details, establishing a tradition of pitting a Midwestern powerhouse against a West Coast representative to symbolize East-West competition. The inaugural game under the agreement featured the Big Nine champion defeating the PCC champion UCLA 45–14 on January 1, 1947. The agreement's core mechanic required automatic participation by each conference's champion, with selections rotating based on prior-year outcomes and internal conference rules, such as the Big Ten's initial no-repeat policy that occasionally led to the previous year's participant yielding to another qualifier. selections were permitted in rare cases, such as when a champion opted out or scheduling conflicts arose, but adherence remained consistent, with conference champions appearing in over 90% of games from 1947 through the early 2000s, fostering empirical stability in matchup predictability. Extensions renewed the pact beyond its initial term, adapting to the PCC's 1959 dissolution and succession by the Athletic Association of Western Universities (AAWU), which evolved into the Pacific-8, Pacific-10, and ultimately by 2011, while the Big Nine expanded to the modern Big Ten. Conference realignments prompted further adaptations, particularly following the Pac-12's effective dissolution after the 2023 season, as 10 members departed for other leagues amid media rights disputes. The remaining Pac-12 institutions, Oregon State and Washington State, retained access to prior bowl tie-ins, including the Rose Bowl, through the 2025 season under existing contracts, preserving short-term continuity despite the loss of full-conference structure. This tripartite arrangement between the Tournament of Roses, Big Ten, and Pac-12 entities—originally forged in 1946—endures as college football's longest-running bowl affiliation, having facilitated 75 consecutive champion-involved games by 2021 before realignment pressures.

Integration with Bowl Championship Series and College Football Playoff

The Bowl Championship Series (BCS), established in 1998, incorporated the Rose Bowl into a structured framework for crowning a national champion via a formula blending Associated Press and coaches' polls with computer rankings from multiple algorithms. Under this system, the Rose Bowl hosted the BCS National Championship twice: in 2002, #1 Miami routed #2 Nebraska 37-14 before 93,781 fans, and in 2006, #2 Texas edged #1 USC 41-38 on January 4, a selection driven by the BCS standings where computer models elevated Texas over other contenders like #3 Michigan despite human poll preferences. This rotation among the Rose, Sugar, Fiesta, and Orange Bowls marked the Rose Bowl's evolution from a conference-specific showcase to a periodic venue for top-ranked non-tie-in matchups, with the algorithm's emphasis on mathematical precision often sparking debates over its rigidity compared to subjective evaluations. The College Football Playoff (CFP), launched for the 2014 season, further embedded the Rose Bowl in national title contention by designating it a semifinal host from 2015 through 2021, rotating with other bowls under a 13-member selection committee that ranks teams based on qualitative factors like wins against strong opponents, head-to-head results, and conference championships rather than BCS-style computers. The committee's process, announced December 7-8 annually, supplanted the BCS formula's perceived flaws, such as overreliance on poll momentum, enabling at-large bids that occasionally bypassed traditional tie-ins. With the CFP's expansion to 12 teams for the 2024 season, the Rose Bowl shifted to quarterfinal status for 2025 and 2026, exemplified by the January 1, 2025, game where #6 Ohio State defeated #1 Oregon 41-21, advancing the Buckeyes to the semifinals via committee seeding that paired conference foes despite prior regular-season meetings. CFP participation has elevated the Rose Bowl's profile, with semifinal and quarterfinal games averaging over 20 million viewers—such as the 2025 quarterfinal's 21.1 million average and 24.3 million peak, the most-watched non-NFL event since the prior year's title game—surpassing pre-playoff averages by leveraging playoff stakes. Yet, this national focus has drawn criticism for undermining the Rose Bowl's foundational Big Ten-Pacific Coast tie-in, as selections prioritize overall merit over automatic slots, leading to instances where league champions play elsewhere and diluting the game's century-old regional rivalry ethos. Proponents of the old system, including some officials, contend the shift favors power-concentration dynamics over balanced representation, though empirical data shows playoff games enhance and without fully eroding bowl prestige.

Game Formats and Arrangements

Traditional East-West Format and Evolutions

The Rose Bowl Game has traditionally adhered to standard (NCAA) football rules, pitting a representative team from eastern conferences, often the Big Ten, against a western counterpart from the (later Pac-12), symbolizing an East-versus-West matchup. This format originated with the inaugural "Tournament East-West football game" on January 1, 1902, featuring from the East defeating Stanford 49-0 from the West. The symbolism emphasized regional rivalry, with selections intended to showcase the best available teams from each coast to highlight contrasting styles of play. Halftime traditions integrate marching band performances from both participating universities, often featuring elaborate formations, card stunts by spectators, and musical tributes that complement the game's festive atmosphere. These band shows tie directly to the preceding , where university bands frequently participate, reinforcing the Tournament of Roses' cultural emphasis on pageantry and community celebration ahead of the afternoon contest. Evolutions in format include the adoption of NCAA overtime rules in to resolve ties, replacing previous outcomes that could end in draws and ensuring a decisive winner in postseason play. Prior to this, no Rose Bowl games required , but the change aligned the bowl with broader standardization. policies follow NCAA guidelines, with teams typically donning their primary home jerseys for the neutral-site event, though specific bowl stipulations prioritize contrasting colors for visibility. Pasadena's mild , with average New Year's Day temperatures around 68°F (20°C) and rare , necessitates minimal weather adaptations, such as occasional field covers for light , preserving consistent playing conditions. Early games reflected the era's football rules, which prior to the legalization of the forward pass emphasized running strategies, as evidenced by the ground-dominant play in the matchup. This run-heavy approach influenced tactical preparations, favoring robust lines and ball-control offenses suited to the pre-passing game's physical demands.

Modern Playoff Quarterfinal Role and Scheduling Changes

The College Football Playoff's expansion to a 12-team format beginning with the 2024 season positioned the Rose Bowl Game as one of six designated quarterfinal sites, hosting contests on January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2026, rather than the traditional Big Ten versus Pac-12 matchup. This shift elevated the game's stakes by pitting top seeds against selections, as exemplified by the 2025 quarterfinal featuring No. 1 against No. 8 State, an entrant that advanced via a first-round victory over . Such pairings introduce variability beyond conference tie-ins, potentially matching non-champions from power conferences against conference winners or independents. Scheduling adjustments for the quarterfinal role prioritized television logistics within a tripleheader, moving the 2026 kickoff to 1 p.m. PT (4 p.m. ET), the earliest in Rose Bowl history, to mitigate delays from preceding games and ensure prime-time alignment across time zones. The 2025 game retained the traditional 5 p.m. ET start but faced broadcast friction when the prior extended into double overtime, prompting to forgo a kickoff delay; this resulted in viewers missing the pregame military flyover and some channels erroneously airing an alternate broadcast featuring Pat McAfee's commentary. The extended playoff calendar amplifies physical demands, with data from 2014–2019 indicating that additional postseason games correlate with heightened rates, as teams face intensified without proportional recovery periods. Injuries accumulated notably in the inaugural expanded format, affecting key players and prompting the CFP to mandate player availability reports starting in 2025 to enhance transparency on health impacts. Logistical pressures have intensified under name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation and the transfer portal, enabling teams to assemble larger, more transient rosters that complicate playoff preparation and depth management amid the format's demands. Post-House settlement discussions highlight challenges in accommodating unlimited roster sizes, as programs navigate fluid player movement while extending seasons for quarterfinal participants. These dynamics strain coaching staffs and support personnel, who must integrate late transfers and NIL-influenced recruits into high-stakes environments without historical precedents for such roster volatility.

Sponsorship, Broadcasting, and Commercialization

Sponsorship History and Corporate Involvement

The Rose Bowl Game operated without a title sponsor for its inaugural 83 editions from 1902 through the 1998 season, preserving its traditional identity as the "Granddaddy of Them All" amid growing commercialization pressures in college football. This changed in 1999 when AT&T became the first presenting sponsor in a multi-year deal, marking the game's entry into corporate naming partnerships that aligned with broader trends in bowl game monetization. Subsequent sponsors included Sony's PlayStation 2 for the 2003 edition, Citigroup from 2004 to 2009, Vizio from 2011 to 2014 under a four-year agreement, and Northwestern Mutual starting in 2015 with an annual commitment reported at $25 million, which concluded after the 2019 game. Prudential Financial assumed the presenting sponsorship role beginning with the 109th Rose Bowl Game on January 2, 2023, via a multi-year pact with Disney Advertising and the Tournament of Roses, subsequently extended through the 2025-26 season. These arrangements, typically valued in the $20-25 million annual range for major bowls like the Rose, have bolstered the event's by generating dedicated streams independent of fluctuating ticket sales or broadcast deals. Such funds have directly supported stadium maintenance and upgrades at the Rose Bowl facility, including renovations to seating, videoboards, and infrastructure, ensuring operational viability amid rising costs for hosting a premier postseason event. Corporate involvement has, however, correlated with heightened , including expanded in-stadium and branding integrations that some observers contend erode the game's historic purity by prioritizing vendor visibility over unadorned . This shift has coincided with ticket price escalation, from averages in the low hundreds of dollars in the pre-sponsorship era to over $500—and often exceeding $1,000 on secondary markets in recent CFP-involved editions—potentially limiting for non-premium fans as demand and production expenses mount. Despite these dynamics, sponsorships have empirically sustained the game's prestige and logistical scale, offsetting deficits from event-specific variables like weather or matchup appeal, and enabling payouts to participating conferences that exceed $100 million collectively in playoff contexts.

Broadcasting Milestones and Media Rights

The Rose Bowl Game pioneered several broadcasting innovations in . Its first national radio broadcast occurred on January 1, 1927, marking the inaugural nationwide radio coverage of a sporting event. Local radio broadcasts had begun earlier, in 1926. The game's first national television broadcast took place on January 1, 1952, aired on and featuring versus Stanford, which drew an estimated audience amid the early expansion of coast-to-coast TV signals. Local TV coverage had debuted in 1947 on in . Technological advancements continued with the 1962 Rose Bowl, the first game broadcast nationally in color on , enhancing visual appeal for Minnesota's victory over UCLA. By 1968, live transmission enabled international beaming of the game. ABC assumed primary TV rights from 1989 through 2010, with the 2005 edition introducing high-definition television. ESPN secured exclusive rights starting in 2011, integrating the game into its coverage of the Bowl Championship Series and later the College Football Playoff (CFP). This exclusivity extends through the 2031-32 season under ESPN's CFP media agreement, valued at $7.8 billion over six years for all playoff rounds. Media rights deals have escalated dramatically, reflecting the game's national prominence; ESPN's annual payments averaged $80 million by the , a stark increase from earlier eras when broadcasts operated with minimal or no fees. Digital expansions include streaming on platforms like since the , alongside and international feeds via for Spanish-language coverage starting in 2013. Viewership has sustained high levels, with the 2025 CFP quarterfinal (Ohio State vs. ) averaging 21.1 million viewers on , peaking at 24.3 million—the strongest non-semifinal audience since the network took over. These metrics underscore the game's role in driving college football's media nationalization.

Results, Records, and Statistical Analysis

Historical Game Outcomes and Future Schedules

The Rose Bowl Game has been played 111 times through its January 1, 2025, edition, when No. 6 Ohio State defeated No. 1 Oregon 41–21 in a College Football Playoff quarterfinal, advancing the Buckeyes to the semifinals with a dominant 34–0 first-half lead. Earlier outcomes trace back to the inaugural 1902 matchup, a 49–0 Michigan victory over Stanford, followed by annual games from 1916 onward featuring a mix of East-West representatives and later conference champions. Notable results include the January 1, 1926, game where unheralded Alabama upset heavily favored Washington 20–19 on a last-second field goal, marking the first Rose Bowl appearance and win by a Southern team. Attendance figures have routinely surpassed 90,000, with peaks like 106,869 for the 1973 Ohio State–Southern California clash and 102,063 for the 1969 edition. The Player of the Game award, established in 1947 and initially presented by the , has highlighted performers such as USC's in 1952 and Texas's in 2006.
YearWinnerScoreLoserAttendancePlayer of the Game
2025Ohio State41–21~90,000 (est.)Jeremiah Smith (Ohio State)
202427–20 (OT)92,052 ()
2023USC47–24Tulane92,346 (USC)
202234–11TCU92,852 ()
202152–24Notre Dame~90,000 (COVID-limited) ()
The 112th Rose Bowl Game is set for January 1, 2026, as a College Football Playoff quarterfinal at Rose Bowl Stadium, with kickoff at 1:00 p.m. PT (4:00 p.m. ET) and pre-game activities starting at 12:00 p.m. PT. Participants will be selected via the CFP committee following the 2025 season, adhering to the expanded 12-team playoff structure where the Rose Bowl serves as one of four rotating quarterfinal sites alongside the Fiesta, Peach, and Sugar Bowls. Subsequent games will continue in this format, with site assignments announced annually by the CFP.

Team Appearances, Win-Loss Records, and Frequent Matchups

The (USC) holds the record for the most Rose Bowl Game appearances with 34, achieving a 25–9 win–loss record in those contests. ranks second with 21 appearances and a 9–12 record. State follows with 17 appearances and an 8–9 record through early 2025 games. These figures reflect participation patterns heavily influenced by conference tie-ins until the era introduced at-large selections from other conferences starting in 2015.
TeamAppearancesWin–Loss–Tie Record
USC3425–9–0
219–12–0
Ohio State178–9–0
Washington158–6–1
Stanford157–7–1
UCLA125–7–0
In the traditional Big Ten versus /Pac-12 matchup period from 1947 through 2013, Pacific conference representatives secured 28 victories to the Big Ten's 24, with 2 ties, establishing a narrow Western edge in 54 games. Prior to formal tie-ins, the 1902–1946 era featured 17 contests (with intermittent pauses), yielding 8 Western wins, 8 Eastern wins, and 1 tie, indicating balanced competition after initial Eastern shutouts like Michigan's 49–0 triumph in 1902. USC and Michigan represent the most frequent Rose Bowl matchup, meeting 8 times from 1948 to 2007, with USC holding a 6–2 advantage. USC also clashed with Ohio State 8 times, splitting the series 4–4. Since the 2014 playoff expansion, 7 of 11 games (through January 2025) have deviated from Big Ten–Pac-12 pairings, incorporating teams from the SEC (e.g., in 2021 and 2024), Big 12 (TCU in 2023), and AAC ( in 2021), diluting traditional conference rivalries while broadening national representation.

Individual and Team Records

The Rose Bowl Game holds numerous team statistical benchmarks, with establishing the record for most points scored by a single team at 59 in a 59–20 victory over Florida State on January 1, 2015. This surpassed prior marks, including Washington's 42 points in a 42–23 win over in the 1992 game. The largest margin of victory occurred twice with +49 points: 's 49–0 of Stanford on January 1, 1902, and 's 49–0 defeat of USC on January 1, 1948. In the most recent game on January 1, 2025, Ohio State defeated 41–21, accumulating 500 total yards to 's 276, though it did not eclipse established scoring highs.
CategoryRecordDetails
Most Points (Team)59 vs. Florida State (2015)
Largest Margin+49Michigan over Stanford (1902); Michigan over USC (1948)
Total Yards (Team, Game)500Ohio State vs. (2025)
Individual records emphasize offensive dominance, particularly in passing. Ohio State quarterback set the single-game passing yards mark with 573 in a 48–45 win over on January 1, 2022. USC's Sam Darnold previously held a high with 453 yards against Penn State in 2017. For rushing, Wisconsin's recorded the most yards with 246 on 27 carries versus UCLA on January 1, 2000. Ernie Nevers of Stanford gained 114 rushing yards on 34 carries against Notre Dame on January 1, 1925, a mark notable for its era despite being surpassed.
CategoryRecordPlayer, Team (Year)
Passing Yards573C.J. Stroud, Ohio State (2022)
Rushing Yards246Ron Dayne, Wisconsin (2000)
Team turnover records include Oregon's zero turnovers in their 59-point outing, contributing to defensive efficiency benchmarks, while Ohio State's 2025 performance featured strong third-down conversion (4-of-11) amid Oregon's 8-of-19. Longest drives remain less standardized but include notable 95-yard scoring efforts, such as Oregon's in 2012 against Wisconsin.

Notable Achievements and Top-Ranked Team Performances

The Rose Bowl Game has hosted two matchups between the nation's top two ranked teams, underscoring its role in contests with direct implications. The inaugural such clash occurred on January 1, 1963, when No. 1 USC defeated No. 2 42–37 in a high-scoring affair that featured late-game drama, including Wisconsin's rally from a 42–14 deficit. This game represented the first No. 1 versus No. 2 bowl matchup in history, elevating the Rose Bowl's status as a de facto title decider before formalized . A second No. 1 versus No. 2 encounter took place in the , which doubled as the , pitting undefeated No. 1 USC against No. 2 . prevailed 41–38 on a game-winning pass from with 19 seconds remaining, snapping USC's 34-game winning streak and securing the Longhorns' fourth national title. These rare top-two collisions highlight the bowl's capacity to feature elite competition, with both outcomes influencing final polls and championship claims in eras lacking a unified playoff system. Beyond these pinnacles, the Rose Bowl has witnessed dominant performances by top-ranked entrants, often amplifying national title stakes. In 1973, No. 3 Ohio State routed No. 4 USC 42–21, ending the Big Ten's eight-game losing streak in the bowl and affirming the Buckeyes' selection amid controversy over their tied regular-season finale with . Similarly, No. 1 Oregon's 59–20 demolition of No. 3 Florida State in the 2015 semifinal showcased explosive offensive output, with the Ducks setting a Rose Bowl record for points scored. Such victories by highly ranked teams—typically from the Pac-12 or Big Ten champions—have contributed to the bowl's legacy of rewarding superior regular-season form, though exact win rates for top-10 entrants vary by era due to evolving selection criteria and opponent strength.

Awards and Recognitions

Player of the Game Award Evolution

The Rose Bowl Game's Player of the Game award, commonly referred to as the (MVP), began with the inaugural 1902 matchup, where fullback Neil Snow was recognized as the first recipient for his performance in a 49-0 over Stanford. Early selections relied on informal consensus among media and observers, lacking a standardized process or physical trophy. By the mid-20th century, the award formalized with the introduction of a crystal trophy in 1953, presented to the standout performer as determined by a media panel. Prior to 2005, the MVP was typically a single honoree, selected via media polls emphasizing overall game impact, with occasional co-recipients such as UCLA's Don Rogers and Tom Ramsey in 1983. This era saw multiple winners from programs like USC and , with players like Charles White earning the award twice (1979, 1980). The process shifted in the game, when the Rose Bowl began officially recognizing separate Offensive and Defensive MVPs, reflecting the game's increasing alignment with national championship stakes under the (BCS), introduced in 1998. (offense) and (defense) of received these inaugural dual honors in a 38-37 win over . Post-BCS, with the (CFP) era starting in 2014, criteria evolved to highlight players contributing decisively in semifinal contexts, prioritizing statistical dominance and game-altering plays amid higher competitive intensity. Trophies for both offensive and defensive categories became standard, awarded post-game ceremonies. In the 2025 CFP quarterfinal, Ohio State's Jeremiah Smith earned Offensive Player of the Game for 187 receiving yards and two touchdowns, while teammate Cody Simon took Defensive honors with 11 tackles, two sacks, and three tackles for loss in a 41-21 defeat of .
YearOffensive MVPDefensive MVPWinning Team
2005 (QB, ) (LB, )
2024 (QB, )-
2025 (WR, Ohio State)Cody Simon (LB, Ohio State)Ohio State
This dual structure persists, ensuring recognition of balanced contributions without diluting the award's focus on pivotal performances.

Rose Bowl Hall of Fame and All-Century Honors

The Rose Bowl Hall of Fame, established in 1989 by the , honors players, coaches, officials, and other contributors who have advanced the game's legacy through exceptional performances and lasting influence. Inductees are chosen annually by a selection comprising former Rose Bowl participants and football experts, prioritizing documented on-field contributions such as rushing yards, records, and coaching victories in the game over subjective narratives. As of 2025, the hall includes 148 members, with classes typically adding three to four individuals each year during pre-game ceremonies. Notable early inductees include , enshrined in 1993 for his 1968 and 1969 performances where he rushed for 354 combined yards and two touchdowns while leading USC to back-to-back victories. Later classes feature figures like (2001), recognized for Michigan's four appearances under his tenure from 1969 to 1987, yielding a 2-2 record and emphasizing disciplined, run-heavy offenses that averaged over 200 rushing yards per game. Recent honorees, such as the 2025 class including ( with 39 points scored in the 2013 game) and ( coach for the 2004 team), underscore the hall's focus on quantifiable impacts like Ball's record-setting touchdown output. Complementing the hall, the Rose Bowl Game All-Century Class was unveiled in 2013 to commemorate the 100th edition in 2014, selecting one player and one coach per decade based on statistical dominance and game-altering plays. (Ohio State) was named the overall All-Century Player for his 1974 and 1976 efforts, including 162 rushing yards in the 1974 win, while John McKay (USC) earned All-Century Coach honors for six victories from 1963 to 1975, during which his teams outscored opponents 208-88. Other decade representatives, such as for the 1950s (four wins, 1950-1975 span) and as a 1960s nominee, highlight selections grounded in metrics like win percentages and yardage totals rather than post-career fame. These honors reinforce the game's emphasis on empirical excellence, with many recipients later succeeding in the , including multiple alumni drafted in 2025 such as those from recent Ohio State and rosters.

Cultural Significance and Impact

Influence on College Football and National Traditions

The Rose Bowl Game, initiated in 1902 as the Tournament East-West football game, established the foundational model for 's postseason bowl system by demonstrating the appeal of a high-profile, holiday-associated matchup between regional conference champions. Its early success, with annual play resuming in 1916, directly influenced the emergence of other major bowls, including the in 1933 and the in 1935, which adopted similar festive formats, naming conventions, and conference tie-in structures to capitalize on proven fan interest and revenue potential. This proliferation expanded postseason opportunities beyond league championships, shifting toward a decentralized, multi-game framework that prioritized matchups over a singular national title game until the era. By pioneering exclusive conference affiliations—such as the longstanding Big Ten–Pac-12 tie-in starting in 1946—the Rose Bowl introduced revenue-sharing mechanisms through gate receipts and media deals, setting precedents for economic incentives that encouraged the growth of over 40 games by the . These developments causally elevated participation as a key motivator in regular-season play, fostering competitive depth while embedding rituals like pre-game parades and fan festivities into national sports culture. The game's national television exposure, beginning with coast-to-coast broadcasts in , transformed it into a staple, routinely achieving top viewership ratings among holiday programming and reinforcing communal viewing traditions across generations. For instance, the drew 27.2 million viewers, underscoring its dominance in postseason audiences. However, scholars critique such traditions for sustaining the NCAA's amateurism paradigm, wherein unpaid "student-athletes" generate commercial spectacles that primarily serve as scouting showcases, perpetuating a of non-professional status amid escalating institutional revenues. This tension highlights how the Rose Bowl's ritualistic prominence has historically masked the sport's quasi-professional dynamics.

Economic and Community Effects in Pasadena

The Rose Bowl Game, in conjunction with the Tournament of Roses Parade, delivers substantial economic benefits to Pasadena through heightened and visitor expenditures. In , these events collectively generated an estimated $245 million in economic impact for the area, with the game alone contributing $119 million via direct spending on lodging, dining, and transportation by approximately 100,000 out-of-town visitors. Over 90% of this spending originated from non-local sources, bolstering hotel occupancy rates that often exceed 95% during the period and supporting sectors like retail and . The combined events also sustained the equivalent of 2,166 full-time jobs through induced labor demand in event operations, vendor services, and ancillary activities. The Rose Bowl Stadium's role as a multi-purpose venue extends these benefits beyond the January events, hosting UCLA Bruins football games and concerts that maintain year-round revenue streams for facility management and groundskeeping. This usage supports ongoing employment for stadium staff, including event coordinators and maintenance crews, with operational budgets funded partly by non-event sources like golf course fees and parking concessions. Post-COVID recovery has been robust, as 2024 visitor spending rebounded to levels that generated $35.7 million in tax revenues, aiding Pasadena's municipal budget amid prior pandemic-related shortfalls estimated at tens of millions in lost event income. Community integration occurs through the parade's route along Colorado Boulevard, fostering local participation in floats and viewing traditions, though it entails managed disruptions like street closures from 10 p.m. on December 31 to 2 p.m. on 1. Traffic control firms implement detours, no- zones enforced from noon the prior day, and crowd barriers to handle peak volumes of spectators and vehicles, minimizing broader via coordination with Pasadena authorities. Residents face temporary inconveniences such as restricted access and scarcity, yet these are counterbalanced by the influx of tax dollars—primarily sales and hotel levies—that fund improvements and enhancements.

Controversies and Criticisms

Selection Disputes and BCS-Era Conflicts

In 1961, following an undefeated regular season with two ties, Ohio State University, as Big Ten champion, received an invitation to the 1962 Rose Bowl but declined due to a faculty council vote prioritizing academics over postseason athletics. The council approved the rejection by a narrow 28-25 margin on November 28, 1961, reflecting concerns that participation would harm the university's scholarly reputation amid perceptions of overemphasis on football. This decision, which led to widespread student protests including a march of approximately 2,000 to the Ohio Statehouse, resulted in Minnesota accepting the Big Ten slot against UCLA, highlighting tensions between institutional priorities and athletic opportunities. The BCS era, spanning 1998 to 2013, introduced computerized rankings alongside human polls to determine bowl selections, including Rose Bowl at-large berths when conference champions advanced to the national title game, but this formula sparked disputes over its opacity and perceived biases. Proponents argued computers minimized subjective human elements in polls, such as favoritism toward marquee programs, by aggregating metrics like margin of victory and from multiple models. Critics, however, contended the systems amplified flaws, including inconsistent weighting of data that disadvantaged non-elite conferences or teams with blowout wins, leading to claims of algorithmic rigidity overriding on-field evidence reflected in polls. A prominent example occurred after the 2004 regular season, when California (10-1) ranked fourth in both major human polls but fell to fifth in final BCS standings, primarily due to computer models elevating Texas (11-0) into the Rose Bowl slot against Michigan on January 1, 2005. Cal's exclusion stemmed from the BCS formula's six computer components, which penalized the Bears' schedule strength and win margins relative to Texas, despite human voters favoring Cal; this prompted accusations that computers unduly favored Big 12 metrics and ignored poll consensus. Cal subsequently lost 45-31 to Texas Tech in the Holiday Bowl, fueling debates on whether the snub reflected efficient data-driven selection or a failure to capture qualitative factors like head-to-head relevance and voter expertise. Pre-BCS conflicts occasionally echoed these tensions, as in the 1979 Rose Bowl between USC and , where a disputed second-quarter call on USC's Charles White—ruled valid despite apparent failure to break the plane, confirmed by later replay analyses and polls favoring the on-field decision—intensified scrutiny of human judgment in high-stakes games. coach initially decried the officiating but later acknowledged the empirical evidence from reviews supported USC's 17-10 victory, illustrating how post-selection execution disputes paralleled broader selection reliability concerns later amplified by BCS mechanics.

Racial and Social Context in Historical Games

The Rose Bowl's early games featured limited but pioneering Black participation, with Fritz Pollard becoming the first African American to play in 1916 as a halfback for Brown University against Washington State. In 1922, Charles Fremont West quarterbacked Washington & Jefferson, marking the first instance of a Black player at that position in the game. These instances reflected sporadic inclusion from non-Southern institutions amid broader societal segregation, but Black athletes remained rare in subsequent decades due to informal "gentleman's agreements" and conference norms that prioritized white rosters, resulting in predominantly all-white teams from the 1920s through the 1940s. The , relocated to , following the attack, exemplified Jim Crow-era exclusion, with neither Oregon State nor fielding Black players and Black attendance restricted to minimal numbers under Southern segregation laws. This game's demographics aligned with national patterns where Northern and Western teams occasionally integrated while Southern programs enforced strict racial barriers, but overall participation in the Rose Bowl mirrored college football's delayed desegregation, influenced by institutional policies rather than event-specific animus. With the 1947 Big Nine-Pacific Coast Conference agreement, integration resumed modestly; Illinois' Claude "Buddy" Young, the program's first prominent football star, scored two touchdowns in a 45-14 over UCLA, alongside other players like Ike Owens on Illinois and Bob Mike on UCLA. Numbers grew in the 1950s as conferences relaxed barriers: Michigan State fielded running backs in the 1954 game against UCLA, and the 1956 matchup set a then-record with 13 players combined (seven for Michigan State, six for UCLA). Post-1960s, rosters diversified rapidly alongside civil rights advancements, with athletes comprising majorities on many participant teams by the , reflecting causal shifts in recruitment and federal desegregation pressures rather than isolated Rose Bowl reforms.

Modern Broadcast and Commercialization Issues

In the January 1, 2025, Rose Bowl Game, designated as a quarterfinal between Notre Dame and , opted not to delay kickoff despite double overtime extending the prior matchup between and Arizona State, which concluded just before the scheduled start. This scheduling rigidity caused some television audiences to miss the traditional military flyover, prompting fan backlash accusing the network of prioritizing rigid programming over iconic pre-game rituals central to the event's heritage. Sponsor-driven has reshaped bowl operations, exemplified by Prudential Financial's multi-year presenting sponsorship agreement with , extending through the 2025-26 season and valued in the multimillions to offset rising production and operational costs. While such deals generate essential revenue—replacing prior sponsors like , whose contract ended in 2019 amid broader corporate reevaluations of spend—they have fueled critiques that increased integration and naming conventions dilute the game's foundational emphasis on regional rivalries and purity. Proponents counter that sponsorships sustain financial viability in an era of escalating expenses, without evidence of direct viewership erosion, as the 2025 game drew 21.1 million average viewers, peaking at 24.3 million. The integration of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation and the transfer portal has further strained roster continuity for Rose Bowl-contending teams, enabling high-profile players to depart or sit out postseason games for professional pursuits or better deals, as seen in broader trends where portals open immediately after regular seasons. This mechanism, introduced via NCAA interim policies in 2021 and expanded thereafter, disrupts team chemistry and long-term development, with analyses indicating it favors short-term individual gains over collective stability, potentially diminishing the event's narrative appeal rooted in program loyalty. Advocates for NIL and portals emphasize their role in aligning athlete compensation with market realities and player mobility rights, arguing these reforms address prior exploitation without inherently undermining bowl prestige, though empirical data links them to increased opt-outs in non-championship games.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.