Hubbry Logo
RupelianRupelianMain
Open search
Rupelian
Community hub
Rupelian
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rupelian
Rupelian
Rupelian
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Rupelian
33.9 – 27.30 Ma
Chronology
−70 —
–
−65 —
–
−60 —
–
−55 —
–
−50 —
–
−45 —
–
−40 —
–
−35 —
–
−30 —
–
−25 —
–
−20 —
MZ
 
←
←
First Antarctic permanent ice-sheets[1]
←
Subdivision of the Paleogene according to the ICS, as of 2024.[2]
Vertical axis scale: Millions of years ago
Formerly part ofTertiary Period/System
Etymology
Name formalityFormal
Usage information
Celestial bodyEarth
Regional usageGlobal (ICS)
Time scale(s) usedICS Time Scale
Definition
Chronological unitAge
Stratigraphic unitStage
Time span formalityFormal
Lower boundary definitionLAD of Planktonic Foraminiferans Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina
Lower boundary GSSPMassignano quarry section, Massignano, Ancona, Italy
43°31′58″N 13°36′04″E / 43.5328°N 13.6011°E / 43.5328; 13.6011
Lower GSSP ratified1992[3]
Upper boundary definitionLAD of the Planktonic Foraminifer Chiloguembelina (Base of Foram Zone P21b)
Upper boundary GSSPMonte Cagnero, Central Apennines, Italy
43°38′48″N 13°28′04″E / 43.6466°N 13.4677°E / 43.6466; 13.4677
Upper GSSP ratifiedSeptember 2016[4]

The Rupelian, in the geologic timescale, the older of two ages or the lower of two stages of the Oligocene Epoch/Series. It spans the time between 33.9 and 27.3 Ma. It is preceded by the Priabonian Stage (part of the Eocene) and is followed by the Chattian Stage. The Rupelian is also known, informally, as the early Oligocene and lower Oligocene.

Name

[edit]

The stage is named after the small river Rupel in Belgium, a tributary to the Scheldt. The Belgian Rupel Group derives its name from the same source. The name Rupelian was introduced in scientific literature by Belgian geologist André Hubert Dumont in 1850. The separation between the group and the stage was made in the second half of the 20th century, when stratigraphers saw the need to distinguish between lithostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic names.

Stratigraphic definition

[edit]

The base of the Rupelian Stage (which is also the base of the Oligocene Series) is at the extinction of the foraminiferan genus Hantkenina. An official GSSP for the base of the Rupelian has been assigned in 1992 (Massignano, Italy). The transition with the Chattian has also been marked with a GSSP in August 2017 (Monte Conero, Italy).[5]

The top of the Rupelian Stage (the base of the Chattian) is at the extinction of the foram genus Chiloguembelina (which is also the base of foram biozone P21b).

The Rupelian overlaps the Orellan, Whitneyan and lower Arikareean North American Land Mammal Ages, the upper Mustersan and Tinguirirican South American Land Mammal Ages, the uppermost Headonian, Suevian and lower Arvernian European Land Mammal Mega Zones (the Rupelian spans the Mammal Paleogene zones 21 through 24 and part of 25[6]), and the lower Hsandgolian Asian Land Mammal Age. It is also coeval with the only regionally used upper Aldingan and lower Janjukian stages of Australia, the upper Refugian and lower Zemorrian stages of California and the lower Kiscellian Paratethys stage of Central and eastern Europe. Other regionally used alternatives include the Stampian, Tongrian, Latdorfian and Vicksburgian.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rupelian

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Rupelian is the lowermost stage of the epoch within the period of the era, representing a key interval of early time from 33.9 to 27.3 million years ago. Named after the Rupel River (formerly Rupen) in , where significant reference deposits occur, it marks the transition from the late Eocene stage below to the upper stage above, with its base defined by the global stratotype section and point (GSSP) at the Massignano quarry section near , . This stage is characterized by prominent marine clay deposits, such as the Boom Clay Formation in the Basin of and adjacent regions, which exhibit rhythmic bedding tied to 41,000-year obliquity cycles and contain septarian concretions. Paleoenvironmentally, the Rupelian records a trend, including the Oi-1 glaciation event that initiated widespread icehouse conditions and the expansion of the , alongside a major biotic turnover known as the Grande Coupure, which affected terrestrial mammal faunas across . Biostratigraphically, its base coincides with the extinction of the planktonic genera Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina within nannofossil zone NP21, while the top is defined by the extinction of Chiloguembelina at the base of zone P21b; fossil assemblages include calcareous nannoplankton (zones NP23–NP24), benthic and planktonic (zones O1–O4), and dinoflagellate cysts, reflecting hemipelagic to outer shelf settings with euphotic marine conditions dominant in many areas. Regionally, Rupelian sediments vary from continuous clays in to turbidites and marls in southern European basins like the Betic Cordillera, underscoring its role in documenting post-Eocene sea-level changes and tectonic adjustments.

Introduction

Definition and Time Span

The Rupelian represents the lower stage of the series and epoch within the period and system of the era. It constitutes the initial subdivision of the Oligocene, marking the onset of this epoch following the Eocene. This stage spans approximately 33.9 to 27.3 million years ago (Ma). It is preceded by the stage of the late Eocene epoch and succeeded by the stage of the upper Oligocene. The numerical age boundaries for the Rupelian are established through a combination of radioisotopic methods, such as ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar analyses on layers, and orbital tuning of cyclic sediments from deep-sea cores, which calibrate the timescale against astronomical parameters. These techniques provide high-resolution constraints on the stage's duration and placement within the broader framework. The Rupelian temporally overlaps with geomagnetic polarity chrons C13r through C11n, as identified in magnetostratigraphic records from key sections and ocean drilling sites, aiding in global correlations.

Geological Significance

The Rupelian stage represents a pivotal interval in Earth's geological history, marking the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT) around 33.9–33.7 million years ago, when the planet shifted from a largely ice-free to an icehouse state characterized by the onset of permanent glaciation. This transition initiated the first major ice sheets, primarily the (EAIS), which expanded rapidly and set the stage for long-term . The base of the Rupelian correlates directly with the Oi-1 glaciation event, an abrupt oxygen excursion (approximately 1.0–1.5‰ in benthic ) that reflects a step-wise increase in global ice volume and deep-ocean cooling of about 3–4°C. This event, lasting roughly 400,000 years, underscores the Rupelian's role as a threshold for bipolar glaciation dynamics that persisted through the . The Oi-1 glaciation profoundly influenced global sea levels, with estimates indicating a eustatic fall of up to 70 meters due to the accumulation of ice on , equivalent to about 70% of the modern volume. This drop led to widespread shallowing and exposure of continental shelves, reducing the area of shallow marine habitats and triggering regressive sequences in sedimentary records worldwide, such as unconformities in neritic deposits. Concurrently, paleogeographic changes during the Rupelian facilitated the reconfiguration of ocean currents, particularly through the widening of gateways like the Tasman Gateway (around 33.5 ± 1.5 Ma), which enabled the establishment of the (ACC). This thermal isolation of amplified cooling and altered global , enhancing meridional heat transport and contributing to the stabilization of the icehouse regime. On land, the Rupelian's climatic shifts had far-reaching implications for biotic evolution, notably driving the "Grande Coupure"—a major faunal turnover in Eurasian mammals around 33.9–33.4 Ma, involving the extinction of archaic perissodactyls and the proliferation of modern lineages like and . In , this period overlaps with the Duchesnean and early Orellan Land Mammal Ages, where cooling and aridification spurred diversification and migration patterns that laid the foundation for contemporary ecosystems. These changes, intertwined with marine perturbations, marked the Rupelian as a critical juncture for the emergence of biomes resilient to cooler, more seasonal conditions, influencing the trajectory of biodiversity.

Nomenclature

Etymology

The Rupelian stage derives its name from the Rupel River in northwestern , a tributary of the , where the characteristic clay sediments of the Rupel Formation were first extensively studied and described. The term "Rupelian" was introduced by Belgian geologist André Hubert Dumont in 1850, within the legend of 's first geological map, as part of his stratigraphic classification of the ; he designated it as the "Système Rupélien" to describe the sequence of marine and continental deposits observed in the region's outcrops. The name itself is a Latinized form of "Rupel," the river's designation, which linguistic analysis reconstructs as *rūpīna and traces to the Indo-European *reub- meaning "to break, tear, or ," likely alluding to a rocky gorge or incised valley formed by the waterway. Initially applied to a regional lithostratigraphic unit in , the Rupelian designation evolved into an internationally recognized chronostratigraphic stage by the late through correlations across European basins.

Historical Development

The Rupelian stage was first recognized in the early by Belgian geologist André Hubert Dumont, who introduced the term in 1850 to describe a series of marine clay deposits outcropping along the Rupel River in the Basin of northern . These strata were initially identified as part of the regional succession, correlating with the lower portion of the , which in contemporary French terminology was encompassed by the Stampian stage. Dumont's work established the Rupelian as a lithostratigraphic unit in the Belgian type sections, laying the foundation for its use in northwestern European . During the , the Rupelian underwent significant refinements through correlations across European basins, integrating marine microfossil with emerging magnetostratigraphic data. By the , efforts to incorporate the stage into the international geologic timescale advanced, particularly through syntheses that aligned regional European stages with global marine biozonations. Key contributions came from paleontologists such as Hans de Bruijn, whose studies on small mammal faunas provided critical biostratigraphic markers for correlating Rupelian-equivalent deposits in . These works facilitated the Rupelian's transition from a regional Belgian unit to a widely accepted component of the framework. The formal international status of the Rupelian was achieved through ratifications by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). The base of the stage, defining the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, was ratified in 1992 at the Massignano section in Italy, using the extinction of the planktonic foraminifera genera Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina as the primary marker. The top of the Rupelian, corresponding to the base of the Chattian stage, was ratified in 2016 at the Monte Cagnero section in Italy, marked by the highest common occurrence of the foraminifer Chiloguembelina cubensis. These milestones solidified the Rupelian's role in the global chronostratigraphic scale.

Stratigraphy

Global Stratotype Section and Point

The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Rupelian Stage, which also marks the base of the Series, is located at the Massignano Section, an abandoned quarry approximately 10 km southeast of on the Adriatic coast of , in the Monte Conero area. This site is situated within the Scaglia Variegata and Scaglia Cinera Formations, consisting primarily of reddish and greenish-gray marls and calcareous marls that record fully marine, open-ocean pelagic sedimentation without significant hiatuses. The section spans a 23-meter-thick interval from the late Eocene to the early , providing a continuous stratigraphic record ideal for defining the stage boundary. The GSSP is precisely defined at the base of a 0.5-meter-thick greenish-gray marl bed, located 19 meters above the base of the exposed section, corresponding to the last occurrence (extinction) of the planktonic foraminiferal genera Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina. This biostratigraphic marker ensures precise global correlation, supported by associated calcareous nannofossil zones NP21 (late Eocene) below and CP16a (early Oligocene) above, as well as abundant radiolarians throughout the sequence. The site's paleomagnetic record aligns with magnetic polarity Chron C13r, further aiding chronostratigraphic placement. The Massignano GSSP was formally proposed in 1988 following detailed multidisciplinary studies and ratified in 1992 by the (ICS) of the (IUGS), establishing it as the international reference for the Eocene-Oligocene transition. This ratification emphasized the section's exceptional preservation of biotic and environmental signals, including ash layers from volcanic events that provide additional geochronological anchors via . For global correlation, auxiliary sections such as those in (e.g., deep-sea cores revealing similar foraminiferal extinctions) and (e.g., Bath Cliff section with comparable pelagic deposits) have been instrumental in verifying the boundary across diverse paleogeographic settings.

Boundaries and Biozonation

The lower boundary of the Rupelian stage marks the Eocene–Oligocene transition and is defined by the extinction (last occurrence) of the foraminiferal genus Hantkenina, a biohorizon recognized in marine sections worldwide. This event, dated to approximately 33.9 Ma, coincides with significant and the onset of Antarctic glaciation. The boundary is further supported by calcareous nannofossil markers within Zone NP21. The Global Stratotype Section and Point for this boundary is at Massignano, . The upper boundary of the Rupelian, defining the transition to the stage, is delineated by the highest common occurrence (HCO) of the planktonic foraminifer Chiloguembelina cubensis, dated to 27.3 Ma (GTS2020). This bioevent reflects changes in oceanic conditions during the early . The Global Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the (thus the top of the Rupelian) is established at Monte Cagnero, , where the marker occurs at approximately 197 m in the . Biozonation of the Rupelian relies on integrated schemes for precise , such as the Martini (1971) scheme for calcareous nannofossils and Wade et al. (2011) for planktonic . nannofossil zones NP21–NP24 characterize the stage, initiated by the last occurrence of Discoaster saipanensis (base NP21) and extending to the last occurrence of Sphenolithus predistentus (top NP24). Planktonic foraminiferal zones O1–O4 (or P21 in older schemes) span the Rupelian, with the base marked by the first appearance of Pseudohastigerina spp. and the top near the last common occurrence of Chiloguembelina cubensis. Radiolarian biozonation includes zones such as RP9 to RP11 in low-latitude schemes, providing additional resolution in siliceous sequences. Stratigraphic correlation of the Rupelian integrates these biozones with geomagnetic polarity chrons, placing the base within Chron C13r and the top within Chron C9n. This framework aligns the stage with the interval from 33.9 to 27.3 Ma on the Geologic Time Scale (GTS2020).

Regional Subdivisions and Correlations

In Europe, the Rupelian stage is regionally subdivided and correlated with several local stages reflecting variations in marine and continental deposits across the continent. In France, it corresponds to the lower part of the Stampian stage, characterized by marine sands, clays, and limestones in the Paris Basin, with key lithostratigraphic units like the Calcaire de Brie and Sables de l'Essonne. In Belgium and the Netherlands, the Rupelian aligns with the Tongrian stage, represented by the Boom Clay Formation, a thick sequence of plastic clays deposited in a shallow marine environment along the Rupel and Scheldt rivers. In Germany, it equates to the Lattorfian stage, featuring glauconitic sands and marls in the Lattorf section near Hamburg, which serve as a reference for northern European correlations. These subdivisions are linked through shared foraminiferal and molluscan assemblages, allowing precise chronostratigraphic matching across the North Sea Basin. In , the Rupelian correlates primarily with the Orellan Land Mammal Age and the lower part of the Whitneyan, spanning continental deposits rather than continuous marine sequences. This interval is well-represented in the White River Formation of the , particularly in and , where fluviatile and lacustrine sediments yield abundant vertebrate fossils and volcanic tuffs suitable for . The Duchesnean Land Mammal Age overlaps the earliest Rupelian in western basins like the of , with riverine sandstones and mudstones indicating a transition from Eocene warmth to aridity. Correlations rely on and ash layers, tying these units to the global Rupelian through shared polarity chrons like C12r to C11n. In , the Rupelian overlaps with the lower Arikareean Land Mammal Age equivalents in northern regions, such as the Hsanda Gol Formation in , where eolian sands and conglomerates reflect arid environments. These continental sequences are correlated via mammalian and limited marine intercalations with Tethyan . In , the Rupelian corresponds to the upper Aldingan and lower Janjukian stages, particularly in southeastern basins like the Otway and , featuring marine limestones and siliciclastics such as the Jan Juc Formation near . The base of the Janjukian is dated to approximately 28.7 Ma via and Sr-isotope , aligning with the mid-Rupelian and enabling ties to global sea-level curves through shared nannofossil markers. Correlations in utilize the historical Patagonian stages, with the early Patagonian (or "Patagoniano") encompassing Rupelian-equivalent marine and deltaic deposits , such as the lower Chenque Formation in the San Jorge Basin, characterized by sandstones and shales with . These units are linked to the global stage via planktonic zones like E15 to O2. In , Tanzanian sections provide key marine correlations through similar assemblages, notably in the Lindi District where Rupelian limestones and marls in the TDP sites contain larger benthic such as Nummulites and Operculina, mirroring Tethyan patterns. These assemblages, including porcellaneous and imperforate forms, facilitate biostratigraphic matching across the margin, with the Eocene-Oligocene transition marked by diversity declines in nummulitids.

Paleoenvironment

Paleogeography

During the Rupelian stage of the early (33.9–27.3 Ma), global paleogeography was characterized by ongoing and tectonic reconfiguration following the breakup of and the progressive closure of the , which influenced marine depositional environments across multiple basins. The positions of major continents reflected a transition toward more modern configurations, with significant rifting in the and convergence in the Tethyan realm shaping shallow marine shelves, epicontinental seas, and foreland basins. India achieved full continent-continent collision with around the Eocene-Oligocene boundary (~34 Ma), though the timing is debated with some evidence suggesting initial contact as early as ~50 Ma, marking the onset of the Himalayan orogeny's uplift phase and the development of associated foreland basins in the Indo-Gangetic region. Concurrently, the final separation of from progressed, with the southwestern South Tasman Rise detaching around 33.5 Ma, widening the Tasman Gateway and facilitating deeper water exchange in the emerging . In the Atlantic, at the continued to widen the ocean basin at rates of approximately 2–3 cm/year, expanding both the North and South Atlantic while connecting them more fully to global circulation patterns. The Tethys Sea underwent marked narrowing due to northward drift of the African and Arabian plates, resulting in restrictions within the proto-Mediterranean seaways and the isolation of the as a semi-enclosed basin during the early Rupelian. This convergence also isolated the Antarctic continent further, with the opening of the (~34–30 Ma) and Tasman Gateway enabling the initial development of a proto-circum-Antarctic current, though a fully coherent flow was impeded by the proximal position of . In , the Cordilleran remained active, driven by flat-slab of the Farallon plate, leading to uplift and erosion in the Eastern Cordillera of during the Rupelian to early . Meanwhile, convergence between the European and African plates intensified, accommodating ~2–4 cm/year of relative motion and fueling the Alpine 's compression in the Western Mediterranean region. These configurations briefly influenced emerging ocean circulation patterns, particularly in the .

Climate and Oceanography

The Rupelian stage, spanning approximately 33.9 to 27.3 million years ago, was characterized by continued following the Eocene thermal maximum, marking a significant phase in the transition to an icehouse . Deep-sea temperatures dropped by about 4–5°C across the Eocene-Oligocene transition into the early Rupelian, as evidenced by oxygen isotope records from benthic in deep Pacific sites, reflecting the establishment of cooler oceanic conditions. Surface waters experienced a milder decline of 2–3°C on average, with greater variability by —high-latitude surface temperatures decreased by around 5°C, while low-latitude sites showed smaller shifts of approximately 2°C—based on proxy data from multiple ocean basins including the and equatorial Pacific. A key feature of Rupelian climate was the onset of permanent Antarctic ice sheets during the Oi-1 glaciation event near the stage's beginning around 33.7 Ma, driven by a decline in atmospheric CO₂ concentrations below approximately 600 ppm, which crossed a critical threshold for ice sheet stability. This event involved a step-like expansion of continental , inferred from paired benthic δ¹⁸O and Mg/Ca records that separate ice volume growth from ocean cooling, leading to a global sea-level fall of up to 50–70 meters. The CO₂ drawdown, estimated at a 40% reduction from late Eocene levels, was likely influenced by enhanced and changes in circulation, solidifying the Antarctic as a persistent throughout the Rupelian. Oceanographic shifts during the Rupelian included the development of psychrospheric conditions, defined by stable deep-water temperatures below 10°C, which emerged at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary and persisted through the stage as cold, oxygen-rich waters formed at high southern latitudes. This transition replaced warmer, Tethyan-influenced deep waters with a bipolar circulation pattern, as recorded by assemblages in Tethyan sections showing a faunal turnover to cold-adapted species at bathyal depths. Concurrently, enhanced in the , facilitated by the nascent , promoted nutrient-rich water ascent and increased primary productivity, evidenced by siliceous blooms and carbon excursions in cores from the region. In mid-latitudes, the Rupelian saw the onset of regional aridity, particularly in , as intensified continentality and reduced moisture transport, leading to the formation of deposits in restricted basins of the proto- and Central Asian interiors. and layers in the Carpathian and Tajik regions, dated to the late , indicate hypersaline conditions in isolated marine embayments, reflecting decreased and higher rates under a cooling . These deposits, up to several meters thick in sequences like those of the Eastern , highlight a shift toward drier continental interiors across and , contrasting with more humid Eocene conditions.

Paleobiology

Marine Biota

During the Rupelian stage, marine biota underwent significant transformations, particularly in planktonic assemblages, reflecting a shift from warm-water to cooler-water species amid . The extinction of the warm-water genera Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina (family Hantkeninidae) occurred precisely at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, marking the base of the Rupelian and signifying a major turnover in tropical-subtropical planktonic . This event, driven by cooling and changes in water mass , led to the dominance of deeper-dwelling, cooler-water species such as Globigerina spp., which became prevalent in Rupelian assemblages and persisted into the . Calcareous nannoplankton experienced notable diversification during the Rupelian, with assemblages assigned to biozones NP23-NP24, characterized by increased abundance and variety in response to evolving oceanographic conditions. The genera Reticulofenestra and Sphenolithus were particularly dominant, comprising significant portions of the nannofossil flora. These taxa, including Sphenolithus praedistentus in NP23, contributed to enhanced biostratigraphic resolution and indicated a recovery in primary productivity following Eocene boundary extinctions. Benthic communities in deeper marine settings shifted toward infaunal deposit feeders, adapting to increased organic and reduced oxygenation associated with cooling-driven changes. In deep-water agglutinated foraminiferal assemblages, infaunal morphogroups became dominant by the upper Rupelian, with taxa like Nothia reappearing and epifaunal deposit feeders declining, signaling a transition to more opportunistic, phytodetritus-exploiting lifestyles. This turnover paralleled blooms of species such as Epistominella exigua in benthic , reflecting eutrophic conditions in the aftermath of boundary events. Concurrently, early modern faunas of bryozoans and echinoids appeared in shallow to mid-depth marine environments, with bryozoans forming diverse colonies and echinoids contributing to carbonate-rich deposits, indicative of stabilizing shelf ecosystems. Among higher marine vertebrates, archaic odontocete groups persisted alongside emerging modern lineages, as evidenced by fossils from the upper Rupelian Ashley Formation. Primitive forms akin to squalodont whales coexisted with derived early odontocetes such as Ashleycetus planicapitis, Xenorophus sloanii, and the advanced Ediscetus osbornei, which exhibited telescoped skulls and double-rooted teeth foreshadowing later platanistoid adaptations. These assemblages highlight an of toothed whales in coastal neritic habitats during the stage.

Terrestrial Biota

During the Rupelian, terrestrial mammalian faunas in and underwent significant radiations following the Eocene-Oligocene transition, characterized by the diversification of such as the Eomyidae family, which appeared as small, burrowing forms adapted to forested environments. saw the emergence of early Gelocidae, primitive ruminants like Gelocus that filled browsing niches in woodland settings across . Perissodactyls, including early rhinocerotoids and equids, diversified in both regions, with forms like Mesohippus in exploiting open woodland habitats. In European continental sequences corresponding to mammalian zones MP21 through MP25, adapiform such as Adapis and Leptadapis remained prominent, representing the last major radiation of these arboreal, folivorous strepsirrhine-like forms before their decline. Early carnivorans, including nimravids like Eofelis and amphicyonids such as Cynodictis, began to diversify, occupying predatory roles in the evolving ecosystems of western and during this interval. Plant communities shifted toward temperate forests dominated by (oaks and beeches) and (pines and firs), reflecting cooler, more seasonal climates that favored and coniferous mixed woodlands across mid-latitudes in and . In higher latitudes, preliminary evidence of open grasslands emerged, linked to the initial spread of pooid grasses and increased aridity, though forests still prevailed overall. Insect and reptile faunas thrived in the stable mesic environments of these forested landscapes, with diverse herpetofauna including turtles (e.g., ), lizards (), and snakes (e.g., boines like Bavarioboa) indicating humid, vegetated habitats supportive of ectothermic diversity across . These biotic patterns were influenced by progressive , which began to fragment mesic habitats by the late Rupelian.

Notable Fossil Assemblages

The Massignano section in , designated as the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Rupelian, exposes a continuous succession of pelagic carbonates that preserve a rich assemblage of microfossils crucial for calibrating the Eocene- boundary and early biostratigraphy. This ~23-meter-thick sequence yields abundant planktonic , such as the extinction horizon of the Hantkeninidae family at the boundary level, alongside calcareous nannofossils and dinoflagellate cysts that document trophic shifts and paleoceanographic changes during the initial Rupelian cooling. These microfossil assemblages provide high-resolution insights into marine productivity and extinction patterns at the onset of the , with remnants of geochemical anomalies from the boundary event preserved in the lowermost Rupelian strata. In , the Boom Clay Formation of the Rupel Group represents the unit stratotype for the Rupelian and contains diverse marine assemblages from a shallow neritic environment in the southern [North Sea](/page/North Sea) Basin. This thick clay unit yields well-preserved remains, including otoliths and teeth from taxa like Scyliorhinidae, alongside scattered avian and mammalian elements such as bird bones and cetacean vertebrae that illuminate early coastal ecosystems in . The pyritized and banded nature of the deposits has facilitated the recovery of these vertebrates, offering key evidence for the diversification of marine fauna following the Eocene- transition. The White River Group in the United States, particularly its Brule Formation, features extensive badlands in and surrounding states that expose Rupelian-aged terrestrial assemblages dominated by fossils from fluvial and lacustrine settings. These quarries have produced abundant remains of oreodonts like and early equids, alongside rhinocerotoids such as Hyracodon, contributing significantly to understanding North American faunal turnover and grassland expansion during the early . The site's prolific quarries preserve a snapshot of post-boundary mammalian radiation, with over 100 documented across multiple localities. Other notable Rupelian sites include the Latdorf Sands in , part of the Lattorfian regional stage, which yield marine deposits with early cetacean remains such as whale vertebrae and teeth, highlighting the initial diversification of archaeocetes in the Paratethys-North Sea region. In , the Fayum Depression's Jebel Qatrani Formation contains late Rupelian horizons with early anthropoid primate fossils, including propliopithecids, that document Afro-Arabian mammalian evolution amid cooling climates.

Major Events and Transitions

Eocene-Oligocene Boundary Events

The Eocene-Oligocene boundary, marking the base of the Rupelian stage at approximately 33.9 Ma, represents a pivotal transition characterized by profound climatic and biotic disruptions. This period witnessed stepwise , culminating in the establishment of a semi-permanent , driven by declining atmospheric CO₂ levels and changes in ocean circulation, such as the opening of the Tasman Gateway and the development of the . The Oi-1 glaciation event, centered around 33.7 Ma, exemplifies this cooling trend, with benthic foraminiferal δ¹⁸O records showing a ~1.5‰ positive shift indicative of both decrease (~2–3°C in deep waters) and ice volume expansion. This isotopic excursion correlates with a eustatic sea-level fall of 40–50 m, as evidenced by sequence stratigraphic analyses of records, reflecting the rapid growth of the and a shift toward an icehouse state. Preceding the boundary by about 1.4 million years, the (dated to 35.3 ± 0.3 Ma) has been proposed as a contributing factor to late Eocene environmental stress. This ~85 km diameter structure, formed by a impact in shallow coastal waters off , ejected significant tektites and disrupted local ecosystems, potentially exacerbating through dust-induced solar dimming or sulfate effects, though its direct role in triggering the full boundary transition remains debated. The impact's timing aligns with initial cooling steps (e.g., EOT-1 at ~34 Ma), but the primary drivers appear to be tectonic and feedbacks rather than extraterrestrial forcing alone. Biotic responses to these changes were severe, particularly in marine realms. Deep-sea benthic foraminiferal assemblages underwent a gradual faunal turnover and diversity decline, with low rates attributed to expanded oxygen minimum zones, reduced bottom-water oxygenation, and contraction from sea-level lowering. Coincidentally, larger symbiont-bearing benthic , such as those in nummulitid and alveolinid groups dominant in tropical shallow-water carbonates, underwent significant turnover, with many Eocene genera disappearing near the boundary due to cooling-induced stress on photosymbiotic relationships and reduced shallow-marine habitats. A notable carbon cycle perturbation accompanied these events, featuring a transient negative δ¹³C shift of ~0.5–1.0‰ immediately preceding the main δ¹⁸O increase, recorded in both marine and terrestrial proxies. This , observed in bulk carbonate and , may reflect release from destabilized hydrates on continental shelves amid falling levels or changes in productivity and carbon export, though the exact magnitude and synchronicity vary by site. Overall, these boundary events underscore a threshold crossing in Earth's , with cascading effects on and that defined the early .

Mid-Rupelian Developments

The mid-Rupelian stage, approximately 31 to 29 million years ago, witnessed significant climatic fluctuations within the broader cooling trend of the early , most notably the Oi-2 oxygen event, which represents a transient expansion of ice volume. This event, characterized by a positive shift in benthic foraminiferal δ¹⁸O values of about 0.5 to 1.0‰, indicates a of roughly 2–4°C and a corresponding sea-level fall of up to 50 meters. The Oi-2 event is dated to around 30.0 Ma, based on magnetostratigraphic correlations to chron C12r, and is interpreted as a response to declining atmospheric CO₂ levels and , particularly eccentricity minima that enhanced ice accumulation on . Evidence for the Oi-2 cooling derives primarily from deep-sea sediment cores, such as those from Ocean Drilling Program Site 1218 in the equatorial Pacific, where paired δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C records reveal synchronous increases in ice volume and . This led to reduced deep-water ventilation and enhanced in marine sediments, further amplifying the cooling. On land, pollen and leaf assemblages from northwest Europe show a shift toward more seasonal temperate forests, with increased dominance of taxa like Quercus and Fagus, reflecting cooler winters and expanded frost events. Tectonically, the mid-Rupelian period coincided with the stabilization of several rift basins in , such as the Upper Rhine Graben, where the main extensional phase waned around 31 Ma, transitioning to thermal subsidence and . This tectonic quiescence facilitated widespread deposition of clay-rich sediments, like the Boom Clay in the Basin, preserving diverse marine faunas amid the cooling. Sea-level fluctuations associated with Oi-2 also triggered regressive sequences in marginal marine settings, such as the Froidefontaine Subgroup in the Swiss Jura, marking a shift from open marine to fluvio-lacustrine environments. In terms of paleobiology, the Oi-2 event influenced marine ecosystems by promoting upwelling and eutrophic conditions, as seen in calcareous nannofossil assemblages with increased abundances of cool-water taxa like Reticulofenestra pseudoumbilicus. Terrestrial biota experienced biome contractions, with subtropical elements retreating southward, paving the way for grassland expansion in mid-latitudes. These developments underscore the mid-Rupelian as a pivotal interval in establishing the Oligocene icehouse climate dynamics.

References

  1. https://stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2024-12.pdf
  2. https://stratigraphy.org/gssps/rupelian
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/rupelian
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018221003485
  5. https://www.episodes.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.18814/epiiugs/2018/v41i1/018003
  6. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8Z3284M/download
  7. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-269-2021
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39806-6
  9. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/grl.50941
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233774984_The_age_of_the_Grande_Coupure_mammal_turnover_New_constraints_from_the_Eocene-Oligocene_record_of_the_Eastern_Ebro_Basin_NE_Spain
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128239575000068
  12. https://popups.uliege.be/1374-8505/index.php?id=1114&file=1&pid=1108
  13. https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3286978&journal_code=TD
  14. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9788132307259_A34037953/preview-9788132307259_A34037953.pdf
  15. https://natuurtijdschriften.nl/pub/541761/CR2012009001007.pdf
  16. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/649656
  17. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8R78QJ5/download
  18. https://stratigraphy.org/gssps/chattian
  19. https://timescalefoundation.org/gssp/
  20. https://stratigraphy.org/gssps/
  21. https://timescalefoundation.org/charts/GTS2020.pdf
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2006JB004706
  23. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/166/3/1398/2140301
  24. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023PA004650
  25. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aab0669
  26. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/269/2021/
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223901171_The_EoceneOligocene_boundary_and_the_psychrospheric_event_in_the_Tethys_as_recorded_by_deep-sea_ostracods_from_the_Massignano_Global_Boundary_Stratotype_Section_and_Point_Central_Italy
  28. https://faculty.washington.edu/kate1/ewExternalFiles/Page-et-al_XiningNETibet-cool-decline-monsoon-OligoceneIcehouse_Geology_2019.pdf
  29. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/38/6/515/130283/Late-Oligocene-Miocene-mid-latitude-aridification
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336587161_Parathethys_Last_Gasp_in_Central_Asia_and_Late_Oligocene_Accelerated_Uplift_of_the_Pamirs
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325417061_The_Rupelian-Chattian_transition_in_the_north-western_Transylvanian_Basin_Romania_revealed_by_calcareous_nannofossils_Implications_for_biostratigraphy_and_palaeoenvironmental_reconstruction
  32. https://journalofpalaeogeography.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42501-021-00092-2
  33. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2017/1746-e-o-dwaf-from-sicily
  34. https://d-nb.info/1352606038/34
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.2018.1482555
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328148792_An_Unexpectedly_Derived_Odontocete_from_the_Ashley_Formation_Upper_Rupelian_of_South_Carolina_USA
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7D4EE67B813B709B9AC440254E8E5574/S0094837300011696a.pdf/north-american-mammalian-diversity-and-eoceneoligocene-extinctions.pdf
  38. https://hal.science/hal-04423577v1/document
  39. https://doc.rero.ch/record/16006/files/PAL_E3760.pdf
  40. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a9f5/48968dc5b2a07a6df83fb9137cc9c48a8274.pdf
  41. https://www.hetnatuurhistorisch.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/documents-nmr/Publicaties/Deinsea/Deinsea_10/Deinsea_10_04_Collinson.pdf
  42. https://core.ac.uk/download/158312193.pdf
  43. https://www.zin.ru/journals/trudyzin/doc/vol_327_3/TZ_327_3_Zvonok.pdf
  44. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-57/issue-3/app.2011.0075/Boine-Snake-Bavarioboa-from-the-Oligocene-Miocene-of-Eastern-Turkey/10.4202/app.2011.0075.pdf
  45. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/268503/1/author_postprint.pdf
  46. https://www.micropress.org/stratigraphy/pdfs/Stratigraphy_2.1.13.pdf
  47. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:866330/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  48. https://ncs.naturalsciences.be/lithostratigraphy/boom-formation/
  49. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0xv324c8/qt0xv324c8.pdf
  50. https://biblio.naturalsciences.be/rbins-publications/memoirs-of-the-geological-survey-of-belgium/pdfs/msgb-2014-60.pdf
  51. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app59/app20110045.pdf
  52. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/UnitRefs/WhiteRiverRefs_11141.html
  53. https://2dgf.dk/xpdf/DGF_Bulletin_Vol_73_samlet.pdf
  54. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0600689103
  55. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs49-98/
  56. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/92PA00284
  57. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015PA002818
  58. https://eps.rutgers.edu/images/stories/faculty/wright_james_d/pubs/5_Miller_JGR_1991.pdf
  59. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2004PA001042
  60. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2024/5275-mid-cenozoic-palaeoclimates-northwest-europe
  61. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010TC002767
  62. https://sjg.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s00015-013-0146-4
  63. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/94B503C1004C8619E976F023AB1DBB56/S0016774600020308a.pdf/the-rupelian-chattian-boundary-in-the-north-sea-basin-and-its-calibration-to-the-international-time-scale.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.