Hubbry Logo
SubalgebraSubalgebraMain
Open search
Subalgebra
Community hub
Subalgebra
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Subalgebra
Subalgebra
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, a subalgebra is a subset of an algebra, closed under all its operations, and carrying the induced operations.

"Algebra", when referring to a structure, often means a vector space or module equipped with an additional bilinear operation. Algebras in universal algebra are far more general: they are a common generalisation of all algebraic structures. "Subalgebra" can refer to either case.

Subalgebras for algebras over a ring or field

[edit]
Algebras are ordered by inclusion as in this lattice of associative algebras. There is a corresponding lattice of groups generated by basis elements, an example of a Galois correspondence.

A subalgebra of an algebra over a commutative ring or field is a vector subspace which is closed under the multiplication of vectors. The restriction of the algebra multiplication makes it an algebra over the same ring or field. This notion also applies to most specializations, where the multiplication must satisfy additional properties, e.g. to associative algebras or to Lie algebras. Only for unital algebras is there a stronger notion, of unital subalgebra, for which it is also required that the unit of the subalgebra be the unit of the bigger algebra.

Example

[edit]

The 2×2-matrices over the reals R, with matrix multiplication, form a four-dimensional unital algebra M(2,R). The 2×2-matrices for which all entries are zero, except for the first one on the diagonal, form a subalgebra. It is also unital, but it is not a unital subalgebra.

The identity element of M(2,R) is the identity matrix I, so the unital subalgebras contain the line of diagonal matrices {x I  : x in R}. For two-dimensional subalgebras, consider

When p = 0, then E is nilpotent and the subalgebra { x I + y E : x, y in R } is a copy of the dual number plane. When p is negative, take q = 1/√−p, so that (q E)2 = − I, and subalgebra { x I + y (qE) : x,y in R } is a copy of the complex plane. Finally, when p is positive, take q = 1/√p, so that (qE)2 = I, and subalgebra { x I + y (qE) : x,y in R } is a copy of the plane of split-complex numbers. By the law of trichotomy, these are the only planar subalgebras of M(2,R).

L. E. Dickson noted in 1914, the "Equivalence of complex quaternion and complex matric algebras", meaning M(2,C), the 2x2 complex matrices.[1] But he notes also, "the real quaternion and real matric sub-algebras are not [isomorphic]." The difference is evident as there are the three isomorphism classes of planar subalgebras of M(2,R), while real quaternions have only one isomorphism class of planar subalgebras as they are all isomorphic to C.

Subalgebras in universal algebra

[edit]

In universal algebra, a subalgebra of an algebra A is a subset S of A that also has the structure of an algebra of the same type when the algebraic operations are restricted to S. If the axioms of a kind of algebraic structure is described by equational laws, as is typically the case in universal algebra, then the only thing that needs to be checked is that S is closed under the operations.

Some authors consider algebras with partial functions. There are various ways of defining subalgebras for these. Another generalization of algebras is to allow relations. These more general algebras are usually called structures, and they are studied in model theory and in theoretical computer science. For structures with relations there are notions of weak and of induced substructures.

Example

[edit]

For example, the standard signature for groups in universal algebra is (•, −1, 1). (Inversion and unit are needed to get the right notions of homomorphism and so that the group laws can be expressed as equations.) Therefore, a subgroup of a group G is a subset S of G such that:

  • the identity e of G belongs to S (so that S is closed under the identity constant operation);
  • whenever x belongs to S, so does x−1 (so that S is closed under the inverse operation);
  • whenever x and y belong to S, so does xy (so that S is closed under the group's multiplication operation).

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a subalgebra of a kk-algebra AA, where kk is a (often a field), is a nonempty BAB \subseteq A that is both a of AA (closed under and , containing the multiplicative identity if AA is unital) and a kk-submodule of AA (closed under by elements of kk). This structure ensures BB inherits the algebraic operations from AA while forming its own kk-algebra, making subalgebras fundamental building blocks for studying algebraic structures such as rings, fields, and modules. Subalgebras appear in diverse contexts, including associative algebras like matrix rings Mn(k)M_n(k), where diagonal matrices form a commutative subalgebra, and non-associative algebras like algebras, where a subalgebra is a subspace closed under the Lie bracket [x,y][x,y]. For instance, the complex numbers C\mathbb{C} form a 2-dimensional subalgebra of the quaternions H\mathbb{H} over the reals R\mathbb{R}, and they facilitate homomorphisms and ideals in algebraic extensions. In , the notion extends to algebraic systems beyond rings, where a is any closed under all operations of the structure.

General Concepts

Definition

In algebra, an algebra AA over a RR (or more specifically, over a field when RR is a field) is defined as a ring with multiplicative identity 1A1_A that is also an RR-module, equipped with a bilinear operation satisfying r(ab)=(ra)b=a(rb)r(ab) = (ra)b = a(rb) for all rRr \in R and a,bAa, b \in A. When RR is a field, AA is a over RR with the being RR-bilinear. This structure ensures that the from RR commutes with the ring operations in AA. A subalgebra SS of an AA over RR is a SAS \subseteq A that is itself an RR-algebra under the induced operations from AA, meaning SS is closed under , scalar multiplication by elements of RR, and the multiplication in AA, and contains the multiplicative identity 1A1_A of AA. Equivalently, SS is both an RR-submodule of AA and a of AA with the same identity. This closure respects the full , including the compatibility between module actions and ring multiplication. While a subspace (or submodule) of AA is merely closed under and , a subalgebra additionally requires closure under the bilinear and inclusion of the identity, thereby inheriting the complete algebra operations rather than just the module structure. This distinction highlights that subalgebras preserve the ring-theoretic aspects essential to the algebra's definition.

Basic Properties

A subalgebra SS of an AA over a RR is a nonempty that is closed under the and operations inherited from AA, as well as under by elements of RR. This closure ensures that SS forms both an RR-submodule of AA and a of AA, thereby inheriting the full of AA restricted to SS. In the context of , a subalgebra is similarly defined as a closed under all fundamental operations of the parent , preserving the induced structure without additional assumptions on the ring RR. If the parent algebra AA is unital, possessing a multiplicative identity 1A1_A, then unital subalgebras are required to contain 1A1_A, ensuring they share the same unit element and form unital algebras in their own right. Non-unital subalgebras, by contrast, need not contain 1A1_A but still satisfy the closure properties, allowing for structures like ideals or proper subspaces that lack a global identity. This distinction is particularly relevant in associative settings, where unital subalgebras preserve invertibility properties tied to the identity. The subalgebra relation is transitive: if SS is a subalgebra of TT and TT is a subalgebra of AA, then SS is necessarily a subalgebra of AA, as the closure under operations in TT implies closure in the larger of AA. This transitivity follows directly from the definitions and underpins the lattice structure of subalgebras within an . For any subset XAX \subseteq A, the subalgebra generated by XX, denoted X\langle X \rangle, is the smallest subalgebra containing XX, constructed as the intersection of all subalgebras containing XX. Explicitly, X\langle X \rangle consists of all finite RR-linear combinations of finite products of elements from XX, providing the minimal structure closed under the algebra's operations that incorporates XX. In particular, for a singleton {a}\{a\}, the generated subalgebra RR is commutative and spans the polynomials in aa with coefficients in RR.

Subalgebras in Ring and Field Algebras

Associative Algebras over Fields

In the context of associative algebras over a field kk, a subalgebra BB of an associative kk-algebra AA is defined as a subset of AA that is both a kk-subspace (closed under addition and by elements of kk) and a with respect to the multiplication in AA (closed under and containing additive inverses). This refinement leverages the vector space structure inherent to algebras over fields, distinguishing subalgebras from those in more general ring settings where module properties may complicate closure. If AA is unital, subalgebras are typically required to contain the 1A1_A to preserve the unital structure. A prominent example of such a subalgebra arises in polynomial rings, where the subring kk[x,y]k \subseteq k[x,y] consists of all polynomials in the single indeterminate xx with coefficients in kk, embedded within the polynomial ring k[x,y]k[x,y] in two indeterminates. This inclusion is closed under multiplication because the product of any two elements f(x),g(x)kf(x), g(x) \in k is f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x), which depends only on xx and yields no terms involving yy, thus remaining in kk. Similarly, and preserve this form, confirming kk as a subalgebra; moreover, it is infinite-dimensional over kk with basis {1,x,x2,}\{1, x, x^2, \dots \}. When AA is finite-dimensional over kk, any subalgebra BAB \subseteq A inherits this property and satisfies dimkBdimkA\dim_k B \leq \dim_k A, as BB is a subspace of the finite-dimensional AA. A basis for BB can be extended to a basis for AA via the standard subspace dimension theorem, ensuring that the algebraic structure of BB embeds compatibly within AA without exceeding the ambient . The center Z(A)={aAab=ba bA}Z(A) = \{ a \in A \mid ab = ba \ \forall b \in A \} forms a subalgebra of AA, as it is a kk-subspace (closed under addition and scalars) and closed under multiplication: for a,cZ(A)a, c \in Z(A), (ac)b=a(cb)=a(bc)=(ac)b(ac)b = a(cb) = a(bc) = (ac)b, confirming associativity and commutativity with all elements. The commutator subalgebra, often denoted [A,A][A, A] and spanned by elements of the form abbaab - ba for a,bAa, b \in A, also qualifies as a subalgebra in this setting, capturing the "non-commutative part" of AA while respecting the associative multiplication.

Algebras over Rings

In the context of algebras over a commutative ring RR, an RR-algebra AA is defined as an associative ring with identity that is also an RR-module, equipped with a bilinear multiplication satisfying α(ab)=(αa)b=a(αb)\alpha(ab) = (\alpha a)b = a(\alpha b) for all αR\alpha \in R and a,bAa, b \in A. A subalgebra BB of AA is then a subset that is both a subring (with the same identity) and an RR-submodule of AA, ensuring closure under the ring multiplication and the RR-action. This definition generalizes the field case by replacing vector space structure with module structure, introducing challenges such as the lack of invertibility for scalars, which prevents automatic division and requires explicit verification of submodule closure. Unlike subrings, which may ignore the module structure, subalgebras must respect the RR-action fully. For instance, consider the Z\mathbb{Z}-algebra Z\mathbb{Z}, where the structure map is the identity. The even integers 2Z2\mathbb{Z} form a subring under addition and multiplication, but it is not a subalgebra because it fails to contain the multiplicative identity 1Z1 \in \mathbb{Z}, and scalar multiplication by odd integers (viewed through the ring action) aligns with this exclusion, as subalgebras require sharing the unit element. In contrast, ideals like 2Z2\mathbb{Z} are Z\mathbb{Z}-submodules but not subalgebras due to the unit condition. This highlights how the module and unital requirements distinguish subalgebras from mere subrings over rings like Z\mathbb{Z}. Bimodule aspects arise naturally since, for commutative RR, the RR-action on AA is central, making AA an RR-bimodule with left and right actions coinciding. A subalgebra BAB \subseteq A is thus an RR-bimodule closed under the internal multiplication of AA. The centralizer of a subalgebra BB, defined as CA(B)={aAab=ba bB}C_A(B) = \{ a \in A \mid ab = ba \ \forall b \in B \}, forms a subalgebra containing BB and the image of RR, acting as the largest subalgebra commuting elementwise with BB. Two-sided ideals of AA are AA-bimodules (and hence RR-bimodules), but only the unit ideal is typically a subalgebra; non-unit ideals illustrate bimodule structure without unital closure. These centralizers and ideals play key roles in decomposition theorems for algebras over rings, such as analyzing simple components via centralizer chains. Regarding Noetherian properties, if RR is a commutative and AA is a Noetherian RR-algebra, then any subalgebra BB that is finitely generated as an RR-algebra inherits the Noetherian property, satisfying the ascending chain condition on ideals. This follows from the fact that finitely generated algebras over Noetherian base rings are themselves Noetherian, extending the Hilbert basis theorem to the module setting. However, arbitrary subalgebras need not inherit this property, as infinite generation can lead to non-stabilizing ideal chains, though specific classes (e.g., graded subalgebras in certain polynomial-like algebras) may preserve it under additional hypotheses.

Subalgebras in Universal Algebra

Universal Algebra Framework

In universal algebra, an algebra is defined as a nonempty set equipped with a collection of finitary operations of specified arities, collectively referred to as the type of the algebra, where these operations satisfy certain identities that define the algebraic structure. This framework abstracts common properties across diverse algebraic systems, such as groups, rings, and lattices, by focusing on operations and their preservation under structure-preserving maps rather than specific axioms. A subalgebra of an algebra AA is a BAB \subseteq A that is closed under all the operations of AA, meaning that for every operation ff of nn in the type, if b1,,bnBb_1, \dots, b_n \in B, then fB(b1,,bn)=fA(b1,,bn)Bf^B(b_1, \dots, b_n) = f^A(b_1, \dots, b_n) \in B. This closure ensures that BB itself forms an of the same type, inheriting the identities satisfied by AA, and it constitutes a substructure that preserves the operational relations of the parent . Subalgebras thus provide a natural way to study embedded structures within larger algebras, analogous to subgroups in group theory but generalized to arbitrary operation sets. Subalgebras frequently appear as homomorphic images in . A α:AB\alpha: A \to B between algebras of the same type is a function that preserves operations, satisfying α(fA(a1,,an))=fB(α(a1),,α(an))\alpha(f^A(a_1, \dots, a_n)) = f^B(\alpha(a_1), \dots, \alpha(a_n)) for all operations ff and elements aiAa_i \in A. The α(A)\alpha(A) under such a map is itself a subalgebra of BB, as it is closed under the operations of BB by the preservation property. Conversely, kernels of homomorphisms correspond to congruences on AA, which are equivalence relations compatible with the operations, and the algebra A/ker(α)A / \ker(\alpha) is isomorphic to the α(A)\alpha(A), linking subalgebras to these quotient constructions. Free subalgebras are generated by subsets within the context of a variety, which is a class of algebras closed under homomorphic images, subalgebras, and products, and defined by identities. For a subset XX of an algebra AA in a variety V\mathcal{V}, the subalgebra generated by XX, denoted SgA(X)\mathrm{Sg}^A(X), is the smallest subalgebra containing XX, consisting of all elements obtainable by evaluating terms (polynomial expressions built from the operations and constants) applied to elements of XX. This generated subalgebra is free in V\mathcal{V} on XX if XX satisfies no additional relations beyond those enforced by the identities of V\mathcal{V}, making it isomorphic to the free algebra in V\mathcal{V} on XX. Such free generations highlight the role of terms in constructing substructures without imposed dependencies.

Varietal Subalgebras

In , a variety is a class of algebras of the same type defined by a set of identities, which are equations that hold universally for all elements and operations in the algebras, such as the associative law in groups or the distributive law in rings. These equational classes ensure that all algebras within the variety share the same structural properties enforced by the identities. Subalgebras within a variety are subsets closed under all operations of the ambient and thus automatically satisfy the defining identities, as identities are preserved under restrictions to operation-closed subsets. Congruence relations, which are equivalence relations compatible with the operations via the substitution , further characterize the : in a variety, congruences on an algebra induce algebras that remain within the variety, and subalgebras inherit compatible congruence classes. For instance, in the variety of groups—defined by identities for associativity, , and inverses—a is a , which must contain the , be closed under the binary operation, and closed under the unary inverse operation to preserve the group structure. Normal serve as subalgebras in this variety while also generating principal congruences, as their cosets form the equivalence classes compatible with group operations, ensuring quotients are groups. Birkhoff's HSP theorem implies that varieties are closed under subalgebras (S), homomorphic images (H), and products (P), meaning the subalgebras of any algebra in the variety, along with their homomorphic images and arbitrary products, remain within the variety. This closure property underscores the robustness of varietal subalgebras, facilitating the study of algebraic structures through decomposition and projection.

Advanced Topics and Examples

Subalgebras in Lie Algebras

A over a field kk (typically R\mathbb{R} or C\mathbb{C}) is defined as a g\mathfrak{g} equipped with a bilinear operation [,]:g×gg[\cdot, \cdot]: \mathfrak{g} \times \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{g}, called the Lie bracket, that is skew-symmetric ([x,y]=[y,x][x, y] = -[y, x] for all x,ygx, y \in \mathfrak{g}) and satisfies the ([x,[y,z]]+[y,[z,x]]+[z,[x,y]]=0[x, [y, z]] + [y, [z, x]] + [z, [x, y]] = 0 for all x,y,zgx, y, z \in \mathfrak{g}). This structure captures infinitesimal symmetries, contrasting with associative algebras by emphasizing non-associative bracket relations derived from commutators. A sub- (or ) of g\mathfrak{g} is a subspace hg\mathfrak{h} \subseteq \mathfrak{g} that is closed under the , meaning [h,h]h[\mathfrak{h}, \mathfrak{h}] \subseteq \mathfrak{h}. Since the bracket is bilinear and the holds globally, any such h\mathfrak{h} automatically inherits the full structure, including skew-symmetry and the . play a central role in decomposing g\mathfrak{g} and studying its representations, often serving as building blocks for classifications like the Cartan decomposition. A prominent example arises in the special linear sl(n,C)\mathfrak{sl}(n, \mathbb{C}), consisting of n×nn \times n complex matrices with trace zero under the bracket [A,B]=ABBA[A, B] = AB - BA. The Borel subalgebra b\mathfrak{b} comprises all trace-zero upper triangular matrices, which forms a sub-Lie algebra because the product of two upper triangular matrices is upper triangular, and thus their preserves the trace-zero condition and upper triangular form. Specifically, if A=(aij)A = (a_{ij}) and B=(bij)B = (b_{ij}) are trace-zero upper triangular (i.e., aij=bij=0a_{ij} = b_{ij} = 0 for i>ji > j), then [A,B]ij=k(aikbkjbikakj)[A, B]_{ij} = \sum_k (a_{ik} b_{kj} - b_{ik} a_{kj}) vanishes for i>ji > j since the terms involve only upper triangular entries, ensuring closure. This b\mathfrak{b} is maximal solvable and decomposes as b=nh\mathfrak{b} = \mathfrak{n} \oplus \mathfrak{h}, where h\mathfrak{h} is the of diagonal trace-zero matrices (abelian) and n\mathfrak{n} is the subalgebra of strictly upper triangular matrices. Within subalgebras, solvability and nilpotency are characterized by descending series of nested subalgebras. A subalgebra h\mathfrak{h} is solvable if its derived series terminates at : define h(0)=h\mathfrak{h}^{(0)} = \mathfrak{h} and h(k+1)=[h(k),h(k)]\mathfrak{h}^{(k+1)} = [\mathfrak{h}^{(k)}, \mathfrak{h}^{(k)}] for k0k \geq 0, requiring h(m)={0}\mathfrak{h}^{(m)} = \{0\} for some mm. For the Borel subalgebra bsl(n,C)\mathfrak{b} \subset \mathfrak{sl}(n, \mathbb{C}), the first derived subalgebra b(1)=n\mathfrak{b}^{(1)} = \mathfrak{n} (strictly upper triangular), and subsequent terms shift superdiagonals until vanishing after n1n-1 steps, confirming solvability. Nilpotency strengthens this, using the lower central series: h0=h\mathfrak{h}_0 = \mathfrak{h} and hk+1=[h,hk]\mathfrak{h}_{k+1} = [\mathfrak{h}, \mathfrak{h}_k], terminating at for some step. The nilradical n\mathfrak{n} of b\mathfrak{b} exemplifies this, as repeated bracketing with b\mathfrak{b} (or itself) produces matrices with zeros on more initial superdiagonals, reaching in n1n-1 steps. These properties underpin root space decompositions and theory.

Relation to Ideals and Subrings

In the context of ring theory, a subring of a ring RR is a subset closed under the ring's addition and multiplication operations, along with additive inverses, but when RR is viewed as an algebra over a base ring or field kk, a subalgebra requires additional closure under scalar multiplication by elements of kk. This distinction arises because subrings need not respect the module structure over kk, whereas subalgebras do. For instance, the integers Z\mathbb{Z} form a subring of the rationals Q\mathbb{Q}, as they are closed under integer addition and multiplication, but Z\mathbb{Z} is not a subalgebra of Q\mathbb{Q} over Q\mathbb{Q} itself, since scalar multiplication by 12Q\frac{1}{2} \in \mathbb{Q} maps 1Z1 \in \mathbb{Z} to 12Z\frac{1}{2} \notin \mathbb{Z}. In associative algebras over a field, two-sided ideals play a special role as they are precisely the subalgebras that absorb from the ambient algebra on both sides. Specifically, a two-sided ideal II of an associative algebra AA is closed under the algebra's and scalar actions, making it a subalgebra, while also satisfying AIIA \cdot I \subseteq I and IAII \cdot A \subseteq I. This absorption property distinguishes ideals from general subalgebras, which may not interact with the full algebra in this way. However, simple associative algebras, which have no nontrivial two-sided ideals, can still contain proper subalgebras that are not ideals. Division algebras provide a key example: they are simple (with no proper two-sided ideals other than zero), yet they often admit proper subalgebras, such as maximal subfields embedded as commutative subalgebras. For instance, the real quaternions H\mathbb{H} is a division algebra over R\mathbb{R} with no proper ideals, but it contains C\mathbb{C} as a proper subalgebra. The term "subalgebra" was formalized in the early amid the axiomatization of ring and theory, particularly through works developing abstract structures beyond number fields and polynomials.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.