Hubbry Logo
Thermodynamic betaThermodynamic betaMain
Open search
Thermodynamic beta
Community hub
Thermodynamic beta
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Thermodynamic beta
Thermodynamic beta
Thermodynamic beta
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

SI temperature/coldness conversion scale: Temperatures in Kelvin scale are shown in blue (Celsius scale in green, Fahrenheit scale in red), coldness values in gigabyte per nanojoule are shown in black. Infinite temperature (coldness zero) is shown at the top of the diagram; positive values of coldness/temperature are on the right-hand side, negative values on the left-hand side.

In statistical thermodynamics, thermodynamic beta, also known as coldness,[1] is the reciprocal of the thermodynamic temperature of a system: (where T is the temperature and kB is Boltzmann constant).[2]

Thermodynamic beta has units reciprocal to that of energy (in SI units, reciprocal joules, ). In non-thermal units, it can also be measured in byte per joule, or more conveniently, gigabyte per nanojoule;[3] 1 K−1 is equivalent to about 13,062 gigabytes per nanojoule; at room temperature: T = 300K, β ≈ 44 GB/nJ ≈ 39 eV−1 ≈ 2.4×1020 J−1. The conversion factor is 1 GB/nJ = J−1.

Description

[edit]

Thermodynamic beta is essentially the connection between the information theory and statistical mechanics interpretation of a physical system through its entropy and the thermodynamics associated with its energy. It expresses the response of entropy to an increase in energy. If a small amount of energy is added to the system, then β describes the amount the system will randomize.

Via the statistical definition of temperature as a function of entropy, the coldness function can be calculated in the microcanonical ensemble from the formula

(i.e., the partial derivative of the entropy S with respect to the energy E at constant volume V and particle number N).

Advantages

[edit]

Though completely equivalent in conceptual content to temperature, β is generally considered a more fundamental quantity than temperature owing to the phenomenon of negative temperature, in which β is continuous as it crosses zero whereas T has a singularity.[4]

In addition, β has the advantage of being easier to understand causally: If a small amount of heat is added to a system, β is the increase in entropy divided by the increase in heat. Temperature is difficult to interpret in the same sense, as it is not possible to "Add entropy" to a system except indirectly, by modifying other quantities such as temperature, volume, or number of particles.

Statistical interpretation

[edit]

From the statistical point of view, β is a numerical quantity relating two macroscopic systems in equilibrium. The exact formulation is as follows. Consider two systems, 1 and 2, in thermal contact, with respective energies E1 and E2. We assume E1 + E2 = some constant E. The number of microstates of each system will be denoted by Ω1 and Ω2. Under our assumptions Ωi depends only on Ei. We also assume that any microstate of system 1 consistent with E1 can coexist with any microstate of system 2 consistent with E2. Thus, the number of microstates for the combined system is

We will derive β from the fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics:

When the combined system reaches equilibrium, the number Ω is maximized.

(In other words, the system naturally seeks the maximum number of microstates.) Therefore, at equilibrium,

But E1 + E2 = E implies

So

i.e.

The above relation motivates a definition of β:

Connection of statistical view with thermodynamic view

[edit]

When two systems are in equilibrium, they have the same thermodynamic temperature T. Thus intuitively, one would expect β (as defined via microstates) to be related to T in some way. This link is provided by Boltzmann's fundamental assumption written as

where kB is the Boltzmann constant, S is the classical thermodynamic entropy, and Ω is the number of microstates. So

Substituting into the definition of β from the statistical definition above gives

Comparing with thermodynamic formula

we have

where is called the fundamental temperature of the system, and has units of energy.

History

[edit]

The thermodynamic beta was originally introduced in 1971 (as Kältefunktion "coldness function") by Ingo Müller [de], one of the proponents of the rational thermodynamics school of thought,[5][6] based on earlier proposals for a "reciprocal temperature" function.[1][7][non-primary source needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Thermodynamic beta

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , thermodynamic beta (β), also known as inverse temperature or coldness, is defined as the reciprocal of the scaled by Boltzmann's constant: β = 1/(k_B T), where k_B is Boltzmann's constant and T is the absolute temperature in . This quantity inversely measures the available to a system, with higher values of β indicating lower temperatures and greater "coldness," such that adding a small amount of reduces β by increasing the system's . It serves as a key parameter that bridges microscopic probabilistic descriptions of particle states to macroscopic thermodynamic behavior. Thermodynamic beta plays a central role in the canonical ensemble, which models systems in thermal contact with a at fixed but isolated in terms of particle number and volume. Here, the probability P_i of the system occupying a i with energy E_i is given by the : P_i = (1/Z) e^{-β E_i}, where Z is the partition function summing over all possible states, Z = ∑_i e^{-β E_i}. This distribution ensures that lower-energy states are more probable at higher β (lower T), reflecting as derived from the principle of equal a priori probabilities for accessible microstates. Key thermodynamic quantities emerge directly from β and the partition function, including the Helmholtz free energy F = -k_B T ln Z, internal energy U = -∂(ln Z)/∂β, and entropy S = (U - F)/T, thus providing a statistical foundation for classical thermodynamics. Beyond the canonical ensemble, β appears in other formulations, such as the grand canonical ensemble for open systems (β = 1/(k_B T) with chemical potential μ), and it underpins derivations of phase transitions, specific heats, and fluctuation-dissipation relations in diverse physical systems from ideal gases to quantum materials. The concept, rooted in the foundational work of J. Willard Gibbs, remains essential for computational methods like Monte Carlo simulations and path integral formulations in modern theoretical physics.

Definition and Basic Properties

Definition

In statistical thermodynamics, thermodynamic beta, denoted as β\beta, is defined as the reciprocal of the product of the kBk_B and the TT: β≡1kBT\beta \equiv \frac{1}{k_B T} This quantity serves as a fundamental measure that connects variations to corresponding changes in physical systems at equilibrium. Thermodynamic beta is alternatively known as "coldness" and, as it depends on , qualifies as a in equilibrium , depending solely on the system's macroscopic state rather than its history. For instance, at room temperature (T≈300T \approx 300 K), β≈2.41×1020\beta \approx 2.41 \times 10^{20} J−1^{-1}, based on the exact value kB=1.380649×10−23k_B = 1.380649 \times 10^{-23} J/K.

Units and Notation

Thermodynamic beta is conventionally denoted by the Greek letter β in statistical mechanics and thermodynamics literature. This notation explicitly incorporates the Boltzmann constant kBk_B, defined as β=1kBT\beta = \frac{1}{k_B T}, where TT is the absolute temperature and kB=1.380649×10−23k_B = 1.380649 \times 10^{-23} J/K is the exact value fixed in the International System of Units (SI). In SI units, temperature TT is measured in kelvin (K) and kBk_B has dimensions of energy per temperature (J/K), yielding β\beta with units of inverse energy, or J−1^{-1}. In theoretical physics, natural units are often used where kB=1k_B = 1, making β=1/T\beta = 1/T dimensionless when energy is expressed in units of temperature. Dimensional analysis confirms that β\beta possesses dimensions of [energy]−1^{-1}, a property that ensures dimensionless arguments in exponential expressions like partition functions and promotes additivity of β\beta across independent subsystems in canonical and grand canonical ensemble formulations.

Physical Interpretations

Thermodynamic Interpretation

In thermodynamics, the parameter known as thermodynamic beta, denoted β, is defined as β=1kB(∂S∂E)V,N,\beta = \frac{1}{k_B} \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial E} \right)_{V,N}, where SS is the entropy of the system, EE is its internal energy, VV is the volume, NN is the number of particles, and kBk_B is the Boltzmann constant. This expression arises from the fundamental thermodynamic relation dE=TdS−pdV+μdNdE = T dS - p dV + \mu dN, where the partial derivative (∂S∂E)V,N=1T\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial E} \right)_{V,N} = \frac{1}{T} identifies β as the inverse temperature scaled by kBk_B, with TT being the absolute temperature. Thus, β encapsulates the macroscopic response of the system's entropy to infinitesimal changes in internal energy while holding volume and particle number fixed. Physically, β quantifies the rate of entropy production per unit energy added to the system under these constraints, serving as a measure of the system's "coldness.") A higher value of β corresponds to a lower temperature, indicating reduced thermal agitation and a steeper entropy gradient with respect to energy; conversely, as β approaches zero, the system becomes increasingly "hot," with entropy rising more gradually per unit energy input. This interpretation aligns with β's role in describing how the system absorbs heat: at constant volume, the infinitesimal heat addition dQ=TdS=1kBβdSdQ = T dS = \frac{1}{k_B \beta} dS, which implicitly links β to the efficiency of energy transfer in altering the entropic state without altering volume or composition. Such a perspective highlights β's utility in thermodynamic analyses where temperature's reciprocal form simplifies expressions for thermal equilibria and responses. An important extension of this view occurs in systems capable of exhibiting negative β, which arises when (∂S∂E)V,N<0\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial E} \right)_{V,N} < 0, implying that decreases as increases. This counterintuitive regime corresponds to negative absolute temperatures and is observed in isolated systems with bounded levels, such as spin systems, where leads to higher-energy states being more occupied than lower ones. In practical contexts like lasers, negative β characterizes the inverted populations in the gain medium, enabling and amplification of light, as the system's effective "hotness" exceeds that of any positive-temperature state.

Statistical Mechanics Interpretation

In , thermodynamic beta emerges within the , which describes an with fixed EE, volume VV, and particle number NN. Here, Ω(E)\Omega(E) denotes the number of accessible microstates consistent with the total EE. The statistical definition of beta is given by β=dln⁡ΩdE,\beta = \frac{d \ln \Omega}{dE}, where this captures the logarithmic rate of change in the multiplicity of microstates with respect to . This quantity physically measures the sensitivity of the logarithm of the to variations in , reflecting how densely microstates are packed as increases. In an at equilibrium, beta determines the condition for maximum multiplicity across subsystems: when two subsystems exchange , equilibrium occurs where their respective betas are equal, ensuring the total number of microstates is maximized. The provides the foundational context for beta through the entropy maximization principle, where the SS is defined as S=kBln⁡ΩS = k_B \ln \Omega with kBk_B the . Beta thus arises naturally from the steepness of the curve with , guiding the system's approach to the most probable configuration among all possible microstates. As an illustrative example, consider an of NN non-interacting particles in the . The scales as Ω(E)∝E3N/2−1\Omega(E) \propto E^{3N/2 - 1}, so ln⁡Ω≈(3N/2)ln⁡E+const\ln \Omega \approx (3N/2) \ln E + \mathrm{const}, yielding β≈(3N/2)/E\beta \approx (3N/2)/E in the large-NN limit. This relation ties beta to the width of the energy shell in , where the relative thickness δE/E∼2/(3N)\delta E / E \sim 2/(3N) highlights how beta governs the sharpness of the distribution for thermodynamic consistency.

Connections Between Views

Derivation of the Equivalence

In , the entropy SS of an in equilibrium is given by Boltzmann's formula S=kBln⁡ΩS = k_B \ln \Omega, where kBk_B is Boltzmann's constant and Ω\Omega is the number of accessible microstates corresponding to the system's macrostate. The thermodynamic definition of arises from the fundamental relation for the UU, where 1T=(∂S∂U)V,N\frac{1}{T} = \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N}, with the taken at constant volume VV and particle number NN. Combining this with the definition of thermodynamic beta as β≡1kBT\beta \equiv \frac{1}{k_B T}, it follows that β=1kB(∂S∂U)V,N\beta = \frac{1}{k_B} \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N}. To link this to the statistical view, substitute Boltzmann's formula into the thermodynamic expression. The partial derivative becomes (∂S∂U)V,N=kB(∂ln⁡Ω∂U)V,N\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N} = k_B \left( \frac{\partial \ln \Omega}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N}. In the microcanonical ensemble, Ω\Omega is a function of energy UU (with VV and NN fixed), so the partial derivative reduces to the total derivative dln⁡ΩdU\frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U}, yielding β=dln⁡ΩdU\beta = \frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U}. This equivalence can be proven step by step by assuming the thermodynamic S(U,V,N)S(U, V, N) coincides with the statistical expression S=kBln⁡Ω(U,V,N)S = k_B \ln \Omega(U, V, N) in the . Differentiating both sides with respect to UU at fixed VV and NN gives on the left (∂S∂U)V,N=1T\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N} = \frac{1}{T} from , and on the right kB1Ω(∂Ω∂U)V,N=kB(dln⁡ΩdU)k_B \frac{1}{\Omega} \left( \frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial U} \right)_{V,N} = k_B \left( \frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U} \right) since dln⁡ΩdU=1ΩdΩdU\frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U} = \frac{1}{\Omega} \frac{d \Omega}{d U}. Equating the two sides confirms 1kBT=dln⁡ΩdU\frac{1}{k_B T} = \frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U}, or β=dln⁡ΩdU\beta = \frac{d \ln \Omega}{d U}. The derivation relies on key assumptions: the is in equilibrium, described by the ; the is large enough for the , where relative energy fluctuations are negligible (ΔU/U≪1\Delta U / U \ll 1); and is extensive and additive for weakly interacting subsystems, ensuring SS scales linearly with system size.

Role in Equilibrium Conditions

In thermal equilibrium, thermodynamic beta serves as the fundamental parameter that governs the condition for stability between systems in contact. For two systems in thermal contact, equilibrium is achieved when their respective betas are equal, β₁ = β₂, which ensures that both systems exhibit the same degree of "coldness" and results in zero net energy flow between them. This equality of beta arises naturally from the maximization of total entropy in the combined system, preventing spontaneous heat transfer. In the context of energy exchange, beta regulates the probabilistic distribution of energy states within a coupled to a , as described in the . Specifically, the probability of the occupying a state with energy difference ΔE relative to a reference is proportional to the Boltzmann factor e^{-β ΔE}, which suppresses higher-energy fluctuations as β increases (corresponding to lower temperatures). This factor ensures that energy exchanges with the maintain the system's equilibrium by balancing the rates of energy absorption and emission. The role of equal beta aligns with the , providing a statistical mechanical foundation for the transitivity of : if two systems each share the same beta with a third, they are in equilibrium with each other, generalizing the classical notion of equal temperatures. This connection underscores beta's primacy in defining across diverse systems, independent of their microscopic details. For multi-system scenarios involving particle exchange, such as in the , beta continues to control the aspect of equilibrium while coexisting with the μ. Here, the grand partition function incorporates β through factors like e^{-β (E - μ N)}, where N is , ensuring that both and particle fluctuations stabilize when β matches that of the reservoirs. This extension maintains beta as the key parameter for thermal consistency in open systems.

Advantages and Applications

Advantages Over Temperature

One key advantage of thermodynamic beta (β) over temperature (T) lies in its continuity across regimes involving negative temperatures. Unlike T, which approaches positive infinity for arbitrarily hot systems and jumps discontinuously to negative infinity without intermediate values, β varies continuously through zero as the system transitions from high positive T (β → 0⁺) to negative T (β < 0). This occurs when dS/dE < 0, as in population-inverted systems like lasers, where β = (1/k_B) ∂S/∂E|_{V,N} directly reflects the entropy-energy relation without divergence issues. β also provides a more intuitive causal interpretation for thermodynamic processes compared to T. Specifically, β = (1/k_B) dS/dQ for reversible heat addition dQ, representing the incremental entropy increase per unit heat absorbed and directly embodying the second law's constraint on entropy production. This formulation aids in analyzing irreversibility and heat flow directions, whereas T inversely scales this rate, obscuring the direct proportionality to entropy change. In ensembles, β exhibits additivity for independent subsystems, streamlining calculations in ways T does not. For non-interacting systems in , equilibrium requires a uniform β, yielding the total Boltzmann factor as e^{-β H_{total}} = \prod_i e^{-β H_i} and the partition function Z_{total} = \prod_i Z_i, which simplifies logarithmic sums for thermodynamic potentials like free energy. This product structure exploits β's role as the shared conjugate to energy, avoiding the inversions needed when using T. Finally, β offers profound information-theoretic insights, linking physical to computational concepts through its units and form. With dimensions of inverse (e.g., scaled as gigabits per nanojoule in information-processing contexts), β quantifies how scales with logarithmic probabilities in the distribution p_i \propto e^{-β E_i}, bridging S/k_B = -\sum p_i \ln p_i to Shannon information measures. This connection, foundational in unifying with , proves valuable for analyzing efficiency in nanoscale and .

Applications in Physics and Beyond

In equilibrium statistical mechanics, thermodynamic beta parameterizes the partition function Z=∑iexp⁡(−βEi)Z = \sum_i \exp(-\beta E_i), enabling the calculation of canonical ensemble averages for key thermodynamic quantities such as internal energy ⟨E⟩=−∂ln⁡Z∂β\langle E \rangle = -\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial \beta}, entropy, and Helmholtz free energy, which underpin the statistical description of macroscopic properties from microscopic states. Extensions to non-equilibrium systems appear in the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, where β connects the amplitude of thermal noise—manifesting as random forces in Brownian motion—to the dissipative friction coefficient γ via relations like ⟨F(t)F(0)⟩=2γkBTδ(t)=2γ/β δ(t)\langle F(t) F(0) \rangle = 2 \gamma k_B T \delta(t) = 2 \gamma / \beta \ \delta(t), ensuring that equilibrium fluctuations predict linear responses to perturbations in colloidal particles or molecular motors. In quantum mechanics, β enters the density matrix for thermal states as ρ=exp⁡(−βH^)Z\rho = \frac{\exp(-\beta \hat{H})}{Z}, with Z=Tr[exp⁡(−βH^)]Z = \mathrm{Tr}[\exp(-\beta \hat{H})], providing the mixed-state representation essential for quantum thermodynamics, including the analysis of heat flows, entanglement in thermal baths, and efficiency bounds in quantum refrigerators. Beyond physics, β finds interdisciplinary applications; in biology, it scales energy landscapes in protein folding models, where the Boltzmann factor exp⁡(−βΔE)\exp(-\beta \Delta E) weights conformations, and an energy gap of several kBTk_B T (corresponding to β ΔE ≈ 5–10) stabilizes the native fold against unfolding at physiological temperatures around 300 K, as seen in lattice and Go̅ models of α/β proteins. Similarly, at these temperatures where β ≈ 2.4 × 10^{20} J^{-1}, β appears in analyses of thermodynamic constraints on metabolic networks, influencing growth efficiency and reaction fluxes in unicellular organisms. In information theory, β acts as the inverse of "thermal noise" temperature in statistical mechanical models of error-correcting codes, such as those on the Nishimori line where 1/β aligns decoding temperatures with channel noise for optimal low-density parity-check codes, minimizing bit-error rates in noisy transmissions. In emerging areas, employs β = \frac{8\pi G M}{\hbar c^3} (in , β ∼ M for Schwarzschild mass M), linking the Hawking temperature T_H = 1/β to and S = A/4 (with A the horizon area), which unifies gravitational and quantum effects in processes. For nanoscale devices, β governs single-shot work extraction in quantum thermodynamic cycles, via free energy F_min = - (1/β) D_min(ρ || γ_β) where γ_β is the Gibbs state, imposing fluctuation-limited efficiencies on thermoelectrics, quantum dots, and far from equilibrium.

Historical Development

Early Concepts of Reciprocal Temperature

The origins of reciprocal temperature concepts in thermodynamics trace back to the , where early formulations of efficiency implicitly introduced the inverse of as a key quantity. In Sadi Carnot's analysis of ideal s, the motive power was shown to depend on differences between hot and cold reservoirs, with later interpretations revealing the role of ratios involving 1/T in determining maximum , such as in the expression for the work output relative to heat input. This laid groundwork for viewing reciprocals as measures of thermal potential, though Carnot himself did not explicitly formalize 1/T. Rudolf Clausius, building on Carnot's ideas in the 1850s, explicitly incorporated the reciprocal of into the mathematical structure of . In his 1854 paper, Clausius derived the of a reversible as η = 1 - T_c / T_h, where T_h and T_c are the absolute temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs, respectively, highlighting 1/T as essential for quantifying the convertibility of to work. This formulation not only resolved inconsistencies in Carnot's but also paved the way for as the integral of dQ_rev / T, where the reciprocal temperature directly scales the contribution of heat transfers to a . William A. Day's contributions in 1969 further developed these ideas in , introducing "coldness" explicitly as 1/T to describe thermodynamic restrictions in materials with effects, such as in the Clausius-Duhem inequality for fading- solids. Day's approach demonstrated that coldness functions universally in thermoelastic bodies, providing a rigorous basis for stability and without relying on absolute temperature scales alone.

Introduction of Thermodynamic Beta

While the concept of inverse temperature appeared earlier in through J. Willard Gibbs' foundational work on the in 1902, the formal establishment of thermodynamic beta as a distinct concept in occurred in 1971, when Ingo Müller introduced the term "Kältefunktion" (coldness function) in his seminal paper on the of viscous, heat-conducting fluids. Published in the Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, this work positioned β = 1/(k_B T)—where k_B denotes the and T the —as a universal function to reformulate the in a manner compatible with the rational extended framework. Müller's motivation stemmed from the limitations of classical equilibrium in describing non-equilibrium processes, where traditional temperature-based formulations led to inconsistencies in handling heat fluxes and viscous effects; by employing β, he achieved a more symmetric and tractable expression for in irreversible scenarios. Following its introduction, thermodynamic beta saw rapid adoption within , particularly as researchers sought parameters that streamlined derivations in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium contexts. A key refinement in the mid-1970s linked β more explicitly to empirical scales, enhancing its utility in bridging theoretical models with experimental measurements of properties. This evolution was driven by motivations such as resolving discontinuities associated with systems—where β remains continuous and can assume negative values, avoiding singularities at T = 0—and further simplifying the differential forms of in processes involving irreversibility, such as those with non-zero conduction or dissipation. By the 1980s, β had become a standard parameter in , reflecting its profound influence through integration into authoritative textbooks like R. K. Pathria's (first edition, 1972; subsequent editions reinforcing its role). This widespread acceptance underscored β's value in unifying thermodynamic descriptions across diverse systems, from classical fluids to quantum ensembles, while building directly on Müller's foundational contributions to non-equilibrium theory.

References

  1. https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Engineering/EGR_1010%253A_Introduction_to_Engineering_for_Engineers_and_Scientists/14%253A_Fundamentals_of_Engineering/14.12%253A_Thermodynamics_%28Statistical_Physics%29
  2. https://phas.ubc.ca/~berciu/TEACHING/PHYS403/LECTURES/FILES/file6n.pdf
  3. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Statistical_Thermodynamics_%28Jeschke%29/03%253A_Classical_Ensembles/3.03%253A_Canonical_Ensemble
  4. https://www.physics.udel.edu/~glyde/PHYS813/Lectures/chapter_5.pdf
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/thermodynamic-function
  6. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?k
  7. https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/jared-kaplan/files/2018/11/StatisticalMechanicsNotes.pdf
  8. https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/kelvin-boltzmann-constant
  9. https://courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2018/Spring/physics210a/LECTURES/STATMECH.pdf
  10. https://www3.nd.edu/~powers/ame.20231/notes.pdf
  11. https://scalettar.physics.ucdavis.edu/p219a/ArovasStatMechnotes.pdf
  12. https://ggckondagaon.in/Content/154_105_Book_ChemicalThermodynamics_Keszei2012_.pdf
  13. https://madar-ju.com/storage/images/files/file_1738446353sLcAF.pdf
  14. https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/statphys/statmechhtml/S1.html
  15. https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/astr5110_13/notes/statmech.pdf
  16. https://ps.uci.edu/~cyu/p115A/LectureNotes/Lecture9/html_version/lecture9.html
  17. http://web.mit.edu/8.333/www/lectures/lec13.pdf
  18. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Therm/entrop2.html
  19. https://kiskis.physics.ucdavis.edu/student/phy9b_11/entropy.pdf
  20. https://pages.uoregon.edu/dbelitz/teaching/2021_22/PHYS_614/lecture_notes/Stat_Mech_Notes.pdf
  21. https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/355/Surveyhtml/node231.html
  22. https://ps.uci.edu/~cyu/p115A/LectureNotes/Lecture3/html_version/lecture3.html
  23. https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~gros/Vorlesungen/TD/9_Canonical_ensemble.pdf
  24. https://theory.physics.manchester.ac.uk/~xian/thermal/chap4.pdf
  25. https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~gros/Vorlesungen/TD/10_Grand_canonical_ensemble.pdf
  26. https://ps.uci.edu/~cyu/p115A/LectureNotes/Lecture9/html_version/
  27. https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Engineering/EGR_1010%3A_Introduction_to_Engineering_for_Engineers_and_Scientists/14%3A_Fundamentals_of_Engineering/14.12%3A_Thermodynamics_(Statistical_Physics)
  28. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Statistical_Thermodynamics_(Jeschke)/03%3A_Classical_Ensembles/3.03%3A_Canonical_Ensemble
  29. https://www.cmu.edu/biolphys/deserno/pdf/FD.pdf
  30. https://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/1112/notes/density.pdf
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2735084/
  32. https://academic.oup.com/book/5185/chapter/147839903
  33. https://www.physics.umd.edu/grt/taj/776b/lectures.pdf
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3059
  35. https://www.asme.org/about-asme/engineering-history/landmarks/275-reflections-on-the-motive-power-of-fire-and-on-machines-fitted-to-develop-that-power
  36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.18541691202
  37. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-32380-5_1
  38. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00248154
  39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281528
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.