Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Tourniquet
View on WikipediaThis article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2019) |


A tourniquet is a medical device used to stop the flow of blood to a limb or extremity via the application of localized pressure. It may be used in emergencies, in surgery, or in post-operative rehabilitation.
A simple tourniquet can be made from a stick and a rope, but the use of makeshift tourniquets has been reduced over time due to their ineffectiveness compared to a commercial and professional tourniquet. This may stem the flow of blood, but side effects such as soft tissue damage and nerve damage may occur.
History
[edit]
During Alexander the Great's military campaigns in the fourth century BC, tourniquets were used to stanch the bleeding of wounded soldiers.[1] Romans used them to control bleeding, especially during amputations.[2] These tourniquets were narrow straps made of bronze, using only leather for comfort.[2]

In 1718, French surgeon Jean Louis Petit developed a screw device for occluding blood flow in surgical sites. Before this invention, the tourniquet was a simple garrot, tightened by twisting a rod (thus its name tourniquet, from tourner = to turn).
In 1785, Sir Gilbert Blane advocated that, in battle, each Royal Navy sailor should carry a tourniquet:
It frequently happens that men bleed to death before assistance can be procured, or lose so much blood as not to be able to go through an operation. In order to prevent this, it has been proposed, and on some occasions practised, to make each man carry about him a garter, or piece of rope yarn, in order to bind up a limb in case of profuse bleeding. If it be objected, that this, from its solemnity may be apt to intimidate common men, officers at least should make use of some precaution, especially as many of them, and those of the highest rank, are stationed on the quarter deck, which is one of the most exposed situations, and far removed from the cockpit, where the surgeon and his assistants are placed. This was the cause of the death of my friend Captain Bayne, of the Alfred, who having had his knee so shattered with round shot that it was necessary to amputate the limb, expired under the operation, in consequence of the weakness induced by loss of blood in carrying him so far. As the Admiral on these occasions allowed me the honour of being at his side, I carried in my pocket several tourniquets of a simple construction, in case that accidents to any person on the quarter deck should have required their use.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
In 1864, Joseph Lister created a bloodless surgical field using a tourniquet device.[12][13] In 1873, Friedrich von Esmarch introduced a rubber bandage that would both control bleeding and exsanguinate.[14] This device is known as Esmarch's bandage.[14] In 1881, Richard von Volkmann noted paralysis can occur from the use of the Esmarch tourniquet, if wrapped too tightly.[12] Many cases of serious and permanent limb paralysis were reported from the use of non-pneumatic Esmarch tourniquets.[14][12][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
After observing considerable number of pressure paralysis with non-pneumatic, elastic, tourniquets, Harvey Cushing created a pneumatic tourniquet, in 1904.[12][15] Pneumatic tourniquets were superior over Esmarch's tourniquet in two ways: (1) faster application and removal; and (2) decrease the risk of nerve palsy.[12]
In 1908, August Bier used two pneumatic tourniquets with intravenous local anesthesia to anesthetize the limb without general anesthetics.[16]
In the early 1980s, microprocessor-based pneumatic tourniquet systems were invented by James McEwen.[17][18][13] These modern electronic pneumatic tourniquet systems generally regulate the pressure in the tourniquet cuff within 1% of the target pressure and allows real-time monitoring of the inflation time.[18] Modern pneumatic tourniquet systems include audiovisual alarms to alarm the user if hazardously high or low cuff pressures are present, automatic self-test and calibration, and backup power source.[13]
In the 2000s, the silicon ring tourniquet, or elastic ring tourniquet, was developed by Noam Gavriely, a professor of medicine and former emergency physician.[19][20] The tourniquet consists of an elastic ring made of silicone, stockinet, and pull straps made from ribbon that are used to roll the device onto the limb. The silicone ring tourniquet exsanguinates the blood from the limb while the device is being rolled on, and then occludes the limb once the desired occlusion location is reached.[21] Unlike the historical mechanical tourniquets, the device reduces the risk of nerve paralysis.[22][23] The surgical tourniquet version of the device is completely sterile, and provides improved surgical accessibility due to its narrow profile that results in a larger surgical field. It has been found to be a safe alternative method for most orthopedic limb procedures, but it does not completely replace the use of contemporary tourniquet devices.[24][25] More recently the silicone ring tourniquet has been used in the fields of emergency medicine and vascular procedures.[20][26] However, in 2015 Feldman et. al. reported two cases of pulmonary embolism after silicon ring exsanguination tourniquet application in patients with traumatic injuries.[4] In one case of exsanguination tourniquet induced bilateral pulmonary emboli, after rapid intervention a 65-year-old woman was discharged in good condition 7 days after surgery.[4] In a second case with multiple pulmonary emboli, despite extensive efforts of intervention a 53-year-old man's condition quickly deteriorated after surgery, and was declared brain dead 2 days after.[4] While Feldman et. al. discuss the potential risk of DVT for various types of tourniquets and exsanguination methods, the authors recommend extreme caution and suggest avoiding the use of an exsanguination tourniquet in patients with risk factors for DVT, including patients with traumatic injury of the extremities.[4]
Most modern pneumatic tourniquet systems include the ability to measure the patient's limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and recommend a tourniquet pressure based on the measured LOP to set safer and lower tourniquet pressures.[13] Limb occlusion pressure is defined as "the minimum pressure required, at a specific time by a specific tourniquet cuff applied to a specific patient's limb at a specific location, to stop the flow of arterial blood into the limb distal to the cuff."[13]
After World War II, the US military reduced use of the tourniquet because the time between application and reaching medical attention was so long that the damage from stopped circulation was worse than that from blood loss. Since the beginning of the 21st century, US authorities have resuscitated its use in both military and non-military situations because treatment delays have been dramatically reduced. The Virginia State Police and police departments in Dallas, Philadelphia and other major cities provide tourniquets and other advanced bandages. In Afghanistan and Iraq, only 2 percent of soldiers with severe bleeding died compared with 7 percent in the Vietnam War, in part because of the combination of tourniquets and rapid access to doctors.[citation needed] Between 2005 and 2011, tourniquets saved 2,000 American lives from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.[27] In civilian use, emerging practices include transporting tourniquetted patients even before emergency responders arrive and including tourniquets with defibrillators for emergency use.
There are currently no standards for testing tourniquets although there have been several proposed devices to ensure that the appropriate pressures could be generated including many commercial systems and an open source system that can be largely 3D printed.[28] This would allow distributed manufacturing of tourniquets.[29][30]
Risks
[edit]Risks and contraindications related to the use of a surgical tourniquet include: nerve injuries, skin injuries, compartment syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, and pain.[31] Risk of injury can be minimized by minimizing tourniquet pressure and pressure gradients.[31][13] Tourniquet pressure and pressure gradients can be minimized by using a tourniquet pressure based on the patient's limb occlusion pressure, and by using a wider, contoured pneumatic tourniquet cuff.[13]
In some elective surgical procedures such as total knee arthroplasty, some research suggests tourniquet use may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events, pain, and a longer hospital stay, despite tourniquet use allowing shorter times in the operating room.[32] However, such evidence (meta-analyses and reviews) often omit the analysis of key tourniquet parameters and their correlation to outcomes leading to limited, inconclusive, and conflicting results.[33]
A study by Pavao et al compared no tourniquet use to optimized tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and found no significant differences in surgical timing, blood loss, thigh and knee pain, edema, range of motion, functional scores, and complications, thus allowing surgery to occur with the benefits of a clean and dry surgical field from an optimized tourniquet without increase procedure-related comorbidities.[34] Therefore, tourniquet use optimized to mitigate tourniquet related-risks while maintaining the benefits of a clear bloodless field and faster operating times may be achieved by minimizing tourniquet pressure and inflated tourniquet times.[31][33][34]
Types
[edit]There are three types of tourniquets: surgical tourniquets, emergency tourniquets, and rehabilitation tourniquets.
Surgical tourniquets
[edit]Surgical tourniquets prevent blood flow to a limb and enable surgeons to work in a bloodless operative field.[35] This allows surgical procedures to be performed with improved precision, safety and speed.[35] Surgical tourniquets can be divided into two groups: pneumatic tourniquets and non-pneumatic tourniquets.[35]
Surgical pneumatic tourniquets
[edit]Surgical pneumatic tourniquets are routinely and safely used orthopedic and plastic surgery, as well as in intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block anesthesia) where they serve the additional function of preventing the central spread of local anesthetics in the limb.[35] Modern pneumatic tourniquet systems consist of a pneumatic tourniquet instrument, tourniquet cuffs, pneumatic tubing, and limb protection sleeves.
Surgical pneumatic tourniquet instrument
[edit]Modern pneumatic tourniquet instruments are microcomputer-based with the following features:[13]
- Accurate pressure regulator to maintain cuff pressure within 1% of the target pressure,[13]
- Automatic timer to provide precise record of inflation time,[13]
- Audiovisual alarms to warn the operator if potential hazards are detected,[13]
- Automatic self test and self-calibration to ensure system hardware and software integrity,[13] and
- Backup power source to allow continued operation if unanticipated power outage occurs[13]
Many studies published in the medical literature have shown that higher tourniquet pressures and pressure gradients are associated with higher risks of tourniquet-related injuries.[13][36] Advances in tourniquet technology have reduced the risk of nerve-related injury by optimizing and personalizing tourniquet pressure based on the patient's Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP), rather than setting standard tourniquet pressures, which are generally higher and more hazardous.[37] LOP is defined as "the minimum pressure required, at a specific time by a specific tourniquet cuff applied to a specific patient's limb at a specific location, to stop the flow of arterial blood into the limb distal to the cuff."[13] LOP accounts for variables such as cuff design (bladder width), cuff application (snugness), patient limb characteristics (shape, size, tissues), and patient's systolic blood pressure.[13] After LOP is measured, personalized tourniquet pressure is set to LOP plus a safety margin to account for any increase in limb occlusion pressure normally expected during the surgery.[13] The use of personalized pressures and wide contour tourniquet cuffs have been found to reduce average tourniquet pressure by 33%-42% from typical pressures.[38] Setting the tourniquet pressure on the basis of LOP minimizes the pressure and related pressure gradients applied by a cuff to an underlying limb, which helps to minimize the risk of tourniquet-related injuries.[13]
LOP may be measured manually by Doppler ultrasound. However, the method is time consuming and its accuracy is highly dependent on the skill and experience of the operator.[39] LOP may also be measured automatically using a photoplethysmography distal sensor applied to the patient's finger or toe of the operative limb to detect volumetric changes in blood in peripheral circulation as cuff pressure is gradually increased.[39] Finally, most recently, LOP may be measured using a dual-purpose tourniquet cuff to monitor arterial pulsations in the underlying limb as the cuff pressure is gradually increased.[39]
Pneumatic tourniquet instruments and cuffs are available in a single-line (single-port) or dual-line (dual-port) setup.[40] Single-port configuration uses the same pneumatic line that connects the instrument to the cuff for both pressure regulation and pressure monitoring.[40] Dual-port configuration uses one pneumatic line to regulate pressure and one pneumatic line to monitor pressure.[41][42][17][40] The dual-port configuration may facilitate faster cuff pressure regulation and the detection of occlusions in the hoses.[41][40][42][17]
Surgical pneumatic tourniquet cuff
[edit]Compressed gas is introduced into a bladder within a pneumatic tourniquet cuff by the pneumatic tourniquet instrument through a pneumatic tubing.[35] The inflated cuff exerts pressure on the circumference of the patient's limb to occlude blood flow.[35]

Compression by the inflated cuff can result in tissue injury.[43] A good tourniquet cuff fit ensures even pressure distribution across the underlying soft tissues, whereas a poor tourniquet cuff fit can result in areas of higher pressure which can lead to soft tissue ischemia.[43] Therefore, in order to safely and effectively occlude blood flow distal to the applied tourniquet cuff, proper selection and application of the tourniquet cuff should be followed.
The following should be considered when selecting a tourniquet cuff:[35][43]
- Cuff location,[35][43]
- Limb shape which determines the cuff shape (e.g. cylindrical or contour shaped),[35][43]
- Limb circumference which determines the cuff length,[35][43]
- Cuff width,[35][43]
- Single versus dual bladder design (e.g. whether an IVRA cuff is needed),[35][43] and
- Use sterile cuff when it will be very close to the sterile field[43]
Surgical limb protection sleeve
[edit]It is recommended to protect the limb beneath the cuff by applying a low-lint, soft padding around the limb, prior to cuff application, according to the cuff manufacturer's instructions for use.[44] Matching limb protection sleeves matched to the cuff width and patient's limb circumference has been shown to produce significantly fewer, less severe wrinkles and pinches in the skin surface than other padding types tested.[40][45]
Surgical non-pneumatic tourniquet
[edit]

In silicone ring tourniquets, or elastic ring tourniquets, the tourniquet comes in a variety of sizes. To determine the correct tourniquet size, the patient's limb circumference at the desired occlusion location should be measured, as well as their blood pressure to determine the best model.[21] Once the correct model is selected, typically two sterile medical personnel will be needed to apply the device. Unlike with a pneumatic tourniquet, the silicone ring tourniquet should be applied after the drapes have been placed on the patient. This is due to the device being completely sterile.[46] The majority of the devices require a two-man operation (with the exception of the extra large model):
- One person is responsible for holding the patient's limb. The other will place the device on the limb (extra large models may require two people).
- Application:
- The elastic ring tourniquet is placed on the patient's limb. If placed on a hand or foot, all fingers or toes should be enclosed within the tourniquet.
- The handles of the tourniquet should be positioned medial-lateral on the upper extremity or posterior-anterior on the lower extremity.
- The person applying the device should start rolling the device while the individual responsible for the limb should hold the limb straight and maintain axial traction.
- Once the desired occlusion location is reached, the straps can be cut off or tied just below the ring.
- A window can be cut or the section of stockinet can be completely removed.
- Once the surgery is completed the device is cut off with a supplied cutting card.
The elastic ring tourniquet follows similar recommendations noted for pneumatic tourniquet use:
- It should not be used on a patient's limb for more than 120 minutes, as the interruption of blood flow may cause cell damage and necrosis.
- The tourniquet should not be placed on the ulnar nerve or the peroneal nerve.
- The silicone ring device cannot be used on patients with blood problems such as DVT, edema, etc.
- A patient suffering from skin lesions or a malignancy should use this type of tourniquet.[47]
Emergency tourniquets
[edit]Emergency tourniquets differ from surgical tourniquets as are they are used in military combat care, emergency medicine, and accident situations where electrical power is not available, and may need to be applied by an assisting person or self-applied by the injured person.[48] Emergency tourniquets are assessed for their effectiveness of hemorrhage control, pulse stoppage distal to the tourniquet, time to stop bleeding, total blood loss, and applied pressure.[49][48] However, their design and safe use should be considered as it relates to nerve injury, reperfusion injury, soft tissue injury, and pain.[48]
Early implementation of non-pneumatic tourniquet use in the nineteenth century for non-amputation surgical procedures often resulted in reports of permanent and temporary limb paralysis, nerve injuries, and other soft-tissue injuries.[13] As a result, pneumatic tourniquets were developed for surgery, where the applied pressure and pressure gradients can be controlled, minimized, and controlled, and thereby minimize the risk of tourniquet related injuries.[13]
Pneumatic emergency tourniquet
[edit]Emergency military tourniquet
[edit]The Emergency & Military Tourniquet (EMT) is an example of a pneumatic tourniquet developed for safe use in pre-hospital or military settings. In a study that evaluated 5 emergency tourniquet systems for use in the Canadian Forces, the EMT was one of the most effective tourniquets and caused the least pain.[50] In another study comparing the effectiveness of 3 emergency tourniquet systems, while all devices were effective in both hemorrhage control and stopping blood flow, the EMT also performed the best for shortest time to stop blood flow, lowest total blood loss, and required the least amount of pressure to stop blood flow.[49]
Non-pneumatic emergency tourniquet
[edit]Silicone ring auto-transfusion tourniquet
[edit]The silicone ring auto-transfusion tourniquet (SRT/ATT/EED), or surgical auto-transfusion tourniquet (HemaClear), is a simple to use, self-contained, mechanical tourniquet that consists of a silicone ring, stockinet, and pull straps that results in the limb being exsanguinated and occluded within seconds of application.[51] The tourniquet can be used for limb procedures in the operating room, or in emergency medicine as a means to stabilize a patient until further treatment can be applied.[52]
Combat application tourniquet
[edit]The combat application tourniquet (CAT) was developed by Ted Westmoreland. It is used by the U.S. and coalition militaries to provide soldiers a small and effective tourniquet in field combat situations. It is also used in the UK by NHS ambulance services, along with some UK fire and rescue services. The unit utilizes a windlass with a locking mechanism and can be self-applied. The CAT has been adopted by military and emergency personnel around the world.[53]
An open hardware-based 3D printing project called the Glia Tourniquet[54] (windlass type) enables emergency tourniquets to use distributed manufacturing to make them for $7 in materials.[55] Concerns over quality control of distributed manufactured tourniquets was partially addressed with an open source testing apparatus.[56] The tourniquet tester costs less than $100 and once calibrated with a blood pressure monitor, the built-in LCD displays the measuring range of the tester (0 to 200 N), which can be used to test the validation of all tourniquets.[56]
Rehabilitation tourniquets
[edit]Personalized blood flow restriction
[edit]Recently, pneumatic tourniquets have been successfully used for a technique called Personalized Blood Flow Restriction Training (PBFRT) to accelerate the rehabilitation of orthopedic patients, injured professional athletes, and wounded soldiers.[57]
Typically, to increase muscle size and strength, a person needs to lift loads at or above 65% of their one repetition maximum.[58] However, injured patients are often limited to low-load resistance exercise where strength and size benefits are limited compared to high-load resistance exercise.[57]
Low-load resistance exercise combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown in literature to increase both muscle strength and size across different age groups.[57] With BFR, exercise can be performed at substantially lower loads and intensities while generating similar muscular and physiological adaptations seen in high intensity resistance training.[59] For load compromised populations, this reduces the pain during the exercise protocol and leads to overall improvements in physical function.[59]
To provide consistent BFR pressure stimulus to patients, it is recommended to (1) apply a restrictive pressure that is personalized to each individual patient based on the patient's limb occlusion pressure,[60] and (2) utilize a BFR system that can provide surgical-grade tourniquet autoregulation.[61]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Schmidt MS (January 19, 2014). "Reviving a Life Saver, the Tourniquet". New York Times.
- ^ a b "Thigh tourniquet, Roman, 199 BCE-500 CE". sciencemuseum.org.uk. July 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
- ^ Blane G (1785). Observations on the diseases incident to seamen. London: Joseph Cooper; Edinburgh: William Creech. pp. 498–499.
- ^ a b c d e f Feldman V, Biadsi A, Slavin O, Kish B, Tauber I, Nyska M, Brin YS (December 2015). "Pulmonary Embolism After Application of a Sterile Elastic Exsanguination Tourniquet". Orthopedics. 38 (12): e1160-3. doi:10.3928/01477447-20151123-08. PMID 26652340.
- ^ a b Middleton RW, Varian JP (May 1974). "Tourniquet paralysis". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 44 (2): 124–8. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1974.tb06402.x. PMID 4533458.
- ^ a b McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH (March 1985). "The pressure distribution under tourniquets". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 67 (3): 433–8. doi:10.2106/00004623-198567030-00014. PMID 3972869.
- ^ a b Klenerman L (November 1962). "The tourniquet in surgery". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 44-B (4): 937–43. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.44B4.937. PMID 14042193.
- ^ a b Richards RL (May 1951). "Ischaemic lesions of peripheral nerves: a review". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 14 (2): 76–87. doi:10.1136/jnnp.14.2.76. PMC 499577. PMID 14850993.
- ^ a b Fletcher IR, Healy TE (November 1983). "The arterial tourniquet". Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 65 (6): 409–17. PMC 2494408. PMID 6357039.
- ^ a b Moldaver J (February 1954). "Tourniquet paralysis syndrome". A.M.A. Archives of Surgery. 68 (2): 136–44. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1954.01260050138002. PMID 13123650.
- ^ a b The Tourniquet Manual — Principles and Practice | Leslie Klenerman | Springer. Springer. 2003. doi:10.1007/b97532. ISBN 978-1-85233-706-3. S2CID 26268006.
- ^ a b c d e Kragh, John F.; Swan, Kenneth G.; Smith, Dale C.; Mabry, Robert L.; Blackbourne, Lorne H. (2011-07-22). "Historical review of emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding". The American Journal of Surgery. 203 (2): 242–252. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.028. ISSN 0002-9610. PMID 21782152.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Noordin, Shahryar; McEwen, James A; Kragh, Colonel John F; Eisen, Andrew; Masri, Bassam A (December 2009). "Surgical Tourniquets in Orthopaedics". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 91 (12): 2958–2967. doi:10.2106/jbjs.i.00634. ISSN 0021-9355. PMID 19952261.
- ^ a b c Austin, M. (1963-05-01). "The Esmarch Bandage and Pulmonary Embolism". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 45-B (2): 384–385. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.45b2.384. ISSN 0301-620X.
- ^ Prevoznik, Stephen J. (1970-02-01). "Injury from Use of Pneumatic Tourniquets". Anesthesiology. 32 (2): 177. doi:10.1097/00000542-197002000-00025. ISSN 0003-3022. PMID 5414299.
- ^ Stevens, Donald S. (July 2005). "Bier Block With Steroid for CRPS". Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 30 (4): 409. doi:10.1097/00115550-200507000-00015. ISSN 1098-7339.
- ^ a b c McEwen, J. A. (1981). "Complications of and improvements in pneumatic tourniquets used in surgery". Medical Instrumentation. 15 (4): 253–257. ISSN 0090-6689. PMID 7300701.
- ^ a b Radulovic, Aleksandar; Cerovac, Sonja (2023-10-26). "The history of tourniquet use in limb surgery". International Orthopaedics. 48 (2): 603–609. doi:10.1007/s00264-023-06018-y. ISSN 0341-2695. PMID 37882842. S2CID 264488005.
- ^ "Unit of Physiology and Biophysics- Noam Gavriely".
- ^ a b Tang DH, Olesnicky BT, Eby MW, Heiskell LE (6 December 2013). "Auto-transfusion tourniquets: the next evolution of tourniquets". Open Access Emergency Medicine. 5 (5): 29–32. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S39042. PMC 4806816. PMID 27147871.
- ^ a b Drosos GI, Ververidis A, Stavropoulos NI, Mavropoulos R, Tripsianis G, Kazakos K (June 2013). "Silicone ring tourniquet versus pneumatic cuff tourniquet in carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparative study". Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 14 (2): 131–5. doi:10.1007/s10195-012-0223-x. PMC 3667358. PMID 23361654.
- ^ Mohan A, Baskaradas A, Solan M, Magnussen P (March 2011). "Pain and paraesthesia produced by silicone ring and pneumatic tourniquets". The Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume. 36 (3): 215–8. doi:10.1177/1753193410390845. PMID 21131688. S2CID 31477205.
- ^ Gavriely N (May 2010). "Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 92 (5): 1318–22, author reply 1322–3. PMID 20439692.
- ^ Demirkale I, Tecimel O, Sesen H, Kilicarslan K, Altay M, Dogan M (May 2014). "Nondrainage decreases blood transfusion need and infection rate in bilateral total knee arthroplasty". The Journal of Arthroplasty. 29 (5): 993–7. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.022. PMID 24275263.
- ^ Drosos GI, Ververidis A, Mavropoulos R, Vastardis G, Tsioros KI, Kazakos K (September 2013). "The silicone ring tourniquet in orthopaedic operations of the extremities". Surgical Technology International. 23: 251–7. PMID 23860930.
- ^ Ladenheim E, Krauthammer J, Agrawal S, Lum C, Chadwick N (April–June 2013). "A sterile elastic exsanguination tourniquet is effective in preventing blood loss during hemodialysis access surgery". The Journal of Vascular Access. 14 (2): 116–9. doi:10.5301/jva.5000107. PMC 6159822. PMID 23080335.
- ^ "Trauma medicine has learned lessons from the battlefield". The Economist. 12 October 2017.
- ^ Liu, Dawei; Kulkarni, Apoorv; Jaqua, Victoria F.; Cole, Christina A.; Pearce, Joshua M. (2023). "Distributed manufacturing of an open-source tourniquet testing system". HardwareX. 15 e00442. doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2023.e00442. PMC 10338363. PMID 37457304.
- ^ Stout, James. "3D-printed tourniquets could save lives in conflict zones". New Scientist. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
- ^ Loubani, Tarek (2022-03-25). "Reinventing 3D printed tourniquets for Ukraine is a mistake". Medium. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
- ^ a b c Guideline for care of patients undergoing pneumatic tourniquet-assisted procedures. AORN. 2020.
- ^ Ahmed I, Chawla A, Underwood M, Price AJ, Metcalfe A, Hutchinson C, et al. (December 2020). "Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (12) CD012874. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012874.pub2. PMC 8094224. PMID 33316105.
- ^ a b Neufeld, Michael E.; McEwen, James A.; Kerr, Julie; Sidhu, Arsh; Howard, Lisa C.; Masri, Bassam A. (2023-04-17). "Optimization of surgical tourniquet usage to improve patient outcomes: Translational cross-disciplinary implications of a surgical practice survey". Frontiers in Surgery. 10. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1104603. ISSN 2296-875X. PMC 10149658. PMID 37139190.
- ^ a b Pavão, Douglas M.; Pires eAlbuquerque, Rodrigo S.; de Faria, José Leonardo R.; Sampaio, Yuri D.; de Sousa, Eduardo B.; Fogagnolo, Fabricio (April 2023). "Optimized Tourniquet Use in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative, Prospective, and Randomized Study". The Journal of Arthroplasty. 38 (4): 685–690. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.026. ISSN 0883-5403. PMID 36280159. S2CID 253075542.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Kumar, Kamal; Railton, Craig; Tawfic, Qutaiba (2016). "Tourniquet application during anesthesia: "What we need to know?"". Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 32 (4): 424–430. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.168174. ISSN 0970-9185. PMC 5187604. PMID 28096570.
- ^ Masri, Bassam A.; Eisen, Andrew; Duncan, Clive P.; McEwen, James A. (2020-05-28). "Tourniquet-induced nerve compression injuries are caused by high pressure levels and gradients – a review of the evidence to guide safe surgical, pre-hospital and blood flow restriction usage". BMC Biomedical Engineering. 2 (1): 7. doi:10.1186/s42490-020-00041-5. ISSN 2524-4426. PMC 7422508. PMID 32903342.
- ^ Masri, Bassam A.; Day, Brian; Younger, Alastair S. E.; Jeyasurya, Jeswin (October 2016). "Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial". Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. 36 (5): 644–650. doi:10.1007/s40846-016-0173-5. ISSN 1609-0985. PMC 5083760. PMID 27853415.
- ^ Younger, Alastair S. E; McEwen, James A; Inkpen, Kevin (November 2004). "Wide Contoured Thigh Cuffs and Automated Limb Occlusion Measurement Allow Lower Tourniquet Pressures". Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 428 (428): 286–293. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000142625.82654.b3. ISSN 0009-921X. PMID 15534554. S2CID 12807792.
- ^ a b c Hughes, Luke; McEwen, James (2021-05-08). "Investigation of clinically acceptable agreement between two methods of automatic measurement of limb occlusion pressure: a randomised trial". BMC Biomedical Engineering. 3 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s42490-021-00053-9. ISSN 2524-4426. PMC 8105974. PMID 33964963.
- ^ a b c d e "How to Choose a Tourniquet - Outpatient Surgery Magazine - November, 2". Outpatient Surgery Magazine. Retrieved 2024-02-09.
- ^ a b McEwen, James A. US Patent No. 4,469,099, September 4, 1984, "Pneumatic Torniquet".
- ^ a b McEwen, James A. US Patent No. 7,771,453, August 10, 2010, "Occlusion detector for dual-port surgical tourniquet systems".
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Jensen, Jacob; Hicks, Rodney W.; Labovitz, Jonathan (2019-01-29). "Understanding and Optimizing Tourniquet Use During Extremity Surgery". AORN Journal. 109 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1002/aorn.12579. ISSN 0001-2092. PMID 30694553. S2CID 59339160.
- ^ Spruce, Lisa (September 2017). "Back to Basics: Pneumatic Tourniquet Use". AORN Journal. 106 (3): 219–226. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2017.07.003. ISSN 0001-2092. PMID 28865632.
- ^ McEwen, James A.; Kelly, Deborah L.; Jardanowski, Theda; Inkpen, Kevin (September 2002). "Tourniquet Safety in Lower Leg Applications". Orthopaedic Nursing. 21 (5): 61–62. doi:10.1097/00006416-200209000-00009. ISSN 0744-6020. PMID 12432700.
- ^ Thompson SM, Middleton M, Farook M, Cameron-Smith A, Bone S, Hassan A (November 2011). "The effect of sterile versus non-sterile tourniquets on microbiological colonisation in lower limb surgery". Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 93 (8): 589–90. doi:10.1308/147870811X13137608455334. PMC 3566682. PMID 22041233.
- ^ Norman D, Greenfield I, Ghrayeb N, Peled E, Dayan L (December 2009). "Use of a new exsanguination tourniquet in internal fixation of distal radius fractures". Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 13 (4): 173–5. doi:10.1097/BTH.0b013e3181b56187. PMID 19956041. S2CID 116895.
- ^ a b c Lee, C; Porter, K M; Hodgetts, T J (2007-08-01). "Tourniquet use in the civilian prehospital setting". Emergency Medicine Journal. 24 (8): 584–587. doi:10.1136/emj.2007.046359. ISSN 1472-0205. PMC 2660095. PMID 17652690.
- ^ a b Gibson, Rudy; Aden, James K; Dubick, Michael A; Kragh, John F (2016). "Preliminary Comparison of Pneumatic Models of Tourniquet for Prehospital Control of Limb Bleeding in a Manikin Model". Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 16 (2): 21–27. doi:10.55460/tkbm-gs8o. ISSN 1553-9768. PMID 27450599.
- ^ King, Roger B.; Filips, Dennis; Blitz, Sandra; Logsetty, Sarvesh (May 2006). "Evaluation of Possible Tourniquet Systems for Use in the Canadian Forces". The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 60 (5): 1061–1071. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000215429.94483.a7. ISSN 0022-5282. PMID 16688072.
- ^ HemaClear Instructional Video for the Orange Model (Large) on YouTube
- ^ "Emergency EED". Emergency EED.
- ^ Walters T (16–18 August 2004). Testing of Battlefield Tourniquets. Advanced Technology Applications for Combat Casualty Care 2004 (ATACCC) Conference. St. Petersburg, FL.: US Army Institute of Surgical Research.
- ^ EXERCISE CAUTION WITH CLINICAL USE Tourniquet, Glia Free Medical hardware, 2023-07-22, retrieved 2023-07-29
- ^ "The Glia Tourniquet Project". Glia. Retrieved 2023-07-29.
- ^ a b Liu D, Kulkarni A, Jaqua VF, Cole CA, Pearce JM (September 2023). "Distributed manufacturing of an open-source tourniquet testing system". HardwareX. 15 e00442. doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2023.e00442. PMC 10338363. PMID 37457304.
- ^ a b c McEwen, Jim A.; Jeyasurya, Jeswin; Owens, Johnny (2016-05-24). "How Can Personalized Tourniquet Systems Accelerate Rehabilitation of Wounded Warriors, Professional Athletes and Orthopaedic Patients?". CMBES Proceedings. 39. ISSN 2371-9516.
- ^ American College of Sports Medicine (March 2009). "Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults". Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 41 (3): 687–708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670. ISSN 0195-9131. PMID 19204579.
- ^ a b Hughes, Luke; Rosenblatt, Benjamin; Haddad, Fares; Gissane, Conor; McCarthy, Daniel; Clarke, Thomas; Ferris, Graham; Dawes, Joanna; Paton, Bruce; Patterson, Stephen David (2019-07-12). "Comparing the Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction and Traditional Heavy Load Resistance Training in the Post-Surgery Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients: A UK National Health Service Randomised Controlled Trial". Sports Medicine. 49 (11): 1787–1805. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2. ISSN 0112-1642. PMID 31301034. S2CID 196350271.
- ^ Jessee, Matthew B.; Mattocks, Kevin T.; Buckner, Samuel L.; Dankel, Scott J.; Mouser, J. Grant; Abe, Takashi; Loenneke, Jeremy P. (June 2018). "Mechanisms of Blood Flow Restriction: The New Testament". Techniques in Orthopaedics. 33 (2): 72–79. doi:10.1097/bto.0000000000000252. ISSN 0885-9698. S2CID 79572988.
- ^ Lai, Tom; Hughes, Luke; McEwen, James (2023-05-14). "Blood flow restriction therapy: The essential value of accurate surgical-grade tourniquet autoregulation". CMBES Proceedings. 45. ISSN 2371-9516.
External links
[edit]- Klenerman L (November 1962). "The tourniquet in surgery". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 44-B (4): 937–43. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.44B4.937. PMID 14042193.
Tourniquet
View on GrokipediaOverview and Principles
Definition and Primary Uses
A tourniquet is a constricting device designed to apply external pressure to a limb, thereby occluding arterial blood flow and restricting circulation to the distal extremity for a controlled period.[2] This mechanism temporarily isolates the limb from the body's vascular system, minimizing blood loss and enabling precise interventions. Tourniquets can be manual (such as improvised belts or commercial straps) or pneumatic (inflatable cuffs connected to pressure regulators), with the choice depending on the clinical context.[1] The primary use of tourniquets in modern medicine is in emergency trauma care, where they serve as a critical intervention to control life-threatening external hemorrhage from limb injuries, such as those caused by penetrating trauma or accidents.[4] By compressing major blood vessels, tourniquets rapidly staunch bleeding that direct pressure or hemostatic agents cannot manage, potentially saving lives in prehospital settings like battlefields or civilian incidents. Guidelines from organizations like the American College of Surgeons emphasize their application when bleeding is severe and uncontrolled, with proper placement proximal to the wound and tightening to achieve complete hemostasis.[9] In surgical settings, particularly orthopedic procedures on the extremities, tourniquets are routinely employed to establish a bloodless operative field, enhancing visibility and precision while reducing intraoperative blood loss.[13] This application is common in surgeries such as total knee or hip replacements, where the device is inflated to a pressure typically 50-100 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure to ensure arterial occlusion without excessive tissue damage.[14] Studies indicate that tourniquet use in elective surgery can reduce transfusion requirements in certain limb procedures, though duration is limited to under 2 hours to avoid complications like nerve injury.[13] Secondary applications include venipuncture for blood draws, where a simple elastic tourniquet briefly engorges veins to facilitate access, and in some rehabilitation protocols to simulate ischemic conditions for therapeutic training, though these are less common than trauma and surgical uses.[15] Overall, tourniquets remain a cornerstone tool in acute care, with efficacy supported by military and civilian data showing survival rates exceeding 90% for major limb trauma when applied promptly.[16]Physiological Mechanisms
When a tourniquet is applied to a limb, it exerts external pressure sufficient to occlude arterial blood flow distal to the site of application, thereby creating an ischemic environment that deprives tissues of oxygen and nutrients. This mechanism relies on the tourniquet pressure exceeding the systolic blood pressure plus an additional margin to account for limb and tissue factors, typically resulting in complete cessation of both arterial inflow and venous outflow.[17] The primary goal in surgical contexts is to establish a bloodless operative field, while in trauma care, it halts exsanguinating hemorrhage by compressing vessels against underlying bone.30320-7/fulltext) During the ischemic phase, local physiological changes occur rapidly in the affected limb due to the absence of perfusion. Tissues shift to anaerobic metabolism, leading to accumulation of metabolic byproducts such as lactic acid, carbon dioxide (increasing PaCO₂), and potassium ions, alongside a decrease in pH and depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). These alterations can cause cellular swelling, particularly in skeletal muscle and nerves, and if prolonged beyond safe limits (typically 1-2 hours for upper limbs and 2-3 hours for lower limbs), may result in irreversible damage including myonecrosis or neuropathy.[18] Nerve compression injuries, a common complication, arise from two main mechanisms: direct mechanical deformation of nerve fibers under the cuff edge and ischemic hypoxia, with studies showing that pressures above 200 mmHg exacerbate vulnerability in compliant tissues like the peroneal nerve.[19] Upon deflation and reperfusion, the sudden restoration of blood flow triggers a cascade of systemic and local responses known as ischemia-reperfusion injury. Metabolites accumulated during ischemia are flushed into the central circulation, potentially causing transient hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and hypotension, which can strain cardiovascular stability—evidenced by increases in heart rate and blood pressure during inflation followed by a deflation-induced drop in mean arterial pressure by up to 20-30 mmHg.[18] Additionally, reperfusion generates reactive oxygen species and inflammatory mediators, promoting endothelial dysfunction and potential remote organ effects, though clinical significance is minimized with proper timing and pressure management. Coagulopathy may also ensue, with enhanced fibrinolysis and temporary platelet activation observed in some cases.30320-7/fulltext) The overall physiological impact is influenced by factors such as tourniquet pressure, duration, and patient variables like limb girth and vascular health. Optimal pressures, often calculated as limb occlusion pressure (LOP) plus 50-100 mmHg, balance efficacy with safety to mitigate risks like postoperative swelling or chronic pain syndromes.[17] In emergency settings, similar ischemic principles apply, but shorter application times reduce complication rates, with studies confirming effective hemostasis without long-term sequelae when applied correctly.[20]Historical Development
Ancient and Pre-Modern Uses
The earliest documented use of tourniquets dates to ancient India in the 6th century BCE, where the surgeon Sushruta described employing leather straps to constrict limbs and control bleeding during amputations and for treating snakebites in his foundational text, the Sushruta Samhita.[4] These devices were rudimentary, often improvised from available materials like cloth or cord, and aimed at temporarily halting arterial flow to facilitate surgical intervention or venom extraction. Sushruta's techniques emphasized precise application to avoid tissue damage, reflecting an early understanding of pressure's role in hemostasis.[21] Hindu medical knowledge on tourniquets was transmitted to ancient Greece in the 4th century BCE, during Alexander the Great's invasion of the Indus Valley in 326 BCE, influencing Greek physicians who adopted similar tight bandaging methods for wound management.[22] The Hippocratic Corpus briefly references compressive wrappings on extremities to limit blood loss distal to injuries, though without detailed mechanical descriptions.[22] By the Roman era (circa 200 BCE to 500 CE), tourniquets evolved into more structured tools, such as narrow bronze bands applied during battlefield amputations to save soldiers' lives by stemming hemorrhage.[8] However, prominent Roman surgeon Galen (129–200 CE) criticized their routine use, arguing that proximal constriction could exacerbate bleeding from wounds by redirecting pressure and potentially induce hypotension.[8] In medieval Europe, tourniquet application persisted primarily for surgical amputations, with 14th-century surgeon Guy de Chauliac recommending tight cloth bands placed above and below the incision site in his Chirurgia Magna (1363) to minimize pain and blood flow during procedures.[23] These methods remained basic, often relying on sticks or windlasses to twist and tighten ligatures, but faced intermittent skepticism due to risks of gangrene. By the late 17th century, pre-modern battlefield innovations emerged, exemplified by French army surgeon Étienne Morel's 1674 use of a rudimentary windlass tourniquet, twisting a bandage with a stick, during the Siege of Besançon to control exsanguination in wounded troops, marking one of the first unambiguous military applications.[4] This era bridged rudimentary ancient practices toward more systematic designs, though tourniquets were still viewed as measures of last resort.[4]Modern Medical Evolution
In the late 19th century, the development of the Esmarch bandage by German surgeon Friedrich von Esmarch in 1873 marked a significant advancement in surgical tourniquet application, allowing for exsanguination of limbs to create a bloodless field during operations, particularly in orthopedics and vascular surgery.[8] This elastic bandage, wrapped tightly from distal to proximal, facilitated clearer visualization and reduced intraoperative blood loss, though it was limited by risks of nerve compression and required careful removal to avoid reperfusion injury.[4] A pivotal innovation occurred in 1904 when American neurosurgeon Harvey Cushing introduced the first pneumatic tourniquet, adapting the Riva-Rocci sphygmomanometer to provide controlled, inflatable pressure for hemostasis during cranial and limb procedures.[4][24] This device allowed precise pressure regulation, minimizing tissue damage compared to rigid straps, and became integral to modern orthopedic surgery by the mid-20th century, enabling procedures like total knee arthroplasty with reduced bleeding.[8] However, early adoption was tempered by concerns over complications such as postoperative nerve palsy, prompting refinements like wider cuffs and automated inflation systems in the 1970s to optimize safety and efficacy.[25] In military medicine, tourniquet use evolved dramatically across 20th-century conflicts, shifting from rarity to standard protocol. During World War II and the Korean War, tourniquets were seldom applied due to fears of gangrene and prolonged evacuation times, contributing to mortality rates of 7-9% from preventable extremity hemorrhage. Usage increased modestly in Vietnam, but controversy persisted until the 1996 Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines endorsed them for severe limb bleeding, leading to the development of one-handed designs like the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) in 2002.[6] In Iraq and Afghanistan, widespread TCCC implementation reduced extremity hemorrhage deaths to under 2%, with studies reporting over 86% effectiveness in prehospital settings and saving an estimated 1,000-2,000 lives.[26][4] The 21st century saw tourniquets transition into civilian trauma care, driven by battlefield evidence. The 2015 Stop the Bleed initiative, launched by the American College of Surgeons, Department of Homeland Security, and American Red Cross, promoted public access to tourniquets and training, mirroring military protocols to address mass casualty events.[27] This evolution emphasized rapid application within the "golden hour," with devices like the CAT gaining FDA approval for civilian use and integration into emergency medical services, significantly lowering mortality from exsanguination in urban shootings and accidents.[4] Ongoing research focuses on hybrid designs combining pneumatic precision with emergency durability, prioritizing minimal ischemic time to balance hemorrhage control and limb salvage.[28]Medical Applications
Surgical Procedures
Tourniquets are routinely employed in various surgical procedures to establish a bloodless operative field, thereby enhancing visibility, precision, and safety during interventions on the extremities.[8] This application is particularly prevalent in orthopedic and plastic surgeries, where minimizing blood loss facilitates intricate tissue handling and reduces the need for intraoperative hemostasis.[2] In orthopedic contexts, tourniquets are applied proximal to the surgical site on the limb, often after exsanguination achieved by elevating the limb for approximately two minutes or using an elastic bandage, followed by rapid inflation of a pneumatic cuff to occlude arterial flow.[8] In lower extremity orthopedic procedures, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and knee arthroscopy, tourniquets enable surgeons to perform osteotomies and soft tissue repairs with optimal clarity, though their routine use in TKA has been debated due to potential postoperative complications.[8] For tibial fracture fixation, the device provides a controlled environment for plate or intramedullary nailing, limiting intraoperative bleeding that could obscure fracture alignment.[8] Similarly, in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, tourniquets support graft placement and tunnel drilling by maintaining a dry field, although meta-analyses indicate associated increases in postoperative pain and drainage volume.[29] Cuff pressure is typically set based on limb occlusion pressure (LOP) plus a safety margin, such as 40 mmHg for upper limbs or 60-80 mmHg for lower limbs, to ensure effective hemostasis without excessive tissue trauma.[2] Upper extremity surgeries, including hand and wrist procedures like carpal tunnel release or tendon repairs, benefit from tourniquets applied at the forearm or upper arm to allow meticulous dissection of fine structures.[8] In plastic and reconstructive surgeries, such as flap elevations or microvascular anastomoses, the bloodless field promotes accurate vessel identification and suturing, reducing operative time.[2] Tourniquets also facilitate intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's block) in short procedures on the limbs, where the cuff isolates the anesthetic agent distally while preventing systemic dissemination.[2] Procedural guidelines emphasize limiting tourniquet time to under two hours in healthy adults to mitigate ischemic risks, with mandatory deflation intervals of at least 10 minutes after 90-120 minutes of use for longer cases.[8] Cuffs should be positioned over the widest part of the limb, padded with no more than two layers to avoid pressure points, and calibrated using LOP measurement devices for personalized pressure settings.[2] Preoperative patient assessment, including vascular status and comorbidities, is critical to determine suitability, with alternatives like controlled hypotension considered for high-risk individuals.[2]Emergency and Trauma Care
Tourniquets play a critical role in emergency and trauma care by rapidly controlling life-threatening external hemorrhage from extremity injuries, particularly in prehospital settings where immediate intervention can prevent exsanguination.[4] Their use has been widely adopted following evidence from military applications, which demonstrated significant reductions in preventable deaths from limb trauma.[30] In civilian contexts, programs like Stop the Bleed, endorsed by the American College of Surgeons, emphasize tourniquet application as a core component of hemorrhage control for bystanders, first responders, and emergency medical services (EMS). Indications for tourniquet use in trauma care include any severe, pulsatile bleeding from a limb that cannot be stopped with direct pressure or wound packing, prioritizing rapid application to preserve life over concerns about potential complications.[31] The 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) and American Red Cross focused update recommends tourniquets for life-threatening extremity bleeding as soon as they are available, assigning this a Class 1 (strong) recommendation with Level B-R (moderate) evidence from randomized and nonrandomized studies.[31] Similarly, the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) guidelines, adapted for both military and civilian use, specify application for any traumatic amputation or massive hemorrhage amenable to tourniquet placement, noting that delays in application contribute to up to 90% of battlefield deaths from extremity bleeding.[32] Proper application technique involves placing the tourniquet 2 to 3 inches above the wound—ideally high and tight on the thigh or upper arm, proximal to the injury but avoiding joints—to ensure complete arterial occlusion without slippage.[10] Recommended devices include CoTCCC-approved models such as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) or SOF Tactical Tourniquet (SOFTT), which are windlass-style and allow one-handed self-application if needed.[32] Tighten until bleeding stops, then secure the device and note the time of application; multiple tourniquets may be stacked if one fails to control bleeding.[31] In prehospital care, tourniquets should remain in place during transport unless replaced by surgical control, with conversion to pressure dressings considered only in tactical or prolonged field scenarios after hemorrhage is fully arrested.[30] Evidence from systematic reviews supports the efficacy and safety of prehospital tourniquet use in civilians, with studies showing low rates of complications (under 5%) when applied correctly to major limb trauma from blunt or penetrating mechanisms.[16] For instance, a review of civilian applications found that tourniquets reduced transfusion requirements and mortality compared to historical direct pressure alone, mirroring military outcomes where their routine use decreased extremity hemorrhage deaths by approximately 85%.[33] The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma's 2014 guidelines endorse tourniquets for uncontrolled external hemorrhage, highlighting their role in mass casualty incidents and active shooter scenarios.[34] Regarding duration and removal, tourniquets are considered safe for up to 2 hours in most cases, but those exceeding 6 hours require removal in a controlled critical care environment with readiness for reperfusion injury management.[35] In emergency departments, prehospital tourniquets should be assessed for ongoing need, with prompt removal if bleeding is controlled and no vascular compromise exists, to minimize risks like nerve palsy or compartment syndrome.[4] Training initiatives, such as those from the AHA and CoTCCC, stress simulation-based education to ensure accurate placement and avoid common errors like inadequate tightening, which can lead to failure in 10-20% of initial applications without proper instruction.[32]Rehabilitation and Training
Blood flow restriction (BFR) training, also known as occlusion training, utilizes specialized tourniquet-like cuffs to partially restrict arterial inflow and fully occlude venous outflow in the limbs during low-intensity exercise, enabling significant gains in muscle strength, hypertrophy, and endurance comparable to high-load training.[36] This approach is particularly valuable in rehabilitation settings where patients cannot tolerate heavy loads due to injury, surgery, or frailty, allowing for accelerated recovery while minimizing stress on healing tissues.[37] Originating from KAATSU training developed by Yoshiaki Sato in the 1960s, BFR has evolved into a widely adopted modality in physical therapy, supported by decades of research demonstrating its efficacy in orthopedic and sports rehabilitation.[38] The physiological mechanisms underlying BFR training involve creating a hypoxic environment in the working muscles, which triggers metabolite accumulation (e.g., lactate), fast-twitch fiber recruitment, and anabolic signaling pathways such as mTOR activation, even at low loads of 20-30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM).[39] This partial occlusion elevates shear stress on vascular endothelium, promoting angiogenesis and improving muscle oxidative capacity over time, while the intermittent release allows reperfusion and reduces ischemia risks.[40] In rehabilitation, these effects facilitate muscle preservation and growth during immobilization or early post-operative phases, counteracting atrophy that can occur after procedures like ACL reconstruction or total knee arthroplasty.[41] Applications of BFR training span various rehabilitation contexts, including post-surgical recovery from orthopedic injuries, chronic conditions like osteoarthritis, and athletic return-to-play protocols. Similarly, it has been effectively used in upper and lower extremity rehab to enhance functional outcomes in athletes with devastating injuries, enabling safe progression to sports-specific training.[42] Seminal studies, such as those on KAATSU-walk training, demonstrated that restricting venous blood flow during low-intensity walking increased quadriceps cross-sectional area by 5.7% and strength by 7-10% over 3 weeks in healthy adults, establishing foundational evidence for its rehab potential.[43] Training protocols for BFR in rehabilitation emphasize individualized cuff pressure set at 40-80% of limb occlusion pressure (LOP), measured via Doppler ultrasound to ensure safe partial arterial restriction without full ischemia.[37] Sessions typically involve 2-3 bouts per week, with exercises like leg extensions or curls performed in sets of 30 repetitions to fatigue, followed by 15-30 repetitions with short rests (e.g., 30 seconds), totaling 75-100 repetitions per session and lasting 5-15 minutes of occlusion time.[36] The American Physical Therapy Association endorses BFR for strength gains under lighter loads, recommending screening for contraindications such as vascular disease or hypertension, and gradual progression to avoid complications like excessive fatigue.[44] High-impact reviews confirm that adherence to these guidelines yields hypertrophy rates of 4-8% and strength increases of 10-20% in rehab populations over 4-8 weeks, outperforming low-load training alone.[39] Professional training for BFR implementation is crucial, with certifications from organizations like the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists emphasizing proper cuff selection (e.g., wide, pneumatic designs for even pressure distribution) and real-time monitoring of subjective ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 7-8).[45] In clinical practice, therapists integrate BFR into periodized programs, starting early (e.g., 1-3 days post-arthroscopic surgery) and advancing as tolerance improves, supported by evidence from systematic reviews showing reduced atrophy and faster return to function in knee surgery patients.[46][47]Types and Designs
Pneumatic Tourniquets
Pneumatic tourniquets are medical devices that employ compressed gas to inflate an adjustable cuff wrapped around a patient's limb, thereby occluding arterial blood flow and establishing a bloodless operative field during surgical procedures.[2] This design allows for precise control over pressure application, typically ranging from 250 to 350 mmHg depending on the limb, to minimize blood loss and enhance surgical visibility.[8] Unlike non-pneumatic alternatives, pneumatic systems enable rapid inflation and deflation, with built-in safety features to prevent excessive pressure that could lead to tissue damage.[48] The core components of a pneumatic tourniquet include an inflatable cuff, a source of compressed gas, a pressure regulator, a pressure display gauge, and connecting tubing.[2] The cuff, often constructed from durable materials such as nylon-reinforced vinyl with an inner latex or silicone bladder, is secured around the limb proximal to the surgical site using hook-and-loop fasteners or straps for even distribution of pressure.[8] Compressed gas is supplied either by an electric pump in modern units or a manual bulb/cylinder in simpler models, while the regulator maintains consistent occlusion pressure, and digital or analog displays monitor real-time values along with elapsed time to adhere to safe usage limits of approximately 2 hours.[48] Advanced systems incorporate microcomputerized controls for automatic adjustments and alarms for pressure deviations or timeouts.[8] Design variations in pneumatic tourniquets primarily revolve around cuff configuration to optimize fit, safety, and efficacy across different limb sizes and shapes. Straight cylindrical cuffs are standard for uniform limbs like the upper arm, but contoured cuffs—shaped to match anatomical curves such as the thigh's taper—are preferred for lower limbs to ensure uniform pressure and reduce the required inflation pressure by up to 40% compared to narrow designs.[8] Cuff widths are selected to be at least 40% wider than the limb diameter to lower the risk of uneven compression and nerve injury, with common sizes ranging from 5 cm for pediatric arms to 12 cm for adult thighs.[48] Disposable sterile cuffs, often made from single-use materials, are used in orthopedic and vascular surgeries to prevent cross-contamination, while reusable cuffs require meticulous cleaning and integrity checks to avoid leaks or material degradation.[2] Dual-bladder or bilateral systems facilitate simultaneous use on both limbs, enhancing efficiency in procedures like total knee arthroplasty.[8] These design elements contribute to the widespread adoption of pneumatic tourniquets in orthopedic, plastic, and vascular surgeries, where they support exsanguination via elevation or elastic bandages prior to inflation for complete hemostasis.[13] Seminal advancements, such as wider contoured cuffs introduced in the 1980s, have improved patient outcomes by reducing tourniquet-related complications like postoperative pain and ischemia.[8] As of 2025, innovations include touchscreen-enabled systems like Tourniquet Touch for enhanced monitoring and reusable cuffs.[49]Non-Pneumatic Tourniquets
Non-pneumatic tourniquets are mechanical devices designed to occlude arterial blood flow to a limb through manual tightening mechanisms, such as straps, buckles, windlasses, or elastic bands, without relying on inflatable bladders or pneumatic pressure.[8] These devices contrast with pneumatic tourniquets by providing a simpler, non-inflatable structure that allows for rapid application in resource-limited environments.[50] Historically rooted in early surgical practices like the Esmarch bandage—a narrow rubber strip wrapped spirally around the limb to exsanguinate blood prior to incision—non-pneumatic designs have evolved for both surgical and pre-hospital use.[8] Common designs include windlass-style tourniquets, which employ a rotating rod to twist and tension a nylon or webbing strap, generating high occlusive pressure through leverage. Representative examples are the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT), featuring a Velcro-secured strap and aluminum windlass for one-handed application, and the Emergency and Military Tourniquet (EMT), which uses a similar buckle-and-rod system for secure fastening.[51] Elastic variants, such as silicone ring tourniquets or exsanguination bands, rely on stretchable materials to conform to the limb and apply distributed pressure, often used in orthopedic procedures for temporary ischemia.[7] Specialized sterile models, like the HemaClear for upper extremity surgery, integrate a self-contained elastic band within a disposable sleeve to maintain a bloodless field while minimizing contamination risks.[52] These designs prioritize portability and durability, with widths typically ranging from 3 to 4 cm to concentrate force effectively on major vessels.[53] In emergency and trauma care, non-pneumatic tourniquets serve as primary tools for controlling severe limb hemorrhage, particularly in military and pre-hospital scenarios where rapid deployment is critical. Battlefield data from the U.S. Military's Emergency Tourniquet Program indicate effectiveness rates of 92% for the EMT and 79% for the CAT in stopping major bleeding, contributing to reduced mortality from extremity trauma.[51] A prospective study of 232 casualties confirmed that their use more than doubled survival rates in cases of major limb injury, with low complication rates when applied correctly.[54] In surgical applications, they are less prevalent but employed for short-duration procedures, such as carpal tunnel release or minor orthopedic interventions, where pneumatic systems may be cumbersome; for instance, the HemaClear device achieved comparable bloodless fields to pneumatic tourniquets in 76 cases, with reduced postoperative pain reported in some patients.[52] Unlike pneumatic tourniquets, which allow precise pressure adjustment for prolonged surgical ischemia (up to 2 hours), non-pneumatic models are better suited to acute, uncontrolled settings due to their mechanical simplicity.[8] Advantages of non-pneumatic tourniquets include their lightweight construction (often under 100 grams), independence from external power or gas sources, and ease of self-application, making them ideal for austere environments like combat or remote trauma response.[7] They also enable application over clothing in emergencies, maintaining efficacy against layered fabrics common in civilian or military attire.[55] However, disadvantages arise from inconsistent pressure distribution; manual tightening can result in peak pressures exceeding 700 mmHg—far above the 250 mmHg typical of pneumatic devices—leading to uneven gradients that compromise safety in extended use.[56] Risks associated with non-pneumatic tourniquets primarily stem from excessive localized pressure, which can cause nerve compression injuries, such as tourniquet palsy, affecting up to 1-2% of surgical cases and manifesting as temporary sensory or motor deficits.[57] Soft tissue damage, including skin necrosis or muscle ischemia beyond the intended duration, increases with application times over 30 minutes in emergencies or 90 minutes in surgery, exacerbated by their inability to release pressure gradually.[17] Studies highlight that narrow strap designs amplify these gradients, correlating with higher injury incidence compared to wider pneumatic cuffs.[58] In military contexts, overuse has been linked to rare cases of compartment syndrome, though overall complication rates remain below 5% when protocols are followed.[51] Best practices for non-pneumatic tourniquets emphasize commercial devices over improvised alternatives to ensure reliable occlusion, with application proximal to the wound, tightened until bleeding ceases, and time of placement documented for monitoring.[59] In trauma care, guidelines from the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommend their use only for life-threatening extremity hemorrhage unresponsive to direct pressure, with conversion to hemostatic dressings or surgical repair as soon as possible.[54] For surgical settings, limit inflation-equivalent pressure to the limb occlusion pressure plus 50-100 mmHg, though exact measurement is challenging without integrated gauges, and total ischemia time should not exceed 120 minutes with periodic deflation if prolonged.[60] Training focuses on proper tensioning to avoid over-tightening, and post-application assessment for distal pulses or neurovascular status is essential to mitigate complications.[8] As of 2025, newer models like the SOF Tourniquet Generation 5 and SAM XT incorporate improved buckles and windlass systems for enhanced reliability and ease of use.[61][62]Specialized Blood Flow Restriction Devices
Specialized blood flow restriction (BFR) devices are engineered tourniquet systems designed to achieve partial arterial inflow restriction while fully occluding venous outflow during low-load exercise, distinguishing them from traditional tourniquets used for complete limb ischemia in surgery. These devices typically employ narrow pneumatic cuffs inflated to 40-80% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), enabling metabolic stress and muscle activation without high mechanical loads, which is particularly beneficial in rehabilitation settings for patients with joint limitations or post-surgical recovery.[36] The seminal KAATSU system, developed by Yoshiaki Sato in 1966 and patented in Japan in the 1990s, introduced cyclic pressure modulation to mimic natural blood flow pulsations, promoting safer and more effective training outcomes compared to constant occlusion methods.[63] BFR devices are broadly classified into laboratory-based (traditional) and portable (practical) types, reflecting their evolution from research-oriented precision tools to accessible clinical and athletic applications. Laboratory-based devices, such as the Hokanson E20 AGC tourniquet system, integrate automated pneumatic control with Doppler ultrasound for accurate AOP measurement, allowing researchers to standardize pressures across studies and ensure consistent restriction levels (e.g., 50% AOP). These systems feature wider cuffs (10-15 cm) and digital regulators for precise inflation, but their bulkiness limits everyday use. In contrast, portable devices emphasize simplicity and mobility, often using manual hand pumps or battery-powered automation with narrower cuffs (3-5 cm for arms, 5-10 cm for legs) to target specific muscle groups more effectively. Examples include the original KAATSU-Master, which uses elastic cuffs for cyclic inflation-deflation protocols, reducing risks like nerve compression associated with wider designs.[63][64] Key components of specialized BFR devices include the cuff bladder, pressure delivery mechanism, and monitoring features, all optimized for safety and efficacy. Single-chamber bladders provide uniform circumferential pressure but can unevenly distribute force on conical limbs, while multi-chamber designs (e.g., in advanced portable systems) allow zonal control to better approximate physiological restriction and minimize discomfort. Pressure regulation varies from manual gauges in basic models to automated systems that autoregulate based on real-time limb circumference changes or photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors, ensuring restriction adapts to exercise-induced swelling. Studies comparing device types have shown that portable pneumatic cuffs achieve comparable muscle activation and hypertrophy to laboratory models when set to personalized pressures (e.g., 40-60% AOP), though elastic wrap alternatives often underperform due to inconsistent occlusion.[65][66] Advancements in BFR device design prioritize personalization and safety, with high-impact contributions including integration of wireless monitoring for remote pressure adjustments and validation against gold-standard Doppler methods. For instance, wearable devices validated in supine positions demonstrate high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.9) for lower-limb AOP assessment, facilitating home-based rehabilitation. Seminal research underscores that device width and material compliance significantly influence downstream blood flow, with narrower, compliant cuffs (e.g., 5 cm silicone) yielding better venous occlusion at lower pressures than rigid wide bands, thus reducing pain and cardiovascular strain during sessions. Overall, these specialized devices have expanded BFR applications from elite athletics to broad clinical use, supported by guidelines recommending AOP-based prescription to optimize outcomes while mitigating risks like thrombosis.[67][68] As of 2025, updated models such as SmartCuffs 4.0 incorporate advanced Bluetooth connectivity and real-time pressure feedback for improved precision in training.[69]Risks and Complications
Immediate and Acute Effects
The application of a tourniquet induces immediate ischemia in the distal limb by occluding arterial blood flow, leading to rapid onset of pain and sensory changes. Patients often experience tourniquet pain, described as a deep, aching sensation that intensifies over time due to the accumulation of metabolic byproducts in ischemic tissues. This pain is exacerbated by higher cuff pressures and longer application durations, with studies indicating it affects a significant proportion of patients, particularly under regional anesthesia, with autonomic responses such as hypertension under general anesthesia.[2] Acute nerve compression injuries represent a primary immediate risk, resulting from the mechanical pressure exerted by the tourniquet cuff on underlying nerves. These injuries manifest as transient paresthesia, numbness, or motor weakness immediately upon application or shortly after deflation, with mechanisms involving direct compression and ischemia-induced demyelination. Research demonstrates that pressures exceeding 250 mmHg significantly increase the likelihood of such damage, particularly in the radial, ulnar, and sciatic nerves during upper and lower limb procedures, respectively. Permanent deficits occur in less than 1% of cases but can include neuropraxia lasting days to weeks.[57][70] Vascular and soft tissue effects emerge acutely, including endothelial damage and microvascular thrombosis beneath the cuff site. Direct vascular injury, though uncommon (incidence <0.1%), is more frequent in pediatric, obese, or elderly patients due to fragile vessel walls, potentially leading to immediate hemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation upon deflation. Skin complications, such as blistering or necrosis, can occur within hours if excessive pressure causes subcutaneous ischemia.[2] Upon tourniquet deflation, reperfusion injury triggers a cascade of acute systemic and local responses. The sudden influx of oxygen-rich blood to ischemic tissues releases free radicals, potassium, and myoglobin, causing metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, and potential rhabdomyolysis in prolonged applications (>2 hours). Edema and swelling develop rapidly due to increased vascular permeability, contributing to post-tourniquet syndrome characterized by stiffness, weakness, and pallor lasting 1-2 days. Thromboembolic events, including deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, may arise immediately post-deflation from dislodged clots, with reported incidences up to 2.6% in orthopedic surgeries.[8][70][11] In emergency trauma settings, improper or prolonged tourniquet use amplifies these acute effects, with complications including compartment syndrome reported in 23.8% of cases involving prehospital application, often due to delayed reperfusion leading to elevated intracompartmental pressures. Coagulopathy and systemic inflammation can further complicate the picture, underscoring the need for time-limited use (typically <120 minutes), although some traditional Ukrainian first aid guidelines recommend adjusting the maximum duration based on environmental temperature—with up to 2 hours permitted in warm weather (summer) and shorter limits such as 1–1.5 hours in cold weather (winter)—to prevent tissue necrosis due to prolonged ischemia.[71][72][73][74]Long-Term and Systemic Risks
Prolonged tourniquet application during surgery can result in post-tourniquet syndrome, a condition characterized by persistent limb swelling, stiffness, weakness, and pallor due to microvascular thrombosis, myoglobin release, and edema following ischemia-reperfusion. This syndrome typically resolves within weeks to months but may lead to long-term functional impairment if ischemia exceeds 2-3 hours. Nerve injuries, such as peroneal or sciatic nerve palsy, represent another significant long-term risk, with incidence rates up to 5-10% in lower limb procedures and potential for permanent sensory or motor deficits when tourniquet pressures surpass 300 mmHg or durations extend beyond 120 minutes. Muscle fibrosis and chronic pain have also been documented in cases of repeated or extended use, contributing to delayed rehabilitation and reduced range of motion.[11][75] Systemically, tourniquet deflation triggers reperfusion injury, releasing accumulated anaerobic metabolites, potassium, and inflammatory cytokines into the circulation, which can induce metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, and transient hypotension. This inflammatory cascade, evidenced by elevated levels of interleukins and tumor necrosis factor, may exacerbate remote organ dysfunction, particularly in the lungs, kidneys, and liver, with studies in animal models and human trauma cases showing increased risk of acute kidney injury from myoglobinuria after tourniquet times over 4 hours. Thromboembolic complications, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, arise from venous stasis and endothelial damage during occlusion, with earlier meta-analyses reporting a 2-3 fold higher incidence in tourniquet-assisted orthopedic surgeries compared to non-tourniquet procedures, though recent studies (as of 2025) show no significant increase with appropriate thromboprophylaxis.[18][76][77] Evidence from systematic reviews indicates that while major systemic events like renal failure or pulmonary embolism are rare (occurring in less than 1% of elective cases), risks escalate significantly with tourniquet durations exceeding 90 minutes or in patients with comorbidities such as peripheral vascular disease. For instance, a scoping review of extremity injuries highlighted thromboembolic risks and post-tourniquet syndrome in prolonged emergency applications, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring. In total knee arthroplasty, tourniquet use has been linked to elevated C-reactive protein levels and prolonged hospital stays due to systemic inflammation; recent studies (as of 2025) indicate that limiting tourniquet duration to under 60 minutes can mitigate these effects, though randomized trials show these effects are mitigated by limiting inflation to under 60 minutes. Overall, long-term outcomes emphasize that while tourniquets enhance surgical precision, their systemic repercussions demand adherence to pressure and time limits to prevent irreversible damage.[78][11][79][80]Guidelines and Best Practices
Application Techniques
Application techniques for tourniquets vary by context, including emergency trauma care, surgical procedures, and rehabilitation settings such as blood flow restriction (BFR) training. In all cases, proper application prioritizes patient safety, effective occlusion of blood flow, and adherence to evidence-based protocols to minimize risks like nerve damage or tissue injury. Techniques are guided by organizations such as the American College of Surgeons' Stop the Bleed program for emergencies and professional associations like the Association of Surgical Technologists for operative use.Emergency and Prehospital Application
In life-threatening limb hemorrhage, tourniquets are applied only when direct pressure and wound packing fail to control bleeding. The primary goal is rapid arterial occlusion to prevent exsanguination, with application over clothing permitted to expedite the process. Standard commercial devices like the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) are recommended for their reliability in civilian and military settings. Key steps for application include:- Assess and expose the wound: Confirm severe, pulsatile bleeding from an extremity that cannot be controlled by direct manual pressure for at least 3-5 minutes or wound packing. Expose the injury by removing or cutting clothing without delaying care.[81]
- Position the tourniquet: Place it 2-3 inches (5-7.6 cm) above the wound edge, proximal to the injury and toward the heart, avoiding joints like the elbow or knee to ensure effective compression. For upper arm injuries, position high in the axilla if needed, but prioritize the 2-3 inch rule over "high and tight" for optimal distal pressure.[82][83]
- Apply and tighten: Route the tourniquet band through its buckle or clip, pull taut, and twist the windlass (if equipped) until bleeding stops, indicated by no distal pulse and pallor. Secure the windlass with the provided clip or strap. If bleeding persists, add a second tourniquet immediately proximal to the first.[10][84]
- Record and monitor: Note the exact time of application on the device or patient (e.g., using a marker or tag) to track duration, as prolonged use beyond 2 hours increases complication risks. Do not loosen or remove the tourniquet in the field; transfer care to advanced providers promptly.[81][30]
Surgical Application
Pneumatic tourniquets are routinely used in orthopedic and elective surgeries to create a bloodless field, typically inflated to pressures of 250-300 mmHg for upper limbs and 300-350 mmHg for lower limbs, or based on limb occlusion pressure plus 50-100 mmHg, depending on limb size and patient factors. Application occurs preoperatively in a controlled environment, with deflation limited to under 2 hours to avoid reperfusion injury.[86][87] Best practices involve:- Patient assessment and cuff selection: Evaluate for vascular disease, hypertension, or obesity, which may require adjusted pressures (e.g., 250-300 mmHg for upper limbs, 300-350 mmHg for lower). Select a contoured, wide cuff (at least 10-12 cm) sized to 40-60% of limb circumference, applied to the proximal thigh or upper arm with padding (e.g., stockinette) to prevent skin shear.[87][86]
- Inflation and maintenance: Exsanguinate the limb using elevation or an Esmarch bandage, then inflate to the calculated pressure (Limb Occlusion Pressure + 50-100 mmHg) while monitoring with Doppler ultrasound for complete occlusion. Maintain throughout the procedure, with intermittent release if exceeding 90-120 minutes.[88]
- Deflation protocol: Gradually deflate over 1-2 minutes post-procedure, applying compressive dressings to manage reperfusion. Monitor for complications like compartment syndrome.[87]
Rehabilitation and Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Application
In BFR training, narrow pneumatic cuffs partially occlude venous return (40-80% of arterial occlusion pressure) during low-load exercise to enhance muscle hypertrophy and strength gains, particularly in post-injury rehab. Sessions are short (5-20 minutes) to limit ischemia. Guidelines emphasize:- Cuff placement and pressure: Apply a wide (10-15 cm), automated cuff proximally (upper arm or thigh), inflating to 40-80% of individualized Limb Occlusion Pressure (measured via Doppler), typically 50-200 mmHg. Avoid full arterial occlusion; personalize based on limb size and tolerance.[89][36]
- Exercise integration: Perform 3-4 sets of 15-30 repetitions at 20-30% of one-rep max, with 30-60 second rests between sets (intermittent occlusion recommended). Total occlusion time per session should not exceed 20 minutes.[89]
- Safety monitoring: Use automated devices with pressure regulation; cease if pain, numbness, or discoloration occurs. Contraindicated in acute thrombosis or hypertension.[90]