Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Absolute presentation of a group
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Absolute presentation of a group Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Absolute presentation of a group. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Absolute presentation of a group

In mathematics, an absolute presentation is one method of defining a group.[1]

Recall that to define a group by means of a presentation, one specifies a set of generators so that every element of the group can be written as a product of some of these generators, and a set of relations among those generators. In symbols:

Informally is the group generated by the set such that for all . But here there is a tacit assumption that is the "freest" such group as clearly the relations are satisfied in any homomorphic image of . One way of being able to eliminate this tacit assumption is by specifying that certain words in should not be equal to That is, we specify a set , called the set of irrelations, such that for all

Formal definition

[edit]

To define an absolute presentation of a group one specifies a set of generators and sets and of relations and irrelations among those generators. We then say has absolute presentation

provided that:

  1. has presentation
  2. Given any homomorphism such that the irrelations are satisfied in , is isomorphic to .

A more algebraic, but equivalent, way of stating condition 2 is:

2a. If is a non-trivial normal subgroup of then

Remark: The concept of an absolute presentation has been fruitful in fields such as algebraically closed groups and the Grigorchuk topology. In the literature, in a context where absolute presentations are being discussed, a presentation (in the usual sense of the word) is sometimes referred to as a relative presentation, which is an instance of a retronym.

Example

[edit]

The cyclic group of order 8 has the presentation

But, up to isomorphism there are three more groups that "satisfy" the relation namely:

and

However, none of these satisfy the irrelation . So an absolute presentation for the cyclic group of order 8 is:

It is part of the definition of an absolute presentation that the irrelations are not satisfied in any proper homomorphic image of the group. Therefore:

Is not an absolute presentation for the cyclic group of order 8 because the irrelation is satisfied in the cyclic group of order 4.

Background

[edit]

The notion of an absolute presentation arises from Bernhard Neumann's study of the isomorphism problem for algebraically closed groups.[1]

A common strategy for considering whether two groups and are isomorphic is to consider whether a presentation for one might be transformed into a presentation for the other. However algebraically closed groups are neither finitely generated nor recursively presented and so it is impossible to compare their presentations. Neumann considered the following alternative strategy:

Suppose we know that a group with finite presentation can be embedded in the algebraically closed group then given another algebraically closed group , we can ask "Can be embedded in ?"

It soon becomes apparent that a presentation for a group does not contain enough information to make this decision for while there may be a homomorphism , this homomorphism need not be an embedding. What is needed is a specification for that "forces" any homomorphism preserving that specification to be an embedding. An absolute presentation does precisely this.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs