Hubbry Logo
Punnett squarePunnett squareMain
Open search
Punnett square
Community hub
Punnett square
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Punnett square
Punnett square
Punnett square
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A Punnett square showing a typical test cross. (Green pod color is dominant over yellow for pea pods[1] in contrast to pea seeds, where yellow cotyledon color is dominant over green[2]).
Punnett squares for each combination of parents' colour vision status giving probabilities of their offsprings' status, each cell having 25% probability in theory.

The Punnett square is a square diagram that is used to predict the genotypes of a particular cross or breeding experiment. It is named after Reginald C. Punnett, who devised the approach in 1905.[3][4][5][6][7][8] The diagram is used by biologists to determine the probability of an offspring having a particular genotype. The Punnett square is a tabular summary of possible combinations of maternal alleles with paternal alleles.[9] These tables can be used to examine the genotypical outcome probabilities of the offspring of a single trait (allele), or when crossing multiple traits from the parents.

The Punnett square is a visual representation of Mendelian inheritance, a fundamental concept in genetics discovered by Gregor Mendel.[10] For multiple traits, using the "forked-line method" is typically much easier than the Punnett square. Phenotypes may be predicted with at least better-than-chance accuracy using a Punnett square, but the phenotype that may appear in the presence of a given genotype can in some instances be influenced by many other factors, as when polygenic inheritance and/or epigenetics are at work.

Zygosity

[edit]
Main article: Zygosity

Zygosity refers to the grade of similarity between the alleles that determine one specific trait in an organism. In its simplest form, a pair of alleles can be either homozygous or heterozygous. Homozygosity, with homo relating to same while zygous pertains to a zygote, is seen when a combination of either two dominant or two recessive alleles code for the same trait. Recessive are always lowercase letters. For example, using 'A' as the representative character for each allele, a homozygous dominant pair's genotype would be depicted as 'AA', while homozygous recessive is shown as 'aa'. Heterozygosity, with hetero associated with different, can only be 'Aa' (the capital letter is always presented first by convention). The phenotype of a homozygous dominant pair is 'A', or dominant, while the opposite is true for homozygous recessive. Heterozygous pairs always have a dominant phenotype.[11] To a lesser degree, hemizygosity[12] and nullizygosity[13] can also be seen in gene pairs.

Monohybrid cross

[edit]
Main article: Monohybrid cross

"Mono-" means "one"; this cross indicates that the examination of a single trait. This could mean (for example) eye color. Each genetic locus is always represented by two letters. So in the case of eye color, say "B = Brown eyes" and "b = green eyes". In this example, both parents have the genotype Bb. For the example of eye color, this would mean they both have brown eyes. They can produce gametes that contain either the B or the b allele. (It is conventional in genetics to use capital letters to indicate dominant alleles and lower-case letters to indicate recessive alleles.) The probability of an individual offspring's having the genotype BB is 25%, Bb is 50%, and bb is 25%. The ratio of the phenotypes is 3:1, typical for a monohybrid cross. When assessing phenotype from this, "3" of the offspring have "Brown" eyes and only one offspring has "green" eyes. (3 are "B?" and 1 is "bb")

Paternal

Maternal
B b
B BB Bb
b Bb bb

The way in which the B and b alleles interact with each other to affect the appearance of the offspring depends on how the gene products (proteins) interact (see Mendelian inheritance). This can include lethal effects and epistasis (where one allele masks another, regardless of dominant or recessive status).

Dihybrid cross

[edit]
Main article: Dihybrid cross

More complicated crosses can be made by looking at two or more genes. The Punnett square works, however, only if the genes are independent of each other, which means that having a particular allele of gene "A" does not alter the probability of possessing an allele of gene "B". This is equivalent to stating that the genes are not linked, so that the two genes do not tend to sort together during meiosis.

The following example illustrates a dihybrid cross between two double-heterozygote pea plants. R represents the dominant allele for shape (round), while r represents the recessive allele (wrinkled). A represents the dominant allele for color (yellow), while a represents the recessive allele (green). If each plant has the genotype RrAa, and since the alleles for shape and color genes are independent, then they can produce four types of gametes with all possible combinations: RA, Ra, rA, and ra.

RA Ra rA ra
RA RRAA RRAa RrAA RrAa
Ra RRAa RRaa RrAa Rraa
rA RrAA RrAa rrAA rrAa
ra RrAa Rraa rrAa rraa

Since dominant traits mask recessive traits (assuming no epistasis), there are nine combinations that have the phenotype round yellow, three that are round green, three that are wrinkled yellow, and one that is wrinkled green. The ratio 9:3:3:1 is the expected outcome when crossing two double-heterozygous parents with unlinked genes. Any other ratio indicates that something else has occurred (such as lethal alleles, epistasis, linked genes, etc.).

Forked-line method

[edit]

The forked-line method (also known as the tree method and the branching system) can also solve dihybrid and multi-hybrid crosses. A problem is converted to a series of monohybrid crosses, and the results are combined in a tree. However, a tree produces the same result as a Punnett square in less time and with more clarity. The example below assesses another double-heterozygote cross using RrYy x RrYy. As stated above, the phenotypic ratio is expected to be 9:3:3:1 if crossing unlinked genes from two double-heterozygotes. The genotypic ratio was obtained in the diagram below, this diagram will have more branches than if only analyzing for phenotypic ratio.

There are also Punnett squares for epistasis. In these cases the genotype epistatic over the other genes hinders their expression in the phenotype.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Punnett square

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Punnett square is a used in to predict the possible genotypic and phenotypic outcomes of a cross between two individuals with known , by systematically combining their parental to show all potential offspring combinations. It consists of a grid where one parent's possible gametes are listed along the top and the other parent's along the side, with each cell representing the genotype formed by the union of one from each parent. Devised by British geneticist Reginald Crundall Punnett (1875–1967), the tool was first introduced in his 1905 textbook Mendelism, providing a visual representation of patterns to simplify the calculation of inheritance probabilities. Punnett, a key figure in early 20th-century and collaborator with , created the square to depict the number and variety of genetic combinations in hybrid crosses, aiding in the understanding of segregation. The Punnett square is foundational for analyzing monohybrid crosses, where it predicts ratios such as 3:1 for phenotypes (e.g., dominant to recessive traits) and 1:2:1 for genotypes in the F2 generation from heterozygous parents. It extends to dihybrid and polyhybrid crosses, illustrating independent assortment by showing how alleles for different traits combine independently, though it assumes complete dominance and no linkage. Widely taught in biology education, it remains a core method for demonstrating probabilistic inheritance despite limitations in complex scenarios like incomplete dominance or multiple alleles.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

The Punnett square is a simple tabular diagram employed in to predict the possible genotypic and phenotypic outcomes of from parents with known genotypes. It visually represents the random combination of alleles from parental gametes during fertilization, allowing for the determination of all potential formations. This tool operates on the principles of independent assortment and segregation outlined in Mendel's laws, making it particularly useful for modeling inheritance in diploid organisms. The primary purpose of the Punnett square is to illustrate patterns, enabling the calculation of genotypic and phenotypic ratios among potential offspring without relying on intricate mathematical computations. By organizing possibilities in a grid, it demonstrates the probabilistic nature of genetic transmission, where each combination occurs with equal likelihood under ideal conditions. This approach facilitates the prediction of trait distributions, such as in monohybrid crosses for single traits, and serves as a foundational educational aid in . Developed by British geneticist Reginald C. Punnett in 1905, the Punnett square emerged during the early 20th-century resurgence of interest in Mendelian following its rediscovery in 1900. Punnett introduced the in his writings on heredity, notably appearing in reports and editions related to his book Mendelism, to simplify the visualization of crosses. Named after its creator, the tool's basic structure features a square grid in which rows and columns denote the alleles of gametes from each parent, with individual cells indicating the resulting genotypes formed by their union.

Key Genetic Concepts

Alleles are alternative forms of a gene that occupy the same position, or locus, on a chromosome, arising from differences in the DNA sequence at that location. In genetic notation, alleles are typically represented by letters, such as uppercase A for a dominant allele that expresses its trait even when paired with a different allele, and lowercase a for a recessive allele that expresses its trait only when paired with another recessive allele. The refers to an organism's specific genetic constitution at a particular locus, represented by the combination of it carries, such as AA, Aa, or aa. In contrast, the encompasses the observable characteristics or traits of an organism, such as flower color or height, which result from the interaction between the genotype and environmental factors, often modulated by allele dominance relationships. Zygosity describes the genetic state at a locus based on whether the two inherited s are identical or different. An individual is homozygous if both alleles are the same, either homozygous dominant (AA) or homozygous recessive (aa), also known as , meaning all gametes produced will carry that single allele type. Conversely, an individual is heterozygous (Aa), or hybrid, if the alleles differ, resulting in gametes that carry one or the other allele in equal proportions. Gametes are haploid reproductive cells, such as or cells, that contain a single set of chromosomes and thus one per locus. These cells form through , a specialized process in sexually reproducing organisms that halves the chromosome number from diploid to haploid, ensuring each gamete receives only one from each parental pair. Central to these concepts is Mendel's law of segregation, which states that during gamete formation, the two alleles for a separate, so each gamete receives only one , with the alleles assorting independently and equally into the gametes. This principle, derived from Gregor Mendel's experiments with pea plants published in , underpins the predictive power of Punnett squares by modeling combinations in .

Construction and Interpretation

Building a Punnett Square

To construct a Punnett square, begin by identifying the genotypes of the two parent organisms involved in the genetic cross. For instance, consider parents with heterozygous genotypes such as Aa and , where A and a represent different alleles for a single . Next, determine the possible gametes each parent can produce by separating the alleles in their genotypes according to Mendel's principle of segregation, which states that alleles separate during gamete formation. In the Aa x Aa example, each parent produces two types of gametes: A and a. Then, create a grid where the gametes from one parent are listed along the top (as columns) and the gametes from the other parent along the side (as rows). This forms a square matrix, with a 2x2 grid for a involving one locus. Finally, fill each cell in the grid by combining one from the row with one from the column to represent the possible genotypes of . For the Aa x Aa cross, this yields the following grid:
Aa
AAAAa
aAaaa
For crosses involving more genes, such as a with two loci, expand the grid accordingly to a 4x4 matrix by listing all combinations of s (e.g., AB, Ab, aB, ab) along the rows and columns. This mechanical scaling maintains the same principles of gamete separation and allele combination.

Analyzing Outcomes

Once a Punnett square is completed, analysis begins by tallying the genotypes in each cell to determine their frequencies. For a between two heterozygous parents (Aa × Aa), the square yields one cell with AA, two cells with Aa, and one cell with aa, resulting in a genotypic ratio of 1 AA : 2 Aa : 1 aa. This ratio reflects the possible combinations under Mendel's law of segregation, where each parent contributes alleles equally. To derive phenotypic ratios, dominance relationships are applied to the genotypic outcomes. In the Aa × Aa example, assuming A is dominant over a, the AA and Aa genotypes express the dominant phenotype, while aa expresses the recessive phenotype, producing a 3:1 phenotypic ratio of dominant to recessive traits. This simplification highlights how Punnett squares predict observable traits rather than underlying alone. Probabilities for specific genotypes or phenotypes are calculated by assuming each cell represents an equally likely outcome, based on the uniform production of gametes from each parent. For the AA genotype in the Aa × Aa cross, the probability is 1 out of 4 cells, or 25% (or 14\frac{1}{4}). These values can be expressed as fractions, decimals, or percentages to quantify inheritance risks or breeding expectations. The general equation for the probability of a particular genotype is P(genotype)=number of favorable cellstotal number of cellsP(\text{genotype}) = \frac{\text{number of favorable cells}}{\text{total number of cells}}. This derives from the assumption of independent assortment and equal likelihood of each gamete type, as each parental allele segregates with a probability of 12\frac{1}{2} in heterozygotes, leading to uniform cell probabilities in the grid. For larger squares, such as dihybrids with 16 cells, the same principle scales the counts accordingly. In real breeding experiments, the Punnett square provides expected frequencies, but actual observed outcomes may vary due to chance; statistical tests like chi-square compare these to assess fit to Mendelian expectations. Larger sample sizes tend to align more closely with predicted ratios, underscoring the probabilistic nature of .

Applications in Crosses

Monohybrid Cross

A is a genetic cross between two individuals that differ in a single trait, determined by alleles at one locus. This type of cross is used to predict the patterns of that trait in the offspring, assuming complete dominance where one masks the expression of the other. For instance, consider a cross between a homozygous dominant parent with genotype PP, exhibiting the dominant phenotype (such as purple flowers in pea plants), and a homozygous recessive parent with genotype pp, showing the recessive phenotype (white flowers). To construct the Punnett square for this , list the gametes from each parent along the axes: the PP parent produces only P gametes, while the pp parent produces only p gametes. The resulting 2x2 grid is as follows:
PP
pPpPp
pPpPp
All four possible offspring genotypes are Pp, meaning 100% of the progeny are heterozygous and express the dominant , yielding a phenotypic ratio of 1:0 (all dominant, no recessive). This outcome demonstrates that in a between purebred homozygous parents differing at one locus, all offspring are heterozygous carriers of the recessive . Another common monohybrid cross involves two heterozygous parents, each with genotype Aa, where A is dominant over a. The Punnett square for this cross, with gametes A and a from each parent, appears as:
Aa
AAAAa
aAaaa
The genotypic outcomes are AA (1/4), Aa (2/4), and aa (1/4), producing a 1:2:1 genotypic ratio. Phenotypically, since AA and Aa both show the dominant trait, the ratio is 3:1 (three dominant to one recessive). These ratios align with Mendel's law of segregation, as observed in his experiments. In real-world applications, monohybrid crosses using Punnett squares help illustrate inheritance in organisms like Mendel's pea plants, where crossing homozygous tall (TT) and dwarf (tt) varieties produced all tall F1 offspring, confirming the heterozygous state. Similarly, for human blood types at the ABO locus (simplified to consider dominant I^A over recessive i for type A vs. O), a cross between I^A i (type A) and ii (type O) parents yields 50% I^A i (type A) and 50% ii (type O) offspring, highlighting probabilistic outcomes for single-gene traits.

Dihybrid Cross

A examines the inheritance of two distinct traits simultaneously, typically involving parents heterozygous for both genes, such as pea plants with genotypes RrYy (round yellow seeds) crossed with RrYy, where R represents the dominant round seed shape , r the recessive wrinkled, Y the dominant yellow color, and y the recessive green. This setup allows observation of how segregate and assort independently during formation, as described in Mendel's experiments on pea plants. To construct a Punnett square for a , a 4×4 grid is used to account for the four possible combinations from each parent—RY, Ry, rY, and ry—resulting from the independent assortment of the two pairs. Each row and column header lists these gametes, and the intersections fill with the combined genotypes from the parental contributions, yielding 16 possible offspring combinations. In Mendel's classic example with and color, the phenotypic outcomes produce a 9:3:3:1 ratio: 9/16 round yellow (dominant for both), 3/16 round green (dominant , recessive color), 3/16 wrinkled yellow (recessive , dominant color), and 1/16 wrinkled green (recessive for both), reflecting the combined effects of monohybrid ratios under independence. The genotypic ratios from this cross reveal nine distinct genotypes in the proportions 1 RRYY : 2 RRYy : 1 RRyy : 2 RrYY : 4 RrYy : 2 Rryy : 1 rrYY : 2 rrYy : 1 rryy, which can be derived by counting the occurrences in the cells. As an alternative to constructing the full grid, the forked-line method applies stepwise probability multiplication for independent traits, where the joint probability is the product of individual trait probabilities: P(both traits)=P(trait 1)×P(trait 2)P(\text{both traits}) = P(\text{trait 1}) \times P(\text{trait 2}). For instance, the probability of round and yellow offspring is 34×34=916\frac{3}{4} \times \frac{3}{4} = \frac{9}{16}, efficiently yielding the same ratios without enumerating all combinations.

Extensions and Limitations

Multihybrid and Linked Traits

Multihybrid crosses extend the Punnett square method to three or more traits, assuming independent assortment among the genes involved. For a trihybrid cross, where each parent is heterozygous for three genes (e.g., AaBbCc × AaBbCc), each parent produces 2³ = 8 distinct gametes, resulting in an 8 × 8 Punnett square comprising 64 cells. This exponential growth in grid size—generally 2ⁿ × 2ⁿ for n traits—quickly becomes impractical for higher-order crosses, such as a tetrahybrid (16 × 16 = 256 cells), limiting the visual utility of Punnett squares beyond a few traits. Under conditions of complete dominance and independent assortment, the phenotypic ratios in the F₂ generation of a trihybrid follow a 27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1 pattern, reflecting the combinations of dominant and recessive expressions across the three traits. For instance, in garden peas, a involving genes for flower color, seed shape, and plant height would yield this ratio, illustrating the principle observed in Mendel's experiments. This outcome arises from multiplying the monohybrid ratios (3:1) for each trait, confirming the predictive power of the method when assumptions hold. When genes are linked on the same , they do not assort independently, violating a core assumption of the standard Punnett square and leading to unequal frequencies that distort predicted ratios. In such cases, the tool's tabular format becomes inadequate for directly visualizing outcomes, as it presumes all combinations occur with equal probability (25% each for dihybrids). Instead, linkage requires accounting for the tendency of alleles to be inherited together unless separated by crossing over during . Sex-linked traits, carried on the X or Y chromosomes, exemplify linkage challenges in Punnett squares, as males produce s with either an X or a Y (lacking a homologous pair for most genes), resulting in uneven gamete contributions compared to the two X-bearing gametes from s. For X-linked recessive (genotype Xᶜ for affected, Xᶜᴬ for normal), a Punnett square for a carrier (Xᶜ Xᶜᴬ) crossed with a normal male (Xᶜᴬ Y) yields four outcomes: 25% normal (Xᶜᴬ Xᶜᴬ), 25% carrier (Xᶜ Xᶜᴬ), 25% normal male (Xᶜᴬ Y), and 25% affected male (Xᶜ Y), with no affected females possible in this cross. This 2 × 2 grid highlights the sex-specific inheritance but assumes no recombination on the non-homologous XY pair. To adjust Punnett squares for linkage, recombination frequency (r, expressed as a proportion between 0 and 0.5) is incorporated by modifying probabilities: parental gametes each occur with (1 - r)/2, while each recombinant type has probability r/2. For example, in a dihybrid with 10% recombination (r = 0.1), parental gametes appear at 45% each, and recombinants at 5% each, allowing weighted outcome calculations rather than equal divisions. This probabilistic refinement extends the method's applicability but underscores its limitations for complex linkages, where alternative tools like probability trees or mapping functions are often preferred.

Assumptions and Modern Alternatives

The Punnett square relies on several foundational assumptions rooted in Mendel's laws of inheritance. It presupposes independent assortment, where alleles for different traits segregate independently during formation, as described in Mendel's second law. Additionally, it assumes complete dominance, in which one fully masks the expression of another in the heterozygous state, leading to discrete phenotypic ratios like 3:1 in monohybrid crosses. The model further assumes that each trait is controlled by a single gene locus with no interactions such as , that from each parent are equally viable and produced in equal proportions, and that fertilization occurs randomly without biases. It also neglects environmental influences on , treating phenotypes as solely genetically determined. These assumptions impose significant limitations on the Punnett square's applicability. For crosses involving more than two traits, the method becomes impractical due to , requiring grids with 16 cells for dihybrids and 256 cells for tetrahybrids, which hinders visualization and . The tool overlooks complex genetic phenomena, including polygenic where multiple genes contribute to a trait, incomplete where not all carriers express the , and mutations that alter frequencies. It fails to account for , where genes on the same do not assort independently, violating the core independent assortment premise. Developed by in 1905, the Punnett square predates the discovery of DNA's double-helix structure by Watson and Crick in 1953, limiting its integration of insights such as gene regulation and epigenetic modifications. This historical context means it does not incorporate modern understandings of genomic interactions, making it incomplete for analyzing real-world inheritance patterns influenced by non-Mendelian factors. Contemporary alternatives address these shortcomings by offering more flexible and scalable approaches. Probability trees, or forked-line diagrams, extend Mendelian predictions to multiple traits by applying the sequentially, avoiding large grids while maintaining accuracy for independent events. Chi-square goodness-of-fit tests validate Punnett square predictions against observed data, quantifying deviations due to factors like linkage or selection; for instance, in a expecting a 3:1 ratio, the test assesses if empirical results align statistically. Simulation software such as PopG enables modeling of population-level dynamics, incorporating selection, drift, and multiple alleles to simulate outcomes beyond simple crosses. Despite these advances, the Punnett square remains valuable for educational purposes in demonstrating basic Mendelian principles, particularly in introductory settings, but it is less suitable for real-world breeding programs where genetic complexity and environmental variables predominate.

References

  1. https://pressbooks.umn.edu/introbio/chapter/inheritancelaws/
  2. http://faculty.kirkwood.edu/ryost/punnett.htm
  3. https://dnalc.cshl.edu/view/15585-Godfrey-Hardy-and-Reginald-Punnett.html
  4. https://bioprinciples.biosci.gatech.edu/module-4-genes-and-genomes/4-2-4-mendelian-genetics/
  5. https://www.wku.edu/gifted/project_gems/documents/sfp_punnet_squares_lesson.pdf
  6. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Introductory_Biology_%28CK-12%29/03%253A_Genetics/3.06%253A_Punnett_Squares
  7. https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/punnett-square
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/punnett-square
  9. https://microbenotes.com/punnett-square/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3430543/
  11. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Allele
  12. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Dominant-Traits-and-Alleles
  13. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Recessive-Traits-Alleles
  14. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/genotype
  15. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Phenotype
  16. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/homozygous
  17. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/heterozygous
  18. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Gamete
  19. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Meiosis
  20. https://www.genome.gov/Pages/Education/Modules/BasicsPresentation.pdf
  21. http://www.sbs.utexas.edu/sanders/bio309/Lectures/2006/Punnet.htm
  22. https://askabiologist.asu.edu/punnett-squares
  23. https://biology.arizona.edu/mendelian_genetics/problem_sets/dihybrid_cross/03t.html
  24. https://passel2.unl.edu/view/lesson/98bd1fdffd82/12
  25. https://slcc.pressbooks.pub/collegebiology1/chapter/punnett-squares-and-laws-of-probability/
  26. https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/bio-oer/genetics/probability-and-chi-square-analysis/
  27. https://mathbench.umd.edu/modules/prob-stat_punnett-squares_intro/page09.htm
  28. https://www.lehigh.edu/~jas0/G08.html
  29. https://pressbooks.umn.edu/classroompartners/chapter/punnett-squares/
  30. https://biology.arizona.edu/mendelian_genetics/problem_sets/monohybrid_cross/01t.html
  31. https://biotech.gsu.edu/2107/lecture12.html
  32. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/663/student/?section=3
  33. https://www.k-state.edu/parasitology/biology198/mendel.html
  34. https://biology.arizona.edu/mendelian_genetics/problem_sets/monohybrid_cross/11t.html
  35. http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/gregor-mendel-and-the-principles-of-inheritance-593/
  36. https://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/gm-65-a.pdf
  37. https://www.nature.com/scitable/definition/dihybrid-cross-dihybrid-303/
  38. https://mathbench.umd.edu/modules/prob-stat_punnett-squares_advanced/page10.htm
  39. http://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/biology/chapter/laws-of-inheritance/
  40. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/heredity/mendelian-genetics-ap/a/mendel-and-his-peas
  41. https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/mhccmajorsbio/chapter/linked-genes-violate-the-law-of-independent-assortment/
  42. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_(Boundless)/12:_Mendels_Experiments_and_Heredity/12.03:_Laws_of_Inheritance/12.3E:_Genetic_Linkage_and_Violation_of_the_Law_of_Independent_Assortment
  43. https://biology.arizona.edu/human_bio/problem_sets/color_blindness/intro.html
  44. https://vetmed.tamu.edu/peer/wp-content/uploads/sites/72/2020/04/Mendelian-Genetics-and-Punnett-Squares.docx
  45. https://mathbench.umd.edu/modules/prob-stat_recombination/page19.htm
  46. https://mcb.berkeley.edu/courses/mcb140/Syllabus/AmacherLecture/Lecture5.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.