Hubbry Logo
Big WingBig WingMain
Open search
Big Wing
Community hub
Big Wing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Big Wing
Big Wing
Big Wing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Air Chief Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory was a key advocate of the Big Wing

The Big Wing, also known as a Balbo,[1][2][3] was an air fighting tactic proposed during the Battle of Britain by 12 Group commander Air Vice-Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory and Acting Squadron Leader Douglas Bader. In essence, the tactic involved meeting incoming Luftwaffe bombing raids in strength with a wing-shaped formation of three to five squadrons. In the Battle, this tactic was employed by the Duxford Wing, under Bader's command.

The name "Balbo" refers to Italo Balbo, an Italian air force officer and fascist political leader famous for leading large formations of aircraft on long distance flights before the war.[1][2][3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Big Wing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Big Wing was an air fighting tactic proposed and implemented by the Royal Air Force (RAF) during the in 1940, involving the assembly of large formations—typically three or more squadrons, totaling around 50 or more aircraft—to engage bombers and escorts in overwhelming force rather than using smaller, more responsive groups. Developed primarily by , commander of No. 12 Group, the strategy aimed to maximize destructive impact on German raids while minimizing RAF attrition by concentrating firepower, with strong advocacy from , who led the first major Big Wing operation on 30 August 1940 involving his No. 242 Squadron and others. The tactic was first executed in full by the Duxford Wing—comprising squadrons from airfield—on 7 September 1940, when it intercepted a large German formation over , though post-war analysis revealed exaggerated victory claims, with actual kill ratios closer to 1:1 rather than the reported 7:1. The Big Wing sparked intense controversy within RAF leadership, as Sir , Commander-in-Chief of Fighter Command, and of No. 11 Group opposed it, arguing that the time required for assembly (often 30-45 minutes) allowed enemy bombers to reach their targets unchecked, while small, flexible formations better preserved scarce pilots and aircraft during the critical defense of . Leigh-Mallory's persistent advocacy, backed by Sholto Douglas and political influences, contributed to Dowding's dismissal on 24 November 1940 and Park's replacement, with Leigh-Mallory assuming command of No. 11 Group shortly thereafter; this leadership shake-up occurred despite Dowding's overall strategy securing Britain's victory in the by October 1940. Although the Big Wing saw limited use during the height of the battle and was later adopted more widely in 1941—resulting in heavy RAF losses, including Bader's capture on 9 August 1941—it highlighted deep divisions in RAF doctrine between offensive mass tactics and defensive efficiency, influencing post-war evaluations of the campaign's command structure.

Historical Context

Battle of Britain Overview

The Battle of Britain was the first major military campaign fought entirely by air forces, taking place from July to October 1940 as part of World War II. It pitted the Royal Air Force (RAF), primarily through its Fighter Command, against the German Luftwaffe in a desperate defense of the United Kingdom following the fall of France. The campaign unfolded over the skies of southern England, where the RAF sought to repel relentless German air assaults aimed at crippling British defenses. This aerial struggle marked a pivotal moment, as its outcome determined whether Nazi Germany could launch a cross-Channel invasion. The Luftwaffe's primary objective was to achieve air superiority over , a prerequisite for , the planned invasion of Britain. Under Hermann Göring's command, German forces launched coordinated attacks to destroy RAF infrastructure and aircraft, believing this would force Britain to negotiate peace. In contrast, the RAF, led by Sir , faced significant numerical disadvantages at the outset, with approximately 1,400 fighter aircraft available compared to the Luftwaffe's over 2,500 aircraft committed to the campaign. Dowding's Fighter Command, numbering around 59 squadrons, played the central role in coordinating defenses through an integrated system of , observers, and ground control. The battle progressed through distinct phases, beginning with preliminary skirmishes over the in July. The main offensive commenced on , or Eagle Day, on August 13, 1940, when the initiated large-scale attacks on RAF airfields, radar stations, and aircraft factories. This intensified from August 24 to September 6, 1940, with focused assaults on Fighter Command bases that strained British resources to the breaking point. On September 7, 1940, the Germans shifted strategy, redirecting efforts to bomb and other cities in an attempt to break civilian morale, marking the onset of and easing pressure on airfields. Casualties were heavy on , underscoring the battle's ferocity. The RAF suffered 544 pilots killed during the campaign, representing about one in six of Fighter Command's aircrew. The incurred approximately 1,733 aircraft destroyed, with over 2,500 aircrew killed, contributing to unsustainable attrition that ultimately forced to abandon its invasion plans by late October 1940. These losses highlighted the RAF's success in maintaining operational strength despite initial disadvantages, setting the stage for the need for more concentrated fighter responses in subsequent engagements.

Initial RAF Fighter Tactics

The , developed under Hugh Dowding's leadership, formed the backbone of RAF Fighter Command's defensive strategy during the early phases of the . This integrated air defense network combined radar stations along the south and east coasts for early detection of incoming raids up to 200 miles away, the Royal Observer Corps for visual confirmation and tracking of low-flying aircraft, and sector stations that coordinated responses through filter rooms and operations centers. data was filtered to eliminate false positives and vectored fighters toward threats, enabling a responsive rather than proactive defense. The primary RAF fighter tactic emphasized decentralized operations, with squadrons of approximately 12 aircraft typically kept on readiness at airfields and scrambled individually or in pairs upon detection of intruders. These patrols prioritized the protection of vital assets such as airfields, sector stations, and convoys, focusing on over enemy territory to minimize vulnerability. In No. 11 Group, responsible for the frontline defense of southeast England under , the approach stressed rapid response to immediate threats while avoiding standing patrols that wasted fuel and exposed pilots to unnecessary risks. Park's philosophy aimed to conserve fighting strength by engaging only when necessary, ensuring pilots returned to base for quick rearmament and refueling to maintain rates. Despite these efficiencies, the tactics had significant limitations in countering large-scale German raids, as the decentralized scrambles often resulted in isolated engagements where small RAF formations faced numerically superior forces. This piecemeal response hindered the rapid concentration of fighters, leading to higher attrition rates as squadrons fought outnumbered without mutual support. For instance, on August 11, 1940, No. 213 Squadron's Hurricanes intercepted a large formation of German bombers and escorts over the , suffering losses including the deaths of F/Lt R.D.G. Wight and Sgt S.I. Butterfield against overwhelming odds. Similarly, during the intense fighting on August 18—known as the "Hardest Day"—multiple squadrons from No. 11 Group were vectored into separate combats, contributing to 69 RAF aircraft destroyed and 24 damaged in combat, with additional losses on the ground, while defending against massed attacks on airfields. These challenges in concentrating forces against large raids contributed to debates within Fighter Command, particularly in No. 12 Group, over more aggressive tactical responses.

Development of the Big Wing

Advocacy by Key Figures

, commander of No. 12 Group, first proposed the Big Wing tactic in late August 1940, advocating the massing of 3 to 5 squadrons—up to 60 aircraft—into coordinated wings that would form en masse and launch decisive attacks on German bomber formations to inflict maximum damage. This concept was shaped by Leigh-Mallory's observations of large-scale raids assembling over at altitudes of 15,000 to 17,000 feet, which highlighted the need for concentrated fighter responses, as well as influences from the Italian "Balbo" formations pioneered by in and observed by RAF personnel during pre-war maneuvers. Leigh-Mallory actively promoted the tactic through internal RAF debates, sending multiple memos to Sir , the commander of Fighter Command, that criticized the more piecemeal, "defensive" intercepts employed by No. 11 Group under . In a memo dated September 2, 1940, Leigh-Mallory highlighted the lack of sufficient tactical information provided to his group by Nos. 10 and 11 Groups, urging the dispatch of experienced officers to sector stations to improve coordination. He followed this on September 8 with another communication enclosing a report from on enemy tactics, arguing that No. 11 Group's methods were leading to unnecessarily high casualties among RAF pilots. These exchanges underscored Leigh-Mallory's push for rear groups to execute large-scale, offensive Big Wing operations rather than reactive reinforcements. Squadron Leader Douglas Bader, commanding No. 242 Squadron at RAF Duxford, who became the de facto leader of the Duxford Wing in September 1940, became a fervent proponent of the Big Wing, refining its execution by emphasizing height advantages and tight formations to maximize firepower concentration—a principle rooted in his pre-war advocacy for aggressive, massed fighter tactics during RAF exercises. Bader's enthusiasm stemmed from his command of No. 242 Squadron, where he integrated it with Nos. 310 and 611 Squadrons to form the initial Duxford Wing, conducting practice formations to achieve operational cohesion. The first formal authorization for a Big Wing assembly came on August 30, 1940, following No. 242 Squadron's engagement that day, in which Bader reported destroying 12 enemy aircraft; however, the full three-squadron formation was not operational until early September, marking the transition from proposal to practice.

Initial Implementations

The first attempt to implement the Big Wing tactic occurred on September 7, 1940, when No. 12 Group sought to assemble a formation of five squadrons to counter a major raid on involving nearly 1,000 aircraft. However, coordination issues among the squadrons, including delays in takeoff and rendezvous, prevented the full assembly, with only three squadrons—Nos. 19, 242, and 310—managing to engage scattered German formations of Dornier bombers and escorts after the main bomber force had already passed inland. This initial sortie highlighted the practical challenges of the tactic, as the wing arrived too late to influence the primary threat, contributing to Fighter Command's broader effort that day which resulted in 41 verified German aircraft destroyed. A more structured implementation followed on September 15, 1940—known as —when the Duxford Wing, under the leadership of , assembled three squadrons initially (comprising Hurricanes and Spitfires) before expanding to five for vectored over . The formation patrolled from Debden to and engaged incoming bombers, claiming over 20 German aircraft downed in the action, though post-war verification adjusted this to approximately 19 confirmed kills for the wing with no RAF losses. These mixed results underscored the tactic's potential for concentrated firepower but also its limitations, as overclaiming was common amid the chaos of large-scale engagements. Technical hurdles plagued these early operations, particularly the reliance on radio direction finding (RDF) systems for squadron rendezvous, which required precise ground control to vector aircraft into position. Assembly and climb times often totaled 20–30 minutes or more, often rendering the wings too late to intercept frontline threats effectively, as slower-climbing Hurricanes struggled to reach operational altitude alongside faster Spitfires. In response, adjustments were made to shift from ground-controlled takeoffs, which left aircraft vulnerable on runways, to airborne assembly procedures, allowing squadrons to scramble individually and form up en route to reduce exposure and improve response times.

Implementation and Operations

Organizational Structure

The Big Wing formations typically comprised 3 to 5 squadrons, totaling 36 to 60 fighter , with a mix of Spitfires and Hawker Hurricanes to balance speed and maneuverability. These units were often divided into sub-formations, such as pairs or sections of 12 each, to enhance tactical flexibility while maintaining overall cohesion during engagements. For example, the Wing initially included three squadrons—No. 19 (Spitfires), No. 242 (Hurricanes), and No. 310 (Czech-manned Hurricanes)—before expanding to five, incorporating additional units like No. 611 (Spitfires) and No. 302 (Polish Hurricanes). Command of Big Wing operations followed a hierarchical structure within , with a designated wing leader responsible for airborne coordination. At , Douglas served as the primary wing leader, directing the formation via radio communications while liaising with 12 Group headquarters under . Sector controllers from the ground provided vectoring instructions based on incoming raid data, enabling the wing to rendezvous with threats over 11 Group's sector in southeast . This chain emphasized rapid decision-making by the wing leader to adapt to evolving battle conditions, though it relied heavily on clear radio links and timely intelligence relays. Operations were primarily staged from rear-area bases in 12 Group, such as RAF Duxford in , which allowed sufficient time for squadrons to assemble into formation before vectoring southward toward the frontline sectors of 11 Group. This positioning provided a strategic buffer, enabling climbs to operational altitudes en route, but it also introduced transit delays that could affect timing. Support for Big Wing units included specialized ground crews trained for efficient rearming and refueling, achieving turnaround times of 20 to 30 minutes to sustain multiple sorties per day. Integration with the RAF's radar network, part of the , facilitated early raid detection, though 12 Group formations occasionally experienced delays in receiving plot updates forwarded from 11 Group's filters, impacting response speed. Variations in Big Wing composition occasionally incorporated auxiliary or foreign-manned squadrons, such as the Polish No. 302 or Czech No. 310, to bolster numbers and bring diverse experience. Emphasis was placed on tight V-shaped or echelon formations to preserve , with slower Hurricanes positioned to accommodate Spitfire speeds during assembly.

Major Battles and Engagements

The Duxford Wing conducted its first effective intercept on September 9, 1940, when Nos. 19, 242, and 310 Squadrons, comprising Spitfires and Hurricanes, engaged a formation of bombers escorted by Bf 110s over and . The wing claimed 21 enemy aircraft destroyed during the action, though post-war verification aligned these with broader losses of around 30 for the day. RAF losses from the wing were limited to one Hurricane and its pilot. The most prominent deployment occurred on September 15, 1940, known as Battle of Britain Day, when the expanded Duxford Wing—now five squadrons (Nos. 19, 242, 302, 310, and 611)—launched at 11:22 and climbed to high altitude en route to the southeast. Positioned astern of retreating Luftwaffe formations over the Thames Estuary, the wing attacked from advantageous rear angles, with Spitfires targeting escorting Bf 109s while Hurricanes focused on bombers near Beckenham and Woolwich; top-cover fighters maintained altitude superiority. The formation typically climbed to 15,000–20,000 feet to engage bombers at 12,000 feet with escorts above, exploiting height for dives and massed strikes. The wing claimed 12 bombers and fighters destroyed, though verified losses numbered 5–7, contributing to the day's overall RAF tally of 61 confirmed German aircraft downed. Big Wing losses remained minimal, with no specific aircraft or pilots reported from the formation amid the chaos. Throughout September and October 1940, Big Wings from and other 12 Group bases conducted multiple operations against diminishing daylight raids, often positioning at 15,000–20,000 feet to shadow and assault bomber streams from the rear while providing mutual top cover. These wings claimed over 200 victories in total, but analyses revealed significant inflation due to combat confusion, with actual confirmed kills estimated at around 50. RAF casualties in these massed engagements were relatively low compared to smaller patrols, as the concentrated firepower deterred prolonged fights. The tactic was phased out by late October 1940, as the Luftwaffe transitioned to night bombing operations, rendering large daylight formations obsolete and reducing opportunities for intercepts.

Controversy and Criticism

Arguments in Favor

Proponents of the Big Wing tactic, including Air Vice-Mallory and Wing Commander , argued that massing multiple squadrons into large formations provided numerical superiority over Luftwaffe bomber escorts, enabling the RAF to turn defensive interceptions into offensive routs. By concentrating up to five squadrons—approximately 60 fighters—into a single "Big Wing," they believed this overwhelming force could decisively engage and destroy enemy formations, as demonstrated in claims from the Wing's operations where large groups outnumbered and disrupted German raiders. Bader emphasized the need for aggressive action, advocating to "hit them hard" to maximize impact against numerically superior Luftwaffe incursions. The tactic was also seen as beneficial for pilot morale and preservation, as concentrated attacks minimized individual squadron exposure time to enemy fire compared to the smaller, attritional skirmishes favored by 11 Group under . Leigh-Mallory contended that these massed assaults reduced overall RAF losses by delivering swift, decisive blows that deterred prolonged engagements, thereby conserving experienced pilots and boosting confidence through visible successes. This approach contrasted with the piecemeal engagements in , where 11 Group's fighters often faced immediate attrition without the reinforcement of larger wings. Leigh-Mallory cited operational data from 12 Group to support the Big Wing's effectiveness, claiming higher kill ratios against the —such as approximately 7:1 on 15 September 1940, with 105 enemy aircraft reportedly destroyed against 14 RAF losses—attributable to the tactic's use of massed formations from rear-area bases. He argued this suited 12 Group's positioning farther north, allowing time to assemble wings without the urgency faced by frontline groups, thus optimizing their contribution to Fighter Command's overall effort. In post-battle advocacy, Leigh-Mallory's reports to the Air Staff, including assessments from September 1940 operations, highlighted the Big Wing's pivotal role in key victories that thwarted a potential German invasion. He credited these large-scale engagements with inflicting unsustainable losses on the during critical phases, such as the intense raids over in mid-September, which shifted the momentum and secured air defense for Britain. Additionally, the psychological impact of Big Wings was emphasized as a deterrent, with large, coordinated formations demonstrating RAF resolve and overwhelming German pilots through sheer scale and aggression. This visible show of strength not only disrupted raids but also served purposes, portraying the RAF as an unyielding force capable of mounting formidable counterattacks.

Arguments Against

Critics of the Big Wing tactic, particularly of No. 11 Group, argued that the time required to assemble large formations severely undermined its effectiveness. Forming a wing of three to five squadrons typically took 20–40 minutes, allowing German bombers to penetrate British defenses and reach their targets before interception could occur. Park specifically critiqued the approach as "too late to be effective," emphasizing that rapid response was essential to disrupt raids in their early stages. The tactic also led to significant overclaiming of victories and operational inefficiencies. For instance, the Duxford Wing claimed around 200 enemy aircraft destroyed in engagements, but post-war analysis confirmed only about 50 actual German aircraft destroyed, inflating perceptions of success while diverting resources to prolonged pursuits. These chases exacerbated consumption and due to the extended climbs needed to reach operational altitudes, reducing the overall endurance of sorties. Air Chief Marshal Sir , head of Fighter Command, expressed strategic concerns that the Big Wing diverted fighters away from the critical defenses of No. 11 Group, which bore the brunt of attacks over southeastern . This redistribution risked leaving key airfields exposed to bombing, potentially crippling and command . Dowding favored "filtering" tactics instead, which involved individual or small groups of squadrons for immediate, continuous harassment of incoming raids to maximize disruption without large-scale commitments. This internal discord culminated in biased 1940 Air Staff inquiries, such as the Salmond Committee, which prioritized resolving the controversy through leadership changes favoring Big Wing proponents. Large formations inherent in the Big Wing increased operational risks, including mid-air collisions during assembly and maneuvers, and demanded highly skilled leaders to maintain cohesion—conditions not universally met across all groups. Slower aircraft like Hurricanes often lagged behind faster Spitfires in climbs, creating vulnerabilities to enemy fighters.

Post-War Assessment

Historical Evaluations

Post-war historical evaluations of the Big Wing tactic, particularly in the context of the , have generally been critical, emphasizing its limited effectiveness compared to the more responsive Dowding-Park system employed by Fighter Command's No. 11 Group. In the 1950s and 1960s, official analyses by the Air Historical Branch of the Royal Air Force and influential works such as Derek Wood and Derek Dempster's (1961) credited the centralized control and rapid deployment under Air Chief Marshal Hugh Dowding and Air Vice-Marshal with the majority of successes, portraying Big Wings as marginal contributors that accounted for less than 10% of confirmed losses. These assessments highlighted how the time required to assemble large formations often resulted in missed interceptions, allowing German bombers to reach their targets before No. 12 Group's wings could engage. Quantitative studies in this era further underscored these limitations by cross-referencing RAF claims against captured records. Francis K. Mason's Battle Over Britain (1969) provided a detailed statistical , revealing that Big Wing operations had a success rate approximately 20% lower than those of individual squadrons due to organizational challenges, such as formation delays and pilot confusion in large-scale engagements. For instance, while No. 12 Group claimed hundreds of victories, verified destructions were significantly fewer, often inflated by the chaos of massed combat, which reduced overall efficiency in defensive scenarios. This evidence reinforced the view that the tactic, while imposing on paper, failed to deliver proportional impact during the high-tempo raids of 1940. Modern scholarly assessments since 2000 have built on these foundations, incorporating broader archival access and computational modeling to affirm the Big Wing's shortcomings while noting ancillary benefits. Stephen Bungay's The Most Dangerous Enemy (2000) acknowledges the morale boost provided to RAF pilots by the sight of large formations but concludes that assembly delays negated any numerical advantages, as wings frequently arrived too late to prevent bomber penetrations. Recent simulations, such as the by Matthew Oldham, evaluate the Big Wing's potential to minimize British losses against larger German forces, though effectiveness depends on German formation spreading. These analyses estimate that the tactic contributed minimally to overall attrition of the , prioritizing psychological effects over tactical efficacy. The Big Wing controversy also played a pivotal role in post-battle leadership changes, exacerbating internal divisions that led to Dowding's removal as of Fighter Command on 24 November 1940, and the subsequent elevation of . Historians attribute this ousting partly to the politicization of tactical debates, where advocates of the Big Wing leveraged inflated claims to undermine Dowding's authority, despite the battle's successful outcome under his oversight. Contemporary consensus among air power scholars holds that while the Big Wing proved viable for offensive operations—such as sweeps over occupied —it was mismatched for the Battle of Britain's defensive needs, where speed and flexibility were paramount. This evaluation underscores the tactic's doctrinal limitations in a radar-guided, time-sensitive air defense environment, influencing later RAF adaptations toward more integrated command structures.

Legacy in Air Warfare Doctrine

Following the , the Big Wing concept directly shaped RAF Fighter Command's transition to offensive operations in 1941–1942, most notably through the Circus raids over occupied , where large multi-squadron fighter formations were adapted to provide close escorts for small bomber groups and draw the into combat. These sweeps, conceived under Sholto Douglas, explicitly extended the "Big Wing" principle from defensive intercepts to proactive engagements, often involving up to 18 squadrons to overwhelm German defenses while minimizing bomber losses. Trafford Leigh-Mallory's appointment as Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief of Fighter Command on 18 November 1942 further entrenched wing tactics in RAF strategy, as he promoted massed fighter concentrations for achieving air superiority during the Normandy campaign in 1944. As Air Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Expeditionary Air Force from November 1943, Leigh-Mallory applied Big Wing-inspired principles to coordinate large-scale operations supporting Operation Overlord, integrating fighter wings with tactical bombing and ground forces to dominate the battlefield. The Big Wing contributed to a lasting emphasis on integration in air warfare , prioritizing the massing of air assets to support joint operations, a concept that echoed in Cold War planning for coordinated intercepts against massed Soviet bomber formations. Its rigid large-formation approach, however, drew criticism for vulnerability and delays, prompting doctrinal refinements toward more flexible tactics, such as the "fighting wing" developed in the , where jet fighters operated in tight, mutually supportive pairs to enhance maneuverability over cumbersome masses. In RAF historical narrative, the Big Wing endures as a symbol of audacious innovation and offensive spirit, exemplified by figures like , yet its legacy is balanced by acknowledgment of Hugh Dowding's radar-integrated defense system as the indispensable foundation for sustaining air defense during the .

References

  1. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-big-wing-controversy-and-hugh-downings-fall-from-grace/
  2. https://aspectsofhistory.com/douglas-baders-big-wing-controversy/
  3. https://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/blog/baders-big-wing-controversy-duxford-1940/
  4. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-dowding-system-and-the-battle-of-britain
  5. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/how-hugh-dowding-and-the-raf-won-the-battle-of-britain
  6. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/battle-britain-not-so-few
  7. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/8-important-dates-in-the-battle-of-britain
  8. https://bentleypriorymuseum.org.uk/bentley-priory-and-the-battle-of-britain/battle-of-britain-timeline-10-july-1940-31-october-1940/
  9. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/listen-to-raf-pilots-tell-the-story-of-the-battle-of-britain
  10. https://www.raf.mod.uk/what-we-do/our-history/anniversaries/battle-of-britain/
  11. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/battle-britain-air-perspective
  12. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/what-was-the-dowding-system
  13. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/history-of-the-battle-of-britain/radar-the-battle-winner/
  14. https://www.rafbf.org/news-and-stories/raf-history/dowding-system-and-role-radar-battle-britain
  15. https://www.classicwarbirds.co.uk/articles/royal-air-force-tactics-during-the-battle-of-britain.php
  16. https://www.history.co.uk/article/sir-keith-park-battle-of-britains-defender-of-london
  17. https://www.agilier.com/blog/sir-keith-park-airborne-tactics-and-agility/
  18. https://battleofbritain1940.com/entry/sunday-11-august-1940/
  19. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/history-of-the-battle-of-britain/the-hardest-day/
  20. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/86150/2/314767_VOL2.pdf
  21. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/battle-of-britain-big-wing-was-the-big-wing-a-bad-idea
  22. https://erenow.org/ww/narrow-margin-battle-britain-rise-air-power-1930-1940/18.php
  23. https://www.raf.mod.uk/what-we-do/centre-for-air-and-space-power-studies/aspr/apr-vol18-iss2-3-pdf/
  24. https://battleofbritain1940.com/entry/sunday-15-september-1940/
  25. https://www.key.aero/article/baders-big-wing
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24453576
  27. https://battleofbritain1940.com/entry/monday-9-september-1940/
  28. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/big-wing
  29. https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/history-of-the-battle-of-britain/the-new-tactics/
  30. https://books.google.com/books/about/NARROW_MARGIN.html?id=OK4WAAAAYAAJ
  31. https://www.raf.mod.uk/what-we-do/our-history/air-historical-branch/ahb-narratives/
  32. https://moldham74.github.io/AussieCAS/papers/best-paper.pdf
  33. http://www.gblume.com/timeline-of-strategic-aviation/wwii-1941/
  34. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/all-little-purpose
  35. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/6090/1/Mahoney15PhD.pdf
  36. https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AAF/AAF-H-DDay/
  37. https://www.raf.mod.uk/what-we-do/centre-for-air-and-space-power-studies/aspr/apr-vol17-iss2-4-pdf/
  38. https://warontherocks.com/2017/10/the-korean-war-and-the-phoenix-of-flight-leadership-the-fighter-pilot-part-ii/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.