Hubbry Logo
Canadian heraldryCanadian heraldryMain
Open search
Canadian heraldry
Community hub
Canadian heraldry
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Canadian heraldry
Canadian heraldry
from Wikipedia
Canadian heraldry
 
Heraldic traditionGallo-British
Governing bodyCanadian Heraldic Authority
Chief officerSamy Khalid, Chief Herald of Canada

Canadian heraldry is the cultural tradition and style of coats of arms and other heraldic achievements in both modern and historic Canada. It includes national, provincial, and civic arms, noble and personal arms, ecclesiastical heraldry, heraldic displays as corporate logos, and Canadian blazonry.

Derived mainly from heraldic traditions in France and the United Kingdom, Canadian heraldry also incorporates distinctly Canadian symbols, especially native flora and fauna, references to the Indigenous peoples of Canada, and uniquely Canadian elements such as the Canadian pale, derived from the Canadian flag. A unique system of cadency is used for daughters inheriting arms, and a special symbol for United Empire Loyalists.

In 1988, governance of both personal and corporate heraldry in Canada was patriated from the heraldic authorities in England and Scotland, with the formation of the Canadian Heraldic Authority, which now has exclusive jurisdiction over granting awards of arms in Canada. Coats of arms are used throughout Canada by all levels of government, in many cases including royal insignia as a mark of authority, an example being the arms of the House of Commons and the Senate, and of Parliament as a combined body. Use of armorial bearings is not limited to governmental bodies; all citizens of Canada have the right to petition for an award of arms, as do other entities including businesses and religious institutions. The granting of arms is regarded as an honour from the king of Canada, via his viceregal representative, the governor general of Canada, and thus are generally bestowed only on those whom the chief herald has deemed worthy of receiving a grant of arms.

History

[edit]
Royal arms of France, three gold fleurs-de-lis on a blue background
Royal arms of France (modern)
Coat of arms of Nova Scotia
Coat of arms of Nova Scotia

Before the arrival of Europeans, the Indigenous peoples of Canada used symbolic artwork to denote their allegiance to a particular clan or pantribal sodalities, and to show legendary and religious themes. For the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast this would be done with carvings on totem poles. carvings integrated into longhouses and smaller wooden objects like boxes, masks, and canoes. For the Indigenous peoples of the Great Plains the hide painting tradition painted images onto tipis, shields, and other animal-hide objects.[1]

The history of European-style heraldry in Canada began with the raising of the royal arms of France (modern) by French explorer Jacques Cartier in 1534, when he landed on Canadian soil at what is now known as the Gaspé Peninsula.[2] From the beginning of the settlement of Canada until the Treaty of Paris in 1763, armorial bearings were largely either brought from France or awarded by the French crown. A notable exception is the coat of arms of Nova Scotia, awarded in 1625 by Charles I (making it the oldest coat of arms in the Commonwealth outside the United Kingdom[3]), in use until 1868, when it was replaced by a new achievement.[4] The original was later rediscovered, and replaced the 1868 version in 1929.[5][6] The present-day coat of arms of Newfoundland and Labrador was granted to a private company shortly after that of Nova Scotia, although it did not enter use as the region's arms until the 1920s.[7] The coat of arms of the Hudson's Bay Company was first used in 1671 (although no record of the original grant exists, and it was not registered with the College of Arms in London until 1921[8]) and has been in continual use with minor cosmetic changes to the official depiction ever since.[9]

Upon ratification of the Treaty of Paris, the British Crown confirmed the French awards of arms.[2] Between 1763 and 1867, the year of Canadian Confederation, there is little evidence of much heraldic activity.[2] After Confederation, however, heraldry in Canada became more widespread, including grants of arms to the provinces, various educational institutions, municipalities, and individuals.[2] In the immediate post-Confederation period, arms were granted to New Brunswick,[10] Nova Scotia,[5] Ontario,[11] and Quebec,[12] although not to the country as a whole.[4] In the period between the Treaty of Paris and Confederation, the Arms of the United Kingdom had served as the emblem of authority within Canada.[4]

From 1763 until 1988, heraldry in Canada was under the authority of the College of Arms in London and the Court of the Lord Lyon in Edinburgh. In the late 1980s, the Queen issued letters patent authorizing the governor general to exercise her authority in heraldic matters. The governor general then established the Canadian Heraldic Authority.[2][13]

Modern heraldry

[edit]

Official

[edit]

Now know Ye that We, by and with the advice of our Privy Council of Canada, do by these presents authorise and empower Our Governor General of Canada to exercise or provide for the exercise of all power and authorities lawfully belonging to Us as Queen of Canada in respect of the granting of armorial bearings in Canada.

From the Letters Patent,1988 [14]

Before the creation of the Canadian Heraldic Authority, Canadians wishing to obtain a legally granted coat of arms had to apply to one of the two heraldic offices in the United Kingdom: either the College of Arms in London or, if of Scottish descent, the Court of the Lord Lyon in Edinburgh.[13] This process was quite lengthy—and costly. In addition, the heralds in Britain could sometimes be unfamiliar with Canadian history and symbols.[15] In time, many Canadians with an interest in heraldry began calling for an office that would offer armorial bearings designed by and for Canadians.[16]

As early as 1967, plans were reportedly in the works to transfer overview of heraldry from the College of Arms in the UK to Canada.[17] The push for a wholly Canadian heraldic system came largely from the Heraldry Society of Canada (now the Royal Heraldry Society of Canada[18]) almost from its inception,[19] though it was not seen as a priority by successive national governments.[16] In 1986, Vicki Huntington, a politician from British Columbia, forwarded a brief written by the Royal Heraldry Society of Canada calling for the creation of the Canadian Heraldic Authority to a staff member in then-Secretary of State David Crombie's office.[16] Mr. Crombie had his department organize a meeting in Ottawa the following year, to which many national and international heraldic experts were invited. The meeting concluded with "a strong recommendation to government that an Authority be created."[16]

Two years later, on 4 June 1988, then-Governor General Jeanne Sauvé authorized the creation of the Canadian Heraldic Authority, made possible by letters patent signed by Queen Elizabeth II, on the advice of her Canadian Privy Council, and presented by her son, Prince Edward.[13][16] As a result, Canada became the first Commonwealth realm outside the United Kingdom to have its own heraldic authority.[13][16] Canada also provides full equality to women in terms of inheriting and transmitting arms.[16] Additionally, all armigers within Canada may file for trademark protection of their grant of arms under the Trade-Marks Act.[20]

State and national

[edit]
The official depiction of the Arms of Canada as it appeared in 1923
1923–1957
The official depiction of the Arms of Canada as painted in 1957 by Allan Beddoe
1957–1994
A non-official rendition made by a non-herald. For the official version made by a Canadian herald and issued by the Canadian Heraldic Authority see Coat of arms of Canada
1994-present
Depictions of the Arms of the Sovereign in Right of Canada

The royal arms of Canada[21] are the official coat of arms of the Canadian monarch and thus also of Canada.[22][23] They incorporate many distinctive Canadian elements such as the maple leaves, and the reference to the French royal arms in the fourth quarter[24] which replace or add to those derived from the British.[25]

The arms are used as a mark of authority[26] by various government agencies and representatives, including the Prime Minister[27] and Cabinet,[28] the Speaker of the House of Commons,[29] some courts and, formerly, Parliament, and on the cover of Canadian passports.[30] From 1962 until her death in 2022, a banner of the arms, defaced with a variant of the Queen's cypher, formed the Royal Standard of Canada, for use by the Canadian sovereign.[31] The personal flag of the governor general has featured the crest of the arms of Canada on a blue background since 1981.[32][33]

On 15 February 2008, the House of Commons was granted its own heraldic symbol following a request by Commons Speaker Peter Milliken to the Canadian Heraldic Authority.[29] The symbol for Parliament is a badge of the escutcheon in the Arms of Canada superimposed on the mace used by the House of Commons as a symbol of its authority derived from the Crown.[34][35] The Senate was granted a similar badge on 15 April 2008, using its own mace.[36] Parliament as a whole has been granted the right to use the escutcheon of the Arms of Canada, superimposed over the maces of the Commons and Senate in saltire.[37]

In June 2008, MP Pat Martin introduced a motion into the House of Commons calling on the government to amend the coat of arms to incorporate symbols representing Canada's First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.[38]

Provincial

[edit]
Flags of the lieutenant governors of Canada
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of British Columbia
British Columbia
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Alberta
Alberta
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Manitoba
Manitoba
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario
Ontario
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec
Quebec
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick
New Brunswick
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Prince Edward Island
Prince Edward Island
Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador
As territories, Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut do not have lieutenant governors

In much the same way that there is a national coat of arms, each province and territory possesses its own unique arms;[39] Saskatchewan's is known formally as Her Majesty's Arms in Right of Saskatchewan.[40] The year after Confederation, Queen Victoria issued royal warrants assigning arms to Canada's original four provinces: Quebec, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick.[4]

Each provincial coat of arms includes specific local symbolism;[39] most also include symbolism derived from the coats of arms of the United Kingdom, France, or both. Since 1868, each province and territory within Canada has been granted arms through warrants either from the monarch directly or from the governor general, or has assumed them through other means.[4]

Apart from Newfoundland and Labrador,[41] each province and territory bears at least some elements from its coat of arms upon its flag. The flags of British Columbia,[42] New Brunswick,[10] Nova Scotia,[5] and Prince Edward Island[43] are banners of the provincial arms, while Alberta,[44] Manitoba,[45] Ontario,[11] Saskatchewan,[46] the Northwest Territories,[47] and Yukon[48] each have the shield of the local coat of arms on their flags, with other design elements. The flag of Nunavut uses some elements from its coat of arms along with other symbols and colours.[49] The shield of the arms of each province, on a blue background and circled with ten gold maple leaves, the whole surmounted by a crown, forms the main element of the flag of the lieutenant governor of that province. Nova Scotia was the last to use the Union Flag defaced with the shield of Nova Scotia, surrounded by green maple leaves. Quebec uses the shield on a white circle with the provincial motto inscribed below.[50]

Municipal

[edit]

The use of armorial bearings among Canadian cities is inconsistent, because many of them have been assumed and brought into force by local governmental authorities, rather than granted from the Crown.[51] Many municipal coats of arms either awarded or confirmed by the Canadian Heraldic Authority may be found within the Public Register of Arms, though the online version of the Register is not complete.[52]

Personal

[edit]
Lt-Gen Sir A C Macdonell Arms @ Currie Building, Royal Military College of Canada
Gen Sir Arthur William Currie arms, Currie Building, Royal Military College of Canada
The arms of Lt Gen Sir Archibald Cameron Macdonell (L) and Gen Sir Arthur William Currie (R), Currie Building, Royal Military College of Canada

In Canada, every citizen has the right to petition the Crown for a grant of arms.[53] Canadians who have been appointed to the Order of Canada are automatically entitled to receive an award of arms including the ribbon of the Order, or should they already be armigerous, to encircle their extant arms with the ribbon.[54] Amongst others, all members of the Privy Council are entitled to supporters in their arms, as are the Speakers of the House of Commons and the Senate, Companions of the Order of Canada, Commanders of the Orders of Military Merit, Merit of the Police Forces, and of the Royal Victorian Order.[54][55]

Unique Canadian elements and practices

[edit]

Indigenous symbolism

[edit]

Due to the history of Canada, heraldry in the country has incorporated indigenous symbols and elements.[56] The coat of arms of Nunavut,[49] for example, includes elements such as an inukshuk, a qulliq, and an igloo, all of which are references to the Inuit who live in the area,[57][58] while the arms of the Canadian Heraldic Authority include ravens, a First Nations symbol of creation and transformation.[53] In addition, some Canadians choose to bear their arms on a roundel rather than a shield, a reference to a drumhead; an example is the coat of arms of Nunavut.

Cadency

[edit]

In many systems of heraldry, the arms of each living person must be unique. English heraldry has used armorial variants to distinguish the arms of brothers from their father's arms and from each other since the 13th century;[59] this is now normally done by the system of marks or brisures set up by the early Tudor herald John Writhe.[60] Canada adds a unique series of brisures for use by female children who inherit arms. As in other heraldic systems, these cadency marks are not always used;[55] in any case, when the heir succeeds (in Canada, this is normally the first child, whether male or female, according to strict primogeniture; however, the grantee may choose another person as heir), the mark of cadency is removed and the heir uses the plain coat of arms.[61]

Brisures
First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth Ninth
Daughter Heart An ermine spot A snowflake A fir twig as used in heraldry A chess rook as used in heraldry A scallop shell An heraldic harp An heraldic buckle An heraldic clarichord
heart ermine spot snowflake fir twig chess rook escallop harp buckle clarion
Son An heraldic label A crescent An heraldic mullet (star of five points) A martlet (bird) An heraldic annulet (ring) A fleur-de-lis An heraldic rose A cross moline, an equilateral cross with split and curved ends A double quatrefoil, an eight-lobed radial shape
label of three points crescent mullet martlet annulet fleur-de-lys rose cross moline double quatrefoil[N 1]

Charges, ordinaries, and divisions of the field

[edit]

The Canadian Pale, a pale division amounting to half the entire field, derived from the Canadian flag, is widely used in Canadian heraldry, while the Canadian fess, a similar horizontal division, has been used once.[62][63] The term érablé, referring to maple leaves, is often used in Canadian arms. For example, as a tressure érablé[64] in the arms of the Monarchist League of Canada,[65] coronets érablé in the arms of Sudbury[66] and Canada's National History Society,[67] and as a partition much like engrailed or dancetty.[63][68]

Canadian animals and birds, both real and fantastical, have also been widely used in arms, including the mythical raven-bears in the arms of the Canadian Heraldic Authority.[63] Other uniquely Canadian symbols also appear in Canadian grants of armorial bearings, including the heraldic mark of the prime minister of Canada and the Canadian Royal Crown.[69]

Status of women

[edit]

In both the English[60] and the Scottish[61] systems of heraldry, from which the Canadian draws many of its practices,[16] a woman does not inherit or transmit arms unless she is a heraldic heiress,[70] that is, a daughter of an armiger who has no sons. In Canadian heraldry, by contrast, women may inherit arms on an equal basis with their brothers (if any).[16] Women in Canada may also transmit their arms to their heirs, regardless of gender.[16] This system of equality for men and women is a result of provisions in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,[16] which guarantee, among other things, freedom from discrimination under the law on the basis of sex.[71]

United Empire Loyalists

[edit]
The Loyalist Civil Coronet
Civil
The Loyalist Military Coronet
Military
The Loyalist coronets

Those who are descended from the citizens loyal to the British Crown who fled the United States during and shortly after the revolution are known in Canada as United Empire Loyalists,[72] and are entitled to the use of special coronets within their arms, if arms are granted to them.[73] There are two versions of the Loyalist coronet: the civil, which is made up of alternating oak and maple leaves, and the military, made up of maple leaves alternating with crossed swords;[62] the latter is reserved for use by the families of those who served in the British military during the revolution.[73] Proof of United Empire Loyalist ancestry must be provided to the Canadian Heraldic Authority before permission is granted to use the coronet in arms.[55] Unlike the common use of coronets in heraldry,[74][75] the Loyalist coronet denotes no rank of nobility or royalty, but instead alludes to ancestral allegiance.[73]

Helmets

[edit]

In Canadian heraldry, helmets play little role and are not blazoned; as such, the armiger can display their helm in whatever style they choose. One notable example of a non-traditional helmet used in Canadian heraldry is the arms of Julie Payette, Governor General 2017–2021, which bears an astronaut's helmet as the helm.[76] Other examples include nasal helmets,[77] Corinthian helmets,[78] and parka hoods.[79]

Obtaining arms

[edit]

All citizens of Canada, as well as corporate bodies, may petition the Crown for an award of arms.[53] For an individual to obtain a grant of arms, a petition must be sent to the Chief Herald, providing a biography, references, and completed application forms. If the grant is approved, the individual then consults with heralds from the Authority to work out the design of their award. Upon completion of this process, the grant documents, in the form of letters patent, are created and provided to the grantee. The entire process is subject to certain fees required by the Government of Canada to cover costs of research and artwork; the fees are not to purchase the grant of arms. For corporations and institutions the process is similar.[53]

Those individuals and institutions who are already armigerous through recognized heraldic authorities worldwide may apply to the Canadian Heraldic Authority to have their arms registered. There is no cost associated with application for registration, and it takes less time, approximately three months,[80] than application for a new award of arms, which takes approximately twelve to fourteen months.[53]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Canadian heraldry refers to the system of armorial bearings, including coats of arms, flags, and badges, devised and granted to individuals, institutions, and entities within Canada, with the Canadian Heraldic Authority serving as the official regulator since its establishment in 1988 by Letters Patent issued under the Great Seal of Canada. This authority, operating under the Governor General as the Sovereign's delegate, maintains a public register and adheres to heraldic standards while permitting innovations reflective of Canadian identity, such as maple leaves in the royal crest and occasional incorporation of Indigenous emblems denoting heritage and sovereignty. The practice traces its origins to European traditions imported by early settlers, beginning with the display of French royal arms by explorer Jacques Cartier in 1534 and evolving through British colonial influences post-Conquest, with a notable expansion in grants following Confederation in 1867. The Royal Coat of Arms of Canada, formally granted in 1921 and modified in 1957 and 1994 to emphasize national symbols, features a quartered shield representing England, Scotland, Ireland, and France (via fleurs-de-lis), surmounted by a crest of a lion holding a red maple leaf, with supporters of a lion and unicorn, and the motto A Mari Usque Ad Mare ("From Sea to Sea"). Provincial and territorial coats of arms, such as Nova Scotia's granted in 1625 and renewed in 1868, similarly blend historic European elements with local flora, fauna, and geography, underscoring regional identities within the federal structure. Prior to the CHA, heraldic grants for Canadians were handled by foreign bodies like the College of Arms in England or the Court of the Lord Lyon in Scotland, but the domestic authority now enables designs incorporating uniquely Canadian charges, including beavers, narwhals, and fir twigs, fostering a distinct national heraldic style that prioritizes symbolic clarity and artistic distinctiveness over rigid medieval conventions.

Historical Development

French and Early Colonial Influences

Heraldry arrived in what is now Canada with French explorers in the 16th century, establishing a tradition rooted in French royal and noble practices. On July 24, 1534, Jacques Cartier erected a cross at Gaspé Bay adorned with the arms of King Francis I—azure, three fleurs-de-lis or—symbolizing French sovereignty over the claimed territory. This marked the first documented use of heraldry in the region, reflecting the European convention of using armorial bearings to assert authority and identity during colonial expansion. During the French regime in New France (1534–1763), settlers and officials imported personal coats of arms from France, often displaying them on seals, buildings, and possessions to denote status and lineage. Nobles such as Charles Le Moyne, Sieur de Longueuil, and governors like Louis de Buade, Comte de Frontenac, bore granted or inherited arms that adhered to French heraldic styles, including tinctures, charges, and compositions governed by rules of blazon. The royal arms of France appeared prominently on official documents, coins, medals, and maps associated with colonial administration, reinforcing monarchical ties without a dedicated local heraldic authority. Practices emphasized inheritance and noble privilege, mirroring metropolitan France where arms were regulated by the Chambre des Comptes and juges d'armes, though enforcement in the colony was informal. Following the 1763 Treaty of Paris, which ceded to Britain, French heraldic traditions persisted among the Canadiens, with families continuing to use ancestral arms on tombstones, church decorations, and legal seals. Some arms were confirmed or registered with the English to maintain validity under the new regime, preserving French influences amid emerging British customs. This continuity laid foundational elements for Canadian heraldry, blending Gallic symbolism like the fleur-de-lis with later adaptations, as evidenced in early provincial grants that echoed colonial precedents.

British Traditions and Loyalist Preservation

Following the Treaty of Paris in 1783, approximately 40,000 Loyalists—American colonists loyal to the British Crown—resettled in , primarily in regions that became , , and (present-day ). Many among them descended from earlier British or Scottish settlers and carried existing coats of arms or heraldic knowledge from the , where such symbols had originated under English, Scottish, or Irish granting authorities. This migration reinforced British heraldic conventions in a colonial context, as Loyalists rejected republican iconography in favor of monarchical emblems, continuing practices like differencing arms for and using traditional charges such as lions, eagles, and fleurs-de-lis adapted to British rules of and . The Loyalist influx ensured that heraldry in British North America remained tethered to British institutions, with petitioners seeking grants or confirmations from the College of Arms in or the Lord Lyon in rather than developing independent systems. For instance, Hon. James , a Scottish aligned with Loyalist interests, received arms from the Lord Lyon King of Arms in 1778, exemplifying the importation of heraldic authority. Similarly, Major-General Sir , defender of —a Loyalist stronghold—obtained a grant via Letters Patent from the College of Arms dated February 13, 1813, featuring quarterly arms with Brock family bearings including a chevron between mullets. Such grants, though infrequent before 1867 due to colonial deference to metropolitan oversight, preserved core British elements like royal warrants, , and crests, preventing the dilution seen in post-revolutionary . Provincial symbols further embodied this preservation, with the Royal Arms of the serving as the de facto emblem of authority across until , symbolizing unbroken loyalty that Loyalists had championed. Loyalist settlements, such as those in formed in 1784 from Loyalist petitions, adopted British-derived badges and seals incorporating union devices and imperial motifs, maintaining heraldic discipline amid demographic shifts. This fidelity to British precedents—rooted in the Loyalists' exodus from egalitarian upheaval—sustained a hierarchical, tradition-bound system until Canadian-specific evolutions post-1867.

Evolution from Confederation to Autonomy

Following Confederation on July 1, 1867, the Dominion of Canada initially employed the Royal Arms of the United Kingdom as the primary symbol of royal authority and governance, reflecting its status as a self-governing colony within the British Empire. This usage persisted on official documents, seals, and flags, such as the Canadian Red Ensign, which incorporated the Union Jack and provincial emblems but lacked a distinct national coat of arms. In 1868, issued royal warrants granting coats of arms to the four original provinces: , , , and , adapting colonial symbols to heraldic standards under British oversight. By 1869, the federal government authorized a composite shield quartering these provincial arms for Dominion-wide use, providing an interim national emblem as territories expanded. Subsequent provinces received grants from the British monarch; for instance, in 1870 and in the same year, integrating local motifs like and Pacific elements while maintaining heraldic conventions from the in . The push for a unified Canadian intensified in the early amid growing national identity. On April 21, 1921, an requested a distinct from King George V, who proclaimed the Arms of on November 21, 1921. This featured a shield tierced per fess—upper two-thirds quarterly with the arms of , , and , and lower third the ancient arms of (azure three fleurs-de-lis or)—surmounted by a , , and crest of a statant guardant, with supporters of a crowned and , and a compartment of leaves on snow, symbolizing 's indigenous and winter . The inclusion of French royal arms acknowledged historical dual heritage, diverging from the United Kingdom's version by emphasizing continental influences over Hanoverian elements. This grant marked a pivotal towards heraldic , establishing symbols tailored to Canadian and while retaining monarchical sanction, as petitions for personal and institutional arms continued to route through British heralds until domestic mechanisms developed later. By the 1931 Statute of Westminster, which formalized legislative independence, the Arms of Canada had supplanted ad hoc combinations, underscoring a transition from colonial replication to differentiated imperial expression.

Institutional Framework

Establishment of the Canadian Heraldic Authority

The Canadian Heraldic Authority was established on June 4, 1988, through Letters Patent issued by Queen Elizabeth II, which authorized the Governor General of Canada to exercise the Sovereign's prerogative powers over heraldry within the country. This formal transfer ended the longstanding practice under which Canadians seeking armorial bearings, flags, or badges had to petition foreign institutions such as the College of Arms in England or the Court of the Lord Lyon in Scotland, often resulting in designs that did not fully reflect Canadian contexts or symbols. The initiative stemmed from advocacy by the Heraldry Society of Canada, founded in 1966, which had long pushed for a domestic heraldic body to foster national identity and incorporate elements like Indigenous motifs or regional flora into grants. , serving from 1984 to 1990, oversaw the implementation; the were presented to her at by Prince Edward, representing the Queen. The Authority operates as a branch of the Office of the Secretary to the , with the Chief Herald of Canada—initially Robert D. Watt—as its head, responsible for advising on and issuing grants under the Governor General's authority. By centralizing heraldic functions in Canada, the CHA enabled the creation of a Public Register of Arms, Flags and Badges, which by 2023 contained thousands of entries, including those for individuals, corporations, and municipalities, thereby preserving and evolving heraldic traditions adapted to modern while maintaining ties to . This establishment marked a key step in cultural autonomy, as it allowed for innovations such as badges for Indigenous communities and symbols reflecting Canada's multicultural fabric, without reliance on overseas approval processes that could impose British-centric conventions.

Oversight by the Governor General and Monarchical Ties

The Governor General of Canada serves as the head of the Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), overseeing its operations and exercising the Sovereign's heraldic powers on behalf of the Canadian monarch. This authority derives from the Crown's ancient prerogative to grant armorial bearings, which in Canada is delegated through the Governor General to ensure heraldic grants align with monarchical traditions. The CHA was established in 1988 via Royal issued by Queen Elizabeth II, empowering the to administer domestically rather than relying on foreign authorities such as the College of Arms in . On 4 June 1988, Jeanne formally received these from Prince Edward at , marking the official creation of the CHA as a federal institution under viceregal direction. In this role, the appoints the CHA's principal officers, including the Chief Herald of Canada, the Herald Chancellor (typically the Secretary to the ), and specialized heralds responsible for designing and approving coats of arms, flags, and badges. These appointments maintain professional standards rooted in expertise, with the CHA maintaining the Public Register of Arms, Flags and Badges of Canada to document all grants. Monarchical ties are evident in the nature of grants, which constitute honours from , and in specific approvals required from the , such as the inclusion of the in emblems—a symbol of the monarch's authority redesigned in 2023 to incorporate Canadian elements like maple leaves while retaining its heraldic form. This oversight preserves the royal character of Canadian , distinguishing it from non-monarchical systems by embedding grants within the constitutional framework where the acts as the monarch's representative.

Processes for Granting and Registration

The Heraldic administers the granting of new heraldic emblems, including coats of arms, flags, and badges, as a royal prerogative exercised on behalf of . Eligible applicants encompass Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and corporations incorporated under Canadian law; non-citizens may qualify if they demonstrate a strong, direct, and recent connection to , with approvals determined on individual merit rather than entitlement. Applications for grants begin with submission of an online form detailing the applicant's background and emblem preferences, followed by supporting documentation—such as proof of eligibility and biographical materials—emailed within five days to avoid . Upon validation, a processing fee is invoiced to open the file, after which an experienced herald is assigned to collaborate with the applicant. This herald researches and drafts a written concept proposal incorporating symbolic elements tied to the applicant's heritage, achievements, or affiliations, which the Chief Herald of Canada reviews and approves before proceeding. Design development follows, involving preliminary sketches by CHA-appointed artists, iterative refinements to ensure heraldic propriety and uniqueness, and emblazonment of components like shields, crests, and supporters. Final authorization requires endorsement by the Chief Herald and Deputy Herald Chancellor. The grant culminates in issuance of , available in formats such as Option I (64 cm x 81 cm, fully hand-painted with calligraphed text) or Option II (simpler execution), produced by specialized artists and calligraphers, sealed with the CHA seal, and signed by designated officers. Additional costs arise for artwork and calligraphy, with one standard format exceeding $5,000 plus tax; the full process, constrained by backlogs and handcrafting, typically requires 6-12 months for initial assessment and up to three years overall. Completed grants are archived in the Public Register of Arms, Flags and Badges of Canada. In distinction to new grants, registration pertains to pre-existing emblems, enabling official Canadian recordation without alteration. Qualifying cases include emblems awarded by recognized foreign heraldic bodies, those inherited via prior CHA grants, or confirmations following entity name changes. Applicants submit an online form and timely supporting evidence, such as original grant documents proving . The Chief Herald examines the submission, soliciting further details if needed, before the Deputy Herald Chancellor authorizes entry. A registration document is then prepared, signed, and delivered, with entry into the Public Register following within 6-12 months; no fees apply, reflecting the procedural nature absent design innovation. Posthumous grants are prohibited, though cadet differencing for heirs or spousal courtesy use during the grantee's lifetime may be arranged separately. Self-assumed emblems lack official status but can be registered if later formalized abroad and meeting criteria. The Register serves as the authoritative repository, conferring copyright protection under Canadian law for documented emblems.

Categories of Heraldic Achievements

National and Viceregal Symbols

The primary national heraldic symbol of is the Royal Coat of Arms, granted by King George V via royal warrant on November 21, 1921, and modified in 1957 and 1994 to incorporate a more distinctly Canadian design. The shield is quartered with the arms of the ( passant guardant), ( rampant), and (harp)—and the ancient arms of (three fleurs-de-lis), with the first quarter adapted to feature a white escutcheon bearing a single , symbolizing . Supporters consist of a crowned on the dexter and a chained on the sinister, derived from British royal , standing on a compartment of terrestrial and aquatic elements representing Canada's landscapes. The crest features a royal holding a atop a gold helmet with red and white mantling, while the motto ("From sea to sea"), drawn from Psalm 72:8, appears on a ribbon below. This achievement serves as the personal arms of the Sovereign in right of and represents federal authority on official documents, seals, and buildings. Viceregal symbols derive authority from and adapt national and provincial to denote the and Governors as representatives. The 's personal standard, adopted in 1980 and updated to reflect design evolutions, is a field bearing the crest of the Arms of —a crowned holding a —centered without additional charges, signifying the office's federal oversight. This flag flies at and accompanies the incumbent during official duties, distinguishing it from personal arms granted separately by the Canadian Heraldic Authority, such as that of in 2022, which incorporates motifs like a and northern lights. Governors' standards follow a uniform pattern established by royal proclamation: a field with the provincial centered, surmounted by a white label of three points (a mark for royal difference), and encircled below by ten gold maple leaves, with some provinces adding scrolls. These designs, varying by province since the 1980s, integrate local heraldic shields—such as Nova Scotia's with its salmon and thistle—under viceregal emblems to affirm monarchical continuity and regional identity. These symbols maintain heraldic ties to British traditions while embedding elements, ensuring visual distinction from foreign or republican emblems; for instance, the label differentiates viceregal use from the undifferentiated Royal Arms. Official depictions, protected under , appear on flags, seals, and correspondence, with the Governor General's authority overseeing their protocol to preserve symbolic integrity.

Provincial, Territorial, and Municipal Arms

Coats of arms for Canada's provinces and territories were primarily granted through royal warrants issued by the British monarch or, later, the Governor General acting on behalf of the sovereign, reflecting regional histories, natural resources, and settler traditions. These emblems predate the Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), with grants occurring as early as 1625 for Nova Scotia via a warrant from King Charles I, featuring a cross of St. Andrew with an escutcheon of the ancient arms of Scotland. Subsequent provincial arms, such as New Brunswick's shield granted by Queen Victoria in 1868 depicting a salmon, lion, and ship, were authorized shortly after Confederation to affirm provincial sovereignty within the Dominion. By the early 20th century, most provinces had received full achievements including crests and supporters; for instance, Ontario's arms, designed with input from the College of Arms in London, incorporate a moose and deer as supporters symbolizing the province's wildlife. Territorial arms, reflecting Canada's northern expanses, were granted more recently, often post-1988 under CHA oversight to integrate modern heraldic practices with territorial identities. received its arms in 1999, featuring an and in a circular design evoking the Arctic landscape and heritage. Yukon's arms, granted in 1956 by Queen Elizabeth II, include mountains, a malamute dog, and circlets of gold representing the . These designs emphasize indigenous motifs and natural features, such as ' polar bear and aurora borealis elements granted in 1957, underscoring the territories' distinct environmental and cultural contexts. Municipal coats of arms in Canada are frequently commissioned through the CHA since its inception, providing official heraldic designs that municipalities previously adopted informally or assumed without warrant. The CHA's grants for municipalities typically cost under $5,000 and include shields, badges, and flags tailored to local and geography; examples include arms for cities like , incorporating a ship and mountains, or , featuring a stylized and . These emblems are registered in the Public Register of Arms, Flags, and Badges, ensuring compliance with heraldic standards and avoiding conflicts, with over hundreds of municipal grants recorded to date. Historical municipal arms, such as those assumed pre-Confederation, may be confirmed or redesigned by the CHA to align with Canadian practices.

Corporate and Institutional Grants

The Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA) extends grants of armorial bearings to corporations and institutions, encompassing incorporated businesses, non-profit organizations, educational bodies, and government agencies, as a means of formally recognizing their societal contributions and embedding heraldic symbolism in their identity. These grants, initiated since the CHA's establishment in 1988, include coats of arms for ceremonial purposes, badges adaptable for logos, and flags for official display, designed to reflect the entity's mandate, history, and values while adhering to heraldic conventions adapted to Canadian contexts. Applicants contact the Chief Herald of Canada to initiate the process, providing details on their organization's purpose and preferred symbols, after which CHA heralds develop bespoke designs through iterative consultation to ensure uniqueness and propriety. Unlike personal heraldry, corporate and institutional achievements emphasize collective representation over lineage, often omitting elements like helmets or crests reserved for individuals and incorporating institutional motifs such as tools of trade or emblems of service. All granted emblems are recorded in the Public Register of Arms, Flags, and Badges of Canada, serving as official validation against unauthorized assumptions. Illustrative grants include those to the Parole Board of Canada, whose armorial bearings, featuring a balance scale and , symbolize and offender rehabilitation within the correctional system. The Monarchist League of Canada received arms incorporating a and maple leaves to denote advocacy for . Municipal corporations, treated as institutional entities, such as the Corporation of the Township of Stanbridge, East, have obtained arms with chevrons, suns, and escallops evoking local geography and heritage, accompanied by supporters and a motto. These examples underscore the CHA's role in perpetuating for modern organizational prestige, with designs prioritizing clarity for practical applications like seals and .

Personal and Family Heraldry

Personal in encompasses the granting of coats of arms, crests, badges, and associated elements to individuals by the Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), established on June 1, 1988, under the authority of the . Prior to this, Canadians seeking armorial bearings petitioned foreign institutions such as the in or the in , reflecting the colonial inheritance of heraldic practices from Britain and . The CHA's creation marked a shift toward autonomous, Canadian-specific designs, emphasizing personal significance over strict adherence to European precedents of or . Grants are awarded as a form of national honor, available to any Canadian citizen upon application, without fees for the grant itself, though applicants cover costs for commissioned artwork. The application process begins with submission of a form detailing the applicant's background, proposed symbols, and rationale, followed by consultation with a CHA-appointed artist to develop emblazonments. An advisory committee reviews submissions for heraldic propriety, ensuring designs incorporate elements reflective of the individual's heritage, profession, or achievements—such as maple leaves for national ties or regional flora and fauna. Approval by the Chief Herald results in letters patent, officially documenting the grant in the Public Register of Arms, Grants, and Flags. Unlike traditional systems reserving advanced elements like supporters for peers, the CHA extends these to commoners, promoting broader access and innovation, as seen in grants to military figures like Lieutenant-General Sir Archibald Cameron Macdonnell, whose arms feature at the Royal Military College of Canada. Family heraldry builds on personal grants, where arms may be differenced using marks of —such as labels or martlets—to distinguish heirs, adapting British conventions to Canada's non-hereditary context. Individuals can register inherited foreign arms with the CHA for official recognition in , or petition for new family-oriented designs, though each grant remains tied to the recipient rather than automatic inheritance. This approach avoids feudal assumptions, focusing instead on merit and identity, with over 1,800 personal and familial entries in the public register by 2023, demonstrating sustained uptake among professionals, veterans, and community leaders. Examples include impaled shields combining personal arms with official ones for heralds, underscoring the system's flexibility for lineage representation without prescriptive quartering.

Distinctive Elements

Integration of Indigenous and Regional Symbols

The Canadian Heraldic Authority incorporates Indigenous symbols from First Nations, Inuit, and Métis traditions into armorial bearings, emphasizing consultation with originating communities to maintain cultural integrity and avoid appropriation. These elements, such as animal forms, feathers, and geometric patterns derived from totems or carvings, serve to denote identity and heritage rather than purely ornamental function. For instance, the arms granted to the First Nations Tax Commission on February 15, 2023, include a central emblem with an otter and coyote adorned with eagle feathers, a tree representing enduring life, and a winter lodge symbolizing shelter, all drawn directly from Indigenous motifs to signify governance and resilience. Similarly, the Huron-Wendat Nation's registered arms feature a wampum belt with a hatchet, commemorating their historical alliance with the British Crown formalized in treaties. The CHA's own full armorial bearings, granted in , illustrate institutional adoption of such symbolism through supporters depicted as two raven-bears—hybrid creatures blending raven wings and bear bodies in a style evocative of Pacific Northwest Indigenous art—positioned on an outcrop of the Canadian Shield amid maple leaves and seeds, underscoring a fusion of ancient motifs with national geography. This approach extends to territorial grants, as seen in Nunavut's , which includes an igloo stone inukshuk as crest, a narwhal tusk in the , and a in script, reflecting and . Such integrations, while innovative, adhere to principles of distinctiveness, with the CHA requiring evidence of communal endorsement to prevent misrepresentation, as Indigenous emblems carry implications predating European by centuries. Regional symbols from Canada's provinces and territories are similarly embedded to evoke local landscapes and economies, often adapting , , or geological features into charges or supporters. Provincial arms, many confirmed or redesigned post-Confederation with CHA input, exemplify this: 's include Pacific dogwood flowers and a setting sun over waves, Saskatchewan's sheaves and lions denote , and Newfoundland and Labrador's feature two Indigenous warriors in traditional attire as armed supporters, honoring pre-colonial inhabitants. These elements, such as fir twigs in grants or snowflakes in northern badges, ground in empirical regional identity, distinguishing Canadian practice from undifferentiated imperial models by prioritizing verifiable local distinctiveness over abstract universality.

Reforms on Cadency and Differentiation

In traditional , cadency marks—known as brisures—are small charges added to a to differentiate the arms of junior family members from those of the head of the family, typically following a patrilineal system where only male heirs inherit undifferenced arms. This English-derived convention, using symbols such as a for the eldest son, for the second, and mullet for the third, prioritizes and male succession. The Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), established in 1988, reformed these practices to align with egalitarian principles, extending cadency to daughters and emphasizing the eldest child as heir regardless of gender. This shift promotes broader family participation in heraldry, requiring heirs to apply to the CHA for confirmation or differenced arms rather than assuming inheritance automatically. In 1999, the CHA introduced a dedicated set of cadency marks for daughters, incorporating Canadian-specific symbols to reflect regional identity and enable distinct inheritance: the heart for the eldest daughter, ermine spot for the second, snowflake for the third, and fir twig for the fourth. These innovations, such as the evoking Canada's winters and the twig its coniferous landscapes, allow for layered differencing (e.g., charging a parent's mark with one's own) while maintaining heraldic clarity. The system also includes a special differencing for descendants of Loyalists, honoring their historical migration without overriding personal grants. Examples from CHA registers demonstrate flexible application, such as fleurs-de-lis as permanent for a daughter or traditional brisures adapted for female heirs, ensuring unique achievements for all siblings. This approach contrasts with stricter European traditions, fostering differentiation through grants that balance lineage with individual merit.

Helmets, Mantling, and Visual Innovations

In Canadian heraldry, the helmet surmounting the shield serves a primarily decorative function rather than indicating rank or status, departing from European traditions where helmet styles denote nobility, knighthood, or commoner standing. The Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), established in 1988, does not blazon helmets in grants, allowing recipients and artists to select styles that align with personal, cultural, or thematic elements of the achievement. This flexibility promotes artistic expression while adhering to heraldic form, with the medieval jousting helmet being the most frequently depicted, though variations such as steel or gold helms oriented affronté or profile are common. Mantling, the stylized cloth draping from the , symbolizes the protective fabric originally used to shield armor from sunlight and strikes, evolving into a decorative element reflecting battle wear. In Canadian grants, typically employs the principal tinctures of the —often and to evoke national colors—with the exterior in color and lining in metal, though artistic renderings may adapt folds and edges for visual harmony. The Royal Arms of Canada exemplify this, featuring argent doubled gules, sometimes stylized into shapes to integrate symbolic national . Visual innovations in helmets and mantling arise from the CHA's emphasis on to Canadian contexts, enabling non-traditional depictions that incorporate indigenous motifs or regional symbolism without compromising heraldic integrity. Artists exercise license in stylizing to evoke natural elements, such as flowing lines mimicking northern landscapes, or selecting that complement charges like animal crests perched uniquely atop. This approach, avoiding rigid status hierarchies, fosters diverse achievements since the CHA's , with over 2,000 grants registered by 2023 showcasing varied helmet orientations and mantling patterns tailored to bearers' narratives.

Charges and Fields Adapted to Canadian Context

Canadian heraldry, administered by the Canadian Heraldic Authority since 1988, incorporates charges and fields that reflect the nation's diverse geography, indigenous heritage, and natural symbols, distinguishing it from traditional European practices. These adaptations emphasize regional flora, fauna, and cultural motifs, such as stylized indigenous symbols and northern emblems, to create emblems resonant with . Fields in Canadian arms often feature innovative lines of partition evoking local landscapes. The érablé line, formed by alternating maple leaf indentations, symbolizes national unity and has been used in elements like the tressure of the Monarchist League of Canada. Similarly, sapiné partitions alternate fir tree shapes, while sapinagé employs fir twigs, reflecting Canada's coniferous forests; examples include chiefs and fesses in various grants. Tapissé lines mimic ears of wheat, denoting prairie agriculture, as seen in bends for agricultural institutions. Indented poplar leaves appear in ecclesiastical and museum arms, such as those of St. Paul’s Cathedral and the Royal Saskatchewan Museum. Tinctures have been expanded to include rose (pink) for figures like Kim Campbell and copper as a metal for Eric Nisbet-Brown, evoking regional resources. Charges draw heavily from Canadian wildlife and symbols. The , emblematic of industriousness and national history, serves as a common charge, appearing sejant in banners like that of Canada's National History Society and supporting crowns in provincial crests such as Ontario's. The , formalized in the 1921 Royal Arms with three leaves on a stem, represents the and recurs in personal and institutional grants. Other fauna include the for , , ptarmigan, and paw prints of bears or wolves; larger mammals like , , and denote territorial strength. Innovative monsters, such as raven-bear fusions symbolizing indigenous lore, appear in authority emblems and personal crests. Indigenous and regional elements integrate cultural specificity. Aboriginal symbols like the in the Royal Saskatchewan Museum arms, Métis infinity signs, wampum belts for Windsor, and calumets for Ontario's honor First Nations, Inuit, and Métis traditions. Objects such as igloos for , canoes, hockey sticks for national sports, and astrolabes for exploration history further localize charges. These adaptations maintain heraldic principles while prioritizing symbolic relevance to Canada's multicultural and environmental context.

Criticisms and Contemporary Debates

Tensions Between Tradition and Egalitarian Reforms

In traditional European , elements such as styles served to denote social rank, with peers entitled to gold open-faced helmets, knights to silver or steel barred varieties, and commoners to closed steel helmets, thereby reinforcing hierarchical distinctions. The Canadian Heraldic Authority (CHA), established in , has eschewed these conventions by not blazoning helmets in grants and allowing recipients to depict them in any preferred style, explicitly to avoid implying marks of . This egalitarian approach reflects Canada's constitutional commitment to equality under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but it has drawn critique from adherents of classical who view the omission of rank-based differentiation as a dilution of the system's historical purpose in signaling precedence and achievement. Inheritance and cadency practices further exemplify these tensions. Historically, armorial bearings followed male-preference , with marks—such as labels or bends—applied to distinguish cadet branches, often limiting transmission to sons. In , the CHA mandates gender-neutral succession, enabling daughters to inherit undifferenced arms or apply adapted symbols, in alignment with federal equality legislation prohibiting sex-based discrimination. While this promotes inclusivity, permitting equal passage through female lines has prompted concerns among some heraldists that repeated transmissions could result in arms borne by descendants bearing little relation to the , thereby undermining the lineage-specific integrity central to traditional . These reforms extend to other achievements, such as granting and supporters to on par with men, diverging from precedents where arms were often lozenge-shaped without such embellishments. Proponents argue this modernizes for a democratic society, yet traditionalists contend it erodes the art's rootedness in feudal orders, potentially commodifying symbols once reserved for or merit. The CHA's framework, while fostering broader access—over 2,500 grants issued by 2023—thus navigates a persistent divide between preserving heraldic and accommodating egalitarian imperatives.

Secularization and Removal of Religious Imagery

In 2023, the Canadian Heraldic Authority, operating under the Governor General's office, unveiled a revised heraldic crown for official depictions of the Royal Coat of Arms of Canada, supplanting the St. Edward's Crown—which had incorporated Christian crosses and fleurs-de-lis since its adoption in 1957—with a new design featuring maple leaves, snowflakes, and stars devoid of religious motifs. This alteration, timed with King Charles III's coronation, aimed to establish a "distinctly Canadian" symbol distinct from the Tudor Crown selected by the monarch for Commonwealth use. The previous St. Edward's Crown, introduced in 1957 by herald Allan Beddoe, retained medieval Christian iconography originating from the 11th-century crown of St. Edward the Confessor, including twelve crosses symbolizing the apostles and fleurs-de-lis evoking French monarchical ties with Catholic heritage. Its removal eliminated these elements from federal badges, seals, and military insignia, prompting accusations of unilateral secularization by the Liberal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, as no public consultation occurred despite precedents like the 1994 addition of a Latin motto facing backlash for similar reasons. Heraldic authorities and monarchists, such as protocol expert Christopher McCreery, condemned the redesign—derisively termed the "Trudeau Crown"—as a politicized rupture from shared royal traditions, arguing it undermined the unity of across realms and prioritized ephemeral national motifs over enduring symbolic continuity. While the authority maintained the change reflected without altering the arms' core structure, detractors highlighted its alignment with state secularism initiatives, such as Quebec's Bill 21 restricting religious symbols in public roles, though grants by the same body continue to incorporate overt Christian charges like the ichthus fish. This episode exemplifies tensions in contemporary Canadian heraldry, where the push for localized, inclusive symbolism intersects with historical precedents laden with Christian elements inherited from British and French colonial arms, including the in provincial shields like Nova Scotia's. No comparable removals have been systematically applied to personal or corporate grants, but the crown redesign sets a for prioritizing secular neutrality in official emblems, potentially influencing future adaptations amid debates.

Calls for Redesign and Cultural Inclusivity

In November 2021, marking the centennial of the 1921 royal proclamation granting Canada's coat of arms, Nunavut MP Lori Idlout advocated for revisions to incorporate symbols representing First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples, arguing the existing design inadequately reflects Indigenous presence on the land predating European settlement. Similarly, a 2019 e-petition initiated by citizen Ted Shrofel urged the federal government to amend the arms to acknowledge Indigenous peoples as foundational to the nation, garnering signatures but receiving no commitment for action from officials. These proposals highlighted perceived Eurocentric emphases on British and French colonial elements, such as the quartered shield with lions, fleurs-de-lis, and maple leaves, while omitting explicit Indigenous motifs despite Canada's multicultural composition. Provincial heraldry has seen parallel demands for inclusivity, informing national discourse; for instance, announced plans in 2018 to redesign its 400-year-old , which depicted Indigenous figures labeled as "savages" in archaic blazons, following criticism from Indigenous leaders and advocates for perpetuating outdated stereotypes. By October 2021, the province committed to replacing the term "savages" with neutral descriptors like "Indigenous people" in official descriptions, though full redesign details remained pending consultation. Such efforts underscore tensions in adapting heraldic traditions—rooted in medieval European conventions—to modern egalitarian ideals, yet critics of redesign argue that altering national symbols risks diluting historical continuity without empirical evidence of widespread public demand. Canadian Heritage has consistently rebuffed federal-level changes, stating in December 2021 no revisions were planned for the despite advocacy, emphasizing its role as a fixed of sovereignty tied to . This stance aligns with the Canadian Heraldic Authority's practice since of granting personalized arms incorporating Indigenous-inspired elements, such as totems or regional motifs, to individuals and institutions, suggesting inclusivity through expansion rather than overhaul of core national designs. Proponents of redesign, including some parliamentarians, contend such incrementalism fails to address systemic underrepresentation in foundational symbols, potentially reinforcing narratives of European dominance in Canada's origin story.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.