Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Four temperaments
View on Wikipedia
The four temperament theory is a proto-psychological theory which suggests that there are four fundamental personality types: sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic.[2][3] Most formulations include the possibility of mixtures among the types where an individual's personality types overlap and they share two or more temperaments. Greek physician Hippocrates (c. 460 – c. 370 BC) described the four temperaments as part of the ancient medical concept of humourism, that four bodily fluids affect human personality traits and behaviours. Modern medical science does not define a fixed relationship between internal secretions and personality, although some psychological personality type systems use categories similar to the Greek temperaments.
The four temperament theory was abandoned after the 1850s.[4]
History
[edit]Temperament theory has its roots in the ancient theory of humourism. It may have originated in Mesopotamia,[5] but it was Greek physician Hippocrates (460–370 BC) (and later Galen) who developed it into a medical theory. He believed that certain human moods, emotions, and behaviours were caused by an excess or lack of body fluids (called "humours"), which he classified as blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm,[3] each of which was responsible for different patterns in personalities, as well as how susceptible one was to getting a disease. Galen (AD 129 – c. 200) developed the first typology of temperament in his dissertation De temperamentis, and searched for physiological reasons for different behaviours in humans. He classified them as hot/cold and dry/wet taken from the four elements.[6] There could also be balance between the qualities, yielding a total of nine temperaments. The word "temperament" itself comes from Latin "temperare", "to mix". In the ideal personality, the complementary characteristics were exquisitely balanced among warm-cool and dry-moist. In four less-ideal types, one of the four qualities was dominant over all the others. In the remaining four types, one pair of qualities dominated the complementary pair; for example, warm and moist dominated cool and dry. These last four were the temperamental categories which Galen named "sanguine", "choleric", "melancholic", and "phlegmatic" after the bodily humours. Each was the result of an excess of one of the humours which produced the imbalance in paired qualities.[3][7][8][9]
For example, if a person tends to be too happy or "sanguine", one can assume they have too much blood in proportion to the other humours, and can medically act accordingly. Likewise for being too calm and reserved or "phlegmatic" from too much phlegm; excessively sad or "melancholic" from too much black bile; and too angry or "choleric" from excess yellow bile.[10]
The properties of these humours also corresponded to the four seasons. Thus blood, which was considered hot and wet, corresponded to spring. Yellow bile, considered hot and dry, corresponded to summer. Black bile, cold and dry, corresponded to autumn. And finally, phlegm, cold and wet, corresponded to winter.[11]
These properties were considered the basis of health and disease. This meant that having a balance and good mixture of the humours defined good health, while an imbalance or separation of the humours led to disease.[11] Because the humours corresponded to certain seasons, one way to avoid an imbalance or disease was to change health-related habits depending on the season. Some physicians did this by regulating a patient's diet, while some used remedies such as phlebotomy and purges to get rid of excess blood. Even Galen proposed a theory of the importance of proper digestion in forming healthy blood. The idea was that the two most important factors when digesting are the types of food and the person's body temperature. This meant that if too much heat were involved, then the blood would become "overcooked." This meant that it would contain too much of the yellow bile, and the patient would become feverish.[12] Lack of sufficient heat was believed to result in an excess of phlegm.

Persian[13] polymath Avicenna (980–1037 AD) extended the theory of temperaments in his Canon of Medicine, which was a standard medical text at many medieval universities. He applied them to "emotional aspects, mental capacity, moral attitudes, self-awareness, movements and dreams."[14] Nicholas Culpeper (1616–1654) suggested that the humors acted as governing principles in bodily health, with astrological correspondences,[15] and explained their influence upon physiognomy and personality.[16] He proposed that some people had a single temperament, while others had an admixture of two, a primary and secondary temperament.[17]
Modern medical science has rejected the theories of the four temperaments, though their use persists as a metaphor within certain psychological fields.[18] Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Erich Adickes (1866–1925), Alfred Adler (1879–1937), Eduard Spranger (1914), Ernst Kretschmer (1920), and Erich Fromm (1947) all theorised on the four temperaments (with different names) and greatly shaped modern theories of temperament. Hans Eysenck (1916–1997) was one of the first psychologists to analyse personality differences using a psycho-statistical method called factor analysis, and his research led him to believe that temperament is biologically based. The factors that he proposed in his book Dimensions of Personality were neuroticism (N), the tendency to experience negative emotions, and extraversion (E), the tendency to enjoy positive events, especially social ones. By pairing the two dimensions, Eysenck noted how the results were similar to the four ancient temperaments.[citation needed]
In the field of physiology, Ivan Pavlov studied on the types and properties of the nervous system, where three main properties were identified: strength, mobility of nervous processes and balance between excitation and inhibition, and derived four types based on these three properties.[19]
Other researchers developed similar systems, many of which did not use the ancient temperament names, and several paired extraversion with a different factor which would determine relationship and task-orientation. Examples are DISC assessment and social styles. One of the most popular today is the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, attributed to the work of David Keirsey, whose four temperaments were based largely on the Greek gods Apollo, Dionysus, Epimetheus, and Prometheus, and were mapped to the 16 types of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). They were renamed as Artisan (SP), Guardian (SJ), Idealist (NF), and Rational (NT).[20] C.G. Jung's Psychological Types surveys the historical literature of the 'four humors' and related discussions extensively and in depth and proposes a psychoanalytic integration of the material.
| Classical | Element[6] | Adler[21] | Riemann[22] | DISC[23]
(Different publishers use different names) |
Physical manifestation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melancholic | Earth | Leaning | Depressed | Conscientiousness/Cautious | Black bile | Spleen |
| Phlegmatic | Water | Avoiding | Schizoid | Steadiness/Supportive | Phlegm | Lungs |
| Sanguine | Air | Socially Useful | Hysterical | Influence/Inspiring | Blood | Marrow |
| Choleric | Fire | Ruling | Obsessive | Dominance/Direct | Yellow bile | Liver/Gall Bladder |
Modern views, implementations and restatements
[edit]Waldorf education and anthroposophy believe that the temperaments help to understand personality. They also believe that they are useful for education, helping teachers understand how children learn. Christian writer Tim LaHaye has attempted to repopularize the ancient temperaments through his books.[24][25][26]
James David Barber developed The Presidential Character, wherein active relates to hot, passive relates to cold, positive relates to moist, and negative relates to dry. If one were to make a Punnett square of these characters, one can find an Active–Positive, Passive–Positive, Active–Negative, or Passive–Negative individual. This diagram was made after an influential study of the U.S. presidency, hence the name.[27]
Robert R. Blake created The Managerial Grid, wherein high concern for production relates to hot, low concern for production relates to cold, high concern for people relates to moist, and low concern for people relates to dry. If one were to make the same Punnett square of these characters, one can find a Team Management, a Country Club Management, a Task Management, or an Ineffective Management individual.[27]
The National Christian Counselors Association of Richard and Phyllis Arno, licensed the FIRO-B instrument in the 1980's, and derived from it a theory of five temperaments, where the classical phlegmatic temperament is deemed to be a neutral temperament, whereas the "relationship-oriented introvert" position traditionally held by the phlegmatic is declared to be a new "fifth temperament" called "Supine" (meaning "lying on the back"). This instrument is used by many Christian ministries[28]
| Date (c.) | Author | Choleric temperament | Phlegmatic temperament | Sanguine temperament | Melancholic temperament |
| 2015 | Octopus Temperament (Sy Montgomery) | Assertive | Curious | Joyful | Gentle |
| 2014 | HUCMI | Controlling | Relational | Experimental | Analytical |
| 2006 | Berens | Theorists (NT) | Catalyst (NF) | Improvisor (SP) | Stabilizer (SJ) |
| 1999/2001 | Linda V. Berens' four Interaction Styles | In Charge | Chart the Course | Get Things Going | Behind the Scenes |
| 1999 | StrengthsFinder | Striving (Executing) | Relating (Relationships) | Impacting (Influencing) | Thinking (Strategic Thinking) |
| 1998 (Erikson's behavior types are a 2014 revision) | Hartman Personality Profile | Red (Leaders; Bold & Brash) | White > Green (Most Selfless; Relaxed, Friendly, & Loyal) | Yellow (Social Butterflies; Creative & Optimistic) | Blue (Keen Minds; Analytical & Detail-oriented) |
| 1996 | Tony Alessandra Personality Styles | Director | Relater | Socializer | Thinker |
| 1989 | Benziger | Logic & Results | Intuition & Empathy | Vision & Creativity | Process & Routine |
| 1978, 1988 | Keirsey/Bates four temperaments (old), Keirsey's four temperaments | Promethean (Technological) > Rational (NT) | Apollonian (Soulful) > Idealist (NF) | Dionysian (Artful) > Artisan (SP) | Epimethean (Dutiful) > Guardian (SJ) |
| 1973/74 | Conflict | Competing | Accommodating | Collaborating | Avoiding |
| 1967 | Dreikurs' four mistaken goals | Power or Defiance | Revenge or Retaliation | Undue Attention or Service | Inadequacy or Deficiency |
| 1960s | Fritz Riemann | Obsessive | Schizoid | Hysterical | Depressed |
| Stuart Atkins LIFO's four Orientations to Life | Controlling-Taking | Supporting-Giving | Adapting-Dealing | Conserving-Holding | |
| David Merrill, "Social Styles" | Driving | Amiable | Expressive | Analytical | |
| 1958 | Myers' Jungian types | Thinking (T); "Logical & Ingenious" | Feeling (F); "Sympathetic & Friendly" | Perceiving (P); "Enthusiastic & Insightful" | Judging (J); "Practical & Matter of Fact" |
| 1948, 1957, 1987 | California Psychological Inventory CPI 260 | Leader/Implementer (Alphas) | Supporter (Betas) | Innovator (Gammas) | Visualizer (Deltas) |
| 1947 | Eysenck | High Extraversion, High Neuroticism (Unstable-Extraverted) | Low Extraversion, Low Neuroticism (Stable-Introverted) | High Extraversion, Low Neuroticism (Stable-Extraverted) | Low Extraversion, High Neuroticism (Unstable-Introverted) |
| 1947 | Fromm's four orientations | Exploitative (Taking) | Receptive (Accepting) | Marketing (Exchanging) | Hoarding (Preserving) |
| 1935, 1966 | Alfred Adler's four Styles of Life, Temperament by LaHaye | Ruling/Dominant (Choleric) | Getting/Leaning (Phlegmatic) | Socially Useful (Sanguine) | Avoiding (melancholic) |
| 1928, 1970s | William Marston and John G. Geier DiSC assessment | Dominance (D); Red | Steadiness (S); Blue | Influence (I); Green | Conscientiousness (C); Yellow |
| 1921 | Jung | Intuition | Feeling | Sensation | Thinking |
| 1920s | Pavlov | Angry Dogs (High Excitation, Low Inhibition) | "Accepting" Dogs (fell asleep) (Low Excitation, High Inhibition) | High-spirited Dogs (High Excitation, High Inhibition) | "Weak" Dogs (whiny) (Low Excitation, Low Inhibition) |
| 1920 | Kretschmer's four character styles | Hyperesthetic (oversensitive) | Anesthetic (insensitive) | Hypomanic | Depressive |
| 1914 | Spranger's four* value attitudes | Economic/Political | Religious/Social | Aesthetic | Theoretical |
| 1905 | Adickes' four world views | Traditional | Agnostic (Skeptical) | Innovative | Dogmatic (Doctrinaire) |
| 1894 | Sasang | So-Yang (SY; Little Yang); Active (Unstable & Active) | Tae-Eum (TE; Big Yin); Organized (Stable & Passive) | Tae-Yang (TY; Big Yang); Originative (Stable & Active) | So-Eum (SE; Little Yin); Conservative (Unstable & Passive) |
| 1798 | Kant's four temperaments | Energetic & Emotional (Choleric) | Weak & Balanced (Phlegmatic) | Energetic & Balanced (Sanguine) | Weak & Emotional (Melancholic) |
| 1550 | Paracelsus' four totem spirits | Gnomes (Industrious & Guarded) | Sylphs (Curious & Calm) | salamanders (Impulsive & Changeable) | Nymphs (Inspiring & Passionate) |
| 185 AD | Irenaeus' four temperaments | Historical | Spiritual | Spontaneous | Scholarly |
| 325 BC | Aristotle's four sources of happiness | Propraieteri (Acquiring Assets) | Ethikos (Moral Value) | Hedone (Sensual Pleasure) | Dialogike (Logical Investigation) |
| 325 BC | Aristotle's social order | Pistic (Common sense & Care-taking) | Noetic (Intuitive, Sensibility, Morality) | Iconic (Artistic & Art-making) | Dianoetic (Reasoning & Logical Investigator) |
| 340 BC | Plato's four characters | Sensible | Intuitive | Artistic | Reasoning |
| 307 BC | Hippocrates' four humours | Yellow Bile (Hot and Dry) | Phlegm (Cold and Wet) | Blood (Hot and Wet) | Black Bile (Cold and Dry) |
| 450 BC | Empedocles | Fire (Zeus) | Water (Pluto/Nestis) | Air (Hera) | Earth (Persephone/Aidoneus) |
| 590 BC | Ezekiel's four living creatures | Lion (Bold) | Ox (Sturdy) | Eagle (Far-seeing) | Man (Spiritual) |
| Adapted and modified from: Montgomery, Stephen (2002). People Patterns: A Modern Guide to the Four Temperaments. Archer Publications. p. 20. ISBN 1-885705-03-4.; Keirsey, David (1998) [1978]. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Prometheus Nemesis Book Co. ISBN 1-885705-02-6. | |||||
Usage
[edit]The 18th-century classical composer Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach composed a trio sonata in C minor known as Sanguineus et Melancholicus (Wq 161/1). In the 20th century, Carl Nielsen's Symphony No. 2 (Op.16) is subtitled "The Four Temperaments", each of the four movements being inspired by a sketch of a particular temperament.[29] Paul Hindemith's Theme and Four Variations for string orchestra and piano is also known as The Four Temperaments: although originally conceived as a ballet for Léonide Massine,[30][31] the score was ultimately completed as a commission for George Balanchine, who subsequently choreographed it as a neoclassical ballet, using the theory of the temperaments as a point of departure.[32][33]
The 19th-century French author Émile Zola used the four temperaments as a basis for his novel Thérèse Raquin.[34]
See also
[edit]- Big Five personality traits – Personality model consisting of five broad dimensions
- Blood type personality theory – Pseudoscience linking character and blood type
- Enneagram of Personality – Model of the human psyche used as a personality typology
- Four sons of Horus – Ancient Egyptian gods
- Fundamental interpersonal relations orientation – W. Schutz's social behavior theory
- Two-factor models of personality – Psychological factor analysis measurement including behavior and temperament
- Table of similar systems of comparison of temperaments
- Humorism – The theory of the four humours
- Intermittent explosive disorder - DSM-5 diagnosis of a person with severe choleric traits
References
[edit]- ^ Woodcut from Johann Kaspar Lavater, Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe (1775–1778)
- ^ "The Four Human Temperaments". www.thetransformedsoul.com. Archived from the original on 2022-07-07. Retrieved 2018-01-03.
- ^ a b c Merenda, P. F. (1987). "Toward a Four-Factor Theory of Temperament and/or Personality". Journal of Personality Assessment. 51 (3): 367–374. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5103_4. PMID 16372840.
- ^
- Marks, David F.; Murray, Michael; Evans, Brian; Estacio, Emee Vida (2015). Health Psychology. Sage. p. 406. ISBN 978-1-4739-2759-9.
four bodily humours, blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile. Little scope was left for psychological causation and this theory only really lost its hold on Western thinking in the 1850s. [...] The humoral theory was eventually abandoned following [...] Rudolf Virchow in the 1850s.
- David F. Marks, Michael Murray, Brian Evans, Emee Vida Estacio (2015). "16 Illness and Personality". Health Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice. Sage Publications. p. PT555. ISBN 978-1-4739-2758-2.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Marks, David F.; Murray, Michael; Evans, Brian; Estacio, Emee Vida (2015). Health Psychology. Sage. p. 406. ISBN 978-1-4739-2759-9.
- ^ Sudhoff, Karl (1926). Essays in the History of Medicine. Medical Life Press, New York. pp. 67, 87, 104.
- ^ a b Boeree, C. George. "Early Medicine and Physiology". Retrieved 21 February 2013.
- ^ Kagan, Jerome (1998). Galen's Prophecy: Temperament In Human Nature. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-08405-2.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - ^ Osborn L. Ac., David K. "Inherent Temperament". Retrieved 21 February 2013.
- ^ "Temperament: Developmental and Ecological Dimensions". Archived from the original on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2010-03-26.
- ^ "Judy Duchan's History of Speech – Language Pathology". www.acsu.buffalo.edu. Retrieved 2023-03-30.
- ^ a b Jouanna, Jacques (2012), "The Legacy of the Hippocratic Treatise The Nature of Man: The Theory of the Four Humours", Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen, Brill, pp. 335–359, doi:10.1163/9789004232549_017, ISBN 9789004232549, S2CID 171176381
- ^ Ayoub, Lois (1995). "Old English Wæta and the Medical Theory of the Humours". The Journal of English and Germanic Philology. 94 (3): 332–346. JSTOR 27711180.
- ^
- Corbin 2016, Overview. "In this work a distinguished scholar of Islamic religion examines the mysticism and psychological thought of the great eleventh-century Persian philosopher and physician Avicenna (Ibn Sina), author of over a hundred works on theology, logic, medicine, and mathematics."
- Pasnau & Dyke 2010, p. 52. "Most important of these initially was the massive Book of Healing (Al-Shifa) of the eleventh-century Persian Avicenna, the parts of which labeled in Latin as De anima and De generatione having been translated in the second half of the twelfth century."
- Daly 2013, p. 18. "The Persian polymath Ibn Sina (981–1037) consolidated all of this learning, along with Ancient Greek and Indian knowledge, into his The Canon of Medicine (1025), a work still taught in European medical schools in the seventeenth century."
- ^ Lutz, Peter L. (2002). The Rise of Experimental Biology: An Illustrated History. Humana Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-89603-835-1.
- ^ Nicholas Culpeper (1653) An Astrologo-Physical Discourse of the Human Virtues in the Body of Man, transcribed and annotated by Deborah Houlding. Skyscript, 2009 (retrieved 16 November 2011). Originally published in Culpeper's Complete Herbal (English Physician). London: Peter Cole, 1652.
- ^ Nicholas Culpeper, Semeiotica Urania, or Astrological Judgement of Diseases. London: 1655. Reprint, Nottingham: Ascella, 1994.
- ^ Greenbaum, Dorian Gieseler (2005). Temperament: Astrology's Forgotten Key. Wessex Astrologer. pp. 42, 91. ISBN 1-902405-17-X.
- ^ Martindale, Anne E.; Martindale, Colin (1988). "Metaphorical equivalence of elements and temperaments: Empirical studies of Bachelard's theory of imagination". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 55 (5): 836. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.836.
- ^ Rokhin, L, Pavlov, I and Popov, Y. (1963), Psychopathology and Psychiatry, Foreign Languages Publication House: Moscow. [1]
- ^ Becerra, Jose. Chapter 3 Keirsey's personality types | The Bailey Seven Ray Types.
- ^ Lundin, Robert W. (1989). Alfred-Adler's Basic Concepts and Implications. Taylor and Francis. p. 54. ISBN 0-915202-83-2.
- ^ Riemann, Fritz (2008). Anxiety. Reinhardt Ernst. ISBN 978-3-497-02043-0.
- ^ "What Are the Four DISC Types?". DISC Personality Testing Blog. 2014-01-27. Retrieved 2020-09-22.
- ^ LaHaye, Tim (1966). The Spirit Controlled Temperament. Tyndale Publishing.
- ^ LaHaye, Tim (1984). Your Temperament: Discover Its Potential. Tyndale Publishing. ISBN 0-8423-6220-7.
- ^ LaHaye, Tim (1988). Why You Act the Way You Do. Tyndale Publishing. ISBN 0-8423-8212-7.
- ^ a b Doody, John A.; Immerwahr, John (1983). "The Persistence of the Four Temperaments". Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 66 (3): 348–359. ISSN 0038-1861. JSTOR 41178265.
- ^ "History and Development of the Arno Profile System". Arno Profile System. 2005. Retrieved 15 November 2024.
- ^ Foltmann, Niels Bo, ed. (1998). Symphony No. 2 (PDF). II. Instrumental Music. Vol. 2. The Carl Nielsen Edition, Royal Danish Library. ISBN 978-87-598-0913-6. ISMN 979-0-66134-000-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2014.
{{cite book}}:|work=ignored (help) - ^ Corleonis, Adrian (19 November 2007). "Paul Hindemith, Theme and Variations, 'Die vier Temperamente' (The Four Temperaments)". American Symphony Orchestra. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
- ^ Hindemith, Paul (1948). Theme and Four Variations (The Four Temperaments) (PDF). New York: Associated Music Publishers.
- ^ Kant, Marion (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Ballet. Cambridge University Press. pp. 231–232. ISBN 9781139827195.
- ^ Balanchine, George; Mason, Francis (1977). Balanchine's Complete Stories of the Great Ballets. Doubleday. p. 253. ISBN 9780385113816.
- ^ Zola, Preface to Thérèse Raquin.
Works cited
[edit]- Corbin, Henry (2016). Avicenna and the visionary recital. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691630540.
- Daly, Jonathan (2013). The Rise of Western Power: A Comparative History of Western Civilization. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-1851-6.
- Pasnau, Robert; Dyke, Christina Van (2010). Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
Further reading
[edit]- Arikha, Noga (2007). Passions and Tempers: A History of the Humours. Harpers. ISBN 978-0060731175
- Edelman, Kathleen (2019). I Said This, You Heard That: How Your Wiring Colors Your Communication. North Point Resources. ISBN 978-1943535415
External links
[edit]- In Our Time (BBC Radio 4) episode on the four humours in MP3 format, 45 minutes
- I Said This, You Heard That (A Group Study in the Four Temperaments) interactive workbook format that includes a temperament assessment; accompanying teaching videos available through the free app.
- Shakespeare and the Four Humors
Four temperaments
View on Grokipedia| Temperament | Humor | Qualities | Key Traits | Element | Season | Associated Planet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanguine | Blood | Hot, Moist | Cheerful, sociable, active | Air | Spring | Jupiter |
| Choleric | Yellow Bile | Hot, Dry | Ambitious, passionate, angry | Fire | Summer | Mars |
| Melancholic | Black Bile | Cold, Dry | Introspective, scholarly, sad | Earth | Autumn | Saturn |
| Phlegmatic | Phlegm | Cold, Moist | Calm, reliable, lethargic | Water | Winter | Moon |
Historical Development
Ancient Greek Foundations
The theory of the four temperaments originated in the Hippocratic Corpus, a collection of medical texts attributed to Hippocrates and his followers around 400 BCE, which linked individual personality differences to imbalances in four bodily humors: blood associated with the sanguine temperament, yellow bile with the choleric, black bile with the melancholic, and phlegm with the phlegmatic.[1][7] These humors were viewed as essential fluids whose equilibrium determined not only physical health but also psychological traits, with excesses or deficiencies leading to distinct behavioral patterns.[8] Hippocrates, often regarded as the "father of medicine," proposed this humoral framework as a rational explanation for disease and temperament, shifting away from supernatural causes toward observable environmental and physiological factors.[9][10] Hippocratic writings also connected humor production to seasonal and climatic influences, suggesting that environmental conditions affected the balance of these fluids and, consequently, mood and vitality.[1] For instance, Hippocrates observed that mood changes often aligned with seasonal shifts, such as increased cheerfulness in spring due to rising blood levels or lethargy in winter from phlegm dominance, as detailed in texts like Airs, Waters, and Places.[11] This environmental perspective underscored the idea that external factors, including climate, could alter humoral composition and thus influence temperament.[12] The Roman physician Galen (c. 129–216 CE) significantly expanded the humoral theory through his anatomical dissections, clinical observations, and synthesis of earlier Greek works, classifying temperaments primarily by the dominant humor while acknowledging mixtures.[13][14] Building on Hippocrates, Galen proposed nine temperament variations arising from combinations of the four humors, with the balanced temperament (equal proportions) as the ideal, and extremes like pure melancholic or blends such as sanguine-choleric representing deviations.[15] His empirical approach, including pulse analysis and dietary recommendations to restore balance, solidified the theory's role in ancient medicine and laid the groundwork for its enduring influence.[16][17]Medieval and Early Modern Adaptations
The theory of the four temperaments was transmitted to the medieval Islamic world through scholars who built upon Galenic foundations, notably Avicenna (Ibn Sina, c. 980–1037 CE). In his seminal work The Canon of Medicine, Avicenna refined the humoral framework by linking the four humors—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—to corresponding temperaments (sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric, and melancholic), while incorporating astrological influences on health and environmental factors such as air quality and water sources as determinants of humoral balance.[18][19] These adaptations emphasized a holistic approach, where planetary positions could exacerbate or mitigate imbalances, influencing medical diagnosis and treatment across the Islamic scholarly tradition.[20] In medieval Europe, the theory gained prominence through translations of Arabic texts, particularly via the 12th-century Toledo School of Translators, which rendered Avicenna's Canon and Galenic works into Latin, facilitating their integration into scholastic medicine and philosophy.[21] This transmission shaped university curricula at centers like Salerno and Montpellier, where humoral temperaments informed diagnostics, dietary regimens, and bloodletting practices to restore equilibrium.[22] The approach permeated scholastic thought, aligning with Aristotelian natural philosophy to view temperaments as innate dispositions affected by age, climate, and season. During the Renaissance, the theory faced challenges and evolutions. Paracelsus (1493–1541) critiqued pure humoralism, advocating a chemical medicine that incorporated metallic salts and spiritual essences alongside the humors, positing that diseases arose from external poisons rather than internal imbalances alone.[23] Robert Burton's The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621) applied the temperaments extensively to psychology, classifying melancholy as a pervasive affliction tied to black bile excess, and recommending remedies like music and travel to adjust humoral states.[24] By the 17th century, mechanistic advances eroded the theory's dominance; William Harvey's On the Motion of the Heart and Blood (1628) demonstrated systemic blood circulation, undermining Galenic assumptions of humoral production and flow.[25] Despite this decline, cultural applications persisted: Shakespeare's plays featured temperament-based archetypes, such as the choleric Hotspur or sanguine Falstaff, reflecting humoral psychology in character motivations. Similarly, astrological texts linked zodiac signs to humors—e.g., Aries to choleric fire—guiding medieval and early modern prognostic medicine.[26] In the 18th century, Immanuel Kant, in his Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, reframed the four temperaments as psychological categories based on the strength and balance of emotional and active faculties, viewing them as innate dispositions rather than physiological imbalances.[27] He classified the sanguine as energetic yet balanced in feeling, the choleric as strong in activity but unbalanced, the melancholic as weak in activity with strong feeling, and the phlegmatic as weak overall, emphasizing their influence on moral and social conduct.[27]Core Concepts
Humoral Theory
The humoral theory, originating in ancient Greek medicine, posits that the human body consists of four fundamental fluids or humors—blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm—that govern physiological function, health, and personality. These humors were believed to be produced by specific organs: blood by the liver, yellow bile by the gallbladder, black bile by the spleen, and phlegm by the brain and lungs.[28][4][29] Health was understood to depend on eucrasia, a state of harmonious balance among the humors, which ensured vitality and well-being, whereas dyscrasia, or imbalance, resulted in illness and the predominance of one humor influencing temperament and behavior. For instance, an excess of blood was thought to foster sociability and optimism. Imbalances could arise from internal processes like faulty digestion or external factors, leading to diseases characterized by the dominant humor's excess or deficiency.[30][31][32] Each humor possessed distinct primary qualities of hot/cold and wet/dry, which not only affected bodily functions but also shaped psychological traits through their physiological dominance. Blood was hot and wet, promoting nourishment and expansion; yellow bile was hot and dry, aiding digestion but potentially causing inflammation; black bile was cold and dry, supporting structure but risking stagnation; and phlegm was cold and wet, providing lubrication yet possibly inducing sluggishness. These qualities formed the basis for therapeutic interventions aimed at restoring equilibrium.[28][33][34] The production and regulation of humors were linked to digestive processes, where nutrients from food were transformed in the liver and distributed throughout the body, with lifestyle elements such as diet, exercise, climate, and environment playing key roles in maintaining balance. Seasonal variations further influenced humoral fluctuations, aligning with natural cycles: spring invigorated blood, summer heated yellow bile, autumn cooled black bile, and winter dampened phlegm. Galen of Pergamum (c. 129–c. 216 CE), building on Hippocratic foundations, emphasized these mechanisms in his comprehensive medical writings.[35][34][36] Galen integrated the humoral model into a broader cosmological framework, positing that the body as a microcosm mirrored the macrocosm of the universe, with humors corresponding to universal principles like seasons and elements to explain health and disease holistically. This doctrine underscored qualitative mappings between humors and environmental factors, as illustrated below:| Humor | Primary Organs | Qualities | Seasonal Association |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | Liver | Hot, Wet | Spring |
| Yellow Bile | Gallbladder | Hot, Dry | Summer |
| Black Bile | Spleen | Cold, Dry | Autumn |
| Phlegm | Brain, Lungs | Cold, Wet | Winter |
Associations with Elements and Qualities
The four temperaments are traditionally mapped to the classical elements and their associated qualities, forming a foundational aspect of ancient Greek cosmology and medicine. The sanguine temperament corresponds to air, characterized by warm and moist qualities; the choleric to fire, warm and dry; the melancholic to earth, cold and dry; and the phlegmatic to water, cold and moist. These associations derive from the humoral theory, where imbalances in bodily fluids reflect elemental dominances, influencing personality and health.[37] This framework traces back to Empedocles (c. 494–434 BCE), who proposed the four roots—earth, water, air, and fire—as the fundamental building blocks of all matter, prefiguring later humoral links by emphasizing their eternal, unchangeable nature under forces of love and strife. Aristotle (c. 384–322 BCE) further systematized these elements by defining them through pairs of fundamental opposites: hot versus cold and wet versus moist, which drive natural change and mixture in the universe, including human temperament. In Aristotelian physics, these qualities determine the elemental properties, with mixtures producing the diversity observed in bodies and behaviors, establishing temperament as a manifestation of qualitative balance.[38][39] The temperaments also exhibit symbolic correspondences across various domains, integrating them into a broader cosmological schema. For instance, the sanguine temperament aligns with the east and spring, the choleric with the south and summer, the melancholic with the west and autumn, and the phlegmatic with the north and winter. Body parts are similarly linked, such as the head to phlegm (phlegmatic), reflecting sites of humoral production. Zodiac signs provide further analogies: Aries, Leo, and Sagittarius to the choleric (fire signs); Gemini, Libra, and Aquarius to the sanguine (air signs); Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorn to the melancholic (earth signs); and Cancer, Scorpio, and Pisces to the phlegmatic (water signs).[40][14]| Temperament | Element | Qualities | Season | Direction | Example Zodiac Signs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanguine | Air | Warm/Moist | Spring | East | Gemini, Libra, Aquarius |
| Choleric | Fire | Warm/Dry | Summer | South | Aries, Leo, Sagittarius |
| Melancholic | Earth | Cold/Dry | Autumn | West | Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn |
| Phlegmatic | Water | Cold/Moist | Winter | North | Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces |
Temperament Descriptions
Sanguine Temperament
The sanguine temperament, one of the four classical personality types in humoral theory, is characterized by an excess of blood, the hot and moist humor associated with the air element.[41] Individuals with this temperament are described as sociable, optimistic, energetic, and pleasure-seeking, exhibiting a buoyant and lively disposition that thrives on social interactions and external stimulation.[42] In ancient Greek medicine, Hippocrates linked this type to cheerfulness and vitality, while Galen, in works such as De temperamentis, portrayed the sanguine person as joyful, eager, hopeful, and amorous, often engaging in pursuits of love and enjoyment.[43][1] Historically, this temperament was depicted in art and literature as an active, embracing figure symbolizing youth and sociability, such as in 15th-century illustrations of wooers or allegorical statues representing enthusiasm.[1] Strengths of the sanguine temperament include charismatic leadership in social environments, where their enthusiasm and adaptability foster group cohesion and inspiration.[42] They demonstrate resilience and creativity, particularly in dynamic fields like arts and entertainment, leveraging their wide range of emotions to engage others effectively.[44] These qualities made the sanguine ideal for roles requiring interpersonal flair, as noted in Galen's observations of their supportive and fluent social nature.[45] In contrast to the introspective melancholic temperament, the sanguine excels in outward expression and optimism.[5] However, weaknesses such as impulsivity, lack of sustained focus, emotional volatility, and avoidance of conflict can undermine their potential.[42] Galen highlighted inconsistencies and overindulgence in passions as risks, leading to short-lived enthusiasms and erratic behavior.[1] Behaviorally, sanguines thrive in varied, stimulating settings but struggle with routine tasks, often dwelling on immediate pleasures rather than long-term planning.[5] In modern stereotypes, this manifests as the "life of the party," a fun-loving extrovert who energizes social gatherings but may appear superficial or indecisive.[46] From a humoral perspective, the predominance of blood was linked to potential health issues, including fevers, inflammation, and circulatory disorders like plethora, which could strain the cardiovascular system if unbalanced.[1][47] Galen associated such excesses with conditions treatable by bloodletting to restore equilibrium, emphasizing the temperament's tie to heart function and overall vitality.[48]Choleric Temperament
The choleric temperament, one of the four classical temperaments identified in ancient humoral theory, is characterized by an excess of yellow bile, a humor produced in the liver and associated with hot and dry qualities as well as the element of fire. Individuals with this dominant temperament are typically described as ambitious, decisive, and energetic, exhibiting a passionate and leader-like demeanor that drives them toward action and achievement. Historically, Galen (c. 129–c. 216 AD), building on Hippocratic foundations, described the choleric temperament as quick-tempered and irascible. Later interpretations, including those in modern psychology, portray cholerics as touchy, restless, aggressive, excitable, changeable, impulsive, optimistic, and active, positioning them as unstable extraverts prone to quick shifts in mood and behavior.[49] This profile aligns with their association to youth, summer, and a sharp, mean-looking physical appearance, reflecting the fiery intensity of their humoral imbalance. The strengths of the choleric temperament lie in its inherent decisiveness and goal-oriented motivation, enabling individuals to thrive under pressure with remarkable resilience and natural authority. Such traits make cholerics effective doers and leaders, capable of instilling ambition and drive in others while pursuing objectives with unwavering focus and physical vigor. For instance, their strong will and leadership qualities often manifest in roles requiring bold initiative, where they serve as sources of inspiration and direction. However, the choleric temperament's weaknesses include pronounced irritability, domineering tendencies, impatience, and a propensity for aggression or burnout due to unchecked intensity. These individuals may exhibit greater anger and restlessness compared to other temperaments, leading to touchiness and a hot-headed stubbornness that can strain relationships. In extreme cases, this imbalance was historically linked to disorders involving the digestive system or liver, such as jaundice or inflammatory conditions, underscoring the physical toll of their fiery disposition. In historical contexts, the choleric temperament has been archetypally linked to warriors and rulers, embodying the archetype of figures like Alexander the Great, whose conquests exemplified the choleric drive for glory and dominance as interpreted in later Galenic traditions. Behaviorally, cholerics excel in competitive arenas such as business and politics, where their passion and resilience propel success, though their intensity may alienate collaborators through domineering or impulsive interactions. Blends with other temperaments, such as sanguine-choleric combinations, often produce charismatic leaders who temper aggression with sociability.Melancholic Temperament
The melancholic temperament, one of the four classical personality types, is characterized by an excess of black bile, a cold and dry humor produced in the spleen and kidneys, leading to introspective and analytical dispositions. Individuals with this temperament are often thoughtful and perfectionistic, exhibiting a moody depth of emotion that fosters profound self-reflection but can also result in despondency. Galen, in his treatise On the Temperaments, associated the melancholic temperament with an excess of black bile, leading to dejection and mood disturbances stemming from the cooling and drying effects of black bile on the body's vital heat. This humoral imbalance contrasts with the phlegmatic temperament's more subdued emotional intensity, emphasizing the melancholic's heightened sensitivity to internal states.[37][36] Strengths of the melancholic temperament include deep empathy, loyalty, and intellectual depth, particularly in pursuits like philosophy and science, where their analytical nature excels. Historically, Aristotle praised this temperament in Problemata 30.1, associating melancholy with genius and noting that many outstanding philosophers, statesmen, and artists—such as Socrates and Plato—were melancholics, attributing their exceptional abilities to the stimulating effects of black bile when moderated. During the Renaissance, this view persisted, portraying melancholics as inspired visionaries capable of artistic and intellectual breakthroughs, as seen in the emblematic depictions of scholarly figures surrounded by books and instruments. Their loyalty manifests in steadfast relationships, while empathy allows for nuanced understanding of others' emotions.[50][51] However, the melancholic temperament's challenges often overshadow these gifts, including pessimism, self-doubt, and a propensity for depression and anxiety, which can lead to social withdrawal and isolation. Robert Burton, in his 1621 work The Anatomy of Melancholy, detailed these weaknesses, portraying melancholics as afflicted by causeless fear and sorrow, perpetual cogitations that breed suspicion and despair, and a tendency toward solitariness that hinders social engagement. Behaviorally, they prefer solitude for reflection and thrive in detailed, meticulous work, yet are prone to overthinking, which exacerbates mood swings and links to imbalances in the spleen and kidneys affecting overall vitality. Burton viewed melancholy as both a disease and a source of inspiration, capable of driving individuals to madness if unchecked, but redeemable through self-awareness and remedies.[52]Phlegmatic Temperament
The phlegmatic temperament is characterized by a predominance of phlegm, the cold and wet humor in Galen's humoral theory, which corresponds to the water element and promotes a stable, passive disposition.[49] Individuals with this temperament are typically calm, reliable, peaceful, and even-tempered, exhibiting thoughtful and controlled behaviors that prioritize harmony over action.[49] However, they often display indecisiveness and a measured pace, reflecting the sluggish quality attributed to excess phlegm.[43] Key strengths of the phlegmatic temperament include diplomatic mediation skills, patience, and consistency, making them effective in supportive roles where low stress levels foster endurance.[53] Their reliability and calmness under pressure contribute to emotional stability, allowing them to maintain composure in challenging situations.[49] Conversely, weaknesses such as passivity, resistance to change, and unassertiveness can lead to complacency or avoidance of necessary risks, potentially hindering personal initiative.[53] Historically, Galen viewed the phlegmatic temperament as balanced when humors were in equilibrium, but an excess of phlegm was associated with health issues like respiratory congestion, brain-related disorders such as apoplexy, and overall sluggishness.[54] In ancient Greco-Roman medicine, this temperament was perceived as apathetic with little propensity for excitation, contrasting sharply with more dynamic types.[55] Behaviorally, phlegmatic individuals thrive in harmonious team environments, avoiding confrontation and contributing to group cohesion through their empathetic and patient nature, though they are often underestimated for their quiet steadiness.[53] Unlike the high-drive choleric temperament, their low energy supports roles focused on maintenance and support rather than leadership.[49]Modern Interpretations
In Personality Psychology
In the 20th and 21st centuries, the classical four temperaments have been reinterpreted within personality psychology as innate predispositions influencing emotional reactivity and behavioral tendencies, often integrated with empirical models of trait dimensions.[56] This shift emphasizes temperament as a biologically rooted foundation for broader personality development, distinct from learned behaviors shaped by environment and experience.[57] Key theorists have mapped these temperaments onto modern frameworks, highlighting their role in understanding individual differences without relying on outdated humoral explanations. In the early 20th century, Rudolf Steiner, founder of anthroposophy, extended this in lectures such as The Four Temperaments (1909), describing temperaments as expressions of the interplay between physical, etheric, astral, and ego bodies, with the sanguine dominated by the astral (emotional and changeable), choleric by the ego (willful), melancholic by the physical (introspective), and phlegmatic by the etheric (steady).[58] Steiner portrayed these as archetypal predispositions observable in childhood, guiding educational approaches to balance innate traits.[58] Hans Eysenck's hierarchical model of personality, developed from the 1940s onward, explicitly linked his two primary dimensions—extraversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability—to the four temperaments, positing them as biologically determined via arousal levels in the brain's reticular activating system.[56] Extraverts (high cortical arousal tolerance) align with sanguine and choleric types, while introverts (low tolerance) correspond to melancholic and phlegmatic; the neuroticism axis differentiates unstable (high emotional reactivity, choleric/melancholic) from stable (low reactivity, sanguine/phlegmatic) variants.[56] Eysenck's work, supported by factor analyses of questionnaire data, viewed these quadrants as heritable temperamental cores underlying personality stability across the lifespan.[59] Contemporary integrations often draw analogies between the temperaments and the Big Five model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism), treating them as composites of trait extremes rather than discrete types. For instance, the sanguine temperament is commonly associated with high extraversion and openness, reflecting sociable and exploratory tendencies; choleric with high extraversion and conscientiousness, indicating assertive goal-directedness; melancholic with high neuroticism and low extraversion, denoting introspective anxiety; and phlegmatic with high agreeableness and low neuroticism, suggesting calm cooperation.[5]| Temperament | Key Big Five Associations | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sanguine | High Extraversion, High Openness | Outgoing, optimistic, adaptable; seeks novelty and social stimulation.[5] |
| Choleric | High Extraversion, High Conscientiousness | Ambitious, dominant, task-focused; driven by achievement.[5] |
| Melancholic | Low Extraversion, High Neuroticism | Thoughtful, sensitive, perfectionistic; prone to worry and depth.[5] |
| Phlegmatic | Low Extraversion, High Agreeableness | Peaceful, reliable, empathetic; prioritizes harmony and stability.[5] |
