Hubbry Logo
Four temperamentsFour temperamentsMain
Open search
Four temperaments
Community hub
Four temperaments
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Four temperaments
Four temperaments
from Wikipedia
18th-century depiction of the four temperaments:[1] phlegmatic and choleric above, sanguine and melancholic below

The four temperament theory is a proto-psychological theory which suggests that there are four fundamental personality types: sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic.[2][3] Most formulations include the possibility of mixtures among the types where an individual's personality types overlap and they share two or more temperaments. Greek physician Hippocrates (c. 460 – c. 370 BC) described the four temperaments as part of the ancient medical concept of humourism, that four bodily fluids affect human personality traits and behaviours. Modern medical science does not define a fixed relationship between internal secretions and personality, although some psychological personality type systems use categories similar to the Greek temperaments.

The four temperament theory was abandoned after the 1850s.[4]

History

[edit]

Temperament theory has its roots in the ancient theory of humourism. It may have originated in Mesopotamia,[5] but it was Greek physician Hippocrates (460–370 BC) (and later Galen) who developed it into a medical theory. He believed that certain human moods, emotions, and behaviours were caused by an excess or lack of body fluids (called "humours"), which he classified as blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm,[3] each of which was responsible for different patterns in personalities, as well as how susceptible one was to getting a disease. Galen (AD 129 – c. 200) developed the first typology of temperament in his dissertation De temperamentis, and searched for physiological reasons for different behaviours in humans. He classified them as hot/cold and dry/wet taken from the four elements.[6] There could also be balance between the qualities, yielding a total of nine temperaments. The word "temperament" itself comes from Latin "temperare", "to mix". In the ideal personality, the complementary characteristics were exquisitely balanced among warm-cool and dry-moist. In four less-ideal types, one of the four qualities was dominant over all the others. In the remaining four types, one pair of qualities dominated the complementary pair; for example, warm and moist dominated cool and dry. These last four were the temperamental categories which Galen named "sanguine", "choleric", "melancholic", and "phlegmatic" after the bodily humours. Each was the result of an excess of one of the humours which produced the imbalance in paired qualities.[3][7][8][9]

For example, if a person tends to be too happy or "sanguine", one can assume they have too much blood in proportion to the other humours, and can medically act accordingly. Likewise for being too calm and reserved or "phlegmatic" from too much phlegm; excessively sad or "melancholic" from too much black bile; and too angry or "choleric" from excess yellow bile.[10]

The properties of these humours also corresponded to the four seasons. Thus blood, which was considered hot and wet, corresponded to spring. Yellow bile, considered hot and dry, corresponded to summer. Black bile, cold and dry, corresponded to autumn. And finally, phlegm, cold and wet, corresponded to winter.[11]

These properties were considered the basis of health and disease. This meant that having a balance and good mixture of the humours defined good health, while an imbalance or separation of the humours led to disease.[11] Because the humours corresponded to certain seasons, one way to avoid an imbalance or disease was to change health-related habits depending on the season. Some physicians did this by regulating a patient's diet, while some used remedies such as phlebotomy and purges to get rid of excess blood. Even Galen proposed a theory of the importance of proper digestion in forming healthy blood. The idea was that the two most important factors when digesting are the types of food and the person's body temperature. This meant that if too much heat were involved, then the blood would become "overcooked." This meant that it would contain too much of the yellow bile, and the patient would become feverish.[12] Lack of sufficient heat was believed to result in an excess of phlegm.

Choleric, sanguine, melancholic, and phlegmatic temperaments: 17c., part of the Grande Commande

Persian[13] polymath Avicenna (980–1037 AD) extended the theory of temperaments in his Canon of Medicine, which was a standard medical text at many medieval universities. He applied them to "emotional aspects, mental capacity, moral attitudes, self-awareness, movements and dreams."[14] Nicholas Culpeper (1616–1654) suggested that the humors acted as governing principles in bodily health, with astrological correspondences,[15] and explained their influence upon physiognomy and personality.[16] He proposed that some people had a single temperament, while others had an admixture of two, a primary and secondary temperament.[17]

Modern medical science has rejected the theories of the four temperaments, though their use persists as a metaphor within certain psychological fields.[18] Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Erich Adickes (1866–1925), Alfred Adler (1879–1937), Eduard Spranger (1914), Ernst Kretschmer (1920), and Erich Fromm (1947) all theorised on the four temperaments (with different names) and greatly shaped modern theories of temperament. Hans Eysenck (1916–1997) was one of the first psychologists to analyse personality differences using a psycho-statistical method called factor analysis, and his research led him to believe that temperament is biologically based. The factors that he proposed in his book Dimensions of Personality were neuroticism (N), the tendency to experience negative emotions, and extraversion (E), the tendency to enjoy positive events, especially social ones. By pairing the two dimensions, Eysenck noted how the results were similar to the four ancient temperaments.[citation needed]

In the field of physiology, Ivan Pavlov studied on the types and properties of the nervous system, where three main properties were identified: strength, mobility of nervous processes and balance between excitation and inhibition, and derived four types based on these three properties.[19]

Other researchers developed similar systems, many of which did not use the ancient temperament names, and several paired extraversion with a different factor which would determine relationship and task-orientation. Examples are DISC assessment and social styles. One of the most popular today is the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, attributed to the work of David Keirsey, whose four temperaments were based largely on the Greek gods Apollo, Dionysus, Epimetheus, and Prometheus, and were mapped to the 16 types of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). They were renamed as Artisan (SP), Guardian (SJ), Idealist (NF), and Rational (NT).[20] C.G. Jung's Psychological Types surveys the historical literature of the 'four humors' and related discussions extensively and in depth and proposes a psychoanalytic integration of the material.

Relation of various four temperament theories
Classical Element[6] Adler[21] Riemann[22] DISC[23]

(Different publishers use different names)

Physical manifestation Source
Melancholic Earth Leaning Depressed Conscientiousness/Cautious Black bile Spleen
Phlegmatic Water Avoiding Schizoid Steadiness/Supportive Phlegm Lungs
Sanguine Air Socially Useful Hysterical Influence/Inspiring Blood Marrow
Choleric Fire Ruling Obsessive Dominance/Direct Yellow bile Liver/Gall Bladder

Modern views, implementations and restatements

[edit]

Waldorf education and anthroposophy believe that the temperaments help to understand personality. They also believe that they are useful for education, helping teachers understand how children learn. Christian writer Tim LaHaye has attempted to repopularize the ancient temperaments through his books.[24][25][26]

James David Barber developed The Presidential Character, wherein active relates to hot, passive relates to cold, positive relates to moist, and negative relates to dry. If one were to make a Punnett square of these characters, one can find an Active–Positive, Passive–Positive, Active–Negative, or Passive–Negative individual. This diagram was made after an influential study of the U.S. presidency, hence the name.[27]

Robert R. Blake created The Managerial Grid, wherein high concern for production relates to hot, low concern for production relates to cold, high concern for people relates to moist, and low concern for people relates to dry. If one were to make the same Punnett square of these characters, one can find a Team Management, a Country Club Management, a Task Management, or an Ineffective Management individual.[27]

The National Christian Counselors Association of Richard and Phyllis Arno, licensed the FIRO-B instrument in the 1980's, and derived from it a theory of five temperaments, where the classical phlegmatic temperament is deemed to be a neutral temperament, whereas the "relationship-oriented introvert" position traditionally held by the phlegmatic is declared to be a new "fifth temperament" called "Supine" (meaning "lying on the back"). This instrument is used by many Christian ministries[28]

Date (c.) Author Choleric temperament Phlegmatic temperament Sanguine temperament Melancholic temperament
2015 Octopus Temperament (Sy Montgomery) Assertive Curious Joyful Gentle
2014 HUCMI Controlling Relational Experimental Analytical
2006 Berens Theorists (NT) Catalyst (NF) Improvisor (SP) Stabilizer (SJ)
1999/2001 Linda V. Berens' four Interaction Styles In Charge Chart the Course Get Things Going Behind the Scenes
1999 StrengthsFinder Striving (Executing) Relating (Relationships) Impacting (Influencing) Thinking (Strategic Thinking)
1998 (Erikson's behavior types are a 2014 revision) Hartman Personality Profile Red (Leaders; Bold & Brash) White > Green (Most Selfless; Relaxed, Friendly, & Loyal) Yellow (Social Butterflies; Creative & Optimistic) Blue (Keen Minds; Analytical & Detail-oriented)
1996 Tony Alessandra Personality Styles Director Relater Socializer Thinker
1989 Benziger Logic & Results Intuition & Empathy Vision & Creativity Process & Routine
1978, 1988 Keirsey/Bates four temperaments (old), Keirsey's four temperaments Promethean (Technological) > Rational (NT) Apollonian (Soulful) > Idealist (NF) Dionysian (Artful) > Artisan (SP) Epimethean (Dutiful) > Guardian (SJ)
1973/74 Conflict Competing Accommodating Collaborating Avoiding
1967 Dreikurs' four mistaken goals Power or Defiance Revenge or Retaliation Undue Attention or Service Inadequacy or Deficiency
1960s Fritz Riemann Obsessive Schizoid Hysterical Depressed
Stuart Atkins LIFO's four Orientations to Life Controlling-Taking Supporting-Giving Adapting-Dealing Conserving-Holding
David Merrill, "Social Styles" Driving Amiable Expressive Analytical
1958 Myers' Jungian types Thinking (T); "Logical & Ingenious" Feeling (F); "Sympathetic & Friendly" Perceiving (P); "Enthusiastic & Insightful" Judging (J); "Practical & Matter of Fact"
1948, 1957, 1987 California Psychological Inventory CPI 260 Leader/Implementer (Alphas) Supporter (Betas) Innovator (Gammas) Visualizer (Deltas)
1947 Eysenck High Extraversion, High Neuroticism (Unstable-Extraverted) Low Extraversion, Low Neuroticism (Stable-Introverted) High Extraversion, Low Neuroticism (Stable-Extraverted) Low Extraversion, High Neuroticism (Unstable-Introverted)
1947 Fromm's four orientations Exploitative (Taking) Receptive (Accepting) Marketing (Exchanging) Hoarding (Preserving)
1935, 1966 Alfred Adler's four Styles of Life, Temperament by LaHaye Ruling/Dominant (Choleric) Getting/Leaning (Phlegmatic) Socially Useful (Sanguine) Avoiding (melancholic)
1928, 1970s William Marston and John G. Geier DiSC assessment Dominance (D); Red Steadiness (S); Blue Influence (I); Green Conscientiousness (C); Yellow
1921 Jung Intuition Feeling Sensation Thinking
1920s Pavlov Angry Dogs (High Excitation, Low Inhibition) "Accepting" Dogs (fell asleep) (Low Excitation, High Inhibition) High-spirited Dogs (High Excitation, High Inhibition) "Weak" Dogs (whiny) (Low Excitation, Low Inhibition)
1920 Kretschmer's four character styles Hyperesthetic (oversensitive) Anesthetic (insensitive) Hypomanic Depressive
1914 Spranger's four* value attitudes Economic/Political Religious/Social Aesthetic Theoretical
1905 Adickes' four world views Traditional Agnostic (Skeptical) Innovative Dogmatic (Doctrinaire)
1894 Sasang So-Yang (SY; Little Yang); Active (Unstable & Active) Tae-Eum (TE; Big Yin); Organized (Stable & Passive) Tae-Yang (TY; Big Yang); Originative (Stable & Active) So-Eum (SE; Little Yin); Conservative (Unstable & Passive)
1798 Kant's four temperaments Energetic & Emotional (Choleric) Weak & Balanced (Phlegmatic) Energetic & Balanced (Sanguine) Weak & Emotional (Melancholic)
1550 Paracelsus' four totem spirits Gnomes (Industrious & Guarded) Sylphs (Curious & Calm) salamanders (Impulsive & Changeable) Nymphs (Inspiring & Passionate)
185 AD Irenaeus' four temperaments Historical Spiritual Spontaneous Scholarly
325 BC Aristotle's four sources of happiness Propraieteri (Acquiring Assets) Ethikos (Moral Value) Hedone (Sensual Pleasure) Dialogike (Logical Investigation)
325 BC Aristotle's social order Pistic (Common sense & Care-taking) Noetic (Intuitive, Sensibility, Morality) Iconic (Artistic & Art-making) Dianoetic (Reasoning & Logical Investigator)
340 BC Plato's four characters Sensible Intuitive Artistic Reasoning
307 BC Hippocrates' four humours Yellow Bile (Hot and Dry) Phlegm (Cold and Wet) Blood (Hot and Wet) Black Bile (Cold and Dry)
450 BC Empedocles Fire (Zeus) Water (Pluto/Nestis) Air (Hera) Earth (Persephone/Aidoneus)
590 BC Ezekiel's four living creatures Lion (Bold) Ox (Sturdy) Eagle (Far-seeing) Man (Spiritual)
Adapted and modified from: Montgomery, Stephen (2002). People Patterns: A Modern Guide to the Four Temperaments. Archer Publications. p. 20. ISBN 1-885705-03-4.; Keirsey, David (1998) [1978]. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Prometheus Nemesis Book Co. ISBN 1-885705-02-6.

Usage

[edit]

The 18th-century classical composer Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach composed a trio sonata in C minor known as Sanguineus et Melancholicus (Wq 161/1). In the 20th century, Carl Nielsen's Symphony No. 2 (Op.16) is subtitled "The Four Temperaments", each of the four movements being inspired by a sketch of a particular temperament.[29] Paul Hindemith's Theme and Four Variations for string orchestra and piano is also known as The Four Temperaments: although originally conceived as a ballet for Léonide Massine,[30][31] the score was ultimately completed as a commission for George Balanchine, who subsequently choreographed it as a neoclassical ballet, using the theory of the temperaments as a point of departure.[32][33]

The 19th-century French author Émile Zola used the four temperaments as a basis for his novel Thérèse Raquin.[34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The four temperaments theory is an ancient proto-psychological framework that classifies human personality into four distinct types—sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic—based on the balance of four bodily humors: blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm, respectively. Originating with the Greek physician Hippocrates around 460–370 BCE, the theory posits that an excess or deficiency of these humors influences physical health, emotional disposition, and behavioral traits. This humoral model linked temperaments to elemental qualities (hot, cold, moist, dry), seasons, and celestial influences, forming a cornerstone of Western medicine for over two millennia. The theory was significantly elaborated by the Roman physician Galen (c. 131–201 CE), who integrated it with Aristotelian philosophy and anatomical observations, associating each temperament with specific organs, life stages, and personality characteristics. For instance, the sanguine temperament, dominated by blood (hot and moist), was characterized by cheerfulness, sociability, and optimism, often linked to the heart, spring, and Jupiter. In contrast, the choleric type, governed by yellow bile (hot and dry) from the gallbladder, exhibited ambition, irritability, and leadership qualities, corresponding to summer and Mars. The melancholic temperament, influenced by black bile (cold and dry) from the spleen, featured introspection, creativity, and a tendency toward sadness, aligned with autumn and Saturn. Finally, the phlegmatic type, ruled by phlegm (cold and moist) from the brain, was marked by calmness, reliability, and passivity, tied to winter and the Moon.
TemperamentHumorQualitiesKey TraitsElementSeasonAssociated Planet
SanguineBloodHot, MoistCheerful, sociable, activeAirSpringJupiter
CholericYellow BileHot, DryAmbitious, passionate, angryFireSummerMars
MelancholicBlack BileCold, DryIntrospective, scholarly, sadEarthAutumnSaturn
PhlegmaticPhlegmCold, MoistCalm, reliable, lethargicWaterWinterMoon
The humoral theory dominated medical and psychological thought through the Middle Ages and Renaissance, influencing literature, astrology, and diagnostics until the scientific revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries displaced it with empirical approaches. Despite its obsolescence in clinical practice, the four temperaments persist in modern psychology as a foundational concept, informing personality assessments like the Big Five model and tools such as DISC, where similar behavioral clusters (e.g., extraversion akin to sanguine) are identified through factor analysis. Recent studies, including a 2018 analysis of over 1.5 million participants, have even revived interest by empirically deriving four broad personality types from large datasets, echoing the ancient categories while emphasizing genetic and environmental influences over humoral balances.

Historical Development

Ancient Greek Foundations

The theory of the four temperaments originated in the Hippocratic Corpus, a collection of medical texts attributed to Hippocrates and his followers around 400 BCE, which linked individual personality differences to imbalances in four bodily humors: blood associated with the sanguine temperament, yellow bile with the choleric, black bile with the melancholic, and phlegm with the phlegmatic. These humors were viewed as essential fluids whose equilibrium determined not only physical health but also psychological traits, with excesses or deficiencies leading to distinct behavioral patterns. Hippocrates, often regarded as the "father of medicine," proposed this humoral framework as a rational explanation for disease and temperament, shifting away from supernatural causes toward observable environmental and physiological factors. Hippocratic writings also connected humor production to seasonal and climatic influences, suggesting that environmental conditions affected the balance of these fluids and, consequently, mood and vitality. For instance, Hippocrates observed that mood changes often aligned with seasonal shifts, such as increased cheerfulness in spring due to rising blood levels or lethargy in winter from phlegm dominance, as detailed in texts like Airs, Waters, and Places. This environmental perspective underscored the idea that external factors, including climate, could alter humoral composition and thus influence temperament. The Roman physician Galen (c. 129–216 CE) significantly expanded the humoral theory through his anatomical dissections, clinical observations, and synthesis of earlier Greek works, classifying temperaments primarily by the dominant humor while acknowledging mixtures. Building on Hippocrates, Galen proposed nine temperament variations arising from combinations of the four humors, with the balanced temperament (equal proportions) as the ideal, and extremes like pure melancholic or blends such as sanguine-choleric representing deviations. His empirical approach, including pulse analysis and dietary recommendations to restore balance, solidified the theory's role in ancient medicine and laid the groundwork for its enduring influence.

Medieval and Early Modern Adaptations

The theory of the four temperaments was transmitted to the medieval Islamic world through scholars who built upon Galenic foundations, notably Avicenna (Ibn Sina, c. 980–1037 CE). In his seminal work The Canon of Medicine, Avicenna refined the humoral framework by linking the four humors—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—to corresponding temperaments (sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric, and melancholic), while incorporating astrological influences on health and environmental factors such as air quality and water sources as determinants of humoral balance. These adaptations emphasized a holistic approach, where planetary positions could exacerbate or mitigate imbalances, influencing medical diagnosis and treatment across the Islamic scholarly tradition. In medieval Europe, the theory gained prominence through translations of Arabic texts, particularly via the 12th-century Toledo School of Translators, which rendered Avicenna's Canon and Galenic works into Latin, facilitating their integration into scholastic medicine and philosophy. This transmission shaped university curricula at centers like Salerno and Montpellier, where humoral temperaments informed diagnostics, dietary regimens, and bloodletting practices to restore equilibrium. The approach permeated scholastic thought, aligning with Aristotelian natural philosophy to view temperaments as innate dispositions affected by age, climate, and season. During the Renaissance, the theory faced challenges and evolutions. Paracelsus (1493–1541) critiqued pure humoralism, advocating a chemical medicine that incorporated metallic salts and spiritual essences alongside the humors, positing that diseases arose from external poisons rather than internal imbalances alone. Robert Burton's The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621) applied the temperaments extensively to psychology, classifying melancholy as a pervasive affliction tied to black bile excess, and recommending remedies like music and travel to adjust humoral states. By the 17th century, mechanistic advances eroded the theory's dominance; William Harvey's On the Motion of the Heart and Blood (1628) demonstrated systemic blood circulation, undermining Galenic assumptions of humoral production and flow. Despite this decline, cultural applications persisted: Shakespeare's plays featured temperament-based archetypes, such as the choleric Hotspur or sanguine Falstaff, reflecting humoral psychology in character motivations. Similarly, astrological texts linked zodiac signs to humors—e.g., Aries to choleric fire—guiding medieval and early modern prognostic medicine. In the 18th century, Immanuel Kant, in his Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, reframed the four temperaments as psychological categories based on the strength and balance of emotional and active faculties, viewing them as innate dispositions rather than physiological imbalances. He classified the sanguine as energetic yet balanced in feeling, the choleric as strong in activity but unbalanced, the melancholic as weak in activity with strong feeling, and the phlegmatic as weak overall, emphasizing their influence on moral and social conduct.

Core Concepts

Humoral Theory

The humoral theory, originating in ancient Greek medicine, posits that the human body consists of four fundamental fluids or humors—blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm—that govern physiological function, health, and personality. These humors were believed to be produced by specific organs: blood by the liver, yellow bile by the gallbladder, black bile by the spleen, and phlegm by the brain and lungs. Health was understood to depend on eucrasia, a state of harmonious balance among the humors, which ensured vitality and well-being, whereas dyscrasia, or imbalance, resulted in illness and the predominance of one humor influencing temperament and behavior. For instance, an excess of blood was thought to foster sociability and optimism. Imbalances could arise from internal processes like faulty digestion or external factors, leading to diseases characterized by the dominant humor's excess or deficiency. Each humor possessed distinct primary qualities of hot/cold and wet/dry, which not only affected bodily functions but also shaped psychological traits through their physiological dominance. Blood was hot and wet, promoting nourishment and expansion; yellow bile was hot and dry, aiding digestion but potentially causing inflammation; black bile was cold and dry, supporting structure but risking stagnation; and phlegm was cold and wet, providing lubrication yet possibly inducing sluggishness. These qualities formed the basis for therapeutic interventions aimed at restoring equilibrium. The production and regulation of humors were linked to digestive processes, where nutrients from food were transformed in the liver and distributed throughout the body, with lifestyle elements such as diet, exercise, climate, and environment playing key roles in maintaining balance. Seasonal variations further influenced humoral fluctuations, aligning with natural cycles: spring invigorated blood, summer heated yellow bile, autumn cooled black bile, and winter dampened phlegm. Galen of Pergamum (c. 129–c. 216 CE), building on Hippocratic foundations, emphasized these mechanisms in his comprehensive medical writings. Galen integrated the humoral model into a broader cosmological framework, positing that the body as a microcosm mirrored the macrocosm of the universe, with humors corresponding to universal principles like seasons and elements to explain health and disease holistically. This doctrine underscored qualitative mappings between humors and environmental factors, as illustrated below:
HumorPrimary OrgansQualitiesSeasonal Association
BloodLiverHot, WetSpring
Yellow BileGallbladderHot, DrySummer
Black BileSpleenCold, DryAutumn
PhlegmBrain, LungsCold, WetWinter
Such correspondences guided preventive medicine, including purgatives, bloodletting, and dietary adjustments tailored to individual and seasonal needs.

Associations with Elements and Qualities

The four temperaments are traditionally mapped to the classical elements and their associated qualities, forming a foundational aspect of ancient Greek cosmology and medicine. The sanguine temperament corresponds to air, characterized by warm and moist qualities; the choleric to fire, warm and dry; the melancholic to earth, cold and dry; and the phlegmatic to water, cold and moist. These associations derive from the humoral theory, where imbalances in bodily fluids reflect elemental dominances, influencing personality and health. This framework traces back to Empedocles (c. 494–434 BCE), who proposed the four roots—earth, water, air, and fire—as the fundamental building blocks of all matter, prefiguring later humoral links by emphasizing their eternal, unchangeable nature under forces of love and strife. Aristotle (c. 384–322 BCE) further systematized these elements by defining them through pairs of fundamental opposites: hot versus cold and wet versus moist, which drive natural change and mixture in the universe, including human temperament. In Aristotelian physics, these qualities determine the elemental properties, with mixtures producing the diversity observed in bodies and behaviors, establishing temperament as a manifestation of qualitative balance. The temperaments also exhibit symbolic correspondences across various domains, integrating them into a broader cosmological schema. For instance, the sanguine temperament aligns with the east and spring, the choleric with the south and summer, the melancholic with the west and autumn, and the phlegmatic with the north and winter. Body parts are similarly linked, such as the head to phlegm (phlegmatic), reflecting sites of humoral production. Zodiac signs provide further analogies: Aries, Leo, and Sagittarius to the choleric (fire signs); Gemini, Libra, and Aquarius to the sanguine (air signs); Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorn to the melancholic (earth signs); and Cancer, Scorpio, and Pisces to the phlegmatic (water signs).
TemperamentElementQualitiesSeasonDirectionExample Zodiac Signs
SanguineAirWarm/MoistSpringEastGemini, Libra, Aquarius
CholericFireWarm/DrySummerSouthAries, Leo, Sagittarius
MelancholicEarthCold/DryAutumnWestTaurus, Virgo, Capricorn
PhlegmaticWaterCold/MoistWinterNorthCancer, Scorpio, Pisces
This table illustrates the classical correspondences, as synthesized in medieval adaptations of Greek thought. At the core of these associations lies the microcosm-macrocosm analogy, where the human body (microcosm) mirrors the structure of the universe (macrocosm) through shared elements and qualities. Human temperaments thus reflect cosmic principles, with individual dispositions echoing universal harmonies or imbalances, a concept central to ancient and medieval philosophy for understanding health, personality, and environmental influences.

Temperament Descriptions

Sanguine Temperament

The sanguine temperament, one of the four classical personality types in humoral theory, is characterized by an excess of blood, the hot and moist humor associated with the air element. Individuals with this temperament are described as sociable, optimistic, energetic, and pleasure-seeking, exhibiting a buoyant and lively disposition that thrives on social interactions and external stimulation. In ancient Greek medicine, Hippocrates linked this type to cheerfulness and vitality, while Galen, in works such as De temperamentis, portrayed the sanguine person as joyful, eager, hopeful, and amorous, often engaging in pursuits of love and enjoyment. Historically, this temperament was depicted in art and literature as an active, embracing figure symbolizing youth and sociability, such as in 15th-century illustrations of wooers or allegorical statues representing enthusiasm. Strengths of the sanguine temperament include charismatic leadership in social environments, where their enthusiasm and adaptability foster group cohesion and inspiration. They demonstrate resilience and creativity, particularly in dynamic fields like arts and entertainment, leveraging their wide range of emotions to engage others effectively. These qualities made the sanguine ideal for roles requiring interpersonal flair, as noted in Galen's observations of their supportive and fluent social nature. In contrast to the introspective melancholic temperament, the sanguine excels in outward expression and optimism. However, weaknesses such as impulsivity, lack of sustained focus, emotional volatility, and avoidance of conflict can undermine their potential. Galen highlighted inconsistencies and overindulgence in passions as risks, leading to short-lived enthusiasms and erratic behavior. Behaviorally, sanguines thrive in varied, stimulating settings but struggle with routine tasks, often dwelling on immediate pleasures rather than long-term planning. In modern stereotypes, this manifests as the "life of the party," a fun-loving extrovert who energizes social gatherings but may appear superficial or indecisive. From a humoral perspective, the predominance of blood was linked to potential health issues, including fevers, inflammation, and circulatory disorders like plethora, which could strain the cardiovascular system if unbalanced. Galen associated such excesses with conditions treatable by bloodletting to restore equilibrium, emphasizing the temperament's tie to heart function and overall vitality.

Choleric Temperament

The choleric temperament, one of the four classical temperaments identified in ancient humoral theory, is characterized by an excess of yellow bile, a humor produced in the liver and associated with hot and dry qualities as well as the element of fire. Individuals with this dominant temperament are typically described as ambitious, decisive, and energetic, exhibiting a passionate and leader-like demeanor that drives them toward action and achievement. Historically, Galen (c. 129–c. 216 AD), building on Hippocratic foundations, described the choleric temperament as quick-tempered and irascible. Later interpretations, including those in modern psychology, portray cholerics as touchy, restless, aggressive, excitable, changeable, impulsive, optimistic, and active, positioning them as unstable extraverts prone to quick shifts in mood and behavior. This profile aligns with their association to youth, summer, and a sharp, mean-looking physical appearance, reflecting the fiery intensity of their humoral imbalance. The strengths of the choleric temperament lie in its inherent decisiveness and goal-oriented motivation, enabling individuals to thrive under pressure with remarkable resilience and natural authority. Such traits make cholerics effective doers and leaders, capable of instilling ambition and drive in others while pursuing objectives with unwavering focus and physical vigor. For instance, their strong will and leadership qualities often manifest in roles requiring bold initiative, where they serve as sources of inspiration and direction. However, the choleric temperament's weaknesses include pronounced irritability, domineering tendencies, impatience, and a propensity for aggression or burnout due to unchecked intensity. These individuals may exhibit greater anger and restlessness compared to other temperaments, leading to touchiness and a hot-headed stubbornness that can strain relationships. In extreme cases, this imbalance was historically linked to disorders involving the digestive system or liver, such as jaundice or inflammatory conditions, underscoring the physical toll of their fiery disposition. In historical contexts, the choleric temperament has been archetypally linked to warriors and rulers, embodying the archetype of figures like Alexander the Great, whose conquests exemplified the choleric drive for glory and dominance as interpreted in later Galenic traditions. Behaviorally, cholerics excel in competitive arenas such as business and politics, where their passion and resilience propel success, though their intensity may alienate collaborators through domineering or impulsive interactions. Blends with other temperaments, such as sanguine-choleric combinations, often produce charismatic leaders who temper aggression with sociability.

Melancholic Temperament

The melancholic temperament, one of the four classical personality types, is characterized by an excess of black bile, a cold and dry humor produced in the spleen and kidneys, leading to introspective and analytical dispositions. Individuals with this temperament are often thoughtful and perfectionistic, exhibiting a moody depth of emotion that fosters profound self-reflection but can also result in despondency. Galen, in his treatise On the Temperaments, associated the melancholic temperament with an excess of black bile, leading to dejection and mood disturbances stemming from the cooling and drying effects of black bile on the body's vital heat. This humoral imbalance contrasts with the phlegmatic temperament's more subdued emotional intensity, emphasizing the melancholic's heightened sensitivity to internal states. Strengths of the melancholic temperament include deep empathy, loyalty, and intellectual depth, particularly in pursuits like philosophy and science, where their analytical nature excels. Historically, Aristotle praised this temperament in Problemata 30.1, associating melancholy with genius and noting that many outstanding philosophers, statesmen, and artists—such as Socrates and Plato—were melancholics, attributing their exceptional abilities to the stimulating effects of black bile when moderated. During the Renaissance, this view persisted, portraying melancholics as inspired visionaries capable of artistic and intellectual breakthroughs, as seen in the emblematic depictions of scholarly figures surrounded by books and instruments. Their loyalty manifests in steadfast relationships, while empathy allows for nuanced understanding of others' emotions. However, the melancholic temperament's challenges often overshadow these gifts, including pessimism, self-doubt, and a propensity for depression and anxiety, which can lead to social withdrawal and isolation. Robert Burton, in his 1621 work The Anatomy of Melancholy, detailed these weaknesses, portraying melancholics as afflicted by causeless fear and sorrow, perpetual cogitations that breed suspicion and despair, and a tendency toward solitariness that hinders social engagement. Behaviorally, they prefer solitude for reflection and thrive in detailed, meticulous work, yet are prone to overthinking, which exacerbates mood swings and links to imbalances in the spleen and kidneys affecting overall vitality. Burton viewed melancholy as both a disease and a source of inspiration, capable of driving individuals to madness if unchecked, but redeemable through self-awareness and remedies.

Phlegmatic Temperament

The phlegmatic temperament is characterized by a predominance of phlegm, the cold and wet humor in Galen's humoral theory, which corresponds to the water element and promotes a stable, passive disposition. Individuals with this temperament are typically calm, reliable, peaceful, and even-tempered, exhibiting thoughtful and controlled behaviors that prioritize harmony over action. However, they often display indecisiveness and a measured pace, reflecting the sluggish quality attributed to excess phlegm. Key strengths of the phlegmatic temperament include diplomatic mediation skills, patience, and consistency, making them effective in supportive roles where low stress levels foster endurance. Their reliability and calmness under pressure contribute to emotional stability, allowing them to maintain composure in challenging situations. Conversely, weaknesses such as passivity, resistance to change, and unassertiveness can lead to complacency or avoidance of necessary risks, potentially hindering personal initiative. Historically, Galen viewed the phlegmatic temperament as balanced when humors were in equilibrium, but an excess of phlegm was associated with health issues like respiratory congestion, brain-related disorders such as apoplexy, and overall sluggishness. In ancient Greco-Roman medicine, this temperament was perceived as apathetic with little propensity for excitation, contrasting sharply with more dynamic types. Behaviorally, phlegmatic individuals thrive in harmonious team environments, avoiding confrontation and contributing to group cohesion through their empathetic and patient nature, though they are often underestimated for their quiet steadiness. Unlike the high-drive choleric temperament, their low energy supports roles focused on maintenance and support rather than leadership.

Modern Interpretations

In Personality Psychology

In the 20th and 21st centuries, the classical four temperaments have been reinterpreted within personality psychology as innate predispositions influencing emotional reactivity and behavioral tendencies, often integrated with empirical models of trait dimensions. This shift emphasizes temperament as a biologically rooted foundation for broader personality development, distinct from learned behaviors shaped by environment and experience. Key theorists have mapped these temperaments onto modern frameworks, highlighting their role in understanding individual differences without relying on outdated humoral explanations. In the early 20th century, Rudolf Steiner, founder of anthroposophy, extended this in lectures such as The Four Temperaments (1909), describing temperaments as expressions of the interplay between physical, etheric, astral, and ego bodies, with the sanguine dominated by the astral (emotional and changeable), choleric by the ego (willful), melancholic by the physical (introspective), and phlegmatic by the etheric (steady). Steiner portrayed these as archetypal predispositions observable in childhood, guiding educational approaches to balance innate traits. Hans Eysenck's hierarchical model of personality, developed from the 1940s onward, explicitly linked his two primary dimensions—extraversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability—to the four temperaments, positing them as biologically determined via arousal levels in the brain's reticular activating system. Extraverts (high cortical arousal tolerance) align with sanguine and choleric types, while introverts (low tolerance) correspond to melancholic and phlegmatic; the neuroticism axis differentiates unstable (high emotional reactivity, choleric/melancholic) from stable (low reactivity, sanguine/phlegmatic) variants. Eysenck's work, supported by factor analyses of questionnaire data, viewed these quadrants as heritable temperamental cores underlying personality stability across the lifespan. Contemporary integrations often draw analogies between the temperaments and the Big Five model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism), treating them as composites of trait extremes rather than discrete types. For instance, the sanguine temperament is commonly associated with high extraversion and openness, reflecting sociable and exploratory tendencies; choleric with high extraversion and conscientiousness, indicating assertive goal-directedness; melancholic with high neuroticism and low extraversion, denoting introspective anxiety; and phlegmatic with high agreeableness and low neuroticism, suggesting calm cooperation.
TemperamentKey Big Five AssociationsDescription
SanguineHigh Extraversion, High OpennessOutgoing, optimistic, adaptable; seeks novelty and social stimulation.
CholericHigh Extraversion, High ConscientiousnessAmbitious, dominant, task-focused; driven by achievement.
MelancholicLow Extraversion, High NeuroticismThoughtful, sensitive, perfectionistic; prone to worry and depth.
PhlegmaticLow Extraversion, High AgreeablenessPeaceful, reliable, empathetic; prioritizes harmony and stability.
Post-2000 research has explored neurobiological underpinnings, correlating temperaments with neurotransmitter systems, though direct links to classical categories remain analogical. For example, extraverted traits akin to sanguine descriptions associate with elevated dopamine activity, facilitating reward-seeking and sociability, as evidenced in studies linking dopaminergic pathways to extraversion. These findings support temperament as a biological substrate, with heritability estimates of 20-60% from twin studies. A notable example is a 2018 study analyzing over 1.5 million participants, which empirically derived four broad personality types from Big Five data, echoing the ancient temperaments while emphasizing genetic and environmental influences. Empirical research has demonstrated the cross-cultural universality of core personality dimensions such as extraversion. This supports the view of temperament as an innate biological foundation, evident from infancy, distinct from more malleable personality aspects shaped by environment and experience.

In Type Theories and Assessments

The four temperaments have influenced several modern personality typing systems, particularly those emphasizing categorical assessments for practical applications. One prominent example is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), developed in the 1940s by Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers, which categorizes individuals into 16 types based on four dichotomies: Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving. David Keirsey's Temperament Sorter, building on MBTI in his 1978 book Please Understand Me, maps these types to four temperaments: Artisans (SP types, akin to Sanguine), Guardians (SJ types, akin to Phlegmatic), Idealists (NF types, akin to Choleric), and Rationals (NT types, akin to Melancholic). Specific associations include Sanguine with ESFP (outgoing performer), Choleric with INFP (reflective idealist), Melancholic with ENTJ (decisive commander), and Phlegmatic with ISTJ (steady inspector). In the self-help domain, Florence Littauer's 1983 book Personality Plus modernized the four temperaments for personal development, describing Sanguine as charismatic and sociable, Choleric as ambitious and leader-like, Melancholic as analytical and perfectionistic, and Phlegmatic as calm and supportive. Littauer included self-administered quizzes to identify primary and secondary temperaments, enabling readers to apply insights to relationships, communication, and self-improvement without professional oversight. Another analogous system is the DISC model, originating from William Moulton Marston's 1928 work Emotions of Normal People and formalized in assessments from the 1950s onward. It maps four behavioral styles to the temperaments: Dominance (D, corresponding to Choleric—assertive and results-oriented), Influence (I, Sanguine—persuasive and enthusiastic), Steadiness (S, Phlegmatic—patient and team-focused), and Compliance/Conscientiousness (C, Melancholic—detail-oriented and rule-abiding). This framework prioritizes observable behaviors in work settings over innate traits. Assessment methods for these temperament-derived systems typically rely on self-report questionnaires, such as forced-choice items or Likert scales, with some incorporating observational scales for clinical or team evaluations. Test-retest reliability varies but generally falls in the moderate-to-good range, with MBTI dichotomies showing coefficients of 0.70–0.85 over intervals of 1–5 weeks, and DISC scales achieving medians around 0.80–0.89 for similar periods. These tools, while useful for typing, face challenges in consistency due to situational influences on responses. Specific examples include online temperament sorters like the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, a free 70-item questionnaire that generates MBTI-aligned profiles for self-exploration. In career counseling, such assessments create temperament profiles to match individuals with suitable roles—for instance, recommending dynamic environments for Sanguine types or structured positions for Phlegmatic ones—to enhance job fit and satisfaction.

Applications and Usage

In Education and Personal Development

In Waldorf education, founded by Rudolf Steiner in 1919, the four temperaments serve as a foundational tool for tailoring instruction to individual students' needs, promoting holistic development during the elementary years (ages 7-14) when temperaments are most pronounced. Teachers observe and classify students' dominant temperaments—sanguine, choleric, phlegmatic, or melancholic—to adapt classroom activities, seating arrangements, and disciplinary approaches accordingly; for instance, choleric students, characterized by their energetic and leadership-oriented nature, are assigned challenging tasks and clear rules to channel their drive productively, while phlegmatic students benefit from structured routines and motivators to encourage initiative and overcome complacency. This temperament-based method fosters compassionate connections, balances classroom dynamics, and supports the harmonization of each child's unique qualities rather than suppressing them. Beyond formal schooling, the four temperaments inform personal development practices, particularly through self-awareness exercises that help individuals align goals with their innate strengths. In the 2008 book The Temperament God Gave Your Kids by Art and Laraine Bennett, parents and children engage in reflective activities to identify temperaments, enabling tailored motivation strategies such as encouraging sanguine individuals to pursue networking and social goals or guiding melancholics toward in-depth study and analytical pursuits. These approaches draw on classical temperament theory integrated with modern counseling to enhance family dynamics and personal growth, emphasizing discipline and love suited to each type. Classroom strategies incorporating the four temperaments extend to grouping students for collaborative projects based on complementary traits—such as pairing action-driven cholerics with steady phlegmatics—to optimize team performance and address weaknesses like low motivation in phlegmatics through predictable routines. The INSIGHTS program, an evidence-based intervention developed post-2010, trains teachers in recognizing four analogous temperaments (high-maintenance, industrious, shy/cautious, social/eager) via puppet-based activities that build empathy and problem-solving skills, allowing educators to customize interactions for better behavior management. Modern applications include teacher training workshops, such as those in the INSIGHTS curriculum, which since 2010 have equipped educators with temperament-sensitive tools for inclusive classrooms, and mobile apps like the Temperaments app that facilitate ongoing self-assessment for personal development. These resources support daily reflection on temperament influences, aiding users in tracking progress toward goals aligned with their personality. Outcomes from temperament-adapted learning demonstrate enhanced student engagement and academic retention; for example, INSIGHTS interventions have been shown in randomized controlled trials to improve attention, empathy, reading, and math scores by reducing disruptive behaviors and increasing participation, particularly for challenging temperaments. Waldorf practitioners report greater classroom harmony and individualized progress, contributing to overall emotional and cognitive growth without rigid labeling.

In Counseling and Organizational Settings

In counseling, the four temperaments theory informs therapeutic strategies by aligning interventions with clients' innate behavioral patterns, facilitating more effective treatment outcomes. For melancholic clients, who exhibit analytical, perfectionistic, and introspective traits, therapists often employ structured, detail-focused approaches that leverage these strengths while addressing tendencies toward self-criticism and moodiness. This matching enhances engagement and progress by providing the precision and privacy melancholics prefer in processing emotions. The theory also integrates with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to modify maladaptive traits rooted in temperament, such as the impulsivity of cholerics or the avoidance of phlegmatics, by targeting underlying beliefs and behaviors through personalized cognitive restructuring. In couples counseling, temperament assessments help identify compatibility and unmet needs, promoting relational reciprocity; research shows that partners who perceive their temperament-specific needs (e.g., emotional support for sanguines or logical validation for melancholics) as reciprocally met experience heightened marital intimacy, whereas unmet needs correlate with diminished connection and increased conflict. In organizational settings, adaptations of the four temperaments, such as the DISC model—where dominance aligns with choleric decisiveness, influence with sanguine sociability, steadiness with phlegmatic reliability, and conscientiousness with melancholic precision—guide hiring and role assignment to optimize person-job fit. Cholerics are frequently placed in management positions requiring assertiveness and goal orientation, while sanguines excel in sales roles demanding charisma, and phlegmatics in support functions emphasizing consistency and harmony. Balanced team composition incorporating diverse temperaments fosters complementary strengths, as evidenced by leadership training programs that recommend mixed profiles to enhance overall performance and adaptability. For conflict resolution, the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) is adapted to address temperament-based clashes, such as power struggles between choleric (dominant, task-focused) and melancholic (analytical, perfectionist) individuals, by promoting awareness of assertive versus cooperative styles. A study of human resources professionals using a temperament framework akin to the four types (via True Colors model) found that relationship-oriented "Blue" temperaments (paralleling phlegmatic/sanguine harmony-seeking) paradoxically favored task-oriented assertive modes like dominating in professional conflicts, underscoring the need for tailored training to mitigate internal tensions and improve resolution. Modern HR tools like DiSC-based programs further support this by equipping teams with strategies for productive dialogue, reducing interpersonal friction in diverse workplaces. Ethical considerations in applying temperament theory organizationally emphasize preventing stereotyping, particularly in diverse teams where overgeneralizing traits can perpetuate bias and undermine inclusion. Assessments must be administered with validation for fairness across demographics, avoiding deterministic labels that could influence hiring or promotions unjustly, as stereotypes in personality typing have been linked to discriminatory outcomes and reduced equity.

Criticisms and Limitations

Scientific and Empirical Critiques

The four temperaments theory, originating from ancient humoral concepts, is widely regarded as pseudoscientific in contemporary psychology due to the absence of empirical evidence supporting the notion that personality arises from imbalances in bodily fluids such as blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile. Modern biology attributes personality variations to polygenic factors and neurobiological processes rather than humoral imbalances; for instance, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 700 genes influencing temperament through mechanisms like associative conditioning, with heritability estimates for personality traits averaging around 40% based on twin and family studies. These genetic influences interact with environmental factors, underscoring the multifactorial nature of traits without reference to archaic fluid-based categories. Empirical investigations reveal low predictive validity for the four temperaments model, far inferior to dimensional frameworks. A meta-analysis of taxometric studies on personality constructs found that dimensional models fit the data five times more often than categorical (taxonic) ones, with most findings supporting continua over discrete types like the temperaments. Methodological flaws exacerbate this, as the theory's binary categorizations—such as choleric versus phlegmatic—ignore the continuous distribution of traits and incorporate cultural biases from original texts, including gender-based assumptions about emotional expression that do not hold in diverse populations. Reviews from the 2010s, including those mapping temperaments to Eysenck's dimensions, highlight better empirical support for trait-based models like the Big Five, where factors such as extraversion and neuroticism predict outcomes like job performance more reliably. Alternative explanations grounded in neuroscience further undermine the theory; for example, neuroimaging meta-analyses link neuroticism (analogous to melancholic traits) to heightened amygdala reactivity during emotion processing, reflecting polygenic and circuit-level influences rather than humoral dominance. Heritability meta-analyses confirm 40–60% genetic contributions to Big Five traits, with environmental modulation explaining the rest, aligning with dimensional rather than typological views. Recent critiques in the 2020s emphasize that AI-driven models, using machine learning on digital footprints to predict dimensional traits, outperform traditional typological assessments in accuracy and generalizability, as they capture nuanced continua without forced categorizations. As of 2025, large-scale GWAS have identified over 1,200 genetic variants associated with personality traits, explaining 4.8%–9.3% of variance and reinforcing polygenic models over categorical humoral theories.

Cultural and Ethical Considerations

The four temperaments theory, originating in ancient Greek humoral medicine, finds parallels in non-Western systems, such as Ayurveda's three doshas—Vata (air-like, associated with movement and creativity), Pitta (fire-like, linked to ambition and intensity), and Kapha (earth-water, tied to stability and calmness)—which similarly categorize individuals based on physiological and psychological balances to guide health and behavior. In Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Yin-Yang duality extends to four constitutional types in Sasang typology—Taeyang (originative and independent), Soyang (active and extroverted), Taeum (balanced and steady), and Soeum (passive and introverted)—mirroring the temperaments' emphasis on elemental forces influencing personality and well-being. These adaptations highlight how temperament-like frameworks have evolved globally, yet the Western model's dominance in modern psychology often leads to ethnocentrism, marginalizing indigenous perspectives and assuming cultural superiority in trait interpretations. Historically, the theory reinforced gender stereotypes, associating melancholic and phlegmatic temperaments—characterized by introspection and passivity—with femininity, while choleric and sanguine types—marked by assertiveness and sociability—were deemed masculine, thereby justifying social roles that limited women's access to leadership or intellectual pursuits. Class biases further embedded these ideas, with the melancholic temperament idealized among elites as a marker of intellectual genius and privilege, linked to Saturnine influences and scholarly pursuits, as seen in Renaissance texts portraying it as a "disease of fashion" for poets, princes, and philosophers. Such associations perpetuated hierarchies, positioning melancholics as refined thinkers while dismissing other temperaments as suited to lower social strata. In contemporary applications, ethical concerns arise from the risk of discrimination in temperament-based assessments, particularly when labeling children early, which can stigmatize them as inherently "difficult" or "unmotivated" and limit educational opportunities without considering environmental factors. This practice promotes fatalism by implying fixed traits over malleable growth, contrasting with evidence-based mindsets that emphasize development through effort and support. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have scrutinized typology rigidity, arguing that such categorical models hinder inclusivity by reinforcing stereotypes and favoring dominant traits in hiring or team-building, often disadvantaging women, minorities, and introverted individuals. Decolonizing psychology calls for integrating global views, such as indigenous healing systems, to counter Western ethnocentrism and foster nuanced, evidence-based alternatives that prioritize cultural context over rigid classifications.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.