Hubbry Logo
Decommunization in UkraineDecommunization in UkraineMain
Open search
Decommunization in Ukraine
Community hub
Decommunization in Ukraine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Decommunization in Ukraine
Decommunization in Ukraine
Decommunization in Ukraine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Destruction of the statue of Lenin in Kyiv during the 1 December 2013 Euromaidan protests

Decommunization in Ukraine started during the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and expanded afterwards.[1] Following the 2014 Revolution of Dignity and beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian War, the Ukrainian government approved laws that banned communist symbols, as well as symbols of Nazism as both ideologies were deemed to be totalitarian.[2][3]

On 15 May 2015, President Petro Poroshenko signed a set of laws that started a six-month period for the removal of Soviet communist monuments (excluding World War II monuments) and renaming of public places that had been named after Soviet communists.[4][5] At the time, this meant that 22 cities and 44 villages were set to get new names.[6] Until 21 November 2015, municipal governments had the authority to implement this;[7] if they failed to do so, the oblasts had until 21 May 2016 to change the names.[7] If the settlement still kept its old name, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine could give a new name to the settlement.[7] Violation of the law carries a penalty of a potential media ban and prison sentences of up to five years.[8][9]

In the early stages of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, the Security Service of Ukraine reported that the Communist Party of Ukraine had been helping pro-Russian separatists and Russian proxy forces in the country.[10] In July 2015, the Ministry of the Interior stripped the Communist Party, the Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed), and the Communist Party of Workers and Peasants of their right to participate in elections and stated it was continuing court actions to end the registration of communist parties in Ukraine.[11] By December 2015, these parties had been banned, for involvement in violating Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, inciting a violent overthrow of the state, and supporting Russian proxy forces.[12] The Communist Party of Ukraine appealed the ban to the European Court of Human Rights.[13][14][15]

By 2016, 51,493 streets and 987 cities and villages were renamed (with either the restoration of their historic names or new names), and 1,320 Lenin monuments and 1,069 monuments to other communist figures removed.[16]

History

[edit]

Early unofficial reforms

[edit]

An unofficial decommunization process started in Ukraine after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the following independence of Ukraine in 1991.[1] Decommunization was carried out much more ruthlessly and visibly in the former Soviet Union's Baltic states and Warsaw Pact countries outside the Soviet Union.[17] Ukraine's first president after the country's 1991 independence from the Soviet Union, Leonid Kravchuk, had also issued orders aimed at "de-sovietisation" in the early 1990s.[1]

In the following years, although at a slow rate, historical monuments to Soviet leaders were removed in Ukraine.[1] This process went on much further in the Ukrainian-speaking western regions than in the industrialised, largely Russian-speaking eastern regions.[1] Decommunization laws were drafted in the Ukrainian parliament in 2002, 2005, 2009, 2011, and 2013, but they all failed to materialize.[18]

Post-Euromaidan reforms

[edit]
See also: Ukrainian decommunization laws
Pulling down the statue of Lenin in Kharkiv on 28 September 2014.

During and after Euromaidan, starting with the fall of the monument to Lenin in Kyiv on 8 December 2013, several Lenin monuments and statues were removed or destroyed by protesters.[5]

In April 2014, a year before the formal, nationwide decommunization process in Ukraine, local authorities removed and altered communist symbols and place names, as in Dnipropetrovsk.[19][20][21]

On 9 April 2015, the Ukrainian parliament passed legislation on decommunization.[22] It was submitted by the Second Yatsenyuk Government, banning the promotion of symbols of "Communist and National Socialist totalitarian regimes".[23][24] One of the main provisions of the bill was the recognition of the Soviet Union's regime as "criminal" and one that "pursued a state terror policy".[24] The legislation prohibits the use of communist symbols and propaganda and also bans all symbols and propaganda of national-socialism and its values and any activities of Nazi or fascist groups in Ukraine.[24] The ban applies to monuments, place and street names.[5] The ban does not apply to World War II monuments and when symbols are located in a cemetery.[5][8]

Expressing pro-communist views was not made illegal.[2] The ban on communist symbols did result in the removal of hundreds of statues, the replacement of street signs and the renaming of populated places including some of Ukraine's biggest cities like Dnipro.[5] The city administration of Dnipro estimated in June 2015 that 80 streets, embankments, squares, and boulevards would have to be renamed.[25] Maxim Eristavi of Hromadske.TV estimated late April 2015 that the nationwide renaming would cost around $1.5 billion.[18]

The legislation also granted special legal status to veterans of the "struggle for Ukrainian independence" from 1917 to 1991 (the lifespan of the Soviet Union).[23] The same day, the parliament also passed a law that replaced the term "Great Patriotic War" in the national lexicon with "World War II" from 1939 to 1945 (instead of 1941–45 as is the case with the "Great Patriotic War"),[23][26] a change of great significance.[27]

On 15 May 2015, President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko signed the Decommunisation Laws.[4] This started a six-month period for the removal of communist monuments and renaming of public places named after communist-related themes.[4]

Symbols of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (flag and emblem).

The Ukrainian decommunization law applies, but is not limited to:

The laws were published in Holos Ukrayiny on 20 May 2015; this made them come into force officially the next day.[28]

On 3 June 2015, the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory published a list of 22 cities and 44 villages subject to renaming.[6] By far most of these places were in the Donbas region in East Ukraine; the others were situated in Central Ukraine and South Ukraine.[6] Under the Decommunisation Laws the municipal governments had until 21 November 2015 to change the name of the settlement they govern.[7] For settlements that failed to rename, the provincial authorities had until 21 May 2016 to change the name.[7] If after that date the settlement still retained its old name the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine renamed the settlement.[7]

In a 24 July 2015 decree based on the decommunization laws, the Ukrainian Interior Ministry stripped the Communist Party of Ukraine, Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed) and Communist Party of Workers and Peasants of their right to participate in elections and it stated it was continuing the court actions (that started in July 2014) to end the registration of Ukraine's communist parties.[11][29]

On 30 September 2015, the District Administrative Court in Kyiv banned the parties Communist Party of Workers and Peasants and Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed); they both did not appeal.[30][31]

In October 2015, a statue of Lenin in Odesa was converted into a statue of Star Wars villain Darth Vader.[32]

On 16 December 2015, the Kyiv District Administrative Court validated the claim of the Ministry of Justice in full, banning the activities of the Communist Party of Ukraine.[12][33] The party appealed this ban at the European Court of Human Rights.[14]

The City Hall of Mykolaiv in 2006 (left) and 2017 (right). The star, reminiscent of the Soviet era Red star still visible in the 2006 picture, was replaced in November 2016 by the coat of arms of Ukraine.[34]

In March 2016, statues of Lenin, Felix Dzerzhinsky, Sergey Kirov and a Komsomol monument were removed or taken down in the eastern city of Zaporizhzhia.[35] The statue overlooking the Dnieper Hydroelectric Station (formerly named Lenin Dam) was the largest remaining Lenin statue in Ukraine.[35]

On 19 May 2016, the Ukrainian parliament voted to rename Ukraine's fourth-largest city Dnipropetrovsk to "Dnipro".[36] The renaming of various locations was signed into the law on 20 May 2016.[37][38]

The Ukrainian parliament declared in July 2016 that the new names of places in Crimea,[d] under full Russian control since the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea, "will enter force with the return of temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol under the general jurisdiction of Ukraine."[42]

In May 2017, 46 Ukrainian MPs, mainly from the Opposition Bloc faction, appealed to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to declare the 2015 decommunization laws unconstitutional.[43]

Director of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance Volodymyr Viatrovych stated in February 2018 that "De-communism in the context of depriving the symbols of the totalitarian regime has actually been completed".[44] Although according to him the city of Kyiv was lagging behind.[44]

In February 2019, the Central Election Commission of Ukraine refused to register the candidacy of (leader of Communist Party) Petro Symonenko for the 2019 Ukrainian presidential election due to the fact that the statute, name and symbolism of the Communist Party of Ukraine did not comply with the 2015 decommunization laws.[45] Symonenko appealed the decision, but the court of appeal confirmed decision of the Central Election Commission of Ukraine.

It was proposed that the oblast of Dnipropetrovsk would be renamed to "Sicheslav".[46]

On 16 July 2019, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine upheld the 2015 Ukrainian decommunization laws.[43]

On 7 November 2020 in the village Mala Rohan, an Emblem of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic was dismantled from the facade of a school.[47]

Reforms following the Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

On 27 April 2022 (during the Russian invasion of Ukraine), the 27-foot (8 m) Soviet-era bronze statue under the People's Friendship Arch in Kyiv, representing Russian–Ukrainian friendship, was removed by order of Mayor of Kyiv Vitali Klitschko.[48]

The Motherland Monument in Kyiv in 2002 with the Soviet emblem (left), and 2024 with the tryzub (right).

On 1 August 2023, the Soviet emblem was removed from the Motherland Monument (part of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War) in Kyiv.[49] Its replacement, the Ukrainian Trident, was fully installed on 23 August 2023 (the day before Independence Day of Ukraine).[50] The monument was also renamed to Mother Ukraine.[51]

On 24 October 2023 President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed Law No. 8263 that abolished the concept of urban-type settlements in Ukraine.[52] Law No. 8263 was meant to facilitate "de-Sovietization of the procedure for solving certain issues of the administrative and territorial system of Ukraine."[52]

On 30 January 2024, the governor of Lviv Oblast said that the region was the first in Ukraine to remove all of its communist-era monuments.[53]

Criticism

[edit]
The Ukrainian SSR emblem seen in top of the city hall in Kharkiv.

On 18 May 2015, the OSCE expressed concern that the laws could negatively impact the freedom of the press in Ukraine.[9] The OSCE also regretted what it perceived as a lack of opportunity of civil society to participate in public discussions about the laws.[9]

The Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group stated (in May 2015) the laws "(one of which) effectively criminalizes public expression of views held by many Ukrainians".[26][54]

On 18 December 2015, the Venice Commission stated that Ukraine's decommunization laws did not comply with European legislative standards.[55] It was in particular critical about the banning of communist parties.[55]

In April 2015, Russian lawmakers claimed that it was "cynical" to put communist and Nazi symbol on par with each other, and Russian-backed paramilitaries have condemned the law.[8] The then leader and head of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic Alexander Zakharchenko stated in late February 2016 that when renamed cities "return under our jurisdiction", they would be renamed to their pre-decommunized name.[56]

In his February 2022 Address concerning the events in Ukraine, Putin claimed that Ukraine's decommunization does not make any sense because "modern Ukraine was created by communist Russia, and specifically Lenin". Vitaly Chervonenko from the BBC noted how Putin's statement was a lie due to independent Ukrainian state formations of 1917–1920 and Kyiv's war with Lenin's Bolshevik government, whose purpose was to include Ukraine in Bolshevik Russia.[57]

Results

[edit]
See also: List of Ukrainian toponyms that were changed as part of decommunization in 2016 and Demolition of monuments to Vladimir Lenin in Ukraine
Former Soviet-era bas-reliefs at the Ukrainian House in Kyiv; removed in August 2016 (to comply with decommunization laws) and transferred to the Museum of Totalitarianism[58]

Since 16 December 2015 three communist parties are banned in Ukraine (the Communist Party of Ukraine, Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed) and Communist Party of Workers and Peasants).[30][14] The only party that appealed this ban was the Communist Party of Ukraine; this resulted in the court's decision to ban the Communist Party of Ukraine did not come into force.[citation needed] However, the April 2015 decommunization law contains a norm that allows the Ministry of Justice to prohibit the Communist Party from participating in elections.[citation needed]

Ukraine had 5,500 Lenin monuments in 1991, declining to 1,300 by December 2015.[59] More than 700 Lenin monuments were removed and/or destroyed from February 2014 (when 376 came down) to December 2015.[59] On 16 January 2017 the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance announced that 1,320 Lenin monuments were dismantled during decommunization.[60]

On 16 January 2017, the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance stated that 51,493 streets, squares and "other facilities" had been renamed due to decommunization.[60] By June 2016 there were renamed 19 raions, 27 urban districts, 29 cities, 48 urban-type settlements, 119 rural settlements and 711 villages. The fourth largest city was renamed from Dnipropetrovsk to Dnipro. In the second-largest city of Ukraine,[61] Kharkiv, more than 200 streets, 5 administrative raions, 4 parks and 1 metro station had been renamed by early February 2016.[62]

In all of 2016, 51,493 streets and 987 cities and villages were renamed, 25 raions were renamed and 1,320 Lenin monuments and 1,069 monuments to other communist figures removed.[16] In some villages Lenin statues were remade into "non-communist historical figures" to save money.[63] One of the most prominent examples was Lenin monument in Odesa, which was remade into the monument to Darth Vader.[64]

In February 2019, The Guardian reported that the two Lenin statues in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone were the only two remaining statues of Lenin in Ukraine, if not taking into account occupied territories of Ukraine.[65] In January 2021 "Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty" located three remaining Lenin statues in three (Ukrainian controlled) small villages.[66]

In January 2021, 24 Ukrainian streets were still named after former Russian cosmonaut and current United Russia member of the Russian State Duma Valentina Tereshkova (6 of them in parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia[e]), according to the 2015 decommunization laws they should have been renamed.[67] They were renamed in 2022. The last Lenin statue in Ukraine (excluding territories currently annexed by Russia or occupied by separatists) was demolished in Stari Troyany, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast on 27 January 2021.[68]

The director of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance Volodymyr Viatrovych stated in February 2018 that the then-still existing Soviet hammer and sickle on the shield of the Motherland Monument in Kyiv should be removed to comply with the country's decommunization laws and replace it with the Ukrainian trident,[44] which was subsequently done in 2023.

Memorial to the Cheka in Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine, 2023

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, many Lenin statues across Ukraine, which had been taken down by the Ukrainians in the preceding years, were re-erected by the Russians in the Russian-controlled areas.[69][70][71][72]

Polling

[edit]

A November 2016 poll, showed that 48% of respondents supported a ban on Communist ideology in Ukraine, 36% were against it and 16% were undecided. It also showed that 41% of respondents supported the initiative to dismantle all monuments to Lenin in the country, whereas 48% were against it and 11% were undecided.[73]

As of 8 April 2022, according to a poll by the sociological group Rating, 76% of Ukrainians support the initiative to rename streets and other objects whose names are associated with the Soviet Union and Russia after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[74][75]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Decommunization in Ukraine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Decommunization in Ukraine is the multifaceted policy of legislative prohibition, physical removal, and symbolic erasure of Soviet-era communist monuments, nomenclature, and ideological remnants, enacted to repudiate the totalitarian legacy of the and foster a distinct independent of Russian imperial and Bolshevik influences. On May 15, 2015, following the 2014 Revolution of Dignity and in response to and support for separatists in , President signed a package of four laws that equated communist and Nazi regimes as criminal, banned their symbols and , recognized Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and fighters as legitimacy-seeking patriots, and opened Soviet archives to public scrutiny. Implementation yielded the toppling of 1,320 Lenin statues and 1,069 other communist-era monuments, alongside the renaming of 987 settlements, 25 districts, and 51,493 streets by late 2016, with over 2,000 additional Soviet monuments dismantled in the ensuing years. Proponents argue these measures were causal necessities for causal realism in national resilience against revanchist threats, empirically severing ties to a regime responsible for mass atrocities like the famine-genocide, though critics, including international bodies such as the , contend the bans on "propaganda" risk overreach into free speech and academic inquiry, potentially stifling nuanced historical analysis amid hasty, uneven execution. The initiative, rooted in grassroots "Leninfall" actions from 2013-2014, intensified post-2022 full-scale Russian invasion, evolving into broader by targeting imperial Russian symbols and toponyms to preclude cultural subversion.

Historical Context

Soviet Legacy and Its Enduring Effects

The imposed communist ideology on through policies of mass repression and cultural engineering, most notoriously via the famine of 1932–1933, which killed an estimated 3.5 to 5 million as a result of deliberate grain requisitions, collectivization enforcement, and border closures that prevented food aid or escape. This engineered starvation targeted Ukraine's rural population and intelligentsia to crush resistance to Soviet control, with archival evidence revealing quotas for food seizure that exceeded harvests and internal directives prioritizing urban and Russian regions. Soviet suppressed recognition of the event's intentionality, framing it as a broader agricultural shortfall rather than a targeted assault on Ukrainian , a that persisted in official histories until the USSR's dissolution. Post-World War II, repression intensified with mass deportations and campaigns aimed at eroding Ukrainian distinctiveness. In May 1944, Soviet authorities forcibly relocated approximately 191,000 to 240,000 to , citing alleged Nazi collaboration, resulting in death rates of up to 46% during transit and exile due to inadequate provisions and harsh conditions. Concurrently, policies under leaders like and promoted Russian as the in , media, and administration, reducing Ukrainian-language publications to marginal levels—by the , over 80% of Ukrainian books faced censorship or Russified content—while purging cultural elites and closing Ukrainian-oriented institutions. These measures systematically diluted Ukrainian ethnic cohesion, fostering dependency on Moscow-centric narratives and infrastructure. After Ukraine's independence in 1991, Soviet legacies endured through physical symbols and institutional holdovers, with around 5,500 monuments to Vladimir Lenin dotting the landscape and thousands of streets, squares, and settlements retaining names honoring communist figures like Lenin, Stalin, or Bolshevik events such as the October Revolution. Former Soviet nomenklatura networks transitioned into post-independence elites, enabling pro-Russian orientations, as seen in Viktor Yanukovych's 2010–2014 presidency, which enacted laws expanding Russian as a regional language in eastern oblasts and delayed European integration in favor of Moscow-aligned economic ties. This incomplete purge of Soviet remnants cultivated nostalgia, particularly in Russified eastern regions like and , where surveys from 2013–2014 showed Soviet-era affinity—tied to memories of stability and shared "brotherhood" with Russia—correlating with 30–40% support for federalization or separatism amid the crisis, facilitating Russian-backed insurgencies and the 2014 annexation of Crimea. Such vulnerabilities stemmed from unaddressed causal chains: suppressed historical weakened national resilience, allowing ideological echoes to amplify external , as evidenced by higher pro-Russian mobilization in areas with dense Soviet symbology and continuity.

Early Post-Independence Initiatives (1991-2013)

Following Ukraine's declaration of independence on August 24, 1991, the banned the (CPU) on August 30, 1991, prohibiting its activities and confiscating its property amid widespread anti-communist sentiment after the failed Soviet coup attempt. This measure led to initial, albeit limited, removals of Lenin statues, primarily in western regions like Galicia and , where nearly 2,000 such monuments were demolished by the end of the . Enforcement remained uneven nationwide, as the CPU reemerged in reformed guises by the mid-, retaining organizational structures and political influence, particularly in eastern Ukraine. In the 2000s, efforts were sporadic and regionally divergent, with proactive measures in —where street renaming to eliminate Soviet toponyms began as early as 1990—contrasting sharply with stasis in the east and south under presidents (1994–2005) and (2010–2014). Central authorities under these pro-Russian leaning leaders provided little impetus for systematic removal of communist symbols, allowing Soviet-era monuments and narratives to persist and sustain divided regional loyalties. Yanukovych's administration, in particular, pursued policies rehabilitating Soviet figures like and downplaying events such as the , further entrenching communist iconography in public spaces. This political inertia, influenced by Moscow's ongoing sway over Ukraine's elite, limited national progress and preserved Soviet myths that equated communist symbols with cultural heritage in Russian-speaking areas. The pent-up public demand for surfaced dramatically in late 2013 during the protests, when demonstrators toppled the prominent Lenin statue in on December 8, initiating a wave of grassroots "Leninfall" actions across the country. This event highlighted the failure of prior tentative initiatives to address the enduring Soviet legacy, as thousands of monuments remained intact despite early western efforts, underscoring the need for more resolute central action amid rising civic activism against Yanukovych's .

Legislative and Policy Framework

The 2015 Package of Decommunization Laws

On April 9, 2015, the adopted a package of four laws aimed at condemning the legacies of totalitarian regimes and initiating processes, which President signed into law on May 15, 2015, with entry into force on May 21, 2015. The core legislation, Law No. 317-VIII "On condemning the communist and National Socialist (Nazi) totalitarian regimes in and prohibiting of their symbols," officially designated both the communist regime of 1917–1991 and the Nazi regime as criminal entities responsible for mass violations of , including against Ukrainians such as the famine of 1932–1933. This law banned public , denial of the regimes' criminal nature, and the use or dissemination of their symbols, including Soviet-era emblems and imagery, with penalties for violations; it specifically mandated the removal of monuments and memorials glorifying communist leaders or events (excluding those at military grave sites or memorials) by local authorities within six months, framing such actions as necessary to prevent the rehabilitation of ideologies incompatible with democratic principles. Complementing this, Law No. 316-VIII "On access to the archives of the repressive bodies of the communist totalitarian regime of 1917–1991" required the declassification and public accessibility of records from Soviet security organs, including the , , , and related entities, to enable examination of collaboration, repression, and personnel files. The law established procedures for , transfer to state archives, and restrictions on access only for reasons, with the empirical goal of exposing networks of former operatives and informants who retained influence in post-Soviet institutions, thereby facilitating accountability and reducing entrenched corruption tied to opaque Soviet-era loyalties. The package's purification mechanism, embodied in the related Law (Law No. 314-VIII "On the purification of power," adopted April 16, 2015, and signed June 10, 2015, but integrated into the decommunization framework), prohibited individuals who held senior positions in the (above departmental level), Soviet security services, or prosecutorial roles from occupying public office, judicial positions, or for periods of 5 to 10 years, depending on rank and involvement in repression. This vetting process, administered by a dedicated commission, targeted over 1 million potential officials, aiming to dismantle inherited authoritarian networks that empirical analyses linked to systemic graft and vulnerability to external manipulation, particularly from , by replacing them with personnel uncompromised by totalitarian affiliations. Collectively, these laws provided a legal basis for rejecting totalitarian inheritance through symbolic erasure, informational transparency, and personnel , justified by proponents as essential to sever causal chains of ideological and that perpetuated inefficiency and foreign leverage in Ukrainian ; however, implementation faced critiques for potential overreach on expression freedoms, though the measures prioritized empirical disruption of Soviet-derived power structures over unrestricted historical discourse.

Expansions and Related Measures Post-2015

Following the enactment of the 2015 decommunization laws, Ukraine pursued refinements to processes, particularly targeting judicial personnel with historical ties to Soviet-era structures or insufficient vetting. In 2019, the High Qualification Commission of Judges intensified evaluations under frameworks, disqualifying over 100 judges for integrity failures linked to pre-2014 affiliations, though critics noted incomplete coverage of communist collaborator archives. By 2021, parliamentary amendments expanded enforcement mechanisms, mandating cross-verification with declassified files for judicial appointments, aiming to purge residual Soviet influence amid broader anti-corruption drives. The 2022 Russian full-scale invasion prompted accelerated legal measures framing as , with presidential decrees streamlining toponymic changes to expedite security clearances in liberated areas. In April 2023, President signed Law No. 3236-IX, condemning and prohibiting of Russian imperial policy, including bans on symbols, memorials, and toponyms evoking the or Soviet era, with penalties for non-compliance extending to explicit efforts. This legislation responded to documented Russian tactics, where cultural and imperial narratives facilitated and territorial claims, as evidenced by pre-invasion invoking Soviet legacies to justify aggression. On September 19, 2024, the approved resolutions renaming 327 settlements and four districts bearing names tied to Russian imperial or Soviet heritage, such as those referencing tsars or Bolshevik figures, fulfilling mandates under the 2023 law and prioritizing national identity amid ongoing conflict. These expansions integrated with language policies, notably the 2019 Law on Ensuring the Functioning of the as the State Language, which restricted Russian in official domains to counter its instrumentalization in hybrid operations, where leveraged linguistic ties for and false narratives of . Post-2022 intensified, with quotas for Ukrainian in media and correlating to reduced penetration of Russian-sourced , as tracked by independent monitors.

Phases of Implementation

Informal Actions Pre-Euromaidan

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, amid the weakening of Soviet control, informal decommunization efforts emerged primarily in , where local activists and crowds dismantled Soviet monuments without central authorization. On September 14, 1990, in , over 50,000 residents surrounded and toppled the city's main Lenin statue, marking one of the earliest such grassroots actions. Similar demolitions occurred in nearby areas like Chervonohrad and that same year, driven by anti-Soviet movements that viewed these symbols as emblems of oppression. By the mid-1990s, these initiatives had removed the vast majority of Lenin statues in regions such as Galicia and , reflecting organic resistance in areas with strong historical grievances against Soviet rule. These actions persisted into the 2000s through local campaigns to erase Soviet iconography from public spaces, such as removing red stars and hammers-and-sickles from buildings in and oblasts, often organized by nationalist groups and civic associations. Parallel cultural efforts included the promotion of anti-communist literature and informal commemorations of events like the famine, which circulated samizdat-style publications and held unauthorized gatherings to challenge official Soviet historiography. However, these remained sporadic and under-resourced, lacking national coordination or legal backing, as central governments under presidents like prioritized political stability over confronting the Soviet legacy. The scope of these informal efforts was geographically limited to western Ukraine's more nationalist enclaves, where anti-Soviet sentiment was entrenched due to less intense and memories of resistance. In eastern and southern regions, pro-Russian elites and local authorities actively suppressed similar initiatives, preserving thousands of monuments and symbols to maintain ties with and avoid alienating Russian-speaking populations. This regional disparity underscored the state's reluctance to enforce nationally, allowing Soviet remnants to endure in areas dominated by former communist networks.

Formal Rollout and Leninfall (2015-2021)

Following the enactment of the four decommunization laws on May 20, 2015, Ukrainian local authorities launched a coordinated nationwide effort to dismantle Soviet monuments and rebrand toponyms, building on earlier informal removals by enforcing statutory deadlines for completion by 2016. This formal phase, often termed "Leninfall," involved systematic demolitions supervised by regional councils and the Institute of National Remembrance, prioritizing the removal of over 1,300 statues and busts of by mid-2016, alongside 1,069 other communist-era memorials. The campaign marked a shift from protests to bureaucratic processes, with demolitions documented via public inventories to ensure compliance across 24 oblasts, excluding contested areas. Toponymic reforms accelerated in parallel, with 987 settlements and 51,493 streets renamed in 2016 alone to excise Soviet nomenclature, such as replacing references to Bolshevik figures with historical Ukrainian or neutral terms. Notable examples included the redesignation of Dnipropetrovsk—named after Soviet official Hryhoriy Petrovsky—as on May 19, 2016, by parliamentary vote, reflecting the law's mandate to purge communist associations from major urban centers. Implementation relied on local commissions submitting proposals for central approval, resulting in over 52,000 total street changes by 2017, though logistical hurdles like archival reviews delayed some rural renamings until 2018. Efforts faced territorial limitations, as and separatist-held regions—annexed or occupied since —remained beyond Kyiv's jurisdiction, preventing removals there and concentrating activity in government-controlled areas. Financial burdens included equipment for demolitions and administrative processing, with critics noting unquantified but substantial local expenditures, though no comprehensive national tally was publicly audited by 2021. By 2017, the reduced prominence of Soviet symbols aligned with electoral data showing the Communist Party of Ukraine's support falling below 2% in local polls, down from 3.9% in 2014 parliamentary elections, prior to its formal ban on , 2015. This decline reflected both legal prohibitions and diminished public tolerance for communist iconography post-reforms.

Wartime Acceleration (2022 Onward)

The Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, launched on February 24, 2022, catalyzed an acceleration of decommunization measures, framing them as essential to dismantling imperial legacies that underpin Moscow's justification of the war as "" while Russia itself restores Soviet monuments in occupied territories. Ukrainian authorities linked these efforts to national resilience, arguing that removing Soviet symbols exposes the inconsistency in Russian rhetoric that equates Soviet history with anti-fascist heroism. In May 2022, shortly after the invasion's onset, the Ukrainian armed forces issued orders to rename all military units bearing Soviet-era designations, such as those honoring figures, to eliminate lingering communist nomenclature and align with national symbols. This was followed by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's signing of legislation on April 21, 2023, prohibiting the naming of geographic sites after Russian imperial or Soviet figures and events, which spurred widespread toponymic changes across regions. In , a focal point of , city councils proposed and implemented renamings of over 200 streets tied to Russian historical figures by mid-2025, replacing them with Ukrainian cultural or independence-themed names amid ongoing debates over implementation speed. Monument removals surged post-invasion, with over 10,000 Soviet-related statues, plaques, and memorials dismantled nationwide by late 2023, many in newly liberated eastern areas to preempt Russian reinstallation efforts. By 2025, extended to cultural , including the removal of propagandistic Soviet-era artworks from schools and public spaces, while non-ideological —such as utilitarian buildings without explicit communist —faced protection under heritage laws to balance erasure with preservation. These wartime initiatives correlated with heightened public support, as polls indicated 76% approval for renaming Soviet- or Russian-linked sites by April 2022, rising in liberated regions where exposure to Russian occupation reduced tolerance for nostalgic Soviet symbols and bolstered unified . In , support for hovered at 44% amid local divisions, yet the process advanced as a bulwark against separatist sentiments previously evident in polls from areas before their liberation.

Core Mechanisms and Processes

Monument and Symbol Removal

The removal of monuments and symbols constituted a central element of Ukraine's decommunization efforts, targeting physical embodiments of Soviet ideology such as statues of Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and other communist leaders, alongside red stars, hammers and sickles, and related iconography. These objects, numbering in the thousands, served as enduring visual propaganda reinforcing Soviet narratives of historical legitimacy and fraternal unity under communism. By 2020, over 2,000 such monuments had been dismantled nationwide, including 1,320 dedicated to Lenin alone, with an additional 1,069 statues to other communist figures removed. Implementation involved local authorities forming commissions to assess and execute removals, guided by the 2015 decommunization laws that mandated the eradication of communist symbols from public spaces within a six-month initial period starting May 15, 2015. Exceptions were permitted for items relocated to historical museums, preserving contextual study while prohibiting their display as ideological endorsements. Local bodies coordinated the physical dismantling, often recycling metals from the statues, which exceeded the pace of earlier informal actions during the 2014 Revolution known as "Leninfall." Peak activity occurred in 2015-2016, with 2,389 monuments and memorial signs addressed, surpassing activist-led efforts. Post-2022, following Russia's full-scale invasion, removals accelerated to include Soviet-era war memorials associated with the Great Patriotic War—the Soviet framing of its World War II victory over Nazism—viewed as symbols of Soviet occupation rather than solely anti-Nazi heroism, such as equestrian statues of commanders and symbolic elements like the on Kyiv's Motherland Monument, replaced with the Ukrainian in August 2023. These actions, building on decommunization efforts since 2015, targeted sites that had functioned as ritual spaces for Soviet nostalgia, particularly around commemorations. Empirical data indicate a decline in public engagement with such events; support for as a favorite holiday fell from 58% in 2010 to 37% by 2017, coinciding with and the holiday's rebranding as "Victory over in ," reflecting diminished ideological hold.

Toponymic and Institutional Renaming

Decommunization efforts in included the systematic renaming of toponyms and institutions bearing Soviet or Russian imperial connotations, as these names were seen to perpetuate symbols of subjugation that historically supported Moscow's territorial claims and cultural dominance over Ukrainian lands. The 2015 decommunization laws mandated local authorities to identify and replace such designations, prioritizing restorations of pre-Soviet Ukrainian historical names or honors for figures emblematic of national independence, while explicitly prohibiting tributes to Soviet leaders, Russian imperial rulers, or Nazi collaborators. By mid-2016, the process had resulted in the renaming of over 51,000 streets, alongside 987 settlements including cities, towns, and villages, often reverting to indigenous or pre-20th-century to underscore Ukrainian independent of Russocentric narratives. A prominent example occurred on July 14, 2016, when the approved changing Kirovohrad—named after Bolshevik —to , honoring Ukrainian theater director Marko Kropyvnytskyi, thereby erasing a direct link to Soviet policies. Institutional renamings followed suit, targeting entities like administrative districts and public buildings tied to communist , with decisions vested in parliamentary committees to ensure alignment with national historical canons excluding totalitarian glorification. The Russian invasion from 2022 intensified this phase, shifting emphasis toward derussification by targeting toponyms evoking Russian imperial expansion, such as those derived from tsarist-era settlements or etymologies implying subordination to Moscow. Between March 2022 and May 2024, approximately 7,800 toponyms across 83 major cities were altered, with at least 650 more pending, reflecting accelerated local initiatives amid wartime imperatives to dismantle irredentist markers. Parliament formalized batches of these changes, including a September 19, 2024, resolution renaming 327 settlements and four districts linked to Russian imperial or Soviet heritage, followed by another 165 localities on June 5, 2025, to further excise propagandistic elements embedded in geographic identities. These renamings have demonstrably contributed to a redefined national , diminishing the visibility of exogenous imperial legacies that previously facilitated Russian narratives of shared "historical space" and hybrid territorial justifications. However, implementation has entailed logistical burdens, including administrative costs for updates, mapping revisions, and postal adjustments, alongside transient public disorientation in and record-keeping, particularly in rural areas where habitual Soviet-era addresses persisted. Critics have noted occasional haste leading to inconsistent application, though empirical patterns show higher compliance in western and central regions, correlating with stronger pre-existing aversion to Russified .

Lustration, Archival Declassification, and Personnel Vetting

The process in , formalized under the Law on Cleansing adopted on September 16, 2014, and effective from October , mandates verification of public officials who held positions during the Yanukovych era or had affiliations with Soviet-era structures, including membership or collaboration. Individuals found to have persecuted protesters, suppressed , or served as agents face a 10-year ban from public office, while other categories, such as senior Yanukovych appointees, incur a 5-year . The oversees implementation, supported by an advisory Civic Lustration Council comprising representatives to review complaints and ensure transparency. By late , the process had subjected over 86,000 public service positions to initial checks, resulting in the dismissal of dozens of senior officials, though broader enforcement faced delays due to legal challenges and resistance from entrenched elites seeking to retain influence. Personnel vetting expanded to the and prosecutorial services through complementary reforms, including the 2014 Law on Restoring Trust in the , which initiated qualification assessments for judges involved in politically motivated rulings or regime loyalty. Post-2019 judicial reforms, amid the launch of the High Court, intensified scrutiny of judges and prosecutors for past abuses, with criteria applied to exclude those with ties or Euromaidan suppression records, affecting approximately 5% of the by incorporating integrity checks beyond mere professional exams. These measures aimed to dismantle networks capable of recycling authoritarian practices, though incomplete coverage—sparing many lower-level holdovers—and elite pushback limited systemic purge, as evidenced by ongoing scandals in unvetted sectors. Archival declassification advanced via the April 2015 Law on Access to the Archives of Repressive Bodies, transferring KGB-era files from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) to public domain under the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, enabling disclosure of millions of documents on Soviet repressions, informants, and collaborators. This has facilitated identification of historical perpetrators, supporting criminal investigations into collaboration, such as treason cases tied to Soviet-era networks, and providing empirical evidence for vetting decisions by cross-referencing official biographies with agent files. While enhancing accountability—evident in exposed KGB operations influencing post-independence elites—the process encountered hurdles like incomplete digitization and wartime destruction of regional SBU holdings, underscoring gaps in enforcement despite causal links to reduced influence of compromised personnel in state institutions. Overall, these mechanisms have yielded partial success in curbing corruption proxies, with vetted sectors showing improved integrity metrics per transitional justice analyses, though persistent elite entrenchment highlights the need for stricter adherence to prevent authoritarian recidivism.

Societal Reception and Empirical Outcomes

Public Opinion Polling and Regional Variations

Public opinion polls conducted between 2015 and 2020 indicated mixed national support for measures, typically ranging from 50% to 60% approval for initiatives like monument removal and renaming, with stronger backing in exceeding 80% and comparatively lower levels in eastern and southern regions around 40-50%. These variations reflected lingering regional differences in historical memory, with showing intermediate support, such as no more than one-third fully endorsing the process in local surveys from Kirovohrad and oblasts. Demographic trends favored younger respondents, who consistently expressed greater approval than older cohorts, as evidenced by cross-regional data from the Razumkov Centre. Following 's full-scale in 2022, support surged, with polls from the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation (DIF) and Razumkov Centre in 2022 recording 59% national approval for condemning the USSR as a totalitarian , a 25 increase from 2020 levels. Similarly, 57% backed renaming streets associated with , the , or the in the same survey, while a May 2023 Razumkov poll found 87% rejecting any restoration of the . These figures, corroborated across multiple institutes including the International Institute of Sociology (KIIS), demonstrated a convergence toward majority consensus, with opposition declining by up to 19 points post-invasion. Regional disparities persisted but narrowed amid wartime shifts, as eastern support for renaming rose to 44% (versus 24% opposition) and southern approval for USSR condemnation reached 25%, though the latter remained more divided with 27% opposition. maintained the highest endorsement at around 67% for related measures, while central areas hovered near 59%, per DIF-Razumkov . Age gaps amplified these trends, with 70-72% of those aged 18-30 viewing the USSR's collapse positively, compared to over 50% support but 20% opposition among those over 60 for condemnation.
Poll DateOrganizationKey MeasureNational SupportRegional Notes
August 2022DIF/RazumkovUSSR condemnation as totalitarian59%East: rising to 43% on related; South: 25% support, 27% oppose
August 2022DIF/RazumkovStreet renaming (Russia/USSR-linked)57%West/Center high; East 44%, South 27%
May 2023RazumkovReject Soviet Union restoration87%Broad consensus, minimal regional breakdown reported
Methodological consistency across face-to-face and telephone surveys from DIF, Razumkov, and KIIS minimized self-reporting biases through representative sampling excluding occupied territories, enabling reliable trend verification despite wartime challenges.

Measurable Impacts on National Cohesion and Russian Influence

Decommunization initiatives, particularly the removal of Soviet monuments and renaming of over 50,000 toponyms by 2016, have coincided with a substantial strengthening of Ukrainian national identity, evidenced by longitudinal surveys showing self-identification as primarily Ukrainian rising from 62% in 2010 to 68% in 2015 and exceeding 90% in western and central regions by 2024. This upward trend accelerated post-Euromaidan and wartime phases, with civic-national identity surging from 45.6% in pre-2022 polls to 84.6% amid intensified decommunization, reflecting a causal link wherein symbolic detachment from Soviet heritage fostered unified identity formation over regional or ethnic fragmentation. The policy's role in eroding Soviet nostalgia has further bolstered cohesion, as decommunization laws banning communist symbols in 2015 promoted historical reckoning that diminished attachments to USSR-era narratives, with surveys post-2014 indicating reduced positive views of Soviet times in favor of independent Ukrainian narratives. This shift has measurably weakened Russian , evidenced by the electoral collapse of pro-Russian parties; the , which secured 13.15% of the vote in 2012 parliamentary elections, was banned in 2015 and garnered less than 1% in subsequent fragmented iterations, rendering such entities marginal and curtailing platforms for hybrid influence operations. Geopolitically, has enhanced resilience against , with renamed regions in —such as Dnipropetrovsk to in 2016—exhibiting fewer localized pro-separatist mobilizations post-renaming compared to pre-2015 baselines, as archival declassifications under processes exposed KGB-era collaborations, aiding accountability and preempting revanchist narratives. Economic analyses attribute negligible macroeconomic disruption to renaming efforts, with no discernible GDP drag amid broader post-2015 growth trajectories, allowing cultural to prioritize long-term societal resilience over short-term costs. By 2025, reports frame this as pivotal to identity-driven resistance, correlating with heightened national unity that has sustained defense against invasion without proportional increases in internal divisions.

Controversies and Debates

Pro-Decommunization Rationales and Evidence of Benefits

![Protesters hammering down Lenin monument][float-right] Decommunization addresses the causal persistence of totalitarian legacies, which enable revanchist actors like to exploit narratives of shared Soviet history for influence and aggression. Soviet symbols, including thousands of Lenin statues erected across , functioned as perpetual reminders of subjugation, psychologically conditioning populations to accept external dominance and hindering the formation of independent . By systematically removing these markers, disrupted the mechanisms through which projected weakness onto , thereby strengthening perceptual and institutional . Empirical outcomes demonstrate tangible benefits in reduced and enhanced national cohesion. Post-2015 decommunization laws facilitated the dismantling of over 1,300 Lenin monuments and renaming of more than 50,000 streets and villages, correlating with electoral declines in support for Soviet-legacy parties, such as the , whose parliamentary representation fell from 12% in 2010 to effective dissolution by 2015. Academic analyses confirm that monument removals had real political consequences, weakening pro-Russian electoral blocs in affected regions and fostering a break from victimhood cycles tied to Soviet glorification. During the 2022 Russian invasion, 's prior achievements manifested in heightened wartime unity, as drew on reclaimed pre-Soviet histories to resist imperial , evidenced by widespread rejection of Russian narratives and sustained public mobilization. Comparative cases, such as Poland's early 1990s and decommunization integrated with economic reforms, yielded resilient institutions less prone to oligarchic capture, illustrating that Ukraine's reforms, though delayed, similarly fortified resistance to hybrid threats by purging communist-era personnel and symbols.

Criticisms from Domestic and International Sources

Domestic critics have described the efforts as chaotic and hasty, resulting in unprofessional renaming processes and decisions that overlooked nuanced historical contexts beyond overt . These shortcomings were attributed to rushed legislative timelines post-2014, exacerbating administrative burdens on local governments. Financial estimates for nationwide toponymic changes alone reached approximately $236 million, according to former Ukrainian tax minister Oleksandr Klimenko, drawing complaints of resource diversion from pressing economic needs. In , where Soviet-era legacies retained stronger sentimental attachment among older populations, regional backlash manifested in protests against monument removals and renamings, with opponents arguing the measures alienated Russophone communities and deepened east-west divides. Such sentiments, often rooted in pro-Soviet sympathies, highlighted fears of cultural erasure rather than reconciliation with totalitarian pasts. Internationally, the and OSCE/ODIHR issued a 2015 joint interim opinion critiquing the decommunization laws for insufficient safeguards on freedom of expression, particularly in blanket prohibitions on communist symbols that could infringe on historical discourse without adequate proportionality. The advisory body recommended revisions to align with European standards, noting risks to democratic pluralism. Russian state media amplified these as evidence of "Nazi" policies, framing decommunization as ultranationalist revisionism to justify aggression, though such portrayals were widely recognized as propagandistic distortions. Cultural heritage advocates in 2024 raised concerns over the fate of Soviet modernist , such as Kyiv's iconic structures, arguing that demolitions risked irreplaceable aesthetic and historical value amid wartime destruction, even as proponents weighed ongoing associations. Activists successfully lobbied for protections on sites like the Zhytniy Market, emphasizing preservation against "blind fury" toward Moscow-linked eras. Despite assertions of widespread or division, empirical observations noted no large-scale unrest, with regional variations in support challenging claims of uniform backlash.

Relativist Historical Narratives and Their Rebuttals

Relativist historical narratives, often advanced in academic and media circles, posit that Soviet communism and represent equivalent totalitarian evils, thereby discouraging targeted decommunization efforts in as overly selective or propagandistic. Proponents argue that "all histories are complex," framing the as a mere byproduct of collectivization rather than a deliberate , and dismissing calls for its recognition as nationalist revisionism that ignores Ukrainian collaboration with Nazis. Such views downplay Soviet crimes by emphasizing , suggesting that equating communist symbols with unique culpability risks "whataboutism" toward fascist atrocities. These narratives falter against empirical data on scale and duration: Soviet policies caused an estimated 3.5–5 million Ukrainian deaths in the 1932–1933 alone, part of broader repression totaling over 10 million Ukrainian victims across famines, purges, and deportations from 1920 to 1950s, dwarfing the 1.5 million Jewish victims of Nazi "" in during three years of occupation (1941–1944). Unlike the Nazis' explicit racial extermination, Soviet archival records—declassified post-1991—reveal intentional targeting of Ukrainian , including village blacklists, quotas amid , and executions of intellectuals to quash national resistance, confirming genocidal beyond mere policy failure. Critics of often mirror Russian state rhetoric, normalizing Putin's "anti-fascist" framing of the 2022 invasion as while Soviet symbols in implicitly endorse Moscow's claims to historical continuity over Ukrainian lands. This bias, prevalent in Western academia's reluctance to equate 's body count (100 million globally per declassified estimates) with fascism's, stems from ideological legacies downplaying leftist regimes' crimes, as seen in delayed recognitions compared to . Rebuttals grounded in causal —Soviet longevity enabled systemic demographic engineering absent in Nazi brevity—underscore 's necessity to excise symbols tied to unrepented aggression, not relativized "complexity."

Long-Term Results and Future Prospects

Achievements in Historical Reckoning

has enabled to systematically dismantle Soviet-era symbolic infrastructure, with over 2,000 monuments to communist figures removed in the initial implementation phase following the 2015 laws, achieving near-total clearance of such commemorations by 2018. This physical reckoning extended to broader de-Sovietization, including the redesignation of 2,389 monuments and related sites by 2020, fostering a environment unburdened by glorification of totalitarian figures. Toponymic reforms represent a comprehensive overhaul of inherited , with more than 51,000 streets, squares, and other objects renamed between and , alongside 991 settlements, culminating in adherence to mandates prohibiting Soviet and imperial references by 2025. These changes, enforced through parliamentary resolutions and local commissions, have reclaimed urban landscapes for national symbols, such as historical figures and independence-era events, thereby embedding a of over one of subjugation. Lustration and archival efforts have exposed extensive collaboration networks, with over 480,000 screenings conducted by 2011 to vet officials for communist-era ties, laying groundwork for institutional transparency and barring former regime affiliates from public roles. Building on this, post-2015 decommunization integrated condemnation of the Soviet totalitarian regime into legal frameworks, facilitating public acknowledgment of atrocities like the as deliberate genocide, which has permeated educational curricula and commemorative practices. Among younger , these initiatives correlate with diminished Soviet nostalgia, as surveys indicate stronger endorsement of democratic governance and rejection of authoritarian legacies compared to regional peers, evidenced by preferences for integration and low affinity for Russian geopolitical narratives. This generational pivot has fortified cultural resilience, with polls showing 91% negative views of by 2025, underscoring decommunization's role in cultivating a truthful, independent historical .

Persistent Challenges and Unresolved Issues

Despite legislative mandates, processes in remain incomplete in the , where of former communist-era officials has faced execution challenges including insufficient institutional capacity and legal ambiguities, as noted in analyses of post-2014 reforms. These gaps persist amid wartime priorities, limiting comprehensive personnel screening beyond . In Russian-occupied territories such as parts of , , , and oblasts, efforts have been systematically reversed since 2022, with occupying forces restoring Soviet monuments, reinstating communist toponyms, and enforcing that glorifies the USSR to undermine Ukrainian . This includes bans on Ukrainian-language education starting September 1, 2025, in occupied schools, effectively nullifying prior removals of Soviet symbols and narratives. Cultural decommunization encounters tensions in preserving Soviet-era architectural heritage while excising propagandistic elements, exemplified by 2024 campaigns to designate modernist buildings—such as those from the 1960s-1980s—as protected sites to prevent blanket demolitions under decommunization laws. These efforts highlight unresolved debates over utilitarian structures' historical value versus their association with totalitarian , with exceptions for listed heritage complicating uniform enforcement. The ongoing full-scale invasion exacerbates resource strains, with war fatigue manifesting in economic hardships and migration that challenge sustained public engagement, potentially eroding decommunization gains without continuous reinforcement. Educational initiatives require bolstering to counter disruptions affecting nearly two million children as of 2025, ensuring long-term internalization of revised historical narratives amid humanitarian needs projected at 12.7 million people.

References

  1. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/ukraines-decommunization-laws-legislating-the-past
  2. https://ukraineworld.org/en/articles/russian-aggression/ukraines-de-communization-pros-and-cons
  3. https://voxukraine.org/en/de-communization-laws-need-to-be-amended-to-conform-to-european-standards
  4. https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-society/2147127-decommunization-reform-25-districts-and-987-populated-areas-in-ukraine-renamed-in-2016.html
  5. https://trafo.hypotheses.org/60892
  6. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282015%29041-e
  7. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/letter-experts-worry-that-decommunization-laws-curtail-free-speech/
  8. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2022-06-17/ukraine-decommunisation-to-derussification
  9. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/wp-content/uploads/attachments/Pepm411_Shevel_Jan2016-1.pdf
  10. https://www.history.com/articles/ukrainian-famine-stalin
  11. https://cla.umn.edu/chgs/holocaust-genocide-education/resource-guides/holodomor
  12. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29089/w29089.pdf
  13. https://openpress.digital.conncoll.edu/beingukraine/chapter/chapter-3/
  14. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/crimean-tatars-and-russification
  15. https://theconversation.com/do-claims-that-crimean-tatars-are-worse-off-under-putin-than-stalin-stand-up-an-expert-examines-the-evidence-217333
  16. https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CR%5CU%5CRussification.htm
  17. https://kyivindependent.com/how-russia-has-attempted-to-erase-ukrainian-language-culture-throughout-centuries/
  18. https://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/what-happened-to-ukraines-5500-lenin-statues/
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Number-and-share-of-Soviet-geographical-street-names-renamed-after-1991_fig2_345807461
  20. https://kyivindependent.com/viktor-yanukovych-ukraines-scandal-ridden-ex-president/
  21. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putins-ukraine-obsession-began-20-years-ago-with-the-orange-revolution/
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323787576_Who_supported_separatism_in_Donbas_Ethnicity_and_popular_opinion_at_the_start_of_the_Ukraine_crisis
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967067X19300017
  24. https://harriman.columbia.edu/researching-public-opinion-in-eastern-ukraine/
  25. https://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/58837
  26. https://www.gis.huri.harvard.edu/revolt-center
  27. https://babel.ua/en/texts/110325-33-years-ago-the-communist-party-was-first-banned-in-ukraine-but-the-communists-quickly-returned-and-hardly-turned-their-coats-that-s-how-it-was
  28. https://veche.kiev.ua/en/open/4753/
  29. https://archive.kyivpost.com/article/opinion/op-ed/yanukovych-stalin-and-the-ukrainian-famine-65982.html
  30. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/escape-from-empire-ukraines-post-soviet-national-awakening/
  31. https://www.gis.huri.harvard.edu/lenin-falls
  32. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/toppling-lenin-the-lessons-of-ukraines-memory-wars/
  33. https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-poroshenko-decommunization-law/27019045.html
  34. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF%282015%29045-e
  35. https://www.osce.org/fom/158581
  36. https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=78092
  37. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2015/04/21/russia-will-cover-up-stalinist-crimes
  38. https://khpg.org/en/1450571329
  39. https://dejure.foundation/en/judicial-reform-in-ukraine-what-has-changed-for-the-last-three-years/
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367841143_Judicial_reforms_in_Ukraine_polishing_procedures_and_their_systemic_role
  41. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/22/7398957/
  42. https://euromaidanpress.com/2023/04/23/ukraine-adopts-law-that-condemns-russian-imperial-policy-and-decolonizes-toponyms/
  43. https://spravdi.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/russias-hybrid-war-against-ukraine.pdf
  44. https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-parliament-votes-to-rename-over-300-settlements/
  45. https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/09/19/ukrainian-parliament-renames-327-towns-to-break-away-from-the-soviet-heritage/
  46. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2025/03/04/odesas-true-identity-countering-russian-propaganda-and-imperialist-myths/
  47. https://voxukraine.org/en/not-the-right-time-fact-checking-politicians-statements-on-derussificat
  48. https://europebetweeneastandwest.wordpress.com/2015/12/07/lenin-leaves-lviv-from-beginning-to-unending-decommunization-in-ukraine-lviv-the-story-of-a-city-in-ukraine-5/
  49. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ukraine-has-finally-removed-all-1320-lenin-statues-our-turn/2017/08/25/cd2d5b06-89ae-11e7-961d-2f373b3977ee_story.html
  50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48694960
  51. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Vlasenko_paper_23Apr2019.pdf
  52. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/decommunization-in-post-euromaidan-ukraine-law-and-practice/
  53. https://www.gis.huri.harvard.edu/center-rules
  54. https://cepa.org/article/ukraine-where-the-streets-have-new-names/
  55. https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-renames-dnipropetrovsk-dnipro/27745215.html
  56. https://en.belsat.eu/84418402/how-and-why-russia-is-rebuilding-lenins-monuments-in-occupied-ukrainian-territories
  57. https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-international/ap-wartime-ukraine-erasing-russian-past-from-public-spaces/
  58. https://providencemag.com/2023/09/do-russian-and-soviet-monument-removals-in-ukraine-matter/
  59. https://www.dw.com/en/goodbye-ussr-former-communist-states-dismantle-the-past/a-62853233
  60. https://www.firstpost.com/world/ukraine-president-zelensky-signs-law-banning-place-names-connected-with-russian-12491162.html
  61. https://en.apa.az/europe/zelensky-inks-law-banning-russian-place-names-in-ukraine-401567
  62. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/28/removing-statues-and-renaming-streets-odesa-cuts-out-russia
  63. https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-odesas-push-to-erase-russian-names-monuments/a-71677529
  64. https://odessadaily.net/en/services/news-673
  65. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/93377/7/Costarelli-HWP-IV-2025-Ukraines-nation-building-amid-war-and-displacement.pdf
  66. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/04/ukraine-campaign-de-russify-odesa
  67. https://www.e-ir.info/2023/12/14/opinion-ambivalence-on-ukraines-de-communisation-process/
  68. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/85076/ssoar-balticreg-2022-4-filev_et_al-Dismantling_monuments_as_the_core.pdf?sequence=1
  69. https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-kyiv-soviet-statue-shchors-225e793b49dce4929bfc80f2d5155225
  70. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/07/europe/kyiv-statue-motherland-trident-symbol-intl
  71. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/point-view/2017-09-13/great-decommunisation-ukraines-wartime-historical-policy
  72. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/here-s-how-ukraine-should-remember-victory-day/
  73. https://uacrisis.org/en/breaking-chains-ukraine-s-cultural-decolonization-2
  74. https://ti-ukraine.org/en/blogs/ready-set-go-decolonization-how-new-law-changes-public-spaces-of-ukraine/
  75. https://transparentcities.in.ua/en/articles/protystoiannia-z-imperiieiu-yak-ukrainski-mista-ostanni-dva-roky-pereimenovuvaly-toponimy
  76. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2016/07/14/7114702/
  77. https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/unian-sweeping-out-soviet-past-kirovohrad-renamed-kropyvnytsky-418670.html
  78. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2025/07/08/the-fight-for-a-letter-how-ukraine-is-removing-russias-imperial-legacy/
  79. https://decentralization.ua/en/news/19676
  80. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/28/friends-no-longer-ukraine-removes-russian-statues-and-street-names
  81. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF%282014%29046-e
  82. https://e-jlia.com/index.php/jlia/article/download/152/139/281
  83. https://www.jtl.columbia.edu/bulletin-blog/developments-in-ukrainian-lustration-1
  84. https://uacrisis.org/en/11749-ukraine-justice-minister-introduces-civic-lustration-council
  85. https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/7029%2Creport-purification-of-government-or-vetting-ukrainian-style-the-first-years-experience/
  86. https://euromaidanpress.com/2016/06/02/yanukovych-regime-aims-to-recover-wages-war-on-ukraines-lustration/
  87. https://binghamcentre.biicl.org/documents/2210_anticor_1_final.pdf
  88. https://www.batory.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Reforming-Justice-in-Ukraine.pdf
  89. https://ecfr.eu/publication/guarding_the_guardians_ukraine_security_and_judicial_reforms_under_zelensky/
  90. https://hiddengalleries.eu/digitalarchive/s/en/item-set/418
  91. https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/11/05/what-makes-russian-spies-tick-worlds-largest-declassified-kgb-archive-in-ukraine-tells-all/
  92. https://creees.stanford.edu/events/archives-war-sbu-archives-during-russu-ukrainian-war
  93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/statecrime.6.1.0055
  94. https://www.jurist.org/features/2023/02/09/preventing-political-corruption-via-lustration-the-ukrainian-experience/
  95. https://dif.org.ua/en/article/how-the-attitude-of-ukrainians-to-decommunization-ukrainian-orthodox-church-moscow-patriarchate-and-nationalism-is-transforming-amid-the-russian-war-against-ukraine
  96. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-is-finally-freeing-itself-from-centuries-of-russian-imperialism/
  97. https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports
  98. https://razumkov.org.ua/en/research-areas/surveys/the-identity-of-ukraine-s-citizens-trends-of-change-june-2024
  99. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1131&page=1
  100. https://e-jlia.com/index.php/jlia/article/view/870
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369133328_THE_INFLUENCE_OF_THE_DECOMMUNIZATION_POLICY_ON_SHAPING_UKRAINIAN_NATIONAL_IDENTITY
  102. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/six-years-after-crimea-outlook-russia-friendly-political-establishment-ukraine
  103. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2012-11-07/after-parliamentary-elections-ukraine-a-tough-victory-party-regions
  104. https://www.csis.org/blogs/post-soviet-post/dnipropetrovsk-dnipro-decommunization-ukraine-context
  105. https://brill.com/view/journals/joah/4/1-2/article-p149_11.xml?language=en
  106. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/28/what-the-west-can-learn-from-ukraines-treatment-of-soviet-monuments-384314
  107. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/718210
  108. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2015/6/1/ukraines-anti-communist-laws-stir-controversy
  109. https://jpinyu.com/2016/03/27/looking-back-in-anger-the-dangers-of-ukraines-decommunization-law/
  110. https://www.asser.nl/research/publications/asser-verfassungsblog-joint-online-symposia/memory-laws-symposium/blog-post-7-decommunization-in-times-of-war-ukraine-s-militant-democracy-problem/
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/12/casual-decommunisation-seeking-to-save-ukraines-soviet-era-modernist-masterpieces
  112. https://kyivindependent.com/under-pressure-from-activists-kyiv-moves-to-protect-iconic-soviet-era-market/
  113. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2022/05/12/ukraine-the-suppressed-tragedy-of-the-great-famine-of-1932-1933_5983239_4.html
  114. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/ukraine-holocaust
  115. https://holodomormuseum.org.ua/en/resolution-of-the-court/
  116. http://eehb.dspu.edu.ua/article/view/226565
  117. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60353677
  118. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/jacobson/1983/xx/communism.htm
  119. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09668130701291899
  120. https://www.radiolemberg.com/en/ua-articles/ua-allarticles/decommunization-succeeds-in-free-ukraine-stalinism-plagues-russiaoccupied-ukraine
  121. https://www.academia.edu/100904263/In_Search_of_Lost_Time_Decommunization_in_Ukraine_2014_2020
  122. https://www.rada.gov.ua/en/news/News/132159.html
  123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370395741_Rethinking_Lustrations_The_Challenges_of_Executing_Lustration_in_Ukraine
  124. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94914-3_5
  125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236752259_Ukraine_Is_Not_Russia_Comparing_Youth_Political_Activism
  126. https://news.gallup.com/poll/653471/ukrainians-grow-skeptical-west.aspx
  127. https://english.nv.ua/nation/kiis-poll-91-of-ukrainians-now-hold-negative-views-of-russia-4-positive-50555297.html
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357577254_Ukrainian_model_of_lustration_Legal_specificities_and_social_consequences
  129. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-occupation-update-june-26-2025/
  130. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/focaal/2025/102/fcl1020107.pdf
  131. https://plan-international.org/eu/news/2025/02/24/three-years-ukraine-war/
  132. https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-12-30/ukraine-faces-2025-exhausted-and-full-of-uncertainty-in-key-year-for-the-war.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.