Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fulkerson Prize
View on Wikipedia| Fulkerson Prize | |
|---|---|
| Awarded for | Outstanding papers in the area of discrete mathematics |
| Country | United States |
| Presented by | |
| Reward | $1,500 |
| First award | 1979 |
| Website | http://www.ams.org/profession/prizes-awards/ams-prizes/fulkerson-prize |
The Fulkerson Prize for outstanding papers in the area of discrete mathematics is sponsored jointly by the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS) and the American Mathematical Society (AMS). Up to three awards of $1,500 each are presented at each (triennial) International Symposium of the MOS. Originally, the prizes were paid out of a memorial fund administered by the AMS that was established by friends of the late Delbert Ray Fulkerson to encourage mathematical excellence in the fields of research exemplified by his work. The prizes are now funded by an endowment administered by MOS.
Winners
[edit]- 1979:
- Richard M. Karp for classifying many important NP-complete problems.[1]
- Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken for the four color theorem.[2]
- Paul Seymour for generalizing the max-flow min-cut theorem to matroids.[3]
- 1982:
- D.B. Judin, Arkadi Nemirovski, Leonid Khachiyan, Martin Grötschel, László Lovász and Alexander Schrijver for the ellipsoid method in linear programming and combinatorial optimization.[4][5][6][7]
- G. P. Egorychev and D. I. Falikman for proving van der Waerden's conjecture that the matrix with all entries equal has the smallest permanent of any doubly stochastic matrix.[8][9]
- 1985:
- Jozsef Beck for tight bounds on the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions.[10]
- H. W. Lenstra Jr. for using the geometry of numbers to solve integer programs with few variables in time polynomial in the number of constraints.[11]
- Eugene M. Luks for a polynomial time graph isomorphism algorithm for graphs of bounded maximum degree.[12][13]
- 1988:
- 1991:
- Martin E. Dyer, Alan M. Frieze and Ravindran Kannan for random-walk-based approximation algorithms for the volume of convex bodies.[16]
- Alfred Lehman for 0,1-matrix analogues of the theory of perfect graphs.[17]
- Nikolai E. Mnev for Mnev's universality theorem, that every semialgebraic set is equivalent to the space of realizations of an oriented matroid.[18]
- 1994:
- Louis Billera for finding bases of piecewise-polynomial function spaces over triangulations of space.[19]
- Gil Kalai for making progress on the Hirsch conjecture by proving subexponential bounds on the diameter of d-dimensional polytopes with n facets.[20]
- Neil Robertson, Paul Seymour and Robin Thomas for the six-color case of Hadwiger's conjecture.[21]
- 1997:
- Jeong Han Kim for finding the asymptotic growth rate of the Ramsey numbers R(3,t).[22]
- 2000:
- Michel X. Goemans and David P. Williamson for approximation algorithms based on semidefinite programming.[23]
- Michele Conforti, Gérard Cornuéjols, and M. R. Rao for recognizing balanced 0-1 matrices in polynomial time.[24][25]
- 2003:
- J. F. Geelen, A. M. H. Gerards and A. Kapoor for the GF(4) case of Rota's conjecture on matroid minors.[26][27]
- Bertrand Guenin for a forbidden minor characterization of the weakly bipartite graphs (graphs whose bipartite subgraph polytope is 0-1).[28][27]
- Satoru Iwata, Lisa Fleischer, Satoru Fujishige, and Alexander Schrijver for showing submodular minimization to be strongly polynomial.[29][30][27]
- 2006:
- Manindra Agrawal, Neeraj Kayal and Nitin Saxena, for the AKS primality test.[31][32][33]
- Mark Jerrum, Alistair Sinclair and Eric Vigoda, for approximating the permanent.[34][33]
- Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour, for the Robertson–Seymour theorem showing that graph minors form a well-quasi-ordering.[35][33]
- 2009:
- Maria Chudnovsky, Neil Robertson, Paul Seymour, and Robin Thomas, for the strong perfect graph theorem.[36][37]
- Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng, for smoothed analysis of linear programming algorithms.[38][37]
- Thomas C. Hales and Samuel P. Ferguson, for proving the Kepler conjecture on the densest possible sphere packings.[39][40][37]
- 2012:
- Sanjeev Arora, Satish Rao, and Umesh Vazirani for improving the approximation ratio for graph separators and related problems from to .[41]
- Anders Johansson, Jeff Kahn, and Van H. Vu for determining the threshold of edge density above which a random graph can be covered by disjoint copies of a given smaller graph.[42]
- László Lovász and Balázs Szegedy for characterizing subgraph multiplicity in sequences of dense graphs.[43]
- 2015:
- Francisco Santos Leal for a counter-example of the Hirsch conjecture.[44][45]
- 2018:
- Robert Morris, Yoshiharu Kohayakawa, Simon Griffiths, Peter Allen, and Julia Böttcher for The chromatic thresholds of graphs
- Thomas Rothvoss for his work on the extension complexity of the matching polytope.[46]
- 2021:
- Béla Csaba, Daniela Kühn, Allan Lo, Deryk Osthus, and Andrew Treglown for Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures
- Jin-Yi Cai and Xi Chen for Complexity of Counting CSP with Complex Weights
- Ken-Ichi Kawarabayashi and Mikkel Thorup for Deterministic Edge Connectivity in Near-Linear Time
Source: Mathematical Optimization Society official website.[47]
- 2024:
- Ben Cousins and Santosh Vempala for Gaussian cooling and algorithms for volume and Gaussian volume
- Zilin Jiang, Jonathan Tidor, Yuan Yao, Shengtong Zhang, and Yufei Zhao for Equiangular lines with a fixed angle
- Nathan Keller and Noam Lifshitz for The junta method for hypergraphs and the Erdős–Chvátal simplex conjecture
Source: American Mathematical Society official website.[48]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Karp, Richard M. (1975). "On the computational complexity of combinatorial problems". Networks. 5: 45–68. doi:10.1002/net.1975.5.1.45.
- ^ Appel, Kenneth; Haken, Wolfgang (1977). "Every planar map is four colorable, Part I: Discharging". Illinois Journal of Mathematics. 21: 429–490.
- ^ Seymour, Paul (1977). "The matroids with the max-flow min-cut property". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. 23 (2–3): 189–222. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(77)90031-4.
- ^ Judin, D.B.; Nemirovski, Arkadi (1976). "Informational complexity and effective methods of solution for convex extremal problems". Ekonomika I Matematicheskie Metody. 12: 357–369.
- ^ Khachiyan, Leonid (1979). "A polynomial algorithm in linear programming". Akademiia Nauk SSSR. Doklady. 244: 1093–1096.
- ^ "Leonid Khachiyan, professor, leading computer scientist". Boston Globe. May 5, 2005..
- ^ Grötschel, Martin; Lovász, László; Schrijver, Alexander (1981). "The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization". Combinatorica. 1 (2): 169–197. doi:10.1007/bf02579273.
- ^ Egorychev, G. P. (1981). "The solution of van der Waerden's problem for permanents". Akademiia Nauk SSSR. Doklady. 258: 1041–1044.
- ^ Falikman, D. I. (1981). "A proof of the van der Waerden conjecture on the permanent of a doubly stochastic matrix". Matematicheskie Zametki. 29: 931–938.
- ^ Beck, Jozsef (1981). "Roth's estimate of the discrepancy of integer sequences is nearly sharp". Combinatorica. 1 (4): 319–325. doi:10.1007/bf02579452.
- ^ Lenstra, H. W. Jr. (1983). "Integer programming with a fixed number of variables". Mathematics of Operations Research. 8 (4): 538–548. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.431.5444. doi:10.1287/moor.8.4.538.
- ^ Luks, Eugene M. (1982). "Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time". Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 25 (1): 42–65. doi:10.1016/0022-0000(82)90009-5.
- ^ "U of O Computer Chief Gets Top Award". Eugene Register-Guard. August 10, 1985..
- ^ Tardos, Éva (1985). "A strongly polynomial minimum cost circulation algorithm". Combinatorica. 5 (3): 247–256. doi:10.1007/bf02579369.
- ^ Karmarkar, Narendra (1984). "A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming". Combinatorica. 4 (4): 373–395. doi:10.1007/bf02579150.
- ^ Dyer, Martin E.; Frieze, Alan M.; Kannan, Ravindran (1991). "A random polynomial time algorithm for approximating the volume of convex bodies". Journal of the ACM. 38 (1): 1–17. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.145.4600. doi:10.1145/102782.102783.
- ^ Alfred Lehman, "The width-length inequality and degenerate projective planes," W. Cook and P. D. Seymour (eds.), Polyhedral Combinatorics, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, volume 1, (American Mathematical Society, 1990) pp. 101-105.
- ^ Nikolai E. Mnev, "The universality theorems on the classification problem of configuration varieties and convex polytope varieties," O. Ya. Viro (ed.), Topology and Geometry-Rohlin Seminar, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1346 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988) pp. 527-544.
- ^ Billera, Louis (1988). "Homology of smooth splines: Generic triangulations and a conjecture of Strang". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 310 (1): 325–340. doi:10.2307/2001125. JSTOR 2001125.
- ^ Kalai, Gil (1992). "Upper bounds for the diameter and height of graphs of the convex polyhedra". Discrete and Computational Geometry. 8 (4): 363–372. doi:10.1007/bf02293053.
- ^ Robertson, Neil; Seymour, Paul; Thomas, Robin (1993). "Hadwiger's conjecture for K_6-free graphs". Combinatorica. 13 (3): 279–361. doi:10.1007/bf01202354.
- ^ Kim, Jeong Han (1995). "The Ramsey number R(3,t) has order of magnitude t2/log t". Random Structures & Algorithms. 7 (3): 173–207. doi:10.1002/rsa.3240070302. MR 1369063..
- ^ Goemans, Michel X.; Williamson, David P. (1995). "Improved approximation algorithms for the maximum cut and satisfiability probelsm using semi-definite programming". Journal of the ACM. 42 (6): 1115–1145. doi:10.1145/227683.227684.
- ^ Michele Conforti, Gérard Cornuéjols, and M. R. Rao, "Decomposition of balanced matrices", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 77 (2): 292–406, 1999.
- ^ "MR Rao New Dean Of ISB". Financial Express. July 2, 2004..
- ^ J. F. Geelen, A. M. H. Gerards and A. Kapoor, "The Excluded Minors for GF(4)-Representable Matroids," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 79 (2): 247–2999, 2000.
- ^ a b c 2003 Fulkerson Prize citation, retrieved 2012-08-18.
- ^ Bertrand Guenin, "A characterization of weakly bipartite graphs," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 83 (1): 112–168, 2001.
- ^ Satoru Iwata, Lisa Fleischer, Satoru Fujishige, "A combinatorial strongly polynomial algorithm for minimizing submodular functions," Journal of the ACM, 48 (4): 761–777, 2001.
- ^ Alexander Schrijver, "A combinatorial algorithm minimizing submodular functions in strongly polynomial time," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 80 (2): 346–355, 2000.
- ^ Manindra Agrawal, Neeraj Kayal and Nitin Saxena, "PRIMES is in P," Annals of Mathematics, 160 (2): 781–793, 2004.
- ^ Raghunathan, M. S. (June 11, 2009). "India as a player in Mathematics". The Hindu. Archived from the original on June 14, 2009..
- ^ a b c 2006 Fulkerson Prize citation, retrieved 2012-08-19.
- ^ Mark Jerrum, Alistair Sinclair and Eric Vigoda, "A polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the permanent of a matrix with nonnegative entries," Journal of the ACM, 51 (4): 671–697, 2004.
- ^ Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour, "Graph Minors. XX. Wagner's conjecture," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 92 (2): 325–357, 2004.
- ^ Chudnovsky, Maria; Robertson, Neil; Seymour, Paul; Thomas, Robin (2006). "The strong perfect graph theorem". Annals of Mathematics. 164: 51–229. arXiv:math/0212070. doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.51.
- ^ a b c 2009 Fulkerson Prize citation, retrieved 2012-08-19.
- ^ Spielman, Daniel A.; Teng, Shang-Hua (2004). "Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time". Journal of the ACM. 51: 385–463. arXiv:math/0212413. doi:10.1145/990308.990310.
- ^ Hales, Thomas C. (2005). "A proof of the Kepler conjecture". Annals of Mathematics. 162 (3): 1063–1183. doi:10.4007/annals.2005.162.1065.
- ^ Ferguson, Samuel P. (2006). "Sphere Packings, V. Pentahedral Prisms". Discrete and Computational Geometry. 36: 167–204. doi:10.1007/s00454-005-1214-y.
- ^ Arora, Sanjeev; Rao, Satish; Vazirani, Umesh (2009). "Expander flows, geometric embeddings and graph partitioning". Journal of the ACM. 56 (2): 1–37. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.310.2258. doi:10.1145/1502793.1502794.
- ^ Johansson, Anders; Kahn, Jeff; Vu, Van H. (2008). "Factors in random graphs". Random Structures and Algorithms. 33: 1–28. doi:10.1002/rsa.20224.
- ^ Lovász, László; Szegedy, Balázs (2006). "Limits of dense graph sequences". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. 96 (6): 933–957. arXiv:math/0408173. doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2006.05.002.
- ^ Santos, Francisco (2011). "A counterexample to the Hirsch conjecture". Annals of Mathematics. 176 (1): 383–412. arXiv:1006.2814. doi:10.4007/annals.2012.176.1.7. MR 2925387.
- ^ 2015 Fulkerson Prize citation, retrieved 2015-07-18.
- ^ Rothvoß, Thomas (2017). "The matching polytope has exponential extension complexity". Journal of the ACM. 64 (6): A41:1–A41:19. arXiv:1311.2369. doi:10.1145/3127497. MR 3713797.
- ^ "The Fulkerson Prize". MOS Prizes. Mathematical Optimization Society. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
- ^ "2024 Delbert Ray Fulkerson Prize Awarded". News from the AMS. American Mathematical Society. July 23, 2024. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
External links
[edit]- Official web page (MOS)
- Official site with award details (AMS website)
- AMS archive of past prize winners
Fulkerson Prize
View on GrokipediaHistory
Establishment
The Fulkerson Prize was established in 1979 through a collaborative effort by the American Mathematical Society (AMS) and the Mathematical Programming Society (now known as the Mathematical Optimization Society, or MOS).[2] The initiative stemmed from a memorial fund created by friends of Delbert Ray Fulkerson (1924–1976) following his death, with the AMS initially administering the fund to support awards in his honor.[3] The prize's funding originated from this memorial fund, which was later transformed into an endowment managed by the MOS to ensure its long-term sustainability.[2][3] This financial structure allowed for the recognition of exceptional contributions without reliance on ongoing external sponsorships. The primary motivation for creating the prize was to encourage mathematical excellence in the fields of research exemplified by Fulkerson's own contributions, particularly in discrete mathematics, operations research, and graph theory.[2] By honoring groundbreaking papers in these areas, the award aimed to perpetuate the innovative spirit of Fulkerson's work at the RAND Corporation and his academic collaborations.[3] The inaugural awards were presented in 1979 at the International Symposium on Mathematical Programming (ISMP) in Montreal, recognizing papers published during the period leading up to that event.[2][3] This debut aligned the prize with a major international forum for optimization and related disciplines, setting a precedent for its triennial presentation at subsequent ISMP gatherings.Namesake and Legacy
Delbert Ray Fulkerson (1924–1976) was an American mathematician renowned for his foundational contributions to operations research and discrete mathematics. Born on August 14, 1924, in Tamms, Illinois, he earned his B.S. from Southern Illinois University in 1947, his M.S. from the University of Wisconsin in 1948, and his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin in 1951.[4][5] Fulkerson spent much of his early career at the RAND Corporation, joining its Mathematics Department in 1951 and working there until 1971, after which he joined Cornell University as the Maxwell M. Upson Professor of Engineering until his death. He also served as a distinguished visitor at the University of Waterloo in 1968 and as a visiting professor in 1971, fostering international collaboration in the field.[4][5] Fulkerson's major contributions centered on network flows and graph theory, where he co-developed the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm and the max-flow min-cut theorem, providing essential tools for solving optimization problems in capacitated networks. These advancements extended to practical applications in combinatorial analysis, including blocking sets and integer programming techniques that bridged theoretical graph theory with real-world resource allocation. Alongside L. R. Ford Jr., he co-authored the seminal book Flows in Networks in 1962, which formalized network flow theory and remains a cornerstone text for researchers in the field. His work emphasized the utility of discrete structures in addressing complex systems, influencing subsequent developments in operations research.[6][7] The Fulkerson Prize, established in 1979 through a memorial fund created by his colleagues, honors his legacy by recognizing outstanding papers in discrete mathematics, reflecting his focus on practical applications of combinatorial methods. Fulkerson's unsolved problems, such as the Berge–Fulkerson conjecture in matching theory—which posits that the all-ones vector in a 3-uniform hypergraph can be expressed as a half-integer combination of incidence vectors of perfect matchings—continue to drive research in areas eligible for the award, underscoring his enduring influence on the field's open challenges.[8][2][9]Prize Details
Criteria and Scope
The Delbert Ray Fulkerson Prize recognizes outstanding papers in the area of discrete mathematics, with the term "discrete mathematics" interpreted broadly to encompass foundational and applied topics such as graph theory, networks, mathematical programming, applied combinatorics, and applications to computer science, including interdisciplinary extensions like computational geometry and coding theory.[1] This expansive scope highlights significant theoretical advances, novel methodologies, or impactful resolutions to longstanding problems within these domains, prioritizing contributions that demonstrate high mathematical quality and lasting significance.[1] Eligibility for the prize is restricted to single papers—excluding series or books—that represent the final publication of their main results and have appeared in recognized, peer-reviewed journals or comparable well-refereed volumes during the six calendar years immediately preceding the award year.[1] Single or multiple authors are permitted, with the prize amount divided equally among co-authors in cases of joint work, and there are no restrictions based on nationality or institutional affiliation.[1] Representative topics within this scope include network flows, integer programming, and extremal graph theory, reflecting the prize's emphasis on rigorous, innovative work that advances the field's core principles.[1] The broad interpretation of discrete mathematics in the prize criteria echoes the diverse legacy of Delbert Ray Fulkerson, whose research spanned optimization, graph theory, and combinatorial applications.[1]Frequency and Administration
The Fulkerson Prize is awarded triennially, with the schedule aligned to the International Symposium on Mathematical Programming (ISMP), where the prizes are presented.[2] The award cycles occur every three years, beginning in 1979; following the 2024 presentation, the next opportunity will be in 2027.[2] Each cycle allows for up to three awards, with a monetary value of $1,500 per recipient. The prize amount originated at $750 for awards from 1979 through 1991 and was increased to the current $1,500 starting with the 1994 cycle.[2] The prize is jointly administered by the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS) and the American Mathematical Society (AMS), who together oversee nominations, evaluation, and presentation.[2] Funding is provided through an endowment managed by MOS, which was established from initial memorial contributions by Fulkerson's colleagues and friends. Over time, the administration has seen minor evolutions, including an increase in the prize value in 1994 and a name change for one sponsor from the Mathematical Programming Society to the Mathematical Optimization Society in 2010, while the core triennial structure and joint sponsorship have remained consistent.[2]Selection Process
Nomination Procedure
Nominations for the Fulkerson Prize are open to any individual, including authors, colleagues, or editors, and can be submitted electronically via the websites of the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS) or the American Mathematical Society (AMS).[10][11] The process involves sending materials to the chair of the Fulkerson Prize Committee, with deadlines typically set for February 15 of the award year, approximately six months prior to the International Symposium on Mathematical Programming (ISMP).[10][11] Required nomination materials consist of a letter that includes a full reference to the nominated paper and a detailed evaluation of its mathematical quality and significance in discrete mathematics.[10][11] Eligible papers must represent final publications of their main results in recognized, well-refereed journals or comparable volumes, strictly limited to those appearing in the six calendar years preceding the ISMP—for example, January 2018 through December 2023 for the 2024 award.[12][11] The Prize Committee devises its own procedures for soliciting and reviewing nominations while actively seeking to identify outstanding but potentially overlooked contributions, particularly those by young or relatively unknown mathematicians.[12] This approach ensures broad consideration of impactful work in the field.[12]Evaluation and Committee
The Fulkerson Prize selection committee consists of three members: two appointed by the chair of the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS) and one appointed by the president of the American Mathematical Society (AMS).[12][2] Members serve three-year terms, with overlapping appointments to ensure continuity, and may participate in up to two award cycles.[12] The committee chair is initially an appointee of the MOS, with subsequent chairs selected internally by the committee, preferably from among experienced prior members who are senior experts in discrete mathematics.[2] The committee conducts its evaluation through correspondence, such as email or videoconference, and devises its own procedures for reviewing nominations and identifying potential papers.[12] Nominations, which include the paper reference and a supporting evaluation, are submitted directly to the committee chair.[13] The committee assesses submissions based on mathematical quality and significance, with a particular emphasis on ensuring that contributions from young or lesser-known mathematicians are not overlooked.[2] To evaluate technical depth, the committee may independently seek out additional papers beyond formal nominations.[2] In applying the selection criteria, the committee prioritizes outstanding single papers—rather than series or books—published in recognized, well-refereed journals within the six years preceding the International Symposium on Mathematical Programming (ISMP).[8][2] The focus is on contributions to discrete mathematics, interpreted broadly to include areas such as graph theory and mathematical optimization, balancing theoretical rigor with broader influence on the field.[8] Up to three prizes may be awarded per cycle, with the $1,500 amount divided among joint authors if applicable; ties are possible, but no award is given if submissions do not meet the high standards.[2] Winners are announced and the prizes presented at the opening ceremony of the triennial ISMP, where citations highlighting the selected papers' contributions are read.[12][2]Recipients
1979–1994
The Fulkerson Prize, established to honor outstanding papers in discrete mathematics, was first awarded in 1979 for contributions published from 1973 to 1978, recognizing breakthroughs that advanced graph theory, complexity, and optimization.[14] In that year, Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken received the prize for their seminal work "Every planar map is four colorable, Part I: Discharging," which provided the first computer-assisted proof of the four-color theorem, resolving a longstanding conjecture by showing that any planar graph is four-colorable and marking a milestone in automated theorem proving.[14] Also in 1979, Richard M. Karp was awarded for "On the computational complexity of combinatorial problems," which systematically classified numerous decision problems as NP-complete, laying the groundwork for modern computational complexity theory in combinatorics.[14] Paul D. Seymour earned recognition for "The matroids with the max-flow min-cut property," characterizing matroids where the max-flow min-cut theorem holds, with profound implications for network flows and structural graph theory.[14] In 1982, awards highlighted progress in polynomial-time solvability and convex optimization. Leonid G. Khachiyan was honored for "A polynomial algorithm in linear programming," introducing the ellipsoid method that proved linear programming solvable in polynomial time, a pivotal result showing the problem lies in P and inspiring subsequent interior-point methods.[14] Martin Grötschel, László Lovász, and Alexander Schrijver received the prize for "The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization," demonstrating how the method yields polynomial-time algorithms for problems like separation over rational polyhedra and separation of the stable set polytope, bridging theory and practice in integer programming.[14] Additional 1982 recipients included D.B. Judin and A.S. Nemirovskii for foundational work on the informational complexity of convex problems; G.P. Egorychev and D.I. Falikman independently for solving van der Waerden's conjecture on permanents of doubly stochastic matrices, providing sharp bounds on the permanent function.[14] The 1985 prizes emphasized algorithmic advances in discrepancy theory, integer programming, and graph isomorphism. József Beck was awarded for "Roth's estimate of the discrepancy of integer sequences is nearly sharp," establishing tight bounds on the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions and influencing combinatorial number theory.[14] Hendrik W. Lenstra, Jr., received it for "Integer programming with a fixed number of variables," developing a polynomial-time algorithm for fixed-dimension integer linear programming, a key result in geometric and parametric optimization.[14] Eugene M. Luks was recognized for "Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time," providing the first polynomial-time algorithm for graph isomorphism in bounded-degree graphs using group theory techniques.[14] By 1988, the focus shifted to efficient network algorithms and linear programming innovations. Éva Tardos earned the prize for "A strongly polynomial minimum cost circulation algorithm," yielding the first strongly polynomial-time solution for minimum-cost flows in networks, with broad applications in operations research and transportation.[14] Narendra Karmarkar was awarded for "A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming," introducing the interior-point method that revolutionized practical linear programming solvers and led to widespread commercial adoption.[14] In 1991, recipients advanced volume computation, polyhedral inequalities, and universality in configurations. Martin Dyer, Alan Frieze, and Ravi Kannan were honored for "A random polynomial time algorithm for approximating the volume of convex bodies," providing a randomized polynomial-time method for volume estimation, crucial for sampling and integration in high dimensions.[14] Alfred Lehman received it for "The width-length inequality and degenerate projective planes," establishing inequalities linking polyhedral widths to combinatorial structures in projective geometry.[14] Nikolai E. Mnev was recognized for "The universality theorems on the classification problem of configuration varieties and convex polytope varieties," proving universality results that connect polytope realizations to topological moduli spaces.[14] The 1994 awards addressed spline homology, polyhedral diameters, and graph colorings. Louis Billera was awarded for "Homology of smooth splines: Generic triangulations and a conjecture of Strang," resolving aspects of spline homology through generic triangulations and confirming a conjecture on spline spaces.[14] Gil Kalai received it for "Upper bounds for the diameter and height of graphs of the convex polyhedra," providing improved bounds on the diameter of polyhedral graphs, impacting the Hirsch conjecture and optimization over polytopes.[14] Neil Robertson, Paul D. Seymour, and Robin Thomas were honored for "Hadwiger's conjecture for K6-free graphs," proving the conjecture for graphs without K6 minors, advancing structural graph theory and coloring.[14] These early Fulkerson Prizes underscored foundational progress in graph coloring, optimization algorithms, and polyhedral combinatorics, establishing benchmarks for computational feasibility and theoretical depth in discrete mathematics.[2]1997–2010
In the years 1997 to 2010, the Fulkerson Prize recognized pioneering contributions that advanced probabilistic combinatorics, approximation techniques in optimization, matroid structure, submodular minimization, primality testing, approximation of permanents, graph minor theory, perfect graph conjectures, sphere packing, and smoothed analysis of algorithms.[2][14] 1997Jeong Han Kim received the prize for his paper "The Ramsey Number R(3,t) Has Order of Magnitude t²/log t," published in Random Structures & Algorithms 7 (1995), 173–207. This work established that the Ramsey number R(3,t), which denotes the smallest number of vertices guaranteeing a clique of size 3 or an independent set of size t in any graph, grows asymptotically as Θ(t² / log t), resolving a 60-year-old problem by tightening the lower bound to match the known upper bound from Ajtai, Komlós, and Szemerédi.[2] The result exemplified the power of probabilistic methods in extremal graph theory, influencing subsequent research on Ramsey bounds.[14] 2000
Michel X. Goemans and David P. Williamson were awarded for "Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming," Journal of the ACM 42 (1995), 1115–1145. Their paper introduced semidefinite programming relaxations to achieve a 0.878-approximation ratio for the maximum cut problem—surpassing previous guarantees—and extended similar techniques to MAX-2SAT and MAX-Ek-SAT, marking a seminal shift toward convex optimization in combinatorial approximation.[15][2] Michele Conforti, Gérard Cornuéjols, and M. R. Rao received the prize for "Decomposition of balanced matrices," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 77 (1999), 292–406. This contribution provided a polynomial-time decomposition algorithm for balanced 0-1 matrices into totally unimodular and network matrices, enabling recognition of balanced matrices and advancing polyhedral combinatorics for integer programming applications.[15][2] 2003
Jim F. Geelen, A. M. H. Gerards, and Ajai Kapoor were honored for "The Excluded Minors for GF(4)-Representable Matroids," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 79 (2000), 247–299. Their work characterized matroids representable over the finite field GF(4) via a finite set of excluded minors, confirming Rota's conjecture for this case and overcoming challenges in non-unique representations to revitalize matroid theory.[16][2] Bertrand Guenin earned the prize for "A characterization of weakly bipartite graphs," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 83 (2001), 112–168. The paper delivered an excluded minor characterization of weakly bipartite graphs, resolving a graphical instance of Seymour's 1977 conjecture through an innovative application of Lehman's theorem, with implications for polyhedral relaxations in optimization.[16][2] Satoru Iwata, Lisa Fleischer, and Satoru Fujishige, along with independent work by Alexander Schrijver, were recognized for their combinatorial algorithms minimizing submodular functions in strongly polynomial time: Iwata et al., "A combinatorial, strongly polynomial-time algorithm for minimizing submodular functions," Journal of the ACM 48 (2001), 761–777; Schrijver, "A combinatorial algorithm minimizing submodular functions in strongly polynomial time," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 80 (2000), 346–355. These developments provided the first combinatorial, strongly polynomial-time solutions to submodular minimization—a cornerstone of discrete optimization—with broad applications in network flows and machine learning.[16][2] 2006
Manindra Agrawal, Neeraj Kayal, and Nitin Saxena received the award for "PRIMES is in P," Annals of Mathematics 160 (2004), 781–793. Their deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for primality testing, based on elliptic curves and modular composition, placed the problem PRIMES in the complexity class P, resolving a major open question in computational number theory since 1976.[17][2] Mark Jerrum, Alistair Sinclair, and Eric Vigoda were awarded for "A polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the permanent of a matrix with nonnegative entries," Journal of the ACM 51 (2004), 671–697. The paper devised the first fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for the permanent using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and spectral techniques, enabling efficient estimation for nonnegative matrices central to statistical mechanics and combinatorics.[17][2] Neil Robertson and Paul D. Seymour gained recognition for "Graph Minors. XX. Wagner's conjecture," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 92 (2004), 325–357. This culmination of their graph minors project proved Wagner's conjecture by showing that every minor-closed family of graphs is characterized by a finite set of forbidden minors, providing a structural foundation for graph theory and algorithm design.[17][2] 2009
Maria Chudnovsky, Neil Robertson, Paul Seymour, and Robin Thomas were awarded for "The strong perfect graph theorem," Annals of Mathematics 164 (2006), 51–229. Their proof established that a graph is perfect if and only if its complement is Berge (odd-hole- and odd-antihole-free), resolving the 45-year-old strong perfect graph conjecture and unifying key concepts in graph coloring and optimization.[18][2][19] Thomas C. Hales and Samuel P. Ferguson shared the prize for proving the Kepler conjecture: Hales, "A proof of the Kepler conjecture," Annals of Mathematics 162 (2005), 1065–1185; Ferguson, "Sphere Packings, V. Pentahedral Prisms," Discrete & Computational Geometry 36 (2006), 167–204. Using linear programming, semidefinite programming, and exhaustive computer case analysis, they confirmed that the densest packing of equal spheres in three dimensions achieves π/(3√2) density, settling a problem posed by Kepler in 1611.[18][2][19] Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng received the award for "Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time," Journal of the ACM 51 (2004), 385–463. They introduced smoothed analysis, demonstrating that the simplex method for linear programming runs in expected polynomial time under Gaussian perturbations of inputs, bridging worst-case and average-case complexity for practical algorithms.[18][2][19] These awards underscored the prize's role in fostering interdisciplinary progress, from theoretical barriers to computational tools, during a era of rapid growth in discrete algorithms.[2]
2012
In 2012, the Fulkerson Prize recognized outstanding contributions in graph partitioning approximations, random graph factors, and limits of dense graphs, presented at the International Symposium on Mathematical Programming.[2][14] 2012Sanjeev Arora, Satish Rao, and Umesh Vazirani were awarded for "Expander flows, geometric embeddings and graph partitioning," Journal of the ACM 56 (2009), 1–37. Their paper introduced expander flows to improve the approximation ratio for graph separators and partitioning problems, with applications to network design and parallel computing.[20][14] Anders Johansson, Jeff Kahn, and Van H. Vu received the prize for "Factors in random graphs," Random Structures & Algorithms 33 (2008), 1–28. The work determined the threshold probability for the existence of factors (H-factors) in random graphs, resolving a central question in probabilistic combinatorics via the second moment method.[20][14] László Lovász and Balázs Szegedy were honored for "Limits of dense graph sequences," Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 96 (2006), 933–957. This foundational paper developed the theory of graphons as limits of dense graph sequences, providing a framework for analyzing subgraph densities and convergence properties in extremal graph theory.[20][14]
2014–2024
The Fulkerson Prize continued to recognize groundbreaking contributions in discrete mathematics during this period, with awards presented in 2015, 2018, 2021, and 2024, reflecting the prize's triennial cycle.[14] These selections highlight advances in polyhedral theory, extremal graph theory, computational complexity, algorithmic graph theory, convex body algorithms, high-dimensional geometry, and Boolean function analysis.| Year | Recipients | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Francisco Santos | For constructing a counterexample to the Hirsch conjecture, which posited that the diameter (graph distance between vertices) of a d-dimensional polytope with n facets is at most n − d; Santos built a 43-dimensional polytope with 86 facets having diameter at least 44, disproving the conjecture and combining techniques from polyhedral combinatorics and geometric methods.[21] |
| 2018 | Peter Allen, Julia Böttcher, Simon Griffiths, Yoshiharu Kohayakawa, Robert Morris | For determining the precise threshold probabilities in random graphs beyond which every graph is H-colorable for any fixed graph H, resolving long-standing questions in extremal graph theory and Ramsey-type problems on chromatic thresholds.[14] |
| 2018 | Thomas Rothvoß | For proving that the perfect matching polytope in the complete graph on n vertices has exponential extension complexity (at least ), implying it cannot be formulated as a linear program with polynomially many variables and constraints, with implications for combinatorial optimization.[14] |
| 2021 | Béla Csaba, Daniela Kühn, Allan Lo, Deryk Osthus, Andrew Treglown | For proving the 1-factorization conjecture and Hamilton decomposition conjecture of Baranyai and Nash-Williams from the 1970s–1980s, using a unified approach based on graph replacement methods to decompose regular tournaments and hypergraphs into perfect matchings.[22] |
| 2021 | Jin-Yi Cai, Xi Chen | For resolving the complexity dichotomy for counting constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) with complex weights, showing that such partition functions are either polynomial-time computable or #P-hard, with applications to approximate counting, sampling, and statistical physics models.[22] |
| 2021 | Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, Mikkel Thorup | For developing a deterministic algorithm to compute edge connectivity in undirected graphs in near-linear time (O(m log n)) time, introducing novel techniques like fast deterministic graph sparsification and expander decomposition.[22] |
| 2024 | Ben Cousins, Santosh Vempala | For introducing Gaussian cooling, a Markov chain method yielding the fastest O*(n3) algorithms for approximating the volume of convex bodies and sampling from Gaussian distributions over them, advancing randomized algorithms in high dimensions with ties to machine learning.[6] |
| 2024 | Zilin Jiang, Jonathan Tidor, Yuan Yao, Shengtong Zhang, Yufei Zhao | For solving the maximum equiangular lines problem by proving that the maximum number of equiangular lines in ℝd with fixed angle θ is at most roughly d3/2 for large d, using spectral graph theory and linear algebra bounds.[6] |
| 2024 | Nathan Keller, Noam Lifshitz | For extending the junta method from Boolean functions to hypergraphs, resolving the Erdős–Chvátal simplex conjecture on the maximum size of intersection-free families and advancing Turán-type problems in extremal set theory.[6] |
