Hubbry Logo
GerbillingGerbillingMain
Open search
Gerbilling
Community hub
Gerbilling
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gerbilling
Gerbilling
Gerbilling
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Gerbils are the most common rodents to be allegedly inserted.

Gerbilling, also known as gerbil stuffing or gerbil shooting, is the alleged sexual practice of inserting a gerbil or other small rodent into one's rectum to obtain stimulation. Gerbilling is considered an urban legend and there is no evidence that the practice has ever occurred in real life. Its existence remains highly dubious, as all rodents have long nails and teeth for digging or burrowing and naturally try to burrow out of any small spaces.

Overview

[edit]

According to folklorist Jan Harold Brunvand, fictitious accounts of gerbilling were first recorded in 1984 and initially were said to involve a mouse and an unidentified man. In subsequent versions of the story, the animal was a gerbil and the story applied to several male celebrities.[1][2] Rumors surrounding various male celebrities engaging in gerbilling have become persistent urban legends.[1][3][4]

As of the mid-1980s, there were no reports in peer-reviewed medical literature describing gerbilling among the variety of rectal foreign objects removed from people's bodies.[5][6]

Mike Walker, a National Enquirer gossip columnist, spent months attempting to verify the gerbilling rumors about a celebrity. "I've never worked harder on a story in my life," Walker told the Palm Beach Post in 1995. After much investigation, he was unable to find any evidence that a gerbilling incident ever happened: "I'm convinced that it's nothing more than an urban legend."[7]

Dan Savage, a sex-advice columnist who frequently discusses unusual sexual practices, stated in 2013 that he has never received a first-hand or even a second-hand account of the practice.[8]

According to the editors of Snopes.com, gerbilling is an unverified and persistent urban legend.[1]

M Jenny Edwards, an attorney who specialises in "sexual offenses relating to bestiality, zoophilia and zoosexuality", connects the folkloric practise of 'gerbiling' to formicophilia. She defines this as "a form of bestiality, which essentially deals with things crawling on you or in you". However, she acknowledges that she hasn't "personally dealt with a gerbil case, nor read about them".[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gerbilling

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gerbilling, also known as gerbil stuffing or gerbil shooting, is an describing a purported sexual practice in which a small live animal—typically a gerbil—is inserted into the to achieve stimulation from its movements. The tale commonly involves using a makeshift tube, such as a greased roll, to guide the animal inside, with a sometimes attached to retrieve it after it suffocates and dies. No verified medical or supports gerbilling as an actual behavior, and it is classified as a baseless perpetuated through and media sensationalism. The legend emerged in the United States during the , initially as anonymous gossip within communities before evolving into a homophobic targeting . It achieved national prominence in the early 1990s when radio host and tabloid reports falsely linked it to actor , prompting lawsuits, hospital denials, and Gere's public refutations. Variations occasionally substitute other small like hamsters or mice, but the core narrative remains a fictional reflecting cultural anxieties about sexuality and deviance.

Definition and Description

Core Concept

Gerbilling refers to an depicting a supposed sexual practice in which a small live , typically a gerbil, is inserted into the rectum to achieve sexual gratification. The purported stimulation arises from the animal's frantic movements and clawing against the rectal walls as it struggles for air. Legends commonly describe basic methods to enable the act, including the use of a hollow tube—such as a cylinder or plastic pipe—coated with to ease insertion without direct handling of the animal. Retrieval is said to involve similar tools or manual extraction, though accounts often emphasize the risks of the gerbil becoming lodged or dying internally. As documented in , gerbilling stands apart from documented zoophilic behaviors due to its complete lack of ; no medical or veterinary records substantiate occurrences, confirming its role as fabricated narrative within traditions. Folklorist classifies it among apocryphal tales of extreme sexual deviance, underscoring its circulation as cautionary or sensational rather than reality.

Reported Methods and Variations

In the of gerbilling, the most commonly reported method involves lubricating a tube, such as a roll, and inserting it into the to serve as a guide for the live animal. The gerbil is then nudged into the outer end of the tube, prompting it to inward for , with a sometimes tied to its tail to facilitate retrieval after the act. Variations on this technique include the use of alternative guiding devices, such as PVC pipe, to direct the animal's entry. Other accounts describe simpler insertions without tools, where the is manually placed or coaxed into the . While gerbils are the primary animal featured, legends frequently substitute other small like mice, , or rats, selected for their size and burrowing instincts. These details vary widely across tellings. Legendary accounts often highlight complications arising from the procedure, such as the animal becoming lodged inside the body, leading to emergency medical extraction, potential infections from rodent pathogens, or severe physical trauma requiring surgical intervention like a colostomy.

Historical Origins

Early Folklore Accounts

The earliest documented folklore account of what would later become known as gerbilling circulated by 1984, predating celebrity associations, and involved the rectal insertion of a live mouse by an unidentified gay man seeking sexual gratification, resulting in a medical emergency to remove the animal. An early print example appeared that year in a Denver weekly newspaper, which claimed a confirmed emergency room case. Folklorist Jan Harold Brunvand recorded this version in the "Medical Horrors" section of his 1986 book The Mexican Pet: More "New" Urban Legends and Some Old Favorites, under the title "The Colo-Rectal Mouse," noting its circulation as an anonymous tale among healthcare workers and in informal storytelling networks. Brunvand described the narrative as a classic example of urban legend structure, featuring exaggerated peril and moral undertones about taboo practices, with the mouse causing internal damage that necessitated surgical intervention. These initial stories remained entirely anonymous, lacking any named protagonists or verifiable details, and spread primarily through oral transmission in professional circles such as hospitals and clinics, as well as in lowbrow tabloids and gossip columns that sensationalized medical oddities without attribution. Norine Dresser, in her analysis, highlighted how such tales were shared as "" (FOAF) narratives among emergency room staff, emphasizing the of the incident while omitting specifics to enhance believability and anonymity. Dresser traced variants collected from the mid-1980s onward, confirming their roots in pre-celebrity where the focus was on the grotesque mechanics of the act rather than individual culpability. Pre-1980s parallels to the gerbilling legend can be found in broader urban myths involving rectal foreign body insertions, often linked to themes of bestiality or fabricated medical emergencies in folklore collections from the mid-20th century. These earlier motifs, such as tales of accidental or experimental insertions of small animals or objects, echoed anxieties about deviance and bodily violation, though none specifically featured rodents until the 1980s mouse variant. The evolution from a mouse to a gerbil in subsequent retellings is largely attributed to the popularity of gerbils as affordable, low-maintenance pets in the United States starting in the late 1950s, following their importation in 1954 and widespread availability through pet stores by the end of that decade. Dresser noted that this substitution made the story more relatable to contemporary audiences, as gerbils' familiarity as household animals amplified the legend's plausibility and horror.

Evolution in the 1980s

Brunvand's 1986 book provided the first widespread scholarly print documentation of the , describing the insertion of a live into the rectum of an unidentified man for . By the mid-, variants had shifted the animal to a gerbil while maintaining the core elements of the tale. During the decade, the rumor proliferated through oral transmission, tabloid publications, and underground newsletters, often linking the practice to unnamed male celebrities in Hollywood to heighten its sensational appeal. A notable 1986 instance involved a query sent to the "Straight Dope" in the , seeking details on the "mechanics and philosophy" of gerbil insertion among in contexts like subcultures, reflecting the legend's growing circulation. The legend's amplification coincided with the AIDS epidemic, where homophobic stereotypes portrayed such acts as emblematic of deviance within gay communities, reinforcing narratives of and "crimes against nature." This era's cultural climate likely contributed to the rumor's persistence, as evidenced by cases like a Wichita Falls, Texas, TV weatherman forced to resign amid gerbil-related gossip in the late .

Celebrity Associations

The Richard Gere Rumor

The urban legend involving centers on an alleged incident in 1990, in which the actor purportedly sought emergency medical treatment at in after inserting a live gerbil into his for sexual gratification, resulting in the animal becoming lodged and requiring surgical removal. This tale, often referred to as "gerbilling," portrays Gere as engaging in a bizarre fetish where a gerbil is lubricated and inserted anally, sometimes with a string attached for retrieval, though in this version, the procedure failed catastrophically. The rumor first gained traction around 1990-1992, coinciding with Gere's rising fame from films like . One prominent theory attributes its origin to an anonymous : a fabricated mimicking a complaint from the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), accusing Gere of gerbil mistreatment and circulated via fax machines across Hollywood offices. Alternative accounts suggest it stemmed from interpersonal rivalries, such as a between Gere and dating back to their 1974 collaboration on , where Stallone reportedly resented Gere's success and may have propagated the story to undermine him. No definitive source has been identified, and the legend predates widespread dissemination, evolving from earlier, vaguer tales of celebrity rectal foreign objects in urban . In the pre-digital age, the story spread virally through fax chains, office gossip, and print media, with tabloids like the amplifying it despite lacking evidence. Radio further propelled it in 1992 broadcasts, where he mocked Gere on-air and speculated about the details, turning it into a staple of late-night humor and celebrity scandal discussions. This fax-to-airwave transmission mechanism allowed the rumor to permeate Hollywood and beyond, often mutating with embellishments like the gerbil's supposed name or the involvement of veterinary expertise during the surgery. Gere publicly addressed and denied the allegation multiple times starting in 1991, including in a interview where he dismissed "salacious rumors" as baseless fabrications, likening them to calling a cow a zebra without altering reality. He threatened legal action against those spreading it, including media outlets and individuals like Stallone, but no lawsuits were filed, reportedly due to the anonymous origins and difficulty in tracing perpetrators. Gere reiterated his stance in later years, emphasizing the rumor's harm to his reputation amid his advocacy work, though it persisted as a punchline in pop culture.

Rumors Involving Other Figures

Beyond named musicians, vague associations emerged in 1990s Hollywood circles, implicating unnamed actors in gerbilling incidents, typically whispered in contexts targeting perceived homosexual or bisexual figures to amplify . These rumors rarely specified individuals beyond fleeting mentions and lacked any verifiable , serving more as vehicles for than documented events. Non-celebrity variants appeared in medical community anecdotes, where emergency room staff reportedly shared stories of anonymous "patients" requiring intervention for gerbil insertions, often used to sensationalize tales of exotic or deviant behaviors encountered in urban hospitals; no medical records or confirmed cases supported these accounts. Across these iterations, gerbilling rumors consistently targeted high-profile or bisexual icons, leveraging homophobic narratives to humiliate and marginalize them by associating with grotesque perversion, a pattern evident in of the era. This mirrors the archetype seen in the variant but extends to broader cultural anxieties about sexual nonconformity.

Cultural and Media Impact

The gerbil rumor, originating from unsubstantiated claims about actor , has served as fodder for comedic depictions in various media, often exaggerating the for shock value or satire. In the early 1990s, radio host frequently referenced the on his show, portraying it as a supposed practice among gay men and directly linking it to Gere in bits that played on homophobic stereotypes for humor. Television parodies have amplified the legend's absurdity. The animated series prominently featured a direct allusion in its 2002 episode "The Death Camp of Tolerance" (Season 6, Episode 14), where teacher inserts a classroom gerbil named Lemmiwinks into the rectum of his partner, Mr. Slave, as part of a scheme to get fired; Lemmiwinks then embarks on a fantastical journey inside the body, encountering historical figures in a nod to the rumor's bizarre nature. In literature and print media, the legend appears in collections documenting urban folklore. Folklorist includes an entry on "gerbilling" in his Encyclopedia of Urban Legends (2001), describing it as a tale involving rectal insertion of small animals for sexual gratification, often tied to celebrity gossip, and traces its variations back to the 1980s without endorsing its veracity. Recent revivals have occurred in podcasting and online humor. In August 2023, comedian discussed the rumor on his podcast Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend during an episode with guest , jokingly questioning its truth while acknowledging its persistence as a cultural punchline, which sparked renewed memes across platforms. As of 2025, the rumor persists in online media, with articles revisiting its history and cultural impact.

Role in Urban Legend Studies

Gerbilling serves as a quintessential example of "friend of a friend" (FOAF) tales in urban legend folklore, where narratives are typically relayed through indirect personal connections to lend plausibility without verifiable evidence. Folklorist Jan Harold Brunvand, a leading scholar on modern legends, analyzed it in his 1980s and 1990s publications as emblematic of contemporary sexual taboo myths, often circulated to reinforce stereotypes about marginalized sexual practices. In comparative folklore, gerbilling parallels other global insertion myths, such as stories involving bottles, snakes, or small animals lodged in bodily orifices, which serve similar functions in expressing anxieties about deviance and bodily violation across cultures. These motifs appear in collections as cautionary tales blending disgust, humor, and moral judgment, highlighting shared narrative patterns in transmission. Key academic treatments include Brunvand's entry in The Encyclopedia of Urban Legends (2001), which traces the legend's structure and cultural resonance without endorsing its veracity. Discussions also appear in contexts, such as Dan Savage's 2013 column debunking it as a persistent while contextualizing its role in broader misconceptions about sexual behaviors. Studies of gerbilling evolved from viewing it as a 1980s medical rumor—often tied to anonymous hospital anecdotes—to a 1990s archetype of celebrity-driven gossip in analysis, reflecting shifts in media influence on legend dissemination. This progression underscores how urban myths adapt to societal changes, moving from localized whispers to widespread cultural memes.

Analysis and Debunking

Evidence Against Existence

Despite extensive investigations into urban legends involving unusual rectal foreign bodies, no peer-reviewed medical journals have documented any cases of gerbil insertion. Journalistic probes, including consultations with medical sources, have found no verified incidents of such procedures. The practice is biologically implausible due to the mismatch between human rectal and a gerbil's size and physiology; the rodent's small body would provide no meaningful stimulation, while its sharp claws and teeth would likely cause immediate and severe lacerations to the rectal lining during any attempted insertion or movement. Additionally, a live gerbil confined in the rectum would rapidly suffocate from lack of oxygen in the enclosed , leading to and subsequent , further complicating any safe or pleasurable outcome. Investigative by since 1998 has repeatedly classified gerbilling as a false , tracing its origins to unsubstantiated tabloid rumors without supporting evidence from hospitals or witnesses. Earlier reports in tabloid publications from the early failed verification efforts, leading to implicit retractions through lack of follow-up corroboration. Sex columnist , in a 2013 analysis, dismissed gerbilling as a homophobic unsupported by any credible accounts, emphasizing its impracticality and the absence of reported pleasure or feasibility. The act would also cause severe harm to the animal, as gerbils' burrowing instincts and fragile would result in distress, injury, or death, rendering it cruel if attempted.

Sociological Interpretations

The gerbilling has been interpreted sociologically as a manifestation of homophobia, particularly in its portrayal of engaging in extreme and deviant sexual practices. Emerging prominently in the 1980s amid the AIDS crisis, the rumor amplified negative stereotypes by associating with perverse acts that violated both human and animal boundaries, thereby reinforcing societal fears and moral panics about sexual minorities. Scholars note that such legends function as informal slurs, pathologizing sexuality as inherently dangerous and unnatural, which contributed to broader stigmatization during a period of heightened public anxiety over transmission. This homophobic framing persisted in variants targeting celebrities, where the act symbolized a "double crime against ," combining with bestiality to evoke disgust and justify . In the realm of celebrity gossip, the legend serves as a vehicle for , allowing audiences to revel in the imagined downfall of high-profile figures like , whose public image as a made him an ideal target. Folklore analysts argue that these stories thrive on the pleasure derived from toppling idols, especially when tied to cultural tensions; Gere's outspoken for Tibetan independence, which drew criticism from conservative and pro-China groups, may have intensified such narratives by positioning him as an outsider worthy of ridicule. The rumor's endurance reflects how urban legends exploit celebrity vulnerability to disseminate moral judgments, blending envy with taboo-breaking elements to heighten their appeal in gossip networks. Psychologically, the gerbilling captivates through its embodiment of subjects like bestiality and bodily invasion, evoking a mix of horror, fascination, and emotional that facilitates oral transmission in traditions. on propagation highlights "emotional selection," where stories eliciting strong or surprise—such as the image of a live animal causing internal harm—are more likely to be shared as cautionary tales warning against deviance. This appeal aligns with cognitive biases favoring social information, like about intimate violations, which enhances and dissemination over neutral or survival-oriented narratives. In the digital age, the legend's persistence illustrates the evolution of urban through memes and online sharing, where fragmented references reinforce the core motif without requiring evidentiary support. Academic studies of digital describe this as "memetic folk humor," an ephemeral hybrid form that adapts legends to viral platforms, sustaining their cultural relevance amid rapid . Unlike traditional variants, modern iterations often appear in humorous or ironic contexts, yet they continue to propagate underlying stereotypes, demonstrating how amplifies rather than erodes such narratives.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.