Hubbry Logo
In the CarIn the CarMain
Open search
In the Car
Community hub
In the Car
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
In the Car
In the Car
In the Car
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In the Car
ArtistRoy Lichtenstein
Year1963
MovementPop art
Dimensions172 cm × 203.5 cm (67.75 in × 80.125 in)
LocationScottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh

In the Car (sometimes Driving)[1] is a 1963 pop art painting by Roy Lichtenstein. The smaller, older of the two versions of this painting formerly held the record for highest auction price for a Lichtenstein painting. The larger version has been in the collection of the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art in Edinburgh since 1980.[2][3][4]

Background

[edit]
The source for In the Car was Girls' Romances number 78 (September 1961).

The painting is based on a panel illustrated by Tony Abruzzo[5] in the comic book series Girls' Romances[6] #78, dated September 1961 and published by Signal Publishing Corp.[7] (a romance comic imprint of DC Comics).[8] The painting was part of Lichtenstein's second solo exhibition at Leo Castelli Gallery from September 28 to October 24, 1963 that included Drowning Girl, Torpedo...Los!, Baseball Manager, Conversation, and Whaam![9][10] Marketing materials for the show included the lithograph artwork, Crak![11][12]

The smaller version, which was the original version, from the estate of Roy Lichtenstein and consigned by his son Mitchell Lichtenstein, was sold in 2005.[4] On November 8, 2005, it surpassed the previous Lichtenstein work record auction price of $7.1 million set when Happy Tears sold three years earlier (November 13, 2002). In the Car sold for $16.2 million at Christie's auction house in New York City.[13][14] In November 2010, this figure was surpassed when Ohhh...Alright... was sold for a record US $42.6 million (£26.7 million), also at Christie's in New York.[15] The hammer price was $38 million.[16]

Details

[edit]

After 1972, Lichtenstein's comics-based women "look hard, crisp, brittle, and uniformly modish in appearance, as if they all came out of the same pot of makeup." This particular example is one of several that is cropped so closely that the hair flows beyond the edges of the canvas.[17] As with most of his early romance comics, this consisted of "a boy and a girl" subject.[18] It is described as a tense, melodramatic graphic single-frame depiction of a romantic dialogue between a man and woman.[4] Lichtenstein used horizontal parallel lines to convey the sense of motion.[19] A November 1963 Art Magazine review stated that this was one of the "broad and powerful paintings" of the 1963 exhibition at Castelli's Gallery.[10]

In the early 1960s, Lichtenstein produced several "fantasy drama" paintings of women in love affairs with domineering men causing the women to be miserable, such as Drowning Girl, Hopeless and In the Car. These works served as prelude to 1964 paintings of innocent "girls next door" in a variety of tenuous emotional states.[20] "In the Car evokes a mood of resignation, with silence apparently prevailing as the woman stares stonily out the window."[21][22]

In the Car is one of the artworks that Lichtenstein showed interest in discussing gender and identity. The depiction of a woman in the driver’s seat has been interpreted as engaging with ideas about gender roles, autonomy, and power dynamics.[23]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

In the Car

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In the Car is a 1963 oil and Magna on by artist , measuring 172 by 203.5 centimeters, that depicts a dramatic of a blonde woman and a square-jawed man sharing an intimate moment in the front seat of a car. The work is based on a panel from the DC Comics romance series Girls' Romances, which Lichtenstein enlarged and adapted, incorporating his signature Ben-Day dots to mimic the mechanical printing process of comic books. Acquired by the National Galleries of Scotland in 1980, it exemplifies Lichtenstein's early exploration of imagery in the . Lichtenstein created In the Car as part of a series of romance-themed works that transformed everyday comic-strip narratives into monumental , challenging traditional distinctions between high and . The painting's source material originates from a issue of Girls' Romances, where the original panel included a thought bubble from the woman's perspective expressing internal conflict about her rendezvous, though Lichtenstein omitted the text to heighten the visual tension and impersonality of the scene. By zooming in on the figures, he amplified the inherent in the comic's archetypes—a glamorous yet mundane portrayal of postwar American romance—while employing bold outlines, primary colors, and dotted shading to evoke the impersonal efficiency of commercial printing. As a cornerstone of , In the Car captures the confident energy of capitalist America, contrasting the emotional abstraction of earlier with a cool, ironic detachment derived from consumer culture. The painting's scale and smooth execution have made it one of Lichtenstein's most recognizable works, influencing subsequent generations of artists who engage with media and advertising imagery. It is held in the collection of the National Galleries of Scotland, underscoring its enduring role in the Pop Art movement.

Description

Composition

"In the Car" features a cropped view of seated inside a speeding , capturing an intimate and tense moment within the of the . The woman's blonde flows dynamically, extending beyond the edges of the to evoke a sense of rapid motion while underscoring the enclosed environment. Horizontal black lines at the bottom represent the car's , grounding the scene in the automobile's interior, while horizontal lines across the composition amplify the dynamic sense of movement. The larger version of the painting measures 172 cm × 203.5 cm (68 in × 80 in) and is executed in oil and Magna on canvas. Ben-Day dots are employed as a stylistic choice to mimic comic-book printing techniques.

Visual Elements

Lichtenstein employs a restricted palette of primary colors in In the Car to replicate the commercial printing techniques of 1950s romance comics, prominently featuring vivid red for the woman's lips and a stark blue for the car interior, which heightens the emotional intensity within the confined space. These hues are applied in flat, unmodulated areas using Magna paint, a synthetic polymer medium that allows for smooth, opaque surfaces mimicking mass-produced illustrations. Complementing this is the extensive use of Ben-Day dots—small, patterned circles in magenta, yellow, cyan, and black—to simulate halftone shading and texture, evoking the mechanical reproduction process of comic books while infusing the work with pop art's ironic nod to consumer culture. The figures are defined by bold, thick black outlines, a hallmark of Lichtenstein's adaptation of comic-strip graphics, which imparts a cartoonish, impersonal quality to the characters and underscores their stylized detachment. Flat shading, achieved primarily through the density of Ben-Day dots rather than graduated tones, further emphasizes this graphic flatness, reducing the forms to simplified, iconic shapes devoid of naturalistic depth. The composition's absence of extraneous background details—limited to subtle reflections on the 's window—intensifies the focus on the intimate, enclosed interior, creating a sense of claustrophobic immediacy that draws the viewer into the narrative moment. A smaller preparatory version of In the Car, produced earlier in 1963, precedes the larger canonical work held by the National Galleries of Scotland; while both share the core stylistic elements, the larger iteration (measuring 172 x 203.5 cm) amplifies the scale of figures and speech bubbles for greater visual emphasis and dramatic impact, transforming the intimate comic panel into a monumental statement. This adjustment in proportion enhances the impersonal, larger-than-life quality of the cartoonish elements, distinguishing the final version's innovative fusion of commercial reproduction with fine art scale.

Creation

Inspiration

Roy Lichtenstein's In the Car originated from a single panel in the DC Comics romance anthology Girls' Romances #78, published in September 1961. The panel was illustrated by Tony Abruzzo within the eight-page story "Tomorrow and Tomorrow," which depicts archetypal romantic turmoil between a blonde woman and a stern, square-jawed man. In the comic's narrative arc, the female protagonist vows to avoid going riding with the man to attend an important appointment, yet she unexpectedly ends up beside him in the , creating a tense moment of and relational mishap. This scene underscores the driving scenario as a metaphor for her faltering resolve, drawn from the original panel's thought bubble reading, "I vowed to myself I would not miss my appointment. That I would not go riding with him. Yet before I knew it..." Lichtenstein adapted the panel by isolating it from its surrounding comic context and dramatically enlarging it, shifting the scale from the original's roughly 6- to 7-inch dimensions to a canvas measuring 172.1 × 203.8 cm (67¾ × 80¼ in). This transformation elevated a fleeting, mass-produced comic element into a monumental statement, emphasizing visual drama through Pop art's appropriation of commercial imagery. The inspiration also stemmed from the broader conventions of romance comics, which frequently portrayed female characters grappling with anxiety over romantic decisions and male figures embodying frustration or dominance in relationships. These tropes provided Lichtenstein with source material to critique and elevate everyday media narratives.

Production Process

Lichtenstein employed a systematic three-step process to create In the Car, beginning with preliminary sketches derived from comic book panels, where he made compositional adjustments to emphasize dramatic elements. He then used an to enlarge and trace these sketches onto the , allowing for precise outlining in graphite pencil while recomposing the image as needed. This projection technique ensured the bold, graphic lines characteristic of commercial printing were accurately scaled for the painting's format. Following the tracing, Lichtenstein hand-painted the work using a combination of oil and Magna acrylic paints, applying broad areas of flat color with a to achieve a glossy, uniform finish that mimicked mass-produced illustrations. For the signature Ben-Day dots—small, evenly spaced circles used in comic printing to simulate shading and tone—he initially stippled them by hand but, starting in 1962, employed perforated metal screens as stencils to apply the dots mechanically with paint, enhancing the illusion of industrial reproduction. These techniques deliberately incorporated effects of mechanical duplication, underscoring a commentary on consumer culture through the emulation of commercial . The artist produced two versions of the painting: a smaller preparatory work (RLCR 780) in acrylic, oil, and graphite pencil on canvas, measuring 76 × 101.8 cm, and the larger final version (RLCR 779) in oil and Magna on canvas, measuring 172.1 × 203.8 cm. Both were completed in 1963, with the Magna acrylic confirmed in gallery records for the primary piece. The work was finished in early 1963 specifically for inclusion in Lichtenstein's second solo at the Gallery in New York, held from September 28 to October 24, 1963. This timeline aligned with his intensifying engagement with motifs during that period.

History

Exhibition

"In the Car" debuted as a centerpiece in Lichtenstein's second solo at the Gallery in New York, held from September 28 to October 24, 1963. The painting, in its larger format, quickly gained prominence within the movement and was featured in subsequent major retrospectives. The larger version of the painting entered the collection of the of Modern Art in in February 1980 and remains part of the permanent collection; as of 2024, it is in storage. This acquisition marked a significant addition to the gallery's holdings of postwar American art and was met with controversy, including criticism in local media questioning its artistic value. Prior to its placement there, it had circulated through various institutional shows highlighting Lichtenstein's early mature works. A smaller version of "In the Car," measuring approximately 30 by 40 inches, was created around the same time and primarily remained in private collections following its initial exhibition at the Gallery in 1963. It appeared in select group exhibitions and retrospectives during the late while held privately, including loans to shows focused on , before being consigned to auction in 2005.

Ownership and Provenance

Following its debut exhibition at the Gallery in New York in 1963, the larger version of In the Car (RLCR 779, 67¾ × 80¼ inches) was initially acquired by collectors Mr. and Mrs. Robert C. Scull through the gallery. In January 1969, it was sold to Italian industrialist via Gallery and Ileana Sonnabend Galerie in . The of Modern Art in purchased the painting in February 1980 for approximately £100,000, adding it to its permanent collection as accession GMA 2133. The smaller version of In the Car (RLCR 780, 29⅞ × 40⅛ inches), dated 1963, was gifted by the artist to his son, , around the time of its creation. It was later consigned by to auction. On November 8, 2005, New York sold the work for $16,256,000 (including buyer's premium) to Helen and Charles Schwab, setting a then-record price for a Lichtenstein painting. Both versions are authenticated by their inclusion in the official : A Catalogue Raisonné (volumes 1–5, 2024), compiled by the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation, which verifies details such as media (acrylic, oil, and graphite pencil on canvas) and dimensions based on studio records and historical documentation. No significant restorations or conservation interventions are documented for the larger version held by the of Modern Art, which remains in stable condition suitable for display. The smaller version's post-auction history is private, with no public conservation records available.

Analysis

Themes

"In the Car" centrally explores gender roles in America, portraying the female figure as a glamorous yet submissive blonde whose —expressed in the original comic's omitted thought bubble about vowing not to meet the man yet doing so—symbolizes a loss of self-control, reflecting societal norms where women were often depicted as swept away by male characters in popular media. The woman's position behind the wheel, typically a symbol of agency, ironically underscores her vulnerability and the cultural constraints on female autonomy during the era. The enclosed space of the automobile functions as a for within strained relationships, amplifying the escalating between the couple through its claustrophobic confines and reflective glass surfaces that distance the viewer from the intimate drama. This setting heightens the tension of interpersonal dynamics, where the confined environment mirrors the inescapable pressures of romantic entanglements. The painting critiques mass-media romance narratives by adapting a panel from the comic book Girls' Romances #78 (1961), exaggerating its formulaic elements to expose the stereotypical depiction of female vulnerability and male authority as contrived entertainment tropes. The original panel's thought bubble from the highlights her personal without resolving the tension. As a work, "In the Car" offers a broader commentary on and in modern life, employing mechanical reproduction techniques like Ben-Day dots and flat, bold colors to transform personal turmoil into an impersonal, mass-produced akin to commercial advertising. This stylistic detachment critiques how consumer culture commodifies human emotions, reducing relational strife to stylized, reproducible motifs devoid of genuine depth.

Critical Reception

Upon its debut in 1963 as part of Roy Lichtenstein's exhibition at the Gallery, In the Car elicited mixed critical responses that highlighted the novelty and controversy of Pop art's engagement with aesthetics. Reviewers appreciated the painting's ironic commentary on mass-media romance narratives, capturing a moment of interpersonal tension through stylized Benday dots and bold outlines that mimicked commercial printing techniques. However, some critics faulted Lichtenstein for unoriginal appropriation of panels, viewing the work's approach as one of cool detachment lacking innovation. In the 1980s and 1990s, feminist art scholars reevaluated In the Car through the lens of gender representation, critiquing its reinforcement of stereotypical dynamics between men and women. Lucy Lippard, a prominent critic, lambasted Pop art—including Lichtenstein's contributions—for aggressively colonizing feminine consumer domains and perpetuating objectified portrayals of women, as seen in the painting's depiction of a passive female figure confined in a domestic, relational space. This perspective aligned with broader feminist discourse, exemplified by Linda Nochlin's analyses, which viewed such works as complicit in upholding patriarchal norms under the guise of cultural critique. Subsequent pop art scholarship offered more affirmative interpretations, emphasizing In the Car's technical achievements in translating ephemeral comic imagery into monumental canvas form. Note that there are two versions of the painting: a larger one (172 x 203.5 cm) held by the National Galleries of Scotland since 1980, and a smaller one (76 x 101.6 cm) sold at auction. The comprehensive Roy Lichtenstein: A Catalogue Raisonné (2005), published in conjunction with the National Gallery of Art, positions the painting as a pivotal example of Lichtenstein's innovative adaptation of mechanical reproduction processes, such as simulated halftone patterns, which elevated commercial vernacular to fine art status. This reevaluation underscores the work's role in Pop's enduring challenge to artistic hierarchies. The smaller version's sale for $16.2 million at in November 2005 set a record for Lichtenstein at the time, with contemporary critics and market analysts hailing it as emblematic of Pop art's sustained vitality amid evolving art markets. Auction reports framed the transaction as affirmation of the movement's cultural resonance, demonstrating how Lichtenstein's ironic appropriations continue to command premium values decades later and validate Pop's penetration into mainstream consciousness.

Legacy

Cultural Impact

"In the Car" has contributed to the prominence of Roy Lichtenstein's romance series within education through its inclusion in resources like the National Galleries of Scotland's learning materials, which use it to illustrate techniques such as reflections in glass and the transformation of into , fostering discussions on American . Lichtenstein's style, exemplified by works like "In the Car," has influenced practices through the adoption of bold lines, Ben-Day dots, and comic-inspired elements in and commercial visuals. The painting has informed feminist discourse by highlighting stereotypical media portrayals of women in , as discussed in scholarly analyses of Pop Art's gendered imagery. This has encouraged examinations of how such works represent female passivity in visual narratives. The enduring market appeal of Lichtenstein's style, including romance-themed works, has motivated subsequent generations of artists to explore comic-inspired techniques in their practice. "In the Car" forms part of Roy Lichtenstein's early romance comics series, produced between 1961 and 1965, which drew from DC Comics titles such as Girls' Romances and Secret Hearts to explore interpersonal dynamics. This series includes works like The Engagement Ring (1961), depicting a moment of romantic commitment fraught with tension, and We Rose Up Slowly (1964), portraying a couple in an intimate, emotionally charged embrace, both sharing the overarching theme of emotional turmoil in relationships. These paintings, like "In the Car," employ comic book conventions such as bold outlines, Ben-Day dots, and dramatic dialogue to amplify feelings of anxiety, longing, and conflict. Within Lichtenstein's oeuvre, "In the Car" connects to other driving-themed works from 1963, such as , which similarly evokes sensations of speed and confinement through vehicular imagery but shifts emphasis to expansive landscapes rather than interpersonal . This contrast highlights Lichtenstein's versatility in using the automobile motif to symbolize isolation or momentum, distinct from the narrative-driven tension in romance scenes. As a key figure, Lichtenstein shared influences with contemporaries like , whose serial imagery of consumer products emphasized mechanical repetition and cultural saturation. However, Lichtenstein's approach in "In the Car" and related works is distinguished by a focus derived from comic strips, prioritizing storytelling and emotional specificity over Warhol's detached multiplicity. The piece also signals an evolution in Lichtenstein's practice toward his 1965 Brushstrokes series, where abstracted comic elements like exaggerated strokes replace the directness of panel reproductions, marking a transition from literal comic adaptation to stylized abstraction. This shift, beginning with science fiction-inspired motifs, reflects a broader experimentation with Pop Art's ironic engagement with modernist traditions.

References

  1. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/664/car
  2. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/sep/15/roy-lichtenstein-in-the-car-dramatic-close-encounter
  3. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/features/roy-lichtenstein-learning-resource
  4. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/catalogue/entry.php?id=465
  5. https://www.artistrooms.org/sites/default/files/downloads/RoyLichtensteinLearningResource.pdf
  6. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/resources/?Reference%2BMaterial=Comic%2BBook%2BReferences&REF=CB045
  7. https://www.comics.org/issue/16420/
  8. https://flashbak.com/tormented-and-alone-the-neurotic-dreams-of-the-ladies-of-romance-comics-1915/
  9. https://www.thecollector.com/how-did-roy-lichtenstein-make-his-pop-art/
  10. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/catalogue/entry.php?id=1192
  11. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/exhibitions/entry.php?id=108
  12. https://lichtensteinfoundation.org/biography/
  13. https://www.roylichtenstein.com/crak.jsp
  14. https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/uk-travel/scotland-travel/edinburgh/scotland-is-finally-in-the-mood-for-pop-art-6l7g38p7rtg
  15. https://www.christies.com/presscenter/pdf/11092005/11092005c.pdf
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/arts/design/11roy.html
  17. https://www.lichtensteinfoundation.org/
  18. https://guyhepner.com/news/493-roy-lichtenstein-suspended-storytelling-picture-perfect-vignettes/
  19. https://aaeportal.com/publications/-17653/a-taste-for-pop-pop-art-gender-and-consumer-culture
  20. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ohiou1388760449&disposition=inline
  21. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/
  22. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-11732551
  23. https://www.paulfrasercollectibles.com/blogs/art-photography/pop-christies-sets-new-42-6m-world-auction-record-for-lichtenstein
  24. https://www.artmajeur.com/en/magazine/8-meet-and-discover/roy-lichtenstein-icon-of-pop-art-and-cultural-transformation/335689
  25. https://www.afterall.org/articles/women-concept-art-lucy-r-lippards-numbers-shows-cornelia-butler/
  26. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-roy-lichtenstein/articles/roy-lichtenstein-10-most-famous-works
  27. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/chronology/
  28. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/catalogue/entry.php?id=658
  29. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/catalogue/entry.php?id=1003
  30. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/literature/entry.php?id=3242
  31. https://www.lichtensteincatalogue.org/catalogue/entry.php?id=779
  32. https://www.phillips.com/article/2327842/theme-and-variation-a-parody-of-expressionism-by-roy-lichtenstein-and-andy-warhol
  33. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/lichtenstein-brushstroke-p07354
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.