Hubbry Logo
Louis de BonaldLouis de BonaldMain
Open search
Louis de Bonald
Community hub
Louis de Bonald
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Louis de Bonald
Louis de Bonald
Louis de Bonald
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Louis Gabriel Ambroise, Vicomte de Bonald (French: [lwi də bɔnald]; 2 October 1754 – 23 November 1840) was a French counter-revolutionary[1] philosopher and politician. He is mainly remembered for developing a theoretical framework from which French sociology would emerge.[2][3][4][5]

Key Information

Life

[edit]

Early life and education

[edit]
The College of Juilly, where Bonald attended school as a boy.

Bonald came from an ancient noble family of Provence. Louis was born in the chateau of Le Monna, a modest estate that served as the family seat; the only son in his family, Louis was heir to the family estate. Le Monna is situated just east of the market town of Millau, overlooking the Dourbie river. His father, Antoine Sébastien de Bonald, died when Louis was four years old and the young boy would be brought up by his pious mother Anne née de Boyer du Bosc de Périe. Like many in the provincial nobility of the time, Anne was influenced by the Jansenists and brought up her son with a stern Catholic piety. De Bonald was tutored at Le Monna until the age of eleven, when he was sent to boarding school in Paris. He would then move to the Oratorian College of Juilly at age fifteen at the behest of his mother.[6][7][8] The Oratorians were known for their rigor and grounded de Bonald in the classics, as well as in mathematics, philosophy, and especially history. The headmaster of the school, Father Mandar, was a friend of Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and de Bonald was most likely acquainted with the writings of the philosophes early on.

He left Juilly in 1772 and entered the musketeers the following year. His unit was attached to King Louis XV at Versailles before being disbanded in 1776. After leaving the military, de Bonald returned to his estates in his native region of Rouergue. He assumed the life of a country gentleman, and took an interest in growing his properties and making them as productive as possible. He married a country nobleman’s daughter, Elisabeth-Marguerite de Guibal de Combescure, and the two had seven children, four of whom lived past childhood. One of their sons, Louis Jacques Maurice de Bonald, would go on to become the Cardinal-Archbishop of Lyon. His other son, Victor, would have a writing career of his own and would write a biography of his father.[7]

Revolution and exile

[edit]

He was elected to the town council of Millau in 1782 and was appointed mayor by the province's royal governor in 1785. He was popular as mayor and after the introduction of election for local officials in 1789, rather than appointment, he easily won reelection in February 1790. He was elected as a deputy to the departmental assembly later that year. De Bonald was at first supportive of the French Revolution and its initial decentralizing tendencies, and hoped the nobility would recover powers lost during the centralization of the 17th century. He even lead the citizens of Millau in drafting a letter of congratulations to the National Assembly, King Louis XVI, and to finance minister Jacques Necker, expressing the wish that "this sacred title of citizen [and] the spirit of concord and fraternity" would lead to a new sense of solidarity. He managed to quell the Great Fear in his region and would earn the thanks of the National Assembly, and he would be elected president of the departmental assembly soon after. However he soured on the Revolution with the enactment of the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in July 1790. Feeling unable to carry out the decrees of the Constitution in good conscience, he resigned from his post in January 1791.[7][9]

Fearing that his position as a former public official would make him the target of reprisals, he emigrated with his two eldest sons – leaving behind his wife, mother, and his remaining children – in October 1791 and joined the army of the Prince of Condé. He was within earshot of the Battle of Jemappes in November 1792. He soon settled in Heidelberg and later moved to Switzerland. There he wrote his first important work, the highly conservative Theorie du Pouvoir Politique et Religieux dans la Societe Civile Demontree par le Raisonnement et l'Histoire (3 vols., 1796; new ed., Paris, 1854, 2 vols.), which the Directory condemned. His exile would separate him from his family for more than a decade, with only a brief reunion in 1797.[10][9]

He returned to France in 1797 and largely spent the next five years in Paris in a sort of internal exile. Napoleon was an admirer of de Bonald's writings and had him removed from the list of proscribed émigrés in 1802. This amnesty granted de Bonald a greater degree of freedom to travel and publish his writings. He moved within literary and political circles, and would make the acquittance of writers such as La Harpe, Lacretelle, and, most importantly, François-René de Chateaubriand. During this time he wrote a critical review of The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith, arguing that the true common good of a nation lies in a shared life of law-abiding virtue and not simply in material prosperity. He would strike up a long correspondence and friendship with the conservative Savoyard philosopher Joseph de Maistre, however the two would never meet.[7][9] In 1806, he, along with Chateaubriand and Joseph Fiévée, edited the Mercure de France. Two years later, he was appointed counsellor of the Imperial University, which he had often attacked previously.[11]

Bourbon Restoration and political career

[edit]
The French Chamber of Deputies, where de Bonald was a deputy from 1815 to 1823.

The Bourbon Restoration saw de Bonald's political fortunes increase. He was made a member of the Royal Council for Public Instruction,[12] and in 1816 was appointed to the French Academy by Louis XVIII.[10] From 1815 to 1823, de Bonald served as an elected deputy for Aveyron in the Chamber of Deputies. A member of the Ultra-royalist faction (also known as "Ultras"), his speeches were extremely conservative and he vigorously sought to undo the legislation passed in the wake of the Revolution. He opposed the Charter of 1814, seeing it as giving too many concessions to the revolutionaries and enfeebling the government.[7] He sought strong protections for the traditional family and in 1815 successfully argued for the repeal of laws passed during the Revolution permitting divorce, which afterwards remained illegal in France until 1884.[9]

The Revolution had abolished the remainder of the medieval trade guilds, affording little protection to workers. The Le Chapelier Law of 1791 forbade workers the right to form workers' associations and prohibited strike actions.[13] De Bonald worked to reverse the Le Chapelier Law and reintroduce guilds but his efforts were unsuccessful,[9] and the right to form workers' associations would not be reintroduced in France until 1864.[13]

He also continued his writing career during this time, and his intellectual pursuits led to him visit many of Paris' Salons. Both de Bonald and Chateaubriand frequented the salon of Juliette Récamier, who drew from the leading literary and political circles of her day. He, along with Chateaubriand, contributed to various newspapers and journals, including The Correspondant, a journal of French and British thinkers, as well as Conservateur, a newspaper dedicated to defending the position of the Ultras. 1817 saw the publication of his Thoughts on Various Subjects, and his Observations on Madame de Staël's Considerations on the Principle Events of the French Revolution in the following year.[7]

Peerage and later life

[edit]
Portrait of de Bonald by an unknown artist.

In 1822, de Bonald was made Minister of State, and in the following year, he was raised to the peerage by Louis XVIII, a dignity which he had lost by refusing to take the required oath in 1803. This entitled de Bonald to sit in the Chamber of Peers, the upper house of the French Parliament during the Bourbon Restoration. In 1825, he argued strongly in favor of the Anti-Sacrilege Act, including its prescription of the death penalty under certain conditions.[10] In 1826, de Bonald briefly stepped away from politics due to the death of his wife.

In 1826, the Prime Minister and leader of the Ultras, Joseph de Villèle, introduced a bill reestablishing the law of primogeniture, at least for owners of large estates, unless they chose otherwise.[14] The Revolution had radically changed inheritance law by mandating partitive inheritance, where property is dispersed equally among heirs, in order to break up aristocratic holdings.[15] The proposed law was met with fierce opposition from the liberal Doctrinaires, the press, and even from Dissident Ultras, such as Chateaubriand.[14] De Bonald's On the Agricultural Family, the Industrial Family, and the Right of Primogeniture was written in defense of primogeniture, agrarianism, and the proposed law.[9] The government tried to manage popular outrage by attempting to pass a bill in December of that year curtailing the press, having largely withdrawn censorship in 1824. This only inflamed tensions and the proposed changes to inheritance were dropped by the government.[14]

In 1827, Charles X created a commission on censorship and tasked de Bonald with presiding over it.[16][9] This position would lead to the end of his long friendship with Chateaubriand, who opposed literary censorship. De Bonald's own attitudes towards censorship were somewhat mixed; he was in favor of taking a hard line on books since objectionable material in this form would be harder to take out of circulation, however he felt newspapers and periodicals should enjoy a greater degree of freedom. He felt that offending journalists and publishers should be first given a warning and then face legal prosecution if they continued to publish material detrimental to the public order. Bonald felt that the censorship practices of the 17th century would be anachronistic in the 19th century, and that the best way to combat error would be through the "marketplace of ideas." Bonald himself had voted against a proposed censorship law in 1817 as giving too much power to the government.[7]

He retired from the Chamber of Peers in 1829. Following the July Revolution and the institution of the liberal July Monarchy in 1830, he retired from public life for good and spent the remainder of his days on his estate at Le Monna.

Philosophy

[edit]
Part of a series on
Conservatism in France
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Literature
Politicians
Commentators
Parties
Active
Defunct
Organisations
Active
Defunct
Media
Active
Defunct
Related topics
Part of a series on
Catholic philosophy
  
Aquinas, Scotus and Ockham
Ethics
Metaphysics
Schools
Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Contemporary

Politics

[edit]
Part of a series on
Integralism
Vendéen Sacred Heart
Principles
Variants
Thinkers
Politicians and rulers
Works
Organizations
Related

Bonald's political philosophy rests on the assumptions of humanity's fallenness, the need for strong government to repress man's evil tendencies, and the belief that humans are inherently social creatures. He opposed the individualistic and atomistic tendencies of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. At the heart of his political thought was the idea that the family was the basis of society and that institutions should work to protect it in its traditional form. For this reason he opposed the secularization of marriage, divorce, and partitive inheritance. He was also critical of the Industrial Revolution because of its negative effects on traditional patterns of family life.[9]

The sharing of power, as in a democracy, seemed ludicrous to Bonald, and the doctrine of the separation of powers tended towards anarchy. The monarch rules for the good of society and thus represents the general will, contrary to Rousseau; whereas a multitude of individual wills, even when united in purpose, do not constitute the general will.[7][10]

Economics

[edit]

Bonald was also an early critic of laissez-faire economics. In 1806, he wrote a treatise critical of usury, or the practice of lending at interest, and in 1810 he wrote a critical review of the French edition of The Wealth of Nations. He was likewise critical of Louis XVI's finance minister, Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, a physiocrat who liberalised France's grain trade and supported the suppression of the trade guilds. Bonald criticised Turgot as a "fanatical partisan of a materialistic politics." Elsewhere he says, "[w]heat was not given to man to be an object of commerce, but to nourish him." Shaped by Tacitus and his condemnations of Roman decadence, Bonald felt that economic liberalism and unrestrained wealth would undermine the Christian character of the French people, and would lead men to become less generous and more self-centered.[17]

Religion

[edit]

Bonald was one of the leading writers of the theocratic or traditionalist school,[18][19] which included Maistre, Lamennais, Ballanche and Ferdinand d'Eckstein.[20] The traditionalist school, in reaction to the rationalists, believed that human reason was incapable of even arriving at natural religion, and that tradition, the result of a primitive revelation, was necessary to know both natural religion as well as the truths of supernatural revelation.[21] Bonald believed that the principles of good governance could be deduced from history and sacred scripture. His political thought is closely tied to his theory of the divine origin of language. Since man learns to speak through imitation, he believed that the first man must have learned to speak from God, who announced all moral principles to this first man. In his own words, "L'homme pense sa parole avant de parler sa pensée" (man thinks his speech before saying his thought); the first language contained the essence of all truth. These moral truths were then codified in Holy Scripture. From this he deduces the existence of God, the divine origin and consequent supreme authority of the Holy Scriptures, and the infallibility of the Catholic Church.[7][10]

Bonald published an anti-Semitic text during the post-French Revolutionary period, Sur les juifs, in which he described Jews an alien race, describing them with the same racialized language he used to attack the recently emancipated Black slaves in the colonies.[22] In it, the philosophes are condemned for fashioning the intellectual tools used to justify Jewish emancipation during the Revolution. Bonald accused French Jews of not becoming "authentic" French citizens and of being a disruptive force in traditional society.[22] Bonald called for the reversal of Jewish emancipation and endorsed new discriminatory measures, such as a distinctive mark which Jews would be forced to wear to identify them in public.[22]

Metaphysics

[edit]

While this thought lies at the root of all his speculations, there is a formula of constant application. All relations may be stated as the triad of cause, means and effect, which he sees repeated throughout nature and society. Thus, in the universe, he finds the First Cause as mover, movement as the means, and bodies as the result; in the state, power as the cause, ministers as the means, and subjects as the effects; in the family, the same relation is exemplified by father, mother and children; and in political society, the monarch as cause, ministers/nobility as means, and the subjects as effect. These three terms bear specific relations to one another; the first is to the second as the second to the third. Thus, in the great triad of the religious world—God, the Mediator, and Man—God is to the God-Man as the God-Man is to Man. On this basis, he constructed a system of political absolutism.

Influence

[edit]

Bonald's writings exercised a great deal of influence over conservative and French Catholic thought throughout the 19th century. The French writer Honoré de Balzac considered himself to be an intellectual heir of Bonald and took up many Bonaldian themes in his writings, once declaring that "when it beheaded Louis XVI, the Revolution beheaded in his person all fathers of families." Bonald's influence carried on throughout the counter-revolutionary tradition in the writings of Spanish conservative Juan Donoso Cortés, Italian philosopher Monaldo Leopardi and the ultramontane French journalist Louis Veuillot. His writings also exerted a great influence over the corporatist philosophical tradition through Frédéric le Play and René de La Tour du Pin, and through them he had an influence on the development of the principle of solidarity in Catholic social thought.

Bonald's direct influence fell into decline after World War I, especially outside of French Catholic circles. Since then he has generally suffered neglect at the hands of economic historians and historians of Catholic thought. Bonald's thought has often drawn more positive attention from historians working within the Marxist or socialist tradition.[8]

Works

[edit]
  • 1796: Théorie du Pouvoir Politique et Religieux.[23]
  • 1800: Essai Analytique sur les Lois Naturelles de l’Ordre Social.[23]
  • 1801: Du Divorce: Considéré au XIXe, Impr. d'A. Le Clere.
  • 1802: Législation Primitive (3 volumes).
  • 1815: Réflexions sur l’Intérêt Général de l’Europe.[23]
  • 1817: Pensées sur Divers Sujets.[23]
  • 1818: Recherches Philosophiques sur les Premiers Objets des Connaissances Morales.[23]
  • 1818: Observations sur un Ouvrage de Madame de Staël.
  • 1819: Mélanges Littéraires, Politiques et Philosophiques.[23]
  • 1821: Opinion sur la Loi Relative à la Censure des Journaux.
  • 1825: De la Chrétienté et du Christianisme.
  • 1826: De la Famille Agricole et de la Famille Industrielle.
  • 1830: Démonstration Philosophique du Principe Constitutif de la Société.[23]
  • 1834: Discours sur la Vie de Jésus-Christ.

Complete works

[edit]
  • Œuvres de M. de Bonald, 1817-1843 (A. Le Clere, 14 vols. in-8°).
  • Œuvres de M. de Bonald, 1847-1859 (A. Le Clere, 7 vols. in-8° gr.).
  • Œuvres Complètes de M. de Bonald, 1858 (Jacques-Paul Migne, 3 vols. in-4°).
  • Œuvres Complètes, Archives Karéline, 2010 (facsimile of the Migne edition).

Writings in English translation

[edit]
  • In Menczer, Béla, 1962. Catholic Political Thought, 1789-1848, University of Notre Dame Press.
  • On Divorce, Transaction Publishers, 1992.
  • In Blum, Christopher Olaf, editor and translator, 2004. Critics of the Enlightenment. Wilmington DE: ISI Books.
    • 1815: "On Bossuet, Bishop of Meaux," pp. 43–70.
    • 1817: "Thoughts on Various Subjects," pp. 71–80.
    • 1818: "Observations on Madame de Staël's Considerations on the Principle Events of the French Revolution," pp. 81–106.
    • 1826: "On the Agricultural Family, the Industrial Family, and the Right of Primogeniture," pp. 107–32.
  • The True and Only Wealth of Nations: Essays on Family, Society and Economy, trans. by Christopher Blum. Ave Maria University Press, 2006. ISBN 1-932589-31-7
  • In Blum, Christopher O., editor and translator, 2020. Critics of the Enlightenment. Providence, RI: Cluny Media.
    • 1810: "On the Wealth of Nations," pp. 25–34.
    • 1815: "A Proposal to Abolish Divorce," pp. 35–44.
    • 1817: "Thoughts on Various Subjects," pp. 45–52.
    • 1826: "On the Agricultural Family, the Industrial Family, and the Right of Primogeniture," pp. 53–71.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Louis de Bonald

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Louis Gabriel Ambroise, vicomte de Bonald (2 October 1754 – 23 November 1840), was a French aristocrat, philosopher, and statesman renowned for his counter-revolutionary writings that defended hereditary monarchy, the Catholic Church, and the natural hierarchical order of society as essential constituents derived from divine providence rather than human invention. Born near Millau in southern France to a noble family, Bonald received a classical education at the Oratorian Collège de Juilly before serving in the royal musketeers and later as mayor of Millau, positions from which he witnessed the escalating threats of revolutionary ideology. Opposing the French Revolution's atomization of social bonds, he emigrated in 1791, composing his seminal Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux (1796), which posited that political and religious authority form an indissoluble unity ordained by God, with society preceding the individual in ontological priority. Returning under the Directory, Bonald's subsequent works, such as Démonstration philosophique du principe constitutif de la société (1802), elaborated a traditionalist science of society emphasizing primitive revelation—wherein language and moral order originate divinely—as the causal foundation for stable governance, critiquing Enlightenment deism and contractualism for eroding communal causality and empirical social cohesion. During the Bourbon Restoration, he entered politics as a deputy in 1815, instrumental in abolishing divorce in 1816 to restore familial sovereignty, and later as a peer of France and censor under Charles X, advocating the subordination of temporal power to spiritual authority amid liberal encroachments. Bonald's insistence on organic, ternary structures—uniting teaching, ruling, and priestly functions under monarchical mediation—profoundly influenced ultramontane conservatism and early sociological thought, underscoring the Revolution's causal role in societal disintegration through the severance of transcendent norms from immanent practice.

Early Life and Education

Family and Upbringing

Louis-Gabriel-Ambroise de Bonald was born on October 2, 1754, at the of Le Monna, a modest family estate near in the province of Rouergue (present-day department). He was the only son of a noble family tracing its origins to , with deep-rooted Catholic traditions and historical allegiance to the French monarchy. His father, Antoine Sébastien de Bonald, died when Louis was four years old, curtailing any prolonged paternal guidance. The family's noble status nonetheless embedded early exposure to hierarchical duties and monarchical loyalties inherent in pre-revolutionary provincial . Bonald's upbringing occurred amid the rural agrarian economy of Rouergue, where the served as the and traditional practices prevailed. Primarily raised by his mother, Anne de Boyer du Bosc, Bonald was instilled with stern Catholic piety under her Jansenist-influenced oversight, which emphasized religious discipline and moral rigor from a young age. This familial environment, centered on the estate's operations and local customs, immersed him in the organic social structures of feudal-era rural , including landlord-tenant relations and communal traditions tied to the land.

Intellectual Development

Louis de Bonald pursued his education at the Oratorian Collège de Juilly near from 1769 to 1772, an institution renowned for its rigorous humanistic curriculum that included classical literature, , , and religious instruction. This formation emphasized the integration of pagan antiquity with , fostering in Bonald a preference for organic social structures rooted in historical precedent over individualistic innovation. Central to his early intellectual influences was , whose Politique tirée des propres paroles de l'Écriture sainte articulated the as derived directly from biblical , a framework Bonald adopted and extended in his critiques of secular power. Bossuet's anti-Protestant polemics, stressing the unity of faith, church, and state, further reinforced Bonald's conviction that legitimate emanates from supernatural origins rather than contractual arrangements. Bonald engaged selectively with Enlightenment thinkers, such as , appreciating the latter's empirical analysis of diverse governmental forms in The Spirit of the Laws, yet subordinating such observations to theological imperatives. He explicitly rejected Cartesian , faulting René Descartes' methodical doubt for engendering subjectivist skepticism that undermined traditional certainties, instead advocating reliance on verifiable social facts and inherited customs as the true basis for understanding human order. Through his studies in , , and classical texts, Bonald began formulating preliminary ideas on as a , divinely sanctioned medium that preserves societal truths across generations, distinct from . This perspective, evident in his pre-revolutionary reflections, anticipated his mature philosophy by privileging communal transmission over rationalist invention.

Revolutionary Period and Exile

Response to the Revolution

In the initial stages of the , Bonald, serving as mayor of in the Rouergue region from 1785 to 1789, initially endorsed moderate reforms, including the convocation of the Estates-General in May 1789 to address fiscal and administrative grievances. However, by mid-1789, he became disillusioned with the National Assembly's pursuit of radical egalitarian principles, such as the abolition of feudal privileges on August 4, 1789, which he observed as exacerbating local disorders. In Rouergue, events like the —a wave of peasant uprisings from July to August 1789 involving attacks on châteaux and hoarding by rural laborers—provided empirical evidence of societal breakdown, as these actions inverted traditional hierarchies of authority between landowners and dependents, fostering anarchy rather than orderly reform. Bonald's opposition intensified with the National Assembly's enactment of the on July 12, 1790, which reorganized the French Church under state control, mandating clerical elections and oaths of loyalty to over the pope. Elected president of the departmental administration earlier in 1790, he resigned in 1791, refusing to enforce the measure, which he regarded as a direct assault on independence and the causal foundations of social stability derived from divine ordinance. This legislation, rejected by in briefs dated March 10 and April 13, 1791, triggered widespread clerical resistance and early de-Christianization efforts, including forced oaths that divided communities and precipitated violence against non-juring priests in regions like Rouergue. Bonald interpreted these developments as empirical confirmation of the Revolution's tendency to dismantle inherited structures of authority, power, and ministry essential to maintaining order. His resignation symbolized a decisive pivot to conviction, grounded in firsthand observations of how egalitarian experiments eroded deference to , , and , leading to instability rather than progress. Local testimonies from Rouergue, including reluctance to sustain revolutionary fervor amid economic strains, further reinforced his assessment that the upheaval prioritized abstract rights over proven communal bonds. This stance positioned Bonald against the Revolution's core premise of , viewing it as a causal rupture in the organic transmission of authority from through constituted bodies.

Emigration and Initial Writings

In October 1791, amid escalating revolutionary violence and the , Louis de Bonald fled with his two eldest sons, settling initially in , , where he joined the émigré under Louis Joseph de Bourbon, Prince de Condé, to oppose republican forces militarily. This involvement exposed him to the tactical disarray of efforts, including proximity to the 1792 , reinforcing his view of republicanism's destabilizing effects on constituted authority derived from divine and societal origins rather than abstract . During his exile, which lasted over five years and separated him from his wife and younger children, Bonald relocated temporarily to Constance, where he composed and oversaw the printing of his seminal Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux en société civile, démontrée par le raisonnement et par l'histoire (1796), a self-published work without named publisher, funded from personal resources amid émigré networks. In it, Bonald contended from first principles that political and religious power originates in God, transmitted through the family and society as organic mediators, not the atomized will of individuals or assemblies, which he empirically linked to the Revolution's anarchy, including the Reign of Terror's 17,000 documented executions and societal breakdown. He distributed copies clandestinely among fellow exiles and sympathizers, arguing that religion's causal necessity in enforcing moral order—evident in historical polities' stability versus republics' recurrent collapses, as in ancient Athens or revolutionary France—demanded restoration of monarchical and ecclesiastical hierarchies to avert perpetual civil war. The Directory regime in swiftly condemned the as seditious, banning it and issuing a death sentence against Bonald in absentia, consistent with decrees against émigrés disseminating texts that challenged the regime's secular foundations. This judicial response underscored Bonald's thesis: regimes severing authority from transcendent sources invite self-undermining violence, as the Directory's own coups and fiscal insolvency by 1797 demonstrated empirically. His writings thus served not as abstract theory but as a pragmatic blueprint for exiles, prioritizing societal conservation through religious causation over revolutionary experimentation.

Bourbon Restoration and Public Service

Return to France

Following his emigration in 1791 amid the escalating violence of the , de Bonald clandestinely reentered in 1797 by crossing the at night to evade border patrols, initially under the alias Saint-Severin. This return occurred during the Directory period, prior to Napoleon's rise, and placed him under suspicion as a former , confining him to a form of internal in where he avoided public prominence to mitigate risks of or further . Despite these constraints, he reunited briefly with his family, who had endured separation and property losses, marking a tentative step toward personal resettlement amid ongoing revolutionary instability. Under the Napoleonic regime, de Bonald adopted a strategy of selective engagement, publishing Du divorce in 1801, which critiqued family law reforms and earned admiration from for its defense of , influencing later policy deliberations on marriage indissolubility. He accepted a position as councillor in the Imperial University in 1808, a body he had previously criticized, viewing 's centralization as a pragmatic restoration of and authority—albeit incomplete without deeper religious foundations—while steering clear of overt oaths that might endorse constitutions. This role allowed limited administrative influence in education, aligning with his emphasis on moral instruction, yet he maintained discreet ties to counter- circles, including collaborations like the 1806 editorship of the alongside , to subtly advance traditionalist ideas without direct confrontation. De Bonald's reintegration also involved gradual economic stabilization through family estates in Rouergue, where he prioritized agrarian self-sufficiency reflective of his belief in landed nobility's stabilizing role, recovering from confiscations via Napoleonic amnesties that permitted property reclamation for non-combatant exiles by 1802. These efforts underscored his personal investment in monarchical revival, as familial and territorial recovery intertwined with broader hopes for a theocratic order to supplant Napoleonic , positioning him for greater influence upon the Bourbon Restoration.

Parliamentary and Peerage Roles

Upon returning to France, de Bonald was elected as a deputy representing Aveyron in the Chamber of Deputies, serving from 1815 to 1823 as a prominent ultra-royalist aligned with the chambre introuvable. In this role, he was twice elected vice-president of the chamber and delivered speeches critiquing constitutional liberalism, advocating instead for reinforced monarchical authority grounded in divine right and the historical stability of absolute rule, while supporting measures to censor irreligious publications that he viewed as fomenting social disorder akin to the Revolution. His interventions emphasized empirical observations of revolutionary upheaval, including elevated crime and instability, as evidence against diluting sovereignty through charters that empowered popular assemblies over traditional hierarchies. In 1823, de Bonald was appointed to the Chamber of Peers by King , elevating his influence within the amid the ultra-royalist dominance under ministries like that of the Comte de Villèle. There, he opposed concessions to liberal doctrines, steering debates toward policies restoring ecclesiastical oversight in public life and countering the Charter of 1814's perceived erosions of absolutist precedents. His advocacy extended to , where he pressed for reforms prioritizing Catholic moral instruction to instill societal order, drawing on precedents of pre-revolutionary systems that had maintained cohesion through religious formation rather than secular . De Bonald's parliamentary tenure ended with vehement opposition to the of 1830, which installed the Louis-Philippe and dismantled Bourbon legitimacy; he resigned his in protest, refusing allegiance to what he decried as a usurpation perpetuating revolutionary chaos under liberal guise. This act underscored his commitment to hereditary as empirically validated by centuries of monarchical stability against the transience of elective or constitutional experiments.

Philosophical System

Foundations: Society, Language, and Human Nature

De Bonald maintained that human beings are inherently social creatures, incapable of full or development in isolation, and that precedes and perfects the by transmitting essential faculties and duties from birth. Influenced by a acknowledging the effects of , he viewed humans as fallen yet redeemable through institutional frameworks that progressively rehabilitate natural imperfections via "social palingenesis," or rebirth through communal order. In this schema, functions as a formative "minister," educating the in , , and obligations before individual reason can emerge, thereby countering atomistic views that prioritize autonomous self-creation. Central to Bonald's was the empirical reality of as proof of divine and social inheritance, rather than spontaneous human invention. He rejected Étienne Bonnot de Condillac's sensationalist theory, which derived from associative chains of sensory impressions and natural cries evolving into conventional signs, arguing instead that linguistic —evident in ancient grammars and uniform structures across civilizations—demands a originator and intergenerational transmission. For Bonald, ideas themselves arise not from isolated sensation but from societal embedded in words, with revealing language's stability and purposeful design as hallmarks of transcendent causality. Bonald conceptualized society through a triadic ontology mirroring divine and familial relations: pouvoir (constitutive power or authority, establishing order), ministère (executive ministry, applying laws), and doctrine (instructive teaching, rooted in religion to unify beliefs). These interdependent elements form the causal minimum for social coherence, as power without doctrine devolves into despotism, ministry without power into anarchy, and doctrine without ministry into abstraction; their harmony, observed in stable historical polities, underscores society's organic necessity over contractual fictions. This structure, analogous to the Trinity in theology and paternity-maternity-filiality in the family, ensures equilibrium by balancing command, obedience, and moral sanction.

Political Theory: Authority and Sovereignty

Bonald conceived as an indivisible attribute residing exclusively in the , who functions as the unifying source of power embodying will, force, and paternal direction within . This structure mirrors a ternary —, nobles, and subjects—where the integrates legislative, executive, and administrative functions without fragmentation, ensuring coherent order against human inclinations toward disorder. He rejected theories of divided powers, such as Montesquieu's separation into distinct legislative, executive, and judicial branches, arguing that such divisions empirically foster conflict and weaken the central necessary for stability. Authority, in Bonald's view, derives not from hypothetical social contracts but from immutable traditions and fundamental laws inherent to , which predate and transcend individual consent. He contended that contractual origins, as posited by Enlightenment thinkers like Rousseau, ignore the empirical reality of human limitations and lead to illusions of that dissolve into , as evidenced by the French Revolution's progression from 1789 assemblies to the Terror of 1793–1794. In contrast, the hierarchical stability of the Old Regime, spanning centuries under Bourbon monarchs like (r. 1643–1715), demonstrated the efficacy of authority rooted in longstanding customs and paternal oversight, which restrained depraved impulses through unified command. Within this framework, and corporate bodies served as organic intermediaries, providing checks on monarchical power while embedding local customs and provincial laws into the national structure, thus averting the abstractions of centralized . These institutions, hereditary and embedded in tradition, preserved societal cohesion by mediating between the sovereign's directives and subjects' particularities, as seen in the parlements and of pre-revolutionary , which balanced royal edicts with regional prerogatives until their abolition in 1788 precipitated unchecked upheaval. Bonald's paternal model thus prioritized causal mechanisms of order—hierarchical restraint over egalitarian experimentation—to counter innate human tendencies toward self-undermining liberty.

Religious and Theocratic Elements

Bonald regarded the state as inherently theocratic, with political authority deriving from and sustained by divine order, rendering causally destructive to social cohesion as evidenced by the French Revolution's descent into chaos following the . In his Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux (1796), he posited that society originates from God's love and requires as its " and of unity," arguing that the "identity of and of constitution between the religious monarchy and the political monarchy" underpins the strength of Catholic states. This integration mirrors the in a ternary structure of powers: the sovereign's ruling power, the priesthood's teaching power, and the ministerial power exercised by family heads, ensuring moral truths are enforced hierarchically to prevent disorder. The priesthood, as the teaching authority, parallels the monarchy's executive function by disseminating divine doctrine through and sacraments like the , rooted in primitive revelation to maintain societal moral order. Bonald defended religious intolerance toward heresies such as —particularly , which he saw as fostering division and democratic upheaval—as essential for preserving confessional unity, rejecting pluralism, , , and as existential threats to the social body. Drawing on historical precedents, he contended that unified Catholic monarchies demonstrated greater longevity and stability compared to fragmented confessional polities amid the religious wars of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, where tolerance eroded authority and invited . Bonald prophesied that denial of divine sovereignty, exemplified by the revolutionary dogma of , would inevitably culminate in and societal dissolution, as "the dogma of … was naturally bound to lead to ." He illustrated this causal chain allegorically, with seduced by birthing Revolution, anticipating the moral voids and institutional failures of subsequent secular doctrines like nineteenth-century , which substituted empirical for transcendent truths and exacerbated social fragmentation.

Economic and Social Critiques

De Bonald advocated for the preservation of agrarian family structures as the foundation of social stability, arguing that agricultural families maintained independence from fluctuating economic conditions and external events, unlike industrial families reliant on markets and machinery. In his 1826 essay On the Agricultural Family, the Industrial Family, and the Right of , he posited that land-based households fostered moral cohesion and paternal authority, countering the of workers detached from property ownership. He supported and entailment laws to keep estates intact across generations, viewing them as essential to preventing the fragmentation of familial patrimony and ensuring continuity in rural society. Critiquing the rise of industrialism, de Bonald warned that it dissolved organic communities by promoting mobility, dependency, and urban concentration, which he observed led to and compared to the disciplined life of rural agrarians. He drew contrasts between the self-sufficiency of agricultural laborers, bound to land and tradition, and the precariousness of workers, whose conditions eroded familial bonds and encouraged over communal duties. This perspective influenced subsequent Catholic social thinkers, who echoed his emphasis on and property distribution to mitigate industrial alienation. De Bonald opposed and unchecked , contending in his 1806 treatise that excessive interest-bearing loans disrupted natural economic hierarchies by inverting productive labor with speculative gain, thereby undermining paternal control within families and society. He distinguished permissible lending for productive assets from usurious practices that prioritized money over goods, arguing the latter fueled akin to ancient Roman excesses and precipitated social decay. Preferring moderated trade within moral bounds, he criticized 's expansion as breeding rivalry and rather than harmony, favoring instead regulated associations that enforced ethical obligations over markets.

Critiques of Modernity

Opposition to the French Revolution

De Bonald characterized the as a deliberate assault on the intertwined authorities of the throne and the altar, severing the divine sanction that underpinned legitimate power and substituting it with the illusory abstractions of the 1789 Declaration of the and of the Citizen. In his seminal 1796 treatise Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux dans la société civile, composed during exile in , he contended that this replacement of time-tested traditions with individualistic "rights" derived from human reason alone inverted the natural hierarchical order of society, initiating a causal chain of anarchy that progressed inexorably to the from September 1793 to July 1794. By prioritizing over and ecclesiastical guidance, the Revolution dissolved the moral and political bonds essential for stability, rendering governance a precarious exercise in coercion rather than consent rooted in providence. This inversion found empirical refutation in the Revolution's immediate upheavals, which Bonald linked directly to the erosion of religious authority: the 1790 precipitated schism and persecution, with over 2,000 refractory priests executed or deported by 1793, fostering widespread disorder as yielded to arbitrary statutes. Economic collapse ensued, exemplified by the assignat's from in 1790 to under 1% by 1797 amid and fiscal mismanagement, while noble emigration exceeded 130,000 by 1792, depleting administrative expertise and exacerbating chaos. Crime and vendettas surged in the absence of traditional restraints, contrasting sharply with the Ancien Régime's maintenance of public order through monarchical and clerical mediation, where centralized authority had historically contained unrest despite underlying fiscal strains. Bonald anticipated that the Revolution's secular momentum would doom subsequent regimes lacking full restoration of throne and altar, predicting Napoleon's imperial consolidation—despite the Concordat's partial religious appeasement—would falter without reinstating divine-right , as evidenced by the empire's amid endless wars and internal dissent by 1815. He viewed the Terror not as an aberration but as the logical outcome of in , where expelling God's paternal authority from the state invited tyrannical substitutes, a pattern observable in the 40,000-250,000 deaths during the uprising alone as suppressed traditionalist resistance. Only a return to pre-revolutionary principles, Bonald argued, could arrest the cycle of instability unleashed since 1789.

Rejection of Enlightenment Rationalism

Louis de Bonald critiqued Enlightenment for prioritizing speculative individual reason over the collective and historical foundations of human thought. He contended that thinkers like , with the , erroneously posited solitary cognition as the origin of knowledge, ignoring that ideas emerge through language, which is inherently social and divinely instituted rather than invented by isolated minds. Bonald argued that language's evolution demonstrates thought's dependence on communal transmission, as no individual could originate complex signification without prior societal structures, thus debunking the autonomous central to Cartesian method. This subjectivist error, he maintained, severs reason from its empirical roots in , fostering illusions of self-sufficiency that undermine social cohesion. In Bonald's view, the of and similar exacerbated this by applying abstract deduction to dismantle inherited authorities, treating as a construct of pure intellect rather than . He rejected such approaches as causally linked to social atomization, where detached speculative principles erode communal bonds, leading to unstable constructs that devolve into arbitrary power when confronted with reality's complexities. from historical precedents, Bonald asserted, shows that utopian designs grounded in unmoored reason collapse under their internal contradictions, as they disregard the proven stability of time-tested institutions. Bonald advocated instead for tradition as a superior epistemic guide, rooted in observable patterns from biblical revelation and classical antiquity, which provide causal insights into human nature's social essence over fleeting rational constructs. Drawing on authorities like Scripture and ancient philosophers who emphasized man's embeddedness in polity and divine order, he positioned empirical continuity—accumulated through generations—as truer to causality than speculative ventures that abstract from lived experience. This framework, for Bonald, aligns reason with reality's hierarchical structures, avoiding the pitfalls of Enlightenment overreach.

Views on Liberalism and Democracy

De Bonald rejected democratic governance as an expression of that inevitably amplifies humanity's fallen tendencies toward disorder and vice, positing instead that true authority derives from divine delegation to hierarchical institutions like , which alone can impose the restraint necessary for social stability. He drew on historical precedents from ancient republics, where direct or broad participation devolved into mob rule and subsequent tyranny, as seen in the cycles described by observers of and , arguing that such systems fail to curb the multitude's passions without strong, transcendent . In his Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux (1796), Bonald contended that 's elevation of individual will over constituted authority dissolves the organic bonds of society, leading to fragmentation rather than genuine order. Liberal freedoms, particularly those of and universal elections, were critiqued by Bonald as mechanisms that undermine paternal and royal authority by diffusing irresponsible opinion and fostering . He advocated as essential to preserve moral and political unity, declaring absolute press liberty equivalent to societal dissolution, and favored representation confined to traditional —clergy, , and —to reflect natural hierarchies rather than numerical equality. Representative assemblies, in his analysis, exhibit inherent weakness and susceptibility to factionalism, as evidenced by the instability of post-revolutionary experiments, rendering them inferior to monarchical direction informed by divine and . Bonald foresaw liberalism's internal contradictions culminating in self-undermining , where unchecked individual rights erode the transcendent truths anchoring society, a prophecy borne out by the recurrent upheavals of the , including the of 1830, which he explicitly linked to the Revolution's initial denial of God's rights in favor of man's. This causal progression, rooted in the inversion of authority from divine to popular sources, would propagate endless instability until hierarchy and faith were restored to repress base impulses and affirm objective order.

Controversial Positions

On Judaism and Emancipation

Louis de Bonald opposed the emancipation of Jews in France, arguing that their distinct religious and social organization rendered them incapable of full assimilation into Christian society, positioning them as an imperium in imperio—a state within a state—with loyalties divided between their own communal laws and the host nation. In his 1806 essay "Sur les Juifs," published in the Mercure de France, Bonald contended that historical expulsions of Jews from medieval European states, such as England's Edict of Expulsion in 1290 and multiple French decrees from 1182 onward, stemmed causally from practices like usury—permitted by Jewish religious law toward non-Jews—which fostered economic dominance, indebtedness among Christians, and resultant moral and social subversion. Bonald viewed the National Assembly's decree of 27 September 1791, which granted citizenship to as part of revolutionary , as a perilous that ignored these precedents and undermined Christian societal homogeneity. Post-emancipation observations, including persistent Jewish communal in ghettos and regions like —where usury complaints persisted into the early 19th century—reinforced his claim of cultural alienation and failed integration, evidenced by Napoleon's 1808 "Infamous Decree" imposing restrictions on Jewish commerce in response to such issues. Rather than legal equality, Bonald prescribed moral and religious upliftment through conversion to Catholicism as the prerequisite for any rights, asserting that only this would dissolve dual loyalties and align with the providential order of Christian society. While acknowledging instances of individual via conversion, Bonald prioritized empirical patterns of collective cohesion, warning that encouraged perpetuation of a foreign nation within , potentially eroding national unity as seen in pre-revolutionary privileges that maintained separation without full equality. He endorsed discriminatory measures, such as requiring a distinctive mark for , to preserve until conversion occurred, framing this not as mere but as a realistic response to observed historical disruptions over abstract rights.

Family, Divorce, and Usury

Bonald regarded indissoluble as a divine foundational to paternal and societal , with the serving as the primary social unit rather than the autonomous . In his 1801 treatise Du , composed in response to the 1792 revolutionary legalization of , he argued that dissolution of contravenes and by enabling spousal repudiation, thereby eroding the father's , the mother's dignity, and the children's security within the domestic order. He contended that such reforms assault the principle of inherent in , as marriage's permanence mirrors the indivisibility of political and religious s, preventing the chaos of fragmented allegiances and disputes. Bonald warned that divorce facilitates egalitarian challenges to paternal rule, potentially leading to illegitimacy and inheritance fragmentation by weakening lineage continuity and property transmission under male . To counter partible 's divisive effects, which he viewed as promoting industrial fragmentation over agrarian stability, he endorsed in his 1826 essay "On the Agricultural Family, the Industrial Family, and the Right of ." This system, he reasoned, ensures the family's perpetual existence by concentrating authority and estates in the eldest son, analogous to hereditary monarchy's role in preserving political against democratic dissolution. In economic matters tied to welfare, Bonald opposed —excessive interest on loans—as predatory exploitation of the vulnerable, particularly the agrarian poor, eroding charitable in favor of impersonal . His 1806 critique distinguished moderate lending from usurious practices that disrupt domestic economies, arguing they foster dependency and moral decay by prioritizing profit over familial bonds and communal . This perspective prefigured elements of Catholic social doctrine's emphasis on and protection against capitalist excesses, though Bonald rooted it in the family's role as society's causal bedrock.

Major Works

Principal Publications

Bonald's initial significant publication, Théorie du pouvoir politique et religieux dans la société civile, démontrée par le raisonnement et l'histoire, appeared in 1796 while he resided in exile in Constance, printed anonymously through émigré networks amid the Directory's suppression of counter-revolutionary texts in France. An expanded edition followed in 1818 during the Restoration period. Following his amnesty and return to France in 1797, Bonald issued Essai analytique sur les lois naturelles de l'ordre social, ou principes d'une morale et d'une politique universelles in 1800 from Paris presses. His subsequent major work, Législation primitive considérée dans les derniers temps par les seules lumières de la raison, a three-volume treatise, was published in 1802 by Le Clere in Paris, marking his most extensive single publication and benefiting from Napoleonic-era tolerances despite prior suppressions. During the Bourbon Restoration, Bonald's writings proliferated via aligned journals and official channels, with reprints and new editions circulating among conservative circles, though he later endorsed press restrictions to curb liberal periodicals. His final principal work, Démonstration philosophique du principe constitutif de la société, accompanied by Méditations politiques tirées de l'Évangile, emerged in from Adrien Leclère et Cie in , shortly before the disrupted monarchical publications. After Bonald's death in 1840, his Œuvres complètes were compiled and issued posthumously in 1859 by J.P. Migne in across multiple volumes, aggregating prior texts with revisions based on author-approved editions. English translations remained sparse, with limited scholarly renditions appearing in the early to introduce his ideas to Anglo-American audiences. Early dissemination relied on clandestine émigré printing in and , transitioning to domestic outlets post-1802 amid Napoleonic oversight that occasionally halted radical content but permitted conservative tracts.

Structure and Key Themes

Bonald's writings exhibit a dense, systematic prose style characterized by logical progression from theological foundations to societal principles, often employing triadic schemas to elucidate social structures. Central to this methodology is the triad of pouvoir (power), ministère (ministry), and doctrine or sujet (doctrine or subject), which he applies analogically across family, political, and religious domains to mirror divine order and the Trinity. For instance, in the family, the father embodies power, the mother ministry, and children the subject; in politics, the king holds power, nobles ministry, and the people the subject. This framework rejects narrative histories in favor of abstract analogies and historical exemplars, such as ancient Hebrew society, to demonstrate immutable hierarchies rather than contingent events. Recurrent motifs underscore Bonald's view of as an organic entity—a living, interdependent whole preceding and encompassing individuals, sustained by unity and divine rather than contracts. He posits as eternally structured in God's mind, resistant to reconfiguration, with disruption leading to dissolution through causal breakdown of its ternary parts. emerges as a key proof of transcendence, not a but a divine endowment via primitive , conveying innate ideas and moral truths essential to social cohesion; its mutability or secular origins, Bonald argues, undermine reason itself. These motifs serve as antidotes to , positing theological realism against abstract . Bonald's empirical-deductive approach integrates observable societal patterns—such as the French Revolution's chaos—with deductions from first principles like God's existence and attributes (will, power, love), falsifying liberal hypotheses through causal chains linking doctrinal erosion to . He critiques Enlightenment sensationalism, favoring innate ideas over empirical , yet grounds arguments in historical evidence to trace deviations from organic unity. This rigor, while intellectually coherent, renders his texts less accessible, demanding familiarity with theological and classical references amid polemical density.

Influence and Reception

Contemporary Impact

Bonald forged a significant intellectual partnership with , the Savoyard philosopher, through sustained correspondence and shared advocacy for monarchical legitimacy and Catholic orthodoxy, which bolstered the ideological framework of ultraroyalists during the Bourbon Restoration. This alliance emphasized the indivisibility of throne and altar, influencing ultraroyalist efforts to counteract liberal constitutionalism in the after 1815. Their joint critique of Enlightenment individualism resonated among traditionalist factions seeking to embed divine-right principles in post-Napoleonic governance. Bonald's ideas initially shaped early Catholic revivalists, including Félicité de Lamennais, who adopted elements of Bonald's traditionalist of society and language as foundational social bonds in his pre-1830 writings on ecclesiastical authority and under papal guidance. Lamennais credited Bonald's emphasis on over rationalist in defending clerical influence against , though Lamennais later diverged toward . This reception among revivalists amplified Bonald's role in fostering doctrinal resistance to Doctrinaire compromises, such as those proposed by , which diluted royal prerogatives. Elected to the on March 20, 1816, replacing Jean-Jacques Régis de Cambacérès, Bonald leveraged the institution to disseminate anti-liberal rhetoric, critiquing the ' hybrid constitutionalism in public discourses and publications. As a deputy from (1815–1822) and later peer of (1823–1830), he contributed to restrictive measures, including the 1820 laws curbing press freedom and electoral assemblies, aimed at suppressing revolutionary residues. These efforts yielded partial successes in reinforcing and clerical oversight until the of 1830 overturned ultraroyalist gains, confining Bonald's institutional impact to the Restoration era.

Long-Term Legacy in Conservatism and Social Science

De Bonald's emphasis on society as an organic, hierarchical entity prior to the individual provided key intellectual foundations for later Catholic integralism and corporatist theories, notably influencing Frédéric Le Play's social surveys on family-based economic units and René de La Tour du Pin's advocacy for vocational guilds under monarchical oversight as antidotes to liberal atomism. These extensions preserved Bonald's causal view that social stability derives from divinely ordained structures rather than contractual individualism, shaping 19th-century responses to industrialization and republicanism. Parallels appear in modern paleoconservative critiques of globalism, where defenses of national sovereignty and subsidiarity echo his rejection of universalist abstractions eroding local customs and authority. In , Bonald's proto-sociological —positing as constitutive of the person and as a deposit—ironically seeded empirical approaches despite his antimodern intent, contributing to the collectivist turn in Émile Durkheim's framework of faits sociaux as external constraints on individuals. Durkheim, while opposing Bonald's theocratic conclusions, adopted analogous premises of societal primacy over isolated agency, marking Bonald's inadvertent role in sociology's origins as a analyzing non-voluntary social bonds. Recent scholarship underscores Bonald's prescience in , with analyses like Sarah François's 2018 thesis framing his system as a realist counter to Enlightenment , where political order causally stems from theological truths rather than autonomous reason. This approach anticipates empirical validations of his warnings: studies dissolution—evident in U.S. rates rising from 2.2 per 1,000 in 1960 to peaks near 5.3 in 1981, correlating with heightened and —undermining the paternal authority Bonald deemed essential for moral formation. Similarly, secular decline, with religious "nones" in America surging from 5% in 1972 to 23% by 2014 alongside weakened transmission of , aligns with his causal linkage of dechristianization to societal fragmentation. Such data, drawn from longitudinal surveys, affirm the disintegrative effects of severing traditional institutions, countering narratives minimizing religion's role in causal .

References

  1. https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v10n2/TOQv10n2Devlin.pdf
  2. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/18570/FrancoisSarahPhDThesis.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2
  3. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780228016595-007/html
  4. https://hearthandfield.com/on-the-agricultural-family-the-industrial-family-and-the-right-of-primogeniture/
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.3078924
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340385690_From_Enlightenment_to_Counter-Enlightenment_Semiotics_Bonald
  7. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/18570/FrancoisSarahPhDThesis.pdf
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41299310
  9. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-Gabriel-Ambroise-vicomte-de-Bonald
  10. https://academic.oup.com/book/11931/chapter/161132347
  11. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/man/1984-v2-man0228/1011815ar.pdf
  12. https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-annales-historiques-de-la-revolution-francaise-2021-1-page-45.htm
  13. https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Th%25C3%25A9orie-pouvoir-politique-religieux-soci%25C3%25A9t%25C3%25A9-civile/31117180554/bd
  14. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-napoleonica-la-revue-2012-1-page-65?lang=fr
  15. https://www.napoleon-empire.org/en/university.php
  16. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2022/08/being-conservative-louis-de-bonald-christopher-olaf-blum.html
  17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13507486.2022.2086449
  18. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780228016595-009/html
  19. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004507241/BP000018.xml?language=en
  20. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780228016595-007/html?lang=en
  21. https://thecharnelhouse.org/2012/06/20/louis-de-bonalds-on-the-agricultural-family-the-industrial-family-and-the-right-of-primogeniture-1826/
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1878004
  23. https://counter-currents.com/2011/05/bonalds-economic-thought/
  24. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/877482/summary
  25. https://academic.oup.com/fs/article-abstract/76/4/667/6628617
  26. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/download/encyclopedia-of-modern-political-thought/chpt/bonald-louis-de.pdf
  27. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9913897449802121
  28. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/bonald-louis-de
  29. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/counter-enlightenment/
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26215860
  31. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9781666970654-9.pdf
  32. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/popular-sovereignty/
  33. https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3498-bonald-louis-gabriel-ambroise
  34. https://lawliberty.org/into-the-reactionary-abyss/
  35. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ajs-review/article/french-revolution-and-the-jews-assessing-the-cultural-impact/6393D65C0AC8AFDE2320075927B15955
  36. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-49238-9_11
  37. https://italianacademy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Battini_f08_antijudaic_abstract.pdf
  38. https://www.routledge.com/On-Divorce/Bonald/p/book/9781138529090
  39. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780691213118-009/html?lang=en
  40. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-historiques-de-la-revolution-francaise-2021-1-page-45?lang=en
  41. https://classiques.uqam.ca/classiques/de_bonald_louis/de_bonald_louis.html
  42. https://books.google.com/books/about/L%25C3%25A9gislation_primitive.html?id=N9IyzwEACAAJ
  43. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6484855b.texteImage
  44. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009266578
  45. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02647a.htm
  46. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/download/sociological-theory/chpt/origins-sociological-theory.pdf
  47. https://www.academia.edu/44224542/The_French_Idea_of_History_Joseph_de_Maistre_and_his_Heirs_1794_1854
  48. https://kirkcenter.org/reviews/a-celebration-of-conservative-politics-in-france/
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23917547
  50. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/18570
  51. https://rsj.winchester.ac.uk/articles/321/files/submission/proof/321-1-3050-1-10-20221209.pdf
  52. https://www.academia.edu/21522819/The_Blue_Shirts
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/radical-conservatism-and-global-order-international-theory-and-the-new-right/829FA2A0232BD368CA20F1B39F8A17D4
  54. https://www.academia.edu/1537391/Louis_de_Bonalds_Univocity_of_Being_The_Mythos_of_the_Fait_Sociale_and_the_Rise_of_French_Sociology
  55. https://brill.com/view/journals/cad/9/2/article-p167_3.xml
  56. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/the-decline-of-religion-in-american-family-life/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.