Hubbry Logo
Mirror worldMirror worldMain
Open search
Mirror world
Community hub
Mirror world
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Mirror world
Mirror world
Mirror world
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A mirror world is a representation of the real world in digital form. It attempts to map real-world structures in a geographically accurate way. Mirror worlds offer a software model of real human environments and their workings.[1] It is very similar to the concept of a digital twin.[2]

The term in relation to digital media is coined by Yale University computer scientist David Gelernter. He first speaks of a hypothetical mirror world in 1991.[3]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mirror world

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A mirror world, also referred to as a mirrorworld, is a software-generated digital replica of a physical environment or —such as a , , or —that enables users to visualize, interact with, and analyze real-world dynamics in real time through computer interfaces. Coined by David , the concept envisions these virtual models as "high-tech voodoo dolls," where manipulations in the digital space correspond to and influence the actual world, fostering deeper comprehension without direct physical intervention. Gelernter first elaborated on mirror worlds in his 1991 book Mirror Worlds: or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox...How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean, predicting that advancing computational power would soon allow for such immersive simulations using then-existing technologies like databases and networks. In this vision, mirror worlds function as dynamic "crystal balls," providing live, detailed views of complex systems—ranging from urban traffic flows to corporate operations—supplemented by intelligent agents that automate and historical archives for . Gelernter argued that these systems would democratize access to information, transforming computers from mere filing tools into portals for exploring societal structures, though he cautioned about privacy risks in their pervasive . The core elements of a mirror world, as outlined by Gelernter, include a deep, live picture of the target (capturing both static structures and real-time changes), software agents to interpret and act on data, and accumulated history to enable predictive modeling and . These components were designed to scale from small-scale applications, like simulating a hospital's flow, to global ones, such as modeling networks, all rendered accessibly on personal screens. Early prototypes in the early , including Gelernter's own Scopeware software from Mirror Worlds Technologies, demonstrated feasibility but faced limitations in processing power and data integration, delaying widespread adoption. In contemporary contexts, mirror worlds have influenced the development of digital twins—virtual replicas used in industries like , healthcare, and for , optimization, and —directly echoing Gelernter's foundational ideas from over three decades ago. Technologies such as (AR), Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, and have realized aspects of this vision, enabling real-time mirroring in applications like smart cities and autonomous systems, while raising ongoing concerns about data security and ethical representation. Despite these advancements, full-scale mirror worlds remain aspirational, constrained by computational demands and the complexity of accurately modeling human behaviors and unpredictable events.

Overview and Definition

Core Concept

A mirror world is defined as an interlinked collection of digital representations that mirror real-world structures, objects, and processes in a spatially accurate manner. This digital layer operates as a bi-directionally coupled counterpart to the physical environment, where entities in the real world have corresponding digital models that can be observed, analyzed, and influenced. Unlike isolated models, mirror worlds enable a comprehensive reflection of . Key characteristics of mirror worlds include real-time synchronization, where updates from physical systems via sensors and data streams ensure the digital layer remains dynamically aligned with the real world. Additionally, integration of multimodal data—such as 3D models, sensor feeds, and geospatial information—supports a rich, multifaceted depiction of the physical domain. Mirror worlds differ from simulations in that they actively reflect and interact with existing reality through bidirectional coupling, rather than modeling hypothetical or predictive scenarios in isolation. This focus on mirroring actual conditions emphasizes fidelity to the present physical state over speculative forecasting. For instance, a mirror world can conceptualize an entire as a dynamic , where buildings, traffic flows, and weather patterns are mirrored in real time to facilitate and . Such representations enable stakeholders to visualize and respond to urban dynamics without altering the physical environment directly.

Relation to Other Digital Representations

Mirror worlds differ fundamentally from virtual worlds, which are typically fully synthetic environments created for immersion in fictional or abstracted settings, such as those enabled by (VR) systems. In contrast, mirror worlds are software-based representations anchored to real-world geography and structures, allowing users to explore and analyze actual physical settings like cities or institutions through dynamic, data-driven models. This grounding in reality distinguishes them from VR's emphasis on simulated experiences detached from terrestrial accuracy. Mirror worlds overlap with the broader concept as a specialized subset, where the focus remains on faithfully replicating and enhancing real-world contexts rather than developing expansive social, economic, or gamified virtual economies. For instance, tools like exemplify mirror worlds within metaverse frameworks by providing GPS-linked virtual models that mirror physical spaces for practical utility, such as navigation or simulation, without the avatar-driven interactivity central to many metaverse platforms. This positions mirror worlds as reality-constrained extensions of the metaverse, prioritizing informational fidelity over imaginative expansion. Unlike (AR), which superimposes digital elements directly onto the user's view of the physical environment in real-time—often through wearable devices—mirror worlds construct a separate, parallel digital stratum that users can access remotely via screens or interfaces. This parallel layer enables comprehensive modeling and interaction with real-world data without requiring on-site presence or immediate sensory overlay, allowing for deeper analytical exploration, such as historical reconstructions or predictive simulations. AR enhances immediate perception, whereas mirror worlds facilitate detached, scalable representation.

Historical Development

Origins in Computing Theory

The concept of mirror worlds traces its intellectual roots to pioneering ideas in during the mid-20th century, particularly Ivan Sutherland's visionary 1965 paper "The Ultimate Display," which proposed an immersive computing environment capable of generating interactive three-dimensional that mimic physical reality with . Sutherland envisioned a display system where computers could manipulate matter-like representations, allowing users to interact with virtual objects as if they were tangible, laying foundational groundwork for digital environments that reflect and extend the real world. This idea shifted computing from mere calculation toward , influencing subsequent explorations of virtual interfaces. In the and , advancements in and database technologies further developed these notions through spatial indexing techniques and early geographic information systems (GIS), enabling efficient storage and retrieval of location-based data to model real-world spaces. Pioneering GIS efforts, such as the Harvard Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis's system in the mid-1970s, integrated vector-based representations with analytical tools for mapping geographic features, transitioning from static digitization to structured spatial databases. Concurrently, data structures like quadtrees, introduced by Raphael Finkel and J.L. Bentley in 1974 for partitioning spatial data, and R-trees by Antonin Guttman in 1984 for dynamic indexing of multidimensional objects, provided computational efficiency for querying complex geographic datasets, essential for any mirrored representation of physical environments. A key theoretical shift occurred in academic work on information visualization during this period, moving from static cartographic maps to dynamic, interactive representations that allowed users to query and explore real-world phenomena in real time. Influential contributions, such as John Tukey's 1977 framework in for probing datasets through visual tools, and William Cleveland and Robert McGill's 1988 exploration of dynamic graphics for statistical brushing and linking, emphasized queryable interfaces that revealed patterns in spatial and temporal data, bridging visualization with computational . These developments conceptualized information spaces as living mirrors of reality, prioritizing user-driven discovery over passive display. David Gelernter, a at Yale, contributed early theoretical insights in the 1980s through his work on and coordination languages like Linda, which enabled distributed software processes—precursors to agents—to interact with shared, virtualized data spaces that echoed real-world information flows. In papers such as "Generative Communication in Linda" (1985), Gelernter described tuple spaces as associative memory models where independent processes could deposit and retrieve data dynamically, fostering ideas of software entities operating within a mirrored, collective representation of external realities without centralized control. This prefigured agent-based systems for maintaining synchronized digital reflections of physical domains.

Key Publications and Milestones

The seminal work introducing the concept of mirror worlds is David Gelernter's 1991 book Mirror Worlds: or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox... How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean, which envisions software systems that create dynamic, live digital replicas of the physical world and streams of information, allowing users to observe and interact with these mirrors in real time. Published by Oxford University Press, the book argues that advancing computational power would enable these mirrors to process vast data flows, simulating real-world events and information ecosystems with unprecedented fidelity. Gelernter, a Yale computer scientist, drew on emerging trends in distributed computing to predict that such systems would transform how individuals perceive and navigate complex realities, emphasizing their potential for visualization and analysis over mere data storage. Building directly on these ideas, Mirror Worlds Technologies was founded in 1996 in , by Gelernter and Eric Freeman to develop practical implementations of mirror world principles. The company created Lifestreams, a pioneering software prototype launched in the late 1990s that organized personal data chronologically in timeline-based streams, serving as an early model for mirroring an individual's digital life and activities over time. Lifestreams allowed users to search, filter, and visualize evolving data flows—such as emails, documents, and events—in a unified, dynamic interface, anticipating modern timeline interfaces while addressing the limitations of static file hierarchies. Though the company ceased operations in 2004 due to low sales, its innovations influenced subsequent tools and underscored the feasibility of software-based world mirroring. The company's patents later led to significant litigations, including a 2016 settlement with Apple for $25 million over infringement claims related to file organization features like . In the , mirror world concepts gained traction through integration with technologies, which emphasized and interactive mapping, exemplified by the 2005 launch of as an early global-scale digital mirror. Developed from the acquired Keyhole technology, provided a 3D virtual globe overlaying , terrain data, and user contributions to create a navigable replica of Earth's surface, enabling real-time exploration and annotation of physical locations. This milestone aligned with Gelernter's vision by democratizing access to a mirrored world, fostering applications in geography, , and through its open API and collaborative features. The 2010s marked a surge in mirror world advancements driven by the rise of the (IoT), which proliferated connected devices and sensors to supply continuous real-time data feeds essential for dynamic digital replicas. IoT's expansion, with billions of devices deployed globally by mid-decade, enabled mirror systems to update instantaneously with environmental, urban, and operational data, bridging static models toward fully synchronized simulations. A key project in this era was Microsoft's CityNext initiative, unveiled in 2013 and expanded in 2014, which leveraged , , and IoT to create integrated digital mirrors of urban environments for smarter city management. By 2014, over 200 partners had adopted CityNext to deliver more than 700 solutions worldwide, using IoT sensors for real-time analytics on traffic, energy, and public services, thus advancing scalable mirror world applications in and . In the 2020s, mirror world ideas evolved further through the maturation of technologies, with widespread adoption across industries facilitated by advancements in (AI) and . For instance, General Electric's Predix platform, initially launched in , expanded significantly by 2020 to support real-time digital twins for industrial assets, enabling and optimization. As of 2025, the integration of AI has allowed digital twins to incorporate for more accurate simulations of complex systems, influencing sectors like and healthcare, while building on Gelernter's foundational vision.

Technical Foundations

Mapping and Data Integration

The technical foundations of mirror worlds, as envisioned by , rely on advanced from diverse sources to create a "deep, live picture" of the target reality. This involves aggregating information from databases, sensors, and networks to form dynamic representations that capture both static structures and real-time changes. Early concepts emphasized the use of distributed databases to handle vast amounts of data, enabling scalable mirroring of complex systems like cities or organizations without the need for physical intervention. Data integration in mirror worlds draws on network technologies to synchronize updates across distributed systems. Protocols for real-time data exchange allow continuous feeds from various inputs, such as transaction logs in corporate settings or traffic sensors in urban environments, to maintain the mirror's fidelity. Gelernter highlighted the role of software in fusing these heterogeneous data streams into coherent views, using techniques like indexing and querying to support interactive exploration. Accumulated history is stored in temporal databases, facilitating and predictive insights through . Accuracy depends on robust and mechanisms to ensure the digital replica aligns with physical events. Error correction protocols handle discrepancies from delayed updates or incomplete sources, aiming for near-real-time consistency. Standards for data interchange, such as those emerging in the for networked information systems, provide frameworks for , though early implementations were limited by bandwidth and processing constraints. Scalability is achieved through hierarchical data structures that organize information by relevance and time, allowing users to zoom from global overviews to specific details. Stream-based organization, a key innovation, treats data as chronological flows (e.g., Lifestreams), reducing complexity by sequencing events and enabling efficient retrieval without traditional folder hierarchies. These approaches address the challenges of managing petabyte-scale datasets, supporting simulations from small processes to worldwide networks.

Technologies Enabling Mirror Worlds

Mirror worlds depend on core technologies for data handling, dynamic simulation, and user interaction, centered on software architectures that process and visualize information flows. Networking infrastructure forms the backbone, enabling to collect and disseminate data in real time across wide-area connections, as predicted by Gelernter with the growth of internet-like systems. This allows mirror worlds to scale from personal devices to shared global platforms, integrating inputs from multiple stakeholders without centralized bottlenecks. Software agents are pivotal, acting as intelligent intermediaries to interpret data, automate processing, and respond to queries. These agents, described as "high-tech elves," filter noise, correlate events, and generate summaries or predictions, enhancing the mirror's utility for analysis. Implemented using rule-based systems and early AI techniques, they enable proactive features like alerting users to anomalies in the mirrored system. Historical archives complement agents by providing longitudinal for precursors, such as statistical modeling of trends. User interfaces for mirror worlds leverage visualization tools to render abstract data into navigable spaces, often through graphical displays on personal computers. Early prototypes used windowing systems and hypertext links to allow panning, zooming, and drilling down into details, transforming into intuitive "" views. Database technologies, including relational and object-oriented models, underpin storage and retrieval, ensuring efficient access to the mirror's live and historical components. Interoperability is supported by open standards for data exchange, promoting compatibility across heterogeneous systems. In Gelernter's era, this involved protocols like those for and , evolving to support federated mirrors where updates propagate seamlessly. These foundations, though constrained by 1990s hardware, laid the groundwork for later advancements in and agent-based .

Applications and Implementations

Urban and Environmental Modeling

Mirror worlds, as virtual replicas of physical environments, enable advanced by integrating high-fidelity 3D models with to simulate and optimize . In , the Virtual Singapore project, launched in 2014 by the National Research Foundation in collaboration with , serves as a prominent example of this application. This provides a detailed, dynamic representation of the , allowing planners to model traffic flows, assess impacts, and optimize urban development scenarios, such as reducing congestion through predictive simulations of vehicle and pedestrian movements. Environmental modeling within mirror worlds extends these capabilities to natural systems, using mirrored terrain and sensor data to forecast climate-related risks. For instance, digital twins facilitate simulations by coupling high-resolution hydrological models with 3D urban representations, enabling accurate predictions of inundation extents and impacts on under varying rainfall scenarios. These models also incorporate projections to evaluate long-term effects, such as sea-level rise or , on ecosystems and built environments, supporting proactive strategies. As of 2025, advancements in AI-integrated digital twins have improved urban risk management, with applications demonstrating up to 40% faster response times through real-time remote sensing and . The primary benefits of mirror worlds in these domains include enhanced for , where real-time simulations can guide evacuation planning and during events like floods, and promotion of by testing low-impact urban designs before implementation. By leveraging (IoT) sensors for continuous data feeds, these systems achieve greater accuracy in forecasting outcomes, ultimately reducing economic losses and . A notable case study is IBM's application of digital twins in initiatives, where mirrored urban models integrate from sensors and platforms to monitor and manage city operations. Navigation in mirror worlds leverages (AR) to overlay digital representations of the physical environment onto users' views, enabling intuitive in both familiar and unfamiliar settings. This approach integrates real-time location data with 3D models to create a seamless blend of the mirrored digital layer and the real world, enhancing spatial awareness and reducing during movement. Early conceptual work on mirror world navigation emphasized hybrid systems combining (GPS), inertial measurement units (IMUs), and for accurate 2D/3D alignment, as demonstrated in a 2009 prototype for office environments that aligned virtual models with physical spaces via mobile AR devices. Consumer navigation systems exemplify this integration, with applications like Live View using AR to superimpose directional arrows and 3D environmental models directly onto the camera feed, guiding users through urban streets by mirroring real-world geometry. This feature, powered by smartphone cameras and for precise localization, extends to AR glasses, where mirrored 3D reconstructions of surroundings provide hands-free orientation, effectively turning the physical world into an interactive digital map. Such systems draw from the broader mirror world vision, where comprehensive 1:1 digital replicas enable AR overlays for practical navigation, as articulated in analyses of emerging platforms. AR integrations have popularized mirror world concepts through , with (launched in 2016) serving as an early benchmark by overlaying virtual creatures and interactive elements onto geolocated real-world views via smartphone AR. Developed by Niantic, the game uses GPS and camera feeds to mirror physical locations with digital augmentations, encouraging exploration and social interaction while demonstrating scalable consumer applications of mirrored environments. This approach has influenced subsequent AR experiences, highlighting how gamified mirror worlds can drive user engagement in everyday navigation and discovery. For indoor and outdoor applications, technologies like (BLE) beacons enable precise mirroring in GPS-denied environments such as malls and museums, where beacons broadcast signals for meter-level accuracy in positioning AR overlays. Deployed strategically, these low-power devices integrate with mobile apps to render directional cues and virtual guides that align with physical layouts, facilitating seamless transitions from outdoor GPS-based to indoor AR paths. In museums, for instance, beacon-supported AR directs visitors to exhibits while overlaying contextual information, creating an enriched mirrored experience without disrupting real-world flow. User interaction in these mirrored AR environments often relies on gesture-based inputs, as seen with devices that support hand tracking for querying and manipulating digital overlays in real time. Users can employ air taps, grabs, and ray-casting s to select points of interest or adjust views within the mirrored 3D , enabling natural, controller-free engagement with navigational elements like routes or annotations. This paradigm, refined in through eye and hand tracking, enhances immersion by allowing intuitive queries—such as pointing to summon details about a virtual object—directly within the augmented physical surroundings.

Challenges and Future Directions

Technical and Ethical Issues

Building mirror worlds, which seek to create real-time digital replicas of physical environments and processes, encounters significant technical hurdles related to data latency and computational demands. Achieving seamless real-time syncing requires continuous data streams from sensors and IoT devices, but network variability and challenges often introduce delays, compromising the fidelity of the mirror model. For instance, in edge-enabled systems, time between the physical entity and its digital counterpart can falter due to propagation delays, leading to inaccurate simulations. High-fidelity models exacerbate these issues by demanding substantial computational resources; rendering complex 3D environments or processing vast datasets in real time necessitates advanced hardware, often straining edge devices and infrastructures. Ethical concerns arise prominently from privacy risks associated with the pervasive inherent in for mirror worlds. To construct accurate replicas, systems aggregate extensive personal and environmental data, raising issues of consent and data minimization under regulations like the EU's (GDPR). Ethical frameworks emphasize the need for privacy-by-design approaches to mitigate these risks, ensuring that data processing aligns with user autonomy and avoids unauthorized profiling. Data bias in mirror worlds stems from incomplete or skewed datasets, which can perpetuate underrepresentation of certain areas or populations. Historical data often favors well-monitored urban centers in developed regions, leading to distorted models that overlook rural or low-income locales, thus reinforcing socioeconomic disparities in applications like . In healthcare-focused digital twins, underrepresentation of diverse demographics—such as non-Western or marginalized groups—in training data results in biased predictions, exacerbating inequities in outcomes. Addressing this requires inclusive data curation to ensure equitable representations across geographic and demographic lines. Security vulnerabilities pose critical threats to shared mirror world infrastructures, particularly against cyberattacks that could disrupt or manipulate synchronized data flows. Digital twins, reliant on interconnected networks, are susceptible to distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks that overwhelm systems and degrade performance, or that alters . For instance, tracking and secure design practices are essential to detect and recover from such intrusions, as compromised twins could propagate errors to physical counterparts in industrial settings. National cybersecurity agencies recommend robust and access controls to safeguard these systems from state-sponsored or opportunistic threats. The integration of (AI) with mirror worlds, often realized through digital twins, is advancing predictive capabilities for autonomous systems. In self-driving cars, AI-enhanced digital twins enable real-time simulation of driving scenarios, allowing vehicles to anticipate and respond to dynamic environments by mirroring physical conditions with high fidelity. For instance, these models use sensor data and to predict traffic patterns and vehicle behaviors, improving safety and efficiency in autonomous navigation. Blockchain and Web3 technologies are fostering decentralized mirror worlds that prioritize user-owned data, shifting control from centralized platforms to individuals. Platforms like Dwinity and MOBI's Self-Sovereign Digital Twins leverage to create tamper-proof, distributed replicas where users maintain ownership and control over their data representations. This decentralization enhances and , enabling secure across ecosystems without intermediaries. Societal predictions suggest that by 2030, mirror worlds will facilitate unprecedented global collaboration in virtual mirrored spaces, transforming work, education, and . Digital twins are expected to become omnipresent, allowing seamless interactions in simulated environments that replicate real-world cities and infrastructures for collaborative decision-making across borders. The highlights how such technologies could scale to support international urban simulations, promoting through shared virtual models. Research frontiers in mirror worlds are exploring to dramatically enhance speeds for complex systems. Quantum algorithms promise to solve optimization problems in digital twins exponentially faster than classical methods, enabling real-time modeling of intricate physical phenomena like climate dynamics or molecular interactions. This integration could unlock scalable mirror worlds for previously intractable simulations, as noted in analyses of emerging computational paradigms.

References

  1. https://cs.nyu.edu/davise/papers/MirrorWorlds.html
  2. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/mirror-worlds-9780195079067
  3. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/agre/mirror.html
  4. https://www.network-1.com/portfolios/mirror-worlds
  5. https://www.noemamag.com/a-digital-twin-might-just-save-your-life
  6. https://www.osrl.com/es/knowledge-hub/resource-library/industry/digital-twins-response-through-the-looking-glass/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7399680/
  8. https://www.surf.nl/files/2023-09/surf_intro-to-metaverse-report_2023_en_1.pdf
  9. https://cs.nyu.edu/~davise/papers/MirrorWorlds.html
  10. https://www.technologyreview.com/2007/07/01/129557/a-virtually-new-web/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8737403/
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024046334
  13. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1007/s00146-017-0788-2
  14. https://homepages.abdn.ac.uk/n.oren/pages/COIN14/papers/p16.pdf
  15. https://worrydream.com/refs/Sutherland_1965_-_The_Ultimate_Display.pdf
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2921721/
  17. https://www.esri.com/en-us/what-is-gis/history-of-gis
  18. https://www.datavis.ca/papers/hbook.pdf
  19. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Mirror-worlds-or-The-day-software-puts-the-universe-in-a-shoebox-:-how-it-will-happen-and-what-it-will-mean/oclc/23868481
  20. http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/freeman/lifestreams.html
  21. https://sigmod.org/publications/sigmodRecord/9603/lifestreams.ps
  22. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203833104577072162782422558
  23. https://www.macrumors.com/2016/07/08/apple-mirror-worlds-cover-flow-patent-settlement/
  24. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=2734
  25. https://medium.com/trajectory-magazine/the-genesis-of-google-earth-7357204ecfb5
  26. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a492d679-ce19-4b9d-b5e1-4acf198e1c6e/content
  27. https://www.perle.com/articles/the-2010s-the-decade-of-the-internet-of-things-40187999.shtml
  28. https://www.pubnub.com/blog/digital-twins-and-the-future-of-real-time-data/
  29. https://blogs.microsoft.com/ai/citynext-imagining-a-new-world-with-big-data-smarter-citizens-and-better-cities/
  30. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2014/07/15/microsoft-provides-one-year-update-on-citynext-initiative-at-worldwide-partner-conference-2/
  31. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/industry/blog/manufacturing-and-mobility/2014/09/03/the-internet-of-things-gives-the-worlds-cities-a-major-lift/
  32. https://www.ge.com/digital/predix
  33. https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/virtual-twin-singapore/
  34. https://www.3ds.com/virtual-twin/infrastructure-cities
  35. https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/mission/solutions/mission-stories/coupling-high-resolution-flood-modelling-story34
  36. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/17/3104
  37. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/aies/2/4/AIES-D-23-0023.1.xml
  38. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/digital-twin
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221571501_Mirror_world_navigation_for_mobile_users_based_on_augmented_reality
  40. https://blog.google/products/maps/immersive-ar-content-google-maps-paris/
  41. https://www.wired.com/story/mirrorworld-ar-next-big-tech-platform/
  42. https://www.mokosmart.com/bluetooth-beacon-indoor-navigation/
  43. https://arway.ai/navigation/
  44. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/mixed-reality/guides/authoring-gestures-hl2
  45. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10974844/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959525000025
  47. https://www.gdpr-advisor.com/gdpr-and-digital-twins-managing-data-privacy-in-virtual-replicas/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8844982/
  49. https://www.isacajournal-digital.org/isacajournal/2025_volume_2/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=2045380
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12583872/
  51. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1584415/full
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452414X24000773
  53. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.12501
  54. https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/blog-post/digital-twins-secure-design-development
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345222000116
  56. https://www.volvoautonomoussolutions.com/en-en/news-and-insights/insights/articles/2025/jun/digital-twins--the-ultimate-virtual-proving-ground.html
  57. https://dwinity.com/
  58. https://dlt.mobi/web3-infrastructure/
  59. https://www.siemens.com/global/en/company/stories/research-technologies/digitaltwin/outlook2030.html
  60. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Digital_Twin_Cities_Framework_and_Practice_2022.pdf
  61. https://www.digicatapult.org.uk/blogs/post/intelligent-digital-twins/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.