Hubbry Logo
MortmainMortmainMain
Open search
Mortmain
Community hub
Mortmain
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mortmain
Mortmain
Mortmain
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mortmain (/ˈmɔːrtmeɪn/[1][2]) is the perpetual, inalienable ownership of real estate by a corporation or legal institution; the term is usually used in the context of its prohibition. Historically, the land owner usually would be the religious office of a church; today, insofar as mortmain prohibitions against perpetual ownership still exist, it refers most often to modern companies and charitable trusts. The term mortmain is derived from Medieval Latin mortua manus, literally "dead hand", through Old French morte main[3] (in modern French, mainmorte).

History

[edit]

During the Middle Ages in Western European countries such as England, the Roman Catholic Church acquired a substantial amount of real estate. As the Church and religious orders were each recognised as a legal person separate from the office holder who administered the Church land (such as the abbot or the bishop), the land would not escheat on the death of the holder, or pass by inheritance, as the Church and the religious orders would not die. The land was held in perpetuity. This was in contrast to feudal practice in which the nobility would hold land granted by the king in return for service, especially service in war. Over time, the Church gained a large share of land in many feudal states; this was a cause of increasing tension between the Church and the Crown.[4]

In 1279, and again in 1290, Statutes of Mortmain were enacted under King Edward I to impose limits on the Church's holding of property, although limits on the Church's power to hold land are also found in earlier statutes, including Magna Carta (1215) and the Provisions of Westminster (1259).[5] The broad effect of these provisions was that the authorisation of the Crown was needed before the land could vest perpetually in a corporation. As an example of the response of the institutions, the chartulary of Chertsey Abbey records that "shortly after one of these statutes vulgarly called Mortmain" 11 acres (4.5 ha) in Ash, Surrey, were held by Robert de Zathe with sufficient common pasture for his flocks and herds, while Geoffrey de Bacsete and his brother William had 28 acres (11 ha).[6]

Corporate mortmain is legal in most countries today. In a person's making of their own trusts, provisions and settlements, to newly proposed founded bodies or groups of persons, there are commonly still laws against perpetuities, preventing their "dead hand" from prevailing more than, for example, 80 years away and there is the common law rule in Saunders v Vautier enabling all of the adult beneficiaries to draw special legal agreements together to override any historic provisions. See rule against perpetuities—rules vary by jurisdiction.

Mortmain was a key underlying interdiction in legal history, contextualising much early case law. The decision of Thornton v Howe (1862) 31 Beav 14 held that a trust for publishing the writings of Joanna Southcott[7] was charitable, being for the "advancement of religion". This decision is often held up as setting the bar extremely low in determining whether a charity is for the advancement of religion.[8] At the time of her trust-making the statutes against mortmain were in force (pre-dating the Law of Property Amendment Act 1860 piloted by Lord Cozens-Hardy) and having not met the narrow, high-authority formalities for such a trust to be valid it was void, rather than imbuing it with special privileges in relation to taxation and viability. Identifying the trust within the general run of mortmain forbiddance shapes the case's reasoning (ratio).

Etymology

[edit]

William Blackstone wrote, in 1765, "The reason of [this] appellation Sir Edward Coke offers many conjectures; but there is one which seems more probable than any that he has given us: viz. that these purchases being usually made by ecclesiastical bodies, the members of which (being professed) were reckoned dead persons in law, land therefore, holden by them, might with great propriety be said to be held in mortua manu. [in dead hands]."[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mortmain

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mortmain, from the Old French morte main meaning "dead hand," refers to the perpetual and inalienable ownership of by a or religious institution, whereby the or tenements cannot be alienated, sold, or subjected to feudal services. This condition arose because corporate entities, unlike natural persons, do not die, allowing indefinite control that conflicted with feudal principles requiring to support obligations and yield revenues through escheats or wards. In medieval , mortmain primarily concerned lands transferred to the Church, which accumulated vast estates through s and bequests, thereby withdrawing them from secular taxation and duties essential for national defense. The of Mortmain, promulgated by King Edward I on November 15, 1279, prohibited such alienations—whether by purchase, , or subterfuge—without royal , empowering lords or to reclaim affected properties to restore feudal obligations and prevent fraudulent evasions of public burdens. This measure highlighted tensions between ecclesiastical expansion and secular authority, influencing later doctrines like the to limit indefinite property restraints.

Definition and Etymology

Mortmain denotes the of held in perpetual, inalienable by a or other immortal entity, rendering it incapable of alienation or reversion as would occur under natural persons subject to mortality. This "" (from French main morte) control arises because corporate bodies persist indefinitely, evading the feudal mechanisms of , , and feudal incidents such as reliefs, wardships, and primer seisins that typically returned to secular lords or upon a holder's . In English , transfers into mortmain were presumptively invalid or voidable, as they frustrated the sovereign's economic and jurisdictional rights over . The doctrine primarily targeted ecclesiastical corporations, whose vows of poverty and perpetual succession enabled land to be locked away from productive feudal circulation, often through devises in wills or outright grants to avoid secular dues. Legally, mortmain alienated land from the dynamic feudal tenure system, where land was conditional on services to overlords; once in corporate hands, it escaped such obligations, leading to statutes deeming such conveyances unlawful without royal assent to preserve monarchical prerogatives. This restriction extended to both aggregate (e.g., monasteries) and sole (e.g., bishops) corporations, encompassing temporal entities only insofar as their perpetual nature mirrored the "dead hand" effect. Enforcement hinged on that no interest in land could vest perpetually without oversight, aligning with broader aversion to perpetuities that hinder alienability and economic utility. While later modified, the core concept underscored a causal tension between institutional and the temporal, service-based structure of medieval landholding, prioritizing feudal liquidity over charitable or devotional permanence.

Linguistic Origins

The term mortmain entered English legal usage in the mid-15th century as a designation for inalienable ownership of land, borrowed from Anglo-French morte mayn (mid-14th century) and mortemain. This expression, attested as early as the 13th century in legal contexts, translates literally to "," derived from mortua manus, combining mortuus ("dead") and manus ("hand"). The phrase's earliest recorded English appearance dates to 1464 in parliamentary rolls, reflecting its integration into terminology from Norman legal traditions. The metaphorical "" evokes the unchanging grip of perpetual corporate or tenure on , which evades the natural cycle of and mortality that applies to individual owners, thereby rendering the land effectively immobile and beyond feudal reversion or alienation. This imagery underscores the term's origin in medieval concerns over land locked indefinitely by immortal entities like religious institutions, contrasting with the transient "living hand" of personal estates.

Historical Development

Medieval European Context

In medieval , the doctrine of mortmain emerged as a response to the feudal structure of , wherein estates were granted conditionally in exchange for , rents, and other incidents owed to overlords. institutions, as perpetual corporations without natural heirs or capacity to perform knight-service, acquired lands through donations and bequests that effectively removed them from the feudal hierarchy, depriving secular lords of revenues such as wardships, marriages, and reliefs. This "dead hand" ownership—termed mortua manus in Latin and reflecting Norman legal traditions—enabled the Church to amass substantial holdings, estimated at one-third of cultivated land in parts of ninth-century , though proportions varied regionally. Such accumulations intensified after the Gregorian Reforms of the eleventh century, which bolstered ecclesiastical independence and encouraged pious alienations to avoid lay exactions. Restrictions on these transfers predated comprehensive statutes, rooted in both canon and secular law. Early church councils, such as the in 506, prohibited unauthorized alienations of ecclesiastical property to preserve endowments, while lay rulers increasingly demanded licenses for acquisitions to safeguard feudal rights. In , antecedents included the Assize of Northampton (1176), which echoed earlier assizes against fraudulent conveyances, and baronial complaints during Henry III's reign, culminating in the (1258) that sought to curb evasions via religious houses. On the continent, similar concerns appeared in fueros like that of Cuenca (twelfth century) in Castile, which limited clerical purchases to protect settler tenures from perpetual inalienability. These measures reflected a causal tension: while donations secured spiritual benefits for donors, they disrupted the reciprocal obligations of , prompting secular authorities to prioritize economic viability over uncompensated losses. The 1279 Statute of Mortmain under formalized these prohibitions continent-wide in influence, declaring void any conveyance of land to religious bodies without royal license, aimed explicitly at halting "fraudulent bestowal" that evaded feudal dues. This built on prior writs requiring overlord consent, addressing how feoffees to uses—intermediaries gifting land postmortem—circumvented earlier bans. Enforcement varied, but the statute underscored a broader European shift toward royal oversight of property flows, balancing clerical immunities against the fiscal imperatives of emerging monarchies. In regions like , analogous death duties reinforced seigneurial claims upon servile or ecclesiastical tenures, illustrating the doctrine's adaptability amid declining .

Key Statutes and Legislation

The Statute of Mortmain, enacted on November 15, 1279, during the reign of Edward I (7 Edward I, also known as Statutum de viris religiosis), prohibited the alienation of land to religious corporations or other perpetual entities without royal license, declaring such transfers void and subjecting the land to forfeiture to the crown or immediate lord. This legislation targeted the practice of granting estates to ecclesiastical bodies, which rendered land inalienable as the "dead hand" of the corporation could not convey feudal services or revert to secular heirs. Exceptions were permitted for small gifts under specified values, but violations incurred penalties including recovery of the land by the donor's lord within a year. Complementing the 1279 statute, the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum of 1290 (18 Edward I) further restricted mortmain by abolishing , mandating that any permitted land transfers to corporations or lay fee-farm tenants occur by substitution rather than creating new intermediate tenures, thereby preserving feudal revenues and limiting perpetual holdings. This measure addressed loopholes in prior laws allowing religious houses to evade restrictions through layered feudal grants, ensuring that land reverted to the original lord upon rather than remaining locked in corporate ownership. Subsequent Tudor-era legislation reinforced these principles; for instance, the statute of 23 , chapter 10 (1531), extended prohibitions against transfers "to the use of churches, chapels, churchwardens, guilds, fraternities" without license, aiming to curb accumulations by local religious institutions amid rising royal control over church lands. These enactments collectively formed the core English framework for mortmain regulation, influencing similar laws in other jurisdictions until gradual repeals in the 19th and 20th centuries, such as the Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act 1888 and its abolition in Britain via the Charities Act 1960.

Enforcement Mechanisms and Notable Cases

The enforcement of the Statute of Mortmain (1279) centered on procedural rights of recovery granted to feudal lords and to reclaim lands alienated without proper license. The immediate lord in chief could enter and seize the property within one year of the unauthorized transfer; if that lord failed to act, the right passed to the next mediate lord for a subsequent six months, escalating through overlords until reaching the king, who could then hold the land in royal keeping pending reassignment to a military tenant obligated to provide services for the realm's defense. Violations triggered forfeiture of the land to the recovering party, ensuring it remained subject to feudal dues rather than perpetual tenure, though ambiguities in prioritizing mesne lords' rights over direct intervention often complicated proceedings. Royal writs facilitated enforcement, including those for inquisitions to detect unlicensed acquisitions, while licenses from or relevant lords became standard for permissible transfers, evolving by the late 13th century to include fines on grantees as a revenue mechanism—initially absent but routine after April 1299. institutions frequently evaded strict compliance through legal maneuvers, such as feoffments to intermediaries or claims of prior grants, prompting supplemental statutes like that of 1391, which mandated disposal of unlicensed holdings or faced seizure. Notable early enforcement followed the Hundred Rolls inquiry of 1279–1280, which cataloged ecclesiastical land accumulations and informed targeted recoveries under Edward I. A specific instance involved William Tochet's seizure of Appleby manor from Thornholme Priory in the late 13th century for unlicensed alienation, exemplifying lordly intervention upheld by royal authority. Between 1279 and 1348, the Crown rigorously applied the statute against Benedictine houses including Crowland, Ramsey, and Thorney abbeys, initiating suits over unauthorized acquisitions that led to prolonged losses of seisin, even when abbeys asserted compliance via general licenses (e.g., Crowland's 1327 grant permitting £20 annual acquisitions), underscoring the law's role in curbing monastic expansion despite evasion attempts. These cases highlighted enforcement's dual aim of fiscal recovery and feudal preservation, though inconsistent application allowed some religious entities to retain gains through litigation or papal influence.

Underlying Rationales

Feudal and Economic Imperatives

In the feudal system of medieval England, formed the economic and military foundation of society, with lords granting estates in exchange for services such as , homage, , and various incidents including reliefs (payments upon inheritance), wardships (control over minors' estates), marriages (fines for arranging heirs' unions), escheats (reversion of land upon failure of heirs), and suits of court. These incidents provided essential revenue and manpower to the king and overlords, funding governance and defense; for instance, I's military campaigns in and relied heavily on such feudal dues amid fiscal pressures. Transfers of land into mortmain—perpetual corporate ownership, typically by religious houses—evaded these obligations, as corporations lacked mortality, minority, or liability, rendering the land inalienable and free from recurring feudal burdens. By the late , institutions had accumulated approximately one-quarter of England's through donations, often motivated by donors' desires to avoid these incidents or secure spiritual benefits, thereby diminishing the feudal pyramid's base and eroding lords' control over vassals. The "dead hand" of the church withdrew lands originally granted for the realm's defense, eliminating contributions and customs like heriots ( returned upon death), which compounded economic strain during periods of war and administrative reform under Edward I. This accumulation not only reduced fiscal yields—estimated to have cost and significant annual revenues—but also locked out of circulation, hindering and economic reassignment that could adapt to changing agricultural or demographic needs. The Statute of Mortmain of 1279 explicitly addressed these imperatives by prohibiting unlicensed alienations, declaring that such grants to religious entities led to the "withdrawal of services... homage and , and other services, and the wardships, marriages, reliefs, escheats, and other profits" from the king and his lords. Economically, this preserved the of feudal assets, preventing a scenario where vast tracts became unproductive endowments exempt from taxation or improvement incentives, while feudally it upheld the reciprocal obligations essential to maintaining military readiness and hierarchical stability against the church's growing temporal power. Enforcement through forfeiture rights reinforced these aims, allowing overlords to reclaim lands within specified periods, thereby mitigating the systemic revenue losses that threatened the crown's sovereignty.

Political and Anti-Clerical Dimensions

The political dimensions of mortmain prohibitions stemmed from the need to preserve the feudal system's economic and military foundations, as land alienated to perpetual corporate ownership escaped obligations such as , taxes, and inheritance fees like reliefs and wardships. In medieval , feudal lords and relied on these incidents for revenue and manpower; transfers to religious houses, often via deathbed bequests or long-term leases disguised as temporary, reduced the available subject to secular control, thereby undermining baronial estates and royal prerogatives. The Statute of Mortmain of 1279, enacted under Edward I, explicitly barred religious corporations from acquiring land without royal license to counteract this erosion, reflecting a broader effort to centralize authority amid post-Magna Carta tensions between king, , and church. Anti-clerical motivations intertwined with these concerns, as the Catholic Church's accumulation of estates—through pious donations exempt from and feudal burdens—concentrated temporal power in hands, rivaling secular rulers and fostering jurisdictional conflicts over taxation and appointments. By the late , religious institutions in controlled an estimated 20-25% of cultivated land, a figure amassed via mechanisms like uses and feoffments to trustees that circumvented earlier prohibitions, prompting Edward I's legislation as a check on papal influence and monastic expansion. This was evident in the statute's focus on "religious persons" and houses, which halted fraudulent alienations while allowing licensed transfers under royal oversight, signaling a strategic curb on the Church's autonomy amid contemporaneous disputes like the Clericis Laicos (1296-1297) that resisted secular taxation of clerical property.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Objections from Philanthropic and Religious Perspectives

From the perspective of religious institutions, particularly the medieval English Church, mortmain legislation was criticized for obstructing the perpetual endowment of land essential to functions, including the sustenance of monasteries that provided spiritual services, , and hospitality to travelers. contended that such restrictions violated the traditional tenure of frankalmoign, under which land was granted to religious houses in exchange for prayers and divine services, thereby undermining the Church's capacity to fulfill pious testators' intentions and maintain ongoing charitable works. The Statute of Mortmain of 1279, enacted under Edward I, elicited particular opposition from bishops and abbots, who argued during parliamentary consultations that prohibiting alienations without royal license would curtail the establishment of new religious foundations and the expansion of existing ones for divine worship and almsgiving, potentially leading to a decline in societal moral and material support. Religious critics further objected that the licensing system introduced by the 1279 statute imposed burdensome administrative and financial hurdles, such as fines and Chancery approvals, which disproportionately affected smaller religious houses seeking land for burial grounds or churchyards, as evidenced by petitions under later statutes like 15 Richard II c. 5 (1391). These processes were seen not merely as regulatory but as secular encroachments on autonomy, conflicting with principles favoring perpetual ownership for spiritual perpetuity. Philanthropic perspectives, often intertwined with religious ones in the pre-modern era, raised concerns that mortmain laws stifled enduring charitable trusts by preventing land from being dedicated irrevocably to public benefits like hospitals and schools, which historically delivered sustained to the indigent and to the populace. Proponents of charitable argued that such restrictions ignored the long-term societal gains from stable endowments, as transient ownership risked dissipation of funds through heirs or economic shifts, thereby prioritizing feudal revenues over verifiable historical contributions of endowed institutions to welfare. Later iterations, such as 9 George II c. 36 (1736), amplified these critiques by extending prohibitions to non-ecclesiastical charities, prompting assertions that the laws constituted a misguided "public mischief" policy that undervalued donors' rights to direct assets toward perpetual good.

Empirical Defenses and Causal Benefits

The mortmain statutes defended the economic vitality of medieval by curbing the perpetual withdrawal of from active markets, thereby preserving its availability for productive uses and feudal obligations. Prior to the 1279 , bequests to religious institutions had enabled substantial accumulation of estates, which evaded and other incidents, reducing the crown's military revenue base at a time when Edward I required funds for campaigns in and . By mandating royal licenses for such transfers, the laws generated fees while limiting unchecked expansion, ensuring remained subject to alienation and taxation rather than locked in inalienable corporate hands. Causally, this prohibition fostered land , preventing the "dead hand" from imposing indefinite restraints that hindered reallocation to higher-value agricultural or commercial purposes. Analogous to the , which emerged later to avoid similar socio-economic rigidities by limiting remote contingent interests, mortmain promoted dynamic property rights essential for adapting to demographic shifts and technological improvements in farming. Empirical evidence from the subsequent in the 1530s–1540s, which released church-held lands back into circulation, demonstrates parallel benefits: affected areas experienced a rise in gentry , accelerated agricultural , greater labor mobility out of , and higher long-term industrialization rates, implying that prior mortmain restrictions had already mitigated stagnation from excessive perpetual holdings. These mechanisms countered potential monopolistic tendencies in control, as immortal corporations like monasteries prioritized non-market ends over efficiency, often leading to underutilized focused on liturgical rather than innovative uses. The statutes' enforcement thus sustained a broader base of taxable and service-renderable , bolstering fiscal capacity for public goods like defense without relying on politically contentious expropriations.

Repeal, Evolution, and Modern Equivalents

Progressive Modifications and Abolition

The Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act 1888 consolidated prior statutes governing land transfers to charitable and corporate bodies, repealing obsolete enactments while retaining core restrictions on alienations in mortmain unless approved by the Charity Commissioners or executed through specific mechanisms such as leases not exceeding 21 years. This legislation permitted dispositions of without restriction and allowed land gifts for charitable uses under supervised conditions, reflecting a shift toward facilitating amid industrial-era demands for charitable endowments, though it preserved safeguards against perpetual lock-up of estates. An amending act in 1891 further refined these provisions, extending flexibilities for certain trusts and bequests. Parliamentary debates in the mid-19th century, such as those in , highlighted growing calls to relax mortmain prohibitions to enable broader testamentary gifts for charitable purposes, particularly benefiting religious and educational institutions, though opponents cited risks of evading feudal dues and fiscal losses. These reforms incrementally eroded the absolute bans of medieval statutes, influenced by evolving economic views that viewed moderate charitable accumulations as socially beneficial rather than feudal threats. The outright abolition of mortmain restrictions occurred with the Charities Act 1960, which repealed the and acts in their entirety, eliminating statutory barriers to land devises for charitable purposes and affirming that such transfers no longer required special licenses or consents beyond general charity registration. This repeal, effective from August 16, 1960, aligned with post-war recognition that historical concerns over land immobilization had diminished in a modern economy reliant on fluid property markets and regulated corporate entities. Subsequent charity legislation, including the Charities Act 1993, maintained oversight through administrative frameworks but without mortmain's prohibitive core.

Persistent Restrictions and Contemporary Parallels

Although formal mortmain statutes were repealed in by the Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act 1888 and the act of 1891, which permitted limited companies and authorized charitable incorporations to hold land subject to regulatory oversight, analogous principles endure in jurisdictions to curb perpetual inalienability. These persist primarily through the , a doctrine codified in 1682 under the Duke of Norfolk's Case and aimed at averting "dead hand" control by ensuring property interests vest, if at all, within a life in being plus 21 years, thereby preserving marketability and economic productivity. This rule directly addressed mortmain-like abuses where remote contingencies could indefinitely suspend alienation, as seen in historical ecclesiastical accumulations that reduced feudal revenues and land circulation. In the United States, the applies to trusts and estates, exempting most charitable trusts from strict enforcement to honor perpetual philanthropic intents while subjecting non-charitable ones to validation tests that invalidate overly remote provisions; however, statutory reforms in states like (Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, adopted 1986, allowing 90-year periods) and (repealed for in 2011) reflect ongoing tensions between donor control and societal needs for adaptability. Complementing this, twelve U.S. jurisdictions retain "modern mortmain acts" mandating approval, waiting periods (e.g., 15 months in some cases), or spousal consent for testamentary charitable bequests exceeding certain thresholds, designed to mitigate , hasty dispositions, or evasion of creditors—echoing medieval fears of land withdrawal from productive use. For instance, New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 8-1.3 requires for charitable gifts under wills probated after specific dates if deemed imprudent, prioritizing against potential overreach by institutions. Contemporary parallels extend to conservation easements, enforceable in perpetuity under U.S. federal law ( § 170(h), enacted ), where landowners voluntarily encumber against development to secure deductions, creating restrictions akin to mortmain's inalienable holdings but critiqued for imposing rigid 19th-century priorities on future generations amid climate variability or urban pressures. Judicial doctrines like cy pres allow modification of failed perpetual charitable purposes, as in the 2011 Treasury Regulations permitting easement adjustments for "changed conditions," yet empirical analyses highlight enforcement challenges, with over 20,000 easements monitored by trusts facing administrative burdens that parallel historical oversight of church lands. In , residual mortmain influences appear in provincial laws restricting religious corporations' accumulations without governmental assent, as under Ontario's Mortmain Act remnants, underscoring enduring policy favoring circulation over immobilization. These mechanisms, grounded in of reduced liquidity from perpetual ties (e.g., pre-repeal English land markets stagnating under church holdings comprising up to one-third of acreage by 1279), affirm causal benefits of alienability for and taxation without fully eradicating institutional perpetual claims.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mortmain
  2. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/mortmain.asp
  3. https://thelawdictionary.org/mortmain/
  4. https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/statute-of-mortmain/
  5. https://lawshelf.com/coursewarecontentview/limitations-on-charitable-trusts
  6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/mortmain
  7. https://wordsmith.org/words/mortmain.html
  8. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/mortmain_n
  9. https://academic.oup.com/book/32805/chapter/274635227
  10. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10579a.htm
  11. https://www.academia.edu/45997176/Exceptis_militibus_et_sanctis_Restrictions_upon_Ecclesiastical_Ownership_o_Land_in_the_Foral_Legislation_of_Medieval_Castile_and_Valencia
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/continuity-and-change/article/death-and-taxes-mortmain-payments-and-the-authority-of-the-count-in-fourteenthcentury-flanders/7E051A5BE3C12905DE48402E1BCFD6E4
  13. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100211278
  14. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Statute-of-Mortmain
  15. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/51-52/42/contents/enacted
  16. https://www.britannica.com/topic/mortmain
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/099B9C7E05B341A4E3E11603B029DF12/9780511896095c3_p72-101_CBO.pdf/enforcement_of_the_statute.pdf
  18. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/FFA9030ECD49BFAA2F7223B50053C06B/9780511896095c1_p12-28_CBO.pdf/statute_of_1279_and_its_antecedents.pdf
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/mortmain-legislation-and-the-english-church-12791500/E712C40C1692ECC7E3EFB22D22660ED2
  20. https://academic.oup.com/book/27107/chapter/196468506
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/175064
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/650461
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-british-studies/article/crown-three-benedictine-houses-and-the-statute-of-mortmain-12791348/730E33CB7FCE2060DDD9D69CA8CEC672
  24. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21450/revisions/w21450.rev0.pdf
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/english-government-in-the-thirteenth-century/mortmain-licensing-system-12801307/F3836E221E67815F3DDA5D6671D7FE8E
  26. https://unamsanctamcatholicam.com/2022/05/28/ecclesiastical-property-ownership-in-the-middle-ages/
  27. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/mortmain
  28. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1326&context=blr
  29. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1865&context=plr
  30. https://wire.insiderfinance.io/the-mortmain-act-of-1279-and-its-theological-implications-1108a8cf6a35
  31. https://nemolegal.com/analysis-of-the-rule-against-perpetuities/
  32. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21450/w21450.pdf
  33. https://archive.org/download/reportonmortmain00onta/reportonmortmain00onta.pdf
  34. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1843-08-01/debates/4984652d-fe0f-45c0-888b-2fd31f979cf2/LawOfMortmain
  35. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/8-9/58/contents
  36. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/commentary/halsburys-laws-of-england/charities/84-repeal-consequential-provisions
  37. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/8-9/58/section/38/enacted?view=plain
  38. https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1428&context=faculty_scholarship
  39. https://insight.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2072&context=dlra
  40. https://rmfpc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/mortmain-statutes-and-restrictions-on-testamentary-gifts-to-charities.pdf
  41. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/easements-covenants-servitudes/
  42. https://www.landcan.org/pdfs/perpetualisnotforever.pdf
  43. https://cbr.cba.org/index.php/cbr/article/download/1806/1806
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.