Hubbry Logo
Palmer notationPalmer notationMain
Open search
Palmer notation
Community hub
Palmer notation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Palmer notation
Palmer notation
from Wikipedia

Palmer notation (sometimes called the "Military System" and named for 19th-century American dentist Dr. Corydon Palmer from Warren, Ohio[1]) is a dental notation (tooth numbering system). Despite the adoption of the FDI World Dental Federation notation (ISO 3950) in most of the world and by the World Health Organization, the Palmer notation continued to be the overwhelmingly preferred method used by orthodontists, dental students and practitioners in the United Kingdom as of 1998.[2]

The notation was originally termed the Zsigmondy system after Hungarian dentist Adolf Zsigmondy, who developed the idea in 1861 using a Zsigmondy cross to record quadrants of tooth positions.[3] Adult teeth were numbered 1 to 8, and the child primary dentition (also called deciduous, milk or baby teeth) were depicted with a quadrant grid using Roman numerals I, II, III, IV, V to number the teeth from the midline. Palmer changed this to A, B, C, D, E, which made it less confusing and less prone to errors in interpretation.

The Palmer notation consists of a symbol (⏌⎿ ⏋⎾) designating in which quadrant the tooth is found and a number indicating the position from the midline. Adult teeth are numbered 1 to 8, with deciduous (baby) teeth indicated by a letter A to E. Hence the left and right maxillary central incisor would have the same number, "1", but the right one would have the symbol "⏌" underneath it, while the left one would have "⎿".

Comparison of alphanumeric notation, Palmer notation, ISO 3950 (FDI) notation, Universal Numbering System, and paleoanthropology notation

Table of codes

[edit]

Orientation of the chart is traditionally "dentist's view", i.e. patient's right corresponds to notation chart left. The designations "left" and "right" on the chart, however, nonetheless correspond to the patient's left and right, respectively.

Palmer notation
Permanent Dentition
upper right upper left
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
lower right lower left
Primary Dentition
upper right upper left
E D C B A A B C D E
E D C B A A B C D E
lower right lower left

One advantage of Palmer notation is that it can produce a very graphical image, akin to a 'map' of the dentition; tooth transpositions or edentulous spaces can easily be depicted if desired. It would also be feasible to introduce additional alphabetic characters or other symbols, for example to denote supernumerary teeth or bridge pontics, to which a purely numerical method such as the FDI system does not lend itself easily.[4]

Palmer notation for an upper right first premolar tooth
Palmer notation for a deciduous lower right central incisor tooth
Palmer notation for a normal adult full set of teeth
Palmer notation for a normal child full set of teeth

Computerization

[edit]

With the move from written dental notes to electronic records, some difficulty in reproducing the symbols has been encountered.[4] On a standard keyboard 'slash' and 'backslash' may be used as a crude approximation to the symbols with numbers placed before or afterwards; hence 3/ is 3 and /5 is 5.

The Miscellaneous Technical block in Unicode provides Palmer notation symbols in U+23BE through U+23CC. The symbols are not to be confused with box-drawing characters (┘└ ┐┌), which have the horizontal line at the middle.[5] These symbols are inherited from JIS X 0213 Dentist symbols.[6]

Daniel Johnson has put together a Palmer Tooth Notation TrueType font called FreePalmer. It is covered by the GPL 3 license. This font is descended from FreeSans. It can be used in OpenOffice and other software. A "MP7" derivative which enables the grid patterns to be produced that correspond to handwritten Palmer tooth notations is available for download as well. The FreePalmer characters are placed in the Latin-1 part, overriding existing characters.[7] A more technically correct way would be to program orthographic ligatures into the font.

Victor Haderup notation (Danish variant)

[edit]

The Danish dentist Victor Haderup devised a variation of the Palmer notation where the (⏌⎿ ⏋⎾) symbols are replaced by plus/minus signs, which can either be placed in front or behind the number.[8][9] A plus (+) indicates upper position while minus (−) indicates lower. When the sign is in front of the number, it indicates left while after it indicates right. For instance −6 indicates the 6th lower left tooth, i.e. first mandibular molar.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Palmer notation, also known as the Zsigmondy-Palmer system, is a standardized method in for numbering and identifying teeth by dividing the oral cavity into four quadrants and assigning sequential numbers or letters to teeth within each quadrant based on their position from the midline. This system originated with Austrian dentist Adolf Zsigmondy, who proposed it in 1861 as a quadrant-based approach using numerical identifiers, and was later modified and popularized by American dentist Corydon Palmer of in 1891. For permanent dentition, teeth are numbered 1 to 8 in each quadrant, starting with 1 for the central and progressing posteriorly to 8 for the third molar; primary dentition uses letters A to E correspondingly, from central to second molar. Quadrants are distinguished by unique symbols: ┘ for the upper right, └ for the upper left, ┐ for the lower left, and ┌ for the lower right, allowing precise notation such as "┘1" for the upper right central . These symbols align with the midline (vertical line) and occlusal plane (horizontal line), facilitating visual representation in charts and records. Although the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) notation (ISO 3950) has become the global standard since the 1970s for its simplicity in digital systems, Palmer notation remains prevalent in the , parts of , and certain academic institutions, particularly in , due to its intuitive quadrant symmetry and ease in manual charting. Its advantages include straightforward learning for beginners and effective communication in clinical settings without requiring full arch sequencing, though challenges arise in computerized records where symbols may not render consistently.

History

Zsigmondy System

The Zsigmondy system was developed in 1861 by Hungarian-born dentist Adolf Zsigmondy, who practiced in , as a foundational method for systematically charting positions in the . This system introduced a diagrammatic approach known as the "Zsigmondy cross" to visually represent the oral cavity, facilitating precise documentation in clinical and educational settings. The Zsigmondy cross consisted of a horizontal line symbolizing the upper (occlusal plane) intersected by a vertical line marking the midline, forming an L-shaped or cross-like structure; tooth positions were indicated by placing numerals around this diagram to denote the four quadrants without employing quadrant-specific symbols. For permanent , 1 through 8 were assigned to each quadrant, progressing from the central (1) to the third molar (8). Primary teeth were denoted using I to V per quadrant, with I representing the central and V the second molar. Zsigmondy detailed his system in publications within German dental journals, including the 1861 article "Grundzüge einer praktischen Methode," which emphasized its utility for practical tooth recording. This work contributed to the system's early adoption in , where it became a standard for visually mapping dental arches in professional practice.

Palmer Modifications

Corydon Palmer, a from , , developed modifications to the Zsigmondy system around 1870, claiming independent invention while adapting its core numeric positioning for greater practicality in clinical use. These changes replaced the original Zsigmondy cross—a diagrammatic grid for quadrant identification—with simpler line-based symbols to denote the four quadrants more efficiently in records. Palmer introduced specific symbols for the quadrants: right-angle symbols ┘ for the upper right, └ for the upper left, ┐ for the lower left, and ┌ for the lower right, often depicted as inverted L shapes for handwriting ease. This simplification aimed to streamline documentation without requiring complex diagrams, making the system more accessible for daily dental practice. In a 1891 article published in The Dental Cosmos, Palmer advocated for the modified system's adoption, highlighting its utility in accurately tracking treatments and avoiding errors in patient charts. He emphasized how the line symbols and retained numbering enhanced record-keeping efficiency compared to verbose descriptions or anatomical names. For primary teeth, Palmer shifted from Zsigmondy's (I–V) to letters A–E, aligning the notation with permanent while preventing overlap with permanent and molar numbers (4–8); A denoted the central , B the lateral , C the canine, D the first molar, and E the second molar within each quadrant. The historical debate centers on whether Palmer's work represented true independent invention—given his unawareness of Zsigmondy's 1861 publication—or a direct adaptation, as the core sequencing remained similar; Palmer actively promoted the system at meetings and through journals, facilitating its spread in American and European dentistry by the early 20th century.

Core Principles

Quadrant Identification

Palmer notation divides the oral cavity into four quadrants based on the patient's perspective, with the upper right quadrant encompassing teeth from the upper right central to the upper right third molar, the upper left quadrant covering the corresponding left-side teeth, the lower left quadrant including the lower left teeth from central to third molar, and the lower right quadrant addressing the lower right equivalents. This division facilitates precise localization of teeth within the . Each quadrant is designated by a specific L-shaped derived from the corners of a diagrammatic representation of the dental arches, mimicking directional lines for intuitive visual reference aligned with the layout of the mouth. The are: ┘ for the upper right quadrant, └ for the upper left quadrant, ┐ for the lower left quadrant, and ┌ for the lower right quadrant. These provide a compact, non-numeric method to indicate and arch position, enhancing quick identification during clinical documentation. The quadrant symbol is conventionally placed immediately before the number to denote the , ensuring unambiguous reference within the . For instance, the upper right first molar would be represented as ┘6, integrating seamlessly with the sequential numbering. In cases involving exact midline teeth, such as the central incisors, a quadrant symbol is typically still specified for complete clarity, though some simplified contexts may omit it when the position is evident. Visually, the symbols align with the patient's facial orientation: when facing the patient, the ┘ symbol points to the upper right side (patient's right), └ to the upper left (patient's left), ┐ to the lower left (patient's left), and ┌ to the lower right (patient's right), creating a logical mapping that corresponds to the anatomical arrangement of the dental arches. This patient-centered perspective aids in standardizing communication across dental records and radiographs.

Tooth Positioning

In Palmer notation for , each quadrant employs a sequential from 1 to 8, beginning with the central designated as 1 and progressing posteriorly to the third molar as 8. This arrangement reflects the anatomical order of and position within the . The system maintains symmetry across quadrants, mirroring the numbering for corresponding teeth between the left and right sides of both the maxillary and mandibular arches, which simplifies bilateral comparisons. Numbers increase away from the midline, oriented from the patient's perspective to ensure consistent identification regardless of the observer's viewpoint. While the standard scheme adheres strictly to numbers 1 through 8, some extensions incorporate 9 to denote supernumerary teeth or serve as placeholders for absent ones, though this is not part of the core system. Quadrant symbols, such as ┘ for the upper right, prefix these numbers to specify location. This emphasis on positional over absolute global numbering aids orthodontic planning by enabling straightforward assessment of alignment and movement across symmetric arches.

Application to Dentitions

Permanent Teeth

In the Palmer notation system, the 32 permanent teeth are identified by combining a quadrant symbol with a number from 1 to 8, where the numbering begins at the midline and proceeds posteriorly in each quadrant. The quadrants are designated as follows: upper right with ┘, upper left with └, lower left with ┐, and lower right with ┌. This approach ensures precise identification across the maxillary and mandibular arches, with numbers corresponding to specific tooth positions regardless of the quadrant. The numbering sequence is consistent: 1 for central , 2 for lateral , 3 for canine, 4 for first , 5 for second , 6 for first molar, 7 for second molar, and 8 for third molar. For instance, ┘1 refers to the upper right central , └8 to the upper left third molar, ┐1 to the lower left central , and ┌7 to the lower right second molar. In clinical contexts, this notation streamlines ; a procedure such as a filling on the upper right canine would be recorded as "filling on ┘3," while an extraction of the lower right first might be noted as "extraction of ┌4." These combinations allow for quick reference in records, radiographs, and treatment plans.
QuadrantSymbolNumberTooth Type
Upper Right1Central Incisor
Upper Right2Lateral Incisor
Upper Right3Canine
Upper Right4First Premolar
Upper Right5Second Premolar
Upper Right6First Molar
Upper Right7Second Molar
Upper Right8Third Molar
Upper Left1Central Incisor
Upper Left2Lateral Incisor
Upper Left3Canine
Upper Left4First Premolar
Upper Left5Second Premolar
Upper Left6First Molar
Upper Left7Second Molar
Upper Left8Third Molar
Lower Left1Central Incisor
Lower Left2Lateral Incisor
Lower Left3Canine
Lower Left4First Premolar
Lower Left5Second Premolar
Lower Left6First Molar
Lower Left7Second Molar
Lower Left8Third Molar
Lower Right1Central Incisor
Lower Right2Lateral Incisor
Lower Right3Canine
Lower Right4First Premolar
Lower Right5Second Premolar
Lower Right6First Molar
Lower Right7Second Molar
Lower Right8Third Molar
The notation's quadrant-based structure offers advantages for permanent dentition, including easy recognition and comprehension that aids in visualizing tooth positions for procedures like extractions or restorations, particularly in and where spatial relationships are critical. Its simplicity facilitates clear communication among dental professionals and is especially user-friendly for manual charting. In mixed dentition, as erupt, the system transitions seamlessly by assigning the appropriate numbers (1-8) to emerging permanent teeth while retaining letters (A-E) for remaining primary teeth, all under the same quadrant symbols.

Primary Teeth

In the Palmer notation system, primary (deciduous) teeth are designated using letters A through E within each quadrant to account for the 20-tooth , which lacks premolars and thus requires a condensed scheme compared to the permanent set. The lettering begins at the midline and proceeds posteriorly: A for the central , B for the lateral , C for the canine, D for the first molar, and E for the second molar. This adaptation ensures unambiguous identification in , where primary teeth predominate until approximately age 6. Quadrant symbols mirror those used for permanent teeth: ┘ for the upper right, └ for the upper left, ┐ for the lower left, and ┌ for the lower right. Simplified variants in clinical records or handwriting may employ + for upper right, - for upper left, V for lower left, and ^ for lower right. Full notations combine the symbol with the letter; for instance, ┘A (+A) denotes the upper right primary central , └E (-E) the upper left primary second molar, and ┐B (VB) the lower left primary lateral . These combinations facilitate precise communication in treatment planning, such as noting the extraction of ┌C (^C), the lower right primary canine, in a pediatric case. Primary teeth are distinguished from primarily through the use of letters (A-E) versus numbers (1-8), preventing confusion during the mixed phase. In handwritten charts, primary notations may include an underline beneath the letter or a superscript "d" (for ) to emphasize their temporary nature, while digital records often rely on contextual labels or separate sections. This distinction is crucial for tracking exfoliation and eruption sequences. The table below outlines the Palmer notation for all 20 primary teeth, specifying tooth types and approximate eruption timelines based on standard developmental patterns.
QuadrantTooth TypeNotationEruption Timeline (months)
Upper RightCentral Incisor┘A7–8
Upper RightLateral Incisor┘B9–10
Upper RightCanine┘C16–18
Upper RightFirst Molar┘D13–14
Upper RightSecond Molar┘E25–27
Upper LeftCentral Incisor└A6–7
Upper LeftLateral Incisor└B7–8
Upper LeftCanine└C16–18
Upper LeftFirst Molar└D13–14
Upper LeftSecond Molar└E25–27
Lower LeftCentral Incisor┐A6–10
Lower LeftLateral Incisor┐B10–12
Lower LeftCanine┐C17–21
Lower LeftFirst Molar┐D14–16
Lower LeftSecond Molar┐E23–31
Lower RightCentral Incisor┌A6–10
Lower RightLateral Incisor┌B10–16
Lower RightCanine┌C17–21
Lower RightFirst Molar┌D14–16
Lower RightSecond Molar┌E23–31
Eruption timelines represent averages and can vary by individual factors such as and ; central incisors typically appear first, followed by molars, canines, and lateral incisors last among primary teeth. The system supports alignment with permanent numbering for monitoring succession, as primary positions roughly correspond to permanent incisors (1–2), canines (3), and molars (6–8), aiding in predictive .

Variants

Victor Haderup Notation

The Victor Haderup notation was developed between 1887 and 1891 by Danish dentist Victor Haderup as a Scandinavian adaptation of the Palmer notation system. This variant aimed to simplify dental recording in the region by retaining core elements of the original while introducing modifications suited to local practices. It shares the quadrant identification symbols with the core Palmer system, using or directional brackets to denote upper and lower arches, respectively. For , the Haderup notation is identical to the Palmer system, employing the same symbols combined with numbers 1 through 8 to indicate position from the midline outward, such as 1+ for the upper right central or 8- for the lower left third molar. The primary distinction arises in the notation for primary teeth, where a "0" prefix is added to the numerical identifiers to differentiate them from . This results in designations like 01+ for the upper right primary central , 02+ for the upper right primary lateral , 03+ for the upper right primary canine, 04+ for the upper right primary first molar, and 05+ for the upper right primary second molar; similarly, +05 denotes the upper left primary second molar. These prefixed numbers maintain the sequential logic of the Palmer system but enhance clarity in mixed scenarios by avoiding overlap with numbers. The Haderup notation is predominant in and other , where it promotes consistency in clinical records, particularly for mixed cases involving both primary and emerging . Its adoption in these regions stems from Haderup's emphasis on practical, unambiguous charting that facilitates communication among dental professionals.
Tooth DescriptionStandard Palmer Notation (Primary)Haderup Notation (Primary)
Upper right central 4+01+
Upper right lateral 5+02+
Upper right canine6+03+
Upper right first molar7+04+
Upper right second molar8+05+
Upper left second molar+8+05
Lower left central 4-01-
Lower right second molar-8-05

Frykholm and Lysell System

The Frykholm and Lysell system was introduced in 1962 by Swedish dentists K.O. Frykholm and L. Lysell to enhance the recording of both teeth and their surfaces in dental documentation. This variant builds on the standard primary numbering principles of Palmer notation by retaining its quadrant symbols—such as the plus sign (+) for the upper right quadrant and the minus sign (–) for the lower left—while incorporating numbers 1 through 5 for primary teeth. To distinguish primary ( or ) teeth from permanent ones, a lowercase "m" is appended to these numerals, ensuring unambiguous identification in mixed without overhauling the foundational . The system's primary purpose is to facilitate clear differentiation in international dental records, particularly for pediatric cases where primary and coexist, thereby improving communication across diverse notation practices. It also extends to surface notations, using symbols like "v" for vestibular (buccal/labial), "o" for oral (lingual/palatal), "d" for distal, and "m" for mesial, applied after the identifier (e.g., +1mv for the buccal surface of the upper right primary central ). This approach maintains compatibility with existing Palmer-based systems while addressing ambiguities in primary charting. Adoption of the Frykholm and Lysell system has remained limited, primarily within certain European contexts of , where it supports research and with multiple notation frameworks. It is occasionally referenced in surveys of global dental practices but has not achieved widespread use beyond specialized applications. For illustration, the following table compares notations for select primary teeth in the Frykholm and Lysell system against a standard numbered Palmer variant (without suffix or letters):
Tooth DescriptionQuadrant SymbolStandard Palmer (Primary)Frykholm and Lysell
Upper right central ++4+1m
Upper right lateral ++5+2m
Upper right canine++6+3m
Upper right first molar++7+4m
Upper right second molar++8+5m
Lower left central –4–1m
Lower left lateral –5–2m
This table highlights the minimal modification via the "m" suffix for primary specificity.

Challenges and Modern Use

Computerization

The implementation of Palmer notation in digital dental systems has faced technical challenges primarily due to its reliance on non-standard symbols for quadrant identification, such as the right-angle brackets (┌, ┐, └, ┘) or approximations like +, -, V, and /. In early software applications from the and , these symbols often lacked adequate font or encoding support, leading to rendering problems where they appeared as blank boxes, question marks, or crude approximations, complicating and display in electronic records. To address these issues, developers introduced workarounds such as ASCII-based alternatives, for example, using abbreviations like "UR1" to denote the upper right first , which could be typed directly on standard keyboards without special characters. Additionally, many electronic records (EHRs) defaulted to the FDI two-digit system (ISO 3950) as a more compatible numeric alternative, avoiding symbol-related complications altogether. From the 1990s onward, international standards like ISO 3950, which formalized the FDI notation in 1984 (with corrections in 1995), increasingly favored numeric systems over symbolic ones like Palmer for their ease of , storage, and in computerized environments. Contemporary dental software has improved support for Palmer notation through features like custom fonts, dedicated dropdown menus for symbol selection, and integrated charting tools. For instance, Open Dental's orthodontic module displays teeth using Palmer nomenclature by default, while systems like Dentrix offer configurable notation preferences that accommodate Palmer via user-defined setups or extensions for third-party integrations. These advancements have mitigated some barriers, yet the need for such adaptations has contributed to reduced adoption of Palmer notation in fully computerized practices worldwide, though it persists in orthodontics for its visual clarity in treatment planning charts.

Current Adoption

Palmer notation remains widespread in the , , and certain countries, where it serves as a standard for identification in many clinical contexts. It is also commonly employed in European orthodontics due to its quadrant-based structure, which facilitates precise charting of tooth positions. A 2024 review confirms its continued prevalence in these regions alongside the FDI system. In educational settings, Palmer notation is taught in dental schools across the and to provide historical context and essential charting skills, typically alongside the FDI system to prepare students for both local and international practices. This dual instruction ensures graduates are proficient in multiple notations, enhancing their versatility in global dental communication. A 2017 survey of and Irish dental hospitals revealed that Palmer notation is one of the primary systems instructed, with 12 responding institutions reporting its routine use in teaching and clinical recording. Clinically, Palmer notation offers advantages in handwritten documentation, allowing for rapid notation in treatment plans without requiring complex numerical sequences. It is particularly favored by orthodontists for diagrams involving placement and movement, as the symbolic quadrants provide a clear visual aid for alignment and positioning. Surveys indicate high familiarity among dentists, with persistence in private practices for maintaining legacy patient records. Despite these strengths, Palmer notation has declined in broader adoption due to its supersession by the FDI system under ISO 3950, which promotes uniformity worldwide. In the United States, the Universal Numbering System has dominated since its endorsement by the in 1968. Computerization further limits its expansion, as the notation's symbols are challenging to input digitally compared to numeric alternatives.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.