Hubbry Logo
ParanephropsParanephropsMain
Open search
Paranephrops
Community hub
Paranephrops
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Paranephrops
Paranephrops
Paranephrops
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Paranephrops
Northern koura, P. planifrons
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Malacostraca
Order: Decapoda
Suborder: Pleocyemata
Family: Parastacidae
Genus: Paranephrops
White, 1842
Species
  • P. planifrons White, 1842
  • P. zealandicus (White, 1847)

Paranephrops is a genus of freshwater crayfish found only in New Zealand. They are known by the English common names freshwater crayfish[1] and koura,[2] the latter from their Māori name of kōura.[1]

Species

[edit]

The two species are:

Image Name Distribution
northern koura, Paranephrops planifrons the North Island, but also in Marlborough, Nelson, and the West Coast of the South Island
southern koura, Paranephrops zealandicus the eastern and southern of the South Island and on Stewart Island / Rakiura

Both species are a traditional food for Māori, and a small koura aquaculture industry supplies the restaurant market.

Description

[edit]

The northern koura (P. planifrons) reaches lengths of about 70 mm (2.8 in), whereas the southern koura (P. zealandicus) is slightly larger – 80 mm (3.1 in) – with relatively shorter antennae. Their first pair of legs (chelipeds) are pincers used for scavenging food and warding off predators or other koura. The chelipeds in P. zealandicus are much hairier at their tips than those of P. planifrons.[3] The four pairs of well-developed walking legs are used for most movement, but the pleopods are small and no use for swimming; when alarmed, koura can flick their tails forward violently to propel themselves backwards at speed.[3] They can be sexed by looking at their underside; males have a pair of gonads that protrude from the base of the fourth pair of legs, while females have holes at the base of the second pair of legs.

Ecology

[edit]

Diet

[edit]

Koura in natural populations are omnivorous scavengers, consuming a variety of foods, with animal protein contributing the most to growth. Invertebrates including aquatic snails, chironomids, and mayflies are the main food source. Juvenile koura require higher amounts of protein in their diet than adults due to greater growth rate demands with invertebrates forming the bulk of their diet. Koura in lakes have been shown to feed predominantly in the littoral zone where food availability is greatest. Feeding in the littoral zone may reflect diel movement with koura moving to deeper and darker parts of lakes to avoid predation during daylight hours and moving to the littoral zone at night to feed.[4]

Habitat

[edit]
Paranephrops forms much of the diet of the black shag in the Rotorua lakes

Koura occupy freshwater lakes, streams, rivers, and swamps, in mud or gravel substrates. Koura are nocturnal, moving into shallower water at night and deeper water column during the day. During daytime, they find shelter under rocks, debris such as cans and bottles, and vegetation. In soft sediments they may also excavate burrows or fan shaped depressions, in Lake Rotoiti at depths of 5–10 metres (16–33 ft).[3] In streams, koura take cover on the bottom beneath fallen leaf litter, fallen logs, and tree roots and undercut banks. Tree fern roots that project into the stream are thought to provide excellent cover for juveniles.[4] Fossil evidence of Paranephrops in Pleistocene sediment demonstrate occurrence in or near marginal-marine habitat, unfortunately there is little published literature about occurrences of fossilized Paranephrops.[5]

Predators, cannibalism and disease

[edit]

Eels, perch, catfish, and trout are the major aquatic predators of koura. Terrestrial predators include rats, kingfishers, shags, scaup, stoats, and kiwi. Shag populations in the Rotorua lakes district in the North Island of New Zealand have been shown to feed on koura as the bulk of their diet. Predation on koura by trout is thought to be restricted to larger adult trout. Streams and lakes with established populations of trout have been shown to affect koura abundance. Cannibalism in koura is most likely to occur when koura are sick or moulting. Cannibalism can be a greater problem in high-density situations where competition for shelter and territory is greatest. Juvenile koura can be consumed whole by larger koura, and this presents problems for aquaculture in ensuring continuity of intergenerational growth. Koura use their chelae for both attack and defence, and when one limb is lost, the koura will divert energy for overall growth to restoring the lost limb. The only disease known to seriously affect koura is "white tail disease" caused by the microsporidian parasite Thelohania contejeani. This parasite causes degeneration of striated muscle in the tail area, which turns the tail a pale white colour and correspondingly leads to death soon after.[4]

Growth

[edit]
Northern crayfish, P. planifrons

Koura, like all crustaceans, moult their exoskeletons to increase in size. During moulting, the carapace becomes soft with calcium being resorbed and the remaining outer shell shed. The new carapace forms underneath, where it takes a number of days to harden. Calcium for this new outer shell comes from gastroliths that line the stomach wall of the koura, and these produce around 10–20% of the calcium needs for exoskeleton production. The gastroliths drop into the koura's foregut, where they are broken down to allow the adsorption of calcium. After moulting, the demand for calcium to harden the exoskeleton is high, and this demand is met in part by the koura eating its discarded exoskeleton. The remaining calcium required to completely harden the exoskeleton is achieved by absorption from the water. A lower limit of 5 mg/L of calcium in water for temperate species of koura has been suggested as sufficient to support exoskeleton hardening.[6]

Water temperature and calcium concentrations are thought to be the key variables determining koura growth rates. P. zealandicus has high survivability (>80%) rates below 16 °C (61 °F), but temperatures above this correlate with lower rates of survivability. Higher death rates are thought to be associated with increased activity of koura at higher temperatures. Greater activity by koura increases cannibalistic behavior, and increased activity may also affect water quality with the greater production of ammonia as a waste product. Survival of koura also increases with higher calcium concentrations in the water, and this is thought to be in part due to a lower incidence of moulting-related deaths and decreased risk from predation. A calcium concentration value of 20–30 mg/L in water is thought to be ideal for maintaining koura growth and survivability in aquaculture setups.[4]

Reproduction

[edit]
Northern koura, P. planifrons

The female carries 20–200 eggs under the side flaps of her abdomen, where they take 3–4 months to hatch. Over this time, male sperm production corresponds with females' reproductivity. Once hatched, juvenile koura cling to their mother's abdomen using their pincers to attach until they have reached a length of 4–10 mm (0.16–0.39 in). At this stage, they resemble adult koura in appearance, having undergone two moults.[4] In Lake Rotoiti in the central North Island of New Zealand, the main breeding period occurs between April and July (autumn–winter), with a second breeding period occurring from October–January (spring–summer). The total breeding length time from peak egg laying to the release of juveniles is estimated to be 28 weeks for the autumn–winter period and 19–20 weeks in spring–summer breeding groups. This difference is attributed to warmer temperatures speeding up the egg development process. In stream populations, this growth period has been shown to take around 25–26 weeks in P. planifrons,[7] and up to 60 weeks for P. zealandicus in Otago streams.[8]

Aquaculture

[edit]

Farming of koura is currently undertaken by a small number of companies within New Zealand. Sweet Koura Enterprises Ltd and New Zealand Clearwater Crayfish Ltd are two such operators. Koura is sold solely to the high-end restaurant trade, where they are commonly eaten as an entrée dish. Koura are harvestable once larger than 100 mm (3.9 in) in total length, which can take 2–5 years in P. planifrons.[9] Sweet Koura Enterprises Ltd, located in Central Otago, within the South Island of New Zealand, farm P. zealandicus in artificial ponds around 200 m2 (2,200 sq ft) in size. These ponds attempt to replicate the natural environment where P. zealandicus grows. Water supplied to the growing ponds is sourced from an aquifer and is artificially aerated. The temperature of the water is controlled to reflect the seasonal temperature variations that would be expected in the natural environment. The optimal temperature for growth in these ponds is achieved at 15–18 °C (59–64 °F), with P. zealandicus sensitive to rapid temperature changes. The natural biological life in a pond can support 3–4 koura per m2. Additional feed in the form of fish-based pellets is supplied to koura to support growth; this feed has been altered to reflect the lower-protein, higher-calcium nutritional requirements of koura.[9] Overstocking of crayfish can lead to higher rates of mortality, which is associated with higher rates of cannibalism and increased competition for shelter and food.[9]

New Zealand Clearwater Crayfish Ltd farm grows the northern koura species P. planifrons using a gravity-fed system with pond culture and raceways. A key step in this koura farm is the depuration of koura in clean running water without food for up to 2 days to purge the gut cavity. This enables the tail to be presented as an appealing white flesh to the consumer.[9]

To breed koura in aquaculture a ratio of one male to five females is suggested during the mating periods, with koura removed and placed in separate tanks according to the life stage once hatched. The creation of artificial habitat in ponds may support koura survival. Plastic containers, tyres, plastic piping, and bottles are all possible habits for koura to occupy when being grown in ponds.[9] The suggested depth for ponds used to farm P. zealandicus is 1.3–5.0 m (4 ft 3 in – 16 ft 5 in).

A number of environmental challenges exist for koura farmers in ensuring optimum growth and survivability of stock. Environmental contamination of fresh water supplied to ponds from other land use activities, such as livestock farming, can affect survival. Other risks come from the introduction into the ponds of predators such as carp, eels, and birds; however, these can be controlled by steps such as placing netting across pond surfaces. Algal blooms creating anoxic conditions and cannibalism caused by high-density stocking of ponds are also challenges to koura farmers.[10]

The outlook for the growth of koura aquaculture in the New Zealand domestic setting may be positive, with the potential for increasing demand in the restaurant and tourism fields. Export of koura to the international market may offer less potential due to competition from other established freshwater crayfish species such as the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii, of which the United States and China annually consume 34,000 tonnes and 88,000 tonnes, respectively.[10]

History

[edit]

The kōura was formerly abundant in New Zealand, and was a major traditional food source for Māori. The two main ways that kōura could be caught are ruku kōura, free diving to collect crayfish, or tau kōura. Tau kōura are bundles of Pteridium esculentum (bracken fern) that were constructed and placed into the water, where the crayfish would begin to inhabit and feed on the fern spores. The bundles would be carefully lifted out with a net.[11] Kōura was commonly eaten during the early colonial era in New Zealand, but became less popular due to habitat destruction and predation by introduced trout species.[11]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Paranephrops

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Paranephrops is a of freshwater in the family , endemic to and comprising two species: the northern kōura (P. planifrons) and the southern kōura (P. zealandicus). These are the only native species in the country, known locally as kōura in , and they inhabit a variety of freshwater environments including streams, lakes, ponds, and swamps across both main islands and . The Paranephrops was established by in 1842, with subsequent taxonomic revisions confirming the current two-species delineation based on morphological differences such as pincer hairiness and body size. P. planifrons is smaller (up to 70 mm) with less hairy pincers and occupies the , as well as northern and western areas of the including Marlborough, Nelson, and the West Coast. In contrast, P. zealandicus is larger (up to 80 mm) with hairier pincers and is distributed in the eastern and southern , extending to . Ecologically, kōura are nocturnal and omnivores, primarily feeding on plant detritus such as fallen leaves, but also consuming , , and small when available. They shelter during the day under rocks, in woody debris, weed beds, or self-excavated burrows, contributing to nutrient cycling and serving as prey for native , birds, and eels in healthy freshwater ecosystems. Reproduction occurs seasonally from April to December, with females carrying 20–200 eggs under their tails until the juveniles hatch and cling to the mother for several weeks. Culturally, kōura hold significant value in Māori tradition, featured in customary fisheries, particularly for iwi such as Te Arawa. They are harvested for food using sustainable methods like traps, but overharvesting is regulated to protect populations, including a daily limit of 50 kōura per person under the Fisheries Act 1996. Conservation efforts are critical as P. zealandicus is classified as At Risk–Declining, while P. planifrons is Not Threatened (as of the 2019 New Zealand Threat Classification System assessment), with populations of the former in gradual decline due to habitat destruction from wetland drainage and deforestation, intensified land use practices, water abstraction, pollution, and predation by introduced species like trout and catfish. Ongoing monitoring and restoration initiatives by the Department of Conservation aim to mitigate these pressures and preserve their ecological and cultural roles.

Taxonomy and Species

Taxonomic Classification

Paranephrops is a of freshwater endemic to , belonging to the family within the order Decapoda. It represents the sole of native freshwater in the country. The is characterized by a spinous or tuberculate , an elongate triangular rostrum with spines, and chelipeds approximately 1.5 times the length of the . The full taxonomic classification of Paranephrops follows the standard hierarchy for decapod crustaceans:
  • Kingdom: Animalia
  • Phylum: Arthropoda
  • Subphylum: Crustacea
  • Class: Malacostraca
  • Order: Decapoda
  • Family: Parastacidae
  • Genus: Paranephrops
Paranephrops was established by in 1842, with P. planifrons designated as the . Early recognized three (P. planifrons, P. zealandicus, and P. setosus), but a systematic revision by in 1970 synonymized P. setosus with P. zealandicus due to insufficient distinguishing morphological characters, resulting in two extant . This has remained stable in subsequent assessments, with no major revisions to the genus-level reported. A , P. fordycei, was described in 1994, but it does not alter the classification of the living taxa.

Recognized Species

The genus Paranephrops includes two recognized of freshwater , both endemic to and collectively known as kōura in . These species exhibit allopatric distributions with no overlapping ranges, a pattern that has persisted since their divergence. Paranephrops planifrons, the northern kōura, is distributed across the and the northwestern , including regions such as Marlborough, Nelson, and the northern West Coast. This species inhabits a variety of freshwater environments, from lowland streams to higher-altitude lakes up to approximately 1,300 meters, preferring areas with gravel, silt, and vegetative cover. It is classified as Not Threatened under New Zealand's conservation criteria, reflecting its relatively stable populations despite habitat pressures. Paranephrops zealandicus, the southern kōura, occupies the eastern and southern , extending to . Its range is separated from P. planifrons by the , and it favors similar low-gradient streams and pools with stable substrates in forested or pastoral catchments. This species faces greater vulnerability and is listed as At Risk – Declining, primarily due to habitat degradation, introduced predators, and historical overharvesting. The taxonomic distinction between the two species was established based on morphological differences, such as rostral structure and chelae proportions, with P. planifrons exhibiting a flatter frontal region (reflected in its specific ). Both belong to the family within the superfamily Parastacoidea, and no additional species have been formally recognized in recent classifications.

Physical Description

Morphology

Paranephrops species exhibit the typical decapod body plan of crayfish, consisting of a cephalothorax and abdomen, with five pairs of head appendages, eight thoracic segments (bearing three maxillipeds, one pair of chelipeds, and four pairs of walking legs), and six abdominal segments ending in a telson and uropods. The exoskeleton is chitinous and calcified, providing protection and support, with periodic moulting to accommodate growth. The carapace, which covers the cephalothorax, is smooth to tuberculate with scattered spines or tubercles (excluding rostral, postorbital, branchiostegal, and cervical regions) and features a deeply impressed, broadly U-shaped cervical groove dorsally. Anterolateral branchiocardiac grooves are widely separated from and parallel to the cervical groove, while the postcervical groove is prominent and fuses with the anterolateral arms of the branchiocardiac grooves; postorbital ridges are well developed. Carapace coloration varies from red-brown to blue, influenced by environmental water chemistry and genetic factors. The is elongated and muscular, adapted for and burrowing, with pleura bearing setiferous punctations but lacking spines. The first abdominal pleuron is distinct and partially overlapped by the second. The is entirely calcified without a transverse suture, and uropods form a fan-like for . Antennae extend no farther than the third abdominal segment, aiding in sensory perception. is pronounced: females have a broader for brooding, with pleopods densely covered in setae during breeding to secure embryos, while males possess genital papillae on the eighth thoracic segment coxae, featuring a large, articulated, partially sclerotized lobe on the mesial surface. Females have genital openings on the sixth thoracic segment. Appendages are robust and adapted for locomotion, feeding, and defense. The chelipeds (claws) are prominent, hairy, and armed with spines and tubercles; the chelae bear two ventrolateral rows of large spines or tubercles, plus additional dorsal and ventral rows, with the dactyl moving primarily horizontally when the carpus upper surface is horizontal. The carpus of the cheliped has large spines mesially and ventrally. The third maxillipeds feature a submedian ventral row of spiniform tubercles, stiff setae on the mesial half, and a distolateral spine; the exopodite extends beyond the . Walking legs decrease in size posteriorly, facilitating benthic movement. The respiratory system comprises gills housed in lateral branchial chambers beneath the carapace, with a formula of 20 fully developed gills plus one epipodite, one rudimentary posterior arthrobranch on somite XIII, and a stem without winglike expansion. Pleurobranchiae occur on somites XI to XIV. Filaments are cylindrical and less collapsible than lamellar types in other crustaceans, divided into respiratory (thin 0.7 µm cuticle, simple epithelium with afferent/efferent vessels and haemolymph lacunae) and ion-regulating types (thicker 1.2 µm cuticle, epithelium rich in organelles for osmoregulation). Arthrobranchs are feather-like with a main stem bearing numerous filaments, the posterior shorter than the anterior; pleurobranchs are smaller and similar to the posterior arthrobranch. Podobranchs feature an ovate plate-like "flange" on the coxa dorsal surface with long simple setae, a single stem with tubular epipod covered by fine branchial filaments, and a corrugated, trough-shaped posterior surface; no epipodites on podobranchs, but a narrow membranous wing along the proximal half of the stem aids in water management during emersion. Pleurocoxal lappets are present on articular membranes posterior to the fourth pereiopod base. Typical weights range from 9–61 g; varies with age, , and (P. planifrons and P. zealandicus). The overall form is streamlined for freshwater environments, with robust chelipeds emphasizing predatory and defensive capabilities.

Size and Variation

Species of the genus Paranephrops typically attain adult -carapace lengths (OCL) ranging from 40 to 80 mm, with measurements taken from the posterior margin of the to the posterior dorsal margin of the . The maximum recorded length for P. zealandicus is 80.0 mm, while for P. planifrons it is 72.1 mm. Interspecific variation is evident, with P. zealandicus (southern koura) generally larger than P. planifrons (northern koura), a difference attributed to environmental factors across their respective ranges. occurs in chelae size, where males exhibit disproportionately larger claws relative to body size compared to females, which develop broader abdomens for egg carrying; however, overall body size differences between sexes are minimal. Intraspecific size variation is pronounced and influenced by . In environments, growth is slower, with maximum OCL often limited to 37 mm after 4 years due to lower temperatures and limited resources. In contrast, lake-dwelling populations achieve larger sizes, up to 52 mm OCL, benefiting from warmer waters and abundant food, which accelerate and increment growth. Geographic variation within species includes regional differences in proportions, such as more slender forms in northern populations of P. planifrons.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The genus Paranephrops is endemic to , with its two recognized species exhibiting allopatric distributions that do not overlap, primarily separated by the (Kā Tiritiri o te Moana). Paranephrops planifrons, the northern kōura, occupies the entirety of the , including nearshore islands such as Great Barrier, Great Mercury, Kapiti, and D'Urville Islands, as well as the northwestern regions of Marlborough, Nelson, and the West Coast down to Jackson Bay at approximately 43.9°S latitude. It is particularly abundant in areas like and but less common in the central (except Te and Tūwharetoa lakes), East Cape, and parts of and . Specific records include the Waihou River and Mokau River system in the , and the Naike Stream, a of the lower . In contrast, Paranephrops zealandicus, the southern kōura, is confined to the eastern and southern portions of the , with its northern boundary at the Waipara River in North , and extends southward to include (Rakiura). Its distribution encompasses rivers such as the Avon, Halswell, Selwyn, Ashburton, Waitaki, Taieri, Mataura, Oreti, and Otapiri Stream, as well as locations on including Coal Island, Codfish Island, and Paterson Inlet. Populations are sparsely distributed across the central , and the species is absent from mountain streams of the eastern and Kaikoura Range, such as those in the Clarence and Waiau Rivers. This separation, established by the Early , reflects a historical biogeographic divide influenced by geological barriers.

Habitat Preferences

Paranephrops species, commonly known as kōura or freshwater , inhabit a variety of freshwater environments including streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands across . They show a strong preference for areas providing and structural complexity, such as under stones, boulders, logs, woody , undercut banks, and aquatic vegetation, which offer protection from predators and high flows. In wetlands, individuals into mud during dry periods to survive low water levels, emerging when conditions improve. The northern species, Paranephrops planifrons, is primarily found in low-order streams and rivers less than 6 m wide, favoring low-gradient sections with slow current velocities below 0.4 m/s and depths of 0.2–0.3 m, where abundance is highest. Young-of-the-year (YOY) associate with shallow depths, fine substrates, and stream edges, while larger individuals prefer cobble substrates and increased water depth for refuge. Cover elements like leaf litter, , bryophytes, and in-stream macrophytes are critical, with riparian planted forests and native scrub enhancing presence by promoting pool formation and undercut banks. Coarse substrates and wood debris further support habitat suitability by providing foraging and hiding opportunities. In contrast, Paranephrops zealandicus, the southern species, occurs in similar freshwater habitats but shows particular affinity for stable, low-gradient tributaries with gravel and silt beds, often in silt-covered areas (over 20% cover). It thrives in pools and slow-flowing sections of streams and rivers, sheltering among cobbles, boulders, and macrophytes, with shading from riparian trees reducing excessive vegetation growth that could limit access. Native riparian vegetation, such as tussock grasses and shrubs, positively influences distribution, while exotic species like willows correlate with reduced presence; burrowing occurs in cohesive sediments along banks. Fine sediment accumulation negatively impacts habitat by smothering substrates and reducing invertebrate prey availability.

Ecology

Diet and Foraging

Paranephrops are opportunistic omnivores, with diets dominated by detrital material such as leaf litter, grass stems, and seeds, alongside aquatic and plant matter. In bush , allochthonous inputs like tree leaves and dicotyledonous seeds form the bulk of the diet, while in pasture , grass stems and monocotyledonous seeds predominate. Aquatic , including nymphs (Deleatidium), larvae (Aoteapsyche), chironomid larvae, and snails (Potamopyrgus), constitute a smaller but nutritionally significant portion, typically less than 4% of volume but contributing disproportionately to biomass assimilation via stable . Vascular , , epilithic , and macrophytes like are also consumed, with plant material often comprising over 80% of gut contents in certain habitats. Terrestrial , such as earthworms, appear occasionally (around 4% of stomachs), and is rare but documented in specific populations. Foraging occurs primarily at night, with peak activity between 2300 and 0200 hours, during which use their chelipeds to manipulate and browse sedentary prey or from the substrate. They exhibit , disturbing sediments and constructing burrows, which influences stream community structure by redistributing . Prey selection scales with body size, with larger individuals ( length >40 mm) targeting items up to 65% of their length, while smaller juveniles (<30 mm) focus on finer particles. Ingestion rates vary by size and temperature; smaller ingest 3–73 mg dry weight per gram body weight per day at 15°C, compared to 4 mg/g/day for larger ones, with efficiency increasing at lower temperatures (e.g., 87% assimilation at 5°C). Dietary composition reflects local resource availability and shows ontogenetic and seasonal shifts, with larger adults consuming more and plants than juveniles, and intake peaking in autumn-winter. Land-use changes, such as to , alter food choices—favoring over leaf —without substantially impacting overall energy sources or trophic position as predators. Despite high consumption, stable isotopes confirm that animal-derived energy supports growth, positioning Paranephrops as functional omnivores with predatory tendencies.

Behavior and Interactions

Paranephrops species, including P. zealandicus and P. planifrons, exhibit nocturnal and crepuscular activity patterns, with peak occurring at night during warmer months, while becoming less active or dormant in winter when water temperatures drop below 5°C. These are primarily benthic, spending much of their time sheltering under rocks, logs, or vegetation during the day to avoid predation, and they respond to environmental cues by increasing refuge use in the presence of predators. In terms of anti-predator behavior, P. zealandicus detects chemical cues from native predators like the long-finned eel (Anguilla dieffenbachii) via mucus, leading to reduced locomotion, increased sheltering, and defensive displays such as upright chela waving; swimming escapes occur primarily upon direct contact with eels. Responses to the introduced (Salmo trutta) are weaker, with no clear chemical detection and fewer defensive actions, potentially increasing vulnerability to this non-native predator. Similarly, P. planifrons reduces feeding and leaf processing activity in the presence of or eels, with trout eliciting stronger indirect effects through habitat avoidance. Social interactions among Paranephrops are limited, with low rates of observed (<1% in stomach contents for P. zealandicus), though occasional instances occur, such as a single male consuming multiple juveniles. These crayfish act as functional omnivores in ecosystems, on vascular , , and like mayfly larvae (Deleatidium) and chironomids, with prey size increasing ontogenetically to up to 65% of length. Through predation, they selectively consume medium- to large-sized predatory (e.g., Tanypodinae larvae), reducing their abundance and facilitating grazers like Deleatidium via trophic cascades. Bioturbation by Paranephrops further shapes interactions, as their burrowing and sediment disturbance reduce fine accumulation, altering benthic habitats and communities—favoring some taxa (e.g., Deleatidium) while decreasing others (e.g., chironomids). With , interactions involve mutual predation risks; while adult crayfish rarely prey on live juvenile , they scavenge dead ones, and their presence negatively correlates with abundance due to predation pressure on juveniles. Overall, these behaviors position Paranephrops as key ecosystem engineers in streams, influencing nutrient cycling and community structure through both consumptive and non-consumptive effects.

Predators and Threats

Paranephrops species, commonly known as kōura, face predation from a variety of native and introduced aquatic and terrestrial predators. Native predators include long-finned eels (Anguilla dieffenbachii), which elicit strong anti-predator responses such as chela displays, swimming escapes, and increased use of cover in P. zealandicus. Shags (Phalacrocorax spp.) and large native fish also consume kōura, particularly juveniles. Cannibalism occurs among conspecifics, especially under high densities or resource scarcity, contributing to population regulation. Introduced predators pose a significant threat, as kōura have not co-evolved defenses against them, leading to altered behaviors and reduced abundances. (Salmo trutta) negatively correlate with kōura presence and density in streams, preying heavily on individuals sized 7–20 mm, and suppressing foraging activity. (Ameiurus nebulosus) incorporate up to 80% kōura in their diet in systems like , while (Perca fluviatilis) introductions have been linked to sharp declines in kōura populations in Northland lakes. These invaders disrupt kōura distribution, with P. zealandicus showing weaker chemical detection and escape responses to compared to native eels. Beyond predation, kōura are vulnerable to habitat degradation and environmental stressors that exacerbate mortality. High temperatures above 16°C reduce survival in P. zealandicus, with 50% mortality at 21°C after 12 weeks, while low calcium levels (<10 mg/L), anoxia, , and cyanobacterial toxins impair and . Land-use intensification, including pastoral conversion, causes , flooding, and reduced riparian cover, lowering kōura densities in affected streams compared to native forest habitats.

Life History

Growth and Development

Paranephrops species, like other , grow through a process of , or , where they periodically shed their to allow for body expansion. This occurs multiple times throughout their lifespan, with juveniles moulting more frequently—up to twice per season—than adults, enabling incremental increases in size. serves as the primary environmental driver of growth and moulting frequency, with warmer conditions accelerating development while cooler streams slow it. In natural habitats, growth rates for Paranephrops planifrons and P. zealandicus are notably slow compared to other species, with annual gains in orbit-carapace length (OCL) decreasing as individuals age. Juveniles in pastoral exhibit faster growth, reaching 7–22.9 mm OCL in their first year, versus 5–10 mm in native forest streams, attributed to higher temperatures and increased increments in open landscapes. Laboratory studies confirm this temperature sensitivity: at 10–21°C, P. planifrons attains 20 mm OCL in 12–18 months, while P. zealandicus reaches the same size in 9–10 months; under warmer conditions (18–21°C), P. planifrons can grow to 35 mm OCL in 18 months. Development to reproductive maturity varies by habitat and species. For P. planifrons, females typically reach at approximately 20 mm OCL—in streams after one year and in forest streams after two years—while P. zealandicus females mature later at larger sizes. Overall is extended in forested environments, with individuals surviving up to 7 years, compared to 4 years in areas; maximum recorded ages exceed 16 years, underscoring their long-lived nature relative to faster-growing .

Reproduction

Paranephrops species exhibit sexual reproduction characterized by internal fertilization via spermatophores. Males deposit a packet of sperm on the female's underside during mating, which fertilizes the eggs as they are extruded and attached to the female's pleopods. Mating typically occurs during specific seasons, influenced by water temperature and habitat type. Breeding seasons vary between species and populations. In P. planifrons, lake populations may have two annual breeding periods: one in late autumn to winter (the primary season) and a smaller one in late spring to summer, with egg-bearing females observed year-round but peaking in winter. Stream populations of P. planifrons breed primarily from April to December, with ovigerous females appearing in April and peaking in May-June. For P. zealandicus, breeding is more discrete, occurring in December and January in forest streams, where low temperatures (below 8–10°C for much of the year) delay reproductive activity. Sexual maturity sizes differ by species: P. planifrons females typically mature at 17–28 mm carapace length (CL) or orbit-carapace length (OCL), for instance at 22–28 mm OCL in lakes, while P. zealandicus females in streams reach maturity at larger sizes of 36–65 mm CL after 6–7 years. Fecundity increases with size, from 20–30 eggs at minimum maturity to a maximum of approximately 300 eggs per female, attached via adhesive glair to the pleopods. Not all mature females breed annually, particularly in slower-growing populations. Egg incubation duration varies by , , and , ranging from 4 to 15 months. In P. planifrons, incubation lasts 16–17 weeks, with the full brooding period (egg to juvenile release) extending 25–26 weeks; eggs hatch into metanauplius larvae that develop through three juvenile stages on the female. Stage I juveniles (20–30 days) attach via pereiopods; Stage II (~20 days) feature stalked eyes and chromatophores; and Stage III juveniles, with developed uropods, depart at 3.4–3.8 mm CL, typically by November–December. In contrast, P. zealandicus in cold streams incubates eggs for over 12 months, with juveniles remaining attached for at least 15 months, reflecting slower development in cooler waters (mean 10.1°C). Juveniles cling to the female's using their pereiopods until independent, after which females may breed again.

Conservation

Population Status

The genus Paranephrops comprises two endemic freshwater species: P. zealandicus (southern kōura), found primarily along the eastern and , and P. planifrons (northern kōura), distributed across the and northwestern . According to the (NZTCS) 2018 assessment, P. zealandicus is categorized as At Risk – Declining, reflecting an ongoing or projected population reduction of 10–30% over three generations (at least 10 years), with an estimated 5,000–20,000 mature individuals. In contrast, P. planifrons is classified as Not Threatened, indicating a large and stable population. Both species are assessed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as Least Concern globally, though P. planifrons shows decreasing population trends while P. zealandicus populations are considered stable. Despite these classifications, and localized monitoring suggest gradual declines in kōura populations across parts of their range, particularly in areas affected by habitat alteration and introduced predators. For P. zealandicus, sparse distribution in regions like the central exacerbates vulnerability, with no systematic long-term population records available to quantify broader trends precisely. P. planifrons remains more widespread but faces similar pressures leading to reported reductions in some streams and lakes. Overall, while neither species faces imminent , their status underscores the need for continued monitoring, as declines are driven by environmental changes rather than acute threats. The NZTCS notes that P. zealandicus populations are in an unnatural state due to human influences, with medium confidence in trend estimates based on available data.

Major Threats

The major threats to Paranephrops species, including P. planifrons and P. zealandicus, stem primarily from anthropogenic activities that degrade their freshwater habitats and introduce novel pressures. Habitat loss and modification, driven by wetland drainage, , and riparian vegetation removal, have significantly reduced suitable refugia and foraging areas for these , leading to population declines in affected regions. Introduced predators pose a severe risk, particularly salmonid fish such as ( mykiss and trutta), which prey heavily on juvenile and adult Paranephrops individuals. These non-native have been linked to local extinctions, including that of P. planifrons in Lake Waingata, and contribute to reduced by targeting vulnerable life stages. Other , like and , exacerbate predation pressure in streams and lakes where Paranephrops densities are already low. Water quality degradation from , including nutrient enrichment causing and hypoxia, further threatens survival. Elevated loads from land-use changes smother burrows and feeding grounds, while chemical pollutants and low dissolved oxygen levels—often below critical thresholds for P. zealandicus—impair physiological functions and increase mortality. Water management practices, such as abstraction for , hydro schemes, and altered flows, fragment habitats and create barriers to migration, limiting dispersal in these poor-mobility species. Climate change amplifies these vulnerabilities through rising water temperatures and altered . Projections indicate autumn temperatures could increase by up to 4°C by 2081–2100 under high-emission scenarios, exceeding the thermal tolerance of Paranephrops (optimal below 23°C, with 0% survival at 32.4°C), potentially disrupting and growth. Increased and intensity may also dislodge egg-bearing females and juveniles, while low calcium concentrations in warming waters hinder formation. Overharvesting, though regulated, remains a concern in culturally significant areas where kōura are traditionally gathered, potentially compounding other pressures on remnant populations. Despite their "Least Concern" status under IUCN and Department of Conservation assessments, ongoing declines underscore the need for integrated threat mitigation.

Protection Measures

Protection measures for Paranephrops species, known as kōura, primarily consist of regulatory restrictions on harvesting and targeted conservation initiatives led by government agencies, (Māori tribes), and research institutions. Under the Fisheries Act 1996, kōura are classified as , permitting recreational fishers to take up to 50 individuals per person per day, with no minimum size limit specified nationally but regional variations possible under the Fisheries (Amateur Fishing) Regulations 2013. Commercial sale or trade of wild-caught kōura is prohibited, except for aquaculture-derived stock under special permits issued by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), to prevent and support sustainable farming. On public conservation land managed by the Department of Conservation (), such as reserves and protected waterways, harvesting kōura requires a specific and collection permit to ensure minimal impact on populations, particularly in areas where P. zealandicus is classified as At Risk–Declining under the (NZTCS). P. planifrons holds a Not Threatened status in the NZTCS, reflecting more stable populations, though both species face ongoing pressures that necessitate these controls. The Lakes Settlement Act 2006 further empowers trustees to regulate customary harvests in specific lakes (e.g., Rotoiti, Tarawera), potentially imposing additional measures like minimum legal lengths, closed seasons, and protections for berried (egg-bearing) or moulting females to align with mātauranga (Māori knowledge systems). Restoration efforts emphasize habitat enhancement and population monitoring, guided by frameworks from the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA). These include assessing site-specific declines due to habitat loss or invasives, followed by interventions like riparian planting, weed removal, and oxygen level improvements in lakes and streams. A key monitoring tool is the tau kōura method, a traditional technique revived for scientific use, involving bundles placed on lake or stream beds to attract and sample kōura non-destructively; it provides data on abundance, size, sex, and reproduction, aiding in projects across Te Arawa lakes. Collaborative initiatives integrating indigenous knowledge have advanced genetic conservation, such as a project since 2016 partnering with Ngāti Kurī to sample kōura using lunar calendar-guided timing and cultural protocols, revealing high inter-population to inform safe translocations and prevent in declining habitats. Data from these efforts are stored in iwi-managed repositories, supporting long-term resilience planning without species-specific national recovery plans currently in place.

Human Relations

Aquaculture

Aquaculture of Paranephrops species, particularly P. zealandicus (southern kōura) and P. planifrons (northern kōura), has been explored in New Zealand since the 1980s as a means to supplement wild populations and provide a sustainable protein source. Early assessments highlighted their potential due to local demand and absence of major diseases, though slow growth rates—reaching commercial size (30 g, ~100 mm) in 2–5 years—posed economic challenges. Omnivorous diets and preference for shaded, low-flow environments make them suitable for pond-based systems, but high setup costs and cannibalism risks limited initial viability. Modern efforts center on low-intensity, within forestry landscapes, exemplified by Ernslaw One's KEEWAI operation across and Southland. This approach utilizes approximately 2,000 existing fire ponds and wetlands (20–40 hectares total), filled with pristine spring or rainwater, avoiding chemicals, artificial feeds, or water abstractions. Ponds are prepared by planting native riparian vegetation like Carex species and for natural foraging on , , snails, and ; twiggy refuges (e.g., coprosma branches) reduce stress and predation. Stocking occurs after 2 years of development, with juveniles sourced locally to maintain genetic integrity. Optimal culture conditions emphasize water quality and temperature, critical for growth and survival. For P. zealandicus, productivity peaks at 16°C, with specific growth rates up to 0.57 and inter-moult periods shortening from over 90 days at 14°C to ~40 days above 20°C; survival declines above 16°C, while calcium levels exceeding 10 mg/L enhance survival without altering growth. Extensive systems yield low densities (100–500 kg/ha), but intensive setups with high stocking (up to 16/m²) and female removal to curb cannibalism offer potential yields estimated at 1,900–6,100 kg/ha over 2 years based on studies of similar crayfish species, though survival is ~65% in the first year and such levels have not yet been achieved for kōura. Harvesting occurs seasonally (February–April) via scoop or fyke nets, targeting 50–100 g individuals after 3 years; KEEWAI's 2020 harvest reached 250 kg across 500 ponds. Challenges include regulatory consents for water use, low egg survival (~5%), labor-intensive harvests, and vulnerability to predators like eels and , necessitating fencing or traps. Despite these, the model supports conservation by boosting wild stocks through releases and generates revenue via local markets, where kōura fetch premiums (~NZ$14–20/kg) for their sweet, lobster-like flavor and cultural value. Demand from restaurants exceeds supply, with collaborations proposed to expand. with fish or is recommended to improve .

Cultural and Historical Role

Paranephrops species, known to Māori as kōura, have been a vital part of indigenous culture in New Zealand since the arrival of Polynesian settlers around the 14th century, serving as an important mahinga kai (traditional food-gathering practice) and taonga (treasure or heritage species). Historically, kōura provided a key source of protein and were harvested in large quantities for both personal consumption and trade, especially in central North Island lakes such as those in the Te Arawa and Taupō regions. This reliance underscores their role in sustaining communities and fostering intergenerational knowledge transmission about sustainable resource use. A prominent traditional harvesting technique is the tau kōura, a method refined by over approximately 500 years, which involves submerging whakaweku—bundles of bracken fern ()—in lakes, streams, or wetlands to attract kōura seeking shelter. The bundles are then retrieved using a flax net (korapa) or modern , allowing for efficient capture across various water conditions without specialized equipment. This practice not only facilitated large-scale gatherings but also reflected ecological understanding, as it targeted all size classes of kōura while minimizing disruption. Māori oral histories and tribal narratives further highlight kōura's cultural depth, including accounts of translocation between water bodies to bolster declining populations and ensure long-term availability. Such practices demonstrate proactive stewardship, with genetic studies confirming unusual diversity patterns linked to these human-mediated movements. Today, this historical significance is enshrined in legislation, permitting customary fisheries in specific lakes like Rotomā, Rotoiti, and , thereby preserving kōura's role in and management.

References

  1. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-animals/invertebrates/crayfish-koura/
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330.1970.9515347
  3. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/tools-and-resources/identification/freshwater-invertebrates-guide/identification-guide-what-freshwater-invertebrate-is-this/jointed-legs/crustaceans/crayfish/crayfish-or-koura-paranephrops
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783615001058
  5. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-technical/nztcs28entire.pdf
  6. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/90755-Paranephrops
  7. https://research.nhm.org/pdfs/17316/17316.pdf
  8. https://nztcs.org.nz/nztcs-species/13452
  9. https://www.fws.gov/taxonomic-tree/1966966
  10. https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sfc148.pdf
  11. https://www.mindat.org/taxon-8679322.html
  12. https://niwa.co.nz/freshwater/kaitiaki-tools/mahinga-kai-what-species-interests-you/koura
  13. https://rarespecies.nzfoa.org.nz/species/freshwater-crayfish/
  14. https://academic.oup.com/jcb/article/37/5/615/4060680
  15. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/5955/titulaer_thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  16. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-SI-PURL-gpo32616/pdf/GOVPUB-SI-PURL-gpo32616.pdf
  17. https://academic.oup.com/jcb/article/41/1/ruab004/6209342
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330.2002.9517137
  19. https://niwa.co.nz/taonga-species/taonga-species-series/koura-freshwater
  20. https://scispace.com/pdf/growth-and-population-dynamics-of-crayfish-paranephrops-5hamqesrop.pdf
  21. https://waimaori.maori.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Section5_KOURA_KEWAI_FRESHWATER_CRAYFISH_Sept2017.pdf
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227244322_Habitat_characteristics_of_crayfish_Paranephrops_planifrons_in_New_Zealand_streams_using_generalised_additive_models_GAMs
  23. https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/f7f17537-334e-43af-bd93-8529bc69c28e/download
  24. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/12949/Thoms%2CChannell%20MSc%20Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330.2002.9517076
  26. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstreams/4eadb509-7bdd-450a-b474-0e590dd66d03/download
  27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00702.x
  28. https://newzealandecology.org/nzje/1945/pdf
  29. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/02-0618
  30. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330.1981.9515892
  31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.03.015
  32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1967.9515191
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229586212_Life_history_and_production_of_Paranephrops_zealandicus_in_a_forest_stream_with_comments_about_the_sustainable_harvest_of_a_freshwater_crayfish
  34. https://waimaori.maori.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Koura-kewai-species-report.pdf
  35. https://niwa.co.nz/sites/default/files/CCVA%20species_Koura%20Kewai%20%28Freshwater%20crayfish%29_Paranephrops%20planifrons.pdf
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1095643317301654
  37. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2013/0482/latest/DLM3629901.html
  38. https://niwa.co.nz/freshwater/guide-restoring-koura-freshwater-crayfish-lakes-rivers-and-streams
  39. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/2994-monitoring-koura
  40. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pan3.10126
  41. https://undark.org/2022/08/24/in-new-zealand-indigenous-knowledge-helps-crayfish-conservation/
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298102741_The_aquaculture_potential_of_New_Zealand_Freshwater_Crayfish
  43. https://www.ernslaw.co.nz/community-conservation/koura
  44. https://ourwayoflife.co.nz/how-to-farm-new-zealand-freshwater-crayfish-koura/
  45. https://www.thewholestory.co.nz/farming-koura-in-forestry-with-john-hollows/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848605003716
  47. https://www.stats.govt.nz/indicators/tau-koura-freshwater-crayfish-traditional-fishing-method/
  48. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/assets/Publications/Te-reo-o-te-repo/5_2_Fauna_Koura.pdf
  49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330909510036
  50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eva.13367
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.