Hubbry Logo
PubMedPubMedMain
Open search
PubMed
Community hub
PubMed
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

PubMed
Contact
Research centerUnited States National Library of Medicine (NLM)
Release dateJanuary 1996; 29 years ago (1996-01)
Access
Websitepubmed.gov

PubMed is an openly accessible, free database which includes primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health maintains the database as part of the Entrez system of information retrieval.[1]

From 1971 to 1997, online access to the MEDLINE database was provided via computer, phone lines primarily through institutional facilities, such as university libraries.[2] PubMed, first released in January 1996, ushered in the era of private, free, home- and office-based MEDLINE searching.[3] The PubMed system was offered free to the public starting in June 1997.[2]

Content

[edit]

In addition to MEDLINE, PubMed provides access to:

  • older references from the print version of Index Medicus, back to 1951 and earlier
  • references to some journals before they were indexed in Index Medicus and MEDLINE, for instance Science, BMJ, and Annals of Surgery
  • very recent entries to records for an article before it is indexed with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and added to MEDLINE
  • a collection of books available full-text and other subsets of NLM records[4]
  • PMC citations
  • NCBI Bookshelf

Many PubMed records contain links to full text articles, some of which are freely available, often in PubMed Central[5] and local mirrors, such as Europe PubMed Central.[6]

Information about the journals indexed in MEDLINE, and available through PubMed, is found in the NLM Catalog.[7]

As of 23 May 2023, PubMed has more than 35 million citations and abstracts dating back to 1966, selectively to the year 1865, and very selectively to 1809. As of the same date, 24.6 million of PubMed's records are listed with their abstracts, and 26.8 million records have links to full-text versions (of which 10.9 million articles are available, full-text for free).[8] Over the last 10 years (ending 31 December 2019), an average of nearly one million new records were added each year. [citation needed]

In 2016, NLM changed the indexing system so that publishers are able to directly correct typos and errors in PubMed indexed articles.[9]

PubMed has been reported to include some articles published in predatory journals. MEDLINE and PubMed policies for the selection of journals for database inclusion are slightly different. Weaknesses in the criteria and procedures for indexing journals in PubMed Central may allow publications from predatory journals to leak into PubMed.[10]

Characteristics

[edit]

Website design

[edit]

A new PubMed interface was launched in October 2009 and encouraged the use of such quick, Google-like search formulations; they have also been described as 'telegram' searches.[11] By default the results are sorted by Most Recent, but this can be changed to Best Match, Publication Date, First Author, Last Author, Journal, or Title.[12]

The PubMed website design and domain was updated in January 2020 and became default on 15 May 2020, with the updated and new features.[13] There was a critical reaction from many researchers who frequently use the site.[14]

PubMed for handhelds/mobiles

[edit]

PubMed/MEDLINE can be accessed via handheld devices, using for instance the "PICO" option (for focused clinical questions) created by the NLM.[15] A "PubMed Mobile" option, providing access to a mobile friendly, simplified PubMed version, is also available.[16]

[edit]
[edit]

Simple searches on PubMed can be carried out by entering key aspects of a subject into PubMed's search window.

PubMed translates this initial search formulation and automatically adds field names, relevant MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms, synonyms, Boolean operators, and 'nests' the resulting terms appropriately, enhancing the search formulation significantly, in particular by routinely combining (using the OR operator) textwords and MeSH terms.

[edit]

For optimal searches in PubMed, it is necessary to understand its core component, MEDLINE, and especially of the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) controlled vocabulary used to index MEDLINE articles. They may also require complex search strategies, use of field names (tags), proper use of limits and other features; reference librarians and search specialists offer search services.[17][18]

The search into PubMed's search window is only recommended for the search of unequivocal topics or new interventions that do not yet have a MeSH heading created, as well as for the search for commercial brands of medicines and proper nouns. It is also useful when there is no suitable heading or the descriptor represents a partial aspect. The search using the thesaurus MeSH is more accurate and will give fewer irrelevant results. In addition, it saves the disadvantage of the free text search in which the spelling, singular/plural or abbreviated differences have to be taken into consideration. On the other side, articles more recently incorporated into the database to which descriptors have not yet been assigned will not be found. Therefore, to guarantee an exhaustive search, a combination of controlled language headings and free text terms must be used.[19]

Journal article parameters

[edit]

When a journal article is indexed, numerous article parameters are extracted and stored as structured information. Such parameters are: Article Type (MeSH terms, e.g., "Clinical Trial"), Secondary identifiers, (MeSH terms), Language, Country of the Journal or publication history (e-publication date, print journal publication date).

Publication Type: Clinical queries/systematic reviews

[edit]

Publication type parameter allows searching by the type of publication, including reports of various kinds of clinical research.[20]

Secondary ID

[edit]

Since July 2005, the MEDLINE article indexing process extracts identifiers from the article abstract and puts those in a field called Secondary Identifier (SI). The secondary identifier field is to store accession numbers to various databases of molecular sequence data, gene expression or chemical compounds and clinical trial IDs. For clinical trials, PubMed extracts trial IDs for the two largest trial registries: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT identifier) and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register (IRCTN identifier).[21]

See also

[edit]

A reference which is judged particularly relevant can be marked and "related articles" can be identified. If relevant, several studies can be selected and related articles to all of them can be generated (on PubMed or any of the other NCBI Entrez databases) using the 'Find related data' option. The related articles are then listed in order of "relatedness". To create these lists of related articles, PubMed compares words from the title and abstract of each citation, as well as the MeSH headings assigned, using a powerful word-weighted algorithm.[22] The 'related articles' function has been judged to be so precise that the authors of a paper suggested it can be used instead of a full search.[23]

Mapping to MeSH

[edit]

PubMed automatically links to MeSH terms and subheadings. Examples would be: "bad breath" links to (and includes in the search) "halitosis" and "heart attack" to "myocardial infarction". Where appropriate, these MeSH terms are automatically "expanded", that is, include more specific terms. Terms like "nursing" are automatically linked to "Nursing [MeSH]" or "Nursing [Subheading]". This feature is called Auto Term Mapping and is enacted, by default, in free text searching but not exact phrase searching (i.e. enclosing the search query with double quotes).[24] This feature makes PubMed searches more sensitive and avoids false-negative (missed) hits by compensating for the diversity of medical terminology.[24]

PubMed does not apply automatic mapping of the term in the following circumstances: by writing the quoted phrase (e.g., "kidney allograft"), when truncated on the asterisk (e.g., kidney allograft*), and when looking with field labels (e.g., Cancer [ti]).[19]

My NCBI

[edit]

The PubMed optional facility "My NCBI" (with free registration) provides tools for

  • saving searches
  • filtering search results
  • setting up automatic updates sent by e-mail
  • saving sets of references retrieved as part of a PubMed search
  • configuring display formats or highlighting search terms

and a wide range of other options.[25] The "My NCBI" area can be accessed from any computer with web-access. An earlier version of "My NCBI" was called "PubMed Cubby".[26]

LinkOut

[edit]

LinkOut is an NLM facility to link and make available full-text local journal holdings.[27] Some 3,200 sites (mainly academic institutions) participate in this NLM facility (as of March 2010), from Aalborg University in Denmark to ZymoGenetics in Seattle.[28] Users at these institutions see their institution's logo within the PubMed search result (if the journal is held at that institution) and can access the full-text. Link out is being consolidated with Outside Tool as of the major platform update coming in the Summer of 2019.[29]

PubMed Commons

[edit]

In 2016, PubMed allows authors of articles to comment on articles indexed by PubMed. This feature was initially tested in a pilot mode (since 2013) and was made permanent in 2016.[30] In February 2018, PubMed Commons was discontinued due to the fact that "usage has remained minimal".[31][32]

askMEDLINE

[edit]

askMEDLINE, a free-text, natural language query tool for MEDLINE/PubMed, developed by the NLM, also suitable for handhelds.[33]

PubMed identifier

[edit]
For help using PubMed identifiers within Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:PMID.

A PMID (PubMed identifier or PubMed unique identifier)[34] is a unique integer value, starting at 1, assigned to each PubMed record. A PMID is not the same as a PMCID (PubMed Central identifier) which is the identifier for all works published in the free-to-access PubMed Central.[35]

The assignment of a PMID or PMCID to a publication tells the reader nothing about the type or quality of the content. PMIDs are assigned to letters to the editor, editorial opinions, op-ed columns, and any other piece that the editor chooses to include in the journal, as well as peer-reviewed papers. The existence of the identification number is also not proof that the papers have not been retracted for fraud, incompetence, or misconduct. The announcement about any corrections to original papers may be assigned a PMID. [citation needed]

Each number that is entered in the PubMed search window is treated by default as if it were a PMID. Therefore, any reference in PubMed can be located using the PMID. [citation needed]

Alternative interfaces

[edit]
MEDLINE is one of the databases which are accessible via PubMed. Several companies provide access to MEDLINE through their platforms.

The National Library of Medicine leases the MEDLINE information to a number of private vendors such as Embase, Ovid, Dialog, EBSCO, Knowledge Finder and many other commercial, non-commercial, and academic providers.[36] As of October 2008, more than 500 licenses had been issued, more than 200 of them to providers outside the United States. As licenses to use MEDLINE data are available for free, the NLM in effect provides a free testing ground for a wide range[37] of alternative interfaces and 3rd party additions to PubMed, one of a very few large, professionally curated databases which offers this option.

Lu identifies a sample of 28 current and free Web-based PubMed versions, requiring no installation or registration, which are grouped into four categories:[37]

  1. Ranking search results, for instance: eTBLAST; MedlineRanker;[38] MiSearch;[39]
  2. Clustering results by topics, authors, journals etc., for instance: Anne O'Tate;[40] ClusterMed;[41]
  3. Enhancing semantics and visualization, for instance: EBIMed;[42] MedEvi.[43]
  4. Improved search interface and retrieval experience, for instance, askMEDLINE[44][45] BabelMeSH;[46] and PubCrawler.[47]

As most of these and other alternatives rely essentially on PubMed/MEDLINE data leased under license from the NLM/PubMed, the term "PubMed derivatives" has been suggested.[37] Without the need to store about 90 GB of original PubMed Datasets, anybody can write PubMed applications using the eutils-application program interface as described in "The E-utilities In-Depth: Parameters, Syntax and More", by Eric Sayers, PhD.[48] Various citation format generators, taking PMID numbers as input, are examples of web applications making use of the eutils-application program interface. Sample web pages include Citation Generator – Mick Schroeder, Pubmed Citation Generator – Ultrasound of the Week, PMID2cite, and Cite this for me.

In 2025, the ZBMed, the German National Library of Medicine, announced plans to develop an internationally supported open source version of PubMed.[49][50]

Data mining of PubMed

[edit]

Alternative methods to mine the data in PubMed use programming environments such as Matlab, Python or R. In these cases, queries of PubMed are written as lines of code and passed to PubMed and the response is then processed directly in the programming environment.[citation needed] Code can be automated to systematically query with different keywords such as disease, year, organs, etc.

For bulk processing, the full PubMed database is available as XML which can be downloaded from an FTP server. The annual baseline is released in December, followed by daily update files.[51]

In addition to its traditional role as a biomedical database, PubMed has become common resource for training biomedical language models.[52]

The data accessible by PubMed can be mirrored locally using an unofficial tool such as MEDOC.[53]

Millions of PubMed records augment various open data datasets about open access, like Unpaywall. Data analysis tools like Unpaywall Journals are used by libraries to assist with big deal cancellations: libraries can avoid subscriptions for materials already served by instant open access via open archives like PubMed Central.[54]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

PubMed

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
PubMed is a free, publicly accessible online database developed and maintained by the (NCBI) at the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), part of the (NIH), that comprises more than 39 million citations and abstracts (as of March 2025) for biomedical literature from , life science journals, and online books, with the aim of supporting the search and retrieval of this literature to improve health globally and personally. It does not host full-text articles but provides links to them when available through publisher websites, (PMC), or other sources. Launched in 1997, PubMed serves as the primary user interface for accessing , NLM's premier bibliographic database, which originated from the MEDLARS (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System) established in 1964 and has provided online access to biomedical citations since 1966. forms the core of PubMed's content, indexing over 31 million references (as of September 2025) from more than 5,200 scholarly journals worldwide in areas such as , health, behavioral sciences, chemical sciences, life sciences, and bioengineering, with articles primarily in English but including content in about 40 languages. PubMed enhances search capabilities through features like advanced filters for publication date, article type, , and ; integration with (MeSH) for precise indexing and retrieval; and tools for creating alerts, saving searches, and exporting results. It is updated daily to include the latest citations, making it an essential resource for researchers, clinicians, students, and the public seeking evidence-based information in the biomedical field.

History and Development

Origins in MEDLINE

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) established in 1971 as an online , serving as the interactive successor to the MEDLARS (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System) batch-processing system introduced in 1964. This development marked a shift from tape-based distribution of citations to real-time online searching, with the database initially encompassing approximately 400,000 citations dating back to 1966. 's creation built on the NLM's long tradition of indexing , which originated with the print in 1879, but computerized processing via MEDLARS enabled more efficient handling of growing biomedical publications. From its inception, MEDLINE focused on indexing peer-reviewed biomedical literature, starting with citations from 239 journals selected for their relevance to clinical and related fields. Over the following years, coverage expanded to include broader life sciences and topics, incorporating journals in areas such as basic sciences, , and , while maintaining rigorous selection criteria based on scientific quality and editorial standards. Central to this indexing was the () controlled vocabulary, introduced by the NLM in 1960 to standardize terminology and improve retrieval accuracy across the database's growing corpus. By the 1970s, technological advancements like the ELHILL search software facilitated direct online access through distributed networks, transitioning from limited institutional use to wider availability for researchers and clinicians. The database experienced significant growth throughout the and , with citations expanding from around 400,000 in the early to several million by the , reflecting the explosion in biomedical publishing. To enhance user-friendliness amid this scale, the NLM introduced Grateful Med in 1986, a personal computer-based interface that simplified searches of and related databases via dial-up connections, remaining in use until 2001. These foundations in automated indexing and accessible retrieval positioned as a cornerstone of biomedical information, paving the way for its integration into the free web-based PubMed interface launched in 1996.

Launch and Key Milestones

PubMed was officially launched in January 1996 by the (NCBI) at the of Medicine (NLM), providing free public access to the database via the internet and replacing previous fee-based services such as Grateful Med. This experimental release under the retrieval system marked a significant shift, enabling home- and office-based searching of over 9 million biomedical citations without subscription costs. Developed to democratize access to , PubMed quickly became a cornerstone resource for researchers worldwide. In 2000, PubMed began integrating full-text content through (PMC), NLM's free digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal articles, which expanded the platform beyond abstracts to include peer-reviewed full texts where available. This addition supported growing demands for , with PMC launching publicly that year to host deposited articles. In September 2003, over 1.5 million OLDMEDLINE citations—covering pre-1966 biomedical literature from 1953 to 1965—were incorporated into PubMed, retroactively broadening its historical scope without abstracts for those older records. Concurrently, NCBI Bookshelf, established in 1999 as a repository of full-text books and documents in life sciences and healthcare, became linked within PubMed searches, allowing users to access book chapters and reports directly from citation results. Key enhancements continued into the 2010s, including the release of PubMed Mobile in March 2011, a lightweight web interface optimized for smartphones to facilitate faster loading and easier navigation on mobile devices. In 2013, PubMed Commons was introduced as an author commenting feature to foster post-publication discussion on indexed articles, but it was discontinued in March 2018 due to low engagement and limited participation. The 2008 NIH Public Access Policy further propelled PubMed's evolution by mandating that peer-reviewed manuscripts from NIH-funded research be submitted to PMC no later than 12 months after publication, enhancing availability. By 2020, PubMed had expanded to encompass over 30 million citations, reflecting its growth through ongoing additions from , PMC, and other sources, while emphasizing initiatives to support global biomedical research.

Recent Updates and Modernization

In 2024, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) transitioned (PMC) to an updated website on October 16, integrating enhanced full-text rendering capabilities and synchronized search functionality with PubMed to streamline user access to biomedical literature. This modernization effort leverages the U.S. Web Design System to improve overall usability, including better responsiveness for mobile devices, ensuring equitable access across platforms. Building on these changes, PubMed introduced significant interface updates in 2025. The "Latest Literature" section on the homepage was removed after March 31, 2025, and replaced with a dedicated PubMed updates feed to provide more targeted notifications on platform enhancements and new content. In June 2025, further refinements included improved rendering of reference lists for clearer citation display, the addition of timestamps to search history downloads for better tracking, and streamlined sharing options to facilitate collaboration among researchers. Content categorization also advanced with the 2025 MeSH updates, effective January 2025, which added new publication types such as Scoping Review and Network Meta-Analysis to accommodate emerging research methodologies and improve indexing precision. These additions enable more accurate filtering and retrieval of systematic reviews and comparative effectiveness studies, reflecting PubMed's adaptation to evolving scholarly practices. Ongoing modernization includes expansions to PubMed Labs, initially introduced in 2017 as an experimental platform for testing new features. This initiative supports proactive discovery in biomedical research while maintaining standards for diverse users.

Content and Coverage

Core Databases and Scope

PubMed's core database is , the National Library of Medicine's premier bibliographic resource containing over 31 million references to journal articles in the biomedical and sciences . draws from more than 5,200 scholarly journals published worldwide in approximately 40 languages, primarily focusing on , , sciences, behavioral sciences, chemical sciences, bioengineering, and related fields such as , environmental sciences, and . This database emphasizes peer-reviewed content, providing citations and abstracts that support research in clinical medicine, preclinical sciences, and allied disciplines. In addition to MEDLINE, PubMed incorporates (PMC), a free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature with over 11 million articles as of 2025. PMC includes open-access publications from participating journals, author manuscripts required by funder policies, and select preprints, spanning from the late 1700s to the present. PubMed also integrates content from the NCBI Bookshelf, which provides citations and full-text access to thousands of e-books, reports, and documents in , health, and life sciences, enhancing the platform's utility for comprehensive literature reviews. Furthermore, OLDMEDLINE extends coverage to historical records, including citations from the 1946 through 1965 volumes of the Current List of and Cumulated , adding approximately 2 million pre-1966 references that were retroactively digitized and integrated into PubMed. The scope of PubMed is deliberately focused on high-quality, peer-reviewed journal articles, abstracts, and select or book chapters, prioritizing substantive contributions to scientific knowledge while excluding materials such as patents, dissertations, , or non-peer-reviewed content unless specifically selected for inclusion. Although multilingual content is indexed when relevant, the majority is in English, with non-English dominant publications included only if they meet 's rigorous selection criteria for scientific merit and relevance. Coverage begins systematically from 1946 for most journals, with selective indexing of earlier literature via OLDMEDLINE, and PubMed adds 1 to 1.5 million new citations annually to maintain its currency in rapidly evolving fields.

Indexing with MeSH

(MeSH) serves as the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) controlled vocabulary for indexing, cataloging, and searching biomedical literature in PubMed. Developed in 1960, MeSH organizes concepts hierarchically to standardize terminology across health-related topics, ensuring consistent retrieval of relevant articles. The vocabulary undergoes annual updates to incorporate emerging concepts; for the 2025 edition, new descriptors include "" to address advancements in AI applications within healthcare, alongside the addition of "Scoping Review" as a publication type with retroactive indexing for citations from 2020 onward. The indexing process for PubMed articles, primarily from MEDLINE, transitioned to full automation in April 2022 using the Medical Text Indexer (MTI) system, supplemented by human review and curation where necessary to maintain accuracy. This automated approach assigns approximately 10-15 terms per article, focusing on the most specific descriptors that capture the content's main subjects, often including qualifiers to denote aspects like methodology or outcomes. For instance, an article on drug side effects might be indexed with terms such as "Aspirin/adverse effects," where "adverse effects" is a subheading (qualifier) refining the primary descriptor. During searches, PubMed employs automatic term mapping to translate user queries into corresponding terms, enhancing . MeSH's hierarchical organizes over 30,000 descriptors into 16 top-level categories, such as [A], Diseases [C], and Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E], allowing for the "" of related narrower terms in searches to broaden results systematically. Subheadings provide further specificity, with 83 topical qualifiers (e.g., "therapy," "," "adverse effects") that can be paired with descriptors to highlight particular facets of a topic, enabling targeted retrieval without exhaustive keyword variations. Additionally, MeSH integrates Supplementary Concept Records (SCRs), a daily-updated for rapidly emerging substances like new drugs or chemicals, which link to established descriptors and support indexing of novel entities not yet in the main vocabulary. This structure ensures PubMed's content remains dynamically organized for comprehensive biomedical discovery.

Publication Types and Filters

PubMed categorizes biomedical using over 80 distinct publication types, which describe the format, style, or purpose of an article, such as , , and . These types are assigned during indexing based on data provided by publishers or by National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexers, allowing users to identify specific article formats efficiently. Examples include for experimental studies evaluating interventions, for statistical syntheses of multiple studies, and Case Reports for detailed descriptions of individual patient cases. In 2025, new publication types were added to reflect evolving methodologies, including Scoping Review, which maps the extent and nature of literature on a broad topic without critically appraising it, and Network Meta-Analysis, which compares multiple interventions simultaneously using direct and indirect evidence from randomized trials. The filter system in PubMed enables post-search refinement of results to focus on relevant subsets of citations, applied via a sidebar interface after an initial query. Key filters include article types, which limit results to specific publication types like those mentioned above; text availability, distinguishing between free full text, full text (regardless of access), and abstracts only; and publication date, with presets such as the last 5 years or custom ranges like 2020-2025. Additional filters cover species (e.g., humans or other animals, based on terms), language (e.g., English), age groups (e.g., child: birth to 18 years or aged: 65+ years), and journal categories (e.g., by title or subject area). These filters rely on indexed metadata, such as Publication Type [pt] tags for article types or [sb] for text availability, and can exclude citations lacking full indexing. A specialized component of the filter system is Clinical Queries, designed to retrieve high-quality for clinical using predefined, evidence-based search hedges. It includes categories for (e.g., broad search for s on treatments), (e.g., studies on test accuracy), (e.g., risk factors and causes), (e.g., outcomes), and clinical prediction guides (e.g., models for forecasting patient events), each available in narrow or broad sensitivity options to balance . These hedges incorporate terms like "[pt]" combined with topic-specific keywords, ensuring results align with standards. Filters in PubMed are applied to the results display and can be combined using logic for targeted refinement, such as restricting to s, randomized controlled trials, and publications from 2020-2025 to identify recent human clinical trials. Users access additional options by selecting "See all" links in the sidebar, and applied filters persist across sessions via My NCBI preferences until manually cleared. This modular approach enhances usability by allowing iterative narrowing without altering the core search query.

Search Functionality

PubMed's basic search interface is designed for accessibility, featuring a prominent single search box on the homepage where users can enter queries in natural language or simple keywords, such as "," without requiring specialized syntax. This entry point processes untagged terms through Automatic Term Mapping (ATM), which intelligently maps them to controlled vocabularies like (MeSH) as well as free-text fields in titles, abstracts, and other searchable components, ensuring broad and relevant retrieval for general users. To refine queries, PubMed supports standard Boolean operators—AND, OR, and NOT (entered in uppercase)—allowing users to combine or exclude concepts; AND is the default operator between adjacent terms. For instance, "diabetes AND treatment" retrieves articles containing both terms, while "(covid OR coronavirus) AND (vaccine OR immunization)" combines alternatives, and "stroke NOT "hemorrhagic stroke"[tiab]" excludes specific phrases from titles and abstracts; processing occurs left-to-right unless parenthesized for grouping complex expressions. Phrase searching is facilitated by enclosing exact terms in double quotes, such as "heart disease," which searches for the precise sequence and bypasses if the phrase is not indexed as such. Additionally, field-specific tags enable targeted searches; the [tiab] tag limits results to titles and abstracts, deactivating to focus solely on those fields, which is useful for quick, text-based explorations. Handy tricks for keyword searches include using hyphens for compound terms, such as "breast-feed*" or "covid-19," to treat them as phrases, and noting that stopwords like "of" or "in" are generally ignored unless enclosed in quotes or used in proximity searches. Search results are displayed in a relevance-ranked order using PubMed's Best Match algorithm, a machine learning-based system that prioritizes the most pertinent citations, showing up to 10 per page by default with informative snippets, author lists, publication dates, and journal details for rapid scanning. Users can export selected citations in formats like RIS or BibTeX through the Citation Manager tool, or download them as .nbib files for integration with reference software; alternatively, citations can be emailed directly via the NCBI mail server by selecting items and providing an address. After performing a search, users can apply filters from the sidebar for criteria such as publication date, article type, and availability of full text to refine results further. For managing too many or too few results, strategies include adding or removing terms to narrow or broaden the query, using OR to incorporate synonyms for expansion, or checking the "Similar Articles" feature on a relevant abstract to discover related content. The search history feature maintains a record of the most recent 100 queries, each timestamped for easy reference, and automatically expires after eight hours to manage session data; as of 2025, enhancements allow users to this history in CSV format for offline archiving and . For more intricate needs, advanced options build upon these basics, though the standard interface suffices for most everyday literature retrieval. PubMed's Advanced Search Builder enables users to construct precise and complex queries by selecting specific search fields and incorporating operators. This tool allows selection from over 50 fields, such as [au] for creator names, Journal [ta] for publication titles, and Date - Publication [dp] for temporal ranges, with autocomplete suggestions to refine entries. operators—AND to combine concepts, OR to include synonyms, and NOT to exclude terms—facilitate structured queries, with AND serving as the default operator between adjacent terms and queries processed left-to-right unless grouped with parentheses; examples include (covid OR coronavirus) AND (vaccine OR immunization) or stroke NOT "hemorrhagic stroke"[tiab], such as (diabetes[mh] OR "type 2 diabetes"[ti]) AND (insulin[ti] OR [sulfonylurea](/page/Sulfonylurea)[ti]) NOT [pediatrics](/page/Pediatrics)[ti], enabling exhaustive literature retrieval for research purposes. The Advanced Search Builder also allows combining elements from the search history, such as referencing previous queries with "#1 AND #2" to build upon prior results. For comprehensive searches, particularly in systematic reviews, PubMed offers a dedicated mode that incorporates high-sensitivity hedges to maximize recall. The filter, accessible via the sidebar, applies a pre-defined strategy combining publication types like "systematic review[pt]" with title terms such as "meta-analysis[ti]" or "systematic review[ti]", excluding protocols and comments to focus on synthesized evidence; this hedge retrieves citations from MEDLINE, pre-MEDLINE, and non-MEDLINE sources, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Users can further enhance sensitivity by appending "systematic[sb]" to queries, mimicking exhaustive strategies for evidence synthesis. MeSH term integration supports advanced querying through direct entry from the database, where users select terms like "[mh]" and apply subheadings such as "/[sh]" to specify aspects like treatment. The feature automatically includes the selected term and all narrower hierarchical terms (e.g., exploding "Cardiovascular Diseases[mh]" encompasses subtypes like "[mh]"), unless disabled with [mh:noexp]; subheading similarly broadens to related qualifiers unless tagged [sh:noexp], ensuring comprehensive coverage of indexed concepts. Clinical Queries provide pre-built filters tailored for evidence synthesis in clinical contexts, categorizing searches into areas like (emphasizing randomized controlled trials), (focusing on diagnostic accuracy studies), and Systematic Reviews (leveraging publication type filters for meta-analyses and overviews). These topic-specific queries, such as those for or , apply broad or narrow sensitivity-specificity balances to refine results efficiently, for instance, by prioritizing high-quality evidence in disease-specific topics. Limits and hedges further refine advanced searches to emulate Cochrane-style comprehensiveness, with options for date ranges (e.g., "2015:2025[dp]" or "last 10 years[dp]"), language restrictions (e.g., "english[la]"), and study designs via article types (e.g., "[pt]" or "[pt]"). These can be combined with hedges like species limits ("humans[mh] NOT animals[mh] NOT [mesh:noexp]") or age filters, applied through the builder or sidebar to ensure reproducible, high-recall strategies without over-narrowing results.

Specialized Search Tools

PubMed Labs, launched in 2017 as an experimental platform by the (NCBI), serves as a testing ground for innovative search features and enhancements aimed at improving biomedical literature discovery for PubMed's approximately 2.5 million daily users (as of 2018). It incorporates machine learning-driven tools, such as the "Best Match" , which ranks results based on relevance rather than recency, and query auto-completion for refining searches. Additional features include search facets for filtering by topics like article types or publication dates, AI-powered previews of search results, and beta functionalities like mobile-responsive layouts to gather user feedback for iterative improvements. These experimental elements allow researchers to preview and contribute to the evolution of PubMed's core search capabilities without disrupting the main interface. Historical specialized tools within PubMed have addressed niche needs, such as querying and journal-based browsing, though many have been discontinued as core functionalities matured. askMEDLINE, introduced in , enabled users to pose free-text questions in everyday language to query MEDLINE/PubMed, making it accessible for clinicians and non-experts without requiring operators or terms; for example, a query like "What is the best treatment for ?" would return relevant citations. Developed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM), it processed over 15,000 queries in its first year. Similarly, PubMed Journals, launched in 2016 under NCBI Labs, facilitated parameter-based browsing of journals and articles by allowing users to follow specific publications, view recent issues, and track updates via email alerts, enhancing discovery for journal-centric research. This tool was discontinued on June 15, 2018, due to low usage, with its features influencing subsequent PubMed updates like improved journal filtering. For clinical users, PubMed offers specialized integration with through linked queries that connect literature citations to ongoing or completed trials. Since 2005, NLM has incorporated National Clinical Trial (NCT) identifiers into records when mentioned in articles, enabling direct hyperlinks from PubMed abstracts to corresponding trial records on . Users can refine PubMed searches using filters for articles linked to registered trials, such as by entering an NCT number or selecting "Linked to " in advanced options, which reveals publications reporting trial results or related studies; this supports by bridging published outcomes with trial protocols. Approximately 72% of trials lack direct publication links, but this integration has improved tracking, with tools like automated linking systems aiding in identifying results for over 100,000 registered studies. In June 2025, PubMed introduced usability enhancements to its Related Citations feature, originally developed under PubMed Labs, to facilitate better discovery of similar articles. The update allows right-clicking "See all similar articles" links to open in new tabs, clears applied filters upon clicking to show comprehensive results, and relocates related search suggestions to the search bar for seamless iteration. These changes build on the machine learning foundation of Related Citations, which identifies semantically similar content based on article metadata and full-text availability in PubMed Central, promoting exploratory research without altering the underlying algorithm at that time. This feature is particularly useful for handling searches with too many or too few results by allowing users to explore "Similar Articles" directly from a relevant abstract to iteratively expand or refine discovery.

User Interface and Tools

Website Design and Accessibility

The PubMed homepage features a prominent central search bar that allows users to enter queries directly upon loading the site, facilitating immediate access to its database of over 39 million biomedical citations. Accompanying this are contextual elements such as a sidebar on results pages for applying filters, including publication date, article types, and text availability, which enable quick refinement of search outcomes. Users can also access recent searches through the Advanced tab, where a history of prior queries is maintained for reuse, and an updates feed is available via the PubMed New and Noteworthy section, highlighting recent enhancements like changes to references and search tools as of June 2025. Navigation on PubMed is streamlined through dedicated tabs located at the top of the interface, including Help for user guides and tutorials, Advanced for building complex queries and viewing search history, and Clipboard for temporarily storing up to 500 citations across sessions. On results pages, facets appear in a left sidebar, offering interactive options to narrow results by criteria such as species, language, or journal subsets, which supports efficient browsing without returning to the main search form. This layout emphasizes usability, with pagination controls and display options (e.g., Summary or Abstract views) integrated directly into the results interface. PubMed adopted a responsive design in early to enhance compatibility across devices, automatically adjusting layouts for desktops, tablets, and smartphones without requiring a separate mobile site. This update incorporated app-like features, such as saving and emailing citations, functionality, and integration with My NCBI collections, directly on mobile browsers for and Android. The legacy PubMed for Handhelds, a dedicated mobile interface from earlier years, was retired and fully integrated into the main responsive site by March , ensuring seamless access to core search and navigation tools on handheld devices. As part of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), PubMed adheres to NLM's policy, which commits to making digital content available in alternate formats for users with disabilities and adaptive equipment, in line with federal standards for . The site supports screen readers through compatibility with major browsers like Chrome, , and , and provides access keys for keyboard to aid users with motor impairments. High-contrast modes are facilitated via browser settings, with NLM offering support for customization requests through its Support Center for any identified barriers.

My NCBI Personalization

My NCBI is a free account system provided by the (NCBI) that enables users to personalize their interactions with PubMed and other NCBI databases by storing searches, managing collections of citations, and setting up alerts for new content. Upon creating an account, users can save an unlimited number of searches and collections without storage limits, allowing for efficient organization and retrieval of biomedical literature results. This system integrates seamlessly across NCBI resources, such as PubMed, , and , ensuring that saved items and preferences are accessible in a unified manner. As of October 2025, My Bibliography uses the earliest publication date from PubMed records for improved accuracy in tracking and compliance. Key features include search history management, where users can view, edit, or rerun saved queries timestamped by their save date, with options to export results in formats like CSV or MEDLINE for further analysis. Preferences can be customized to highlight search terms and synonyms in up to 10 colors within PubMed records, apply up to 15 predefined or custom filters (such as for free full-text articles or clinical trials), and prioritize LinkOut links to institutional resources for full-text access. Alerts for saved searches deliver notifications via email or RSS feeds when new matching results are added to PubMed, with configurable frequencies (daily, weekly, or monthly) and result limits up to 200 items per update; these alerts require annual account logins to remain active. Collections allow users to organize PubMed citations into shareable or private folders, with options to add items directly via the "Send To" menu in search results or by manual upload in formats like RIS or . These collections support sorting by author, date, or title, and public sharing through a stable that displays only non-private items, facilitating collaboration while maintaining controls. For institutional users linked to Commons, options enable collaborators to access and manage specific My NCBI elements, such as My for NIH grant compliance. Setup involves signing in via email, , or third-party services like Login.gov or NIH credentials, with no cost or capacity restrictions on account creation.

LinkOut and Full-Text Access

The LinkOut program, introduced in 2001, enables external organizations such as publishers, libraries, and repositories to create direct hyperlinks from PubMed records to full-text articles hosted on their sites, including and institutional platforms. This service supplements PubMed's abstract-only content by facilitating seamless navigation to external resources, with links appearing under the "LinkOut - more resources" section in citation displays. As of November 2025, over 465 providers participate, supporting links across more than 13,000 journals. PubMed uses visual indicators to signal full-text availability, including a "Free in PMC" icon—often with a green banner for no-cost access or a red background for PMC-hosted gold articles—and distinct icons from publishers indicating potential paywalls or subscription requirements. The Outside Tool further enhances third-party integrations, allowing libraries and institutions to embed custom (e.g., to DOIs or local holdings) directly in search results without user , using up to five configurable icons. Users can personalize LinkOut experiences through My NCBI by setting site preferences, such as prioritizing institutional or library links via the Outside Tool and selecting up to 15 filters to reorder or highlight preferred providers (e.g., placing institutional logins first). In June 2025, PubMed streamlined sharing options by removing social media buttons and introducing a universal permalink for citations to facilitate sharing across platforms. As of June 2024, approximately 75% of PubMed citations (28 million out of 37 million) provide links to full text via LinkOut or , though this coverage fluctuates based on journal open-access policies, publisher participation, and the growing integration of PMC for free articles—where, as of 2022, about 40% of recent documents in analyzed datasets offered no-cost access, though overall free full-text availability via PMC is over 10 million articles as of mid-2024. This mechanism ensures broader accessibility while respecting external site terms, such as restrictions on downloads.

Identifiers and Data Standards

PubMed Identifier (PMID)

The PubMed Identifier (PMID) is a unique, sequentially assigned 8-digit numeric code given to each citation record in the PubMed database, serving as its primary permanent locator. Introduced with the launch of PubMed in 1996, PMIDs begin from 1 and increase incrementally without reuse, ensuring each remains a stable, one-to-one reference for the associated biomedical literature citation. For instance, the citation for a article might bear the PMID 35251006, distinguishing it from other identifiers like the (DOI) for digital objects or the International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) for periodicals. Upon addition of a new citation to PubMed—typically from the subset or (PMC)—the system automatically generates and assigns the next available PMID. This process supports direct, enduring access via URLs formatted as pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ followed by the PMID, facilitating reliable retrieval across PubMed, PMC, and linked NCBI resources. PMIDs play a central role in , enabling precise citations in publications, programmatic queries through APIs such as E-utilities, and cross-references in bibliographic tools. Their immutability—no numbers are retired or reassigned—underpins their utility in long-term tracking and verification of research outputs. While versatile for journal articles and similar records, PMIDs are inherently specific to PubMed citations; content from the NCBI Bookshelf, such as books and chapters, employs distinct unique identifiers (e.g., NBK accession numbers) for internal referencing, though many such items also receive PMIDs when indexed in PubMed. These primary PMIDs integrate with secondary identifiers like DOIs for broader in research ecosystems.

Secondary Identifiers and Mapping

PubMed records incorporate several secondary identifiers beyond the primary PubMed Identifier (PMID) to facilitate access to related resources and metadata. These include Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), which are unique alphanumeric strings assigned by publishers to articles and displayed in the Article Identifier (AID) field of citation details. PubMed Central Identifiers (PMCIDs) serve as unique codes for full-text articles archived in PubMed Central (PMC), appearing in the PMC field and often linked via a "Free in PMC" icon on abstract pages. Manuscript Identifiers, such as NIH Manuscript Submission System IDs (NIHMSIDs), are temporary codes for submitted author manuscripts and are included in the AID or Manuscript Identifier (MID) fields during processing. For book-related content, International Standard Book Numbers (ISBNs) identify entire books or chapters and are searchable in the dedicated ISBN field, with display in the Book Title (BTI) section of records. These identifiers are prominently shown in the abstract view, full record displays, and export formats to support comprehensive citation tracking. Mapping tools in PubMed enable seamless conversion and linkage between these secondary identifiers and the core PMID, enhancing cross-database retrieval. The PMC ID Converter tool supports batch or single conversions among PMIDs, PMCIDs, NIHMSIDs, and DOIs, allowing users to input one identifier type to obtain equivalents for PubMed and PMC articles. Direct searches by DOI in the PubMed interface leverage a citation sensor with fuzzy matching to retrieve the corresponding PMID, even with minor input variations, via integration with the Citation Matcher . Additionally, the LinkOut service provides hyperlinks from PubMed records to databases, including and Protein, using secondary identifiers like accession numbers in the Secondary Source ID (SI) field to connect articles with molecular sequence data. PubMed aligns with interoperability standards through its adoption of persistent identifiers like DOIs and PMCIDs, which are compatible with the Identifiers.org resolution service for consistent access to life science across platforms. In 2025, enhancements to () introduced "Scoping Review" as a new publication type, improving mapping and filtering of review articles in PubMed searches to support evidence synthesis workflows. These secondary identifiers and mapping capabilities address practical use cases, such as resolving duplicate records in literature searches by cross-referencing IDs to consolidate entries from multiple submissions. They also enable linkages to external resources, including Europe PMC, which mirrors all PubMed abstracts and full texts while providing bidirectional access to additional datasets not in PubMed.

Alternative Interfaces and Extensions

PubMed Central (PMC)

PubMed Central (PMC) is a free, full-text digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature, serving as the official repository for the U.S. (NIH). Established in 2000 by the (NCBI) at the National Library of Medicine (NLM), PMC was proposed in 1999 by then-NIH Director Harold Varmus to create an electronic counterpart to the NIH's existing print collections, emphasizing to scholarly research. As of September 2024, the archive contains over 10 million articles, including those mandated by the NIH Public Access Policy, which requires investigators funded by NIH grants to deposit peer-reviewed manuscripts into PMC no later than 12 months after publication to ensure public accessibility. PMC's content is selected independently of MEDLINE indexing in PubMed, focusing on full-text availability rather than abstract citations. It includes complete issues from participating open-access journals that meet NLM's quality and technical standards, author-submitted manuscripts (particularly those from NIH-funded research), and digitized historical texts from the life sciences dating back centuries. Publishers and authors submit content through various methods, such as direct journal deposits or the NIH Manuscript Submission System, ensuring long-term preservation while prioritizing scholarly integrity and adherence to ethical publishing practices. Unlike PubMed's metadata-focused searches, PMC emphasizes full-text archiving to support comprehensive research discovery. The PMC interface operates as a standalone platform with advanced capabilities, allowing users to query article content, figures, and tables directly, which complements but differs from PubMed's citation-based retrieval. In October 2024, PMC underwent a major website update, transitioning to pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov with enhanced cloud-based rendering, improved accessibility features, and better synchronization with PubMed for seamless navigation between abstracts and full texts. This redesign improves article display, including mobile responsiveness and structured data extraction, to facilitate easier reading and analysis of complex scientific documents. In September 2025, the was updated to a new beta version, providing more robust functionality and accurate results on the same platform as PubMed. PMC's policies govern content archiving through defined participation levels for publishers: Level A enables immediate for all accepted articles upon publication, while Level B allows delayed release, typically up to 12 months, often for subscription-based journals depositing only NIH-funded works. Each archived article receives a unique PubMed Central ID (PMCID), which integrates directly with PubMed records to provide hyperlinks from citations to full texts, enabling compliance tracking for NIH grants and enhancing discoverability across both platforms. These policies ensure sustainable growth while balancing publisher agreements with public access goals.

Third-Party and Regional Interfaces

Europe PMC, launched in 2007 by the , functions as a prominent third-party interface that mirrors and extends access to PubMed's biomedical database. As of May 2025, it encompasses over 46 million life science records, including abstracts, full-text articles, preprints, and patents. Distinct from the official PubMed, PMC integrates additional datasets such as grant information from more than 35 research funders and patents sourced from the , facilitating connections between funded research outputs and their publications. It builds upon for full-text archiving while emphasizing content. Europe PMC enhances user interaction through advanced text-mining capabilities, employing to automatically annotate articles with biological entities like genes, proteins, diseases, and chemicals, thereby supporting more precise literature discovery and analysis. Its RESTful offers programmatic access similar to PubMed's E-utilities, enabling developers to retrieve annotations, citations, and full-text data efficiently. Other notable third-party interfaces include GoPubMed, an early semantic search tool that leveraged ontologies like and to categorize PubMed results thematically, though it was discontinued in the . , maintained by the , serves as a modern alternative by applying to generate concise summaries (TL;DRs), influence scores, and contextual paper recommendations across biomedical and broader . Regionally, interfaces like Wanfang Data in provide mirrored access to international biomedical records alongside extensive Chinese-language publications, supporting localized searches and integrating domestic journals for comprehensive coverage in Asian contexts. In , CiNii Research offers a similar regional platform, aggregating scholarly articles with links to global databases like PubMed and enabling Japanese-language querying for domestic and international biomedical content. These third-party and regional platforms commonly feature local language interfaces and supplementary datasets tailored to specific geographies, such as links or national patents, while maintaining compatibility for seamless integration with PubMed tools. However, they may experience delays in indexing new records compared to the official PubMed and prioritize open-access materials, potentially limiting coverage of subscription-based content.

Data Mining and API Access

Programmatic Access Methods

PubMed provides programmatic access to its vast collection of biomedical literature citations through the Entrez Programming Utilities (E-utilities), a suite of RESTful s developed by the (NCBI) since the early 2000s. These utilities enable automated searching, retrieval, and linking of records across databases, including PubMed, without relying on the web interface. Key components include ESearch, which performs queries similar to those in the PubMed web interface and returns unique identifiers such as PMIDs, and EFetch, which retrieves full records based on those identifiers in structured formats. For instance, an ESearch call might query for articles on a specific topic, yielding a list of PMIDs that can then be passed to EFetch for detailed data extraction. To manage access and prevent overload, E-utilities impose rate limits of 3 requests per second for unauthenticated users; registering an through a My NCBI account increases this to 10 requests per second, with higher volumes available upon request for justified needs. requires including a valid and optional tool identifier in requests, while are generated via the NCBI account settings page. These measures ensure fair usage, and exceeding limits may result in temporary IP blocking, resolvable through NCBI support. In addition to API-based retrieval, PubMed supports bulk downloads of its data for offline analysis, primarily through FTP servers hosting MEDLINE files, which form the core of PubMed citations. An annual baseline file provides a complete XML snapshot of all records, released at year-end—for example, the 2025 baseline is scheduled for December 2025—while daily update files capture new, revised, or deleted citations to maintain currency. These files are accessible via public FTP at ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ for non-commercial use, with subsets available in directories like baseline/ and updates/. Downloads must use binary mode and adhere to NCBI's terms, including subscription to announcements for release notifications. Supported output formats from E-utilities and bulk files emphasize structured data for programmatic processing: XML as the primary format for comprehensive records, and ASCII-based format for plain-text abstracts and citations. is available for lighter-weight retrievals through post-processing tools such as Direct. Tools such as NCBI's Direct facilitate parsing these outputs, allowing users to extract and reformat elements like titles, authors, and identifiers directly from XML streams. This combination of s and downloads supports scalable data access, with identifiers like PMIDs serving as anchors in API calls for precise record linking.

Applications in Research and Mining

PubMed serves as a foundational resource for in biomedical , enabling the extraction of insights from vast collections of abstracts, metadata, and linked . Text techniques, such as topic modeling, are commonly applied to abstracts to uncover emerging trends and thematic patterns, often leveraging (MeSH) for structured categorization. For instance, (LDA) and BERTopic models have been used to identify latent topics in PubMed abstracts, facilitating the discovery of research hotspots in fields like and infectious diseases. Additionally, MeSH terms enhance search precision by mapping free-text queries to controlled vocabularies, allowing researchers to abstract content through semantic lenses for trend detection. Citation networks, constructed using PubMed Identifiers (PMIDs) to trace referenced articles, reveal influence patterns and knowledge diffusion; these networks have been employed to map academic performance fields and propagate error across interconnected publications. Several specialized tools support these mining efforts by providing user-friendly interfaces for statistical analysis. PubMed Miner, for example, visualizes MeSH-based associations and computes co-occurrence statistics across large PubMed subsets, aiding in the identification of term relationships without requiring programming expertise. Similarly, VOSviewer enables bibliometric mapping of PubMed data, generating network visualizations of co-citations and keyword clusters to illustrate research landscapes. These tools must be used in compliance with National Library of Medicine (NLM) terms, which permit data redistribution for non-endorsed applications but disclaim liability for commercial uses and require clear attribution to avoid implying official support. In research applications, PubMed's comprehensive search capabilities underpin systematic reviews by enabling exhaustive retrieval of relevant studies, ensuring methodological rigor through filters like publication dates and qualifiers. During the , researchers applied date filters (e.g., 2020-2025) for rapid mining of PubMed records, supporting bibliometric analyses of over 394,000 publications to track evolving themes in research and outcomes. Such approaches, often facilitated by programmatic access methods, accelerate evidence synthesis for responses. Despite these advantages, challenges persist in PubMed , including biases from inconsistent indexing, which can skew trend analyses in rapidly evolving fields like respiratory medicine. Since 2022, NLM has implemented automated indexing with a goal of completion within 24 hours of a citation's appearance in PubMed, though human review may introduce minor delays in complex cases. Ethical considerations also arise with de-identified data usage, emphasizing the need for safeguards to prevent re-identification risks while promoting beneficial research, as outlined in frameworks balancing sharing with consent limitations.

References

  1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148949/
  4. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/medline.html
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/help/
  6. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_history.html
  7. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/so99/so99_million.html
  8. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_preface.html
  9. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/so99/so99_elhill.html
  10. https://circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov/2016/04/28/grateful-med-personal-computing-and-user-friendly-design/
  11. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/so06/so06_pm_10.html
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/intro/
  13. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/so03/so03_oldmedline.html
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/about/conversion/
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53564/
  16. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2018/02/01/pubmed-commons-to-be-discontinued/
  17. https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access/nih-public-access-policy-overview
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542188/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/new-in-pmc/
  20. https://nlmdirector.nlm.nih.gov/2024/10/23/the-future-of-pubmed-central-publicly-accessible-digitally-equitable-universally-valuable/
  21. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/jf25/jf25_pubmed_news_beta.html
  22. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj25/mj25_pubmed_updates.html
  23. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/nd24/nd24_annual_mesh_processing.html
  24. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tag/pubmed-labs/
  25. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2017/10/17/try-our-new-experimental-pubmed-search-and-user-interface-in-pubmed-labs/
  26. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_overview.html
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/intro/
  29. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/databases_oldmedline.html
  30. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/medline_cit_counts_yr_pub.html
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC35238/
  32. https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D000098842
  33. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/indexfaq.html
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8859845/
  35. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_indexing.html
  36. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_trees.html
  37. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/subhierarchy.html
  38. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/oet/ed/pubmed/mesh/mod01/03-400.html
  39. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/pubtypes.html
  40. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/oet/ed/mesh/2025/mesh_highlights.html
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinical/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/help/#clinical-study-categories
  43. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pubmed_subsets/sysreviews_strategy.html
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30239682/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6152140/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15760470/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1839379/
  48. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2016/09/07/pubmed-journals/
  49. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj18/brief/mj18_ncbi_labs_pubmed_journals_discontinued.html
  50. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj05/mj05_ct.html
  51. https://library.mskcc.org/blog/2016/08/linking-pubmed-and-clinicaltrials-gov/
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23874614/
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/help/#similar-articles
  54. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2020/01/23/the-new-pubmed-is-here/
  55. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2020/03/27/try-the-new-pubmed-on-your-mobile-device/
  56. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/accessibility.html
  57. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/browsers/
  58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3842/
  59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53595/
  60. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2025/09/08/upcoming-change-my-bibliography/
  61. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53593/
  62. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53592/
  63. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/webinar_docs/webinar_transcript_20130115.pdf
  64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/linkout/
  65. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3807/
  66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3810/
  67. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/linkout/journals/jourlists.fcgi?type=providers&typeid=1&format=html&show=ALL&operation=Show
  68. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj03/mj03_icon.html
  69. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/so00/so00_pmc.html
  70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3809/
  71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3803/
  72. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/oet/ed/pubmed/06-24_oh-pubmed.html
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2568849/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9561061/
  75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45610/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/idconv/
  77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33031499/
  78. https://blog.rayyan.ai/2025/08/11/whats-new-in-mesh-2025-key-updates-and-impacts-for-pubmed-searching/
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10789108/
  80. https://europepmc.org/help
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825438/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/public-access-info/
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/submission-methods/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nih.gov/about/guidelines/
  85. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2024/10/21/pubmed-central-updated-website/
  86. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2024/03/14/preview-pmc-improvements/
  87. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2025/08/19/new-pmc-search/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/guidelines/
  89. https://blog.europepmc.org/2025/05/making-sense-of-europe-pmc-answers-to-your-biggest-faqs.html
  90. https://europepmc.org/Funders/
  91. https://europepmc.org/About
  92. https://docs.ropensci.org/europepmc/
  93. https://norecopa.no/3r-guide/gopubmed/
  94. https://www.semanticscholar.org/faq
  95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5600207_Five_large_Chinese_biomedical_bibliographic_databases_Accessibility_and_coverage
  96. https://support.nii.ac.jp/en/cir/manual_articles_detail
  97. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/52/D1/D1668/7442539
  98. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/
  99. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25497/
  100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25500/
  101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/download/
  102. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/download/pubmed_medline.html
  103. https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2015/03/13/exploring-entrez-direct-parsing-the-xml-output-of-e-utilities/
  104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40093658/
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5039918/
  106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32722277/
  107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29451542/
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4419975/
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20585380/
  110. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/download.html
  111. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12583822/
  112. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/3/298
  113. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7819582/
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5001759/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.