Recent from talks
Royal prerogative of mercy
Knowledge base stats:
Talk channels stats:
Members stats:
Royal prerogative of mercy
In the English and British tradition, the royal prerogative of mercy is one of the historic royal prerogatives of the British monarch, by which he can grant pardons (informally known as a royal pardon) to convicted persons. The royal prerogative of mercy was originally used to permit the monarch to withdraw, or provide alternatives to, death sentences; the alternative of penal transportation to "partes abroade" (lands overseas) was used since at least 1617. It is now used to change any sentence or penalty. A royal pardon does not overturn a conviction.
In modern times, by constitutional convention, the prerogative is exercised by the Sovereign on ministerial advice. Those responsible for recommending its exercise are:
In Commonwealth realms other than the United Kingdom, the prerogative is exercised by the country’s governor-general on behalf of the Sovereign, on the advice of government ministers. In federations such as Australia and Canada, the prerogative is also exercised at the state or provincial level by the governors (Australia) and lieutenant governors (Canada), also acting on ministerial advice: the Attorneys-General in Australia, and the federal and provincial cabinets in Canada, in respect of federal and provincial offences.
In the important case of Derek Bentley, a court found that this royal prerogative power is "probably" entirely a matter of policy, and thus not justiciable.
Free pardons release a person from the effect of a penalty or a consequence of a sentence, but they do not quash or overturn the conviction, which remains after the pardon. They were traditionally used where new evidence demonstrated conclusively that no crime was committed or that the individual did not commit the offence, but the expansion of rights of appeal have reduced the need for free pardons, particularly since appeals have the power to quash the original conviction and provide a presumption of innocence. The most recent free pardons were granted to Michael Shields (2009) and, posthumously, to Alan Turing (2013).
Conditional pardons substitute one type of sentence for another, and were often used to substitute a lesser sentence for the death penalty. The abolition of the death penalty and the increase in the rights of appeal, have meant this pardon is rarely used. The last use of the conditional pardon was the posthumous pardon of Derek Bentley in 1993.
Special remissions, also called remission pardons, reduce the effect of a sentence, by releasing a prisoner from having to serve some or all of the remainder of his sentence in custody, but the sentence itself remains unaltered. Special remissions are normally granted on compassionate grounds (although there are now statutory powers available), after an offender provides information to help bring other offenders to justice after they have been convicted (however this is now partly covered by section 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005), to recognize remarkably good conduct in custody, such as the prevention of escape, injury, or death, or to remedy an incorrectly calculated release date.
Use of the royal prerogative of mercy (RPM) is exercised by the sovereign, under the advice of his ministers. The sovereign pledges to administer "Justice in Mercy" in the coronation oath. The last monarch who attempted to use the RPM on his own initiative was King George IV, who favored mercy in many cases. George wished to commute death sentence for a defendant in Clare who had burned his own house; the king backed down after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel threatened to resign. Capital sentences passed at the Old Bailey were once reviewed by the ‘grand cabinet' at Privy Council meetings, but this practice ended so that cases of "an unnamable character" would not be discussed in Queen Victoria's presence.
Hub AI
Royal prerogative of mercy AI simulator
(@Royal prerogative of mercy_simulator)
Royal prerogative of mercy
In the English and British tradition, the royal prerogative of mercy is one of the historic royal prerogatives of the British monarch, by which he can grant pardons (informally known as a royal pardon) to convicted persons. The royal prerogative of mercy was originally used to permit the monarch to withdraw, or provide alternatives to, death sentences; the alternative of penal transportation to "partes abroade" (lands overseas) was used since at least 1617. It is now used to change any sentence or penalty. A royal pardon does not overturn a conviction.
In modern times, by constitutional convention, the prerogative is exercised by the Sovereign on ministerial advice. Those responsible for recommending its exercise are:
In Commonwealth realms other than the United Kingdom, the prerogative is exercised by the country’s governor-general on behalf of the Sovereign, on the advice of government ministers. In federations such as Australia and Canada, the prerogative is also exercised at the state or provincial level by the governors (Australia) and lieutenant governors (Canada), also acting on ministerial advice: the Attorneys-General in Australia, and the federal and provincial cabinets in Canada, in respect of federal and provincial offences.
In the important case of Derek Bentley, a court found that this royal prerogative power is "probably" entirely a matter of policy, and thus not justiciable.
Free pardons release a person from the effect of a penalty or a consequence of a sentence, but they do not quash or overturn the conviction, which remains after the pardon. They were traditionally used where new evidence demonstrated conclusively that no crime was committed or that the individual did not commit the offence, but the expansion of rights of appeal have reduced the need for free pardons, particularly since appeals have the power to quash the original conviction and provide a presumption of innocence. The most recent free pardons were granted to Michael Shields (2009) and, posthumously, to Alan Turing (2013).
Conditional pardons substitute one type of sentence for another, and were often used to substitute a lesser sentence for the death penalty. The abolition of the death penalty and the increase in the rights of appeal, have meant this pardon is rarely used. The last use of the conditional pardon was the posthumous pardon of Derek Bentley in 1993.
Special remissions, also called remission pardons, reduce the effect of a sentence, by releasing a prisoner from having to serve some or all of the remainder of his sentence in custody, but the sentence itself remains unaltered. Special remissions are normally granted on compassionate grounds (although there are now statutory powers available), after an offender provides information to help bring other offenders to justice after they have been convicted (however this is now partly covered by section 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005), to recognize remarkably good conduct in custody, such as the prevention of escape, injury, or death, or to remedy an incorrectly calculated release date.
Use of the royal prerogative of mercy (RPM) is exercised by the sovereign, under the advice of his ministers. The sovereign pledges to administer "Justice in Mercy" in the coronation oath. The last monarch who attempted to use the RPM on his own initiative was King George IV, who favored mercy in many cases. George wished to commute death sentence for a defendant in Clare who had burned his own house; the king backed down after Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel threatened to resign. Capital sentences passed at the Old Bailey were once reviewed by the ‘grand cabinet' at Privy Council meetings, but this practice ended so that cases of "an unnamable character" would not be discussed in Queen Victoria's presence.