Recent from talks
Colonial and Imperial Affairs
Death and Legacy
Marriage and Family Life
Public Life and Celebrations
Assassination Attempts and Security
Relationship with John Brown
Social and Educational Reforms
Widowhood and Later Life
Early Life and Accession
Political Influence and Reign
Main milestones
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Queen Victoria
View on Wikipedia
Victoria (Alexandrina Victoria; 24 May 1819 – 22 January 1901) was Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland from 20 June 1837 until her death. Her reign of 63 years and 216 days, which was longer than those of any of her predecessors, constituted the Victorian era. It was a period of industrial, political, scientific, and military change within the United Kingdom, and was marked by a great expansion of the British Empire. In 1876, the British parliament voted to grant her the additional title of Empress of India.
Key Information
Victoria was the daughter of Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn (the fourth son of King George III), and Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld. After the deaths of her father and grandfather in 1820, she was raised under close supervision by her mother and her comptroller, John Conroy. She inherited the throne aged 18 after her father's three elder brothers died without surviving legitimate issue. Victoria, a constitutional monarch, attempted privately to influence government policy and ministerial appointments; publicly, she became a national icon who was identified with strict standards of personal morality.
Victoria married her first cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, in 1840. Their nine children married into royal and noble families across the continent, earning Victoria the sobriquet "grandmother of Europe". After Albert's death in 1861, Victoria plunged into deep mourning and avoided public appearances. As a result of her seclusion, British republicanism temporarily gained strength, but in the latter half of her reign, her popularity recovered. Her Golden and Diamond jubilees were times of public celebration. Victoria died at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight, at the age of 81. The last British monarch of the House of Hanover, she was succeeded by her son Edward VII of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Early life
[edit]Birth and ancestry
[edit]Victoria's father was Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, the fourth son of King George III and Queen Charlotte. Until 1817, King George's only legitimate grandchild was Edward's niece Princess Charlotte of Wales, the daughter of George, Prince Regent (who would become George IV). Charlotte's death in 1817 precipitated a succession crisis that brought pressure on Edward and his unmarried brothers to marry and have children. In 1818, the Duke of Kent married Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, a widowed German princess with two children—Carl (1804–1856) and Feodora (1807–1872)—by her first marriage to Emich Carl, 2nd Prince of Leiningen. Her brother Leopold was Charlotte's widower and later the first king of Belgium. Victoria was born at 4:15 am on Monday, 24 May 1819 at Kensington Palace in London and was the Duke and Duchess of Kent's only child.[1]
Victoria was christened privately by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Charles Manners-Sutton, on 24 June 1819 in the Cupola Room at Kensington Palace.[b] She was baptised Alexandrina after one of her godparents, Tsar Alexander I of Russia, and Victoria, after her mother. Additional names proposed by her parents—Georgina (or Georgiana), Charlotte, and Augusta—were dropped on the instructions of the Prince Regent.[2]
At birth, Victoria was fifth in the line of succession after the four eldest sons of George III: George, Prince Regent (later George IV); Frederick, Duke of York; William, Duke of Clarence (later William IV); and Victoria's father, Edward, Duke of Kent.[3] Prince George had no surviving children, and Frederick had no children; further, both were estranged from their wives, who were both past child-bearing age, so the two eldest brothers were unlikely to have any further legitimate children. William married in 1818, in a joint ceremony with his brother Edward, but both of William's legitimate daughters died as infants. The first of these was Princess Charlotte, who was born and died on 27 March 1819, two months before Victoria was born. Victoria's father died in January 1820, when Victoria was less than a year old. A week later her grandfather died and was succeeded by his eldest son as George IV. Victoria was then third in line to the throne after Frederick and William. She was fourth in line while William's second daughter, Princess Elizabeth, lived, from 10 December 1820 to 4 March 1821.[4]
Heir presumptive
[edit]Frederick died in 1827, followed by George IV in 1830; their next surviving brother succeeded to the throne as William IV, and Victoria became heir presumptive. The Regency Act 1830 made special provision for Victoria's mother to act as regent in case William died while Victoria was still a minor.[5] King William distrusted the Duchess's capacity to be regent, and in 1836 he declared in her presence that he wanted to live until Victoria's 18th birthday, so that a regency could be avoided.[6]

Victoria later described her childhood as "rather melancholy".[7] Her mother was extremely protective, and Victoria was raised largely isolated from other children under the so-called "Kensington System", an elaborate set of rules and protocols devised by the Duchess and her ambitious and domineering comptroller, Sir John Conroy, who was rumoured to be the Duchess's lover.[8] The system prevented the princess from meeting people whom her mother and Conroy deemed undesirable (including most of her father's family), and was designed to render her weak and dependent upon them.[9] The Duchess avoided the court because she was scandalised by the presence of King William's illegitimate children.[10] Victoria shared a bedroom with her mother every night, studied with private tutors to a regular timetable, and spent her play-hours with her dolls and her King Charles Spaniel, Dash.[11] Her lessons included French, German, Italian, and Latin,[12] but she spoke only English at home.[13] At age ten, she wrote and illustrated a children's story, The Adventures of Alice Laselles, which was eventually published in 2015.[14]
In 1830, the Duchess and Conroy took Victoria across the centre of England to visit the Malvern Hills, stopping at towns and great country houses along the way.[15] Similar journeys to other parts of England and Wales were taken in 1832, 1833, 1834 and 1835. To the King's annoyance, Victoria was enthusiastically welcomed in each of the stops.[16] William compared the journeys to royal progresses and was concerned that they portrayed Victoria as his rival rather than his heir presumptive.[17] Victoria disliked the trips; the constant round of public appearances made her tired and ill, and there was little time for her to rest.[18] She objected on the grounds of the King's disapproval, but her mother dismissed his complaints as motivated by jealousy and forced Victoria to continue the tours.[19] At Ramsgate in October 1835, Victoria contracted a severe fever, which Conroy initially dismissed as a childish pretence.[20] While Victoria was ill, Conroy and the Duchess unsuccessfully badgered her to make Conroy her private secretary.[21] As a teenager, Victoria resisted persistent attempts by her mother and Conroy to appoint him to her staff.[22] Once queen, she banned him from her presence, but he remained in her mother's household.[23]

By 1836, Victoria's maternal uncle Leopold, who had been King of the Belgians since 1831, hoped to marry her to Prince Albert,[24] the son of his brother Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Leopold arranged for Victoria's mother to invite her Coburg relatives to visit her in May 1836, with the purpose of introducing Victoria to Albert.[25] William IV, however, disapproved of any match with the Coburgs, and instead favoured the suit of Prince Alexander of the Netherlands, second son of the Prince of Orange.[26] Victoria was aware of the various matrimonial plans and critically appraised a parade of eligible princes.[27] According to her diary, she enjoyed Albert's company from the beginning. After the visit she wrote, "[Albert] is extremely handsome; his hair is about the same colour as mine; his eyes are large and blue, and he has a beautiful nose and a very sweet mouth with fine teeth; but the charm of his countenance is his expression, which is most delightful."[28] Alexander, on the other hand, she described as "very plain".[29]
Victoria wrote to King Leopold, whom she considered her "best and kindest adviser",[30] to thank him "for the prospect of great happiness you have contributed to give me, in the person of dear Albert ... He possesses every quality that could be desired to render me perfectly happy. He is so sensible, so kind, and so good, and so amiable too. He has besides the most pleasing and delightful exterior and appearance you can possibly see."[31] However at 17, Victoria, though interested in Albert, was not yet ready to marry. The parties did not undertake a formal engagement, but assumed that the match would take place in due time.[32]
Accession and early reign
[edit]
Victoria turned 18 on 24 May 1837, and thus a regency was avoided. Less than a month later, on 20 June 1837, William IV died at the age of 71, and Victoria became Queen of the United Kingdom.[c] In her diary she wrote, "I was awoke at 6 o'clock by Mamma, who told me the Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Conyngham were here and wished to see me. I got out of bed and went into my sitting-room (only in my dressing gown) and alone, and saw them. Lord Conyngham then acquainted me that my poor Uncle, the King, was no more, and had expired at 12 minutes past 2 this morning, and consequently that I am Queen."[33] Official documents prepared on the first day of her reign described her as Alexandrina Victoria, but the first name was withdrawn at her own wish and not used again.[34]
Since 1714, Britain had shared a monarch with Hanover in Germany, but under Salic law, women were excluded from the Hanoverian succession. While Victoria inherited the British throne, her father's unpopular younger brother, Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland, became King of Hanover. He was Victoria's heir presumptive until she had a child.[35]

At the time of Victoria's accession, the government was led by the Whig prime minister Lord Melbourne. He at once became a powerful influence on the politically inexperienced monarch, who relied on him for advice.[36] Charles Greville supposed that the widowed and childless Melbourne was "passionately fond of her as he might be of his daughter if he had one", and Victoria probably saw him as a father figure.[37] Her coronation took place on 28 June 1838 at Westminster Abbey. Over 400,000 visitors came to London for the celebrations.[38] She became the first sovereign to take up residence at Buckingham Palace[39] and inherited the revenues of the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall as well as being granted a civil list allowance of £385,000 per year. Financially prudent, she paid off her father's debts.[40]
At the start of her reign Victoria was popular,[41] but her reputation suffered in an 1839 court intrigue when one of her mother's ladies-in-waiting, Lady Flora Hastings, developed an abdominal growth that was widely rumoured to be an out-of-wedlock pregnancy by Sir John Conroy.[42] Victoria believed the rumours.[43] She hated Conroy, and despised "that odious Lady Flora",[44] because she had conspired with Conroy and the Duchess in the Kensington System.[45] At first, Lady Flora refused to submit to an intimate medical examination, until in mid-February she eventually acquiesced, and was found to be a virgin.[46] Conroy, the Hastings family, and the opposition Tories organised a press campaign implicating the Queen in the spreading of false rumours about Lady Flora.[47] When Lady Flora died in July, the post-mortem revealed a large tumour on her liver that had distended her abdomen.[48] At public appearances, Victoria was hissed and jeered at as "Mrs. Melbourne".[49]
In 1839, Melbourne resigned after Radicals and Tories (both of whom Victoria detested) voted against a bill to suspend the constitution of Jamaica. The bill removed political power from plantation owners who were resisting measures associated with the abolition of slavery.[50] The Queen commissioned a Tory, Robert Peel, to form a new ministry. At the time, it was customary for the prime minister to appoint members of the Royal Household, who were usually his political allies and their spouses. Many of the Queen's ladies of the bedchamber were wives of Whigs, and Peel expected to replace them with wives of Tories. In what became known as the "bedchamber crisis", Victoria, advised by Melbourne, objected to their removal. Peel refused to govern under the restrictions imposed by the Queen, and consequently resigned his commission, allowing Melbourne to return to office.[51]
Marriage and public life
[edit]
Although Victoria was now queen, as an unmarried young woman she was required by social convention to live with her mother, despite their differences over the Kensington System and her mother's continued reliance on Conroy.[52] The duchess was consigned to a remote apartment in Buckingham Palace, and Victoria often refused to see her.[53] When Victoria complained to Melbourne that her mother's proximity promised "torment for many years", Melbourne sympathised but said it could be avoided by marriage, which Victoria called a "schocking [sic] alternative".[54] Victoria showed interest in Albert's education for the future role he would have to play as her husband, but she resisted attempts to rush her into wedlock.[55]
Victoria continued to praise Albert following his second visit in October 1839. They felt mutual affection and the Queen proposed to him on 15 October 1839, just five days after he had arrived at Windsor.[56] They were married on 10 February 1840, in the Chapel Royal of St James's Palace, London. Victoria was love-struck. She spent the evening after their wedding lying down with a headache, but wrote ecstatically in her diary:
I NEVER, NEVER spent such an evening!!! MY DEAREST DEAREST DEAR Albert ... his excessive love & affection gave me feelings of heavenly love & happiness I never could have hoped to have felt before! He clasped me in his arms, & we kissed each other again & again! His beauty, his sweetness & gentleness—really how can I ever be thankful enough to have such a Husband! ... to be called by names of tenderness, I have never yet heard used to me before—was bliss beyond belief! Oh! This was the happiest day of my life![57]
Albert became an important political adviser as well as the Queen's companion, replacing Melbourne as the dominant influential figure in the first half of her life.[58] Victoria's mother was evicted from the palace, to Ingestre House in Belgrave Square. After the death of Victoria's aunt Princess Augusta in 1840, the duchess was given both Clarence House and Frogmore House.[59] Through Albert's mediation, relations between mother and daughter slowly improved.[60]

During Victoria's first pregnancy in 1840, in the first few months of the marriage, 18-year-old Edward Oxford attempted to assassinate her while she was riding in a carriage with Prince Albert on her way to visit her mother. Oxford fired twice, but either both bullets missed or, as he later claimed, the guns had no shot.[61] He was tried for high treason, found not guilty by reason of insanity, committed to an insane asylum indefinitely, and later sent to live in Australia.[62] In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Victoria's popularity soared, mitigating residual discontent over the Hastings affair and the bedchamber crisis.[63] Her daughter, also named Victoria, was born on 21 November 1840. The Queen hated being pregnant,[64] viewed breast-feeding with disgust,[65] and thought newborn babies were ugly.[66] Nevertheless, over the following seventeen years, she and Albert had a further eight children: Albert Edward, Alice, Alfred, Helena, Louise, Arthur, Leopold and Beatrice.[67]
The household was largely run by Victoria's childhood governess, Baroness Louise Lehzen from Hanover. Lehzen had been a formative influence on Victoria[68] and had supported her against the Kensington System.[69] Albert, however, thought that Lehzen was incompetent and that her mismanagement threatened his daughter Victoria's health. After a furious row between Victoria and Albert over the issue, Lehzen was pensioned off in 1842, and Victoria's close relationship with her ended.[70]

On 29 May 1842, Victoria was riding in a carriage along The Mall, London, when John Francis aimed a pistol at her, but the gun did not fire. The assailant escaped; the following day, Victoria drove the same route, though faster and with a greater escort, in a deliberate attempt to bait Francis into taking a second aim and catch him in the act. As expected, Francis shot at her, but he was seized by plainclothes policemen, and convicted of high treason. On 3 July, two days after Francis's death sentence was commuted to transportation for life, John William Bean also tried to fire a pistol at the Queen, but it was loaded only with paper and tobacco and had too little charge.[71] Edward Oxford felt that the attempts were encouraged by his acquittal in 1840.[72] Bean was sentenced to 18 months in jail.[72] In a similar attack in 1849, unemployed Irishman William Hamilton fired a powder-filled pistol at Victoria's carriage as it passed along Constitution Hill, London.[73] In 1850, the Queen did sustain injury when she was assaulted by a possibly insane ex-army officer, Robert Pate. As Victoria was riding in a carriage, Pate struck her with his cane, crushing her bonnet and bruising her forehead. Both Hamilton and Pate were sentenced to seven years' transportation.[74]
Melbourne's support in the House of Commons weakened through the early years of Victoria's reign, and in the 1841 general election the Whigs were defeated. Peel became prime minister, and the ladies of the bedchamber most associated with the Whigs were replaced.[75]
In 1845, Ireland was hit by a potato blight.[76] In the next four years, over a million Irish people died and another million emigrated in what became known as the Great Famine.[77] In Ireland, Victoria was labelled "The Famine Queen".[78][79] In January 1847 she personally donated £2,000 (equivalent to between £230,000 and £8.5 million in 2022)[80] to the British Relief Association, more than any other individual famine relief donor,[81] and supported the Maynooth Grant to a Roman Catholic seminary in Ireland, despite Protestant opposition.[82] The story that she donated only £5 in aid to the Irish, and on the same day gave the same amount to Battersea Dogs Home, was a myth generated towards the end of the 19th century.[83]
By 1846, Peel's ministry faced a crisis involving the repeal of the Corn Laws. Many Tories—by then known also as Conservatives—were opposed to the repeal, but Peel, some Tories (the free-trade oriented liberal conservative "Peelites"), most Whigs and Victoria supported it. Peel resigned in 1846, after the repeal narrowly passed, and was replaced by Lord John Russell.[84]
| Victoria's British prime ministers | |
| Year | Prime Minister (party) |
|---|---|
| 1835 | Viscount Melbourne (Whig) |
| 1841 | Sir Robert Peel (Conservative) |
| 1846 | Lord John Russell (Whig) |
| 1852 (February) | Earl of Derby (Conservative) |
| 1852 (December) | Earl of Aberdeen (Peelite) |
| 1855 | Viscount Palmerston (Liberal) |
| 1858 | Earl of Derby (Conservative) |
| 1859 | Viscount Palmerston (Liberal) |
| 1865 | Earl Russell, Lord John Russell (Liberal) |
| 1866 | Earl of Derby (Conservative) |
| 1868 (February) | Benjamin Disraeli (Conservative) |
| 1868 (December) | William Gladstone (Liberal) |
| 1874 | Benjamin Disraeli, Lord Beaconsfield (Conservative) |
| 1880 | William Gladstone (Liberal) |
| 1885 | Marquess of Salisbury (Conservative) |
| 1886 (February) | William Gladstone (Liberal) |
| 1886 (July) | Marquess of Salisbury (Conservative) |
| 1892 | William Gladstone (Liberal) |
| 1894 | Earl of Rosebery (Liberal) |
| 1895 | Marquess of Salisbury (Conservative) |
| See List of prime ministers of Queen Victoria for details of her British and overseas premiers | |
Internationally, Victoria took a keen interest in the improvement of relations between France and Britain.[85] She made and hosted several visits between the British royal family and the House of Orleans, who were related by marriage through the Coburgs. In 1843 and 1845, she and Albert stayed with King Louis Philippe I at Château d'Eu in Normandy; she was the first British or English monarch to visit a French monarch since the meeting of Henry VIII of England and Francis I of France on the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520.[86] When Louis Philippe made a reciprocal trip in 1844, he became the first French king to visit a British sovereign.[87] Louis Philippe was deposed in the revolutions of 1848, and fled to exile in England.[88] At the height of a revolutionary scare in the United Kingdom in April 1848, Victoria and her family left London for the greater safety of Osborne House,[89] a private estate on the Isle of Wight that they had purchased in 1845 and redeveloped.[90] Demonstrations by Chartists and Irish nationalists failed to attract widespread support, and the scare died down without any major disturbances.[91] Victoria's first visit to Ireland in 1849 was a public relations success, but it had no lasting impact or effect on the growth of Irish nationalism.[92]
Russell's ministry, though Whig, was not favoured by the Queen.[93] She found particularly offensive the Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, who often acted without consulting the cabinet, the prime minister, or the Queen.[94] Victoria complained to Russell that Palmerston sent official dispatches to foreign leaders without her knowledge, but Palmerston was retained in office and continued to act on his own initiative, despite her repeated remonstrances. It was only in 1851 that Palmerston was removed after he announced the British government's approval of President Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte's coup in France without consulting the prime minister.[95] The following year, President Bonaparte was declared Emperor Napoleon III, by which time Russell's administration had been replaced by a short-lived minority government led by Lord Derby.[96]
In 1853, Victoria gave birth to her eighth child, Leopold, with the aid of the new anaesthetic, chloroform. She was so impressed by the relief it gave from the pain of childbirth that she used it again in 1857 at the birth of her ninth and final child, Beatrice, despite opposition from members of the clergy, who considered it against biblical teaching, and members of the medical profession, who thought it dangerous.[97] Victoria may have had postnatal depression after many of her pregnancies.[67] Letters from Albert to Victoria intermittently complain of her loss of self-control. For example, about a month after Leopold's birth Albert complained in a letter to Victoria about her "continuance of hysterics" over a "miserable trifle".[98]
In early 1855, the government of Lord Aberdeen, who had replaced Derby, fell amidst recriminations over the poor management of British troops in the Crimean War. Victoria approached both Derby and Russell to form a ministry, but neither had sufficient support, and Victoria was forced to appoint Palmerston as prime minister.[99]
Napoleon III, Britain's closest ally as a result of the Crimean War,[67] visited London in April 1855, and from 17 to 28 August the same year Victoria and Albert returned the visit.[100] Napoleon III met the couple at Boulogne and accompanied them to Paris.[101] They visited the Exposition Universelle (a successor to Albert's 1851 brainchild the Great Exhibition) and Napoleon I's tomb at Les Invalides (to which his remains had only been returned in 1840), and were guests of honour at a 1,200-guest ball at the Palace of Versailles.[102] This marked the first time that a reigning British monarch had been to Paris in over 400 years.[103]

On 14 January 1858, an Italian refugee from Britain called Felice Orsini attempted to assassinate Napoleon III with a bomb made in England.[104] The ensuing diplomatic crisis destabilised the government, and Palmerston resigned. Derby was reinstated as prime minister.[105] Victoria and Albert attended the opening of a new basin at the French military port of Cherbourg on 5 August 1858, in an attempt by Napoleon III to reassure Britain that his military preparations were directed elsewhere. On her return Victoria wrote to Derby reprimanding him for the poor state of the Royal Navy in comparison to the French Navy.[106] Derby's ministry did not last long, and in June 1859 Victoria recalled Palmerston to office.[107]
Eleven days after Orsini's assassination attempt in France, Victoria's eldest daughter married Prince Frederick William of Prussia in London. They had been betrothed since September 1855, when Princess Victoria was 14 years old; the marriage was delayed by the Queen and her husband Albert until the bride was 17.[108] The Queen and Albert hoped that their daughter and son-in-law would be a liberalising influence in the enlarging Prussian state.[109] The Queen felt "sick at heart" to see her daughter leave England for Germany; "It really makes me shudder", she wrote to Princess Victoria in one of her frequent letters, "when I look round to all your sweet, happy, unconscious sisters, and think I must give them up too – one by one."[110] Almost exactly a year later, the Princess gave birth to the Queen's first grandchild, Wilhelm, who would become the last German emperor.[67]
Widowhood and isolation
[edit]
In March 1861, Victoria's mother died, with Victoria at her side. Through reading her mother's papers, Victoria discovered that her mother had loved her deeply;[111] she was heart-broken, and blamed Conroy and Lehzen for "wickedly" estranging her from her mother.[112] To relieve his wife during her intense and deep grief,[113] Albert took on most of her duties, despite being ill himself with chronic stomach trouble.[114] In August, Victoria and Albert visited their son, Albert Edward, Prince of Wales, who was attending army manoeuvres near Dublin, and spent a few days holidaying in Killarney. In November, Albert was made aware of gossip that his son had slept with the actress Nellie Clifden in Ireland.[115] Appalled, he travelled to Cambridge, where his son was studying, to confront him.[116]
By the beginning of December, Albert was very unwell.[117] He was diagnosed with typhoid fever by William Jenner, and died on 14 December 1861. Victoria was devastated.[118] She blamed her husband's death on worry over the Prince of Wales's philandering. He had been "killed by that dreadful business", she said.[119] She entered a state of mourning and wore black for the remainder of her life. She avoided public appearances and rarely set foot in London in the following years.[120] Her seclusion earned her the nickname "widow of Windsor".[121] Her weight increased through comfort eating, which reinforced her aversion to public appearances.[122]
Victoria's self-imposed isolation from the public diminished the popularity of the monarchy, and encouraged the growth of the republican movement.[123] She did undertake her official government duties, yet chose to remain secluded in her royal residences—Windsor Castle, Osborne House, and the private estate in Scotland that she and Albert had acquired in 1847, Balmoral Castle. In March 1864, a protester stuck a notice on the railings of Buckingham Palace that announced "these commanding premises to be let or sold in consequence of the late occupant's declining business".[124] Her uncle Leopold wrote to her advising her to appear in public. She agreed to visit the gardens of the Royal Horticultural Society at Kensington and take a drive through London in an open carriage.[125]

Through the 1860s, Victoria relied increasingly on a manservant from Scotland, John Brown.[126] Rumours of a romantic connection and even a secret marriage appeared in print, and some referred to the Queen as "Mrs. Brown".[127] The story of their relationship was the subject of the 1997 movie Mrs. Brown. A painting by Sir Edwin Henry Landseer depicting the Queen with Brown was exhibited at the Royal Academy, and Victoria published a book, Leaves from the Journal of Our Life in the Highlands, which featured Brown prominently and in which the Queen praised him highly.[128]
Palmerston died in 1865, and after a brief ministry led by Russell, Derby returned to power. In 1866, Victoria attended the State Opening of Parliament for the first time since Albert's death.[129] The following year she supported the passing of the Reform Act 1867 which doubled the electorate by extending the franchise to many urban working men,[130] though she was not in favour of votes for women.[131] Derby resigned in 1868, to be replaced by Benjamin Disraeli, who charmed Victoria. "Everyone likes flattery," he said, "and when you come to royalty you should lay it on with a trowel."[132] With the phrase "we authors, Ma'am", he complimented her.[133] Disraeli's ministry only lasted a matter of months, and at the end of the year his Liberal rival, William Ewart Gladstone, was appointed prime minister. Victoria found Gladstone's demeanour far less appealing; he spoke to her, she is thought to have complained, as though she were "a public meeting rather than a woman".[134]
In 1870 republican sentiment in Britain, fed by the Queen's seclusion, was boosted after the establishment of the Third French Republic.[135] A republican rally in Trafalgar Square demanded Victoria's removal, and Radical MPs spoke against her.[136] In August and September 1871, she was seriously ill with an abscess in her arm, which Joseph Lister successfully lanced and treated with his new antiseptic carbolic acid spray.[137] In late November 1871, at the height of the republican movement, the Prince of Wales contracted typhoid fever, the disease that was believed to have killed his father, and Victoria was fearful her son would die.[138] As the tenth anniversary of her husband's death approached, her son's condition grew no better, and Victoria's distress continued.[139] To general rejoicing, he recovered.[140] Mother and son attended a public parade through London and a grand service of thanksgiving in St Paul's Cathedral on 27 February 1872, and republican feeling subsided.[141]
On the last day of February 1872, two days after the thanksgiving service, 17-year-old Arthur O'Connor, a great-nephew of Irish MP Feargus O'Connor, waved an unloaded pistol at Victoria's open carriage just after she had arrived at Buckingham Palace. Brown, who was attending the Queen, grabbed him; O'Connor was later sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment[142] and a birching.[143] As a result of the incident, Victoria's popularity recovered further.[144]
Empress of India
[edit]After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British East India Company, which had ruled much of India, was dissolved, and Britain's possessions and protectorates on the Indian subcontinent were formally incorporated into the British Empire. The Queen had a relatively balanced view of the conflict, and condemned atrocities on both sides.[145] She wrote of "her feelings of horror and regret at the result of this bloody civil war",[146] and insisted, urged on by Albert, that an official proclamation announcing the transfer of power from the company to the state "should breathe feelings of generosity, benevolence and religious toleration".[147] At her behest, a reference threatening the "undermining of native religions and customs" was replaced by a passage guaranteeing religious freedom.[147]

In the 1874 general election, Disraeli was returned to power. He passed the Public Worship Regulation Act 1874, which removed Catholic rituals from the Anglican liturgy and which Victoria strongly supported.[149] She preferred short, simple services, and personally considered herself more aligned with the presbyterian Church of Scotland than the episcopal Church of England.[150] Disraeli also pushed the Royal Titles Act 1876 through Parliament, so that Victoria took the title "Empress of India" from 1 May 1876.[151] The new title was proclaimed at the Delhi Durbar of 1 January 1877.[152]
On 14 December 1878, the anniversary of Albert's death, Victoria's second daughter Alice, who had married Louis of Hesse, died of diphtheria in Darmstadt. Victoria noted the coincidence of the dates as "almost incredible and most mysterious".[153] In May 1879, she became a great-grandmother (on the birth of Princess Feodora of Saxe-Meiningen) and passed her "poor old 60th birthday". She felt "aged" by "the loss of my beloved child".[154]
Between April 1877 and February 1878, she threatened five times to abdicate while pressuring Disraeli to act against Russia during the Russo-Turkish War, but her threats had no impact on the events or their conclusion with the Congress of Berlin.[155] Disraeli's expansionist foreign policy, which Victoria endorsed, led to conflicts such as the Anglo-Zulu War and the Second Anglo-Afghan War. "If we are to maintain our position as a first-rate Power", she wrote, "we must ... be Prepared for attacks and wars, somewhere or other, CONTINUALLY."[156] Victoria saw the expansion of the British Empire as civilising and benign, protecting native peoples from more aggressive powers or cruel rulers: "It is not in our custom to annexe countries", she said, "unless we are obliged & forced to do so."[157] To Victoria's dismay, Disraeli lost the 1880 general election, and Gladstone returned as prime minister.[158] When Disraeli died the following year, she was blinded by "fast falling tears",[159] and erected a memorial tablet "placed by his grateful Sovereign and Friend, Victoria R.I."[160]

On 2 March 1882, Roderick Maclean, a disgruntled poet apparently offended by Victoria's refusal to accept one of his poems,[161] shot at the Queen as her carriage left Windsor railway station. Gordon Chesney Wilson and another schoolboy from Eton College struck him with their umbrellas, until he was hustled away by a policeman.[162] Victoria was outraged when he was found not guilty by reason of insanity,[163] but was so pleased by the many expressions of loyalty after the attack that she said it was "worth being shot at—to see how much one is loved".[164]
On 17 March 1883, Victoria fell down some stairs at Windsor, which left her lame until July; she never fully recovered and was plagued with rheumatism thereafter.[165] John Brown died 10 days after her accident, and to the consternation of her private secretary, Sir Henry Ponsonby, Victoria began work on a eulogistic biography of Brown.[166] Ponsonby and Randall Davidson, Dean of Windsor, who had both seen early drafts, advised Victoria against publication, on the grounds that it would stoke the rumours of a love affair.[167] The manuscript was destroyed.[168] In early 1884, Victoria did publish More Leaves from a Journal of a Life in the Highlands, a sequel to her earlier book, which she dedicated to her "devoted personal attendant and faithful friend John Brown".[169] On the day after the first anniversary of Brown's death, Victoria was informed by telegram that her youngest son, Leopold, had died in Cannes. He was "the dearest of my dear sons", she lamented.[170] The following month, Victoria's youngest child, Beatrice, met and fell in love with Prince Henry of Battenberg at the wedding of Victoria's granddaughter Princess Victoria of Hesse and by Rhine to Henry's brother Prince Louis of Battenberg. Beatrice and Henry planned to marry, but Victoria opposed the match at first, wishing to keep Beatrice at home to act as her companion. After a year, she was won around to the marriage by their promise to remain living with and attending her.[171]

Victoria was pleased when Gladstone resigned in 1885 after his budget was defeated.[172] She thought his government was "the worst I have ever had", and blamed him for the death of General Gordon during the Siege of Khartoum.[173] Gladstone was replaced by Lord Salisbury. Salisbury's government only lasted a few months, however, and Victoria was forced to recall Gladstone, whom she referred to as a "half crazy & really in many ways ridiculous old man".[174] Gladstone attempted to pass a bill granting Ireland home rule, but to Victoria's glee it was defeated.[175] In the ensuing election, Gladstone's party lost to Salisbury's and the government switched hands again.[176]
Golden and Diamond Jubilees
[edit]
In 1887, the British Empire celebrated Victoria's Golden Jubilee. She marked the fiftieth anniversary of her accession on 20 June with a banquet to which 50 kings and princes were invited. The following day, she participated in a procession and attended a thanksgiving service in Westminster Abbey.[177] By this time, Victoria was once again extremely popular.[178] Two days later on 23 June,[179] she engaged two Indian Muslims as waiters, one of whom was Abdul Karim. He was soon promoted to "Munshi": teaching her Urdu and acting as a clerk.[180][181][182] Her family and retainers were appalled, and accused Abdul Karim of spying for the Muslim Patriotic League, and biasing the Queen against the Hindus.[183] Equerry Frederick Ponsonby (the son of Sir Henry) discovered that the Munshi had lied about his parentage, and reported to Lord Elgin, Viceroy of India, "the Munshi occupies very much the same position as John Brown used to do."[184] Victoria dismissed their complaints as racial prejudice.[185] Abdul Karim remained in her service until he returned to India with a pension, on her death.[186]
Victoria's eldest daughter became empress consort of Germany in 1888, but she was widowed a little over three months later, and Victoria's eldest grandchild became German Emperor as Wilhelm II. Victoria and Albert's hopes of a liberal Germany would go unfulfilled, as Wilhelm was a firm believer in autocracy. Victoria thought he had "little heart or Zartgefühl [tact] – and ... his conscience & intelligence have been completely wharped [sic]".[187]
Gladstone returned to power after the 1892 general election; he was 82 years old. Victoria objected when Gladstone proposed appointing the Radical MP Henry Labouchère to the Cabinet, so Gladstone agreed not to appoint him.[188] In 1894, Gladstone retired and, without consulting the outgoing prime minister, Victoria appointed Lord Rosebery as prime minister.[189] His government was weak, and the following year Lord Salisbury replaced him. Salisbury remained prime minister for the remainder of Victoria's reign.[190]

On 23 September 1896, Victoria surpassed her grandfather George III as the longest-reigning monarch in British history. The Queen requested that any special celebrations be delayed until 1897, to coincide with her Diamond Jubilee,[191] which was made a festival of the British Empire at the suggestion of the Colonial Secretary, Joseph Chamberlain.[192] The prime ministers of all the self-governing Dominions were invited to London for the festivities.[193] One reason for including the prime ministers of the Dominions and excluding foreign heads of state was to avoid having to invite Victoria's grandson Wilhelm II, who, it was feared, might cause trouble at the event.[194]
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee procession on 22 June 1897 followed a route six miles long through London and included troops from all over the empire. The procession paused for an open-air service of thanksgiving held outside St Paul's Cathedral, throughout which Victoria sat in her open carriage, to avoid her having to climb the steps to enter the building. The celebration was marked by vast crowds of spectators and great outpourings of affection for the 78-year-old Queen.[195]
Declining health and death
[edit]Victoria regularly holidayed in mainland Europe. In 1889, during a stay in Biarritz, she became the first reigning monarch from Britain to visit Spain by briefly crossing the border.[196] By April 1900, the Boer War was so unpopular in mainland Europe that her annual trip to France seemed inadvisable. Instead, the Queen went to Ireland for the first time since 1861, in part to acknowledge the contribution of Irish regiments to the South African war.[197]

In July 1900, Victoria's second son, Alfred ("Affie"), died. "Oh, God! My poor darling Affie gone too", she wrote in her journal. "It is a horrible year, nothing but sadness & horrors of one kind & another."[198]
Following a custom she maintained throughout her widowhood, Victoria spent the Christmas of 1900 at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight. Rheumatism in her legs had rendered her disabled, and her eyesight was clouded by cataracts.[199] Through early January, she felt "weak and unwell",[200] and by mid-January she was "drowsy [...] dazed, [and] confused".[201] Her favourite pet Pomeranian, Turi, was laid on her bed as a last request.[202] She died aged 81 on 22 January 1901 at 6:30 pm, in the presence of her eldest son, Albert Edward, and grandson Wilhelm II. Albert Edward immediately succeeded as Edward VII.[203]
In 1897, Victoria had written instructions for her funeral, which was to be military as befitting a soldier's daughter and the head of the army,[67] and white instead of black.[204] On 25 January, Edward VII and Wilhelm II, together with Prince Arthur, helped lift her body into the coffin.[205] She was dressed in a white dress and her wedding veil.[206] An array of mementos commemorating her extended family, friends and servants were laid in the coffin with her, at her request, by her physician and dressers. One of Albert's dressing gowns was placed by her side, with a plaster cast of his hand, while a lock of John Brown's hair, along with a picture of him, was placed in her left hand concealed from the view of the family by a carefully positioned bunch of flowers.[67][207] Items of jewellery placed on Victoria included the wedding ring of Brown's mother, which Brown gave Victoria in 1883.[67] Her funeral was held on Saturday 2 February, in St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, and after two days of lying-in-state, she was interred beside Prince Albert in the Royal Mausoleum, Frogmore, at Windsor Great Park.[208]
With a reign of 63 years, seven months, and two days, Victoria was the longest-reigning British monarch and the longest-reigning queen regnant in world history, until her great-great-granddaughter Elizabeth II surpassed her on 9 September 2015.[209] She was the last monarch of Britain from the House of Hanover; her son Edward VII belonged to her husband's House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.[210]
Legacy
[edit]Reputation
[edit]According to one of her biographers, Giles St Aubyn, Victoria wrote an average of 2,500 words a day during her adult life.[214] From July 1832 until just before her death, she kept a detailed journal, which eventually encompassed 122 volumes.[215] After Victoria's death, her youngest daughter, Princess Beatrice, was appointed her literary executor. Beatrice transcribed and edited the diaries covering Victoria's accession onwards, and burned the originals in the process.[216] Despite this destruction, much of the diaries still exist. In addition to Beatrice's edited copy, Lord Esher transcribed the volumes from 1832 to 1861 before Beatrice destroyed them.[217] Part of Victoria's extensive correspondence has been published in volumes edited by A. C. Benson, Hector Bolitho, George Earle Buckle, Lord Esher, Roger Fulford, and Richard Hough among others.[218]
In her later years, Victoria was stout, dowdy, and about five feet (1.5 metres) tall, but she projected a grand image.[219] She was unpopular during the first years of her widowhood, but was well liked during the 1880s and 1890s, when she embodied the empire as a benevolent matriarchal figure.[220] Only after the release of her diary and letters did the extent of her political influence become known to the wider public.[67][221] Biographies of Victoria written before much of the primary material became available, such as Lytton Strachey's Queen Victoria of 1921, are now considered out of date.[222] The biographies written by Elizabeth Longford and Cecil Woodham-Smith, in 1964 and 1972 respectively, are still widely admired.[223] They, and others, conclude that as a person Victoria was emotional, obstinate, honest, and straight-talking.[224]
Through Victoria's reign, the gradual establishment of a modern constitutional monarchy in Britain continued. Reforms of the voting system increased the power of the House of Commons at the expense of the House of Lords and the monarch.[225] In 1867, Walter Bagehot wrote that the monarch only retained "the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, and the right to warn".[226] As Victoria's monarchy became more symbolic than political, it placed a strong emphasis on morality and family values, in contrast to the sexual, financial and personal scandals that had been associated with previous members of the House of Hanover and which had discredited the monarchy. The concept of the "family monarchy", with which the burgeoning middle classes could identify, was solidified.[227]
Descendants and haemophilia
[edit]
Victoria's links with Europe's royal families earned her the nickname "the grandmother of Europe".[228] Of the grandchildren of Victoria and Albert, 34 survived to adulthood.[67]
Victoria's youngest son, Leopold, was affected by the blood-clotting disease haemophilia B and at least two of her five daughters, Alice and Beatrice, were carriers. Royal haemophiliacs descended from Victoria included her great-grandsons, Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia; Alfonso, Prince of Asturias; and Infante Gonzalo of Spain.[229] The presence of the disease in Victoria's descendants, but not in her ancestors, led to modern speculation that her true father was not the Duke of Kent, but a haemophiliac.[230] There is no documentary evidence of a haemophiliac in connection with Victoria's mother, and as male carriers always had the disease, even if such a man had existed he would have been seriously ill.[231] It is more likely that the mutation arose spontaneously because Victoria's father was over 50 at the time of her conception and haemophilia arises more frequently in the children of older fathers.[232] Spontaneous mutations account for about a third of cases.[233]
Titles, styles, honours, and arms
[edit]Titles and styles
[edit]At the end of her reign, the Queen's full style was: "Her Majesty Victoria, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Queen, Defender of the Faith, Empress of India".[234]
Honours
[edit]British honours
[edit]- Royal Family Order of George IV, 1826[235]
- Founder of the Victoria Cross 5 February 1856[236]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Order of the Star of India, 25 June 1861[237]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Royal Order of Victoria and Albert, 10 February 1862[238]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Order of the Crown of India, 1 January 1878[239]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Order of the Indian Empire, 1 January 1878[240]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Royal Red Cross, 27 April 1883[241]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Distinguished Service Order, 6 November 1886[242]
- Albert Medal of the Royal Society of Arts, 1887[243]
- Founder and Sovereign of the Royal Victorian Order, 23 April 1896[244]
Foreign honours
[edit]- Spain:
- Dame of the Order of Queen Maria Luisa, 21 December 1833[245]
- Grand Cross of the Order of Charles III[246]
- Portugal:
- Dame of the Order of Queen Saint Isabel, 23 February 1836[247]
- Grand Cross of the Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa[246]
- Russia: Grand Cross of St. Catherine, 26 June 1837[248]
- France: Grand Cross of the Legion of Honour, 5 September 1843[249]
- Mexico/Mexican Empire:
- Grand Cross of the National Order of Guadalupe, 1854[250]
- Grand Cross of the Imperial Order of San Carlos, 1866[251]
- Prussia: Dame of the Order of Louise, 1st Division, 11 June 1857[252]
- Brazil: Grand Cross of the Order of Pedro I, 3 December 1872[253]
- Persia:[254]
- Order of the Sun, 1st Class in Diamonds, 20 June 1873
- Order of the August Portrait, 20 June 1873
- Siam:
- Grand Cross of the White Elephant, 1880[255]
- Dame of the Order of the Royal House of Chakri, 1887[256]
- Hawaii: Grand Cross of the Order of Kamehameha I, with Collar, July 1881[257]
- Serbia:[258][259]
- Hesse and by Rhine: Dame of the Golden Lion, 25 April 1885[260]
- Bulgaria: Order of the Bulgarian Red Cross, August 1887[261]
- Ethiopia: Grand Cross of the Seal of Solomon, 22 June 1897 – Diamond Jubilee gift[262]
- Montenegro: Grand Cross of the Order of Prince Danilo I, 1897[263]
- Saxe-Coburg and Gotha: Silver Wedding Medal of Duke Alfred and Duchess Marie, 23 January 1899[264]
Arms
[edit]As Sovereign, Victoria used the royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom. As she could not succeed to the throne of Hanover, her arms did not carry the Hanoverian symbols that were used by her immediate predecessors. Her arms have been borne by all of her successors on the throne.[265]
Family
[edit]
Left to right: Prince Alfred and the Prince of Wales; the Queen and Prince Albert; Princesses Alice, Helena and Victoria
Issue
[edit]| Name | Birth | Death | Spouse and children[234][266] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria, Princess Royal |
1840 21 Nov |
1901 5 August |
Married 1858, Frederick, later German Emperor and King of Prussia (1831–1888); 4 sons (including Wilhelm II, German Emperor), 4 daughters (including Queen Sophia of Greece) |
| Edward VII | 1841 9 Nov |
1910 6 May |
Married 1863, Princess Alexandra of Denmark (1844–1925); 3 sons (including King George V of the United Kingdom), 3 daughters (including Queen Maud of Norway) |
| Princess Alice | 1843 25 April |
1878 14 Dec |
Married 1862, Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse and by Rhine (1837–1892); 2 sons, 5 daughters (including Empress Alexandra Feodorovna of Russia) |
| Alfred, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha |
1844 6 August |
1900 31 July |
Married 1874, Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia (1853–1920); 2 sons (1 stillborn), 4 daughters (including Queen Marie of Romania) |
| Princess Helena | 1846 25 May |
1923 9 June |
Married 1866, Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein (1831–1917); 4 sons (1 stillborn), 2 daughters |
| Princess Louise | 1848 18 March |
1939 3 Dec |
Married 1871, John Campbell, Marquess of Lorne, later 9th Duke of Argyll (1845–1914); no issue |
| Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn |
1850 1 May |
1942 16 Jan |
Married 1879, Princess Louise Margaret of Prussia (1860–1917); 1 son, 2 daughters (including Crown Princess Margaret of Sweden) |
| Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany |
1853 7 April |
1884 28 March |
Married 1882, Princess Helena of Waldeck and Pyrmont (1861–1922); 1 son, 1 daughter |
| Princess Beatrice | 1857 14 April |
1944 26 Oct |
Married 1885, Prince Henry of Battenberg (1858–1896); 3 sons, 1 daughter (Queen Victoria Eugenie of Spain) |
Ancestry
[edit]| Ancestors of Queen Victoria[265] |
|---|
Family tree
[edit]- Red borders indicate British monarchs
- Bold borders indicate children of British monarchs
| Family of Queen Victoria, spanning the reigns of her grandfather, George III, to her grandson, George V | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
[edit]- ^ As monarch, Victoria was Supreme Governor of the Church of England. She was also aligned with the Church of Scotland.
- ^ Her godparents were Tsar Alexander I of Russia (represented by her uncle Frederick, Duke of York), her uncle George, Prince Regent, her aunt Queen Charlotte of Württemberg (represented by Victoria's aunt Princess Augusta) and Victoria's maternal grandmother the Dowager Duchess of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (represented by Victoria's aunt Princess Mary, Duchess of Gloucester and Edinburgh).
- ^ Under section 2 of the Regency Act 1830, the Accession Council's proclamation declared Victoria as the King's successor "saving the rights of any issue of His late Majesty King William the Fourth which may be borne of his late Majesty's Consort". "No. 19509", The London Gazette, 20 June 1837, p. 1581
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link)
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ Hibbert, pp. 3–12; Strachey, pp. 1–17; Woodham-Smith, pp. 15–29
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 12–13; Longford, p. 23; Woodham-Smith, pp. 34–35
- ^ Longford, p. 24
- ^ Worsley, p. 41.
- ^ Hibbert, p. 31; St Aubyn, p. 26; Woodham-Smith, p. 81
- ^ Hibbert, p. 46; Longford, p. 54; St Aubyn, p. 50; Waller, p. 344; Woodham-Smith, p. 126
- ^ Hibbert, p. 19; Marshall, p. 25
- ^ Hibbert, p. 27; Longford, pp. 35–38, 118–119; St Aubyn, pp. 21–22; Woodham-Smith, pp. 70–72. The rumours were false in the opinion of these biographers.
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 27–28; Waller, pp. 341–342; Woodham-Smith, pp. 63–65
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 32–33; Longford, pp. 38–39, 55; Marshall, p. 19
- ^ Waller, pp. 338–341; Woodham-Smith, pp. 68–69, 91
- ^ Hibbert, p. 18; Longford, p. 31; Woodham-Smith, pp. 74–75
- ^ Longford, p. 31; Woodham-Smith, p. 75
- ^ Jamieson, Alastair (8 June 2015), "Children's Book Written by Queen Victoria Published After 185 Years", NBC News
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ Hibbert, pp. 34–35
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 35–39; Woodham-Smith, pp. 88–89, 102
- ^ Hibbert, p. 36; Woodham-Smith, pp. 89–90
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 35–40; Woodham-Smith, pp. 92, 102
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 38–39; Longford, p. 47; Woodham-Smith, pp. 101–102
- ^ Hibbert, p. 42; Woodham-Smith, p. 105
- ^ Hibbert, p. 42; Longford, pp. 47–48; Marshall, p. 21
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 42, 50; Woodham-Smith, p. 135
- ^ Marshall, p. 46; St Aubyn, p. 67; Waller, p. 353
- ^ Longford, pp. 29, 51; Waller, p. 363; Weintraub, pp. 43–49
- ^ Longford, p. 51; Weintraub, pp. 43–49
- ^ Longford, pp. 51–52; St Aubyn, p. 43; Weintraub, pp. 43–49; Woodham-Smith, p. 117
- ^ Weintraub, pp. 43–49
- ^ Victoria quoted in Marshall, p. 27 and Weintraub, p. 49
- ^ Victoria quoted in Hibbert, p. 99; St Aubyn, p. 43; Weintraub, p. 49 and Woodham-Smith, p. 119
- ^ Victoria's journal, October 1835, quoted in St Aubyn, p. 36 and Woodham-Smith, p. 104
- ^ Hibbert, p. 102; Marshall, p. 60; Waller, p. 363; Weintraub, p. 51; Woodham-Smith, p. 122
- ^ Waller, pp. 363–364; Weintraub, pp. 53, 58, 64, and 65
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 55–57; Woodham-Smith, p. 138
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 140
- ^ Packard, pp. 14–15
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 66–69; St Aubyn, p. 76; Woodham-Smith, pp. 143–147
- ^ Greville quoted in Hibbert, p. 67; Longford, p. 70 and Woodham-Smith, pp. 143–144
- ^ Queen Victoria's Coronation 1838, The British Monarchy, archived from the original on 3 February 2016, retrieved 28 January 2016
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 69; Waller, p. 353
- ^ Hibbert, p. 58; Longford, pp. 73–74; Woodham-Smith, p. 152
- ^ Marshall, p. 42; St Aubyn, pp. 63, 96
- ^ Marshall, p. 47; Waller, p. 356; Woodham-Smith, pp. 164–166
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 77–78; Longford, p. 97; St Aubyn, p. 97; Waller, p. 357; Woodham-Smith, p. 164
- ^ Victoria's journal, 25 April 1838, quoted in Woodham-Smith, p. 162
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 96; Woodham-Smith, pp. 162, 165
- ^ Hibbert, p. 79; Longford, p. 98; St Aubyn, p. 99; Woodham-Smith, p. 167
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 80–81; Longford, pp. 102–103; St Aubyn, pp. 101–102
- ^ Longford, p. 122; Marshall, p. 57; St Aubyn, p. 104; Woodham-Smith, p. 180
- ^ Hibbert, p. 83; Longford, pp. 120–121; Marshall, p. 57; St Aubyn, p. 105; Waller, p. 358
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 107; Woodham-Smith, p. 169
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 94–96; Marshall, pp. 53–57; St Aubyn, pp. 109–112; Waller, pp. 359–361; Woodham-Smith, pp. 170–174
- ^ Longford, p. 84; Marshall, p. 52
- ^ Longford, p. 72; Waller, p. 353
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 175
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 103–104; Marshall, pp. 60–66; Weintraub, p. 62
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 107–110; St Aubyn, pp. 129–132; Weintraub, pp. 77–81; Woodham-Smith, pp. 182–184, 187
- ^ Hibbert, p. 123; Longford, p. 143; Woodham-Smith, p. 205
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 151
- ^ Hibbert, p. 265, Woodham-Smith, p. 256
- ^ Marshall, p. 152; St Aubyn, pp. 174–175; Woodham-Smith, p. 412
- ^ Charles, p. 23
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 421–422; St Aubyn, pp. 160–161
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 213
- ^ Hibbert, p. 130; Longford, p. 154; Marshall, p. 122; St Aubyn, p. 159; Woodham-Smith, p. 220
- ^ Hibbert, p. 149; St Aubyn, p. 169
- ^ Hibbert, p. 149; Longford, p. 154; Marshall, p. 123; Waller, p. 377
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Matthew, H. C. G.; Reynolds, K. D. (October 2009) [2004], "Victoria (1819–1901)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.), Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/36652
{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.) - ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 100
- ^ Longford, p. 56; St Aubyn, p. 29
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 150–156; Marshall, p. 87; St Aubyn, pp. 171–173; Woodham-Smith, pp. 230–232
- ^ Charles, p. 51; Hibbert, pp. 422–423; St Aubyn, pp. 162–163
- ^ a b Hibbert, p. 423; St Aubyn, p. 163
- ^ Longford, p. 192
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 164
- ^ Marshall, pp. 95–101; St Aubyn, pp. 153–155; Woodham-Smith, pp. 221–222
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 281
- ^ Longford, p. 359
- ^ The title of Maud Gonne's 1900 article upon Queen Victoria's visit to Ireland
- ^ Harrison, Shane (15 April 2003), Famine Queen row in Irish port, BBC News, archived from the original on 19 September 2019, retrieved 29 March 2013
- ^ Officer, Lawrence H.; Williamson, Samuel H. (2024), Five Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a UK Pound Amount, 1270 to Present, MeasuringWorth, retrieved 8 June 2024
- ^ Kinealy, Christine, Private Responses to the Famine, University College Cork, archived from the original on 6 April 2013, retrieved 29 March 2013
- ^ Longford, p. 181
- ^ Kenny, Mary (2009), Crown and Shamrock: Love and Hate Between Ireland and the British Monarchy, Dublin: New Island, ISBN 978-1-905494-98-9
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 215
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 238
- ^ Longford, pp. 175, 187; St Aubyn, pp. 238, 241; Woodham-Smith, pp. 242, 250
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 248
- ^ Hibbert, p. 198; Longford, p. 194; St Aubyn, p. 243; Woodham-Smith, pp. 282–284
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 201–202; Marshall, p. 139; St Aubyn, pp. 222–223; Woodham-Smith, pp. 287–290
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 161–164; Marshall, p. 129; St Aubyn, pp. 186–190; Woodham-Smith, pp. 274–276
- ^ Longford, pp. 196–197; St Aubyn, p. 223; Woodham-Smith, pp. 287–290
- ^ Longford, p. 191; Woodham-Smith, p. 297
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 216
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 196–198; St Aubyn, p. 244; Woodham-Smith, pp. 298–307
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 204–209; Marshall, pp. 108–109; St Aubyn, pp. 244–254; Woodham-Smith, pp. 298–307
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 255, 298
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 216–217; St Aubyn, pp. 257–258
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 217–220; Woodham-Smith, pp. 328–331
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 227–228; Longford, pp. 245–246; St Aubyn, p. 297; Woodham-Smith, pp. 354–355
- ^ Woodham-Smith, pp. 357–360
- ^ Queen Victoria, "Saturday, 18th August 1855", Queen Victoria's Journals, vol. 40, p. 93, archived from the original on 25 November 2021, retrieved 2 June 2012 – via The Royal Archives
- ^ 1855 visit of Queen Victoria, Château de Versailles, archived from the original on 11 January 2013, retrieved 29 March 2013
- ^ Queen Victoria in Paris, Royal Collection Trust, archived from the original on 29 August 2022, retrieved 29 August 2022
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 241–242; Longford, pp. 280–281; St Aubyn, p. 304; Woodham-Smith, p. 391
- ^ Hibbert, p. 242; Longford, p. 281; Marshall, p. 117
- ^ Napoleon III Receiving Queen Victoria at Cherbourg, 5 August 1858, Royal Museums Greenwich, archived from the original on 3 April 2012, retrieved 29 March 2013
- ^ Hibbert, p. 255; Marshall, p. 117
- ^ Longford, pp. 259–260; Weintraub, pp. 326 ff.
- ^ Longford, p. 263; Weintraub, pp. 326, 330
- ^ Hibbert, p. 244
- ^ Hibbert, p. 267; Longford, pp. 118, 290; St Aubyn, p. 319; Woodham-Smith, p. 412
- ^ Hibbert, p. 267; Marshall, p. 152; Woodham-Smith, p. 412
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 265–267; St Aubyn, p. 318; Woodham-Smith, pp. 412–413
- ^ Waller, p. 393; Weintraub, p. 401
- ^ Hibbert, p. 274; Longford, p. 293; St Aubyn, p. 324; Woodham-Smith, p. 417
- ^ Longford, p. 293; Marshall, p. 153; Strachey, p. 214
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 276–279; St Aubyn, p. 325; Woodham-Smith, pp. 422–423
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 280–292; Marshall, p. 154
- ^ Hibbert, p. 299; St Aubyn, p. 346
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 343
- ^ e.g. Strachey, p. 306
- ^ Ridley, Jane (27 May 2017), "Queen Victoria – burdened by grief and six-course dinners", The Spectator, archived from the original on 28 August 2018, retrieved 28 August 2018
- ^ Marshall, pp. 170–172; St Aubyn, p. 385
- ^ Hibbert, p. 310; Longford, p. 321; St Aubyn, pp. 343–344; Waller, p. 404
- ^ Hibbert, p. 310; Longford, p. 322
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 323–324; Marshall, pp. 168–169; St Aubyn, pp. 356–362
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 321–322; Longford, pp. 327–328; Marshall, p. 170
- ^ Hibbert, p. 329; St Aubyn, pp. 361–362
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 311–312; Longford, p. 347; St Aubyn, p. 369
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 374–375
- ^ Marshall, p. 199; Strachey, p. 299
- ^ Hibbert, p. 318; Longford, p. 401; St Aubyn, p. 427; Strachey, p. 254
- ^ Buckle, George Earle; Monypenny, W. F. (1910–1920) The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield, vol. 5, p. 49, quoted in Strachey, p. 243
- ^ Hibbert, p. 320; Strachey, pp. 246–247
- ^ Longford, p. 381; St Aubyn, pp. 385–386; Strachey, p. 248
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 385–386; Strachey, pp. 248–250
- ^ Longford, p. 385
- ^ Hibbert, p. 343
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 343–344; Longford, p. 389; Marshall, p. 173
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 344–345
- ^ Hibbert, p. 345; Longford, pp. 390–391; Marshall, p. 176; St Aubyn, p. 388
- ^ Charles, p. 103; Hibbert, pp. 426–427; St Aubyn, pp. 388–389
- ^ Old Bailey Proceedings Online, Trial of Arthur O'Connor. (t18720408-352, 8 April 1872).
- ^ Hibbert, p. 427; Marshall, p. 176; St Aubyn, p. 389
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 249–250; Woodham-Smith, pp. 384–385
- ^ Woodham-Smith, p. 386
- ^ a b Hibbert, p. 251; Woodham-Smith, p. 386
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 335
- ^ Hibbert, p. 361; Longford, p. 402; Marshall, pp. 180–184; Waller, p. 423
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 295–296; Waller, p. 423
- ^ Hibbert, p. 361; Longford, pp. 405–406; Marshall, p. 184; St Aubyn, p. 434; Waller, p. 426
- ^ Waller, p. 427
- ^ Victoria's diary and letters quoted in Longford, p. 425
- ^ Victoria quoted in Longford, p. 426
- ^ Longford, pp. 412–413
- ^ Longford, p. 426
- ^ Longford, p. 411
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 367–368; Longford, p. 429; Marshall, p. 186; St Aubyn, pp. 442–444; Waller, pp. 428–429
- ^ Letter from Victoria to Montagu Corry, 1st Baron Rowton, quoted in Hibbert, p. 369
- ^ Longford, p. 437
- ^ Hibbert, p. 420; St Aubyn, p. 422
- ^ Hibbert, p. 420; St Aubyn, p. 421
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 420–421; St Aubyn, p. 422; Strachey, p. 278
- ^ Hibbert, p. 427; Longford, p. 446; St Aubyn, p. 421
- ^ Longford, pp. 451–452
- ^ Longford, p. 454; St Aubyn, p. 425; Hibbert, p. 443
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 443–444; St Aubyn, pp. 425–426
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 443–444; Longford, p. 455
- ^ Hibbert, p. 444; St Aubyn, p. 424; Waller, p. 413
- ^ Longford, p. 461
- ^ Longford, pp. 477–478
- ^ Hibbert, p. 373; St Aubyn, p. 458
- ^ Waller, p. 433; see also Hibbert, pp. 370–371 and Marshall, pp. 191–193
- ^ Hibbert, p. 373; Longford, p. 484
- ^ Hibbert, p. 374; Longford, p. 491; Marshall, p. 196; St Aubyn, pp. 460–461
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 460–461
- ^ Queen Victoria, Royal Household, archived from the original on 13 March 2021, retrieved 29 March 2013
- ^ Marshall, pp. 210–211; St Aubyn, pp. 491–493
- ^ Longford, p. 502
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 447–448; Longford, p. 508; St Aubyn, p. 502; Waller, p. 441
- ^ Queen Victoria's Urdu workbook on show, BBC News, 15 September 2017, archived from the original on 1 December 2017, retrieved 23 November 2017
- ^ Hunt, Kristin (20 September 2017), "Victoria and Abdul: The Friendship that Scandalized England", Smithsonian, archived from the original on 1 December 2017, retrieved 23 November 2017
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 448–449
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 449–451
- ^ Hibbert, p. 447; Longford, p. 539; St Aubyn, p. 503; Waller, p. 442
- ^ Hibbert, p. 454
- ^ Hibbert, p. 382
- ^ Hibbert, p. 375; Longford, p. 519
- ^ Hibbert, p. 376; Longford, p. 530; St Aubyn, p. 515
- ^ Hibbert, p. 377
- ^ Hibbert, p. 456
- ^ Longford, p. 546; St Aubyn, pp. 545–546
- ^ Marshall, pp. 206–207, 211; St Aubyn, pp. 546–548
- ^ MacMillan, Margaret (2013), The War That Ended Peace, Random House, p. 29, ISBN 978-0-8129-9470-4
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 457–458; Marshall, pp. 206–207, 211; St Aubyn, pp. 546–548
- ^ Hibbert, p. 436; St Aubyn, p. 508
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 437–438; Longford, pp. 554–555; St Aubyn, p. 555
- ^ Longford, p. 558
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 464–466, 488–489; Strachey, p. 308; Waller, p. 442
- ^ Victoria's journal, 1 January 1901, quoted in Hibbert, p. 492; Longford, p. 559 and St Aubyn, p. 592
- ^ Her personal physician Sir James Reid, 1st Baronet, quoted in Hibbert, p. 492
- ^ Rappaport, Helen (2003), "Animals", Queen Victoria: A Biographical Companion, Abc-Clio, pp. 34–39, ISBN 978-1-85109-355-7
- ^ Longford, pp. 561–562; St Aubyn, p. 598
- ^ Hibbert, p. 497; Longford, p. 563
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 598
- ^ Longford, p. 563
- ^ Hibbert, p. 498
- ^ Longford, p. 565; St Aubyn, p. 600
- ^ Gander, Kashmira (26 August 2015), "Queen Elizabeth II to become Britain's longest reigning monarch, surpassing Queen Victoria", The Daily Telegraph, London, archived from the original on 19 September 2015, retrieved 9 September 2015
- ^ Weir, Alison (1996), Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy (Revised ed.), London: Random House, p. 317, ISBN 978-0-7126-7448-5
- ^ Fulford, Roger (1967) "Victoria", Collier's Encyclopedia, United States: Crowell, Collier and Macmillan Inc., vol. 23, p. 127
- ^ Ashley, Mike (1998) British Monarchs, London: Robinson, ISBN 1-84119-096-9, p. 690
- ^ Example from a letter written by lady-in-waiting Marie Mallet née Adeane, quoted in Hibbert, p. 471
- ^ Hibbert, p. xv; St Aubyn, p. 340
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 30; Woodham-Smith, p. 87
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 503–504; St Aubyn, p. 30; Woodham-Smith, pp. 88, 436–437
- ^ Hibbert, p. 503
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 503–504; St Aubyn, p. 624
- ^ Hibbert, pp. 61–62; Longford, pp. 89, 253; St Aubyn, pp. 48, 63–64
- ^ Marshall, p. 210; Waller, pp. 419, 434–435, 443
- ^ Waller, p. 439
- ^ St Aubyn, p. 624
- ^ Hibbert, p. 504; St Aubyn, p. 623
- ^ e.g. Hibbert, p. 352; Strachey, p. 304; Woodham-Smith, p. 431
- ^ Waller, p. 429
- ^ Bagehot, Walter (1867), The English Constitution, London: Chapman and Hall, p. 103
- ^ St Aubyn, pp. 602–603; Strachey, pp. 303–304; Waller, pp. 366, 372, 434
- ^ Erickson, Carolly (1997) Her Little Majesty: The Life of Queen Victoria, New York: Simon & Schuster, ISBN 0-7432-3657-2
- ^ Rogaev, Evgeny I.; Grigorenko, Anastasia P.; Faskhutdinova, Gulnaz; Kittler, Ellen L. W.; Moliaka, Yuri K. (2009), "Genotype Analysis Identifies the Cause of the "Royal Disease"", Science, 326 (5954): 817, Bibcode:2009Sci...326..817R, doi:10.1126/science.1180660, ISSN 0036-8075, PMID 19815722, S2CID 206522975
- ^ Potts and Potts, pp. 55–65, quoted in Hibbert p. 217; Packard, pp. 42–43
- ^ Jones, Steve (1996) In the Blood, BBC documentary
- ^ McKusick, Victor A. (1965), "The Royal Hemophilia", Scientific American, 213 (2): 91, Bibcode:1965SciAm.213b..88M, doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0865-88, PMID 14319025; Jones, Steve (1993), The Language of the Genes, London: HarperCollins, p. 69, ISBN 0-00-255020-2; Jones, Steve (1993), In The Blood: God, Genes and Destiny, London: HarperCollins, p. 270, ISBN 0-00-255511-5; Rushton, Alan R. (2008), Royal Maladies: Inherited Diseases in the Royal Houses of Europe, Victoria, British Columbia: Trafford, pp. 31–32, ISBN 978-1-4251-6810-0
- ^ Hemophilia B, National Hemophilia Foundation, 5 March 2014, archived from the original on 24 March 2015, retrieved 29 March 2015
- ^ a b Whitaker's Almanack (1900) Facsimile Reprint 1998, London: Stationery Office, ISBN 0-11-702247-0, p. 86
- ^ Risk, James; Pownall, Henry; Stanley, David; Tamplin, John; Martin, Stanley (2001), Royal Service, vol. 2, Lingfield: Third Millennium Publishing/Victorian Publishing, pp. 16–19
- ^ "No. 21846", The London Gazette, 5 February 1856, pp. 410–411
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ "No. 22523", The London Gazette, 25 June 1861, p. 2621
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ Whitaker, Joseph (1894), An Almanack for the Year of Our Lord ..., J. Whitaker, p. 112, archived from the original on 22 March 2023, retrieved 15 December 2019
- ^ "No. 24539", The London Gazette, 4 January 1878, p. 113
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ Shaw, William Arthur (1906), "Introduction", The Knights of England, vol. 1, London: Sherratt and Hughes, p. xxxi
- ^ "The Royal Red Cross Archived 28 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine". QARANC – Queen Alexandra's Royal Army Nursing Corps. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
- ^ "No. 25641", The London Gazette, 9 November 1886, pp. 5385–5386
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ The Albert Medal, Royal Society of Arts, London, UK, archived from the original on 8 June 2011, retrieved 12 December 2019
- ^ "No. 26733", The London Gazette, 24 April 1896, p. 2455
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ "Real orden de damas nobles de la Reina Maria Luisa", Calendario Manual y Guía de Forasteros en Madrid (in Spanish), Madrid: Imprenta Real, p. 91, 1834, archived from the original on 28 March 2021, retrieved 21 November 2019 – via hathitrust.org
- ^ a b Kimizuka, Naotaka (2004), 女王陛下のブルーリボン: ガーター勲章とイギリス外交 [Her Majesty The Queen's Blue Ribbon: The Order of the Garter and British Diplomacy] (in Japanese), Tokyo: NTT Publishing, p. 303, ISBN 978-4-7571-4073-8, archived from the original on 22 March 2023, retrieved 13 September 2020
- ^ Bragança, Jose Vicente de (2014), "Agraciamentos Portugueses Aos Príncipes da Casa Saxe-Coburgo-Gota" [Portuguese Honours awarded to Princes of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha], Pro Phalaris (in Portuguese), vol. 9–10, p. 6, archived from the original on 25 November 2021, retrieved 28 November 2019
- ^ Ордена Св. Екатерины [Knights of the Order of St. Catherine], Список кавалерам россійских императорских и царских орденов [List of Knights of the Russian Imperial and Tsarist Orders] (in Russian), Saint Petersburg: Printing house of the II branch of His Imperial Majesty's Chancellery, 1850, p. 15, archived from the original on 22 March 2023, retrieved 20 October 2019
- ^ Wattel, Michel; Wattel, Béatrice (2009), Les Grand'Croix de la Légion d'honneur de 1805 à nos jours. Titulaires français et étrangers (in French), Paris: Archives & Culture, pp. 21, 460, 564, ISBN 978-2-35077-135-9
- ^ "Seccion IV: Ordenes del Imperio", Almanaque imperial para el año 1866 (in Spanish), Mexico City: Imp. de J.M. Lara, 1866, p. 244, archived from the original on 22 March 2023, retrieved 13 September 2020
- ^ Olvera Ayes, David A. (2020), "La Orden Imperial de San Carlos", Cuadernos del Cronista Editores, México
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ Queen Victoria, "Thursday, 11th June 1857", Queen Victoria's Journals, vol. 43, p. 171, archived from the original on 25 November 2021, retrieved 2 June 2012 – via The Royal Archives
- ^ Queen Victoria, "Tuesday, 3rd December 1872", Queen Victoria's Journals, vol. 61, p. 333, archived from the original on 25 November 2021, retrieved 2 June 2012 – via The Royal Archives
- ^ Naser al-Din Shah Qajar (1874), "Chapter IV: England", The Diary of H.M. The Shah of Persia during his tour through Europe in A.D. 1873: A verbatim translation, translated by Redhouse, James William, London: John Murray, p. 149
- ^ "Court Circular", Court and Social, The Times, no. 29924, London, 3 July 1880, col G, p. 11
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link) - ^ ข่าวรับพระราชสาสน์ พระราชสาสน์จากกษัตริย์ในประเทศยุโรปที่ทรงยินดีในการได้รับพระราชสาสน์จากพระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว (PDF), Royal Thai Government Gazette (in Thai), 5 May 1887, archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2020, retrieved 8 May 2019
- ^ Kalakaua to his sister, 24 July 1881, quoted in Greer, Richard A. (editor, 1967) "The Royal Tourist – Kalakaua's Letters Home from Tokio to London Archived 19 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine", Hawaiian Journal of History, vol. 5, p. 100
- ^ Acović, Dragomir (2012), Slava i čast: Odlikovanja među Srbima, Srbi među odlikovanjima (in Serbian), Belgrade: Službeni Glasnik, p. 364
- ^ "Two Royal Families – Historical Ties", The Royal Family of Serbia, 13 March 2016, archived from the original on 6 December 2019, retrieved 6 December 2019
- ^ "Goldener Löwen-orden", Großherzoglich Hessische Ordensliste (in German), Darmstadt: Staatsverlag, 1885, p. 35, archived from the original on 6 September 2021, retrieved 6 September 2021 – via hathitrust.org
- ^ "Honorary Badge of the Red Cross", Bulgarian Royal Decorations, archived from the original on 15 December 2019, retrieved 15 December 2019
- ^ "The Imperial Orders and Decorations of Ethiopia", The Crown Council of Ethiopia, archived from the original on 26 December 2012, retrieved 21 November 2019
- ^ "The Order of Sovereign Prince Danilo I". orderofdanilo.org. Archived 9 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Silver Wedding medal of Duke Alfred of Saxe-Coburg & Grand Duchess Marie, Royal Collection, archived from the original on 12 December 2019, retrieved 12 December 2019
- ^ a b Louda, Jiří; Maclagan, Michael (1999), Lines of Succession: Heraldry of the Royal Families of Europe, London: Little, Brown, pp. 32, 34, ISBN 978-1-85605-469-0
- ^ Whitaker's Almanack (1993) Concise Edition, London: J. Whitaker and Sons, ISBN 0-85021-232-4, pp. 134–136
Bibliography
[edit]- Charles, Barrie (2012), Kill the Queen! The Eight Assassination Attempts on Queen Victoria, Stroud: Amberley Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4456-0457-2
- Hibbert, Christopher (2000), Queen Victoria: A Personal History, London: HarperCollins, ISBN 0-00-638843-4
- Longford, Elizabeth (1964), Victoria R.I., London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, ISBN 0-297-17001-5
{{citation}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Marshall, Dorothy (1972), The Life and Times of Queen Victoria (1992 reprint ed.), London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, ISBN 0-297-83166-6
- Packard, Jerrold M. (1998), Victoria's Daughters, New York: St. Martin's Press, ISBN 0-312-24496-7
- Potts, D. M.; Potts, W. T. W. (1995), Queen Victoria's Gene: Haemophilia and the Royal Family, Stroud: Alan Sutton, ISBN 0-7509-1199-9
- St. Aubyn, Giles (1991), Queen Victoria: A Portrait, London: Sinclair-Stevenson, ISBN 1-85619-086-2
- Strachey, Lytton (1921), Queen Victoria, London: Chatto and Windus
- Waller, Maureen (2006), Sovereign Ladies: The Six Reigning Queens of England, London: John Murray, ISBN 0-7195-6628-2
- Weintraub, Stanley (1997), Albert: Uncrowned King, London: John Murray, ISBN 0-7195-5756-9
- Woodham-Smith, Cecil (1972), Queen Victoria: Her Life and Times 1819–1861, London: Hamish Hamilton, ISBN 0-241-02200-2
- Worsley, Lucy (2018), Queen Victoria – Daughter, Wife, Mother, Widow, London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, ISBN 978-1-4736-5138-8
Primary sources
[edit]- Benson, A. C.; Esher, Viscount, eds. (1907), The Letters of Queen Victoria: A Selection of Her Majesty's Correspondence Between the Years 1837 and 1861, London: John Murray
- Bolitho, Hector, ed. (1938), Letters of Queen Victoria from the Archives of the House of Brandenburg-Prussia, London: Thornton Butterworth
- Buckle, George Earle, ed. (1926), The Letters of Queen Victoria, 2nd Series 1862–1885, London: John Murray
- Buckle, George Earle, ed. (1930), The Letters of Queen Victoria, 3rd Series 1886–1901, London: John Murray
- Connell, Brian (1962), Regina v. Palmerston: The Correspondence between Queen Victoria and her Foreign and Prime Minister, 1837–1865, London: Evans Brothers
- Duff, David, ed. (1968), Victoria in the Highlands: The Personal Journal of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, London: Muller
- Dyson, Hope; Tennyson, Charles, eds. (1969), Dear and Honoured Lady: The Correspondence between Queen Victoria and Alfred Tennyson, London: Macmillan
- Esher, Viscount, ed. (1912), The Girlhood of Queen Victoria: A Selection from Her Majesty's Diaries Between the Years 1832 and 1840, London: John Murray
- Fulford, Roger, ed. (1964), Dearest Child: Letters Between Queen Victoria and the Princess Royal, 1858–1861, London: Evans Brothers
- Fulford, Roger, ed. (1968), Dearest Mama: Letters Between Queen Victoria and the Crown Princess of Prussia, 1861–1864, London: Evans Brothers
- Fulford, Roger, ed. (1971), Beloved Mama: Private Correspondence of Queen Victoria and the German Crown Princess, 1878–1885, London: Evans Brothers
- Fulford, Roger, ed. (1971), Your Dear Letter: Private Correspondence of Queen Victoria and the Crown Princess of Prussia, 1863–1871, London: Evans Brothers
- Fulford, Roger, ed. (1976), Darling Child: Private Correspondence of Queen Victoria and the German Crown Princess of Prussia, 1871–1878, London: Evans Brothers
- Hibbert, Christopher, ed. (1984), Queen Victoria in Her Letters and Journals, London: John Murray, ISBN 0-7195-4107-7
- Hough, Richard, ed. (1975), Advice to a Grand-daughter: Letters from Queen Victoria to Princess Victoria of Hesse, London: Heinemann, ISBN 0-434-34861-9
- Jagow, Kurt, ed. (1938), Letters of the Prince Consort 1831–1861, London: John Murray
- Mortimer, Raymond, ed. (1961), Queen Victoria: Leaves from a Journal, New York: Farrar, Straus & Cudahy
- Ponsonby, Frederick, ed. (1930), Letters of the Empress Frederick, London: Macmillan
- Ramm, Agatha, ed. (1990), Beloved and Darling Child: Last Letters between Queen Victoria and Her Eldest Daughter, 1886–1901, Stroud: Sutton Publishing, ISBN 978-0-86299-880-6
- Victoria, Queen (1868), Leaves from the Journal of Our Life in the Highlands from 1848 to 1861, London: Smith, Elder
- Victoria, Queen (1884), More Leaves from the Journal of Our Life in the Highlands from 1862 to 1882, London: Smith, Elder
Further reading
[edit]- Arnstein, Walter L. (2003), Queen Victoria, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN 978-0-333-63806-4
- Baird, Julia (2016), Victoria The Queen: An Intimate Biography of the Woman Who Ruled an Empire, New York: Random House, ISBN 978-1-4000-6988-0
- Cadbury, Deborah (2017), Queen Victoria's Matchmaking: The Royal Marriages That Shaped Europe, Bloomsbury
- Carter, Sarah; Nugent, Maria Nugent, eds. (2016), Mistress of everything: Queen Victoria in Indigenous worlds, Manchester University Press
- Eyck, Frank (1959), The Prince Consort: a political biography, Chatto
- Gardiner, Juliet (1997), Queen Victoria, London: Collins and Brown, ISBN 978-1-85585-469-7
- Homans, Margaret; Munich, Adrienne, eds. (1997), Remaking Queen Victoria, Cambridge University Press
- Homans, Margaret (1997), Royal Representations: Queen Victoria and British Culture, 1837–1876
- Hough, Richard (1996), Victoria and Albert, St. Martin's Press, ISBN 978-0-312-30385-3
- James, Robert Rhodes (1983), Albert, Prince Consort: A Biography, Hamish Hamilton, ISBN 9780394407630
- Kingsley Kent, Susan (2015), Queen Victoria: Gender and Empire
- Lyden, Anne M. (2014), A Royal Passion: Queen Victoria and Photography, Los Angeles: Getty Publications, ISBN 978-1-60606-155-8
- Ridley, Jane (2015), Victoria: Queen, Matriarch, Empress, Penguin
- Taylor, Miles (2020), "The Bicentenary of Queen Victoria", Journal of British Studies, 59 (1): 121–135, doi:10.1017/jbr.2019.245, S2CID 213433777
- Weintraub, Stanley (1987), Victoria: Biography of a Queen, London: HarperCollins, ISBN 978-0-04-923084-2
- Wilson, A. N. (2014), Victoria: A Life, London: Atlantic Books, ISBN 978-1-84887-956-0
External links
[edit]- Queen Victoria at the official website of the British monarchy
- Queen Victoria at the official website of the Royal Collection Trust
- Queen Victoria at BBC Teach
- Portraits of Queen Victoria at the National Portrait Gallery, London
- Queen Victoria's Journals, online from the Royal Archive and Bodleian Library
- Works by Queen Victoria at Project Gutenberg
- Works by or about Queen Victoria at the Internet Archive
- Works by Queen Victoria at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)

- Newspaper clippings about Queen Victoria in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW
Queen Victoria
View on GrokipediaEarly Life
Birth, Ancestry, and Legitimacy Claims
Alexandrina Victoria was born on 24 May 1819 in Room 13 of the First Floor of Kensington Palace, London, England.[9] She was the only legitimate child of Prince Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent and Strathearn (1767–1820), fourth son of King George III, and Princess Victoire Maria Louisa of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (1786–1861). The couple wed in a proxy ceremony on 29 May 1818 at Ehrenburg Palace in Coburg, followed by a religious service on 11 July 1818 at Kew Palace as part of a double wedding with Edward's brother, the Duke of Clarence.[10] Edward died of pneumonia on 23 January 1820 at Sidmouth, Devon, less than eight months after Victoria's birth, leaving her mother as her sole surviving parent.[9] Victoria's paternal lineage traced through the House of Hanover to George III (1738–1820), who had fifteen children with Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, including George IV, Frederick (Duke of York), William IV, and Edward.[11] At her birth, Victoria stood fifth in the line of succession to the British throne, behind her childless uncles George IV, Frederick, William IV, and her father's younger brother, the Duke of Cambridge, as the Succession to the Crown Act 1701 prioritized male heirs but allowed female succession in default of male issue.[11] The deaths without legitimate male heirs of George IV in 1830 and William IV in 1837 elevated her to direct heir presumptive.[9] On her mother's side, Victoria descended from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha; her maternal grandfather was Francis, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (1750–1806), and her uncles included Leopold (later King of the Belgians) and Ferdinand (father of Queen Maria II of Portugal).[9] Victoire had been widowed from her first marriage to Emich Carl, Prince of Leiningen, with whom she had two sons, and entered her second union with Edward amid efforts to secure a Protestant heir amid the aging, childless sons of George III.[10] Claims questioning Victoria's legitimacy as Edward's biological daughter have circulated since the 19th century, often citing purported physical dissimilarities, the duke's advanced age of 51, or Victoire's prior marital history and later association with Sir John Conroy, but these lack contemporary substantiation and stem from political opposition or sensationalism.[12] Official records, including Edward's acknowledgment of paternity before his death and the timing of conception post-marriage (approximately August 1818), affirm her status; modern historians, including A.N. Wilson after reviewing correspondence and portraits, conclude Edward was her father based on familial traits and documentary evidence.[13] No credible evidence supports alternative paternity theories, such as those involving Conroy, who entered the household only after Victoria's birth.[13]Upbringing Under the Kensington System
Princess Victoria, born Alexandrina Victoria on 24 May 1819 at Kensington Palace, was raised under the Kensington System, a regimen of strict rules imposed by her mother, Victoire, Duchess of Kent, and the Duchess's comptroller, Sir John Conroy, to ensure her dependence and prepare for a potential regency.[14] [15] Following the death of her father, Edward, Duke of Kent, in January 1820, Victoria resided primarily at Kensington Palace, isolated from broader court life and her uncles, King George IV and King William IV.[16] [2] The system mandated constant supervision: Victoria was never permitted to be alone, always required the presence of an adult companion, and encounters with others necessitated a third person in attendance.[15] She slept in her mother's bedchamber, with her governess, Baroness Louise Lehzen, occupying an adjoining ante-room until the Duchess retired for the night.[15] [14] Stair descents required her to hold an adult's hand for safety, a rule she later confirmed in adulthood.[14] Her diet was Spartan, limited to items such as bread soaked in milk and plain roast mutton, excluding sweets, fruits, or other indulgences, while daily exercise involved Indian clubs and a pulley apparatus.[14] Education occurred at home under Lehzen's primary oversight, supplemented by Reverend George Davys from age four, covering languages including French and German, history, music, drawing, dancing, and religious instruction.[2] [16] Social interactions were curtailed, with few playmates beyond her spaniel Dash and occasional inclusion of Conroy's children, fostering resentment toward the imposed isolation and limited exposure to the royal court.[15] A daily "Behaviour Book" recorded her conduct for maternal review, and occasional provincial tours served to cultivate public favor under controlled conditions.[14] Victoria expressed dissatisfaction in her journals, begun at age 13 in 1832, decrying the loneliness and constraints, which she attributed to Conroy's influence and her mother's ambitions for regency control had William IV predeceased her majority on 24 May 1837.[14] [16] The system's intent, as evidenced by Conroy's unsuccessful 1836 attempt to coerce her signature on a document affirming his advisory role under a regency, underscored efforts to dominate her future authority.[15] Upon acceding at 18, she promptly excluded Conroy from her household and separated her mother's apartments, signaling rejection of the regime's lasting effects.[14]Path to Accession
Heir Presumptive Status
Princess Alexandrina Victoria was born on 24 May 1819 as the sole legitimate grandchild in the direct male line of King George III, following the death of Princess Charlotte of Wales in 1817, which had eliminated the previous female heir presumptive and prompted George III's unmarried sons to seek brides.[17] Her father, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of George III, died on 23 January 1820, eight months after her birth, leaving her as the heiress in his branch of the succession under the male-preference primogeniture established by the Act of Settlement 1701.[18] At that point, the line ahead of her included her uncles: George, Prince Regent (later George IV), the childless Frederick, Duke of York, and William, Duke of Clarence (later William IV), none of whom had surviving legitimate male heirs.[19] The death of Frederick without issue on 5 January 1827 removed one obstacle, but Victoria's position remained contingent on her uncles' lack of male progeny. George IV's death on 26 June 1830 elevated William IV to the throne, positioning the 11-year-old Victoria directly as heir presumptive, as William and his wife, Queen Adelaide, had produced no surviving children despite multiple pregnancies, including miscarriages and the death of an infant daughter in 1820.[20] Her status as presumptive—rather than apparent—reflected the possibility of displacement by a hypothetical male heir to William IV under the prevailing succession rules prioritizing sons.[19] Parliament formalized provisions for her potential early accession via the Regency Act 1830, which named her mother, the Duchess of Kent, as regent in the event of William's death before Victoria reached 18, though the king favored his brother Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland, for the role and actively sought to undermine the Duchess's influence.[21] William IV's failed attempts to secure a male successor, coupled with his advanced age and health decline, solidified Victoria's claim, culminating in her unchallenged accession on 20 June 1837 upon his death, as she had attained majority three weeks earlier on 24 May.[22] This trajectory underscored the fragility of female succession in the Hanoverian era, dependent on the absence of closer male relatives.[18]Preparations and Regency Influences
Victoria's education commenced at age four under Reverend George Davys, who instructed her in reading, writing, arithmetic, and the Bible, preparing her for her destined role despite the constraints of the Kensington System.[2] In 1831, Baroness Louise Lehzen became her principal governess, overseeing studies in languages such as German, French, and Italian, alongside history, literature, and constitutional principles, which heightened her awareness of monarchical duties.[2] By her early teens, Victoria maintained detailed journals reflecting on her position as heir presumptive, demonstrating precocious insight into governance; at age eleven, she noted her proximity to the throne, and on the eve of her eighteenth birthday in 1837, she confided expectations of immediate queenship.[18] The shadow of a potential regency profoundly shaped these preparations, as her mother, the Duchess of Kent, and John Conroy, comptroller of the Duchess's household, maneuvered to secure influence should King William IV die before Victoria reached majority.[18] Conroy, ambitious for power, collaborated with the Duchess to portray Victoria as immature and dependent, pressuring her repeatedly—most notably in 1836—to sign a declaration appointing him her private secretary upon accession, an overture she rebuffed amid growing isolation under their control.[18] The Regency Act 1830 outlined that, absent Victoria's majority, the Duchess would assume regency with curtailed authority—barring unilateral appointments like Conroy's—yet William IV, distrustful of the duo, vowed to survive until her eighteenth birthday on 24 May 1837, a pledge fulfilled as he expired on 20 June, enabling Victoria's unencumbered succession at age eighteen.[22][23] These regency intrigues, coupled with the Kensington System's sequestration—which prohibited unsupervised associations and fostered dependency—instilled in Victoria a resolute independence, evident in her post-accession exclusion of Conroy and the Duchess from her household, marking a deliberate break from maternal oversight to assert sovereign autonomy.[24][2]Ascension and Coronation
Death of William IV and Immediate Accession (1837)
King William IV died at Windsor Castle in the early hours of 20 June 1837, specifically at 2:12 a.m., following a period of declining health marked by ailments including dropsy and cardiac issues.[25] At the time, Princess Victoria, aged 18 years and seven months, resided at Kensington Palace under the restrictive Kensington System imposed by her mother, the Duchess of Kent, and her comptroller Sir John Conroy.[2] Around 6 a.m., Victoria was awakened by the arrival of Francis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess Conyngham (Lord Chamberlain), and William Howley, Archbishop of Canterbury, who had been dispatched to inform her of the king's death and her immediate succession to the throne.[26] In her journal entry for that day, Victoria recorded the scene: she rose from bed, donned a dressing gown over her nightgown, and met the messengers in her bedroom, where they knelt to deliver the news, with Conyngham stating that William IV had "expired at 12 minutes past 2 this morning."[25] She noted feeling a mix of solemnity and resolve, kissing the archbishop's hand before instructing her mother, who had been excluded from the initial announcement per Victoria's prior wishes, of the event.[25] Victoria's accession was immediate and unencumbered by regency, as she had attained her majority just six months earlier on 24 May 1837, obviating the need for a regent such as her mother or Conroy, whose influence she had long resisted.[2] Later that morning, she held her first Privy Council meeting at Kensington Palace, where privy councillors, including Prime Minister Lord Melbourne, kissed hands and affirmed her as Queen Victoria; she chose to use "Victoria" as her regnal name, dropping "Alexandrina" at Melbourne's suggestion.[27] Proclamations declaring her queen were issued that day across London, including at St. James's Palace, marking the formal transition without interruption in monarchical continuity.[2] This swift process underscored the constitutional stability of the British monarchy, with Victoria assuming full sovereign powers from the moment of William IV's death.[16]Coronation Ceremony and Early Challenges (1838)
Queen Victoria's coronation took place on 28 June 1838 at Westminster Abbey, nearly a year after her accession on 20 June 1837.[16] The event followed a grand procession from Buckingham Palace through London's streets, amid massive crowds estimated at over 400,000 visitors who had arrived in the city.[28] Victoria, aged 19, awoke at 4 a.m. to the sound of ceremonial guns and proceeded in a crimson velvet robe over a white satin gown, supported by eight young train-bearers in white satin dresses adorned with silver and pink roses.[28] The ceremony, lasting approximately five hours, involved traditional rites including the anointing, presentation of regalia, and crowning with the Imperial State Crown, which featured over 3,000 diamonds, sapphires, and other gems.[29][28] The proceedings were marred by several mishaps due to inadequate rehearsals, with only Victoria and the Sub-Dean, Lord John Thynne, fully briefed on the sequence.[29] Train-bearers stumbled along the aisle, hampered by their own cumbersome trains, creating a jerky procession.[30] At the altar, peers reportedly consumed sandwiches and wine during waits, turning a sacred space into an impromptu refreshment area.[30] The Bishop of Bath and Wells prematurely skipped sections of the service, leading him to declare the ceremony concluded after the recognition; Victoria, believing it over, had to return awkwardly to her chair for the remaining rites.[29] During the investiture, Archbishop William Howley forced the coronation ring—intended for her left ring finger but sized too small—onto her right little finger, causing significant pain that lingered until its removal later.[29][30] Further confusion arose when Howley paused after the unction to confirm if it had occurred, though the rite had proceeded.[30] A notable incident during the homage saw 90-year-old Lord Rolle, tasked with kneeling before the throne, tumble down the steps; Victoria responded with composure, rising to assist him and later praising his effort in her journal.[28] Musical accompaniment was criticized for poor execution, adding to the disorganized atmosphere.[30] The event cost £79,000, more than double that of William IV's coronation, reflecting expanded pomp amid economic scrutiny.[28] Despite the errors, Victoria recorded in her diary that the day was the "proudest" of her life, expressing satisfaction with the crowds and solemnity, though privately noting the "scenes of confusion."[28] Post-ceremony, a state banquet and fireworks display followed at Buckingham Palace.[28] Early challenges in 1838 stemmed from her youth and inexperience in constitutional monarchy, where she relied heavily on Prime Minister Lord Melbourne for guidance while asserting independence from her mother's influence and the Kensington System's lingering constraints.[16] These ceremonial blunders highlighted organizational shortcomings in the royal household, testing her poise but ultimately reinforcing public sympathy for the young sovereign as she navigated initial governance without formal regency interference.[29]Early Reign and Political Formations
Alliance with Lord Melbourne
Upon her accession on June 20, 1837, at the age of 18, Queen Victoria's first private audience was with Prime Minister Lord Melbourne, during which she informed him of her intention to retain the existing Whig ministry.[31] This decision, made without prior consultation due to her isolation under the Kensington System, marked the inception of their alliance, as Melbourne—serving as Prime Minister since 1835—assumed the role of her primary political advisor amid her inexperience in governance.[32] Victoria's journal entry from that day records the meeting as occurring at 9 a.m. in her room, emphasizing her resolve for private ministerial audiences, a practice that facilitated Melbourne's direct influence.[33] Melbourne, a moderate Whig leading a coalition with Radicals and Irish MPs, provided daily instruction on parliamentary procedures, cabinet dynamics, and the constitutional limits of the monarchy, shaping Victoria's early grasp of her ceremonial yet influential position.[32] Their interactions, often extending to informal dinners where Melbourne sat at her left as an established protocol, fostered a bond akin to mentorship, with Victoria relying on his counsel for decisions such as household appointments and responses to opposition overtures.[34] Her diaries from 1837 onward frequently detail these conversations, reflecting her growing dependence on his pragmatic advice, which prioritized stability over radical reforms.[35] This reliance, rooted in Melbourne's paternal demeanor toward the fatherless queen, reinforced the Whig government's position until electoral pressures mounted.[1] The alliance's dynamics highlighted causal tensions in constitutional practice: Victoria's personal affinity for Melbourne biased her toward Whig policies, evident in her resistance to Tory alternatives, yet it also underscored the monarchy's vulnerability to prime ministerial sway absent counterbalancing influences like a consort.[36] By 1839, as Whig support waned in Parliament, the relationship's intensity—characterized by Victoria's explicit trust in Melbourne as her "dearest friend"—began testing partisan boundaries, though it endured as a stabilizing force through her initial regnal years.[37]Bedchamber Crisis and Partisan Interventions
In May 1839, the Whig government under Lord Melbourne lost parliamentary confidence following defeats related to Irish and Jamaican policies, prompting Melbourne's resignation on 7 May.[38] Queen Victoria, advised by Melbourne to summon Conservative leaders, interviewed Sir Robert Peel on 8 May to form a new ministry.[39] Peel, leading the Conservative opposition, accepted the commission but emphasized the need for the royal household to align with the incoming government, as it exerted significant influence over the young monarch's decisions.[40] During a second audience on 9 May 1839, Peel specifically requested "some changes" in the higher household offices, particularly replacing Whig-affiliated ladies-in-waiting—such as the Duchess of Sutherland and Lady Portman—with Conservative equivalents to ensure the Queen's counselors reflected the ministry's partisan composition.[39] Victoria refused, interpreting any alteration as tantamount to dismissing all her ladies, whom she regarded as personal confidantes rather than political tools, and proposed Lord Ashley as a substitute without addressing the core issue.[40] Consulting Melbourne and Whig elders like Lord Grey and Lord John Russell, she received support for her stance, reinforcing her attachment to the outgoing administration.[39] On 10 May, Peel declined to proceed without concessions, citing the household's partisan imbalance as undermining his ability to govern effectively, and resigned his commission.[40] Melbourne's ministry was thereby restored, averting a Conservative government until 1841. This Bedchamber Crisis exposed constitutional tensions over the monarch's household, traditionally a site of informal political sway, and Peel's position drew from precedents like William IV's 1834 interventions.[39] The episode exemplified broader partisan interventions in Victoria's early reign, where her reliance on Melbourne—evident in daily counsel and shared social circles—fostered Whig favoritism, delaying power transitions and prompting Conservative critiques of a "Whig sovereign."[40] Victoria's actions prioritized personal loyalty over impartiality, contravening emerging norms of non-partisan monarchy, though the crisis yielded minimal long-term Whig gains and allowed Peel to avoid a precarious minority akin to 1834–1835.[39] Resolution came amicably in September 1841 upon Peel's return to power, with Victoria conceding limited changes post her 1840 marriage to Prince Albert, which shifted dynamics toward greater restraint.[40]Marriage to Prince Albert
Courtship, Wedding, and Initial Union (1840)
Queen Victoria first met her cousin Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in May 1836 during a visit to Kensington Palace, when both were aged 17; though she found him attractive, she expressed no immediate intention to marry.[41] Their second meeting occurred in October 1839 at Windsor Castle, where Victoria, now queen, quickly developed strong affections for Albert, describing the encounter as the "happiest, brightest moment" of her life and resolving to propose marriage.[42] On 15 October 1839, Victoria proposed to Albert in the Marble Hall at Windsor, an act necessitated by her position as sovereign, which precluded him from initiating the proposal under constitutional precedent.[41] [42] The wedding took place on 10 February 1840 at the Chapel Royal in St. James's Palace, London, with the ceremony commencing at 8 a.m. and attended by about 2,000 guests despite the venue's limited capacity.[4] [43] Victoria wore a white gown of Spitalfields satin woven with silk from her estates, adorned with Honiton lace, setting a precedent for white wedding attire among European royalty and the public.[4] Albert appeared in the uniform of a British field marshal, reflecting his initial lack of formal rank in Britain, which Parliament granted as Prince Consort only later.[44] The union was solemnized by the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Howley, and marked by public celebrations including illuminations and a wedding breakfast at Buckingham Palace.[43] Following the ceremony, the couple honeymooned briefly at Windsor Castle for two days before returning to Buckingham Palace, where their early married life blended domestic routine with royal duties.[42] Victoria became pregnant within weeks of the marriage, giving birth to their first child, Victoria Adelaide Mary Louisa (later Princess Royal), on 21 November 1840 at Buckingham Palace.[44] [45] Albert's influence began to manifest in advising on matters of state and household management, though Victoria initially resisted ceding authority, reflecting tensions over his constitutional role.[44]Family Dynamics and Child-Rearing
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert had nine children over seventeen years, from 1840 to 1857: Victoria (born 21 November 1840), Albert Edward (9 November 1841), Alice (25 April 1843), Alfred (6 August 1844), Helena (25 May 1846), Louise (1848), Arthur (May 1850), Leopold (1853), and Beatrice (1857).[45][46][5] Victoria expressed strong aversion to the physical demands of pregnancy and infancy in private letters, likening the process to that of animals such as dogs or cows and describing newborns as "frog-like creatures."[47][48] She viewed maternity as an "unhappy condition" and the "shadow side" of marriage, prioritizing her marital intimacy with Albert over repeated childbearing, though she fulfilled dynastic expectations.[49] Prince Albert assumed primary responsibility for the children's daily upbringing and education, reversing typical Victorian gender roles where the queen focused on state duties.[50] He emphasized intellectual development, moral discipline, and physical rigor, implementing routines such as early rising, cold baths, and structured lessons in languages, sciences, and arts to instill self-control and public service.[51] The couple rejected spoiling, favoring a rational, non-indulgent approach influenced by Albert's progressive ideals, with governesses and tutors enforcing high standards under parental oversight.[50] Family dynamics reflected complementary parental roles: Victoria provided emotional intensity and favored children like the eldest daughter Vicky and youngest Beatrice, whom she kept close as companion, while Albert offered balanced guidance but clashed with the heir Bertie over his perceived laziness and indiscretions.[52] Tensions arose from the parents' high expectations and criticisms, leading to strained adult relationships with several offspring, though the royal household projected an idealized image of domestic harmony to promote moral family values publicly.[53][50]Albert's Era: Reforms and Innovations
Influence on Constitutional Monarchy
Prince Albert's counsel transformed Queen Victoria's exercise of monarchical prerogatives, embedding a more systematic and impartial advisory function into the British constitutional framework during the 1840s and 1850s. By late 1840, shortly after their marriage, Albert had effectively become the Queen's private secretary, securing unrestricted access to Cabinet minutes, diplomatic dispatches, and other state papers, which enabled him to annotate documents and draft responses that Victoria often adopted verbatim.[54] This arrangement allowed Albert to influence policy formulation without formal authority, as he routinely prepared memoranda on domestic and foreign affairs that ministers were compelled to address, thereby elevating the Crown's role from reactive endorsement to proactive guidance grounded in detailed analysis.[54] Albert's interventions emphasized elevating the monarchy above partisan divisions, countering Victoria's initial favoritism toward Whig ministers inherited from her upbringing under Lord Melbourne. From 1841 onward, he accompanied her at ministerial audiences, advising on appointments and cabinet formations to prioritize competence over party loyalty, as evidenced in his efforts to mediate between competing prime ministers like Robert Peel and Lord John Russell.[54] Following Melbourne's death in November 1848, Albert assumed the mantle of her primary political confidant, steering her through successive administrations by insisting on constitutional restraint—such as refusing to dissolve Parliament arbitrarily—and promoting reforms like improved military organization after the Crimean War's exposures in 1855-1856.[55] His continental perspective informed foreign policy, including diplomatic correspondence with European rulers, which helped maintain Britain's balance-of-power commitments without overt monarchical dictation.[54] These practices established enduring precedents for the constitutional monarchy, defining the consort's supportive yet influential position amid political resistance—initially from figures like Peel, who curtailed Albert's income in 1840, and the Duke of Wellington, who contested his precedence.[56] By 1854, Albert reflected in correspondence with Baron Stockmar on the challenges of navigating his undefined role, yet his persistence normalized the monarchy's behind-the-scenes intellectual engagement, fostering a model where the sovereign advises impartially on the basis of exhaustive review rather than personal whim.[56] This evolution under Victoria and Albert mitigated risks of monarchical overreach, aligning the institution with parliamentary sovereignty while preserving its moral authority, a framework that subsequent reigns emulated despite Victoria's later withdrawal after Albert's death in December 1861.[55]The Great Exhibition and Industrial Promotion (1851)
Prince Albert, as consort to Queen Victoria, played a central role in conceiving and promoting the Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of All Nations, establishing a Royal Commission in 1850 with himself as president to organize the event as a showcase of technological and manufacturing prowess.[57] The exhibition, held from May 1 to October 15, 1851, in London's Hyde Park, featured exhibits from over 13,000 British and foreign participants across 34 nations, displaying more than 100,000 items ranging from machinery and textiles to fine arts and raw materials.[58][57] The structure housing the displays, the Crystal Palace, was engineered by Joseph Paxton using prefabricated cast-iron frames and 900,000 square feet of glass, erected by 5,000 workers in just five months at a cost of £150,000, exemplifying the modular construction techniques the event aimed to highlight.[59] Queen Victoria formally opened the exhibition on May 1, 1851, before an audience of 24,000, amid choral performances and international dignitaries; in her journal, she recorded the occasion as "one of the greatest & most glorious days of our lives," expressing awe at the "splendid & touching" spectacle and the harmonious gathering of nations.[60][61] Victoria visited the site 22 more times during its duration, underscoring her endorsement of Albert's vision for industrial advancement.[58] Attracting over six million paying visitors—equivalent to roughly a third of Britain's population at the time—the exhibition generated £186,000 in surplus profits after expenses, funds that Albert directed toward establishing educational and scientific institutions in South Kensington, including the Victoria and Albert Museum and precursors to the Science Museum, with endowments still supporting research grants today.[57][62] British exhibits dominated, comprising raw materials, machinery, and manufactured goods that affirmed the nation's industrial leadership, while foreign contributions prompted reflections on design flaws in British products, spurring post-exhibition reforms like the Government Schools of Design.[63][64] The event's emphasis on empirical demonstration of mechanical innovations and global competition reinforced causal links between technological investment and economic strength, validating free-market principles over protectionism in industrial policy, though critics like Charles Dickens noted its potential to exacerbate class divides by glorifying machinery at the expense of labor.[63] Albert's advocacy framed the exhibition not as mere spectacle but as a deliberate promotion of applied science and international commerce, aligning with his broader efforts to modernize Britain's constitutional framework through merit-based progress.[64]Crisis of Albert's Death
Health Decline and Passing (1861)
Prince Albert's health had been undermined for years by recurrent gastrointestinal complaints, including abdominal cramps, anorexia, vomiting, and episodes of obstruction, which he attributed to overwork and stress.[65] These symptoms, documented in medical correspondence, suggest a possible underlying chronic condition such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, though contemporaneous physicians lacked diagnostic tools to identify such ailments definitively.[66] In late November 1861, Albert traveled from Windsor to Cambridge on November 25 to comfort his son Edward, the Prince of Wales, who had contracted typhoid fever from contaminated water at Trinity College; this visit likely exposed Albert to the bacterium Salmonella typhi.[67] Initial signs of illness appeared around December 1, manifesting as chills, low fever, vomiting, and severe stomach pains, which Albert initially dismissed as a minor cold exacerbated by fatigue from diplomatic tensions over the American Civil War's Trent Affair.[68] By December 3, Albert's condition confined him to bed at Windsor Castle, with symptoms including persistent nausea, diarrhea, and weakness, prompting consultation from physicians such as William Jenner and Thomas Watson.[65] Treatment involved standard 19th-century remedies, including calomel (mercurous chloride) for purging, quinine for fever, and brandy for stimulation, but these interventions, rooted in humoral theory rather than germ theory, likely accelerated dehydration and toxicity without addressing the root pathology.[66] On December 9, Jenner diagnosed typhoid fever based on the emergence of a rose-spot rash on Albert's abdomen and elevated temperature, aligning with the disease's known incubation period of 7–14 days post-exposure; however, the absence of classic high spiking fevers, prolonged delirium, or intestinal perforation until late stages has fueled retrospective doubts about the accuracy of this attribution.[67][65] Albert's decline intensified over the following days, marked by emaciation, sunken eyes, and lucid but resigned conversations with family, including instructions to Queen Victoria on state matters.[68] On December 14, after a peaceful afternoon nap, he suffered respiratory distress and expired at 10:50 p.m. in the Blue Room of Windsor Castle, aged 42; the death certificate, signed by the registrar-general, certified the cause as "typhoid fever (duration 21 days)."[67] Autopsy was declined by Victoria, precluding direct pathological confirmation, but post-mortem observations noted an enlarged spleen and no evident perforation, inconsistencies with acute typhoid that modern analyses interpret as evidence of a terminal flare-up of chronic bowel disease rather than primary infection.[66][65] This event, amid Britain's improving sanitation awareness, underscored the era's medical limitations, as typhoid remained endemic due to fecal contamination of water supplies despite emerging public health reforms.[67]Immediate Royal Grief and Withdrawals
Queen Victoria was at Prince Albert's bedside when he died on 14 December 1861 at Windsor Castle, aged 42. In her journal entry for that day, she described standing to kiss his forehead before uttering a "bitter & agonizing cry: 'Oh! my dear Darling!'" and collapsing to her knees in "mute, distracted sorrow." This profound personal anguish marked the onset of an intense emotional collapse, compounded by her dependence on Albert for both emotional support and practical guidance in royal affairs.[69][70] Albert's funeral took place on 23 December 1861 at St. George's Chapel, Windsor, where his coffin was placed in the Royal Vault. Victoria, clad in deep mourning, followed the procession but did not enter the chapel for the service, viewing proceedings from an adjacent room due to her fragile state. Five days earlier, on 19 December, she had retreated to Osborne House on the Isle of Wight, seeking isolation from the court and public scrutiny; there, within two weeks, she commissioned sculptor William Theed to begin work on a memorial statue of Albert, channeling her bereavement into tangible commemoration amid ongoing private distress.[69][71] In the ensuing months, Victoria's grief prompted a marked withdrawal from constitutional and ceremonial obligations. She avoided London, preferring secluded residences like Osborne and later Balmoral, and shunned public appearances, attending only a handful of events tied to Albert's memory, such as unveilings. By February 1862, as ministers including the Earl of Derby pressed her to resume duties like opening Parliament—a role she had fulfilled annually prior—she resisted, citing incapacitating sorrow that rendered such tasks unbearable; Parliament was instead prorogued by commission. This seclusion, while allowing private correspondence with advisors on state matters, fueled early public and political frustration over perceived neglect of monarchical visibility.[72][73]Widowhood and Personal Controversies
Extended Mourning Practices
Following the death of Prince Albert on 14 December 1861, Queen Victoria adopted mourning attire consisting of black crepe dresses and widow's caps, which she wore consistently for the remaining 40 years of her life until 1901.[74][75] This practice extended beyond standard Victorian mourning protocols, which typically limited full black mourning for widows to one year followed by half-mourning in gray or lavender, as Victoria rejected phased transitions and maintained unrelieved black as a perpetual symbol of her bereavement.[76] She supplemented her attire with jet jewelry and commissioned mourning rings incorporating Albert's photographic likeness, worn daily alongside lockets containing his hair.[77] Victoria preserved Albert's private apartments across royal residences including Windsor Castle, Balmoral Castle, and Osborne House in their exact state at the time of his death, with servants instructed to maintain daily rituals such as laying out his evening clothes on the bed, preparing fresh shaving water in his basin each morning, and airing his nightshirt.[78] These rooms functioned as shrines, untouched except for dusting, and Victoria documented their contents through inventories and photographs to ensure fidelity to Albert's habits.[78] By her bedside, she kept plaster casts of Albert's hands and face, created by sculptor Joseph Boehm shortly after his passing, which she touched during moments of private reflection.[69] To commemorate Albert, Victoria oversaw the construction of the Royal Mausoleum at Frogmore in 1862–1871, where effigies of both were interred, and initiated numerous public monuments, including the Albert Memorial in Kensington Gardens unveiled in 1872, featuring a 14-foot gilded statue of Albert amid Gothic Revival sculpture symbolizing the arts and sciences.[78] She also commissioned busts, statues, and portraits for placement in royal residences and distributed photographic mourning cards of Albert to family and retainers.[69] These acts of memorialization, sustained over decades, reflected her insistence on tangible preservation of Albert's presence, influencing broader Victorian customs toward elongated grief expressions among the upper classes.[79]Scandals Involving Servants (John Brown and Abdul Karim)
Following Prince Albert's death in 1861, Queen Victoria formed an unusually close bond with John Brown, a Scottish gillie born on 8 December 1826 in Crathie near Balmoral, whom she had first encountered during her 1848 visit to the Scottish Highlands.[80] Brown, who joined the royal household more formally around 1858, provided practical support and emotional companionship during Victoria's prolonged mourning, accompanying her on rides and daily routines at Balmoral, Windsor, and Osborne.[80] He received exceptional privileges, including a personal pony named Lochrosan, priority sleeping quarters adjacent to the queen's, and titles such as "Your Royal Highness's devoted and faithful personal servant and friend" conferred in 1868.[81] Victoria's diaries and letters reveal affectionate terms like "darling John Brown," and she commissioned a marble statue of him in 1883, underscoring her reliance on him for stability amid court isolation.[80] This intimacy fueled scandals and rumors within the royal household and press, with courtiers derogatorily nicknaming Brown "the Queen's stallion" and resenting his influence over her seclusion.[81] Speculation of a romantic affair or morganatic marriage persisted, partly based on ambiguous diary entries referring to "Mrs. John Brown" and Brown's possession of a ring possibly from Victoria, though historians generally view these as unsubstantiated and rooted in Victorian prudery rather than evidence.[80] More recent claims, such as those by historian Fern Riddell in 2025 suggesting a secret child based on New Zealand genealogical records and suppressed letters, remain contested and lack corroboration from primary royal archives, which show no official acknowledgment of impropriety.[82] Victoria staunchly defended Brown against critics, including her son the Prince of Wales, and his sudden death from erysipelas on 27 March 1883 prompted her to close Balmoral for extended mourning, commissioning an effigy for his grave and privately noting profound grief in her journal.[81] Decades later, during the final years of her reign, Victoria developed another controversial attachment to Abdul Karim, born around 1863, who arrived in England in 1887 as one of two Indian servants presented for her Golden Jubilee celebrations.[83] Initially a table servant from Agra Central Jail where he worked as a clerk, the 24-year-old Karim quickly impressed Victoria with his bearing, leading her to appoint him as her Munshi (teacher and secretary) by 1888 to instruct her in Hindustani and provide insights into Indian affairs.[83] She elevated his status dramatically, granting him a home at Windsor, land in India including the Frogmore estate extension, and the title of Companion of the Indian Empire in 1890, while corresponding with him as "your loving mother" and consulting him on policy, such as opposing the Ilbert Bill reforms.[84] Karim's rapid rise provoked intense opposition from the royal household, physicians, and family, who viewed the relationship as an affront to British imperial hierarchy and suspected espionage or undue influence, exacerbated by revelations that Karim had inflated his caste origins from humble jail clerk to noble.[83] Figures like Private Secretary Henry Ponsonby and Doctor James Reid spied on Karim, uncovering his recruitment of relatives to England and private complaints about colonial rule, prompting pleas to Victoria—who rebuffed them fiercely, threatening to publish her diaries exposing court pettiness if Karim were dismissed.[84] No evidence supports romantic involvement, with the scandal centering on favoritism and racial prejudices of the era; after Victoria's death on 22 January 1901, King Edward VII ordered Karim's deportation to India by August 1901, evicted his family from granted properties, and destroyed their mutual correspondence to erase his legacy.[83][84] Karim died on 20 April 1909, his influence reduced to footnotes until rediscovered via surviving diaries in the 2010s.[84]Later Reign: Domestic and Foreign Policy
Rivalries with Gladstone and Affinity for Disraeli
Queen Victoria developed a strong personal affinity for Benjamin Disraeli, the Conservative leader who served as Prime Minister in 1868 and again from 1874 to 1880, appreciating his deference, wit, and alignment with her imperial ambitions. Disraeli's correspondence with the Queen was marked by flattery and romanticism; he addressed her as his "Faery Queen" in a style evoking Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene, fostering a partnership that emphasized gallantry and mutual sympathy.[85][86] Their rapport was evident in Disraeli's orchestration of the Royal Titles Act of 1876, which proclaimed Victoria Empress of India on 1 May 1877, a title she cherished as a symbol of Britain's expanded dominion following the 1876 purchase of Suez Canal shares and the Queen's Proclamation at Delhi in 1877.[87][88] This act not only bolstered her sense of imperial prestige but also reflected Disraeli's intuitive understanding of her desire for ceremonial elevation amid her prolonged mourning seclusion. In contrast, Victoria harbored a profound antipathy toward William Ewart Gladstone, the Liberal Prime Minister whose first ministry spanned 1868 to 1874 and who returned to power in 1880, viewing him as pompous, overly moralistic, and prone to undermining monarchical prerogatives through democratic reforms. She confided in her journals and letters that Gladstone addressed her "as if I were a public meeting rather than the Queen," a complaint underscoring her perception of his lecturing demeanor and lack of personal warmth.[89] Their tensions peaked during Gladstone's tenure, including clashes over the "Royalty Question" in 1872, where Victoria resisted proposals to reduce civil list expenditures tied to royal duties, seeing them as encroachments on her dignity.[90] Further friction arose from Gladstone's advocacy for Irish home rule in 1886, which Victoria opposed vehemently, privately decrying it as a threat to imperial unity; she actively lobbied against his policies, favoring Disraeli's conservative imperialism that preserved hierarchical stability.[87][91] Victoria's partiality influenced her political interventions, as she delayed accepting Gladstone's resignations and attempted to sway elections toward Conservatives, such as in 1874 when Disraeli's victory elicited her rare enthusiasm. This favoritism stemmed from ideological congruence—Disraeli's protection of aristocratic interests and expansionist foreign policy aligned with her worldview, whereas Gladstone's emphasis on parliamentary supremacy and fiscal restraint clashed with her vision of a sovereign monarchy guiding empire.[91][92] Despite constitutional constraints, her letters reveal unfiltered disdain for Gladstone's "subversive" tendencies, as when she labeled him a "mad, bad man" in private correspondence during the 1879 Midlothian campaign that ousted Disraeli.[93] Such sentiments, drawn from her diaries preserved in the Royal Archives, highlight a personal dynamic that occasionally strained the impartiality expected of the crown, though it rarely altered parliamentary outcomes decisively.[94]Interventions in Irish and Colonial Affairs
Queen Victoria personally contributed £2,000 to Irish famine relief efforts in 1847, a sum exceeding the donations of many British nobles and comparable to substantial private philanthropy at the time, countering later nationalist claims of miserly indifference that originated from a misreported £5 contribution to a specific relief committee.[95][96] In response to the ongoing Great Famine, which had already claimed over one million lives by 1849 through starvation and disease, she undertook a state visit to Ireland from 29 August to 3 September 1849, accompanied by Prince Albert and their children; this marked the first visit by a reigning British monarch in over a century and aimed to demonstrate solidarity amid widespread destitution and unrest, though it faced criticism from some quarters as insufficiently addressing root causes like absentee landlordism and export policies.[97][95] Subsequent visits in 1853 and 1861 reinforced perceptions of royal engagement, yet her correspondence revealed persistent frustration with Irish agrarian violence and Fenian agitation, viewing them as threats to social order rather than legitimate grievances.[98] Victoria opposed Irish Home Rule proposals, exerting personal influence through private letters to prime ministers that emphasized the risks of constitutional fragmentation; in 1886, during William Gladstone's first Home Rule Bill, she lobbied against devolution, arguing it would undermine the Act of Union and encourage separatism, a stance aligned with her broader commitment to imperial unity over concessions to nationalist demands.[98] Her final visit to Ireland in May 1900, at age 81 and amid the Second Boer War, focused on thanking Irish regiments for their service, with large crowds in Dublin and Cork greeting her enthusiastically, reflecting loyalty among pro-Union segments despite rising Sinn Féin sentiment; this tour, lasting 10 days, underscored her role in bolstering British-Irish ties through symbolic gestures rather than policy shifts.[99][100] In colonial affairs, Victoria actively corresponded with ministers to advocate for assertive policies preserving British dominance, notably endorsing Benjamin Disraeli's 1875 purchase of Suez Canal shares for £4 million, which secured strategic control over trade routes to India without parliamentary debate, as she viewed it as essential for imperial security.[101] She pressed for her proclamation as Empress of India in 1877, formalized by the Royal Titles Act of 1876, to symbolize direct monarchical oversight post-1857 Indian Rebellion, promising religious tolerance while reinforcing centralized authority under the British Crown.[1] During the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880), she supported Viceroy Lord Lytton's forward policy of preemptive intervention to counter Russian influence, overriding cabinet hesitations and contributing to the restoration of a pro-British emir, though the campaign incurred heavy casualties and financial costs exceeding £15 million.[102] Her interventions often prioritized strategic consolidation over humanitarian concerns, as seen in her approval of policies in South Africa and Egypt that expanded territorial holdings, aligning with the empire's growth to cover 23% of global land by 1898.[8] Victoria's influence extended to personnel decisions, such as recommending loyal administrators for colonial governorships; she backed the annexation of Upper Burma in 1885–1886 to curb French and Russian encroachments, viewing it as vital for buffering India, despite local resistance that required prolonged military pacification.[7] In the First Boer War (1880–1881), she lamented the British defeat at Majuba Hill on 27 February 1881 as a humiliation, urging Gladstone's government toward firmer reprisals, which foreshadowed her staunch support for the more aggressive Second Boer War (1899–1902), where she mobilized public sentiment through personal appeals and honors for troops, contributing to the annexation of Boer republics by 1902.[103] These actions, while constitutionally advisory, shaped policy trajectories by leveraging her prestige to sway ministers toward expansionist realism amid great-power rivalries, though critics in liberal circles attributed ensuing conflicts to monarchical jingoism rather than geopolitical necessities.[104]Imperial Expansion
Assumption of Empress of India Title (1876)
Following the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and the subsequent Government of India Act 1858, which transferred control of India from the East India Company to direct rule by the British Crown, Queen Victoria's title remained simply "Queen", a designation that contemporaries viewed as insufficient to convey the scope of imperial sovereignty over the subcontinent.[105] Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, seeking to elevate the monarchy's prestige and align it with Britain's expanding empire, proposed amending the Queen's style and titles to include "Empress of India" (Kaisar-i-Hind in Urdu), arguing it would symbolize parity with continental empires like those of Germany and Austria-Hungary while reinforcing loyalty among Indian subjects.[106] [107] Victoria enthusiastically supported the change, having long desired a more exalted imperial designation; she reportedly preferred "Empress" over "Queen" in the Indian context, as the latter term evoked local princely rulers rather than supreme sovereign authority, and she briefly advocated extending the title to her British realms before Disraeli dissuaded her to avert domestic republican backlash.[106] [107] The Royal Titles Bill faced parliamentary opposition from figures like Liberal leader William Gladstone, who criticized it as ostentatious and unnecessary, but Disraeli's Conservatives secured passage on April 13, 1876, with royal assent granted shortly thereafter, formally adding the title effective May 1, 1876.[108] [106] The title's assumption marked a pivotal assertion of monarchical symbolism in colonial governance, prompting Victoria to incorporate Indian cultural elements into her court and household, such as employing Indian servants, though it drew criticism in Britain for perceived extravagance amid economic pressures.[109] In India, Viceroy Lord Lytton proclaimed the Empress title at a grand durbar in Delhi on January 1, 1877, attended by over 80,000 people including Indian princes who reaffirmed fealty, though the event's opulence fueled resentment among some nationalists viewing it as unchecked imperial pomp.[110] This proclamation, delayed for ceremonial preparation, underscored the title's role in consolidating British paramountcy without altering administrative structures, as India remained governed via the Secretary of State and viceregal council.[106]Major Wars and Territorial Gains (Crimean, Boer, etc.)
The Crimean War (1853–1856) represented the only major European conflict during Victoria's reign, as Britain allied with France and the Ottoman Empire to counter Russian advances toward the Black Sea and Mediterranean. British forces suffered heavy casualties—over 21,000 deaths, mostly from disease—but contributed to Allied victories, including the relief of Sevastopol after a year-long siege ending in September 1855. The Treaty of Paris, signed on March 30, 1856, demilitarized the Black Sea and limited Russian naval power, preserving Ottoman integrity without granting Britain direct territorial acquisitions; however, it secured strategic influence in the region and prompted domestic military reforms exposing logistical failures.[111][112][113] Colonial wars drove significant territorial consolidation, beginning with the Indian Rebellion (1857–1858), where sepoys and princely states revolted against East India Company rule, capturing Delhi in May 1857. British reprisals, involving 100,000 troops, recaptured key sites like Lucknow by March 1858, resulting in the execution or exile of rebel leaders and an estimated 100,000 Indian deaths. The uprising prompted the Government of India Act 1858, dissolving the Company and placing India under direct Crown administration on November 1, 1858, thereby annexing the subcontinent—home to 200 million subjects—as the Empire's largest possession.[114][115] In Africa, the Anglo-Zulu War (1879) stemmed from British demands for Zulu King Cetshwayo's disarmament; after an initial defeat at Isandlwana on January 22, 1879, British reinforcements triumphed at Ulundi on July 4, dissolving the Zulu kingdom and partitioning its territory, with formal annexation following in 1887. The First Boer War (1880–1881) erupted over British annexation of the Transvaal in 1877; Boer forces routed troops at Majuba Hill on February 27, 1881, forcing the Pretoria Convention that restored Boer self-rule while retaining British suzerainty. The Second Boer War (1899–1902), triggered by disputes over uitlander rights in gold-rich Transvaal, mobilized 450,000 British troops against 60,000–88,000 Boers, employing blockhouses and scorched-earth policies that included interning 28,000 Boer civilians in camps where disease claimed 26,000 lives, predominantly women and children. By January 1901, Britain had captured Boer capitals, annexing the Orange Free State (May 1900) and Transvaal (September 1900), securing mineral wealth estimated at billions in today's value and paving the way for the Union of South Africa.[116][117][118] Other conflicts amplified gains: the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880) installed a pro-British emir after the Treaty of Gandamak, establishing Afghanistan as a buffer against Russia with British control over foreign affairs; occupation of Egypt in 1882 protected the Suez Canal, leading to de facto annexation; and the Third Anglo-Burmese War (1885) incorporated Upper Burma into the Empire by 1886. These endeavors expanded British holdings from 9.5 million square miles in 1860 to 12 million by 1901, incorporating diverse territories like Cyprus (1878), Fiji (1874), and parts of West Africa, underpinned by naval supremacy and economic motives including resource extraction and trade routes.[115][119]Jubilees and Public Restoration
Golden Jubilee Celebrations (1887)
The Golden Jubilee commemorated the fiftieth anniversary of Queen Victoria's accession to the throne on 20 June 1837, with principal events held on 20 and 21 June 1887.[120] Preparations included widespread public decorations across London, such as illuminated arches, flags, and triumphal gateways funded by subscriptions and local committees, alongside a national holiday declared for 21 June to enable mass participation.[121] These festivities marked a deliberate effort to reaffirm monarchical prestige following nearly three decades of Victoria's relative seclusion after Prince Albert's death in 1861, which had eroded public support amid perceptions of detachment.[122] On 20 June, Victoria observed the anniversary privately, beginning with breakfast under trees at Frogmore near Albert's mausoleum before traveling to London for a family dinner at Buckingham Palace.[120] The following day featured a grand procession from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey, involving over 30,000 troops from the British Army, Indian contingents, and colonial forces, who lined the route amid cheering crowds estimated in the millions along the streets.[123] Victoria participated in an open gilded state landau drawn by six cream-colored horses, dressed in white satin with a lace veil and diamond jewelry but declining to wear her crown, marking her first such public procession in 24 years.[123] A service of thanksgiving followed at Westminster Abbey, attended by the Queen, royal family, and dignitaries including colonial premiers, with prayers, hymns, and choral performances emphasizing themes of imperial unity and divine providence.[121] Post-service, Victoria returned to Buckingham Palace for a balcony appearance to acknowledge the assembled multitudes, followed by evening illuminations of fireworks and electric lights across the city, which drew further public gatherings.[121] The events underscored the British Empire's cohesion, with representatives from dominions and colonies highlighting Victoria's role as symbolic head, though foreign royal attendance was limited compared to later jubilees, focusing instead on domestic and imperial loyalty.[124] Overall costs for official proceedings approximated £66,000, covered through parliamentary grants and private contributions, reflecting broad societal investment in the spectacle.[125] The Jubilee's success in generating enthusiasm dispelled lingering republican critiques, restoring the monarchy's visibility and popular affection through tangible displays of pomp and collective reverence.[122]Diamond Jubilee and Global Spectacle (1897)
The Diamond Jubilee commemorated the 60th anniversary of Queen Victoria's accession to the throne on 20 June 1837, with principal public celebrations held on 22 June 1897 in London. The event served as a grand display of the British Empire's cohesion and military might, drawing participants and observers from across the globe to underscore the monarchy's enduring stability amid imperial expansion.[126] An estimated four million visitors flooded the city, with over one million lining the procession route, reflecting widespread public enthusiasm for the occasion.[127] The centerpiece was a six-mile procession from Buckingham Palace to St. Paul's Cathedral, featuring approximately 20,000 troops who lined the streets, including contingents from colonial forces such as Indian lancers and African regiments, symbolizing the empire's diverse contributions to British power. [128] The parade, divided into segments led by figures like Field Marshal Lord Roberts, incorporated the Royal Horse Guards, Life Guards, and other elite units, with the total equine participants sufficient to span 5.3 miles if aligned end-to-end.[129] [130] Queen Victoria, aged 78 and afflicted with arthritis and partial blindness, rode in an open carriage, unable to participate in more strenuous elements, yet her presence evoked cheers from the massive crowds.[131] At St. Paul's, a thanksgiving service was conducted outdoors due to the queen's mobility limitations, avoiding the cathedral steps, with seventeen carriages conveying royal family members and international dignitaries.[132] [133] The spectacle highlighted global imperial ties, as representatives from dominions and colonies, including 25,000 camped soldiers in Hyde Park, participated, fostering a sense of unified loyalty under Victoria's rule.[128] Medical preparations were extensive, with 40 surgeons, 102 nursing sisters, and 95 stations along the route to manage potential crowd-related incidents.[134] The jubilee reinforced perceptions of British supremacy, though Victoria's frail health foreshadowed the monarchy's transition to a more ceremonial role.[130]Final Years
Health Deterioration and Medical Interventions
In the decade preceding her death, Queen Victoria experienced progressive physical decline marked by chronic rheumatism, which caused persistent pain in her legs and swollen ankles, necessitating the use of a wheelchair for mobility by the mid-1890s.[135] Vision impairment from cataracts and hearing loss compounded her frailty, limiting her engagement in public duties despite her continued oversight of state matters. These symptoms reflected age-related degeneration rather than acute disease, with no curative interventions available beyond palliative measures like rest and pain relief, as medical understanding of geriatric conditions remained rudimentary.[136] By late 1900, Victoria exhibited signs of vascular depression, characterized by apathy, withdrawal, and cognitive slowing over approximately five months, potentially linked to cerebrovascular insufficiency.[137] Her personal physician, Sir James Reid, noted increasing infirmity but attributed it to exhaustion from recent exertions rather than foreseeing terminal decline.[135] Reid, appointed Physician-in-Ordinary in 1889, managed her care conservatively, emphasizing family tensions and the Queen's reluctance for invasive treatments, which aligned with limited Victorian-era options for chronic conditions. The terminal phase began acutely on January 13, 1901, at Osborne House, when Victoria suffered a paralytic stroke manifesting as left-sided weakness, confusion, and speech difficulties, diagnosed by Reid as a cerebral event.[138] Over the following days, she lapsed into semi-consciousness, repeatedly expressing distress to Reid: "I am very ill," though he reassured her of recovery.[135] Medical interventions were minimal and symptomatic; the sole documented treatment was oxygen administration via inhaler to alleviate respiratory distress, reflecting the era's nascent palliative approaches without antibiotics, anticoagulants, or surgical options for stroke.[136] Reid's management prioritized comfort and family presence, prefiguring modern end-of-life care models amid familial strains, including the Kaiser Wilhelm II's delayed arrival.[139] Victoria died on January 22, 1901, at 6:30 p.m., from a cerebral hemorrhage, with autopsy confirming extensive vascular pathology but no prior preventive measures having been feasible.[135] Her final illness underscored the inefficacy of contemporaneous medicine against age-related neurological failure, as Reid later reflected in private journals on the constraints of available therapies.Death and Succession (1901)
Queen Victoria died on 22 January 1901 at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight, at 6:30 p.m., aged 81 years and 201 days, after suffering a cerebral haemorrhage that rendered her comatose for several hours.[135][140][141] Her final hours were attended by family members including her son the Prince of Wales (later Edward VII) and daughter Princess Beatrice, with the event marked by widespread public mourning across the British Empire.[135] Victoria was immediately succeeded by her eldest son, Albert Edward, who ascended as Edward VII without interruption to the throne, in accordance with the constitutional principle of automatic succession upon the death of the sovereign.[1] The Accession Council convened on 24 January 1901 at St. James's Palace to formally proclaim Edward VII, affirming his title and expressing loyalty to the new monarch.[142] The state funeral occurred on 2 February 1901 at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, following the Queen's explicit instructions for a military-style ceremony rather than traditional royal pomp; her coffin, transported from Osborne House aboard the royal yacht Alberta and then by gun carriage through London, was draped in white rather than black and carried amid artillery salutes and troop honors.[135][143][144] She lay in state for two days prior at Osborne, and after the service, was privately interred on 4 February in the Royal Mausoleum at Frogmore, Windsor, beside Prince Albert, dressed in her white wedding gown with jewelry and a plaster death mask applied to preserve her features.[140][144] Court mourning was decreed for one year.[145]Legacy
Constitutional Evolution and Monarchical Restraint
Queen Victoria's accession in 1837 occurred amid an established parliamentary system, yet her early reign tested the boundaries of monarchical prerogative within Britain's unwritten constitution. Influenced by her mentor, Prime Minister Lord Melbourne, she initially viewed the crown's role as actively partisan, resisting transitions that might alter her personal circle. This stance reflected residual Hanoverian traditions of royal intervention, but evolving conventions—driven by parliamentary sovereignty and public expectation—compelled a shift toward restraint, transforming the monarchy into a stabilizing, non-partisan institution by the century's end.[146][1] A pivotal early confrontation was the Bedchamber Crisis of May 1839, when Melbourne's Whig government resigned following electoral setbacks, prompting Victoria to summon Tory leader Sir Robert Peel to form a ministry. Peel conditioned his acceptance on replacing the Whig-dominated ladies of the bedchamber—unmarried women close to the queen—with Tory appointees, citing the need for household alignment with the government. Victoria refused, prioritizing personal loyalty over constitutional accommodation, which led Peel to withdraw and Melbourne to resume office temporarily until a general election. This episode, resolved only after Whig defeats in 1841 allowed Peel's uncontested return, underscored the risks of monarchical intransigence; it eroded Victoria's popularity and prompted Melbourne's counsel toward deference to parliamentary majorities, marking an initial lesson in restraint.[40][7] Throughout her interactions with ten prime ministers, Victoria exerted private influence—expressing preferences in audiences, correspondence, and veto threats over appointments—but gradually internalized limits on public partisanship. She favored Disraeli's flattery and imperial policies, granting him audiences exceeding protocol, while detesting Gladstone's moralism and reforms, once attempting in 1886 to block his return by urging alternatives despite Liberal electoral victory. Prince Albert's rational counsel from 1840 reinforced impartiality, as seen in her eventual acquiescence to Peel's 1846 Corn Law repeal despite personal opposition to free trade. By the 1870s, amid Gladstone's Irish policies and Disraeli's Eastern Question maneuvers, she focused on "advising, encouraging, and warning" without overt obstruction, aligning with emerging norms that preserved ministerial accountability to Parliament over royal fiat.[146][147] Walter Bagehot's 1867 analysis in The English Constitution crystallized this evolution, portraying the monarchy as the "dignified" element—symbolizing continuity and deference—contrasted with the "efficient" Cabinet's policy-making. Bagehot observed Victoria's personal virtues, including diligence and moral example, as enhancing public reverence without challenging democratic efficiency, though he noted residual "secret doctrine" of royal sway in crises. Her widowhood after Albert's 1861 death initially prompted seclusion and perceived irrelevance, fueling republican critiques, yet her restrained reemergence—culminating in jubilees—reaffirmed the crown's apolitical prestige.[148] In legacy, Victoria's reign entrenched monarchical restraint as causal to stability: by forgoing vetoes after 1839 and prioritizing constitutional advice over command, she facilitated power's transfer to elected executives, averting the absolutist pitfalls seen in continental Europe. Empirical shifts, such as expanded suffrage via 1867 and 1884 Reform Acts, further diminished crown electoral leverage, rendering intervention untenable without eroding legitimacy. Her model—personal influence tempered by public neutrality—shaped successors, ensuring the monarchy's survival amid industrialization and democratization.[102][149]Victorian Social Norms: Moral Achievements and Rigidities
Victorian social norms emphasized sexual restraint, familial duty, piety, and respectability, particularly among the middle and upper classes, fostering a culture of self-control and public decorum.[150] These values contributed to measurable moral advancements, including a sustained decline in violent crime rates; homicide rates in England hovered around 1.5 per 100,000 population throughout much of the era, rarely exceeding 2 per 100,000, reflecting broader reductions in interpersonal violence compared to preceding centuries.[151] Illegitimacy rates remained low, typically under 2 to 3 percent of total births, underscoring the era's strong stigma against non-marital childbearing and reinforcement of marital fidelity.[152] The temperance movement, gaining traction from the 1830s onward, promoted abstinence and correlated with public health gains by curbing excessive alcohol consumption, which reformers linked to social ills like poverty and domestic abuse.[153] Family-centric norms bolstered population stability and early industrialization; an initial baby boom in the mid-19th century supported economic expansion while Sunday schools and philanthropic efforts disseminated literacy and ethical instruction, enhancing social mobility for the working classes.[154] These structures prioritized paternal authority and maternal domesticity, yielding large households—Queen Victoria and Prince Albert exemplified this with nine children—and a cultural premium on child-rearing that contrasted with later fertility declines.[155] However, these norms imposed rigidities, particularly in gender roles, where married women lost legal autonomy over property and earnings, remaining economically subordinate to husbands under coverture laws until partial reforms like the 1882 Married Women's Property Act.[156] Sexual repression bred hypocrisies, as public prudishness masked widespread male patronage of prostitution; estimates placed London's sex workers at around 80,000 by the 1850s, fueling scandals such as the 1889 Cleveland Street affair involving elite clients and telegraph boys.[157] Double standards permitted male infidelity while condemning female lapses, exacerbating underground vice and social stratification, where working-class women faced harsher judgments and limited recourse.[158] Class divides further rigidified norms, with the poor enduring moralistic interventions like workhouses that prioritized discipline over empathy, despite middle-class philanthropy.[159]Imperial Impact: Civilizational Advances vs. Exploitation Critiques
The British Empire under Queen Victoria expanded to encompass approximately 14 million square miles of territory and over 450 million people by the late 19th century, incorporating regions in India, Africa, the Middle East, and the Pacific through conquests, protectorates, and administrative annexations.[160] Imperial policy, often framed as a civilizing mission, aimed to export British institutions, technology, and governance to supplant local systems characterized by arbitrary rule, ritual violence, and economic stagnation. Empirical evidence supports advancements in infrastructure and security, such as the development of extensive railway networks in India starting in 1853, which reached 25,373 miles by 1901, enabling faster resource distribution, military logistics, and eventual famine mitigation despite initial profit motives.[161] Similarly, the suppression of thuggee—organized gangs responsible for thousands of ritual murders annually—involved systematic campaigns from the 1830s, resulting in over 4,500 arrests and executions by 1840, dismantling networks that preyed on travelers under religious pretexts.[162] Legal reforms introduced uniform codes emphasizing property rights, contract enforcement, and due process, replacing fragmented princely jurisdictions prone to extortion and feuds; this fostered long-term stability, as evidenced by reduced interstate warfare post-1857.[163] Public health and sanitation initiatives, including vaccination drives against smallpox and quarantine systems, curbed epidemics in urban centers, while telegraph lines—over 100,000 miles in India by 1900—accelerated administration and commerce. Education saw the establishment of Western-style universities in Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras in 1857, producing an English-literate administrative class that facilitated bureaucratic efficiency, though literacy rates remained low overall due to limited funding and cultural resistance. Critiques of exploitation highlight economic extraction mechanisms, including high land revenue assessments that strained peasant agriculture and facilitated raw material exports to Britain, contributing to India's share of world GDP declining from around 27% in 1700 to 4% by 1947 according to some estimates.[164] The Great Famine of 1876–1878, triggered by monsoon failures but exacerbated by export-oriented policies under Viceroy Lord Lytton, caused 5.6 to 9.6 million excess deaths through starvation and disease, as grain shipments continued abroad amid inadequate relief.[165] In China, the Opium Wars (1839–1842 and 1856–1860) enforced opium imports from British India to reverse trade imbalances, resulting in millions addicted and territorial cessions like Hong Kong, imposing unequal treaties that undermined Qing sovereignty.[166] In southern Africa, the Second Boer War (1899–1902) employed scorched-earth tactics and concentration camps, leading to 28,000 Boer civilian deaths, primarily women and children, from disease and malnutrition, fueling accusations of brutality to secure mining interests.[163] Nationalist historians, often drawing from figures like Dadabhai Naoroji, attribute deindustrialization—such as the collapse of Indian textiles—to protectionist tariffs favoring Manchester mills, though counterarguments note British capital inflows exceeding £380 million by 1913 and net infrastructure gains that pre-colonial India lacked.[163] Causal analysis reveals that while short-term human costs were severe, imperial institutions provided enduring frameworks for economic modernization absent in many successor states, with pre-colonial baselines of endemic famine and violence underscoring relative progress despite biases in contemporary academic narratives favoring victimhood over empirical metrics.[167]Descendants, Haemophilia Propagation, and Dynastic Spread
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert had nine children between 1840 and 1857, all of whom survived to adulthood, a rarity for the era given high infant mortality rates.[5] These offspring included five daughters and four sons: Princess Victoria (born 21 November 1840, died 5 August 1901), who married Frederick III of Germany; Albert Edward (born 9 November 1841, died 6 May 1910), who succeeded as Edward VII; Princess Alice (born 25 April 1843, died 14 December 1878), who married Louis IV of Hesse; Prince Alfred (born 6 August 1844, died 30 July 1900), Duke of Edinburgh; Princess Helena (born 25 May 1846, died 9 December 1923), who married Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein; Princess Louise (born 18 March 1848, died 3 December 1939), who married the Marquess of Lorne; Prince Arthur (born 1 May 1850, died 16 January 1942), Duke of Connaught; Prince Leopold (born 7 April 1853, died 13 March 1884), Duke of Albany; and Princess Beatrice (born 14 April 1857, died 26 October 1944), who married Prince Henry of Battenberg.[168] [45] The children produced 42 grandchildren and 87 great-grandchildren, amplifying Victoria's genetic and dynastic reach across Europe.[169] Victoria was an asymptomatic carrier of haemophilia B, an X-linked recessive disorder likely arising from a spontaneous genetic mutation, as no prior family history existed on either parental side.[170] Her eighth child, Prince Leopold, inherited the condition and suffered frequent bleeding episodes, dying at age 30 from injuries sustained in a fall.[171] Two daughters, Alice and Beatrice, were carriers who transmitted the gene: Alice's daughter Alexandra Feodorovna (Alix of Hesse) passed it to her son, Tsarevich Alexei of Russia (1904–1918), whose haemophilia exacerbated the Romanovs' political vulnerabilities; Beatrice's daughter Victoria Eugenie married Alfonso XIII of Spain, resulting in haemophiliac sons Alfonso (1907–1938) and Gonzalo (1914–1934).[172] No other children carried or expressed the gene, and the condition did not affect male-line transmission directly but persisted through carrier females marrying into other houses, influencing Russia, Spain, and minor German principalities until dying out in the male lines by the mid-20th century, with no living descendants affected today.[173] The strategic marriages of Victoria's children and grandchildren forged extensive dynastic ties, earning her the moniker "Grandmother of Europe."[174] Her eldest daughter Victoria's union with Prussia produced Wilhelm II (born 1859, reigned 1888–1918), linking to the German Empire; Alice's descendants included Russia's last tsar, Nicholas II, via Alix; Edward VII's line continued the British throne through George V; and Beatrice's Spanish connections endured in later Bourbon kings.[175] By 1914, six of Europe's reigning monarchs—George V (UK), Wilhelm II (Germany), Michael (Romania, grandson via Alice), Christian X (Denmark, via Louise's niece), Haakon VII (Norway, via Edward's daughter Maud), and Alfonso XIII (Spain)—were Victoria's grandchildren or close kin, creating interlocking familial interests that some historians argue restrained, while others claim amplified, continental conflicts like World War I due to cousinly rivalries.[176] Her lineage persists in contemporary monarchs, including Charles III of the UK, Felipe VI of Spain, Harald V of Norway, Margrethe II's successor Frederik X of Denmark, and Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, underscoring the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (later Windsor) house's pervasive influence on European royalty.[177]Formal Attributes
Titles, Styles, and Honorifics
Prior to her accession to the throne, Victoria was styled as Her Royal Highness The Princess Victoria of Kent, reflecting her position as the only child of Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld.[1] She was baptized Alexandrina Victoria on 24 May 1819, but from early childhood preferred the name Victoria and was commonly addressed as such, dropping the use of Alexandrina in official contexts by the time of her majority.[1] Upon the death of her uncle, King William IV, on 20 June 1837, Victoria ascended as Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, choosing to reign solely under the regnal name Victoria rather than Alexandrina Victoria, as confirmed in her accession proclamation issued that day.[178] Her formal style became "Her Majesty Victoria, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Queen, Defender of the Faith," a phrasing rooted in the traditional royal proclamation formula established by statute since the Act of Settlement 1701.[179] This style emphasized her role as head of the Church of England via the title Fidei Defensor, originally granted to Henry VIII in 1521 and retained post-Reformation.[180] In 1876, the Royal Titles Act authorized the addition of "Empress of India" to her style, formally proclaimed on 28 April 1876 to align the monarchy with Britain's expanding imperial holdings following the 1858 Government of India Act, which transferred control from the East India Company to the Crown. The updated style thus read "Victoria, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Queen, Defender of the Faith, Empress of India," with the imperial title taking effect in the United Kingdom on 1 May 1876 and in India on 1 January 1877.[181] In Latin, this was rendered as Victoria Regina et Imperatrix (V.R. et I.), supplanting her earlier cypher of V.R. (Victoria Regina) used on official documents, seals, and coinage from 1837 onward.[182] Throughout her reign, Victoria was addressed in formal correspondence and ceremonies as "Her Most Gracious Majesty" or simply "The Queen," with courtiers and family using honorifics such as "Ma'am" in direct address, per established protocol at the time.[183] No further substantive changes to her core titles occurred, though minor adjustments reflected evolving imperial nomenclature without altering the 1876 style, which persisted until her death on 22 January 1901.[179]Honours Conferred and Received
As Sovereign of the United Kingdom from 20 June 1837, Queen Victoria assumed the position of head of all extant British orders of chivalry, including the Most Noble Order of the Garter, the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, and the Most Honourable Order of the Bath, thereby "receiving" these honours in the sense of sovereign investiture rather than personal award.[184] These roles positioned her as the ultimate authority over appointments within the orders, with no formal conferral upon herself beyond ceremonial installation rites customary for monarchs. Victoria instituted several new honours during her reign to recognize specific categories of service, expanding the honours system in response to imperial growth and military needs. On 29 January 1856, she established the Victoria Cross by royal warrant as the highest award for valour in the face of the enemy, initially retrospective to cover actions from the Crimean War starting in 1854; it was designed to be rank-agnostic, awarded solely on merit.[185] On 25 June 1861, she founded the Most Exalted Order of the Star of India to honour contributions to the governance and administration of British India, reflecting the subcontinent's strategic importance amid expanding colonial administration.[186] The Royal Order of Victoria and Albert, created on 10 February 1862, served as a dynastic honour limited primarily to female members of the royal family and select noblewomen, symbolizing familial and courtly distinction.[187] Later, on 21 April 1896, she instituted the Royal Victorian Order and its associated Royal Victorian Medal to reward personal service directly to the sovereign or royal household, bypassing prime ministerial advice for greater discretionary control.[188] In conferring honours, Victoria exercised her prerogative through regular lists, special jubilees, and wartime recognitions, bestowing thousands of appointments across military, civil, and imperial domains from 1837 to 1901. Notable examples include the 1887 Golden Jubilee Honours, which elevated figures in government and empire, and the 1897 Diamond Jubilee Honours, emphasizing loyalty amid global festivities; these lists often prioritized empirical demonstrations of service, such as administrative efficiency in colonies or battlefield courage, over mere patronage. She personally approved gallantry awards like the Victoria Cross, with 1,358 issued by the end of her reign, underscoring a causal link between observed bravery and reward independent of social hierarchy. Foreign recipients, including allied princes and colonial officials, received British honours to foster diplomatic ties, though domestic critics occasionally noted inconsistencies in merit-based selection amid political pressures. Limited records indicate she exchanged grand crosses with European monarchs, such as Prussian and Russian orders tied to familial alliances, but these were ceremonial reciprocities rather than unilateral awards.[7]| Honour Instituted | Date | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Victoria Cross | 29 January 1856 | Valour in combat, rank-neutral.[185] |
| Order of the Star of India | 25 June 1861 | Services to British India.[186] |
| Royal Order of Victoria and Albert | 10 February 1862 | Dynastic and courtly recognition.[187] |
| Royal Victorian Order | 21 April 1896 | Personal service to the sovereign.[188] |