Hubbry Logo
Silvergate BankSilvergate BankMain
Open search
Silvergate Bank
Community hub
Silvergate Bank
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Silvergate Bank
Silvergate Bank
Silvergate Bank
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Silvergate stock price

Key Information

Silvergate Bank was a California bank founded in 1988. The company began providing services for cryptocurrency users in 2016, and conducted an IPO in 2019. In November 2022, concerns were raised about Silvergate's health, after a fall in cryptocurrency prices and the bankruptcy of FTX.[1][2][3][4] In March 2023, the bank announced plans to wind down and liquidate.[5] Its failure was one of the first in the 2023 United States banking crisis.

Foundation and growth

[edit]

Silvergate Bank was founded as a savings and loan association.[6][7] In 1996, it was re-capitalized and reorganized into a bank by Dennis Frank and Derek J. Eisele, but it initially remained a three-branch community bank in the San Diego region.[6][8]

In 2013, CEO Alan Lane personally invested in Bitcoin; the company launched an initiative to start serving cryptocurrency clients in 2016.[6][9] After this, the bank grew rapidly, reaching $1.9 billion in assets and 250 clients by 2017.[6] The company conducted an IPO in November 2019 at a share price of $13, and by November 2021 the price had risen by 1,580% to $219 due to the cryptocurrency bubble at the time.[10][9]

Silvergate Exchange Network and Diem acquisition

[edit]

The bank operated a real-time payments system called the "Silvergate Exchange Network" (SEN), which enabled cryptocurrency exchanges, institutions, and customers to exchange fiat currencies such as US dollars and euros.[2][11] Silvergate was probably the first regulated bank to develop this sort of payment system.[2] By the third quarter of 2022 it had $12 billion in deposits from 1,677 "Silvergate Exchange Network" (SEN) customers including all major cryptocurrency exchanges and over 1,000 institutional investors.[2]

In 2021, Silvergate initiated efforts to launch its own U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin,[12] acquiring Meta's Diem technology in January, 2022 for around $200 million to assist with this (Silvergate had previously intended to serve as a key issuer of the Diem currency for Meta).[13][14][12] As of late 2022, the stablecoin had not yet launched.[12]

By this time, the bank was led by Lane as CEO and Ben Reynolds as president, while Eisele remained in the leadership as chief credit officer.[15][16][8]

FTX exposure, drop in liquidity, and winding down

[edit]
See also: Bankruptcy of FTX

In late 2022—following a fall in cryptocurrency prices and the collapse of many cryptocurrency exchanges and schemes such as FTX—concerns were raised about potential effects on Silvergate due to loss of deposits and credit exposure from SEN leverage, as well as potential ramifications of issues for the wider cryptocurrency ecosystem due to Silvergate's key role in it.[1][2][4][3] Some short sellers raised the prospect of a bank run.[2] The share price of Silvergate had fallen 89% from its November 2021 all-time-high to $25 by 5 December 2022, and its deposits fell to $9.8 billion.[10][1] Silvergate reported in November 2022 that it had adequate liquidity, that it only held FTX deposits, and that it was not exposed to FTX via lending.[4][1] Senators Elizabeth Warren, Roger Marshall, and John Kennedy requested that the bank explain its relationship to FTX in December 2022.[17] By December 2022 deposits at Silvergate had fallen to $3.8 billion.[18]

On March 8, 2023, it was announced that Silvergate Bank would wind down its operations and liquidate.[5] On September 18, 2024, Silvergate Capital filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, listing assets between $100 million and $500 million and liabilities between $10 million and $50 million.[19]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Silvergate Bank

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

was a state-chartered headquartered in , founded in as a traditional savings before pivoting in to specialize in banking services for the emerging sector. The bank developed the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN), a proprietary platform enabling 24/7 real-time payments and settlements tailored for firms, which facilitated its rapid growth as a key financial partner to exchanges and s during the industry's expansion. Under Silvergate Capital Corporation, its that conducted an in November 2019, the bank amassed over $14 billion in deposits by late 2022, predominantly from crypto-related customers, positioning it as a pioneer in bridging traditional banking with technologies. However, this heavy concentration in volatile digital assets exposed Silvergate to sector-specific risks, culminating in a sharp decline in deposits from $11.9 billion in September 2022 to $3.8 billion by year-end, driven by market turmoil including the collapse and broader "risk-off" sentiment. On March 8, 2023, Silvergate announced its intent to wind down operations and voluntarily liquidate, citing unsustainable business conditions amid ongoing industry distress; the process enabled full repayment of all deposits using its $4.6 billion in cash reserves as of December 31, 2022, without losses to the federal deposit insurance fund. The bank's orderly self-liquidation, distinct from forced resolutions like those of , underscored causal vulnerabilities from undiversified crypto exposure rather than generalized interest rate mismanagement, while later regulatory settlements in 2024 addressed supervision lapses in anti-money laundering and compliance.

Origins and Early Operations

Founding as a Traditional Savings Institution

Silvergate Thrift and Loan Company was established on August 26, 1988, as an chartered in , operating initially as a traditional thrift focused on deposit-taking and lending activities. Headquartered in , the provided standard savings products and consumer typical of savings and loan associations during that era, serving local communities in County with conservative banking operations amid the of the late 1980s. As a thrift, it adhered to regulations limiting its scope to services, emphasizing through state mechanisms rather than federal FDIC coverage at inception, though it later transitioned to full banking status. The founding occurred in a period of regulatory for thrifts following widespread failures in the industry, prompting Silvergate to maintain a low-profile, risk-averse model centered on residential and commercial lending supported by customer deposits. With remaining modest in its early years—totaling under $100 million by the mid-1990s—the institution avoided aggressive expansion, prioritizing stability over growth in line with traditional principles of matching short-term deposits to long-term loans. This foundational approach positioned it as a community-oriented savings provider until subsequent reorganizations shifted its trajectory.

Acquisition by Silvergate Capital and Initial Modernization

Silvergate Capital Corporation, established in , functioned as the for Silvergate Bank from the outset, with the bank commencing operations that year as a California-chartered specializing in savings deposits and lending. This structure allowed the to oversee the subsidiary's traditional community banking activities, primarily serving local depositors and borrowers in the area through physical branches and standard loan products. Early operations emphasized conservative growth amid the savings and loan industry's challenges post-1980s crisis, with assets remaining modest—under $1 billion for decades—supported by a focus on residential mortgages and accounts. No major external acquisition event separated the bank from its ; instead, Silvergate Capital managed internal recapitalizations and compliance adaptations to evolving state regulations. A key modernization milestone occurred on December 20, 2012, when Silvergate Bank restructured as a state-chartered and joined the System as a member, gaining eligibility for borrowing and access previously unavailable to industrial loan companies. This transition enhanced liquidity management and supervisory framework, aligning with post-financial crisis reforms like Dodd-Frank Act requirements for stronger capital standards. Concurrently, the bank pursued technological upgrades, partnering with core providers to implement digital deposit processing and early portals by the mid-2010s, which streamlined operations and reduced branch dependency—culminating in the sale of non-core assets like a San Marcos branch in November 2018 to focus resources on scalable infrastructure. These steps boosted efficiency, enabling deposit growth to surpass $1 billion by August 2017 without proportional expense increases.

Pivot to Cryptocurrency-Focused Banking

Recognition of Market Gap and Entry into Crypto Services

In 2013, Silvergate Bank identified a significant market gap in banking services for the burgeoning industry, where traditional financial institutions were reluctant to engage due to perceived risks including high volatility, regulatory ambiguity, and stringent anti-money laundering (AML) requirements that existing compliance frameworks struggled to accommodate for firms. This reluctance stemmed from broader industry caution following early price fluctuations and enforcement actions by regulators like the (FinCEN), which classified virtual currencies as money services businesses subject to enhanced scrutiny. Silvergate's leadership, led by CEO Alan Lane, recognized that exchanges, miners, and related entities required reliable deposit accounts, wire transfers, and payment processing but faced repeated account closures or denials from major banks. To capitalize on this underserved niche, Silvergate launched its banking initiative in 2013, pivoting from its prior focus on community banking and lending to onboard firms as depositors. The bank proactively invited early-stage crypto exchanges to discuss their needs, offering tailored deposit services that emphasized robust know-your-customer (KYC) and AML compliance adapted for the sector, thereby positioning itself as one of the few U.S. institutions willing to bridge traditional finance with digital assets. This entry facilitated rapid deposit growth from crypto clients, which constituted just 1% of total deposits in but demonstrated the viability of serving an industry projected to expand amid Bitcoin's post-2013 price recovery. By prioritizing institutional clients like exchanges over retail users, Silvergate mitigated some early risks while establishing a foothold in a market shunned by larger competitors wary of reputational and supervisory backlash. The initiative's success hinged on Silvergate's ability to maintain amid evolving guidance, such as FinCEN's 2013 clarification on administrators, which underscored the need for specialized banking without prohibiting it outright. Unlike mainstream banks that de-risked entirely from crypto exposures to avoid potential fines—evidenced by widespread account terminations for Bitcoin-related businesses—Silvergate invested in customized , enabling it to capture deposits from firms previously operating on cash or offshore alternatives. This strategic entry not only addressed a causal void in on-ramps for crypto trading volumes but also laid the groundwork for subsequent innovations, though it later amplified vulnerabilities tied to sector-specific demands.

Development of Compliance and Risk Management Frameworks

Silvergate Bank, upon pivoting to serve cryptocurrency clients starting in 2013, established an anti-money laundering (AML) program under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) that included customer identification procedures, enhanced due diligence for high-risk crypto entities, and manual transaction monitoring to address sector-specific risks such as pseudonymity and rapid fund transfers. This framework was overseen by the board and senior management, with dedicated compliance staff led by figures like Kathleen Fraher, who held roles in BSA, operations, and risk management since 2006. The bank claimed these measures enabled real-time surveillance aligned with the USA PATRIOT Act, emphasizing risk-adjusted customer onboarding and ongoing monitoring to mitigate illicit finance risks inherent in digital assets. In 2017, coinciding with the launch of the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) for 24/7 crypto transfers, the bank enhanced its by integrating industry-specific tools for deposit concentration monitoring and liquidity stress testing, given the volatile nature of crypto client deposits. By April 2021, Silvergate deployed an upgraded automated transaction monitoring system (ATMS-B), intended to replace prior manual and legacy systems (ATMS-A) with intelligence-based rules for detecting suspicious patterns in crypto-related flows. That July, the bank partnered with Elliptic to automate know-your-customer (KYC) processes using blockchain analytics, incorporating crypto risk scoring and wallet screening to support a risk-based compliance approach for onboarding exchanges and trading firms. Public disclosures, including 2021 filings, asserted that these frameworks provided "robust" coverage of crypto exposures, with thorough cited as exemplary despite the exchange's later collapse. However, examinations in and November 2022 uncovered significant gaps, including the failure of ATMS-B to monitor over $1 trillion in SEN transactions from 2021 to September 2022, and inadequate detection of approximately $9 billion in suspicious transfers from between January and November 2022. These deficiencies prompted a $43 million fine from the in July 2024 for BSA/AML program shortfalls, alongside SEC charges alleging misleading investor statements about compliance efficacy, highlighting execution failures amid rapid deposit growth from $770 million in 2017 to $14.1 billion in 2021. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation issued a consent order in 2024 mandating remediation, underscoring that while foundational elements were in place, issues undermined the frameworks' effectiveness against surging crypto volumes.

Core Products and Technological Innovations

Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN)

The Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) was a proprietary real-time platform developed by Silvergate Bank, enabling 24/7 instant USD transfers among its institutional clients, primarily cryptocurrency exchanges, trading platforms, funds, and related businesses. Launched in , SEN addressed the limitations of traditional banking systems, which operated on slower settlement cycles ill-suited to the continuous trading demands of markets, by providing API-enabled, near-instantaneous settlements without reliance on external networks like ACH or wire transfers. SEN facilitated secure, efficient B2B transactions, processing over $10 billion in USD volume by early 2020 through its integration with client trading infrastructures, which allowed for rapid funding, withdrawals, and inter-exchange settlements. Key features included real-time liquidity access, reducing counterparty risks and operational delays in high-volume crypto environments, and compliance with banking regulations via Silvergate's risk management protocols. In 2020, the platform introduced SEN Leverage, an extension permitting institutional clients to obtain USD loans collateralized by bitcoin, with funding and repayments executed in real time over the SEN rails. By 2022, SEN expanded internationally with Euro-denominated transfers, leveraging the same underlying technology as its USD counterpart to support cross-border payments for European clients while maintaining 24/7 availability. This growth reflected SEN's role in bridging traditional finance and ecosystems, handling billions in quarterly transfer volumes at its peak and becoming a for over 1,000 firms. However, amid Silvergate's liquidity challenges in early 2023, SEN operations were suspended effective March 3, 2023, as a measure, halting its services prior to the bank's voluntary liquidation.

Other Specialized Offerings and Diem Asset Acquisition

Silvergate Bank provided institutional-grade custody services, including segregated, permission-controlled cold storage accounts designed for storage. These offerings catered to exchanges, market makers, and other firms seeking secure, compliant storage solutions integrated with the bank's broader banking infrastructure. Additionally, the bank extended SEN Leverage, a lending program enabling clients to access U.S. dollar-denominated loans collateralized by assets, thereby bridging traditional with crypto liquidity needs. Complementing these, Silvergate offered API-driven solutions for real-time USD transfers and tailored to high-volume crypto operations, alongside standard commercial banking products such as business checking, savings, accounts, and certificates of deposit. These services emphasized 24/7 availability and compliance frameworks to support the operational demands of the digital currency sector. In January 2022, Silvergate acquired key assets from the Diem Association—formerly Facebook's Libra project—for $182 million, comprising $50 million in cash and 1,221,217 shares of Silvergate's class A . The purchase included , development tools, deployment infrastructure, and operational systems for Diem's -based payment network (DPN), aimed at enhancing Silvergate's capabilities in issuance and cross-border payments. This acquisition aligned with Silvergate's strategy to leverage advanced technology for scalable, regulated financial products in the crypto ecosystem, though the bank's subsequent issues limited full integration.

Growth Phase and Financial Metrics

Client Acquisition and Deposit Expansion

Silvergate Bank's client acquisition strategy centered on cryptocurrency industry participants, including exchanges, trading platforms, miners, and institutional investors seeking banking services tailored to 24/7 operations. The bank began onboarding such clients around 2013, with the customer base expanding to over 1,000 -related entities by 2020. This growth accelerated amid the market's expansion, as Silvergate positioned itself as a compliant bridge between traditional finance and digital assets, leveraging its Silvergate Exchange Network for real-time transfers. By December 31, 2020, the number of customers stood at 969, rising to 1,381 by December 31, 2021, reflecting a 43% year-over-year increase driven by heightened crypto adoption and trading volumes. In the first quarter of 2021 alone, Silvergate added 135 new clients, further bolstering its ecosystem. Client numbers continued to climb, reaching 1,677 by the third quarter of 2022—an addition of more than 350 customers compared to the prior year's third quarter—despite emerging market volatility. This influx of specialized clients propelled deposit expansion, with total deposits surging from $1.8 billion at the end of 2017 to $14.3 billion by the end of 2021, a exceeding 68%. Deposits from customers, which comprised over 90% of the total by the third quarter of 2022, were predominantly non-interest-bearing and tied to transactional activity in the crypto sector, enabling Silvergate to fund growth and investments without relying heavily on . The bank's focus on this niche allowed it to capture deposits that traditional banks avoided due to regulatory and risk concerns, though this concentration later amplified vulnerabilities during sector downturns.

Stock Performance and Valuation Peaks

Silvergate Capital Corporation went public on November 7, 2019, through an that priced shares at $12.00 on the under the SI. The offering capitalized on the company's emerging role in banking, with shares initially reflecting modest post-IPO gains of 27.08% for 2019. The stock's performance accelerated dramatically in tandem with the market expansion. In 2020, shares delivered a return of 366.48%, driven by surging demand for Silvergate's specialized services among crypto exchanges and institutions. This momentum carried into 2021, yielding a 121.39% gain as and related assets hit record highs, boosting investor enthusiasm for crypto-adjacent financial firms. Silvergate's shares culminated at a peak closing price of $222.13 on November 3, 2021, representing an approximate 18.5-fold increase from the IPO price. At this zenith, the company's reached roughly $5.9 billion, underscoring peak valuations tied to its niche dominance in facilitating real-time crypto transactions via the Silvergate Exchange Network. Such metrics highlighted investor perceptions of Silvergate's scalable model amid the bull market, though they also embedded risks from concentrated crypto exposure.

Precipitating Events and Liquidity Crisis

Heavy Exposure to FTX and Alameda Research

Silvergate Bank maintained significant banking relationships with , a major , and , its affiliated trading firm, providing deposit accounts and facilitating wire transfers between the entities. As of September 30, 2022, FTX accounted for less than 10% of Silvergate's $11.9 billion in total deposits from customers, equating to under $1.19 billion in exposure. The bank processed payments to Alameda Research upon instructions from senders, consistent with standard banking procedures, though this drew scrutiny amid revelations of improper fund transfers between FTX and Alameda that contributed to the exchange's . The collapse of on November 11, 2022, following a surge in customer withdrawals triggered by reports of shortfalls and asset commingling with Alameda, intensified pressure on Silvergate's . Some FTX users had been directed to wire funds to Alameda-held accounts at Silvergate to circumvent restrictions on direct FTX banking access, embedding the bank's role in the ecosystem's operations. In the fourth quarter of 2022, Silvergate experienced an $8.1 billion run on deposits, largely from crypto clients amid the FTX fallout, forcing the bank to liquidate securities holdings at a loss to meet demands. Silvergate's CEO Alan Lane stated that the bank had conducted extensive due diligence on and was not a custodian for its bitcoin-collateralized products, emphasizing that FTX deposits formed a limited portion of overall liabilities. Nonetheless, the entanglement raised concerns about risk concentration in unregulated crypto counterparties, with U.S. prosecutors later investigating Silvergate's dealings with FTX and Alameda for potential facilitation of fraudulent activities. Senator questioned the bank's oversight in enabling transfers that may have masked Alameda's misuse of customer funds, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities in crypto-banking integrations. This exposure, while not dominant, amplified the strain that precipitated Silvergate's broader crisis.

Onset of Withdrawals and Balance Sheet Strain

In November 2022, following the bankruptcy filing of Trading Ltd. on , Silvergate Bank encountered a surge in deposit withdrawals from its digital asset customers, driven by a broader crisis of confidence in the sector amid revelations of over-leverage and insolvencies. These outflows, which began accelerating that month, totaled approximately $8.1 billion by year-end, representing over 60% of the bank's deposits and exposing underlying liquidity vulnerabilities tied to its concentrated crypto clientele. Total deposits declined sharply from $13.2 billion as of September 30, 2022, to $6.3 billion by December 31, 2022, with customer deposits falling from $11.9 billion to $3.8 billion over the same period. To satisfy these demands without immediate , the bank drew on wholesale funding sources, including $4.3 billion in Federal Home Loan Bank advances and $2.4 billion in short-term brokered certificates of deposit, while also accessing the Federal Reserve's —borrowings that peaked and were fully repaid by December 15, 2022. The balance sheet faced acute strain from these events, as Silvergate sold $5.2 billion in held-to-maturity debt securities—primarily U.S. government and agency obligations purchased in a low-interest-rate environment—to generate cash, realizing a $718 million loss amid rising market rates that had already produced unrealized losses on remaining holdings. This transaction, combined with a $196 million impairment on acquired intangible assets, contributed to a $1 billion net earnings loss for the fourth quarter. Although on-balance-sheet remained above digital asset deposits at $4.6 billion in cash equivalents versus $3.8 billion in such deposits by quarter-end, the realized losses eroded capital buffers and highlighted maturity mismatches between short-term liabilities and longer-term assets, amplifying pressure in a higher-rate regime.

Decline, Liquidation, and Regulatory Aftermath

Announcement of Voluntary Liquidation

On March 8, 2023, Silvergate Capital Corporation, the of Silvergate Bank, announced its intent to wind down banking operations and voluntarily liquidate the institution in an orderly manner, subject to regulatory approvals. The decision followed the bank's discontinuation of its Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) on March 3, 2023, amid a broader liquidity strain precipitated by market turmoil, though the announcement attributed the move to "recent industry and regulatory developments." The press release emphasized that the wind-down plan included full repayment of all customer deposits, with other deposit-related services to remain operational during the process to facilitate an orderly transition. Silvergate stated that voluntary represented "the best path forward" to preserve residual value from assets, including proprietary technology platforms and tax assets, while resolving claims against the bank. The company engaged advisors such as Centerview Partners LLC for financial matters, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP for legal guidance, and Strategic Risk Associates for transition management to execute the process. No specific timeline was detailed beyond aiming for completion aligned with regulatory requirements, but the announcement aligned with Silvergate's prior disclosure of a $1 billion net loss for the fourth quarter of , driven largely by unrealized losses on securities amid rising rates and deposit outflows exceeding $8 billion in the weeks following the collapse. This step marked Silvergate's exit from the banking sector it had pioneered, with the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation confirming the bank's initiation of voluntary proceedings on the same day.

Post-Liquidation Settlements and Bankruptcy Proceedings

Following the March 8, 2023, announcement of voluntary by Silvergate Bank, the institution completed its wind-down process, including the relinquishment of its banking charter to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation on July 8, 2024. The terminated its May 2023 enforcement action against the bank on July 26, 2024, confirming the orderly that prioritized depositor protection without invoking FDIC , unlike contemporaneous failures at and . Regulatory settlements ensued, with Silvergate Capital Corporation agreeing on July 1, 2024, to pay $63 million in combined penalties across agencies: $20 million to the California DFPI, $43 million to the , and an additional $50 million civil penalty to the SEC on July 2, 2024, for alleged misleading disclosures on risk management and exposure, without admitting or denying wrongdoing. Investor litigation culminated in a $37.5 million settlement for a , receiving final court approval on September 3, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of ; the suit alleged misrepresentations about anti-money laundering controls and high-risk client , which contributed to over $700 million in securities losses and $4.3 billion in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings amid the November 2022 crypto market turmoil. Silvergate Capital Corporation and affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 17, 2024, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of (Case No. 24-12158), listing assets of $100–500 million against liabilities of $10–50 million, to facilitate final operational wind-down post-bank liquidation. The debtors proposed a first amended reorganization plan on June 24, 2025, allowing common equity holders to retain ownership in a reorganized entity focused on asset distribution, with voting concluded by October 15, 2025; as of late 2025, confirmation proceedings remain ongoing, supported by monthly operating reports through September 30, 2025. As of February 6, 2026, Silvergate Capital Corporation's stock (SICPQ) remains actively traded on the OTC Expert Market tier, restricted to unsolicited quotes only, with the most recent trade at $0.50 per share; it carries high risk due to limited public information and the ongoing bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings.

Industry Impact and Controversies

Achievements in Bridging Traditional and Crypto Finance

Silvergate Bank pioneered banking services for the sector by offering FDIC-insured USD deposits to firms at a time when many traditional institutions avoided such clients due to regulatory uncertainties. Starting in , the bank pivoted from community lending to servicing crypto exchanges, trading platforms, and funds, enabling them to maintain compliant on-ramps and off-ramps essential for trading operations. This infrastructure addressed a core friction in crypto markets: the need for reliable, instantaneous USD without reliance on slower legacy systems like ACH transfers. The bank's flagship innovation, the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN), launched in 2018, created a proprietary 24/7 payments platform for near-real-time USD settlements among crypto clients via integrations. SEN bypassed traditional banking's operational hour restrictions and multi-day clearing times, allowing exchanges to process trade settlements, , and capital movements globally and cost-effectively in USD. By 2021, SEN had scaled dramatically, handling over $219 billion in transfers in the fourth quarter alone, generating $9.3 million in associated revenue. From April 2021 to September 2022, the network executed more than 400,000 transactions totaling over $1 trillion, underscoring its role in facilitating high-volume crypto-fiat . Silvergate extended its bridging capabilities with SEN Leverage in January 2020, partnering with to offer bitcoin-collateralized lending, which provided institutional traders increased capital efficiency by leveraging crypto holdings against USD loans. The bank also introduced SEN for 24/7 euro transfers, enhancing cross-currency support for international crypto operations. Additionally, Silvergate offered bitcoin-collateralized loans directly to industry participants, further integrating volatile digital assets with stable traditional credit mechanisms. These products collectively reduced barriers between regulated banking and , enabling crypto entities to scale operations with institutional-grade stability and speed.

Criticisms of Risk Management and Regulatory Overreach

Silvergate Bank's practices drew significant criticism for inadequate oversight of its heavy concentration in cryptocurrency-related activities, which exposed the institution to acute and market volatility risks. A 2023 review by the Federal Reserve's Office of Inspector General highlighted "significant weaknesses" in the bank's and capabilities, noting that supervisors failed to fully appreciate the escalating risks from its rapid growth and crypto focus, but attributing primary deficiencies to internal controls that did not scale with a deposit base that surged from $1.8 billion in 2018 to over $14 billion by late 2022. The bank's SENIOR Loan Platform, which facilitated over $90 billion in payments for crypto clients between 2018 and 2022, amplified these vulnerabilities by prioritizing volume over robust , leading to undetected suspicious transfers totaling $9 billion, as later revealed in regulatory findings. Further scrutiny emerged over compliance lapses, particularly in anti-money laundering (AML) protocols under the Bank Secrecy Act. In July 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Silvergate Capital, its former CEO Alan Lane, and former Chief Risk Officer Gretchen Hammoud with misleading investors about the effectiveness of its AML program, resulting in a $63 million settlement by the parent company and individual penalties of $1 million and $250,000, respectively. Critics, including analyses from financial risk bodies, argued that the bank's overreliance on uncollateralized loans to crypto firms like FTX and Alameda Research—amid the November 2022 FTX collapse—exemplified a failure to diversify or hedge against sector-specific downturns, introducing "crypto market risk into the traditional banking system" and culminating in a $1 billion liquidity shortfall by March 2023. These issues were compounded by the absence of effective key control functions, as the OIG noted, allowing unchecked expansion without commensurate stress testing for crypto volatility. On regulatory overreach, some observers contended that heightened federal scrutiny of crypto banking post-FTX contributed to Silvergate's downfall beyond its internal failings, by eroding client confidence and prompting preemptive deposit outflows. In a September 2024 bankruptcy filing, former executive Louis Hetrick attributed the collapse partly to "regulators who soured on its crypto-friendly business," pointing to guidance from agencies like the and FDIC that reappraised crypto exposures as high-risk, which allegedly deterred traditional clients and amplified withdrawal pressures starting in November 2022. A analysis echoed this, linking U.S. regulatory "criticism" and neutrality concerns to accelerated losses, as banks faced elevated capital requirements and examination intensity for activities, potentially overstepping into discouragement of innovation without tailored frameworks. However, from the OIG review suggests that while supervision could have been more proactive, the bank's voluntary liquidation on March 8, 2023—unlike regulator-seized peers SVB and —stemmed primarily from self-identified after $8.1 billion in withdrawals, underscoring that operational risks, not direct overreach, precipitated the end. Pro-crypto advocates have framed this as evidence of against , yet causal analysis ties the core failure to unmitigated exposure rather than exogenous regulatory hostility alone.

References

  1. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R48430/R48430.3.pdf
  2. https://www.investing.com/equities/silvergate-capital-corp-company-profile
  3. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48430
  4. https://silvergate.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/securities5172019.pdf
  5. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210923000011/ex991silvergateannouncesse.htm
  6. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-capital-corporation-announces-intent-to-wind-down-operations-and-voluntarily-liquidate-silvergate-bank/
  7. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000095015723001160/ex99-1.htm
  8. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/enforcement20240726a.htm
  9. https://www.usbanklocations.com/silvergate-bank-locations.htm
  10. https://oig.federalreserve.gov/reports/board-review-silvergate-summary-sep2023.pdf
  11. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/31/meet-silvergates-alan-lane-whos-bankrolling-cryptocurrency-exchanges.html
  12. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4586509-silvergate-bank-rise-and-fall
  13. https://www.cbinsights.com/company/silvergate-capital-corp
  14. https://www.silvergatebank.com/custom/fi/silvergate/fb/disclosure/Carlsbad-Branch-Celebrates-One-Year-Anniversary.pdf
  15. https://ajemb.us/index.php/gp/article/download/40/71/314
  16. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210920000020/si10-k12312019.htm
  17. https://www.fisglobal.com/insights/fis-client-stories/silvergate
  18. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/homestreet-bank-to-acquire-business-lending-team-and-san-marcos-retail-branch-of-silvergate-bank/
  19. https://protos.com/a-comprehensive-timeline-of-silvergates-downfall/
  20. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/11/15/bitcoin-companies-and-entrepreneurs-cant-get-bank-accounts/
  21. https://www.advisorhub.com/crypto-companies-complain-theyre-being-shunned-by-most-banks/
  22. https://sites.williams.edu/williamsinsight/fall-2021/581/
  23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41261-024-00243-0
  24. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IN/PDF/IN12148/IN12148.1.pdf
  25. https://www.fdic.gov/resources/regulations/federal-register-publications/2021/2021-rfi-digital-assets-3064-za25-c-014.pdf
  26. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210922000204/ex991silvergateannouncesch.htm
  27. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210922000233/ex991-letterfromsilvergate.htm
  28. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2024/comp-pr2024-82.pdf
  29. https://www.finextra.com/pressarticle/88460/silvergate-bank-enlists-elliptic-to-automate-kyc-for-crypto-business
  30. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/enforcement20240701a.htm
  31. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-82
  32. https://dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/337/2024/06/Consent-Order-Silvergate-Bank.pdf
  33. https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/03/silvergate-suspends-sen-exchange-network
  34. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/crypto-market-trades-at-risk-without-silvergate-s-si-sen-network
  35. https://silvergate.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/current1142020.pdf
  36. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/crypto/elizabeth-warren-ftx-silvergate-bank-crypto-rcna60147
  37. https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/public-companies/sen-transfer-volume
  38. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-announces-sen-leverage-to-provide-digital-currency-investors-increased-capital-access/
  39. https://blog.bitstamp.net/post/bitstamp-and-silvergate-bank-begin-pilot-phase-bit/
  40. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220215005242/en/Silvergate-Announces-Expansion-of-Silvergate-Exchange-Network-to-Include-Euros
  41. https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/silvergate-suspends-crypto-payments-network-shares-fall-after-hours-2023-03-04/
  42. https://dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/337/2022/09/Silvergate-Bank-comment-letter-8.3.22.pdf
  43. https://binariks.com/blog/blockchain-banking/
  44. https://suttersecurities.com/portfolio/silvergate-bank/
  45. https://www.bankingdive.com/news/diem-to-end-crypto-project-sell-its-assets-to-silvergate-bank-for-182m/617839/
  46. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-purchases-blockchain-payment-network-assets-from-diem/
  47. https://www.thebankslate.com/2022/02/silvergate-buys-diem-related-assets-for-stablecoin-push/
  48. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210922000021/ex991assetpurchasepr1-31x22.htm
  49. https://www.pymnts.com/acquisitions/2022/silvergate-closes-182m-deal-to-purchase-facebooks-digital-currency-project-diem/
  50. https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/history/si-history-mission-ownership?srsltid=AfmBOorQEojkdJVHyVfCWnT5BMK9Q8xnwwWqHJ_geo7dH_ZG7ENZoeFQ
  51. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/crazy-deposit-growth-masked-an-unbelievable-quarter-for-silvergate-capital-2021-05-11
  52. https://silvergate.com/earnings/silvergate-capital-corporation-announces-fourth-quarter-2021-results/
  53. http://silvergate.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Earnings-Transcript-2022-Q3.pdf
  54. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/ipos/overview?dealId=658821-88409
  55. https://companiesmarketcap.com/silvergate-capital/stock-price-history/
  56. https://twitter.com/charliebilello/status/1634043964276736002
  57. https://companiesmarketcap.com/silvergate-capital/marketcap/
  58. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-provides-statement-on-ftx-exposure/
  59. https://cryptoslate.com/silvergate-addresses-ftxs-exposure-reassure-stakeholders/
  60. https://www.investopedia.com/silvergate-plunges-45-7091740
  61. https://www.businessinsider.com/ftx-customers-wire-fund-crypto-alameda-bank-account-silvergate-deposits-2022-11
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64176446
  63. https://www.reuters.com/technology/crypto-lender-silvergates-descent-into-voluntary-liquidation-2023-03-09/
  64. https://www.fdic.gov/news/speeches/2023/spmar2923.html
  65. https://www.garp.org/risk-intelligence/culture-governance/crypto-connected-silvergate-240712
  66. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210923000020/ex991si4q22earningsrelease.htm
  67. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-announces-select-preliminary-fourth-quarter-2022-financial-metrics-and-provides-business-update/
  68. https://bpi.com/silvergate-bank-a-discount-window-success-story/
  69. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210923000058/ex991sipressrelease3x8x23.htm
  70. https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/08/crypto-bank-silvergate-announces-voluntary-liquidation
  71. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/09/crypto-bank-silvergate-liquidation-sector-turmoil-wind-down-ftx-exchange
  72. https://dfpi.ca.gov/press_release/dfpi-statement-silvergate-bank-to-begin-voluntary-liquidation/
  73. https://cases.stretto.com/public/x353/13020/PLEADINGS/1302006252580000000005.pdf
  74. https://cryptoslate.com/federal-reserve-ends-enforcement-action-against-silvergate-bank-after-successful-liquidation/
  75. https://dfpi.ca.gov/press_release/silvergate-to-pay-63-million-in-combined-penalties-following-coordinated-investigations-by-dfpi-federal-partners/
  76. https://www.cohenmilstein.com/court-approves-37-5m-cash-settlement-with-silvergate-capital-corporation-in-securities-fraud-class-action/
  77. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/09/03/3144119/1494/en/Court-Approves-37-5M-Cash-Settlement-With-Silvergate-Capital-Corporation-in-Securities-Fraud-Class-Action.html
  78. https://cases.stretto.com/silvergate/
  79. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/silvergate-capital-enters-bankruptcy-after-crypto-banks-shutdown-2024-09-18/
  80. https://cases.stretto.com/silvergate/court-docket/
  81. https://octus.com/resources/articles/silvergate-first-amended-plan-provides-for-common-equity-to-retain-ownership-in-reorganized-silvergate/
  82. https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SICPQ/overview
  83. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SICPQ/
  84. https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1008608/silvergate-bank-end-of-the-road-for-decade-long-crypto-experiment-1008608.html
  85. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/03/07/signature-bank-stablecoins-might-benefit-from-silvergate-exchange-networks-demise
  86. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1312109/000131210920000088/silvergateannouncement.htm
  87. https://silvergate.com/uncategorized/silvergate-announces-expansion-of-silvergate-exchange-network-to-include-euros/
  88. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4583000-silvergate-capital-if-it-survives-it-could-thrive-beyond-measure
  89. https://oig.federalreserve.gov/reports/board-review-silvergate-sep2023.htm
  90. https://www.axios.com/2024/07/01/sec-sues-silvergate-bank-secrecy-act
  91. https://www.oversight.gov/reports/review-supervision-silvergate-bank
  92. https://www.cato.org/commentary/silvergate-bankruptcy-reveals-major-regulatory-problem
  93. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2023/03/17/regulators-shut-down-banks-raising-questions-about-neutrality/
  94. https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilymason/2023/03/06/silvergate-bank-extends-downward-spiral-after-us-criticism-spurs-losses/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.