Hubbry Logo
Storegga SlideStoregga SlideMain
Open search
Storegga Slide
Community hub
Storegga Slide
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Storegga Slide
Storegga Slide
Storegga Slide
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Map of Storegga Slides

The three Storegga Slides (Norwegian: Storeggaraset) are amongst the largest known submarine landslides. They occurred at the edge of Norway's continental shelf in the Norwegian Sea, approximately 6225–6170 BCE. The collapse involved an estimated 290 km (180 mi) length of coastal shelf, with a total volume of 3,500 km3 (840 cu mi) of debris, which caused a paleotsunami in the North Atlantic Ocean.

Description

[edit]
The yellow numbers give the height of the tsunami wave as indicated by tsunamites studied by researchers. [1]

Storegga (Norwegian: 'Great Edge') is located at the edge of Norway's continental shelf in the Norwegian Sea, 100 km (62 mi) north-west of the Møre coast. In around 6200 BCE, structural failures of the shelf caused three underwater landslides, which triggered very large tsunamis in the North Atlantic Ocean. The collapses involved an estimated 290 km (180 mi) length of coastal shelf, with a total volume of 3,500 km3 (840 cu mi) of debris.[2]

Based on carbon dating of plant material recovered from sediment deposited by the tsunamis, the latest incident occurred around 6225–6170 BCE.[3][4] In Scotland, traces of the subsequent tsunami have been recorded, with deposited sediment being discovered in Montrose Basin and the Firth of Forth up to 29 km (18 mi) inland and 4 m (13 ft) above current normal tide levels.[5]

Possible mechanism

[edit]

The triggering mechanism is thought to have been an earthquake that induced a catastrophic expansion of methane clathrate, a solid compound consisting of large amounts of methane suspended within a crystal water structure that forms in deep oceans under extremely high pressure. If removed from a high-pressure, low-temperature environment, one cubic metre of solid methane clathrate expands to 164 cubic metres of gaseous methane.[6] If such an expansion occurred, it may have weakened the integrity of the surrounding rock sufficiently to trigger the slide.

A second theory states that over time, streams from melting glaciers had carried trillions of tons of sediment to the edge of the continental shelf, where it accumulated in many layers. In this case, a trigger such as an earthquake could have caused a large area of seafloor to collapse into the deep Norwegian sea, thus carrying the enormous volume of accumulated sediment along with it.[7]

Impact on human populations

[edit]
Storegga tsunami deposits (grey upper layer), bracketed by peat (dark brown layers), taken at Maryton on the Montrose Basin, Scotland

At, or shortly before, the time of the Second Storegga Slide, a land bridge known to archaeologists and geologists as Doggerland linked Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands across what is now the southern North Sea. This area is believed to have included a coastline of lagoons, marshes, mudflats and beaches, and to have been a rich hunting, fowling and fishing ground populated by Mesolithic human cultures.[8][9][10]

Although Doggerland was permanently submerged through a gradual rise in sea level, it has been hypothesized that coastal areas of both Britain and mainland Europe, extending over areas which are now submerged, would have been temporarily inundated by a tsunami triggered by the Storegga Slide. This event would have had a catastrophic impact on the Mesolithic population at the time.[11][12][13] It is estimated that up to a quarter of the Mesolithic population of Britain lost their lives.[14]

A 2021 study found that about 600 km (370 miles) of Scotland's northern and eastern coastline were affected, with water encroaching 29 km (18 miles) inland. With present-day populations and sea levels, a similar event today could devastate and destroy seafront and port areas of Arbroath, Stonehaven, Aberdeen, Inverness, Wick, and Montrose.[5]

While the tsunami caused by the Second Storegga Slide would have been devastating for those within the run-in zone, ultimately the tsunami was neither universally catastrophic nor the reason behind the inundation of the last vestiges of Doggerland.[15]

Future slides

[edit]

Storegga has been thoroughly investigated as part of the preparation activities for the Ormen Lange gas field off the coast of Norway. The prevalent conclusion is that the slide was caused by glacial deposits left behind after the previous glacial period, making any recurrence only possible following a new glaciation.[2] After facts and arguments supporting this conclusion were published in 2004, the development of the Ormen Lange gas field was considered unlikely to increase the risk of triggering a new slide.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Storegga Slide

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Storegga Slide was a massive that occurred approximately 8,200 years ago in the , off the western coast of , involving the catastrophic failure of a 290-kilometer-long section of the continental shelf and displacing an estimated 2,500–3,500 cubic kilometers of sediment. This event, recognized as the largest known exposed on , triggered a with waves reaching run-up heights of at least 20 meters along affected coastlines. Recent reconstructions indicate that the slide comprised at least two major phases, reshaping the seafloor over an area exceeding square kilometers and contributing to the depositional history of the region. The generated by the slide inundated low-lying coastal areas across , with extensive deposits documented in , the , and , where sediment layers up to 1.6 meters thick have been identified in coastal lakes and bogs. These impacts likely influenced human settlements in the region, though direct archaeological evidence of casualties remains elusive. The causes of the Storegga Slide are attributed to a combination of factors, including following the last Ice Age, which led to isostatic rebound and oversteepening of the continental slope, potentially exacerbated by methane hydrate destabilization or seismic activity. Studies of the slide's morphology and continue to inform understandings of submarine geohazards, highlighting the potential for similar events in modern glaciated margins.

Geological Context

Location and Morphology

The Storegga Slide is situated on the continental shelf offshore mid-Norway in the , approximately 100–120 km northwest of the Møre coast, centered around 64°N, 1°E. The slide complex spans roughly 800 km in a north-south direction and up to 300 km east-west, forming a prominent feature along the that connects to the broader of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea region. The morphology of the Storegga Slide consists of three principal slide scars, designated Storegga I, II, and III, each characterized by distinct headwall scarps reaching heights of up to 300 m. These scars include expansive evacuation zones where has been removed, transitioning into fields that extend across the continental rise, with the overall structure exhibiting an amphitheater-shaped depression in the slide scar area covering about 30% of the total slide extent. Bathymetrically, the upper slide area features gentle slope angles of 1–2°, which progressively flatten toward the abyssal plains of the deeper basin. Recent 2025 seismic surveys have further revealed a buried mega-slide within the Fan, imaged through 2D reflection data showing its headwall beneath sediments, adding complexity to the regional slide morphology. The delineation of these features has relied on advanced mapping techniques, including multibeam sonar for high-resolution and 2D/3D seismic reflection profiling to resolve subsurface structures and scar boundaries.

Sediment and Slope Characteristics

The sediments in the Storegga Slide area primarily consist of fine-grained glacial marine clays and silts deposited during the Pleistocene , with interbedded layers of sands and glacial diamictons forming a stratified sequence up to 500 m thick in the slide scars. These materials originated from ice-proximal glaciomarine environments, where rapid during glacial led to thick accumulations of low-permeability clays overlain by more permeable silts and sands, creating heterogeneous layering prone to differential loading. Geotechnical analyses reveal that these clays exhibit moderate to high sensitivity, with ratios of peak to remolded undrained often exceeding 10, facilitating rapid strength loss and during . Undrained values typically range from 10 to 50 kPa in the upper slide units, influenced by overconsolidation and pore pressure conditions that reduce and promote retrogressive propagation along weak clay horizons. Overpressure ratios in deeper layers further compromise by elevating pore fluids, with sensitivity enhanced by high (often >50%) and plasticity indices that allow for significant remolding under shear. Recent studies from 2024-2025 have identified evidence of reworking in extensions of the slide influence toward the northwestern , where backwash disturbed fine-grained deposits, mixing glacial marine silts with redeposited material up to 75°. These findings highlight ongoing instability in similar types, with multi-proxy analyses showing homogenized layers indicative of high-energy reworking in low-gradient settings.

The Storegga Slides

Chronology and Sequence

The Storegga Slide complex comprises a series of submarine landslides along the mid-Norwegian , spanning from the to the , with major events dated between approximately 20,000 and 8,000 years (). Recent seismic interpretations and sediment core analyses have revised the to include two primary failures within the main , separated by about 12,000 years, fundamentally adjusting the understanding of the event's temporal framework. These occurred during the deglacial phase following the , when and sediment destabilization were prominent. The principal event, often referred to as the main Storegga Slide, is dated to approximately 8,150 ± 70 calibrated years through () of and organic material in cores retrieved from the slide scar and distal deposits. Complementary dating methods, including tephrochronology from layers in proximal marine sequences, corroborate this timing, placing the onset around 7,250 ± 250 uncalibrated radiocarbon years . Earlier classifications identified three distinct phases—Storegga I at ~50,000–30,000 , Storegga II at ~8,000–5,000 , and Storegga III at ~5,000 —based on core and morphological mapping, though subsequent work has consolidated these into a more unified retrogressive progression for the main event while noting smaller subsequent slides extending to ~2,200 . The sequence of the main failure initiated as a retrogressive slide in the northern sector of the lower , where initial destabilization led to block sliding and flows that propagated southward across the margin over distances exceeding 800 km. This progression involved multiple sub-phases of headwall retrogression, with the failure front advancing upslope and laterally, mobilizing material in a chain-like manner; the entire process for the primary event is estimated to have unfolded over hours to a few days based on morphological evidence and dynamic modeling constraints. The 2023 reconstruction further refines this by attributing the deepest parts of the scar to an older failure around 20,000 BP (the Nyegga Slide), with the younger event overlapping and enlarging the pre-existing morphology, thus extending the effective of significant activity in the region.

Scale and Volume of the Main Event

The main Storegga Slide, occurring approximately 8,200 years ago, involved the displacement of an estimated 1,300–2,300 km³ of sediment as part of the Storegga Slide complex, which includes the older Nyegga Slide (~900–1,100 km³ at ~20,000 ); the event alone makes it one of the largest known submarine landslides in Earth's history. This volume for the main event is equivalent to roughly 450–900 times the material mobilized in the 1980 debris avalanche, which released about 2.5–2.9 km³ of debris. The slide created an expansive scar zone covering approximately 95,000 km² on the continental off mid-Norway, with the headwall extending up to 300 km in length. Debris from the event formed extensive flows that spread across the seafloor, with the primary depositional lobe reaching lengths of up to 800 km. Within this, the main runout distance for the mobilized material was around 700 km, reflecting the slide's capacity for long-distance transport despite the gentle average of 0.6–0.7°. Modeling of the slide dynamics indicates that debris accelerated to velocities ranging from 20 to 100 m/s during , enabling the rapid and far-field deposition observed in seismic profiles. The total released by the event is estimated at 10¹⁷–10¹⁸ J, derived from assessments of the slide's volume, velocity, and frictional dissipation along the runout path. This immense energy underscores the slide's exceptional scale compared to other documented submarine failures, such as the smaller but still significant Currituck landslide off .

Mechanisms and Triggers

Glacial and Deglacial Influences

During the retreat of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet following the , rapid sedimentation occurred on the mid-Norwegian between approximately 15,000 and 10,000 years , depositing 100–200 m of glaciomarine s that loaded and destabilized the Storegga slope. An earlier , the Nyegga Slide around 20,000 years , removed 35–70 m of , further preconditioning the slope by loss of basal support. This buildup was driven by ice-lobe advances and decay, with high accumulation rates exceeding 30 m per millennium in the region, creating thick, fine-grained layers prone to excess pore fluid pressures and reduced . These s, primarily consisting of clay-rich glaciomarine deposits, formed unstable units that preconditioned the margin for large-scale . Isostatic rebound in the deglaciated Fennoscandian region further contributed to through differential uplift rates of up to 10 mm per year, which oversteepened the continental margin and induced excess pore pressures by altering effective stresses in the underlying sediments. The rapid adjustment to the removal of the ice load propagated stresses laterally into the offshore , exacerbating overpressuring in low-permeability clays and promoting shear failure along weak horizons. Glacial unloading during ice sheet retreat also weakened sediments by facilitating hydrofracturing, as the abrupt decrease in allowed pressurized to infiltrate and propagate fractures through the stratified deposits. This process reduced the mechanical integrity of the slope, creating pathways for fluid migration that sustained high pore pressures over time. Sediment cores from the Storegga area provide direct evidence of these deglacial dynamics, revealing intercalated layers from glacial advances and incised channels that document repeated loading-unloading cycles during the to transition. These features indicate episodic delivery and , which collectively conditioned the margin for the major Storegga Slide event around 8,200 years BP.

Gas Hydrate Dissociation and Other Factors

One proposed immediate trigger for the Storegga Slide involves the dissociation of methane gas hydrates within the continental slope sediments, which reduced sediment cohesion by generating excess pore pressures and releasing free gas. This process was likely driven by post-glacial bottom water warming and associated sea-level changes during the early , destabilizing the hydrate stability zone primarily in water depths greater than 400 meters. Studies indicate that the base of the hydrate stability zone in the region thinned significantly due to these environmental shifts, with evidence of fluid escape structures and pockmarks near the slide headwall supporting widespread dissociation in the aftermath of the event. Seismic activity, potentially from earthquakes of magnitude approximately 7 generated by glacio-isostatic rebound stresses following ice sheet retreat, has been identified as another key immediate trigger. These events could have provided the dynamic loading necessary to initiate failure along pre-existing weaknesses in the slope. Geophysical surveys reveal fault scarps and reactivated Jurassic-Cretaceous fault systems in the vicinity, consistent with tectonic stresses amplified by isostatic adjustment, which preconditioned the margin through long-term glaciation but culminated in acute seismic shaking. Additional contributing factors include episodic storm-wave loading on the upper and pulses of rapid that increased pressures without sufficient consolidation time. Quantitative modeling of dissociation thresholds highlights that instability occurs when bottom water temperatures exceed approximately 8°C or hydrostatic pressures fall below 30 MPa, conditions approached during deglacial warming despite stabilizing effects from rising sea levels. Recent simulations, including revised slide reconstructions, debate the primacy of dissociation versus seismic or loading triggers, suggesting hydrates played a significant preconditioning role but were likely insufficient alone to initiate the full-scale failure without a seismic impetus.

Tsunami Generation

Landslide Dynamics

The Storegga Slide initiated as a retrogressive , beginning at the continental and progressively eroding upslope into the shelf, with initial blocky failures involving large masses that transitioned into a debris and subsequent flow phase. This retrogressive progression is evidenced by the slide scar morphology, which shows headwall retreat over distances exceeding 100 km, starting from a toe near the Faroe-Shetland and cutting back to the mid-Norwegian shelf edge. Initial blocks reached volumes up to approximately 1 km³, characterized by intact glacial and layers that detached along low-angle glide planes inclined at less than 2°. During acceleration, the slide material exhibited granular flow mechanics, where intergranular friction and basal shear dominated, leading to velocity profiles that increased rapidly downslope. Simulations indicate peak front velocities of 30–140 km/h (8–39 m/s), with the avalanche phase sustaining high speeds over the gently sloping before decelerating into a viscous . These dynamics were driven by the remolding of sensitive clays and glaciomarine sediments, reducing effective and enabling prolonged across the basin floor. Numerical modeling of the slide has employed depth-averaged codes such as BINGClaw, which incorporate visco-plastic to simulate the from rigid block sliding to fluid-like flow, including recent extensions to analogous Barents Sea scenarios in 2025 studies. These models validate the retrogressive by matching observed depths and deposit spreads, using finite-volume methods to resolve mass conservation and in two-phase granular mixtures. The internal structure of the slide reveals evacuated blocks within the main scar, alongside rafted masses of coherent that were transported basinward before partial disintegration. These features overlie widespread deposits formed from the finer-grained tail of the , which spread across the deep seafloor as density currents. Multibeam and seismic profiles confirm this layering, with rafted blocks up to several kilometers in dimension preserving original amid chaotic avalanche debris.

Wave Propagation and Modeling

The Storegga Slide generated tsunami waves through the sudden displacement of approximately 2,400 km³ of across a ~ km wide area, producing initial wave heights of 10–25 m near the source due to the impulsive motion of the . The multi-phase character of the slide, involving retrogressive , resulted in double-peaked wave trains, characterized by an initial positive surge followed by a prolonged trough that amplified coastal impacts. These waves propagated radially across the North Atlantic, with paths directed southward into the and northward into the Norwegian and s; waves reached the Islands and Faeroe Islands in approximately 1.5 hours, the east coast in 2–3 hours, and region in about 1 hour, reflecting deep-water propagation speeds of ~200 m/s modulated by regional . Run-up heights varied significantly by location and paleotopography, attaining 20–40 m on the exposed coasts, 5–12 m along , and lower values of 3–6 m on northeast , where waves were focused by shelf geometry. In the , waves extended over 1,000 km, causing disturbance and reworking of seafloor sediments up to 50 km inland along southern shores. Numerical modeling of the tsunami has advanced with hydrodynamic simulations based on nonlinear shallow-water equations, incorporating high-resolution paleobathymetry to capture wave evolution; seminal work by Harbitz (1992) used finite-difference methods to predict offshore wave propagation, while recent 2025 studies employ multiscale approaches with variable grid resolutions from 500 m to 50 km for efficient computation across the Norwegian-Greenland Sea basin. Models such as COMCOT and Tsunami-HySEA have been applied to simulate landslide-induced waves, demonstrating inundation extents in the Barents Sea consistent with sedimentary evidence, including up to 50 km inland flooding in coastal lowlands. Wave attenuation during propagation was influenced by shelf shoaling, which increased amplitudes in shallower regions through depth reduction, and refraction, which bent wave crests toward coastal convergence zones, thereby enhancing local run-up despite overall energy dissipation over distance. The high velocity of landslide material, exceeding 20–40 m/s in initial phases, contributed briefly to the efficiency of wave generation before hydrodynamic forces dominated propagation.

Environmental and Human Impacts

Coastal and Inland Effects

The Storegga Slide caused extensive inundation along the coasts of , with waves penetrating up to 25 kilometers inland in low-lying areas, leading to widespread flooding and morphological alterations to the landscape. In northeast , the event eroded coastal dunes and deposited large boulders weighing over 10 tons, transported from offshore sources and indicative of high-energy wave action that reshaped beaches and barriers. Modeling studies suggest wave heights reached up to 20 meters along affected shorelines, amplifying the erosive power and sediment redistribution. Further inland, from the inundated freshwater ecosystems, resulting in the death of coastal forests and the salinization of soils that persisted for centuries. This intrusion altered vegetation patterns, with evidence preserved in bogs showing abrupt shifts from terrestrial to brackish assemblages, including rip-up clasts of organic material eroded during the event. Lake sediments in coastal regions similarly record the tsunami's passage through graded sand layers and marine microfossils, highlighting disruptions to lacustrine environments and accelerated sedimentation rates. The also contributed to the final submergence of , the low-lying land bridge across the southern , around 8,200 years , where catastrophic flooding overwhelmed existing topography and hastened permanent inundation. Recent studies from 2024 and 2025 have revealed extended impacts beyond the , with tsunami-related sediments identified in the , indicating wave propagation across the wide and disturbance to coastal sediments there. In the , evidence from marine cores shows the reached the northern , causing seabed remobilization and erosion on shelves as far as 75°N in the Kveitehola Trough.

Archaeological Evidence

Archaeological investigations have identified several sites affected by the Storegga Slide , particularly submerged settlements in the now-flooded region of the and coastal areas of . In , sediment cores from the southern reveal deposits overlying human occupation layers dated to approximately 8,200 years (BP), suggesting inundation of low-lying communities. In , sites such as the Montrose Basin and the Kyles of Bute in coastal lochs show similar patterns, where sands directly overlie hearths and occupation horizons radiocarbon-dated to around 8,200 , indicating abrupt disruption of settled activities. The impacts of the event appear to include widespread population displacement or localized wipeouts in vulnerable lowlands, as evidenced by the of lithic tools and debris within overlying layers at multiple sites, pointing to chaotic inundation and post-event abandonment. No skeletal remains directly attributable to have been recovered, but the stratigraphic interruptions suggest significant societal stress on groups reliant on coastal resources. These disruptions likely forced migrations to higher ground, altering settlement patterns in the basin. However, the extent of and long-term cultural disruptions remains debated, with no of fatalities identified despite stratigraphic indications of site desertion. Recent studies, including a 2024 analysis of sediment profiles in the , have identified tsunami-related sand sheet deposits and microfossil anomalies, indicating wave propagation across the . Bioarchaeological data further corroborates abandonment, with pollen records from affected sites showing abrupt shifts from woodland and wetland indicators to open-ground taxa post-8,200 BP, consistent with landscape clearance and site desertion. Additionally, shell middens at Scottish coastal locations, such as those near Montrose, are buried beneath anomalous sand sheets, preserving evidence of pre-tsunami marine foraging that ceased thereafter.

Research History and Methods

Discovery and Dating Techniques

The Storegga Slide was first identified in the 1970s through seismic surveys conducted by the Continental Shelf Institute () in , which mapped large slide scars on the continental margin off mid-Norway. Detailed analysis of these surveys revealed the slide's extensive headwall and debris field, with initial volume estimates exceeding 5,000 km³ based on preliminary bathymetric data. In the , links to a were proposed after sedimentary cores from coastal sites in eastern identified anomalous sand layers interpreted as deposits, correlating them with the slide's timing. Dating of the Storegga Slide has relied on multiple proxy methods applied to cores extracted from the slide scar and surrounding deposits. Radiocarbon (¹⁴C) dating of organic material in cores has provided the primary , yielding calibrated ages around 8,150–8,200 years (cal BP) for the main event. Optically stimulated (OSL) analysis of grains in paleotsunami sands has complemented ¹⁴C by dating the last exposure of sediments to sunlight, confirming tsunami deposition shortly after the slide. Paleomagnetic analysis of slide debris and host sediments has aided in correlating slide phases with geomagnetic excursions, particularly for pre- precursors. Tephrochronology, using ash layers such as those from the eruption for stratigraphic correlation in regional sequences, has helped anchor the slide's position within broader paleoclimatic records, though direct within the slide scar is limited. Early reconstructions in the integrated multibeam with seismic reflection profiles to refine the slide's morphology, reducing volume estimates to 2,400–3,200 km³ by accounting for debris dispersal and retrogressive failure stages. These efforts also incorporated deposit mapping from coastal cores across the North Atlantic, linking onshore sands in and to wave run-up models derived from the slide's dimensions. Key expeditions in the 2000s, including cruises under the Ormen Lange project, confirmed and expanded on the slide scars through high-resolution swath bathymetry and over 80 cores, validating the multi-phase of the and providing samples for refined geotechnical analysis.

Recent Studies and Simulations

Recent geophysical surveys and seismic data analysis have led to significant revisions in the understanding of the Storegga Slide's mechanism. A 2023 study utilizing high-resolution seismic profiles from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research identified a two-phase model, distinguishing the main Storegga Slide event around 8,200 years ago from an earlier Nyegga Slide approximately 20,000 years prior, which had previously been conflated with it. This revision, based on detailed mapping of slide scars and removal depths exceeding 35 meters in the northern segment, adjusted the estimated volume of mobilized material in the Storegga Slide upward to a range of 2,400 to 3,200 cubic kilometers, representing an increase of up to 33% over prior single-event estimates. Further expanding the event's geographic scope, a 2025 multi-proxy sediment core analysis published in Scientific Reports provided evidence of tsunami-induced disturbance in the northwestern Barents Sea, approximately 1,000 kilometers north of the slide's origin. Researchers examined microfossil disruptions and grain-size anomalies in cores from the Kveitehola Trough at 75°N, attributing reworking of seabed sediments to strong tsunami currents capable of mobilizing material in water depths up to 400 meters. These findings, corroborated by numerical wave propagation models, indicate that the tsunami's influence extended into Arctic waters, challenging earlier assumptions of a more confined impact zone. Advancements in computational modeling have enhanced simulations of the slide's dynamics and tsunami generation. The depth-averaged visco-plastic landslide model BingClaw has been employed in post-2020 studies to replicate the slide's runout and material behavior, incorporating remolding effects to better match observed deposit distributions. Complementing this, (CFD) approaches, as detailed in 2023 Norwegian Geotechnical Institute reports, have been used for high-fidelity inundation modeling, capturing nonlinear wave interactions and coastal amplification with greater accuracy than earlier shallow-water equations. These tools have validated trigger scenarios by integrating paleoclimate proxies, such as sea-level reconstructions and hydrate stability models, to assess deglaciation's role in slope destabilization. A notable 2025 discovery via 2D seismic reflection data revealed the Solsikke Slide, a mega-landslide in the Fan with a volume exceeding 15,000 cubic kilometers—five times that of the Storegga Slide—buried beneath sediments. Dated to the , this event's headwall and deposits suggest it preconditioned the regional slope, potentially contributing to the Storegga Slide's initiation by altering sediment loading and stability. This finding underscores the recurrent nature of large-scale failures in the area, informing hazard assessments for similar margins.

Future Risks

Recurrence Potential

Geological evidence from scar dating and records in the indicates a recurrence interval of approximately 3,000 to 6,000 years for major submarine landslides in the region, with the Storegga Slide complex serving as a key example of such events. This estimate derives from the identification of multiple slide phases within the Storegga system, including pre- precursors spaced over tens of thousands of years, and layers that record sediment mobilization patterns. A 2023 reconstruction revised the volume of the main Storegga event to 1,300–2,300 km³, a reduction of approximately 30%, while confirming its significant generation potential; this update suggests large-scale failures may occur more frequently than previously thought, once per glacial cycle. For mega-slides exceeding 1,000 km³ in volume, like the primary Storegga event, recurrence intervals extend to around 100,000 years, reflecting the rarity of conditions required for such massive failures. Historical analogs highlight ongoing activity in the area, with smaller slides occurring after the main Storegga Slide III around 8,200 years ago. Detailed core analyses have identified minor slump events along the northern , dated to approximately 5,000 and 2,500 years , involving localized volumes far smaller than the mega-slide. These post-Storegga mobilizations suggest a pattern of retrogressive and flank , where initial large events precondition slopes for subsequent, reduced-scale movements without triggering tsunamis of comparable magnitude. Precursors to future events are monitored through indicators such as slope creep rates and seismic activity. Seismic monitoring complements these efforts by tracking low-level activity, which, while below thresholds for immediate , provides on stress buildup in the glaciated . Assessments indicate an approximately 5% probability of landslide-tsunami event in the region over the next 200 years, informed by long-term recurrence . These evaluations emphasize the low baseline risk for mega-scale events under present geological conditions, though they underscore the need for continued given the region's of repetitive sliding. Past events, while varying in scale, illustrate that even smaller analogs could pose localized hazards if mobilized rapidly.

Climate Change Implications

Global warming is projected to accelerate the dissociation of methane hydrates in ocean sediments, particularly along continental margins like the mid-Norwegian shelf where the Storegga Slide occurred. temperatures in the North Atlantic are expected to rise by 2–4°C by 2100 under high-emission scenarios, reducing the stability zone for gas hydrates and potentially generating excess pore pressures that weaken slope integrity. This process, observed in contemporary settings such as where warming has already triggered hydrate dissociation and leakage, could precondition similar submarine landslides by altering sediment mechanical properties. In addition to hydrate instability, climate-driven permafrost thaw in Arctic regions is increasing sediment delivery to submarine slopes, heightening the risk of mass wasting. Thawing submarine permafrost leads to volume loss and liquified sediment flows, which accumulate on continental margins and reduce shear strength, as evidenced by rapid seafloor changes in the Beaufort Sea. These inputs exacerbate oversteepening and loading on slopes vulnerable to failure, mirroring conditions that may have contributed to past events but amplified under future warming. Sea-level rise, forecasted at 0.63–1.02 meters by under high-emission pathways, further destabilizes these slopes through increased hydrostatic loading and overpressurization of sediments. This loading effect, combined with reduced , promotes failure on glaciated margins like those in the North Atlantic, where modeling shows sea-level changes can trigger widespread mass movements. Such dynamics are particularly concerning for the Norwegian-Barents margin, where historical slides correlate with rapid sea-level fluctuations. Recent studies, including UK Research and Innovation-funded projects through the British Antarctic Survey's Arctic Office, project that Arctic climate change could elevate landslide-tsunami risks to UK coasts by factors of 2–5 times baseline levels by mid-century, driven by isostatic rebound and increased seismicity from ice melt. These assessments highlight the North Sea's vulnerability, where tsunamis from slides could impact densely populated areas and offshore infrastructure. Mitigation strategies emphasize real-time monitoring using seabed-deployed sensors for early warning of slope instability. Seismic and acoustic networks, as deployed in the North Sea for geohazard assessment, can detect precursors like microseismicity or deformation, enabling timely evacuations and infrastructure protections. The Ormen Lange gas field, situated near the Storegga Slide scar, exemplifies this approach, with ongoing sensor-based surveillance to safeguard North Sea energy assets against future risks.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001771
  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-00710-y
  3. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AGUFMOS34C..01B/abstract
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.767460/full
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10995125/
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0037073816000154
  7. https://www.geomar.de/fileadmin/personal/fb4/gdy/cberndt/micallef-08a.pdf
  8. https://www.almannavarnir.is/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/article.pdf
  9. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021GC010283
  10. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1988.0055
  11. https://urbanrim.org.uk/cache/Storegga-Slide-Bryn-2005.pdf
  12. https://www.geomar.de/fileadmin/personal/fb4/gdy/cberndt/micallef-08b.pdf
  13. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JF000505
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025322725000799
  15. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/m46.182
  16. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JF000739
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025322707002198
  18. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003JB002863
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228895892_The_Storegga_Slide_Architecture_Geometry_and_Slide_Development
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001941
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001874
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226929218_Parameter_studies_of_sediments_in_the_Storegga_Slide_region
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393088021_Expanding_the_footprint_of_the_Storegga_tsunami_through_new_evidence_from_Arctic_marine_sediments
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001837
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223156883_The_dating_and_morphometry_of_the_Storegga_Slide
  26. https://www.tonylutz.net/images/ebooks/Yajnavalkya/pdf/chapter-05/Late_Pleistocene_submarine_mass_movements.pdf
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025322704002713
  28. https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/mount-st.-helens/science/1980-cataclysmic-eruption
  29. https://foreninger.uio.no/ngf/ngt/pdfs/NJG_88_1-11.pdf
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239769493_Dynamics_Velocity_and_Run-Out_of_the_Giant_Storegga_Slide
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001904
  32. https://www.academia.edu/11077845/The_Storegga_slide_evaluation_of_triggering_sources_and_slide_mechanics
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379113001601
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001813
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817204001783
  36. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003JB002738
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928893705800554
  38. https://onepetro.org/SUTOSIG/proceedings/OSIG02/OSIG02/SUT-OSIG-02-219/3229
  39. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2007GC001920
  40. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JC014893
  41. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/14/10/262
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027737912300481X
  43. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-022-00572-w
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-10811-7
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260597283_Propagation_of_the_Storegga_tsunami_into_ice-free_lakes_along_the_southern_shores_of_the_Barents_Sea
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002532279290178K
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265382965_How_does_multiscale_modelling_and_inclusion_of_realistic_palaeobathymetry_affect_numerical_simulation_of_the_Storegga_Slide_tsunami
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222657170_The_Storegga_Slide_tsunami_-_Comparing_field_observations_with_numerical_simulations
  49. https://news.sky.com/story/modelling-reveals-storegga-tsunami-that-hit-scotland-8-200-years-ago-would-wipe-out-whole-towns-today-12324275
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222613695_The_Storegga_Slides_Evidence_from_eastern_Scotland_for_a_possible_tsunami
  51. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jqs.3586
  52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jqs.3539
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228667700_The_catastrophic_final_flooding_of_Doggerland_by_the_Storegga_Slide_tsunami
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12246226/
  55. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/great-wave-the-storegga-tsunami-and-the-end-of-doggerland/CB2E132445086D868BF508041CC1B827
  56. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/174960/1/bor.12532.pdf
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230890486_Large_Submarine_Slides_in_the_Norwegian_Continental_Margin_Sediments_Transport_and_Timing
  58. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapgbull/article/88/6/841/40153/Seafloor-reconnaissance-and-classification-of-the
  59. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/7/270
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308793326_A_new_date_for_a_large_pre-Holocene_Storegga_Slide
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223776467_The_Laacher_See-eruption_12920_BP_and_material_culture_change_at_the_end_of_the_Allerd_in_Northern_Europe
  62. https://www.geomar.de/n8849
  63. https://www.ngi.no/globalassets/dokumenter/prosjekter/initiator/stg_ngi_numeriske_tsunami_simuleringer_ogf_20221117.pdf
  64. https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FK00008X%2F1
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264924177_Recent_slope_mobilizations_in_the_Storegga_slide_area
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026481720400193X
  67. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/european-sea-surface-temperature
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17289-z
  69. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2119105119
  70. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/global-and-european-sea-level-rise
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027737911300406X
  72. https://www.arctic.ac.uk/projects/will-climate-change-in-the-arctic-increase-the-landslide-tsunami-risk-to-the-uk-18/
  73. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119750925.ch5
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.