Hubbry Logo
Stressed member engineStressed member engineMain
Open search
Stressed member engine
Community hub
Stressed member engine
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Stressed member engine
Stressed member engine
Stressed member engine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A stressed member engine is a vehicle engine used as an active structural element of the chassis to transmit forces and torques, rather than being passively contained by the chassis with anti-vibration mounts. Automotive engineers use the method for weight reduction and mass centralization in vehicles. Applications are found in several vehicles where mass reduction is critical for performance reasons, usually after several iterations of conventional frame/chassis designs have been employed.

Applications

[edit]
Harley-Davidson Model W with structural tubes bolted directly to engine case to complete the frame triangle
The Lotus 49 suspension is bolted directly to the drivetrain
A frameless Fordson Model F tractor

Motorcycles

[edit]
Further information: Motorcycle frame § Engine as a stressed member

Stressed member engines was patented in 1900 by Joah ("John") Carver Phelon and his nephew Harry Rayner.[1] and were pioneered at least as early as the 1916 Harley-Davidson 8-valve racer, and incorporated in the production Harley-Davidson Model W by 1919.[2] The technique was developed in the 20th century by Vincent and others, and by the end of the century was common feature of chassis built by Ducati, BMW and others. In 2019, KTM Duke 790's engine is used as a stressed member.

Automobiles

[edit]

Many mid-engine sport cars[example needed] have used stressed engine design.

Race cars

[edit]

The 1967 Lotus 49 is credited for establishing a solution copied by "everyone" in Formula One.[3] This requirement is cited as a reason the rules committee changed from an inline-four to a V-6 configuration for the 2014 Formula One season.[4]

Production automobiles

[edit]

The limited-production De Tomaso Vallelunga mid-engine car prototyped in 1963 used the engine as a stressed member.[5]

In GM's Chevrolet Bolt and Tesla Motors Model S and Roadster electric cars, the battery pack is a stressed member to increase rigidity.[6][7]

Tractors

[edit]

The Fordson tractor Model F, designed during World War I, eliminated the frame to reduce cost of materials and assembly, and was probably influenced by the similar design of the 1913 Wallis Cub.[8]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Stressed member engine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A stressed member engine is an integrated into a vehicle's such that it functions as a load-bearing , actively transmitting forces, torques, and stresses between the frame components rather than being suspended or isolated within a cradle. This design contrasts with traditional setups where the is merely mounted passively, allowing the to leverage the engine's inherent rigidity to enhance overall structural integrity while reducing the need for additional framing materials. The concept originated in the early , with the foundational for using an as a stressed member filed in 1900 by British inventors Joah ("John") Carver Phelon and Harry Rayner, who applied it to chain-driven motorcycles produced under the Phelon & Rayner brand. This innovation was first commercialized in models like the Phelon & Rayner machines around 1901 and later in Phelon & Moore (P&M) and Panther motorcycles, where the sloping formed a key part of the frame to simplify construction and improve . By the 1910s, American manufacturers such as adopted the approach in racing prototypes (e.g., the 1916 8-valve racer) and production bikes like the 1919 Model W, marking its transition to broader use in high-performance applications. Post-World War II developments, including Vincent's 1946 Series B Rapide and later Japanese designs like the 1983 , refined the technique by eliminating redundant frame tubes and relying on the engine for primary rigidity. Primarily employed in motorcycles—especially trellis-frame sport and naked bikes from brands like Ducati (e.g., Monster series) and KTM (e.g., Duke models)—and in agricultural machinery, the stressed member configuration offers key benefits such as reduced overall vehicle weight compared to cradle frames, lower central mass for improved handling, and enhanced chassis stiffness without added complexity. It has also appeared in select automobiles, notably mid-engine exotics like the Ferrari F50 (1995), where the V12 engine integrates with the carbon-fiber tub as a structural element to minimize mass, and in Formula 1 cars from the 1960s onward, such as the 1967 Lotus 49 that combined a stressed engine with a monocoque for aerodynamic and performance gains. While advantageous for racing and lightweight vehicles, the design demands robust engine casings to withstand torsional loads, potentially increasing manufacturing costs and vibration transmission if not engineered with isolators.

Overview

Definition

A stressed member engine is an designed to serve as an active load-bearing component of the vehicle's , transmitting torsional, bending, and shear forces directly between the frame elements. In this configuration, the engine integrates structurally with the overall vehicle framework, contributing to its rigidity rather than merely hanging from it as a passive . The engine block and cases function as integral structural links, often forming the lower portion of the frame or monocoque structure, where mounting points on the cylinder heads, crankcases, or transmission housing directly connect to upper frame tubes or body panels. This setup allows the engine to bear and distribute chassis loads, such as those from suspension or aerodynamics, enhancing overall stiffness without requiring additional bracing materials. Textually, the arrangement can be visualized with the engine positioned longitudinally or transversely within the chassis, its robust casing serving as the central "box" section to which frame spars bolt securely, effectively bridging the steering head and swingarm pivot areas. Unlike conventional designs, where the engine is isolated via rubber mounts to dampen vibrations and protect the powertrain from chassis flex, a intentionally shares these stresses to optimize weight and handling dynamics. This deliberate integration demands that the engine's components, including the block and transmission, be engineered for enhanced under multi-axis loads. Such engines find application in vehicles like motorcycles and race cars, where compactness and performance are paramount.

Comparison to Conventional Designs

In conventional engine designs, the powerplant is typically mounted to the using isolated cradles, rubber bushings, or elastomeric mounts that decouple it from the primary structural frame. This setup positions the as the sole bearer of major loads, such as torsional forces and impacts, while shielding the from direct stress to enhance its operational and reduce wear on internal components. Stressed member engines differ fundamentally by integrating the powerplant as a load-bearing element, eliminating the need for extensive subframes or cradles and yielding mass reductions of approximately 10-20% through simplified tubing and mounting hardware. In contrast, conventional isolated systems prioritize engine protection via but introduce added complexity and weight from dedicated frame reinforcements. Regarding , stressed member configurations enhance overall rigidity by minimizing frame flex under loads, often increasing torsional by over 100% compared to flexible mount setups. However, this direct load path transmits engine vibrations more readily to the , potentially elevating (NVH) levels. Conventional mounts excel in NVH mitigation through their inherent properties, isolating oscillations and improving ride comfort. Engineering trade-offs are pronounced: stressed member approaches necessitate robust engine redesigns to withstand chassis stresses, limiting compatibility with standard powerplants. Conventional designs, while permitting off-the-shelf engines, elevate total vehicle mass due to auxiliary support structures, complicating efforts toward lightweighting.

History

Origins in Motorcycles

The concept of the stressed member engine in originated in early 20th-century experiments aimed at creating lighter, more integrated vehicle structures. The earliest known patent for this approach was granted in 1901 to Joah Carver Phelon and his nephew Harry Rayner (British Patent GB190103516), describing a design with a large sloping serving as a stressed frame member to replace portions of traditional tubing. This innovation was first implemented commercially by Phelon & Moore (P&M) starting in 1904, where the engine's robust construction provided structural support, contributing to compact and efficient designs in models like their chain-driven singles with capacities from 500 cc upward. Practical adoption advanced in the and , driven by the demand for lightweight, high-performance motorcycles in a post-World War II era marked by material shortages and innovation needs. pioneered a significant evolution with engineer Phil Irving's 1934 overhead-valve (OHV) 500 cc single-cylinder Meteor engine, which introduced advanced rigidity that later enabled stressed member integration. By 1946, this culminated in the Series B Rapide, featuring a 50-degree explicitly designed as a stressed frame component to eliminate excess tubing, reduce weight, and simplify assembly while enhancing overall stiffness—motivations rooted in wartime engineering lessons and the scarcity of steel, which favored lighter alternatives. The design's influence peaked with the Black Shadow model, where 's aluminum-crankcased V-twin formed a core stressed element of the frame, allowing for a minimal upper frame member and superior handling in high-speed applications. This era also saw a technical shift from heavier cast-iron to aluminum cases across British manufacturers, improving the strength-to-weight ratio essential for load-bearing without ; 's use of aluminum components exemplified this, capitalizing on its availability to meet demands in compact machines. The series in the further popularized the approach in high-performance British motorcycles, establishing it as a foundational technique for integrating engine rigidity into design. By the 1910s, the design had spread to American manufacturers, with Harley-Davidson adopting it in racing prototypes like the 1916 8-valve racer and production models such as the 1919 Model W. Later refinements appeared in Japanese motorcycles, such as the 1983 Kawasaki GPZ900R, which used the engine for primary rigidity in its frame.

Evolution in Racing and Production Vehicles

The adoption of stressed member engines in automotive racing accelerated in the mid-1960s, transitioning from motorcycle applications to high-performance prototypes and Formula 1 cars where weight savings were paramount. The Ferrari 158 F1 car, introduced in 1964, marked the first use of a fully stressed engine in Formula 1, with its 1.5-liter V8 engine block serving as the monocoque rear section of the chassis to enhance rigidity and reduce overall mass. This design allowed Ferrari to compete effectively under the era's 450 kg minimum weight regulations, which incentivized lightweight construction. The concept gained widespread popularity through the in , which integrated the V8 as a stressed member within a , bolting the rear suspension and gearbox directly to the engine for optimal weight distribution and handling. This innovation, pioneered by , influenced subsequent spaceframe and designs across Formula 1, enabling teams to achieve significant weight reductions compared to traditional setups. By the late 1960s, the approach extended to endurance racing, where rear-engine prototypes like the series employed American V8 engines as semi-stressed members to withstand high-stress environments at events such as and , prioritizing durability in 24-hour races. In production vehicles, stressed member engines remained rare due to manufacturing complexities and costs, appearing primarily in limited-run supercars. The 1995 exemplified this, integrating its 4.7-liter V12—derived from Formula 1 technology—directly into a carbon-fiber as a load-bearing element, enhancing structural integrity without a traditional rear subframe. Such designs were confined to elite models and kit cars, like the Light Car Company Rocket, which utilized a Yamaha as a fully stressed component for ultra-lightweight . This evolution was propelled by FIA regulations in the that emphasized minimum weights and unrestricted chassis innovation, fostering the shift from spaceframes to monocoques and encouraging engine integration for competitive edges in power-to-weight ratios. However, adoption waned in production cars after the 2000s as stringent crash standards mandated and deformable front structures, favoring isolated engines that could shift during impacts to absorb energy and protect occupants.

Design and Engineering

Structural Integration

In stressed member engine designs, particularly for motorcycles, the is architecturally integrated into the by bolting it at multiple points to form a load-bearing component of the frame. Typically, the features top mounts that secure the upper frame sections, while the provides bottom attachments for lower spars or cradle elements, creating a unified without isolated engine mounts. This configuration often positions the to form the "lower triangle" of the frame, connecting the steering head to the pivot and rear suspension. For instance, in the AJP PR5 , the 660 cc is bolted to an engine cradle using metal plates at the front and welded supports at the rear, enhancing overall rigidity. In automotive applications, integration methods adapt the engine to serve as a rear bulkhead or subframe element, bolted directly to the main or . The engine casing transmits structural loads, with attachments such as shear plates or gussets at mounting points to distribute forces evenly and prevent localized deformation. A classic example is the 1967 Formula 1 car, where the Ford-Cosworth DFV is secured to the aluminum tub via two primary bolts at the rear, suspending the between front suspension and rear while acting as a fully stressed member. Similarly, in the motoinno TS3 prototype , the 900SS V-Twin engine's front mounting lug directly pivots the front suspension , with rear loads routed through the transmission casing to the frame spars. Load paths in these designs route torque reaction, braking forces, and cornering loads through the rather than isolating them via rubber mounts. In motorcycles, the engine commonly serves as the pivot point for the rear , channeling rear wheel forces—such as thrust and suspension rebound—directly into the frame via the and mounts, which improves torsional . For example, in trellis frame motorcycles, chassis loads pass through the engine mounts to enhance under dynamic conditions like cornering. In cars, such as the racer, the power unit integrates with the carbon-fiber to transmit longitudinal and lateral forces from the to the chassis bulkhead. This contrasts with non-stressed setups, where flow is confined to separate subframes, potentially introducing flex; in stressed designs, the engine's rigidity shortens and strengthens these paths. Engineering challenges in structural integration center on achieving precise alignment during assembly to minimize stress concentrations at bolt interfaces. Misalignments can amplify localized strains, necessitating tolerances within millimeters and the use of shear plates or gussets to reinforce joints against shear and torsional loads. In the AJP PR5 frame analysis, for instance, high stresses exceeding 800 MPa were observed at connecting rod supports under impact simulations, requiring iterative redesign for uniform load distribution. Variations exist between full and semi-stressed integrations. Full integration treats the engine as a direct replacement for frame sections, bearing the majority of chassis loads, as seen in the where the engine fully bridges the and rear suspension. Semi-stressed approaches, by contrast, share partial loads with auxiliary frame elements, such as in some trellis designs where the engine handles primary but relies on perimeter tubes for secondary support, allowing flexibility in packaging. This originated in racing contexts, like early Formula 1 applications, to optimize weight and rigidity.

Materials and Load-Bearing Requirements

Stressed member engines require materials capable of enduring both internal forces and external loads, necessitating selections that prioritize high strength-to-weight ratios and resistance. High-strength aluminum alloys, such as A356 (Al-Si7Mg), are widely used for engine cases and blocks due to their excellent castability, corrosion resistance, and mechanical properties, particularly after to the T6 condition, which enhances tensile strength to approximately 280 MPa and yield strength to 200 MPa. Cylinder heads in these engines often incorporate reinforced designs with steel inserts or liners to bolster resistance against and mechanical stresses, preventing deformation under combined operational and structural demands. Thin-wall castings are generally avoided to minimize the risk of cracking under cyclic loading, favoring instead robust geometries that maintain integrity without excessive weight. Load-bearing requirements for stressed member engines demand that the withstand significant additional torsional and bending moments transmitted from the , which can substantially increase overall stress levels compared to conventional isolated . Block becomes critical, as it directly contributes to rigidity and handling performance by providing a stiffer connection between suspension components. Finite element analysis (FEA) is routinely applied during to model these chassis-induced stresses on the engine structure, allowing engineers to predict deformation, stress concentrations, and potential points under simulated real-world conditions such as cornering torques and impacts. Manufacturing adaptations for stressed member engines emphasize through features like thicker wall sections in critical areas, integral mounting bosses for direct attachment, and processes to optimize material properties. These elements ensure the engine can absorb and distribute loads without compromising internal functionality. For instance, the engines, employed in MotoGP racing where the serves as a stressed member, utilize cases produced via die-casting for their superior strength-to-weight ratio, with components like the , head covers, and oil sump benefiting from this material to handle high dynamic loads while minimizing mass. To verify structural reliability, stressed member engines undergo extensive testing protocols focused on , including accelerated cycles that replicate operational harmonics and , as well as drop tests to assess impact resistance at mounting interfaces. These evaluations confirm the absence of initiation in load-bearing regions, such as engine mounts and case walls, over extended equivalents.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Key Benefits

Stressed member engines provide substantial weight reduction by eliminating the need for separate, redundant elements, as the engine itself bears structural loads and integrates directly into the frame. This approach minimizes overall without compromising strength, while also centralizing to lower the center of gravity, which enhances stability and handling responsiveness in both and automobiles. For example, in designs, this centralization contributes to more agile cornering and reduced inertia during maneuvers. The design significantly boosts rigidity, particularly torsional stiffness, by creating a unified load path that distributes forces more efficiently across the engine and surrounding structure. This reduces frame flex under dynamic conditions like hard acceleration or high-speed cornering, leading to sharper power delivery and minimized driveline lash for improved drivetrain efficiency. In applications such as the , the engine's structural role enhances overall handling precision without adding extra bracing. Compact packaging is another core advantage, enabling tighter integration of components that optimizes space utilization. Motorcycles benefit from more compact geometry, promoting nimbler handling and easier maneuverability, while in cars, the approach supports sleeker layouts that improve aerodynamic profiles and reduce drag. BMW's for an advanced stressed member configuration, for instance, highlights how this minimizes overall width, rivaling more complex engine layouts like V-twins. In terms of production, stressed member engines yield cost savings through reduced part counts and streamlined assembly processes, particularly in high-volume . The K-series exemplifies this, where the acts as the lower stressed element of the trellis frame, eliminating dedicated frame sections and simplifying construction while maintaining support for features like single-sided swingarms.

Principal Limitations

Stressed member engines bear additional loads from the , leading to accelerated wear on critical components such as bearings and the due to the combined operational and structural stresses. This heightened loading can compromise long-term durability, particularly in demanding conditions. Furthermore, the engine cases are susceptible to cracking from impacts, such as those encountered during off-road drops or accidents, as the lack of isolation from external forces amplifies vulnerability. Maintenance presents significant challenges, as removing the engine typically requires partial disassembly of the frame or surrounding structural elements, which extends labor time considerably compared to conventional designs. This complexity also restricts engine swaps to units precisely compatible with the 's load-bearing requirements, limiting flexibility in repairs or upgrades. The rigid integration results in direct transmission of engine vibrations to the and rider, intensifying (NVH) levels that contribute to user fatigue over extended periods. Mitigating these effects demands sophisticated systems, which are not always feasible in cost-sensitive or lightweight applications. Development and production costs are elevated because engines must undergo custom reinforcement to handle structural duties, increasing research and engineering expenses. The design's repair intricacies, including high costs for replacing damaged cases, further render it less viable for high-volume mass-market vehicles.

Applications

Motorcycles

Stressed member engines are widely adopted in modern motorcycles, particularly in and models, where the engine integrates directly into perimeter or trellis to serve as a core structural component. This design allows the engine to bear loads, enhancing overall rigidity while minimizing additional framing material. In sport-oriented bikes, the approach is prevalent due to the need for construction and precise handling dynamics. Specific adaptations vary by engine configuration to optimize load distribution in two-wheeled applications. Longitudinal twins, such as those in models, position the engine to act as the pivot, transmitting and lateral forces directly through the cases and heads. V-twin engines, common in performance cruisers and racers, distribute stresses via reinforced head mounts and lower cradle attachments, ensuring balanced weight transfer during cornering and acceleration. These adaptations prioritize torsional , which is critical for the agile response required in high-speed riding. Notable examples illustrate the evolution and application of this design. The of 1948 pioneered full stressed member integration with its 998 cc V-twin serving as the primary frame element, eliminating traditional down tubes for a compact, high-stiffness . The from 1968 employed a semi-stressed setup, where the 325 cc parallel twin acted as a load-bearing member within a cradling frame, providing enhanced structural integrity over earlier non-stressed designs. In the 2010s, the series advanced full integration, using its Desmosedici Stradale as a stressed element in a aluminum front frame connected directly to the heads, optimizing track performance. This configuration contributes to superior handling in contexts, such as MotoGP prototypes, by enabling agile weight transfer and cornering precision. Compared to traditional cradle frames, stressed member designs achieve significant weight reductions—often 5-10 kg—while increasing stiffness, which supports higher corner speeds and stability under extreme loads. These benefits align with broader advantages like overall mass centralization, though they require robust engine casings to withstand dynamic stresses.

Automobiles

In automobile applications, stressed member engines have been predominantly utilized in racing contexts, particularly in Formula 1 during the to , where they served as integral structural components to enhance rigidity and reduce weight. The , introduced in 1967, exemplified this approach by employing the as the rear structural member of the , with the rear suspension bolted directly to the , a design that contributed to its success in winning the 1968 Constructors' Championship. This concept, which originated earlier with the Ferrari 1512 in 1964, became standard in F1 cars, allowing the engine to bear torsional loads and transmit forces, thereby minimizing additional framework. In endurance racing, such as prototypes, stressed member engines were adopted from the late onward to comply with stringent weight regulations, enabling lighter carbon-fiber s while maintaining structural integrity under high-speed stresses. Production automobiles have rarely incorporated stressed member engines due to stringent safety regulations that prioritize crash energy absorption through deformable subframes rather than rigid engine integration, which could exacerbate occupant injury in collisions. The , produced in 1995 with a limited run of 349 units, stands as a notable exception, homage to Formula 1 heritage by using its 4.7-liter Tipo F125 C —derived from the 1990 F1-90—as a load-bearing element, hard-bolted to the bulkhead without rubber mounts to form the rear structure. In niche applications like kit , builders of Locost-style spaceframes have occasionally employed motorcycle-derived engines, such as inline-fours, as stressed members to simplify construction and achieve lightweight performance in amateur-built sports . Design specifics in automotive stressed member engines often involve transverse mounting in mid-engine layouts to optimize weight distribution and aerodynamics, with the engine-transmission unit functioning as a fully integrated stressed subframe that supports the rear suspension and differential. This configuration transmits torque and lateral forces directly through the powertrain, eliminating separate cross-members and enhancing overall vehicle stiffness. While phased out in mainstream road cars to accommodate modern crash standards requiring energy-managing structures, stressed member engines persist in niche hypercars and racing prototypes, such as Ferrari's 499P Le Mans Hypercar, where the 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 acts as a fully stressed member to meet weight limits in the LMH class. Similarly, the Mercedes-AMG One hypercar integrates its Formula 1-derived 1.6-liter V6 hybrid power unit as a stressed member in its carbon-fiber chassis for superior rigidity in high-performance road use.

Agricultural Machinery

In agricultural machinery, particularly tractors, the stressed member engine design is widely employed, with the functioning as a key structural component that supports the front , hood, and associated loads from towing implements and field operations. This configuration, dominant in tractor architecture since the , integrates the engine and transmission to bear mechanical stresses, reducing overall vehicle mass and simplifying . Key design features emphasize durability for demanding rural environments, including robust cast-iron engine blocks capable of resisting shear forces generated during plowing and soil tillage. Engine mounts are typically integrated directly with the transmission housing to accommodate the rear power take-off (PTO) shaft, ensuring seamless power transfer to attached equipment while maintaining structural rigidity. These elements allow the engine to act as a load-bearing beam, distributing forces from front-end attachments and rearward pulls. Notable examples include John Deere's 8000-series tractors, introduced in the late 1970s, where the engine serves as the primary front structural beam to handle heavy-duty tasks. Earlier models, such as the Ford 8N from the 1940s, utilized semi-stressed engine setups that partially integrated the block into the for basic load support. A recent development is the F4.5 structural engine, introduced in 2025, which eliminates the need for a surrounding in tractors, streamlining design and improving efficiency. The rationale for this design in agricultural applications lies in its ability to streamline chassis construction by eliminating redundant framing, thereby enhancing off-road durability and vibration resistance in uneven . It enables to endure substantial drawbar pulls—typically 5 to 10 tons for mid-sized models—without chassis , optimizing performance for plows, harrows, and other implements.

References

  1. https://carbiketech.com/trellis-frame/
  2. https://www.hemmings.com/stories/1948-panther-redwing-model-70/
  3. https://www.thesahb.com/snapshot-256-1916-pm/
  4. https://www.motorcycleclassics.com/classic-american-motorcycles/1919-harley-davidson-model-w-sport-zmsz18mjzhur/
  5. https://www.motorcycleclassics.com/classic-british-motorcycles/vincent-rapide-series-b-zm0z21mjzbut/
  6. https://www.motorcyclistonline.com/tale-1984-kawasaki-ninja-900r/
  7. https://carbuzz.com/ferrari-f50-first-automaker-to-fit-f1-engine-road-legal-car/
  8. https://newhopeautoshow.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2023_NewHopeAutoShowProgram2.pdf
  9. https://www.revzilla.com/common-tread/why-things-are-the-way-they-are-frame-design
  10. https://www.cycleworld.com/2015/03/27/the-pursuit-of-chassis-rigidity-design-insights-by-kevin-cameron/
  11. https://www.motorbiscuit.com/what-does-it-mean-when-an-engine-is-a-stressed-member/
  12. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/vibrationacoustics/article/129/5/590/446907/Frame-Flexibility-Effects-on-Engine-Mount
  13. https://mech.utm.my/mech/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/5STRUCTURAL-PERFORMANCE-ANALYSIS-OF-FORMULA-SAE-CAR.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/engine-mountings
  15. https://autocomponentsindia.com/modal-analysis-of-motor-and-mount-as-a-stress-member/
  16. https://phelonandmoore.com/history/
  17. https://britishclassicmotorcycles.com/vincent-history/
  18. https://silodrome.com/history-vincent-black-shadow/
  19. https://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/4150/Ferrari-158-F1.html
  20. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/columnists/andrew-frankel/thank-frankel-its-friday-the-greatest-engine-of-all/
  21. https://modatek.co.uk/cosworth-dfv-engine-birth/
  22. https://williamianson.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Lola-T70-Mk3B-1.pdf
  23. https://www.ferrari.com/magazine/articles/the-f50-a-formula-1-car-for-the-road
  24. https://thelightcarcompany.co.uk/home-of-the-light-car-company-rocket/
  25. https://www.f1technical.net/articles/24
  26. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/88605/2/32524.pdf
  27. https://www.autoweek.com/news/a2078406/1968-lotus-49c-rindts-r6-lives/
  28. https://motoinno.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/History-and-Specs-of-the-motoinnoTS3.pdf
  29. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/lotus-49-driving-motor-sports-race-car-of-the-century/
  30. https://dl.asminternational.org/handbooks/edited-volume/91/chapter/2088204/356-0-and-A356-0-1-Al-Si-Mg-High-Strength-Casting
  31. https://www.sae.org/papers/constitutive-modeling-thermomechanical-fatigue-life-predictions-a356-t6-aluminum-cylinder-heads-considering-ageing-effects-2019-01-0534
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6766307/
  33. https://www.wbcastings.com/non-ferrous-alloys/aluminum/a356
  34. https://www.ducati.com/ww/en/company/innovation/engines/desmosedici-stradale
  35. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/750129/
  36. https://www.cycleworld.com/motorcycle-news/bmw-patents-lightweight-frame/
  37. https://www.motodeal.com.ph/articles/motorcycle-features/5-things-we-love-about-ducati-monster
  38. https://www.bluestradatours.com/a-brief-history-of-the-bmw-k-series/
  39. https://www.ducati.com/us/en/bikes/panigale/panigale-v2-my24
  40. https://www.motorcycleclassics.com/classic-british-motorcycles/classic-vincent-motorcycles/1951-series-c-black-shadow-zm0z25ndzbro/
  41. https://www.hagerty.com/media/motorcycles/honda-cb350/
  42. https://www.audrainautomuseum.org/technological-marvels-a-story-of-evolution/1953-vincent-black-shadow-series-c
  43. https://www.ducati.com/us/en/bikes/panigale/panigale-v4-2024/chassis
  44. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanicaldesign/article/141/3/031107/368515/An-Engineering-Review-of-the-Farm-Tractor-s
  45. https://www.iron-foundry.com/application-of-cast-iron-parts-in-tractors.html
  46. https://www.heavyequipmentforums.com/threads/8630-john-deere.89577/
  47. https://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/threads/1952-ford-8n-302-v8-conversion.295700/
  48. https://www.vehicledynamicsinternational.com/videos/cummins-f4-5-structural-engine-for-tractors.html
  49. https://tractortestlab.unl.edu/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.