Hubbry Logo
Tour of CaliforniaTour of CaliforniaMain
Open search
Tour of California
Community hub
Tour of California
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tour of California
Tour of California
Tour of California
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Tour of California
Race details
DateMay (Formerly in February)
RegionCalifornia, United States
DisciplineRoad
CompetitionUCI World Tour
TypeStage race
OrganiserAEG
Race directorDavid Salzman
Web sitewww.amgentourofcalifornia.com Edit this at Wikidata
History
First edition2006 (2006)
Editions14 (as of 2019)
First winner Floyd Landis (USA)
Most wins Levi Leipheimer (USA) (3 times)
Most recent Tadej Pogačar (SLO)

The Tour of California (officially sponsored as the Amgen Tour of California) was an annual professional road cycling stage race on the UCI World Tour and USA Cycling Professional Tour that ran from 2006 to 2019. It was the only event on the top-level World Tour in the United States. The eight-day race covered 650–700 miles (1,045–1,126 km) through the U.S. state of California.

A typical edition might begin in the Sierra Nevada in northern California, travel through the Redwood forests, California's Wine Country and the Pacific Coast, and finish in southern California. The 2009 race crossed the Central Valley from Merced to Fresno, with an excursion through the Sierra Nevada foothills, before crossing over to the coast.

With eight or nine of the 20 UCI ProTour teams (known as ProTeams) usually racing, the Tour of California was one of the most important cycling races in the United States. On November 28, 2006, the UCI upgraded it from 2.1 (category 1) to 2.HC (French: Hors categorie; English: beyond category), the highest rating for races on the UCI Continental Circuits; the Tour of Utah is the only other 2.HC race as of 2019. On August 2, 2016, the UCI upgraded the race to World Tour status and added it to the 2017 UCI World Tour schedule.[1]

The race was originally staged in February, but the 2010 Tour of California was moved to May, the same time that the Giro d'Italia is held.[2] At the time of the move it was considered likely that the number of Americans in the Giro and Italians in the Tour of California would decrease.[3] Tour of California organizers sought to make the race a preparatory event for the Tour de France, believing few riders who seek a serious position in the Tour would ride the Giro. Since the change in schedule, the race continued to be held in May.

The tour was sponsored by Amgen, a California-based biotechnology company most famous for developing the anti anemia drug Erythropoietin (EPO), which has been used by professional cyclists in several blood doping scandals. No plans have been announced regarding if or when the tour will return.[4]

The start of the first leg of the 2010 race in Nevada City

General Classification Results

[edit]

The leader and overall winner by time after each stage and at the conclusion of the race wore a Yellow Jersey. Originally the leader's jersey was gold, a reference to the California Gold Rush, but in 2009 the jersey color was changed to yellow.

Year 1st place Team 2nd place Team 3rd place Team
2006  Floyd Landis (USA) Phonak  David Zabriskie (USA)[5] Team CSC  Bobby Julich (USA) Team CSC
2007  Levi Leipheimer (USA) Discovery Channel  Jens Voigt (GER) Team CSC  Jason McCartney (USA) Discovery Channel
2008  Levi Leipheimer (USA) Astana  David Millar (GBR) Slipstream–Chipotle  Christian Vande Velde (USA) Slipstream–Chipotle
2009  Levi Leipheimer (USA) Astana  David Zabriskie (USA) Garmin–Slipstream  Michael Rogers (AUS) Team Columbia–High Road
2010  Michael Rogers (AUS) Team HTC–Columbia  David Zabriskie (USA) Garmin–Transitions  Levi Leipheimer (USA) Team RadioShack
2011  Chris Horner (USA) Team RadioShack  Levi Leipheimer (USA) Team RadioShack  Tom Danielson (USA) Garmin–Cervélo
2012  Robert Gesink (NED) Rabobank  David Zabriskie (USA) Garmin–Barracuda  Tom Danielson (USA) Garmin–Barracuda
2013  Tejay van Garderen (USA) BMC Racing Team  Michael Rogers (AUS) Saxo–Tinkoff  Janier Acevedo (COL) Jamis–Hagens Berman
2014  Bradley Wiggins (GBR) Team Sky  Rohan Dennis (AUS) Garmin–Sharp  Lawson Craddock (USA) Giant–Shimano
2015  Peter Sagan (SVK) Tinkoff–Saxo  Julian Alaphilippe (FRA) Etixx–Quick-Step  Sergio Henao (COL) Team Sky
2016  Julian Alaphilippe (FRA) Etixx–Quick-Step  Rohan Dennis (AUS) BMC Racing Team  Brent Bookwalter (USA) BMC Racing Team
2017  George Bennett (NZL) LottoNL–Jumbo  Rafał Majka (POL) Bora–Hansgrohe  Andrew Talansky (USA) Cannondale–Drapac
2018  Egan Bernal (COL) Team Sky  Tejay van Garderen (USA) BMC Racing Team  Daniel Martínez (COL) EF Education First–Drapac p/b Cannondale
2019  Tadej Pogačar (SLO) UAE Team Emirates  Sergio Andrés Higuita García (COL) EF Education First  Kasper Asgreen (DEN) Deceuninck–Quick-Step

Records and Jerseys

[edit]

Sprints Classification

[edit]

The leader and overall winner by points from intermediate and final sprints wears the Green Jersey.

Mountains Classification

[edit]

The leader and overall winner by points in mountain climbs is awarded the Red Jersey (Orange in the past, before 2009) and is known as the race's King of the Mountains or "KOM."

Best Young Rider Classification

[edit]

The leader and overall winner by time for riders under 23 is awarded the White Jersey. Before 2009, this jersey was silver and blue.

Teams Classification

[edit]

Teams are classified based on the total time of the team's top three finishers in each stage.

Best Team Winners

[edit]

Most Courageous Rider Classification

[edit]

The Blue Jersey is given to the most courageous rider at the end of each stage. In 2008, the jersey was red. George Hincapie has won this jersey three times, after stages in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Jan Bárta won the award twice during the 2011 edition. Ben Wolfe and Evan Huffman both won the jersey twice during the 2017 race. No one else has won this jersey more than once.

Doping controversy

[edit]

The main sponsor of the event, Amgen, is the producer of the medical drug Erythropoietin, also called EPO. EPO has been used as a performance-enhancing drug by professional cyclists.[6] Former professional cyclists who admitted their doping, such as Tyler Hamilton, claim that for some time most of the world's top cyclists used EPO.[7]

A plan to perform comprehensive anti-doping tests for the 2011 event was terminated by the UCI.[8] The plan was to do blood tests performed by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), which would have been able to detect EPO, but the UCI and the USADA couldn't agree on the details of the doping tests. For the 2013 edition, the UCI elected to reintroduce testing based on the biological passport, as USADA would also take care of pre-race testing, but with no cooperation between the two agencies.[9]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tour of California

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tour of was an annual professional stage race held across the state of , , from 2006 to 2019. Organized by AEG Presents and sponsored by the company , the event formed part of the UCI WorldTour, attracting elite international teams and riders to compete over routes spanning coastal highways, Sierra Nevada mountains, and urban circuits totaling around 700-800 miles. A parallel women's race began as a one-day in 2010, expanding to a multi-stage format by 2015 to promote gender equity in professional cycling and visibility. The men's edition produced standout victors such as in 2019, in , and multiple-time stage winner , highlighting emerging talents amid grueling climbs like Mount Baldy. Despite boosting cycling's profile in through economic impact exceeding $100 million annually via and sponsorships, the race encountered controversies including high-profile crashes—such as Toms Skujins' severe descent incident—and doping cases involving riders like . Ultimately discontinued after 2019 due to evolving business economics and insufficient revenue amid rising operational costs, the event has not returned, leaving a void in American professional cycling's major stage races.

Overview

Race Format and Categories

The Tour of California operated as a multi-stage professional race for men, typically spanning seven to eight days in May with a total distance of approximately 700 to 1,200 kilometers, depending on the edition. Stages varied in profile, including flat and rolling terrain suited to sprinters, intermediate climbs, and high-mountain ascents with cumulative elevation gains exceeding 68,000 feet in some years, traversing California's coastal highways, valleys, and Sierra Nevada passes. Each stage concluded with a winner determined by the first rider to cross the finish line, while the general classification aggregated riders' times adjusted for bonuses and penalties. As a event from 2007 to 2019, the race mandated participation from all UCI WorldTeams—initially 18 teams, each limited to eight riders—and extended invitations to select UCI ProTeams to fill the field of around 140-180 competitors. selection prioritized top-tier squads to ensure competitive depth, with national teams occasionally included early on but phased out in favor of professional continental outfits. The race featured five main individual classifications, each awarded a distinctive leader's jersey worn by the top rider until the next stage: the (yellow jersey, based on lowest cumulative time), points (green , awarded for intermediate sprints and stage finishes), (red polka-dot jersey, points for categorized climbs), best young rider under 25 (white jersey, derived from general classification times), and most aggressive rider (red jersey, for combative efforts like breakaways). A separate classification ranked squads by the combined times of their top three finishers per stage. These categories emphasized different rider strengths, from all-rounders to climbers and sprinters, aligning with UCI standards while adapting colors like the red polka-dots to distinguish from European Grand Tours.

Organization and Sponsorship

The Tour of California was organized and presented by (AEG), a sports and live entertainment company, from its inception in 2006 until its hiatus announcement in 2019. AEG managed all aspects of event production, including route planning, team invitations, and UCI WorldTour compliance, positioning the race as North America's premier professional cycling stage event modeled after the . Amgen, a California-based biotechnology firm, served as the title sponsor from the race's launch on February 19, 2006, through its final edition in May 2019, with the event officially branded as the Amgen Tour of California. The sponsorship began with a multi-year agreement announced in November 2005, providing Amgen with and promotional benefits tied to its Breakaway from Cancer initiative, which raised awareness and funds for cancer support organizations. Amgen extended its commitment multiple times, including a deal covering 2014–2016 announced in 2013 and a further multiyear renewal in 2018 that secured sponsorship benefits through at least 2020 before the event's suspension. Additional sponsors included as a founding partner and official banking sponsor in a three-year deal that supported early editions, though its role diminished over time as Amgen's prominence grew. AEG's organizational efforts also secured secondary partnerships with entities like the tourism board and local governments for logistical and promotional support, contributing to the event's annual budget estimated in the tens of millions, largely offset by sponsorship revenues and broadcast rights. The combination of AEG's expertise and Amgen's sustained financial backing enabled the race to attract UCI WorldTour teams and achieve global visibility, though escalating costs and regulatory changes, such as California's equal-pay mandates for multi-gender events, factored into its eventual pause.

Historical Development

Inception and Launch (2006)

The Tour of California originated from efforts in the early 2000s to create a high-profile professional stage race in the United States, amid heightened domestic interest in the sport following Lance Armstrong's victories. A preliminary was developed by Jim Birrell in 2001 during his time at Turner Sports, aiming to showcase California's diverse terrain and promote as a spectator event comparable to European grands tours. Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), a Los Angeles-based sports and entertainment conglomerate, announced the inaugural edition on March 26, 2005, with the race set for February 19–26, 2006. AEG owned and operated the event, partnering with Medalist Sports—re-established in 2004 by Birrell and Chris Aronhalt—for production and execution, completing planning in just over three months despite initial skepticism about feasibility. Title sponsorship came from , a California-headquartered firm, reflecting the state's innovation economy and aligning with the race's emphasis on health and endurance. The eight-day event spanned approximately 700 miles (1,100 km), beginning with a 1.9-mile (3.1 km) along San Francisco's Embarcadero, followed by seven stages winding south through , coastal roads, and urban circuits to conclude in Redondo Beach. Sixteen UCI ProTour and professional continental teams competed, featuring riders like and Discovery Channel's squad, with stages designed for both competitive racing and scenic spectator appeal. Race director Jim Birrell prioritized accessible viewing points and varied terrain to attract crowds and media. The launch proved successful, drawing unexpectedly large audiences—such as packed streets in Santa Rosa—and earning immediate upgrade to UCI 2.1 status, positioning it as North America's premier cycling event from inception. Phonak's claimed the general classification victory in 22 hours, 46 minutes, and 46 seconds, ahead of and , though Landis's career later faced scrutiny from his subsequent doping violation. The race's debut highlighted logistical prowess and public enthusiasm, setting a foundation for annual growth.

Expansion and Growth (2007–2012)

The 2007 Tour of marked a significant expansion from its inaugural edition, increasing to eight stages over 650 miles (1,045 km) of diverse terrain, including redwood forests, wine regions, and coastal routes. This upgrade in scope, announced in December 2006, featured route adjustments such as relocating the to Solvang on Stage 5 and lengthening Stages 2 and 6 compared to 2006. The (UCI) elevated the event's status to 2.HC category effective that year, the highest tier below WorldTour races, which drew 18 including nine UCI ProTour squads like and Team CSC—up from eight ProTour teams in 2006. This influx of elite international riders, totaling 144 competitors, positioned the race as a key platform for global cycling talent in the United States. From 2008 to 2009, the event solidified its eight-stage format while enhancing logistical and promotional elements, maintaining UCI 2.HC classification and attracting consistent fields of top-tier teams and riders. Routes emphasized challenging climbs, such as Category One ascents in the Sierra Nevada, fostering competitive depth with victories by riders like , who defended his overall title in 2007 and won again in 2008. The race's visibility grew through expanded media coverage, including live broadcasts, which helped cultivate domestic interest in professional cycling amid a post-Lance Armstrong era seeking new American stars. Organizational improvements by promoter AEG Worldwide, coupled with Amgen's ongoing title sponsorship, supported broader participation from North American squads, aiding their development against European powerhouses. In 2010, the Tour shifted from its traditional February timing to May to synchronize with the European season, though this adjustment created overlaps with the ; the eight-stage distance extended to approximately 700 miles in subsequent years. The event's prestige continued to rise, incorporating more international contenders and contributing to the maturation of U.S. professional teams through high-level exposure. By , the comprised 16 teams, including seven of the UCI's top-10 ranked outfits such as Omega Pharma-Quick Step and Liquigas-Cannondale, reflecting sustained growth in competitive caliber. Spectator turnout surged to over 2 million across the eight days, generating substantial economic activity for host cities through tourism and events, while underscoring the race's role in popularizing nationwide.

Maturity and Challenges (2013–2019)

The Tour of California entered a phase of increased prestige and competitive depth from 2013 to 2016, maintaining its status as a UCI 2.HC-rated event that drew international fields including top climbers and sprinters. of BMC Racing Team claimed the 2013 victory, followed by in 2014, in 2015, and in 2016, reflecting the race's appeal to versatile riders capable of handling diverse terrain from coastal flats to mountain finishes like Mount Baldy. Attendance and media coverage grew, with stages attracting tens of thousands of spectators and live broadcasts enhancing its visibility as North America's premier event. In 2017, the (UCI) elevated the race to WorldTour status, mandating participation from all 18 UCI WorldTeams and boosting its global standing alongside events like the . George Bennett won the 2017 edition, edging out , while subsequent years saw emerging talents triumph: in 2018 and in 2019, both future Grand Tour winners, underscoring the event's role in showcasing young climbers on demanding ascents. The upgrade facilitated higher prize money and technical regulations but also intensified scrutiny on team logistics, with mandatory attendance straining budgets for long-haul travel from Europe. Despite these advancements, operational challenges mounted, including escalating production costs driven by expanding stage lengths—often exceeding 200 kilometers—and complex security for high-profile routes through urban and rural . Local disruptions from road closures sparked community backlash in areas like and counties, where traffic halts and safety concerns led to protests and calls for mitigation measures. Heavy reliance on title sponsor , amid its biotechnology focus on performance-enhancing drugs like EPO, drew ethical questions from anti-doping advocates, though no direct scandals emerged during this period. Scheduling conflicts further compounded issues, as the May timing overlapped with preparations, deterring some European stars and limiting field depth compared to continental rivals. By 2019, organizers noted mounting financial pressures, including rising insurance and permitting fees in a state with stringent environmental and labor regulations, foreshadowing the event's indefinite pause after that edition. Efforts to integrate a women's race from 2018 faced hurdles like unequal infrastructure investment, though California legislation mandating pay equity for co-sanctioned events added administrative burdens without resolving core funding gaps.

Race Structure and Competitions

Stage Profiles and Routes

The Tour of California comprised seven stages over seven consecutive days, spanning roughly 700 to 800 miles across the state's diverse , from Pacific coastal plains to inland ranges. Routes varied annually to showcase regional landmarks, typically progressing northward from starting points in southern or central areas like Long Beach, Sacramento, or , and concluding in northern venues such as Pasadena or . This format emphasized endurance, with total elevation gains often exceeding 60,000 feet, including 14 intermediate sprints and 25 (KOM) opportunities in editions like 2019. Stage profiles balanced rider specialties: flat or gently rolling stages, averaging 130-140 km, facilitated bunch sprints on urban circuits or rural roads, as seen in Sacramento loops with fast finishes. Hilly terrains dominated mid-race segments, featuring undulating coastal highways like the Pacific Coast Highway and inland valleys with short, punchy ascents up to 10-12% gradients, such as those near Morro Bay or Ventura, often exceeding 200 km and favoring aggressive breakaways. Mountain stages, typically the queen stages, incorporated high-altitude passes and summit finishes; examples include the 194.5 km trek to South Lake Tahoe via at 2,627 m elevation or the 127.5 km haul to Mount Baldy with a 17 km climb averaging 6-7% and final sections over 15%. Individual or team time trials appeared sporadically, testing aerodynamic efficiency on closed-road circuits of 20-40 km, while later editions amplified climbing demands with routes like the 207 km ascent of Mount Hamilton's 35 km (HC) climb featuring 25 switchbacks. Overall, stages averaged 110-220 km, with more than half exceeding 120 miles in demanding years, incorporating technical descents, vineyard traverses in Sonoma County, and circuits around sites like the Rose Bowl for spectator-friendly finales. These profiles evolved to heighten competitiveness, shifting from early flat-heavy formats to increased vertical challenges post-2010, reflecting California's geographic range from to Sierra Nevada elevations over 9,000 feet.

Classification Systems

The Tour of California, as a stage race, utilized multiple systems to recognize performance across different rider skills and efforts, with leader jerseys awarded daily to category frontrunners and presented on stage following each stage finish. These included the general for overall time, points for sprinting prowess, mountains for ability, best young rider for emerging talent under age 23, and a based on collective results. The general classification determined the race winner by aggregating each rider's finishing times across all stages, adjusted for time bonuses typically granted to the top finishers (e.g., 10, 6, and 4 seconds for first, second, and third on the stage) and any penalties. The daily leader donned the Overall Leader Jersey, signifying the rider with the lowest cumulative elapsed time to that point. The points classification awarded points to riders at intermediate sprints and stage finishes, with higher values for flat terrain finishes favoring sprinters (e.g., 50 points for a stage win in bunch sprint scenarios under UCI norms adapted for the race). The leader wore a dedicated , often in , to highlight consistent speed and positioning in breakaways or finishes. The classification allocated points to the first riders summiting categorized climbs, with steeper or longer ascents offering more points (e.g., category 1 climbs yielding up to 10 points for the winner). Points accumulated across stages, and the leader received the Jersey, emphasizing endurance on the race's hilly profiles like those in the Sierra Nevada or coastal ranges. The best young rider classification mirrored the general classification but restricted eligibility to riders under 23 years old as of of the race year, calculated by lowest elapsed time to spotlight promising talents. The leader wore the SRAM or Best Young Rider , which varied by sponsorship year. The team classification summed the stage finishing times of each squad's three highest-placed riders daily, excluding bonuses and penalties, with the lowest total time prevailing overall; no jersey was awarded, but it recognized tactical coordination among the eight-rider teams invited annually.

Team and Individual Achievements

achieved the most (GC) victories in the Tour of California's history, winning three consecutive editions from 2007 to 2009 while riding for , , and respectively. His dominance included six stage wins across those years, highlighting American strength in the early races. The full list of GC winners reflects a mix of climbers, time trial specialists, and all-rounders:
YearWinnerNationalityTeam
2006USAPhonak Hearing Systems
2007USADiscovery Channel
2008USA
2009USA
2010Michael RogersAUSHTC-Columbia
2011USA
2012Robert GesinkNED
2013USABMC Racing
2014GBRTeam Sky
2015SVKTinkoff-Saxo
2016FRAEtixx–Quick-Step
2017George BennettNZLLottoNL–Jumbo
2018COLTeam Sky
2019SLOUAE Team Emirates
Peter Sagan holds the record for most stage victories with 17 wins between 2010 and 2019, primarily for Bora-Hansgrohe and Tinkoff, often in bunch sprints but also showcasing versatility on hilly terrain. follows with 10 stage wins, mainly early in the race's history for teams like HTC-Columbia. Other classifications saw standout performances, such as Evan Huffman claiming the King of the Mountains jersey in 2016 for Rally Cycling, a UCI Continental team that punched above its weight with multiple stage podiums. Team achievements emphasized collective efforts in supporting GC contenders and accumulating points. Astana's back-to-back-to-back GC successes with Leipheimer demonstrated tactical depth, while excelled in 2017 by securing the team classification through strong placings from riders like Ian Boswell, contributing to overall race control. UAE Team Emirates in 2019 leveraged Pogačar's youth classification win alongside his GC triumph, underscoring emerging talent development. Continental teams like Rally Cycling achieved breakthroughs, including stage wins by Evan Huffman in 2017, highlighting opportunities for non-WorldTour squads.

Key Results and Records

General Classification Winners

The of the Tour of California awarded the overall race leadership jersey to the rider with the lowest cumulative finishing time across all stages, excluding time bonuses and penalties. American secured the most victories, winning three consecutive editions from 2007 to 2009. The event featured a mix of American dominance in early years and increasing international success later, reflecting the race's growing prestige within the UCI WorldTour calendar from 2010 onward. Floyd Landis claimed the inaugural 2006 edition, finishing in 22 hours, 46 minutes, and 46 seconds over 959.6 km. Leipheimer's triumphs followed in 2007 (24:57:24 over 1,031.7 km), 2008 (29:24:32 over 1,072.5 km), and 2009 (31:28:21 over 1,256.7 km). won in 2010 with a time of 33:08:30 across 1,303.8 km.
YearWinnerNationalityWinning TimeDistance (km)
2006Floyd LandisUnited States22h 46m 46s959.6
2007Levi LeipheimerUnited States24h 57m 24s1,031.7
2008Levi LeipheimerUnited States29h 24m 32s1,072.5
2009Levi LeipheimerUnited States31h 28m 21s1,256.7
2010Michael RogersAustralia33h 08m 30s1,303.8
2011Chris HornerUnited States23h 46m 41s945
2012Robert GesinkNetherlands30h 42m 32s1,184.1
2013Tejay van GarderenUnited States29h 43m 00s1,171.3
2014Bradley WigginsUnited Kingdom28h 22m 05s1,155.6
2015Peter SaganSlovakia28h 13m 12s1,140.3
2016Julian AlaphilippeFrance31h 47m 50s1,253
2017George BennettNew Zealand22h 54m 38s921.9
2018Egan BernalColombia25h 34m 19s1,039.2
2019Tadej PogačarSlovenia32h 55m 12s1,253
Chris Horner defended American success in 2011 (23:46:41 over 945 km), followed by Gesink's 2012 victory (30:42:32 over 1,184.1 km). prevailed in 2013, with taking the 2014 title in a time trial-heavy edition. Peter Sagan's 2015 win marked a rare sprinter's overall triumph, leveraging bonus seconds. Later editions saw (2016), George Bennett (2017), (2018), and (2019) as young international talents dominating the mountainous stages. No single nationality dominated beyond the initial U.S. wins, underscoring the race's evolution into a global proving ground.

Specialized Records and Milestones

(Slovenia) amassed the most stage wins in Tour of California history, securing 17 victories across multiple editions from 2010 to 2019. (United Kingdom) follows with 10 stage triumphs, primarily in sprint finishes between 2007 and 2011. (United States) recorded 6 stage wins, often on time trials and hilly stages during his general classification successes.
RiderStage Wins
(SVK)17
(GBR)10
(USA)6
In classified competitions, Sagan also dominated the points classification, earning the sprinter's jersey multiple times, reflecting his versatility in flat and intermediate terrains. For the King of the Mountains competition, riders like Evan Huffman () claimed the title in 2017 by accumulating points on key climbs, though no single rider holds a multi-win record comparable to stage victories. Milestones include attendance , with drawing unprecedented crowds for a race in the United States, surpassing prior benchmarks for any single sporting event in by . Organizers projected and achieved record-high spectator figures from its , peaking in later years with millions lining routes. () set a benchmark in 2019 by winning overall at age 20, the youngest victor in a UCI WorldTour multi-stage race. Stages featured notable elevation challenges, such as the 2011 Sierra Road ascent with substantial vertical gain, testing climbers' limits.

Controversies and Criticisms

Doping Incidents and Enforcement

In the inaugural 2006 edition, race organizers acknowledged that doping controls did not include tests for (EPO), a implicated in numerous scandals, despite conducting urine tests for other substances. This omission drew amid the sport's ongoing battle with , though no positive results were reported from the event's limited testing protocol. Subsequent editions implemented expanded measures, with the race featuring what organizers described as the most comprehensive anti-doping program in competitive history, including collaboration between and the (USADA) for in-competition and out-of-competition testing. Enforcement evolved through partnerships aimed at addressing UCI shortcomings, but faced setbacks; in 2011, the UCI terminated its testing agreement with USADA and conducted no blood tests during the event, prompting accusations of lax oversight from teams and riders. By 2015, the UCI, Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF), and USADA reinstated joint efforts, including enhanced blood and biological passport monitoring, as part of broader international collaborations to detect micro-dosing and other evasion tactics. These protocols emphasized unannounced controls and data integration, though the UCI's centralized authority continued to spark debates over consistency compared to USADA's domestic rigor. Notable incidents tied to the race were rare and often linked to external investigations rather than on-site positives; no high-profile adverse analytical findings from Tour of California samples were publicly announced across its editions, unlike contemporaneous European events. In 2019, however, UCI provisional suspensions disrupted participation, including UAE Team Emirates' Kristijan Durasek, notified for a 2017 prohibited method violation (alleged blood manipulation), though his team continued racing. Separately, UCI anti-doping rule violation notices led to the withdrawal of other riders and staff linked to a broader blood doping probe, underscoring ongoing vulnerabilities despite preventive measures. The event's primary sponsor, Amgen—a manufacturer of EPO—added irony to these efforts, as the drug's role in cycling's history fueled skepticism about the sport's reform, even as testing volumes increased annually.

Financial Sustainability and Organizational Failures

The Tour of California, organized by (AEG), faced mounting financial pressures that culminated in its indefinite hiatus announced on October 30, 2019, for the 2020 edition. Despite generating prestige as the ' premier stage race since its inception in , the event struggled with escalating operational costs that outpaced revenue from sponsorships and host city contributions. AEG cited these financial difficulties explicitly, noting that the race had become "increasingly problematic from a financial standpoint," with no viable path to without significant . Key contributors to the fiscal strain included California's stringent regulatory environment, which imposed high expenses for road closures, permitting, and security. Urban stage finishes, particularly in densely populated areas like and , required extensive temporary infrastructure and coordination with local authorities, driving up costs for and public safety measures. Organizers reported that hiring California State Patrol for mandatory escort duties alone added substantial line-item expenses, as the state's protocols for large-scale events demanded premium rates not offset by proportional economic returns from the race. Host cities, facing budget constraints and competing priorities, grew reluctant to provide the multimillion-dollar subsidies previously allocated for hosting stages, further eroding the event's funding base. Sponsorship challenges compounded these issues, as the Tour of California relied heavily on title sponsor —a California-based firm—for financial backing, yet struggled to diversify revenue streams amid a saturated global market. While Amgen's involvement lent credibility and partial funding, the race's domestic focus limited its appeal to international brands seeking broader exposure, unlike European counterparts subsidized by tourism boards or cross-promoted with more lucrative events. AEG's organizational model, which treated the Tour as a standalone venture without effective cross-subsidization from other properties, failed to adapt to these dynamics; expansion to an eight-stage format by , while elevating its UCI WorldTour status, inflated logistics without commensurate income growth. Broader organizational shortcomings included inadequate contingency planning for cost inflation and a dependence on volatile support, which proved unsustainable as economic priorities shifted post-2010s recovery. Internal mismanagement allegations surfaced indirectly through AEG's inability to secure alternative investors or streamline operations, leading to the event's cancellation after the edition; no revival has occurred as of , with UCI calendar slots unallocated for a U.S. equivalent. These failures highlight causal factors rooted in mismatched incentives—high fixed costs in a high-regulation state versus limited scalable revenue—rather than external shocks like the , which merely accelerated the hiatus.

Economic and Broader Impacts

Local Economic Contributions

The Tour of California generated substantial direct economic activity in host cities by attracting spectators, professional teams, support staff, and media personnel, who contributed to local spending on lodging, food services, transportation, and retail. Stages typically drew thousands of on-site visitors, filling hotels to capacity and increasing at restaurants and shops during event periods. For instance, in Sacramento, which hosted multiple starts and finishes including the state capitol criterium, the race produced an estimated $3 million in economic impact through visitor expenditures in 2015. Similarly, Elk Grove reported a combined and economic benefit of $905,500 from its 2018 stage hosting, encompassing direct spending and promotional value. These infusions supported and service sectors, with local governments often subsidizing road closures and security in exchange for the transient revenue boost. Beyond immediate spending, the event enhanced long-term by showcasing host communities to a global television audience of millions, prompting future visits from enthusiasts and general travelers. Cities like Modesto, which hosted stages in multiple years, experienced heightened demand for accommodations and dining, benefiting a broad range of service industries. In Nevada City, merchants noted sustained positive effects from the influx of visitors during stage passages, including spillover purchases despite temporary traffic disruptions. Over its 14 editions from 2006 to 2019, the Tour cumulatively injected more than $3.5 billion into California's economy, with a significant portion accruing to the diverse locales along its routes through such mechanisms. However, these local gains were uneven, favoring urban centers with infrastructure for large crowds while smaller towns derived more modest, short-term advantages.

Effects on Professional Cycling in the United States

The Tour of California, held annually from 2006 to 2019, established itself as the premier event , attracting WorldTour teams and top international riders to compete on American soil. This exposure allowed U.S. cyclists to race against elite global competition without the logistical burdens of European travel, fostering growth and visibility. Organizers and officials noted that the event created a global platform for both established and emerging American talent, enhancing the sport's relevance domestically. For U.S. teams, the race incentivized upgrades to higher competitive levels, such as Pro Continental status, and provided critical high-profile opportunities that aided sponsor retention for domestic squads like Rally Cycling and . Riders like , who secured three overall victories, and benefited from home-soil successes that elevated their profiles and extended contracts, with Leipheimer describing it as a "huge opportunity" for domestic athletes. Emerging talents, including Continental-level riders such as Skujins and , achieved stage wins that served as career launchpads, while established Americans like and gained key results against international fields. The event's scale—drawing over 2 million spectators annually and securing substantial television coverage—amplified media exposure for U.S. , inspiring grassroots participation and public engagement. Horner emphasized its professional significance, stating it outweighed many European wins in impact for American careers. By featuring U.S. national teams in select editions, such as 2019's squad representing multiple trade teams, it reinforced a domestic development pathway amid broader challenges in sustaining U.S. pro road racing infrastructure.

Discontinuation and Legacy

Reasons for Hiatus and Cancellation

On October 29, 2019, (AEG), the organizer of the Amgen Tour of California, announced a hiatus for the 2020 edition, stating that the decision was driven by shifts in the event's underlying . Kristin Klein, president of the race and executive vice president of AEG Sports, explained: "This has been a very difficult decision to make, but the business fundamentals of the Amgen Tour of California have changed since we launched the race 14 years ago," adding that mounting the event had grown "more challenging each year," prompting a reevaluation of options. Although AEG expressed intent to explore a potential return in 2021, no resumption occurred, marking the effective cancellation of the annual WorldTour stage race after 14 editions from 2006 to 2019. The undisclosed financial pressures reflected broader difficulties in sustaining high-cost professional events in the United States, where sponsorship revenues and operational expenses had diverged amid evolving market dynamics. Speculation linked the challenges to factors such as stagnant television viewership and rising logistical costs in , but organizers did not attribute the hiatus to specific policies like state equal-pay laws for sports events, which the race had already implemented voluntarily. The decision predated the , underscoring pre-existing economic viability issues rather than external disruptions as the primary cause. chairman Bob Stapleton voiced support for revival efforts but noted the need for structural adaptations in American road racing to address such fiscal hurdles. Ultimately, the Tour of California's discontinuation left the U.S. without a premier men's WorldTour stage race, highlighting systemic strains on domestic professional cycling's funding model.

Long-Term Influence and Potential Revival

The Tour of California exerted a notable influence on professional in the United States by establishing a premier WorldTour-caliber stage race that drew elite international competitors and showcased American talent on a global stage from 2006 to 2019. This event redefined aspects of modern U.S. , including the integration of a parallel women's race that highlighted female athletes and helped build visibility for the sport beyond male-dominated narratives. Over its 14 editions, it attracted 13 WorldTour teams in its final year alone, fostering domestic rider development through exposure to high-stakes competition akin to European Grand Tours. Its discontinuation in 2020, initially framed as a hiatus by organizer AEG due to escalating financial pressures and shifting market dynamics, underscored broader challenges in sustaining large-scale U.S. road events. The absence of a comparable flagship race has contributed to a perceptible decline in professional road racing domestically, with the U.S. lacking any WorldTour stage race since, mirroring trends of reduced grassroots and elite participation amid high operational costs and limited broadcasting revenue. Despite generating substantial local economic activity during its run—estimated in millions annually through tourism and sponsorship—the event's long-term legacy includes highlighting the vulnerabilities of reliance on corporate backers like Amgen, whose EPO association drew scrutiny but did not derail its prominence. Prospects for revival remain dim as of 2025, with no official announcements from AEG or UCI stakeholders indicating a return, even post-pandemic recovery in global calendars. Persistent issues, including AEG's organizational restructuring and the UCI's prioritization of established European and emerging Asian markets, have shifted focus toward alternative formats like or shorter criteriums rather than reinstating a multi-stage tour. While informal discussions in communities speculate on potential reboots under new management, points to structural barriers—such as venue costs exceeding $1 million per edition and tepid television viewership—rendering a full-scale revival economically unviable without transformative sponsorship models.

References

  1. https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tour-of-california
  2. https://aegworldwide.com/press-center/press-releases/amgen-tour-california-cycling-road-race-put-hiatus-2020
  3. https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/after-the-gold-rush-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-tour-of-california/
  4. https://roadbikeaction.com/remembering-the-tour-of-california-through-the-years/
  5. https://bikeraceinfo.com/stageraces/California/california.html
  6. https://www.sanluisobispo.com/sports/article236795133.html
  7. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/tour-california-route-stage-stage-222586
  8. https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/story/_/id/25893761/tour-california-reveals-route-2019
  9. https://aegworldwide.com/press-center/press-releases/2018-amgen-tour-california-newly-designed-jerseys-revealed-press
  10. https://usacycling.org/article/national-team-continues-to-impress-at-stage-2-of-the-amgen-tour-of-california
  11. http://www.pedaldancer.com/2016/04/classification-jerseys-for-2016-tour-of.html
  12. https://granfondoguide.com/Contents/Index/1335/2016-tour-of-california-leader-jerseys-revealed
  13. https://aegworldwide.com/press-center/press-releases/amgen-tour-california-launches-its-second-decade
  14. https://aegworldwide.com/press-center/press-releases/aeg-announces-extended-partnership-amgen-amgen-tour-california-new
  15. https://investors.amgen.com/news-releases/news-release-details/amgen-announces-sponsorship-world-class-cycling-event-company
  16. https://www.amgen.com/newsroom/press-releases/2010/05/amgens-breakaway-from-cancerr-to-honor-cancer-survivors-at-amgen-tour-of-california
  17. https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/amgen-extends-contract-with-tour-of-california/
  18. https://www.sportspro.com/news/rabobank_is_tour_of_californias_new_sponsor/
  19. https://medium.com/beyond-the-scoreboard/the-late-great-tour-of-california-bike-race-10bec02eeca4
  20. https://pezcyclingnews.com/features/medalist-sports-a-microcosm-of-u-s-cycling-tour-de-trump/
  21. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-of-california-to-debut-early-2006/
  22. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/americas-premier-cycling-race-gets-underway-as-amgen-tour-of-california-launches-its-second-decade-300269233.html
  23. https://velo.outsideonline.com/news/tour-of-california-route-unveiled/
  24. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jan-18-sp-cycling18-story.html
  25. http://www.steephill.tv/2006/tour-of-california/route/
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/27/sports/27iht-BIKE.html
  27. https://autobus.cyclingnews.com/road/2006/feb06/california06/?id=results/california067
  28. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-of-california-announces-2007-route-details/
  29. https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tour-of-california/2007/gc
  30. https://www.roadcycling.com/news-results/team-rosters-announced-2007-amgen-tour-california
  31. https://socalcycling.com/2012/05/11/amgen-tour-of-california-field-announced/
  32. https://recreation-law.com/2012/06/12/2012-amgen-tour-of-california-professional-cycling-race-draws-more-than-2-million-spectators/
  33. https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tour-of-california/results/palmares
  34. https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/california-worldtour-status-has-domestic-teams-worried
  35. https://inrng.com/2019/10/tour-of-california-hiatus/
  36. https://www.bicycling.com/racing/a29665320/gender-equity-tour-of-california/
  37. https://labs.strava.com/tour-of-california/
  38. https://www.cyclingstage.com/tour-of-california-2019/route-toc-2019/
  39. https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/pacific-coastline-tour-of-california-route-to-feature-new-mountain-stages/
  40. https://www.granfondoguide.com/Contents/Index/1335/2016-tour-of-california-leader-jerseys-revealed
  41. https://usacycling.org/article/hoehn-crowned-king-of-the-mountain-at-stage-3-of-the-amgen-tour-of-california
  42. https://socalcycling.com/2016/04/22/amgen-tour-california-reveals-leaders-jerseys/
  43. https://www.cyclingranking.com/rider/4976/levi-leipheimer
  44. https://www.procyclingstats.com/rider/levi-leipheimer
  45. https://velo.outsideonline.com/news/leipheimer-on-the-amgen-tour-of-california-i-owe-a-lot-to-that-race/
  46. https://humanpoweredhealthcycling.com/news/evan-huffman-crowned-king-of-the-mountains-at-amgen-tour-of-california/
  47. https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tour-of-california/2012/gc
  48. https://thisisreno.com/2010/10/video-largest-cycling-event-in-america-visits-north-and-south-lake-tahoe/
  49. https://www.biospace.com/the-amgen-tour-of-california-cycling-race-pacing-to-break-records
  50. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/record-breaker-tadej-pogacar-wins-tour-california-cees-bol-wins-stage-seven-424065
  51. https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/amgen-tour-stages-teams-taking-shape/
  52. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/17/sports/othersports/17cycling.html
  53. https://velo.outsideonline.com/news/amgen-tour-usa-cycling-usada-team-up-for-rigorous-drug-testing-regimen/
  54. https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/news/story?id=6541750
  55. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-performed-no-blood-tests-during-amgen-tour-of-california/
  56. https://www.uci.org/article/the-cadf-usada-and-the-uci-announce-new-anti-doping-collaboration-for-the-2015-amgen-tour-of-california-169653/4fmbP5XKI6W98qHK6fwx96
  57. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-of-california-uae-continue-despite-durasek-doping-related-suspension/
  58. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/giro-ditalia/riders-pulled-giro-ditalia-tour-california-uci-publishes-names-linked-blood-doping-scandal-423475
  59. https://www.latimes.com/sports/story/2019-10-30/amgen-tour-of-california-placed-on-hiatus-for-2020
  60. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-of-california-hiatus-unlikely-related-to-equality-law/
  61. https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling/analysis-why-is-there-no-american-race-on-the-uci-world-tour
  62. https://www.bicycling.com/news/a29687094/tour-of-california-cancellation-changes-american-bike-racing/
  63. https://www.bicycling.com/news/a29640173/amgen-tour-of-california-discontinued-2020/
  64. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2019/10/31/no-amgen-tour-of-california-race-in-2020/
  65. https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tour-of-california-put-on-hiatus-for-2020/
  66. https://usacycling.org/article/inside-the-usa-cycling-national-team-at-the-amgen-tour-of-california-sam-boardman-and-travis-mccabe
  67. https://www.thecalifornian.com/story/sports/2018/05/15/amgens-tour-california-wows-king-city-crowds/613403002/
  68. https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-culture/is-the-amgen-tour-of-california-caught-in-a-battle-between-the-uci-aso-and-chinas-richest-man/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.