Hubbry Logo
Traprain LawTraprain LawMain
Open search
Traprain Law
Community hub
Traprain Law
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Traprain Law
Traprain Law
Traprain Law
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

55°57′47″N 2°40′21″W / 55.96306°N 2.67250°W / 55.96306; -2.67250

An aerial view of Traprain Law
Traprain Law from the north

Traprain Law is a hill 6 km (4 mi) east of Haddington, East Lothian, Scotland. It is the site of a hill fort or possibly oppidum, which covered at its maximum extent about 16 ha (40 acres). It is the site of the Traprain Law Treasure,[1] the largest Roman silver hoard from anywhere outside the Roman Empire which included exquisite silver artefacts.

The hill, about 220 m (720 ft) above MSL, was already a place of burial by around 1500 BC, and showed evidence of occupation and signs of ramparts after 1000 BC. The ramparts were rebuilt and realigned many times in the following centuries. Excavations have shown it was occupied in the Late Iron Age from about AD 40 until the last quarter of the 2nd century (about the time that the Antonine Wall was manned).

In the 1st century AD the Romans recorded the Votadini as a British tribe in the area, and Traprain Law is generally thought to have been one of their major settlements, named Curia by Ptolemy.[2] They emerged as a kingdom under the Brythonic version of their name Gododdin and Traprain Law is thought to have been their capital before moving to Din Eidyn (Castle Rock in modern Edinburgh).

In 1938 an area of the hill was leased to the district council for use as a quarry for road stone, causing substantial disfigurement to the landscape.[3]

Name history

[edit]

This hill was only known as Traprain Law from the late 18th century, taking its name from a local hamlet. This is etymologically a Cumbric name cognate with Welsh tref 'farm' and either pren 'tree' or bryn 'hill'.[4] Law comes from the Old English word hlāw, meaning a hill.

Before that, it is found on old maps as Dunpendyrlaw.[5] This name appears on a map printed in 1630.[6] An alternative spelling 'Dounprenderlaw' was used in 1547, when a signal beacon was placed on the hill to warn of an English invasion.[7]

Locally, and particularly amongst fishermen who use it as a landmark, it is still referred to as Dunpelder. This name seems also to be etymologically Cumbric, cognate with Welsh din 'fort' and pelydr 'spear shafts', thus meaning 'fort of the spear shafts'.[8] Dun may also be derived from the Scottish Gaelic word dùn meaning 'fort'. It is as 'Dunpeldyr', the capital of King Lot of Lothian, that Traprain Law appears in Mary Stewart's Merlin Trilogy.

Archaeology

[edit]

A team led by Curle and Cree began the first excavations in 1914 and continued them until 1923, finding layers of fragmentary stone and timber houses under the turf.

Traprain Law Treasure

[edit]
Traprain law from the Garleton hills

In 1919, Alexander Ormiston Curle recovered a hoard of silver plate. The hoard is known as the Traprain Treasure, or Traprain Law Treasure. Consisting of over 24 kg (53 lb) of sliced-up Roman-era silver, the discovery was made in a pit within the boundary of the settlement earlier uncovered. Four Gallic coins were discovered with the hoard; one of the emperor Valens (reigned 364–378), three of Arcadius (reigned 383–408) and one of Honorius (reigned 393–423), which dates the find to some point in the fifth century AD after the Romans had left Britain. The quality of some of the items suggests that they may have come from as far afield as Rome, Ravenna, or possibly Antioch or Constantinople.[9][10]

Most objects had been crushed and hacked to pieces, and only some were left intact. A great deal of the find was table silver, but there were also early Christian items and remnants from a Roman officer's uniform.

It had originally been thought that the objects had been brought back from a raid abroad, as the objects had been split up ready for division. Later finds such as the Mildenhall Treasure found at Mildenhall, Suffolk and the Hoxne Hoard from Suffolk, showed that silverware of this nature was certainly in use in Roman Britain. A further suggestion is that it had been brought back on a raid by the Votadini across Hadrian's Wall. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the silver was in payment for mercenary service to protect weaker tribes from the inroads of the Scots, Picts, and Angles, the silver being split up as bullion due to lack of adequate coinage.

Further excavations were made in 1939 by Cruden and in 1947 by Bersu.

The collection was restored where appropriate and sent to the National Museum of Antiquities in Edinburgh and now is in the care of the National Museum of Scotland.

  • Silver from the Traprain Law Treasure, East Lothian, Scotland
    Silver from the Traprain Law Treasure, East Lothian, Scotland
  • Fragments of Hacksilver
    Fragments of Hacksilver
  • Silver bowl
    Silver bowl
  • Traprain Law Treasure. Triangular silver dish, drinking cup and bowl.
    Traprain Law Treasure. Triangular silver dish, drinking cup and bowl.
  • Traprain Law Treasure. Silver strainer and bowls of silver spoons.
    Traprain Law Treasure. Silver strainer and bowls of silver spoons.

Folklore

[edit]

In legend, Traprain Law was the cliff from which Thenaw, the mother of Saint Mungo, was thrown when her father, King Lot or Leudonus, discovered she was pregnant by Owain mab Urien. Saved by divine providence, she was transported by boat to Saint Serf's community in Culross, where she gave birth to Kentigern, later also known as Mungo.

Geodesy

[edit]

Up to 1891 Traprain Law was the origin (meridian) of the 6-inch and 1:2500 Ordnance Survey maps of East Lothian. After that year the East Lothian maps were drawn according to the meridian of The Buck in Aberdeenshire.[11]

Geology

[edit]

Traprain Law, together with nearby Berwick Law and Bass Rock, is an example of the unusual rock type Phonolite. It was intruded around 350 million years ago as a laccolith into sandstones, siltstones and dolomitic limestones of the Ballagan Formation of the Carboniferous period. During quarrying, large xenoliths of sandstone and shale have been found and recorded in detail. Detailed optical and chemical analysis have revealed the presence of small quantities of Sodalite, Olivine and Apatite.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Traprain Law

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Traprain Law is a prominent volcanic hill in , , rising to 221 metres and serving as the site of a major promontory fort associated with the tribe. Occupied intermittently from the around 1500 BC but primarily developed as a during the , it features extensive ramparts enclosing approximately 16 hectares and reflects intensive settlement with evidence of Roman-era trade and influence. The hill's archaeological significance is epitomized by the Traprain Law Treasure, the largest known hoard of late Roman hacksilver, weighing over 23 kg and comprising fragments from more than 150 silver vessels and objects produced across the Roman Empire in the 4th century AD. Discovered in 1919 during excavations interrupted by World War I, the hoard—consisting largely of deliberately hacked pieces rather than intact tableware—suggests pragmatic economic use, such as bullion for trade, tribute payments, or recycling, rather than ceremonial display. This find illuminates complex Romano-British interactions beyond the Empire's frontiers, including potential diplomatic exchanges or raids, buried around the mid-5th century AD amid post-Roman upheavals. Excavations at Traprain Law, including those by Gerhard Bersu in and later projects like the Traprain Law Environs survey, have revealed additional features such as , quarrying activity, and settlement remains, underscoring its role as a power center in . The site's enduring prominence in the landscape and its artifacts, now housed primarily in the National Museums , highlight Traprain Law's status as one of 's premier archaeological landmarks.

Physical Geography

Location and Topography

Traprain Law is situated approximately 6 kilometers east of Haddington in , , near the village of . The hill occupies a position on the Lothian Plain, rising prominently from the surrounding agricultural lowlands. The features a whaleback-shaped volcanic hill reaching a summit elevation of 221 meters (724 feet) above . Composed primarily of , a rare alkali-rich , the hill exhibits steep, craggy slopes and a distinctive trapezoidal outline when viewed from certain angles. This formation creates a dominant amid the flat terrain, enhancing its visual prominence despite its moderate height. The site's geological and physiographical characteristics, including its isolation and rock composition, contribute to its designation as a .

Geological Formation

Traprain Law is composed primarily of , a fine-grained characterized by its silica-undersaturated composition and minerals such as or . This rock type formed as part of a , a mushroom-shaped that domed the overlying sedimentary layers without breaching the surface. The intruded during the period, approximately 350 million years ago, into underlying sedimentary rocks of the Ballagan Formation, which include sandstones, siltstones, and dolomitic limestones. in the region during this time produced evolved magmas that crystallized to form the phonolitic body, distinct from the more common basaltic elsewhere in the strata of . Subsequent glacial erosion during the period, particularly the last Ice Age, exposed and sculpted the resistant into its current whaleback morphology, while softer surrounding sediments were stripped away. The hill's craggy outcrops and 221-meter elevation reflect this differential , with the phonolite's durability preserving the intrusive feature amid the plain.

Etymology

Linguistic and Historical Names

The hill known today as Traprain Law was recorded under earlier names such as Dunpelder, Dumpelder, or variants like Dunpender and Dunpendyrlaw, the latter appearing on a 1630 map. These designations persisted into the 18th century before the modern name supplanted them. The etymology of Dunpelder traces to Brythonic (P-Celtic) roots, with dun or din denoting a fortified hill or hillfort, a common element in British Iron Age place names, and pelydr signifying shafts, often glossed as spear shafts, yielding interpretations like 'fort of the spear shafts' or 'hill of shafts'. This name reflects the site's role as a defended settlement, possibly evoking weaponry or structural features associated with its occupants, such as the Votadini tribe. Traprain Law as a designation emerged in the late , borrowed from the nearby of Traprain. The element "Traprain" derives from Brittonic tref ('farmstead' or 'settlement') compounded with pren (''), forming a meaning akin to 'farmstead of the tree', a pattern seen in other Cumbric-influenced toponyms in southern . An alternative parsing suggests tra pren, possibly 'across the tree' or 'the wooden town', alluding to a timber-built locale or feature. The suffix "Law" stems from Old English hlāw, meaning 'mound' or 'hill', adopted into Scots dialect as a descriptor for prominent hills in the Borders and Lothians region, creating a hybrid Brittonic-English compound that literally renders 'Traprain hill'. This linguistic layering underscores the site's transition from prehistoric Celtic nomenclature to post-medieval anglicized forms amid Anglo-Scottish cultural exchanges.

Prehistoric and Iron Age Occupation

Neolithic and Bronze Age Evidence

Archaeological investigations at Traprain Law have uncovered limited but indicative evidence of activity, primarily in the form of and potential deposits. Cup-and-ring markings, characteristic of ceremonial practices in , were recorded on the hill's slopes, suggesting its role as a focal point in a broader during the period circa 4000–2500 BCE. These motifs align with regional patterns of interpreted as markers of sacred or territorial significance, though direct dating remains tentative without associated organic material. Bronze Age occupation, dating from approximately 1500 BCE, is more substantially attested through metalworking debris and burial evidence recovered during early 20th-century excavations. Artefacts including bronze tools and fragments of metal objects indicate on-site production or deposition, with finds stratified in lower levels of the hill's deposits, pointing to intermittent settlement or resource exploitation rather than continuous habitation. Human remains and associated urns suggest Traprain Law served as an occasional ground, consistent with its elevated facilitating visibility and symbolic prominence in the prehistoric . This phase of use predates the hillfort's fortifications, with the artefacts' in-situ context supporting genuine prehistoric activity over later intrusions. Overall, these findings portray Traprain Law as a peripheral but symbolically charged location in and , integrated into regional networks of ritual and subsistence without evidence of dense population centers.

Iron Age Hillfort Construction and Use

Traprain Law features a series of multiple ramparts enclosing progressively larger areas of 4 hectares on the summit, expanding to 8, 12, and 16 hectares downslope. The earliest summit enclosure dates to approximately 915–800 BC, with subsequent outer defenses including a constructed around 480–390 BC and a rampart built between 370–200 BC. Five lines of ramparts have been identified, with later stone constructions such as the Cruden Wall overlying earlier earthen or timber elements; the southeastern side relies on natural cliffs for defense, forming a configuration. Entrances occur as gaps and trackways, notably on the northwest side. Excavations reveal evidence of both rectangular and circular structures within the , including elongated platforms on the southwestern slope indicative of rectangular buildings with stone foundations and turf superstructures. Subrectangular houses suggest intensive settlement activity during the . Occupation appears sporadic or low-intensity in the earlier , with more substantial and permanent use emerging in the later Roman (1st–5th centuries AD), marked by deep stratified deposits, hearths, and an abundance of artifacts. The hillfort likely served defensive, residential, and possibly elite or ceremonial functions, given its strategic elevated position and the scale of fortifications; however, the permanence of pre-Roman occupation remains uncertain, with limited structural evidence compared to surrounding smaller sites. Key excavations by Curle and Cree (–) and others uncovered pottery, tools, and metalwork supporting settlement use, though Roman-period materials dominate the finds assemblage. The ramparts' repeated rebuilding implies ongoing investment in defense amid regional threats or social changes.

Roman Period Interactions

Archaeological Evidence of Contact

Excavations at Traprain Law, particularly those in 1915, uncovered substantial quantities of Roman pottery, including over 100 fragments of Samian ware primarily from the late 1st to early 2nd century AD, such as Dragendorff forms 18/31, 30/37, and 33. These sherds, concentrated in the middle levels of the western plateau, show evidence of reuse, with some modified into spindle whorls or gaming counters, suggesting curation and integration into native practices rather than casual discard. Coarse Roman wares dominate the assemblage, comprising the largest such collection from any non-Roman site north of Hadrian's Wall, with types including storage jars (194 sherds from 42 vessels), beakers (225 sherds from 44 vessels), and flagons (93 sherds from 22 vessels), spanning the 1st to 4th centuries AD. Roman coins, totaling at least 18 from the 1915 digs, further attest to sustained contact, with examples ranging from Republican issues (e.g., , 49–48 BC) to imperial denarii and asses of (AD 71, 77–78), (AD 86), (AD 140–143, 154–155), and later 4th–5th century types like those of Constantine II (AD 317–340) and (c. AD 400). Distributed across excavation levels, these coins likely arrived via trade or diplomatic exchanges, as no evidence of Roman , such as forts or structured camps, has been identified at the site. Additional imports include fragments of vessels (e.g., blue-green jars and thin beakers) and 19 glass or beads from the 1st–2nd centuries AD, alongside fibulae such as bow types (5 examples) and penannular forms (7 examples) dated to the same period. The predominance of drinking-related vessels like beakers and flagons among the pottery implies selective adoption focused on social or ceremonial consumption, with limited evidence of Roman culinary or storage practices (e.g., only 2 sherds and 37 mortaria fragments), pointing to indirect access through interactions rather than direct imperial control. This material, lacking signs of or settlement, supports interpretations of episodic elite exchanges between the and Romans during the Flavian and Antonine periods.

The Traprain Law Treasure

The Traprain Law Treasure comprises a of late Roman silver artifacts uncovered in 1919 during excavations at the on Traprain Law in , . Directed by Alexander Ormiston Curle, the digs had commenced in 1914 but were interrupted by , resuming afterward when fieldworker George Pringle discovered the in a shallow pit within the fort's interior. The collection includes 327 fragments from an estimated 129 to 171 original objects, predominantly hacked tableware such as bowls, dishes, platters, and jugs, supplemented by hygiene items like basins and mirrors, as well as decorative pieces; the total weight exceeds 23 kilograms, marking it as the largest known of Roman outside the empire's core territories. The silver spans production from the late 3rd to mid-5th century AD, with most items dating to the 4th and early 5th centuries, and the burial occurring in the second quarter of the 5th century, as inferred from the latest pieces and contextual evidence. The deliberate fragmentation into pieces aligned with Roman weight standards—equivalent to over 11,000 siliquae coins—indicates treatment as bullion for economic purposes rather than mere destruction. Initial assessments in the 1920s, led by Curle, interpreted the as plunder from Roman sources, reflecting hostile raids by local tribes. Subsequent scholarship, including analyses by Fraser Hunter, rejects this in favor of diplomatic or transactional roles, such as tribute payments to the confederacy—whose Traprain Law served as a key center—for border security services amid Rome's late empire instability. This view aligns with broader patterns of along the frontier, suggesting systematic exchange over sporadic violence. A comprehensive re-study published in 2022 by Hunter and Kenneth Painter, drawing on advanced conservation and stylistic examination, refines understandings of the artifacts' provenance, craftsmanship from across the empire, and their adaptation into non-monetary silver economies during the post-Roman transition in Britain. The , conserved at the National Museums , underscores Traprain Law's role in late antique networks, bridging Roman with indigenous societies beyond direct imperial control.

Debates on Roman-Native Relations

The Traprain Law Treasure, comprising approximately 23 kilograms of deliberately fragmented late Roman silver tableware and over 140 kilograms including associated debris, dated primarily to the late 4th and early 5th centuries AD based on siliquae coins minted up to AD 405 and a crossbow brooch fibula post-dating AD 406, has been central to scholarly debates on Roman-native relations during the empire's withdrawal from Britain. The hacksilver form—vessels and utensils systematically cut into irregular pieces without signs of melting—indicates processing for bullion value rather than reuse as functional items, suggesting the Votadini, the Iron Age tribe associated with the hillfort, acquired and repurposed the silver in a manner consistent with peripheral societies integrating Roman wealth into native economies. This deposition around AD 410–425, coinciding with the Roman evacuation of Britain under Honorius, implies interactions at the empire's northern fringe involved economic exchange or coercion rather than outright conquest, as no contemporaneous destruction layers appear at Traprain Law. A primary centers on whether the constituted diplomatic subsidies or tribute payments to maintain Votadini loyalty against northern Pictish threats, aligning with late Roman strategies of subsidizing frontier allies as documented in policies under and Honorius, who diverted payments originally intended for federate troops to barbarian groups to secure borders. Archaeologist Fraser Hunter argues this interpretation is supported by the site's role as a power center for the pro-Roman Votadini, evidenced by earlier 2nd-century Roman imports and the absence of military conflict indicators, positing the silver as "pay-offs" to ensure stability amid imperial collapse rather than loot from southern raids. The treasure's composition, dominated by high-quality silver from British workshops like those supplying the Mildenhall and Water Newton hoards, further suggests controlled transfer through negotiation, as random plundering would likely yield more diverse or lower-grade assemblages. Alternative views propose the silver was acquired through predatory raiding on evacuated Roman sites in Britain, with the hacking reflecting native appropriation for elite redistribution or ritual deposition amid post-Roman turmoil. Some link it to Irish incursions, speculating involvement of figures like , given stylistic parallels with Irish hoards like Ballinrees, though this lacks direct evidence and is critiqued for overemphasizing external agency over local agency. Empirical data, including the hoard's burial integrity without associated weapons or destruction, and comparative analysis with other peripheral hoards like those in , favor non-violent acquisition, underscoring a continuity of pragmatic, if asymmetrical, Roman-native into the rather than unilateral hostility. These interpretations highlight Traprain Law's position as a nexus of hybrid cultural practices, where Roman material prestige was commodified to bolster native power structures.

Post-Roman and Medieval History

Evidence of Continued Use

Archaeological investigations reveal evidence of occupation continuity at Traprain Law into the early medieval period, with the reused as a center of power by the and their successors in the kingdom. Excavations have identified structures and artifacts attributable to the early historic era, indicating adaptation of the defenses for post-Roman settlement and authority. Later medieval activity is attested by the remains of a rectangular building, possibly dating to the 13th or , constructed against a southeast and associated with sherds of medieval and iron nails. This structure suggests targeted reuse of the hill's topography for domestic or utilitarian purposes, distinct from earlier fortifications. Surface surveys and limited excavations have recovered additional medieval pottery fragments, reinforcing patterns of intermittent human presence amid the site's decline as a major fortified center. These findings contrast with the denser prehistoric and Roman-era deposits, pointing to sporadic rather than intensive medieval utilization.

Transition to Modern Era

Following the decline of early medieval occupation associated with the (later ), archaeological evidence points to sporadic late medieval activity on Traprain Law, including a and associated suggesting a structure abandoned around the . Thereafter, the hill saw no substantial settlement, transitioning to primarily use as land for sheep, consistent with post-medieval agricultural practices in East Lothian's upland areas where visible ramparts persisted but were not systematically explored. By the , the hill's nomenclature shifted to "Traprain Law," borrowed from the nearby of Traprain, marking a linguistic in local records and maps that underscored its enduring role as a landmark amid expanding like Traprain Farm and Lawhead Farm. This period of relative quiescence preceded formal antiquarian interest, with the site's and Roman features remaining superficially noted but unexcavated until the early , reflecting broader patterns of rural continuity in Scotland's lowlands where ancient earthworks integrated into modern agrarian economies without disruption.

Modern Archaeology and Discoveries

Early 20th-Century Excavations

Excavations at Traprain Law began in 1914–1915 under the leadership of Alexander O. Curle, with assistance from the Reverend J. Cree, focusing on the hillfort's interior and limited areas at gateways and a . These initial efforts uncovered evidence of occupation but were halted by the outbreak of the First World War. Work resumed in the summer of on the higher levels of the western slope, where deep stratified deposits revealed stone foundations for turf walls and multiple hearths indicative of successive occupation phases. On May 12, , workmen unearthed the Traprain Law Treasure, a hoard of late Roman comprising fragments from over 250 silver vessels, including bowls, cups, spoons, and religious items, accompanied by four coins dating to the early fifth century AD. Artifacts from the 1919 dig included stone axes, brooches, glass beads, armlets, iron tools, spearheads, and Roman-influenced pottery and , pointing to prolonged settlement from prehistoric to post-Roman periods. Excavations continued in , extending along the west and north sides of the area, identifying two courses of drystone as the first clear evidence of built structures. Four distinct levels were delineated, with pre- activity evidenced by cinerary urns and tools, alongside further pottery, jet armlets, and Roman coins. Efforts persisted through 1923, contributing to an understanding of the site's dense, multi-period occupation on the western shoulder. In 1939, Stuart Cruden conducted targeted digs in response to quarry encroachment on structural remains, preserving additional evidence of the hillfort's defenses and interiors. These early twentieth-century investigations established Traprain Law as a key site for studying and Roman interactions in northern Britain, though limited by contemporary methods that prioritized surface-level recovery over systematic stratigraphic analysis.

Recent Findings and Publications

In 2023, the published an open-access volume detailing the Traprain Law Environs Project, which encompassed geophysical surveys at thirty sites and targeted excavations at six across the coastal plain from 2000 to 2004. These investigations uncovered complex occupation sequences spanning the late to early medieval period, including evidence of multiple phases of enclosure construction, domestic activity, and deposition, thereby contextualizing Traprain Law as a central node in regional settlement hierarchies rather than an isolated . A revised catalogue of the Traprain Law Treasure was issued in 2022, superseding Alexander O. Curle's 1923 publication and incorporating modern conservation data, metallurgical analyses, and contextual reinterpretations of the . This update emphasizes the 's composition—primarily fragmented Roman silver vessels and from the early fifth century CE—and supports interpretations of deliberate destruction over mere economic recycling, drawing on comparative evidence from other northern British sites. Recent scholarship has focused on artifact-specific trajectories, such as a study in the Antiquity journal examining spiral rings within the treasure, which traces Roman silver's cultural efficacy in through recycling patterns and stylistic adaptations, arguing for localized elite agency in transforming imperial imports into native prestige . Similarly, a archaeobotanical analysis of plant remains from Traprain Law environs sites highlights uses of wild like and in prehistoric taskscapes, integrating paleoethnobotanical data with landscape surveys to infer symbolic re-wilding practices amid settlement intensification. Minor evaluative works, including a Council on ground disturbance for , yielded no significant new features but confirmed the site's ongoing sensitivity to and bioturbation, informing non-invasive monitoring protocols. Ongoing reappraisals of early twentieth-century excavations, such as those replicating stratigraphic sequences in late Roman contexts, continue to refine understandings of deposition without major new fieldwork.

Cultural and Scientific Significance

Folklore and Local Traditions

Local folklore prominently features Traprain Law in the hagiographical legend of (Kentigern), the 6th-century founder of and patron saint of the Brittonic . Thenew (variously Teneu, Thaney, or Saint Enoch), daughter of King Loth (Lleuddun) of the or , became pregnant through an affair with a suitor, prompting her father to hurl her from the hill's precipitous eastern cliffs. She survived the fall unharmed due to divine intervention, gave birth to Mungo at the base, and the infant was placed in a that drifted down the to Saint Serf's monastery at , where he received his name and upbringing. Variants of the tale, recorded in traditions as early as the , include the suitor's revenge by slaying King Loth with an , followed by the king's atop the . The narrative, emphasizing miraculous preservation and providence, reflects common motifs in medieval saints' vitae and likely drew on the hill's imposing 221-meter summit for dramatic effect, though no archaeological evidence confirms the event's .

Geodesy and Environmental Studies

Traprain Law consists of , a rare evolved silica-undersaturated forming a from volcanic activity approximately 335 million years ago. The hill rises to 221 meters , creating a prominent amid the surrounding lowland plain, shaped by glacial and subsequent . Geophysical surveys employing geomagnetic techniques have mapped subsurface features in the Traprain Law environs as part of the Traprain Law Environs Project since 2000. These non-invasive methods targeted over 30 sites, identifying curvilinear enclosures up to 50 meters in diameter and confirming archaeological structures invisible from alone. The hill is designated a for its geological exposures, lowland acid and grasslands, and assemblages, which are uncommon in the intensively farmed landscape. by cattle and sheep restores vegetation communities, preventing succession to scrub while preserving species-rich grasslands threatened by agricultural intensification. Archaeological environmental analyses from the environs reveal limited prehistoric plant remains, indicating open agricultural landscapes with scattered woodland in the and Roman periods.

Conservation and Access Issues

Traprain Law is designated as a (SM755) by , affording legal protection to its archaeological features, with consents issued for land management and access works to mitigate erosion and maintain structural integrity. The site is managed by Countryside Rangers, who oversee vegetation control through the introduction of ponies around 2010 to graze wild grasses, promote wildflower diversity, and reduce risks by limiting fuel loads. This grazing program has sparked controversy, as the ponies have accelerated path erosion and potentially disturbed buried archaeological deposits, leading to a 2020 campaign by local walkers' groups to remove them and restore the monument's condition. Rangers actively discourage visitors from feeding the animals to prevent behavioral dependency and health issues, emphasizing that such interference undermines conservation objectives. A 2003 wildfire, triggered by a discarded , scorched across the hill, damaging surface remains and heightening vulnerability for exposed features. Public access remains unrestricted for walking, with free parking and information boards provided, though moderate fitness is required and climbing activities have occasionally faced landowner-imposed barriers to protect the terrain. Guided hikes and volunteer conservation tasks are organized periodically to balance educational access with site preservation.

References

  1. https://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/eastlinton/traprainlaw/index.html
  2. https://el4.org.uk/county/revisiting-the-past/traprain-law/
  3. http://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk/records/SC3932.html
  4. https://daw.philhist.unibas.ch/en/classarch/research/research-projects/traprain-law/
  5. https://www.johngraycentre.org/about/museums-service/exhibitions/treasures-from-the-hoard/
  6. https://www.mctears.co.uk/news/tokens-of-the-traprain-treasure/
  7. https://www.trove.scot/place/56384
  8. https://archaeology.co.uk/articles/features/piecing-together-the-puzzle.htm
  9. https://the-past.com/feature/piecing-together-the-puzzle-understanding-the-late-roman-hacksilver-from-the-traprain-hoard/
  10. https://seuso.mnm.hu/en/the-seuso-treasure/similar-treasure-finds/silver-treasure-troves/the-traprain-law-treasure
  11. https://www.historyhit.com/beyond-the-frontier-unearthing-the-secrets-of-scotlands-silver-hoard/
  12. https://www.johngraycentre.org/about/museums-service/exhibitions/footprints-in-the-landscape-exhibition/footprints-in-the-landscape-online-exhibition/traprain-law-rock-art/
  13. https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/berrgk/article/download/92431/87898
  14. https://books.socantscot.org/digital-books/catalog/book/14
  15. https://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=19441
  16. https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/site-special-scientific-interest/1560/site-management-statement.pdf
  17. https://visiteastlothian.org/traprain-law-history-geology-wildlife-and-more/
  18. https://geoguide.scottishgeologytrust.org/p/gcr27/gcr27_traprainlaw
  19. https://www.mindat.org/loc-31507.html
  20. https://scotlandroadtrip.com/traprain-law-east-lothian/
  21. https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Garleton_Hills_Volcanic_Rocks_-_an_excursion
  22. https://www.eastlothian.gov.uk/info/210569/countryside_and_wildlife/12080/countryside_sites/7
  23. https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/site-special-scientific-interest/1560/sssi-citation.pdf
  24. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14857/1/Tilley000905554-Thesis.pdf
  25. https://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/17647282.tims-tales-treasures-traprain-law/
  26. https://www.lothianlife.co.uk/2013/02/the-treasure-that-is-traprain-law/
  27. https://www.alarichall.org.uk/placenames/fox.htm
  28. https://www.nigelsphotoblog.co.uk/2019/08/traprain-law-natural-history-and-flora.html
  29. https://prehistoricsociety.org/sites/prehistoricsociety.org/files/publications/past/past49.pdf
  30. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/71858/1/10392248.pdf
  31. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/7545
  32. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14857/1/Tilley000905554-Thesis.pdf
  33. https://scarf.scot/national/iron-age-panel-report/6-enclosed-places/6-7-the-functions-of-enclosed-places/
  34. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/8126/8094
  35. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/9525/9492
  36. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/7379/7348
  37. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/71624/1/71624.pdf
  38. https://www.academia.edu/4393656/_2012_Beyond_the_Confines_of_Empire_a_reassessment_of_the_Roman_coarsewares_from_Traprain_Law
  39. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/9128/9096/9082
  40. https://classicalassociationni.wordpress.com/2018/05/20/paid-to-behave-the-traprain-law-hoard/
  41. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-21244147
  42. https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/shedding-new-light-on-some-of-scotlands-greatest-roman-silver-treasures-dr-fraser-hunter-3896425
  43. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3366/saj.2018.0100
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350671719_%27Siliquae_from_the_Traprain_Law_treasure_silver_and_society_in_later_fourth-_and_fifth-century_Britain%27_in_F_Hunter_and_K_Painter_eds_%27Late_Roman_silver_and_the_end_of_Empire_the_Traprain_Treasure_in_
  45. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/saj.2023.0189
  46. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-roman-studies/article/niall-of-the-nine-hostages-in-connexion-with-the-treasures-of-traprain-law-and-ballinrees-and-the-destruction-of-wroxeter-chester-caerleon-and-caerwent/A68B3FD2B94D2BB68F334A376AAD5DCE
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237652923_Traprain_Law_native_and_Roman_on_the_northern_frontier
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/00AC63B4CBC4B3126C910236A12153AC/S0959774324000180a.pdf/efficacy_of_roman_silver_in_iron_age_scotland_an_object_trajectory_for_spiral_rings.pdf
  49. https://scarf.scot/regional/sesarf/8-early-medieval/8-2-settlement-and-daily-life/8-2-3-centres-of-power/
  50. https://www.johngraycentre.org/collections/getrecord/ELHER_MEL11785
  51. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/9524/9491/9476
  52. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/9525/9492/9477
  53. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14857/1/Tilley000905554-Thesis.pdf?DDD6%2B
  54. https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb237-coll-370
  55. https://www.johngraycentre.org/collections/getrecord/ELHER_MEL974
  56. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/7480
  57. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/7511
  58. https://www.socantscot.org/news/new-open-access-e-book-the-traprain-law-environs-project/
  59. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/saj.2023.0189
  60. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/preternature/article/13/1/76/384210/Re-wilding-Ritual-An-Archaeological-Study-of
  61. https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/library/browse/issue.xhtml?recordId=1172582&recordType=GreyLitSeries
  62. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/glasgow-scotland-celebrates-st-mungo-trail-festivals
  63. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12236827.digging-up-the-legend-of-saint-mungo/
  64. https://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/1152/folklore/traprain-law
  65. https://i.rcahms.gov.uk/canmore-pdf/WP00006862.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280814156_Geomagnetic_surveys_over_cropmarks_in_the_environs_of_Traprain_Law_East_Lothian
  67. https://pure.sruc.ac.uk/en/publications/restoration-of-upland-vegetation-communities-by-conservation-graz
  68. https://scotlandsnature.wordpress.com/2018/08/01/east-lothian-farming-and-wildlife-developing-a-sustainable-future-for-both-farming-and-wildlife/
  69. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14857/
  70. https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/apex/f?p=1505:300:::::VIEWTYPE%2CVIEWREF:designation%2CSM755
  71. https://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/23647812.visitors-traprain-law-urged-not-feed-popular-ponies/
  72. https://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/18900763.walkers-group-campaign-remove-exmoor-ponies-traprain-law/
  73. https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/people/traprain-law-ponies-east-lothian-rangers-warn-people-not-to-feed-the-wild-ponies-for-conservation-reasons-3976075
  74. https://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/607/traprain-law
  75. https://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/rock_talk/traprain_law_-_usual_access_blocked-459880
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.