Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Ligature (writing)
View on Wikipedia

In writing and typography, a ligature occurs where two or more graphemes or letters are joined to form a single glyph. Examples are the characters ⟨æ⟩ and ⟨œ⟩ used in English and French, in which the letters ⟨a⟩ and ⟨e⟩ are joined for the first ligature and the letters ⟨o⟩ and ⟨e⟩ are joined for the second ligature. For stylistic and legibility reasons, ⟨f⟩ and ⟨i⟩ are often merged to create ⟨fi⟩ (where the tittle on the ⟨i⟩ merges with the hood of the ⟨f⟩); the same is true of ⟨s⟩ and ⟨t⟩ to create ⟨st⟩. The common ampersand, ⟨&⟩, developed from a ligature in which the handwritten Latin letters ⟨e⟩ and ⟨t⟩ (spelling et, Latin for 'and') were combined.[1]
History
[edit]The earliest known script Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieratic both include many cases of character combinations that gradually evolve from ligatures into separately recognizable characters. Other notable ligatures, such as the Brahmic abugidas and the Germanic bind rune, figure prominently throughout ancient manuscripts. These new glyphs emerge alongside the proliferation of writing with a stylus, whether on paper or clay, and often for a practical reason: faster handwriting. Merchants especially needed a way to speed up the process of written communication and found that conjoining letters and abbreviating words for lay use was more convenient for record keeping and transaction than the bulky long forms.[citation needed]

Around the 9th and 10th centuries, monasteries became a fountainhead for these types of script modifications. Medieval scribes who wrote in Latin increased their writing speed by combining characters and by introducing notational abbreviations. Others conjoined letters for aesthetic purposes. For example, in blackletter, letters with right-facing bowls (⟨b⟩, ⟨o⟩, and ⟨p⟩) and those with left-facing bowls (⟨c⟩, ⟨e⟩, ⟨o⟩, ⟨d⟩, ⟨g⟩ and ⟨q⟩) were written with the facing edges of the bowls superimposed. In many script forms, characters such as ⟨h⟩, ⟨m⟩, and ⟨n⟩ had their vertical strokes superimposed.[citation needed] Scribes also used notational abbreviations to avoid having to write a whole character in one stroke. Manuscripts in the fourteenth century employed hundreds of such abbreviations.[citation needed]

In handwriting, a ligature is made by joining two or more characters in an atypical fashion by merging their parts, or by writing one above or inside the other. In printing, a ligature is a group of characters that is typeset as a unit, so the characters do not have to be joined. For example, in some cases the ⟨fi⟩ ligature prints the letters ⟨f⟩ and ⟨i⟩ with a greater separation than when they are typeset as separate letters. When printing with movable type was invented around 1450,[4] typefaces included many ligatures and additional letters, as they were based on handwriting. Ligatures made printing with movable type easier because one sort would replace frequent combinations of letters and also allowed more complex and interesting character designs which would otherwise collide with one another.[citation needed]
Because of their complexity, ligatures began to fall out of use in the 20th century. Sans serif typefaces, increasingly used for body text, generally avoid ligatures, though notable exceptions include Gill Sans and Futura. Inexpensive phototypesetting machines in the 1970s (which did not require journeyman knowledge or training to operate) also generally avoid them. A few, however, became characters in their own right, see below the sections about German ß, various Latin accented letters, & et al.
The trend against digraph use was further strengthened by the desktop publishing revolution. Early computer software in particular had no way to allow for ligature substitution (the automatic use of ligatures where appropriate), while most new digital typefaces did not include ligatures. As most of the early PC development was designed for the English language (which already treated ligatures as optional at best) dependence on ligatures did not carry over to digital. Ligature use fell as the number of traditional hand compositors and hot metal typesetting machine operators dropped because of the mass production of the IBM Selectric brand of electric typewriter in 1961. A designer active in the period commented: "some of the world's greatest typefaces were quickly becoming some of the world's worst fonts."[5]
Ligatures have grown in popularity in the 21st century because of an increasing interest in creating typesetting systems that evoke arcane designs and classical scripts. One of the first computer typesetting programs to take advantage of computer-driven typesetting (and later laser printers) was Donald Knuth's TeX program. Now the standard method of mathematical typesetting, its default fonts are explicitly based on nineteenth-century styles. Many new fonts feature extensive ligature sets; these include FF Scala, Seria and others by Martin Majoor and Hoefler Text by Jonathan Hoefler. Mrs Eaves by Zuzana Licko contains a particularly large set to allow designers to create dramatic display text with a feel of antiquity. A parallel use of ligatures is seen in the creation of script fonts that join letterforms to simulate handwriting effectively. This trend is caused in part by the increased support for other languages and alphabets in modern computing, many of which use ligatures somewhat extensively. This has caused the development of new digital typesetting techniques such as OpenType, and the incorporation of ligature support into the text display systems of macOS, Windows, and applications like Microsoft Office. An increasing modern trend is to use a "Th" ligature which reduces spacing between these letters to make it easier to read, a trait infrequent in metal type.[6][7][8]

Today, modern font programming divides ligatures into three groups, which can be activated separately: standard, contextual and historical. Standard ligatures are needed to allow the font to display without errors such as character collision. Designers sometimes find contextual and historic ligatures desirable for creating effects or to evoke an old-fashioned print look.[citation needed]
Ligatures are also used for logo creation,[9][10][11] such as the Bluetooth logo, (a ligature merging the runes
(ᚼ, Hagall) and
(ᛒ, Bjarkan)).[12][13].
Latin alphabet
[edit]Stylistic ligatures
[edit]


Many ligatures combine ⟨f⟩ with the following letter. A particularly prominent example is ⟨fi⟩ (or ⟨fi⟩, rendered with two normal letters). The tittle of the ⟨i⟩ in many typefaces collides with the hood of the ⟨f⟩ when placed beside each other in a word, and are combined into a single glyph with the tittle absorbed into the ⟨f⟩. Other ligatures with the letter f include ⟨fj⟩,[a] ⟨fl⟩ (⟨fl⟩), ⟨ff⟩ (⟨ff⟩), ⟨ffi⟩ (⟨ffi⟩), and ⟨ffl⟩ (⟨ffl⟩). In Linotype, ligature matrices for ⟨fa⟩, ⟨fe⟩, ⟨fo⟩, ⟨fr⟩, ⟨fs⟩, ⟨ft⟩, ⟨fb⟩, ⟨fh⟩, ⟨fu⟩, ⟨fy⟩, and for ⟨f⟩ followed by a full stop, comma, or hyphen are optional in many typefaces,[14] as well as the equivalent set for the doubled ⟨ff⟩, as a method to overcome the machine's physical restrictions.[citation needed]
These arose because with the usual type sort for lowercase ⟨f⟩, the end of its hood is on a kern, which would be damaged by collision with raised parts of the next letter.[citation needed]
Ligatures crossing the morpheme boundary of a composite word are sometimes considered incorrect, especially in official German orthography as outlined in the Duden. An English example of this would be ⟨ff⟩ in shelfful; a German example would be Schifffahrt ("boat trip").[b] Some computer programs (such as TeX) provide a setting to disable ligatures for German, while some users have also written macros to identify which ligatures to disable.[15][16]

Turkish distinguishes dotted and dotless "I". If a ligature with f were to be used in words such as fırın [oven] and fikir [idea], this contrast would be obscured. The ⟨fi⟩ ligature, at least in the form typical to other languages, is therefore not used in Turkish typography.[citation needed]
Remnants of the ligatures ⟨ſʒ⟩ /⟨ſz⟩ ("sharp s", eszett) and ⟨tʒ⟩/⟨tz⟩ ("sharp t", tezett) from Fraktur, a family of German blackletter typefaces, originally mandatory in Fraktur but now employed only stylistically, can be seen to this day on street signs for city squares whose name contains Platz or ends in -platz. Instead, the "sz" ligature has merged into a single character, the German ß – see below.
Sometimes, ligatures for ⟨st⟩ (⟨st⟩), ⟨ſt⟩ (⟨ſt⟩), ⟨ch⟩, ⟨ck⟩, ⟨ct⟩, ⟨Qu⟩ and ⟨Th⟩ are used (e.g. in the typeface Linux Libertine).[citation needed]
Besides conventional ligatures, in the metal type era some newspapers commissioned custom condensed single sorts for the names of common long names that might appear in news headings, such as "Eisenhower", "Chamberlain". In these cases the characters did not appear combined, just more tightly spaced than if printed conventionally.[17]
German ß
[edit]
The German letter ⟨ß⟩ (Eszett, also called the scharfes S, meaning sharp s) is an official letter of the alphabet in Germany and Austria. A recognizable ligature representing the ⟨sz⟩ digraph develops in handwriting in the early 14th century.[18] Its name Es-zett (meaning S-Z) suggests a connection of "long s and z" (ſʒ) but the Latin script also knows a ligature of "long s over round s" (ſs). Since German was mostly set in blackletter typefaces until the 1940s, and those typefaces were rarely set in uppercase, a capital version of the Eszett never came into common use, even though its creation has been discussed since the end of the 19th century. Therefore, the common replacement in uppercase typesetting was originally SZ (Maße "measure" → MASZE, different from Masse "mass" → MASSE) and later SS (Maße → MASSE). Until 2017, the SS replacement was the only valid spelling according to the official orthography in Germany and Austria. In Switzerland, the ß is omitted altogether in favour of ss. The capital version (ẞ) of the Eszett character was occasionally used since 1905/06, has been part of Unicode since 2008, and has appeared in more and more typefaces. Since the end of 2010, the Ständiger Ausschuss für geographische Namen (StAGN) has suggested the new upper case character for "ß" rather than replacing it with "SS" or "SZ" for geographical names.[19] A new standardized German keyboard layout (DIN 2137-T2) has included the capital ß since 2012. The new character entered the official orthographic rules in June 2017.[citation needed]
Massachusett ꝏ
[edit]A prominent feature of the colonial orthography created by John Eliot (later used in the first Bible printed in the Americas, the Massachusett-language Mamusse Wunneetupanatamwe Up-Biblum God, published in 1663) was the use of the double-o ligature ⟨ꝏ⟩ to represent the /u/ of food as opposed to the /ʊ/ of hook (although Eliot himself used ⟨oo⟩ and ⟨ꝏ⟩ interchangeably).[clarification needed] In the orthography in use since 2000 in the Wampanoag communities participating in the Wôpanâak Language Reclamation Project (WLRP), the ligature was replaced with the numeral ⟨8⟩, partly because of its ease in typesetting and display as well as its similarity to the o-u ligature ⟨Ȣ⟩ used in Abenaki. For example, compare the colonial-era spelling seepꝏash[20] with the modern Wôpanâak Language Reclamation Project (WLRP) spelling seep8ash.[21]
Letter W
[edit]As the letter ⟨W⟩ is an addition to the Latin alphabet that originated in the seventh century, the phoneme it represents was formerly written in various ways. In Old English, the runic letter wynn ⟨Ƿ⟩) was used, but Norman influence forced wynn out of use. By the 14th century, the "new" letter ⟨W⟩, originated as two ⟨V⟩ glyphs or ⟨U⟩ glyphs joined, developed into a legitimate letter with its own position in the alphabet. Because of its relative youth compared to other letters of the alphabet, only a few European languages (including Breton, Dutch, English, German, Maltese, Polish, Walloon, and Welsh) use the letter in native words.[citation needed]
Æ and Œ
[edit]
The character ⟨Æ⟩ (lower case ⟨æ⟩; in ancient times named æsc) when used in Danish, Norwegian, Icelandic, or Old English is not a typographic ligature. It is a distinct letter — a vowel — and when collated, may be given a different place in the alphabetical order than Ae.[citation needed]
In modern English orthography, ⟨Æ⟩ is not considered an independent letter but a spelling variant, for example: "encyclopædia" versus "encyclopaedia" or "encyclopedia". In this use, ⟨Æ⟩ comes from Medieval Latin, where it was an optional ligature in some specific words that had been transliterated and borrowed from Ancient Greek, for example, "Æneas". It is still found as a variant in English and French words descended or borrowed from Medieval Latin, but the trend has recently been towards printing the ⟨A⟩ and ⟨E⟩ separately.[22]
Similarly, ⟨Œ⟩ and ⟨œ⟩, while normally printed as ligatures in French, are replaced by component letters if technical restrictions require it.[citation needed]
Umlaut
[edit]In German orthography, the umlauted vowels ⟨ä⟩, ⟨ö⟩, and ⟨ü⟩ historically arose from ⟨ae⟩, ⟨oe⟩, ⟨ue⟩ ligatures (strictly, from these vowels with a small letter ⟨e⟩ written as a diacritic, for example ⟨aͤ⟩, ⟨oͤ⟩, ⟨uͤ⟩). It is common practice to replace them with ⟨ae⟩, ⟨oe⟩, ⟨ue⟩ digraphs when the diacritics are unavailable, for example in electronic conversation. Phone books treat umlauted vowels as equivalent to the relevant digraph (so that a name Müller will appear at the same place as if it were spelled Mueller; German surnames have a strongly fixed orthography, either a name is spelled with ⟨ü⟩ or with ⟨ue⟩); however, the alphabetic order used in other books treats them as equivalent to the simple letters ⟨a⟩, ⟨o⟩ and ⟨u⟩. The convention in Scandinavian languages and Finnish is different: there the umlaut vowels are treated as independent letters with positions at the end of the alphabet.[citation needed]
Middle English
[edit]
In Middle English, the word the (written þe) was frequently abbreviated as ⟨þͤ⟩, a ⟨þ⟩ (thorn) with a small ⟨e⟩ written as a diacritic. Similarly, the word that was abbreviated to ⟨þͭ⟩, a ⟨þ⟩ with a small ⟨t⟩ written as a diacritic. During the latter Middle English and Early Modern English periods, the thorn in its common script, or cursive, form came to resemble a ⟨y⟩ shape. With the arrival of movable type printing, the substitution of ⟨y⟩ for ⟨þ⟩ became ubiquitous, leading to the common "ye", as in 'Ye Olde Curiositie Shoppe'. One major reason for this was that ⟨y⟩ existed in the printer's types that William Caxton and his contemporaries imported from Belgium and the Netherlands, while ⟨þ⟩ did not.[23]
Ring
[edit]The ring diacritic used in vowels such as ⟨å⟩ likewise originated as an ⟨o⟩ -ligature.[24] Before the replacement of the older "aa" with "å" became a de facto practice, an "a" with another "a" on top (aͣ) could sometimes be used, for example in Johannes Bureus's, Runa: ABC-Boken (1611).[25] The ⟨uo⟩ ligature ů in particular saw use in Early Modern High German, but it merged in later Germanic languages with ⟨u⟩ (e.g. MHG fuosz, ENHG fuͦß, Modern German Fuß "foot"). It survives in Czech, where it is called kroužek.
Hwair
[edit]The letter hwair ⟨ƕ⟩, used only in transliteration of the Gothic language, resembles a ⟨hw⟩ ligature. It was introduced by philologists around 1900 to replace the digraph ⟨hv⟩ formerly used to express the phoneme in question, e.g. by Migne in the 1860s (Patrologia Latina vol. 18).
Byzantine Ȣ
[edit]The Byzantines had a unique o-u ligature ⟨Ȣ⟩ that, while originally based on the Greek alphabet's ο-υ, carried over into Latin alphabets as well. This ligature is still seen today on icon artwork in Greek Orthodox churches, and sometimes in graffiti or other forms of informal or decorative writing.[citation needed]
Gha (OI)
[edit]Gha ⟨ƣ⟩, a rarely used letter based on Q and G, was misconstrued by the ISO to be an OI ligature because of its appearance, and is thus known (to the ISO and, in turn, Unicode) as "Oi". Historically, it was used in many Latin-based orthographies of Turkic (e.g., Azerbaijani) and other central Asian languages.[citation needed]
International Phonetic Alphabet
[edit]The International Phonetic Alphabet formerly used ligatures to represent affricate consonants, of which six are encoded in Unicode: ʣ, ʤ, ʥ, ʦ, ʧ and ʨ. One fricative consonant is still represented with a ligature: ɮ, and the extensions to the IPA contain three more: ʩ, ʪ and ʫ.[citation needed]
Initial Teaching Alphabet
[edit]The Initial Teaching Alphabet, a short-lived alphabet intended for young children, used a number of ligatures to represent long vowels: ⟨æ⟩, ⟨ꜷ⟩, ⟨œ⟩, ⟨ᵫ⟩, and ligatures for ⟨ϵϵ⟩, ⟨ie⟩, ⟨oi⟩, and ⟨ou⟩ that are not yet encoded in Unicode. Ligatures for consonants also existed, including ligatures of ⟨ʗh⟩, ⟨ʃh⟩, ⟨ʈh⟩, ⟨th⟩, and ⟨wh⟩. As of 2025[update], the ligatures not yet encoded are provisionally assigned and pending Unicode inclusion.[26]
Rare ligatures
[edit]Rarer ligatures also exist, including ⟨ꜳ⟩; ⟨ꜵ⟩; ⟨ꜷ⟩; ⟨ꜹ⟩; ⟨ꜻ⟩ (barred ⟨av⟩); ⟨ꜽ⟩; ⟨ꝏ⟩, which is used in medieval Nordic languages for /oː/ (a long close-mid back rounded vowel),[27] as well as in some orthographies of the Massachusett language to represent uː (a long close back rounded vowel); ⟨ᵺ⟩; ⟨ỻ⟩, which was used in Medieval Welsh to represent ɬ (the voiceless lateral fricative);[27] ⟨ꜩ⟩; ⟨ᴂ⟩; ⟨ᴔ⟩; and ⟨ꭣ⟩ have Unicode codepoints (in code block Latin Extended-E for characters used in German dialectology (Teuthonista),[28] the Anthropos alphabet, Sakha and Americanist usage).[citation needed]
Symbols originating as ligatures
[edit]
The most common ligature in modern usage is the ampersand ⟨&⟩ . This was originally a ligature of ⟨E⟩ and ⟨t⟩ , forming the Latin: et, meaning and. It has exactly the same use in French and in English. The ampersand comes in many different forms. Because of its ubiquity, it is generally no longer considered a ligature, but a logogram. Like many other ligatures, it has at times been considered a letter (e.g., in early Modern English); in English it is pronounced and, not et. In most typefaces, it does not immediately resemble the two letters used to form it, although certain typefaces use designs in the form of a ligature (examples include the original versions of Futura and Univers, Trebuchet MS, and Civilité, known in modern times as the italic of Garamond).[citation needed]
Similarly, the number sign ⟨#⟩ originated as a stylized abbreviation of the Roman term libra pondo, written as ⟨℔⟩.[29] Over time, the number sign was simplified to how it is seen today, with two horizontal strokes across two slash-like strokes.[30] Now a logogram, the symbol is used mainly to denote (in the US) numbers, and weight in pounds.[31] It has also been used popularly on push-button telephones and as the hashtag indicator.[32]
The at sign ⟨@⟩ is possibly a ligature, but there are many different theories about the origin. One theory says that the French word à (meaning at), was simplified by scribes who, instead of lifting the pen to write the grave accent, drew an arc around the ⟨a⟩. Another states that it is short for the Latin word for toward, ad, with the ⟨d⟩ being represented by the arc. Another says it is short for an abbreviation of the term each at, with the ⟨e⟩ encasing the ⟨a⟩.[33] Around the 18th century, it started being used in commerce to indicate price per unit, as "15 units @ $1".[34] After the popularization of Email, this fairly unpopular character became widely known, used to tag specific users.[35] Lately, it has been used to de-gender nouns in Spanish with no agreed pronunciation.[36]
The dollar sign ⟨$⟩ possibly originated as a ligature (for "pesos", although there are other theories as well) but is now a logogram.[37] At least once, the United States dollar used a symbol resembling an overlapping U-S ligature, with the right vertical bar of the U intersecting through the middle of the S ( US ) to resemble the modern dollar sign.[38]
The Spanish peseta was sometimes abbreviated by a ligature ⟨₧⟩ (from Pts). The ligature ⟨₣⟩ (F-with-bar) was proposed in 1968 by Édouard Balladur, Minister of Economy.[39] as a symbol for French franc but was never adopted and has never been officially used.[40]

In astronomy, the planetary symbol for Mercury (☿) may be a ligature of Mercury's caduceus and a cross (which was added in the 16th century to Christianize the pagan symbol),[41] though other sources disagree;[42] the symbol for Venus ♀ may be a ligature of the Greek letters ⟨ϕ⟩ (phi) and ⟨κ⟩ (kappa).[42] The symbol for Jupiter (♃) descends from a Greek zeta with a horizontal stroke, ⟨Ƶ⟩, as an abbreviation for Zeus.[41] [43] Saturn's astronomical symbol (♄) has been traced back to the Greek Oxyrhynchus Papyri, where it can be seen to be a Greek kappa-rho with a horizontal stroke, as an abbreviation for Κρονος (Cronus), the Greek name for the planet.[41] It later came to look like a lower-case Greek eta, with the cross added at the top in the 16th century to Christianize it. The dwarf planet Pluto is symbolized by a PL ligature, ♇.
A different PL ligature, ⅊, represents the property line in surveying. [citation needed]
In engineering diagrams, a CL ligature, ℄, represents the center line of an object.[citation needed]
The interrobang ⟨‽⟩ is an unconventional punctuation meant to combine the interrogation point (or the question mark) and the bang (printer's slang for exclamation mark) into one symbol, used to denote a sentence which is both a question and is exclaimed. For example, the sentence "Is that actually true‽" shows that the speaker is surprised while asking their question.[44]
Alchemy used a set of mostly standardized symbols, many of which were ligatures: 🜇 (AR, for aqua regia); 🜈 (S inside a V, for aqua vitae); 🝫 (MB, for balneum Mariae [Mary's bath], a double boiler); 🝬 (VB, for balneum vaporis, a steam bath); and 🝛 (aaa with overline, for amalgam).[citation needed]
Composer Arnold Schoenberg introduced two ligatures as musical symbols to denote melody and countermelody. The symbols are ligatures of HT and NT, 𝆦 and 𝆧, from the German for hauptstimme and nebenstimme respectively.[45][46]
Digraphs
[edit]

Digraphs, such as ⟨ll⟩ in Spanish or Welsh, are not ligatures in the general case as the two letters are displayed as separate glyphs: although written together, when they are joined in handwriting or italic fonts the base form of the letters is not changed and the individual glyphs remain separate. Like some ligatures discussed above, these digraphs may or may not be considered individual letters in their respective languages. Until the 1994 spelling reform, the digraphs ⟨ch⟩ and ⟨ll⟩ were considered separate letters in Spanish for collation purposes. Catalan makes a difference between "Spanish ll" or palatalized l, written ll as in llei (law), and "French ll" or geminated l, written l·l as in col·lega (colleague).[citation needed]
The difference can be illustrated with the French digraph œu, which is composed of the ligature œ and the simplex letter u.[citation needed]
Dutch IJ
[edit]In Dutch, ⟨ij⟩ can be considered a digraph, a ligature, or a letter in itself, depending on the standard used. Its uppercase and lowercase forms are often available as a single glyph with a distinctive ligature in several professional typefaces (e.g. Zapfino). Sans serif uppercase ⟨IJ⟩ glyphs, popular in the Netherlands, typically use a ligature resembling a ⟨U⟩ with a broken left-hand stroke. Adding to the confusion, Dutch handwriting can render ⟨y⟩ (which is not found in native Dutch words, but occurs in words borrowed from other languages) as a ⟨ij⟩-glyph without the dots in its lowercase form and the ⟨IJ⟩ in its uppercase form looking virtually identical (only slightly bigger). When written as two separate letters, both should be capitalized – or both not – to form a correctly spelled word, like IJs or ijs (ice)[47].
Non-Latin alphabets
[edit]

Ligatures are not limited to Latin script:
- The Armenian alphabet has the following ligatures: և (ե+ւ), ﬔ (մ+ե), ﬕ (մ+ի), ﬓ (մ+ն), ﬗ (մ+խ), ﬖ (վ+ն)
- Most Brahmic abugidas make frequent use of ligatures in consonant clusters. The number of ligatures employed is language-dependent; thus many more ligatures are conventionally used in Devanagari when writing Sanskrit than when writing Hindi. Having 37 consonants in total, the total number of ligatures that can be formed in Devanagari using only two letters is 1369, though few fonts are able to render all of them. In particular, Mangal, which is included with Microsoft Windows' Indic support, does not correctly handle ligatures with consonants attached to the right of the characters द, ट, ठ, ड, and ढ, leaving the virama attached to them and displaying the following consonant in its standard form.
- The Georgian script includes უ (uni), which is a combination of ო (oni) and the former letter ჳ (vie).
- A number of ligatures have been employed in the Greek alphabet, in particular a combination of omicron (Ο) and upsilon (Υ), which later gave rise to a letter of the Cyrillic script—see Ou (letter). Among the ancient Greek acrophonic numerals, ligatures were common (in fact, the ligature of a short-legged capital pi was a key feature of the acrophonic numeral system).
- Cyrillic ligatures: Љ, Њ, Ы, Ѿ. Iotated Cyrillic letters are ligatures of the early Cyrillic decimal I and another vowel: Ꙗ, Ѥ, Ѩ, Ѭ, Ю (sometimes also spelled ЮУ). In Serbian Cyrillic alphabet, the letters lje and nje (љ, њ), were developed as ligatures of Cyrillic used in Serbian Language, being El and En (л, н) with the soft sign (ь). They were invented by Vuk Stefanović Karadžić for use in his 1818 dictionary, replacing the earlier digraphs ⟨ль⟩ and ⟨нь⟩.[49] The Yae, a ligature of ya (Я) and e also exists: Ԙԙ, as do Dzze (Ꚉꚉ ← Д + З) and Zhwe (Ꚅꚅ ← З + Ж).
- Some forms of the Glagolitic script, used from Middle Ages to the 19th century to write some Slavic languages, have a box-like shape that lends itself to more frequent use of ligatures.
- In the Hebrew alphabet, the letters aleph (א) and lamed (ל) can form a ligature, ﭏ. The ligature appears in some pre-modern texts (mainly religious), or in Judeo-Arabic texts, where that combination is very frequent, since [ʔ] [a]l- (written aleph plus lamed, in the Hebrew script) is the definite article in Arabic. For example, the word Allah (אַללַּהּ) can be written with this ligature: ﭏלה.
- In the Arabic alphabet, historically a cursive derived from the Nabataean alphabet, most letters' shapes depend on whether they are followed (word-initial), preceded (word-final) or both (medial) by other letters. For example, Arabic mīm, isolated م, tripled (mmm, rendering as initial, medial and final): ممم. Notable are the shapes taken by lām + ʼalif isolated: ﻻ, and lām + ʼalif medial or final: ﻼ. Besides the obligatory lām + ʼalif ligature, Arabic script grammar requires numerous stylistic ligatures.
- Syriac, a semitic alphabet derived from the Aramaic alphabet, has three different scripts that all use ligatures. Like Arabic, some letters change their form depending on their position in relation to other letters, and this can also change how ligatures look. A popular ligature all three scripts use is Lamadh ܠ/ܠ + Alap ܐ/ܐ isolated and final: (Serto) ܠܐ, (Madnhaya) ܠܐ. Another popular one is Taw ܬ/ܬ + Alap ܐ/ܐ, resulting in (Serto) ܬܐ, (Madhnhaya) ـܬܐ. All three scripts use ligatures, but not in an equal spread or always with the same letters. Serto, being a flexible script, especially has many ligatures. For a wider, but not complete, list of Syriac ligatures, see Contextual forms of letters.
- Urdu (one of the main languages of South Asia), which uses a calligraphic version of the Arabic-based Nastaʿlīq script, requires a great number of ligatures in digital typography. InPage, a widely used desktop publishing tool for Urdu, uses Nastaliq fonts with over 20,000 ligatures.
- In American Sign Language a ligature of the American manual alphabet is used to sign "I love you", from the English initialism ILY. It consists of the little finger of the letter I plus the thumb and forefinger of the letter L. The letter Y (little finger and thumb) overlaps with the other two letters.
- The Japanese language has a number of obsolete kana ligatures. Of these, only two are widely available ones on computers: one for hiragana, ゟ, which is a vertical writing ligature of the characters よ and り; and one for katakana, ヿ, which is a vertical writing ligature of the characters コ and ト.
- Lao uses three ligatures, all comprising the letter ຫ (h). As a tonal language, most consonant sounds in Lao are represented by two consonants, which will govern the tone of the syllable. Five consonant sounds are only represented by a single consonant letter (ງ (ŋ), ນ (m), ມ (n), ລ (l), ວ (w)), meaning that one cannot render all the tones for words beginning with these sounds. A silent ຫ indicates that the syllable should be read with the tone rules for ຫ, rather than those of the following consonant. Three consonants can form ligatures with the letter ຫ. ຫ+ນ=ໜ (n), ຫ+ມ=ໝ (m) and ຫ+ລ=ຫຼ (l). ງ (ŋ) and ວ (w) just form clusters: ຫງ (ŋ) and ຫວ (w). ລ (l) can also be used written in a cluster rather than as a ligature: ຫລ (l).
- In many runic texts ligatures are common. Such ligatures are known as bind-runes and were optional.
Chinese ligatures
[edit]
Written Chinese has a long history of creating new characters by merging parts or wholes of other Chinese characters. However, a few of these combinations do not represent morphemes but retain the original multi-character (multiple morpheme) reading and are therefore not considered true characters themselves. In Chinese, these ligatures are called héwén (合文) or héshū (合書); see polysyllabic Chinese characters for more.
One popular ligature used on chūntiē decorations used for Chinese Lunar New Year is a combination of the four characters for zhāocái jìnbǎo (招財進寶), meaning "ushering in wealth and fortune" and used as a popular New Year's greeting.
In 1924, Du Dingyou (杜定友; 1898–1967) created the ligature 圕 from two of the three characters 圖書館 (túshūguǎn), meaning "library".[50] Although it does have an assigned pronunciation of tuān and appears in many dictionaries, it is not a morpheme and cannot be used as such in Chinese. Instead, it is usually considered a graphic representation of túshūguǎn.
In recent years, a Chinese internet meme, the Grass Mud Horse, has had such a ligature associated with it combining the three relevant Chinese characters 草, 泥, and 马 (Cǎonímǎ).
Similar to the ligatures were several "two-syllable Chinese characters" (雙音節漢字) created in the 19th century as Chinese characters for SI units. In Chinese these units are disyllabic and standardly written with two characters, as 厘米 límǐ "centimeter" (厘 centi-, 米 meter) or 千瓦 qiānwǎ "kilowatt". However, in the 19th century these were often written via compound characters, pronounced disyllabically, such as 瓩 for 千瓦 or 糎 for 厘米 – some of these characters were also used in Japan, where they were pronounced with borrowed European readings instead. These have now fallen out of general use, but are occasionally seen.[51]
Japanese ligatures
[edit]The CJK Compatibility Unicode block features characters that have been combined into one square character in legacy character set so that it matches Japanese text. For example, the Japanese equivalent of "stock company", 株式会社 (kabushiki gaisha) can be represented in 1 Unicode character ⟨㍿⟩. Its romanized abbreviation K.K. can also be 1 character ⟨㏍⟩. There are other Latin abbreviations such as kg for "kilogram" that can be ligated into 1 square character ⟨㎏⟩.
Computer typesetting
[edit]
The OpenType font format includes features for associating multiple glyphs to a single character, used for ligature substitution. Typesetting software may or may not implement this feature, even if it is explicitly present in the font's metadata. XeTeX is a TeX typesetting engine designed to make the most of such advanced features. This type of substitution used to be needed mainly for typesetting Arabic texts, but ligature lookups and substitutions are being put into all kinds of Western Latin OpenType fonts. In OpenType, there are standard liga, historical hlig, contextual clig, discretionary dlig and required rlig ligatures.
TeX
[edit]Opinion is divided over whether it is the job of writers or typesetters to decide where to use ligatures. TeX is an example of a computer typesetting system that makes use of ligatures automatically. The Computer Modern Roman typeface provided with TeX includes the five common ligatures ⟨ff⟩ , ⟨fi⟩ , ⟨fl⟩ , ⟨ffi⟩ , and ⟨ffl⟩ . When TeX finds these combinations in a text, it substitutes the appropriate ligature, unless overridden by the typesetter.
CSS
[edit]CSS3 provides control over these properties using font-feature-settings,[52] though the CSS Fonts Module Level 4 draft standard indicates that authors should prefer several other properties.[53] Those include font-variant-ligatures, common-ligatures, discretionary-ligatures, historical-ligatures, and contextual.[54]
Ligatures in Unicode (Latin alphabets)
[edit]This table below shows discrete letter pairs on the left, the corresponding Unicode ligature in the middle column, and the Unicode code point on the right. Provided you are using an operating system and browser that can handle Unicode, and have the correct Unicode fonts installed, some or all of these will display correctly. See also the provided graphic.
Unicode maintains that ligaturing is a presentation issue rather than a character definition issue, and that, for example, "if a modern font is asked to display 'h' followed by 'r', and the font has an 'hr' ligature in it, it can display the ligature." Accordingly, the use of the special Unicode ligature characters is "discouraged", and "no more will be encoded in any circumstances".[55] (Unicode has continued to add ligatures, but only in such cases that the ligatures were used as distinct letters in a language or could be interpreted as standalone symbols. For example, ligatures such as æ and œ are not used to replace arbitrary "ae" or "oe" sequences; it is generally considered incorrect to write "does" as "dœs".)

Microsoft Word disables ligature substitution by default, largely for backward compatibility when editing documents created in earlier versions of Word. Users can enable automatic ligature substitution on the Advanced tab of the Font dialog box.
LibreOffice Writer enables standard ligature substitution by default for OpenType fonts, user can enable or disable any ligature substitution on the Features dialog box, which is accessible via the Features button of the Character dialog box, or alternatively, input a syntax with font name and feature into the Font Name input box, for example: Noto Sans:liga=0.
| Non-ligature | Ligature[55] | Unicode | HTML |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA, aa | Ꜳ, ꜳ[27] | U+A732, U+A733 | Ꜳ ꜳ |
| AE, ae | Æ, æ | U+00C6, U+00E6 | Æ æ |
| AO, ao | Ꜵ, ꜵ[27] | U+A734, U+A735 | Ꜵ ꜵ |
| AU, au | Ꜷ, ꜷ[27] | U+A736, U+A737 | Ꜷ ꜷ |
| AV, av | Ꜹ, ꜹ[27] | U+A738, U+A739 | Ꜹ ꜹ |
| AV, av (with bar) | Ꜻ, ꜻ[27] | U+A73A, U+A73B | Ꜻ ꜻ |
| AY, ay | Ꜽ, ꜽ[27] | U+A73C, U+A73D | Ꜽ ꜽ |
| et | 🙰 | U+1F670 | 🙰 |
| & | U+0026 | & | |
| Et, et | Ꝫ, ꝫ | U+A76A,
U+A76B |
Ꝥ
ꝫ |
| ff | ff | U+FB00 | ff |
| ffi | ffi | U+FB03 | ffi |
| ffl | ffl | U+FB04 | ffl |
| fi | fi | U+FB01 | fi |
| fl | fl | U+FB02 | fl |
| superscript HT | 𝆦 | U+1D1A6 | 𝆦 |
| Hv, hv | Ƕ, ƕ | U+01F6, U+0195 | Ƕ ƕ |
| Is, is | Ꝭ, ꝭ | U+A76C,
U+A76D |
ꝭ
ꝭ |
| lb | ℔ | U+2114 | ℔ ℔ |
| LL, ll | Ỻ, ỻ | U+1EFA, U+1EFB | Ỻ ỻ |
| OE, oe | Œ, œ | U+0152, U+0153 | Œ œ |
| OO, oo | Ꝏ, ꝏ[27] | U+A74E, U+A74F | Ꝏ ꝏ |
| ɔe | ꭢ | U+AB62 | ꭢ |
| ſs, ſz | ẞ, ß | U+1E9E, U+00DF | ß |
| st | st | U+FB06 | st |
| ſt | ſt | U+FB05 | ſt |
| superscript NT | 𝆧 | U+1D1A7 | 𝆧 |
| TZ, tz | Ꜩ, ꜩ | U+A728, U+A729 | Ꜩ ꜩ |
| ue | ᵫ | U+1D6B | ᵫ |
| uo | ꭣ[56] | U+AB63 | ꭣ |
| VV, vv | W, w | U+0057, U+0077 | W w |
| VY, vy | Ꝡ, ꝡ[27] | U+A760, U+A761 | Ꝡ ꝡ |
| ſs | Ꟗ ꟗ | U+A7D6, U+A7D7 | ꟗ ꟗ |
| ƿƿ | ꟕ | U+A7D5 | ꟕ ꟕ |
| þþ | ꟓ | U+A7D3 | ꟓ ꟓ |
There are separate code points for the digraph DZ, the Dutch digraph IJ, and for the Serbo-Croatian digraphs DŽ, LJ, and NJ. Although similar, these are digraphs, not ligatures. See Digraphs in Unicode.
Ligatures used only in phonetic transcription
[edit]| Ligature[55] | Unicode | HTML | |
|---|---|---|---|
| superscript small capital AA | 𐞀[57][58] | U+10780 | 𐞀 |
| superscript ae | 𐞃[59] | U+10783 | 𐞃 |
| aə | ꬱ[56] | U+AB31 | ꬱ |
| əø | ꭁ | U+AB41 | ꭁ |
| db[c] | ȸ | U+0238 | ȸ |
| dz | ʣ | U+02A3 | ʣ |
| dʐ | ꭦ[60] | U+AB66 | ꭦ |
| dʑ (or dz curl) | ʥ | U+02A5 | ʥ |
| dʒ (or dezh) | ʤ | U+02A4 | ʤ |
| dʒ with palatal hook | 𝼒[61][58] | U+1DF12 | 𝼒 |
| dʒ with retroflex hook | 𝼙[62] | U+1DF19 | 𝼙 |
| fŋ (or feng) | ʩ | U+02A9 | ʩ |
| Superscript fŋ | 𐞐[57][58] | U+10790 | 𐞐 |
| fŋ with trill | 𝼀[57][58] | U+1DF00 | 𝼀 |
| ls (or less) | ʪ | U+02AA | ʪ |
| superscript ls | 𐞙[57][58] | U+10799 | 𐞙 |
| lz | ʫ | U+02AB | ʫ |
| superscript lz | 𐞚[57][58] | U+1079A | 𐞚 |
| lʒ (or lezh) | ɮ | U+026E | ɮ |
| superscript lʒ | 𐞞[57] | U+1079E | 𐞞 |
| lʒ with retroflex hook | 𝼅[57][58] | U+1DF05 | 𝼅 |
| superscript lʒ with retroflex hook | 𐞟[57] | U+1079F | 𐞟 |
| oə | ꭀ | U+AB40 | ꭀ |
| qp[c] | ȹ | U+0239 | ȹ |
| tɕ (or tc curl) | ʨ | U+02A8 | ʨ |
| superscript tɕ | 𐞫[59] | U+107AB | 𐞫 |
| ts (or tess) | ʦ | U+02A6 | ʦ |
| superscript ts | 𐞬[59] | U+107AC | 𐞬 |
| ts with retroflex hook | ꭧ | U+AB67 | ꭧ |
| superscript ts with retroflex hook | 𐞭[59] | U+107AD | 𐞭 |
| tʂ | ꭧ[60] | U+AB67 | ꭧ |
| tʃ (or tesh) | ʧ | U+02A7 | ʧ |
| superscript tʃ | 𐞮[59] | U+107AE | 𐞮 |
| tʃ with retroflex hook | 𝼜[62] | U+1DF1C | 𝼜 |
| tʃ with palatal hook | 𝼗[61][58] | U+1DF17 | 𝼗 |
| ui | ꭐ[64] | U+AB50 | ꭐ |
| turned ui | ꭑ[64] | U+AB51 | ꭑ |
| uu | ɯ | U+026F | ɯ |
Four "ligature ornaments" are included from U+1F670 to U+1F673 in the Ornamental Dingbats block: regular and bold variants of ℯT (script e and T) and of ɛT (open E and T).
Contemporary art
[edit]
Typographic ligatures are used in a form of contemporary art,[65] as can be illustrated by Chinese artist Xu Bing's work in which he combines Latin letters to form characters that resemble Chinese.[66] Croatian designer Maja Škripelj also created a ligature that combined Glagolitic letters ⰘⰓ for euro coins.[67]
See also
[edit]- Complex text layout – Neighbour-dependent grapheme positioning
- Digraph (orthography) – Pair of characters used to write one phoneme (the unfused pairing of graphemes)
- Greek ligatures – Ligatures used in Greek writing
- Kerning – Process in typography (optimization of spacing between adjacent letters).
- Letter spacing – Physical spacing of characters in text
- List of English words that may be spelled with a ligature
- Monogram – Motif made by overlapping two or more letters
- Scribal abbreviation – Abbreviations used by ancient and medieval scribes
- Text shaping – Process of converting text to glyph indices and positions
- Unicode equivalence – Aspect of the Unicode standard
Notes
[edit]- ^ The combination ⟨fj⟩ is represented in English only in "fjord" and "fjeld", but is encountered in languages where ⟨j⟩ represents a vocalic or semi-vocalic sound (Norwegian, occasionally in Esperanto) or an affix (Hungarian), or where word-compounding results such ligatures (Hungarian)
- ^ Schifffahrt is written with fff only if the writer follows the spelling reform of 1996. The same standard explicitly allows the spelling Schiff-Fahrt with dash to avoid the tripled f.
- ^ a b Unicode calls this a digraph, but it is actually a ligature.[63]
References
[edit]- ^ "What is the origin of the ampersand (&)? | Oxford Dictionaries". October 21, 2017. Archived from the original on 21 October 2017.
- ^ Capelli – Dizionario di abbreviature latine ed italiane
- ^ Medieval Unicode Font Initiative
- ^ Bellis, Mary (17 April 2017). "Johannes Gutenberg and the Printing Press". ThoughtCo.
- ^ Frere-Jones, Tobias. "Hoefler Text". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
- ^ Shaw, Paul (12 May 2011). "Flawed Typefaces". Print magazine. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
- ^ Ulrich, Ferdinand (22 July 2012). "Hunt Roman". Typographica. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
- ^ Shaw, Paul (31 October 2011). "The Kerning Game". Print. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
- ^ Chase, Margo, ed. (2011). Really good logos explained: top design professionals critique 500 logos & explain what makes them work. Beverly, Mass: Rockport Publishers. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-61673-891-4.
- ^ Bosler, Denise (2025). Mastering type: the essential guide to typography for print and digital design (Second ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-350-41414-3.
- ^ Whitbread, David (2009). Design Manual (2nd ed.). Sydney: University of NSW Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-1-74223-000-9.
- ^ "Bluetooth on Twitter". Archived from the original on 30 December 2018. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
- ^ "Bluetooth Experience Icons". Bluetooth Special Interest Group. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
Bluetooth Experience Icons borrow two of these three features: the blue color and the rune-inspired symbol.
- ^ Mergenthaler Linotype Company (1939). Specimen Book Linotype Faces. Brooklyn. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Helmut Kopka; Patrick W. Daly (1999). A Guide to LaTeX, 3rd Ed. Addison-Wesley. p. 22. ISBN 0-201-39825-7.
- ^ Loretan, Mico. "Selnolig". CTAN. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
- ^ Dunlap, David (23 June 2016). "1952 – 'Eisenhower,' a True Campaign Logo". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 August 2017.
- ^ Brekle, Herbert E. (2001). "Zur handschriftlichen und typographischen Geschichte der Buchstabenligatur ß aus gotisch-deutschen und humanistisch-italienischen Kontexten" [On the handwritten and typographical history of the letter ligature ß from Gothic-German and humanistic-Italian contexts]. Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German). 76. Mainz: 67–76. ISSN 0072-9094.
- ^ Ständiger Ausschuss für geographische Namen (StAGN) Empfehlungen und Hinweise für die Schreibweise geographischer Namen für Herausgeber von Kartenwerken und anderen Veröffentlichungen für den internationalen Gebrauch Bundesrepublik Deutschland 5. überarbeitete Ausgabe
- ^ Trumbull, J. H. (1903). Natick Dictionary. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. p. 149.
- ^ Fermino, J. L. D. (2000). Introduction to the wampanoag grammar. (Master's thesis). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p. 48.
- ^ The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th Ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1993. p. 6.61. ISBN 9780226103891.
- ^ Hill, Will (30 June 2020). "Chapter 25: Typography and the printed English text" (PDF). The Routledge Handbook of the English Writing System. Taylor & Francis. p. 6. ISBN 9780367581565. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 July 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
The types used by Caxton and his contemporaries originated in Holland and Belgium, and did not provide for the continuing use of elements of the Old English alphabet such as thorn <þ>, eth <ð>, and yogh <ʒ>. The substitution of visually similar typographic forms has led to some anomalies which persist to this day in the reprinting of archaic texts and the spelling of regional words. The widely misunderstood 'ye' occurs through a habit of printer's usage that originates in Caxton's time, when printers would substitute the <y> (often accompanied by a superscript <e>) in place of the thorn <þ> or the eth <ð>, both of which were used to denote both the voiced and non-voiced sounds, /ð/ and /θ/ (Anderson, D. (1969) The Art of Written Forms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, p 169)
- ^ "905-906 (Nordisk familjebok / Uggleupplagan. 33. Väderlek - Äänekoski)". runeberg.org. January 24, 1922.
- ^ "Bureus, J., Runa ABC boken". Archived from the original on 2010-01-24. Retrieved 2010-02-05.
- ^ Unicode Pipeline, 2025, reference proposal L2/24-273: Unicode request for Initial Teaching Alphabet
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Everson, Michael; Baker, Peter; Emiliano, António; Grammel, Florian; Haugen, Odd Einar; Luft, Diana; Pedro, Susana; Schumacher, Gerd; Stötzner, Andreas (2006-01-30). "L2/06-027: Proposal to add Medievalist characters to the UCS" (PDF).
- ^ Everson, Michael; Dicklberger, Alois; Pentzlin, Karl; Wandl-Vogt, Eveline (2011-06-02). "Revised proposal to encode "Teuthonista" phonetic characters in the UCS" (PDF).
- ^ Keith Gordon Irwin (1967) [1956]. The romance of writing, from Egyptian hieroglyphics to modern letters, numbers, and signs. New York: Viking Press. p. 125.
The Italian libbra (from the old Latin word libra, 'balance') represented a weight almost exactly equal to the avoirdupois pound of England. The Italian abbreviation of lb with a line drawn across the letters was used for both weights.
- ^ Houston, Keith (2013-09-06). "The Ancient Roots of Punctuation". The New Yorker. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
- ^ Thurston, Ernest L. (1917). Business Arithmetic for Secondary Schools. New York: Macmillan. p. 419.
# ..... number (written before a figure.)
- ^ Keith Houston (2013). "The Octothorpe". Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 41–57. ISBN 9780393064421.
- ^ Allman, William F. "The Accidental History of the @ Symbol". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 9 June 2022.
- ^ "The @ Symbol Meaning And History". Webopedia. 24 June 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2022.
- ^ "at sign". dictionary.com. Retrieved 9 June 2022.
- ^ "Spanish Beyond the Gender Binary". Na'atik Mexico. 1 June 2023. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
- ^ Cajori, Florian (1993). A History of Mathematical Notations. New York: Dover (reprint). ISBN 0-486-67766-4. – contains section on the history of the dollar sign, with much documentary evidence supporting the theory that $ began as a ligature for "pesos".
- ^ Reverse of $1 United States Note (Greenback), series of 1869
- ^ Balladur, Édouard (1988), Un symbole pour le franc.
- ^ Haralambous, Yannis (2007), Fonts & Encodings, p. 78.
- ^ a b c d Jones, Alexander (1999). Astronomical papyri from Oxyrhynchus. American Philosophical Society. pp. 62–63. ISBN 9780871692337. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2021.
- ^ a b Stearn, William T. (May 1962). "The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology" (PDF). Taxon. 11 (4): 109–113. Bibcode:1962Taxon..11..109S. doi:10.2307/1217734. JSTOR 1217734. S2CID 87030547. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-05-27. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
The origin of these symbols has long been a matter of interest to scholars. Probably none now accepts the interpretation of Scaliger that ♂ represents the shield and spear of Mars and ♀ Venus's looking-glass. All the evidence favours the conclusion of the French classical scholar Claude de Saumaise (Salmasius, 1588–1653) that these symbols, as also those for Saturn, Mercury and Jupiter, are derived from contractions in Greek script of the Greek names of the planets which are Kronos (Saturn), Zeus (Jupiter), Thouros (Mars), Phosphoros (Venus) and Stilbon (Mercury). As observed by Linnaeus's one-time student Johann Beckmann in his History of Inventions (English transl., 1797), to understand their origin 'we must make ourselves acquainted with the oldest form of these characters which in all probability, like those used in writing, were subjected to many changes before they acquired that form which they have at present'.
- ^ Maunder, A. S. D. (August 1934). "The origin of the symbols of the planets". The Observatory. 57: 238–247. Bibcode:1934Obs....57..238M.
- ^ Harper, Collins (2014). Collins English Dictionary (12th ed.). HarperCollins.
- ^ Gardner Read (1979). "Music Notation: A Manual of Modern Practice" 2nd ed., p. 282-283. ISBN 0-8008-5459-4, 0-8008-5453-5.
- ^ Bryn-Julson, Phyllis and Mathews, Paul (2009). Inside Pierrot Lunaire, p. 24. ISBN 978-0-8108-6205-0.
- ^ "IJ / Ij*". Vlaanderen.be. Team Taaladvies. Retrieved 5 June 2025.
- ^ "JanaSanskritSans". Archived from the original on 2011-07-16.
- ^ Maretić, Tomislav. Gramatika i stilistika hrvatskoga ili srpskoga književnog jezika. 1899.
- ^ "'圕'字怎麼念?什麼意思?誰造的? Archived 2011-10-03 at the Wayback Machine" Sing Tao Daily online. 21 April 2006. Retrieved 15 January 2011.(in Chinese)
- ^ Victor Mair, "Polysyllabic characters in Chinese writing", Language Log, 2011 August 2
- ^ "font-feature-settings property". MSDN. Retrieved 24 November 2014.
- ^ "CSS Font Module Level 4". CSSWG.
- ^ "CSS font-variant-ligatures Property". CSS Portal.
- ^ a b c "Unicode FAQ: Ligatures, Digraphs, Presentation Forms vs. Plain Text". Unicode Consortium. 2015-07-06.
- ^ a b "Latin Extended-E" (PDF). Unicode Consortium.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Miller, Kirk; Ball, Martin (2020-07-11). "L2/20-116R: Expansion of the extIPA and VoQS" (PDF).
- ^ a b c d e f g h Anderson, Deborah (2020-12-07). "L2/21-021: Reference doc numbers for L2/20-266R "Consolidated code chart of proposed phonetic characters" and IPA etc. code point and name changes" (PDF).
- ^ a b c d e Miller, Kirk; Ashby, Michael (2020-11-08). "L2/20-252R: Unicode request for IPA modifier-letters (a), pulmonic" (PDF).
- ^ a b Everson, Michael (2017-08-17). "L2/17-299 Proposal to add two Sinological Latin letters" (PDF).
- ^ a b Miller, Kirk (2020-07-11). "L2/20-125R: Unicode request for expected IPA retroflex letters and similar letters with hooks" (PDF).
- ^ a b Miller, Kirk; Everson, Michael (2021-01-03), L2/21-004: Unicode request for dezh with retroflex hook (PDF)
- ^ Freytag, Asmus; McGowan, Rick; Whistler, Ken (2006-05-08). "Known Anomalies in Unicode Character Names". Unicode Technical Note #27. Unicode Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
- ^ a b Everson, Michael; Dicklberger, Alois; Pentzlin, Karl; Wandl-Vogt, Eveline (2011-06-02). "L2/11-202: Revised proposal to encode 'Teuthonista' phonetic characters in the UCS" (PDF).
- ^ "The art of typography in the digital age ligatures". Archived from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ Erickson, Britta (2001). The Art of Xu Bing: Words Without Meaning, Meaning Without Words (Asian Art & Culture). Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Ga. ISBN 9780295981437.
- ^ "Designs of Croatian national sides of euro and cent coins presented". 4 February 2022. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
External links
[edit]Ligature (writing)
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and Purpose
In writing and typography, a ligature is a single glyph composed of two or more letters or characters joined together to form a unified visual unit. This combination creates a distinct character that replaces the individual components, often improving the overall appearance and readability of text. The term originates from the Late Latin ligatura, meaning "a band" or "a tying," derived from the verb ligare, "to bind," reflecting the concept of connecting elements.[10] Ligatures fulfill multiple purposes, primarily enhancing aesthetics through better kerning and visual flow between adjacent characters, which prevents awkward spacing or overlaps in letterforms. Functionally, they address practical challenges, such as avoiding collisions between elements like overhanging serifs or ascenders in cursive or handwritten scripts, thereby facilitating smoother writing and printing processes. In historical contexts, ligatures also served orthographic needs by conserving space in constrained formats, such as inscriptions on coins or compact manuscripts, allowing more content to fit within limited areas.[11][12][13] Additionally, certain ligatures provide phonetic representation by denoting combined sounds, such as diphthongs, as a single entity within a writing system. Typographic ligatures differ from orthographic ones: the former are stylistic fusions implemented in font design for visual harmony, while the latter function as standalone characters in an alphabet, embodying multiple phonetic values inherently. These roles underscore ligatures' enduring utility in balancing form, function, and efficiency across writing traditions.[14]Types of Ligatures
Ligatures in writing systems are classified primarily by their function and form, providing a framework that applies across various scripts and typographic traditions. The main categories include typographic, orthographic, and contextual ligatures, each serving distinct roles in enhancing readability, aesthetics, or orthographic efficiency.[14][15][11] Typographic ligatures are discretionary forms created primarily for aesthetic and spacing improvements in printed or digital text, often to prevent awkward overlaps between characters in certain fonts. These are optional and activated based on design preferences, focusing on visual harmony rather than linguistic necessity.[9][7][14] Orthographic ligatures, in contrast, are mandatory in specific languages or scripts, functioning as single glyphs that represent combined letters or phonemes essential to the writing system's structure. They often evolve from digraphs—pairs of letters denoting a single sound—and are treated as unified characters in orthography.[15][14][16] Contextual ligatures form dynamically based on the position or surrounding characters, particularly in cursive or connected scripts where letter shapes adjust for fluid connections. This type ensures seamless joining in handwriting-derived styles, adapting to sequential dependencies.[5][17] Within these categories, subtypes emerge based on composition and purpose. Digraph-based ligatures combine two letters to represent one phoneme, common in alphabetic systems for phonetic economy. In abugidas, conjuncts serve as joined forms for consonant clusters, allowing compact representation of sequences without intervening vowels. Phonetic ligatures appear in transcription systems, binding symbols to denote complex or rare sounds efficiently.[16][18][19][20] Ligatures also differ by complexity and era. Standard ligatures are contemporary, simplified forms used in modern typography for common pairs, while historic ligatures draw from medieval abbreviations or archaic scripts, often more ornate or abbreviated. Simple ligatures involve two characters, whereas complex ones incorporate three or more, such as those for extended clusters, to maintain proportional balance. Vowel ligatures typically fuse adjacent vowels for diphthong-like sounds, and consonant cluster ligatures consolidate multiple consonants into cohesive units.[5][11][1]Historical Development
Ancient and Early Origins
The earliest known instances of ligatures appear in ancient writing systems such as Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs, where joined signs facilitated efficiency in inscription on durable materials like clay tablets and stone. In cuneiform, developed around the late 4th millennium BCE in Mesopotamia, ligatures combined multiple wedges into composite signs to represent complex syllables or words more compactly, reducing the physical effort required for impressing marks into wet clay; examples include overlaid forms like ᵈ⁺EN.ZU, transliterated with a plus sign to denote the joining.[21] Similarly, in Egyptian hieroglyphs from circa 3200 BCE, "group writings" emerged by the Middle Kingdom (circa 2000–1700 BCE) as standardized sequences of two or three signs, often for phonetic or foreign elements, which evolved into true ligatures in the cursive hieratic script for rapid administrative use.[22] These practices prioritized practicality, allowing scribes to convey information swiftly without sacrificing readability in monumental or everyday contexts.[22] Ligatures gained prominence in Greek and Roman scripts during the classical period, particularly in inscriptions where space constraints on stone or metal encouraged joined letter forms. In ancient Greek, ligatures appear in Hellenistic and later uncial scripts from around the 1st century CE, where scribes in papyri and codices combined letters like epsilon with iota or upsilon for smoother cursive flow.[23] By the Roman period, this extended to uncial scripts, with joined forms becoming common in cursive handwriting. In Roman epigraphy from the 1st century CE onward, ligatures became increasingly common, linking strokes of letters like E and T into a single glyph to fit more text on limited surfaces, as seen in provincial inscriptions where combined forms saved material and labor.[24] A notable development in Roman shorthand involved Tironian notes, a system of abbreviated ligatures invented by Marcus Tullius Tiro, Cicero's freedman, in the late 1st century BCE to record speeches efficiently. This included the iconic Tironian et (⁊), a joined form derived from "e" and "t" representing the Latin "et" (and), which persisted as a shorthand symbol into later eras.[25] These notes influenced early abbreviations, blending ligatures with symbolic shortcuts for speed in legal and literary transcription. The dissemination of ligatures accelerated through manuscript production in early Christian monastic scriptoria starting from the 4th century CE, where monks adapted uncial scripts to copy sacred texts rapidly on parchment. In these settings, ligatures like those joining final letters at line ends helped conserve space and time during laborious copying, as evidenced in biblical codices where combined forms such as "ου" or "ει" streamlined the writing process without altering meaning.[26] This monastic innovation built on Greco-Roman precedents, embedding ligatures into the fabric of textual preservation across Europe.[27]Medieval and Print Era Evolution
In the medieval period, ligatures underwent refinement in European manuscripts as scribes sought to balance aesthetics, efficiency, and readability. The Carolingian minuscule, promoted during Charlemagne's reign in the late 8th century, marked a key development by standardizing a clear, legible script with minimal ligatures, such as et and st, to maintain pen flow without excessive joining. This approach contrasted with earlier styles, emphasizing unconnected letters in a four-line system while using ligatures selectively to aid rapid transcription in monastic scriptoria. In religious contexts, nomina sacra—abbreviated sacred terms such as DS for deus (God), IH for Iesus, or CR for Christus—functioned as reverential contractions, often overlined to signify holiness and conserve space in biblical codices.[28][29][30] Scribal practices further integrated ligatures for practicality in illuminated books, where space-saving and speed were paramount amid labor-intensive copying. The et ligature, commonly depicted as a fused e and t or evolving into the ampersand (&), exemplified this in Latin texts, allowing scribes to join frequent conjunctions without lifting the pen. In Gothic scripts emerging around the 12th century, ligatures proliferated for visual density and rhythm, particularly in blackletter forms that compressed text on vellum. Insular script, prevalent in 7th- to 9th-century Celtic manuscripts from Ireland and Britain, showcased elaborate joined letters—such as ti, ae, or ri—to create decorative, interconnected patterns that enhanced the artistic quality of works like gospel books, while still serving functional abbreviation needs.[31][32] The advent of the printing press transformed ligatures from manuscript idiosyncrasies to typographic standards. Johannes Gutenberg's 1455 Bible, the first major European work printed with movable metal type, replicated medieval aesthetics by incorporating ligatures for pairs like ct, st, and ff in blackletter fonts, enabling compositors to mimic scribal fluidity and ensure even justification. This standardization in blackletter typefaces facilitated mass production while preserving the dense, interconnected look of Gothic manuscripts. Gutenberg's innovation, drawing on punchcutting techniques, produced variant sorts including ligatured glyphs to approximate handwriting irregularities, marking a pivotal shift toward reproducible precision.[33][34] Renaissance printing in Venice accelerated ligature evolution toward simplicity and legibility. Printer Aldus Manutius, collaborating with type designer Francesco Griffo, introduced italic fonts in 1501 for editions like Virgil's works, employing selective ligatures—fewer than in blackletter—to emulate humanist cursive handwriting while reducing visual clutter. This Venetian approach, centered at Manutius's Aldine Press, influenced the broader adoption of roman and italic types with minimized joins, prioritizing clarity for scholarly readers over medieval density and paving the way for modern typography.[12][35][36]19th to 20th Century Changes
In the 19th century, the advent of hot metal typesetting machines marked a significant shift in printing technology, enabling faster and more efficient production while still accommodating ligatures. The Linotype machine, invented by Ottmar Mergenthaler and patented in 1886, cast entire lines of type from molten metal, with dedicated matrices available for common ligatures like "fi" and "fl" to improve readability and spacing.[37] Similarly, Tolbert Lanston's Monotype machine, demonstrated in 1887, composed individual characters that could include custom ligatures, allowing greater flexibility for printers seeking aesthetic refinement. However, these innovations prioritized mechanical simplicity and speed over elaborate designs, contributing to a gradual decline in the routine use of ligatures as typesetting became industrialized.[38][39] This trend toward simplification was amplified by concurrent spelling reforms in English, which increasingly favored separate letters over diphthong ligatures such as æ and œ, rendering them obsolete in standard orthography by the late 19th century. The typewriter era, spanning from the late 1800s to the 1960s, further diminished ligatures' prominence, as QWERTY keyboards were designed for basic Latin characters without provisions for joined glyphs, limiting their application in everyday typing. Exceptions existed in regional adaptations, such as Nordic typewriters that incorporated dedicated keys for æ, ø, and å to accommodate Scandinavian languages, preserving these characters in correspondence and documents.[40][41] Early 20th-century design movements offered partial revivals amid broader modernization. The Art Nouveau style, flourishing around 1900, reintroduced decorative ligatures in display fonts characterized by flowing, organic forms, enhancing the era's emphasis on artistic ornamentation in posters and book covers. Influenced by this, the private press movement—led by figures like William Morris through the Kelmscott Press—revived traditional typesetting practices, incorporating ligatures to evoke medieval craftsmanship and counter industrial uniformity in fine book production. Meanwhile, the Bauhaus school's modernist ethos from the 1910s onward promoted sans-serif typefaces devoid of decorative elements, fueling 1920s debates among typographers on legibility versus historical tradition, with proponents like Paul Renner arguing for simplified forms to prioritize functional communication.[42][43][44] The World Wars accelerated standardization for efficiency, curtailing ornate typography including ligatures. In Britain, the 1942 Book Production War Economy Agreement imposed strict guidelines—such as smaller type sizes, minimal leading, and high text density—to conserve paper and labor, resulting in typographical austerity that marginalized decorative ligatures in favor of plain, space-saving layouts. Similar rationing in the U.S. and Europe reinforced this shift, aligning with postwar modernist ideals that valued clarity over embellishment.[45]Ligatures in Latin-Based Scripts
Stylistic and Common Ligatures
Stylistic ligatures in Latin typography primarily serve aesthetic and readability purposes by combining characters that might otherwise clash or create uneven spacing, such as the common fi, fl, ff, ffi, and ffl forms, where the overhanging hook of the lowercase "f" collides with the dot of the "i" or the ascender of the "l".[46][47] These ligatures originated from the practical needs of metal type composition but persist for visual harmony, ensuring smoother letterflow without altering pronunciation.[5] Other frequent examples in serif fonts include ct and st, which feature subtle curls or joins to enhance the decorative rhythm, particularly in historical or traditional faces.[48] In modern digital typography, these are implemented as discretionary ligatures within OpenType fonts, allowing optional activation to replace character sequences with pre-designed glyphs for improved even spacing and typographic refinement.[49] This feature plays a key role in book publishing, where activating ligatures in body text contributes to a more polished appearance by minimizing awkward gaps and promoting consistent counterforms—the enclosed white spaces within letters.[50] Fonts like Times New Roman and Garamond exemplify this usage, incorporating fi, fl, and ct ligatures to maintain the elegant rhythm suited for extended reading in novels and newspapers.[51] The aesthetic benefits of these ligatures include enhanced visual rhythm and better preservation of letter integrity, drawing from their historical roots in metal type where joined forms prevented ink buildup and ensured uniform justification.[9] They foster a sense of continuity in text blocks, making dense prose more inviting without overwhelming the reader. In contexts like body text for literature and journalism, such ligatures subtly elevate the overall composition, prioritizing flow over minimalism. Their adoption declines sharply in sans-serif fonts, where the emphasis on clean, unadorned lines—as seen in Helvetica—renders ligatures rare or nearly imperceptible to align with modernist principles of simplicity.[52][53]Language-Specific Ligatures
In Germanic languages, certain ligatures have evolved into distinct orthographic units treated as single letters. The German ß, known as the Eszett or sharp S, originated as a ligature of the long s (ſ) and z in late medieval and early modern German handwriting and print, representing the /s/ sound after long vowels or diphthongs to distinguish it from /z/.[54] Similarly, in Dutch, the ij digraph functions as a single letter, resembling a yodh-like form and pronounced as /ɛɪ/ or /əɪ/, with origins in Middle Dutch where ii merged into ij for the long i sound; it is sorted as a unit in dictionaries and often rendered as a ligature in typography.[55] In Romance and Nordic languages, ligatures similarly denote fused vowel sounds as unitary graphemes. The French Œ, a ligature of o and e, derives from Latin diphthongs like oe in words borrowed from Greek or Latin, such as œuvre (work) or œuf (egg), where it represents the /ø/ or /œ/ sound and is mandatory in standard orthography to preserve etymological ties. In Danish and Norwegian, the Æ (ash) ligature, evolved from the Latin ae combination, stands as a full letter for the /æ/ vowel, as in Danish æble (apple) or Norwegian lærer (teacher), reflecting a monophthongal sound distinct from separate a and e.[56] Other European languages feature analogous digraphs with ligature-like status, though not always strictly fused. In Old English, the thorn þ, borrowed from the runic alphabet rather than a true ligature, represented the /θ/ or /ð/ dental fricative sounds (as in þæt, that), and was treated as a single phoneme until its replacement by "th" in Middle English.[57] Welsh employs ll as a digraph for the voiceless lateral fricative /ɬ/, pronounced like a hissed "hl" in words like llaw (hand), historically developed from Proto-Celtic *l and considered a distinct letter in the Welsh alphabet, often capitalized as Ll.[58] The evolution of these ligatures highlights orthographic standardization efforts. The German ß was formalized during the 1901 Orthographic Conference, which established uniform rules across German-speaking regions, including its use after long vowels in Fraktur type.[59] In Dutch, uppercase IJ at word beginnings is typically both capitalized (e.g., IJzer, iron), though historical variants like ÏJ with diacritics on the I simulated a dotted y-like form in early print to aid distinction.[60] Culturally, these symbols carry significance amid reform debates. The ß's retention in German after the 1996 spelling reform—despite proposals to replace it with ss in certain contexts—sparked controversy, with advocates emphasizing its role in clarity and tradition, leading to a compromise preserving it after long vowels while allowing ss after short ones in Switzerland and post-reform adjustments elsewhere.[61] Such ligatures complement stylistic ones by serving essential orthographic functions in everyday language, rather than mere aesthetic enhancement.Phonetic and Specialized Ligatures
Phonetic ligatures in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) serve to represent specific sounds absent from standard Latin alphabets, enhancing precision in linguistic transcription. The IPA, developed by the International Phonetic Association and first published in 1888, incorporates symbols such as œ for the open-mid front rounded vowel (as in French "peur") and ɶ for the open front rounded vowel, both derived from the oe ligature to denote rounded front vowels efficiently. These ligatures allow phoneticians to capture subtle phonetic distinctions without relying on diacritics or digraphs, supporting the IPA's goal of a universal transcription system based on the Latin script with minimal non-Latin elements. The Initial Teaching Alphabet (ITA), introduced in the early 1960s by Sir James Pitman in the United Kingdom, employed ligatures to facilitate early reading instruction by providing a one-to-one correspondence between symbols and English phonemes. ITA's 44 characters included ligatures like ƶ (representing the /ŋ/ sound, as in "sing") and others for digraphs such as ch and ng, designed as joined forms to visually mimic traditional spellings while simplifying phonics for young learners.[62] Experimental use in UK schools peaked in the 1960s, with materials like primers printed in ITA to teach approximately 40,000 children, but its adoption declined by the 1970s due to challenges in transitioning to standard orthography and lack of widespread support.[63] Other phonetic systems have similarly utilized specialized ligatures for sound representation. The Shavian alphabet, a 1960s English orthographic reform proposed under the terms of George Bernard Shaw's will and finalized by Kingsley Read, features ligated forms for certain vowels, such as joined symbols for diphthongs like "air" and "ear," to promote phonetic accuracy in a 48-character script aimed at simplifying English spelling.[64] Likewise, the Deseret alphabet, created in the 1850s by the Mormon community under Brigham Young's direction, incorporated joined character forms—such as connected strokes for vowels and consonants—to phonetically encode English sounds in a 38-symbol system intended for unified literacy among diverse immigrants.[65] These ligatures in phonetic and educational alphabets prioritize exact sound depiction over aesthetic or historical conventions, though their use has waned with advancements in digital typography that standardize IPA symbols and reduce the need for custom joined forms.Rare and Derived Symbols
In Latin-based scripts, several rare ligatures emerged from scribal practices in specific historical or regional contexts, often evolving into distinct symbols or letters that served phonetic or orthographic needs. One such example is the Wynn (Ƿ, ƿ), a letter used in Anglo-Saxon manuscripts to represent the /w/ sound, which originated directly from the runic character of the same name in the Anglo-Frisian Futhorc alphabet. This rune-derived form was adopted into the Latin alphabet by Anglo-Saxon scribes around the 7th century to distinguish the voiced labial-velar approximant from the Latin V, which denoted a different sound, and it persisted in Old English texts until the Norman Conquest.[66] Another historical rarity is the OU ligature (Ȣ, ȣ), frequently employed in Byzantine Greek manuscripts from the medieval period, where it combined omicron and upsilon to represent the diphthong /u/.[67] This form occasionally influenced Latin scripts in scholarly or ecclesiastical contexts, appearing in mixed-language texts as a derived symbol for similar vowel sequences, though it remained uncommon outside Byzantine traditions.[68] Among derived symbols, the modern letter W originated as a ligature of two V's (or U's) in 11th-century Norman and Carolingian scripts, initially used to approximate the /w/ sound absent in classical Latin.[69] This double-V form, known as "double u," gradually solidified as a standalone letter by the 14th century in English and French orthographies, replacing earlier runic borrowings like Wynn in vernacular writing. The ampersand (&) similarly evolved from the Latin "et" (meaning "and"), where the E and T were joined in Roman cursive as a time-saving ligature around the 1st century CE, becoming a widespread logogram in medieval and early modern typography.[70] The degree symbol (°) traces its roots to a superscript small 'o' in medieval abbreviations for ordinal indicators or angular measurements, stylized as a raised circle to denote "ordo" or degrees in astronomical and mathematical notations by the 17th century.[71] In Middle English, the yogh (Ȝ, ȝ) developed from the insular form of the letter G (ᵹ) in Old English scripts, serving as a versatile symbol for sounds like /ɣ/, /x/, /j/, or /ŋ/ in words such as "niȝt" (night).[72] This adaptation, prominent in 12th- to 15th-century manuscripts, arose from scribal evolution rather than a direct g+z fusion, though it occasionally appeared in contexts influenced by continental scripts. The umlaut diacritic (¨) over vowels like ä, ö, and ü originated as a superscript small 'e' above the base letter in 12th-century German manuscripts, indicating i-mutation (vowel fronting before a following /i/ or /j/), which scribes compacted into two dots for brevity by the 16th century.[73] Rare instances of the Gha (Ƣ, ƣ), resembling an OI ligature and primarily associated with later Turkic orthographies misconstrued as such by modern standards.[74] Obsolete ligature-like forms in precursor scripts, such as runes and Ogham, provided early models for bound symbols in Germanic and Celtic traditions. In the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc, runes like Wynn functioned as integrated phonetic units akin to ligatures, influencing Latin adaptations for sounds without equivalents.[75] Ogham inscriptions, using linear notches on edges, occasionally combined strokes in ways that prefigured medieval ligatures, as seen in parallels between ogam-names and runic nomenclature in Insular linguistics.[76] These archaic practices highlight how rare ligatures in Latin scripts often built upon non-alphabetic precursors, evolving into standalone symbols over centuries. Modern phonetic ligatures occasionally echo these historical rarities in specialized notations.Ligatures in Non-Latin Scripts
East Asian Ligatures
In East Asian writing systems, ligatures are notably rare compared to alphabetic scripts, primarily due to the logographic nature of Chinese hanzi (characters) and its derivatives in Japanese kanji and Korean hanja, which emphasize standalone square forms for clarity and uniformity. However, historical and artistic contexts reveal specific instances where characters were fused or joined for efficiency or aesthetic purposes. In standard modern hanzi, ligatures do not occur, as the script prioritizes distinct, unjoined glyphs to maintain readability across vast character sets. Chinese ligatures appear sporadically in ancient and historical scripts, particularly in the clerical script (lishu) of the Han dynasty (circa 206 BCE–220 CE), where strokes from adjacent characters were sometimes joined to facilitate rapid writing on bamboo or silk. Earlier examples trace to oracle bone inscriptions (jiaguwen) from the Shang dynasty (circa 1600–1046 BCE), where polysyllabic graphs combined elements of multiple characters into a single form. These joined forms, known as hewen (合文), were more common in medieval manuscript culture for abbreviating frequent multi-character words, such as 囍 (xǐxǐ, double happiness) ligating two 喜 (xǐ, joy), though they remained exceptional and were not standardized. In contemporary usage, ligatures persist in artistic calligraphy, where calligraphers merge strokes for expressive flow, but they are absent from printed or digital text to preserve legibility.[77][78] Japanese employs compound characters more distinctly through kokuji (国字, "national characters"), kanji invented in Japan by combining components of existing characters to denote local terms or concepts without Chinese origins. For instance, ateji (当て字) compounds, which assign kanji based on sound rather than meaning, occasionally result in fused forms; the character 鯏 (U+9C2F, "asari" for short-necked clam) merges fish-related radicals into a single ideograph. Furigana abbreviations, used in annotations above kanji, may also employ simplified ligated forms for brevity in educational texts. These forms appear in names, poetry, or regional dialects for compactness, but their use has declined with digital input methods favoring standard Unicode kanji over custom fusions.[79] In Korean, ligatures are infrequent in the modern Hangul alphabet, where consonant clusters function as conjuncts—precomposed forms like ㄲ (ssangkiyeok) that visually join identical letters but are treated as single units rather than true ligatures. Historical idu (吏讀) script, used from the 7th to 19th centuries to write Korean with hanja, adapted hanja characters with special notation to approximate native phonetics or grammar for administrative or literary purposes. Like in Chinese and Japanese, Korean ligatures served compactness in poetry or personal names but have largely vanished in digital eras due to standardized encoding. Unicode supports these historical forms via the CJK Compatibility Ideographs block (U+FA00–U+FAFF), which includes variant ligatures and fused characters for round-trip compatibility with legacy East Asian systems, ensuring preservation without altering core script rendering.Middle Eastern and South Asian Ligatures
In the Arabic script, used for languages such as Arabic and Persian, ligatures are essential due to the cursive nature of the writing system, where most letters connect to adjacent ones based on their position. The lam-alef ligature (لا), combining the letter lām (ل) with alif (ا), is a mandatory contextual form rendered as a single glyph in nearly all traditional font designs, except some modern simplified styles.[80] This joining alters the shape of the letters to ensure fluid connectivity, with ornate variations in styles like Naskh, a clear and widely used script for printing, and Nastaliq, a more fluid, diagonal form prominent in Persian and Urdu calligraphy.[81] The Arabic alphabet consists of 28 letters, which through positional forms and ligatures can generate over 1,600 glyphs in complex fonts to handle contextual substitutions.[82] In South Asian Indic scripts, such as Devanagari used for Hindi, Sanskrit, and other languages, ligatures primarily manifest as conjunct consonants, where two or more consonants combine into a single glyph to represent clusters without intervening vowels. For instance, the conjunct क्ष (kṣa) fuses the letters ka (क) and ṣa (ष), often employing half-forms—truncated versions of consonants lacking the inherent vowel matra—to stack or join components efficiently.[83] The repha, a special mark for the letter ra (र) in post-consonantal position, appears as a superscript curve in Sanskrit texts, as in the conjunct द्र (dra), enhancing readability in dense scholarly works.[84] These forms are integral to abugida systems, where vowel signs attach around the core consonant ligature. Historically, ligatures featured prominently in illuminated Quran manuscripts, where joined letters in Kufic or early Naskh scripts were embellished with gold and floral motifs to convey spiritual harmony, evolving from the 8th century onward as calligraphy became a sacred art. During the Mughal era (16th–19th centuries), Persian-influenced calligraphy fused with Indian elements, creating hybrid ligatures in Nastaliq for Urdu and Persian texts on architecture and manuscripts, blending intricate joins with local motifs for poetic and imperial expressions.[85] In modern contexts, Urdu digital fonts like Noori Nastaliq incorporate thousands of ligatures to replicate traditional cursive flow, enabling accurate rendering in software despite the script's complexity.[86] Similarly, the Tamil Grantha script, used for Sanskrit loanwords in Tamil texts, mixes ligatures through conjunct graphemes that merge letters like in classical manuscripts, preserving hybrid Dravidian-Indic orthography.[87] Post-1990s standardization in Unicode relies on GSUB tables in OpenType fonts to substitute and position these Indic ligatures dynamically, supporting half-forms and repha across scripts like Devanagari.[88]Digital Implementation
Unicode and Font Standards
In digital typography, Unicode encodes ligatures either as precomposed characters—single code points representing the fused form—or through decomposition and shaping mechanisms that combine base characters at rendering time. Precomposed ligatures, such as the Latin small ligature "fi" at U+FB01, are found in the Alphabetic Presentation Forms block (U+FB00–U+FB4F), which includes compatibility characters like U+FB00 (ff), U+FB02 (fl), and U+FB06 (st) for common Latin script substitutions.[89] These are primarily for backward compatibility with legacy encodings and can be decomposed into their base components (e.g., f + i) under compatibility normalization forms like NFKD.[90] For non-Latin scripts, Unicode allocates specific blocks to handle ligature forms essential for visual correctness. In Arabic script, the Arabic Presentation Forms-B block (U+FE70–U+FEFF) encodes contextual ligatures and presentation variants, such as U+FEFB (Arabic ligature lam with alef isolated form), which fuses ل (lam) and ا (alef) into a single glyph for proper joining behavior in words.[91] Similarly, the CJK Compatibility Ideographs block (U+F900–U+FAFF) includes variant forms that provide round-trip compatibility with legacy encodings for Han characters; however, ligatures in Han script are rare, with historical forms often unified under single code points in the main CJK Unified Ideographs blocks or composed using shaping. The evolution of Unicode standards has progressively expanded support for ligatures to accommodate linguistic and historical needs. Unicode 1.0 (1991) provided basic precomposed forms like æ (U+00E6) in the Latin-1 Supplement but lacked dedicated ligature blocks, relying on early font-level substitutions. By Unicode 5.0 (2006), enhancements included expanded International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) support with affricate digraph ligatures such as U+02A3 (dz digraph) in the IPA Extensions block, enabling precise phonetic transcription. Unicode 5.1 (2008) added characters in the Latin Extended-D block (U+A720–U+A7FF) for medieval abbreviations, including U+A74F (Latin small ligature oo, ꝏ), a fused form used in insular manuscripts to denote "oo" or "w" sounds. Subsequent versions, including Unicode 16.0 (2023) and 17.0 (2024), have continued to expand support for historical and complex scripts, though without major new ligature-specific additions as of November 2025.[92] A key distinction in Unicode lies between compatibility (decomposable) and canonical (atomic) precomposed forms, which affects text processing and search. For instance, the ligature æ (U+00E6) is canonically equivalent to a + ǣ (with modifier), but compatibility ligatures like ffi (U+FB03) decompose to f + f + i under NFKD normalization, potentially altering string comparisons or collation if not handled consistently.[90] This normalization process, detailed in Unicode Standard Annex #15, resolves equivalence issues but can disrupt ligature integrity in unnormalized text, requiring applications to apply forms like NFC for recomposition.[90] To address encoding gaps for rare ligatures, later Unicode versions incorporated specialized characters from historical scripts. Font standards complement Unicode encoding through OpenType features, where the GSUB (Glyph Substitution) table defines rules for ligature formation via type 4 lookups, substituting sequences of glyphs (e.g., f + i → fi) based on script and language tags.[88] The HarfBuzz open-source shaping engine implements these GSUB substitutions for complex scripts, processing bidirectional text and applying ligatures dynamically while respecting zero-width joiner (U+200D) and non-joiner (U+200C) controls to enforce or suppress fusing in Arabic, Indic, or East Asian contexts.[93]Typesetting Systems
In professional typesetting systems, ligatures are managed through a combination of font metrics, engine-specific features, and user options to ensure typographic quality in printed documents. TeX and its derivatives, such as LaTeX, provide robust automation for ligature insertion, particularly for Latin scripts. In pdfTeX, basic ligatures like "ff" and "fi" are built into the engine's character mapping, automatically substituting them with the corresponding glyphs if available in the font during typesetting.[94] This hardcoded approach dates back to TeX's design principles, prioritizing readability without requiring explicit user intervention for common cases. For more advanced handling, XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX use the fontspec package, where the\ligatures option activates OpenType features such as Ligatures=TeX for traditional TeX-style substitutions (e.g., "ffi") or Ligatures=Common for standard discretionary ligatures like "ct". These options leverage the underlying Unicode standard to access font-embedded ligature tables, enabling seamless integration of complex OpenType fonts in academic and technical publishing.[95]
Automation extends to kerning pairs, which are often predefined in font metrics and applied alongside ligatures to adjust spacing for visual harmony; for instance, TeX engines read kerning tables from TFM or OFM files to fine-tune distances between ligatured glyphs and adjacent characters.[96] In mathematical typesetting with AMS-TeX, ligatures are typically suppressed or handled as exceptions in math mode to prevent unintended substitutions in identifiers (e.g., avoiding "fi" as a single glyph in variables like ), ensuring clarity in formulas while allowing them in surrounding text.[97] Historically, Donald Knuth's METAFONT system, developed starting in 1977, introduced parametric design for ligature paths, allowing fonts to generate smooth curves between joined letters like "ffi" based on algorithmic outlines rather than fixed bitmaps.[98]
Commercial tools like Adobe InDesign and QuarkXPress offer both automated and manual ligature support for print workflows. InDesign's Glyphs panel allows users to view and insert specific ligatures from OpenType fonts, with options to enable standard ligatures globally via the OpenType menu for automatic substitution during composition.[99] QuarkXPress provides ligature sets in its font preferences, where users can toggle built-in ligatures (e.g., "fi", "fl") for selected fonts, applying them across documents to maintain consistency. Best practices in academic publishing recommend enabling ligatures for Latin text in LaTeX-based workflows to enhance readability, as seen in standard journal templates, while LuaTeX (introduced in 2008) extends this to complex scripts through its node-based engine, supporting contextual ligatures in non-Latin languages via Lua scripting.[100][101]
Web and CSS Technologies
In web technologies, ligatures are primarily controlled through CSS properties that interact with OpenType font features. Thefont-feature-settings property, introduced in the CSS Fonts Module Level 3 specification, allows developers to enable specific OpenType features by name, such as "liga" 1 for standard ligatures (e.g., "fi" or "ff") and "dlig" 1 for discretionary ligatures (e.g., decorative forms like "ct"). This low-level control is useful for fine-tuning typography, while the shorthand font-variant-ligatures property simplifies activation with values like normal (enabling common ligatures), none (disabling them), or discretionary-ligatures for optional forms. These features became part of the CSS3 Fonts module, with initial working drafts published in 2009, though practical implementation began around 2011 in browser engines.[102]
Browser support for OpenType ligatures via these CSS properties has been robust since the early 2010s. Google Chrome provided full support for OpenType features, including ligatures, starting with version 4.1 in 2010 (with comprehensive unprefixed support by version 36 in 2014), while Mozilla Firefox enabled them from version 3.5 in 2009 (full unprefixed from version 33 in 2014). Apple Safari offered partial support from version 3.1 in 2008 but achieved full unprefixed compatibility for font-feature-settings in version 9.1 (2016), with earlier bugs—such as incorrect rendering of discretionary ligatures in versions 7–8—addressed through updates including WebKit engine improvements around 2018 in Safari 12.[103][104]
For basic ligature characters like the Latin "æ" (Æ), HTML provides predefined entities such as æ for the lowercase and Æ for the uppercase, which render the precomposed glyph if supported by the font; otherwise, they fall back to decomposed Unicode sequences (e.g., "ae") in non-supporting environments. This ensures accessibility across legacy systems, though modern browsers prioritize OpenType substitution for better typography when CSS features are enabled.
Variable fonts, an extension to the OpenType format introduced in 2016, introduce challenges for dynamic ligature rendering in web contexts. These single-file fonts allow interpolation along axes like weight or width, potentially varying ligature forms (e.g., contextual alternates adapting to optical size), but require careful CSS handling via font-variation-settings to avoid inconsistencies in text layout. In responsive web design, ligatures can complicate fluid layouts by altering glyph widths unpredictably during media query adjustments, leading to reflow issues or misalignment on smaller screens if not tested across font variations.[105][106]
To activate ligatures in practice, developers declare custom fonts using the @font-face at-rule to load OpenType or variable fonts, then apply font-feature-settings to target elements; for instance, loading a Google Font like Playfair Display (which includes discretionary ligatures) via @font-face followed by font-feature-settings: "dlig" 1; enhances brand typography on sites like editorial platforms. Google Fonts libraries commonly support these features, with over 1,800 families offering ligature variations as of 2025, promoting their use in web-safe, performant designs.[107][108]
Modern Applications
Graphic Design and Typography
In contemporary graphic design, ligatures have experienced a revival in logo creation, where custom combinations enhance visual cohesion and brand identity. Adobe Fonts offers numerous typefaces with discretionary ligatures, such as IvyMode, which features novel ligatures and flared endings to add crispness and personality to logos and headlines.[109] This resurgence aligns with broader trends in artistic typography, where expressive ligatures contribute to memorable wordmarks without overwhelming the design.[110] While ligatures are traditionally more prevalent in serif fonts to improve flow and readability in connected letterforms, their adoption has expanded to sans-serif typefaces for subtle decorative effects. In serif families like Adobe Garamond, standard ligatures such as "fi" and "fl" prevent awkward overlaps, enhancing legibility in print and branding materials.[11] Sans-serif fonts, often chosen for their clean lines, incorporate ligatures sparingly to maintain simplicity, as seen in modern designs where they add nuance without compromising the geometric structure. Variable fonts further advance this flexibility; for instance, Google's Roboto Flex (released in 2022) supports ligature variants across its axes of weight, width, and optical size, allowing designers to toggle them for responsive branding applications.[111][52] Design principles emphasize balancing ligature use to harmonize legibility with stylistic appeal, particularly in digital media where screen constraints demand clarity. Designers often employ A/B testing to evaluate ligature-enabled versus standard text, measuring metrics like reading speed and user engagement to ensure they enhance rather than hinder comprehension.[112] In user interfaces, minimalist trends frequently reduce or disable ligatures for functional text to prioritize rapid scanning and reduce visual clutter, though subtle ones persist in headers for aesthetic enhancement.[113][114] Industry trends highlight the rise of bespoke ligatures in branding to create unique visual signatures, exemplified by Coca-Cola's iconic Spencerian script logo, where interconnected letters form fluid joins that evoke heritage and dynamism.[115] Accessibility remains a key consideration, as excessive ligatures can confuse screen readers by altering character recognition; best practices recommend disabling them in body text for assistive technologies while retaining them in decorative elements.[113][116] Key developments in the 2010s included a craft revival among indie font designers, who incorporated elaborate discretionary ligatures into bespoke typefaces to infuse handmade warmth into digital products, as seen in offerings from foundries like TypeType.[117] Additionally, Unicode 10.0 (2017) advanced ligature-like functionality through Zero Width Joiner (ZWJ) sequences for emoji, enabling combined glyphs such as family or gender variants that display as unified icons, influencing typographic integration in digital design.[118] These standards have enabled seamless ligature implementation across platforms, supporting innovative graphic applications.[119]Contemporary Art and Cultural Uses
In contemporary art, ligatures have been employed experimentally to fuse letters in glitch-inspired compositions, creating visual disruptions that challenge traditional readability and evoke digital errors. Hungarian designer and visual artist Miklós Kiss exemplifies this approach through intricate typographic works that emphasize elegant ligatures in serif fonts, blending historical forms with modern abstraction to produce logo-like designs and typefaces such as Masqué.[120][121] Street art has seen custom ligatures integrated into hand-lettered graffiti, enhancing the playful and fluid nature of urban typography. British artist Gary Stranger, a self-taught graffiti practitioner since 1996, creates elegant typographic pieces like Ligatures (2016), where joined letterforms add dynamism and aesthetic harmony to wall-based compositions.[122] Cultural revivals have leveraged ligatures to reclaim and innovate indigenous and marginalized scripts in digital art. Type foundry Typotheque's Indigenous North American Type project, launched in 2022 with expansions in 2025 including new Cherokee and Osage fonts, supports revitalization of scripts like Canadian Syllabics and Cherokee through custom fonts that accommodate connected forms akin to ligatures, enabling communities such as the Cree and Inuktitut speakers to preserve oral traditions in visual media.[123][124][125] In New Zealand, Māori digital artists draw on reo Māori orthography to fuse ancestral motifs with contemporary projections.[126] Feminist reappropriation of ligatures appears in literature and design to promote gender inclusivity, particularly in gendered languages like French. The Bye Bye Binary collective, including designer Camille Circlude, has developed experimental ligatures for words like "amoureux/euse" (lover), merging endings into neutral forms such as "amoureuxse" to subvert binary norms, as demonstrated in their typeface prototypes like BBB Poppins TN shared in design workshops as of 2023.[127][128][129] Art installations often feature animated ligatures to explore motion and interconnection. The animated serif font Larumi (2021) by Ana & Yvy includes dynamic ligatures for display typography, used in projection-based works that simulate evolving letter bonds, highlighting ligatures' role in kinetic visual narratives.[130] Similarly, NFT art has incorporated rare ligatures, such as the Icelandic Ȣ in generative pieces, to symbolize cultural fusion; Japanese artist Kazuhiro Aihara's 2021 NFT series pushes unique typographic connections in blockchain visuals.[131] Debates surrounding ligatures in contemporary contexts center on cultural appropriation versus preservation, particularly when Western designers adapt non-Latin forms like Arabic joins or Devanagari conjuncts without community input. Critics argue that stereotypical "exotic" ligatures perpetuate colonial tropes, as explored in Ruben Pater's The Politics of Design (2015), while advocates emphasize decolonizing efforts, such as Bart Leguijt's 2020 zine Stop Typographical Appropriation, which calls for ethical engagement with oppressed scripts to avoid exploitation.[132][133] These discussions underscore ligatures' potential in decolonizing typography by prioritizing indigenous-led innovations over commodified aesthetics.[134] Key examples include the 2019 Ligature Show exhibition by Type Club, showcasing experimental drop caps and contextual ligatures across media, and viral social media fonts like those in TikTok trends (2020s), where custom ligature packs for apps like Canva enable user-generated glitch-text overlays, amassing millions of shares for their fusion of letters in memes and activism.[135]References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Welsh_Grammar%2C_Historical_and_Comparative/Phonology
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%AF%8F
