Hubbry Logo
Walter McMillianWalter McMillianMain
Open search
Walter McMillian
Community hub
Walter McMillian
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Walter McMillian
Walter McMillian
Walter McMillian
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Walter "Johnny D." McMillian (October 27, 1941 – September 11, 2013)[1] was a pulpwood worker from Monroeville, Alabama, who was wrongfully convicted of murder. His conviction was wrongfully obtained, based on police coercion and perjury. In the 1988 trial, under a controversial and now abolished Alabama doctrine known as judicial override, the judge imposed the death penalty, although the jury had voted for a sentence of life imprisonment.

From 1990 to 1993, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals turned down four appeals. In 1993, after McMillian had served six years on Alabama's death row, the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the lower court decision and ruled that he had been wrongfully convicted.

The controversial case received national attention beginning in the fall of 1992. Bryan Stevenson, McMillian's defense attorney, raised awareness on the CBS News program 60 Minutes. Journalist Pete Earley covered it in his book Circumstantial Evidence: Death, Life, and Justice in a Southern Town (1995).[2] Stevenson featured this early case of his career in a TED talk and in his memoir Just Mercy (2014). This was adapted as an eponymous feature film, released in 2019. Jamie Foxx portrays McMillian and Michael B. Jordan stars as Stevenson.

In an interview in 2005, Stevenson said the judge had inadvertently done McMillian a favor by sentencing him to death. Since McMillian had been sentenced to death, this resulted in Stevenson, who was working specifically on capital cases, taking up his case. Had McMillian instead been sentenced to life imprisonment as recommended by the jury, Stevenson said, "he would be in prison today."[3]

Context

[edit]

Walter McMillian, who was born on October 27, 1941, lived in a Black settlement near Monroeville where he "grew up picking cotton."[4] Monroe County was described by The Guardian as "a remote, dirt-poor region of pine trees and bean farms".[5] According to his attorney Bryan Stevenson, McMillian purchased logging and paper mill equipment and became a "moderately successful businessman".[4] A journalist described him as a "black pulpwood worker".[6] In 1986 he had been married to Minnie McMillian for 25 years and they had nine children.[7] McMillian held two jobs and "no criminal record other than a misdemeanor charge stemming [from] a barroom fight". He "did not have a history of violence."[7]

McMillian was known in the small community for having an affair with a white woman, Karen Kelly. In addition, one of his sons had married a white woman.[7][8][9] Both McMillian and the attorney he had in 1987, J. L. Chestnut, "contended that Mr. McMillian's relationships alone had made him a suspect."[7] In a prison interview in 1993, McMillian said, "The only reason I'm here is because I had been messing around with a white lady and my son married a white lady."[7]

Murder of Ronda Morrison

[edit]

Eighteen-year-old Ronda Morrison, a white dry-cleaning clerk, was murdered at Jackson Cleaners on November 1, 1986, in Monroeville, Alabama.[10][6] She had been shot numerous times from behind. At the time of her murder, Walter McMillian was at a church fish fry, where he was seen by dozens of witnesses, one of whom was a police officer.[11][12]

Arrest

[edit]

McMillian, who had "no prior felony convictions",[13] was arrested by newly elected Sheriff Tom Tate, who was under pressure to find a suspect.[4][13] McMillian was arrested in June 1987. In what The New York Times described as "an extraordinary move", McMillian "was immediately sent to Alabama's Death Row, in Holman State Prison, Atmore, which is usually reserved for convicted murderers awaiting execution."[7] He was held there, pre-trial, for 15 months.

McMillian had explained to Sheriff Tate shortly after his arrest that he was at the fish fry on the morning of November 1. Tate replied, "I don't give a damn what you say or what you do. I don't give a damn what your people say either. I'm going to put twelve people on a jury who are going to find your goddamn black ass guilty."[11][12]

On December 11, 1987, Walter McMillian and Ralph Bernard Myers, a career criminal,[14] were jointly indicted.[10] McMillian was charged with a two-count indictment "for the offense of murder made capital because it was committed during a robbery in the first degree", and the jury recommended a life sentence.[8][10] Myers pleaded guilty as a conspirator in the murder and received a 30-year prison term.[8]

Trial and sentencing

[edit]

The trial began on August 15, 1988. Judge Robert E. Lee Key, Jr., "had McMillian await trial on death row, as if a death sentence were a foregone conclusion, and relocated the trial from a county that was forty per cent black to an overwhelmingly white one," Baldwin County, where 86 percent of the residents were white, because the case had "generated extraordinary publicity."[7][Note 1][6] McMillian was represented by attorney J. L. Chestnut.

The trial lasted only a day and a half. On August 17, 1988, the jury of eleven whites and one African American found McMillian "guilty of the capital offense charged in the indictment"[10] and recommended a life sentence, based on the testimony of four state's informants found by the prosecution: Ralph Myers,[10] a career criminal; Bill Hooks, Jr.; Joe Hightower;[10] and one other.[14][6] Two of the witnesses claimed to have seen McMillian's "low-rider" truck outside the dry cleaner's around the time that the crime occurred.[14][6][Note 2]

The "jury ignored multiple alibi defense witnesses, who were black, who testified under oath that he was at a fish fry at the time of the crime."[14][6] There was no physical evidence implicating McMillian.[6]

Six years after the original trial, in an unrelated case, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals found that the prosecutor, District Attorney Theodore Pearson, and Judge Key "had practiced 'intentional racial discrimination' in jury selection."[Note 3][5]

Sentencing override

[edit]

On September 19, 1988, Judge Robert E. Lee Key, Jr., overruled the jury's recommendation of a life sentence and imposed the death penalty.[15] Key remarked that "McMillian deserved to be executed for the brutal killing of a young lady in the first full flower of adulthood."[6] This practice, called judicial override, allows "elected trial judges to override jury verdicts of life and impose death sentences." According to the Equal Justice Initiative of Montgomery, Alabama, "No capital sentencing procedure in the United States has come under more criticism as unreliable, unpredictable, and arbitrary" than the judge override.[16]

Since then, the frequency of the judge override in Alabama has come under scrutiny: "Nearly seventy Alabama judges have single-handedly ordered an inmate's execution, and collectively they have done so more than a hundred times. Thirty-six of the nearly two hundred convicts on death row are there because of override."[6]

In November 1988, 28-year-old attorney Bryan Stevenson, a Harvard Law School and Harvard School of Government graduate, who was the director of the newly formed Alabama Capital Representation Resource Center in Montgomery, took on the task of appealing the case. When he visited McMillian in prison,[11][17][Note 4][18] McMillian maintained his innocence. Stevenson was motivated to take McMillian's case because of the use of the judge override.

After he had decided to take the appeal, he got a phone call from Judge Key discouraging Stevenson from taking the case. In a 2015 NPR interview, Stevenson described how that phone call was a "very, very bizarre start to my career and to the work that I was doing in Alabama." Stevenson then visited McMillian's community and "met dozens of African-Americans who were with this condemned man at the time the crime took place 11 miles away who absolutely knew he was innocent."[19]

First appeal (1991)

[edit]

From 1990 to 1993, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals turned down four appeals.[7] McMillian's conviction and death sentence were affirmed on appeal in 1991 in McMillian v. State, 594 So. 2d 1253 (Ala.Cr. App.1991).[10]

Petition (1992)

[edit]

Following his own trial and sentencing, Ralph Bernard Myers told McMillian's trial counsel that the testimony he gave "against McMillian was false."[10] Myers confessed that "he knew nothing about the crime, that he was not present when the crime was committed, that he had been told what to say by certain law enforcement officers, and that he had testified falsely against McMillian because of pressure from the officers."[10] McMillian's attorneys from the Equal Justice Initiative filed a petition for a new trial alleging various constitutional violations, including "that a key state witness had recanted his testimony, that the appellant's conviction had been obtained by perjured testimony, and that the evidence of perjury was newly discovered." The petition also alleged that the state of Alabama "had violated his constitutional rights by withholding exculpatory and impeachment information".[10][Note 5]

In 1992 the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals in McMillian v. State 594 So. 2d 1289 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) denied the claims by McMillian's attorneys.[10]

Walter McMillian v. State (February 23, 1993)

[edit]

On February 23, 1993, in Walter McMillian v. State in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, all judges concurred that "the state suppressed exculpatory and impeachment evidence that had been requested by the defense, thus denying the appellant due process of law, requiring the reversal of his conviction and death sentence, and the remand of the case for a new trial."[10] D.A. Pearson had failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to McMillian's attorneys, including records from the Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility and Myers' June 3 and August 27 statements.[10]

Further investigation revealed that McMillian's truck, supposedly seen by witnesses at the scene of the crime, had not been converted to a "low-rider" until six months after the crime took place. It also emerged that District Attorney Theodore Pearson "had concealed evidence proving his innocence": a witness had seen the victim alive after the time when prosecutors claimed that McMillian had killed her.[6][15]

The two witnesses who had testified that they had seen McMillian's truck retracted their testimony, and admitted that they lied at trial, committing perjury.[8][15]

McMillian's "appellate lawyers discovered that prosecutors had withheld evidence and that the state's star witnesses had lied."[6] It emerged that Sheriff Tate and investigators with the Monroe County D.A.'s office and the Alabama Bureau of Investigation (ABI) had "pressured [Myers] into lying about Mr. McMillian."[10][Note 6][4][13] In pursuing those claims, the attorneys obtained the original recording of Myers' confession. After listening to it, they flipped the tape over and discovered a recorded conversation in which Myers complained bitterly that he was being forced to implicate McMillian, whom he did not know, for a crime neither of them had any role in.[8]

Upon discovery of this evidence, District Attorney Thomas Chapman, who had represented the state in McMillian's previous appeals, told Stevenson, "I want to do everything I can so that your client will not have to spend a single day more than he already has on death row. I feel sick about the six years that [McMillian] has spent in prison and the part I played in keeping him there."[11]

Exoneration (March 2, 1993)

[edit]

On February 23, 1993, in his fifth appeal to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, the judges ruled 5–0 to reverse McMillian's conviction and grant him a new trial.[7] McMillian's attorney then filed a motion to dismiss all charges. The following week, on March 2, Circuit Court Judge Pamela W. Baschab ruled on the motion, dismissing all charges against McMillian.[8][7]

Chapman, who did not prosecute the original case in 1987, "joined the defense in seeking to have the charges" against McMillian dismissed.[7] However, Chapman did not agree that there had been a "deliberate effort to frame Mr. McMillian." He claimed that McMillian's exoneration "proved the system worked."[7] Stevenson disagreed, telling the court that "it was far too easy to convict this wrongly accused man for murder and send him to death row for something he didn't do and much too hard to win his freedom after proving his innocence."[4]

Civil lawsuit

[edit]

After returning to his family and hometown of Monroeville, McMillian filed a civil lawsuit against state and local officials, including "the three men in charge of investigating the Morrison murder – Tom Tate, the Sheriff of Monroe County; Larry Ikner, an investigator with the District Attorney's office in Monroe County; and Simon Benson, an investigator with the Alabama Bureau of Investigation",[20] for his wrongful prosecution and conviction. It was appealed to the United States Supreme Court,[20] which ruled against McMillian, holding that a county sheriff could not be sued for monetary damages.[20] Subsequently, McMillian settled out of court with other officials for an undisclosed amount. McMillian's case served as a catalyst for Alabama's compensation statute, which was passed in 2001.[8][Note 7]

Life after

[edit]

McMillian later developed dementia, believed to have been brought on by the trauma of imprisonment.[4] He died on September 11, 2013.[8]

Media coverage

[edit]

News

[edit]

In the fall of 1992, McMillian's case received national attention in the CBS News program 60 Minutes. It was pointed out that Monroeville, Alabama, was "best known as the home of Harper Lee, whose To Kill a Mockingbird told a painful story of race and justice in the small-town Jim Crow South."[7]

Books and film

[edit]

The story was featured in a 1995 book entitled Circumstantial Evidence: Death, Life, and Justice in a Southern Town by former Washington Post journalist Pete Earley.[11][12]

Stevenson in 2012
Stevenson in 2012

The 2019 film Just Mercy dramatizes McMillian's case, and stars Jamie Foxx as McMillian and Michael B. Jordan as Bryan Stevenson, with direction by Destin Daniel Cretton, based on Stevenson's 2014 book Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption.[21]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Walter McMillian

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Walter "Johnny D." McMillian (October 27, 1941 – September 11, 2013) was a worker and family man from , wrongfully convicted in 1988 of the of 18-year-old white dry cleaning clerk Ronda Morrison and sentenced to death despite an supported by multiple witnesses and no connecting him to the crime. Arrested in 1987 after an investigation marred by official pressure on witnesses, McMillian's hinged on testimony from Ralph Myers, a white man with his own legal troubles who claimed under duress to have seen the but later recanted, admitting police coerced his false account to secure a conviction. Dozens of alibi witnesses, including church members, placed McMillian at a miles away during the , yet the prosecution discounted this evidence and suppressed information about alternative suspects, including individuals later linked to the killing. After nearly six years on death row—arrested June 8, 1987, and incarcerated until his release on March 2, 1993—the Court of Criminal Appeals overturned the conviction, citing egregious , including the withholding of and reliance on perjured testimony, prompting the state to drop charges rather than retry the case. McMillian's ordeal, defended by attorney of the , underscored vulnerabilities in the judicial process such as pretrial publicity, inadequate counsel, and evidentiary suppression, leading to a federal civil rights lawsuit against Monroe County officials that yielded a settlement acknowledging the injustice, though debates reached the U.S. . Despite exoneration, McMillian endured lasting health effects from imprisonment, dying at age 71 from complications including .

Personal Background

Early Life and Family

Walter McMillian was born on October 27, 1941, in , to sharecropping parents in a poor rural community outside the town. He grew up amid the economic hardships of in Monroe County, a region marked by and limited opportunities for Black families. From an early age, McMillian worked the fields alongside his family, forgoing extended formal education to contribute to their livelihood, consistent with the realities of segregated rural Southern where schooling for children often ended after elementary levels. This upbringing instilled a pattern of manual labor and self-reliance, as he later reflected on starting fieldwork young in Monroeville. McMillian met his wife, , as teenagers and married her in following her , establishing a unit that reflected the close-knit, provider-focused structures common among working-class Black families in the mid-20th-century South. The couple had three children during their 25-year marriage, with McMillian supporting them through agricultural and logging work. He fathered nine children in total across relationships.

Occupation and Community Standing

McMillian operated a self-employed pulpwood business in Monroeville, Alabama, where he worked as a hauler and tree cutter, hauling timber products for local mills. This entrepreneurial activity provided him with a steady in the rural , distinguishing him as an industrious figure among local residents. Locally known as "Johnny D.," McMillian participated in church activities, including organizing and attending community events such as fish fries at local congregations. He maintained a reputation free of violent criminal history prior to his arrest, though his social standing was complicated by reported extramarital relationships, including one with a white woman, which fueled personal resentments in the tightly knit, racially segregated town. These interpersonal dynamics, alongside routine business disputes, contributed to enmities without evidence of broader patterns of aggression.

Prior Criminal Record

Walter McMillian had no prior convictions and no documented history of violent offenses before the 1986 Ronda Morrison murder investigation. His only recorded criminal matter was a single charge from a bar fight occurring years earlier, for which he received . This minor incident did not involve incarceration or escalation to more serious charges.

The Ronda Morrison Murder

Circumstances of the Killing

On November 1, 1986, 18-year-old Ronda Morrison was working alone at Jackson Cleaners, a business in downtown , during its Saturday morning opening hours. She sustained three gunshot wounds to the back from a .25-caliber , with one exhibiting powder residue consistent with a muzzle-to-target distance of 1 to 2 inches, indicating close-range firing. findings confirmed death resulted from caused by these wounds, occurring rapidly within minutes, though minimal blood was present at the scene. Morrison's body was discovered around 10:30 a.m. by arriving co-workers who conducted a search of the store after noting her absence from the front counter; it was found positioned face-down under a rack of in the rear area. The cash drawer remained untouched and intact, with no funds missing, ruling out as a motive despite initial assumptions. Signs pointed to a targeted or impulsive encounter rather than theft, as the victim's was partially disarrayed in a manner suggestive of an attempted . The killing remains unsolved, with no perpetrator definitively identified despite subsequent investigations yielding physical evidence such as bullet fragments but no matching forensic links to suspects.

Victim Background

Ronda Morrison was an 18-year-old white woman born and raised in , a small town in Monroe County. She had recently graduated from high school and was enrolled as a student at a local community college, pursuing her education while holding a . Morrison worked at Jackson Cleaners, a establishment owned by family acquaintances, where she opened the store alone on Saturday mornings to serve customers. Coming from a stable, working-class family with local ties, Morrison was regarded by community members as diligent, well-liked, and a promising young adult reflective of the town's close-knit values. Her family included her parents, who were part of the established white community in Monroeville, a low-crime where such violent incidents were rare. The circumstances of her life underscored the everyday normalcy disrupted by the events of November 1, 1986, amplifying the shock to residents unaccustomed to random acts of violence in their midst.

Community Response and Fear

The murder of 18-year-old Ronda Morrison on November 1, 1986, in downtown —a town of approximately 6,500 residents—elicited immediate shock waves of fear and anger among locals. As a young white woman shot multiple times during what appeared to be a at the dry cleaners where she worked, Morrison's death disrupted the sense of safety in this rural, agricultural community, prompting widespread anxiety about personal vulnerability in everyday public spaces. Residents, accustomed to low crime rates in Monroe County, voiced urgent demands for , reflecting a broader law-and-order ethos prevalent in small Southern towns during the . This pressure stemmed from the crime's brazen nature and the victim's relatability as a local high school graduate from a respected family, amplifying communal outrage and calls for resolution to restore stability essential for the area's economic dependence on farming, local commerce, and emerging literary tourism tied to Harper Lee's . By early 1987, with no arrests after several months, the unresolved case intensified public frustration, heightening expectations on to act decisively amid fears that the perpetrator remained . This environment of escalating communal demand for , rooted in the town's tight-knit fabric and historical sensitivities to interracial tensions, contributed to an investigative climate where expediency overshadowed thoroughness, as later legal reviews indicated.

Investigation Phase

Initial Police Actions

On November 1, 1986, Monroe County Sheriff's deputies responded to Jackson Cleaners in , where 18-year-old Morrison had been found shot to death behind the sales counter, and promptly secured the to preserve potential . Officers dusted surfaces for fingerprints, collecting lifts from multiple areas including counters and equipment, though initial comparisons yielded no matches to known individuals in criminal databases. Autopsy and ballistics examination revealed Morrison had been killed by multiple gunshot wounds from a small-caliber automatic , with shell casings recovered at the scene but no weapon located or traced to a specific owner during early inquiries. Investigators under Sheriff Tom Tate canvassed nearby witnesses, including store patrons and passersby, and examined leads involving local criminals with histories of or , but these efforts produced no immediate identifications or corroborating physical links. The case progressed slowly over the ensuing six months, constrained by the era's forensic limitations—such as the unavailability of routine DNA testing—and a dependence on eyewitness recollections that failed to surface promptly, leaving the investigation without a primary suspect or breakthrough despite standard procedural steps. No robbery appeared to have occurred, as cash remained in the register, further complicating motive assessment in preliminary reports.

Emergence of Key Witnesses

In June 1987, Ralph Bernard Myers, a white man with an extensive including prior convictions and documented psychological vulnerabilities, was arrested in , for the of Vicki Lynn Pittman, a crime unrelated to the death of Ronda Morrison. Despite the distinct jurisdictions and offenses, investigators from Monroe County—Sheriff , Lieutenant Larry Ikner, and Investigator Park Benson—interrogated Myers extensively about Morrison's killing, applying pressure amid public demands to resolve the high-profile case. After approximately a week of isolation and repeated questioning, initially denied involvement in either but recanted, claiming he had been forced by McMillian to drive to Jackson Cleaners on November 1, 1986, where he purportedly witnessed McMillian shoot Morrison multiple times. This statement, delivered under threat of execution for the Pittman , pivoted the investigation toward McMillian, though ' history of mental instability and criminality—factors that inherently undermine testimonial reliability under standard evidentiary scrutiny—prompted no immediate corroborative validation from . Myers' accusation partially spurred additional witnesses, including Bill Hooks, a local with his own for , who came forward claiming to have seen a low-riding resembling McMillian's parked behind the cleaners around the time of the , allegedly carrying Myers and another man. Such accounts, emerging in the wake of Myers' pressured narrative rather than independently, relied on individuals with compromised credibility due to ongoing legal entanglements and incentives for leniency, highlighting foundational concerns over coerced alignment in the absence of forensic links.

Focus on Walter McMillian

Ralph Myers, a white man with a history of criminal activity and issues, emerged as a key witness after his arrest on unrelated murder charges in . Under prolonged interrogation, Myers alleged that Walter McMillian had coerced him into driving to Jackson Cleaners on November 1, 1986, where McMillian entered the store and fatally shot Ronda Morrison during an attempted robbery, positioning McMillian as the triggerman. This claim shifted investigative attention squarely to McMillian, despite Myers' account lacking corroboration from such as fingerprints, , or forensic links to the scene. The accusation intersected with preexisting local rumors of McMillian's interpersonal conflicts, particularly his extramarital affair with a white woman, which had engendered widespread hostility and suspicion in the racially divided community of Monroeville. McMillian, a pulpwood businessman, was already known to due to this relationship, amplifying the weight given to Myers' unverified narrative over alternative leads. These rumors, rather than , contributed to the rapid escalation of McMillian as the primary suspect, even as the purported motive in Myers' story remained tied to inconsistent details. Investigators disregarded apparent timeline discrepancies in Myers' testimony, which placed the events during a busy Saturday morning when the store had seen customers until approximately 10 a.m., conflicting with subsequent accounts locating McMillian at a church fund-raising in a nearby grove. No effort was made to reconcile these placements or pursue forensic verification, allowing the witness-driven focus on McMillian to dominate despite the absence of material evidence.

Arrest and Pretrial Detention

Arrest Details

On June 7, 1987, Walter McMillian was arrested by Monroe County Sheriff and a group of over a dozen officers on a rural road near his home, initially on charges of based on a statement from Ralph accusing McMillian of assaulting him in Conecuh County. This detention occurred without an for the Morrison murder and stemmed from investigators' use of Myers' allegation to secure custody, as Myers—a white man with prior legal troubles—had been pressured by officers including Tate, Investigator Larry Ikner, and Officer G.K. "Tommy" Benson to implicate McMillian. McMillian, who had no prior convictions and operated a business, was held pending formal charges for the of Ronda Morrison, defined under law as murder committed during a . No physical evidence linked McMillian to the crime; authorities relied solely on ' coerced and a chain of informant statements, including from others like Darnell , who later recanted claims of witnessing the . On December 11, 1987, McMillian and were jointly indicted on a two-count charge in Monroe County. Immediately after , McMillian was transferred to Holman Correctional Facility's for —a highly practice for unconvicted defendants—justified by and state officials due to perceived threats McMillian posed to witnesses and the community, despite lacking legal authorization under procedures at the time.

Conditions of Confinement

McMillian was transferred to in , immediately following his November 1987 arrest and housed on as a pretrial detainee, despite lacking a . This placement lasted 15 months until his trial in August 1988. Authorities, including Monroe County Sheriff Tom Tate, justified the move on grounds of heightened security needs, citing reported threats against McMillian himself and the necessity to safeguard potential witnesses amid the case's local notoriety. Death row confinement imposed severe isolation, with McMillian confined to a cell in close proximity to the , where he endured sensory exposure to state executions, including the smell of burning flesh. These conditions, for unconvicted individuals, inflicted profound psychological distress, as McMillian later recounted ", agony, loss, and fear in degrees that I had never imagined possible." The extended pretrial isolation amplified stress without of any escape attempts or misconduct by McMillian during this period.

Suppression of Alibi Evidence

Multiple witnesses, including McMillian's relatives and neighbors, informed Monroe County authorities pretrial that he was hosting and attending a fundraiser at his home in Grove Hill—about 11 miles from the Monroeville —during the murder's estimated timeframe of 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on November 1, 1986. Family members, such as Carolyn McMillian and her mother-in-law, specifically approached Tom Tate at the courthouse to relay this , noting the presence of dozens of attendees, yet Tate later claimed under not to recall the conversation. Investigators, including those from the Alabama Bureau of Investigation assisting Sheriff , received these reports but failed to document, investigate, or disclose them adequately to the defense, prioritizing instead the narrative from coerced witness Ralph Myers. McMillian himself alerted Tate to the immediately after his June 1987 arrest, corroborated by accounts from even the victim's uncle, Ernest Welch, who visited the event, and a police log recording McMillian's purchase of for it. This pretrial disregard and nondisclosure of verifiable alibi details violated the prosecution's obligations under (373 U.S. 83, 1963), which requires turning over material that could undermine guilt. While limited alibi testimony emerged at trial, the suppressed investigative leads prevented comprehensive pretrial verification, as evidenced by postconviction affidavits from additional witnesses affirming McMillian's presence but citing earlier reluctance amid local enforcement pressures. Such handling exemplified systemic failures in management, central to the 1993 appellate reversal.

Criminal Trial

Prosecution's Case

The prosecution's case against Walter McMillian for the of Ronda Morrison centered primarily on the testimony of Ralph Myers, a white career criminal facing his own charges. Myers claimed that on November 1, 1986, McMillian had requested a ride to Pittman Dry Cleaners in , where he allegedly entered the store, shot Morrison multiple times in the back during an attempted robbery, and then fled, leaving her body on the floor. Myers further testified that McMillian later threatened him to remain silent about the crime, asserting direct participation and knowledge of the events. Supporting ' account, the prosecution presented testimony from Karen Kelly, Myers' girlfriend, who stated she observed McMillian with a shortly after the and heard him discuss the killing. No forensic , such as fingerprints, matching McMillian's possessions, or eyewitness identifications from the scene, directly linked him to the crime; the case instead relied on these witness statements amid an absence of physical corroboration. Prosecutor Tommy Chapman argued that McMillian's motive stemmed from financial desperation tied to his business troubles, framing the killing as a gone wrong, while alluding to rumors of McMillian's extramarital affair with a white woman, which had rendered him a social outcast and heightened suspicions in the racially divided Monroeville area. Chapman emphasized the urgency of resolving the high-profile , which had gripped the and stalled local business due to fear, positioning the as sufficient to meet the burden of proof before an all-white jury selected after the defense exhausted its peremptory challenges.

Defense Arguments and Alibi

The defense presented testimony from six witnesses who stated that McMillian was at his participating in a church-sponsored on the morning of November 1, 1986, the date and approximate time of the murder at Jackson Cleaners in . These accounts, corroborated by additional community members including a , placed McMillian at the event, which featured public flyers and drew dozens of attendees, directly conflicting with the prosecution's timeline implicating him in the crime. Defense counsel further challenged the credibility of key prosecution witness Ralph Myers, whose testimony alleged McMillian's involvement, by emphasizing Myers' extensive criminal history, including prior convictions and ongoing investigations at the time, as well as inconsistencies between his account and physical evidence such as the lack of forensic links to McMillian. Myers' statements had evolved under pressure from facing their own scrutiny in unrelated cases, undermining their reliability absent independent corroboration. These arguments contributed to evident juror skepticism, as seven of the twelve jurors recommended a sentence of life imprisonment without parole following the guilty verdict, with only five favoring death, signaling insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in the eyes of a majority.

Jury Deliberation and Verdict

The jury, composed of eleven white members and one Black member, began deliberations on August 17, 1988, following the close of arguments in McMillian's capital murder trial in Monroe County, Alabama. After approximately three hours of , the returned a unanimous guilty verdict on the charge of during a , despite the defense having presented at least six witnesses who testified that McMillian was attending a church miles away at the time of Ronda Morrison's murder on November 1, 1986. Trial records indicate that the jury weighed the prosecution's key witness testimonies—primarily from Ralph Myers and Karen Kelly, who implicated McMillian in the crime—more heavily than the alibi evidence and lack of physical corroboration linking him to the scene. The brevity of the deliberation aligned with patterns in 1980s Alabama capital trials, where juries often favored state narratives in cases pitting white victims against Black defendants amid limited forensic evidence.

Judge's Sentencing Override

Judge Key, Jr. overrode the jury's recommendation of , which had been favored by a 7-5 vote in the sentencing phase, and instead imposed a death sentence on Walter McMillian. This decision occurred in 1988, following the trial in . The override was authorized under 's capital sentencing statute, which permitted elected trial judges to independently weigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances and overrule a jury's advisory if they determined death was warranted, without requiring or strict evidentiary standards beyond considering the jury's input. Judge Key, like other Alabama judges at the time, exercised this discretion in cases perceived to involve particularly egregious offenses, where the crime's severity and effects on victims or the community were deemed to outweigh calls for leniency. This sentencing approach exemplified a broader judicial practice in Alabama, where overrides from life to death outnumbered the reverse by a significant margin—98 life-to-death overrides compared to 9 death-to-life between 1976 and the early 2000s—often influenced by the state's elected system. The mechanism, unique among U.S. states for its routine application to escalate punishments, was eventually discontinued through legislative reform in , eliminating judges' authority to override jury life verdicts in capital cases.

Appeals and Exoneration

Early Appellate Challenges

Following conviction on August 15, 1988, McMillian filed a direct appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals, raising issues including the sufficiency of evidence corroborating accomplice testimony and nondisclosure of state agreements with witnesses such as Ralph Myers and Bill Hooks. On September 21, , the court remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing on these disclosure claims under Giglio v. United States, while preliminarily upholding the death sentence pending further findings, noting that pretrial motions for had been granted to mitigate by relocating the trial from to Baldwin . After the remand hearing, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence on September 20, 1991, rejecting arguments that procedural errors, such as the venue selection amid ongoing community prejudice and limitations on , warranted reversal. The court found sufficient evidence to support the verdict despite testimony from multiple witnesses placing McMillian elsewhere, preliminarily dismissing claims of suppressed exculpatory material related to the alibi as unsubstantiated at that stage, and upholding the trial judge's override of the jury's life sentence recommendation based on aggravating factors outweighing mitigators. These early challenges were pursued by counsel from McMillian's team, who operated with constrained investigative resources and lacked access to advanced forensic review or extensive witness re-interviews that later efforts would employ, limiting the depth of challenges to emerging of investigative . The denials emphasized procedural compliance over substantive reevaluation of , deferring deeper scrutiny of potential Brady violations until subsequent proceedings.

EJI Intervention and Evidence Review

In 1988, , founder of the (EJI), met Walter McMillian on death row and initiated post-conviction representation to challenge his conviction. EJI's investigation focused on , uncovering illegally suppressed , including affidavits from witnesses who had been pressured not to testify about McMillian's alibi. EJI obtained a from key prosecution witness Myers, who admitted under recorded questioning that his testimony implicating McMillian was coerced by law enforcement threats and promises. This , supported by evidence of duress, undermined the state's primary case, as Myers had no firsthand knowledge of the and his account was inconsistent with . Further review by EJI revealed timeline discrepancies disproving McMillian's presence at the ; multiple affidavits placed him at a church 11 miles away at the exact time of the , corroborated by witnesses ignored at . examinations of prosecution witnesses, such as Joe James Jackson, indicated deception in their accounts, while no or credible motive linked McMillian to the victim beyond and coerced statements. EJI filed a Rule 32 petition in state court, equivalent to a petition, emphasizing specific instances of official misconduct, including evidence suppression and witness coercion, rather than broader systemic issues. This petition incorporated the newly uncovered affidavits and Myers' recantation to argue for relief based on violations of .

Court of Criminal Appeals Ruling

On February 23, 1993, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals unanimously reversed Walter McMillian's conviction and death sentence in McMillian v. State, 616 So. 2d 933 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993). The court ruled that the prosecution suppressed material exculpatory and impeachment evidence in violation of , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), undermining confidence in the verdict. The decision centered on the unreliability of Ralph Myers, whose formed the sole implicating McMillian in the murder of Ronda Morrison. Suppressed materials included evidence of Myers' by law enforcement, his incentives to fabricate for reduced charges in unrelated cases, multiple inconsistent statements, and post-trial recantations indicating his account was invented under pressure. The court found this lacked independent corroboration, such as or consistent witness accounts tying McMillian to the , rendering the state's case insufficient once the taint was revealed. Prosecutorial nondisclosure extended to additional exculpatory items, including statements from other witnesses contradicting and supporting McMillian's , which the court deemed would have materially weakened the prosecution's . In post-conviction proceedings leading to the ruling, the state conceded the suppressed evidence's materiality and the overall evidentiary frailties, including the absence of a reliable causal link from McMillian to the offense beyond the impeached . The appeals court emphasized that these failures severed any dependable chain connecting McMillian to the murder, necessitating reversal for a .

Release from Death Row

On March 3, 1993, following the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals' reversal of Walter McMillian's conviction on February 23, 1993, Baldwin County prosecutors dismissed all charges against him in a hearing before Circuit Judge Pam Baschab, who granted a defense motion for his . McMillian, who had been incarcerated for nearly six years—much of it despite awaiting trial for over a year before his conviction—was walked out of the Baldwin County Courthouse in Bay Minette into the arms of waiting relatives, marking the end of his wrongful imprisonment for the 1986 murder of Ronda Morrison. Throughout the investigation and trial, no —such as fingerprints, , or forensic links—ever connected McMillian to the or victim, with the prosecution's case resting entirely on recanted eyewitness accounts from informants like Ralph Myers, whose coerced testimony was later discredited by multiple witnesses and investigative discrepancies. This outcome exemplified broader patterns of eyewitness unreliability, where studies indicate such identifications contribute to approximately 70% of wrongful convictions later exonerated by evidence, often exacerbated by suggestive police procedures and informant incentives absent rigorous corroboration. The release drew immediate national media scrutiny, with outlets highlighting prosecutorial concessions to suppressed and perjured testimony, though McMillian received no immediate or official apology from state authorities at the time.

Civil Litigation

Filing of Federal Suit

In February 1993, shortly after his release from prison, Walter McMillian, through counsel at the (EJI), initiated a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The twenty-seven-count complaint named as defendants Monroe County, Sheriff Thomas Tate in his individual and official capacities, Tommy Chapman, and various other state and local officials involved in the investigation and prosecution. It asserted federal jurisdiction based on claims arising under the U.S. , including deprivations of , equal protection, and protection against unreasonable seizures under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The suit specifically alleged that defendants fabricated evidence, such as coerced witness statements from Ralph Myers, suppressed exculpatory information including witnesses and forensic inconsistencies, and engaged in racially motivated investigative misconduct that violated McMillian's rights. These actions, per the complaint, proximately caused McMillian's six-year wrongful incarceration prior to and subsequent , despite exhaustion of available state post-conviction remedies that had failed to rectify the errors. McMillian sought compensatory for economic losses—including foregone wages from his business—mental anguish, reputational harm, and to deter similar official misconduct. The filing emphasized the absence of county policymaking authority over prosecutorial and sheriff functions under , framing liability as rooted in individual acts implementing state policy.

Allegations Against Officials

In the federal civil McMillian v. Monroe filed on February 28, 1995, plaintiff Walter McMillian alleged that Monroe Thomas engaged in witness intimidation by coercing Ralph Bernard , a key prosecution witness, to provide false testimony implicating McMillian in the 1986 of Ronda Morrison. McMillian claimed Tate applied psychological pressure on Myers, who had no direct knowledge of the crime, through repeated interrogations and threats, leading Myers to fabricate McMillian's involvement despite later recanting under oath in 1993. These actions were asserted to violate McMillian's under the Fourteenth Amendment by manufacturing inculpatory evidence. (pp. 781-782) McMillian further accused Tate of suppressing , including statements pointing to alternative suspects such as Cassity and an unidentified white male, as well as Myers' initial reluctance to implicate him. Similar withholding claims targeted Tommy Chapman, who was alleged to have failed to disclose material favorable to the defense, such as discrepancies in accounts and inconsistencies, in breach of obligations. Chapman, as lead prosecutor, was said to have prioritized Tate's investigative narrative over verifying its reliability, though these assertions centered on individual misconduct rather than coordinated policy. (pp. 785-786) No criminal charges were brought against Tate, Chapman, or other officials involved, consistent with longstanding doctrines of absolute prosecutorial immunity for core advocacy functions and for investigative conduct absent clearly established violations. McMillian's filings highlighted isolated patterns of override decisions and testimony handling in his case but did not substantiate broader systemic issues among officials, focusing instead on verifiable risks and evidence suppression tied to specific interrogations conducted between 1987 and 1988.

Settlements and Resolutions

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's 1997 decision in McMillian v. Monroe County, which affirmed the Eleventh Circuit's dismissal of claims against Monroe County by ruling that the county did not act as a final policymaker capable of imposing municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, McMillian pursued resolutions against remaining defendants. The ruling effectively shielded the county from financial responsibility, as the Court held that a 's law enforcement decisions did not represent county policy. Between 1995 and 1998, McMillian secured out-of-court settlements from various counties and officials involved in his prosecution and incarceration, totaling more than $500,000. These agreements explicitly included no admission of by the settling parties, focusing solely on monetary resolution without establishing for systemic accountability or mandating procedural reforms in Alabama's processes. The funds provided partial compensation for documented losses, though they fell short of covering the full economic damages from six years of wrongful imprisonment, including lost wages and legal expenses.

Post-Exoneration Life

Reintegration Challenges

McMillian faced significant hurdles in resuming after his March 3, 1993, release, having lost his pre-incarceration business during the six years . He attempted to reestablish himself through sporadic manual labor and briefly operated a tree service in Monroeville, but these efforts yielded limited success due to the disruption caused by his wrongful conviction and the passage of time. Later, he sustained himself by selling scrap metal in Monroe County, utilizing funds from eventual civil settlements. Incarceration profoundly strained his family ties; his wife, , separated from him soon after his return, and his nine children grew distant, grappling with the emotional toll of his prolonged absence and the upheaval it inflicted on their lives. This familial fragmentation underscored the enduring relational challenges common among exonerees, where prolonged separation and stigma hindered restoration of pre-arrest dynamics. Community reception was mixed: the local Black community, which had steadfastly supported his innocence throughout the ordeal, expressed widespread relief at his , as evidenced by celebratory gatherings at his family's home on release day. However, broader reintegration was impeded by persistent suspicions fueled by pre-trial rumors of his extramarital affair with a white woman, which had originally heightened scrutiny against him and continued to cast shadows in some quarters despite the court's reversal. McMillian approached advocacy with restraint, focusing on personal testimony rather than expansive political engagement; on April 1, 1993, he testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee about death row experiences to urge reforms in legal aid for the indigent and scrutiny of capital punishment, and he later addressed community groups and attended a 1998 national conference on wrongful convictions without aligning with partisan causes.

Health Issues and Decline

McMillian developed early-onset approximately ten years after his 1993 release, with symptoms including memory impairment that hindered his ability to operate a or perform daily tasks. Multiple physicians attributed this condition to the of six years in on death row, where prolonged isolation and anticipation of execution induced severe stress. His physical health further declined due to resuming strenuous manual labor post-exoneration, as he had lost his prior enterprise and turned to selling scrap metal and car parts for income. In 1995, McMillian broke his neck while cutting down a , resulting in partial that limited his mobility and work capacity. The harsh conditions of , including inadequate nutrition and medical care, likely exacerbated chronic physical strain from years of work, with post-release access to healthcare remaining constrained by financial hardship. By his , these combined ailments accelerated, rendering McMillian unable to work altogether and dependent on others for , though no evidence indicates relapse into prior substance use patterns.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Walter McMillian died on , 2013, at age 71 in , from complications of following years of declining health. In his , McMillian suffered from that caused hallucinations, including delusions that he remained incarcerated on death row despite his six years earlier. His funeral, held shortly after his death, was attended by family members, local supporters, and advocates from the . , McMillian's longtime attorney who secured his release, delivered the eulogy, reflecting on the personal toll of wrongful imprisonment. No public was conducted, and his death was attributed solely to causes without noted irregularities. McMillian's estate matters were managed privately by his , with no of disputes or distributions emerging. His passing underscored the enduring psychological and physical impacts of prolonged isolation and trauma from six years , as evidenced by his final health struggles.

Media and Legacy

Contemporary News Coverage

Local newspapers in , such as the Monroe Journal, initially framed Walter McMillian's June 1987 arrest and December 1987 indictment as a breakthrough in resolving the unsolved November 1, 1986, murder of 18-year-old white clerk Ronda Morrison, emphasizing witness testimonies like that of Ralph Myers despite emerging recantations and lack of physical evidence. This coverage aligned with community demands for swift closure in a small town shaken by the crime, often highlighting McMillian's prior reputation and the interracial nature of the case without probing inconsistencies in the prosecution's narrative. National attention intensified in November 1992 with a segment reported by , which detailed coerced witness statements, suppressed alibis placing McMillian at a church during the , and the absence of forensic links, portraying the conviction as a potential after nearly six years on death row. The episode, aired amid appeals, sparked outrage by questioning officials' handling, including the sheriff's role in witness pressure, and contrasted sharply with earlier local reporting that had largely accepted the trial's outcome. Following the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals' February 1993 reversal of McMillian's conviction and his release on March 3, 1993, national outlets like The New York Times covered the exoneration as emblematic of rushed death penalty processes, noting reliance on unreliable informants and procedural flaws that bypassed stronger evidence of alternative suspects. Southern regional press remained more restrained, often cautious about broader racial or systemic indictments and focusing on specific official errors rather than institutional critique, reflecting local sensitivities in a county with persistent racial divides. This divergence underscored how proximity to the case influenced framing, with proximate sources prioritizing communal resolution over evidentiary scrutiny.

Books, Films, and Adaptations

Bryan Stevenson's memoir Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption, published on October 21, 2014, details his efforts starting in 1988 to overturn McMillian's 1988 conviction for the 1986 murder of Morrison, highlighting coerced witness testimonies, suppressed , and the unusual pre-trial confinement. The narrative frames the case as emblematic of systemic flaws, including the judge's override of the jury's life sentence recommendation to impose death. The 2019 film adaptation, directed by and starring as Stevenson and as McMillian, adheres closely to the book's account of key events, such as the corroborated by multiple witnesses and the of Ralph Myers' testimony, which formed the prosecution's core evidence absent physical links. Minor dramatizations include altered sequences of investigative confrontations, while omissions encompass McMillian's personal circumstances, like his marijuana-related activities, to streamline the focus on legal advocacy. Both the and prioritize the procedural path to the 1993 Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversal—driven by exposed and withheld tapes—over the unresolved aspects of Morrison's , which lacked forensic resolution and remains unsolved. This emphasis on triumphs aligns with Stevenson's perspective but contrasts with EJI's drier case reports, which catalog timelines and evidentiary voids without narrative advocacy. No major discrepancies undermine the representations' fidelity to verifiable facts, though the dramatic structure amplifies interpersonal tensions at the expense of exhaustive procedural minutiae.

Broader Debates on Case Implications

Advocates for criminal justice reform have cited the McMillian case as emblematic of eyewitness testimony's unreliability, noting that such misidentifications contributed to approximately 70% of wrongful convictions later overturned through DNA evidence. They argue this underscores the need for stricter evidentiary standards, including corroboration requirements and lineup reforms, to prevent similar errors in capital trials. The case also fueled criticism of Alabama's judicial override mechanism, which allowed judges to impose death sentences over jury life recommendations; between 1975 and 2017, Alabama judges overrode 28 life verdicts to death, disproportionately affecting Black defendants, prompting the state's legislature to abolish the practice in 2017. Opponents of broad systemic reforms contend that misconduct by individuals, such as former Sheriff Thomas Tate's alleged involvement in coercing testimony, reflects personal failings rather than inherent racial bias in the justice system. They highlight how appellate processes, including federal habeas review, ultimately exonerated McMillian in 1993, demonstrating the system's capacity for self-correction without necessitating abolition of the death penalty. Proponents of retaining capital punishment emphasize its potential deterrent effect on homicide, with some econometric analyses estimating that each execution prevents 3 to 18 murders, arguing this justifies its use amid persistently high rates of unsolved violent crimes. Empirically, McMillian's is one of over 200 from U.S. death rows since 1973, with Black individuals comprising about 54% of exonerees despite representing 13% of the population—a disparity that mirrors their overrepresentation in arrests, which exceed 50% annually. Debates persist on whether such cases warrant narrative-driven pushes for penalty abolition or targeted fixes like improved forensics, with critics of reform agendas questioning if they overlook causal factors like witness incentives over institutional racism. The has concluded that research neither conclusively proves nor refutes capital punishment's deterrent value, complicating causal attributions in isolated exonerations.

References

  1. https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/walter-mcmillan-obituary?pid=185525547
  2. https://eji.org/cases/walter-mcmillian/
  3. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/resources/high-school/courtroom-cases/walter-mcmillian-1985
  4. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1996/96-542
  5. https://everloved.com/life-of/walter-mcmillian-monroeville-alabama/obituary/
  6. https://www.porchlightbooks.com/blogs/changethis/mockingbird-players-an-excerpt-from-just-mercy-a-story-of-justice-and-redemption
  7. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/just-mercy/section1/
  8. https://rgcfairfax.org/strange-disturbing-case-walter-mcmillan/
  9. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/156515NCJRS.pdf
  10. https://allthatsinteresting.com/walter-mcmillian
  11. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/03/us/alabama-releases-man-held-on-death-row-for-six-years.html
  12. https://redeemerjackson.com/2020/06/just-mercy-by-bryan-stephenson/
  13. https://www.npr.org/2014/10/20/356964925/one-lawyers-fight-for-young-blacks-and-just-mercy
  14. https://www.oxygen.com/true-crime-buzz/just-mercy-what-happened-to-walter-mcmillan
  15. https://nypost.com/2020/06/04/the-harrowing-true-story-of-just-mercy/
  16. https://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/just-mercy/
  17. https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/nation-world/1998/11/08/living-with-death/50548750007/
  18. https://www.peteearley.com/2020/11/20/for-the-murder-victims-in-the-movie-book-just-mercy-justice-remains-denied-who-killed-these-girls/
  19. https://eji.org/files/just-mercy-discussion-guide.pdf
  20. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/just-mercy/characters/ronda-morrison
  21. https://bittersoutherner.com/in-the-hate-of-dixie-monroe-county-lynchings
  22. https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=fac_articles
  23. https://www.southernfriedtruecrime.com/85-the-murder-of-ronda-morrison-the-framing-of-walter-mcmillian
  24. https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-criminal/1990/570-so-2d-1285-0.html
  25. https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ie707ccc1562f11d997e0acd5cbb90d3f/View/FullText.html
  26. https://www.deseret.com/1998/11/12/19411811/death-s-door/
  27. https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-criminal/1993/616-so-2d-933-0.html
  28. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/878/1473/1440118/
  29. https://eji.org/cases/walter-mcmillian
  30. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/88/1554/486857/
  31. https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/19956123.OP.pdf
  32. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/just-mercy/chapter-3-trials-and-tribulations
  33. https://www.oxygen.com/true-crime-buzz/just-mercy-were-police-reprimanded-after-walter-mcmillian-release
  34. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/373/83/
  35. https://magazine.wsu.edu/2016/01/31/just-mercy/
  36. https://www.eonline.com/news/1110139/just-mercy-and-the-heartbreaking-true-story-of-walter-mcmillian
  37. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/just-mercy/section2/
  38. https://www.shortform.com/blog/walter-mcmillian-just-mercy/
  39. https://eji.org/news/diverse-juries-more-reliable-less-likely-in-alabama-death-penalty/
  40. https://www.gradesaver.com/just-mercy/study-guide/summary-chapters-2--4
  41. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Just-Mercy-A-Story-of-Justice-and-Redemption/chapter-3-summary/
  42. https://eji.org/report/unreliable-verdicts/200-and-counting/
  43. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/resources/teachers-edition/sections/courtroom-cases-teacher-overview
  44. https://eji.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/death-penalty-in-alabama-judge-override.pdf
  45. https://eji.org/reports/judge-override/
  46. https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-criminal/1991/594-so-2d-1253-0.html
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/11/opinion/abroad-at-home-cruel-and-reckless.html
  48. https://justmercy.eji.org/
  49. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/520/781
  50. https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I8fd609fa933111d9a707f4371c9c34f0/View/FullText.html
  51. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2220&context=faculty_scholarship
  52. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-03-03-mn-273-story.html
  53. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/research/analysis/reports/in-depth/innocence-and-the-death-penalty-assessing-the-danger-of-mistaken-executions
  54. https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/19956369.MAN.pdf
  55. https://www.supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/781/
  56. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-542.ZD.html
  57. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-11th-circuit/1278653.html
  58. https://www.lexplug.com/casebrief/mcmillian_v_monroe_county_67a3a4fc6589ea1409ea7483
  59. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/781/
  60. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/just-mercy/section9/
  61. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/just-mercy/section6/
  62. https://eji.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/04-01-93-walter-mcmillian-testimony-us-senate-judiciarcy-committee.pdf
  63. https://thecinemaholic.com/how-did-walter-mcmillian-die/
  64. https://everloved.com/life-of/walter-johnny-d-mcmillian/
  65. https://slate.com/culture/2019/12/just-mercy-movie-accuracy-fact-fiction-bryan-stevenson.html
  66. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/from-the-60-minutes-archives-the-true-story-behind-just-mercy-2020-01-09/
  67. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/07/weekinreview/on-the-fast-track-from-the-courtroom-to-death-row.html
  68. https://www.porchlightbooks.com/products/just-mercy-bryan-stevenson-9780812994520
  69. https://nobaproject.com/modules/eyewitness-testimony-and-memory-biases
  70. https://innocenceproject.org/eyewitness-misidentification/
  71. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/alabama-legislature-votes-to-end-judicial-override
  72. https://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DezRubShepDeterFinal.pdf
  73. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/the-200th-exoneration-underscores-critical-flaws-in-the-u-s-criminal-legal-system-other-innocent-prisoners-remain-on-death-row
  74. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/deterrence/discussion-of-recent-deterrence-studies
  75. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/13363/deterrence-and-the-death-penalty
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.