Hubbry Logo
Working titleWorking titleMain
Open search
Working title
Community hub
Working title
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Working title
Working title
Working title
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A working title is a preliminary name for a product or project. The usage is especially common in film and TV, gaming, music and publishing. It is often styled in trade publications as (wt) and is synonymous with production title and tentative title.

Usage

[edit]

Working titles are commonly used in film and TV, gaming, music, and publishing.[1] They are used mainly because an official title has not yet been decided upon or to intentionally disguise the real nature of a project.[citation needed]

It is often styled in trade publications as (wt).[2]

Usage as production titles

[edit]

The terms "production title" and "tentative title" are sometimes used instead of "working title".[citation needed] Working titles are primarily a practical matter, just to prevent confusion as ideas for release titles can keep on changing for a variety of reasons. For example, while James Bond films are commonly produced under numerical titles such as Bond 22 until the official title is announced as part of its marketing, release titles may also change because of significant changes to the plot during production, as happened with Disney's The Emperor's New Groove, whose working title was Kingdom of the Sun.[citation needed]

In some cases a working title may ultimately be used as the release title, as in the case of leading man Samuel L. Jackson insisting on the title Snakes on a Plane, after he learned the title was going to be changed to Pacific Air Flight 121 upon release.[citation needed]

Usage as a ruse title

[edit]

Fake production titles are frequently used by high-profile films or television series to prevent undesired attention by the press or fandom, price gouging by suppliers[3] and casual or targeted theft. Notable examples of ruse titles include Blue Harvest (Return of the Jedi), Red Gun (House of the Dragon),[4] and the Batman films Batman Begins, The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises, which were produced under the titles The Intimidation Game, Rory's First Kiss and Magnus Rex.[5]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Working title

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A working title is a provisional or temporary name assigned to a creative project, such as a , , television series, or other media, during its development and production phases, before a final official is selected and finalized. This practice allows creators to proceed with work without committing to a permanent name prematurely. Working titles serve several key functions in the creative process, including providing initial guidance to the production team by establishing a thematic or focus, maintaining to prevent plot leaks or spoilers in early stages, and offering flexibility for adjustments as the project evolves or faces legal hurdles like clearances. For instance, they help internal teams collaborate efficiently while buying time to refine the project's direction or explore marketing implications. In addition, working titles can generate internal curiosity or even inspire alternative options if the eventual final title underperforms in testing. The use of working titles is prevalent across various industries, particularly in , , , and television, where projects often undergo significant changes before release. Notable examples include the film Star Wars: Episode VI – , which was developed under the working title "" to disguise its sci-fi elements and avoid unwanted attention during shooting; and the television series Friends, produced as "Insomnia Café" to reflect its early comedic premise. These temporary names often differ markedly from the final versions, highlighting how they evolve alongside the creative work itself.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

A working title is a provisional or temporary name assigned to a creative project, such as a , television series, , or other media production, during its initial development stages and prior to the selection of a final, title. This placeholder serves as an interim identifier that helps guide the project's conceptualization without committing to a permanent label that might influence public perception or marketing strategies prematurely. The primary purposes of a working title include facilitating efficient internal communication among creators, producers, and team members by providing a shared reference point for discussions and planning. It also helps maintain confidentiality by obscuring the project's true nature from external parties, thereby preventing spoilers or speculative media coverage during sensitive early phases. Additionally, it affords flexibility in creative decision-making, allowing adjustments to the project's direction without the constraint of a fixed, marketable name that could limit evolving ideas. Working titles typically exhibit characteristics that prioritize utility over appeal: they are often straightforward and descriptive of key plot elements, themes, or production codes, rather than crafted for broad audience engagement. Unlike final titles, which are polished for commercial viability, these provisional names may evolve iteratively—sometimes multiple times—as the project matures and refines its identity. This adaptability underscores their role as tools in an ongoing creative process. The of "working title" stems from the English adjective "working," which denotes something temporary or operational in progress, akin to a working model or draft in other fields. The term's earliest documented use appears in , in the context of American and print media, marking its emergence in 20th-century and practices where provisional naming became standard for managing developing works.

Distinction from Final and Alternate Titles

Working titles serve as provisional labels during the creative and production phases of a project, remaining internal and subject to revision as the work evolves, in contrast to final titles, which are the polished, public-facing names selected for release and often protected under to ensure brand recognition and legal exclusivity. This mutability of working titles allows creators flexibility without the constraints of market testing or audience appeal that shape final titles. Unlike alternate titles, which are typically a set of vetted options proposed near the end of development for potential use as the official release name—often evaluated for commercial viability and SEO—working titles lack any marketing intent and are not intended for external consideration. Alternate titles emerge as deliberate candidates during the finalization process, whereas working titles function purely as placeholders to facilitate internal communication without implying endorsement for publication. Working titles differ fundamentally from pseudonyms or pen names, which are fictitious identities adopted by creators to obscure their real names for reasons such as , separation, or branding, rather than to name the project itself. These author aliases are enduring and tied to the individual's output, while working titles are temporary and project-specific, dissolving once a final name is chosen. In certain edge cases, a working title may be retained as the final title if it proves sufficiently evocative or if subsequent refinements fail to yield a superior alternative, thereby transitioning from provisional use to official status. Additionally, elements of a working title can influence the final version, such as inspiring that capture thematic nuances developed during production.

Historical Context

Origins in Early Publishing

The practice of using working titles in publishing emerged during the 18th and 19th centuries, as authors and editors employed provisional or descriptive names to identify unfinished manuscripts and distinguish them from completed works. These temporary titles often reflected the central themes, characters, or plot elements of the draft, serving as practical placeholders during the revision process. This convention arose amid the expanding of the period, where manuscripts circulated among family, friends, or potential publishers before finalization. A notable early example is Jane Austen's debut novel, completed in 1797 at age 21 under the working title First Impressions, which captured the story's focus on initial judgments and social misconceptions. Austen substantially revised the manuscript over the next decade, ultimately changing the title to for its 1813 publication by Thomas Egerton, drawing inspiration from a line in Fanny Burney's 1782 novel . Similarly, Austen's posthumously published (1818) began as The Elliots in 1816, named after the protagonist's family to emphasize their social dynamics during the drafting stage. Another 19th-century instance is Kate Chopin's The Awakening (1899), initially titled A Solitary Soul to highlight the isolation of its female protagonist, before the author settled on a name evoking broader themes of personal transformation upon its release by Herbert S. Stone & Company. These cases illustrate how working titles facilitated creative evolution in an era when authors like Austen operated without formal agents, relying on personal networks for feedback. In the , working titles played a key role in the of novels in periodicals, a dominant format that broke works into installments for magazines like Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine or Dickens's . This structure demanded provisional naming to accommodate ongoing revisions, reader responses, and editorial adjustments between issues, allowing titles to evolve without disrupting the narrative flow. While many serials retained their provisional titles for bound editions—such as Charles Dickens's (1836–1837), which launched the modern serial form under its eventual name—the flexibility of the medium supported changes if needed to better suit the complete work or market appeal. thus reinforced working titles as essential tools for managing the temporal and collaborative aspects of 19th-century literature production, contributing to the era's high output of over 50,000 novel titles.

Development in Film and Modern Media

During the Golden Age of Hollywood (1930s-1950s), the vertically integrated prioritized script and production confidentiality to safeguard and avoid scandals, often employing working titles or code names to obscure project details from leaks and public scrutiny. Studios like and used these placeholders to manage internal communications while navigating censorship pressures, allowing creative development without premature exposure. Following , the decline of the studio monopoly and the rise of independent productions, coupled with 's emergence and international co-productions, expanded the use of coded working titles to coordinate complex collaborations across borders and media formats. Television networks and studios increasingly adopted neutral or misleading titles for pilots and features to facilitate joint ventures, such as those between U.S. and European entities, minimizing risks from competing bids or in a globalizing industry. The 1970s New Hollywood movement marked a pivotal shift, as directors leveraged working titles to experiment with branding and narrative innovation amid relaxed studio controls. This approach reflected the era's push for artistic autonomy, influencing how titles served as creative tools rather than mere identifiers in a post-studio rebellion. In the digital era (1990s-2025), the proliferation of streaming services has amplified working titles' role in pilot development, where platforms like and use them to test concepts discreetly before greenlighting series. Social media's rapid information spread has heightened title secrecy, prompting elaborate code names to counter leaks from cast, crew, or hacks, as seen in high-profile productions shielding plot twists from viral speculation. This evolution underscores working titles' adaptation to tech-driven media landscapes, balancing innovation with protection in an interconnected ecosystem.

Applications in Creative Industries

Usage in Film and Television

In film and television production, working titles are assigned during the phase, typically as scripting begins, to provide a temporary identifier for the project. These titles are integrated into various elements, including casting calls where they help recruit actors without disclosing sensitive details, budgeting processes to discreetly organize financial allocations, and where they label for internal review and archiving. As the production advances, changes to working titles are disseminated through memos to maintain alignment across departments like art, sound, and . A prominent film example is the 1983 production of Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi, which used "Blue Harvest" as its working title to obscure the project's scope and prevent cost escalations from heightened public scrutiny during location shooting. Similarly, in the 2010s, Marvel Studios employed "Mary Lou" for Avengers: Infinity War (2018), allowing the massive ensemble production to proceed with controlled information flow amid growing franchise hype. Television production adapts working titles for episodic formats, particularly in writers' rooms where provisional names streamline script discussions and revisions. By the , working titles have seen heightened application in expansive global franchises from Marvel and DC, driven by the need to curb fan speculation and mitigate online leaks in a hyper-connected media landscape. This trend builds on earlier practices in modern media, emphasizing secrecy for interconnected narratives like those in the .

Usage in Literature and Publishing

In the authorial process of writing books, working titles are provisional names assigned to initial drafts to serve as personal references, helping authors clarify themes, maintain narrative focus, and organize their creative workflow. These titles often emerge early in the drafting stage, capturing core ideas or motifs that guide the writing, and are refined as the manuscript evolves, particularly when preparing proposals for literary agents. For example, a working title might encapsulate a central conflict or , providing a mental anchor during solitary composition, though it is expected to change based on developmental feedback. Upon acquisition, houses assume a key role in shaping working s through committees, which evaluate and modify them to align with acquisition strategies, market trends, and reader appeal during pre-publication phases. Editors facilitate discussions between authors and other departments, such as and , to ensure the title supports broader promotional pitches while preserving the work's essence; this collaborative dynamic often involves iterative revisions in structured meetings. The process underscores the tension between authorial intent and commercial imperatives, with final decisions balancing artistic integrity against potential. Illustrative examples from literature highlight this refinement: George Orwell's dystopian novel was initially titled The Last Man in Europe to evoke isolation and , but publishers opted for the more evocative 1984 to enhance its memorable impact. Likewise, Toni Morrison's Paradise started as War, a direct reference to societal strife, yet was altered by editorial input to broaden its interpretive scope and avoid alienating potential readers. These cases demonstrate how working titles transition from internal tools to polished assets in the publishing pipeline. The rise of from the 2010s to 2025 has empowered authors to retain control over titles, using platforms like Amazon's (KDP) to upload beta manuscripts under provisional working titles for internal previews and early reader testing before committing to a final version. This approach enables rapid without oversight, allowing authors to experiment with titles that reflect evolving drafts while gauging audience response through platform tools.

Usage in Music and Other Media

In music production, working titles play a crucial role during the demo and early recording phases, serving as temporary identifiers for tracks and albums that allow artists and producers to iterate without premature commitment to a final name. For instance, frequently used provisional titles in their songwriting and recording sessions; "" was initially known as "Seventeen," reflecting a simple lyrical reference that evolved as the composition developed. Similarly, Nirvana's track "Sliver" originated under the working title "Rug Burn" during its formative sessions in the early 1990s, highlighting how such placeholders capture raw ideas before refinement. These titles often draw from , session notes, or thematic sketches, enabling collaborative feedback in informal environments like home demos or initial studio takes. The recording process further integrates working titles into practical workflows, appearing in studio logs, (DAW) sessions, and draft to organize multitrack elements efficiently. Producers label individual stems—such as vocals, drums, or guitars—with provisional descriptors to streamline mixing and editing, ensuring consistency across sessions while deferring polished until review. Changes to these titles commonly occur after mixing, when the full artistic vision solidifies, as seen in numerous album releases where early session markers give way to evocative finals that align with and thematic goals. This flexibility supports the iterative nature of music creation, where titles may shift to better encapsulate emotional or narrative arcs. Extending to other media, working titles in function as internal codenames during prototyping and iteration, shielding projects from spoilers while facilitating team communication on expansive, multi-year endeavors. A notable example is Valve's , which during its 1997-1998 development phase bore provisional names like "Free Radical" and "Crysis," evoking themes of scientific upheaval before the final title emphasized the game's core narrative mechanic of temporal disruption. In theater, scripts undergoing workshops and rehearsals often employ working titles to denote evolving drafts, allowing playwrights, directors, and actors to explore content without the pressure of a definitive label that might influence early interpretations. These placeholders, drawn from key motifs or workshop discussions, evolve through table reads and revisions, mirroring the collaborative refinement seen in music but adapted to performative contexts where live feedback shapes the work. By 2025, advancements in AI-assisted composition tools have introduced automated generation of provisional titles, particularly benefiting indie artists by accelerating ideation in resource-limited settings. Platforms like AI Song Name Generators analyze user inputs such as , mood, or lyric snippets to produce tailored suggestions, enabling quick prototyping of track concepts without extensive brainstorming. This integration streamlines the transition from demo to polished release, fostering across overlaps like game soundtracks or theatrical scores where provisional naming supports hybrid production pipelines.

Specialized Functions

As Production Placeholders

Working titles serve as essential internal tools in film and television production, functioning as temporary identifiers that enable efficient operational processes without locking in a final identity. They facilitate key and production activities, such as scheduling shoots, hiring and , and locations, by providing a consistent reference point for teams while the creative elements evolve. This provisional naming allows producers to coordinate —ranging from securing permits to allocating budgets—early in development, ensuring momentum without premature public commitment to a title that may change based on script revisions or strategies. In production documentation, working titles appear prominently across various administrative materials to maintain organization and compliance. They are listed in daily call sheets, which outline shoot schedules, assignments, and location details for cast and , typically in the header section alongside the production date. Similarly, working titles feature in records and crew deal memos, where they identify the project for compensation tracking and employment terms. For union-regulated productions, such as those under , working titles are referenced in contract filings, Taft-Hartley reports for non-union hires, and signatory agreements, helping to verify project details without revealing sensitive content. Additionally, these titles are tracked within production bibles—comprehensive binders or digital documents that compile script breakdowns, budgets, schedules, and asset lists—serving as the central reference for the entire . The use of working titles offers several practical advantages, particularly in large-scale or multi-project environments like major studios. By employing neutral or descriptive placeholders, they minimize confusion among overlapping crews and departments, allowing seamless resource allocation across simultaneous productions. This system also supports creative iteration, as teams can refine story and thematic elements without external pressure or scrutiny from early announcements, fostering a focused internal workflow. In studios handling numerous projects, such as those at streaming giants, this approach streamlines operations and protects ongoing development from premature leaks or speculation. A common example of this practice involves generic placeholders like "Untitled Project" or "Untitled [Genre] Project," widely used by major studios in the 2020s to denote early-stage developments. , for instance, frequently employs such titles for its originals; the 2025 slate includes the untitled Michelle Monaghan hockey drama series, an eight-episode project from Shawn Levy's 21 Laps, and the "Untitled Charlie Brooker Project," a series from the creator, both tracked internally under these monikers during production planning and hiring. These placeholders appear in Netflix's internal documents, such as call sheets and union submissions, exemplifying how working titles enable discreet yet efficient management of high-volume content pipelines.

As Ruse or Decoy Titles

Working titles serve as or in high-profile productions primarily to safeguard plot details from spoilers, deter intrusion on sets, and thwart potential by competitors seeking to anticipate market trends or replicate elements. This strategy is especially prevalent in franchise films or sequels where public interest could compromise creative secrecy or inflate production costs through heightened location fees. Techniques for these decoy titles often involve selecting absurd, innocuous, or entirely unrelated names to deflect curiosity, such as referencing everyday objects, food items, or generic phrases that bear no resemblance to the project's genre or theme. For instance, producers might opt for titles evoking low-stakes scenarios like documentaries or romantic comedies to masquerade blockbuster superhero narratives. These choices not only confuse onlookers but also facilitate discreet permitting and hiring by blending into routine industry activities. Notable examples illustrate this practice's effectiveness. The 1983 film Return of the Jedi was produced under the title "Blue Harvest: Horror Beyond Imagination," a faux low-budget horror project that minimized fan gatherings and kept location costs down during outdoor shoots in California and forests. Similarly, Christopher Nolan's 2008 The Dark Knight filmed in Chicago as "Rory's First Kiss," a seemingly innocuous teen romance title that aimed to obscure the Batman sequel's high-profile cast and action sequences, though it ultimately drew some speculation. James Cameron's 1997 Titanic used "Planet Ice" to film key iceberg sequences off Nova Scotia without alerting rival studios to the epic historical drama's scale. In the fantasy realm, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) went by "Incident on 57th Street" during London production, drawing from a Bruce Springsteen song to evade the wizarding franchise's rabid followers. The use of such decoy titles has intensified since around , coinciding with the explosion of platforms that amplify leaks from cast, crew, or set visitors, prompting studios to layer additional anonymity measures like nondisclosure agreements and controlled information flows. This evolution reflects broader industry adaptations to digital scrutiny, ensuring that even preliminary production details remain shielded until official reveals. Working titles, being provisional and temporary designations used during the creative development process, generally do not qualify for protection. Under U.S. law, safeguards original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium, but short phrases, names, and titles—including working titles—are explicitly excluded from such protection as they lack the requisite and substantiality. This provisional status means that working titles offer no automatic legal shield against unauthorized use, potentially leading to conflicts if they are leaked or adopted prematurely by others in the industry. Trademark considerations add another layer of complexity for working titles, as they may inadvertently infringe on existing registered marks if they resemble established brands, particularly in contexts. While single-work titles are typically not registrable as trademarks—since they do not function as source identifiers for ongoing goods or services—producers must conduct clearance searches to avoid claims of or dilution. The U.S. Copyright Office reinforces that titles per se are non-protectable, shifting reliance to for any branding potential once a title is finalized and commercialized. Disputes arising from working title overlaps have occurred, particularly in franchise developments like 2000s comic book adaptations, where provisional names risked confusion with pre-existing properties. For instance, in the case involving the film (1999, with sequels in the 2000s), courts ruled that the title did not constitute trademark use for a single motion picture, allowing coexistence despite potential overlaps but highlighting the need for early legal vetting in adaptation-heavy genres. These disputes underscore the risks of title recycling in crowded IP landscapes. In international co-productions involving EU entities, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires careful handling of personal data in associated documents, such as those containing collaborator information, to ensure compliance during cross-border sharing.

Marketing and Production Implications

Working titles play a crucial role in enhancing production efficiency by serving as a provisional identifier that facilitates communication and coordination among producers, writers, directors, and crew members throughout the development and filming phases. This shared reference point allows teams to reference the project without committing to a final name, reducing confusion in early stages where scripts and storyboards are frequently revised. However, transitioning from a working title to the official one demands structured protocols, such as updating production logs, call sheets, and digital assets, to prevent discrepancies that could lead to errors in post-production credits or promotional materials. In , working titles often contribute to building anticipation through controlled leaks or intentional teases, generating early buzz on and fan forums before the reveal of a more refined final title. For instance, cryptic working titles like "" for were designed to obscure details but, when speculated upon, sparked intrigue that amplified hype upon official announcements. This approach contrasts sharply with final title campaigns, which rely on polished branding, trailers, and testing to maximize broad appeal and box-office potential. Challenges arise when leaked working titles inadvertently spoil key plot elements, prompting fan backlash on platforms during the , a period marked by heightened online and spoiler sensitivity. Reactions to such leaks, including speculation around titles hinting at major character arcs in franchises like the , often led to heated debates and calls for greater secrecy, underscoring the tension between viral promotion and narrative protection. By 2025, advancements in analytics have introduced sophisticated methods for evaluating title viability, allowing studios to test working title concepts through , predictive modeling, and pre-release audience surveys to forecast market reception and refine selections early in production. These tools integrate linguistic features and historical to assess emotional and potential, enabling more data-driven transitions from provisional to final titles.

References

  1. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/working-title
  2. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-a-working-title-definition/
  3. https://legal-resources.uslegalforms.com/w/working-title-entertainment-law
  4. https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/explainer-meaning-and-usage-of-working-titles-in-films/story
  5. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/working-title
  6. https://www.yourdictionary.com/working-title
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/working-title_n
  8. https://inspiredbylifeandfiction.com/book-titles-do-authors-choose/
  9. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2016/05/25/title-fights/
  10. https://www.audible.com/blog/article-what-is-a-pseudonym-guide
  11. https://www.writersdigest.com/publishing-insights/how-and-when-should-writers-use-a-pen-name-or-pseudonym
  12. https://www.britannica.com/topic/publishing/The-flourishing-book-trade-1550-1800
  13. https://digitalausten.org/node/34
  14. https://janeaustens.house/online-exhibition/the-making-of-pride-and-prejudice/the-making-of-pride-and-prejudice-3/
  15. https://janeausteninvermont.blog/2018/04/06/a-something-ready-for-publication-the-publishing-journey-of-jane-austens-persuasion/
  16. https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-254
  17. https://writersinspire.org/content/victorian-publishing-history
  18. https://www.acmi.net.au/stories-and-ideas/early-hollywood-and-hays-code/
  19. https://www.britannica.com/art/Hays-Code
  20. https://www.britannica.com/art/history-of-film/The-war-years-and-post-World-War-II-trends
  21. http://www.filmreference.com/encyclopedia/Academy-Awards-Crime-Films/Co-productions-THE-POSTWAR-ERA.html
  22. https://www.britannica.com/art/New-Hollywood
  23. https://www.newwavefilm.com/international/new-hollywood.shtml
  24. https://www.finaldraft.com/blog/the-state-of-television-part-3-the-rise-of-streamers-and-the-opening-for-niche-programming
  25. https://www.businessinsider.com/fake-names-movies-use-to-stay-secret-undercover
  26. https://www.lucasfilm.com/news/history-in-objects-blue-harvest-crew-cap/
  27. https://screenrant.com/avengers-infinity-war-working-title/
  28. https://www.yourstoryfinder.com/blog/choose-a-working-title
  29. https://christine-ink.com/how-to-create-a-working-title-for-your-book/
  30. https://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/GW7J4WEKBVU25YEC
  31. https://www.beatlesbible.com/features/working-titles/
  32. https://nirvana-legacy.com/2013/01/09/sliver-rug-burn-nirvana-and-renamed-songs/
  33. https://www2.grammy.com/PDFs/Recording_Academy/Producers_And_Engineers/DAWGuidelineShort.pdf
  34. https://gamingbolt.com/half-lifes-possible-names-during-development-included-free-radical-crysis-and-fallout
  35. https://howlround.com/title-play
  36. https://dontsleepgfx.com/pages/ai-song-name-generator-create-unique-and-catchy-titles-for-your-music
  37. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/call-sheet-terminology/
  38. https://www.wrapbook.com/blog/sag-paperwork
  39. https://www.filmmakersproductionbible.com/the-production-bible/
  40. https://deadline.com/2025/11/michelle-monaghan-cast-netflix-hockey-drama-shawn-levy-1236614792/
  41. https://variety.com/2025/tv/global/charlie-brooker-crime-thriller-series-netflix-1236512584/
  42. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/52871/working-titles-14-popular-hollywood-movies
  43. https://www.cracked.com/image-pictofact-6160-15-sneaky-working-titles-used-by-uber-popular-films
  44. https://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/unprotected.html
  45. https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html
  46. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/global-guide/the-wtr-yearbook/2021/article/protection-of-titles-under-copyright-law-and-trademark-law
  47. https://www.forbes.com/sites/schuylermoore/2023/04/20/trademark-law-for-films/
  48. https://nadiadavari.com/can-film-or-television-project-titles-be-protected-do-copyright-and-trademark-law-protect-film-and-television-show-titles-if-not-how-does-the-entertainment-industry-solve-the-quandary/
  49. https://www.copyright.gov/engage/writers/
  50. https://www.spruson.com/names-of-films-trade-marks-or-not-trade-marks/
  51. https://copyrightlately.com/reuse-and-confuse-hollywoods-recycling-of-movie-titles/
  52. https://www.zerafa.com.mt/the-impact-of-data-protection-on-intellectual-property-in-filmmaking/
  53. https://beverlyboy.com/filmmaking/what-is-a-working-title-in-film/
  54. https://firemark.com/2018/04/19/using-a-title-thats-already-taken-entertainment-law-asked-answered/
  55. https://www.vox.com/2019/12/30/21004981/fandom-history-changes-corporate-marvel-veronica-mars-k-pop
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392564189_Hype_vs_Reality_Integrated_Sentiment_Analysis_and_Machine_Learning_for_Pre-Release_Movie_Revenue_Prediction
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875952125001235
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.