Young temperament
Young temperament
Main page

Young temperament

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
What are your thoughts?
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Young temperament

In music theory, Young temperament is one of the circulating temperaments described by Thomas Young in a letter dated 9 July 1799, to the Royal Society of London. The letter was read at the Society's meeting of 16 January 1800, and included in its Philosophical Transactions for that year. The temperaments are referred to individually as Young's first temperament and Young's second temperament, more briefly as Young's No. 1 and Young's No. 2, or with some other variations of these expressions.

Young argued that there were good reasons for choosing a temperament to make "the harmony most perfect in those keys which are the most frequently used", and presented his first temperament as a way of achieving this. He gave his second temperament as a method of "very simply" producing "nearly the same effect". However, Young did not include practical tuning instructions, and his proposals did not enter common tuning literature.

In his first temperament, Young (1800) chose to make the major third C-E wider than just by 1/4 of a syntonic comma (about 5 cents, Play), and the major third F-A (≈ B) wider than just by a full syntonic comma (about 22 cents, Play). He achieved the first by making each of the fifths C-G, G-D, D-A and A-E narrower than just by 3/16 of a syntonic comma, and the second by making each of the fifths F-C, C-G, G-D (E) and E-B perfectly just. The remaining fifths, E-B, B-F, B-F and F-C were all made the same size, chosen so that the circle of fifths would close – that is, so that the total span of all twelve fifths would be exactly seven octaves. The resulting fifths are narrower than just by about 1/12 of a syntonic comma, or 1.8 cents. The precise difference is 3/16 of a syntonic comma less than 1/4 of a Pythagorean comma, differing from an equal temperament fifth by only about 1/8 of a cent. The exact and approximate numerical sizes of the three types of fifth, in cents, are as follows:

Each of the major thirds in the resulting scale comprises four of these fifths less two octaves. If sj Def══ fj − 600 ( for j = 1, 2, 3 ) , the sizes of the major thirds can be conveniently expressed as in the second row of the table in Jorgensen (1991), Table 71-2, pp. 264-265. In these temperaments the intervals B-E, F-B, C-F, and G-C, here written as diminished fourths, are identical to the major thirds B-D, F-A, C-E, and G-B, respectively.

As can be seen from the third row of the table, the widths of the tonic major thirds of successive major keys around the circle of fifths increase by about 2 cents ( s2s1 or s3s2 ) to 4 cents ( s3s1 ) per step in either direction from the narrowest, in C major, to the widest, in F major.

The following table gives the pitch differences in cents between the notes of a chromatic scale tuned with Young's first temperament and those of one tuned with equal temperament, when the note A of each scale is assigned the same pitch.

In the second temperament, Young (1802) made each of the fifths F-C, C-G, G-E, E-B, B-F, and F-C perfectly just, while the fifths C-G, G-D, D-A, A-E, E-B, and B-F are each 1/6 of a Pythagorean (ditonic) comma narrower than just. The exact and approximate numerical sizes of these latter fifths, in cents, are given by:

f4 = 2600 − 1200 log2( 3 ) ≈ 698.04

See all
User Avatar
No comments yet.