Hubbry Logo
24 City24 CityMain
Open search
24 City
Community hub
24 City
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
24 City
24 City
24 City
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
24 City
Cannes Film Festival poster
Traditional Chinese二十四城記
Simplified Chinese二十四城记
Literal meaningstory of twenty-four city
Hanyu Pinyinèrshísì chéng jì
Directed byJia Zhangke
Written byJia Zhangke
Zhai Yongming
Produced byJia Zhangke
Shozo Ichiyama
Wang Hong
StarringJoan Chen
Lü Liping
Zhao Tao
Chen Jianbin
CinematographyYu Lik-wai
Wang Yu
Edited byLin Xudong
Kong Jinglei
Music byYoshihiro Hanno
Lim Giong
Distributed byMK2 Diffusion
Release dates
  • May 17, 2008 (2008-05-17) (Cannes)
  • March 6, 2009 (2009-03-06) (China)
Running time
107 minutes
CountryChina
LanguagesMandarin
Sichuanese
Shanghainese
Box office$396,044[1]

24 City (Chinese: 二十四城记) is a 2008 Chinese film directed and co-written by Jia Zhangke. The film follows three generations of characters in Chengdu (in the 1950s, the 1970s and the present) as a state-owned factory gives way to a modern apartment complex. The film was also known as The Story of 24 City during production.[2]

Production

[edit]

The apartment complex featured in the film is an actual development (also called "24 City") built on the former site of an airplane engine manufacturing facility.[3] Jia will also produce a documentary about the location.[4]

The film's narrative style is described by critics as a blend of fictive and documentary story-telling, and it consists of authentic interviews and fictive scenes delivered by actors (but presented in a documentary format).[5]

Release

[edit]

24 City made its debut shown in competition for the Palme d'Or at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival.[6] Film Comment, the official journal of the Film Society of Lincoln Center, listed the film at the end of 2008 as the second-best unreleased (without U.S. theatrical release) film of the year.[7]

Reception

[edit]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds a 89% approval rating based on 44 reviews, with an average score of 7.4/10. The consensus reads, "One of China's most talented directors blurs the lines between non-fiction, drama, and musical theater in this vivid portrait of a country in cultural flux."[8] On Metacritic, the film has an average score of 75 out of 100, based on 11 reviews, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[9]

The Hollywood Reporter called the film a "moving elegy to modern-day China" and said of the film's documentary strain that it "prevails to simple, yet emotionally reverberating effect".[10][11]

Time also reviewed the film favorably: "the film interweaves the political overview — of a city institution being torn down to be replaced by commercial and residential buildings — with personal anecdotes that are poignant and charming."[12]

Screen International states "the latest chapter in Jia Zhangke's chronicles of modern Chinese history is certain to reinforce the director's status as an international arthouse icon."[5]

The New York Times film critic Manohla Dargis gave the film a rave and stated "...the often amazing and intricately structured '24 City,' the latest from the Chinese director Jia Zhang-ke...shot in digital so sharp it looks hyper-real and projected digitally, the movie takes as its point of departure the closing of a state-owned munitions factory in southwest China... Mr. Jia is one of the most original filmmakers working today, creating movies about a country that seems like a sequel."[13]

Anthony Kaufman of IndieWire praised the film and states "Jia's masterful aesthetic remains consistent, mixing documentary and fiction with intriguing results."[14]

J. Hoberman of the Village Voice described the film as "so meaningfully framed that it could have been shot by Andy Warhol or Chantal Akerman", and called the film as one of the stand-outs of this year's films in competition at the Cannes Film Festival.[15]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

24 City

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
(Chinese: 二十四城记; pinyin: Èrshísì chéng jì) is a 2008 Chinese film written and directed by . The film examines the demolition of Factory 420, a state-owned plant in founded in 1958 for engine production, which is being razed to build a complex bearing the film's title. Blending documentary-style interviews with scripted monologues from actors such as , Lü Liping, and , it captures reflections from workers across three generations on personal losses, economic shifts, and China's transition from socialist industry to market-driven urbanization. Premiering at the , 24 City received acclaim for its innovative hybrid form and poignant portrayal of societal transformation, earning an 89% approval rating on from critics who praised its intimate evocation of historical upheaval. Jia's work, unburdened by overt state censorship, underscores the human cost of rapid modernization without romanticizing the past or the present.

Historical Context

Factory 420's Origins and Role in Chinese Industrialization

Factory 420, officially the Chengdu Engine Group, was established in October 1958 as a state-owned enterprise specializing in military aircraft engines and munitions production. This founding occurred during the initial phase of Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward campaign, which aimed to accelerate China's industrialization through mass mobilization and ambitious output targets, often at the expense of realistic planning and resource allocation. The factory's creation involved the secretive relocation of personnel, equipment, and technical expertise from Shenyang's Factory 111 (an aircraft engine repair facility) in northeast China to Chengdu in Sichuan Province, approximately 2,000 kilometers inland. This move was driven by strategic imperatives amid Cold War hostilities, including fears of preemptive strikes by the United States—following the Korean War—or the Soviet Union after the emerging Sino-Soviet split, prompting early efforts to disperse vital defense industries away from vulnerable coastal and border regions. The relocation exemplified China's pre-Third Front dispersal policies, with thousands of workers and their families transported southward to construct the facility amid the Great Leap Forward's fervor for rapid buildup. Construction proceeded at breakneck speed, aligning with national directives for self-reliant production of turbojet engines modeled on Soviet designs, such as early copies for MiG fighters, to reduce dependence on foreign technology. By the early , Factory 420 had become a of Maoist industrialization, around 30,000 workers and supporting a total community of approximately 100,000 including dependents, complete with on-site , schools, and services to sustain a closed-loop . This scale underscored the policy's emphasis on centralized, labor-intensive for national defense, contributing engines to like the J-5 and later indigenous models. However, the factory's origins reflected the Great Leap Forward's systemic inefficiencies, including overambitious quotas that strained supply chains and led to widespread resource misallocation across China's aviation sector. Forced labor mobilization and unrealistic timelines exacerbated human costs, with the broader campaign correlating to labor disruptions, equipment shortages, and contributions to the ensuing that claimed tens of millions of lives nationwide due to diverted agricultural resources and poor coordination. While Factory 420 achieved foundational output in military hardware, its early operations highlighted the pitfalls of ideologically driven haste over technical expertise, as evidenced by the aviation industry's stagnation in the late and early from duplicated efforts and inadequate testing protocols. These challenges persisted until post-1960 adjustments refocused on pragmatic development, though the factory's role in fostering domestic engine capabilities laid groundwork for later self-sufficiency despite ongoing technological gaps.

Operations During Key Political Eras

Factory 420, officially part of the Engine Group, was established in through the relocation of personnel and equipment from Shenyang's Factory 111 as part of China's early efforts to decentralize military-industrial production amid tensions. This move aligned with the Third Front campaign launched in 1964, which aimed to build self-sufficient industrial bases in the interior to safeguard against potential invasion, involving massive state investments exceeding the costs of the First Five-Year Plan and combined. The factory specialized in aircraft engine manufacturing for , employing up to 30,000 workers and supporting 100,000 family members in a self-contained compound, sustained by heavy subsidies that prioritized quantity over efficiency in line with Maoist autarky. Operations during the (1958–1962) were hampered by nationwide policy-driven disruptions, including unrealistic production quotas and resource misallocation that triggered famines and industrial shortfalls, diverting labor and materials from specialized sectors like to backyard furnaces and communal . The (1966–1976) further exacerbated underproduction through political purges, factional violence among workers, and ideological campaigns that sidelined technical expertise, resulting in widespread factory stoppages and worker hardships across state-owned enterprises, including those in the Third Front. These eras' emphasis on political loyalty over merit led to persistent gaps in technological advancement and output quality, with Third Front facilities like Factory 420 suffering from dispersed, under-equipped sites that prioritized concealment over productivity. Following Deng Xiaoping's 1978 reforms, Factory 420's state-owned model faced exposure to partial market pressures, revealing chronic inefficiencies such as overstaffing under the "" system, where lifetime employment discouraged innovation and productivity lagged behind global competitors. Bureaucratic inertia thwarted 1980s modernization efforts, including attempts at imports and enterprise , as centralized planning resisted and SOEs like Chengdu's struggled with outdated compared to market-oriented economies. By the , defense industry reforms under Zhu Rongji's SOE shakeout highlighted these vulnerabilities, with military factories burdened by redundant capacity and failure to adapt to dual-use civilian markets, setting the stage for eventual relocation without external scapegoating.

Closure and Urban Redevelopment

Factory 420, a state-owned aeronautics and munitions plant in Chengdu, ceased operations in the early 2000s amid China's transition to market-oriented reforms, which exposed the inefficiency of legacy state enterprises in competing globally. The facility, originally built in 1958 for military aircraft engine production, became unviable due to outdated technology and reduced demand for its specialized output following the contraction of military projects post-Cold War. By 2005, the Chinese government formally closed the site, initiating demolition and relocation of remaining functions to an industrial park in Chengdu's Xindu District by 2008. This decision aligned with broader economic restructuring, prioritizing resource reallocation to high-growth sectors over subsidizing non-competitive industries. The factory's prime urban land was auctioned for redevelopment into the "24 City" luxury apartment complex, symbolizing Chengdu's pivot toward real estate as an engine of urban expansion and middle-class housing. Completed in phases starting around 2008, the project transformed the 1.2 million square meter site into high-end residential towers, commercial spaces, and green areas, catering to China's burgeoning affluent population. This redevelopment contributed to Chengdu's urban sprawl, with the city's built-up area expanding by over 99 square kilometers from 1978 to the early 2010s at an average annual rate of 10.71 percent, facilitating housing for a rising middle class amid rapid industrialization. Worker impacts included pensions for retirees and reassignments for others, reflecting standard state enterprise restructuring protocols rather than mass . While exact figures for Factory 420's workforce—estimated in the thousands—are not publicly detailed, similar closures nationwide involved buyouts or transfers, enabling labor mobility to more productive sectors. These shifts were fiscally unsustainable alternatives to indefinite subsidies, as preserving inefficient factories would have drained resources needed for and private investment. Such closures underpinned China's post-1978 reforms, which achieved average annual GDP growth of 9.4 percent from 1978 to 2018 and lifted nearly 800 million people out of —over 75 percent of global reductions—by fostering market efficiencies over sentimental industrial preservation. Narratives portraying these changes solely as cultural loss overlook the causal link to prosperity: reallocating urban land from low-output to and services boosted Chengdu's , with provincial GDP surging alongside national trends, supporting broader alleviation through job creation in dynamic industries.

Synopsis

24 City depicts the ongoing demolition of Factory 420, a state-owned aeronautics plant in Chengdu founded in 1958 for military aircraft production and employing up to 30,000 workers at its peak. The film intercuts sequences of the site's physical destruction—bulldozers razing buildings and excavators dismantling structures—with a series of direct-to-camera interviews conducted on location. These interviews feature workers from three generations sharing personal accounts tied to the factory's history. Pioneers recount their 1950s migrations from eastern cities like to establish the facility, including arduous boat and train journeys and early operational challenges. Mid-generation interviewees describe experiences during the 1970s , such as internal purges and continued production demands. Younger workers from the 2000s discuss the factory's relocation and impending closure amid China's economic reforms, reflecting on job transitions and urban change. Anecdotes cover instances of worker through decades of service, family separations due to relocations, and adaptations to layoffs and redevelopment. The structure employs a docu-fiction hybrid, drawing from over 130 real interviews but incorporating four fictional monologues delivered by including as Su Na, as Gu Minhua, Lü Liping as Hao Dali, and as Zhao Gang, presented indistinguishably until post-credits text identifies the scripted elements.

Production

Development and Research

Jia Zhangke conceived 24 City after learning of the impending demolition of Factory 420, a state-owned military aircraft plant in Chengdu, through a news report in 2007. This discovery aligned with his prior work documenting China's rapid urbanization and social upheavals, as seen in Still Life (2006), which explored displacement caused by the Three Gorges Dam project. To develop the film, Zhangke partnered with former workers and their families, conducting months of interviews to collect firsthand oral histories that emphasized personal experiences over state-sanctioned accounts. These interviews, numbering in the dozens and focused on empirical testimonies from multiple generations, provided the raw material for the film's structure, with unscripted elements later published in collections like Interviews with Chinese Workers. Zhangke's research also involved collaboration with Factory 420 representatives, facilitating access to site details and partial financial support from the facility itself. The project was financed primarily through Zhangke's production company, XStream Pictures, in association with Office Kitano, enabling an independent approach unbound by large studio oversight. This phase prioritized verifiable worker narratives to capture the factory's role in China's industrialization, from its 1958 establishment as a secretive munitions site to its obsolescence amid economic reforms.

Filming Techniques and Docu-Fiction Hybrid

The film 24 City was shot on high-definition during in in , utilizing a aesthetic with extended long takes and available natural lighting to convey unscripted immediacy and site-specific realism. This approach featured a small production crew to minimize intrusion and preserve raw authenticity in capturing the factory site's decay, including intercut sequences of ongoing —bulldozers razing structures amid lingering industrial remnants—juxtaposed against fixed-camera interviews conducted in sparse interiors or outdoor settings. The docu-fiction hybrid structure integrates genuine oral histories from former Factory 420 employees with scripted performances by professional actors, a blend justified as reflecting how "history is always a blend of facts and imagination," intended to evoke the subjective fragmentation of personal and . However, the absence of upfront disclosure about fictional elements—revealed only in the —creates an initial documentary illusion that invites criticism for potential viewer manipulation, distinguishing it from unalloyed observational documentaries like Yung Chang's Up the (2007), which eschew actors entirely.

Casting Choices

24 City features a hybrid casting strategy that intertwines genuine interviews with non-professional former Factory 420 workers and scripted performances by established portraying fictionalized figures inspired by real accounts. Director drew from approximately 130 interviews with ex-employees, incorporating testimonies from four to five anonymous real workers who deliver personal histories to evoke authenticity. These individuals, appearing without names or credits as , recount lived experiences of labor, migration, and during the factory's operations from the onward. Complementing these are four professional actors embodying invented characters that parallel the documentary elements, emphasizing the film's docu-fiction construct. plays Su Na, a contemporary navigating urban flux; portrays Gu Minhua, a relocated employee from reflecting on mid-century sacrifices; Lü Liping depicts Hao Dali, an elderly figure tied to the factory's foundational era via arduous journeys; and enacts Zhao Gang, representing generational continuity. Jia selected these performers for their ability to infuse emotional resonance into monologues scripted from interview-derived narratives, without prioritizing individual stardom in an ensemble format. This approach aligns with Jia's preference for collaborative, research-grounded ensembles over conventional leads, as the actors' roles—intercut seamlessly with real interviews—intentionally obscure boundaries between fact and fabrication to heighten the portrayal's constructed quality. The inclusion of internationally recognized talent like adds layers of interpretive depth drawn from the actors' own backgrounds, yet remains subordinated to the collective mosaic of worker stories.

Themes and Analysis

Generational Narratives and Personal Memory

The film 24 City constructs its generational narratives through a series of monologues and interviews with workers whose personal recollections span the factory's operational history from its establishment in 1958 to its impending demolition around 2008, illustrating how individual memories anchor perceptions of broader historical shifts. Pioneering workers, often from the factory's early years, recount experiences tied to verifiable events such as the mid-1960s relocation from to amid national defense priorities, evoking a sense of collective pride in contributing to the nation's industrial foundation despite material privations. These accounts reveal the psychological primacy of causal personal involvement in shaping historical , where older narrators emphasize sacrifices and achievements in building the facility from rudimentary conditions, fostering a of enduring to the state enterprise. In contrast, middle-generation workers express disillusionment with the factory's decline, their memories blending for communal stability with frustration over eroding , as the that defined their identities faces . Younger characters, representing post-reform cohorts, perceive the factory as an outdated relic disconnected from contemporary aspirations, their briefer tenures yielding detached reflections that prioritize individual mobility over institutional legacy. Empirically grounded in events like the founding for aviation engine production, these narratives underscore 's subjective filtering, where recollections selectively amplify formative traumas or triumphs—such as relocation hardships—while downplaying intervening adaptations, thereby distorting causal attributions of the factory's trajectory from vitality to redundancy. The film's structure thus exposes how personal mediates historical continuity, with each generation's bias toward its own era's immediacies revealing not as neutral archive but as an interpretive lens prone to affective distortion.

Economic Transformation and Social Displacement

The closure of Chengdu's Factory 420, depicted in 24 City as a poignant emblem of industrial obsolescence, exemplifies the inefficiencies inherent in China's pre-reform state-owned enterprises (SOEs), where lifetime employment—known as the "iron rice bowl"—fostered complacency and stifled productivity. Established in 1958 as part of the "Third Front" military-industrial push, the factory produced aircraft components under a planned economy that prioritized ideological conformity over market incentives, resulting in chronic overstaffing and technological lag. SOE reforms initiated in the mid-1990s dismantled such structures, relocating Factory 420 to Chengdu's Xindu District by 2008 and repurposing its central urban site for residential development, thereby unlocking land value for higher-yield uses. This transformation mirrored China's broader pivot from central planning to market-oriented policies post-1978, yielding sustained GDP growth averaging over 9% annually through the , which propelled and consumer expansion. While the film emphasizes the emotional toll of displacement—evoking lost proletarian camaraderie—the reforms' causal impact was net prosperity: SOE restructuring released labor into dynamic private sectors, boosting and firm creation, with private employment surging from minimal shares to dominating urban jobs by 2017. Layoffs exceeded 34 million by the late , yet efficiency gains in reformed SOEs raised wages by over 20% in many cases, and overall plummeted, lifting over 800 million from extreme deprivation through expanded opportunities in services and . Social costs, including community erosion and initial unemployment spikes, were real but mitigated by policy safeguards like severance, pensions, and retraining, which facilitated reabsorption into a labor market adding millions of urban jobs annually amid rapid city expansion. Narratives romanticizing SOE-era solidarity often overlook the planned economy's stagnation, where Maoist policies entrenched widespread poverty and famine risks, contrasting sharply with reform-driven agency for workers to pursue market-based livelihoods and material gains. The redevelopment into luxury housing like 24 City thus catalyzed not mere gentrification but a causal chain toward elevated living standards, underscoring how market liberalization supplanted inefficiency with adaptive urban economies.

Stylistic Elements and Realism

Jia Zhangke employs long takes in 24 City to structure interviews that emulate oral histories, allowing subjects—both real former workers and actors portraying fictional ones—to recount personal narratives at length, thereby preserving the unhurried rhythm of memory recollection. These extended shots, influenced by directors like and , emphasize duration over acceleration, countering China's compressed temporal shifts while inviting viewer contemplation. However, the static framing in many sequences, such as frontal compositions of workers or establishing shots mimicking still photography, confines the visual field to isolated figures and interiors, potentially restricting depiction of the factory's wider spatial and social dynamics. Demolition montages sequence images of the factory's ruins with a hypnotic color palette—featuring jade-green and azure-blue tones—to symbolize industrial impermanence and urban erasure, integrating textual overlays like poems and documents for layered historical resonance. Shot on by cinematographer , the film achieves a raw, glossy aesthetic that captures contemporary flux without the grit of , yet this polished digital sheen can aestheticize decay, softening environmental harshness like for visual clarity. The film's realism derives from its basis in authentic locations, including the actual 420 Factory site undergoing redevelopment, and draws from over 130 real worker interviews distilled into the narrative core. Yet the deliberate insertion of fiction—four scripted monologues by actors like , intercut with five genuine testimonies—undermines claims of documentary purity, as the hybrid form diverges from by incorporating artifice to probe surreal societal realities rather than unmediated observation. Unlike Hollywood documentaries that often rely on narration for guidance, 24 City eschews explanatory frameworks, employing , , and visual cues to compel viewer inference, though this restraint risks elevating stylized emotional provocation over verifiable historical detail, with scripted segments appearing less viscerally compelling than unscripted ones.

Release

Premiere and Festival Circuit

24 City had its world premiere at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival, screening in the In Competition section on May 17. This appearance marked a significant step in director Jia Zhangke's international recognition, following his Golden Lion win for Still Life in 2006, though specific attendance figures for the screening remain undocumented in primary reports. The film's hybrid docu-fiction style drew early attention from festival programmers for its exploration of China's industrial shifts. The U.S. debut followed at the in October 2008, during the event's run from September 26 to October 12. Screenings there highlighted Jia's evolving approach to blending real interviews with scripted performances, positioning the film within the festival's focus on innovative global cinema. Additional festival circuit appearances included the in late October 2008. Internationally, 24 City saw limited arthouse screenings across and from late 2008 into 2009, reflecting its niche appeal rather than wide commercial rollout. In , domestic release occurred after exposure, amid the standard state review process for independent works, though no detail explicit delays specific to this production. These engagements underscored Jia's growing profile in art-house circuits, with modest audience reach typical for non-mainstream Chinese films.

Theatrical and Home Media Distribution

In the United States, 24 City received a distributed by Cinema Guild, opening on June 5, , primarily in arthouse venues such as the in New York. This rollout targeted niche audiences interested in independent international cinema, reflecting the film's docu-fiction style and lack of broad commercial draw. Home media distribution followed in early 2010 with a Region 1 DVD release from Cinema Guild on January 12, including supplementary materials like a making-of featurette. Blu-ray editions emerged later, often bundled in retrospective collections such as Arrow Academy's Three Films by in 2018 and 2020, which paired 24 City with later works like and . Streaming availability has remained restricted to specialized platforms, including the Criterion Channel and , underscoring its archival rather than mass-market status. In , the film secured domestic approval and premiered theatrically on March 6, 2009, nearly a year after its Cannes debut, through state-permitted channels without reported cuts or bans. This timing aligned with regulatory review processes for independent productions, allowing Jia Zhangke's examination of closure to reach local screens in a subdued manner, distinct from high-grossing domestic blockbusters. Globally, distribution emphasized arthouse circuits and festival-adjacent markets, with no wide international theatrical push, as the film's introspective focus on urban transition limited its appeal beyond specialized viewership.

Reception and Legacy

Critical Evaluations

Critics widely acclaimed 24 City for its poignant depiction of China's rapid industrialization and the human costs of urban transformation, with the film's hybrid docu-fiction style praised for innovating narrative forms to blend personal testimonies with staged performances. The New York Times highlighted how the actors' "existential realities" in short vignettes evoke deep emotions tied to the factory's closure, capturing the erasure of workers' past amid modernization. Similarly, The Guardian described it as "austere realist poetry," initially resembling an unadorned oral-history project that subtly reveals its fictional elements, enhancing reflection on memory and loss. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an 89% approval rating from 45 reviews, reflecting broad consensus on its stylistic restraint and emotional resonance in portraying societal flux. However, some evaluations expressed reservations about the blurring of fact and , which can create emotional distance rather than immersion, as the revelation of scripted segments disrupts the authenticity. aggregates show 64% positive reviews but include 27% mixed and 9% negative, with critics like those at noting an overriding "stench of " and pervasive melancholy that borders on elegiac excess, potentially sentimentalizing displacement without sufficient counterbalance. Chinese perspectives, less amplified in Western discourse, have critiqued the film for softening the anti-capitalist implications of factory closures by underemphasizing the tangible successes of economic reforms, such as the relocation enabling new opportunities amid broader alleviation. This aligns with a in international criticism favoring narratives of "oppressed workers" over empirical metrics like China's GDP per capita rising from $156 in 1978 to over $10,000 by 2008, which drove the very transformations depicted. The film's reception underscores a Western critical tendency to prioritize nostalgic loss—evident in emphases on broken traditions—while sidelining causal drivers of progress, such as state-led that, despite social disruptions, generated widespread employment shifts and urban migration benefiting hundreds of millions. Such biases in outlets like Variety and , which lauded the microcosmic view of tidal changes without quantifying net gains, may inflate acclaim for at the expense of balanced realism. Overall, while 24 City excels in stylistic and intimate portraits, its evaluations reveal divides between empathetic and demands for unflinching appraisal of reform's dual edges.

Awards and Academic Impact

24 City competed in the main competition section of the , where it was nominated for the but did not win. The film also garnered two nominations at the , including for Best Film, reflecting recognition within regional cinema circles, though it secured no victories there. Additional accolades included a win at the Chinese Film Media Awards, underscoring its appreciation among domestic critics for blending and elements. In academic discourse, 24 City has been examined for its innovative docu-fiction approach, which interweaves scripted with real interviews to explore themes of and industrial decline. Scholarly analyses, such as those in Asian Cinema journal, highlight its role in challenging genre boundaries and prompting discussions on authenticity in Chinese filmmaking. The film appears in studies on , with works like those in Sino-American Studies addressing its depiction of spatial transformations and generational shifts amid China's economic reforms. JSTOR-indexed articles further dissect its temporal structure, using elevated gate shots to demarcate historical eras and personal recollections. As part of Jia Zhangke's , 24 City endures as a key text in examinations of post-socialist and factory closures, influencing debates on and commemoration in cinema. However, its broader cultural footprint remains confined to arthouse audiences and academic settings, with limited penetration into mainstream global cinema; recent as of 2025 continue to affirm its niche relevance without evidence of widespread emulation or popular revival.

Cultural and Economic Reflections

The film 24 City reflects 's cultural evolution over approximately 50 years, chronicling the shift from the state-directed communal labor of Factory 420—founded in 1958 for military aircraft engine production and peaking with 30,000 workers and 100,000 dependents—to the consumer-oriented individualism of post-reform urban life. This generational arc, captured through worker testimonies, evokes a sentimental attachment to the factory's role in national self-reliance during the era, yet such nostalgia causally underweights the structural inefficiencies of state-owned enterprises, which prioritized ideological output over economic viability until the 1978 reforms initiated market liberalization. Economically, the 2008 relocation of Factory 420 to Chengdu's Xindu District and the subsequent redevelopment of its central site into the 24 City complex illustrate resource reallocation's tangible gains, transforming obsolete industrial land into a mixed-use hub of luxury apartments, offices, and retail that has bolstered Chengdu's skyline and attracted higher-income residents. This mirrors broader causal dynamics of China's post-1978 trajectory, where reforms spurred average annual GDP growth above 9%, enabling poverty alleviation for over 800 million while rendering legacy factories like 420 uncompetitive amid globalized shifts. from Chengdu's property sector, including surging sales of high-end units exceeding CNY 10 million each in comparable projects, affirms the commercial success of such transitions, housing affluent populations and generating sustained revenue streams that state preservation could not. The film's hybrid style provokes debate on industrial heritage versus developmental progress, with its documentation validating privatization's role in averting stagnation—contrasting biased media portrayals that frame closures as worker exploitation without acknowledging uplift from . Mainstream outlets, often inclined toward left-leaning emphases on social disruption, underplay how these changes have empirically elevated living standards, as seen in Chengdu's integration of former factory sites into thriving districts like 24 City, which prioritize market-driven efficiency over sentimental relic status.

Controversies

Fact-Fiction Blurring and Ethical Concerns

The film 24 City structures its narrative around eight direct-to-camera interviews with purported former employees of Factory 420, a state-owned military plant in being demolished for luxury apartments, without upfront disclosure that four of these are scripted performances by professional portraying invented characters. The remaining four interviews feature genuine ex-workers recounting lived experiences of the factory's from the onward. This hybrid approach, blending verifiable oral histories with fabricated testimonies, is only clarified in the end credits, prompting immediate debate at its premiere in May 2008 over the deliberate withholding of genre markers from audiences expecting a pure . Critics have raised ethical objections centered on the potential to undermine viewer trust in documentary-style personal narratives, particularly when evoking real socio-economic dislocations like those tied to China's state-led industrialization and its reversal. Unlike explicitly labeled docufictions—such as those by directors who fictional segments upfront—Jia Zhangke's method invites audiences to infer authenticity from the interview format and unadorned presentation, which some argue risks conflating artifice with empirical testimony in a manner that could desensitize perceptions of genuine hardship. Director Jia defended the technique as reflective of how "history is always a blend of facts and imagination," positing that scripted elements better capture elusive emotional truths inaccessible through alone. In the Chinese context, where state oversight limits open on industrial legacies and displacement, detractors including avant-garde intellectuals have labeled the film's approach manipulative, accusing it of diluting subversive potential by prioritizing aesthetic evocation over unvarnished evidence, thereby softening critique of official narratives. Proponents counter that the intermingling mirrors memory's inherent unreliability, allowing hybrid forms to ritualize collective loss without falsifying events, though this defense has not quelled concerns over precedents for viewer deception in politically fraught terrains.

Interpretations of Political Subversion

Interpretations of the film's political stance often center on its portrayal of the transition from state-owned enterprises under Maoist communism to market-driven reforms, with some analysts viewing it as a veiled critique of capitalism's disruptive effects. Critics such as those in academic have highlighted the narratives of worker displacement and loss of communal security at Factory 420, interpreting these as indictments of the human costs associated with Deng Xiaoping's starting in 1978, which prioritized efficiency over lifetime employment guarantees. Such readings, common in , the film's "subversive" elements for humanizing the casualties of , akin to Jia's earlier independent works like (1997) that challenged state narratives without approval. However, Jia's production context post-2000s reveals a shift toward state alignment, as 24 City received official approval and partial funding from the factory's redevelopment firm, Xintiancheng Group, contrasting his prior underground films made without clearance. This collaboration suggests the film constructs a controlled for the Mao era's life—evident in interviewees' reminiscences of collective hardships romanticized as —while softening depictions of that period's documented famines and purges, such as the Great Leap Forward's estimated 30-45 million deaths from 1958-1962. Analysts note this as abandoning Jia's earlier radicalism for a palatable that glorifies the socialist without contesting the state's reformist trajectory, framing closure not as ideological defeat but as inevitable progress. From a causal perspective grounded in , the film's emphasis on individual losses underplays the reforms' aggregate benefits, including lifting approximately 800 million out of between 1978 and 2018 through reallocation of resources from inefficient like Factory 420 to higher-productivity sectors. The factory's 2000s demolition for luxury housing exemplified broader restructuring, which boosted 's GDP growth from 9.8% annually in the 1980s-2000s, enabling its emergence as the world's second-largest economy by 2010, rather than perpetuating subsidized stagnation. Left-leaning interpretations in media and academia, prone to systemic biases favoring critiques of market disruption over empirical outcomes, often normalize the film as anti-capitalist , yet evidence of Jia's state-sanctioned approach and the reforms' verifiable causal role in national advancement rebut such claims as selective disconnected from broader causal realism.

References

  1. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1103963/
  2. https://www.criterionchannel.com/24-city
  3. https://www.cinemaguild.com/homevideo/ess_24city.htm
  4. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/24_city
  5. https://www.artforum.com/columns/jia-zhang-kes-24-city-190846/
  6. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/cegc.htm
  7. https://sphere-art.com/en/life/408/Mumian-Chengdu-was-Based-on-the-Inspiration-of-Engraving-the-Area%25E2%2580%2599s-Historical-and-Cultural-Essence-into-the-Hotel-to-Unveil-a-Brand-New-Chapter
  8. https://roxie.com/film/24-city/
  9. https://alphahistory.com/chineserevolution/great-leap-forward/
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/maos-third-front/introduction/3C5279A6756FDCFE2906152518EF4077
  11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24777809
  12. https://www.britannica.com/event/Great-Leap-Forward
  13. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/eastasiapacific/reflections-on-forty-years-of-china-reforms
  14. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/portals/68/documents/books/force-multiplier.pdf
  15. http://www.china.org.cn/culture/2009-03/13/content_17437934.htm
  16. https://jonathanrosenbaum.net/2024/09/chinese-displacements-in-24-city/
  17. https://brill.com/view/journals/sime/3/1-2/article-p76_6.xml
  18. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues8/index.htm
  19. https://www.archdaily.com/367839/films-and-architecture-24-city
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670715000244
  21. https://www.cato.org/publications/chinas-post-1978-economic-development-entry-global-trading-system
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10358941/
  23. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience
  24. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview
  25. https://www.amro-asia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Chinas-Reform-and-Opening-Up_compressed.pdf
  26. https://cinemaguild.com/homevideo/ess_24city.htm
  27. https://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/movies/24-city-is-an-affecting-blend-of-fiction-reality-about-displaced-chinese-workers/
  28. https://reverseshot.org/reviews/entry/935/24_city
  29. https://www.npr.org/2009/06/04/104779697/24-city-chinas-tidal-changes-in-microcosm
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/movies/05twen.html
  31. https://www.alternateending.com/2008/10/chicago-international-film-festival-08-24-city-jia-hong-kongchina.html
  32. https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/feature/2008-10-07-jia-zhang-ke-press-conference-on-24-city-feature-story-by-amber-wilkinson
  33. https://escholarship.org/content/qt02x9977w/qt02x9977w.pdf
  34. https://variety.com/2008/film/markets-festivals/24-city-1200522364/
  35. https://brill.com/view/journals/sime/3/1-2/article-p76_6.xml?language=en
  36. https://www.ifccenter.com/films/24-city/
  37. https://www.chinaindiefilm.org/8058/
  38. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/apr/29/24-city-review
  39. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-monde-chinois-2019-1-page-85?lang=en
  40. https://www.academia.edu/30494555/Reading_docufiction_Jia_Zhangkes_24_City
  41. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/context/masters_theses/article/1133/viewcontent/Thesis_Final_SL__Unsigned_.pdf
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309539660_Memories_in_Performance_Commemoration_and_the_Commemorative_Experience_in_Jia_Zhangke%27s_24_City
  43. https://brill.com/view/journals/sime/3/1-2/article-p76_6.pdf
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298850644_Time_History_and_Memory_in_Jia_Zhangke%27s_24_City
  45. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/film.2016.0015
  46. https://rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2019/dec/pdf/long-term-growth-in-china.pdf
  47. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/reluctant-entrepreneurs-evidence-chinas-state-controlled-enterprise-reform
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167629618309664
  49. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/economichistory/2025/05/23/winners-and-losers-from-chinas-soe-reforms/
  50. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/EAP/China/Urban-China-SRs4-7.pdf
  51. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/bdadc16a4f5c1c88a839c0f905cde802-0070012022/original/Poverty-Synthesis-Report-final.pdf
  52. https://www.filmcomment.com/article/jia-zhangke-interview/
  53. https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2011/feature-articles/the-quest-for-memory-documentary-and-fiction-in-jia-zhangke%E2%80%99s-films/
  54. https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/2008/in-competition-24-city-by-jia-zhangke/
  55. https://www.meniscuszine.com/articles/20081215982/movie-review-jia-zhang-kes-24-city/
  56. http://www.edrants.com/nyff-24-city-2008/
  57. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jun/16/chinese-film-director-hits-censorship
  58. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/24-city/
  59. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/arts/31weekahead.html
  60. https://www.yesasia.com/us/24-city-dvd-us-version/1023162464-0-0-0-en/info.html
  61. https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Three-Films-by-Jia-Zhangke-Blu-ray/272594/
  62. https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/24-city
  63. https://www.kanopy.com/product/24-city
  64. https://letterboxd.com/film/24-city/
  65. https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/mar/31/documentary-fiction
  66. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/24-city/critic-reviews/
  67. https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/24-city-2009/
  68. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1103963/awards/
  69. http://www.cctv.com/english/special/cannes61/20080523/105063.shtml
  70. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17508061.2014.949156
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299427936_Ruin_in_the_films_of_Jia_Zhangke
  72. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17508061.2025.2521977
  73. https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/chinas-second-tier-cities-see-high-property-sales-as-market-confidence-rebounds
  74. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/24-city-rises-southeast-chengdu/35111/
  75. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/05/11/the-long-shot
  76. https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2011/feature-articles/the-quest-for-memory-documentary-and-fiction-in-jia-zhangke%25E2%2580%2599s-films/
  77. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/e09d98d4-5b4a-4808-8f30-13a2194e95ae/download
  78. https://www.filmcomment.com/article/a-touch-of-sin-jia-zhang-ke/
  79. https://girishshambu.net/2012/01/criticism-and-context-jia-zhangke.html
  80. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/languagestextssociety/documents/lts-journal/issue-2/nostalgia-in-urban-cinema-language-texts-society-issue-2.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.