Hubbry Logo
Amartya SenAmartya SenMain
Open search
Amartya Sen
Community hub
Amartya Sen
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Amartya Kumar Sen (Bengali: [ˈɔmortːo ˈʃen]; born 3 November 1933) is an Indian American economist and philosopher. Sen has taught and worked in England and the United States since 1972. In 1998, Sen received the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to welfare economics.[6] He has also made major scholarly contributions to social choice theory, economic and social justice, economic theories of famines, decision theory, development economics, public health, and the measures of well-being of countries.

Key Information

Sen is currently the Thomas W. Lamont University Professor, and Professor of Economics and Philosophy, at Harvard University.[7] He previously served as Master of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge.[8] In 1999, he received India's highest civilian honour, Bharat Ratna, for his contribution to welfare economics. The German Publishers and Booksellers Association awarded him the 2020 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade for his pioneering scholarship addressing issues of global justice and combating social inequality in education and healthcare.

Early life and education

[edit]
'Pratichi', Sen's house in Shantiniketan

Amartya Sen was born on 3 November 1933 in a Bengali[9][10][11][12][13][14] family in Santiniketan, Bengal, British India. The first Asian to win a Nobel Prize,[15] the polymath and writer Rabindranath Tagore, gave Amartya Sen his name (Bengali: অমর্ত্য, romanized: ômorto, lit. 'immortal or heavenly').[16][17] Sen's family was from Wari and Manikganj, Dhaka, both in present-day Bangladesh. His father, Ashutosh Sen, was a Professor of Chemistry at Dhaka University, then the Development Commissioner in Delhi and then Chairman of the West Bengal Public Service Commission. Sen moved with his family to West Bengal in 1945. Sen's mother, Amita Sen, was the daughter of Kshiti Mohan Sen, the eminent Sanskritist and scholar of ancient and medieval India. Sen's maternal grandfather was a close associate of Tagore. K.M. Sen served as the second Vice-Chancellor of Visva Bharati University from 1953 to 1954.[18]

Sen began his school education at St Gregory's School in Dhaka in 1940. In the fall of 1941, he was admitted to Patha Bhavana, Santiniketan, where he completed his school education. The school had many progressive features, such as distaste for examinations or competitive testing. In addition, the school stressed cultural diversity, and embraced cultural influences from the rest of the world.[19] In 1951, he went to Presidency College, Calcutta, where he earned a BA in economics with First in the First Class, with a minor in Mathematics, as a graduating student of the University of Calcutta. While at Presidency, Sen was diagnosed with oral cancer, and given a 15 per cent chance of living five years.[20] With radiation treatment, he survived, and in 1953 he moved to Trinity College, Cambridge, where he earned a second BA in economics in 1955 with a first class, topping the list as well. At this time, he was elected President of the Cambridge Majlis.[21] While Sen was officially a PhD student at Cambridge (though he had finished his research in 1955–56), he was offered the position of First-Professor and First-Head of the Economics Department of the newly created Jadavpur University in Calcutta. Appointed to the position at age 22, he is still the youngest chairman to have headed the Department of Economics. He served in that position, starting the new Economics Department, from 1956 to 1958.[22]

Meanwhile, Sen was elected to a Prize Fellowship at Trinity College, which gave him four years to study any subject; he made the decision to study philosophy. Sen explained: "The broadening of my studies into philosophy was important for me not just because some of my main areas of interest in economics relate quite closely to philosophical disciplines (for example, social choice theory makes intense use of mathematical logic and also draws on moral philosophy, and so does the study of inequality and deprivation), but also because I found philosophical studies very rewarding on their own."[23] His interest in philosophy, however, dates back to his college days at Presidency, where he read books on philosophy and debated philosophical themes. One of the books he was most interested in was Kenneth Arrow's Social Choice and Individual Values.[24]

In Cambridge, there were major debates between supporters of Keynesian economics, and the neo-classical economists who were sceptical of Keynes. Because of a lack of enthusiasm for social choice theory in both Trinity and Cambridge, Sen chose a different subject for his PhD thesis, which was on "The Choice of Techniques" in 1959. The work had been completed earlier, except for advice from his adjunct supervisor in India, A. K. Dasgupta, given to Sen while teaching and revising his work at Jadavpur, under the supervision of the "brilliant but vigorously intolerant" post-Keynesian Joan Robinson.[25] Quentin Skinner notes that Sen was a member of the secret society Cambridge Apostles during his time at Cambridge.[26]

During 1960–61, Amartya Sen visited the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, on leave from Trinity College.[27]

Research work

[edit]
Sen giving inaugural parliamentary lecture at Parliament House (India)

Social choice theory

[edit]

Sen's work on 'Choice of Techniques' complemented that of Maurice Dobb. In a developing country, the Dobb-Sen strategy relied on maximising investible surpluses, maintaining constant real wages and using the entire increase in labour productivity, due to technological change, to raise the rate of accumulation. In other words, workers were expected to demand no improvement in their standard of living despite having become more productive. Sen's papers in the late 1960s and early 1970s helped develop the theory of social choice, which first came to prominence in the work by the American economist Kenneth Arrow. Arrow had most famously shown that when voters have three or more distinct alternatives (options), any ranked order voting system will in at least some situations inevitably conflict with what many assume to be basic democratic norms. Sen's contribution to the literature was to show under what conditions Arrow's impossibility theorem[28] applied, as well as to extend and enrich the theory of social choice, informed by his interests in history of economic thought and philosophy.[citation needed]

Poverty and Famines (1981)

[edit]

In 1981, Sen published Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (1981), a book in which he argued that famine occurs not only from a lack of food, but from inequalities built into mechanisms for distributing food. Sen also argued that the Bengal famine was caused by an urban economic boom that raised food prices, thereby causing millions of rural workers to starve to death when their wages did not keep up.[29] In 1999 he wrote, "no famine has ever taken place ... in a functioning democracy".[30]

In addition to his important work on the causes of famines, Sen's work in the field of development economics has had considerable influence in the formulation of the "Human Development Report",[31] published by the United Nations Development Programme.[32] This annual publication that ranks countries on a variety of economic and social indicators owes much to the contributions by Sen among other social choice theorists in the area of economic measurement of poverty and inequality.[31]

"Equality of What?" (1979)

[edit]

Sen's revolutionary contribution to development economics and social indicators is the concept of "capability" developed in his article "Equality of What?".[33] He argues that governments should be measured against the concrete capabilities of their citizens. This is because top-down development will always trump human rights as long as the definition of terms remains in doubt (is a "right" something that must be provided or something that simply cannot be taken away?). For instance, in the United States citizens have a right to vote. To Sen, this concept is fairly empty. In order for citizens to have a capacity to vote, they first must have "functionings". These "functionings" can range from the very broad, such as the availability of education, to the very specific, such as transportation to the polls. Only when such barriers are removed can the citizen truly be said to act out of personal choice. It is up to the individual society to make the list of minimum capabilities guaranteed by that society. For an example of the "capabilities approach" in practice, see Martha Nussbaum's Women and Human Development.[34]

"More than 100 Million Women Are Missing" (1990)

[edit]

He wrote a controversial article in The New York Review of Books entitled "More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing" (see Missing women of Asia), analysing the mortality impact of unequal rights between the genders in the developing world, particularly Asia.[35] Other studies, including one by Emily Oster, had argued that this is an overestimation, though Oster has since then recanted her conclusions.[36]

Development as Freedom (1999)

[edit]
Main article: Development as Freedom

In 1999, Sen further advanced and redefined the capability approach in his book Development as Freedom.[37] Sen argued that development should be viewed as an effort to advance the real freedoms that individuals enjoy, rather than simply focusing on metrics such as GDP or income-per-capita.

Sen was inspired by violent acts he had witnessed as a child leading up to the Partition of India in 1947. On one morning, a Muslim daily labourer named Kader Mia stumbled through the rear gate of Sen's family home, bleeding from a knife wound in his back. Because of his extreme poverty, he had come to Sen's primarily Hindu neighbourhood searching for work; his choices were the starvation of his family or the risk of death in coming to the neighbourhood. The price of Kader Mia's economic unfreedom was his death. Kader Mia need not have come to a hostile area in search of income in those troubled times if his family could have managed without it. This experience led Sen to begin thinking about economic unfreedom from a young age.[38]

In Development as Freedom, Sen outlined five specific types of freedoms: political freedoms, economic facilities, social opportunities, transparency guarantees, and protective security. Political freedoms refer to the ability of the people to have a voice in government and to be able to scrutinise the authorities. Economic facilities concern both the resources within the market and the market mechanism itself. Any focus on income and wealth in the country would serve to increase the economic facilities for the people. Social opportunities deal with the establishments that provide benefits like healthcare or education for the populace, allowing individuals to live better lives. Transparency guarantees allow individuals to interact with some degree of trust and knowledge of the interaction. Protective security is the system of social safety nets that prevent a group affected by poverty being subjected to terrible misery. Development encompassing non-economic areas, Sen argues, renders the notion of a dichotomy between "freedom" and "development," as implied by the concept of Asian values, meaningless and disingenuous.

Before Sen's work, these had been viewed as only the ends of development; luxuries afforded to countries that focus on increasing income. However, Sen argued that the increase in real freedoms should be both the ends and the means of development. He elaborates upon this by illustrating the closely interconnected natures of the five main freedoms as he believes that expansion of one of those freedoms can lead to expansion in another one as well. In this regard, he discussed the correlation between social opportunities of education and health and how both of these complement economic and political freedoms as a healthy and well-educated person is better suited to make informed economic decisions and be involved in fruitful political demonstrations, etc. A comparison is also drawn between China and India to illustrate this interdependence of freedoms. Sen noted that both countries had been working towards developing their economies—China since 1979 and India since 1991.[39]

The Idea of Justice (2009)

[edit]
Main article: The Idea of Justice

In 2009, Sen published a book called The Idea of Justice.[1] Based on his previous work in welfare economics and social choice theory, but also on his philosophical thoughts, Sen presented his own theory of justice that he meant to be an alternative to the influential modern theories of justice of John Rawls or John Harsanyi. In opposition to Rawls but also earlier justice theoreticians Immanuel Kant, Jean-Jacques Rousseau or David Hume, and inspired by the philosophical works of Adam Smith and Mary Wollstonecraft, Sen developed a theory that is both comparative and realisations-oriented (instead of being transcendental and institutional). However, he still regards institutions and processes as being equally important. As an alternative to Rawls's veil of ignorance, Sen chose the thought experiment of an impartial spectator as the basis of his theory of justice. He also stressed the importance of public discussion (understanding democracy in the sense of John Stuart Mill) and a focus on people's capabilities (an approach that he had co-developed), including the notion of universal human rights, in evaluating various states with regard to justice.[citation needed]

Career

[edit]

Sen began his career both as a teacher and a research scholar in the Department of Economics, Jadavpur University as a professor of economics in 1956. He spent two years in that position.[22] From 1957 to 1963, Sen served as a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Between 1960 and 1961, Sen was a visiting professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States, where he got to know Paul Samuelson, Robert Solow, Franco Modigliani, and Norbert Wiener.[40][27] He was also a visiting professor at the University of California, Berkeley (1964–1965) and Cornell University (1978–1984). He taught as Professor of Economics between 1963 and 1971 at the Delhi School of Economics (where he completed his magnum opus, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, in 1969).[41]

Sen with 13th Prime Minister of India Manmohan Singh

During this time Sen was also a frequent visitor to various other premiere Indian economic schools and centres of excellence, such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, the Indian Statistical Institute, the Centre for Development Studies, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, and the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences. He was a companion of distinguished economists like Manmohan Singh (ex-Prime Minister of India and a veteran economist responsible for liberalising the Indian economy), K. N. Raj (advisor to various prime ministers and a veteran economist who was the founder of the Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, which is one of India's premier think tanks and schools), and Jagdish Bhagwati (who is known to be one of the greatest Indian economists in the field of international trade and currently teaches at Columbia University). This is a period considered to be a Golden Period in the history of the DSE. In 1971, he joined the London School of Economics as a professor of economics, and taught there until 1977. From 1977 to 1988, he taught at the University of Oxford, where he was first a professor of economics and fellow of Nuffield College, and then from 1980 the Drummond Professor of Political Economy and a fellow of All Souls College, Oxford.[42][43][44]

In 1985, Sen co-founded the Eva Colorni Trust at the former London Guildhall University in memory of his deceased wife.[45] In 1987, Sen joined Harvard as the Thomas W. Lamont University Professor of Economics. In 1998 he was appointed as Master of Trinity College, Cambridge,[46] becoming the first Asian head of an Oxbridge college.[47] In January 2004, Sen returned to Harvard.

Sen with 13th President of India Pranab Mukherjee at Rashtrapati Bhavan in 2012

In May 2007, he was appointed chairman of Nalanda Mentor Group to plan the establishment of Nalanda University.[48] The university was intended to be a revival of Nalanda mahavihara, an ancient educational centre.[49][50]

He chaired the Social Sciences jury for the Infosys Prize from 2009 to 2011, and the Humanities jury from 2012 to 2018.[51]

On 19 July 2012, Sen was named the first chancellor of the proposed Nalanda University (NU).[52] Sen was criticised as the project suffered due to inordinate delays, mismanagement, and lack of presence of faculty on ground.[53] Finally teaching began in August 2014. On 20 February 2015, Sen withdrew his candidature for a second term.[54]

Memberships and associations

[edit]

He has served as president of the Econometric Society (1984), the International Economic Association (1986–1989), the Indian Economic Association (1989) and the American Economic Association (1994). He has also served as president of the Development Studies Association and the Human Development and Capability Association. He serves as the honorary director of the Academic Advisory Committee of the Center for Human and Economic Development Studies at Peking University in China.[55]

Sen has been called "the Conscience of the profession" and "the Mother Teresa of Economics"[56][57] for his work on famine, human development theory, welfare economics, the underlying mechanisms of poverty, gender inequality, and political liberalism. However, he denies the comparison to Mother Teresa, saying that he has never tried to follow a lifestyle of dedicated self-sacrifice.[58] Amartya Sen also added his voice to the campaign against the anti-gay Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.[59]

Sen has served as Honorary Chairman of Oxfam, the UK based international development charity, and is now its Honorary Advisor.[60][61]

Sen is also a member of the Berggruen Institute's 21st Century Council.[62]

Sen is an Honorary Fellow of St Edmund's College, Cambridge.[63]

He is also one of the 25 leading figures on the Information and Democracy Commission launched by Reporters Without Borders.[64]

Media and culture

[edit]

A 56-minute documentary named Amartya Sen: A Life Re-examined directed by Suman Ghosh details his life and work.[65][66] A documentary about Amartya Sen, titled The Argumentative Indian (the title of one of Sen's own books[67]), was released in 2017.[68]

A 2001 portrait of Sen by Annabel Cullen is in Trinity College's collection.[69] A 2003 portrait of Sen hangs in the National Portrait Gallery in London.[70]

In 2011, he was present at the Rabindra Utsab ceremony at Bangabandhu International Conference Centre (BICC), Bangladesh. He unveiled the cover of Sruti Gitobitan, a Rabindrasangeet album comprising all the 2222 Tagore songs, brought out by Rezwana Chowdhury Bannya, principal of Shurer Dhara School of Music.[71]

Max Roser said that it was the work of Sen that made him create Our World in Data.[72]

Political views

[edit]

Sen was critical of Narendra Modi when he was announced as the prime ministerial candidate for the BJP. In April 2014, he said that Modi would not make a good prime minister.[73] He conceded later in December 2014 that Modi did give people a sense of faith that things can happen.[74] In February 2015, Sen opted out of seeking a second term for the chancellor post of Nalanda University, stating that the Government of India was not keen on him continuing in the post.[54]

In August 2019, during the clampdown and curfew in Kashmir for more than two weeks after the Indian revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status, Sen criticised the government and said "As an Indian, I am not proud of the fact that India, after having done so much to achieve a democratic norm in the world – where India was the first non-Western country to go for democracy – that we lose that reputation on the grounds of action that have been taken".[75][76] He regarded the detention of Kashmiri political leaders as "a classical colonial excuse" to prevent backlash against the Indian government's decision and called for a democratic solution that would involve Kashmiri people.[77]

Sen has spent much of his later life as a political writer and activist. He has been outspoken about Narendra Modi's leadership in India. In an interview with The New York Times, he claimed that Modi's fearmongering among the Indian people was anti-democratic. "The big thing that we know from John Stuart Mill is that democracy is government by discussion, and, if you make discussion fearful, you are not going to get a democracy, no matter how you count the votes." He disagreed with Modi's ideology of Hindu nationalism, and advocated for a more integrated and diverse ideology that reflects the heterogeneity of India.[78]

Sen also wrote an article for The New York Times in 2013 documenting the reasons why India trailed behind China in economic development. He advocated for healthcare reform, because low-income people in India have to deal with exploitative and inadequate private healthcare. He recommended that India implement the same education policies that Japan did in the late 19th century. However, he conceded that there is a tradeoff between democracy and progress in Asia because democracy is a near reality in India and not in China.[79]

In a 1999 article in The Atlantic, Sen recommended for India a middle path between the "hard-knocks" development policy that creates wealth at the expense of civil liberties, and radical progressivism that only seeks to protect civil liberties at the expense of development. Rather than create an entirely new theory for ethical development in Asia, Sen sought to reform the current development model.[80]

Personal life and beliefs

[edit]
Sen with his wife Emma Rothschild.

Sen has been married three times. His first wife was Nabaneeta Dev Sen, an Indian writer and scholar, with whom he had two daughters: Antara, a journalist and publisher, and Nandana, a Bollywood actress. Their marriage broke up shortly after they moved to London in 1971.[56] In 1978 Sen married Eva Colorni, an Italian economist, daughter of Eugenio Colorni and Ursula Hirschmann and niece of Albert O. Hirschman. The couple had two children, a daughter Indrani, who is a journalist in New York, and a son Kabir, a hip hop artist, MC, and music teacher at Shady Hill School. Eva died of cancer in 1985.[56] In 1991, Sen married Emma Georgina Rothschild, who serves as the Jeremy and Jane Knowles Professor of History at Harvard University.[81]

The Sens have a house in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which is the base from which they teach during the academic year. They also have a home in Cambridge, England, where Sen is a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and Rothschild is a Fellow of Magdalene College. He usually spends his winter holidays at his home in Shantiniketan in West Bengal, India, where he used to go on long bike rides until recently. Asked how he relaxes, he replies: "I read a lot and like arguing with people."[56]

Sen is an atheist.[82] In an interview, he noted:[83]

In some ways people had got used to the idea that India was spiritual and religion-oriented. That gave a leg up to the religious interpretation of India, despite the fact that Sanskrit had a larger atheistic literature than exists in any other classical language. Madhava Acharya, the remarkable 14th century philosopher,[84] wrote this rather great book called Sarvadarshansamgraha, which discussed all the religious schools of thought within the Hindu structure. The first chapter is "Atheism"—a very strong presentation of the argument in favor of atheism and materialism.

Awards and honours

[edit]

Sen has received over 90 honorary degrees from universities around the world.[85] In 2019, London School of Economics announced the creation of the Amartya Sen Chair in Inequality Studies.[86]

Bibliography

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Amartya Sen

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Amartya Sen (born 3 November 1933) is an Indian economist and philosopher whose work has advanced the understanding of through rigorous analysis of , famines, and individual capabilities. Born in Santiniketan, , to a family originating from , Sen's early life was shaped by academic environments, with his father serving as a professor of chemistry. He pursued higher education at Presidency College in Calcutta and , earning a in 1959. Sen's seminal contributions include demonstrating that famines arise not merely from food shortages but from failures in entitlement systems, as detailed in his 1981 book Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. This empirical insight, drawn from historical cases like the , emphasized causal mechanisms in resource distribution over simplistic scarcity narratives. In , his 1970 volume Collective Choice and Social Welfare extended , incorporating interpersonal comparisons of utility to address gaps in aggregating individual preferences for policy evaluation. These frameworks underpinned his 1998 in Economic Sciences, awarded for restoring ethical dimensions to economic analysis while prioritizing observable outcomes in development. Central to Sen's thought is the capabilities approach, which evaluates well-being by what individuals are able to do and be, rather than solely by or resources, as elaborated in (1999). This perspective critiques GDP-centric metrics, advocating for expansions in freedoms like and as both ends and means of progress, supported by cross-country data on disparities and phenomena. Holding positions such as Lamont University Professor at Harvard and former Master of , Sen has influenced global policy, though his emphasis on entitlements has faced scrutiny for potential overemphasis on distributional failures absent deeper institutional incentives.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood Influences

Amartya Sen was born in 1933 in Santiniketan, on the campus of Rabindranath Tagore's in , British India, into a family with scholarly roots. His father, Ashutosh Sen, was a professor of chemistry at University, and the family traced its origins to regions including Wari and , now in . His mother, Amita Sen, also came from an educated background, contributing to an environment that valued intellectual pursuits. Sen's maternal grandfather, , exerted a significant early influence as a professor at Visva-Bharati, specializing in ancient Indian languages such as and , as well as medieval religious texts and cultural history. Kshitimohan, who had studied under Tagore and embraced a rationalist, syncretic approach to that rejected orthodox rituals in favor of ethical universalism, taught at the university where Sen spent much of his infancy. This proximity immersed Sen in discussions of philosophy, history, and from a young age. Between the ages of three and six, Sen lived in , (now ), accompanying his father on a visiting professorship, before returning to spend formative years shuttling between Santiniketan, , and other parts of . Childhood experiences in Santiniketan profoundly shaped Sen's worldview, particularly through exposure to the 1943 Bengal famine, where he witnessed emaciated refugees seeking aid and personally encountered deaths from malnutrition, including that of a famine-affected . These events, amid broader disruptions like and impending partition violence, highlighted causal failures in food distribution and governance rather than absolute shortages, seeding Sen's later analytical focus on entitlements and social mechanisms underlying deprivation. His early education at the progressive Patha school within Visva-Bharati, emphasizing open-air learning, critical , and Tagore's ideals of tolerance and over rote , further reinforced a commitment to reason and pluralism, influenced by both his grandfather's scholarly and the institution's anti-colonial ethos.

Academic Training and Early Intellectual Development

Amartya Sen enrolled at Presidency College in Calcutta in 1951, obtaining a B.A. degree in with a minor in from the in 1953. During this period, he was influenced by faculty members including Bhabatosh Datta, Tapas Majumdar, and Dhiresh Bhattacharya, who encouraged rigorous analysis of , inequality, and issues pertinent to post-colonial . These discussions, often among peers like Sukhamoy Chakravarty, fostered Sen's early interest in applying economic reasoning to , drawing from empirical observations of events such as the 1943 Bengal famine. In 1953, Sen relocated to Trinity College, Cambridge, where he completed a B.A. in pure economics in 1955 and earned a Ph.D. in 1959. His doctoral research, supervised by Joan Robinson, examined the "choice of techniques" in developing economies, evaluating optimal capital-labor mixes under varying surplus conditions—a topic reflecting debates on industrialization strategies in labor-abundant regions. Exposure to diverse faculty, including Maurice Dobb's Marxist perspectives, Dennis Robertson's neoclassical views, and Piero Sraffa's critiques of marginalism, prompted Sen to question orthodox assumptions in economic theory, particularly regarding rationality, preferences, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. This training cultivated Sen's interdisciplinary approach, blending economics with philosophical inquiry; in 1957, he secured a Prize Fellowship at for work in , signaling his shift toward foundational questions in and . Early explorations in social choice mechanisms, inspired by Kenneth Arrow's impossibility theorem and extending utilitarian frameworks, laid groundwork for his critiques of aggregating individual welfares into collective decisions, emphasizing informational gaps in standard metrics like GDP.

Professional Career

Initial Academic Positions

Sen began his academic career at the age of 23 with an appointment as Professor of Economics at in Calcutta, serving from 1956 to 1958. In this role, he contributed to establishing the university's economics department, drawing on his recent training in economics from Presidency College and . This early position allowed him to engage in teaching and research amid India's post-independence economic challenges, including work on themes that would later inform his analyses of choice and welfare. Following completion of his PhD at in 1959, Sen returned to Trinity College as a Prize Fellow and later a staff member, where he taught and conducted research until 1963. During this period, he also held visiting appointments, including at MIT from 1960 to 1961, which exposed him to advanced work in economic theory and social choice. These roles solidified his foundational contributions to , building on influences from figures like . In 1963, Sen relocated to India as Professor of Economics at the , University of Delhi, a position he held until 1971. There, he focused intensively on , completing key works such as Collective Choice and Social Welfare (1970), while mentoring students and collaborating with Indian economists on and development issues. This appointment marked a shift toward applied research on inequality and , informed by empirical observations of India's economic landscape.

Major Institutional Roles and Leadership

Amartya Sen occupied several prominent professorial positions at leading academic institutions. He began with a chair in at in Calcutta from 1956 to 1957, where he established a new economics department. From 1963 to 1971, he served as Professor of at the and the University of Delhi. He then joined the London School of Economics in 1971, followed by appointments at Oxford University as Professor of from 1977 to 1980 and Drummond Professor of from 1980 to 1987. In 1988, Sen moved to , where he holds the position of University Professor and Professor of and . In institutional leadership, Sen was Master of , from January 1998 to 2004, marking him as the first Indian academic to lead an college. He also chaired the Nalanda Mentor Group starting in 2007 and was appointed the inaugural Chancellor of in July 2012, a role he held until resigning in July 2015 amid disputes over governance and government interference. Sen has further demonstrated leadership in professional organizations by serving as president of the Econometric Society, the Indian Economic Association, the , and the International Economic Association.

Later Career and Emeritus Status

Following receipt of the in 1998, Sen assumed the position of Master of College at the , serving from October 1998 until January 2004 and becoming the first Indian academic to lead an college. In 2004, Sen returned to , resuming his prior role as the University Professor of and , a position he continues to hold as of 2025. During this later phase, he maintained an active scholarly presence, including affiliations such as senior fellow at the , while focusing on philosophical and economic writings. Sen also engaged in institutional revival efforts in , chairing the Nalanda Mentor Group appointed in 2006 and serving as the inaugural Chancellor of the revived from 2010 to 2015. His tenure ended in July 2015 when he declined a second term, citing concerns over increasing government influence on academic governance and the replacement of the independent governing board with government nominees, which he argued undermined institutional autonomy. At age 91 in 2025, Sen's -like status at Harvard reflects a shift toward privileges granted earlier in 1998 upon departing for , though he remains listed in active professorial roles without formal retirement, enabling continued influence through lectures, publications, and advisory capacities.

Theoretical Contributions to and

Foundations in Social Choice Theory

Amartya Sen's foundational contributions to emerged in the 1960s, building on Kenneth Arrow's 1951 impossibility theorem, which demonstrated that no could simultaneously satisfy universal domain, , , and nondictatorship under ordinal preferences. Sen systematized and extended this framework in his 1970 book Collective Choice and Social Welfare, where he provided a concise proof of Arrow's result and explored its implications for aggregating individual preferences into coherent social decisions. This work highlighted the theorem's reliance on ordinalism and the absence of interpersonal utility comparisons, arguing that such restrictions often lead to overly pessimistic conclusions about democratic . A key innovation was Sen's formulation of the "Paretian liberal" paradox, which posits that it is impossible to construct a that is Pareto efficient—where unanimous individual preference improvements yield social improvements—and simultaneously respects minimal , defined as each individual having decisive control over at least one pair of alternatives in their personal domain, such as private consumption choices, under unrestricted preference domains. This theorem, detailed in the 1970 volume, revealed tensions between efficiency and individual rights, challenging the completeness of Arrow's original conditions by incorporating rights-based constraints. Sen's analysis showed that resolving such impossibilities requires relaxing assumptions, such as permitting interpersonal comparisons of utilities or narrowing the domain of admissible preferences. Sen further advanced the informational foundations of social choice by critiquing welfarist approaches, which base evaluations solely on utilities or outcomes, and advocating for broader considerations like positional factors and equity in resource distribution. His mid-1960s papers, including those on the impossibility of a Paretian egalitarian, demonstrated that even with egalitarian intent, Pareto optimality conflicts with equal treatment under certain preference profiles. These results, grounded in axiomatic analysis, underscored the need for social choice mechanisms to incorporate non-welfarist , such as achievements relative to circumstances, laying groundwork for Sen's later capability framework while establishing rigorous limits on purely preference-based aggregation. By the 1970s, Sen's extensions had mitigated Arrow's induced gloom, showing possibilities for social decisions through weakened axioms, such as dropping the independence condition or embracing cardinal utilities, thus enabling practical applications in voting and welfare assessment.

Entitlement Approach to Famines and Poverty

Sen developed the entitlement approach in his 1981 book Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, analyzing and famines through the lens of economic entitlements rather than aggregate supply shortages. This framework posits that famines arise from the failure of individuals or groups to secure sufficient via legal ownership, production, trade, or other exchange mechanisms, even when overall food availability remains stable or increases. Central to the approach are three concepts: an individual's endowment (initial ownership of resources like land, labor, or assets), the exchange entitlement mapping (the terms on which endowments can be converted into commodities through market or non-market exchanges), and the resulting entitlement set (the full range of achievable commodity bundles, including ). A contraction in this entitlement set—due to factors like wage declines, price , or policy disruptions—leads to deprivation, triggering if it falls below subsistence levels for affected populations. The approach critiques the traditional Food Availability Decline (FAD) hypothesis, which attributes famines primarily to reductions in per capita food supply from crop failures or imports. Sen demonstrated empirically that FAD is neither necessary nor sufficient for famine, applying the framework to four 20th-century cases: the 1943 Bengal famine, the 1974 Bangladesh famine, the 1972-1973 Ethiopian famine, and the 1973 Sahel drought famine. In none did aggregate food output collapse sufficiently to explain mass starvation; instead, entitlement failures varied by occupational groups, with vulnerable classes like landless laborers experiencing sharp declines in purchasing power. For instance, in the Bengal famine of 1943, which killed an estimated 3 million people, per capita rice availability was about 7% higher than in the non-famine year of 1941, but entitlement erosion occurred through wartime inflation (rice prices surged over 300%), rural employment losses from wartime diversions, and British policies like boat confiscations that hampered local trade and fishing livelihoods. Agricultural laborers' real wages in terms of rice fell by up to 75% in affected districts, confining their entitlement sets to inadequate bundles and causing selective starvation among non-food producers. Extending to poverty, Sen reframed it as a matter of entitlement deprivation, where the poor lack command over basic due to skewed endowments or unfavorable exchange conditions, rather than mere income shortfall. measurement thus shifts from income thresholds to whether entitlement sets include nutritionally adequate bundles, incorporating factors like employment opportunities and . This has influenced policy by emphasizing interventions in labor markets, price stabilization, and social safety nets to bolster entitlements, as seen in responses to later crises where democratic reduced risks through timely relief. Critiques of the approach highlight its market-centric focus, potentially underemphasizing absolute supply constraints, non-market institutions (e.g., or state ), or measurement errors in historical . Some analyses of the 1943 Bengal case argue that localized shortages and exacerbated entitlements beyond Sen's model, requiring integration of supply-side dynamics. Despite these, the framework's empirical grounding in disaggregated and rejection of simplistic narratives has endured as a tool for dissecting deprivation's causal chains.

Capability Approach to Development and Well-Being

Sen introduced the in his 1979 Tanner Lecture on Human Values, "Equality of What?", delivered at on May 22, 1979, where he critiqued resource-based and utility-based metrics for assessing equality and well-being, arguing that they overlook variations in individuals' abilities to convert resources into actual opportunities due to personal heterogeneities such as disabilities, metabolic differences, or environmental factors. In this lecture, Sen proposed focusing instead on capabilities—the substantive freedoms people have to achieve functionings, defined as the achieved beings and doings (e.g., being nourished, participating in community life, or achieving ) that individuals value as part of a worthwhile life. This shift emphasizes agency and real opportunities over mere possession of goods or reported satisfaction, as utility can be distorted by adaptation to deprivation (e.g., victims may not report extreme unhappiness if accustomed to scarcity). Sen elaborated the approach in his 1985 book Commodities and Capabilities, linking it to by distinguishing between commodities (external resources), characteristics of those commodities, and the capabilities they enable through personal and social conversion factors. For development and well-being, the approach reorients policy from GDP growth or toward expanding capabilities, such as access to , , and political participation, which enhance individuals' to pursue valued lives. In (1999), Sen synthesized these ideas, positing development as a process of removing unfreedoms that limit capabilities, with empirical examples like how reduces gender disparities in child survival rates—girls' correlated with a 1.5- to 3-fold decrease in in the 1980s and 1990s by empowering women to act on health knowledge. This framework influenced the (HDI), launched in 1990, which incorporates , , and as proxies for basic capabilities, shifting global discourse from economic output to human-centered metrics. The approach's strength lies in its causal realism: capabilities mediate between resources and outcomes, accounting for why identical inputs yield unequal (e.g., a enables mobility for one person but not another without ramps). However, it has faced for in specifying which capabilities are central—Sen deliberately avoids a fixed list to allow contextual pluralism, but this hampers precise and interpersonal comparisons, as noted in economic where aggregating diverse capabilities into indices risks arbitrary weighting. Despite such challenges, the framework's empirical applications, like in assessments, demonstrate that capability deprivations (e.g., affecting 22% of children under five globally in 2020 per WHO data) better predict long-term societal outcomes than income alone, underscoring its utility for of development barriers.

Analysis of Gender Inequality and Demographic Imbalances

Amartya Sen's analysis of emphasizes empirical discrepancies in survival rates between males and s, particularly in developing regions, where biological advantages for female longevity are overridden by social discrimination. In regions such as , , , and , Sen documented higher female mortality rates compared to males, contrasting with patterns in Western countries where women outlive men by several years. This disparity arises from systematic in nutrition, healthcare, and favoring sons, leading to excess female deaths across age groups. Sen quantified this through comparisons of expected versus observed sex ratios derived from census data and demographic models, attributing the shortfall to entrenched cultural preferences for male offspring. Central to Sen's framework is the concept of "missing women," estimated at over 100 million globally in , representing females absent from population counts due to gender-biased mortality and natality. Using baseline sex ratios—at birth approximately 105-106 males per 100 females, and a natural adult ratio favoring more females—Sen calculated deficits in countries like (around 37 million missing), (around 44 million), and . These figures derive from aggregating excess male-to-female ratios across censuses, such as India's 1981 data showing persistent imbalances despite overall . Mortality bias manifests post-infancy through differential treatment, evidenced by studies in where female exceeds male rates by 20-50% in rural areas during famines or routine scarcity. Natality bias, increasingly prominent with technology, involves sex-selective abortions, exacerbating imbalances; for instance, 's from 1979 amplified son preference, yielding birth ratios as low as 118 males per 100 females in some provinces by the . Demographic imbalances from these practices extend beyond immediate survival deficits, distorting population structures and perpetuating inequality cycles. Skewed sex ratios, such as 93 females per 100 males in and or 94 in as of early 2000s data, forecast future shortages of marriageable women, potentially fueling social tensions like increased trafficking or violence, though Sen cautioned against overemphasizing these secondary effects over root causes. Integrating this with his , Sen argued that gender discrimination curtails women's basic freedoms to survive and thrive, not merely as statistical anomalies but as failures of social arrangements to equalize opportunities. Empirical interventions, such as campaigns in post-1990s, have marginally improved ratios in states like (near parity), but nationwide persistence underscores institutional resistance, with natality skews offsetting mortality gains via abortions estimated at 50 million additional missing females since Sen's initial tally. Sen's estimates, while debated for aggregation methods—some critics argue undercounting adult biases or over-relying on assumptions—remain grounded in verifiable discrepancies and have influenced policy scrutiny of technologies enabling selection.

Comparative Framework for Justice

In The Idea of Justice (2009), Amartya Sen advocates a comparative framework for assessing , emphasizing the evaluation and ranking of alternative social states based on their reduction of manifest injustices rather than the pursuit of an ideal, perfectly just society. This approach contrasts with transcendental institutionalism, exemplified by John Rawls's theory, which seeks to identify unique, fully just institutions through idealized reasoning devices like the veil of ignorance; Sen argues that such quests are often infeasible and unproductive for practical reasoning, as they divert attention from feasible improvements in real-world outcomes. Central to Sen's framework is the distinction between niti—denoting behavioral correctness, rules, and institutional arrangements—and nyaya, which pertains to the realized state of affairs and substantive justice in practice. Sen contends that overemphasizing niti can lead to flawed justice assessments if institutions fail to deliver equitable outcomes, as seen in historical examples where procedurally fair systems perpetuated deprivations; instead, nyaya prioritizes how lives are actually lived, integrating empirical scrutiny of advantages and freedoms. This shift enables comparative analysis: societies can be ranked by degrees of injustice elimination, drawing on social choice theory to aggregate diverse informational bases like capabilities and public deliberations. Public reasoning plays a pivotal role in Sen's method, serving as a mechanism for impartial evaluation across positional differences—such as varying perspectives influenced by , , or information access—without requiring consensus on a singular ideal. By focusing on open impartiality and reasoned scrutiny, akin to Smith's "impartial spectator," the framework avoids parochial biases and supports incremental enhancements, such as enhancing capabilities in or , even amid incomplete agreements. This comparative lens, Sen maintains, better addresses global challenges like inequality by permitting assessments of partial orderings rather than demanding unattainable completeness.

Key Publications

Seminal Works on Inequality and Choice (1970s-1980s)

In Collective Choice and Social Welfare (1970), Sen formalized the aggregation of individual preferences into social decisions, extending by incorporating interpersonal comparisons of utility and ethical considerations into . The book critiques purely ordinal social welfare functions for ignoring intensity of preferences and rights violations, proposing instead a framework where social choices respect minimal liberty conditions, such as protecting individual freedoms from collective overrides unless Pareto improvements justify them. This work established Sen's position in , emphasizing that democratic decision-making must balance efficiency, equity, and individual agency rather than relying solely on or utilitarian sums. Sen's On Economic Inequality (1973) advanced an axiomatic approach to inequality measurement, arguing that standard Gini coefficients inadequately capture distributive ethics by treating all inequalities symmetrically regardless of absolute deprivation levels. He introduced the Sen index, which weights inequality by the shortfall of incomes below a mean, incorporating both the number of deprived individuals and the depth of their poverty, thus linking relative inequality to absolute welfare losses. Unlike income-focused metrics, Sen contended that inequality assessments require normative judgments on what constitutes well-being, critiquing Rawlsian maximin principles for overemphasizing the worst-off without aggregating broader social gains. Empirical applications in the book demonstrated how such measures reveal hidden disparities in developing economies, where growth masks persistent low-end deprivations. The 1976 paper "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement" proposed the Sen poverty index, a composite metric addressing flaws in head-count ratios (which ignore severity) and income-gap ratios (which overlook distribution among the poor). Defined as P=H(I+Gp1−α)P = H \left( I + \frac{G_p}{1 - \alpha} \right), where HH is the head-count ratio, II the average gap, GpG_p the among the poor, and α\alpha the line proportion, it satisfies axioms like monotonicity ( rises with deprivation) and transfer sensitivity (greater weight to worse-off transfers). Sen's ordinal focus avoided assumptions, enabling comparisons across datasets while highlighting how policy interventions, such as targeted transfers, reduce not just incidence but inequality within strata. This measure gained traction for revealing that aggregate growth often fails to alleviate deep without redistributive mechanisms. Choice, Welfare and Measurement (1982) synthesized Sen's prior essays, unifying social choice with inequality and metrics through a welfarist lens that prioritizes observable behaviors over subjective utilities. Chapters on Arrow's theorem extensions argue for enriched informational bases, incorporating capabilities (what individuals can do) alongside resources to evaluate welfare, as equal incomes may yield unequal freedoms due to varying needs or conversions. Sen critiqued Pareto optimality for endorsing inefficient equilibria that perpetuate inequality, advocating instead for dominance comparisons where one distribution unambiguously betters another across ethical criteria. The volume's measurement tools, including generalized Gini variants, provided empirical rigor for , influencing debates on whether inequality reductions require progressive taxation or efficiency-enhancing reforms. In , published in 1999, Amartya Sen argued that economic and social development should be understood primarily as the expansion of individuals' substantive freedoms, rather than mere increases in income or resources. Sen contended that freedoms serve both as the ends of development—enhancing people's capabilities to lead lives they value—and as the means, since greater freedoms enable better economic and social arrangements. This perspective built on his earlier , shifting focus from utilitarian metrics like or Rawlsian primary goods to what individuals can actually do and be, such as achieving , , or political participation. Sen illustrated this with empirical examples, noting that despite in some nations, persistent deprivations in freedoms—like gender disparities in access to —undermine true progress. Central to the book were five types of instrumental freedoms that facilitate capability expansion: political liberties (e.g., voting rights), economic facilities (e.g., market access), social opportunities (e.g., and health services), transparency guarantees (e.g., against corruption), and protective security (e.g., to prevent destitution). Sen emphasized their interconnections, arguing that political freedoms, often sidelined in growth-focused policies, foster and essential for reducing . He critiqued GDP-centric development models for overlooking these dimensions, pointing to cases like post-colonial , where democratic freedoms contributed to prevention despite slower growth compared to authoritarian regimes. This relational view of freedoms challenged resource-based equality, as identical resources yield unequal capabilities due to personal, social, or environmental conversions (e.g., a hindering mobility despite wheelchair access). Related ideas in the 1990s extended this framework to global policy critiques. Sen highlighted how markets, when complemented by public action, enhance freedoms but fail alone without addressing inequalities in opportunity; for instance, he noted China's rapid growth but limited political freedoms leading to vulnerabilities like the 1989 Tiananmen events. In essays and lectures preceding the book, Sen linked development to justice, arguing against narrow welfarism by prioritizing freedom rankings over income distributions, as seen in his analysis of global hunger persisting amid surpluses due to entitlement failures rather than food shortages. These concepts influenced international metrics, though Sen warned against oversimplifying capabilities into rigid indices without contextual evaluation. His 1998 Nobel Prize recognition underscored these contributions, affirming freedoms' role in welfare economics beyond aggregate outputs.

The Idea of Justice and Later Philosophical Texts (2000s onward)

In 2002, Sen published Rationality and Freedom, a compilation of essays that examines the interplay between rational choice, individual freedoms, and social arrangements. He critiques narrow conceptions of rationality confined to self-interested utility maximization, proposing instead a broader framework where rationality incorporates commitments, ethical evaluations, and reasoned scrutiny of preferences. Freedom, in this view, is not merely the absence of constraints but substantive opportunities aligned with what individuals have reason to value, influencing assessments of well-being and justice. Sen's 2005 collection : Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity extends philosophical inquiry into cultural and historical domains, emphasizing India's longstanding tradition of heterodox debate, public reasoning, and intellectual pluralism. Drawing on ancient texts like the and Buddhist arguments, as well as figures from to Tagore, Sen contends that this argumentative heritage counters stereotypes of Indian passivity and underpins the country's democratic resilience, fostering tolerance amid diversity. The essays link such traditions to broader themes of identity, , and nuclear policy, arguing that open discourse enhances by challenging authoritarian or communal impositions. The Idea of Justice, published in 2009, represents Sen's most direct engagement with , rejecting transcendental approaches to justice—such as John Rawls's focus on ideal institutions under a "veil of ignorance"—in favor of a aimed at eliminating manifest injustices. Sen distinguishes between niti (organizational propriety) and (realized fairness), prioritizing the latter through practical reductions in deprivation, like enhancing capabilities for , and participation. He invokes Adam Smith's "impartial spectator" for positional objectivity and stresses public reasoning in diverse societies, where serves as both a procedural value and an epistemic tool for identifying and rectifying injustices. This framework integrates Sen's earlier work on social choice and capabilities, applying it to global issues like gender bias and environmental equity, while critiquing closed idealism for its impracticality in imperfect worlds. Subsequent philosophical contributions in the 2010s, including essays and collaborations, refined these ideas without major monographs. For instance, in An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions (2013, co-authored with Jean Drèze), Sen applies comparative justice to critique India's growth disparities, advocating capability expansion via public investment over market-led metrics alone, though the text leans more empirical than abstract. Sen's ongoing writings, such as lectures on rationality's role in ethical pluralism, reinforce the enduring emphasis on reasoned pluralism against parochialism.

Empirical Applications and Policy Influence

Role in Human Development Metrics

Amartya Sen's , emphasizing individuals' freedoms to achieve valued functionings such as health, education, and participation, formed the intellectual bedrock for the Development Programme's (UNDP) shift toward human-centered metrics in the late 1980s. In 1989, , a Pakistani economist advising the UNDP, consulted Sen to devise indicators transcending (GDP) , drawing on Sen's critique that economic growth alone fails to capture well-being or poverty's multidimensional nature. This collaboration culminated in the 1990 launch of the first (HDR), which introduced the (HDI) as a composite measure of at birth, adult rate (later refined to mean and expected years of schooling), and adjusted GDP using logarithmic scaling to diminish at higher incomes. While Haq is primarily credited with operationalizing the HDI for its and comparability across 130 countries in the inaugural report, Sen's influence ensured an explicit focus on expanding capabilities rather than outputs alone, influencing subsequent HDRs that rank nations and advocate reforms prioritizing social investments. Sen, however, cautioned against overreliance on such aggregates, initially opposing the HDI's creation in favor of disaggregated data to avoid masking inequalities or contextual freedoms; he viewed it as a rhetorical tool for but insufficient for capturing capability sets' breadth, such as gender-specific or environmental dimensions. Despite these reservations, the HDI's framework evolved under Sen's indirect guidance, incorporating adjustments like the Inequality-Adjusted HDI in 2010 to account for disparities in , and . Sen extended his role through collaborations refining poverty metrics, co-authoring with Sudhir Anand a 1997 UNDP background paper that proposed the Human Poverty Index (HPI), quantifying deprivations in longevity (via under-5 mortality), knowledge (adult illiteracy), and decent living (access to health, water, and nutrition) for developing countries, later adapted as HPI-2 for industrialized nations emphasizing unemployment and social exclusion. This work underscored Sen's insistence on direct capability failures over income proxies, influencing global benchmarks. Additionally, Sen's framework inspired the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), launched in 2010 by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI)—an entity he has supported—which assesses acute deprivations in 10 indicators across health, education, and living standards, affecting over 1.3 billion people in 2010 data from 109 countries and prompting targeted interventions beyond monetary lines. These metrics, disseminated annually via HDRs reaching policymakers in over 170 countries by 2025, have redirected toward capability-enhancing programs, such as universal and , though Sen has noted persistent gaps in addressing freedoms like political voice or environmental .

Case Studies in Prevention and Global Policy

Sen's entitlement approach, articulated in his 1981 book Poverty and Famines, posits that famines arise primarily from breakdowns in individuals' and groups' abilities to command food through legal means such as production, , or labor exchange, rather than aggregate food shortages alone. This framework challenges the traditional food availability decline (FAD) hypothesis, emphasizing economic and social entitlement relations. In applying it to historical cases, Sen analyzed how market disruptions, inflation, and policy failures eroded purchasing power for vulnerable populations, even when food supplies remained adequate or increased. A pivotal case study is the , which killed an estimated 2 to 3 million people amid conditions. Sen demonstrated that rice availability per capita was higher in 1943 than in 1941, contradicting FAD explanations; instead, wartime inflation outpaced rural wages, boat confiscations disrupted trade entitlements, and exports to military needs and Ceylon reduced local access for landless laborers. by speculators and inadequate colonial relief exacerbated entitlement collapses, shifting the burden onto the poorest whose exchange entitlements—derived from selling labor or assets—failed. The 1974 famine, claiming up to 1.5 million lives following floods, provides another illustration. Sen's examination revealed no net , as food production did not plummet relative to prior years; rather, rural landless laborers' declined sharply due to soaring prices from speculative bubbles and market panic, eroding their wage-based entitlements. Post-independence , including war-related disruptions and uneven distribution, amplified vulnerabilities, with mortality concentrated among those outside direct production entitlements. Sen extended this approach to other 1970s famines, such as Ethiopia's 1973 crisis and the drought, where entitlement failures among pastoralists and smallholders stemmed from livestock price collapses and trade barriers, not absolute scarcity. These analyses underscore causal realism: famines as outcomes of relational economic structures and policy responses, rather than isolated natural events. In policy terms, Sen advocated preventive measures rooted in sustaining entitlements through open markets, employment guarantees, and information flows. He argued that democratic accountability—via free press and elections—has prevented major famines in independent democracies like , even during 1960s-1970s droughts, by enabling rapid relief and public pressure on governments. No substantial famine has occurred in such systems since 1947, contrasting with authoritarian regimes where opacity allows escalation. Globally, Sen's insights influenced frameworks like the UN's emphasis on access over supply in metrics, countering Malthusian narratives and promoting entitlement-based interventions in design. His 1998 Nobel and advisory roles reinforced policies prioritizing economic freedoms and anti-starvation commitments, though critics note that market reliance can falter without state safeguards, as partial evidence from suggests government errors compounded 1974's woes. Empirical applications, such as India's public distribution systems, reflect adaptations of his approach to bolster entitlements during shocks.

Critiques of Empirical Operationalization

Critics have argued that Sen's , while theoretically innovative, encounters substantial hurdles in empirical due to its emphasis on substantive freedoms rather than observable outcomes. Operationalizing capabilities requires assessing individuals' real opportunities across diverse dimensions, but this demands high informational inputs, including counterfactual choices and conversion factors, which complicate data collection and analysis. Sugden (1993) highlighted that the framework's lack of a predefined list of capabilities renders it insufficiently operational for policy applications, as disagreements over relevant dimensions persist without a coherent selection mechanism. A primary measurement challenge lies in distinguishing capabilities (potential functionings) from achieved functionings, as the former involve unobservable freedoms and trade-offs that surveys struggle to capture. For instance, items phrased as "are you able to" or "can you" often elicit responses on isolated achievements, failing to reflect the full capability set or the value of choice among alternatives, leading to incomplete or biased assessments. Empirical applications frequently revert to proxies like resources or functionings, undermining the approach's core focus on freedoms, as direct measurement of capabilities requires evaluating contextual barriers and personal heterogeneities, which are resource-intensive and context-specific. Aggregation poses further difficulties, as combining multiple capabilities into comparable indices necessitates subjective weighting and valuation, raising issues of incommensurability and interpersonal comparability. Sen's proposals, such as dominance rankings or incomplete orderings, address some gaps but do not resolve foundational disputes over how to prioritize capabilities without democratic processes that may themselves be infeasible in practice. In development metrics influenced by Sen, such as the , arbitrary selections and equal weighting of dimensions have been critiqued for oversimplifying multidimensional , ignoring distribution within capabilities and limiting for policy. Practical implementation in global policy reveals additional constraints, including data scarcity for non-market conversions (e.g., social norms affecting capability realization) and the risk of in capability selection processes. While advances like Nussbaum's fixed list offer partial remedies, they introduce rigidity that conflicts with Sen's contextual pluralism, perpetuating debates over whether the approach remains more evaluative than prescriptive for empirical work. These critiques underscore that, absent resolved methodological protocols, operationalizations often dilute the approach's ambition, favoring measurable indicators over true capability assessments.

Critiques and Intellectual Debates

Methodological and Measurement Challenges

Sen's faces substantial methodological difficulties in operationalizing its core concepts, particularly in identifying and selecting capabilities without a predefined list. Sen advocates for context-specific determination through public reasoning and democratic deliberation rather than fixed enumerations, as proposed by critics like , but this flexibility results in inconsistent application across studies and jurisdictions, with at least 14 distinct methods documented for capability selection. Measurement challenges arise from the distinction between capabilities—substantive freedoms to achieve valued functionings—and more observable functionings or resources themselves. Capabilities are not directly quantifiable, requiring of an individual's real opportunity set, which demands accounting for heterogeneous conversion factors such as personal heterogeneities (e.g., disabilities), social norms, and environmental conditions; this variability undermines standardized metrics and reliable interpersonal comparisons of advantage. Aggregation further complicates implementation, as there is no agreed-upon framework for weighting or trading off diverse capabilities, with proposals ranging from Nussbaum's rejection of trade-offs to deliberative processes, yet empirical applications often resort to schemes that risk oversimplification or bias. In the (HDI), shaped by Sen's influence through collaborations with and the UNDP, aggregation of just three dimensions—life expectancy, , and gross national income per capita—has been critiqued for its arbitrariness and failure to encompass broader capabilities, a limitation Sen conceded as "crude" but justified for its rhetorical challenge to income-only metrics like GDP. These issues contribute to broader critiques of and under-theorization, rendering the approach informationally demanding and empirically elusive; for instance, assessing complex capabilities like "appearing in public without shame" requires intrusive data on preferences and contexts, while alternatives like resourcism or offer more precise, observable proxies despite their own flaws. Economists such as have highlighted the risk of , where external judgments on valued capabilities override individual preferences, questioning the approach's feasibility for policy without clearer valuation mechanisms. Sen responds by prioritizing "having reason to value" over mere subjective , yet the absence of consensus on weighting systems persists, limiting rigorous and cross-context comparability.

Ideological Objections from Market-Oriented Perspectives

Economists aligned with market-oriented paradigms, such as those emphasizing , price signals, and minimal state intervention, have objected to Sen's on grounds that it invites paternalistic evaluations of individual opportunities, potentially overriding voluntary choices in favor of externally defined "functionings." , in critiquing Sen, argues that the approach risks allowing theorists or policymakers to impose judgments on what constitutes valuable capabilities, conflicting with libertarian priors that prioritize and the to pursue one's own ends without interference, as long as no harm is done to others. This tension arises because Sen's expansion of freedoms beyond negative liberties—encompassing positive opportunities like or —may necessitate coercive redistribution or , undermining the market's role in generating diverse opportunity sets through voluntary exchange. Sen's entitlement framework for analyzing famines and deprivation has drawn fire for attributing crises primarily to market-mediated entitlement failures rather than supply disruptions or policy distortions, thereby downplaying the resilience of free markets in allocating resources via prices. Critics contend that Sen's examples, such as the 1943 Bengal famine where food availability did not decline sharply, overlook how wartime government controls on trade and inflation exacerbated entitlement collapses, whereas unimpeded markets could have facilitated imports and adjustments to avert mass starvation. This perspective holds that entitlements are inherently tied to market processes, but Sen's emphasis on relational failures justifies interventions that distort incentives, ignoring evidence from market liberalizations—like India's post-1991 reforms or China's opening—which lifted hundreds of millions from without relying on capability metrics. In , Sen endorses markets for expanding instrumental freedoms like economic participation, yet market critics argue this subordinates objective market outcomes—such as creation and —to vague, subjective capability evaluations that lack operational precision and favor state "nurturing" over dynamics. Such frameworks, per detractors, replicate mainstream rationales for correcting "market failures" (e.g., public goods provision) without demonstrating why decentralized markets fail to evolve solutions through , as seen in historical reductions uncorrelated with Sen-style interventions. Libertarian-leaning analyses further highlight incompatibilities, noting that ensuring capabilities like or affiliation often implies overriding property rights or voluntary contracts in cases of , tensions unresolved by Sen's refusal to specify a fixed capability list. These objections portray Sen's paradigm as theoretically appealing but practically conducive to overreach, prioritizing egalitarian adjustments over the -generating capacities of unfettered markets.

Responses to Political Economy Criticisms

Sen maintains that markets play a central role in enhancing capabilities by facilitating efficient , individual choice, and , which he views as instrumental to rather than an end in itself. He counters market-oriented critiques, such as those emphasizing potential distortions from state interventions, by arguing that unregulated markets often fail to deliver substantive freedoms, particularly in addressing externalities, information asymmetries, and public goods like and health infrastructure. For instance, Sen's posits that famines arise not from aggregate food shortages but from breakdowns in exchange entitlements, where market mechanisms collapse during crises, as evidenced by the 1943 Bengal famine that killed approximately 3 million despite sufficient food availability, underscoring the need for institutional safeguards without rejecting market efficiency in normal conditions. In rebutting concerns over incentive dilution from redistributive policies, Sen emphasizes empirical outcomes in democratic settings, noting that post-independence avoided major famines through democratic accountability and public entitlements, even amid market-oriented reforms, contrasting with authoritarian regimes where markets alone proved insufficient. He draws on Smith's framework to argue that effective markets presuppose supportive freedoms—political participation, , and basic capabilities—rejecting the notion that capabilities advocacy implies anti-market paternalism, as markets themselves expand agency when embedded in such contexts. This integrated view, Sen contends, aligns with causal realities where pure libertarian emphases on negative freedoms overlook how capability deprivations, like illiteracy affecting 26% of Indian adults in 2001, hinder market participation and perpetuate traps. Addressing ideological objections that capabilities metrics invite subjective interventions over objective growth, Sen advocates comparative assessments of justice, favoring incremental market-enhancing reforms—like property rights and trade liberalization—that demonstrably boost capabilities, as seen in East Asian growth models combining markets with public investments yielding higher human development indices by the 1990s. He critiques narrow neo-liberal defenses of markets for conflating procedural freedoms with outcomes, insisting that causal evidence from reveals trade-offs, such as Pareto improvements conflicting with libertarian rights, resolvable through public reasoning rather than doctrinal absolutism. While acknowledging government failures, Sen's position, informed by historical data like China's 1959-1961 killing tens of millions under centralized , prioritizes empirical pluralism over ideological purity, evaluating policies by their enhancement of real opportunities amid market imperfections.

Public Engagement and Views

Involvement in Indian Politics and Global Issues

Amartya Sen served as chairman of the Indian government's from 2006, tasked with planning the revival of the ancient as a modern international institution focused on interdisciplinary studies. He was appointed chancellor of in 2012, overseeing its establishment amid challenges including funding delays and site selection disputes. Sen resigned in July 2015, citing undue government interference in academic governance, as the governing body attempted to remove him without following statutory procedures, which he described as reflective of broader vulnerabilities in Indian higher education administration. Sen has frequently commented on Indian electoral politics, interpreting the 2024 Lok Sabha results as evidence that India rejects transformation into a "Hindu Rashtra," emphasizing the secular electorate's preference for pluralism over . In February 2025, he urged unity between the Congress party and for assembly elections, warning that fragmentation aids opponents promoting ideology. Regarding Bihar's 2025 Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, Sen expressed concerns that stringent documentation requirements could disenfranchise poor and marginalized voters, particularly from deprived regions, without adequate sensitivity to implementation challenges. On broader Indian politics under the Modi government since 2014, Sen has criticized policies for prioritizing over poverty alleviation, describing the administration as "fragile" for neglecting education and healthcare as engines of development. He accused it of a "quantum jump in the wrong direction" on social welfare and clamping down on through imposition of perspectives. In 2023, Sen labeled the government "one of the most appalling," citing mistreatment of citizens based on ancestry and failure to uphold justice and fairness. In global affairs, Sen has advocated integrating with development strategies, arguing in works like (1999) that capabilities such as access to and are essential for realizing freedoms, influencing frameworks like the UN Human Development Reports. He has warned against combined with disdain for democratic norms, stating in 2019 that such trends pose risks to pluralistic worldwide, drawing parallels to threats in and elsewhere. Sen's has shaped international policy debates on and inequality, emphasizing empirical measurement of freedoms over mere , though he critiques top-down implementations that overlook local reasoning.

Commentary on Migration, Democracy, and Recent Events

Amartya Sen has advocated for migration as a fundamental driver of human progress, arguing that it facilitates the exchange of , , and ideas across societies. In August 2025, he emphasized that migration has historically been essential to , stating it enables diversity in languages and traditions, which he views as a source of pride particularly for nations like with multilingual populations. This perspective aligns with his capabilities approach, where migration serves as a means to expand individual freedoms by alleviating economic, political, and social constraints in origin countries, thereby enhancing opportunities for functionings such as and . Sen integrates migration into his broader , positing that open democratic societies with public reasoning and foster environments conducive to beneficial mobility. He contends that , through mechanisms like free press and electoral competition, prevent catastrophic failures such as famines—evident in the absence of major famines in independent despite vulnerabilities—by prioritizing public discussion over authoritarian opacity. This instrumental role of democracy extends to managing migration's challenges, as pluralistic deliberation allows societies to balance economic gains from labor mobility with social cohesion, contrasting with closed systems prone to mismanagement. In recent commentaries, Sen has warned of threats to these ideals from , particularly when it merges with anti-democratic tendencies and restricts migration. He has described such as "very dangerous," citing risks in contexts like the where it undermines open societies and global cooperation, often by targeting free movement of people. Regarding , Sen expressed in 2019 and 2022 interviews that the ruling regime's actions, including perceived erosion of institutional independence, weaken democratic values rather than strengthen them, potentially exacerbating divisions over identity and mobility. These views underscore his advocacy for emphasizing voice and pluralism to counter narrow nationalist impulses that could stifle migration's progressive potential.

Media Representations and Cultural Impact

Sen has been portrayed in media primarily through documentaries and interviews that emphasize his intellectual legacy in economics and philosophy rather than sensationalized narratives. The 2003 documentary Amartya Sen: A Life Reexamined, directed by Suman Ghosh and distributed by First Run/Icarus Films, centers on a conversation with Sen, incorporating archival footage to examine his work on poverty, famines, and capabilities, marking it as an early post-Nobel biographical treatment. This 56-minute film positions Sen as a "Renaissance man" bridging Bengali intellectual traditions with global theory. A later documentary, The Argumentative Indian (2018), also directed by Ghosh, traces Sen's life from colonial India to his Nobel Prize, exploring how personal experiences shaped his views on identity, democracy, and development; it premiered at film festivals and was made available on platforms like Prime Video, framing Sen as an exemplar of argumentative pluralism in Indian thought. Sen participated in the 2010 PBS POV segment "Amartya Sen on Development," where he discussed welfare economics, entitlements, and the role of freedoms in averting crises like famines, influencing public broadcasting treatments of human development. Beyond visual media, Sen's media presence includes profiles in outlets like Prospect Magazine (2021), which depicted him as an "optimistic Indian" engaging in companionable discourse on ethics and policy, reflecting a consistent portrayal as a humane, interdisciplinary thinker rather than a polemical figure. His 2022 Talks at Google appearance promoting the memoir Home in the World further extended this, focusing on his early influences in India and England. Culturally, Sen's ideas have permeated discussions on and development, as in his 2012 commentary critiquing oversimplified media framing in , advocating for diverse headlines on the same events to enhance public reasoning—a principle drawn from his broader capability framework. His essay "Our Culture, Their Culture" (2009), analyzing Ray's , has informed cultural critiques of , promoting hybrid identities over rigid communalism in intellectual media. However, Sen's direct footprint in remains modest, with influence largely confined to policy-oriented and academic discourse rather than mainstream , underscoring his role in elevating empirical over narrative-driven .

Recognition and Legacy

Awards and Honors

Amartya Sen was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1998 by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for his contributions to , particularly his work on , measurement, and analysis. The prize recognized Sen's axiomatic approach to ethical dimensions in economics and his empirical studies demonstrating that famines result from entitlement failures rather than mere food shortages. In 1999, Sen received the , India's highest civilian honor, bestowed by the for exceptional service in advancing human development and economic thought. He was also decorated as a Chevalier of the by in recognition of his achievements in and philosophy. Sen has been honored with the in 2010 by the U.S. President for his scholarly contributions integrating with ethical considerations. In 2017, he received the Johan Skytte Prize in from for his work on democracy and development. Earlier academic distinctions include the from the in 1954 for his undergraduate thesis on choice mechanisms. Sen holds over 90 honorary degrees from universities across , , , and , reflecting global acknowledgment of his interdisciplinary impact.
YearAward/HonorConferring Body
1954
1998Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
1999
2010
2017Johan Skytte Prize

Institutional Memberships and Endowments

Amartya Sen holds the University Professorship, an endowed chair, and serves as of Economics and Philosophy at , positions he has occupied since 1988. He previously served as Master of , from 1998 to 2004. At the , Sen was the Drummond of Political Economy from 1980 to 1988 and a Fellow of All Souls College during that period, as well as an associate member of Nuffield College. Earlier academic roles include of Economics at the from 1963 to 1971 and again from 1980 to 1987, and at the London School of Economics from 1971 to 1977. Sen also acted as the founding of in from 2010 until his resignation in 2015 amid governance disputes with the government. Sen is elected Fellow of the British Academy since 1977 and Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, as well as a member of the . He maintains honorary fellowships at institutions including (since 2012), and the Royal Society of Edinburgh. In professional economic societies, Sen has led major organizations, serving as president of the Econometric Society, the in 1994, the Indian Economic Association, and the International Economic Association from 1986 to 1989, later becoming its honorary president. These memberships underscore his influence in and development policy within global academic networks.

Long-Term Influence and Ongoing Debates

Sen's capabilities approach has exerted enduring influence on by reorienting the field toward the expansion of individuals' substantive freedoms rather than mere or resource accumulation. This framework, articulated in works like (1999), posits that development entails enhancing people's ability to achieve valued functionings, such as being nourished or participating in community life, influencing international organizations like the (UNDP). The UNDP's (HDI), introduced in 1990, operationalizes elements of Sen's ideas by integrating , education attainment, and as proxies for capability achievement, shifting global policy discourse from GDP-centric metrics to multidimensional well-being assessments. His analyses of famines, emphasizing entitlement failures over food shortages—as demonstrated in the 1943 Bengal famine where adequate food supplies existed but distribution mechanisms collapsed—have informed anti-poverty strategies worldwide, underscoring democratic accountability's role in averting . By 2023, this perspective had permeated policy frameworks in over 190 countries via UNDP reports, promoting institutional reforms to bolster public entitlements and reduce vulnerability. Sen's emphasis on gender disparities as capability deprivations has also driven initiatives like the (1995), highlighting how discriminatory norms limit women's freedoms, with empirical studies linking such insights to improved female literacy and labor participation rates in . Ongoing debates center on the capabilities approach's practicality and philosophical underpinnings. Critics contend it suffers from operational challenges, as Sen deliberately avoids prescribing a fixed list of capabilities, rendering interpersonal comparisons and policy prioritization ambiguous; for instance, argued in that without clear aggregation methods, the framework resists empirical testing akin to utilitarian or Rawlsian alternatives. This vagueness persists in applications, with debates over weighting diverse capabilities—like health versus —complicating cost-benefit analyses in resource-scarce settings. Another contention involves alleged , where the approach prioritizes personal freedoms over collective or relational dynamics; scholars like Sabina Alkire and Séverine Deneulin have proposed extensions incorporating group capabilities, yet Sen maintains that individual agency underpins , rejecting communitarian dilutions that might entrench inequalities. In , market-oriented economists debate Sen's integration of freedoms with interventions, praising his market affirmations but questioning whether capability enhancements necessitate expansive state roles that could distort incentives, as evidenced in critiques of HDI's with slower growth in capability-focused regimes. These discussions, ongoing in journals like the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, reflect tensions between Sen's ethical pluralism and positivist demands for falsifiable metrics.

Personal Life

Marriages and Family Dynamics

Amartya Sen has been married three times. His first marriage was to , an Indian and scholar, in 1959; the couple had two daughters, Antara, a and publisher, and Nandana, a and . They separated in 1976 amid challenges including Nabaneeta's health issues, which had prompted earlier relocations for better medical care. In 1978, Sen married Eva Colorni, an Italian economist and daughter of philosopher Eugenio Colorni and political activist , with whom he had begun a relationship in 1973. The couple had two children: daughter , a based in New York, and son , who were aged 10 and 8, respectively, at the time of Colorni's death from in 1985. Sen has described this sudden loss as a profound disruption, leaving him to raise the young children amid his academic commitments. Sen's third marriage, to economic historian in 1991, has endured; Rothschild, a fellow at , and professor at , shares Sen's interests in economic thought and policy. The union produced no additional children, with Sen's four offspring from his prior marriages maintaining connections across his professional networks in , the , and the .

Philosophical Beliefs and Personal Writings

Sen's philosophical framework emphasizes the capability approach, which assesses human well-being and through the lens of substantive freedoms—specifically, the opportunities individuals have to achieve valued functionings, such as being nourished, educated, or participating in community life—rather than mere or maximization. This approach posits that deprivations in capabilities, often arising from entitlement failures or social barriers, underlie phenomena like and , as evidenced by Sen's analysis of historical events such as the 1943 famine, where food availability was sufficient but access was not. In his writings on , Sen critiques narrow behavioral models in that equate rational choice with self-interested maximization, instead advocating for a broader conception incorporating commitments, social influences, and positional objectivity—where reasoning depends on the observer's perspective and context. He links to freedom, arguing that true agency requires not only opportunity freedom (the capability set) but also process freedom (the ability to act without ), enabling individuals to pursue what they have reason to value. This perspective draws from classical sources like and integrates ethical considerations, rejecting consequentialism's isolation from deontological constraints. Sen's theory of justice favors comparative assessments aimed at remedying specific injustices—such as disparities or capability gaps—over transcendental ideals of perfect institutions, a method informed by practical reasoning traditions in (niti, or behavioral correctness) and global debates. He maintains an agnostic stance on , prioritizing empirical scrutiny and open debate over doctrinal authority, while highlighting heterodox Indian intellectual currents—like Buddhist and skepticism—that challenge orthodoxies and foster pluralism. Sen warns against reductive , which he sees as fostering division, advocating instead for multifaceted affiliations that enhance reasoned public discourse. Sen's personal writings elucidate these beliefs through reflective essays and . In The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity (2005), he compiles essays tracing India's heterodox traditions of debate—from ancient epics to modern reformers—arguing that cultural openness, including secular and agnostic strains, underpins democratic vitality and counters monolithic communalism. His Home in the World: A Memoir (2021) recounts childhood in , exposure to Tagore's Santiniketan emphasizing holistic inquiry over , and traumas like partition violence, which reinforced his focus on shared humanity, fluid identities, and as redress for real-world deprivations. These narratives underscore causal links between personal experience—such as witnessing famine entitlements collapse—and philosophical commitments to freedom-enhancing policies.

References

  1. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1998/sen/facts/
  2. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1998/sen/biographical/
  3. https://www.economics.harvard.edu/people/amartya-sen
  4. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1998/press-release/
  5. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/biocv
  6. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/06/tracing-amartya-sens-path-from-childhood-during-the-raj-to-nobel-prize-and-beyond/
  7. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/12/08/becoming-amartya-sen-home-in-the-world/
  8. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2022/01/24/economist-and-philosopher-amartya-sen-on-the-memories-that-shaped-his-research
  9. https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2022/0124/The-compassionate-economist-Amartya-Sen-reflects-on-an-Indian-childhood
  10. https://www.telegraphindia.com/gallery/some-things-dont-change-amartya-sens-bond-with-santiniketan-remains-unbreakable-photogallery/cid/2123911
  11. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Sen.html
  12. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/
  13. https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/fellows/master/
  14. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/amartya-sen-named-nalanda-university-chancellor/articleshow/15049508.cms
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/21/world/asia/nobel-winner-is-quitting-as-head-of-revived-university-in-india.html
  16. https://www.ineteconomics.org/research/experts/asen
  17. https://www.aapss.org/fellows/fellow/armartya-sen/
  18. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2002/10/nobelist-amartya-sen-to-return/
  19. https://philosophy.fas.harvard.edu/people/amartya-sen
  20. https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/people/profiles/amartya-sen/
  21. https://www.chronicle.com/article/nobel-laureate-steps-down-from-nalanda-after-government-run-in/
  22. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Academic-governance-vulnerable-to-politics-Sen/article60331633.ece
  23. https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2015/02/22/in-full-amartya-sens-nalanda-university-resignation-letter/
  24. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/sen-lecture.pdf
  25. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-choice/
  26. https://academic.oup.com/book/32827
  27. https://www.britannica.com/science/famine/Entitlement-failure
  28. https://d-nb.info/1191048799/34
  29. https://academic.oup.com/book/32827/chapter/275134412
  30. http://www.regionalclimateperspectives.com/uploads/4/4/2/5/44250401/sen1977thecausesoffamine.pdf
  31. https://gdsnet.org/Sen1982PovertyandFaminesBook.pdf
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0305750X9090133I
  33. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0306615031000169125
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23745151_Understanding_the_Entitlement_Approach_to_Famine
  35. https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf
  36. https://do-server1.sfs.uwm.edu/slug/%248V599194L2/edu/3V7980L/commodities%2Band%2Bcapabilities.pdf
  37. https://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue/issue-8/amartya-sens-development-freedom-ten-years-later
  38. https://raggeduniversity.co.uk/2014/05/10/development-as-freedom/
  39. https://www.cmiuniversal.com/en/amartya-sens-capability-theory-approach/
  40. https://base.socioeco.org/docs/developments_critiques_advances.pdf
  41. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1990/12/20/more-than-100-million-women-are-missing/
  42. https://prof.chicanas.com/readings/SenInequality.pdf
  43. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/10/10/indias-women-mixed-truth/
  44. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/asias-missing-millions-how-policy-and-social-pressure-made-millions-of-women-disappear/
  45. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674060470
  46. https://www.analyse-und-kritik.net/Dateien/569652e6d6af1_ak_hinsch_2011.pdf
  47. https://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/journal/on-amartya-sen-and-the-idea-of-justice-full-text
  48. https://www.asiasociety.org/northern-california/amartya-sen-and-idea-justice
  49. https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/journal/001-67
  50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2012.757911
  51. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674919211
  52. https://ophi.org.uk/publications/WP-113
  53. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/on-economic-inequality-9780198281931
  54. https://milescorak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/amartya-sen-on-economic-inequality.pdf
  55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40403521
  56. https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780198281931.html
  57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912718
  58. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v44y1976i2p219-31.html
  59. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/poverty-ordinal-approach-measurement
  60. https://www.econometricsociety.org/publications/econometrica/1976/03/01/poverty-ordinal-approach-measurement
  61. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674127784
  62. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/choice-welfare-and-measurement
  63. https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/94/374/409/5190367
  64. https://books.google.com/books/about/Choice_Welfare_and_Measurement.html?id=u8GPYeT1qAUC
  65. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/development-as-freedom-9780192893307?lang=en&cc=nl
  66. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/development-freedom
  67. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/
  68. https://iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/
  69. https://www.shortform.com/blog/development-as-freedom-book-review/
  70. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674013513
  71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1dv0td8
  72. https://sen.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/argumentative-indian
  73. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2000/07/20/east-and-west-the-reach-of-reason/
  74. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/amartya-sen-and-idea-of-justice/
  75. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ctls_papers
  76. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/52913/frontmatter/9780521852913_frontmatter.pdf
  77. https://asiasociety.org/amartya-sen-more-human-theory-development
  78. https://hdr.undp.org/about/human-development
  79. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/sen-amartyaanand-sudhirconsumption.pdf
  80. https://hdr.undp.org/content/inaugural-mahbub-ul-haq-amartya-sen-lecture-unige
  81. https://ophi.org.uk/research/amartya-sen-and-ophi
  82. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2010/12/who-is-poor
  83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882681
  84. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/77095/14-73-fall-2009/contents/lecture-notes/MIT14_73F09_lec05.pdf
  85. https://nicholaswoodesmith.com/sens-approach-bengali-famine-1943/
  86. https://en.prothomalo.com/opinion/op-ed/dmdxih6qaf
  87. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6294652.pdf
  88. https://academic.oup.com/book/32827/chapter/275136196
  89. https://www.becomingbangladesh.net/theperfectstorm
  90. https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol10-issue4/Ser-3/C10041821.pdf
  91. https://pseudoerasmus.com/2015/06/08/markets-famine-stop-treating-amartya-sen-as-the-last-word/
  92. https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/WP121.pdf
  93. https://press.un.org/en/1998/19981015.sen.html
  94. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17449626.2015.1100651
  95. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00448.x
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301516304934
  97. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/utilitas/article/sugdens-critique-of-the-capability-approach/98073F56BB92CC88903555B8D9109283
  98. https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/capabilities-approach-libertarianism
  99. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00220388808422098
  100. https://shs.cairn.info/article/E_LECO_023_0072?lang=en
  101. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2009/03/26/capitalism-beyond-the-crisis/
  102. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr06/cos444/papers/sen.pdf
  103. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00213624.2024.2307785
  104. https://academic.oup.com/book/9111/chapter/315316569
  105. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/economics-and-philosophy/article/rights-and-social-choice-is-there-a-paretian-libertarian-paradox/37163CCE7BD588D9513C7698028539C1
  106. https://asiasociety.org/video/interview-amartya-sen-reviving-nalanda
  107. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/amartya-sen-says-recent-poll-results-prove-india-not-a-hindu-rashtra/articleshow/111302537.cms
  108. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/amartya-sen-calls-for-congress-aap-unity-warns-against-hindutva-influence/articleshow/118212324.cms
  109. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/there-should-not-be-targeted-attempt-to-eliminate-voice-of-some-citizens-especially-from-deprived-parts-of-india-amartya-sen-on-sir/article69904060.ece
  110. https://m.thewire.in/article/communalism/full-text-modis-india-is-fragile-neglects-engines-of-development-amartya-sen-to-karan-thapar
  111. https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-new-yorker-interview/amartya-sens-hopes-and-fears-for-indian-democracy
  112. https://blog.oup.com/2015/08/amartya-sen-modi-government-education-health-care-politics/
  113. https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/modi-government-one-of-the-most-appalling-amartya-sen/cid/1909964
  114. https://indiahousefoundation.org/populism-when-combined-with-a-disdainful-and-negative-attitude-towards-democracy-can-be-very-dangerous-amartya-sen
  115. https://www.nextias.com/ca/current-affairs/23-08-2025/migration-essential-globalisation-amartya-sen
  116. https://vajiramandravi.com/current-affairs/amartya-sen-migration-integral-to-globalisation-and-human-progress/
  117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304577644_International_migration_seen_through_the_lens_of_Amartya_Sen%27s_capability_approach
  118. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracy-as-a-universal-value/
  119. https://www.idea.int/news/democracy-truth-why-democracies-are-better-preventing-pandemics
  120. https://www.iese.edu/insight/articles/amartya-sen-growth-human/
  121. https://m.thewire.in/article/politics/amartya-sen-interview-inequality-democracy
  122. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17449626.2023.2255600
  123. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Amartya-Sen-:-a-life-reexamined/oclc/56801343
  124. https://southasia.ucla.edu/culture/intellectuals/amartya-sen-argumentative-indians-bengali-modernity/
  125. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6523702/
  126. https://www.primevideo.com/detail/The-Argumentative-Indian/0RMNSU8HLWOBRCF2LGAYIFN11Y
  127. https://www.pbs.org/video/pov-amartya-sen-on-development/
  128. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/culture/37804/amartya-sen-the-optimistic-indian
  129. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36n38LIvRS4
  130. https://www.firstpost.com/india/is-amartya-sen-oversimplifying-our-media-choices-177236.html
  131. https://satyamshot.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/satyajit-ray-and-the-art-of-universalism-our-culture-their-culture-amartya-sen/
  132. https://www.icrw.org/staff-members/amartya-sen/
  133. https://boston.consulfrance.org/Amartya-Sen-awarded-Legion-of-Honor-Medal-for-Achievements-in-Economics-and
  134. https://www.iss.nl/en/about-iss/organization/honorary-fellows/amartya-sen
  135. https://www.asc.ox.ac.uk/person/professor-amartya-sen
  136. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/profiles/amartya-sen-FBA/
  137. https://www.ethics.harvard.edu/people/amartya-sen
  138. https://www.ssrc.org/programs/council-initiatives/the-albert-o-hirschman-prize/2016-amartya-sen/
  139. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2004/09/pdf/people.pdf
  140. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/economic-consequences-professor-amartya-sen-0
  141. https://www.lgt.com/global-en/market-assessments/insights/financial-knowledge/how-amartya-sen-changed-our-understanding-of-inequality-294486
  142. https://books.openedition.org/obp/4868?lang=en
  143. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00346764.2020.1774636
  144. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24376/1/Critiquing_capabilities_%28LSERO_version%29.pdf
  145. https://www.livemint.com/mint-lounge/ideas/nabaneeta-dev-sen-1938-2019-writer-and-fighter-till-the-end-111641420309911.html
  146. https://www.indiablooms.com/news/nobel-laureate-amartya-sen-expresses-grief-over-nabaneeta-dev-sens-death/details
  147. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/12-lesser-known-facts-about-the-nobel-laureate-amartya-sen/articleshow/95257311.cms
  148. https://family.rothschildarchive.org/people/148-emma-georgina-rothschild-1948
  149. https://globalsocialtheory.org/thinkers/sen-amartya/
  150. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/381117
  151. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2021/07/sen-memoir
  152. https://www.goodtimes.sc/archives/metro-santa-cruz/10.04.06/amartya-sen-0640.html
  153. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/essays/53293/sen-and-sensibility
  154. https://www.amazon.com/Argumentative-Indian-Writings-History-Identity/dp/0374105839
  155. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/04/the-story-behind-amartya-sens-new-memoir/
  156. https://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/journal/identity-and-shared-humanity-reflections-on-amartya-sens-memoir
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.