Hubbry Logo
Black Like MeBlack Like MeMain
Open search
Black Like Me
Community hub
Black Like Me
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Black Like Me
Black Like Me
Black Like Me
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Black Like Me, first published in 1961, is a nonfiction book by journalist John Howard Griffin recounting his journey in the Deep South of the United States, at a time when African Americans lived under racial segregation. Griffin was a native of Mansfield, Texas, who had his skin temporarily darkened to pass as a black man. He traveled for six weeks throughout the racially segregated states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, and Georgia to explore life from the other side of the color line. Sepia Magazine financed the project in exchange for the right to print the account first as a series of articles.

Key Information

Griffin kept a journal of his experiences; the 188-page diary was the genesis of the book. When he started his project in 1959, race relations in America were particularly strained. The title of the book is taken from the last line of the Langston Hughes poem "Dream Variations".

In 1964, a film version of Black Like Me, starring James Whitmore, was produced.[1] A generation later, Robert Bonazzi published a biographical book about Griffin, these events, and his life: Man in the Mirror: John Howard Griffin and the Story of Black Like Me (1997).

Account of the trip

[edit]
Griffin, in disguise as a black man, in a Negro café.

In late 1959, John Howard Griffin went to a friend's house in New Orleans, Louisiana. Once there, under the care of a dermatologist, Griffin underwent a regimen of large oral doses of the anti-vitiligo drug methoxsalen, and spent up to 15 hours daily under an ultraviolet lamp for about a week. He was given regular blood tests to ensure that he was not suffering liver damage. The darkening of his skin was not perfect, so he touched it up with stain. He shaved his head bald to hide his straight brown hair. Satisfied that he could pass as an African-American, Griffin began a six-week journey in the South. Don Rutledge traveled with him, documenting the experience with photos.[2]

During his trip, Griffin abided by the rule that he would not change his name or alter his identity; if asked who he was or what he was doing, he would tell the truth.[3] In the beginning, he decided to talk as little as possible[4] to ease his transition into the social milieu of southern U.S. blacks. He became accustomed everywhere to the "hate stare" received from whites.

After he disguised himself, many people who knew Griffin as a white man did not recognize him. Sterling Williams, a black shoeshine man in the French Quarter whom Griffin regarded as a casual friend, did not recognize him. He first hinted that he wore the same unusual shoes as somebody else,[5] but Sterling still did not recognize him until Griffin told him. Because Griffin wanted assistance in entering into the black community, he decided to tell Williams about his identity and project.

In New Orleans, a black counterman at a small restaurant chatted with Griffin about the difficulties of finding a place to go to the bathroom, as facilities were segregated and blacks were prohibited from many. He turned a question about a Catholic church into a joke about "spending much of your time praying for a place to piss".

On a bus trip, Griffin began to give his seat to a white woman, but disapproving looks from black passengers stopped him. He thought he had a momentary breakthrough with the woman, but she insulted him and began talking with other white passengers about how impudent the blacks were becoming.

Griffin decided to end his journey in late November in Montgomery, Alabama. He spent three days secluded from sunlight in a hotel room and stopped taking his skin-darkening medication. When his skin had regained its natural color, he quietly slipped into the white part of Montgomery, and was jarred by how warmly the people there now treated him.[6]

Reaction

[edit]

After his book was published, Griffin received many letters of support. He said they helped him understand the experience. Griffin received very few hostile letters.[7]

Griffin became a national celebrity for a time. In a 1975 essay included in later editions of the book, he recounted encountering hostility and threats to him and his family in his hometown of Mansfield, Texas. He moved to Mexico for a number of years for safety.[8][9]

In 1964, while stopped with a flat tire in Mississippi, Griffin was assaulted by a group of white men and beaten with chains. The assailants' motivation was attributed to the book. It took Griffin five months to recover from his injuries.[10]

Precedent

[edit]

Journalist Ray Sprigle of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette had undertaken a similar project more than a decade earlier.

Publication history

[edit]

Sepia Magazine financed the project in exchange for the right to print the account first as a series of articles, which it did under the title Journey into Shame.

United States

[edit]
  • Griffin, John Howard (1961). Black Like Me. Houghton Mifflin. LCCN 61005368.
  • Griffin, John Howard (1962). Black Like Me. Signet Books. ISBN 0-451-09703-3. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  • Griffin, John Howard (1977). Black Like Me. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-395-25102-8.
    • 2nd Edition, with an epilogue by the author, written three years before his death in 1980.
  • Griffin, John Howard (1996). Black Like Me: 35th Anniversary Edition. Signet. ISBN 0-451-19203-6.
  • Griffin, John Howard (1999). Black Like Me. Buccaneer Books. ISBN 1-56849-730-X.
  • Griffin, John Howard (2003). Black Like Me. New American Library Trade. ISBN 0-451-20864-1.
  • Griffin, John Howard (2004). Black like Me: The Definitive Griffin Estate Edition, Corrected from Original Manuscripts. Wings Press. ISBN 0-930324-72-2.
  • Griffin, John Howard (2010). Black Like Me (50th Anniversary ed.). Signet. ISBN 978-0451234216.

UK

[edit]
  • Griffin, John Howard (1962). Black Like Me. Collins.
  • Griffin, John Howard (1962). Black Like Me. The Catholic Book Club.
  • Griffin, John Howard (1962). Black Like Me. Grafton Books. ISBN 0-586-02482-4. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) (repeatedly reprinted under same ISBN)
  • Griffin, John Howard (1964). Black Like Me. Panther. ISBN 0-586-02824-2. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  • Griffin, John Howard (2009). Black Like Me. Souvenir Press. ISBN 978-0-285-63857-0.

Cultural references

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Crowther, Bosley (May 21, 1964). "Black Like Me (1964) James Whitmore Stars in Book's Adaptation". The New York Times.
  2. ^ Stanley Leary. "Black Like Me". Archived from the original on June 6, 2015.
  3. ^ Griffin 1996, p. 4: "I decided not to change my name or identity...If asked who I was or what I was doing, I would answer truthfully..."
  4. ^ Griffin 1996, p. 19: "I had made it a rule to talk as little as possible at first."
  5. ^ Griffin 1996, p. 22: "He looked up without a hint of recognition...He had shined them many times and I felt he should certainly recognize them."
  6. ^ Robert Bonazzi (1997), Man in the Mirror, p. 106
  7. ^ Griffin 1996, p. 160: "There were six thousand letters to date and only nine of them abusive."
  8. ^ Connolly, Kevin (October 25, 2009). "Exposing the colour of prejudice". BBC News.
  9. ^ Yardley, Jonathan (March 17, 2007). "John Howard Griffin Took Race All the Way to the Finish". The Washington Post.
  10. ^ Manzoor, Sarfraz (October 27, 2011). "Rereading: Black Like Me by John Howard Griffin". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved January 20, 2020.
  11. ^ Jonathan Bernstein (June 5, 2020). "Mickey Guyton on Country Music's Response to George Floyd's Death". Rolling Stone. Retrieved June 16, 2020.
  12. ^ Vincenty, Samantha (2025-02-07). "Eddie Murphy's "White Like Me" SNL Sketch Parodies a Real Book". NBC. Retrieved 2025-03-25.
  13. ^ Kennedy, Mark (2025-02-12). "12 times 'Saturday Night Live' made a cultural bang over the past 50 years". NBC Los Angeles. Retrieved 2025-03-25.

General and cited references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Black Like Me

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Black Like Me is a by American journalist and writer , first published in October 1961, in which he details his six-week experiment in late 1959 of using a drug for and exposure to sunlamps to darken his skin and pass as a Black man while traveling through the segregated American from New Orleans to . Griffin, motivated by a desire to empirically investigate the realities of Jim Crow segregation firsthand after widespread denials of its severity, recorded daily encounters of , including restricted access to public facilities, hostile "hate stares" from whites, economic hardships faced by Blacks, and interpersonal dynamics revealing systemic racial animus. His diary-style account exposed the stark contrast in treatment he received as a white man versus a perceived Black one, providing direct causal evidence of prejudice's effects on daily life in states like and . The book achieved significant commercial and cultural success, selling over 10 million copies worldwide, being translated into 14 languages, and adapted into a 1964 film directed by Carl Lerner starring as Griffin. It influenced public discourse on civil rights, prompting white audiences to confront the empirical realities of segregation they had often dismissed, and led Griffin to lecture extensively and form alliances with figures like . Serialized initially in Sepia magazine, a publication aimed at Black readers, it bridged experiential gaps but drew contemporary criticism from some Black nationalists, such as , who viewed it as primarily beneficial for enlightening whites rather than advancing Black perspectives. Despite such debates over a white author's authority to represent Black experiences, the work's value as a primary-source of mid-20th-century racial dynamics endures, underscoring causal mechanisms of through Griffin's controlled personal transformation.

Author and Historical Context

John Howard Griffin Biography

John Howard Griffin was born on June 16, 1920, in , . He received early before traveling to France as a teenager, where he trained as a musicologist specializing in in Tours. His background reflected a middle-class upbringing typical of urban families in the , with exposure to and European cultural traditions shaping his initial intellectual pursuits. During , Griffin served in the U.S. military from 1942 to 1945, including assignments in the Pacific theater. In 1945, he sustained a severe from shrapnel during an air raid, resulting in a that led to total blindness for nearly a decade. While blind, he composed two novels, The Devil Rides Outside (1952) and Nuni (1956), along with short stories, demonstrating his resilience and literary productivity amid physical hardship. This period intensified his spiritual introspection, fostering a profound engagement with existential questions of suffering and human purpose. Griffin experienced partial recovery of his vision in the early 1950s, which he attributed to a combination of medical treatment and personal faith developments. He converted to Roman Catholicism in 1951, influenced by Thomistic philosophy and thinkers like , emphasizing universal human dignity grounded in rather than contingent social identities. Post-recovery, he pursued a career in journalism, contributing to publications such as Sepia magazine, which catered to African American readers, while articulating opposition to segregation through ethical arguments derived from his Catholic worldview rather than organized political . This stance reflected a commitment to individual over collective ideological movements.

Pre-Experiment Motivations and Influences

, a Texas-based and novelist, grew increasingly frustrated with the abstract and polarized nature of racial debates in the American South following the Supreme Court's decision in 1954, which declared school segregation unconstitutional, and the 1957 Little Rock crisis, where federal intervention was required to enforce desegregation amid white resistance. These events highlighted persistent white skepticism toward black testimonies of , prompting Griffin to seek an empirical means to verify claims of systemic racism through personal immersion rather than relying on secondhand accounts or ideological assertions. He viewed such direct experience as essential to bridging experiential gaps, stating that the only way to comprehend the divide was "to become a ." Griffin's motivations were shaped by his Catholic faith, to which he converted during a of blindness caused by a war , and by personal relationships with individuals who challenged him to understand their reality firsthand. Influenced by theological studies, including the works of , and interactions with figures like , Griffin saw racism not merely as a social ill but as a profound spiritual deformation affecting human dignity. Remarks from associates, such as Adelle Martin's assertion that true comprehension required "waking up in my skin," reinforced his conviction that empathy alone was insufficient without lived verification, countering what he perceived as superficial civil rights discourse detached from causal realities of . In 1959, driven by journalistic inquiry into phenomena like elevated suicide rates among Southern blacks—research that had stalled due to evasive responses—Griffin proposed the experiment to George Levitan, publisher of Sepia magazine, as a serialized investigative series rather than an act of predetermined activism. Levitan, initially hesitant, agreed to fund the project, reflecting Griffin's approach grounded in curiosity and methodological testing over advocacy. This collaboration underscored his intent to document observable dynamics empirically, anticipating a modest sociological contribution amid ongoing segregation enforcement failures, such as unindicted lynchings in Mississippi that year.

Segregation Era in the American South

The institutionalized across the American South following Reconstruction, mandating separation in public facilities, transportation, schools, and accommodations under the guise of "." The U.S. Supreme Court's 1896 ruling upheld a statute requiring segregated railroad cars, interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment to permit such divisions if facilities were nominally equivalent, thereby providing constitutional cover for state-enforced disparities that disadvantaged black citizens. This doctrine endured until the 1954 decision, which invalidated segregated public schooling as inherently unequal, though Southern compliance lagged due to executive resistance, legislative maneuvers like interposition resolutions, and localized defiance that preserved separation into the late 1950s. State statutes in former Confederate territories—such as Alabama's 1901 constitution mandating separate railway cars and Mississippi's 1890 laws segregating schools and waiting rooms—extended these separations to daily interactions, with penalties including fines up to $500 or imprisonment for violations like black passengers occupying white-designated seats. Beyond legal mandates, social customs enforced compliance through oversight, where white employers wielded economic leverage via job threats and black neighborhoods self-policed to avert reprisals, embedding divisions in a web of mutual dependencies rather than isolated . These norms drew from entrenched post-emancipation , including systems that tethered black laborers to white landowners through perpetual debt, confining over 75% of Southern black workers to by 1950 and stifling or migration. Escalating frictions in the late 1950s stemmed from civil rights encroachments on this order, exemplified by the of December 5, 1955, to December 20, 1956, when approximately 40,000 Montgomery residents abstained from city buses after ' arrest for refusing to yield her seat, forcing economic strain on the system and yielding a federal court mandate for desegregated local transit. White countermeasures included the revival of the , whose Southern chapters expanded from under 10,000 members in 1950 to peaks exceeding 200,000 by mid-decade, targeting integration via cross burnings, church arsons, and voter intimidation in states like Georgia and to counter federal pressures. Such dynamics underscored a regime sustained by intertwined legal, economic, and vigilante mechanisms, where and tradition amplified enforcement amid nascent challenges to the .

The Experiment

Preparation and Methodology

John Howard began preparing for his experiment by consulting a dermatologist in New Orleans, who prescribed —a ordinarily used to treat by increasing skin sensitivity to light—combined with controlled exposure to lamps to induce temporary . To enhance the effect and obscure facial features, Griffin applied liquid shoe polish as a stain and shaved his head bald, aiming for a plausible phenotypic shift without surgical intervention. This regimen, medically supervised to mitigate risks like burns or uneven tanning, was designed for reversibility but required daily maintenance, highlighting the method's feasibility constraints: the darkening was superficial and prone to fading under scrutiny or washing, potentially compromising long-term immersion in black communities. The experiment was scheduled to last six weeks, commencing on October 28, 1959, to allow sufficient time for observation across multiple Southern locales while testing the durability of his altered appearance. Travel logistics emphasized replication of black mobility barriers: Griffin planned to originate in New Orleans and proceed via hitchhiking or public buses—eschewing private vehicles or air travel—through , , , and Georgia, thereby encountering spatial and social restrictions firsthand without financial or logistical privileges. To prioritize empirical data over advocacy, Griffin committed to journaling contemporaneous notes each evening, eschewing any preconceived hypotheses or policy-oriented framing in favor of raw documentation of daily interpersonal encounters and environmental cues. This approach, while yielding unfiltered personal testimony, carried inherent limitations for broader truth-seeking: as a solitary white observer in transient , his experiences risked toward urban or roadside interactions, and the brevity of disguises (often requiring reapplication) underscored that the method captured episodic rather than cumulative racial dynamics.

Itinerary and Daily Experiences

Griffin initiated the experiment on October 28, 1959, in New Orleans, Louisiana, where he underwent skin pigmentation treatment and began navigating the city as a black man, primarily on foot and observing segregated facilities such as restrooms and counters that excluded him. He encountered welcoming attitudes from black residents, including conversations in YMCAs and churches, but faced overt white hostility, including refusals of service and suspicious glares while attempting to board buses or enter white areas. From New Orleans, he traveled by segregated bus to Hattiesburg, Mississippi, around mid-November, covering short distances amid delays and racial tensions on public transport. In Hattiesburg and nearby , Griffin sought manual labor jobs but encountered systemic barriers, with employers dismissing black applicants outright, and experienced harassment such as verbal rebukes from white passengers on buses who enforced spatial segregation. He proceeded to , in late November, spending several days and applying for factory work, where he noted widespread among blacks and rare instances of cross-racial aid, like a white driver's offer of a ride despite risks under segregation laws. Continuing to , he documented similar patterns of exclusion from public spaces and job markets, relying on black community networks for shelter and meals in designated areas. By early November's end, Griffin shifted to Atlanta, Georgia, temporarily reverting to his white persona for comparative experiences, noting easier access to integrated facilities before resuming black identity en route to Savannah, Georgia, where he faced renewed harassment and job rejections. The six-week journey, spanning approximately 1,000 miles via buses, hitchhiking, and walking on segregated routes through Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia, culminated in his return to Texas in early December 1959, where he began depigmentation. Throughout, daily routines involved evading enforcement of Jim Crow laws, such as separate waiting rooms and transport seating, with encounters highlighting enforced isolation punctuated by occasional anonymous kindness from whites.

Personal Risks and Health Consequences

During his travels as a black man in the Deep South from November 1959 to early 1960, Griffin encountered immediate physical dangers, including verbal abuse and direct threats of violence from white individuals who suspected his authenticity or reacted hostilely to his presence. In one documented incident in Mississippi, a white man pursued Griffin on foot, hurling racial epithets and threats, forcing Griffin to evade confrontation through flight. He also faced heightened police scrutiny, as law enforcement often targeted black men for arbitrary stops and intimidation, amplifying the risk of escalation to physical assault or arrest on fabricated charges. To mitigate these perils, Griffin depended heavily on informal networks within black communities for shelter, guidance, and warnings about unsafe areas, as solitary travel exposed him to potential lynching or mob violence if his white identity were uncovered. The physical transformation process itself imposed significant burdens. Griffin ingested Oxsoralen (), a photosensitizing drug prescribed for that enhances light absorption to induce pigmentation, combined with prolonged exposure to sunlamps and , resulting in acute blistering and burns during the experiment. These treatments carried known risks of long-term dermal damage, hepatic toxicity, and elevated incidence due to cumulative UV exposure and drug-induced cellular changes, though Griffin discontinued use post-experiment. No direct causation links these to vision impairment, as Griffin had previously recovered from wartime blindness unrelated to the project; however, photosensitizers like Oxsoralen can exacerbate ocular issues with overuse. He succumbed to complications on September 9, 1980, at age 60 in , amid a of chronic health challenges including prior injuries, with urban legends falsely attributing his death to skin cancer from the darkening regimen. Publication of his experiences in late 1961 triggered severe social repercussions, including anonymous death threats against Griffin and his family, some explicitly promising castration or assassination by white supremacist elements in . In response, cross burnings occurred near associates' homes, and an effigy of Griffin was publicly hanged in , compelling the family to relocate temporarily to for two years to evade ongoing . This backlash, while stemming from the experiment's revelations, was intensified by Griffin's deliberate public disclosure, rendering the perils partly self-imposed through journalistic commitment rather than unavoidable martyrdom.

Book Content and Themes

Narrative Structure and Key Events

employs a format, consisting of episodic journal entries that chronicle 's experiences during his six-week transformation and travels from October 28, 1959, to December 14, 1959. Beginning with his skin-darkening process in New Orleans, Louisiana, the narrative progresses day-by-day through bus rides, , and interactions in cities across the , including ; Hattiesburg and ; and Atlanta, Georgia. This structure reflects the immediacy of Griffin's contemporaneous notes, serialized initially in Sepia magazine in three parts starting in 1960. Pivotal incidents underscore the routine barriers of segregation. Upon arriving in , on November 7, 1959, Griffin faced denial of access to white-designated restrooms and other facilities, such as at bus stations where black passengers were prohibited from disembarking to use amenities available to whites. Later, while through and , he accepted rides from white drivers on multiple occasions, only to encounter sexual propositions from them, as they assumed availability based on racial . Griffin also documented encounters within black communities that provided contrast, such as attending church services where congregants offered hospitality, shared meals, and emotional support amid shared hardships. The account incorporates photographs by photojournalist Don Rutledge, depicting Griffin's disguised appearance in everyday settings like cafés and documenting Southern racial divides visually.

Observations on Racial Dynamics

Griffin documented whites' interactions with blacks as marked by superficial , such as polite greetings masking denial of equality, alongside a pervasive of black sexuality that manifested in of irresponsibility and immorality tied to skin color. This was evident in white women's hate stares during church services and in morbid curiosity about black physical attributes, with some whites pursuing black women sexually under hypocritical pretenses of racial "improvement." In response, blacks adopted survival strategies of , including avoiding eye contact with white women, obeying abrupt commands like "Boy, come here. Hurry!", and displaying forced grins to retain menial jobs, thereby minimizing risks of violence or dismissal. Hostility varied by socioeconomic and geographic factors, with poorer whites exhibiting greater overt antagonism rooted in economic competition fears, contrasting with more subtle urban discriminations. Rural areas, such as , displayed intense , including references to recent lynchings and isolation, while urban centers like New Orleans offered marginally more courtesies and hints of passive resistance, though segregation persisted. Economically, segregation enforced labor market exclusions, confining educated blacks to menial roles or perpetual debt, as foremen systematically "weeded out" blacks from skilled positions and professionals sought opportunities only outside the . unemployment in the exceeded national averages, with and discriminatory hiring amplifying joblessness amid overall rates around 5.5% for 1959, effectively doubling for blacks due to regional barriers.

Griffin's Reflections on Human Nature

Griffin contended that manifests as a universal failing driven by and rather than any innate sense of racial superiority, observing that such distortions afflict individuals across racial lines and stem from learned conditioning rather than essential differences. He explicitly rejected racial , asserting that observed traits in black and white communities alike "don’t spring from whiteness or blackness, but from a man’s conditioning," thereby prioritizing individual and environmental influences over . This perspective positioned hate as a projection of personal insecurities, with "dim[ming] even the sunlight" and fostering behaviors that degrade dignity universally. Reflecting on his own preconceptions, Griffin acknowledged carrying "emotional garbage" of for years prior to the experiment, which he linked to societal that categorizes others as inferior without direct experience. He critiqued the tendency to paternalize or downgrade others' through unexamined assumptions, arguing that true humanity requires confronting such internal biases rather than attributing them solely to external racial dynamics. Griffin drew on Christian ethics to advocate transcending racial barriers, emphasizing that authentic faith demands justice as the measure of manhood—"He who is less than just is less than "—while decrying how "every fool in error [can] find a passage of scripture to back him up." This underscored a universal moral framework over group-based identities, favoring personal and brotherhood in opposition to divisive racial collectivism emerging in the era. In concluding reflections, including later epilogues, Griffin voiced doubt about swift resolutions to entrenched prejudice, highlighting how legal changes alone fail to eradicate deep-seated habits, as racism proved "intractable" in white society despite desegregation efforts. He warned that without sustained individual and communal reckoning, underlying fears and ignorances would perpetuate division, trapping societies in cycles of stereotype and resentment.

Publication and Distribution

Initial Serialization and Book Release

Griffin's account of his experiences traveling as a man in the segregated was first serialized in the African American magazine Sepia under the title "Journey into Shame," appearing in three installments beginning in late 1959. The series, drawn directly from his daily journal entries, detailed his observations without embellishment, emphasizing a raw, firsthand documentary approach rather than dramatic narrative. The serialization generated significant interest among readers, leading Houghton Mifflin Company to acquire rights for a full book version. Black Like Me was released in by Houghton Mifflin on October 17, 1961, compiling the expanded journal with minimal editorial alterations to preserve Griffin's original voice and chronological structure. Priced at $3.95, the initial edition sold briskly through civil rights-oriented channels and word-of-mouth promotion, rather than extensive advertising campaigns. It quickly ascended to status, with strong initial sales reflecting public curiosity about racial dynamics amid rising civil rights tensions.

Editions and International Reach

Following its initial U.S. publication, Black Like Me underwent multiple reprints, including a Signet paperback edition issued in 1962 that broadened domestic accessibility through mass-market distribution. An international edition appeared in the , published by Barrie and Rockliff in 1963. The book was translated into 14 languages, extending its reach beyond English-speaking markets by the early . Later print editions incorporated editorial enhancements, such as epilogues authored by Griffin; a notable addition in the 1975 edition addressed the persistence of racial barriers post-civil rights advancements. These updates provided contextual reflections without altering the core narrative from Griffin's 1959 experiences. Post-2000 formats emphasized digital and audio accessibility, including e-book versions available via platforms like OverDrive and Kindle. An unabridged edition, narrated by Ray Childs, was released in 2011 by Blackstone Publishing. The Definitive Griffin Estate Edition, corrected against original manuscripts and including historic photographs alongside a biographical afterword, represents a scholarly reprint without substantive textual changes beyond introductory materials.

Commercial Success Metrics

Black Like Me achieved rapid commercial success after its 1961 hardcover release by Houghton Mifflin, becoming a national bestseller and propelling author to prominence. The book topped sales charts, with initial print runs quickly exhausted amid high demand from readers interested in its firsthand account of . It earned the for nonfiction in 1962, recognizing its contribution to literature on . Sales figures reflect strong , with the title reportedly selling over five million copies in its early decades and continuing to generate revenue through subsequent editions. Paperback releases by Signet Books further boosted accessibility, contributing to its status as an enduring translated into 16 languages. Unlike more academic works on similar themes, such as Gunnar Myrdal's (1944), which influenced policy but lacked comparable mass-market appeal, Black Like Me resonated broadly with general audiences, evidenced by its sustained reprints and adaptations. Griffin received royalties from book sales and serialization rights, which provided modest financial support despite personal threats stemming from the content's ; these funds enabled further writing projects, including related essays and lectures. The work's profitability underscored its appeal beyond niche civil rights circles, marking it as a rare exposé to achieve widespread popular distribution in the early .

Reception and Reactions

Positive Responses from Civil Rights Advocates

Civil rights advocates valued Black Like Me for offering a white author's to the daily humiliations of segregation, which they argued carried greater persuasive weight with skeptical white audiences than accounts from black voices alone. Historian observed that Griffin articulated experiences local black individuals had long described, yet authorities dismissed until validated by an outsider. Scholar emphasized that the book substantiated black reports of systemic , demonstrating through Griffin's immersion that such claims were not exaggerated but empirically grounded realities of Jim Crow enforcement. Following its 1961 release, Griffin forged alliances with prominent civil rights figures, including a friendship with Martin Luther King Jr., and delivered over 1,000 joint lectures to advance interracial dialogue and challenge racial prejudices. These efforts aligned with activists' strategies to leverage white intermediaries for broader mobilization, as Griffin's narrative reportedly prompted some white participants to reconsider entrenched attitudes toward integration. The book's adoption in early 1960s sociology and African American studies curricula further supported this, equipping educators to cultivate empathy among white students and encourage participation in desegregation initiatives. Readers, particularly whites, frequently reported profound emotional responses, including induced guilt over unexamined privileges, which advocates cited as catalyzing donations and volunteerism for civil rights organizations amid escalating protests. This subjective impact reinforced the text's role in fostering tentative white allyship, though its efficacy depended on readers' willingness to confront uncomfortable causal links between societal norms and black disenfranchisement.

Backlash from Southern Conservatives

Following the serialization of Griffin's experiences in Sepia magazine in April 1960, residents in his hometown of —a community known for its staunch resistance to desegregation—responded with overt hostility. An depicting Griffin, portrayed as half black and half white with a yellow stripe symbolizing cowardice, was hanged from a downtown traffic light. Days later, a was burned in front of the town's predominantly black elementary school, signaling Klan-style intimidation. Anonymous phone threats warned of castration, reflecting the visceral rejection by local segregationists who viewed Griffin's account as a betrayal of Southern racial norms. These acts exemplified broader pushback from Southern conservatives skeptical of Griffin's narrative, which they saw as amplifying Northern criticisms of the region's social order without acknowledging its purported stability under segregation. Among the approximately 6,000 letters Griffin received post-serialization, only nine were overtly hostile, but those from Southern states dismissed his observations as exaggerated or self-serving, questioning the feasibility of his temporary racial passing and implying ulterior motives tied to civil rights agitation. Such responses underscored empirical doubts about the universality of the discrimination depicted, with critics arguing that Griffin's brief immersion failed to capture variances in local interracial interactions or the self-sufficiency of segregated communities. The intensity of this resistance escalated into sustained personal endangerment, as Griffin faced repeated death threats from affiliates and other white supremacist elements opposed to his exposé. These threats, rooted in fears that the book undermined the defense of Jim Crow customs, prompted heightened security measures and contributed to Griffin's eventual relocation abroad for safety.

Media Coverage and Public Debates

Griffin's account garnered significant media attention shortly after its book publication on November 17, 1961, with outlets framing the narrative as a bold personal experiment amid escalating civil rights tensions. Coverage in national magazines and broadcasts often highlighted the stark racial contrasts he described, influencing public discourse by personalizing abstract segregation issues while prompting immediate pushback on the experiment's representativeness. Television and radio appearances amplified these discussions, exposing regional fault lines in reception. Griffin was interviewed by journalist on multiple occasions, including a television segment that delved into the book's findings and the vitriolic responses it elicited, particularly from Southern audiences who challenged its veracity. These interviews underscored how media platforms aired both empathetic northern perspectives and defensive southern counterarguments, framing the around experiential authenticity rather than policy alone. Newspaper letters to editors and opinion columns fueled ongoing public contention, with correspondents debating whether a man's temporary alteration could encapsulate the enduring psychological and social burdens of life in the Jim Crow South. Critics contended that the six-week duration overlooked generational patterns of discrimination, a view echoed in contemporaneous responses that portrayed Griffin's observations as selective or sensationalized. The resultant polarization drove commercial interest, as threats against Griffin and public book burnings in places like his hometown generated free publicity, spiking sales and elevating the title to national bestseller lists by early 1962. Southern white respondents frequently rejected the narrative as overstated, contributing to a fractured where media amplification both validated the experiment's shock value and entrenched among skeptics.

Controversies and Criticisms

Authenticity of Skin Darkening and Passing

Griffin achieved skin darkening through a regimen prescribed by a dermatologist involving high doses of Oxsoralen, a psoralen derivative typically used in photochemotherapy for , ingested orally and followed by intensive exposure to sunlamps over four days beginning November 1, 1959. This method stimulated melanogenesis, producing a temporary increase in skin pigment, but resulted in mottled and uneven coloration rather than uniform darkening, accompanied by side effects such as and lassitude. To compensate for patchy areas, Griffin applied vegetable dye to lighter spots and, in some cases, makeup for further evening, while also shaving his head and razoring fine hairs on his hands to avoid giveaways from his naturally lighter features. Photographs taken during the experiment, including those of Griffin in public settings, reveal the limitations of this approach: his skin appeared tanned to a medium but lacked the depth and consistency of genetic distribution, often requiring ongoing adjustments to maintain the illusion under varying light conditions. Griffin himself documented episodes of heightened scrutiny, such as prolonged "hate stares" from and occasional wary glances from individuals, though he maintained that neither group penetrated the disguise, attributing success to superficial interactions and societal aversion to close examination of . Contemporary accounts from his travels corroborate general acceptance in passing for over six weeks across , , , and Georgia, with no verified instances of outright exposure during the journey. Post-experiment dermatological evaluations highlight the method's impermanence: psoralen-activated UVA exposure induces via temporary stimulation, which fades within weeks without maintenance and produces a photosensitive, inducible tan distinct from the constitutive, evenly distributed in individuals of African descent. This distinction could manifest as inconsistencies in texture or resilience to wear, potentially vulnerable to detection in prolonged or intimate contacts, though Griffin's itinerant lifestyle minimized such risks. The process's efficacy thus relied heavily on behavioral adaptation and contextual avoidance rather than flawless physiological .

Methodological Limitations and Potential Biases

Griffin's field observations were restricted to a six-week period from late to early 1959, primarily in urban and rural locales across , , , Georgia, and , representing a limited cross-section of environments. This sampling scope overlooked the heterogeneous realities of African American life in Northern, Midwestern, or Western states, where legal segregation had largely eroded following the Great Migration of approximately 6 million blacks northward between 1910 and 1970, yielding distinct patterns of shaped by industrial opportunities and reduced Jim Crow enforcement. Such geographic insularity constrained generalizability, as Southern experiences under de jure apartheid diverged markedly from those in desegregated urban Norths, where blacks encountered subtler economic barriers rather than overt spatial exclusion. The brevity of the immersion—spanning roughly —precluded insights into the protracted, multigenerational impacts of systemic racism, including inherited community coping mechanisms, familial transmission of survival strategies, and entrenched psychological adaptations absent in transient encounters. Griffin's ability to revert to white privilege at will, unlike lifelong , mitigated the experiment's fidelity to sustained oppression, potentially eliciting less guarded hostility from whites aware, subconsciously, of his detachable "blackness." His documented revulsion at the transformation—"The completeness of this transformation appalled me"—further indicates an observer's detachment, where acute novelty overshadowed normalized . Absence of rigorous controls exacerbated vulnerabilities to subjective distortion, with the reliance on unverified personal journals yielding anecdotal data prone to selective recall favoring preconceived hypotheses of pervasive Southern animus. Lacking quantitative metrics, comparative baselines, or blinded validation, the approach mirrored uncontrolled case studies, where confirmation effects amplify racism-aligned incidents while marginalizing neutral or ameliorative interactions, such as interracial courtesies Griffin occasionally noted but downplayed. Griffin's swift presumption of black mindset comprehension within days underscores this peril, as rapid assimilation claims strain causal inference absent longitudinal embedding or diverse informant triangulation.

Ideological Critiques from Diverse Perspectives

Black nationalist thinkers and later scholars from African American studies have critiqued Griffin's experiment as a form of white appropriation of Black suffering, reducing complex lived experiences to a temporary voyeuristic spectacle. , in discussions alongside and , argued that works like Black Like Me reveal more about the "repressed fantasies of white men" than authentic Black realities, positioning the narrative as a projection of white liberal guilt rather than genuine insight. Similarly, historian has described Griffin's skin-darkening method as dehumanizing, enabling whites to "inhabit [Black] body, at will, to whatever effect we wish," which perpetuates even absent comedic intent. These critiques, emerging from a tradition wary of white-mediated representations, view the book as reinforcing a "Negro problem" framework that centers white empathy over Black . From a conservative perspective emphasizing causal realism, Griffin's account has been faulted for overattributing post-segregation racial disparities to white alone, sidelining agency, family structure erosion, and cultural adaptations that hinder progress. Eleanor Brown, in analyzing persistent issues, invokes "Black Like Me?" to question uniform identity narratives, arguing instead for recognition of self-inflicted cultural elements like "gangsta" glorification and afrocentric , which undermine individual responsibility as exemplified by Clarence Thomas's ascent despite adversity. Empirical patterns support this: poverty rates halved from 87% in 1940 to 47% by amid legal segregation, driven by migration and internal reforms, yet stagnated post-s welfare expansions, indicating policy-induced dependency over residual . Such views contend Griffin's focus fosters victimhood dependency, evident in rising out-of-wedlock births (from 18% in to 72% by 2010 among Blacks) correlating with economic reversals, rather than solely external animus. Feminist and intersectional minority critiques highlight Griffin's limitations as a white male Catholic, whose experiences overlooked how gender compounded racial oppression for Black women, including heightened sexual vulnerability and domestic burdens absent in his transient male passing. Grace Halsell, a white journalist who replicated the experiment as a Black woman in Soul Sister (1969), documented intensified harassment and exclusion—such as propositions from Black men and white advances—that Griffin's narrative elides, underscoring a gender-blind lens that fragments racial analysis by ignoring class and sex intersections. This male-centric framing, critics argue, privileges a universalized "Black" plight rooted in public mobility over the privatized, embodied threats women faced, limiting the book's applicability to diverse minority subgroups.

Legacy and Impact

Influence on Civil Rights Awareness

Black Like Me, published on November 17, 1961, achieved rapid commercial success, selling over 10 million copies in subsequent decades and reaching a predominantly white readership during the escalation of civil rights activism. Its release preceded the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom by under two years, coinciding with heightened national attention to racial segregation in the South. The narrative's depiction of everyday discrimination encountered by Griffin while posing as Black aimed to evoke empathy among white audiences, potentially broadening awareness of Jim Crow realities beyond activist circles. However, establishing direct causal links to measurable shifts in public consciousness remains elusive, given the contemporaneous surge in organized protests and litigation that independently amplified demands for reform. Empirical data from attitude surveys indicate modest, incremental changes in white perceptions of civil rights issues around this period, but without clear attribution to Griffin's account. Gallup polling in May 1961 revealed 48% awareness of ' anti-segregation efforts, rising amid broader media coverage of events like the 1963 , yet white approval of civil rights leaders hovered at 35% that year. By late 1964, support for the reached slim majorities of 58-59% nationally, influenced more visibly by televised against demonstrators than by literary expositions. These polls suggest any gains from personal narratives like Black Like Me were marginal and overshadowed by resistance, with 78% of whites in 1963 expressing intent to relocate if Black families integrated their neighborhoods. Behavioral inertia persisted, as evidenced by limited voluntary desegregation prior to federal mandates. A counterfactual assessment underscores that core civil rights advances in the stemmed primarily from strategic legal precedents and mass , rather than isolated experiential testimonies. Landmark rulings like (1954) and sustained litigation laid foundational challenges to segregation, complemented by nonviolent campaigns from groups such as the and . These efforts generated undeniable pressure for policy shifts, including the 1964 Act, whereas personal narratives, though resonant for some, lacked the coercive leverage to alter entrenched institutions independently. Griffin's work thus contributed to discursive awareness but operated within a momentum propelled by judicial and protest dynamics, with no polling anomalies pinpointing it as a pivotal catalyst.

Long-Term Cultural and Educational Role

The book Black Like Me has maintained a prominent position in educational curricula, with over 10 million copies sold and translations into 14 languages establishing it as a modern classic on . It continues to be assigned in many high schools, serving as a that exposes the realities of Jim Crow-era , though its white-authored perspective has drawn commentary, such as Stokely Carmichael's view that it functions as "an excellent book—for whites." A 2011 Smithsonian Magazine retrospective highlighted its ongoing inclusion in high school reading lists, noting that the narrative remains "shocking to younger readers" and provides unflinching insight into the segregated , even as debates persist over its dated viewpoints amid evolving racial discussions. The 1964 , directed by Carl Lerner and starring as Griffin, broadened the work's media presence despite limited box office returns and mixed reviews critiquing the premise's execution. Restored versions have supported sustained viewings, including television broadcasts targeted for educational contexts during in 2013.

Contemporary Reassessments and Relevance

In the context of the racial reckonings following events like the killing and the protests, reassessments of Black Like Me have highlighted its enduring depiction of interpersonal racism while questioning the sufficiency of white-authored empathy experiments for addressing systemic issues. Critics such as Alisha Gaines argue that Griffin's six-week immersion, though revelatory of 1950s Southern , often mischaracterizes through a lens of white voyeurism and selective fear narratives, limiting its transformative power in an era prioritizing authentic Black voices over performative solidarity. Similarly, a 2021 analysis in America magazine noted the book's additions underscoring white society's "intractable" denial of racism's persistence, yet observed that its brevity and outsider perspective fall short amid demands for sustained, insider-driven rather than episodic white awakening. From conservative perspectives, post-2000 evaluations contrast the book's valid exposure of historical animus with the reality that Black socioeconomic disparities have not abated proportionally to legal desegregation, attributing stagnation more to cultural pathologies like family breakdown—evident in single-parent household rates exceeding 70% in Black communities by 2020—than to racism alone. Scholars like have critiqued narratives akin to Griffin's for overemphasizing external while underplaying behavioral adaptations and self-inflicted wounds, such as the post-1960s welfare expansions correlating with family structure erosion, which perpetuate cycles independent of Jim Crow-era residues. These views frame the experiment as a snapshot of overt now largely supplanted by subtler, policy-driven barriers, urging causal focus on agency and incentives over perpetual victimhood. As of 2025, Black Like Me maintains commercial viability, with ongoing editions and academic adoptions signaling nostalgic appeal, yet faces scrutiny for fostering without prescriptive remedies for contemporary inequities like educational gaps or crime rates disproportionately affecting Black communities. Revelations of Griffin's subsequent , induced by high-dose Oxsoralen and UV exposure used in the darkening process, underscore a cautionary dimension absent from initial acclaim, illustrating the physical hazards of such methodological extremes in pursuit of experiential truth. This serves as a meta-reminder in truth-seeking discourse that empirical immersion, while illuminating, carries unverifiable personal costs and risks oversimplifying multifaceted causal chains in racial dynamics.

References

  1. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/black-like-me-50-years-later-74543463/
  2. http://www.cnn.com/2001/books/news/01/11/black.like.me/
  3. https://research.hrc.utexas.edu/fasearch/findingAid.cfm?eadID=00050
  4. https://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/inside/projects/findingaids/scans/pdfs/Griffin_J.H.pdf
  5. http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2015/06/black-like-story-white-journalist-john-howard-griffin/
  6. https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2020/06/15/john-howard-griffin-100-black-like-me-catholic/
  7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24584676
  8. https://www.americanheritage.com/man-who-changed-his-skin
  9. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/plessy-v-ferguson
  10. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/brown-v-board-education-re-enactment/history-brown-v-board-education-re-enactment
  11. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/civil-war-reconstruction/jim-crow-laws-andracial-segregation/
  12. https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/what.htm
  13. https://eji.org/news/history-racial-injustice-sharecropping/
  14. https://americanexperience.si.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-Jim-Crow-South.pdf
  15. https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/montgomery-bus-boycott
  16. https://study.com/learn/lesson/kkk-goals-resurgence-when-did-the-kkk-start.html
  17. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/civil-rights-act/segregation-era.html
  18. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/black-like-me/characters/the-dermatologist
  19. https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-possible-changing-your-skin-color/811828
  20. https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/question/2011/may.htm
  21. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/oct/27/black-like-me-john-howard-griffin
  22. https://robertsenglish.yolasite.com/resources/Black%20Like%20Me%20Text.pdf
  23. https://www.anisfield-wolf.org/winners/black-like-me/
  24. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/blacklikeme/section1/
  25. https://patricktreardon.com/book-review-black-like-me-by-john-howard-griffin/
  26. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2020/08/14/reading-john-howard-griffins-challenging-black-me
  27. https://vaccination.gov.ng/Resources/GcUCvj/0S9013/Black%2520Like%2520Me%2520John%2520Howard%2520Griffin%2520Summary.pdf
  28. https://mcsprogram.org/browse/u2A59H/243180/Black%2520Like%2520Me%2520Short%2520Answer%2520Questions.pdf
  29. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0%2C33009%2C826167-2%2C00.html
  30. https://www.enotes.com/topics/black-like-me/questions/what-was-medication-taken-change-skin-color-163545
  31. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dead-like-me/
  32. https://www.nytimes.com/1980/09/10/archives/john-h-griffin-dead-white-novelist-wrote-book-black-like-me.html
  33. https://theclick.news/more-than-60-years-later-john-howard-griffins-exploratory-black-like-me-still-cuts-skin-deep/
  34. https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/13uvb4l/til_in_1959_john_howard_griffin_passed_himself_as/
  35. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/9427475
  36. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Black-Like-Me/summaries/
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1354469
  38. https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/John-Howard-Griffin-s-Black-Like-Me-at-50-2328639.php
  39. https://www.shortform.com/blog/black-like-me-john-howard-griffin/
  40. https://www.amazon.com/Black-Like-Me-Definitive-Griffin/dp/0930324722
  41. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c4374/c4374.pdf
  42. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3323
  43. https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/16652.John_Howard_Griffin
  44. https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/16652.John_Howard_Griffin?page=2
  45. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2021/12/29/griffin-black-me-today-242127/
  46. https://findingaids.library.columbia.edu/pdf/cul-6749110.pdf
  47. https://undercover.hosting.nyu.edu/s/undercover-reporting/item-set
  48. https://www.burnsiderarebooks.com/pages/books/140940330/john-howard-griffin/black-like-me
  49. https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=griffin%20john%20howard&fe=on&sortby=100&tn=black&cm_sp=mbc-_-ats-_-filter
  50. https://www.burnsiderarebooks.com/pages/books/140940011/john-howard-griffin-kurt-enoch/black-like-me
  51. https://www.facebook.com/groups/369294349838892/posts/6586576068110658/
  52. https://apa.si.edu/bookdragon/black-like-me-by-john-howard-griffin/
  53. https://clc.overdrive.com/media/457167
  54. https://catalog.tamworthlibrary.org/OverDrive/7cb1ba4b-5d0a-4192-b8ca-97a124eedd1b/Home
  55. https://www.anisfield-wolf.org/winners/
  56. https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Black-Like-Me-by-John-Howard-Griffin/9781788164528
  57. https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/sociology-brief-edition-v1.0/s10-race-and-ethnicity.html
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323371179_Black_Like_Me_Reframing_Blackness_for_Decolonial_Politics
  59. https://www.humanitiestexas.org/news/articles/black-like-me
  60. https://historyofsocialwork.org/eng/details.php?cps=9&canon_id=150
  61. https://www.shortform.com/blog/black-like-me-book-review/
  62. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/mike-wallace-interviewing-john-howard-griffin-author-of-the-news-photo/629363408
  63. https://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/black_like_me
  64. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2020/08/14/reading-john-howard-griffins-challenging-black-me/
  65. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/15/article/374955/pdf
  66. https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/canadian-writer-blackface-racism-1.7221168
  67. https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NYULawReview-75-2-Brown.pdf
  68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13110/criticism.58.1.0035
  69. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/10/how-public-attitudes-toward-martin-luther-king-jr-have-changed-since-the-1960s/
  70. https://www.crmvet.org/docs/60s_crm_public-opinion.pdf
  71. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/169361/public-opinion-civil-rights-years-civil-rights-act-1964.aspx
  72. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/public-opinion-civil-rights-reflections-civil-rights-act-1964
  73. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/post-war-united-states-1945-1968/civil-rights-movement/
  74. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4950&context=vlr
  75. https://www.postmagazine.com/Publications/Post-Magazine/2012/November-1-2012/Sound-Picture-Restoration.aspx
  76. https://www.npr.org/2020/03/06/812864654/the-limits-of-empathy
  77. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2021/12/29/griffin-black-me-today-242127
  78. https://shop.stmu.ca/black-like-me.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.