Hubbry Logo
BrontotheriidaeBrontotheriidaeMain
Open search
Brontotheriidae
Community hub
Brontotheriidae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Brontotheriidae
Brontotheriidae
Brontotheriidae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Brontotheres
Temporal range: 56–34 Ma Eocene
Megacerops skeleton at the
National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Perissodactyla
Family: †Brontotheriidae
Marsh, 1873
Genera

See text

Synonyms
  • Menodontidae
  • Titanotheriidae

Brontotheriidae is a family of extinct mammals belonging to the order Perissodactyla, the order that includes horses, rhinoceroses, and tapirs. Superficially, they looked rather like rhinos with some developing bony nose horns, and were some of the earliest mammals to have evolved large body sizes of several tonnes. They lived around 56–34 million years ago, until the very close of the Eocene. Brontotheres had a Holarctic distribution, with the exception of Western Europe: they occupied North America, Asia, and Eastern Europe.[1] They were the first fossilized mammals to be discovered west of the Mississippi, and were first discovered in South Dakota.[2]

Characteristics and evolution

[edit]
Megacerops reconstruction
Life reconstruction of Megacerops
Protitanops curryi reconstruction
Life reconstruction of Protitanops curryi
Rhinotitan skull
Skull of Rhinotitan

This group has also been referred to as "Titanotheres." "Titan" refers to the mythological Greek gods who were symbols of strength and large size, and "theros" is Greek for "wild animal." "Bronto" is Greek for "thunder," which may be how this group got the nickname "thunder beasts."[3]

Brontotheres retain four toes on their front feet and three toes on their hind feet. Their teeth are adapted to shearing (cutting) relatively nonabrasive vegetation. Their molars have a characteristic W-shaped ectoloph (outer shearing blade). The wear patterns observed on brontothere teeth suggests a folivorous diet. Early Brontotheres had brachydont teeth with thick enamel, while later forms evolved a more hypsodont style tooth with thinner enamel.[1]

Brontotheres also shared an elongated postorbital cranium, meaning that their skulls are lengthened between their eyes and ears. They also had anteroposteriorly abbreviated (shortened) faces.[1]

The evolutionary history of this group is well known due to an excellent fossil record in North America.[4] The earliest stem-brontotheres, had an estimated body mass of only 18 kilograms (40 lb)[5]

The earliest brontotheres, such as Eotitanops, were rather small, no more than a meter in height, and hornless.

Brontotheres evolved massive bodies, with some species standing over 2.5 meters (7 feet) tall,[3] with body masses of over a tonne, perhaps exceeding 4,000 kilograms (8,800 lb), in large individuals of Megacerops,[5] although some small species such as Nanotitanops did persist through the Eocene.[5] Some genera, such as Dolichorhinus, evolved highly elongated skulls. Some later brontotheres developed horn-like bony projections of the skull. The North American brontothere Megacerops, for example, evolved large sexually dimorphic paired horns above their noses. The sexually dimorphic horns, along with highly developed neck musculature, suggest that brontotheres were highly gregarious (social) and males may have performed some sort of head-clashing behavior in competition for mates.[6] Females had smaller appendages, which may have been used to ward off predators and protect young. In Asia, another species of brontothere, Embolotherium, evolved a similarly gigantic body size; however, instead of the slingshot-like horns of the Megacerops, they evolved a single elongated bony process that was composed of both nasal and frontal bones.[6] Embolotherium may have used its large nasal cavity to make vocalizations in order to communicate with others of its species.[6] Unlike rhinoceros, in which the horns are made of keratin, however, the horns of brontotheres are composed of bone (the frontal bone and nasal bone) and were placed side-to-side rather than front-to-back. Similarly to Giraffes, their horns were covered in skin and did not have grooves for nutrient blood vessels. There is some evidence of secondary bone growth, likely due to impact from head clashing.[1]

Brontotheres had likely adapted to the warmer and more humid climates of the Eocene, and probably became extinct because they could not adapt to the drier conditions and more open landscapes of the Oligocene.[5]

Discovery

[edit]
Brontothere model reconstruction (Parvicornis occidentalis) at the San Diego Natural History Museum

Brontotheres were one of the first fossilized mammals to be discovered west of the Mississippi, with the first fossil being found in 1846 in the Badlands, South Dakota.[2] Joseph Leidy was the first researcher to scientifically describe brontothere fossils, followed by Cope and Marsh, who studied skulls and entire skeletons.[1] Marsh came up with the term "Brontotheridae," identified them as odd-toed ungulates, and identified distinguishing characteristics of the group.[7][1][8] Brontotheriidae fossils have been found in eastern Europe, eastern Russia, Kazakstan, Pakistan, southeast Asia, Korea, Japan, the southeastern U.S., and Canada.[1]

Classification

[edit]

Brontotheres are an early diverging clade within Perissodactyla. Although historically suggested to be closely related to horses,[9] phylogenetic analyses have recovered them to lie outside the clade containing chalicotheres, rhinoceroses, tapirs and horses,[10] or more closely related to chalicotheres, rhinoceroses and tapirs than to horses.[11]

Classification for Brontotheriidae after Mihlbachler 2008[12] and Mader 2010[13]
Brontotheriidae

Two classification systems for Brontotheriidae are presented below. The first contains 43 genera and 8 subfamilies, and although it is based on a 1997 publication by McKenna and Bell, it summarizes research that was conducted before 1920 and is badly outdated. The second classification is based on 2004 and 2005 research by Mihlbachler et al., which indicates that many of the previous subfamily names are invalid. Several more recently discovered brontotheres are included in the newer classification.

Although Lambdotherium and Xenicohippus were previously included in Brontotheriidae, they are no longer considered members of this family. Lambdotherium, though excluded, may be the closest known relative to brontotheres. Xenicohippus is now thought to be an early member of the horse family, Equidae.

Old classification (summarized by McKenna and Bell, 1997) New classification (Mihlbachler et al., 2004a, 2004b; Mihlbachler, 2005)

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Brontotheriidae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Brontotheriidae is an extinct family of perissodactyl mammals, belonging to the order of odd-toed ungulates that also includes modern , rhinoceroses, and tapirs, known primarily from the Eocene across , , and rarely Eastern Europe. These "thunder beasts" evolved from small, hornless ancestors into large herbivores, some exceeding the size of contemporary rhinoceroses, with distinctive elongated skulls featuring shortened faces and bunoselenodont molars displaying W-shaped ectoloph ridges adapted for browsing vegetation. Members of Brontotheriidae varied widely in size and morphology, ranging from early, relatively small forms like Eotitanops—lacking prominent skull appendages—to later, massive genera such as Megacerops in North America and Embolotherium in Asia, which developed paired or single bony frontal or nasal horns likely used for display or intraspecific combat. The family first appeared in the early Eocene, around 50 million years ago, and persisted until the late Eocene, approximately 34 million years ago, when they abruptly disappeared, possibly due to climatic changes and competition from emerging artiodactyls. Their phylogenetic position within Perissodactyla remains unresolved, but they are considered a specialized, monophyletic clade that did not give rise to any modern lineages. Fossils of Brontotheriidae are abundant in Eocene formations, particularly in the White River Group of the and similar deposits in , revealing a diverse array of over 40 described across more than 20 genera, though taxonomic revisions continue due to historical over-splitting influenced by early 20th-century theories of . Recent discoveries as of 2025, such as the genus Aktautitan from , further expand the known diversity of Asian brontotheres. Notable adaptations include robust musculature supporting heavy skulls and a dental arcade with a prominent between incisors and cheek teeth, facilitating their role as dominant herbivores in subtropical to ecosystems of the time. While most were terrestrial browsers, their marks a key faunal turnover in the , highlighting the vulnerability of large-bodied specialists to environmental shifts.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification

Brontotheriidae is an extinct family of odd-toed ungulates () that represents an early diverging clade within the order, distinct from more basal taxa such as Lambdotherium and Xenicohippus. Modern classifications, as revised by Mihlbachler between 2004 and 2008, divide the family into two primary subfamilies: the primitive Dolichorhininae and the more derived Brontotheriinae. Dolichorhininae encompasses early genera like Eotitanops, Telmatherium, and Palaeosyops, characterized by smaller size and simpler cranial features. Brontotheriinae includes larger, late-diversifying genera such as , , Menodus, and Protitan, often with paired frontal horns or protuberances. Mihlbachler's revisions recognize 20–25 valid genera in total, a substantial reduction from the 43 genera proposed in the outdated classification of McKenna and Bell (1997), achieved through rigorous synonymization of oversplit taxa and invalidation of poorly supported names based on craniodental morphology. Key examples of synonymies include the merger of multiple late Eocene North American forms into Megacerops (incorporating Brontotherium, Brontops, and Menodus) and Asian taxa like Bothriodon into Embolotherium. Nomenclatural challenges persist, particularly with the type genus Brontotherium, whose type species Brontotherium hatcheri (Osborn, 1929) serves as the basis for the family name but is now considered a junior synonym of Megacerops coloradensis under priority rules, prompting calls for conservation of common usage. Recent studies, such as those from in 2021, confirm the validity of these revisions without major changes.

Evolutionary relationships

Brontotheriidae occupies a basal position within , generally regarded as a stem group relative to the crown perissodactyls, which comprise , Rhinocerotidae, and Tapiridae (Tapiroidea). This placement is supported by morphological analyses of cranial and dental features, positioning brontotheres as outgroups to the hippomorph (horse-related) and ceratomorph (rhino- and tapir-related) lineages that diverged in the early Eocene. Early basal genera such as Eotitanops and Palaeosyops are inferred to represent the most primitive members of the family, branching off near the root of perissodactyl diversification shortly after the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Phylogenetic analyses, primarily based on morphological data from 87 cranial, dental, and postcranial characters across 47 taxa, recover multiple parsimonious trees that place Brontotheriidae as sister to all other perissodactyls or in an unresolved with major Eocene radiations. Outgroups in these studies include early equids like and basal tapiromorphs such as Lambdotherium, highlighting brontotheres' primitive status. Alternative hypotheses have variably allied them with Hippomorpha (alongside equids and palaeotheres) or Ceratomorpha (with tapirs and rhinos), though these groupings lack consistent support across datasets. Within the family, cladograms often depict Eotitanops as the sister taxon to more derived horned forms like Metatitan and , with Asian lineages such as Aktautitan clustering closely to North American ones in late Eocene trees. Shared morphological traits underpin these relationships, including the W-shaped ectoloph on bunoselenodont upper molars, a primitive perissodactyl feature retained in basal brontothere genera like Palaeosyops and Dolichorhinus. Horn development, observed in advanced taxa such as Megacerops and Brontotherium, involves paired frontonasal bony protuberances, potentially analogous to rhinoceros horns but evolving independently as a derived brontothere autapomorphy rather than a synapomorphy linking them to ceratomorphs. Debates over paraphyly persist, with many traditional subfamilies (e.g., Dolichorhininae, Telmatheriinae) rendering the family grade-like in parsimony analyses, though Brontotheriinae emerges as a monophyletic clade defined by advanced molar lophs and size increase. A study using ancient proteins from reinforced Brontotheriidae's stem position by showing that , Rhinocerotidae, and Tapiridae form a sister to those extinct South American lineages, with brontotheres more basal. A analysis of early Eocene fossils from further confirms Eotitanops as a primitive outgroup to derived brontotheres, with no genomic data available due to the family's Eocene .

Anatomy and morphology

Physical characteristics

Brontotheriidae, an extinct family of perissodactyl mammals, displayed a distinctive body plan characterized by a robust, barrel-shaped torso supported by pillar-like limbs adapted for weight-bearing in forested environments. Early members, such as Eotitanops borealis from the early Eocene, were relatively small, reaching shoulder heights of approximately 0.7 meters and body masses around 40 kg, resembling large tapirs in overall form. By the late Eocene, the family had evolved giants like Megacerops, which stood over 2.5 meters at the shoulder, measured up to 4.6 meters in length, and weighed between 3,300 and 3,800 kg, approaching the scale of modern rhinoceroses. This dramatic size increase across the family's temporal range reflects adaptations for browsing on soft vegetation, with a graviportal posture emphasizing stability over speed. The limbs of brontotheres were sturdy and columnar, featuring four toes on the front feet and three on the hind feet, a primitive perissodactyl trait retained from earlier ancestors and differing from the three-toed configuration of modern rhinoceroses. This structure supported their increasing body mass, enabling efficient locomotion across Eocene woodlands while facilitating access to mid-level foliage. External features included a large, elongated with a shortened facial region, and many species developed prominent bony protuberances on the head. In Megacerops, these manifested as paired, laterally positioned frontal horns that were sexually dimorphic, with males exhibiting larger, more robust forms derived from fused nasal and frontal bones. Osteological evidence, including secondary bone deposition, indicates these horns grew through periosteal apposition, suggesting developmental continuity with skin-covered structures. In contrast, Asian genera like Embolotherium featured a single, enlarged nasal process forming a paddle- or battering ram-shaped horn, elevated above the orbits and supported by expanded nasal bones. These horns, across the family, were likely sheathed in skin rather than keratin, analogous to giraffe ossicones, based on the absence of vascular grooves and patterns of bone remodeling observed in fossils. While direct skin impressions are rare, the overall integument is inferred to have been thick and leathery, similar to that of extant perissodactyls, providing protection against environmental hazards in their browsing habitats.

Skeletal and dental features

Brontotheriidae exhibited distinctive cranial adaptations, including enlarged nasal bones that provided structural support for paired, sexually dimorphic bony horns in many derived species, such as Megacerops and Protitan, with these horns arising from the frontonasal region and varying in size from small protuberances to large, laterally positioned structures up to 140 mm long.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2) The zygomatic arches were robust yet often thin and weakly curved, expanding laterally to accommodate powerful masseter muscles, as seen in genera like Protitanops where arches measured 40-98 mm in thickness and showed possible sexual dimorphism. Additional cranial traits included an elongated postorbital region, a flat to convex dorsal surface, and a sagittal crest in species such as Sphenocoelus and Metarhinus, contributing to the overall dolichocephalic skull form with orbits positioned above the posterior molars.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2) The postcranial skeleton of Brontotheriidae was characterized by heavy, robust vertebrae, particularly in the neck region, which supported the large and horn structures, as evidenced in partial of Menodus (likely referable to Protitanops). Limbs were pillar-like and graviportal, adapted for bearing substantial body mass up to 2.5 meters at the , with robust humeri, femora, and four functional digits on the forefeet differing from the three-toed condition in modern rhinoceroses; for example, in Dolichorhinus, the slender horizontal mandibular ramus and long coronoid process indicate strong leverage for mastication.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2) These features scaled with overall body size, enabling a quadrupedal suited to large terrestrial herbivores.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2) Dentition in Brontotheriidae featured a brachydont condition with low-crowned molars specialized for folivorous processing, displaying a characteristic W-shaped ectoloph formed by alternating paracones, metacones, and associated crests that facilitated shearing of vegetation.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2) The dental formula varied slightly across taxa but typically included 2-3 upper incisors (often reduced in later forms), 1 canine, 4 premolars, and 3 molars per quadrant, with the lower formula consistently 3-1-4-3; premolars showed wedge-shaped lingual margins and thick cingula, while molars had tall, lingually angled ectolophs with thin labial ribs and variable hypocones on M3, as in Protitanops curryi. Incisors were small and vestigial in advanced Brontotheriita, with a slight arch in the row and a postcanine of 5-11 mm. Jaw mechanics in Brontotheriidae were adapted for efficient folivorous mastication, inferred from cranial endocasts and mandibular morphology, revealing a small with a rectilinear structure in early forms like Metarhinus, where the and robust (extending to p3 or P4) supported transverse or bilateral chewing motions via the semilophodont . The ascending ramus was short relative to the horizontal body, with a tall coronoid process providing attachment for temporalis muscles, enhancing bite force at the molars for processing fibrous plant material, as reconstructed from Uintan specimens.501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2)

Evolutionary history

Origins and diversification

The Brontotheriidae originated in the early Eocene, approximately 50 million years ago, evolving from small early Eocene ancestors with primitive dental and skeletal features resembling contemporaneous equoids and tapiroids. These basal forms were modest in size, weighing around 150 kg, and adapted to the warm, humid environments following the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. The family's emergence marked an early diversification within , with the earliest definitive brontotheriid , Eotitanops, appearing in early Eocene strata across and , serving as a transitional that bridged primitive perissodactyl morphology to more specialized brontothere traits like elongated skulls and robust limbs. Diversification accelerated during the Eocene, with a rapid radiation into multiple lineages by the middle Eocene (Bridgerian to Uintan stages), encompassing over 40 genera that outpaced other perissodactyl families in species richness. This proliferation involved branching phylogenies, where intermediate genera like Protitan exhibited evolving features such as larger body proportions and incipient horn-like protuberances, facilitating adaptation to browsing niches in dense Eocene woodlands. By the late Eocene (Chadronian), the family reached its peak diversity and morphological elaboration, with some lineages extending into the early Oligocene, though overall abundance waned as climatic shifts altered habitats. Recent phylogenetic studies continue to refine the relationships among basal genera like Eotitanops and Palaeosyops. Adaptive trends in Brontotheriidae prominently featured a marked increase in body size, from early Eocene forms under 200 kg to late Eocene giants exceeding 1,000 kg, driven by peripatric speciation rather than consistent directional selection, and correlating with the expansion of forested ecosystems that supported megaherbivory. This size escalation likely enhanced survival in competitive herbivore guilds by reducing predation risk and optimizing resource access in lush, closed-canopy environments. Concurrently, the development of paired nasal horns in later genera showed sexual dimorphism, with males exhibiting larger, more robust structures for intraspecific combat, a pattern evidenced in cranial variation and paralleled in other ungulate radiations. These traits underscored the family's specialization as dominant browsers, though they contributed to vulnerability during environmental transitions.

Biogeography and temporal range

Brontotheriidae exhibited a predominantly Holarctic distribution, with fossils primarily documented in and , and rare occurrences in . In , remains are widespread across formations such as the White River Formation in the and the Uinta Formation in the Rocky Mountain region, reflecting a broad occupation of subtropical to temperate paleoenvironments during the Eocene. Asian records are concentrated in central and eastern regions, including the Irdin Manha Formation in and the Ulan Shireh Formation in , while finds are limited to isolated specimens from the Eocene of the region. Notably, brontotheres are absent from and , constraining their biogeographic range to northern continental landmasses. The temporal range of Brontotheriidae spans the Eocene from approximately 50 to 33.9 million years ago (Ma), extending into the early (34–28 Ma) in North American faunas. Early records appear in the Wasatchian land mammal age of the early Eocene, with diversification accelerating through the Bridgerian and Uintan of the middle to late Eocene. The family reached peak abundance in the late Eocene, particularly during the Duchesnean , where diverse assemblages dominate communities in North American deposits. In , the record is largely confined to the middle and late Eocene, with no confirmed extensions into the . Biogeographic provincialism is evident between North American and Asian faunas, marked by distinct distributions and evolutionary trajectories. North American assemblages are dominated by Brontotheriinae, featuring taxa such as Telmatherium validus and Metarhinus species, which emphasize larger body sizes and hornless or simple-horned morphologies. In contrast, Asian faunas include both Brontotheriinae (e.g., Protitan grangeri) and the endemic Dolichorhininae (e.g., Microtitan mongoliensis and Embolotherium andrewsi), characterized by smaller, more gracile forms alongside advanced horned giants. These differences suggest regional following initial dispersals. Recent studies support episodic intercontinental exchanges. Migration events are inferred from faunal correlations, particularly intercontinental dispersals between and during the middle Eocene via Beringian land connections. Shared morphologies, such as those between North American Metatelmatherium ultimum and Asian Microtitan species, indicate episodic exchanges that facilitated the spread of basal brontotheres across the Holarctic. These movements likely occurred around 48–40 Ma, aligning with climatic stability that supported faunal interchange.

Fossil record

History of discovery

The discovery of Brontotheriidae fossils began in 1846 when a fragment was collected from the White River Badlands of and briefly described by physician Hiram A. Prout as belonging to a Paleotherium, marking the first published account of brontothere remains. This specimen, later recognized as part of the family, was formally named Menodus giganteus by Auguste Pomel in 1849, establishing the earliest binomial for a brontothere. In 1852, Joseph Leidy provided the first detailed scientific description of brontothere fossils, naming the genus Titanotherium based on fragmentary material received from Prout and other sources, including teeth and bones from that highlighted their perissodactyl affinities. During the late 19th century, the intense rivalry known as the "" between and accelerated brontothere research, with both paleontologists describing numerous skulls and skeletons from the White River Group. Cope named genera such as Symborodon in 1873, emphasizing dental and cranial variations, while Marsh established the family Brontotheriidae in 1873 and coined Brontotherium for large-horned forms, contributing over a dozen taxa based on expeditions yielding complete specimens from and . Their competitive efforts, spanning 1870–1890, amassed hundreds of fossils and laid the groundwork for understanding brontothere diversity, though initial classifications often overlapped due to fragmentary evidence. In the early 20th century, synthesized these findings through extensive monographs, culminating in his 1929 two-volume work The Titanotheres of Ancient , Dakota, and , which cataloged 37 from North American sites and clarified evolutionary patterns using of over 200 specimens. Osborn's analyses, drawing on collections, refined earlier nomenclature and emphasized horn morphology as a key diagnostic trait, solidifying Brontotheriidae as a distinct Eocene family. Modern revisions in the 2000s, led by Matthew C. Mihlbachler, incorporated advanced imaging like CT scans to reexamine cranial and dental structures, resulting in the 2008 comprehensive phylogeny that reduced synonymies and integrated Asian fossils for a global biogeographic framework. More recently, Sanisidro et al. (2023) analyzed body size evolution across 57 brontothere species, revealing how megaherbivory emerged through differential and rates favoring larger forms in competitive ecosystems.

Key fossil localities

The most significant fossil localities for Brontotheriidae are concentrated in and , with rare occurrences in . In , the White River Formation of and stands out as a primary source, particularly during the Chadronian stage of the late Eocene, where numerous specimens of genera such as have been recovered from its fluviolacustrine deposits. These sites have yielded hundreds of complete skulls and postcranial elements, often preserved in channel sandstones and overbank mudstones that reflect riverine environments conducive to the accumulation of large remains. Similarly, the Wind River Basin in has produced early to middle Eocene brontothere fossils, including skulls and mandibles of primitive forms like Eotitanops borealis, from the Wind River Formation's floodplain and lacustrine sediments. In Asia, the Irdin Manha Formation of Inner Mongolia, China, represents a key middle Eocene (Irdinmanhan) locality, approximately one half mile south of the Kalgan Urga telegraph line, where articulated skulls and mandibles of taxa such as Protitan grangeri and Microtitan mongoliensis have been found in redbed fluvial deposits. These specimens often include complete dentition but show some distortion from sediment compaction. The Ily Basin in Kazakhstan also yields important Eocene material, including the holotype skulls of Aktautitan hippopotamopus from fluvio-lacustrine red beds of the upper Kyzylbulak Formation at Aktau Mountain, highlighting dispersal patterns across central Asia. European records are sparse, limited to isolated remains from the Eocene in , where fragmentary dental and cranial elements suggest populations in fluvial settings. Across all major localities, preservation favors articulated skeletons in fluvial deposits, with taphonomic biases evident toward adult individuals, as seen in monospecific bonebeds like those in the Washakie Formation of , where over twenty partial adult skeletons of Telmatherium were accumulated in channel lag deposits, likely due to selective and dynamics that disfavor juvenile remains. This pattern underscores the role of river systems in concentrating brontothere fossils while introducing size- and age-related preservation disparities.

Paleobiology and extinction

Diet, behavior, and ecology

Brontotheriidae exhibited a folivorous diet as browsers, primarily consuming soft leaves and fibrous vegetation, as evidenced by dental microwear patterns showing low anisotropy and high complexity scratches consistent with leaf-dominated feeding similar to modern moose or black rhinoceroses. Their low-crowned (brachydont), selenodont cheek teeth further supported this browsing adaptation for processing woody and leafy material rather than abrasive grasses. Stable carbon isotope analyses of tooth enamel from genera such as Brontops confirm a diet dominated by C3 plants, with δ¹³C values averaging -11.2‰ in the late Eocene, indicating consumption of forest vegetation without significant C4 grass input. A 2023 macroevolutionary study highlights Embolotherium and other late brontotheres as early megaherbivores, achieving multitonne body sizes that allowed exploitation of abundant Eocene foliage through reduced interspecific competition in herbivore guilds. Behavioral inferences from fossil assemblages suggest gregariousness in some brontothere , as indicated by beds containing multiple individuals, such as a Washakie Formation site with over 20 partial skeletons of Mesatirhinus likely representing a herd mortality event from flooding. However, oxygen ratios in from Middle Eocene specimens of genera like Telmatherium and Palaeosyops show high variance (e.g., 1.30–1.46‰), implying flexible social structures with possible small groups or mixed-age aggregations rather than strictly large, cohesive herds. Horns in derived brontotheres, formed from paired nasal and frontal bony projections, likely served in intraspecific combat for , with allometric analyses indicating accelerated late-ontogenetic growth adapted for head-to-head ramming similar to ossicones. High intraspecific variation in horn size and zygomatic robustness among horned further supports their role in male-male agonistic interactions. Ecologically, brontotheres inhabited subtropical forested environments during the Eocene, with fossils from localities like the Clarno Nut Beds preserving evidence of warm, humid s dominated by broad-leaved evergreens and browse. Their large body sizes and folivorous habits positioned them in less saturated niches, overlapping with early equids in Middle Eocene perissodactyl-dominated faunas where both groups competed for leafy resources in diverse ecosystems. In , the enlarged nasal "ram" structure, formed by fused extending the cavity upward, likely functioned as a for vocalizations, enhancing communication in forested habitats as inferred from narial morphology comparisons. Juvenile fossils reveal rapid ontogenetic growth in brontotheres, with specimens like the early Uintan Heterotitanops parvus skull (CMNH 2909) showing near-fetal proportions and erupting indicative of accelerated early development to reach adult sizes quickly. Mandibles such as AMNH 1858 of Dolichorhinus hyognathus display mixed deciduous and (e.g., erupting m3), suggesting a compressed growth phase to support high metabolic demands in Eocene forests. This rapid , including late acceleration in horn development observed in juveniles, aligns with perissodactyl strategies for evading predation and establishing reproductive maturity.

Causes of extinction

The Brontotheriidae underwent an abrupt decline at the end of the Chadronian land mammal age, approximately 34 million years ago, with no known fossils from the , marking their extinction at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary. This temporal pattern coincides with the Eocene-Oligocene transition, a period of profound global climatic shift from a warm "hothouse" world to a cooler "icehouse" regime characterized by rapid cooling and the onset of glaciation around 33.9 million years ago. The primary causes of their extinction were the associated cooling and increasing , which dramatically altered terrestrial ecosystems worldwide and are analogous to the Grande Coupure faunal turnover observed in during the same interval. These changes reduced the extent of humid, forested habitats that supported browsing herbivores like brontotheres, whose low-crowned teeth and large body sizes were adapted to soft, leafy vegetation in closed environments rather than the emerging open woodlands and grasslands. Secondary factors included intensified ecological competition from newly diversifying , such as early ruminants and oreodonts, which were better suited to exploit fibrous in drier, more seasonal landscapes through efficient digestive systems, and from smaller, more equids within the perissodactyl that could navigate changing terrains more effectively. Additionally, late Eocene brontothere lineages exhibited low rates, with diversity peaking earlier in the Eocene and stagnating as environmental pressures mounted, limiting their ability to adapt or radiate into new niches. Their massive body plans, often exceeding 2 tons, further hindered flexibility in response to and resource scarcity. Supporting evidence includes marked faunal turnovers in North American formations like the White River Group, where brontothere remains are abundant in Chadronian beds but absent in younger Orellan and Whitneyan units of the , reflecting a broader replacement of Eocene holdover taxa by more modern-looking mammals. The complete lack of post- fossils underscores this terminal decline, with no indications of recovery or migration to refugia. Hypotheses invoking catastrophic events like asteroid impacts or widespread disease lack substantiation, as no corresponding geological or paleopathological evidence exists for the Eocene- boundary, unlike the well-documented Cretaceous-Paleogene event.

References

  1. https://research.amnh.org/paleontology/perissodactyl/evolution/groups/brontotheriidae
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230881823_Species_Taxonomy_Phylogeny_and_Biogeography_of_the_Brontotheriidae_Mammalia_Perissodactyla
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232696713_A_New_Brontothere_Brontotheriidae_Perissodactyla_Mammalia_from_the_Eocene_of_the_Ily_Basin_of_Kazakstan_and_a_Phylogeny_of_Asian_Horned_Brontotheres
  4. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2021/3479-texas-brontotheriidae
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14249
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/new-brontotheriidae-mammalia-perissodactyla-from-the-early-and-middle-eocene-of-pakistan-with-implications-for-mammalian-paleobiogeography/5A233545E23DB007339BA8A7C18924C6
  7. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=gradreports2023
  8. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2008/issue-311/0003-0090(2008)501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090(2008)501[1:STPABO]2.0.CO;2.full
  9. https://doi.org/10.26879/944
  10. https://www.sdnhm.org/exhibitions/fossil-mysteries/fossil-field-guide-a-z/brontothere/
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232665934_The_Cranial_Anatomy_of_Metarhinus_Mammalia_Perissodactyla_Brontotheriidae
  12. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0136-1
  13. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade1833
  14. https://www.sci.news/paleontology/brontothere-megaherbivory-11912.html
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230881820_A_New_Uintan_Horned_Brontothere_from_Wyoming_and_the_Evolution_of_Canine_Size_and_Sexual_Dimorphism_in_the_Brontotheriidae_Perissodactyla_Mammalia
  16. https://sddenr.net/pubs/PDF/GB-02.pdf
  17. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2008/issue-311/0003-0090%282008%29501%5B1:STPABO%5D2.0.CO%3B2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090%282008%29501%5B1:STPABO%5D2.0.CO%3B2.full
  18. https://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2014/04/06/woosters-fossil-of-the-week-a-brontothere-jaw-fragment-miocene-of-south-dakota/
  19. https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/items/9686e57d-6932-4c8c-be21-52a85adb483c
  20. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/uwyo/rmg/article-abstract/56/1/37/599894/A-latest-Eocene-Chadronian-brontothere-Mammalia
  21. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/pdfs/944.pdf
  22. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2008/issue-311/0003-0090_2008_501_1_STPABO_2.0.CO_2/Species-Taxonomy-Phylogeny-and-Biogeography-of-the-Brontotheriidae-Mammalia/10.1206/0003-0090%282008%29501%5B1:STPABO%5D2.0.CO%3B2.full
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/smallbodied-species-of-brontotheriidae-from-the-middle-eocene-nut-beds-of-the-clarno-formation-john-day-basin-oregon/9C237ECDA5B58855424774AEF311504E
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230881680_Body_size_dental_microwear_and_brontothere_diets_through_the_Eocene
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222580753_Ecology_and_physiology_of_White_River_mammals_based_on_stable_isotope_ratios_of_teeth
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/heterochrony-in-brontothere-horn-evolution-allometric-interpretations-and-the-effect-of-life-history-scaling/3E46D81D1562F29022571A657955382A
  27. https://flmnhbulletin.com/index.php/flmnh/article/download/flmnh-vol45-no4-pp495-520/vol45-no4/1201
  28. https://www.nps.gov/articles/brontothere.htm
  29. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2019/09/Pony-Express-Vol10-No01.pdf
  30. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1110246108
  31. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/b97018d7-f019-4498-bcb0-647752f75102/download
  32. https://www.nyit.edu/news/articles/beyond-the-bones-sizing-up-thunder-beasts/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2657734/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.