Hubbry Logo
Charge density waveCharge density waveMain
Open search
Charge density wave
Community hub
Charge density wave
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Charge density wave
Charge density wave
Charge density wave
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A charge density wave (CDW) is an ordered quantum fluid of electrons in a linear chain compound or layered crystal. The electrons within a CDW form a standing wave pattern and sometimes collectively carry an electric current. The electrons in such a CDW, like those in a superconductor, can flow through a linear chain compound en masse, in a highly correlated fashion. Unlike a superconductor, however, the electric CDW current often flows in a jerky fashion, much like water dripping from a faucet, due to its electrostatic properties. In a CDW, the combined effects of pinning (due to impurities) and electrostatic interactions (due to the net electric charges of any CDW kinks) likely play critical roles in the CDW current's jerky behavior, as discussed in sections 4 and 5 below.

Most CDW's in metallic crystals form due to the wave-like nature of electrons – a manifestation of quantum mechanical wave–particle duality – causing the electronic charge density to become spatially modulated, i.e., to form periodic "bumps" in charge. This standing wave affects each electronic wave function, and is created by combining electron states, or wavefunctions, of opposite momenta. The effect is somewhat analogous to the standing wave in a guitar string, which can be viewed as the combination of two interfering, traveling waves moving in opposite directions (see interference (wave propagation)).

The CDW in electronic charge is accompanied by a periodic distortion – essentially a superlattice – of the atomic lattice.[1][2][3] The metallic crystals look like thin shiny ribbons (e.g., quasi-1-D NbSe3 crystals) or shiny flat sheets (e.g., quasi-2-D, 1T-TaS2 crystals). The CDW's existence was first predicted in the 1930s by Rudolf Peierls, who argued that a 1-D metal would be unstable to the formation of energy gaps at the Fermi wavevectors ±kF, which reduce the energies of the filled electronic states at ±kF as compared to their original Fermi energy EF.[4] The temperature below which such gaps form is known as the Peierls transition temperature, TP.

The electron spins are spatially modulated to form a standing spin wave in a spin density wave (SDW). A SDW can be viewed as two CDWs for the spin-up and spin-down sub-bands, whose charge modulations are 180° out-of-phase.

Fröhlich model of superconductivity

[edit]

In 1954, Herbert Fröhlich proposed a microscopic theory,[5] in which energy gaps at ±kF would form below a transition temperature as a result of the interaction between the electrons and phonons of wavevector Q=2kF. Conduction at high temperatures is metallic in a quasi-1-D conductor, whose Fermi surface consists of fairly flat sheets perpendicular to the chain direction at ±kF. The electrons near the Fermi surface couple strongly with the phonons of 'nesting' wave number Q = 2kF. The 2kF mode thus becomes softened as a result of the electron-phonon interaction.[6] The 2kF phonon mode frequency decreases with decreasing temperature, and finally goes to zero at the Peierls transition temperature. Since phonons are bosons, this mode becomes macroscopically occupied at lower temperatures, and is manifested by a static periodic lattice distortion. At the same time, an electronic CDW forms, and the Peierls gap opens up at ±kF. Below the Peierls transition temperature, a complete Peierls gap leads to thermally activated behavior in the conductivity due to normal uncondensed electrons.

However, a CDW whose wavelength is incommensurate with the underlying atomic lattice, i.e., where the CDW wavelength is not an integer multiple of the lattice constant, would have no preferred position, or phase φ, in its charge modulation ρ0 + ρ1cos[2kFx – φ]. Fröhlich thus proposed that the CDW could move and, moreover, that the Peierls gaps would be displaced in momentum space along with the entire Fermi sea, leading to an electric current proportional to dφ/dt. However, as discussed in subsequent sections, even an incommensurate CDW cannot move freely, but is pinned by impurities. Moreover, interaction with normal carriers leads to dissipative transport, unlike a superconductor.

CDWs in quasi-2-D layered materials

[edit]

Several quasi-2-D systems, including layered transition metal dichalcogenides,[7] undergo Peierls transitions to form quasi-2-D CDWs. These result from multiple nesting wavevectors coupling different flat regions of the Fermi surface.[8] The charge modulation can either form a honeycomb lattice with hexagonal symmetry or a checkerboard pattern. A concomitant periodic lattice displacement accompanies the CDW and has been directly observed in 1T-TaS2 using cryogenic electron microscopy.[9] In 2012, evidence for competing, incipient CDW phases were reported for layered cuprate high-temperature superconductors such as YBCO.[10][11][12]

CDW transport in linear chain compounds

[edit]

Early studies of quasi-1-D conductors were motivated by a proposal, in 1964, that certain types of polymer chain compounds could exhibit superconductivity with a high critical temperature Tc.[13] The theory was based on the idea that pairing of electrons in the BCS theory of superconductivity could be mediated by interactions of conducting electrons in one chain with nonconducting electrons in some side chains. (By contrast, electron pairing is mediated by phonons, or vibrating ions, in the BCS theory of conventional superconductors.) Since light electrons, instead of heavy ions, would lead to the formation of Cooper pairs, their characteristic frequency and, hence, energy scale and Tc would be enhanced. Organic materials, such as TTF-TCNQ were measured and studied theoretically in the 1970s.[14] These materials were found to undergo a metal-insulator, rather than superconducting, transition. It was eventually established that such experiments represented the first observations of the Peierls transition.

The first evidence for CDW transport in inorganic linear chain compounds, such as transition metal trichalcogenides, was reported in 1976 by Monceau et al.,[15] who observed enhanced electrical conduction at increased electric fields in NbSe3. The nonlinear contribution to the electrical conductivity σ vs. field E was fit to a Landau-Zener tunneling characteristic ~ exp[-E0/E] (see Landau–Zener formula), but it was soon realized that the characteristic Zener field E0 was far too small to represent Zener tunneling of normal electrons across the Peierls gap. Subsequent experiments[16] showed a sharp threshold electric field, as well as peaks in the noise spectrum (narrow band noise) whose fundamental frequency scales with the CDW current. These and other experiments (e.g.,[17]) confirm that the CDW collectively carries an electric current in a jerky fashion above the threshold field.

Classical models of CDW depinning

[edit]

Linear chain compounds exhibiting CDW transport have CDW wavelengths λcdw = π/kF incommensurate with (i.e., not an integer multiple of) the lattice constant. In such materials, pinning is due to impurities that break the translational symmetry of the CDW with respect to φ.[18] The simplest model treats the pinning as a sine-Gordon potential of the form u(φ) = u0[1 – cosφ], while the electric field tilts the periodic pinning potential until the phase can slide over the barrier above the classical depinning field. Known as the overdamped oscillator model, since it also models the damped CDW response to oscillatory (AC) electric fields, this picture accounts for the scaling of the narrow-band noise with CDW current above threshold.[19]

However, since impurities are randomly distributed throughout the crystal, a more realistic picture must allow for variations in optimum CDW phase φ with position – essentially a modified sine-Gordon picture with a disordered washboard potential. This is done in the Fukuyama-Lee-Rice (FLR) model,[20][21] in which the CDW minimizes its total energy by optimizing both the elastic strain energy due to spatial gradients in φ and the pinning energy. Two limits that emerge from FLR include weak pinning, typically from isoelectronic impurities, where the optimum phase is spread over many impurities and the depinning field scales as ni2 (ni being the impurity concentration) and strong pinning, where each impurity is strong enough to pin the CDW phase and the depinning field scales linearly with ni. Variations of this theme include numerical simulations that incorporate random distributions of impurities (random pinning model).[22]

Quantum models of CDW transport

[edit]

Early quantum models included a soliton pair creation model by Maki[23] and a proposal by John Bardeen that condensed CDW electrons tunnel coherently through a tiny pinning gap,[24] fixed at ±kF unlike the Peierls gap. Maki's theory lacked a sharp threshold field and Bardeen only gave a phenomenological interpretation of the threshold field.[25] However, a 1985 paper by Krive and Rozhavsky[26] pointed out that nucleated solitons and antisolitons of charge ±q generate an internal electric field E* proportional to q/ε. The electrostatic energy (1/2)ε[E ± E*]2 prevents soliton tunneling for applied fields E less than a threshold ET = E*/2 without violating energy conservation. Although this Coulomb blockade threshold can be much smaller than the classical depinning field, it shows the same scaling with impurity concentration since the CDW's polarizability and dielectric response ε vary inversely with pinning strength.[27]

Building on this picture, as well as a 2000 article on time-correlated soliton tunneling,[28] a more recent quantum model[29][30][31] proposes Josephson-like coupling (see Josephson effect) between complex order parameters associated with nucleated droplets of charged soliton dislocations on many parallel chains. Following Richard Feynman in The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III, Ch. 21, their time-evolution is described using the Schrödinger equation as an emergent classical equation. The narrow-band noise and related phenomena result from the periodic buildup of electrostatic charging energy and thus do not depend on the detailed shape of the washboard pinning potential. Both a soliton pair-creation threshold and a higher classical depinning field emerge from the model, which views the CDW as a sticky quantum fluid or deformable quantum solid with dislocations, a concept discussed by Philip Warren Anderson.[32]

Aharonov–Bohm quantum interference effects

[edit]

The first evidence for phenomena related to the Aharonov–Bohm effect in CDWs was reported in a 1997 paper,[33] which described experiments showing oscillations of period h/2e in CDW (not normal electron) conductance versus magnetic flux through columnar defects in NbSe3. Later experiments, including some reported in 2012,[34] show oscillations in CDW current versus magnetic flux, of dominant period h/2e, through TaS3 rings up to 85 μm in circumference above 77 K. This behavior is similar to that of the superconducting quantum interference device (see SQUID), lending credence to the idea that CDW electron transport is fundamentally quantum in nature (see quantum mechanics).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Charge density wave

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A charge density wave (CDW) is a periodic modulation of the in a solid, typically accompanied by a corresponding of the atomic lattice, that emerges from electronic instabilities at low temperatures and results in an energy gap at the . This phenomenon lowers the overall electronic energy of the system, though it is partially offset by the elastic strain energy of the lattice, and is particularly favored in low-dimensional materials where the geometry enables efficient nesting. CDWs were first theoretically predicted by in the 1930s as a consequence of the Peierls instability in one-dimensional conductors, with subsequent developments by in 1959 highlighting softening (the Kohn anomaly) and by Albert Overhauser in the 1960s–1970s extending the concept to higher dimensions. CDWs are driven by mechanisms such as Fermi surface nesting (FSN), where the wave vector qq connects parallel sections of the Fermi surface, or by electron-phonon coupling (EPC), which can dominate even without strong nesting, as seen in materials like 2H-NbSe₂ where the CDW transition occurs at TCDW=33.5T_{CDW} = 33.5 K. They are commonly observed in quasi-one-dimensional organic conductors and two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), such as NbSe₂ and TaSe₂, but can also appear in three-dimensional systems under specific conditions. CDWs manifest in commensurate or incommensurate phases, with transitions between them often detected through satellite reflections in diffraction techniques like X-ray or neutron scattering, and they influence material properties by opening band gaps that suppress electrical conductivity while potentially coupling to superconductivity, magnetism, or ferroelectricity. Based on their origins, CDWs are classified into three main types: Type I, driven by Peierls-like instabilities and FSN in quasi-1D systems; Type II, arising from k-dependent EPC in 2D or 3D materials without dominant nesting; and Type III, unconventional charge modulations in strongly correlated systems like cuprate superconductors, where electron correlations play a key role rather than EPC or FSN. In recent studies of two-dimensional III₂–VI₃ materials, such as In₂Se₃, multiple CDW orders with chiral distortions have been identified, leading to enhanced electron localization and bandgap increases (e.g., from 0.49 eV to 1.38 eV), highlighting the diversity of CDW phases in simple electronic systems. Experimental probes like angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) have revealed the role of phonon softening and EPC matrix elements in stabilizing these waves, advancing understanding beyond traditional models.

Fundamentals

Definition and Physical Mechanism

A charge density wave (CDW) is a broken-symmetry of a solid in which the conduction undergoes a periodic modulation with a characteristic wavevector q\mathbf{q}, typically near 2kF2k_F where kFk_F is the Fermi wavevector, often accompanied by a corresponding periodic of the underlying lattice structure. This modulation can be either commensurate with the lattice periodicity or incommensurate, and it arises spontaneously below a critical temperature, transforming the material from a metallic to an insulating state by opening an energy gap at the . The lattice is linked to softening, particularly at the wavevector q\mathbf{q}, due to enhanced electron-phonon interactions. The physical mechanism driving CDW formation is primarily the electron-phonon coupling, which couples the electronic to lattice and leads to an instability that lowers the total of the system. In this process, known as a Peierls-like instability, the periodic modulation induces a lattice displacement that reconstructs the , opening a gap 2Δ2\Delta in the at the and reducing the electronic at the expense of a small cost from the lattice distortion. Schematically, the varies as ρ(r)=ρ0+ℜ[ψeiq⋅r]\rho(\mathbf{r}) = \rho_0 + \Re[\psi e^{i\mathbf{q}\cdot\mathbf{r}}], where ρ0\rho_0 is the uniform background and ψ\psi is the complex order parameter representing the and phase of the modulation; this wave backscatters electrons across the , effectively gapping nested portions of the and stabilizing the ordered state. The CDW order parameter can be expressed as ψ∼Δeiq⋅r\psi \sim \Delta e^{i\mathbf{q}\cdot\mathbf{r}}, with Δ\Delta proportional to the gap, and its magnitude is determined by the strength of the electron-phonon coupling. CDWs often compete with other collective orders, such as , where the gap Δ\Delta in the CDW state can suppress or coexist with the superconducting pairing gap depending on the relative strengths of the interactions. Unlike spin density waves (SDWs), which involve periodic modulations of both charge and spin densities driven primarily by electron-electron interactions, CDWs feature purely charge modulation without net spin polarization, emphasizing the role of lattice-mediated electron-phonon effects over magnetic ordering.

Historical Context and Discovery

The theoretical foundations of charge density waves (CDWs) trace back to early investigations of electron-lattice interactions in low-dimensional metals. In 1930, proposed that a strictly one-dimensional chain of atoms with conduction electrons would be unstable to a periodic lattice distortion at low temperatures, doubling the unit cell periodicity and opening an energy gap at the to favor an insulating over metallic conduction. This Peierls instability highlighted the role of electron-phonon coupling in driving structural and electronic rearrangements in idealized one-dimensional systems. The concept evolved significantly with Herbert Fröhlich's 1954 work, which extended Peierls' ideas by predicting that conduction electrons could condense into a coherent, propagating modulation—a charge density wave—coupled to a commensurate lattice distortion, potentially enabling frictionless collective transport akin to in one dimension. Fröhlich's model emphasized the dynamic, collective nature of such waves, distinguishing them from static distortions and sparking interest in their possible observability in real materials. Experimental confirmation of CDWs emerged in the 1970s through structural probes of inorganic compounds exhibiting quasi-one-dimensional or quasi-two-dimensional electronic structures. In 1974, diffraction studies on molybdenum (K_{0.3}MoO_3, known as blue bronze) revealed satellite peaks indicative of a modulation below 180 K, providing the first direct evidence of a periodic lattice driven by electronic instability. Concurrently, similar observations in layered (1T-TaS_2) showed reflections below approximately 350 K, confirming CDW formation in a quasi-two-dimensional system and broadening the phenomenon beyond strict one-dimensional models. A pivotal milestone came in 1976 with transport measurements on niobium triselenide (NbSe_3), where Monceau and colleagues observed a sharp threshold above which resistivity dropped dramatically, signaling the collective depinning and sliding of the , with nonlinear current-voltage characteristics linking to electrical response. This demonstration of Fröhlich-like conduction resolved earlier ambiguities in interpreting resistivity anomalies as potential superconducting effects. Early reviews, such as those by Wilson et al. (1975) and Zuckermann (1975), synthesized these findings, emphasizing the transition from theoretical 1D constructs to in quasi-low-dimensional solids and clarifying signatures via and .

Theoretical Foundations

Peierls Instability and Electron-Phonon Coupling

The Peierls instability refers to a structural in one-dimensional metals where the lattice periodicity doubles, driven by electron-phonon interactions that lower the total of the system. In a half-filled tight-binding band, the undistorted lattice features a Fermi wavevector kF=π/(2a)k_F = \pi / (2a), where aa is the , leading to perfect nesting of the at wavevector q=2kFq = 2k_F. This nesting allows electrons near the to pair across the boundary, favoring a lattice that opens an gap Δ\Delta at ±kF\pm k_F, reducing the electronic by an amount proportional to Δ2ln⁡(W/Δ)\Delta^2 \ln( W / \Delta ), where WW is the bandwidth. The gain in electronic outweighs the elastic cost of the when the distortion amplitude uu satisfies Eel≈−(4tu/a)2N(0)ln⁡(EF/(tu/a))<Ku2/2E_{el} \approx - (4 t u / a)^2 N(0) \ln( E_F / (t u / a) ) < K u^2 / 2, with tt the hopping integral, N(0)N(0) the density of states at the , EFE_F the , and KK the lattice stiffness; this results in a finite even at infinitesimal coupling in strictly one dimension. Electron-phonon coupling mediates an effective attraction between electrons at wavevectors differing by 2kF2k_F, enhancing the susceptibility to charge density wave formation. The relevant Hamiltonian is the Fröhlich model, given by H=∑kϵkck†ck+∑qℏωqbq†bq+∑k,qgq(ck+q†ck(bq+b−q†)),H = \sum_{\mathbf{k}} \epsilon_{\mathbf{k}} c^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}} c_{\mathbf{k}} + \sum_{\mathbf{q}} \hbar \omega_{\mathbf{q}} b^\dagger_{\mathbf{q}} b_{\mathbf{q}} + \sum_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}} g_{\mathbf{q}} \left( c^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}} c_{\mathbf{k}} (b_{\mathbf{q}} + b^\dagger_{-\mathbf{q}}) \right), where ϵk\epsilon_{\mathbf{k}} is the electronic dispersion, the second term describes phonons of frequency ωq\omega_{\mathbf{q}}, and the coupling gqg_{\mathbf{q}} connects electrons to acoustic or optical phonons, typically peaking near q=2kFq = 2k_F due to umklapp scattering. This interaction generates a phonon renormalization, softening the mode at q=2kFq = 2k_F via the electron-phonon vertex. The instability arises from the divergence of the electronic susceptibility, captured by the Lindhard response function χ(q,ω=0)=−∑kf(ϵk)−f(ϵk+q)ϵk−ϵk+q\chi(q, \omega = 0) = - \sum_{\mathbf{k}} \frac{f(\epsilon_{\mathbf{k}}) - f(\epsilon_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}})}{\epsilon_{\mathbf{k}} - \epsilon_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}}, which in one dimension exhibits a logarithmic singularity χ(2kF)≈N(0)ln⁡(EF/T)\chi(2k_F) \approx N(0) \ln( E_F / T ) at low temperatures TT, reflecting perfect nesting. The phonon frequency then renormalizes as ωq2=ω02(1−λχ(q)/N(0))\omega^2_{\mathbf{q}} = \omega_0^2 (1 - \lambda \chi(q) / N(0) ), where λ=2g2N(0)/(ℏω0)\lambda = 2 g^2 N(0) / (\hbar \omega_0) is the dimensionless electron-phonon coupling constant. The system becomes unstable when λ>1\lambda > 1, leading to a charge density wave with gap Δ≈We−1/(2λ)\Delta \approx W e^{-1/(2\lambda)} in the weak-coupling limit. This features a metallic phase at high temperatures or weak (λ<1\lambda < 1), transitioning to a charge density wave below TCDW∼We−1/λT_{CDW} \sim W e^{-1/\lambda} as coupling increases, with the transition becoming first-order for λ≳1\lambda \gtrsim 1. In higher dimensions, the instability weakens: the Lindhard function peaks finitely at 2kF2k_F in three dimensions due to poor nesting, remains constant in two dimensions, and only diverges logarithmically in one dimension, making the Peierls transition robust primarily in quasi-one-dimensional systems.

Fröhlich Model and Connection to Superconductivity

The Fröhlich model conceptualizes the charge density wave (CDW) as a rigid, phase-coherent electron lattice capable of collective sliding, providing a dynamical description of CDW behavior through electron-phonon interactions. Proposed by Herbert Fröhlich in 1954, this framework introduces a collective coordinate φ to represent the phase of the CDW modulation, enabling the analysis of sliding modes where the entire pattern translates without dissipation in the ideal case. The model's Hamiltonian incorporates terms for electronic, phononic, and coupling energies, with the phase φ governing the collective dynamics and leading to a massless Goldstone mode due to the broken translational symmetry of the CDW ground state. The effective Lagrangian for the phase fluctuations in the Fröhlich model takes the form L=ℏ2n4m∗(∂ϕ∂t)2−V(ϕ),\mathcal{L} = \frac{\hbar^2 n}{4 m^*} \left( \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} \right)^2 - V(\phi), where nn denotes the carrier density, m∗m^* the effective mass, and V(ϕ)V(\phi) the potential arising from pinning effects. This structure yields a linear dispersion for long-wavelength phason excitations, ω(q)≈vF∣q∣\omega(q) \approx v_F |q|, where vFv_F is the Fermi velocity, characterizing the Goldstone mode as an acoustic collective oscillation of the CDW phase. Although formulated as a theory of superconductivity, the Fröhlich model predates the BCS theory by three years and posits CDW sliding as a mechanism for dissipationless transport via coherent electron-phonon pairing. In CDW systems, however, impurities introduce pinning that gaps the Goldstone mode, hindering the realization of superconductivity. The model underscores a fundamental link between CDWs and superconductivity, with CDWs acting as precursors in the normal state through analogous electron-phonon mechanisms; in cuprate superconductors, phase diagrams reveal competition or coexistence, where doping suppresses CDW order to enhance superconducting pairing.

Material Systems

Quasi-One-Dimensional Chain Compounds

Quasi-one-dimensional chain compounds, such as K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3 (blue bronze), NbSe3_3, and orthorhombic TaS3_3, exemplify systems where charge density waves (CDWs) emerge prominently due to their anisotropic lattice structures featuring linear chains with weak interchain coupling. These materials consist of transition metal atoms coordinated in chain-like arrangements—Nb atoms in trigonal prismatic Se coordination along the b-axis in NbSe3_3, Ta atoms in similar sulfur coordination in TaS3_3, and MoO6_6 octahedra forming chains along the b-axis in K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3, separated by potassium ions—resulting in highly anisotropic electronic properties dominated by one-dimensional conduction. The weak interchain interactions, on the order of transverse bandwidths much smaller than longitudinal ones, enhance Fermi surface nesting, favoring CDW formation over three-dimensional metallic behavior. CDW transitions in these compounds occur at characteristic temperatures TcT_c ranging from approximately 100 K to 180 K, with NbSe3_3 exhibiting two successive transitions at 145 K and 59 K, orthorhombic TaS3_3 at 215 K, and K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3 at 180 K. Below TcT_c, the lattice undergoes periodic distortions accompanied by hysteresis in structural and electronic properties, arising from the formation of CDW domains that accommodate phase slips due to incommensurability with the underlying lattice. Domain formation is particularly evident in these systems, where discommensurations or phase boundaries separate regions of varying CDW phase, as visualized in low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images showing large-scale domain structures and walls in NbSe3_3 and incommensurate modulations in K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3. Electronically, these compounds feature partially filled conduction bands—such as nearly half-filling in TaS3_3 and NbSe3_3, and effective three-quarter filling in K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3—leading to Fermi surface nesting at wavevector 2kF2k_F, where kFk_F is the Fermi wavevector. This nesting drives the Peierls instability, opening an energy gap at 2kF2k_F in the electronic density of states, but the gap remains incomplete due to finite interchain dispersion, resulting in a fraction of unpinned carriers coexisting with pinned CDW condensate. The resulting incommensurate CDWs, with wavelengths not rationally related to the lattice constant, further promote domain structures and incomplete gap coverage, as the CDW wavevector in K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3 evolves temperature-dependently toward a near-commensurate value below 100 K. Experimental signatures of CDW formation include sharp peaks in resistivity at TcT_c, reflecting the partial gapping of the Fermi surface and onset of pinning, alongside lambda-like anomalies in specific heat indicative of electronic entropy changes and latent heat release during the transition. In NbSe3_3 and TaS3_3, the dual transitions manifest as successive resistivity upturns and specific heat jumps, while in K0.3_{0.3}MoO3_3, the single transition shows a pronounced thermal anomaly driven by weak electron-phonon coupling. These observations underscore the role of one-dimensionality in stabilizing CDWs, with unpinned carriers contributing to residual metallic conduction below TcT_c, occasionally exhibiting nonlinear transport hints of classical depinning at low temperatures.

Quasi-Two-Dimensional Layered Materials

Quasi-two-dimensional layered materials, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) exemplified by 1T-TaS₂ and 2H-NbSe₂, as well as cuprates like La₂₋ₓSrₓCuO₄, exhibit charge density waves (CDWs) driven by the anisotropic electronic structure inherent to their layered architecture. In these systems, the weak interlayer van der Waals interactions confine electrons primarily to individual layers, fostering quasi-2D Fermi surfaces that enable CDW formation through mechanisms distinct from strictly one-dimensional chains. For instance, 1T-TaS₂ displays multiple CDW phases upon cooling from the metallic state: an incommensurate phase emerging around 545 K, transitioning to a nearly commensurate phase at approximately 355 K, and then to a commensurate phase at about 225 K, where the lattice distorts into a √13 × √13 superstructure, localizing electrons into star-of-David clusters. Similarly, 2H-NbSe₂ hosts a CDW transition at approximately 33 K, characterized by a triangular lattice distortion, while La₂₋ₓSrₓCuO₄ at x ≈ 0.12 shows stripe-like charge order with a periodicity of about 4 lattice spacings, coexisting with antiferromagnetic spin order. The formation of CDWs in these materials arises from two-dimensional Fermi surface nesting, where parallel sections of the cylindrical Fermi surface connect via a nesting vector, promoting instabilities at specific wave vectors. This leads to unidirectional stripe patterns in cuprates or checkerboard and triangular modulations in TMDs, as opposed to the more rigid quarter-filled band distortions in lower dimensions. Commensurability effects play a crucial role, with incommensurate CDWs evolving into commensurate ones upon cooling, often accompanied by Mott insulating behavior due to electron localization; in 1T-TaS₂, the commensurate phase at low temperatures forms a band insulator with a gap of about 0.3 eV. Higher transition temperatures are observed in some layered organics, reaching up to 300 K, though TMDs like 1T-TaS₂ demonstrate robust CDW order persisting to elevated temperatures, highlighting the stability from 2D electron-phonon coupling. Unique to quasi-2D systems, interlayer coupling modulates the CDW amplitude and phase coherence across layers, leading to surface reconstructions or enhanced correlations at interfaces that differ from bulk behavior. In 2H-NbSe₂, this manifests in competition with superconductivity, where the CDW at 33 K suppresses but coexists with the superconducting state at 7 K, potentially through pair density wave formation that intertwines the orders. Such interplay is evident in the absence of a superconducting dome suppression at the CDW quantum critical point under pressure, suggesting filamentary superconductivity channels bypassing CDW domains. Recent advances, particularly post-2010, have utilized ultrafast spectroscopy to reveal hidden metastable states in these materials, where laser pulses quench the CDW order into long-lived configurations with altered lattice dimerization and electronic gaps. In 1T-TaS₂, such excitations collapse interlayer stacking faults, exposing metallic domains within the insulating CDW matrix that persist for nanoseconds, offering insights into non-equilibrium phase control. Additionally, in the 2020s, CDWs have been observed in twisted bilayer graphene systems, such as double bilayers at 2.37° twist angles, where moiré potentials induce density wave insulators at charge neutrality, driven by flat band correlations rather than phonons. These findings underscore the versatility of quasi-2D platforms for engineering CDW-superconductivity competition.

Transport Phenomena

Classical Depinning and Sliding Modes

In charge density waves (CDWs), impurities and lattice defects pin the collective electron modulation, preventing motion unless an applied electric field exceeds a threshold value ETE_T. Below ETE_T, the CDW remains static, contributing negligibly to conduction, while above it, the CDW depins and slides coherently, leading to a sharp nonlinear increase in current. This depinning transition manifests in characteristic nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) curves, where the current rises dramatically for fields just beyond ETE_T, often accompanied by hysteresis due to pinning landscape metastability. Additionally, the sliding CDW generates voltage oscillations, observed as narrow-band noise with a fundamental frequency proportional to the driving voltage, reflecting the periodic passage of the CDW modulation past impurities. Classical descriptions of CDW dynamics rely on elastic models treating the CDW phase ϕ\phi as a deformable field. The elastic sine-Gordon equation governs the phase evolution in the presence of pinning and driving: ∂2ϕ∂t2+γ∂ϕ∂t=eEℏ+Km∗∇2ϕ−V0m∗sin⁡(ϕ+ϕimp),\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial t^2} + \gamma \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = \frac{e E}{\hbar} + \frac{K}{m^*} \nabla^2 \phi - \frac{V_0}{m^*} \sin(\phi + \phi_{\rm imp}), where γ\gamma is the damping coefficient, KK the elastic constant, m∗m^* the effective mass, V0V_0 the pinning amplitude, and ϕimp\phi_{\rm imp} the impurity phase. This equation captures the competition between driving force, elastic deformation, and sinusoidal pinning potential. Pinning regimes divide into strong pinning, where individual impurities dominate and ET∝niE_T \propto n_i (with nin_i the impurity density), leading to localized deformations, and weak pinning, where collective effects from dilute impurities yield ET∝ni2E_T \propto n_i^2 and broader phase coherence. In the sliding regime above ETE_T, the CDW can behave as either rigid, undergoing uniform translation with minimal internal deformation in clean samples, or flexible, exhibiting local phase slips and deformations around pinning centers in disordered systems. The Fukuyama-Lee-Rice (FLR) model formalizes this for weak pinning, describing the CDW as an elastic medium with random impurity potentials, predicting a conductivity that scales as σ∼(E−ET)ζ\sigma \sim (E - E_T)^\zeta near threshold, where ζ≈1\zeta \approx 1 in mean-field approximations but higher (ζ≈2\zeta \approx 2) in numerical simulations accounting for disorder. This scaling reflects the gradual unlocking of pinned segments, transitioning to ohmic behavior at high fields. Experimental observations validate these classical features, particularly in quasi-one-dimensional materials like NbSe3_3. At 4.2 K, NbSe3_3 displays oscillatory conduction above ET≈10E_T \approx 10 mV/cm, with narrow-band noise frequencies f∼Vf \sim V following the Lee-Rice model, where the oscillation period corresponds to the time for the to advance by one wavelength under the field. These pulses, with quality factors up to 30,000, confirm coherent sliding and have been linked to the Fröhlich collective mode as the basis for macroscopic transport.

Quantum Tunneling and Creep in CDW Transport

In charge density wave (CDW) systems, classical models of transport predict a sharp depinning threshold at low temperatures, but quantum effects introduce corrections by enabling tunneling through pinning barriers as T approaches 0 K. Quantum depinning arises from coherent tunneling of the entire CDW phase, modeled using the sine-Gordon equation for the phase field φ(x,t), where impurities create a washboard potential. The tunneling process is described by an instanton configuration in the Euclidean path integral formulation, representing a saddle-point trajectory in imaginary time that connects pinned and depinned states of the phase φ(τ). The resulting tunneling rate Γ for depinning events scales as Γ ≈ (ω_0 / 2π) exp(-S/ℏ), where ω_0 is a characteristic attempt frequency and S is the Euclidean action of the instanton, typically S ∝ (λ / ξ)^{1/2} with λ the pinning strength and ξ the coherence length. This mechanism lowers the effective threshold field compared to classical predictions and leads to finite conductivity at zero temperature without thermal activation. At finite but low temperatures below the classical depinning threshold, the creep regime governs subthreshold CDW motion, where the wave advances via thermally activated nucleation and propagation of dislocation pairs over collective pinning landscapes formed by random impurities. In this regime, the pinning energy barriers U vary with the driving force E, leading to a nonlinear velocity-field relation v(E,T) ≈ v_0 exp[-U(E)/T], but for strong collective pinning, the activation follows a variable-range form v ≈ exp[-(T_0 / T)^μ], with μ = 1/2 characteristic of elastic creep in one dimension, where T_0 reflects the pinning energy scale and domain correlations. The Imry-Ma argument provides a framework for estimating domain sizes in these landscapes: in disordered media, random pinning fields favor domain walls over long-range order, yielding optimal domain lengths L ≈ (J / Δ)^{2/(4-d)} in d dimensions, with J the CDW elastic modulus and Δ the disorder variance, though CDWs in quasi-one-dimensional systems often circumvent full destruction of order due to discrete symmetries. In strictly one-dimensional CDW wires, quantum phase slips—tunneling events that unwind the phase by 2π—dominate dissipation, analogous to those in superconducting nanowires, and contribute to ohmic-like resistance at ultra-low temperatures. The distinction from classical overdamped dynamics emerges below a crossover temperature T_cr ≈ ℏ γ / k_B, where γ is the normal-state damping coefficient from electron-phonon coupling, marking the onset of quantum fluctuations in the phase dynamics. Above T_cr, thermal activation prevails, while below it, quantum tunneling and zero-point motion suppress creep, leading to a plateau or saturation in the resistivity-temperature curve. Experimental signatures include excess low-temperature noise and non-Arrhenius conductivity in materials like NbSe₃, where time-domain transport reveals coherent quantum dynamics below 20 K, consistent with instanton-mediated depinning. Similar quantum noise has been observed in organic conductors akin to Bechgaard salts, supporting the role of macroscopic quantum coherence in CDW transport at millikelvin scales.

Advanced Effects and Applications

Aharonov-Bohm Interference in CDWs

In mesoscopic ring geometries fabricated from (CDW) materials, the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect manifests as quantum interference in the coherent transport of the sliding CDW condensate, sensitive to magnetic flux threading the structure. Experiments have utilized micron-scale rings, such as NbSe₃ cylinders containing columnar defects that trap magnetic flux and effectively form closed-loop paths for the CDW, as well as seamless single-crystal rings of orthorhombic TaS₃ with diameters of 5–100 μm and cross-sections around 10 μm². The AB effect modulates the phase φ of the CDW order parameter by the enclosed magnetic flux Φ, leading to periodic oscillations in magnetoresistance with a flux period of Φ₀ = h/2e. The underlying mechanism arises from the coupling of the coherently sliding CDW to the electromagnetic vector potential, akin to a supercurrent response, where the collective motion of the electron condensate experiences an effective phase shift proportional to the flux. This results in interference between CDW wavefronts propagating around the ring, with the magnetic field oscillation period given by ΔB = Φ₀ / A, where A is the ring's effective area. The flux quantization Φ₀ = h/2e reflects the paired or collective nature of the CDW charge carriers, matching that in superconductors but distinct from single-electron Aharonov-Bohm effects with period h/e. The interference is described by the conductance G(Φ)≈G0[1+cos⁡(2πΦΦ0)],G(\Phi) \approx G_0 \left[ 1 + \cos \left( \frac{2\pi \Phi}{\Phi_0} \right) \right], where G₀ is the average conductance, observable only above the CDW depinning threshold when sliding is induced. Pioneering 1990s experiments by Latyshev et al. in NbSe₃ demonstrated these h/2e oscillations in the nonlinear CDW conductivity under magnetic fields up to 12 T, confirming macroscopic quantum coherence over lengths comparable to the defect spacing (∼1 μm). Subsequent work in TaS₃ rings revealed robust AB oscillations in current and resistance at temperatures up to 79 K, with oscillation amplitudes (∼10% of baseline) increasing with bias voltage (e.g., 100–300 mV) and current switching between discrete states modulated by flux. These findings underscore the topological quantum behavior of the CDW as a macroscopic wave. Dephasing is limited by thermal fluctuations and pinning disorder, yet coherence persists over >100 μm due to the large phase correlation length in clean samples; quantum creep aids in sustaining coherence during low-bias sliding.

Experimental Probes and Recent Developments

Charge density waves (CDWs) are primarily detected through structural and electronic probes that reveal periodic lattice modulations and associated band structure changes. and techniques identify satellite peaks corresponding to the CDW wavevector, confirming lattice distortions on the order of a few percent in materials like TbTe₃. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) visualizes atomic-scale charge modulations and domain structures, while maps the CDW-induced and reconstructed , as demonstrated in kagome metals such as ScV₆Sn₆. Transport measurements reveal characteristic nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) characteristics, where above a threshold field, the CDW slides collectively, leading to sharp increases in conductivity; noise spectroscopy further probes phase slips and pinning dynamics in quasi-one-dimensional systems like NbSe₃ nanowires. attenuation experiments detect softening near the CDW transition temperature, with elastic moduli anomalies signaling electron-phonon coupling in compounds such as (TaSe₄)₂I. Recent advances since 2015 have leveraged time-resolved techniques to capture dynamics on timescales. Time-resolved ARPES has revealed hindered melting of the order in TbTe₃, where photoexcitation transiently enhances nesting but persistent order survives due to electron-phonon decoupling. In 2D materials, persist in monolayer TaSe₂ with a superstructure, confirmed by STM and , despite metallic screening altering the electronic structure. Quantum criticality near CDW-superconductivity boundaries has been explored in iron-based superconductors, where doping suppresses CDW-like charge fluctuations, enhancing superconducting pairing under the dome, as seen in Ba(Fe₁₋ₓCoₓ)₂As₂. In September 2025, studies on ErTe₃ and HoTe₃ revealed a ferroaxial wave originating from intertwined charge and orbital ordering, enhancing understanding of complex CDW phases in these materials. Applications of CDWs exploit their switchable phases for device technologies. Hysteresis in the CDW transition enables memristive behavior, with multi-state resistance switching observed in 1T-TaS₂ via photocurrent imaging, allowing access to metastable domains for . Ultrafast switching, driven by terahertz pulses exciting the amplitudon mode, transforms CDWs to insulating metastable states in ErTe₃ on scales, promising high-speed . In the 2020s, has analyzed CDW domain coarsening in simulations of 1T-TaS₂, enabling prediction of phase ordering kinetics for scalable modeling of low-dimensional systems. Key challenges in CDW research include distinguishing them from competing orders like , where ARPES and reveal coexistence but require careful disentanglement of gap symmetries in cuprates and iron pnictides. Doping tunes CDW phases by altering carrier density and nesting, suppressing the order in 1T-TiSe₂ to induce metallic states, yet precise control remains difficult due to disorder-induced domain fragmentation.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/charge-density-wave
  2. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1424791112
  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54205-1
  4. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/17/7/1135
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S163107051500225X
  6. https://www.to.infn.it/~mussod/RevModPhys.60.1129.pdf
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00018737500101391
  8. https://archive.org/details/quantumtheoryofs0000rudo
  9. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2008/ph373/yao1/
  10. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1954.0116
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00018732.2012.719674
  12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41535-021-00327-4
  13. https://hal.science/jpa-00245546/document
  14. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2015/EECS-2015-73.pdf
  15. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.075442
  16. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/0119c7c9-4efe-4daf-b165-392c785a49ce/download
  17. https://hal.science/hal-02056654/file/2138264.pdf
  18. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1512092112
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05153-0
  20. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11167-z
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2019
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41699-023-00395-z
  23. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032053
  24. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3267
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10504333/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341552/
  27. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043392
  28. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1500168
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15079-1
  30. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.17.535
  31. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.12205
  32. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9811103
  33. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.605
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31897
  35. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.13850
  36. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04934
  37. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.919
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2008.11.066
  39. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03008-2
  40. https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.1007/s12274-021-3859-0
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.