Hubbry Logo
Pyrotechnic fastenerPyrotechnic fastenerMain
Open search
Pyrotechnic fastener
Community hub
Pyrotechnic fastener
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pyrotechnic fastener
Pyrotechnic fastener
Pyrotechnic fastener
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A pyrotechnic fastener (also called an explosive bolt, or pyro, within context) is a fastener, usually a nut or bolt, that incorporates a pyrotechnic charge that can be initiated remotely. One or more explosive charges embedded within the bolt are typically activated by an electric current, and the charge breaks the bolt into two or more pieces. The bolt is typically scored around its circumference at the point(s) where the severance should occur.[1] Such bolts are often used in space applications to ensure separation between rocket stages, because they are lighter and much more reliable than mechanical latches.

Explosive bolt in an Orion module

In applications that require safety, precision and reliability, such as the aerospace industry,[2] pyrotechnic fasteners are triggered using exploding bridgewire detonators, which were themselves later succeeded by slapper detonators.[citation needed] Classical blasting caps are generally avoided for such usage.

More recent developments have used pulsed laser diodes to detonate initiators through fiber-optic cables,[3] which subsequently fire the main charge.

Gas generators are similar to pyrotechnic fasteners. They are used to generate large amounts of gas, as for turbopumps, to inflate balloons, especially airbags, to eject parachutes and similar applications.

Compositions used

[edit]

Various pyrotechnic compositions can be used, depending on the desired burn rate and required amount of energy and volume of gas produced. Some materials, such as RDX, sublime in vacuum, which limits their usefulness in aerospace applications.[4] Composition with the character of bipropellants and flash powders are often used.[citation needed]

Standard pyrotechnic mixtures used by NASA

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pyrotechnic fastener

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A pyrotechnic fastener, also known as an bolt or separation bolt, is a mechanical device that securely joins components under high tensile loads and enables rapid, on-command separation through the of an embedded pyrotechnic charge, fracturing the fastener at a predetermined weak point. These fasteners typically consist of a machined bolt or nut with a contained , initiated by electrical current, explosive transfer lines, or mechanical means, resulting in separation times under 10 milliseconds while minimizing debris and shock. Pyrotechnic fasteners have been integral to and defense systems since the early days of , with notable use in NASA's Mercury program for tasks like capsule hatch release, though early incidents highlighted the need for rigorous testing and to prevent premature activation. They are engineered for extreme environments, operating reliably from -65°F to +420°F and withstanding high , shock, and pressures up to 15,000 PSI in undersea applications, with tensile capacities ranging from 300 pounds to over 500,000 pounds depending on size. Key features include no pre-operation moving parts, low fragmentation options, and high reliability rates exceeding 99.99%, often certified to military standards like MIL-DTL-23659. In practice, these devices facilitate critical mission phases, such as jettisoning boosters, deploying satellites or payloads, separating stages, and emergency releases in vehicles, reducing overall mass for reentry by shedding non-essential parts. Types include fragmenting bolts for cost-effective applications and non-fragmenting variants for clean, debris-free operations, with designs often incorporating splinter guards or redundant initiators to enhance safety and performance in high-stakes scenarios like solid motor separations.

Overview

Definition

A pyrotechnic fastener is a mechanical fastening device, such as a bolt, nut, or pin, that incorporates an integrated pyrotechnic charge to facilitate rapid, controlled separation or release of connected components upon command initiation. These devices are engineered for one-time use in high-reliability scenarios, where the pyrotechnic material undergoes a or to fracture or displace parts of the , enabling instantaneous disconnection without mechanical tools. Key characteristics of pyrotechnic fasteners include their compact , high , and ability to achieve separation in milliseconds, making them suitable for environments requiring precise timing and minimal residual mass. The fastener is structured to contain the pyrotechnic reaction internally, often weakening or fragmenting at a designated shear plane or groove to ensure clean separation with controlled debris. In technical literature, pyrotechnic fasteners are also referred to as explosive bolts, pyros, or separation fasteners, emphasizing their role in release mechanisms. The basic components consist of a structural body—typically made from high-strength alloys like for the threaded or engaging portion—a contained pyrotechnic charge embedded within the body, and an initiation interface such as electrical leads or a percussion primer to trigger the charge.

Operating principle

A pyrotechnic functions through a controlled reaction that enables the rapid separation of mechanically joined components upon command. The device incorporates a pyrotechnic charge embedded within or adjacent to the body, which remains inert under normal conditions but activates to disrupt the structural continuity at a precisely engineered weak point, such as a scored or notched plane. This design ensures the can bear significant loads during operation while allowing for instantaneous release when required. The activation process begins with an initiation signal, typically an electrical current delivered via a bridgewire to a sensitive igniter, such as one containing or a similar primary . This igniter detonates, propagating the reaction to the main pyrotechnic charge, which undergoes rapid to produce high-pressure gases or, in some configurations, fragments. The ensuing gas expansion exerts immense tensile or shear forces on the , fracturing it cleanly at the weakened section and allowing the connected parts to separate. Physically, the separation relies on shock waves generated by the detonating charge, which propagate through the material to induce , augmented by effects from the that may locally weaken the . These dynamics ensure a predictable break with minimal uncontrolled fragmentation, particularly when shock-absorbing elements like sleeves are incorporated to direct the . metrics highlight the efficiency of this , with separation times generally under 5 milliseconds and output forces ranging from 10 to 100 kN, tailored to specific load-bearing needs. In normal use, the upholds full mechanical integrity against environmental stresses and operational loads, but results in a controlled that produces clean separation interfaces, often without hazardous debris in designed applications. This reliability stems from the precise of the charge and structural features, providing a functional margin that prevents premature while guaranteeing response upon signal.

Types

Explosive bolts

Explosive bolts are threaded fasteners that incorporate an internal pyrotechnic charge along the shank, specifically designed to at a notched section upon for controlled separation. These devices function by containing the explosive material within a machined cavity or bore, which, when initiated, generates high-pressure gases that propagate a to the notched weak point, ensuring precise breakage. The structure typically consists of a cylindrical body with external threads for secure pre-load attachment, and the charge is embedded axially to align with the fracture plane. Upon activation, the bolt shatters into controlled fragments, with designs such as ridge-cut notches reflecting the to minimize shrapnel and promote clean separation. This fragmentation control is critical for applications requiring low debris, and the absence of moving parts prior to enhances reliability in demanding conditions. Common diameters for explosive bolts range from 1/4 inch to 1 inch, allowing for preload tensions up to 50,000 lbs while withstanding environmental stresses. They are particularly suited for high-vibration environments, where they maintain full until the moment of initiation, delivering an instantaneous release in under 10 milliseconds.

Frangible nuts

Frangible nuts are pyrotechnic fasteners designed as load-bearing components that incorporate an internal charge to enable controlled separation by fracturing the nut body into segments, thereby releasing the engaged bolt without damaging it. The device typically consists of a single-piece metal , often machined from high-strength alloys like 718, featuring precision-machined webs or a notched separation plane that defines the fracture path. Upon activation, the pyrotechnic charge detonates, generating rapid gas expansion and shock waves that propagate through the nut, causing it to split along the predetermined planes into two or more petals or halves that separate controllably. This mechanism ensures the mating bolt passes through the resulting opening freely, facilitating reliable disconnection in high-stakes environments while minimizing debris scatter through designed containment features. Unique to frangible nuts are their geometric configurations, such as hexagonal external shapes for compatibility with standard tooling, and the strategic placement of the pyrotechnic charge within integrated booster assemblies located at the core of the nut. These boosters, often containing (HNS) or similar insensitive , provide redundant initiation paths—typically two assemblies fired simultaneously—to enhance reliability and prevent partial failures. The design emphasizes "non-destructive" release, where the bolt retains full structural integrity for potential reuse or continued function in the assembly, distinguishing it from mechanisms that fully fragment the . This petal-like separation, rather than explosive scattering, reduces shock propagation and secondary hazards in sensitive applications. In terms of performance, frangible nuts are engineered to sustain preload tensions ranging from 20 kN to over 4,000 kN, depending on size and application, with activation resulting in near-instantaneous release times under 1 and fracture energies calibrated to exceed operational loads by a margin of at least 50%. For instance, the 2.5-inch model used in major launch systems holds up to 1,000,000 lbf (approximately 4,448 kN) axially while operating reliably from -65°C to +105°C, with lot verifying consistent web fracture via and destructive trials on thickened prototypes. These nuts achieve separation without relying on or residual preload, often incorporating kickoff springs for positive bolt extraction. Historically, frangible nuts evolved from early aerospace requirements for precise, reusable-bolt separation systems, first prominently deployed in the to secure the to the Command Module, where they were jettisoned post-second-stage ignition across all missions without failure. This design addressed needs for single-use, high-reliability actuators in crewed vehicles, building on prior pyrotechnic innovations and later adapting for hold-down posts and stage separations.

Applications

Aerospace

Pyrotechnic fasteners play a critical role in applications, particularly in launch vehicles and , where they enable precise and reliable separation events essential for mission success. These devices are primarily employed for separation in rockets, where they sever structural connections between boosters and core stages to allow independent operation post-burnout. They are also used for jettison, releasing protective nose cones after atmospheric exit to expose satellites or probes to , and for deployment from , facilitating the release of payloads from dispensers or adapters. Historical examples highlight their longstanding integration in human spaceflight. In the Apollo program, pyrotechnic fasteners, including explosive nuts and bolts, were used for lunar module descent and ascent stage separation, with four such devices severing interstage structural connections to ensure clean detachment in vacuum conditions. More recently, in NASA's Orion spacecraft, pyrotechnic separation bolts facilitate crew module release and fairing jettison, as demonstrated in ground tests where six bolts actuated to propel separation components clear of the joint. These applications underscore the devices' evolution from early manned missions to contemporary deep-space vehicles. To perform reliably in the harsh environment, pyrotechnic fasteners incorporate vacuum-compatible designs, such as sealed enclosures using heat- and vacuum-resistant explosives like (HNS), to prevent charge degradation from or contamination in space. They are also engineered for resistance to extreme temperatures, typically qualified from cryogenic lows approaching -200°C during orbital storage to highs up to +150°C near systems, ensuring consistent performance across mission profiles. For enhanced reliability, pyrotechnic fasteners are integrated in redundant arrays, often 4 to 12 units per separation plane, distributed to handle preload forces and provide if individual devices fail. This configuration, seen in Apollo's four-bolt setup and Orion's multi-bolt systems, balances structural integrity with rapid, simultaneous actuation for shock-minimized separations.

Defense and other industries

Pyrotechnic fasteners play a critical role in military applications, particularly for rapid and reliable separation in high-stakes environments. In missile systems, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and cruise missiles, explosive bolts facilitate stage separation by fracturing at predetermined points upon initiation, allowing the detachment of booster stages or payloads. For instance, these devices break the mechanical link of clamp bands to separate solid rocket motors from the main missile body, ensuring precise and controlled release under dynamic conditions. Similarly, in fighter jet ejection systems, pyrotechnic fasteners enable canopy release and pilot emergency egress by providing on-demand structural separation, integrated into broader pyrotechnic sequences for crew escape. For torpedo release mechanisms, pyrotechnic gas generators and explosive bolts secure and jettison torpedoes from submarines or surface vessels, initiating separation through gas pressure or direct fracture to support rapid deployment. Beyond missiles and , pyrotechnic fasteners find use in naval and operations for hatch releases and systems. These devices are used in underwater egress systems, such as the Underwater Emergency Egress System (UEES) for helicopters, to enable safe crew escape by fracturing restraints or seals in flooded compartments. They also support the release of buoys, mines, or torpedoes by providing pressure-driven separation in subsea conditions. In automotive applications, pyrotechnic devices are integral to systems. Specific examples highlight their deployment in defense systems. The U.S. Army employs pyrotechnic components, including bolts, within explosive trains for , enabling controlled separation in multistage missiles and fuzes through propagation or gas pressure mechanisms. PyroAlliance bolts are utilized in defense applications, such as opening of tanks or cargo holds, and are adaptable for naval systems requiring rapid structural release. These designs accommodate high-g , with tensile loads up to 50 kN and tolerance for shock environments exceeding 100g prior to , ensuring integrity during launch or transit. For corrosive environments like saltwater exposure in marine operations, hermetic sealing and material adaptations allow operation from -65°F to +270°F, preventing degradation and maintaining reliability in submerged or humid conditions.

Pyrotechnic Compositions

Common mixtures

Pyrotechnic fasteners commonly employ pyrotechnic mixtures consisting of a and an oxidizer that react to produce rapid gas generation and heat for separation. One widely used example is boron-potassium nitrate (BKNO3), typically formulated as approximately 24% boron, 71% , and 5% polyester binder, known for its consistent performance in igniters and gas generators. Flash powders represent another primary type, often comprising metallic fuels such as aluminum or magnesium alloyed with oxidizers like ; typically around 70% and 30% aluminum powder, valued for its rapid energy release in release mechanisms. Other common mixtures include zirconium-potassium perchlorate (ZPP) for initiators and manganese-barium chromate for delay elements, tailored for reliability. These mixtures exhibit deflagration rates generally ranging from 100 to 700 m/s, enabling controlled without , which is essential for minimizing structural shock in fasteners. Energy outputs typically fall between 2 and 6 kJ/g, providing sufficient and effects for bolt severance or nut fragmentation while maintaining efficiency in small charges. They demonstrate high stability under mechanical shock and elevated temperatures up to 250°C, with low sensitivity to and impact, ensuring reliability during storage and handling; however, exposure to can degrade performance in boron-based formulations. Certain high-explosive materials like are avoided in these applications, particularly in vacuum environments, due to sublimation risks that could compromise charge integrity over time. Compositions are preferentially deflagrating rather than detonating to reduce shock loads on adjacent components. Commercial suppliers such as PacSci EMC provide these formulations, often customizing binder ratios or particle sizes to adjust burn rates for specific dimensions, ensuring compatibility with varying load requirements.

NASA standard mixtures

NASA has developed standardized pyrotechnic mixtures for initiators used in fasteners and other separation devices, with the NASA Standard Initiator (NSI) propellant being a key formulation. The primary composition, detailed by Hohmann et al., consists of 52% (Zr, MIL-Z-399D, Type II, Class II), 42% (KClO4, MIL-P-217, Grade A, Class 4), 5% Viton-B binder ( Sales Spec No. 14), and 1% (MIL-G-155, Grade III), providing a caloric content of 1340–1450 cal/g. This zirconium-potassium perchlorate (ZPP) mix was originally qualified in 1966 for the as the Small Business Administration Standard Initiator (SBASI) and later standardized for the , emphasizing hot particle generation over gas production for reliable ignition in vacuum environments. Guidelines for these formulations, as outlined by Bement and Schimmel, focus on design qualification to achieve low-shock outputs through controlled burn rates and combustion parameters such as density and particle size. The NSI mix exhibits a burn rate of hundreds of feet per second, producing hot particles with minimal gas, which minimizes shock in applications like explosive bolts and frangible nuts (pp. 14-16). Performance specifications include an all-fire current not exceeding 50% of the minimum supplied operating current with 0.999 reliability at 95% confidence, no-fire threshold of 1 A/1 W for 5 minutes, and function times under 400 µs even at -420°F, ensuring consistent output in vacuum and extreme conditions. These mixtures have been employed in missions such as the Space Shuttle for stage separations and continue in programs like Artemis for pyrotechnic bolt activations during hardware separation. The evolution of NASA standard mixtures reflects a shift from earlier black powder analogs, which were prone to variability, with refinements to ZPP-based formulations following 1986 testing issues at low temperatures, prioritizing low-vulnerability characteristics like reduced sensitivity to electrostatic discharge and improved thermal stability for insensitive munitions compliance. This progression addressed issues identified in 1986 testing failures at low temperatures, leading to refined processing (e.g., optimized zirconium slurry) for enhanced reliability without compromising output consistency.

Design and Initiation

Mechanical design features

Pyrotechnic fasteners are engineered with precise structural elements to ensure reliable load-bearing during operation and controlled failure upon activation. Key features include scored or notched shear planes that dictate the location and strength, allowing predictable separation without unintended structural compromise. Threaded interfaces enable the application of preload forces, maintaining under tension, while containment collars or internal cavities capture fragments and byproducts to minimize hazards. Material selection emphasizes high-strength alloys to withstand extreme conditions, with 718 commonly used for its resistance and tensile properties in shear bolt components, and like 6Al-4V employed for lightweight, high preload applications. Hermetic seals, often achieved through welding or O-rings, protect the internal pyrotechnic charge from environmental contaminants such as , ensuring long-term reliability with leak rates as low as 1 × 10⁻⁶ cc He/sec at 1 . Qualification involves rigorous to verify performance at 150% of rated preload, confirming structural margins before deployment, alongside environmental exposure assessments under for vibration, shock, and thermal cycling to simulate operational stresses. These tests ensure the fastener maintains integrity across temperature ranges from -65°F to +270°F and preloads up to 86,000 pounds force. Customization allows modular designs tailored to specific load requirements, with bolt diameters ranging from 0.25 inches to over 5 inches and adjustable threading for diverse applications. Integration of sensors for monitoring arming status or energy output further enhances reliability in critical systems.

Initiation methods

Pyrotechnic fasteners are typically initiated through electrical or optical systems designed for precise and reliable triggering in high-stakes environments such as applications. Electrical initiation remains the most common method, employing exploding bridgewire (EBW) detonators that vaporize a thin bridgewire to generate a directly initiating the pyrotechnic charge without primary explosives. These detonators require a rapid high-voltage discharge, delivering pulses with threshold burst currents around 180-500 A and functioning times of 2-5 μs to ensure instantaneous response. Slapper detonators, an advanced variant of exploding foil initiators (EFI), offer reduced sensitivity to accidental ignition by accelerating a thin flyer plate via plasma formation from a foil bridge, impacting the explosive at velocities up to 6500 ft/s; this design enhances safety in pyrotechnic nuts and bolts by minimizing response to stray electrical energy. Optical initiation methods utilize diodes coupled to , transmitting coherent pulses to directly ignite the pyrotechnic material, bypassing electrical vulnerabilities. These systems deliver pulses of 1-10 J over durations such as 10 ms, achieving reliable while providing inherent immunity to (EMI) and radiofrequency (RF) hazards critical for operations. has integrated laser-initiated ordnance in missions like the 1995 launch, where optic transmission initiated separation events without mechanical barriers, demonstrating enhanced reliability in EMI-prone environments. Safety protocols are integral to initiation systems, incorporating arming sequences that maintain circuits deenergized until firing is imminent, with dual-signal redundancy requiring simultaneous inputs to authorize activation. Fail-safe designs employ fault containment regions, inhibit monitors for real-time health verification, and two-fault tolerance to prevent accidental discharge, ensuring no single or combined failure leads to unintended initiation. Historically, initiation evolved from hot-wire igniters predominant in pre-1960s programs like Mercury and early Apollo, which used resistive heating for reliable but EMI-susceptible triggering, to EBW adoption in the 1970s for military and applications requiring precise timing and reduced sensitivity. Laser methods emerged in the 1990s and gained prominence in 2000s missions, driven by needs for EMI immunity in complex spacecraft systems.

Advantages and Limitations

Benefits over alternatives

Pyrotechnic fasteners offer significant weight and space efficiencies compared to mechanical or electromechanical alternatives such as solenoid-based latches, primarily due to their high and compact design that minimizes volume requirements in constrained assemblies like those in applications. These devices leverage storage, enabling them to be substantially lighter—often achieving minimum volume-to-weight relationships—while supporting high-density configurations without the bulk of moving components found in systems. In terms of reliability, pyrotechnic fasteners demonstrate exceptional performance in single-use scenarios, with success rates exceeding 99.9% (e.g., 0.999955 at 90% confidence for certain explosive bolts), attributed to the absence of that could introduce failure modes in pyrotechnic-free mechanisms. This design reduces susceptibility to environmental factors and mechanical wear, ensuring consistent operation under demanding conditions, such as stage separations in rocketry. The activation speed and force delivery of pyrotechnic fasteners provide critical advantages for dynamic separations under load, with initiation occurring in milliseconds (e.g., under 10 ms for separation nuts) and precise energy output for instantaneous, simultaneous action across multiple points. This rapid response outperforms slower electromechanical alternatives, enabling reliable performance in high-stakes environments like payload deployment. Regarding cost-effectiveness, pyrotechnic fasteners yield lower lifecycle costs in mass-produced systems owing to their , long-term storage stability, and minimal input energy needs, which streamline integration and reduce ongoing maintenance compared to more complex reusable mechanisms. However, emerging non-explosive actuators (NEAs), such as shape memory alloys and motorized light bands, are gaining adoption for their reusability and reduced shock, particularly in small satellites and reusable launch vehicles, as noted in NASA's 2024 Small Spacecraft Technology report.

Challenges and safety considerations

Pyrotechnic fasteners are inherently single-use devices, as the charge is consumed upon , necessitating replacement after each deployment and complicating integration into systems. This one-time nature limits pre-flight functional verification to non-destructive simulations, increasing reliance on rigorous qualification testing to ensure reliability. In reusable architectures, post- poses significant challenges, as from the severed must be meticulously cleared to avoid interference with subsequent operations, and the expended device requires complete replacement without compromising the vehicle's turnaround time. Sensitivity to electrostatic discharge (ESD) represents a primary handling risk, with pyrotechnic compositions like lead azide exhibiting ignition thresholds as low as 0.1 joules, necessitating comprehensive grounding and bonding protocols during assembly and testing. To mitigate inadvertent initiation from ESD, personnel and equipment must maintain grounding resistance below 25 ohms, and relative humidity is controlled above 50% in operational areas; static voltage scans are required if humidity drops lower. Qualification testing for inadvertent initiation involves exposing devices to simulated ESD events, thermal extremes, and mechanical shocks to verify a functional margin exceeding 99% probability of survival under flight conditions. Debris generation during activation exacerbates risks in zero-gravity environments, where unrestrained fragments from pyrotechnic separation nuts can rebound and damage adjacent cabling or mechanisms, potentially leading to mission failures. These concerns, along with high pyroshock, are driving increased use of low-shock non-pyrotechnic alternatives in modern missions. safety protocols, outlined in standards like NASA-STD-7003A (2011), limit pyrotechnic shock in far-field regions to below 1,000 g to protect sensitive , with qualification tests simulating these impulses using hoppers or resonant beams to envelope the maximum expected environment plus a 3 dB margin. Environmental degradation in vacuum poses additional challenges, as certain pyrotechnic materials undergo or charge sublimation, potentially altering performance over extended missions; for instance, RDX-based compositions are unsuitable for deep space due to instability, while alternatives like HNS remain stable. Mitigation strategies include hermetic sealing via or glass-to-metal bonds to encapsulate the explosive fill, preventing moisture ingress and that could degrade initiator sensitivity. These seals are qualified through leak testing to levels below 10^{-6} atm-cc/sec, ensuring integrity in . Regulatory compliance adds complexity, particularly under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which classifies pyrotechnic fasteners as defense articles under United States Munitions List Category V, requiring export licenses and strict controls on technical data sharing for international collaborations. Handling per NASA-STD-8719.12A mandates certified personnel, quantity-distance separations based on net explosive weight, and two-fault-tolerant safe/arm mechanisms to prevent accidental firing during ground operations.

References

  1. https://psemc.com/products/explosive-bolts-sep-bolts/
  2. https://cadenergetics.com/explosive-bolts/
  3. https://ebad.com/product/separation-bolt-series/
  4. https://99percentinvisible.org/article/pyrotechnic-fasteners-explosive-bolts-help-get-ships-into-space-back-again/
  5. https://pyroalliance.ariane.group/products/explosive-bolts/
  6. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950024937/downloads/19950024937.pdf
  7. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sv/2016/1218767/
  8. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730022108/downloads/19730022108.pdf
  9. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3237521A/en
  10. http://www.i-asem.org/publication_conf/asem13/177.M4I.2.SM129_554F.pdf
  11. https://esmats.eu/amspapers/pastpapers/pdfs/2012/lazansky.pdf
  12. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14613484211051872
  13. https://psemc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Explosive-Bolts-Datasheet.pdf
  14. https://ebad.com/product/frangible-nut/
  15. https://psemc.com/products/frangible-nut/
  16. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730011151/downloads/19730011151.pdf
  17. https://standards.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/standards/MSFC/C/0/msfc-spec-3635c.pdf
  18. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20090015395/downloads/20090015395.pdf
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1270963814001801
  20. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130011040/downloads/20130011040.pdf
  21. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/11/piecing-together-blowing-apart-eft-1-orion/
  22. https://www.esmats.eu/esmatspapers/pastpapers/pdfs/2013/delap.pdf
  23. https://ariane.group/app/uploads/sites/5/2025/06/Fiche-EXPLOSIVE-BOLTS_03.2025-1.pdf
  24. https://psemc.com/solutions/subsea-pyro-devices/
  25. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6418870B1/en
  26. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0777482.pdf
  27. https://psemc.com/energetics/
  28. https://www.sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Flash_powder
  29. https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2024/01/matecconf_sesam2023_00057.pdf
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20000120417/downloads/20000120417.pdf
  31. http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-SPECS/download.php?spec=DOD-E-83578A.023586.pdf
  32. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/orion/fired-up-engines-and-motors-put-artemis-mission-in-motion/
  33. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19790013196/downloads/19790013196.pdf
  34. https://ebad.com/products/tini-mini-frangibolt/
  35. https://www.atec.army.mil/publications/Mil-Std-810G/Mil-Std-810G.pdf
  36. https://psemc.com/products/exploding-bridge-wire/
  37. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA322055.pdf
  38. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/898461
  39. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960002336/downloads/19960002336.pdf
  40. https://psemc.com/products/laser-ordnance/
  41. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230001889/downloads/TB_23-01_Pyro%20Best%20Practices_031523.pdf
  42. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690000660/downloads/19690000660.pdf
  43. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960001997/downloads/19960001997.pdf
  44. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42405-024-00802-9
  45. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42775937.pdf
  46. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/soa-2024.pdf
  47. https://standards.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/standards/A/0/nasa-std-871912a.pdf
  48. https://llis.nasa.gov/lesson/1360
  49. https://s3vi.ndc.nasa.gov/ssri-kb/static/resources/NASA-STD-7003A.pdf
  50. https://www.hermetron.com/pyrotechnic-headers/
  51. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/subchapter-M/part-121
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.