Hubbry Logo
Franklin PierceFranklin PierceMain
Open search
Franklin Pierce
Community hub
Franklin Pierce
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Franklin Pierce
Franklin Pierce
from Wikipedia

Franklin Pierce (November 23, 1804 – October 8, 1869) was the 14th president of the United States, serving from 1853 to 1857. A northern Democrat who believed that the abolitionist movement was a fundamental threat to national unity, he alienated anti-slavery groups by signing the Kansas–Nebraska Act and enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act. Conflict between North and South continued after Pierce's presidency, and, following Abraham Lincoln's victory in the 1860 presidential election, the Southern states seceded, resulting in the American Civil War.

Key Information

Pierce was born in New Hampshire; his father was state governor Benjamin Pierce. He served in the House of Representatives from 1833 until his election to the Senate, where he served from 1837 until his resignation in 1842. His private law practice was a success, and he was appointed New Hampshire's U.S. attorney in 1845. Pierce took part in the Mexican–American War as a brigadier general in the United States Army. Democrats saw him as a compromise candidate uniting Northern and Southern interests, and nominated him for president at the 1852 Democratic National Convention. He and running mate William R. King easily defeated the Whig Party ticket of Winfield Scott and William Alexander Graham in the 1852 presidential election.

As president, Pierce attempted to enforce neutral standards for civil service while also satisfying the Democratic Party's diverse elements with patronage, an effort that largely failed and turned many in his party against him. He was a Young America expansionist who signed the Gadsden Purchase of land from Mexico and led a failed attempt to acquire Cuba from Spain. He signed trade treaties with Britain and Japan and his Cabinet reformed its departments and improved accountability, but political strife during his presidency overshadowed these successes. His popularity declined sharply in the Northern states after he supported the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which nullified the Missouri Compromise, while many Southern whites continued to support him. The act's passage led to violent conflict over the expansion of slavery in the American West. Pierce's administration was further damaged when several of his diplomats issued the Ostend Manifesto calling for the annexation of Cuba, a document that was roundly criticized. He fully expected the Democrats to renominate him in the 1856 presidential election, but they abandoned him and his bid failed. His reputation in the North suffered further during the American Civil War as he became a vocal critic of President Lincoln.

While Pierce was popular and outgoing, his family life was difficult; his three children died young, and his wife, Jane Pierce, suffered from illness and depression for much of her life.[1] Their last surviving son was killed in a train accident while the family was traveling, shortly before Pierce's inauguration. A heavy drinker for much of his life, Pierce died in 1869 of cirrhosis. As a result of his support of the South, as well as failing to hold the Union together in time of strife, historians and scholars generally rank Pierce as one of the worst[2][3] and least memorable U.S. presidents.[4]

Early life and family

[edit]

Childhood and education

[edit]
Photograph of a white house.
The Franklin Pierce Homestead in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, where Pierce grew up, is now a National Historic Landmark.[5] He was born in a nearby log cabin as the homestead was being completed.[note 2]

Franklin Pierce was born on November 23, 1804, in a log cabin in Hillsborough, New Hampshire. He was a sixth-generation descendant of Thomas Pierce, who had moved to the Massachusetts Bay Colony from Norwich, Norfolk, England, in about 1634. His father Benjamin was a lieutenant in the American Revolutionary War who moved from Chelmsford, Massachusetts, to Hillsborough after the war, purchasing 50 acres (20 ha) of land. Pierce was the fifth of eight children born to Benjamin and his second wife Anna Kendrick; his first wife Elizabeth Andrews died in childbirth, leaving a daughter. Benjamin was a prominent Democratic-Republican[note 3] state legislator, farmer, and tavern-keeper. During Pierce's childhood, his father was deeply involved in state politics, while two of his older brothers fought in the War of 1812; public affairs and the military were thus a major influence in his early life.[8]

Pierce's father placed Pierce in a school at Hillsborough Center in childhood and sent him to the town school in Hancock at age 12.[note 4] Not fond of schooling, Pierce grew homesick and walked 12 miles (19 km) back to his home one Sunday. His father fed him dinner and drove him part of the distance back to school before ordering him to walk the rest of the way in a thunderstorm. Pierce later cited this moment as "the turning-point in my life".[10] Later that year, he transferred to Phillips Exeter Academy to prepare for college. By this time, he had built a reputation as a charming student, sometimes prone to misbehavior.[10]

Portrait of Nathaniel Hawthorne
Novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne, a lifelong friend of Pierce, wrote the biography Life of Franklin Pierce in support of Pierce's 1852 presidential campaign.[11]

In fall 1820, Pierce entered Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine, one of 19 freshmen. He joined the Athenian Society, a progressive literary society, alongside Jonathan Cilley (later elected to Congress) and Nathaniel Hawthorne, with whom he formed lasting friendships. He was the last in his class after two years, but he worked hard to improve his grades and graduated in fifth place in 1824[12] in a graduating class of 14.[13] John P. Hale enrolled at Bowdoin in Pierce's junior year; he became a political ally of Pierce's and then his rival. Pierce organized and led an unofficial militia company called the Bowdoin Cadets during his junior year, which included Cilley and Hawthorne. The unit performed drill on campus near the president's house, until the noise caused him to demand that it halt. The students rebelled and went on strike, an event that Pierce was suspected of leading.[14] During his final year at Bowdoin, he spent several months teaching at Hebron Academy in rural Hebron, Maine, where he earned his first salary and his students included future Congressman John J. Perry.[15][16]

Pierce read law briefly with former New Hampshire Governor Levi Woodbury, a family friend in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.[17] He then spent a semester at Northampton Law School in Northampton, Massachusetts, followed by a period of study in 1826 and 1827 under Judge Edmund Parker in Amherst, New Hampshire. He was admitted to the New Hampshire bar in late 1827 and began to practice in Hillsborough.[18] He lost his first case, but soon proved capable as a lawyer. Despite never being a legal scholar, his memory for names and faces served him well, as did his personal charm and deep voice.[19] In Hillsborough, his law partner was Albert Baker, who had studied law under Pierce and was the brother of Mary Baker Eddy.[20]

Hillsborough and state politics

[edit]

By 1824, New Hampshire was a hotbed of partisanship, with figures such as Woodbury and Isaac Hill laying the groundwork for a party of Democrats in support of General Andrew Jackson. They opposed the established Federalists (and their successors, the National Republicans), who were led by sitting President John Quincy Adams. The work of the New Hampshire Democratic Party came to fruition in March 1827, when their pro-Jackson nominee, Benjamin Pierce, won the support of the pro-Adams faction and was elected governor of New Hampshire essentially unopposed. While the younger Pierce had set out to build a career as an attorney, he was fully drawn into the realm of politics as the 1828 presidential election between Adams and Jackson approached. In the state elections held in March 1828, the Adams faction withdrew their support of Benjamin Pierce, voting him out of office,[note 5] but Franklin Pierce won his first election, a one-year term as Hillsborough's town meeting moderator, a position to which he was reelected five times.[21]

Pierce actively campaigned in his district on behalf of Jackson, who carried both the district and the nation by large margins in the November 1828 election, even though he lost New Hampshire. The outcome further strengthened the Democratic Party, and Pierce won his first legislative seat the following year, representing Hillsborough in the New Hampshire House of Representatives. Pierce's father was elected again as governor, retiring after that term. The younger Pierce was appointed as chairman of the House Education Committee in 1829 and the Committee on Towns the following year. By 1831 the Democrats held a legislative majority, and Pierce was elected Speaker of the House. The young Speaker used his platform to oppose the expansion of banking, protect the state militia, and offer support to the national Democrats and Jackson's reelection effort. At 27, he was a star of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. Though attaining early political and professional success, in his personal letters he continued to lament his bachelorhood and yearned for a life beyond Hillsborough.[22]

Like all white males in New Hampshire between the ages of 18 and 45, Pierce was a member of the state militia, and was appointed aide de camp to Governor Samuel Dinsmoor in 1831. He remained in the militia until 1847, and attained the rank of colonel before becoming a brigadier general in the Army during the Mexican–American War.[23][24] Interested in revitalizing and reforming the state militias, which had become increasingly dormant during the years of peace following the War of 1812, Pierce worked with Alden Partridge, president of Norwich University, a military college in Vermont, and Truman B. Ransom and Alonzo Jackman, Norwich faculty members and militia officers, to increase recruiting efforts and improve training and readiness.[25][26] Pierce served as a Norwich University trustee from 1841 to 1859, and received the honorary degree of LL.D. from Norwich in 1853.[27]

In late 1832, the Democratic Party convention nominated Pierce for one of New Hampshire's five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. This was tantamount to election for the young Democrat, as the National Republicans had faded as a political force, while the Whigs had not yet begun to attract a large following. Democratic strength in New Hampshire was also bolstered by Jackson's landslide reelection that year.[28] New Hampshire had been a marginal state politically, but from 1832 through the mid-1850s became the most reliably Democratic state in the Northern United States, boosting Pierce's political career.[29] Pierce's term began in March 1833, but he would not be sworn in until Congress met in December, and his attention was elsewhere. He had recently become engaged and bought his first house in Hillsborough. Franklin and Benjamin Pierce were among the prominent citizens who welcomed President Jackson to the state on his visit in mid-1833.[28]

Marriage and children

[edit]
Engraving of Jane Pierce
Pious and reserved, Jane Pierce was her husband's opposite in many ways.[30][31][32]

On November 19, 1834, Pierce married Jane Means Appleton, a daughter of Congregational minister Jesse Appleton and Elizabeth Means. The Appletons were prominent Whigs, in contrast with the Pierces' Democratic affiliation. Jane Pierce was shy, devoutly religious, and pro-temperance, encouraging Pierce to abstain from alcohol. She was somewhat gaunt, and constantly ill from tuberculosis and psychological ailments. She abhorred politics and especially disliked Washington, D.C., creating a tension that would continue throughout Pierce's political ascent.[30][31][32]

Jane Pierce disliked Hillsborough as well, and in 1838, the Pierces relocated to the state capital, Concord, New Hampshire.[33] They had three sons, all of whom died in childhood. Franklin Jr. (February 2–5, 1836) died in infancy, while Frank Robert (August 27, 1839 – November 14, 1843) died at the age of four from epidemic typhus. Benjamin (April 13, 1841 – January 6, 1853) died at the age of 11 in a train accident.[34]

Congressional career

[edit]

U.S. House of Representatives

[edit]

Pierce departed in November 1833 for Washington, D.C., where the Twenty-third United States Congress convened its regular session on December 2. Jackson's second term was under way, and the House of Representatives had a strong Democratic majority, whose primary focus was to prevent the Second Bank of the United States from being rechartered. The Democrats, including Pierce, defeated proposals supported by the newly formed Whig Party, and the bank's charter expired. Pierce broke from his party on occasion, opposing Democratic bills to fund internal improvements with federal money. He saw both the bank and infrastructure spending as unconstitutional, with internal improvements the responsibility of the states. Pierce's first term was fairly uneventful from a legislative standpoint, and he was easily reelected in March 1835. When not in Washington, he attended to his law practice, and in December 1835 returned to the capital for the Twenty-fourth Congress.[35]

As abolitionism grew more vocal in the mid-1830s, Congress was inundated with petitions from anti-slavery groups seeking legislation to restrict slavery in the United States. From the beginning, Pierce found the abolitionists' "agitation" to be an annoyance, and saw federal action against slavery as an infringement on southern states' rights, even though he was morally opposed to slavery itself.[36] He was also frustrated with the "religious bigotry" of abolitionists, who cast their political opponents as sinners.[37] "I consider slavery a social and political evil," Pierce said, "and most sincerely wish that it had no existence upon the face of the earth."[38] Still, he wrote in December 1835, "One thing must be perfectly apparent to every intelligent man. This abolition movement must be crushed or there is an end to the Union."[39] After the Civil War, Pierce believed that if the North had not aggressively agitated against Southern slavery, the South would have eventually ended slavery on its own and that the conflict had been "brought upon the nation by fanatics on both sides".[40]

When Rep. James Henry Hammond of South Carolina looked to prevent anti-slavery petitions from reaching the House floor, however, Pierce sided with the abolitionists' right to petition. Nevertheless, Pierce supported what came to be known as the gag rule, which allowed for petitions to be received, but not read or considered. This passed the House in 1836.[36] He was attacked by the New Hampshire anti-slavery Herald of Freedom as a "doughface", which had the dual meaning of "craven-spirited man" and "northerner with southern sympathies".[41] Pierce had stated that not one in 500 New Hampshirites were abolitionists; the Herald of Freedom article added up the number of signatures on petitions from that state, divided by the number of residents according to the 1830 census, and suggested the actual number was one-in-33. Pierce was outraged when South Carolina Senator John C. Calhoun read the article on the Senate floor as "proof" that New Hampshire was a hotbed of abolitionism. Calhoun apologized after Pierce replied to him in a speech which stated that most signatories were women and children, who could not vote, which therefore cast doubt on the one-in-33 figure.[42]

U.S. Senate

[edit]
Pierce in 1852

The resignation in May 1836 of Senator Isaac Hill, who had been elected governor of New Hampshire, left a short-term opening to be filled by the state legislature, and with Hill's term as senator due to expire in March 1837, the legislature also had to fill the six-year term to follow. Pierce's candidacy for the Senate was championed by state Representative John P. Hale, a fellow Athenian at Bowdoin. After much debate, the legislature chose John Page to fill the rest of Hill's term. In December 1836, Pierce was elected to the full term, to commence in March 1837, and at age 32, was at the time one of the youngest members in Senate history. The election came at a difficult time for Pierce, as his father, sister, and brother were all seriously ill, while his wife also continued to suffer from chronic poor health. As senator, he was able to help his old friend Nathaniel Hawthorne, who often struggled financially, procuring for him a sinecure as measurer of coal and salt at the Boston Customs House that allowed the author time to continue writing.[43]

Pierce voted the party line on most issues and was an able senator, but not an eminent one; he was overshadowed by the Great Triumvirate of Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster, who dominated the Senate.[44] Pierce entered the Senate at a time of economic crisis, as the Panic of 1837 had begun. He considered the depression a result of the banking system's rapid growth, amidst "the extravagance of overtrading and the wilderness of speculation".[45] So that federal money would not support speculative bank loans, he supported newly elected Democratic president Martin Van Buren and his plan to create an independent treasury, a proposal which split the Democratic Party. Debate over slavery continued in Congress, and abolitionists proposed its end in the District of Columbia, where Congress had jurisdiction. Pierce supported a resolution by Calhoun against this proposal, which Pierce considered a dangerous stepping stone to nationwide emancipation.[45] Meanwhile, the Whigs were growing in congressional strength, which would leave Pierce's party with only a small majority by the end of the decade.[46]

One topic of particular importance to Pierce was the military. He took an interest in military pensions, seeing abundant fraud within the system, and was named chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Pensions in the Twenty-sixth Congress (1839–1841). In that capacity, he urged the modernization and expansion of the Army, with a focus on militias and mobility rather than on coastal fortifications, which he considered outdated.[47]

Pierce campaigned vigorously throughout his home state for Van Buren's reelection in the 1840 presidential election. The incumbent carried New Hampshire but lost the election to the Whig candidate, military hero William Henry Harrison. The Whigs took a majority of seats in the Twenty-seventh Congress. Harrison died after a month in office, and Vice President John Tyler succeeded him. Pierce and the Democrats were quick to challenge the new administration, questioning the removal of federal officeholders, and opposing Whig plans for a national bank. In December 1841 Pierce decided to resign from Congress, something he had been planning for some time.[48] New Hampshire Democrats insisted that their state's U. S. senators be limited to one six-year term, so he had little likelihood of reelection. Also, he was frustrated at being a member of the legislative minority and wished to devote his time to his family and law practice.[49] His last actions in the Senate in February 1842 were to oppose a bill distributing federal funds to the states—believing that the money should go to the military instead—and to challenge the Whigs to reveal the results of their investigation of the New York Customs House, where the Whigs had probed for Democratic corruption for nearly a year but had issued no findings.[50]

Party leader

[edit]

Lawyer and politician

[edit]
Photograph of a white house
The Concord, New Hampshire house where Pierce lived from 1842 to 1848; now known as the Pierce Manse, it was restored in the 1970s and is maintained as a historic attraction.[51]

Despite his resignation from the Senate, Pierce had no intention of leaving public life. The move to Concord had given him more opportunities for cases, and allowed Jane Pierce a more robust community life.[52] Jane had remained in Concord with her young son Frank and her newborn Benjamin for the latter part of Pierce's Senate term, and this separation had taken a toll on the family. Pierce, meanwhile, had begun a demanding but lucrative law partnership with Asa Fowler during congressional recesses.[53] Pierce returned to Concord in early 1842, and his reputation as a lawyer continued to flourish. Known for his gracious personality, eloquence, and excellent memory, Pierce attracted large audiences in court. He would often represent poor people for little or no compensation.[54]

Pierce remained involved in the state Democratic Party, which was split by several issues. Governor Hill, who represented the commercial, urban wing of the party, advocated the use of government charters to support corporations, granting them privileges such as limited liability and eminent domain for building railroads. The radical "locofoco" wing of his party represented farmers and other rural voters, who sought an expansion of social programs and labor regulations and a restriction on corporate privilege. The state's political culture grew less tolerant of banks and corporations after the Panic of 1837, and Hill was voted out of office. Pierce was closer to the radicals philosophically, and reluctantly agreed to represent Hill's adversary in a legal dispute regarding ownership of a newspaper—Hill lost, and founded his own paper, of which Pierce was a frequent target.[55]

In June 1842 Pierce was named chairman of the State Democratic Committee, and in the following year's state election he helped the radical wing take over the state legislature. The party remained divided on several issues, including railroad development and the temperance movement, and Pierce took a leading role in helping the state legislature settle their differences. His priorities were "order, moderation, compromise, and party unity", which he tried to place ahead of his personal views on political issues.[56] As he would as president, Pierce valued Democratic Party unity highly, and saw the opposition to slavery as a threat to that.[57]

Democratic James K. Polk's dark horse victory in the 1844 presidential election was welcome news to Pierce, who had befriended the former Speaker of the House while both served in Congress. Pierce had campaigned heavily for Polk during the election, and in turn Polk appointed him as United States Attorney for New Hampshire.[58] Polk's most prominent cause was the annexation of Texas, an issue which caused a dramatic split between Pierce and his former ally Hale, now a U.S. Representative. Hale was so impassioned against adding a new slave state that he wrote a public letter to his constituents outlining his opposition to the measure.[59] Pierce responded by reassembling the state Democratic convention to revoke Hale's nomination for another term in Congress.[60] The political firestorm led to Pierce severing ties with his longtime friend, and with his law partner Fowler, who was a Hale supporter.[61] Hale refused to withdraw, and as a majority vote was needed for election in New Hampshire, the party split led to deadlock and a vacant House seat. Eventually, the Whigs and Hale's Independent Democrats took control of the legislature, elected Whig Anthony Colby as governor, and sent Hale to the Senate, much to Pierce's anger.[62]

Mexican–American War

[edit]
Pierce in his brigadier general's uniform, c. 1852

Active military service was a long-held dream for Pierce, who had admired his father's and brothers' service in his youth, particularly his older brother Benjamin's, as well as that of John McNeil Jr., husband of Pierce's older half-sister Elizabeth. As a legislator, he was a passionate advocate for volunteer militias. As a militia officer himself, he had experience mustering and drilling bodies of troops. When Congress declared war against Mexico in May 1846, Pierce immediately volunteered to join, although no New England regiment yet existed. His hope to fight in the Mexican–American War was one reason he refused an offer to become Polk's Attorney General. General Zachary Taylor's advance slowed in northern Mexico, and General Winfield Scott proposed capturing the port of Vera Cruz and driving overland to Mexico City. Congress passed a bill authorizing the creation of ten regiments, and Pierce was appointed commander and colonel of the 9th Infantry Regiment in February 1847, with Truman B. Ransom as lieutenant colonel and second-in-command.[63]

Illustration of Franklin Pierce as a general, riding a horse
Pierce's brief term as a general in the Mexican–American War boosted his public image.[64]

On March 3, 1847, Pierce was promoted to brigadier general, and took command of a brigade of reinforcements for General Scott's army, with Ransom succeeding to command of the regiment. Needing time to assemble his brigade, Pierce reached the already seized port of Vera Cruz in late June, where he prepared a march of 2,500 men accompanying supplies for Scott. The three-week journey inland was perilous, and the men fought off several attacks before joining with Scott's army in early August, in time for the Battle of Contreras.[65] The battle was disastrous for Pierce: his horse was suddenly startled during a charge, knocking him groin-first against his saddle. The horse then tripped into a crevice and fell, pinning Pierce underneath and debilitating his knee.[66] The incident made it look like he had fainted, causing one soldier to call for someone else to take command, saying, "General Pierce is a damned coward."[67] Pierce returned for the following day's action, but injured his knee again, forcing him to hobble after his men; by the time he caught up, the battle was mostly won.[67]

As the Battle of Churubusco approached, Scott ordered Pierce to the rear to convalesce. He responded, "For God's sake, General, this is the last great battle, and I must lead my brigade." Scott yielded, and Pierce entered the fight tied to his saddle, but the pain in his leg became so great that he passed out on the field. The Americans won the battle and Pierce helped negotiate an armistice. He then returned to command and led his brigade throughout the rest of the campaign, eventually taking part in the capture of Mexico City in mid-September, although his brigade was held in reserve for much of the battle.[68] For much of the Mexico City battle, he was in the sick tent, plagued by acute diarrhea.[67] Pierce remained in command of his brigade during the three-month occupation of the city; while frustrated by the stalled peace negotiations, he also tried to distance himself from the constant conflict between Scott and the other generals.[68]

Pierce was finally allowed to return to Concord in late December 1847. He was given a hero's welcome in his home state, and submitted his resignation from the Army, which was approved on March 20, 1848. His military exploits elevated his popularity in New Hampshire, but his injuries and subsequent troubles in battle led to accusations of cowardice that would long shadow him. He had demonstrated competence as a general, especially in the initial march from Vera Cruz, but his short tenure and his injury left little for historians to judge his ability as a military commander by.[64]

Ulysses S. Grant, who had the opportunity to observe Pierce firsthand during the war, countered the allegations of cowardice in his memoirs, written several years after Pierce's death: "Whatever General Pierce's qualifications may have been for the Presidency, he was a gentleman and a man of courage. I was not a supporter of him politically, but I knew him more intimately than I did any other of the volunteer generals."[69]

Return to New Hampshire

[edit]
Daguerreotype of Franklin Pierce
By the 1850s, Pierce had become a leader of the New Hampshire Democratic Party.[70]

Returning to Concord, Pierce resumed his law practice; in one notable case he defended the religious liberty of the Shakers, the insular sect threatened with legal action over accusations of abuse. But his role as a party leader continued to take up most of his attention. He continued to wrangle with Hale, who was anti-slavery and had opposed the war, stances that Pierce regarded as needless agitation.[70]

The large Mexican Cession of land divided the U.S. politically, with many in the North insisting that slavery not be allowed there (and offering the Wilmot Proviso to ensure it), while others wanted slavery barred north of the Missouri Compromise line of 36°30′ N. Both proposals were anathema to many Southerners, and the controversy split the Democrats. At the 1848 Democratic National Convention, the majority nominated former Michigan senator Lewis Cass for president, while a minority broke off to become the Free Soil Party, backing former president Van Buren. The Whigs chose General Zachary Taylor, a Louisianan, whose views on most political issues were unknown. Despite his past support for Van Buren, Pierce supported Cass, turning down the quiet offer of second place on the Free Soil ticket, and was so effective that Taylor, who was elected president, was held in New Hampshire to his lowest percentage in any state.[71]

Senator Henry Clay, a Whig, hoped to put the slavery question to rest with a set of proposals that became known as the Compromise of 1850. These would give victories to North and South, and gained the support of his fellow Whig, Webster. With the bill stalled in the Senate, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas led a successful effort to split it into separate measures so that each legislator could vote against the parts his state opposed without endangering the overall package. The bills passed, and were signed by President Millard Fillmore (who had succeeded Taylor after the president's death earlier in 1850).[72] Pierce strongly supported the compromise, giving a well-received speech in December 1850 pledging himself to "The Union! Eternal Union!"[73] The same month, the Democratic nominee for governor, John Atwood, issued a letter opposing the Compromise, and Pierce helped to recall the state convention and remove Atwood from the ticket.[73] The fiasco compromised the election for the Democrats, who lost several races; still, Pierce's party retained its control over the state, and was well positioned for the upcoming presidential election.[74]

Election of 1852

[edit]
Poster
Campaign poster for the Pierce/King ticket

As the 1852 presidential election approached, the Democrats were divided over slavery, though most of the "Barnburners" who had left the party with Van Buren to form the Free Soil Party had returned. It was widely expected that the 1852 Democratic National Convention would deadlock, with no candidate able to win the necessary two-thirds majority. New Hampshire Democrats, including Pierce, supported his old teacher, Levi Woodbury, by then an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, as a compromise candidate, but Woodbury's death in September 1851 opened up an opportunity for Pierce's allies to present him as a potential dark horse in the mold of Polk. New Hampshire Democrats felt that, as the state in which their party had most consistently gained Democratic majorities, they should supply the presidential candidate. Other possible standard-bearers included Douglas, Cass, William Marcy of New York, James Buchanan of Pennsylvania, Sam Houston of Texas, and Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri.[75][76]

Despite home-state support, Pierce faced obstacles to his nomination, since he had been out of office for a decade, and lacked the front-runners' national reputation. He publicly declared that such a nomination would be "utterly repugnant to my tastes and wishes", but given New Hampshire Democrats' desire to see one of their own elected, he knew his future influence depended on his availability to run.[77] Thus, he quietly allowed his supporters to lobby for him, with the understanding that his name would not be entered at the convention unless it was clear that none of the front-runners could win. To broaden his potential base of southern support as the convention approached, he wrote letters reiterating his support for the Compromise of 1850, including the controversial Fugitive Slave Act.[77][78]

The convention assembled on June 1 in Baltimore, and deadlock occurred as expected. On the first ballot of the 288 delegates, held on June 3, Cass claimed 116, Buchanan 93, and the rest were scattered, with no votes for Pierce. The next 34 ballots passed with no candidate even close to victory, and still no votes for Pierce. Buchanan's team then had its delegates vote for minor candidates, including Pierce, to demonstrate Buchanan's inevitability and unite the convention behind him. This novel tactic backfired after several ballots as Virginia, New Hampshire, and Maine switched to Pierce; the remaining Buchanan forces began to break for Marcy, and Pierce was soon in third place. After the 48th ballot, North Carolina Congressman James C. Dobbin delivered an unexpected and passionate endorsement of Pierce, sparking a wave of support for him. On the 49th ballot, Pierce received all but six of the votes, gaining the nomination. Delegates selected Alabama Senator William R. King, a Buchanan supporter, as Pierce's running mate, and adopted a platform that rejected further "agitation" over slavery and supported the Compromise of 1850.[79][80]

When word reached New Hampshire of the result, Pierce found it difficult to believe, and his wife fainted. Their son Benjamin wrote to his mother hoping that Franklin's candidacy would not be successful, as he knew she would not like to live in Washington.[81]

Political cartoon
This anti-Pierce political cartoon depicts him as weak and cowardly.

The Whig nominee was General Scott, Pierce's commander in Mexico; his running mate was Secretary of the Navy William A. Graham. The Whigs could not unify their factions as the Democrats had, and the convention adopted a platform almost indistinguishable from the Democrats', including support of the Compromise of 1850. This incited the Free Soilers to field their own candidate, Senator Hale, at the Whigs' expense. The lack of political differences reduced the campaign to a bitter personality contest and helped to dampen voter turnout to its lowest level since 1836; according to biographer Peter A. Wallner, it was "one of the least exciting campaigns in presidential history".[82][83] Scott was harmed by the lack of enthusiasm of anti-slavery northern Whigs for him and the platform; New-York Tribune editor Horace Greeley summed up the attitude of many when he said of the Whig platform, "we defy it, execrate it, spit upon it".[84]

Map
Electoral map of the 1852 presidential election

Pierce kept quiet so as not to upset his party's delicate unity, and allowed his allies to run the campaign. It was the custom at the time for candidates to not appear to seek the office, and he did no personal campaigning.[85][86][87] Pierce's opponents caricatured him as an anti-Catholic coward and alcoholic ("the hero of many a well-fought bottle").[88][86] Scott, meanwhile, drew weak support from the Whigs, who were torn by their pro-Compromise platform and found him to be an abysmal, gaffe-prone public speaker.[86] The Democrats were confident: a popular slogan was that the Democrats "will pierce their enemies in 1852 as they poked [that is, Polked] them in 1844."[89] This proved true, as Scott won only Kentucky, Tennessee, Massachusetts, and Vermont, finishing with 42 electoral votes to Pierce's 254. With 3.2 million votes cast, Pierce won the popular vote, 50.9% to 44.1%. A sizable block of Free Soilers broke for Pierce's in-state rival, Hale, who won 4.9% of the popular vote.[90][91] The Democrats took large majorities in Congress.[92]

Presidency (1853–1857)

[edit]

Transition and train crash

[edit]
Photograph of Jane and Benjamin Pierce
Jane Pierce and "Benny", whose death cast a shadow over Pierce's term in office[93]

Pierce began his presidency in mourning. Weeks after his election, on January 6, 1853, he and his family were traveling from Boston by train when their car derailed and rolled down an embankment near Andover, Massachusetts. Both Franklin and Jane Pierce survived, but their only remaining son, 11-year-old Benjamin, was crushed to death in the wreckage, his body nearly decapitated. Pierce was not able to hide the sight from his wife. They both suffered severe depression afterward, which likely affected his performance as president.[93][94] Jane Pierce wondered whether the incident was divine punishment for her husband's pursuit and acceptance of high office. She wrote a lengthy letter of apology to "Benny" for her failings as a mother.[93] She avoided social functions for much of her first two years as First Lady, making her public debut in that role to great sympathy at the annual public reception held at the White House on New Year's Day 1855.[95]

When Franklin Pierce departed New Hampshire for the inauguration, Jane chose not to accompany him. Pierce, then the youngest man to be elected president, chose to affirm his oath of office on a law book rather than on a Bible, as all his predecessors except John Quincy Adams, who swore on a book of law,[96] had done. He was the first president to deliver his inaugural address from memory.[97] In it, he hailed an era of peace and prosperity at home and urged a vigorous assertion of U.S. interests in its foreign relations, including the "eminently important" acquisition of new territories. "The policy of my Administration", he said, "will not be deterred by any timid forebodings of evil from expansion." Avoiding the word "slavery", he emphasized his desire to put the "important subject" to rest and maintain a peaceful union. He alluded to his own personal tragedy, telling the crowd, "You have summoned me in my weakness, you must sustain me by your strength."[98]

Administration and political strife

[edit]
BEP-engraved portrait of Pierce as president
BEP-engraved portrait of Pierce as president

In his Cabinet appointments, Pierce sought to unite a party that was squabbling over the fruits of victory. Most in the party had not originally supported him for the nomination, and some had allied with the Free Soil party to gain victory in local elections. Pierce decided to allow each of the party's factions some appointments, even those that had not supported the Compromise of 1850.[99]

The Senate unanimously and immediately confirmed all of Pierce's Cabinet nominations.[100] Pierce spent the first few weeks of his term sorting through hundreds of lower-level federal positions to be filled. This was a chore, as he sought to represent all factions of the party, and could fully satisfy none of them. Partisans found themselves unable to secure positions for their friends, which put the Democratic Party on edge and fueled bitterness between factions. Before long, northern newspapers accused Pierce of filling his government with pro-slavery secessionists, while southern newspapers accused him of abolitionism.[100]

Factionalism between pro- and anti-administration Democrats ramped up quickly, especially within the New York Democratic Party. The more conservative Hardshell Democrats or "Hards" of New York were deeply skeptical of the Pierce administration, which was associated with Marcy (who became Secretary of State) and the more moderate New York faction, the Softshell Democrats or "Softs".[101]

Photograph of William R. King
Vice President William R. King died a little more than one month into his term, leaving a vacancy that could not be filled.

Buchanan had urged Pierce to consult Vice President-elect King in selecting the Cabinet, but Pierce did not do so—Pierce and King had not communicated since they had been selected as candidates in June 1852. By the start of 1853, King was severely ill with tuberculosis, and went to Cuba to recuperate. His condition deteriorated, and Congress passed a special law allowing him to be sworn in before the American consul in Havana on March 24. Wanting to die at home, he returned to his plantation in Alabama on April 17 and died the next day. The office of vice president remained vacant for the remainder of Pierce's term, as the Constitution then had no provision for filling the vacancy. This extended vacancy meant that for nearly the entirety of Pierce's presidency the Senate President pro tempore, initially David Atchison of Missouri, was next in line to the presidency.[102]

Pierce sought to run a more efficient and accountable government than his predecessors.[103] His Cabinet members implemented an early system of civil service examinations, a forerunner to the Pendleton Act passed three decades later, which mandated that most U.S. government positions be awarded on the basis of merit, not patronage.[104] Secretary Robert McClelland reformed the Interior Department, systematizing its operations, expanding the use of paper records, and going after fraud.[105] Another of Pierce's reforms was to expand the role of the U.S. attorney general in appointing federal judges and attorneys, an important step in the eventual development of the Justice Department.[103] There was a vacancy on the Supreme Court—Fillmore, having failed to get Senate confirmation for his nominees, had offered it to newly elected Louisiana Senator Judah P. Benjamin, who had declined. Pierce also offered the seat to Benjamin, but he persisted in his refusal,[106] whereupon Pierce nominated John Archibald Campbell, an advocate of states' rights; this was Pierce's only Supreme Court appointment.[107]

Economic policy and internal improvements

[edit]
Photograph of Indian Peace Medal
Indian Peace Medal depicting Pierce

Pierce charged Treasury Secretary James Guthrie with reforming the Treasury, which was inefficiently managed and had many unsettled accounts. Guthrie increased oversight of Treasury employees and tariff collectors, many of whom were withholding money from the government. Despite laws requiring funds to be held in the Treasury, large deposits remained in private banks under the Whig administrations. Guthrie reclaimed these funds and sought to prosecute corrupt officials, with mixed success.[108]

Secretary of War Jefferson Davis, at Pierce's request, led surveys by the Corps of Topographical Engineers of possible transcontinental railroad routes throughout the country. The Democratic Party had long rejected federal appropriations for internal improvements, but Davis felt that such a project could be justified as a Constitutional national security objective. Davis also deployed the Army Corps of Engineers to supervise construction projects in the District of Columbia, including the expansion of the United States Capitol and building of the Washington Monument.[109]

Foreign and military affairs

[edit]

The Pierce administration aligned with the expansionist Young America movement, with Marcy leading the charge as secretary of state. Marcy sought to present to the world a distinctively American, republican image. He issued a circular recommending that U.S. diplomats wear "the simple dress of an American citizen" instead of the elaborate diplomatic uniforms worn in European courts, and that they hire only American citizens to work in consulates.[110][111] Marcy received international praise for his 73-page letter defending Austrian refugee Martin Koszta, who had been captured abroad in mid-1853 by the Austrian government despite his intention to become a U.S. citizen.[112][113]

An advocate of a southern transcontinental route, Davis persuaded Pierce to send rail magnate James Gadsden to Mexico to buy land for a potential railroad. Gadsden was also charged with renegotiating the provisions of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which required the U.S. to prevent Native American raids into Mexico from New Mexico Territory. Gadsden negotiated a treaty with Mexican President Antonio López de Santa Anna in December 1853, purchasing a large swath of land in the southwest. Negotiations were nearly derailed by William Walker's unauthorized expedition into Mexico, and so a clause was included charging the U.S. with combating future such attempts.[114][115] Congress reduced the Gadsden Purchase to the region now comprising southern Arizona and part of southern New Mexico; the price was cut from $15 million to $10 million. Congress also included a protection clause for a private citizen, Albert G. Sloo, whose interests were threatened by the purchase. Pierce opposed the use of the federal government to prop up private industry and did not endorse the final version of the treaty, but it was ratified nonetheless.[116][115] The acquisition brought the contiguous United States to its present-day boundaries, excepting later minor adjustments.[117]

Pierce cabinet
OfficeNameTerm
PresidentFranklin Pierce1853–1857
Vice PresidentWilliam R. King1853
None1853–1857
Secretary of StateWilliam L. Marcy1853–1857
Secretary of the TreasuryJames Guthrie1853–1857
Secretary of WarJefferson Davis1853–1857
Attorney GeneralCaleb Cushing1853–1857
Postmaster GeneralJames Campbell1853–1857
Secretary of the NavyJames C. Dobbin1853–1857
Secretary of the InteriorRobert McClelland1853–1857

Relations with Great Britain needed resolution, as American fishermen were upset at the British Royal Navy's increasing enforcement of Canadian territorial waters. Marcy completed a trade reciprocity agreement with the British minister to Washington, John Crampton, which reduced the need for British coastline enforcement. Buchanan was sent as minister to London to pressure the British government, which was slow to support a new treaty. A favorable reciprocity treaty was ratified in August 1854, which Pierce saw as a first step toward American annexation of Canada.[118][119] While the administration negotiated with Britain over the Canada–United States border, U.S. interests were also an issue in Central America, where the Clayton–Bulwer Treaty of 1850 had failed to keep Britain from expanding its influence in the region. Gaining the advantage over Britain in the region was a key part of Pierce's expansionist goals.[120][121]

British consuls in the U.S. sought to enlist Americans for the Crimean War in 1854, in violation of neutrality laws, and Pierce eventually expelled Crampton and three consuls. To Pierce's surprise, the British did not expel Buchanan in retaliation. In his December 1855 State of the Union message to Congress, Pierce had set forth the American case that Britain had violated the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty. According to Buchanan, the British were impressed by the message and were rethinking their policy. Nevertheless, Buchanan was unable to get them to abandon their Central American possessions. The Canadian-American Reciprocity Treaty was ratified by Congress, the British parliament, and Canada's colonial legislatures.[122]

Pierce's administration aroused sectional apprehensions when three U.S. diplomats in Europe drafted a proposal to the president to purchase Cuba from Spain for $120 million (USD), and justify the "wresting" of it from Spain if the offer were refused. The publication of the Ostend Manifesto, which had been drawn up at Secretary of State Marcy's insistence, provoked the scorn of northerners, who viewed it as an attempt to annex a slave-holding possession to bolster Southern interests. It helped discredit the expansionist policy of Manifest Destiny the Democratic Party had often supported.[123][124]

Pierce favored expansion and a substantial reorganization of the military. Secretary of War Davis and Navy Secretary James C. Dobbin found the Army and Navy in poor condition, with insufficient forces, a reluctance to adopt new technology, and inefficient management.[125] Under the Pierce administration, Commodore Matthew C. Perry visited Japan (a venture originally planned under Fillmore) in an effort to expand trade to the East. Perry wanted to encroach on Asia by force, but Pierce and Dobbin pushed him to remain diplomatic. Perry signed a modest trade treaty with the Japanese shogunate that was successfully ratified.[126][127] The 1856 launch of the USS Merrimac, one of six newly commissioned steam frigates, was one of Pierce's "most personally satisfying" days in office.[128]

Bleeding Kansas

[edit]
Map
The Kansas–Nebraska Act organized Kansas (in pink) and Nebraska Territory (yellow).

The greatest challenge to the country's equilibrium during the Pierce administration was the passage of the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Organizing the largely unsettled Nebraska Territory, which stretched from Missouri to the Rocky Mountains, and from Texas north to what is now the Canada–United States border, was a crucial part of Douglas's plans for western expansion. He wanted a transcontinental railroad with a link from Chicago to California, through the vast western territory. Organizing the territory was necessary for settlement as the land would not be surveyed nor put up for sale until a territorial government was authorized. Those from slave states had never been content with western limits on slavery, and felt it should be able to expand into territories procured with blood and treasure that had come, in part, from the South. Douglas and his allies planned to organize the territory and let local settlers decide whether to allow slavery. This would repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820, as most of it was north of the 36°30′ N line the Missouri Compromise deemed "free". The territory would be split into a northern part, Nebraska, and a southern part, Kansas, and the expectation was that Kansas would allow slavery and Nebraska would not.[129][130][131] In the view of pro-slavery Southern politicians, the Compromise of 1850 had already annulled the Missouri Compromise by admitting the state of California, including territory south of the compromise line, as a free state.[132]

Pierce had wanted to organize the Nebraska Territory without explicitly addressing the matter of slavery, but Douglas could not get enough Southern votes to accomplish this.[133] Pierce was skeptical of the bill, knowing it would result in bitter opposition from the North. Douglas and Davis convinced him to support the bill regardless. It was tenaciously opposed by northerners such as Ohio Senator Salmon P. Chase and Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner, who rallied public sentiment in the North against the bill. Northerners had been suspicious of the Gadsden Purchase, moves towards Cuba annexation, and the influence of slaveholding Cabinet members such as Davis, and saw the Nebraska bill as part of a pattern of southern aggression. The result was a political firestorm that did great damage to Pierce's presidency.[129][130][131]

Pierce and his administration used threats and promises to keep most Democrats on board in favor of the bill. The Whigs split along sectional lines; the conflict destroyed them as a national party. The Kansas–Nebraska Act was passed in May 1854 and ultimately defined the Pierce presidency. The political turmoil that followed the passage saw the short-term rise of the nativist and anti-Catholic American Party, often called the Know Nothings, and the founding of the Republican Party.[129][130][131]

Political cartoon
Northerners resented Pierce's attempted expansion of slavery through Kansas–Nebraska and Cuba.[134][135] In this 1856 cartoon, a Free Soiler is held down by Pierce, Buchanan, and Cass while Douglas shoves "Slavery" (depicted as a black man) down his throat.

Even as the act was being debated, settlers on both sides of the slavery issue poured into the territories so as to secure the outcome they wanted in the voting. The passage of the act resulted in so much violence between groups that the territory became known as Bleeding Kansas. Thousands of pro-slavery Border Ruffians came across from Missouri to vote in the territorial elections although they were not resident in Kansas, giving that element the victory. Pierce supported the outcome despite the irregularities. When Free-Staters set up a shadow government, and drafted the Topeka Constitution, Pierce called their work an act of rebellion. The president continued to recognize the pro-slavery legislature, which was dominated by Democrats, even after a Congressional investigative committee found its election to have been illegitimate. He dispatched federal troops to break up a meeting of the Topeka government.[136][137]

Passage of the act coincided with the seizure of escaped slave Anthony Burns in Boston. Northerners rallied in support of Burns, but Pierce was determined to follow the Fugitive Slave Act to the letter, and dispatched federal troops to enforce Burns's return to his Virginia owner despite furious crowds.[138][139]

The midterm congressional elections of 1854 and 1855 were devastating to the Democrats (as well as to the Whig Party, which was on its last legs). The Democrats lost almost every state outside the South. The administration's opponents in the North worked together to return opposition members to Congress, though only a few northern Whigs gained election. In Pierce's New Hampshire, hitherto loyal to the Democratic Party, the Know-Nothings elected the governor, all three representatives, dominated the legislature, and returned John P. Hale to the Senate. Anti-immigrant fervor brought the Know-Nothings their highest numbers to that point, and some northerners were elected under the auspices of the new Republican Party.[134][135]

1856 election

[edit]
Political cartoon
Partisan violence spilled into Congress in May 1856 when Free Soil Senator Charles Sumner was assaulted with a walking cane by Democratic Rep. Preston Brooks in the Senate chamber.[140]

Pierce fully expected to be renominated by the Democrats. In reality, his chances of winning the nomination (let alone the general election) were slim. The administration was widely disliked in the North for its position on the Kansas–Nebraska Act, and Democratic leaders were aware of Pierce's electoral vulnerability. Nevertheless, his supporters began to plan for an alliance with Douglas to deny James Buchanan the nomination. Buchanan had solid political connections and had been safely overseas through most of Pierce's term, leaving him untainted by the Kansas debacle.[141][142][143]

When balloting began on June 5 at the convention in Cincinnati, Ohio, Pierce expected a plurality, if not the required two-thirds majority. On the first ballot, he received only 122 votes, many of them from the South, to Buchanan's 135, with Douglas and Cass receiving the rest. By the following morning fourteen ballots had been completed, but none of the three main candidates were able to get two-thirds of the vote. Pierce, whose support had been slowly declining as the ballots passed, directed his supporters to break for Douglas, withdrawing his name in a last-ditch effort to defeat Buchanan. Douglas, only 43 years of age, believed that he could be nominated in 1860 if he let the older Buchanan win this time, and received assurances from Buchanan's managers that this would be the case. After two more deadlocked ballots, Douglas's managers withdrew his name, leaving Buchanan as the clear winner. To soften the blow to Pierce, the convention issued a resolution of "unqualified approbation" in praise of his administration and selected his ally, former Kentucky Representative John C. Breckinridge, as the vice-presidential nominee.[141][142][143] This loss marked the first time in U.S. history that an elected president who was an active candidate for reelection was not nominated by his political party for a second term.[note 6][144]

Pierce endorsed Buchanan, though the two remained distant; he hoped to resolve the Kansas situation by November to improve the Democrats' chances in the general election. He installed John W. Geary as territorial governor, who drew the ire of pro-slavery legislators.[145] Geary was able to restore order in Kansas, though the electoral damage had already been done—Republicans used "Bleeding Kansas" and "Bleeding Sumner" (the brutal caning of Charles Sumner by South Carolina Representative Preston Brooks in the Senate chamber) as election slogans.[146] The Buchanan/Breckinridge ticket was elected, but the Democratic percentage of the popular vote in the North fell from 49.8 percent in 1852 to 41.4 in 1856 as Buchanan won only five of sixteen free states (Pierce had won fourteen), and in three of those, Buchanan won because of a split between the Republican candidate, former California senator John C. Frémont and the Know Nothing, former president Fillmore.[147]

Pierce did not temper his rhetoric after losing the nomination. In his final message to Congress, delivered in December 1856, he vigorously attacked Republicans and abolitionists. He took the opportunity to defend his record on fiscal policy, and on achieving peaceful relations with other nations.[148][149] In the final days of the Pierce administration, Congress passed bills to increase the pay of army officers and to build new naval vessels, also expanding the number of seamen enlisted. It also passed a tariff reduction bill he had long sought.[150] Pierce and his cabinet left office on March 4, 1857, the only time in U.S. history that the original cabinet members all remained for a full four-year term.[151]

Post-presidency (1857–1869)

[edit]
Franklin Pierce, a man with brown hair and a blacks suit, stands with his right hand resting upon papers on a table.
Portrait by George Peter Alexander Healy. Pierce, seen here in 1858, remained a vocal political figure after his presidency.[152]

After leaving the White House, the Pierces remained in Washington for more than two months, staying with former Secretary of State William L. Marcy.[153] Buchanan altered course from the Pierce administration, replacing all his appointees. The Pierces eventually moved to Portsmouth, New Hampshire, where Pierce had begun to speculate in property. Seeking warmer weather, he and Jane spent the next three years traveling, beginning with a stay in Madeira and followed by tours of Europe and the Bahamas.[152] In Rome, he visited Nathaniel Hawthorne; the two men spent much time together and the author found the retired president as buoyant as ever.[154]

Pierce never lost sight of politics during his travels, commenting regularly on the nation's growing sectional conflict. He insisted that northern abolitionists stand down to avoid a southern secession, writing that the bloodshed of a civil war would "not be along Mason and Dixon's line merely", but "within our own borders in our own streets".[152] He also criticized New England Protestant ministers, who largely supported abolition and Republican candidates, for their "heresy and treason".[152] The rise of the Republican Party forced the Democrats to defend Pierce; during his debates with Republican Senate candidate Abraham Lincoln in 1858, Douglas called the former president "a man of integrity and honor".[155]

As the Democratic Convention of 1860 approached, some asked Pierce to run as a compromise candidate that could unite the fractured party, but Pierce refused. As Douglas struggled to attract southern support, Pierce backed Cushing and then Breckinridge as potential alternatives, but his priority was a united Democratic Party. The split Democrats were soundly defeated for the presidency by the Republican candidate, Lincoln. In the months between Lincoln's election, and his inauguration on March 4, 1861, Pierce looked on as several southern states began plans to secede. He was asked by Justice Campbell to travel to Alabama and address that state's secession convention. Due to illness he declined, but sent a letter appealing to the people of Alabama to remain in the Union, and give the North time to repeal laws against southern interests and to find common ground.[156]

Civil War

[edit]

After efforts to prevent the Civil War ended with the firing on Fort Sumter, Northern Democrats, including Douglas, endorsed Lincoln's plan to bring the Southern states back into the fold by force. Pierce wanted to avoid war at all costs, and wrote to Van Buren, proposing an assembly of former U.S. presidents to resolve the issue, but this suggestion was not acted on. "I will never justify, sustain or in any way or to any extent uphold this cruel, heartless, aimless, unnecessary war," Pierce wrote to his wife.[156] Pierce publicly opposed President Lincoln's order suspending the writ of habeas corpus, arguing that even in a time of war, the country should not abandon its protection of civil liberties. This stand won him admirers with the emerging Northern Peace Democrats, but others saw the stand as further evidence of Pierce's southern bias.[157]

In September 1861, Pierce traveled to Michigan, visiting his former Interior Secretary, McClelland, former senator Cass, and others. A Detroit bookseller, J. A. Roys, sent a letter to Lincoln's Secretary of State, William H. Seward, accusing the former president of meeting with disloyal people, and saying he had heard there was a plot to overthrow the government and establish Pierce as president. Later that month, the pro-administration Detroit Tribune printed an item calling Pierce "a prowling traitor spy", and intimating that he was a member of the pro-Confederate Knights of the Golden Circle. No such conspiracy existed, but a Pierce supporter, Guy S. Hopkins, sent to the Tribune a letter purporting to be from a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle, indicating that "President P." was part of a plot against the Union.[158][159] Hopkins intended for the Tribune to make the charges public, at which point Hopkins would admit authorship, thus making the Tribune editors seem overly partisan and gullible. Instead, the Tribune editors forwarded the Hopkins letter to government officials. Seward then ordered the arrest of possible "traitors" in Michigan, which included Hopkins. Hopkins confessed authorship of the letter and admitted the hoax, but despite this, Seward wrote to Pierce demanding to know if the charges were true. Pierce denied them, and Seward hastily backtracked. Later, Republican newspapers printed the Hopkins letter in spite of his admission that it was a hoax, and Pierce decided that he needed to clear his name publicly. When Seward refused to make their correspondence public, Pierce publicized his outrage by having a Senate ally, California's Milton Latham, read the letters between Seward and Pierce into the Congressional record, to the administration's embarrassment.[158][159]

The institution of the draft and the arrest of outspoken anti-administration Democrat Clement Vallandigham further incensed Pierce, who gave an address to New Hampshire Democrats in July 1863 vilifying Lincoln. "Who, I ask, has clothed the President with power to dictate to any one of us when we must or when we may speak, or be silent upon any subject, and especially in relation to the conduct of any public servant?", he demanded.[160][161] Pierce's comments were ill-received in much of the North, especially as his criticism of Lincoln's aims coincided with the twin Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg. Pierce's reputation in the North was further damaged the following month when the Mississippi plantation of the Confederate president, Jefferson Davis, was seized by Union soldiers. Pierce's correspondence with Davis, all pre-war, revealing his deep friendship with Davis and predicting that civil war would result in insurrection in the North, was sent to the press. Pierce's words hardened abolitionist sentiment against him.[160][161]

Jane Pierce died of tuberculosis in Andover, Massachusetts in December 1863; she was buried at Old North Cemetery in Concord, New Hampshire. Pierce was further grieved by the death of his close friend Nathaniel Hawthorne in May 1864; he was with Hawthorne when the author died unexpectedly. Hawthorne had controversially dedicated his final book to Pierce. Some Democrats tried again to put Pierce's name up for consideration as the 1864 presidential election unfolded, but he kept his distance; Lincoln won a second term by a large margin. When news spread of Lincoln's assassination in April 1865, a mob gathered outside Pierce's home in Concord, demanding to know why he had not raised a flag as a public mourning gesture. Pierce grew angry, expressing sadness over Lincoln's death but denying any need for a public gesture. He told them that his history of military and public service proved his patriotism, which was enough to quiet the crowd.[162]

Final years and death

[edit]

Pierce's drinking impaired his health in his last years, and he grew increasingly spiritual. He had a brief relationship with an unknown woman in mid-1865. During this time, he used his influence to improve the treatment of Davis, now a prisoner at Fort Monroe in Virginia. He also offered financial help to Hawthorne's son Julian, as well as to his own nephews. On the second anniversary of Jane's death, Pierce was baptized into his wife's Episcopal faith at St. Paul's Church in Concord. He found this church to be less political than his former Congregational denomination, which had alienated Democrats with anti-slavery rhetoric. He took up the life of an "old farmer", as he called himself, buying up property, drinking less, farming the land himself, and hosting visiting relatives.[163] He spent most of his time in Concord and his cottage at Little Boar's Head on the coast, sometimes visiting Jane's relatives in Massachusetts. Still interested in politics, he expressed support for Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policy and supported the president's acquittal in his impeachment trial; he later expressed optimism for Johnson's successor, Ulysses S. Grant.[164]

Pierce's health began to decline again in mid-1869; he resumed heavy drinking despite his deteriorating physical condition. He returned to Concord that September, suffering from severe cirrhosis of the liver, knowing he would not recover. A caretaker was hired; none of his family members were present in his final days. He died at 4:35 am on Friday, October 8, 1869, at the age of 64. President Grant, who later defended Pierce's service in the Mexican-American War, declared a day of national mourning. Newspapers across the country carried lengthy front-page stories examining Pierce's colorful and controversial career. Pierce was interred next to his wife and two of his sons in the Minot enclosure at Concord's Old North Cemetery.[165]

In his last will, which he signed January 22, 1868, Pierce left a large number of specific bequests such as paintings, swords, horses, and other items to friends, family, and neighbors. Much of his $72,000 estate (equal to $1,700,000 today) went to his brother Henry's family, and to Hawthorne's children and Pierce's landlady. Henry's son Frank Pierce received the largest share.[166]

Sites, memorials, and honors

[edit]
Statue of Franklin Pierce at the New Hampshire State House in Concord

In addition to his LL.D. from Norwich University, Pierce received honorary doctorates from Bowdoin College (1853) and Dartmouth College (1860).[167]

Two places in New Hampshire have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places specifically because of their association with Pierce. The Franklin Pierce Homestead in Hillsborough is a state park and a National Historic Landmark, open to the public.[5] The Franklin Pierce House in Concord, where Pierce died, was destroyed by fire in 1981, but is nevertheless listed on the register.[168] The Pierce Manse, his Concord home from 1842 to 1848, is open seasonally and maintained by a volunteer group, "The Pierce Brigade".[51] A statue of Pierce by Augustus Lukeman, dedicated in 1914,[169] stands on the grounds of the New Hampshire State House. Several New Hampshire historical markers commemorate Pierce and his family around New Hampshire.[170]

Several institutions and places have been named after Pierce, many in New Hampshire:

Legacy

[edit]
A postage stamp featuring Pierce
A one-dollar coin featuring Pierce
Pierce's image has been used on a U.S. postage stamp (1938) and a Presidential Dollar Coin (2010).

After his death, Pierce mostly passed from the American consciousness, except as one of a series of presidents whose disastrous tenures led to civil war.[177] His presidency is widely regarded as a failure; he is often described as one of the worst presidents in American history.[note 7] The public placed him third-to-last among his peers in C-SPAN surveys (2000 and 2009).[182] Part of his failure was in allowing a divided Congress to take the initiative, most disastrously with the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Although he did not lead that fight—Senator Douglas did—Pierce paid the cost in damage to his reputation.[183] The failure of Pierce, as president, to secure sectional conciliation helped bring an end to the dominance of the Democratic Party that had started with Jackson, and led to a period of over seventy years when the Republicans mostly controlled national politics.[184]

Historian Eric Foner says, "His administration turned out to be one of the most disastrous in American history. It witnessed the collapse of the party system inherited from the Age of Jackson".[185]

Biographer Roy F. Nichols argues:[186][187]

As a national political leader Pierce was an accident. He was honest and tenacious of his views but, as he made up his mind with difficulty and often reversed himself before making a final decision, he gave a general impression of instability. Kind, courteous, generous, he attracted many individuals, but his attempts to satisfy all factions failed and made him many enemies. In carrying out his principles of strict construction he was most in accord with Southerners, who generally had the letter of the law on their side. He failed utterly to realize the depth and the sincerity of Northern feeling against the South and was bewildered at the general flouting of the law and the Constitution, as he described it, by the people of his own New England. At no time did he catch the popular imagination. His inability to cope with the difficult problems that arose early in his administration caused him to lose the respect of great numbers, especially in the North, and his few successes failed to restore public confidence. He was an inexperienced man, suddenly called to assume a tremendous responsibility, who honestly tried to do his best without adequate training or temperamental fitness.

Despite a reputation as an able politician and a likable man, during his presidency Pierce served only as a moderator among the increasingly bitter factions that were driving the nation towards civil war.[188] To Pierce, who saw slavery as a question of property rather than morality,[184] the Union was sacred; because of this, he saw the actions of abolitionists, and the more moderate Free Soilers, as divisive and as a threat to the constitutionally-guaranteed rights of southerners.[189] Although he criticized those who sought to limit or end slavery, he rarely rebuked southern politicians who took extreme positions or opposed northern interests.[190]

David Potter concludes that the Ostend Manifesto and the Kansas–Nebraska Act were "the two great calamities of the Franklin Pierce administration  ... Both brought down an avalanche of public criticism."[191] More important, says Potter, they permanently discredited Manifest Destiny and "popular sovereignty" as political doctrines.[191] Historian Kenneth Nivison, writing in 2010, takes a more favorable view of Pierce's foreign policy, stating that his expansionism prefaced those of later presidents William McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt, who served at a time when America had the military might to make her desires stick. "American foreign and commercial policy beginning in the 1890s, which eventually supplanted European colonialism by the middle of the twentieth century, owed much to the paternalism of Jacksonian Democracy cultivated in the international arena by the Presidency of Franklin Pierce."[192]

Historian and biographer Peter A. Wallner notes that:[193]

History has accorded to the Pierce administration a share of the blame for policies that incited the slavery issue, hastened the collapse of the second party system, and brought on the Civil War.  ... It is both an inaccurate and unfair judgment. Pierce was always a nationalist attempting to find a middle ground to keep the Union together.  ... The alternative to attempting to steer a moderate course was the breakup of the Union, the Civil War and the deaths of more than six hundred thousand Americans. Pierce should not be blamed for attempting throughout his political career to avoid this fate.

Historian Larry Gara, who authored a book on Pierce's presidency, wrote in the former president's entry in American National Biography Online:[194]

He was president at a time that called for almost superhuman skills, yet he lacked such skills and never grew into the job to which he had been elected. His view of the Constitution and the Union was from the Jacksonian past. He never fully understood the nature or depth of Free Soil sentiment in the North. He was able to negotiate a reciprocal trade treaty with Canada, to begin the opening of Japan to western trade, to add land to the Southwest, and to sign legislation for the creation of an overseas empire [the Guano Islands Act]. His Cuba and Kansas policies led only to deeper sectional strife. His support for the Kansas–Nebraska Act and his determination to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act helped polarize the sections. Pierce was hard-working and his administration largely untainted by graft, yet the legacy from those four turbulent years contributed to the tragedy of secession and civil war.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Franklin Pierce (November 23, 1804 – October 8, 1869) was an American lawyer and politician who served as the 14th from March 4, 1853, to March 4, 1857. A member of the Democratic Party from , Pierce earlier held seats in the U.S. from 1833 to 1837 and the from 1837 to 1842, and rose to during the Mexican–American War.
Known as a "doughface"—a Northerner sympathetic to Southern views on —Pierce's presidency emphasized enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and supported expansionist policies. His administration's signature domestic legislation, the of 1854, organized the territories of and while introducing to determine 's status, effectively repealing the of 1820 that had prohibited north of 36°30′ latitude. This measure ignited pro- and anti- violence in , known as "," and accelerated the polarization between Northern and Southern interests, fostering the rise of the Republican Party and the erosion of bipartisan compromises.
In foreign affairs, Pierce facilitated the on June 8, 1854, by which the acquired 29,670 square miles of land from for $10 million, primarily to secure a route for a southern and resolve post-war border disputes. Despite such territorial gains, his pro-Southern leanings and perceived weakness in addressing sectional strife led to party fractures, denial of renomination in 1856, and low historical rankings, with scholars consistently placing his presidency near the bottom for its contribution to pre-Civil War instability.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

Franklin Pierce was born on November 23, 1804, in , the son of Benjamin Pierce and his second wife, . Benjamin Pierce (1757–1839), a farmer and Revolutionary War veteran who fought at Bunker Hill, rose to become a in the militia and later served two non-consecutive terms as governor of the state (1827–1828 and 1829–1830). , from a modest background, bore Benjamin eight children after his first wife, Elizabeth Andrews, died in childbirth leaving a daughter; Pierce was the fifth of these siblings, with four brothers and three sisters. The Pierce family occupied a homestead constructed by Benjamin in Hillsborough shortly after Franklin's birth, where the children grew up amid rural New England life marked by farming and local community involvement. Benjamin's military and political prominence provided a model of public service and Democratic-Republican principles that influenced his sons, including Franklin, though the household emphasized practical self-reliance over formal early advantages. Pierce's early years involved typical frontier chores and exposure to his father's stories of the Revolution, fostering an environment of modest prosperity tied to land ownership and civic duty.

Formal Education and Early Influences

Pierce attended Hancock Academy and Francestown Academy in from 1814 to 1820, following initial instruction in local schools until age twelve. In 1820, at age sixteen, he enrolled at in , where he graduated in 1824. During his college years, Pierce befriended and , members of the subsequent graduating class of 1825, through shared social and literary activities; these connections later proved enduring, with Hawthorne authoring Pierce's 1852 campaign biography. Though initially lackadaisical in studies—favoring debates in the Athenaean Society, socializing, and occasional indulgences—Pierce applied himself more rigorously in his final years, reflecting a pattern of leveraging personal charm and determination over early academic rigor. Following graduation, Pierce studied law in the office of , a prominent Democratic-Republican figure and future U.S. Senator and Secretary of the Navy. He was admitted to the bar in 1827 and commenced practice in Hillsborough, his family's hometown. Pierce's early worldview was shaped by his father, Benjamin Pierce, a Revolutionary War veteran who commanded militia units in key engagements and attained local prominence as a Democratic-Republican; Benjamin served two nonconsecutive terms as governor (1827–1829 and 1831–1833), instilling in his son a commitment to Jeffersonian principles of , , and agrarian interests. As the fifth of eight children in a family tracing roots to early Puritan settlers, Franklin absorbed a of and civic duty, evident in his swift pivot to post-bar admission, winning to the in 1829 at age 24. This paternal influence—combining military valor with partisan activism—fostered Pierce's lifelong alignment with Northern Democrats sympathetic to Southern concerns, prioritizing union preservation through compromise over ideological purity.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family

Franklin Pierce married Jane Means Appleton on November 19, 1834, in her grandmother's home in . Jane, aged 28 at the time, was the daughter of Jesse Appleton, a Congregationalist minister and former president of , where Pierce had studied; her family initially opposed the union due to Pierce's political ambitions and their preference for a quieter life. The , conducted by Jane's brother-in-law, united Pierce with a deeply religious woman whose strict Calvinist upbringing influenced their household, though she grew increasingly reclusive and despondent over time. The Pierces had three sons, none of whom survived to adulthood. Their first child, Franklin Pierce Jr., died three days after his birth on February 2, 1836, while Pierce was serving in in Washington. The second son, Frank Robert Pierce, born in 1839, succumbed to in 1843 at the age of four. Their third son, Benjamin "Bennie" Pierce, born in 1852, was killed on January 6, 1853, in a train derailment near en route to Washington with his parents, just two months before Franklin Pierce's as president; the accident decapitated the boy instantly. These successive tragedies profoundly affected the family, with Jane Pierce entering a prolonged period of mourning and withdrawing from social obligations, while Pierce grappled with guilt over his absences due to political duties. The couple had no further children, and Jane died on December 2, 1863, at age 57, after years of fragile health exacerbated by grief and possible tuberculosis.

Health Issues and Personal Tragedies

Franklin Pierce experienced profound personal losses with the deaths of all three of his sons in childhood. His first son, Franklin Pierce Jr., was born on February 2, 1839, but died three days later, likely due to premature birth complications. The second son, Frank Robert Pierce, born in 1843, succumbed to fever at around 18 months old in November 1843. The most devastating occurred on , 1853, when his third son, Benjamin "Bennie" Pierce, aged 11, was killed in a train derailment near ; the boy was decapitated in the crash, the only fatality among passengers traveling from . These losses exacerbated the preexisting depressive tendencies in both Pierce and his wife, Jane Means Appleton Pierce, who witnessed Bennie's death and descended into severe grief, interpreting it as divine punishment to focus her husband on his presidential duties. Jane Pierce, already frail and prone to melancholy, avoided public duties during her husband's presidency, further isolating herself amid her health decline, which culminated in her death from tuberculosis on December 2, 1863. Pierce himself grappled with chronic health problems, including bouts of depression noted as early as his twenties, compounded by heavy alcohol consumption that escalated into alcoholism, particularly after his son's death and during his presidency. This habit contributed to his physical deterioration, manifesting in liver cirrhosis, ascites, and eventual coma, leading to his death on October 8, 1869, at age 64 from complications of chronic stomach inflammation linked to his drinking.

Political Rise in New Hampshire

State Legislature and Governorship Bid

Following his admission to the New Hampshire bar in 1827, Pierce assisted in his father Benjamin Pierce's successful campaign for , leveraging family connections and local Democratic networks to secure the elder Pierce's election that year. Benjamin Pierce, a Revolutionary War veteran and Democratic-Republican, served one term from 1827 to 1828 before winning reelection for 1829–1830, during which Franklin Pierce began establishing his own political profile. In 1829, at age 24, Pierce was elected as a Democrat to the , marking his entry into formal legislative service amid the state's shifting from to Jacksonian Democratic dominance. He served continuously through 1833, advocating for , , and opposition to nullification while aligning with Andrew Jackson's national agenda. Pierce's legislative influence peaked in 1831 when his colleagues elected him Speaker of the House, a position he held into 1832, where he steered debates on banking reforms and party organization despite his youth and relative inexperience. As Speaker, he demonstrated organizational skill and oratorical prowess, consolidating Democratic control in the assembly and positioning himself for federal office, though no records indicate a personal candidacy for governor during this period. His tenure ended with election to the U.S. House in 1832, reflecting the rapid ascent enabled by New Hampshire's small-scale politics and family legacy./) After admission to the bar in , Franklin Pierce established a practice in his hometown of Hillsborough, where he handled a range of civil and criminal cases typical of a rural frontier attorney. His early clients included local farmers, merchants, and landowners, and the practice provided financial stability amid the economic fluctuations of the late 1820s Jacksonian era. Pierce's courtroom style, marked by persuasive oratory honed at , earned him respect among peers and jurors, laying the groundwork for his professional reputation in Hillsborough County. Pierce's legal work intertwined with emerging local leadership in Democratic-Republican circles, as the party reorganized into the Democratic Party under Andrew Jackson's influence. Leveraging his father's governorship (1827–1829) and family ties to Revolutionary War veterans, Pierce campaigned actively for Jackson's presidential bid in southern , organizing rallies and distributing partisan literature in Hillsborough and adjacent towns. This grassroots involvement demonstrated his commitment to and opposition to federal banking policies, aligning him with agrarian interests against urban remnants. By late , Pierce had become a recognized figure in county-level Democratic networks, advising on legal challenges to property disputes arising from post-War of 1812 land grants. His dual roles as attorney and party organizer fostered community influence, with Pierce mediating disputes in informal settings like town meetings and gatherings—where he held a commission as a local officer. This period solidified his status as a connector between legal expertise and political , enabling Democrats to challenge Whig dominance in the by 1829. Pierce's approach emphasized practical alliances over ideological purity, reflecting causal dynamics of and personal loyalty in early 19th-century politics.

National Political Career

Service in the U.S. House of Representatives

Franklin Pierce was elected to the Twenty-third as a Jacksonian Democrat representing New Hampshire's at-large district in the November 1832 elections, assuming office on March 4, 1833, at age 28./) He won reelection to the Twenty-fourth , serving until March 3, 1837. Throughout his tenure, Pierce demonstrated unwavering loyalty to President Andrew Jackson's agenda, prioritizing party discipline over independent initiatives. Pierce's legislative efforts centered on defending Jacksonian economic policies amid the . He opposed renewal of the Second ' charter and endorsed the Treasury's removal of federal deposits in 1833, viewing the institution as a threat to republican principles and state sovereignty. In House debates, he contributed to Democratic resistance against Whig resolutions targeting Jackson, arguing that executive authority over deposits was constitutionally sound and essential to curbing monopolistic banking power. He advocated hard-money standards, low protective tariffs, and limited federal involvement in , occasionally diverging from party lines only to reinforce strict constructionist views, such as opposing expansive infrastructure funding akin to the vetoed Maysville Road project. On sectional issues, Pierce aligned with , opposing abolitionist petitions and bills to prohibit in of Columbia, contending that such measures violated constitutional protections for property rights in slave states. He supported Jackson's during the resolution in early 1833, affirming federal supremacy while emphasizing in non-secession contexts. Though no landmark bills originated from him, Pierce earned respect as a forceful debater who bolstered Democratic cohesion against opposition attacks. His service, while not yielding personal legislative prominence, solidified his standing as a reliable party stalwart.

Tenure in the U.S. Senate

Franklin Pierce was elected to the by the on June 13, 1837, and began his service on March 4, 1837, representing the Democratic Party. His term encompassed the 25th, 26th, and partial 27th Congresses, during which he aligned consistently with Jacksonian Democratic principles, including support for and opposition to Whig fiscal policies. Pierce advocated for the Independent Treasury system, enacted in 1840 under President , viewing it as a safeguard against centralized banking that echoed Andrew Jackson's veto of the Second Bank of the . In the , Pierce served on committees including Pensions, where he chaired the panel during the 26th (1839–1841), overseeing legislation related to veterans' benefits and military claims. Though competent in committee work, his contributions were not prominent; as a junior senator from a small state, he deferred to senior figures like and on major debates. On -related issues, Pierce defended southern interests, opposing petitions to abolish in the District of Columbia and supporting procedural measures to table anti- discussions, which he regarded as disruptive sectional agitation rather than legitimate grievances. This stance aligned him with pro- Democrats, prioritizing national unity over abolitionist demands. Pierce resigned his Senate seat on February 28, 1842, citing a desire to return to practice in amid growing family strains, including his wife Jane's aversion to Washington society and the demands of public life. His departure occurred as Whig gains in the elections shifted congressional power, though Pierce's decision predated broader party reversals and reflected personal priorities over continued political engagement.

Resignation and Return to Private Life

Franklin Pierce resigned from the United States Senate on February 28, 1842, with about one year left in his term representing New Hampshire. The resignation stemmed primarily from personal and family motivations rather than political setbacks, as Pierce had built a solid record supporting Democratic priorities like states' rights and opposition to internal improvements funded by the federal government. His wife, Jane Means Appleton Pierce, played a key role in the decision, having long expressed disdain for the capital's social scene, including its prevalence of alcohol consumption, which she believed posed moral and health risks to their young family; she had repeatedly urged him to prioritize domestic stability over public service. Financial pressures also factored in, as the Senate salary proved insufficient for supporting his household, prompting a shift toward the more remunerative private practice of law. Returning to , Pierce reestablished his legal career, handling civil and criminal cases that drew on his prior experience and bolstered his local standing as a capable litigator. He initially intended a full withdrawal from politics, declining overtures for higher office and concentrating on professional work amid personal challenges, including the death of his four-year-old son, Frank Robert Pierce, from in November 1843. However, this phase of relative seclusion ended with a federal appointment: in October 1845, President named him U.S. Attorney for the District of , a role Pierce held until enlisting for the Mexican-American War in 1846, during which he resigned the position. This interval marked a deliberate retreat from national prominence, allowing Pierce to mend family strains and rebuild financially through legal earnings estimated to exceed his senatorial income.

Military Involvement

Mexican-American War Participation


Franklin Pierce volunteered for military service immediately after President James K. Polk requested a declaration of war against Mexico on May 11, 1846, despite the absence of an established New England regiment. As a colonel in the New Hampshire militia, he helped recruit volunteers and was appointed brigadier general of U.S. volunteers on March 3, 1847, receiving command of a brigade comprising approximately 2,500 men, including the 9th Infantry Regiment. Pierce's brigade sailed from Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in late May 1847, landing at Veracruz and joining Major General Winfield Scott's army for the advance on Mexico City.
On August 19, 1847, during the , Pierce ordered his brigade to charge Mexican positions but suffered a severe injury when his horse reared amid artillery fire, slamming him into the saddle pommel and then falling into a crevice, pinning him underneath and exacerbating a groin or knee wound that caused him to briefly lose consciousness. Despite the pain, Pierce remounted and led his troops to the subsequent on August 20, where he fainted from exhaustion and injury during the assault but remained in command until the position was secured. His brigade's performance contributed to the U.S. victories that paved the way for the capture of on September 14, 1847. Pierce resigned his commission on November 27, 1847, citing persistent health issues from the Contreras injury, and returned to the , where his wartime service enhanced his national reputation despite his lack of prior experience. The injury troubled him intermittently for years, though medical accounts attribute some ongoing ailments to complications like possible rather than solely the battlefield mishap.

Brigade Command and Wartime Role

Pierce received his commission as a of volunteers on March 3, 1847, from President , placing him in command of a comprising approximately 2,500 recruits, including regiments from , New York, and other states. This force formed part of General Winfield Scott's reinforcements for the campaign against , departing from and landing at in mid-1847 before marching inland roughly 150 miles to amid harassment from guerrilla forces. By August, Pierce's had integrated into the Army of Observation, positioned for the advance on the Mexican capital. During the on August 19, 1847, Pierce's brigade participated in the against approximately 7,000 Mexican troops entrenched under General Gabriel Valencia at Padierna. As the brigade advanced over rocky terrain, Pierce's horse slipped into a crevice, fell, and injured his left knee severely, causing him to lose consciousness from the pain. Revived by his aides, he remounted despite the agony and directed the withdrawal and repositioning of his troops overnight, enabling a successful dawn the following morning that captured the Mexican position in under 20 minutes. The subsequent on August 20, 1847, saw Pierce lead his brigade in pursuit of retreating Mexican forces across challenging ground under fire, exacerbating his injuries and leading to another collapse from exhaustion. His unit contributed to the rout of the enemy at key points, including the defense of the Churubusco and bridge, though Pierce was compelled to remain on the field rather than direct operations actively. Following the victory, Pierce served as a in the armistice negotiations with Mexican representatives. Pierce's health deteriorated further from and lingering effects of his injuries, preventing participation in the September 13 assault on . He retained command during the occupation of but resigned his commission in December 1847 upon the cessation of major hostilities, returning to with his brigade intact and disciplined. Throughout his service, Pierce's troops demonstrated effective discipline under his leadership, though his personal contributions were limited by recurrent health setbacks.

Path to the Presidency

Democratic Party Dynamics

The Democratic Party, having gained dominance after the Whig Party's fractures over the Compromise of 1850, navigated internal tensions primarily centered on slavery's territorial expansion. Southern Democrats demanded robust protections for slaveholders' rights, including enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, while northern Democrats emphasized popular sovereignty to mitigate anti-slavery sentiment in their regions. This balance was precarious, as overt northern opposition risked southern secessionist threats, yet concessions to the South alienated free-soil sympathizers within the party. The party's Jacksonian roots prioritized states' rights and limited federal intervention, positioning it as the defender of the 1850 Compromise against northern critics who viewed its slavery provisions as morally compromising. Leading into the 1852 nominating convention, factional rivalries among ambitious leaders deepened divisions. Prominent figures like , associated closely with the 's authorship, faced southern distrust for his perceived ambition and northern ties; James Buchanan's diplomatic post in Britain rendered him unavailable and suspect; , the 1848 nominee, carried the baggage of defeat; and William Marcy evoked regional hostilities. These dynamics underscored the party's need for a nominee who endorsed the unequivocally without embodying sectional extremism—a pro-southern northerner to unify delegates wary of either a firebrand southerner or an anti-slavery advocate. The convention, convened in from June 1 to 5, 1852, mandated a two-thirds majority for , amplifying deadlock amid 48 ballots of maneuvering. Initial balloting saw no surpass one-third support, as state delegations traded votes in a web of personal and regional alliances, exposing the fragility of party cohesion. Franklin Pierce, absent from national office since resigning his seat in 1842 but loyal to Democratic orthodoxy—including opposition to and backing for southern interests—gained traction as a "" with few enemies. His Mexican War service and leadership further appealed to war hawks and northern moderates, allowing him to consolidate support on the 48th ballot and resolve the impasse. This outcome illustrated the party's pragmatic calculus: prioritizing electoral viability over ideological purity to counter a fragmented opposition.

1852 Presidential Nomination

The Democratic Party entered the 1852 presidential nomination process amid internal divisions over slavery and the , seeking a who could unify Northern and Southern factions while endorsing the finality of the compromise to avoid further agitation. Leading contenders included of , of Michigan, of New York, and of Illinois, but regional rivalries prevented any from securing the required two-thirds majority of delegate votes. The convention convened in Baltimore, Maryland, from June 1 to 5, 1852, with 223 delegates requiring approximately 149 votes for nomination. A prolonged deadlock ensued, with ballots cycling among the frontrunners; after 34 ballots, no candidate approached the threshold due to opposition from opposing state delegations. Franklin Pierce, a former senator from who had not sought the presidency and held only modest national prominence, emerged as a compromise after supporters, including his state's delegation, lobbied Southern delegates by highlighting his Mexican-American War service, pro-compromise stance, and lack of personal enemies. Pierce received negligible support initially, garnering just a handful of votes, but gained momentum when Virginia's 15 delegates shifted to him on the 35th , signaling Southern acceptability for a Northern Democrat perceived as accommodating on issues. The deadlock persisted until the 49th , when Pierce secured the with overwhelming support, reflecting the party's desperation for unity rather than strong ideological commitment. His selection underscored the convention's exhaustion and preference for an obscure figure untainted by factional battles, enabling the platform's adoption affirming the Compromise of 1850.

Election of 1852

Campaign Against Winfield Scott

The Democratic campaign against Whig nominee emphasized personal attacks and exploited divisions within the Whig Party over sectional issues. Democrats highlighted Scott's advanced age of 66 years and portrayed him as overly ambitious and inconsistent in his loyalties, referencing his refusal to accept a challenge to duel President in 1817 as evidence of timidity. They also depicted Scott as a potential military dictator, drawing on his long career and past political maneuvers to question his civilian judgment. Pierce himself refrained from active campaigning, adhering to the era's norms for presidential candidates, while his supporters distributed a biography by that praised his Mexican War service as a brigade commander to counter perceptions of obscurity. Key issues revolved around the , though both parties nominally endorsed its finality to avoid alienating voters. Scott's public letter affirming support for the Compromise alienated Southern Whigs, who viewed him as insufficiently committed to 's protection and more aligned with Northern interests, prompting widespread defections to the Democrats. The Democratic platform stressed and non-interference with in the territories, positioning Pierce as a unifying figure for pro-Southern Northerners—a "doughface" acceptable to the South. In contrast, Whig efforts to leverage Scott's status as a Mexican War hero faltered amid party disunity, with Southern Whigs refusing to rally behind a seen as favoring Unionism over regional demands. Whig attacks on Pierce focused on character assassination, nicknaming him "Fainting Frank" in reference to his collapse during the Mexican War—attributed by critics to cowardice or intoxication, though medically linked to a prior injury or seizure—and questioning his fitness for leadership. Despite Scott's military prestige, the Whigs' strategy of emphasizing Pierce's relative anonymity failed to resonate, as Democrats effectively unified their base by framing the election as a defense against Whig sectional unreliability. Voter turnout reached approximately 70 percent, reflecting intense engagement despite the candidates' avoidance of direct slavery debates. The 1852 United States presidential election occurred on November 2, 1852, pitting Democratic nominee Franklin Pierce against Whig nominee Winfield Scott. Pierce secured a decisive electoral victory, winning 254 electoral votes to Scott's 42, capturing all but four states: Kentucky, Tennessee, Vermont, and Massachusetts. This outcome reflected Pierce's broad appeal as a compromise candidate who unified Democrats behind support for the Compromise of 1850, contrasting with the Whig Party's internal divisions over slavery and sectional issues. In the popular vote, the contest was narrower, with Pierce receiving 1,607,510 votes (50.8 percent) compared to Scott's 1,386,942 (43.9 percent); Free Soil John P. Hale garnered 155,210 votes (4.9 percent). reached approximately 69.6 percent of eligible voters, the highest since 1840, driven by intense partisan mobilization. Pierce's success stemmed from his nomination as a dark-horse at the Democratic convention, where he emerged after 48 ballots amid deadlocks among frontrunners unacceptable to Southern delegates. Scott's campaign suffered from his explicit endorsement of the , alienating Southern Whigs who defected to Pierce, viewed as a pro-Southern Northerner.
CandidatePartyElectoral VotesPopular VotesPopular Vote Percentage
Franklin PierceDemocratic2541,607,51050.8%
Whig421,386,94243.9%
Free Soil0155,2104.9%
Democrats also gained control of both houses of Congress, solidifying Pierce's mandate despite the popular vote margin. The election highlighted the Whig Party's fragility, foreshadowing its collapse, as sectional tensions eroded national coalitions.

Presidency (1853–1857)

Inauguration and Initial Challenges

Franklin Pierce was inaugurated as the 14th president on March 4, 1853, at the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. The ceremony proceeded under clear skies, with Pierce delivering his inaugural address entirely from memory, a first for any president. In the address, he emphasized national unity, peace, and prosperity, while alluding to the ongoing sectional tensions over slavery and the importance of adhering to the Compromise of 1850 to preserve harmony. Uniquely among presidents, Pierce affirmed rather than swore the , stating "I do solemnly affirm" as permitted by Article II, Section 1 of the for those with religious objections to oaths. He placed his left hand on a law book rather than a , reflecting his Episcopalian background and aversion to swearing oaths due to personal beliefs shaped by earlier experiences. Pierce also canceled the traditional inaugural ball, citing the recent personal tragedy that had profoundly affected him and his family. The tragedy occurred on January 6, 1853, when the Pierces' train derailed near , killing their only surviving child, 11-year-old Benjamin "Benny" Pierce, in a horrific witnessed by his parents; Benny was crushed when a wooden beam struck him through a train window. This loss, following the deaths of their two earlier sons in infancy, left Pierce grief-stricken and emotionally depleted as he assumed office, exacerbating his existing tendencies toward melancholy and heavy drinking, which hindered his early assertiveness in leadership. Vice President William R. King, already gravely ill with , could not attend the inauguration; he was sworn in remotely on March 24, 1853, in , , where he had traveled for health reasons under congressional authorization. King returned to the but died on April 18, 1853, at his plantation after serving just 45 days—the shortest vice-presidential tenure in U.S. history—leaving the office vacant for the remainder of Pierce's term and complicating administrative balance without a presiding officer in the . These events compounded Pierce's initial challenges in organizing the executive branch and maintaining Democratic Party cohesion amid patronage disputes and rising abolitionist pressures, as his focus on sectional clashed with demands for firmer stances on slavery's expansion. Pierce prioritized party unity to avert disunion, viewing anti-slavery agitation as a direct threat to national stability, but his subdued demeanor in the wake of personal losses allowed factional rivalries to simmer unchecked in the early months.

Administrative Organization and Cabinet

Pierce assembled his cabinet shortly after his on March 4, 1853, prioritizing sectional balance and Democratic Party unity by selecting members from diverse geographic regions and factions, including northern and with a tilt toward pro-slavery interests. The cabinet was sworn in on March 7, 1853, and notably maintained complete stability throughout his term, with no resignations or replacements—a unique occurrence in U.S. presidential history for a full four-year administration.
PositionAppointeeState/NotesTerm
Secretary of StateNew York; experienced diplomat1853–1857
Secretary of the TreasuryJames Guthrie; fiscal conservative1853–1857
Secretary of War; future Confederate leader1853–1857
Attorney General; legal scholar1853–1857
Secretary of the NavyJames C. Dobbin; naval reformer1853–1857
Secretary of the InteriorRobert McClelland; supported by faction1853–1857
Postmaster GeneralJames Campbell; handled patronage1853–1857
This lineup reflected Pierce's strategy to appease while incorporating northern allies, such as Marcy from the Hunker faction in New York and McClelland from . Jefferson Davis's appointment as Secretary of War proved influential, overseeing military matters including frontier expansion and the expedition against Mormon settlers in 1857. The cabinet's cohesion contrasted with growing national divisions, enabling Pierce to pursue policies like the Kansas-Nebraska Act without internal executive discord, though it drew criticism for prioritizing party loyalty over broader administrative innovation. William R. D. King, a Democrat, died on April 18, 1853, after less than two months in office, leaving the position vacant for the remainder of the term as no mechanism existed for succession until the 25th Amendment.

Economic Policies and Fiscal Restraint

Pierce's economic approach emphasized strict constitutional limits on federal authority, prioritizing revenue generation through without protective intent and opposing expansive on or welfare. In his first annual message to on December 5, 1853, he advocated reducing tariff rates to serve purely as a source of revenue, arguing that excessive duties burdened commerce and that the existing Walker Tariff of 1846 had already proven sufficient for fiscal needs while promoting principles. This stance aligned with Democratic orthodoxy, which viewed high protective tariffs as favoring Northern manufacturing interests at the expense of Southern agricultural exporters and consumers nationwide. A cornerstone of his fiscal restraint was consistent vetoes of legislation for internal improvements, which he deemed unconstitutional encroachments on state prerogatives and risks to balanced budgets through regionally biased expenditures. On May 31, 1854, Pierce vetoed a bill authorizing surveys and improvements for rivers and harbors, asserting that federal involvement would inevitably lead to demands for perpetual funding without clear constitutional warrant, potentially destabilizing public finances by diverting resources from essential national duties. He reiterated this position in subsequent vetoes, including one on August 4, 1854, against a broader public works appropriation, warning that such a "general system" would erode federalism and invite pork-barrel politics that unequally burdened taxpayers. These vetoes reflected Pierce's first-principles adherence to enumerated powers, preventing federal debt accumulation amid ample revenues from customs and public land sales. Pierce extended this restraint to proposed federal welfare initiatives, vetoing on May 3, 1854, the "Bill for the Benefit of the Indigent Insane," which sought to allocate 10 million acres of for state asylums. He argued that charity fell under powers, not federal domain, and that land grants would indirectly expand executive discretion over vast territories, fostering dependency and fiscal precedents contrary to . This decision halted early momentum for centralized social spending, preserving surpluses in coffers—verified in his messages as aligning with projected receipts exceeding outlays—and setting a restraint against federal intrusion into that endured for decades. Overall, these policies maintained low federal outlays, with expenditures focused on debt reduction and administration rather than domestic subsidies, amid an economy buoyed by territorial expansion and pre-panic stability.

Foreign Affairs and Territorial Expansion

Pierce's foreign policy emphasized territorial expansion and commercial interests, reflecting principles and efforts to secure routes for transcontinental infrastructure amid domestic sectional tensions. His administration prioritized negotiations with to resolve lingering border disputes from the 1848 , aiming to facilitate a southern railroad corridor while avoiding further military conflict. William Learned Marcy instructed envoy to acquire land south of the , leading to the treaty signed on December 30, 1853, which ceded approximately 29,670 square miles of arid territory—now and —to the for an initial $15 million, later amended by the to $10 million with territorial adjustments ratified by on June 8, 1854. This acquisition provided a viable southern route for a railroad to the Pacific, enhanced border security against incursions, and marked the last major territorial addition to the before the Civil War, though critics noted its high cost relative to the land's limited immediate economic value. Efforts to acquire dominated Pierce's expansionist agenda, driven by strategic concerns over the island's proximity, potential for akin to Haiti's uprising, and competition with European powers. In 1854, U.S. diplomats Pierre Soulé, , and convened secretly in , , producing the , which asserted Cuba's indispensability to U.S. and recommended purchasing it from for up to $120 million—or seizing it by force if refused, framing non-acquisition as a national hazard. The document, leaked to in October 1854, provoked outrage in the North as an overt bid to extend , while Southern advocates viewed it as against British abolitionist influence; Pierce publicly repudiated the manifesto to mitigate political damage but privately continued purchase overtures, which rebuffed amid its internal instability. This episode underscored causal tensions in U.S. policy: expansion for and , yet entangled with 's geographic extension, eroding Pierce's northern support without securing the . In , Pierce tolerated filibustering expeditions as informal extensions of U.S. influence, particularly in , where American adventurer William Walker invaded in 1855, overthrowing the government and establishing a pro-slavery regime by 1856. The administration initially maintained neutrality to avoid European backlash but recognized Walker's government on May 20, 1856, supplying indirect support through naval protection, motivated by desires for a Nicaragua canal route and markets for U.S. goods. Walker's regime collapsed in 1857 under regional opposition, highlighting the policy's risks: it inflamed Latin American resentment toward U.S. interventionism and failed to yield lasting territorial gains, though it aligned with broader reciprocity treaties, such as the 1854 British convention easing trade barriers. Overall, Pierce's foreign initiatives achieved modest territorial success via Gadsden but faltered on aggressive bids like and filibusters, prioritizing Southern economic imperatives over unified national consensus, as evidenced by diplomatic records and contemporaneous debates.

Sectional Conflicts Over Slavery

During Franklin Pierce's presidency, sectional conflicts over slavery intensified, particularly through legislation and territorial disputes that challenged prior compromises. Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law on May 30, 1854, which organized the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and replaced the Missouri Compromise's prohibition on slavery north of the 36°30' parallel with popular sovereignty, allowing settlers to decide the issue by vote. This repeal ignited fierce opposition in the North, where it was viewed as an expansion of slavery's potential reach, contributing to the formation of the Republican Party dedicated to halting its spread. The Act precipitated violent clashes in , known as "," as pro-slavery settlers from and anti-slavery emigrants from the North vied for control. By 1856, conflicts included the sacking of the free-soil town of Lawrence on May 21 and the Pottawatomie Massacre on May 24, where John Brown and his followers killed five pro-slavery men; overall, the strife resulted in approximately 200 deaths and $2 million in property damage over two years. Pierce's administration recognized a pro-slavery territorial legislature elected amid widespread fraud and intimidation in March 1855, rejecting a rival free-state convention and thereby endorsing southern interests, which further alienated northern Democrats and deepened sectional divides. Pierce enforced the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 with federal authority, exemplified by the case in in May 1854, where he deployed U.S. troops and marines to suppress a attempt and ensure the fugitive's return to , amid public outrage that included one death during the courthouse attack. This strict adherence to the law, intended to uphold the and preserve national unity, instead fueled abolitionist sentiment and perceptions of Pierce as overly conciliatory toward slaveholding states, exacerbating tensions that persisted beyond his term.

Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act

Pierce, adhering to his pledge to uphold the , rigorously enforced the Fugitive Slave Act, which mandated the return of escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on those aiding fugitives, viewing non-compliance as a threat to national unity. The Act, passed September 18, 1850, empowered federal commissioners to adjudicate claims without jury trials and required Northern states to assist in captures, often overriding local personal liberty laws. The most prominent enforcement occurred in the case in , beginning May 24, 1854, when Burns, a 20-year-old escaped slave from , who had fled in 1853, was arrested by federal agents under the Act. An attempted rescue by abolitionists on May 26 resulted in the death of a jailer, prompting Pierce to dispatch U.S. Marines, artillery, and additional troops to secure the courthouse and ensure the law's execution, authorizing the U.S. to "incur any expense deemed necessary" including military aid. Commissioner Edward G. Loring ruled on May 30, 1854, that Burns was the property of his claimant, Charles Suttle, leading to Burns's rendition on June 2 amid 1,900 troops, 22 , and chained escorts parading him to a ship bound for , at a federal cost exceeding $40,000. Pierce's intervention quelled resistance but inflamed Northern outrage, with protests decrying the militarized spectacle as an imposition of on free soil. This enforcement exemplified Pierce's broader directive to federal officials to prioritize the Act's provisions, contributing to heightened sectional animosity as Northern states passed increasingly defiant personal liberty laws, though Pierce maintained that such federal action preserved constitutional obligations under Article IV, Section 2. The Burns affair, in particular, galvanized anti-slavery sentiment, boosting recruitment for groups like the Vigilance Committee and underscoring the Act's role in eroding compromise efforts.

Midterm Setbacks and the 1856 Election

The 1854 midterm congressional elections delivered severe setbacks to President Pierce's Democratic Party, driven largely by northern backlash against the Kansas-Nebraska Act he had signed into law on May 30, 1854. In the , Democrats lost 66 of their 91 seats, plummeting from 157 to 91 members and ceding control to an opposition coalition. Among the 44 northern Democrats who had supported the Act, only 7 secured reelection, underscoring the depth of voter repudiation in free-soil regions. This electoral rout stemmed from perceptions that the Act's repeal of the 1820 invited slavery's extension into northern territories, igniting organized resistance that coalesced into the Republican Party and fragmented the Whigs. Although Democrats retained a narrow Senate majority amid the losses, the House reversal crippled Pierce's ability to advance his agenda, rendering his administration increasingly lame-duck. The elections amplified sectional fissures, with "" violence erupting as pro- and anti-slavery settlers clashed over territorial organization, resulting in over 200 deaths and $2 million in property damage by 1856. Pierce's firm enforcement of and the Fugitive Slave Act further alienated northern moderates, associating his presidency with southern interests despite his origins. As the 1856 presidential contest approached, Pierce actively sought renomination at the Democratic National Convention, convened from June 2 to 6 in Cincinnati, Ohio. Contesting against rivals James Buchanan, Stephen A. Douglas, and Lewis Cass, Pierce's candidacy faltered amid party divisions over his handling of Kansas-Nebraska fallout. He withdrew his name prior to the 15th ballot, throwing support to Douglas, yet deadlock persisted until Buchanan clinched the nomination unanimously on the 17th ballot. This rebuff marked Pierce as the first elected president denied his party's renomination, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with his term's exacerbation of national divisions. In the ensuing on November 4, 1856, Pierce backed Buchanan, who defeated Republican and American Party candidate , securing 174 electoral votes to Frémont's 114. Buchanan captured just 4 of 14 northern states but swept the South, with Democrats holding 45.3% of the popular vote amid heightened turnout fueled by slavery debates. Pierce's ouster signaled the perils of prioritizing territorial over sectional reconciliation, leaving his successor to inherit a polarized union on the brink of fracture.

Post-Presidency (1857–1869)

Return to New Hampshire and Retirement

Upon completing his presidential term on March 4, 1857, Franklin Pierce returned to , in the spring of that year, resuming residence in the state capital where he had maintained ties since his early career. His finances, bolstered by presidential salary and prior legal earnings, allowed for a comfortable without documented necessity for active professional engagement. Pierce engaged in limited legal consultations rather than establishing a formal practice, reflecting a shift toward amid ongoing personal struggles with depression and alcohol use following family losses. No major commercial investments or entrepreneurial pursuits are recorded in primary accounts from this period; instead, he focused on recuperation, including international for reasons. In November 1857, Pierce departed for a two-year tour of , accompanied initially by his wife Jane, visiting sites in , , , and to address his physical ailments and seek distraction from domestic . The journey concluded in summer , after which he briefly resided in , during the first half of 1860, prioritizing recovery over economic endeavors.

Stance During the Civil War

Following the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861, Pierce publicly affirmed his support for a to preserve the Union against , emphasizing strict adherence to constitutional limits on federal power. However, he quickly blamed Republican anti-slavery agitation for provoking Southern and criticized President Lincoln for escalating the conflict into what Pierce described as an "aggressive war of conquest" rather than a limited effort to restore the status quo. Pierce opposed Lincoln's suspension of in 1861, arguing it violated civil liberties even amid rebellion, and viewed the of 1863 as a shift from Union preservation to abolitionist warfare that prolonged the bloodshed. Pierce's alignment with Northern Democrats favoring negotiation and peace—often labeled Copperheads by Republicans—intensified Northern distrust of him, particularly in , where he intervened in 1861 to dissuade a mob from the editor of a secessionist newspaper, the Concord Statesman. His private correspondence with former allies like , a prewar friend from the Mexican-American War, fueled perceptions of Southern sympathy, though no evidence supports claims of active Confederate aid. In December 1862, Pierce penned a letter to New Hampshire's Patriot and State Gazette decrying the administration's "imbecility and wickedness," which, when leaked and published, prompted accusations of disloyalty and eroded his local popularity. Tensions peaked in July 1863 amid draft riots and war weariness, when a fabricated report—allegedly from U.S. Secretary of State William H. Seward—claimed Pierce had written treasonous letters to Confederate leaders; Pierce vehemently denied the charges in public letters, asserting his lifelong Unionism and dismissing the allegations as partisan smears by Republicans seeking to silence dissent. The hoax, traced to anti-Democratic broadsides, highlighted Pierce's isolation: once a war hero, he faced effigy burnings and social ostracism for refusing to endorse unconditional Union victory or Reconstruction on Republican terms. By 1864, Pierce declined overtures to lead anti-Lincoln Democrats, citing health but underscoring his belief that compromise, not conquest, offered the path to reconciliation. Following Abraham Lincoln's assassination in April 1865, an angry mob gathered outside Pierce's home in Concord, New Hampshire, demanding to know why he had not displayed a flag as a gesture of mourning. Pierce addressed the crowd, affirming his Union loyalty and successfully calming them through dialogue.

Final Years, Health Decline, and Death

Following the death of his wife, Jane Means Appleton Pierce, from on December 2, 1863, Franklin Pierce retreated further into seclusion at his home in , where his longstanding battle with accelerated. His drinking, which had been excessive for decades, intensified amid grief and political isolation, contributing to progressive liver damage. By the mid-1860s, Pierce's health had noticeably declined, marked by fatigue and abdominal issues linked to chronic , though he occasionally traveled for respite, including brief stays in earlier in the decade. In mid-1869, his condition deteriorated rapidly; he resumed heavy alcohol consumption, leading to classic end-stage symptoms such as (fluid accumulation in the abdomen) and . Pierce died on October 8, 1869, at his Concord residence from liver , entering a in his final hours at age 64. He was buried in the Old North Cemetery in Concord. President issued a mourning Pierce as a former chief executive, though public sentiment remained divided over his legacy.

Historical Legacy and Assessments

Contemporaneous Reputation

Pierce assumed the presidency amid widespread acclaim as a war hero from the Mexican-American War and a unifying Democrat, securing a decisive victory in the 1852 election with 254 electoral votes to Whig nominee Winfield Scott's 42, capturing 50.9% of the popular vote. His affable demeanor and promises of sectional compromise initially bolstered his standing, with supporters portraying him as a capable administrator committed to national expansion and enforcement of existing compromises on slavery. particularly praised his firm support for the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, viewing him as a defender of constitutional obligations to return escaped slaves, which reinforced his appeal in slaveholding states. However, his signing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act on May 30, 1854, which organized the territories of Kansas and Nebraska under popular sovereignty and effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise's ban on slavery north of 36°30', ignited fierce opposition in the North. Northern newspapers and anti-slavery advocates branded him a "doughface"—a Northerner malleable to Southern pro-slavery interests—accusing him of inflaming sectional tensions that led to "Bleeding Kansas" violence, including the 1855 Wakarusa War and armed clashes over pro- and anti-slavery settlers. Critics in the emerging Republican Party and remnants of the Whigs depicted him as weak and partisan, prioritizing Southern demands over national unity, with outlets like the New York Tribune lambasting his administration for fostering anarchy in the territories. By the in , Pierce's unpopularity in the North—stemming from the Kansas-Nebraska fallout and perceived administrative failures, including cabinet scandals and economic downturns—culminated in his rejection for renomination, the first time an elected sitting president was denied his party's backing. He received only 122 of 290 delegate votes on the first ballot, falling short of the required two-thirds majority, as party leaders shifted to to broaden appeal amid rising Republican strength. While Southern delegates defended his record on expansion and foreign policy initiatives like the of December 30, 1853, which added 29,670 square miles to the U.S. Southwest, his overall contemporaneous image shifted to that of an ineffective conciliator who exacerbated rather than resolved the crisis.

Key Achievements and Policy Rationales

One of Pierce's notable foreign policy successes was the , finalized on December 30, 1853, through which the acquired 29,670 square miles of arid land in present-day and from for $10 million. This transaction, negotiated by American minister under instructions from Pierce and , resolved lingering border disputes from the 1848 and secured a feasible southern route for a , as advocated by Secretary of War to enhance military logistics, commerce, and national cohesion. Pierce viewed the purchase as a pragmatic extension of , achievable through diplomacy rather than force, thereby avoiding escalation while advancing infrastructure critical for westward expansion and economic integration. In East Asian relations, Pierce's administration oversaw the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa on March 31, 1854, by Commodore Matthew Perry, which compelled to end over two centuries of isolation by opening Shimoda and ports to American ships for provisioning and establishing consular access. Although the initial expedition was authorized by Pierce's predecessor, the treaty's execution and subsequent ratification on June 22, 1855, fell under Pierce, who proclaimed it to foster reciprocal trade amid growing Pacific interests. The rationale stemmed from Pierce's emphasis on commercial expansion to counter European influence and secure markets for American whaling and merchant vessels, reflecting a broader policy of vigorous yet non-aggressive to project U.S. power without entanglement in European-style . Domestically, Pierce signed legislation on February 24, 1855, creating the Court of Claims to adjudicate monetary claims against the federal government, marking the first specialized tribunal for such disputes and streamlining resolutions previously handled ad hoc by . This addressed inefficiencies in processing claims arising from contracts, seizures, and treaties, with Pierce rationalizing it as an impartial mechanism to uphold contractual obligations and fiscal accountability without expanding executive overreach, consistent with his strict constructionist view of limited federal authority. Similarly, in 1855, Pierce approved reorganization of the diplomatic and consular services, standardizing appointments and operations to enhance efficiency in overseas representation. The policy aimed to professionalize amid expansionist goals, reducing abuses while aligning with Democratic principles of economical administration. Pierce endorsed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, signed May 30, 1854, which organized the Kansas and Nebraska territories west of Missouri and Iowa, extending them to the Rocky Mountains and introducing popular sovereignty to determine slavery's status rather than prohibiting it via the 1820 Missouri Compromise. Spanning roughly 300,000 square miles, the act facilitated settlement and railroad development by repealing the compromise line, with Pierce's rationale rooted in deference to democratic self-determination and avoidance of congressional dictation, believing it would mirror the Compromise of 1850's temporary pacification by letting territorial residents resolve the issue locally and preserving Union balance. In his final months, Pierce also signed the Tariff Act of March 3, 1857, reducing average duties from 21% to about 15% on imports, expanding the free list, to promote free trade, lower consumer costs, and stimulate Southern exports, aligning with Democratic revenue tariff ideology over protectionism.

Major Criticisms and Failed Initiatives

![Political cartoon depicting the forcing of slavery into free states](./assets/lossy-page1-250px-Forcing_slavery_down_the_throat_of_a_freesoiler_18561856 Pierce's endorsement of the Kansas-Nebraska Act on May 30, 1854, drew widespread condemnation for repealing the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and permitting slavery's potential expansion into territories north of 36°30' latitude through popular sovereignty. This initiative, championed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas, aimed to facilitate a transcontinental railroad but instead ignited "Bleeding Kansas," a proxy conflict marked by election fraud, armed incursions from Missouri pro-slavery settlers, and approximately 56 political killings between 1854 and 1859. Critics, including Northern antislavery factions, accused Pierce of enabling Southern dominance by failing to enforce fair elections or suppress violence, thereby exacerbating sectional tensions that propelled the nation toward civil war. The , drafted in October 1854 by U.S. diplomats Pierre Soulé, , and , proposed purchasing from or seizing it by force if refused, reflecting Pierce's expansionist ambitions under the . Leaked to the press in 1855, the document provoked outrage in Northern states and Europe as an imperialist scheme favoring slaveholding interests, leading to the resignation of in protest and damaging Pierce's administration diplomatically. Although Pierce disavowed the manifesto's aggressive tone, his initial support for negotiations alienated antislavery advocates who viewed it as complicit in perpetuating slavery's spread. Pierce's rigorous enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 further fueled accusations of partisanship toward the South, as federal commissioners remanded hundreds of alleged fugitives without , including high-profile cases like that of in on June 2, 1854. His administration's reluctance to intervene decisively in territorial disputes or , coupled with scandals involving corrupt officials, underscored perceptions of ineffectiveness and moral compromise. These failures culminated in Democratic midterm losses in 1854–1855, Pierce's exclusion from the 1856 nomination, and a legacy of accelerating disunion rather than compromise.

Modern Historiographical Views

In contemporary scholarly assessments, Franklin Pierce is consistently ranked among the least effective U.S. presidents, often placed near the bottom in surveys of historians and political scientists. For instance, in the 2021 Presidential Historians Survey, Pierce ranked 41st out of 44 presidents overall, with particularly low scores in categories such as "pursuit of equal justice for all" (44th) and "moral authority" (42nd), reflecting critiques of his enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act and perceived favoritism toward Southern interests. Similarly, the Siena College Research Institute's 2022 U.S. Presidents Study positioned him 42nd out of 45, citing weaknesses in economic management and integrity, while the 2024 Presidential Greatness Project by political scientists further underscored his low standing, averaging scores indicative of failure in amid rising sectional tensions. These rankings stem from empirical evaluations of archival records, policy outcomes, and partisan impacts, rather than anecdotal narratives. Historians attribute Pierce's poor reputation primarily to his administration's role in intensifying the slavery crisis through the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which repealed the and introduced , leading to violent conflicts in "" that eroded national unity. Michael F. Holt's analysis in Franklin Pierce (2010) upholds the conventional view of Pierce as a presidential , arguing that his rigid adherence to Democratic party unity and deference to Southern demands blinded him to the act's destabilizing effects, prioritizing short-term compromise over long-term constitutional stability. Leroy Gara's The Presidency of Franklin Pierce (1982, reissued in scholarly contexts) offers a balanced yet critical appraisal, praising administrative reforms like departmental accountability but condemning Pierce's inept handling of congressional factions and foreign policy missteps, such as the , as evidence of weak executive vision. The Miller Center's evaluation echoes this, portraying Pierce's traditional leadership style as mismatched against the era's electoral divisions, resulting in Democratic midterm losses in 1854 and his exclusion from the 1856 nomination. Recent scholarship also examines personal factors, such as the death of Pierce's son Benjamin in a train accident on , 1853, shortly before , alongside rumors of , as contributors to perceived indecisiveness, though evidence linking these to policy errors remains circumstantial and debated. A 2022 Constitution Center assessment notes Pierce's ethical diligence in routine but faults his pro-Southern advocacy as a New Englander for alienating Northern voters and accelerating polarization, a view informed by primary sources like cabinet correspondence rather than retrospective moralizing. While some older defenses highlight his efforts to enforce compromises as causal realism in preserving the Union temporarily, modern consensus—shaped by post-Civil archival access—holds that Pierce's deference to sectional exacerbated irreconcilable conflicts, rendering his presidency a cautionary case in executive passivity. This historiographical judgment persists across surveys, undiluted by institutional biases, as rankings correlate with measurable outcomes like territorial violence and party disintegration.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.