Bob
Have a question related to this hub?
Alice
Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.
Gen.[1] | Vi- sual |
IEEE standard |
Adopt. | Link rate (Mbit/s) |
RF (GHz) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
— | 802.11 | 1997 | 1–2 | 2.4 | |
— | 802.11b | 1999 | 1–11 | 2.4 | |
— | 802.11a | 1999 | 6–54 | 5 | |
— | 802.11g | 2003 | 2.4 | ||
Wi-Fi 4 | ![]() |
802.11n | 2009 | 6.5–600 | 2.4, 5 |
Wi-Fi 5 | ![]() |
802.11ac | 2013 | 6.5–6,933 | [a] | 5
Wi-Fi 6 | ![]() |
802.11ax | 2021 | 0.4–9,608 | 2.4, 5 |
Wi-Fi 6E[b] | 2.4, 5, 6 | ||||
Wi-Fi 7 | ![]() |
802.11be | 2024 | 0.4–23,059 | 2.4, 5, 6 |
Wi-Fi 8[2][3] | — | 802.11bn | 100,000[4] | 2.4, 5, 6 |
IEEE 802.11ac-2013 or 802.11ac is a wireless networking standard in the IEEE 802.11 set of protocols (which is part of the Wi-Fi networking family), providing high-throughput wireless local area networks (WLANs) on the 5 GHz band.[c] The standard has been retroactively labelled as Wi-Fi 5 by Wi-Fi Alliance.[5][6]
The specification has multi-station throughput of at least 1.1 gigabit per second (1.1 Gbit/s) and single-link throughput of at least 500 megabits per second (0.5 Gbit/s).[7] This is accomplished by extending the air-interface concepts embraced by 802.11n: wider RF bandwidth (up to 160 MHz), more MIMO spatial streams (up to eight), downlink multi-user MIMO (up to four clients), and high-density modulation (up to 256-QAM).[8][9]
The Wi-Fi Alliance separated the introduction of 802.11ac wireless products into two phases ("waves"), named "Wave 1" and "Wave 2".[10][11] From mid-2013, the alliance started certifying Wave 1 802.11ac products shipped by manufacturers, based on the IEEE 802.11ac Draft 3.0 (the IEEE standard was not finalized until later that year).[12] Subsequently in 2016, Wi-Fi Alliance introduced the Wave 2 certification, which includes additional features like MU-MIMO (downlink only), 160 MHz channel width support, support for more 5 GHz channels, and four spatial streams (with four antennas; compared to three in Wave 1 and 802.11n, and eight in IEEE's 802.11ax specification).[13] It meant Wave 2 products would have higher bandwidth and capacity than Wave 1 products.[14]
New technologies introduced with 802.11ac include the following:[9][15]
The single-link and multi-station enhancements supported by 802.11ac enable several new WLAN usage scenarios, such as simultaneous streaming of HD video to multiple clients throughout the home, rapid synchronization and backup of large data files, wireless display, large campus/auditorium deployments, and manufacturing floor automation.[16]
To fully utilize their WLAN capacities, 802.11ac access points and routers have sufficient throughput to require the inclusion of a USB 3.0 interface to provide various services such as video streaming, FTP servers, and personal cloud services.[17] With storage locally attached through USB 2.0, filling the bandwidth made available by 802.11ac was not easily accomplished.
All rates assume 256-QAM, rate 5/6:
Scenario | Typical client form factor |
PHY link rate | Aggregate capacity (speed) |
---|---|---|---|
One-antenna AP, one-antenna STA, 80 MHz | Handheld | 433 Mbit/s | 433 Mbit/s |
Two-antenna AP, two-antenna STA, 80 MHz | Tablet, laptop | 867 Mbit/s | 867 Mbit/s |
One-antenna AP, one-antenna STA, 160 MHz | Handheld | 867 Mbit/s | 867 Mbit/s |
Three-antenna AP, three-antenna STA, 80 MHz | Laptop, PC | 1.30 Gbit/s | 1.30 Gbit/s |
Two-antenna AP, two-antenna STA, 160 MHz | Tablet, laptop | 1.73 Gbit/s | 1.73 Gbit/s |
Four-antenna AP, four one-antenna STAs, 160 MHz (MU-MIMO) |
Handheld | 867 Mbit/s to each STA | 3.39 Gbit/s |
Eight-antenna AP, 160 MHz (MU-MIMO)
|
Digital TV, Set-top Box, Tablet, Laptop, PC, Handheld |
|
6.93 Gbit/s |
Eight-antenna AP, four 2-antenna STAs, 160 MHz (MU-MIMO) |
Digital TV, tablet, laptop, PC | 1.73 Gbit/s to each STA | 6.93 Gbit/s |
Wave 2, referring to products introduced in 2016, offers a higher throughput than legacy Wave 1 products, those introduced starting in 2013. The maximum physical layer theoretical rate for Wave 1 is 1.3 Gbit/s, while Wave 2 can reach 2.34 Gbit/s. Wave 2 can therefore achieve 1 Gbit/s even if the real world throughput turns out to be only 50% of the theoretical rate. Wave 2 also supports a higher number of connected devices.[14]
MCS index[d] |
Spatial Streams |
Modulation type |
Coding rate |
Data rate (Mbit/s)[18] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 MHz channels | 40 MHz channels | 80 MHz channels | 160 MHz channels | ||||||||
800 ns GI | 400 ns GI | 800 ns GI | 400 ns GI | 800 ns GI | 400 ns GI | 800 ns GI | 400 ns GI | ||||
0 | 1 | BPSK | 1/2 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 13.5 | 15 | 29.3 | 32.5 | 58.5 | 65 |
1 | 1 | QPSK | 1/2 | 13 | 14.4 | 27 | 30 | 58.5 | 65 | 117 | 130 |
2 | 1 | QPSK | 3/4 | 19.5 | 21.7 | 40.5 | 45 | 87.8 | 97.5 | 175.5 | 195 |
3 | 1 | 16-QAM | 1/2 | 26 | 28.9 | 54 | 60 | 117 | 130 | 234 | 260 |
4 | 1 | 16-QAM | 3/4 | 39 | 43.3 | 81 | 90 | 175.5 | 195 | 351 | 390 |
5 | 1 | 64-QAM | 2/3 | 52 | 57.8 | 108 | 120 | 234 | 260 | 468 | 520 |
6 | 1 | 64-QAM | 3/4 | 58.5 | 65 | 121.5 | 135 | 263.3 | 292.5 | 526.5 | 585 |
7 | 1 | 64-QAM | 5/6 | 65 | 72.2 | 135 | 150 | 292.5 | 325 | 585 | 650 |
8 | 1 | 256-QAM | 3/4 | 78 | 86.7 | 162 | 180 | 351 | 390 | 702 | 780 |
9 | 1 | 256-QAM | 5/6 | — | — | 180 | 200 | 390 | 433.3 | 780 | 866.7 |
0 | 2 | BPSK | 1/2 | 13 | 14.4 | 27 | 30 | 58.5 | 65 | 117 | 130 |
1 | 2 | QPSK | 1/2 | 26 | 28.9 | 54 | 60 | 117 | 130 | 234 | 260 |
2 | 2 | QPSK | 3/4 | 39 | 43.3 | 81 | 90 | 175.5 | 195 | 351 | 390 |
3 | 2 | 16-QAM | 1/2 | 52 | 57.8 | 108 | 120 | 234 | 260 | 468 | 520 |
4 | 2 | 16-QAM | 3/4 | 78 | 86.7 | 162 | 180 | 351 | 390 | 702 | 780 |
5 | 2 | 64-QAM | 2/3 | 104 | 115.6 | 216 | 240 | 468 | 520 | 936 | 1040 |
6 | 2 | 64-QAM | 3/4 | 117 | 130.3 | 243 | 270 | 526.5 | 585 | 1053 | 1170 |
7 | 2 | 64-QAM | 5/6 | 130 | 144.4 | 270 | 300 | 585 | 650 | 1170 | 1300 |
8 | 2 | 256-QAM | 3/4 | 156 | 173.3 | 324 | 360 | 702 | 780 | 1404 | 1560 |
9 | 2 | 256-QAM | 5/6 | — | — | 360 | 400 | 780 | 866.7 | 1560 | 1733.3 |
0 | 3 | BPSK | 1/2 | 19.5 | 21.7 | 40.5 | 45 | 87.8 | 97.5 | 175.5 | 195 |
1 | 3 | QPSK | 1/2 | 39 | 43.3 | 81 | 90 | 175.5 | 195 | 351 | 390 |
2 | 3 | QPSK | 3/4 | 58.5 | 65 | 121.5 | 135 | 263.3 | 292.5 | 526.5 | 585 |
3 | 3 | 16-QAM | 1/2 | 78 | 86.7 | 162 | 180 | 351 | 390 | 702 | 780 |
4 | 3 | 16-QAM | 3/4 | 117 | 130 | 243 | 270 | 526.5 | 585 | 1053 | 1170 |
5 | 3 | 64-QAM | 2/3 | 156 | 173.3 | 324 | 360 | 702 | 780 | 1404 | 1560 |
6 | 3 | 64-QAM | 3/4 | 175.5 | 195 | 364.5 | 405 | — | — | 1579.5 | 1755 |
7 | 3 | 64-QAM | 5/6 | 195 | 216.7 | 405 | 450 | 877.5 | 975 | 1755 | 1950 |
8 | 3 | 256-QAM | 3/4 | 234 | 260 | 486 | 540 | 1053 | 1170 | 2106 | 2340 |
9 | 3 | 256-QAM | 5/6 | 260 | 288.9 | 540 | 600 | 1170 | 1300 | 2340 | 2600 |
0 | 4 | BPSK | 1/2 | 26 | 28.8 | 54 | 60 | 117.2 | 130 | 234 | 260 |
1 | 4 | QPSK | 1/2 | 52 | 57.6 | 108 | 120 | 234 | 260 | 468 | 520 |
2 | 4 | QPSK | 3/4 | 78 | 86.8 | 162 | 180 | 351.2 | 390 | 702 | 780 |
3 | 4 | 16-QAM | 1/2 | 104 | 115.6 | 216 | 240 | 468 | 520 | 936 | 1040 |
4 | 4 | 16-QAM | 3/4 | 156 | 173.2 | 324 | 360 | 702 | 780 | 1404 | 1560 |
5 | 4 | 64-QAM | 2/3 | 208 | 231.2 | 432 | 480 | 936 | 1040 | 1872 | 2080 |
6 | 4 | 64-QAM | 3/4 | 234 | 260 | 486 | 540 | 1053.2 | 1170 | 2106 | 2340 |
7 | 4 | 64-QAM | 5/6 | 260 | 288.8 | 540 | 600 | 1170 | 1300 | 2340 | 2600 |
8 | 4 | 256-QAM | 3/4 | 312 | 346.8 | 648 | 720 | 1404 | 1560 | 2808 | 3120 |
9 | 4 | 256-QAM | 5/6 | — | — | 720 | 800 | 1560 | 1733.3 | 3120 | 3466.7 |
Several companies are currently offering 802.11ac chipsets with higher modulation rates: MCS-10 and MCS-11 (1024-QAM), supported by Quantenna and Broadcom. Although technically not part of 802.11ac, these new MCS indices became official in the 802.11ax standard, ratified in 2021.
160 MHz channels are unavailable in some countries due to regulatory issues that allocated some frequencies for other purposes.
802.11ac-class device wireless speeds are often advertised as AC followed by a number, that number being the highest link rates in Mbit/s of all the simultaneously-usable radios in the device added up. For example, an AC1900 access point might have 600 Mbit/s capability on its 2.4 GHz radio and 1300 Mbit/s capability on its 5 GHz radio. No single client device could connect and achieve 1900 Mbit/s of throughput, but separate devices each connecting to the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radios could achieve combined throughput approaching 1900 Mbit/s. Different possible stream configurations can add up to the same AC number.
Type | 2.4 GHz band[c] Mbit/s |
2.4 GHz band config [all 40 MHz] |
5 GHz band Mbit/s |
5 GHz band config [all 80 MHz] |
---|---|---|---|---|
AC450[19] | - | - | 433 | 1 stream @ MCS 9 |
AC600 | 150 | 1 stream @ MCS 7 | 433 | 1 stream @ MCS 9 |
AC750 | 300 | 2 streams @ MCS 7 | 433 | 1 stream @ MCS 9 |
AC1000 | 300 | 2 streams @ MCS 7 | 650 | 2 streams @ MCS 7 |
AC1200 | 300 | 2 streams @ MCS 7 | 867 | 2 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1300 | 400 | 2 streams @ 256-QAM | 867 | 2 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1300[20] | - | - | 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1350[21] | 450 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 | 867 | 2 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1450 | 450 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 | 975 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 |
AC1600 | 300 | 2 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1700 | 800 | 4 streams @ 256-QAM | 867 | 2 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1750 | 450 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC1900 | 600[e] | 3 streams @ 256-QAM | 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC2100 | 800 | 4 streams @ 256-QAM | 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC2200 | 450 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,733 | 4 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC2300 | 600 | 4 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,625 | 3 streams @ 1024-QAM |
AC2400 | 600 | 4 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,733 | 4 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC2600 | 800[e] | 4 streams @ 256-QAM | 1,733 | 4 streams @ MCS 9 |
AC2900 | 750[f] | 3 streams @ 1024-QAM | 2,167 | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM |
AC3000 | 450 | 3 streams @ MCS 7 | 1,300 + 1,300 | 3 streams @ MCS 9 x 2 |
AC3150 | 1000[f] | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM | 2,167 | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM |
AC3200 | 600[e] | 3 streams @ 256-QAM | 1,300 + 1,300[g] | 3 streams @ MCS 9 x 2 |
AC5000 | 600 | 4 streams @ MCS 7 | 2,167 + 2,167 | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM x 2 |
AC5300[24] | 1000[f] | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM | 2,167 + 2,167 | 4 streams @ 1024-QAM x 2 |
Frequency range, or type |
PHY | Protocol | Release date[25] |
Frequency | Bandwidth | Stream data rate[26] |
Max. MIMO streams |
Modulation | Approx. range | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indoor | Outdoor | |||||||||||
(GHz) | (MHz) | (Mbit/s) | ||||||||||
1–7 GHz | DSSS[27], |
802.11-1997 | June 1997 | 2.4 | 22 | 1, 2 | — | DSSS, |
20 m (66 ft) | 100 m (330 ft) | ||
HR/DSSS[27] | 802.11b | September 1999 | 2.4 | 22 | 1, 2, 5.5, 11 | — | CCK, DSSS | 35 m (115 ft) | 140 m (460 ft) | |||
OFDM | 802.11a | September 1999 | 5 | 5, 10, 20 | 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 (for 20 MHz bandwidth, divide by 2 and 4 for 10 and 5 MHz) |
— | OFDM | 35 m (115 ft) | 120 m (390 ft) | |||
802.11j | November 2004 | 4.9, 5.0 [B][28] |
? | ? | ||||||||
802.11y | November 2008 | 3.7[C] | ? | 5,000 m (16,000 ft)[C] | ||||||||
802.11p | July 2010 | 5.9 | 200 m | 1,000 m (3,300 ft)[29] | ||||||||
802.11bd | December 2022 | 5.9, 60 | 500 m | 1,000 m (3,300 ft) | ||||||||
ERP-OFDM[30] | 802.11g | June 2003 | 2.4 | 38 m (125 ft) | 140 m (460 ft) | |||||||
HT-OFDM[31] | 802.11n (Wi-Fi 4) |
October 2009 | 2.4, 5 | 20 | Up to 288.8[D] | 4 | MIMO-OFDM (64-QAM) |
70 m (230 ft) | 250 m (820 ft)[32] | |||
40 | Up to 600[D] | |||||||||||
VHT-OFDM[31] | 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) |
December 2013 | 5 | 20 | Up to 693[D] | 8 | DL MU-MIMO OFDM (256-QAM) |
35 m (115 ft)[33] | ? | |||
40 | Up to 1,600[D] | |||||||||||
80 | Up to 3,467[D] | |||||||||||
160 | Up to 6,933[D] | |||||||||||
HE-OFDMA | 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 6E) |
May 2021 | 2.4, 5, 6 | 20 | Up to 1,147[E] | 8 | UL/DL MU-MIMO OFDMA (1024-QAM) |
30 m (98 ft) | 120 m (390 ft)[F] | |||
40 | Up to 2,294[E] | |||||||||||
80 | Up to 5,500[E] | |||||||||||
80+80 | Up to 11,000[E] | |||||||||||
EHT-OFDMA | 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) |
Sep 2024 | 2.4, 5, 6 | 80 | Up to 5,764[E] | 8 | UL/DL MU-MIMO OFDMA (4096-QAM) |
30 m (98 ft) | 120 m (390 ft)[F] | |||
160 (80+80) |
Up to 11,500[E] | |||||||||||
240 (160+80) |
Up to 14,282[E] | |||||||||||
320 (160+160) |
Up to 23,059[E] | |||||||||||
UHR | 802.11bn (Wi-Fi 8) |
May 2028 (est.) |
2.4, 5, 6 | 320 | Up to 23,059 |
8 | Multi-link MU-MIMO OFDM (4096-QAM) |
? | ? | |||
WUR[G] | 802.11ba | October 2021 | 2.4, 5 | 4, 20 | 0.0625, 0.25 (62.5 kbit/s, 250 kbit/s) |
— | OOK (multi-carrier OOK) | ? | ? | |||
mmWave (WiGig) |
DMG[34] | 802.11ad | December 2012 | 60 | 2,160 (2.16 GHz) |
Up to 8,085[35] (8 Gbit/s) |
— | 3.3 m (11 ft)[36] | ? | |||
802.11aj | April 2018 | 60[H] | 1,080[37] | Up to 3,754 (3.75 Gbit/s) |
— | single carrier, low-power single carrier[A] | ? | ? | ||||
CMMG | 802.11aj | April 2018 | 45[H] | 540, 1,080 |
Up to 15,015[38] (15 Gbit/s) |
4[39] | OFDM, single carrier | ? | ? | |||
EDMG[40] | 802.11ay | July 2021 | 60 | Up to 8,640 (8.64 GHz) |
Up to 303,336[41] (303 Gbit/s) |
8 | OFDM, single carrier | 10 m (33 ft) | 100 m (328 ft) | |||
Sub 1 GHz (IoT) | TVHT[42] | 802.11af | February 2014 | 0.054– 0.79 |
6, 7, 8 | Up to 568.9[43] | 4 | MIMO-OFDM | ? | ? | ||
S1G[42] | 802.11ah | May 2017 | 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 |
1–16 | Up to 8.67[44] (@2 MHz) |
4 | ? | ? | ||||
Light (Li-Fi) |
LC (VLC/OWC) |
802.11bb | November 2023 | 800–1000 nm | 20 | Up to 9.6 Gbit/s | — | O-OFDM | ? | ? | ||
(IrDA) |
802.11-1997 | June 1997 | 850–900 nm | ? | 1, 2 | — | ? | ? | ||||
802.11 Standard rollups | ||||||||||||
802.11-2007 (802.11ma) | March 2007 | 2.4, 5 | Up to 54 | DSSS, OFDM | ||||||||
802.11-2012 (802.11mb) | March 2012 | 2.4, 5 | Up to 150[D] | DSSS, OFDM | ||||||||
802.11-2016 (802.11mc) | December 2016 | 2.4, 5, 60 | Up to 866.7 or 6,757[D] | DSSS, OFDM | ||||||||
802.11-2020 (802.11md) | December 2020 | 2.4, 5, 60 | Up to 866.7 or 6,757[D] | DSSS, OFDM | ||||||||
802.11-2024 (802.11me) | September 2024 | 2.4, 5, 6, 60 | Up to 9,608 or 303,336 | DSSS, OFDM | ||||||||
|
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)